Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Potential Use of Natural and Biological Products as Alternative Anti-Mycobacterial Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Heavy Metals Contamination and Antimicrobial Drugs Residue in Broiler Edible Tissues in Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Profile, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Honeys Produced in Minas Gerais (Brazil)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Single Dose Enrofloxacin Injection on Development of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in Calves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ciprofloxacin Concentrations 1/1000th the MIC Can Select for Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae—Important Implications for Maximum Residue Limits in Food

by
Natalia González
1,
Saïd Abdellati
2,
Irith De Baetselier
2,
Jolein Gyonne Elise Laumen
1,3,
Christophe Van Dijck
1,3,
Tessa de Block
2,
Sheeba Santhini Manoharan-Basil
1,† and
Chris Kenyon
1,4,*,†
1
STI Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
2
Clinical Reference Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
3
Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
4
Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(10), 1430; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101430
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 8 October 2022 / Accepted: 15 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain)

Abstract

:
Background: Concentrations of fluoroquinolones up to 200-fold lower than the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) have been shown to be able to select for antimicrobial resistance in E. coli and Salmonella spp. (the minimum selection concentration—MSC). We hypothesized that the low concentrations of quinolones found in meat may play a role in the genesis of quinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We aimed to (i) establish the ciprofloxacin MSC for N. gonorrhoeae and (ii) assess if, at the ecological level, the prevalence of gonococcal ciprofloxacin resistance is associated with the concentration of quinolones used in food animal production, which is an important determinant of long-term low-dose exposure to ciprofloxacin in humans. Methods: (i) To assess if subinhibitory ciprofloxacin concentrations could select for de novo generated resistant mutants, a susceptible WHO-P N. gonorrhoeae isolate was serially passaged at 1, 1:10, 1:100 and 1:1000 of the ciprofloxacin MIC of WHO-P (0.004 mg/L) on GC agar plates. (ii) Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and quinolone use for animals and quinolone consumption by humans. Results: Ciprofloxacin concentrations as low as 0.004 µg/L (1/1000 of the MIC of WHO-P) were able to select for ciprofloxacin resistance. The prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae was positively associated with quinolone use for food animals (ρ = 0.47; p = 0.004; N = 34). Conclusion: Further individual level research is required to assess if low doses of ciprofloxacin from ingested foodstuffs are able to select for ciprofloxacin resistance in bacteria colonizing humans and other species.

1. Introduction

Gonococcal resistance to fluoroquinolones has spread around the world, but the prevalence of resistance varies considerably between countries and regions. Certain countries in East Asia are amongst those most heavily affected. The prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in China, for example, increased from 10% to 95% between 1996 and 2003 [1]. In comparison, the country-level median prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in 2009 was 24% in the Americas and 6% in Africa [2]. Whilst differences in the intensity of exposure to fluoroquinolones likely play a key role in explaining these differences in resistance, it is unclear what pathways are most important. Since Neisseria gonorrhoeae is asymptomatic the majority of the time it circulates in a population, quinolones used for other indications can also select for antimicrobial resistance (AMR), i.e., bystander selection [3]. N. gonorrhoeae can also acquire resistance conferring genes from commensal Neisseria [4]. Quinolone used for any indication could select for ciprofloxacin resistance in commensals and, subsequently, in N. gonorrhoeae, i.e., indirect selection [5,6]. Studies have provided support for each of these pathways in the genesis of gonococcal AMR [4,5,6]. In particular, a number of studies have established that a country-level consumption of quinolones is a predictor of ciprofloxacin resistance [2,3]. Certain Asian countries such as China, Malaysia and the Philippines have been noted to be outliers in these analyses [2]. In 2009, for example, these three countries had close to 100% resistance to ciprofloxacin. However, all consumed less than half the volume of quinolones consumed by the United States, where less than 10% of gonococcal isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin [2].
There is also an increasing body of evidence suggesting that quinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae in Asia and elsewhere is part of a syndemic of resistance affecting a range of Gram-negatives, including Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas spp. [7]. Further evidence for the syndemic perspective comes from studies that show how the prevalence of quinolone resistance is considerably higher (up to 16-fold higher) in several Gram-negatives in Asia compared to in Europe and the Americas [8,9,10,11]. Between 1998 and 2009, for example, the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in Shigella increased from 0% to 29% in Asia compared to 0% to 0.6% in Europe–America [8]. This syndemic of quinolone resistance included Neisseria meningitidis and various species of commensal Neisseria [12]. Recent studies from Shanghai, for example, found the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance to be 99% in N. gonorrhoeae, 100% in commensal Neisseria and 66% in N. meningitidis [6,13,14]. These findings suggest that unconsidered types of quinolone exposure may play a role in the genesis and spread of quinolone resistance. One such possibility is the use of quinolones in animal husbandry.
Quinolone use in animals has been linked to AMR in a number of Gram-negative pathogens circulating in humans [15,16]. This use of quinolones could induce resistance in N. gonorrhoeae directly or indirectly. Direct selection on N. gonorrhoeae could occur via human ingestion of quinolone residues in meats or water/soil contaminated by animal manure [17]. Quinolones have been found to show very low biodegradability in the environment [17,18]. Selection could also occur indirectly where quinolones select for resistance in commensal Neisseria, which would then be transformed into N. gonorrhoeae. Commensal Neisseria have been found in the resident microbiomes in a range of food animals, including chickens, cows, sheep and goats [19,20,21,22]. The selection of quinolone resistance in commensal Neisseria could thus occur in animals or humans. Of note, the indirect pathway has been shown to be important in the genesis and spread of cephalosporin resistance (mainly via the spread of plasmids) in various Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli [15].
An important finding in this field is that antimicrobial concentrations up to 230-fold lower than the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) are capable of inducing AMR in bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella enterica spp. [23,24,25]. Whilst such experiments have not been conducted in Neisseria spp., concentrations of ciprofloxacin as low as 0.1 μg/L have been shown to select for resistance in other Gram-negative bacteria [23,26]. The minimum concentration of an antimicrobial that is able to select for antimicrobial resistance is defined as the minimum selective concentration (MSC) [23,26]. Quinolone concentrations in meat, water and environmental samples have been found to exceed this threshold in a number of locales. For example, studies have found the mean concentration of ciprofloxacin in samples of milk, eggs and edible fish in China to be 8.5 µg/L, 16.8 µg/kg and 331.7 µg/kg, respectively [27,28,29]. In addition, quinolones have been detected in tap water (median quinolone concentration 0.270 μg/L) [30] and bottled water [31] in China.
These findings provided the motivation for the two aims of this study: (i) assess the MSC of N. gonorrhoeae and (ii) assess at the country level if the prevalence of gonococcal ciprofloxacin resistance is associated with the intensity of quinolones used in food animal production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. In Vitro Determination of Minimum Selection Concentrations (MSCs)

2.1.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The WHO-P reference strain of N. gonorrhoeae (ciprofloxacin MIC 0.004 mg/L) was used in all experiments. The ciprofloxacin-resistant WHO-P used for the MSCselect experiment is an isogenic strain of WHO-P, except for the presence of a ciprofloxacin resistance-conferring mutation in the gyrA gene (S91F).
All experiments were conducted using GC broth supplemented with IsoVitaleX™ (BD BBL™) (1%) for liquid or solid media. Strains were grown in an incubator at 36 °C in 6% CO2.

2.1.2. MSC Determination

There are two important components of the MSC: (i) the minimum concentration of an antimicrobial at which one can induce de novo resistance (MSCdenovo) and (ii) the lowest antimicrobial concentration that selects for a resistant—compared to a susceptible—strain (MSCselect) [23,32]. The methodology to assess the MSCselect and the MSCdenovo was based on the study by Gullberg et al. [23,26]. We defined ciprofloxacin resistance as the MIC ≥ 0.064 mg/L.

2.1.3. MSCdenovo

To assess if subinhibitory ciprofloxacin concentrations could select for de novo generated resistant mutants, susceptible WHO-P was exposed to a constant concentration of ciprofloxacin at 1, 1:10, 1:100 and 1:1000 of its ciprofloxacin MIC (0.004 mg/L) on GC agar plates. Identical control experiments were conducted with GC agar plates without ciprofloxacin. All strains were passaged to a new plate with the same conditions every 24 h for 7 days. The number of colonies of WHO-P with reduced susceptibility and resistance to ciprofloxacin was established by plating 600 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution containing the lawn of colonies (5.9–11.6 McFarland) from each experiment onto three GC agar plates as follows: (i) no ciprofloxacin, (ii) ciprofloxacin conc. of 0.016 mg/L (reduced susceptibility) and (iii) ciprofloxacin conc. of 0.06 mg/L. The number of colonies was counted after 24-h incubation at 36 °C. The lowest ciprofloxacin concentration that resulted in the growth of WHO-P, in the ciprofloxacin 0.016 mg/L or 0.06 mg/L plates and that contained at least one established fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutation (S91F or D95N in gyrA [33]) was defined as the MSCdenovo. Each experiment was conducted in quadruplicate. A single colony from each concentration was replicated on plates with the same concentration of ciprofloxacin they were isolated from to confirm their resistance, and additionally, MICs were determined via the E-test (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France).

2.1.4. MSCselect

Growth rates were measured in standard 15-mL vials in NGmorbidostat, which construction and optimization for the culture of N. gonorrhoeae has been described elsewhere [34,35]. In brief, NGmorbidostat vials are continuously stirred at a speed of 200 rotations per minute (rpm) via a magnetic stirrer. The optical density (OD) of each vial is measured once a minute via a system of infrared light-emitting diodes and photodetectors and recorded in an automated fashion (The Math Works, Inc., Natick, MA, USA. MATLAB, version R2015b).
The growth rates of the ciprofloxacin-susceptible (WHO-P) and -resistant (WHO-P S91F gyrA mutation; ciprofloxacin MIC 0.064 mg/L) N. gonorrhoeae at 36 °C in GC broth were assessed in vials containing the following ciprofloxacin concentrations: 0, 1, 1:10, 1:100 and 1:1000 times the ciprofloxacin MIC of WHO-P (0.004 mg/L).
Each vial was inoculated with 100 µL of 4 McFarland WHO-P (one set with the susceptible and one with the resistant strain), and the cultures were grown for 24 h. The relative growth rates at each concentration of ciprofloxacin were calculated as the observed growth rate of the strain divided by the growth rate of the same strain without ciprofloxacin. This experiment was conducted in triplicate.
Growthcurver was used in R (4.1.2) to summarize the growth characteristics of each vial [36]. Growthcurver fits a basic form of the logistic equation common in ecology and evolution to experimentally obtained growth curve data. It provides a number of summary measures to describe growth curves. We used two of these measures to calculate the MSCselect:
  • Growth rate. The intrinsic growth rate of the population, r, is the growth rate that would occur if there were no restrictions imposed on growth. Growthcurver uses the nonlinear least-squares Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm to determine r.
  • Area under the curve. Growthcurver calculates the area under the logistic curve (AUC). This integrates information from the carrying capacity, growth rate and the population size at time 0.
The MSCselect was calculated as the point where the relative growth curves of the ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae crossed [26]. For the calculation of the MSCselect, we calculated the average value obtained from the three individual experiments.

2.1.5. Whole-Genome Sequencing

We confirmed the presence of mutations by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the samples: (i) A.MIC/100 (0.06 mg/L) and (ii) D.MIC/1000 (0.016 mg/L) (Table S1).
Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy ® Blood &Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (t) and suspended in nuclease-free water (Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany). Paired-end 150-bp indexed reads using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit were generated using Illumina technology according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Eurofins, Konstanz, Germany). The WGS data are available on GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA798268). After the initial quality control by FastQC (https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC) and trimming using trimmomatic [37], the processed Illumina reads were de novo assembled with Shovill (v1.0.4) (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill), which uses SPAdes (v3.14.0) (https://github.com/ablab/spades) using the following parameters: --rim --depth 150 --opts –isolate. The annotation was performed with Prokka (v1.14.6) (https://github.com/tseemann/prokka). The different single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined using Snippy (v4.6.0) (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy).

2.2. Ecological Association between Quinolone Use and Ciprofloxacin MICs

2.2.1. Quinolone Use for Animal Food Production Data

We obtained the country-level consumption of quinolones for animal food production in the year 2013 from a systematic review on this topic performed by Broeckel et al. [38]. This study calculated the volume of antimicrobials (in tons) by class of antimicrobial in 38 countries in the year 2013. Four categories of animals were included: chicken, cattle, pigs and small ruminants (sheep and goats), which together account for the overwhelming majority of terrestrial animals raised for food [15,38].
We used this data to calculate the number of milligrams of quinolones used for animal food production/population correction unit (PCU) (a kilogram of animal product) in the year 2013. The data for the tonnage of food animals produced per country and year in the year 2013 was taken from the Food and Agriculture Organization estimates (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/, accessed 18 February 2021).

2.2.2. Quinolone Consumption in Humans

Data from IQVIA were used as a measure of the national antimicrobial drug consumption. IQVIA uses national sample surveys that are performed by pharmaceutical sales distribution channels to estimate the antimicrobial consumption from the volume of antibiotics sold in retail and hospital pharmacies [39]. The sales estimates from this sample are projected with the use of an algorithm developed by IQVIA to approximate the total volumes for sales and consumption [39]. Quinolone consumption (moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, emifloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, norfloxacin, enoxacin, gatifloxacin, trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin) estimates are reported as the number of standard doses (a dose is classified as a pill, capsule or ampoule) per 1000 population per year [2].

2.2.3. N. gonorrhoeae Ciprofloxacin Resistance Data

The percent of isolates per country that were resistant to ciprofloxacin in the year 2014 (the year following the quinolone consumption variables) was taken from the WHO Global Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (GASP; https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators, accessed 18 February 2021). GASP is a collaborative global network of regional and subregional reference laboratories that monitors gonococcal AMR in participating countries. The full GASP methodology, including suggested sampling strategy, laboratory techniques, external quality assurance and internal quality control mechanisms published elsewhere [40]. GASP uses a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoint of 1 μg/mL to define resistance to ciprofloxacin, which was, therefore, the definition of ciprofloxacin resistance we used [40]. In the case of 4 countries, data were not available for the year 2014. We used the data for the first subsequent year with available data—2016 (Czechia, Luxembourg) and 2017 (Finland, Switzerland).

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and the two independent variables—quinolone use for animals and quinolone consumption by humans for the purpose of treating infections. Linear regression was used to assess the country-level association between the percent of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with ciprofloxacin resistance and the two independent variables in 3 models. We started by assessing the association between ciprofloxacin resistance and quinolone consumption in humans (Model 1). We then assessed the association between ciprofloxacin resistance and quinolone use in animals (Model 2). Finally, in Model 3, we evaluated the effect of both independent variables on ciprofloxacin resistance. Stata 16.0 was used for all analyses. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Minimum Selection Concentration

3.1.1. MSCdenovo

Ciprofloxacin concentrations as low as 0.00004 mg/L (1/100th the MIC) were able to induce resistance to ciprofloxacin in a fully susceptible strain of WHO-P (Figure 1; Table S1). Out of the four experiments, three showed growth at this concentration. Whole-genome sequencing in one of the ciprofloxacin-resistant colonies revealed that it acquired an E137K substitution in porB. This mutation has not been linked to fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae previously.
Ciprofloxacin concentrations of 1/1000th the MIC induced a four-fold increase in MIC (to 0.016 mg/L; Figure 1; Table S1), but this occurred in only one colony in one of the four experiments. Whole-genome sequencing of this colony revealed that it had acquired the gyrA D95N mutation.
Higher concentrations of ciprofloxacin resulted in a higher number of ciprofloxacin resistant colonies (Figure 1; Table S1).

3.1.2. MSCselect

The mean MSCselect obtained by the AUC ratio method (mean 0.007 µg/L, range 0.001–0.019 µg/L) was considerably lower than that obtained by the growth rate method (mean 0.413 µg/L, range 0.023–0.98 µg/L; Figure 2; Table S2).

3.1.3. Ecological Association between Quinolone Consumption and Ciprofloxacin Resistance

No animal quinolone consumption data were available for two countries (Iran and Nepal). There was considerable variation in the intensity of quinolone use for food animals in the 36 countries with data (median 1.9 mg quinolones/PCU; IQR 0.7–6.6 mg/PCU; Table S3). Quinolone exposure in food animals in China was higher than all other countries (261.2 mg/PCU).
The prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae was significantly positively associated with quinolone use for food animals (ρ = 0.47; p = 0.004; N = 34) but not quinolone consumption in humans (ρ = 0.31; p = 0.097; N = 30).
The regression model that combined quinolone use in food animals and humans was a better predictor of gonococcal ciprofloxacin resistance (R2 = 0.30; Model 3) than the models that only included either quinolone use in animals or humans (R2 = 0.14 (Model 2) and R2 = 0.07 (Model 1), respectively; Table 1).

4. Discussion

We found that the gonococcal MSC for ciprofloxacin was lower than that for any other bacteria on record [23,26]. In particular, the MSCdenovo (0.004 µg/L) was considerably lower than quinolone concentrations found in foodstuffs such as meat products, milk and water in China and elsewhere [27,28,29,30,31]. The consumption of foods with high quinolone concentrations has been found to be associated with high urinary and fecal concentrations of quinolones in humans [41,42,43,44]. For example, a study from South Korea found that high urinary excretions of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the general population were strongly associated with the consumption of beef, chicken and dairy products [41]. Similarly, a large study of the general population in three regions of China found ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and ofloxacin in the feces of 67%, 30% and 57% of individuals [44]. The authors attributed the high median concentration of quinolones (median 20 μg/kg) in large part to the ingestion of veterinary antimicrobials in food [45]. Reducing the consumption of these foodstuffs has also been found to result in a reduction of the urinary quinolone concentrations [45]. The problem of high antimicrobial concentrations in human food is not limited to Asian countries. In European countries, food animals consume a greater mass of antimicrobials per kilogram per year than humans do [46]. Furthermore, studies from Europe have shown that AMC in animals is independently associated with AMR in bacterial species colonizing and infecting humans [46]. The concentration of quinolones varies considerably by locale and meat type. We were unable to find a systematic review on the topic. In addition to the studies noted above, we found studies where the mean concentration of ciprofloxacin in chicken meat was 6.3 μg/kg (Lebanon) and 31 μg/kg (Turkey) and, in goat’s milk, was 100 mcg/L (Spain) [1,2,3].
These findings generate the hypothesis that quinolone concentrations in meat may play a role in the genesis of quinolone resistance in bacteria such as N. gonorrhoeae [47,48,49]. We found supportive evidence at the country level—quinolone consumption for animal husbandry was positively associated with the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae. Furthermore, the combination of quinolone consumption in humans and food animals provided the best prediction of ciprofloxacin resistance. These findings could explain the higher prevalence of quinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis and commensal Neisseria in countries such as China than would be predicted based on the human consumption of quinolones [2,6,40,50].
Our estimates of the MSCselect derived from the two methods differed considerably. The estimate of the MSCselect derived from the AUC ratio method was, however, similar to the MSCdenovo. A number of factors have been shown experimentally to affect the MSC. For example, MSCs have been shown to increase by 13- to 43-fold in complex environments, such as those in the human body where bacteria compete with one another and interact with the host’s defenses [24,51,52]. The use of gfp-labeling of the resistant and susceptible strains in direct competitive growth assays has also been shown to provide a more accurate way to ascertain the MSCselect [26].
Furthermore, in a real-world setting, human microbiota would be exposed to low-dose antimicrobials intermittently (such as during and after eating) rather than continuously, such as in our experiments. There are also large differences in antimicrobial penetration to different anatomical sites, such as the oropharynx, which we have not considered [53]. We also do not know if the effect of quinolones in food on Neisseria would act via direct contact with Neisseria in the mouth during mastication, in the colon during drug elimination or in the genital tract following absorption and distribution. We have also not considered the indirect commensal pathway through which quinolones could select for AMR. Quinolones could select for resistance in commensals that could then be transferred to the pathogenic Neisseria via transformation [6,54]. These considerations imply that our estimates of the gonococcal MSC should be viewed as tentative. It is possible and even likely that the lowest concentration that can select for quinolone resistance in Neisseria species is contingent on a large number of cofactors such as microbiome community state types and individual human pharmacogenomic variations [24,51,52,55].
For these reasons, we consider the calculation of an exact gonococcal ciprofloxacin MSC less important than establishing that ciprofloxacin concentrations considerably lower than the MIC can select for resistance. Our results suggest the need for experiments to ascertain if the concentrations of quinolones detected in contemporary foodstuffs can induce AMR in N. gonorrhoeae and other bacteria. Whilst it may be difficult to perform human challenge studies with N. gonorrhoeae, studies with commensal Neisseria may be possible. A further option would be to assess if food spiked with low concentrations of quinolones could induce AMR in Neisseria musculi, a colonic and oropharyngeal commensal of the common mouse, Mus musculus [56,57]. These studies may be of considerable use in determining what safe maximum residue limits (MRLs) of quinolones are in foodstuffs. The current European Commission and WHO/FAO guidelines for establishing MRLs evaluate the effect of antimicrobial residues on the toxicity towards a range of bacteria [58,59]. However, they do not evaluate the effect of these residues on the genesis of AMR [52,58,60,61].
There are also a number of limitations pertaining to the ecological study. These include the relatively small number of countries with available data, the lack of longitudinal data on quinolone consumption in animals and the absence of data on quinolone use for aquaculture. The epidemiology of resistance is complex, and factors other than the mass of quinolones consumed may influence the level of quinolone resistance. These include the consumption of other classes of antimicrobials, inadequate sanitation, travel by humans and trade of live animals and meat [15]. The movement of humans, animals and meat may be particularly important factors, since these can result in the dissemination of bacteria and genes conferring AMR [15].
We found that the E137K substitution in PorB emerged under low-dose ciprofloxacin selection pressure. This was the only plausible mutation that may explain the elevated ciprofloxacin MIC of this isolate. We could not find any evidence in the literature that this mutation has been linked to ciprofloxacin susceptibility. To explore the possibility that this mutation may result in reduced ciprofloxacin susceptibility, we searched for this mutation in a collection of 17,881 N. gonorrhoeae isolates publicly available at Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch/) and PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org/), accessed on 2 April 2020. We found that E137K substitution was present in 311 isolates (1.7%). Out of the 311 isolates, ciprofloxacin MIC was not available for 286 isolates (91.9%), whereas 22 (7.07%) and 3 (1%) isolates were resistant and susceptible, respectively. In comparison, 15,923 (89%) isolates had glutamine at position 137. Of these, 11,141 (69.9%) had no ciprofloxacin MIC available, and 3014 (18.9%) and 1768 (11.1%) isolates were resistant and susceptible, respectively. The G120K and A121D/N mutations in PorB have previously been linked to penicillin, cephalosporin and tetracycline resistance [33,62]. These positions are situated in loop 3 of the protein, which modulates the permeability of the porin to hydrophilic antimicrobials [62]. Whilst speculative, mutations such as E137K, which also occur in loop 3, may modulate permeability in a similar fashion.
Our results are thus best considered hypothesis-generating. Further in vivo experiments along the lines outlined above will be required to assess if quinolones in food residues play a role in the genesis of quinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and related bacteria.

5. Conclusions

This study had two aims. Firstly, we undertook to ascertain the MSC of N. gonorrhoeae. Our experiments revealed that ciprofloxacin concentrations 1000 times lower than the MIC could induce a four-fold increase in MIC. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that this increase in MIC was associated with the gyrA D95N mutation, which is a well-established cause of quinolone resistance. In addition, we found a novel E137K mutation in porB, which may be associated with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Secondly, we aimed to assess at the country level if the prevalence of gonococcal ciprofloxacin resistance is associated with the intensity of quinolones used in food animal production. We found that the prevalence of gonococcal resistance to ciprofloxacin was positively associated with the intensity of quinolone use in food-producing animals.
Further individual level research is required to assess if low doses of ciprofloxacin from ingested foodstuffs are able to select for ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and other species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11101430/s1: Table S1: Number of colonies of N. gonorrhoeae grown in plates at 0.06, 0.016 and 0 (mg/L) of ciprofloxacin after 7 days of subculturing exposed to different concentrations; Table S2: The MSCselect values for N. gonorrhoeae WHO-P as derived from an assessment of the differential growth rates and AUC ratios; Table S3: Quinolone consumption in humans (defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per year) and in food animals (mg/population correction unit (PCU)) and the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae.

Author Contributions

N.G., S.S.M.-B. and C.K. conceptualized the study. N.G. and S.A. conducted the MSC experiments, and C.K. was responsible for the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the ecological analyses. N.G. and T.d.B. conducted the WGS analysis. I.D.B., J.G.E.L., C.V.D., S.S.M.-B. and C.K. reviewed and checked the final analysis and calculations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by SOFI 2021 grant—“PReventing the Emergence of untreatable STIs via radical Prevention” (PRESTIP) from the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bash, M.C.; McKnew, D.L.; Tapsall, J.W. Antibiotic Resistance in Neisseria. In Antimicrobial Drug Resistance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 763–782. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kenyon, C.; Buyze, J.; Wi, T. Antimicrobial consumption and susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A global ecological analysis. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kenyon, C.; Laumen, J.; Van Dijck, C.; De Baetselier, I.; Abdelatti, S.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Unemo, M. Gonorrhoea treatment combined with population-level general cephalosporin and quinolone consumption may select for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance at the levels of NG-MAST genogroup: An ecological study in Europe. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 23, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spratt, B.G.; Bowler, L.D.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhou, J.; Smith, J.M. Role of interspecies transfer of chromosomal genes in the evolution of penicillin resistance in pathogenic and commensal Neisseria species. J. Mol. Evol. 1992, 34, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Potts, C.C.; Retchless, A.C.; McNamara, L.A.; Marasini, D.; Reese, N.; Swint, S.; Hu, F.; Sharma, S.; Blain, A.E.; Lonsway, D.; et al. Acquisition of ciprofloxacin resistance among an expanding clade of β-lactamase positive, serogroup Y Neisseria meningitidis in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M. Meningococcal quinolone resistance originated from several commensal Neisseria species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 64, e01494-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kenyon, C.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Van Dijck, C. Gonococcal resistance can be viewed productively as part of a syndemic of antimicrobial resistance: An ecological analysis of 30 European countries. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gu, B.; Cao, Y.; Pan, S.; Zhuang, L.; Yu, R.; Peng, Z.; Qian, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, G.; et al. Comparison of the prevalence and changing resistance to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin of Shigella between Europe–America and Asia–Africa from 1998 to 2009. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, P.-L.; Liu, Y.-C.; Toh, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-L.; Liu, Y.-M.; Ho, C.-M.; Huang, C.C.; Liu, C.E.; Ko, W.C.; Wang, J.H.; et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region: 2009–2010 results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, S37–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, J.H. Antimicrobial resistance control in Asia. Monitoring, surveillance and national plans. AMR Control 2015, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yam, E.L.Y.; Hsu, L.Y.; Yap, E.P.; Yeo, T.W.; Lee, V.; Schlundt, J.; Lwin, M.O.; Limmathurotsakul, D.; Jit, M.; Dedon, P.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in the Asia Pacific region: A meeting report. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fiore, M.A.; Raisman, J.C.; Wong, N.R.H.; Hudson, A.O.; Wadsworth, C.B. Exploration of the Neisseria Resistome Reveals Resistance Mechanisms in Commensals That May Be Acquired by N. gonorrhoeae through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shen, Y.F.; Chen, M.L. Prevalence, sequence type, and quinolone resistance of Neisseria lactamica carried in children younger than 15 years in Shanghai, China. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yang, Y.; Liao, M.M.; Gu, W.M.; Bell, K.; Wu, L.; Eng, N.F.; Zhang, C.G.; Chen, Y.; Jolly, A.M.; Dillon, J.A.R. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular determinants of quinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Shanghai. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 868–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06490. [Google Scholar]
  16. Muloi, D.; Ward, M.J.; Pedersen, A.B.; Fevre, E.M.; Woolhouse, M.E.; van Bunnik, B.A. Are food animals responsible for transfer of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli or their resistance determinants to human populations? A systematic review. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ben, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, M.; Liu, L.; Wong, M.H.; Zheng, C. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cantas, L.; Shah, S.Q.; Cavaco, L.M.; Manaia, C.M.; Walsh, F.; Popowska, M.; Garelick, H.; Bürgmann, H.; Sørum, H. A brief multi-disciplinary review on antimicrobial resistance in medicine and its linkage to the global environmental microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Răpuntean, S.; FiŃ, N.; Chirilă, F.; Nadăş, G.; Cosmina, C.; Călina, D.; Drig, C. Physical factors action on Neisseria spp. strains isolated from animals. Bull. UASVM 2008, 65, 1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sneath, P.; Barrett, S. A new species of Neisseria from the dental plaque of the domestic cow, Neisseria dentiae sp. nov. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 23, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kayalvizhi, N.; Anthony, T.; Gunasekaran, P. Characterization of the Predominant Bacteria Associated with Sheep and Goat Skin. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2008, 103, 182–187. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, G.; Tang, C.M.; Exley, R.M. Non-pathogenic Neisseria: Members of an abundant, multi-habitat, diverse genus. Microbiology 2015, 161, 1297–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gullberg, E.; Albrecht, L.M.; Karlsson, C.; Sandegren, L.; Andersson, D.I. Selection of a multidrug resistance plasmid by sublethal levels of antibiotics and heavy metals. mBio 2014, 5, e01918-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Stanton, I.C.; Murray, A.K.; Zhang, L.; Snape, J.; Gaze, W.H. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at low antibiotic concentrations including selection below the minimal selective concentration. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, A.; Fong, A.; Becket, E.; Yuan, J.; Tamae, C.; Medrano, L.; Maiz, M.; Wahba, C.; Lee, C.; Lee, K.; et al. Selective advantage of resistant strains at trace levels of antibiotics: A simple and ultrasensitive color test for detection of antibiotics and genotoxic agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1204–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gullberg, E.; Cao, S.; Berg, O.G.; Ilbäck, C.; Sandegren, L.; Hughes, D.; Andersson, D.I. Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, Y.; Qiu, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, L. Antibiotic residues in poultry food in Fujian Province of China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2020, 13, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, L.; Mo, Y.; Wu, Z.; Rad, S.; Song, X.; Zeng, H.; Bashir, S.; Kang, B.; Chen, Z. Occurrence, distribution, and health risk assessment of quinolone antibiotics in water, sediment, and fish species of Qingshitan reservoir, South China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, N.; Wang, J.; Han, R.; Xu, X.; Zhen, Y.; Qu, X.; Sun, P.; Li, S.; Yu, Z. Occurrence of several main antibiotic residues in raw milk in 10 provinces of China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2013, 6, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Q.-J.; Mo, C.-H.; Li, Y.-W.; Gao, P.; Tai, Y.-P.; Zhang, Y.; Ruan, Z.L.; Xu, J.W. Determination of four fluoroquinolone antibiotics in tap water in Guangzhou and Macao. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2350–2358. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ben, Y.; Hu, M.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S.; Wong, M.H.; Wang, M.; Andrews, C.B.; Zheng, C. Efficient detection and assessment of human exposure to trace antibiotic residues in drinking water. Water Res. 2020, 175, 115699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kraupner, N.; Ebmeyer, S.; Hutinel, M.; Fick, J.; Flach, C.F.; Larsson, D.G.J. Selective concentrations for trimethoprim resistance in aquatic environments. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 106083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Unemo, M.; Shafer, W.M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: Past, evolution, and future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 587–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Verhoeven, E.; Abdellati, S.; Nys, P.; Laumen, J.; De Baetselier, I.; Crucitti, T.; Kenyon, C. Construction and optimization of a ‘NG Morbidostat’-An automated continuous-culture device for studying the pathways towards antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. F1000Research 2019, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Laumen, J.G.E.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Verhoeven, E.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Crucitti, T.; Xavier, B.B.; Chapelle, S.; Lammens, C.; Van Dijck, C.; et al. Molecular pathways to high-level azithromycin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1752–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sprouffske, K.; Wagner, A. Growthcurver: An R package for obtaining interpretable metrics from microbial growth curves. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Van Boeckel, T.P.; Glennon, E.E.; Chen, D.; Gilbert, M.; Robinson, T.P.; Grenfell, B.T.; Levin, S.A.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals. Science 2017, 357, 1350–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Klein, E.Y.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Martinez, E.M.; Pant, S.; Gandra, S.; Levin, S.A.; Goossens, H.; Laxminarayan, R. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3463–E3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wi, T.; Lahra, M.M.; Ndowa, F.; Bala, M.; Dillon, J.R.; Ramon-Pardo, P.; Eremin, S.R.; Bolan, G.; Unemo, M. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ji, K.; Kho, Y.; Park, C.; Paek, D.; Ryu, P.; Paek, D.; Kim, M.; Kim, P.; Choi, K. Influence of water and food consumption on inadvertent antibiotics intake among general population. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Tang, C.; Yang, J.; Wang, N.; Jiang, F.; Xia, Q.; He, G.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Q. Predictors of urinary antibiotics in children of Shanghai and health risk assessment. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhou, Y.J.; Zhu, F.; Zheng, D.Y.; Gao, M.M.; Guo, B.F.; Zhang, N.; Meng, Y.; Wu, G.L.; Zhou, Y.L.; Huo, X. Detection of antibiotics in the urine of children and pregnant women in Jiangsu, China. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Q.; Duan, Y.J.; Wang, S.P.; Wang, L.T.; Hou, Z.L.; Cui, Y.X.; Hou, J.; Das, R.; Mao, D.Q.; Luo, Y. Occurrence and distribution of clinical and veterinary antibiotics in the faeces of a Chinese population. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ji, K.; Kho, Y.L.; Park, Y.; Choi, K. Influence of a five-day vegetarian diet on urinary levels of antibiotics and phthalate metabolites: A pilot study with “Temple Stay” participants. Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. ECDC; EFSA; EMA. ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals: Joint Interagency Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance Analysis (JIACRA) Report. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Muaz, K.; Riaz, M.; Akthar, S.; Park, S.; Ismail, A. Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat: Global Prevalence, Threats, and Decontamination Strategies: A Review. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jammoul, A.; El Darra, N. Evaluation of Antibiotics Residues in Chicken Meat Samples in Lebanon. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Quintanilla, P.; Doménech, E.V.A.; Escriche, I.; Beltrán, M.C.; Molina, M.P. Food Safety Margin Assessment of Antibiotics: Pasteurized Goat’s Milk and Fresh Cheese. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 1553–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vanbaelen, T.; Van Dijck, C.; Laumen, J.; Gonzalez, N.; De Baetselier, I.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; De Block, T.; Kenyon, C. Global epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Neisseria: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 312, 151551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klümper, U.; Recker, M.; Zhang, L.; Yin, X.; Zhang, T.; Buckling, A.; Gaze, W.H. Selection for antimicrobial resistance is reduced when embedded in a natural microbial community. ISME J. 2019, 13, 2927–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Murray, A.K.; Stanton, I.; Gaze, W.H.; Snape, J. Dawning of a new ERA: Environmental Risk Assessment of antibiotics and their potential to select for antimicrobial resistance. Water Res. 2021, 200, 117233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kong, F.Y.S.; Hatzis, C.L.; Lau, A.; Williamson, D.A.; Chow, E.P.F.; Fairley, C.K.; Hocking, J.S. Treatment efficacy for pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3109–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Block, T.; Laumen, J.G.E.; Van Dijck, C.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Van den Bossche, D.; Kenyon, C. WGS of commensal Neisseria reveals acquisition of a new ribosomal protection protein (MsrD) as a possible explanation for high level azithromycin resistance in Belgium. Pathogens 2021, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aneesh, T.P.; Jose, A.; Chandran, L.; Zachariah, S.M. Pharmacogenomics: The right drug to the right person. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2009, 1, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rhodes, K.; Ma, M.; So, M. A Natural Mouse Model for Neisseria Persistent Colonization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1997, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, M.; Powell, D.A.; Weyand, N.J.; Rhodes, K.A.; Rendon, M.A.; Frelinger, J.A.; So, M. A Natural Mouse Model for Neisseria Colonization. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00839-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. FAO/WHO. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC): Maximum Residue Limits. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/maximum-residue-limits/en/ (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  59. European Comission. 37/2010. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 15, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  60. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products: Enrofloxacin Summary Report (2); EMEA: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mitchell, J.; Griffiths, M.; McEwen, S.; McNab, W.; Yee, A. Antimicrobial drug residues in milk and meat: Causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests, and test performance. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 742–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Olesky, M.; Hobbs, M.; Nicholas, R.A. Identification and analysis of amino acid mutations in porin IB that mediate intermediate-level resistance to penicillin and tetracycline in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2811–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth distribution of colonies. Mean number of colonies of N. gonorrhoeae grown at 7 days in different ciprofloxacin concentrations ranging from 1xMIC to 1/1000th MIC of WHO-P, stratified according to their final growth in plates with no ciprofloxacin, 0.016 mg/L and 0.06 mg/L. All the experiments were conducted in quadruplicate.
Figure 1. Growth distribution of colonies. Mean number of colonies of N. gonorrhoeae grown at 7 days in different ciprofloxacin concentrations ranging from 1xMIC to 1/1000th MIC of WHO-P, stratified according to their final growth in plates with no ciprofloxacin, 0.016 mg/L and 0.06 mg/L. All the experiments were conducted in quadruplicate.
Antibiotics 11 01430 g001
Figure 2. Growth rates as a function of ciprofloxacin (CIP) concentrations. The relative exponential growth rates (AC) and AUC ratio (DF) of N. gonorrhoeae WHO-P with (red) and without (blue) the gyrA S91F mutation conferring resistance to ciprofloxacin. The MSCselect is determined as the point where the blue and red lines intersect.
Figure 2. Growth rates as a function of ciprofloxacin (CIP) concentrations. The relative exponential growth rates (AC) and AUC ratio (DF) of N. gonorrhoeae WHO-P with (red) and without (blue) the gyrA S91F mutation conferring resistance to ciprofloxacin. The MSCselect is determined as the point where the blue and red lines intersect.
Antibiotics 11 01430 g002
Table 1. Linear regression models testing the country-level association between quinolone consumption in food animals/humans and the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance expressed as a percentage (coefficients (95% confidence intervals)).
Table 1. Linear regression models testing the country-level association between quinolone consumption in food animals/humans and the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance expressed as a percentage (coefficients (95% confidence intervals)).
Model 1Model 2Model 3
Quinolones Humans0.02 (−0.007–0.043)-0.2 (0.001–0.046) *
Quinolones Food animals-0.2 (0.02–0.38) *0.2 (0.07–0.40) **
N303430
R20.070.140.30
* p-value < 0.05 and ** p-value < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, N.; Abdellati, S.; De Baetselier, I.; Laumen, J.G.E.; Van Dijck, C.; Block, T.d.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Kenyon, C. Ciprofloxacin Concentrations 1/1000th the MIC Can Select for Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae—Important Implications for Maximum Residue Limits in Food. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101430

AMA Style

González N, Abdellati S, De Baetselier I, Laumen JGE, Van Dijck C, Block Td, Manoharan-Basil SS, Kenyon C. Ciprofloxacin Concentrations 1/1000th the MIC Can Select for Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae—Important Implications for Maximum Residue Limits in Food. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(10):1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101430

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Natalia, Saïd Abdellati, Irith De Baetselier, Jolein Gyonne Elise Laumen, Christophe Van Dijck, Tessa de Block, Sheeba Santhini Manoharan-Basil, and Chris Kenyon. 2022. "Ciprofloxacin Concentrations 1/1000th the MIC Can Select for Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae—Important Implications for Maximum Residue Limits in Food" Antibiotics 11, no. 10: 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101430

APA Style

González, N., Abdellati, S., De Baetselier, I., Laumen, J. G. E., Van Dijck, C., Block, T. d., Manoharan-Basil, S. S., & Kenyon, C. (2022). Ciprofloxacin Concentrations 1/1000th the MIC Can Select for Antimicrobial Resistance in N. gonorrhoeae—Important Implications for Maximum Residue Limits in Food. Antibiotics, 11(10), 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop