Next Article in Journal
Control of Healthcare-Associated Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by Enhancement of Infection Control Measures
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic Analysis of a mcr-9.1-Harbouring IncHI2-ST1 Plasmid from Enterobacter ludwigii Isolated in Fish Farming
Previous Article in Journal
Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/antibiotics11081075
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt

by
Amira A. Moawad
1,2,*,
Helmut Hotzel
1,
Hafez M. Hafez
3,
Hazem Ramadan
4,
Herbert Tomaso
1,
Sascha D. Braun
5,6,
Ralf Ehricht
5,6,7,
Celia Diezel
5,6,
Dominik Gary
8,
Ines Engelmann
9,
Islam M. Zakaria
2,
Reem M. Reda
2,
Samah Eid
2,
Momtaz A. Shahien
2,
Heinrich Neubauer
1 and
Stefan Monecke
5,6,10
1
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Naumburger Str. 96a, 07743 Jena, Germany
2
Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza 12618, Egypt
3
Institute for Poultry Diseases, Free University Berlin, Königsweg 63, 14163 Berlin, Germany
4
Hygiene and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
5
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), 07745 Jena, Germany
6
InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena e.V., Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, Germany
7
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Friedrich -Schiller University, 07743 Jena, Germany
8
INTER-ARRAY by fzmb GmbH, 99947 Bad Langensalza, Germany
9
BLINK AG, 07747 Jena, Germany
10
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 1075; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081075
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Profiles of Gram-Negative Bacteria)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poultry is one of the most important reservoirs for zoonotic multidrug-resistant pathogens. The indiscriminate use of antimicrobials in poultry production is a leading factor for development and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli isolated from healthy turkey flocks of different ages in Nile delta region, Egypt. In the current investigation, 250 cloacal swabs were collected from 12 turkey farms in five governorates in the northern Egypt. Collected samples were cultivated on BrillianceTM ESBL agar media supplemented with cefotaxime (100 mg/L). The E. coli isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF-MS and confirmed by a conventional PCR assay targeting 16S rRNA-DNA. The phenotypic antibiogram against 14 antimicrobial agents was determined using the broth micro-dilution method. DNA-microarray-based assay was applied for genotyping and determination of both, virulence and resistance-associated gene markers. Multiplex real-time PCR was additionally applied for all isolates for detection of the actual most relevant Carbapenemase genes. The phenotypic identification of colistin resistance was carried out using E-test. A total of 26 E. coli isolates were recovered from the cloacal samples. All isolates were defined as multidrug-resistant. Interestingly, two different E. coli strains were isolated from one sample. Both strains had different phenotypic and genotypic profiles. All isolates were phenotypically susceptible to imipenem, while resistant to penicillin, rifampicin, streptomycin, and erythromycin. None of the examined carbapenem resistance genes was detected among isolates. At least one beta-lactamase gene was identified in most of isolates, where blaTEM was the most commonly identified determinant (80.8%), in addition to blaCTX-M9 (23.1%), blaSHV (19.2%) and blaOXA-10 (15.4%). Genes associated with chloramphenicol resistance were floR (65.4%) and cmlA1 (46.2%). Tetracycline- and quinolone-resistance-associated genes tetA and qnrS were detected in (57.7%) and (50.0%) of isolates, respectively. The aminoglycoside resistance associated genes aadA1 (65.4%), aadA2 (53.8%), aphA (50.0%), strA (69.2%), and strB (65.4%), were detected among isolates. Macrolide resistance associated genes mph and mrx were also detected in (53.8%) and (34.6%). Moreover, colistin resistance associated gene mcr-9 was identified in one isolate (3.8%). The class 1 integron integrase intI1 (84.6%), transposase for the transposon tnpISEcp1 (34.6%) and OqxB -integral membrane and component of RND-type multidrug efflux pump oqxB (7.7%) were identified among the isolates. The existing high incidence of ESBL/colistin-producing E. coli identified in healthy turkeys is a major concern that demands prompt control; otherwise, such strains and their resistance determinants could be transmitted to other bacteria and, eventually, to people via the food chain.

1. Introduction

The increasing incidence of intestinal colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae observed in food animals including poultry, emphasizes the possibility that food animals are major sources of ESBL-producing bacteria. This can result in an emerging public health hazard due to the compromised efficacy of the treatment of infectious diseases in humans and animals [1,2,3,4]. ESBL producing bacteria have been recovered from livestock (swine, cattle, poultry and turkey), from companion animals (cats, dogs and horses) and from wild animals [5]. The continuous exposure of bacteria to β-lactams as the most extensively used group of antibiotics in the world at the mean time has led to massive proliferation and extensive evolution of β-lactamases [6]. The ESBLs are those that hydrolyze third generation cephalosporins. Some are derived from mutations in the blaTEM-1 and blaSHV-1 β-lactamase genes, while others originate from horizontal gene transfer from environmental bacteria, such as blaCTX-M enzymes from Kluyvera species. ESBLs are mainly linked to the family of Enterobacteriaceae, including Klebsiella spp., Salmonella enterica, Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp. and Escherichia coli [6]. Many ESBL-producers are also resistant to non-β-lactam antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, sulfonamides, and chloramphenicol [7,8].
This concern encouraged the European Union (EU) to forbid the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in food animals [9]. However, in some countries including Egypt, antimicrobials are still used in the poultry industry for non-therapeutic purposes such as prevention of diseases and promotion of growth [10,11,12]. ESBLs has been described in healthy poultry, in broiler chicken fecal and cecal samples and in turkey flocks [13,14,15]. In Egypt, Escherichia (E.) coli infections are considered one of the most serious infections causing economic losses in poultry production [16]. Despite the huge economic size of the Egyptian poultry industry, turkey production is still considered a growing sector limited to a small scale. Many recent studies have discussed the presence of ESBL producing E. coli in chickens in Egypt, while very few data are available about the same problem in turkeys [17,18].
Carbapenems are considered the last-line agents against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The carbapenem resistance is either due to carbapenemase production, decrease in bacterial outer membrane permeability with production of AmpC/ESBL, or due to the efflux pumps [19]. Carbapenemases are beta-lactamases having high affinity for hydrolysis of penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems [20]. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) including E. coli, have gained a great attention since their outbreaks in the last two decades [21]. Infections caused by CRE cause high fatality rates in humans due to their resistance against the whole class of beta lactam antibiotics [22,23]. Carbapenemases are usually associated with resistances against other antimicrobial classes such as β-lactamases, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones leaving very limited treatment options. Additionally, carbapenemase-encoding genes are easily transferable through mobile genetic elements as, e.g., plasmids and transposons, and spread easily among Enterobacteriaceae [24]. The CRE were classified as “critical priority pathogens” by World Health Organization [WHO] in 2017 [25]
Common carbapenemase genes include oxacillinase-48-like [OXA-48], Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase [KPC], and the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase [NDM].
Less common genes include imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas (IMP)-type carbapenemases, VIM (Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase), SIM (Seoul imipenemase), and GIM (German imipenemase) [19].
Colistin is considered the drug of choice in veterinary medicine for the treatment of recurrent E. coli-related digestive tract infections in animals used for food production. The drug is among the last-resort antimicrobials for the treatment of diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. The rising rate of colistin resistance is mainly attributed to the use of the drug in veterinary medicine. The evolution of colistin resistance has recently raised serious concerns and the plasmid-borne mcr gene has been implicated in resistance in Enterobacteriaceae around the globe [17,26].
Many different single PCRs or phenotypic tests are available to obtain information about the different genetic features of E. coli isolates. More extensive information about the bacterial genotype can be obtained by DNA microarrays, which allow the parallel identification of a variety of genes. The microarray includes many oligonucleotide probes in total, covering various genes for clinically relevant features and typing.
The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in E. coli isolates originating from healthy turkey flocks in different districts in northern Egypt and to understand its public health significance. In addition, ESBL, Carbapenemase, and colistin producing E. coli and the possibility of their transmission to humans were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Characterisation of E. coli Strains

A total of 250 cloacal swabs were randomly obtained from healthy turkeys housed in 12 farms spread over five governorates in the Nile Delta of Egypt, namely Dakahlia, Damietta, Kafr El-Sheikh, Sharkiya, and Gharbiya. Table 1 provides information about the studied poultry farms, the number of birds and the number of samples that were collected. Sterile swabs were used to carry out the sampling. The samples were subjected to microbiological analysis in the laboratory directly after being transported at a temperature of 4 °C. The samples were enriched using buffered peptone water. In order to identify ESBL-producing E. coli, after 24 h incubation at 37 °C cultures were streaked on Brilliance™ ESBL agar (Oxoid GmbH, Wesel, Germany), a commercial selective media that contains cefpodoxime (100 mg/L).

2.2. Identification by MALDI-TOF MS

Recovered isolates were identified using the MALDI-TOF MS Ultraflex instrument (BrukerDaltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) as described previously [27,28].

2.3. Phenotypic Testing for Antimicrobial Susceptibility

All isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility with the MICRONAUT system (Merlin, Bornheim, Germany) using commercial 96-well microtiter plates as per manufacturer’s instructions. With the use of this technique, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 14 antimicrobial drugs against E. coli were evaluated (Table 2) using serial antibiotic dilutions. To achieve a turbidity corresponding to a McFarland standard of 0.5, overnight-grown bacteria were suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 7.4 pH). The solution was diluted by adding 100 µL of the suspension to 10 mL of Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid GmbH), yielding a concentration of roughly 106–107 colony forming units (cfu) per ml. A total of 100 µL of the suspension was pipetted in each well of the plate. The plates were then sealed and incubated aerobically for 18 to 24 h at 37 °C. At a wavelength of 620 nm, plates were read using a photometer (MICRONAUT, MERLIN Diagnostika GmbH, Bornheim, Germany). Growth was considered to be indicated by an optical density of >0.1. The German Institute for Standardization’s (DIN, Berlin, Germany) criteria were used to interpret MICs using the advanced expert system MCN-6 (Merlin). E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as controls.

2.4. Identification of Colistin Resistance

The MICs for colistin resistance among isolates were determined using the RUO E-test colistin CO 256 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux Deutschland GmbH). To ensure uniform growth, Mueller-Hinton agar plates were equally streaked with an overnight bacterial suspension in Mueller-Hinton broth that had been adjusted to a density of McFarland 0.5. Once the agar surface dried, sterile forceps were used to apply an E-test® colistin strip to the plate (concentration range: 0.016 to 256 g/mL). After 20 h of aerobic incubation at 37 °C, the MICs were identified as the location where the E-test strip was intersected by the suppression of bacterial growth. According to EUCAST’s clinical breakpoints, an isolate was deemed to be colistin-resistant if the MIC value was greater than 2 g/mL [17].

2.5. DNA Extraction and Purification

Genomic DNA was extracted from heat-inactivated pure cultures using the HighPure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantity and purity were determined using a NanoDrop™ 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA).

2.6. Confirmation of E. coli Isolates Using PCR

The confirmation of an isolate as E. coli was applied using a specific PCR assay targeting 16S rRNA-DNA genes as described in a previous study [29]. The PCR reaction was carried out with the following thermal profile: An initial denaturation step at 96 °C for 60 s was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (96 °C for 15 s), annealing (58 °C for 60 s), and extension (72 °C at 45 s) with a final extension at 72 °C for 60 s. PCR amplicons of 585 bp were analyzed on a 1.5% non-denaturing agarose gel (PEQGOLD UNIVERSAL-AGAROSE, VWR, Mönchweiler, Germany), stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light (Syngene G: BOX Chemi XT4, VWR, Germany).

2.7. Microarray-Prediction of Genoserotypes of E. coli Isolates

The E. coli SeroGenoTyping AS-1 Kit (Abbott Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany) and the DNA microarray-based assay CarbaResist from INTER-ARRAY (fzmb GmbH, Bad Langensalza, Germany), were used to determine the genotypes of E. coli isolates. Five microliters of extracted RNA-free high-quality DNA (with a concentration of at least 100 ng/μL) were labeled with biotin by a primer extension amplification using E. coli SeroGenoTyping AS-1 Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions. The procedures for multiplex labelling, hybridization, and data analysis were carried out as described in previous studies [30].

2.8. Detection of Carbapenemase Genes Using Multiplex Real-Time PCR

A multiplex real-time PCR detection of the most common carbapenemase genes blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaOXA-48 was carried out for all E. coli isolates. Primers and probes sequences are included in Table 2. PCR condition was initiated by initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s and final elongation step at 72 °C for 5 min. Klebsiella (K.) pneumoniae, Citrobacter (C.) freundii, Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa, and E. coli were positive controls for the reaction. CTs ≥ 40 were considered negative [31].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

A correlation analysis was performed to determine the association of antimicrobial resistance genes belonging to the same antimicrobial class or different classes among the examined isolates. Binary data (0/1) that denote absence/presence of resistance genes were imported into an R software (version 3.6.1; https://www.r-project.org, (accessed on 20 May 2022). The correlations were then calculated with package “corrplot” using the function “cor” and “cor.mtest” at a significance of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of E. coli

Out of 250 samples cultivated on BrillianceTM ESBL agar, 26 suspicious isolates were confirmed as E. coli by MALDI-TOF and conventional PCR.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tsting

The results of the phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility tests of E. coli isolates are illustrated in Table 3. E. coli isolates were all resistant to penicillin, rifampicin, streptomycin, and erythromycin. The resistance rates to tetracycline and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole were 92.3%, each. All isolates were sensitive to imipenem.
All eight isolates from young poults (6–10 days) were resistant to penicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (8/8, 100%). Additionally, 75% of them showed high MICs to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, respectively. The resistance rate to ceftazidime and gentamicin among isolates was 62.5%, each.
A total of 17 E. coli isolates (65.4%) were confirmed phenotypically as ESBL-producers. Among all isolates, only one E. coli isolate (3.8%) was phenotypically resistant to colistin.

3.3. Serogenotyping of E. coli Isolates Using Microarray Analysis

Serogenotyping by microarray revealed that seven out of 26 E. coli isolates (26.9%) belonged to O9, 27, 29, 112, 123, 126, and 141. Other isolates could not be assigned, most likely because several O-serotypes were not covered by the assay.
H-antigen serotypes were identified in all isolates. Eleven different types of H-antigens were detected. H32 was the most common type, it was identified in four isolates, followed by H38 and H05 (two isolates each), while H37, 45, 31, 25, 30, 19, 04, and 10 were identified in only single isolates.

3.4. Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Determinants in E. coli by Microarray Analysis

Several resistance genes were identified in E. coli isolates using microarray-based analyses (Table 4). The 26 isolates originated from five provinces (Dakahliya (n = 12), Damietta (n = 8), Sharkiya (n = 3), Kafr El-Sheikh (n = 2), and Gharbiya (n = 1)). Microarray analysis revealed the presence of the beta-lactam resistance associated genes; blaTEM (n = 21; 80.8%), blaCTX-M9 (n = 6; 23,1%), in addition to blaSHV (n = 5; 19.2%) and blaOXA10 (n = 4; 15.4%).
With regard to other antimicrobial classes, the genes strA (n = 18; 69.2%), aadA1 (n = 17; 65.4%), strB (n = 17; 65.4%), aadA2 (n = 14; 53.8%) and aphA (n = 13; 50.0%) were the most frequently detected aminoglycoside resistance genes. Genes associated with sulfonamide resistance were sul1(n = 12; 46.2%), sul2 (n = 18; 69.2%), and sul3 (10; 38.5%). Macrolide resistance associated genes were mph (n = 14; 53.8%) and mrx (n = 9; 34.6%).
Chloramphenicol resistance associated genes were floR (n = 17; 65.4%) and cmlA1 (n = 12; 46.2%). Tetracycline and quinolone-associated resistance gene tetA and qnrS were detected in approximately half of E. coli isolates (n = 15; 57.7%) and (n = 13; 50.0%).
Regarding genes encoding virulence factors, the class 1 Integron integrase intI1 gene was detected in 22 (84.6%), while transposase gene for the transposon tnpISEcp1 was detected in 9 (34.6%) and OqxB—integral membrane protein, component of RND-type multidrug efflux pump oqxB in 2 (7.7%) isolates.
Additionally, the colistin resistance associated gene mcr-9 was identified in one isolate (3.8%).
All E. coli isolates obtained from young poults (6–10 days) harbored blaTEM. Additionally, one or more of the following resistance genes were identified in these isolates; blaSHV, blaCTX-M9 and blaOXA-10. The class 1 integron integrase intI1 (84.6%), transposase for the transposon tnpISEcp1 (34.6%) and OqxB -integral membrane and component of RND-type multidrug efflux pump oqxB (7.7%) were identified among the isolates. Genes encoding virulence factors including fimbrae (ipfA), toxins (astA and cma), in addition to miscellaneous virulence-associated genes (intl1, hemL, iroN, iss) were identified among isolates.
Most of resistance and virulence genes against other antimicrobial classes were also identified among these isolates (Table 4 and Table S1).

3.5. Association of Antimicrobial Resistance Genotypes among the Examined Isolates

The associations between resistance genes either those belonged to the same antimicrobial class or different classes were determined among the examined isolates using correlation analysis. Positive correlations were observed for pairs of resistance genes belonging to the same class, i.e., blaSHV and blaOXA-10 (r = 0.75), sul1 with sul2 (r = 0.57) and sul3 (r = 0.54), mph and mrx (r = 0.67). Positive correlations were also found for the co-occurrence of resistance genes from different antibiotic classes. For instance, blaCTX-M-9 showed positive significant associations with aminoglycosides (aadA2, aphA), macrolide (mph, mrx), sulfonamides (sul1, sul3), and dihydrofolate reductase (dfrA12, dfrA14) resistance genes. On the other hand, negative correlations were observed for genes belonging to the same antimicrobial class (dfrA1 and dfrA14) as well as genes belonging to different antimicrobial classes (blaCTX-M-9 and qnrS; sul1 and qnrS) Figure 1.

4. Discussion

Commensal E. coli is a normal inhabitant that maintains the normal gut microbiota in poultry. However, avian pathogenic strains (APEC) mostly carry virulence genes and cause extraintestinal infections in birds. Colibacillosis is mostly caused by APEC, including systemic and localized infections such as omphalitis, swollen head syndrome, cellulitis, diarrhea, respiratory colisepticaemia and enteric colisepticemia [17,32]. Furthermore, it could have a zoonotic pathogenic potential such as neonatal meningitis [33]. The infection of E. coli in poultry farms can spread both vertically and horizontally. It can spread directly by contaminated dust, water, fomites, and feces. E. coli can be inhaled or consumed to cause infection, resulting in illness. High ammonia concentrations, which can harm the skin or respiratory epithelium and make it easier for E. coli to enter the body, are among the most significant non-infectious predisposing variables. The prevalence and severity of E. coli infections are consequently increased by these factors in addition to poor hygiene, short distances between houses, flocks of different ages on a farm, and short service intervals between flocks. E. coli can cause omphalitis and inflammation of the yolk sac when it is vertically transmitted from parent flocks to their offspring. Additionally, it can be transmitted between chicks during hatching and is typically linked to a high mortality rate whenever the yolk sacs become inflamed. Instead of actual vertical transmission within the egg, contamination of the eggshell is mostly to blame for this sequence. Hygiene and management practices are part of the control regimens to stop both the introduction and spread of infection. Longer downtimes between flocks, improved air quality, and thorough cleaning and disinfection are other additional approaches to be considered [34].
Previous studies reported high prevalence of antibiotic resistance rates among APEC in turkeys [15,33,35].
In this study, 26 E. coli were isolated from 250 cloacal swabs collected from 12 turkey farms located in 5 governorates in northern Egypt. The samples were investigated for the presence of ESBL and/or carbapenemase producing E. coli. The E. coli isolates were confirmed either as ESBLs or non ESBLs producers through phenotypic resistance to Ceftazidime. This was a high percentage in healthy turkeys in comparison with a previous result of only 2.2% ESBL producing E. coli isolates from turkeys in other studies [4].
Antimicrobials are usually used in turkey hatcheries to prevent omphalitis in newly hatched birds [36]. Few antimicrobials are available for this purpose, mainly third generation cephalosporins and most are used off-label [37].
In the current investigation, all isolates were MDR, defined as resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes, which is alarming.
Ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin has a high importance in human medicine and it is used to treat severe infections. It is a major concern that the use of ceftazidime in food animals can promote resistance to other cephalosporins, such as ceftriaxone, used in humans and vice versa [38]. Although cephalosporins are not approved for use in poultry, the administration of these drugs in poultry and turkey farms is an emerging problem. Resistance to third and fourth-generation cephalosporins in fecal turkey E. coli has been previously reported [15,35,36,39,40,41,42]. In this study, the prevalence of ceftazidime resistance among all isolates was 65.4%, while its prevalence in young poults (6–10 days) was 62.5%, which is certainly high.
Gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, is classified as a drug of high importance to humans. In this study, the resistance rate to the drug was found in 65.4% of all isolates and in 62.5% of isolates derived from young poults.
It was reported that the highest rates of resistance among pathogenic and commensal E. coli in turkeys were detected against tetracyclines, penicillins, and sulfonamides [15,40]. The high levels of resistance to these classes may be attributed to a long-term selection pressure, as these antimicrobials are very old and widely used in the poultry industry all over the world [43]. The resistance to tetracycline amongst E. coli is suggested to be selected by a bystander effect on commensal E. coli, during treatment of other Enterobacteriales. Bacterial resistance to tetracycline is most commonly mediated by energy-dependent pumping of tetracycline out of the bacterial cell. The tet(A), -(B), -(C), -(D), -(E), -(Y), and -(I) genes in Gram-negative bacteria encode such efflux systems [44].
In this study, the isolates showed resistance prevalence of 88.5% to chloramphenicol, 92.3% for both tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and a full phenotypic resistance prevalence (100%) to penicillin, streptomycin, erythromycin and Rifampicin, respectively. Additionally, all isolates from young poults were fully resistant to penicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole. This result was in accordance with a previous study which reported a high resistance to tetracycline, streptomycin, and sulfisoxazole in E. coli isolated from turkey hatcheries [37]. Moreover, E. coli isolated from turkeys previously were highly resistant to tetracyclines, penicillins, and sulfonamides [45,46].
Erythromycin resistance is intrinsic in E. coli and the members of the erythromycin esterase family known as ereA and ereB, were first discovered in clinical E. coli strains [47].
It has been recognized that fluoroquinolone resistance can be related to the usage of these drugs in a given country, which is in turn influenced by the market dynamics, mainly the cost of commercial products [48]. In this study, most ESBL producing E. coli isolates showed additional high resistance prevalence to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, macrolides, and ansamycins. In a previous study, an additional high resistance prevalence to aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines was recorded among ESBL producing E. coli isolates in turkeys [46].
The resistance to the majority of antimicrobials tested in this study can be attributed to the acquirement of foreign resistance genes through horizontal transfer, which usually involves both pathogenic and commensal bacteria [49,50].
In this study, resistance genes associated with beta-lactam resistance were blaTEM (80.8%), blaCTX-M9 (23.1%), blaSHV (19.2%) and blaOXA-10 (15.4%). All E. coli isolates of young poults (6–10 days), harbored blaTEM, while other beta-lactam resistance genes, CTX-M9, blaSHV and OXA-10 were found in 37.5%, 12.5 and 12.5% E. coli isolated from young poults, respectively.
These results were higher than other previous studies, which identified blaCTX-M8, blaCTX-M-2 and blaTEM in 6.8, 31, and 70% of ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from turkey flocks showing signs of colibacillosis [51]. The prevalence of blaCTX-M2 was only 1% in E. coli isolated from turkeys with air-sacculitis in previously reported results [52], and also (blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-2, and blaSHV-12) were detected in 7, 9, and 4% of isolates from turkeys [46].
The colistin resistance associated mcr-1 gene was detected first in 2015 in raw meat, livestock and human-originated samples in China. The latest mcr gene variant, mcr-9, was reported first in 2019. This allele shares about 64.5% amino acid identity with mcr-3 [53]. It was previously reported that phenotypic colistin resistance in E. coli is mostly associated with the carriage of mcr-1 gene [54].
In this study, one E. coli isolate (3.8%) was phenotypically colistin-resistant and harbored mcr-9 gene. The mcr-1 gene was previously reported in E. coli isolates from healthy broiler chickens in Egypt [17].
The mcr-1 gene was identified in randomly collected E. coli isolates from pigs, poultry, and turkeys in France with 0.5, 1.8, and 5.9%, respectively [55], and 5.05% of phenotypically colistin-resistant E. coli isolates from broilers in Germany [56].
Bacterial efflux pumps (EPs) are proteins that are positioned and embedded in the bacterium’s plasma membrane. Their purpose is to recognize toxic substances that have gotten past the organism’s protective cell wall and into the periplasm or cytoplasm and extrude them before they reach their target organelles. They are mostly described as a major mechanism of drug resistance [57]. A common form of drug-resistance emergence in Enterobacteriales is mediated by transposons. E. coli is known to harbor a wide range of transposons such as Tn3, Tn5, Tn7, Tn9, and Tn10, that are all related to antimicrobial resistance ampicillin, kanamycin, trimethoprim, spectinomycin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline [58].
The transmission of resistance genes in bacteria has been linked to a number of acquired resistance mechanisms in recent years, including bacteriophages, transposons, plasmids, and integrons. Integrons are one of the genetic components that may have a role in the widespread occurrence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance [59]. These components have the ability to seize, incorporate, and mobilize antibiotic resistance gene cassettes. Based on the genetic similarity of the integrase intI gene sequence, the integrons were divided into three major groups, namely 1, 2, and 3. Class 1 integrons are more prevalent in Gram-Negative bacteria. Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and class 1 integron are mostly encoded on the same gene cassettes that are circulating in bacterial populations [60]. Furthermore, newly extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL)-encoding genes such as blaCTX-M, blaGES, and blaVEB-1 are typically found on integron-like structures [61].
In the current study, the class 1 Integron integrase intI1 gene was detected in 84.6% among E. coli isolates. Moreover, transposase gene for the transposon tnpISEcp1 and OqxB - integral membrane protein, component of RND-type multidrug efflux pump oqxB were identified in 34.6% and 7.7% of isolates.
Similarities between human and avian E. coli virulence-associated factors were previously reported in many studies [62]. Although the E. coli isolates in this study were commensal, they harbored genes encoding virulence factors including fimbrae (ipfA), toxins (astA and cma) that are shared between avian and human-isolated E. coli, in addition to miscellaneous virulence-associated genes (intl1, hemL, iroN, iss). These similarities could emphasize a human transmission origin.

5. Conclusions

The obtained results strengthen the need to develop surveillance strategies and control procedures to reduce the use of antibiotics and subsequently the development of antimicrobial resistance.
Understanding how an ESBL and/or carbapenemase gene mobilizes through a bacterial population will be critical for detection methods and ultimately inform infection control practices. Additional understanding of gene mobilization and tracking will require novel approaches to surveillance, which will be required to slow the spread of this emerging resistance.
The strategies to contain AMR emergence rely on a robust antibiotic surveillance system, assessing the threats imposed due to the emergence of MDR.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11081075/s1, Table S1: Phenotypic and serogenotypic characteristics of E. coli isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.M. and H.H; methodology, A.A.M., H.H., I.M.Z., R.M.R., S.E., M.A.S., S.D.B., C.D., I.E. and D.G.; software, H.R. and A.A.M.; validation, A.A.M., H.H., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E.; formal analysis, A.A.M., H.R., S.E. and S.D.B.; investigation, A.A.M.; resources, H.N., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E.; data curation, A.A.M., H.H., H.R., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.M., H.H., H.R. and H.M.H.; writing—review and editing, A.A.M., H.H., H.R., H.M.H., H.T., H.N., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E.; visualization, A.A.M. and S.E.; supervision, A.A.M., S.E. and H.M.H.; H.N., project administration, A.A.M., H.N., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E.; funding acquisition, A.A.M., H.N., S.D.B., S.M. and R.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work at IPHT was carried out within the framework of the projects RESISTOVAC (Rapid and economical POC tests for determination of immune status and bacterial resistance factors; 13GW0458D) and DRESI (Rapid and accurate diagnosis and resistance testing of sepsis pathogens in the intensive care unit; 13GW0423C). Both projects are funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research and managed by VDI-TZ Phys. Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moawad, A.A.; Hotzel, H.; Awad, O.; Tomaso, H.; Neubauer, H.; Hafez, H.M.; El-Adawy, H. Occurrence of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in raw chicken and beef meat in northern Egypt and dissemination of their antibiotic resistance markers. Gut Pathog. 2017, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bonnedahl, J.; Drobni, P.; Johansson, A.; Hernandez, J.; Melhus, A.; Stedt, J.; Olsen, B.; Drobni, M. Characterization, and comparison, of human clinical and black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacterial isolates from Kalmar, on the southeast coast of Sweden. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hernandez, J.; Bonnedahl, J.; Eliasson, I.; Wallensten, A.; Comstedt, P.; Johansson, A.; Granholm, S.; Melhus, A.; Olsen, B.; Drobni, M. Globally disseminated human pathogenic Escherichia coli of O25b-ST131 clone, harbouring blaCTX-M-15, found in Glaucous-winged gull at remote Commander Islands, Russia. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Manageiro, V.; Clemente, L.; Graca, R.; Correia, I.; Albuquerque, T.; Ferreira, E.; Canica, M. New insights into resistance to colistin and third-generation cephalosporins of Escherichia coli in poultry, Portugal: Novel blaCTX-M-166 and blaESAC genes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 263, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mughini-Gras, L.; Dorado-García, A.; van Duijkeren, E.; van den Bunt, G.; Dierikx, C.M.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Bootsma, M.C.J.; Schmitt, H.; Hald, T.; Evers, E.G.; et al. Attributable sources of community-acquired carriage of Escherichia coli containing β-lactam antibiotic resistance genes: A population-based modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2019, 3, e357–e369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pitout, J. Infections with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Changing epidemiology and drug treatment choices. Drugs 2010, 70, 313–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Livermore, D.; Canton, R.; Gniadkowski, M.; Nordmann, P.; Rossolini, G.; Arlet, G.; Ayala, J.; Coque, T.; Kern-Zdanowicz, I.; Luzzaro, F.; et al. CTX-M: Changing the face of ESBLs in Europe. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karisik, E.; Ellington, M.; Pike, R.; Warren, R.; Livermore, D.; Woodford, N. Molecular characterization of plasmids encoding CTX-M-15 beta-lactamases from Escherichia coli strains in the United Kingdom. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Phillips, I. Withdrawal of growth-promoting antibiotics in Europe and its effects in relation to human health. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2007, 30, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, H.; Chen, S.; White, D.G.; Zhao, S.; McDermott, P.; Walker, R.; Meng, J. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from diseased chickens and swine in China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3483–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Aidara-Kane, A. Containment of antimicrobial resistance due to use of antimicrobial agents in animals intended for food: WHO perspective. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2012, 31, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roy Chowdhury, P.; McKinnon, J.; Wyrsch, E.; Hammond, J.M.; Charles, I.G.; Djordjevic, S.P. Genomic interplay in bacterial communities: Implications for growth promoting practices in animal husbandry. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costa, D.; Vinue, L.; Poeta, P.; Coelho, A.C.; Matos, M.; Saenz, Y.; Somalo, S.; Zarazaga, M.; Rodrigues, J.; Torres, C. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates in faecal samples of broilers. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 138, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bortolaia, V.; Larsen, J.; Damborg, P.; Guardabassi, L. Potential pathogenicity and host range of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates from healthy poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5830–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Randall, L.; Clouting, C.; Horton, R.; Coldham, N.; Wu, G.; Clifton-Hadley, F.; Davies, R.; Teale, C. Prevalence of Escherichia coli carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (CTX-M and TEM-52) from broiler chickens and turkeys in Great Britain between 2006 and 2009. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Matthijs, M.G.; Ariaans, M.P.; Dwars, R.M.; van Eck, J.H.; Bouma, A.; Stegeman, A.; Vervelde, L. Course of infection and immune responses in the respiratory tract of IBV infected broilers after superinfection with E. coli. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009, 127, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Moawad, A.A.; Hotzel, H.; Neubauer, H.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Tomaso, H.; Hafez, H.M.; Roesler, U.; El-Adawy, H. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from healthy broilers in Egypt: Emergence of colistin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Gut Pathog. 2018, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ramadan, H.H.; Jackson, C.R.; Taha, S.A.; Moawad, A.A.; Barrett, J.B.; Woodley, T.A. Contribution of Healthy Chickens to Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli Associated with Human Extraintestinal Infections in Egypt. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018, 18, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Codjoe, F.S.; Donkor, E.S. Carbapenem Resistance: A Review. Med. Sci 2017, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mathers, A. Mobilization of Carbapenemase-Mediated Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bratu, S.; Landman, D.; Haag, R.; Recco, R.; Eramo, A.; Alam, M.; Quale, J. Rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in New York City: A new threat to our antibiotic armamentarium. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165, 1430–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Jean, S.S.; Hsueh, P.R.; Group, S.A.-P. Distribution of ESBLs, AmpC beta-lactamases and carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae isolates causing intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008–14: Results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Navarro-San Francisco, C.; Mora-Rillo, M.; Romero-Gomez, M.P.; Moreno-Ramos, F.; Rico-Nieto, A.; Ruiz-Carrascoso, G.; Gomez-Gil, R.; Arribas-Lopez, J.R.; Mingorance, J.; Pano-Pardo, J.R. Bacteraemia due to OXA-48-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: A major clinical challenge. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, E72–E79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L. The difficult-to-control spread of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sulis, G.; Sayood, S.; Katukoori, S.; Bollam, N.; George, I.; Yaeger, L.H.; Chavez, M.A.; Tetteh, E.; Yarrabelli, S.; Pulcini, C.; et al. Exposure to World Health Organization’ s AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multidrug resistant bacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 557–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bizzini, A.; Greub, G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1614–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Paauw, A.; Jonker, D.; Roeselers, G.; Heng, J.M.; Mars-Groenendijk, R.H.; Trip, H.; Molhoek, E.M.; Jansen, H.J.; van der Plas, J.; de Jong, A.L.; et al. Rapid and reliable discrimination between Shigella species and Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seidavi, A.; Mirhosseini, S.; Shivazad, M.; Chamani, M.; Sadeghi, A.; Pourseify, R. Detection and investigation of Escherichia coli in contents of duodenum, jejunum, ileum and cecum of broilers at different ages by PCR. Asia-Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2010, 18, 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  30. Braun, S.D.; Monecke, S.; Thürmer, A.; Ruppelt, A.; Makarewicz, O.; Pletz, M.; Reißig, A.; Slickers, P.; Ehricht, R. Rapid identification of carbapenemase genes in gram-negative bacteria with an oligonucleotide microarray-based assay. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102232. [Google Scholar]
  31. Weiß, D.; Engelmann, I.; Braun, S.D.; Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R. A multiplex real-time PCR for the direct, fast, economic and simultaneous detection of the carbapenemase genes blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM and blaOXA-48. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 142, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ali, A.; El-Mawgoud, A.I.A.; Dahshan, A.-H.M.; El-Sawah, A.A.A.; Nasef, S.A. Escherichia coli in broiler chickens in Egypt, its virulence traits and vaccination as an intervention strategy. Nov. Res. Microbiol. J. 2019, 3, 415–427. [Google Scholar]
  33. Adorján, A.; Makrai, L.; Mag, T.; Jánosi, S.; Könyves, L.; Tóth, I. High Frequency of Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (aEPEC) in Broilers in Hungary. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hafez, H.M.; Hauck, R. Colibcillosis: Main Diseases in Poultry Farming—Bacterial Infection; Grupo Asís Biomedia, S.L.: Zaragoza, Spain, 2016; p. 113. [Google Scholar]
  35. Randall, L.P.; Mueller-Doblies, D.; Lemma, F.L.; Horton, R.A.; Teale, C.J.; Davies, R.H. Characteristics of ciprofloxacin and cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli isolated from turkeys in Great Britain. Br. Poult. Sci. 2013, 54, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dutil, L.; Irwin, R.; Finley, R.; Ng, L.K.; Avery, B.; Boerlin, P.; Bourgault, A.M.; Cole, L.; Daignault, D.; Desruisseau, A.; et al. Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boulianne, M.; Arsenault, J.; Daignault, D.; Archambault, M.; Letellier, A.; Dutil, L. Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2016, 80, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  38. Corcione, S.; Lupia, T.; De Rosa, F.G. Novel Cephalosporins in Septic Subjects and Severe Infections: Present Findings and Future Perspective. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salmon, S.A.; Watts, J.L. Minimum inhibitory concentration determinations for various antimicrobial agents against 1570 bacterial isolates from turkey poults. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gosling, R.J.; Clouting, C.S.; Randall, L.P.; Horton, R.A.; Davies, R.H. Ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli isolated from turkeys in Great Britain. Avian Pathol. 2012, 41, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Altekruse, S.F.; Elvinger, F.; Lee, K.Y.; Tollefson, L.K.; Pierson, E.W.; Eifert, J.; Sriranganathan, N. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Escherichia coli strains from a turkey operation. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2002, 221, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moffat, J.; Chalmers, G.; Reid-Smith, R.; Mulvey, M.R.; Agunos, A.; Calvert, J.; Cormier, A.; Ricker, N.; Weese, J.S.; Boerlin, P. Resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in Escherichia coli and other Enterobacterales from Canadian turkeys. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singer, R.S.; Hofacre, C.L. Potential impacts of antibiotic use in poultry production. Avian Dis. 2006, 50, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Karami, N.; Nowrouzian, F.; Adlerberth, I.; Wold, A.E. Tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli and persistence in the infantile colonic microbiota. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Piccirillo, A.; Giovanardi, D.; Dotto, G.; Grilli, G.; Montesissa, C.; Boldrin, C.; Salata, C.; Giacomelli, M. Antimicrobial resistance and class 1 and 2 integrons in Escherichia coli from meat turkeys in Northern Italy. Avian Pathol. 2014, 43, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Niero, G.; Bortolaia, V.; Vanni, M.; Intorre, L.; Guardabassi, L.; Piccirillo, A. High diversity of genes and plasmids encoding resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and quinolones in clinical Escherichia coli from commercial poultry flocks in Italy. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 216, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Golkar, T.; Zieliński, M.; Berghuis, A.M. Look and Outlook on Enzyme-Mediated Macrolide Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Bywater, R.J. Identification and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance dissemination in animal production. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schwarz, S.; Kadlec, K.; Strommenger, B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius detected in the BfT-GermVet monitoring programme 2004–2006 in Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. van Hoek, A.H.; Mevius, D.; Guerra, B.; Mullany, P.; Roberts, A.P.; Aarts, H.J. Acquired antibiotic resistance genes: An overview. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hoepers, P.G.; Silva, P.L.; Rossi, D.A.; Valadares Junior, E.C.; Ferreira, B.C.; Zuffo, J.P.; Koerich, P.K.; Fonseca, B.B. The association between extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and ampicillin C (AmpC) beta-lactamase genes with multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from turkeys in Brazil. Br. Poult. Sci. 2018, 59, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. da Silva, K.C.; Cunha, M.P.; Cerdeira, L.; de Oliveira, M.G.; de Oliveira, M.C.; Gomes, C.R.; Lincopan, N.; Knobl, T.; Moreno, A.M. High-virulence CMY-2- and CTX-M-2-producing avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from commercial turkeys. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 87, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carroll, L.M.; Gaballa, A.; Guldimann, C.; Sullivan, G.; Henderson, L.O.; Wiedmann, M. Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio 2019, 10, e00853-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Huang, X.; Yu, L.; Chen, X.; Zhi, C.; Yao, X.; Liu, Y.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z.; Yi, L.; Zeng, Z.; et al. High Prevalence of Colistin Resistance and mcr-1 Gene in Escherichia coli Isolated from Food Animals in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Perrin-Guyomard, A.; Bruneau, M.; Houée, P.; Deleurme, K.; Legrandois, P.; Poirier, C.; Soumet, C.; Sanders, P. Prevalence of mcr-1 in commensal Escherichia coli from French livestock, 2007 to 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016, 21, 30135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Irrgang, A.; Roschanski, N.; Tenhagen, B.A.; Grobbel, M.; Skladnikiewicz-Ziemer, T.; Thomas, K.; Roesler, U.; Käsbohrer, A. Prevalence of mcr-1 in E. coli from Livestock and Food in Germany, 2010–2015. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Amaral, L.; Martins, A.; Spengler, G.; Molnar, J. Efflux pumps of Gram-negative bacteria: What they do, how they do it, with what and how to deal with them. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 4, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Roberts, A.P.; Chandler, M.; Courvalin, P.; Guédon, G.; Mullany, P.; Pembroke, T.; Rood, J.I.; Smith, C.J.; Summers, A.O.; Tsuda, M.; et al. Revised nomenclature for transposable genetic elements. Plasmid 2008, 60, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ghaly, T.M.; Chow, L.; Asher, A.J.; Waldron, L.S.; Gillings, M.R. Evolution of class 1 integrons: Mobilization and dispersal via food-borne bacteria. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jones-Dias, D.; Manageiro, V.; Ferreira, E.; Barreiro, P.; Vieira, L.; Moura, I.B.; Caniça, M. Architecture of Class 1, 2, and 3 Integrons from Gram Negative Bacteria Recovered among Fruits and Vegetables. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Karimi Dehkordi, M.; Halaji, M.; Nouri, S. Prevalence of class 1 integron in Escherichia coli isolated from animal sources in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Health 2020, 48, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Johnson, T.; Logue, C.; Johnson, J.; Kuskowski, M.; Sherwood, J.; Barnes, H.; DebRoy, C.; Wannemuehler, Y.; Obata-Yasuoka, M.; Spanjaard, L.; et al. Associations between multidrug resistance, plasmid content, and virulence potential among extraintestinal pathogenic and commensal Escherichia coli from humans and poultry. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2012, 9, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 11 01075 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlation analysis determines the associations between resistance genes among E. coli isolates from turkeys. The blue and red boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. The strength of color corresponds to the numerical value of the correlation coefficient (r). Significance was calculated at p < 0.05, and boxes with non-significant correlations were left blank.
Figure 1. Correlation analysis determines the associations between resistance genes among E. coli isolates from turkeys. The blue and red boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. The strength of color corresponds to the numerical value of the correlation coefficient (r). Significance was calculated at p < 0.05, and boxes with non-significant correlations were left blank.
Antibiotics 11 01075 g001
Table
Table 1. Investigated turkey farms in northern Egypt and number of collected samples.
Table 1. Investigated turkey farms in northern Egypt and number of collected samples.
NumbersGovernoratesTotal
DakahliyaDamiettaKafr El-SheikhSharkiyaGharbiya5
Farms4322112
Bird capacity500021001200180080010,900
Samples7144464643250
Table
Table 2. Target genes, primers and probes.
Table 2. Target genes, primers and probes.
Target GenePrimer, ProbeNucleotide Sequence (5′-3′)Fragment Length (bp)
blaKPCKPC-FWCTG TAT CGC CGT CTA GTT CTG101
KPC-RVAGT TTA GCG AAT GGT TCC G
KPC-P6FAM- TGT CTT GTC TCT CAT GGC CGC TGG –BHQ1
blaNDM-1NDM-FWGCA TTA GCC GCT GCA TT100
NDM-RVGAT CGC CAA ACC GTT GG
NDM-PROX- ACG ATT GGC CAG CAA ATG GAA ACT GG –BHQ2
blaVIMVIM-FWTGG CAA CGT ACG CAT CAC C70
VIM-RVCGC AGC ACC GGG ATA GAA
VIM-PCy5- TCT CTA GAA GGA CTC TCA TCG AGC GGG–BHQ3
blaOXA-48OXA-48-FWTTC CCA ATA GCT TGA TCG C143
OXA-48-RVCCA TCC CAC TTA AAG ACT TGG
OXA-48-PHEX- TCG ATT TGG GCG TGG TTA AGG ATG AAC–BHQ1
Table
Table 3. Phenotypic resistance profiles of E. coli isolates detected by broth microdilution.
Table 3. Phenotypic resistance profiles of E. coli isolates detected by broth microdilution.
Antibiotic0.031250.06250.1250.250.51248163264128256Resistant%
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (T/S)1/19
(2)		2/38
4/76
(24)		 2492.3
Penicillin (PEN) 26 26100
Streptomycin (STR) 422 26100
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (AMC) 0.5/0.25
1/0.5
(1)		2/1
4/2
(3)		8/4
(3)		16/8
(10)		32/16
(5)		64/32
(3)		 1869.2
Ceftazidime (CAZ) 2 244310 1765.4
Imipenem (IMP) 1815 00
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 71 612 1869.2
Levofloxacin (LEV) 44 117 1869.2
Gentamicin (GEN) 21311214 1765.4
Amikacin (AMK) 18123 2 27.7
Tetracycline (TET) 1 124 2492.3
Erythromycin (ERY) 125 26100
Chloramphenicol (CMP) 111 221 2388.5
Rifampicin (RAM) 26 26100
Concentration ranges provided for each antimicrobial drug, are presented in shadows.
Table
Table 4. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance profiles of E. coli isolates from healthy turkeys in five provinces in Egypt.
Table 4. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance profiles of E. coli isolates from healthy turkeys in five provinces in Egypt.
DistrictIsolate CodeAge (d)Virulence GenesResistance GenesPhenotypic Resistance
DakahliyaCS0284-1365hemL, tnpISEcp1strA, strB, cmlA1, floRPEN, STR, AMC, ERY, RAM
CS0302-3365intl1blaTEM, aadA2, aphA, qnrS, sul3, tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floR, dfrA1, dfrA15, mcr-9PEN, STR, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, AMK, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0290-2365intl1tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floR, aadA1, sul1, sul2, dfrA1PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0299-16intl1blaTEM, aphA, mph, qnrS, dfrA14, tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floR,PEN, STR, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, AMK, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0303-16hemL, intl1blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA-10, aadA1, aadA2, mph, qnrS, sul2, dfrA14, dfrA12, dfrA14, tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floRPEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0298-26astA, hemL, intl1, tnpISEcp1blaCTX-M9, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, mph, mrx, sul1, sul2, sul3,tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floRPEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0290-1365hemLblaSHV, blaTEM, qnrS, strA, strB, floR, arrPEN, STR, CAZ, GEN, ERY, CMP, RAM
CS0296-26hemL, intl1, tnpISEcp1blaCTX-M9, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, mrx, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, dfrA14, tetA, strA, strB, cmlA1, floRPEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0278-2365intl1, oqxBblaTEM, aphA, qnrS, sul2, dfrA14, tetA, aar, cmlA1PEN, STR, CAZ, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS03046ifpA, cma, hemL, intl1blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, qnrS, sul3, dfrA14PEN, STR, AMC, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0305-16astA, hemL, intl1, tnpISEcp1blaCTX-M9, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, strA, strB, mrx, cmlA1, floR, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, dfrA14PEN, STR, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0310-1365ifpA, hemL, iss, intI1mph, floR, arrPEN, STR, TET, ERY, RAM, T/S
DamiettaCS0294-1240 aadA1, strA, strB, mph, sul1, sul2, dfrA1, arr, higA, tetA,cmlA1, floRPEN, STR, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0317240cma, intl1, hemL, iroN, issblaTEM, aadA1, strB, mph, qnrS, sul2, tetA, dfrA1, floR, cmIA1PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, TET, ERY, RAM, T/S
CS0314-1240intI1, tnpISEcp1blaCTX-M9, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, strA, strB, mph, mrx, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, dfrA14,PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0316-1240intl1, oqxBblaTEM, aadA1, mph, qnrS, dfrA1PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0324-2240intl1, hemLblaTEM, aadA2, strA, strB, floR, mph, mrx, qnrS, tetA, sul2, dfrA12, dfrA5PEN, STR, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0328-3240hemLtetA, mphPEN, STR, AMC, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0329240astA, intl1, hemL, tnpISEcp1blaCTX-M9, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, strA, strB, mph, mrx, sul1, sul2, sul3, cmlA1, floR, tetA, dfrA14, dfrA12PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0332-210intl1, hemLblaTEM, aphA,strA, strB, qnrS, sul2, dfrA14, cmIA1, floRPEN, STR, AMC, CIP, LEV, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
GharbiyaCS0281-2365intI1blaTEM, blaOXA-10, aadA1, strA, strB, qnrA1, sul1, sul2, floRPEN, STR, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
Kafr El-sheikhCS0296-1365intI1blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA10, aadA1, aadA2, strA, cmlA1, floR, qnrS, arr, tetA, sul2, dfrA14PEN, STR, AMC, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0408-2150intl1, ifpA, hemL, iss,tnpISEcp11blaSHV, blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, mph, mrx, aphA, qnrS, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, dfrA14PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
SharkiyaCS0319-1240intI1, tnpISEcp1blaTEM, blaCTX-M9, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, strA, strB, mph, mrx, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12, dfrA14, tetAPEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0336-210intI1blaTEM, aadA1, aadA2, strA, qnrB, sul1, sul2, dfrA1, dfrA12, tetAPEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, GEN, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
CS0357-275intI1, tnpISEcp1blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA10, aadA1, aadA2, aphA, mph, mrx, qnrS, sul1, sul2, sul3, dfrA12PEN, STR, AMC, CAZ, CIP, LEV, TET, ERY, CMP, RAM, T/S
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moawad, A.A.; Hotzel, H.; Hafez, H.M.; Ramadan, H.; Tomaso, H.; Braun, S.D.; Ehricht, R.; Diezel, C.; Gary, D.; Engelmann, I.; et al. Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081075

AMA Style

Moawad AA, Hotzel H, Hafez HM, Ramadan H, Tomaso H, Braun SD, Ehricht R, Diezel C, Gary D, Engelmann I, et al. Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(8):1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moawad, Amira A., Helmut Hotzel, Hafez M. Hafez, Hazem Ramadan, Herbert Tomaso, Sascha D. Braun, Ralf Ehricht, Celia Diezel, Dominik Gary, Ines Engelmann, and et al. 2022. "Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt" Antibiotics 11, no. 8: 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081075

APA Style

Moawad, A. A., Hotzel, H., Hafez, H. M., Ramadan, H., Tomaso, H., Braun, S. D., Ehricht, R., Diezel, C., Gary, D., Engelmann, I., Zakaria, I. M., Reda, R. M., Eid, S., Shahien, M. A., Neubauer, H., & Monecke, S. (2022). Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt. Antibiotics, 11(8), 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop