Next Article in Journal
Occurrence, Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Turkeys in Northern Egypt
Next Article in Special Issue
C-Locked Analogs of the Antimicrobial Peptide BP214
Previous Article in Journal
Thymol as an Adjuvant to Restore Antibiotic Efficacy and Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Expression in Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Strains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomewide Analysis and Biological Characterization of Cathelicidins with Potent Antimicrobial Activity and Low Cytotoxicity from Three Bat Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies

1
School of Chemistry, The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 1074; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081074
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peptide-Based Antibiotics: Challenges and Opportunities)

Abstract

:
Peptoids are peptidomimetics that have attracted considerable interest as a promising class of antimicrobials against multi-drug-resistant bacteria due to their resistance to proteolysis, bioavailability, and thermal stability compared to their corresponding peptides. Staphylococcus aureus is a significant contributor to infections worldwide and is a major pathogen in ocular infections (keratitis). S. aureus infections can be challenging to control and treat due to the development of multiple antibiotic resistance. This work describes short cationic peptoids with activity against S. aureus strains from keratitis. The peptoids were synthesized via acid amine-coupling between naphthyl-indole amine or naphthyl-phenyl amine with different amino acids to produce primary amines (series I), mono-guanidines (series II), tertiary amine salts (series III), quaternary ammonium salts (series IV), and di-guanidine (series V) peptoids. The antimicrobial activity of the peptoids was compared with ciprofloxacin, an antibiotic that is commonly used to treat keratitis. All new compounds were active against Staphylococcus aureus S.aureus 38. The most active compounds against S.aur38 were 20a and 22 with MIC = 3.9 μg mL−1 and 5.5 μg mL−1, respectively. The potency of these two active molecules was investigated against 12 S. aureus strains that were isolated from microbial keratitis. Compounds 20a and 22 were active against 12 strains with MIC = 3.2 μg mL−1 and 2.1 μg mL−1, respectively. There were two strains that were resistant to ciprofloxacin (Sa.111 and Sa.112) with MIC = 128 μg mL−1 and 256 μg mL−1, respectively. Compounds 12c and 13c were the most active against E. coli, with MIC > 12 μg mL−1. Cytoplasmic membrane permeability studies suggested that depolarization and disruption of the bacterial cell membrane could be a possible mechanism for antibacterial activity and the hemolysis studies toward horse red blood cells showed that the potent compounds are non-toxic at up to 50 μg mL−1.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacteria poses a significant threat to global public health [1]. Microbes, especially bacteria, began to show clinically significant resistance to antibiotics such as penillicin almost as soon as the antibiotics became widely available. For example, most strains of Staphylococcus aureus had become resistant to penicillin in the 1950s [2]. S. aureus is one of the so-called ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) pathogens that have been given the highest priority by the World Health Organisation as they are some of the most common bacterial pathogens to have acquired antibiotic resistance [3]. S. aureus causes a variety of infections in humans including bacteremia, infective endocarditis, osteoarticular, skin pleuropulmonary, and device-related infections [4]. S. aureus is also a major cause of bacterial keratitits, infection of the corea, the clear membrane overlying the pupil and colored iris. If keratitis is not rapidly treated with appropriate antibiotics. it can lead to blindness.
Microbial keratitis is usually monobacterial, with only 2.4% of cases in Sydney Australia being polymicrobial [5], and 3.7% being polybacterial in Florida, USA [6]. A longitudinal ongoing nationwide USA study reported that S. aureus keratitis isolates had a resistance rate to fluoroquinolones of between 25% (for moxifloxacin) and 32% (for ciprofloxacin), 15% to tobramycin, and 35% of strains were methicillin-resistant (MRSA) [7]. MRSA is increasingly being isolated from ocular infections in many countries [8,9,10]. The percentage of S. aureus that was isolated from microbial keratitis that are MRSA in Taiwan or India has increased by four times from 2007 to 2016 [11,12]. MRSA strains have high levels of resistance to most fluoroquinolones (75% ofloxacin, 74% ciprofloxacin) [8]. Moxifloxacin at 5000 μg/mL (0.5%) when applied to the cornea only penetrates the cornea to levels less than 0.2 μg/mL [13], which is less than the concentration of fluoroquinolones that are needed to kill resistant or non-resistant isolates. Infection by a strain of bacterium with a high minimum inhibitory concentration to antibiotics is associated with a slower time to healing [14]. There are significant linear associations between clinical outcomes and MIC for ulcers that are caused by S. aureus (higher MIC, worse outcome) [15]. Therefore, there is a clear need to develop improved therapeutics to treat S. aureus-associated keratitis.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are produced by most living organisms [16,17] and are involved in the first line of immune defense against various pathogens [17,18]. The amphipathic structure of AMPs allows the formation of pores on negatively charged bacterial cell membranes leading to cell lysis. AMPs’ efficiency and selectivity are derived from their chemical and physical properties. Their cationicity is commonly attributed to the abundance of lysine and arginine residues [19,20]. Their hydrophobicity increases the penetration of AMPs into microbial cytoplasmic membranes [21,22]. The most common hydrophobic residues that are attached to the AMPs backbone are phenylalanine, valine, alanine, and tryptophan. Although many conventional AMPs have shown antimicrobial activity, proteolytic degradation and systemic toxicity limit the clinical utilization of AMPs to topical applications [23,24,25]. For these reasons, attempts have been made to improve AMPs’ activity and alleviate these issues [26]. Peptidomimetics including N-substituted glycine oligomers (peptoids) [27,28], β-peptides [27,29], γ-peptides [30,31], and peptide nucleic acids [32], can enhance activity and stability [26,33].
Peptoids (poly-N-substituted glycines) represent a new class of oligomeric compounds that mimic the natural composition of peptides (Figure 1). There is a consensus that peptoids also work via membrane disruption, but the exact nature of this mechanism is unclear [34]. Peptoids have significant biological activity; proteolytic stability against proteases such as trypsin, elastase, and chemotrypsin [35,36,37]; and have excellent cellular permeability compared with their corresponding peptides [38,39]. Peptoids also have a broad antibacterial spectrum of activity [26,40,41,42,43,44]. The first report on antibacterial peptoids was described by in 1998, among a combinatorial library of approximately 840 compounds, where CHIR29498 1 showed the highest antimicrobial activity (Figure 2) [45]. A range of cationic peptoids of variable lengths have been synthesized utilizing lysine and halogen-substituted phenylalanine amino acids 2 (Figure 2). These had good antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa [43]. The conversion of peptide K6L2W3 into its peptoid k6l2w3 enhanced its protease stability and antimicrobial selectivity [46]. Short cationic antimicrobial peptoids have also been synthesized using aromatic scaffolds, including naphthyl, phenyl, and anthracene as hydrophobic centers in addition to lysine chain as the cationic group 3 (Figure 2) [47]. Our research group has synthesized peptide mimics using indole and naphthyl scaffolds 4, 5 with excellent MIC values (Figure 3). The current study generated peptoid molecules using tryptophan and naphthyl cores and investigated their activity against keratitis isolates of S. aureus.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of Antimicrobial Peptoids

The peptoids were prepared by reductive amination of 2-naphthyldehyde with tryptamine or phenylethylamine to produce naphthyl, phenyl, and indole secondary amines and the subsequent acid-amine coupling followed by the removal of boc groups. In order to understand the contribution of the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance to activity, different chain length of amines were incorporated. For cationicity, primary amine (series I), guanidine (series II), tertiary amine salt (series III), and quaternary ammonium salts (series IV) were synthesied. Another series was produced using naphthyl indole as the primary scaffold to produce diamine and diguanidine peptoids (series V). The antibacterial potency of these molecules was tested against strains of Staphylococcus aureus, as well as the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli K12 (ATCC 10798).
The initial core scaffolds were synthesized via a reductive amination reaction between aldehyde 6 bearing a naphthyl group and amine 7a bearing an indole group, to produce the indole-naphthyl secondary amine scaffold (Scheme 1) [48]. The effect of substituting phenyl rings in place of naphthyl or indole resulting in scaffolds 8, 9 (Supplementary Materials) on biological activity was assessed. The synthesis of compounds 11a11f was achieved via a coupling reaction of 8 and 9 with different amino acids 10a10c to give boc-peptoids in good yields. This reaction was followed by a boc-deprotection reaction utilizing trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and dichloromethane as a solvent to yield the desired compounds (series I) 12a12f (Scheme 1). To generate guanidinium peptoids series II (13a13f), compounds 12a12f were reacted with pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine hydrochloride using DIPEA and DMF. The coupling reaction of 3-(dimethylamino) propionic acid hydrochloride or 4-(Dimethyl-amino) butyric acid hydrochloride with 8 and 9 resulted in compounds (14a14d). The reaction of scaffolds 8 and 9 with N,N-dimethylglycine hydrochloride using different methods, reagents, and conditions was unsuccessful (Supplementary Materials). The N-dimethyl peptoids 14a14d were reacted with 1 N HCl at room temperature to afford the tertiary ammonium hydrochloride salts 15a15d (series III) (Scheme 1). Also, the reaction of compounds 14a14d and methyl iodide in acetonitrile gave the quaternary ammonium iodide salts 16a16d (series IV).
To create potentially more active peptoids, the cationicity and the length of the side chain were increased. Compound 8 was treated with tert-butoxycarbonyl-L-ornithine under HATU coupling conditions to afford boc-compounds 18a in 82% yield; meanwhile, Compound 8 was reacted with di-boc-L-lysine hydroxysuccinimide ester in the presence of triethylamine to give product 18b. The removal of the boc groups from compounds 18a and 18b yielded the corresponding primary di-ammonium TFA salts 19a and 19b, respectively (Scheme 2). This was followed by the formation of guanidinium peptoids 20a and 20b which was achieved by the reaction of 19a and 19b with pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine hydrochloride. In an attempt to investigate the role of the two guanidinium groups in compounds 1920, compound 8 was reacted with Fmoc-Arg(pbf)-OH (17c) to generate compound 21. Then the Fmoc-group was removed to give compound 22. Eventually, the Pbf group was eliminated to yield the mono-amine guanidinium peptoid 23.

2.2. 1H NMR Variable Temperature (VT) Study

Many studies of short cationic peptoids have utilized modelling [49,50] and NMR analysis [51,52] to demonstrate that the tertiary amides in the peptoid backbone can exist as both cis and trans isomers, as a result of restricted rotation about the partial C-N double-bond [53]. The presence of isomers could be observed by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy at specific temperatures due to the energy barrier changes between rotamers [54]. It is possible to separate the isomers when the energy barrier is higher than 24 kcal/mol and the half-life time of the interconversion is higher than 1000 s [55]. Rotational isomerism has been observed during the 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic characterization of the majority of the peptoids in DMSO-d6 at room temperature [52] (Supplementary Materials). The peptoid 1HNMR data showed double signals for the methylene protons, some aromatic protons, and the indole-NH of peptoids containing an indole ring, as well as double signals in the 13C-NMR spectra for all carbons that are connected to these protons. Variable temperature (VT) 1H NMR was used to prove the existence of rotational isomers in this work and investigate the coalescence temperatures (Tc) when the signals of specific protons are fused into one peak. The coalescence temperature is one of the Eyring equation variables that allows the calculation of the energy barrier for coalescence [54]. Compounds 12a, 13a, 14a, and 15a were subjected to the VT 1H NMR experiments and the results proved that there were two isomers in the solution at room temperature. The investigation mainly concentrated on the CH2-naphthyl and NH- indole signals. (VT 1H NMR for 13a, 14a, and 15a are available in the Supplementary Materials).
Due to the slow interconversion, compound 12a in DMSO-d6 at 298 K showed major and minor rotamers with different ratios (Figure 4). By raising the temperature, the signals of the two isomers moved closer together but were still detected. At 383 K, each of the two signals dd or dt fused into one broad peak. The signals of the rotamers coalesced to single peaks at the coalescence temperature and moved to a more shielded region, as can be observed with respect to the indole-NH peak in (Figure 5). Figure 6 shows naphthyl-CH2 doublet signals of compounds 12a–12c at 298 K. Compounds 12a12c contain indole rings and have the same structure except for the length of the side chain between the amide carbonyl carbon and the NH2 group. Compound 12a contains one carbon that is attached to the amide carbonyl, and compounds 12b and 12c have two and three carbons that are attached to the amide carbon, respectively. It is noticeable that the energy barriers between the two signals for Nph-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-Ind in compound 12a is higher than that for 12b and 12c due to the frequency difference between the signals in compound 12a. The same phenomenon was observed for compounds 12d, 12e, and 12f when the indole ring was replaced with phenyl (1H NMR spectra in Supplementary Materials).
The energy barriers between two unequal isomers in compound 12a were calculated using Eyring’s equations as modified by Shanan-Atidi and Bar-Eli [56,57] (Supplementary Materials).

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity and Structure Activity Relationship (SAR) Study

The determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the new peptoids (series I to V) initially against the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus strain S.aureus 38 and Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli strain K12. The MIC values of the peptoids in these series are summarized in Table 1.
The MICs provided information on the role of the indole ring, the side chain length, and the cationicty in series I compounds (12a12f). Against Staphylococcus aureus 38, indole derivatives 12a and 12b had approximately the same MIC when the side chain contained one or two carbon atoms (MIC = 21.8 μg mL−1 and 22.7 μg mL−1). The longest side chain indole derivative 12c was found to be the most active molecule in series I, with MICs of 12 μg mL−1. The replacement of the indole moiety by a phenyl ring in series I compounds 12d12f decreased the activity by four-fold or more. Unlike compounds 12a12b, the side chain length played a reverse role in compounds 12d12f and led to a decline in the antibacterial activity from compound 12d to 12f. In general, compounds 12a12f had better antibacterial activity against S. aureus than E. coli. For E. coli K12, compound 12a containing the shortest side chain length showed the highest MIC (44.65 μg mL−1) compared to 12b and 12c There was a two-fold decrease in MIC by increasing of the side chain length (12b MIC = 22.7 μg mL−1; 12c MIC = 12 μg mL−1). In the absence of the indole ring, compounds 12d12f were inactive (MIC > 80 μg mL−1) against E. coli.
The idea of increasing the cationicity emerged as a result of the MICs in series I, with guanidinium peptoids of series II being generated. Overall, an increase of the net cationic charge decreased the MIC of the guanidine compounds (13a13f), especially against E. coli. The MIC of series II compounds 13a13f was greater with E. coli K12 compared to S. aureus 38. The indole derivatives 13a13c had equivalent activity (MIC = 6.2–6.6 μg mL−1) against S. aureus 38. Of the guanidinium phenyl peptoids (13d13f), 13d and 13e had equivalent MICs against S. aureus 38 (MIC = 11.2–11.6 μg mL−1), whereas 13f, with a side chain containing three carbons, had the same MIC as the indole derivatives 13a13c (MIC = 6.1 μg mL−1). The phenyl guanidine peptoids 13d13f had minimal activity against E. coli K12 (MIC = 45–48.5 μg mL−1). The compounds 13a, 13b, and 13c showed better activity with MICs ≤ 25.3 μg mL−1. The series II compounds demonstrated that the side chain length played an important role in the activity of the indole guanidinium peptoids 13a–13c against E. coli, while increases in the side chain length has improved the activity of phenyl guanidinium peptoids 9d9f against S. aureus.
To examine the effect of other related structures and compositions, series III and IV compounds were synthesized. However, the tertiary ammonium hydrochloride salts and quaternary ammonium iodide salts peptoids did not show much activity against either bacteria, with the lowest MIC value in this series being 50 μg mL−1 for 15a against S. aureus 38.
The results that were obtained from series I showed that the indole-core and cationic character were important factors to boost antimicrobial activity. The next step was to generate more guanidine indole peptoids in series V. Series V contains six compounds. Compounds 19a and 19b, which are ornithine and lysine diamine indole-based peptoids, did not show improved activity against S. aureus 38. However, in line with our hypothesis, the lysine guanidinium peptoid 20b was very active against S. aureus 38 with an MIC of 3.9 μg mL−1. On the other hand, compound 20a did not show a good activity against S. aureus 38 (MIC = 15.5 μg mL−1). The Pbf-protected arginine peptoid 22 had good activity (MIC = 5.5 μg mL−1) against S. aureus 38. The MIC result of compound 23, 7.1 μg mL−1, was similar to that of the simple guanidinium peptoids 13a13c and lower than the Pbf-protected peptoid 22. Compounds 19, 20, 22, and 23 did not show high antibacterial activity against E. coli K12, MIC ≥ 51.7 μg mL−1.
The most active compounds, 20b and 22, were tested against different clinical isolates of S. aureus from cases of keratitis [58] (Table 2) and compared with ciprofloxacin, a commonly used antibiotic to treat keratitis [59]. Most of the keratitis strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin (Table 2) but they were highly susceptible to compounds 20b and 22.
The structure-activity relationship of naphthyl-indole and naphthyl-phenyl backbone peptoid derivatives against S. aureus and E. coli can be sumamrised in the following. In series I, the replacement of the phenyl ring by an indole core yielded molecules that were active against S. aureus 38 and E. coli K12. In addition to this, increasing the net cationic charge enhanced the activity of series II in both the phenyl and indole peptoids against S. aureus. Although the side chain length did not play a role with indole derivatives (series II) against S. aureus 38, it made a notable difference with the phenyl peptoids (series II) activity against the same bacteria. The antibacterial activity of indole-peptoids II against E. coli was similar to their simpler amine indole peptoids, even when the cationicity was increased. In the same series, phenyl guanidinium peptoids did not show noticeable activity against E. coli. The experiments showed that the activity of compounds 13a13c, and 23 (mono-guanidinium peptoids) against S. aerus 38 did not depend on the side chain length or the presence of amino group attached to α-carbon in compound 23. The increase of the side-chain size in di-guanidinium molecules from four carbons in peptoid 20a to five carbons in peptoid 20b increased the activity. The tertiary ammonium hydrochloride salts and quaternary ammonium iodide salt peptoids, regardless of the indole or phenyl backbone, were not active. The compounds with a net cationic charge that were attached to the α-carbon atom or close to it lost their activity against E. coli but had good activity against S. aureus. So, the most active compounds against S. aureus 38, 20b and 22, had the lowest activity against E. coli because they contain a guanidine or amine group that is attached to the α-carbon atom. In another example, compounds 12c and 13c were the most active compounds against E. coli with MIC of 12 μg mL−1 and 13.3 μg mL−1, respectively, due to the fact that their cationic groups were further away from the carbonyl carbon atom (attached to the γ-carbon atom). These data indicate that the most effective way to increase the activity of the current peptoids against Gram-negative bacteria would be to increase their side chain length that was connected with the amino groups. The SAR of active peptoids is also outlined in Figure 7 and Figure 8.

2.4. Cytoplasmic Permeability

To investigate whether the peptoids affect the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane the membrane potential-sensitive dye diSC3–5 (3,3′-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide) was used. The dye readily partitions into the bacterial cell membrane and aggregates within the membrane, leading to self-quenching of fluorescence [60]. However, when the bacterial cell membrane is affected or damaged via membrane destabilization or pore formation, an increase in the fluorescence due to release of the dye is observed. The Lys-diguanidine and amino-pbf-guanidine peptoids (20b, 22) that showed excellent MIC values against S. aureus were selected to examine their mode of action. As shown in Figure 9a, compounds 22 (added at 0.5×, 1×, 2× and 4× MIC) caused the release of the dye from S. aureus in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, while compound 20b (added at 0.5×, 1×, 2× and 4× MIC) did not cause a noticeable increase in the fluorescence during the experiment time. In particular, compound 22 showed an increase in the fluorescence at 0.5× MIC levels within 3 min.
To further explore the mechanism that is responsible for cell killing, we analyzed the effect of the active peptoids on bacterial cell viability as shown in Figure 9b The cell viability of compounds 20b and 22 against S. aureus generally resembled the results that were observed in membrane depolarization studies. The compound 22 at 4× MIC showed almost 4 log reductions in bacterial numbers within 6 min and this result coincides with the dye release assay as well. Compound 20b did not show a reduction in the bacterial numbers at all concentrations during the experiment duration.
These results indicated that membrane permeabilization may be one mechanism of action of these peptides over short time points but there must be other longer-term effects that lead to cell death, especially for 20b. These effects might include the release of autolysins, as has been shown with the antimicrobial peptides melimine and Mel4 [61].

2.5. Hemolysis Assay

Hemolytic activity of the most active compounds against S. aureus 38 with MIC ≤ 26 μg mL−1 (15 peptoids) was evaluated by their ability to lyse horse red blood cells and represented as their HC50 values. The most active peptoids 20b and 22 displayed haemolysis <40% at 50 ug/mL concentration. This shows the peptoids have good therapeutic index.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Notes

All chemical reagents were purchased from commercial sources (Combi-Blocks, San Diego, CA, USA; Chem-Impex, Wood Dale, IL, USA; Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. The solvents were commercial and used as obtained. The reactions were performed using oven-dried glassware under an atmosphere of nitrogen and in anhydrous conditions (as required). Room temperature refers to the ambient temperature. Yields refer to chromatographically and spectroscopically pure compounds unless otherwise stated. The reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates that were pre-coated with Merck silica gel 60 F254. Visualization was accomplished with UV light, and a ninhydrin staining solution in n-butanol. Flash chromatography and silica pipette plugs were performed under positive air pressure using Silica Gel 60 of 230–400 mesh (40–63 μm) and also using Grace Davison LC60A 6-μm for reverse phase chromatography. Infrared spectra were recorded using a Cary 630 ATR spectrophotometer. High-resolution mass spectrometry was performed by the Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry facility, UNSW. Proton and Carbon NMR spectra were recorded in the solvents that were specified using a Bruker DPX 300 or a Bruker Avance 400 or 600 MHz spectrometer as designated. Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in parts per million (ppm), to the nearest 0.01 ppm and internally referenced relative to the solvent nuclei. 1HNMR spectroscopic data are reported as follows [chemical shift in ppm; multiplicity in br, broad; s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; quint, quintet; sext, sextet; sept, septet; m, multiplet; or as a combination of these (e.g., dd, dt etc.)]; coupling constant (J) in hertz, integration, proton count, and assignment.

3.2. General Methods

3.2.1. General Procedure A for the Synthesis of Compounds (8–9–24) via Reductive Amination

Tryptamine or phenylethylamine (1 equiv.) and 2-naphthaldehyde or benzaldehyde (1 equiv.) in trimethyl orthoformate (40 mL) was stirred for 1h at room temperature (rt) under an argon atmosphere. After 1 h, AcOH (1.6 mL) and NaCNBH3 (0.3 equiv.) was added to the reaction mixture, and stirring was continued for 20 min. After the completion of the reaction, 1 N NaOH was added to the mixture. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (350 mL) and the extract was dried over NaSO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated in vaccuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography using 10% CHCl3/MeOH. The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a solid product.

3.2.2. General Procedure B for the Synthesis of Compounds (11b–c) via Acid Amine Coupling Reaction

The amine compound (1 equiv.) and acid (2.0 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF (7–20 mL) by stirring at rt. Then, Et3N (3.0 equiv.) was added to the reaction mixture, and EDC (3.0 equiv.) was added portion-wise at 0 °C. The reaction was stirred at rt between 1 to 3 h under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction completion, EtOAc was added to the reaction mixture which was then washed with water, NaHCO3, and brine. The extracted organic layer was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CHCl3 as the eluent). The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a solid product.

3.2.3. General Procedure C for the Synthesis of Compounds (11d–f, 18a, and 21) via Acid Amine Coupling Reaction

The amine compound (1 equiv.), acid (1.0–2.0 equiv.), and HATU (1.1 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF (7–20 mL). Then DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) was added to the reaction portion-wise. The reaction was stirred at rt between 1 to 5 hrs under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction completion, EtOAc was added to the reaction mixture and washed with water, NaHCO3, and brine. The organic layer was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CHCl3 as the eluent). The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give the product.

3.2.4. General Procedure D for the Synthesis of Compounds (11a) via Acid Amine Coupling Reaction

The amine compound (1 equiv.), acid (2.0 equiv.), and HBTU (2.0 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF (15 mL). Then, DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) was added to the reaction portion-wise. The reaction mixtue was stirred at rt between 1 to 3 hrs under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction completion, EtOAc was added to the reaction mixture and washed with water, NaHCO3, and brine. The organic layer was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CHCl3 as the eluent). The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a solid product.

3.2.5. General Procedure E for the Synthesis of Compounds (18b)

The amine compound (1.0 equiv.) and Boc-Lys(Boc)-OSu (1.0 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF (5 mL). Then, Et3N (2.0 equiv.) was added to the reaction portion-wise. The reaction was stirred at rt under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction completion, EtOAc was added to the reaction mixture and washed with water, NaHCO3, and brine. The organic layer was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to flash chromatography (5% MeOH/DCM as the eluent). The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a solid product.

3.2.6. General Procedure F for the Synthesis of Compounds (12a–c, 19a–b, 12d–f, and 23) (N-Boc Deprotection)

To a stirred solution of the Boc-protected peptoid in DCM (1–3 mL) Thioansiole (TA) and 1,2-Ethanedithiol (EDT) (0.1–0.3 mL) was added. Then, at 0 °C TFA (1–3 mL) was added gradually to the reaction mixture, which was stirred at room temperature for 1–3 hrs before the solvent was evaporated under vacuum. After triturating with diethyl ether, the residue was concentrated to dryness, and the product was purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water/acetonitrile (0–100%), then freeze-dried. The same protocol was followed to prepare compounds 12d–f without using TA and EDT reagents.

3.2.7. General Procedure G for the Synthesis of Compounds (13a–f and 20a–b)

Peptoids 12af or 20ab (1.0 equiv.) were dissolved in 0.4 mL DMF, then (3.0 equiv.) of DIPEA was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min at 0 °C before the addition of pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine HCl (1.0 equiv.) to the reaction vessel. After the addition of all the reaction components, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The crude product was concentrated under reduced pressure, purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water/acetonitrile (0−100%), and freeze dried to afford the desired compounds.

3.2.8. General Procedure H for the Synthesis of Compounds (14a–d)

The amine compound (1 equiv.), acid (1.1 equiv.), and HATU (1.1 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF (15 mL) by stirring at rt. Then, DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) was added to the reaction portion-wise. The reaction was stirred overnight at rt under an argon atmosphere. After the reaction completion, EtOAc was added and the reaction mixture was washed with water, NaHCO3, and brine. The organic layer was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to flash chromatography (5% MeOH/CHCl3 as the eluent). The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a solid product.

3.2.9. General Procedure I for the Synthesis of Compounds (15a–d)

To N-dimethyl peptoids (1.0 equiv.) was added 1ml of HCl (1 N) to form the HCl salt. The gummy liquid was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a gummy product which was dissolved in the minimum amount of ACN/H2O and freeze-dried to afford the desired compound.

3.2.10. General Procedure J for the Synthesis of Compounds (16a–d)

To a solution of 14a–14d (0.1 mmol) in CH3CN (1.0 mL) was added CH3I (0.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8 h. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and treated with diethyl ether and the solution was dried under high vacuum to yield the product.

3.3. Preparation of Derivatives

2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) ethan-1-amine (8). The compound 8 was prepared from tryptamine (12 mmol, 2 g) and 2-naphthaldhyde (12 mmol, 1.87 g) according to the general procedure A to yield a yellowish solid (1.838 g, 50%); mp 97.7–99.8 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.76 (s, 1H), 7.90–7.76 (m, 3H), 7.80–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.32 (dt, J = 8.1, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (ddd, J = 8.1, 6.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (ddd, J = 7.9, 7.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 2H), 2.93–2.79 (m, 4H), 2.26 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 138.7, 136.2, 132.9, 132.1, 127.5, 127.4, 127.2, 126.7, 125.9, 125.8, 125.3, 122.5, 120.7, 118.3, 118.1, 112.6, 111.3, 52.9, 49.5, 25.5.; IR (ATR): νmax 3414, 3295, 3049, 2897, 2753, 1425, 1338, 1226, 1096, 997, 813, 737; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C21H20N2 [M]+: 301.1699; found: 301.1697.
N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-2-phenylethan-1-amine (9). The compound 9 was obtained from phenylethylamine (28 mmol, 3.54 mL) and 2-naphthaldhyde (20 mmol, 4 g) according to the general procedure A. The product 9 was obtained as a yellowish solid product. (2.37 g, 35%); mp 41.3–42.7 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.91–7.80 (m, 3H), 7.78 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.27 7.18 (m, 5H), 3.89 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 2H), 2.77 (s, 4H).13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 140.5, 138.5, 132.9, 132.1, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 127.5, 127.4, 126.7, 125.9, 125.8, 125.7, 125.3, 52.9, 50.4, 35.8; IR (ATR): νmax 3022, 2823, 2401, 2115, 1939, 1598, 1442, 1327, 1105, 1013, 897, 821, 739; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C19H19N [M]+: 262.1591; found: 262.1589.
Tert-butyl(2-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)carbamate (11a). The title compound 11a was prepared via procedure D, using 8 (0.5 g, 1.6 mmol) and (Boc-Gly-OH) (0.28 g, 1.6 mmol) as a white solid compound (0.521 g, 68%); mp 146.5–148.7 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.86-10.79 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.95–7.84 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.75–7.74 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.55–7.47 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.43–7.38 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.34–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.18–7.11 (s, ArH-indole,1H), 7.07–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.96–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.87–6.85 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.76–4.72 (sAr-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)Boc-Gly, 2H), 3.91–3.89 (s, α-CH1H2 of Boc-Gly, 2H), 3.56–3.49 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-indole, 2H), 3.00–2.89 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-indole, 2H), 1.41–1.33 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc-Gly, 9H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.1, 168.9, 155.9, 155.8, 136.2, 136.1, 135.5, 135.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.3, 128.1, 127.5, 127.5, 127.4, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.2, 126.08, 126.02, 125.9, 125.7, 125.2, 125.1, 123.1, 122.6, 121.1, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 111.4, 111.3, 110.7, 77.9, 77.9, 50.1, 48.2, 47.1, 46.9, 42.1, 41.4, 28.2, 28.1, 24.1, 23.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3439, 3258, 3056, 2980, 2931, 2321, 2107, 1698, 1630, 1502, 1457, 1366, 1252, 1158, 1046, 969, 865, 738; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C28H31N3O3 [M + Na]+: 480.2257; found: 480.2255.
Tert-butyl(3-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)amino)-3 oxopropyl) carbamate (11b). The title compound 11b was synthesized from compound 8 (0.4 g, 1.3 mmol) and Boc-β-Ala-OH (0.4 g, 2.6 mmol) according to the protocol B. The product 11b was obtained as an off-white solid (0.32 g, 51%); mp 57.4–58.7 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.85–10.78 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.93–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.73–7.69 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.45 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.40–7.38 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.33–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.14–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.06–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.94–6.90 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.80–6.71 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.75–4.73 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)Boc-β-Ala, 2H), 3.56–3.48 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 3.23–3.20 (m, β-CH2 of Boc-β-Ala, 2H), 2.95–2.89 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 2.62–2.54 (t, α-CH1H2 of Boc-β-Ala, 2H), 1.37–1.34 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc- β-Ala, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.7, 155.5, 155.4, 136.2, 136.1, 135.8, 135.3, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.55, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.1, 126.05, 126.0, 125.8, 125.7, 125.1, 124.9, 123.1, 122.6, 120.99, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.17, 118.1, 111.48, 111.4, 111.3, 110.7, 77.6, 77.5, 50.8, 47.7, 47.7, 46.6, 36.8, 36.6, 33.1, 32.2, 28.23, 28.2, 24.2, 23.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3295, 3050, 2921, 2320, 2102, 1687, 1621, 1499, 1453, 1364, 1245, 1162, 1080, 963, 856, 813, 740; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C29H33N3O3 [M + Na]+: 494.2414; found: 494.2416.
Tert-butyl(4-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl) (naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) amino)-4-oxobutyl) carbamate (11c). The title compound 11c was synthesized from compound 8 (1.2 g, 4.0 mmol) and Boc-γ-Abu-OH (1.63 g, 8.0 mmol) according to the protocol B. The product 11c was obtained as a white solid (1.12 g, 58%); mp 116.4–117.2 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.85–10.77 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.93–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.73–7.68 (d, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.44 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.40–7.36 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.34–7.30 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.14–7.09 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.06–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.95–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.84–6.79 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.75–4.72 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2 (indole)Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 3.55–3.48 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 2.96–2.88 (m, γ -CH2 of Boc-γ-Abu and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 4H), 2.43–2.38 (m, α -CH2 of Boc- γ-Abu, 2H), 1.69–1.63 (p, β -CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 1.38–1.33 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc-γ-Abu, 9H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.97, 171.9, 155.6, 136.2, 136.17, 136.0, 135.4, 132.99, 132.9, 132.2, 132.1, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.55, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.6, 125.1, 124.9, 123.1, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.17, 118.1, 111.5, 111.4, 111.3, 110.8, 77.3, 50.9, 47.7, 47.6, 46.7, 29.9, 29.1, 28.24, 28.2, 25.3, 24.1, 23.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3357, 3292, 3052, 2938, 2712, 2287, 1912, 1681,1636, 1520, 1443, 1353, 1246, 1169, 1018, 950, 863, 817, 742; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H35N3O3 [M + Na]+: 508.2570; found: 508.2572.
Tert-butyl (2-((naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) (phenethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl) carbamate (11d). The title compound 11d was synthesized from compound 9 (1.0 g, 4.0 mmol) and Boc-Gly-OH (0.7 g, 4.0 mmol) according to the protocol C. The product 11d was obtained as a colourless gum (0.863 g, 54%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.95–7.85 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.76–7.74 (d, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.53–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.31–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 6.86–6.82 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.71–4.69 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2(phenyl)Boc-Gly, 2H), 3.86–3.84 (s, α-CH1H2 of Boc-Gly, 2H), 3.51–3.46 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.87–2.78 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 1.40–1.35 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc- Gly, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.1, 169.0, 155.85, 155.8, 139.1, 138.4, 135.5, 134.9, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.1, 128.86, 128.8, 128.6, 128.59, 128.5, 128.46, 128.4, 128.39, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.5, 127.4, 126.43, 126.4, 126.38, 126.3, 126.2, 126.17, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.78, 125.7, 125.1, 125.0, 77.9, 77.8, 49.9, 48.1, 47.9, 47.7, 41.9, 41.4, 40.1, 34.1, 34.0, 33.2, 32.6, 28.2, 28.2, 28.1, 27.9; IR (ATR): vmax 3415, 3327, 2974, 2929, 2320, 2104, 1705, 1648, 1454, 1364, 1247, 1021, 948, 858, 813; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H30N2O3 [M ]+: 419.2329; found: 419.2321.
Tert-butyl (3-((naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) (phenethyl)amino)-3-oxopropyl) carbamate (11e). The title compound 11e resulted from the reaction between compound 9 (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol) and Boc-β-Ala-OH (0.72 g, 4.0 mmol) according to the protocol C. The product 11e was obtained as a yellow gum (0.512 g, 62%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.93–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.74–7.69 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.40–7.36 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.30–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 6.78–6.67 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.71–4.68 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)Boc- β-Ala Hz, 2H), 3.52–3.45 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 3.21–3.17 (m, β-CH2 of Boc- β-Ala, 2H), 2.84–2.77 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl 2H), 2.53–2.51 (m, α-CH2 of Boc- β-Ala, 2H), 1.37–1.33 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc- β-Ala, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.8, 155.5, 155.4, 139.2, 138.5, 135.7, 135.2, 132.99, 132.9, 132.2, 132.1, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.36, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.59, 127.55, 127.5, 126.38, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 125.89, 125.8, 125.7, 125.0, 124.7, 77.6, 77.5, 50.7, 48.5, 47.6, 47.5, 36.8, 36.5, 34.3, 33.3, 33.1, 32.2, 28.2, 28.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3432, 3337, 2967, 2929, 2113, 1702, 1630, 1494, 1364, 1246, 1163, 963, 813, 746; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H32N2O3 [M]+: 433.2485; found: 433.2481.
Tert-butyl (4-((naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) (phenethyl)amino)-4-oxobutyl) carbamate (11f). The title compound 11f was prepared from compound 9 (1.0 g, 4.0 mmol) and Boc-γ-Abu-OH (1.63 g, 8.0 mmol) according to the protocol C. The product 11f was obtained as a white solid (0.604 g, 71%); mp 90.1–91.4 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.93–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.75–7.67 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.40–7.35 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.30–7.17 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 6.84–6.76 (t, NH-Boc, 1H), 4.72–4.67 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2 (phenyl)Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 3.48–3.45 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.95–2.91 (q, γ-CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 2.85–2.74 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.36–2.32 (t, α-CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 1.65–1.62 (p, β-CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 2H), 1.38–1.32 (s, (CH3)3 of Boc-γ-Abu, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 172.0, 171.9, 155.6, 155.5, 139.2, 138.6, 135.9, 135.4, 132.99, 132.9, 132.2, 132.1, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.39, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.56, 127.5, 126.36, 126.3, 126.16, 126.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.79, 125.7, 125.0, 124.7, 77.4, 77.3, 50.8, 48.4, 47.6, 47.5, 35.7, 34.2, 33.3, 29.9, 29.1, 28.25, 28.2, 25.33, 25.3; IR (ATR): vmax 3354, 2939, 2881, 2320, 2113, 1644, 1523, 1439, 1361, 1247, 1168, 1018, 959, 859, 822, 748; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C28H34N2O3 [M + Na]+: 469.2461; found: 469.2463.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-2-amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) acetamide(TFA salt)(12a). The title compound 12a was synthesized from compound 11a (0.1 g, 0.21 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12a was obtained as an off-white solid (0.072 g, 90%); mp 161.1–162.8 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.91–10.90 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 8.10–8.05 (t, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.98–7.86 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.80–7.75 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.55–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.47–7.43 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.36–7.32 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.18–7.12 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.08–7.05 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.98–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.83–4.75 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-indole (Gly), 2H), 3.97–3.91 (m, α-CH1H2 of Gly, 2H), 3.63–3.50 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2- indole (Gly), 2H), 3.03–2.91 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-indole, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 166.3, 166.2, 157.9, 157.7, 136.2, 136.1, 134.8, 134.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.3, 128.5, 128.1, 127.65, 127.64, 127.6, 127.4, 127.0, 126.8, 126.5, 126.3, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.5, 125.3, 123.3, 122.8, 121.1, 121.0, 118.4, 118.2, 118.17, 118.1, 111.5, 111.4, 110.9, 110.5, 50.1, 48.0, 47.0, 46.9, 23.5, 23.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3384, 3048, 2898, 2632, 2321, 2075, 1651, 1477, 1422, 1370, 1349, 1242, 1202, 1122, 1024, 927, 811, 720; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C23H23N3O [M]+: 358.1913; found: 358.1914.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-3-amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) propenamide (TFA salt) (12b). The title compound 12b was synthesized from compound 11b (0.15 g, 0.31 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12a was obtained as a brown gummy compound (0.1 g, 83%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.90–10.82 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.96–7.89 (m, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.77–7.74 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 4H), 7.53–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.44–7.42 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.32 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.16–7.11 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.05 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.96–6.93 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.79–4.77 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)-β-Ala, 2H), 3.63–3.50 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-β-Ala, 2H), 3.09–3.05 (m, β-CH2 of β-Ala, 2H), 2.99–2.92 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- β-Ala, 2H), 2.87–2-77 (t, α-CH1H2 of β-Ala, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.9, 169.8, 158.0, 157.8, 136.2, 136.1, 135.4, 134.8, 133.0, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.56, 127.5, 127.0, 126.8, 126.4, 126.28, 126.2, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.1, 124.9, 123.1, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 117.8, 115.8, 111.5, 111.4, 111.2, 110.6, 50.7, 47.8, 47.5, 47.0, 35.4, 35.3, 30.1, 29.6, 23.9, 23.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3392, 2934, 2727, 2343, 2107, 1750, 1674, 1610, 1455, 1370, 1122, 812, 740; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H25N3O [M]+: 372.2071; found: 372.2068.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-4-amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) butanamide (TFA salt) (12c). The title compound 12c was synthesized from compound 11c (0.15 g, 0.31 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12c was obtained as a beige gum (0.1 g, 83%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.88–10.80 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.95–7.86 (m, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.75–7.71 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 4H), 7.52–7.46 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.41–7.39 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.16–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.05 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.95–6.91(t, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.77–4.76 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2 (indole)- γ-Abu, 2H), 3.58–3.51 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- γ-Abu, 2H), 2.98–2.88 (m, γ -CH2 of Boc- γ-Abu, 2H), 2.86–2.72 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-γ-Abu 2H), 2.56–2.57 (t, α -CH1H2 of Boc- γ-Abu, 2H), 1.88–1.74 (p, β-CH1H2 of Boc- γ-Abu, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.3, 158.2, 158.0, 157.8, 157.6, 136.2, 136.1, 135.8, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.55, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.2, 124.9, 123.2, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.18, 118.1, 118.0, 116.0, 111.47, 111.4, 111.3, 110.8, 50.8, 47.7, 47.4, 46.7, 38.6, 38.5, 29.5, 28.8, 23.9, 23.2, 22.9, 22.8; IR (ATR): vmax 3404, 3259, 3051, 2926, 2342, 2106, 1673, 1613, 1424, 1366, 1175, 1126, 1010, 813, 742; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C25H27N3O [M]+: 386.2226; found: 386.2227.
2-Amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethylacetamide (TFA salt) (12d). The title compound 12d was synthesized from compound 11d (0.176 g, 0.42 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12d was obtained as a brown gum (0.1 g, 77%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.10 (s, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.97–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.81–7.74 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.55–7.49 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.44–7.41 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.19 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.79–4.71 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-phenyl-Gly, 2H), 3.92–3.87 (s, α-CH1H2 of Gly, 2H), 3.59–3.47 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-phenyl-Gly, 2H), 2.91–2.80 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-phenyl-Gly, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 166.3, 166.2, 158.1, 157.9, 157.7, 157.5, 138.7, 138.3, 134.8, 134.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.8, 128.6, 128.53, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 126.56, 126.5, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.29, 125.2, 118.2, 116.3, 49.9, 48.0, 47.7, 33.5, 33.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3401, 3025, 2928, 2321, 2077, 1656, 1479, 1427, 1364, 1175, 1125, 1018, 913, 816, 746; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C21H22N2O [M]+: 319.1804; found: 319.1807.
3-Amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethylpropanamide (TFA salt) (12e)
The title compound 12e was synthesized from compound 11e (0.4 g, 0.92 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12e was obtained as a brown gum (0.241 g, 78%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.96–7.87 (m, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.78–7.70 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 4H), 7.56–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.44–7.39 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.19 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.75–4.72 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)- β-Ala, 2H), 3.59–3.46 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl 2H), 3.08 -3.01 (m, β-CH2 of β-Ala, 2H), 2.89–2.73 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl- β-Ala and α-CH2 of β-Ala, 4H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.97, 169.9, 158.1, 157.8,139.0, 138.4, 135.3, 134.8, 133.0, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127. 4, 126.5, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.07, 126.0, 125.8, 125.1, 124.8, 50.7, 48.4, 47.7, 35.4, 35.3, 33.9, 33.2, 30.1, 29.6; IR (ATR): vmax 3022, 2567, 2489, 2096, 1674, 1612, 1532, 1464, 1355, 1193, 1120, 972, 911, 821, 758; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C22H24N2O [M]+: 333.1961; found: 333.1961.
4-Amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl- butanamide (TFA salt) (12f)
The title compound 12f was synthesized from compound 11f (0.189 g, 0.42 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 12f was obtained as a light brown gum (0.09 g, 60%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.95–7.87 (m, +NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.75–7.69 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 4H), 7.53–7.49 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.32–7.16 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.73–4.71 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)-γ-Abu, 2H), 3.55–3.46 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl-γ-Abu, 2H), 2.88–2.75 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-phenyl γ-Abu and γ -CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 4H), 2.49–2.41 (m, α-CH2 of Boc- γ-Abu 2H), 1.82–1.74 (m, β-CH1H2 of Boc-γ-Abu, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.4, 171.3, 158.2, 157.9, 139.1, 138.6, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.5, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.99, 125.9, 125.7, 125.1, 124.8, 50.6, 48.2, 47.6, 47.4, 38.65, 38.6, 33.9, 33.2, 29.4, 28.8, 22.8, 22.8; IR (ATR): vmax 3405, 3025, 2931, 2105, 1674, 1619, 1423, 1366, 1174, 1125, 1032, 815, 748; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C23H26N2O [M]+: 347.2117; found: 347.2118.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-2-guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) acetamide (TFA salt) (13a). The title compound 13a was synthesized from compound 12a (0.1 g, 0.3 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13a was obtained as an off-white solid (0.07 g, 63%); mp 152.2–153.9 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.91–10.81 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.97–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.57–7.47 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 5H), 7.45–7.42 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.19–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.94–6.89 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.80–4.69 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole), 2H), 4.27–4.23 (s, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H), 3.57–3.48 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 3.03–2.88 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 166.9, 166.6, 158.3, 158.1, 157.9, 157.7, 156.9, 156.7, 136.2, 136.1, 135.0, 134.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.68, 127.6, 127.56, 127.5, 127.0, 126.9, 126.4, 126.28, 126.2, 126.09, 126.0, 125.8, 125.6, 125.5, 123.2, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.26, 118.21, 118.2, 118.1, 116.2, 114.2, 111.45, 111.4, 111.1, 110.6, 49.8, 48.1, 46.56, 46.5, 43.0, 42.5, 23.5, 22.9; IR (ATR): vmax 3388, 3186, 3059, 2321, 2113, 1640, 1423, 1361, 1344, 1171, 1124, 1038, 952, 811; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H25N5O [M]+: 400.2131; found: 400.2134.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-3-guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) propenamide (TFA salt) (13b). The title compound 13b was synthesized from compound 12b (0.1 g, 0.26 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13b was obtained as an off-white solid (0.079 g, 74%); mp 55.3–57.1 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.88–10.81 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.95–7.86 (m, 3H), 7.76–7.71 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.44 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 5H), 7.43–7.40 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.15–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.09–7.01 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.97–6.89 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.79–4.76 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole), 2H), 3.61–3.51 (m, β-CH1H2- of guanidine, 1H), 3.44–3.38 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-indole, 2H), 2.99–2.90 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 2.74–2.68 (t, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.57, 170.5, 158.5, 158.3, 158.1, 157.9, 156.82, 156.8, 136.2, 136.1, 135.6, 135.0, 133.0, 132.9, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.64, 127.6, 127.57, 127. 5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.1, 124.9, 123.1, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.2, 118.1, 117.7, 115.7, 111.5, 111.4, 111.3, 110.7, 50.8, 47.8, 47.6, 46.9, 37.2, 37.1, 32.3, 31.7, 23.9, 23.3; IR (ATR): vmax 3274, 3174, 3057, 2320, 2112, 1618, 1424, 1365, 1175, 1129, 950, 813, 742; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C25H27N5O [M]+: 414.2288; found: 414.2286.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-4-guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) butanamide (TFA salt) (13c). The title compound 13c was synthesized from compound 12c (0.1 g, 0.26 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13c was obtained as a brown gum (0.091 g, 82%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.88–10.80 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.95–7.86 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.74 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.70–7.69 (m, NH-guanidine, 1H), 7.53–7.45 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 4H), 7.40–7.38 (m, ArH-indole, 2H), 7.35–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.05 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.97–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.78–4.75 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole), 2H), 3.60–3.51 (t, γ-CH1H2- of guanidine 2H), 3.13–3.02 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 2.98–2.89 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-indole, 2H), 2.49–2.42 (t, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H), 1.78–1.70 (p, β-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.8, 171.7, 158.6, 158.4, 158.2, 157.9, 156.9, 156.8, 136.2, 136.1, 135.8, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.6, 127.57, 127.54, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.4, 126.2, 126.09, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.1, 124.9, 123.1, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.35, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 117.7, 115.7, 111.47, 111.4, 111.3, 110.8, 50.8, 47.7, 47.5, 46.8, 40.3, 40.2, 29.3, 28.7, 24.3, 24.2, 23.9, 23.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3342, 3180, 3067, 2320, 2112, 1663, 1616, 1424, 1365, 1173, 1129, 956, 811, 742; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H29N5O [M]+: 428.2444; found: 428.2441.
2-Guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl acetamide (TFA salt) (13d). The title compound 13d was synthesized from compound 12d (0.1 g, 0.31 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13d was obtained as a brown gum (0.082 g, 72%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.97–7.88 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.81–7.78 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.55–7.42 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 4H), 7.33–7.15 (m, ArH-phenyl and NH-guanidine, 6H), 4.78–4.65 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl), 2H), 4.22–4.16 (s, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H), 3.54–3.44 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.93–2.76 (t Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-phenyl, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 166.9, 166.7, 158.3, 158.0, 156.8, 138.9, 138.3, 134.9, 134.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.2, 128.9, 128.5, 128.43, 128.4, 128.1, 127.69, 127.6, 127.5, 126.47, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.5, 125.4, 49.7, 48.0, 47.37, 47.3, 43.0, 42.6, 33.5, 32.9; IR (ATR): vmax 3379, 3155, 2923, 2321, 2110, 1635, 1478, 1424, 1374, 1184, 1131, 1010, 799, 744, 699; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C22H24N4O [M]+: 361.2022; found: 361.2023.
3-Guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl- propanamide (TFA salt) (13e). The title compound 13e was synthesized from compound 12e (0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13d was obtained as a beige gum (0.088 g, 65%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.95–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.70 (d, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.53–7.45 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.42–7.38 (m, NH-guanidine 1H), 7.31–7.28 (m, ArH-phenyl and NH-guanidine, 2H), 7.27–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 4H), 4.76–4.72 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl), 2H), 3.56–3.48 (m, β-CH2- of guanidine, 2H), 3.40–3.34 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.87–2.79 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-phenyl, 2H), 2.66–2.59 (t, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.6, 170.5, 158.5, 158.3, 158.1, 157.9, 156.8, 139.0, 138.5, 135.5, 135.0, 133.0, 132.9, 132.3, 132.2, 128.8, 128.5, 128.47, 128.4, 128.1, 127.65, 127.6, 127.5, 126.48, 126.4, 126.26, 126.2, 126.05, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.0, 124.8, 50.6, 48.3, 47.7, 47.6, 37.09, 37.0, 33.9, 33.3, 32.2, 31.7; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C23H26N4O [M]+: 374.2107; found: 374.2178; IR (ATR): vmax 3329, 3159, 2341, 2119, 1619, 1452, 1365, 1172, 1128, 1031, 950, 813, 745; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C23H26N4O [M]+: 375.2179; found: 375.2178.
4-Guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl- butanamide (TFA salt) (13f). The title compound 13f was synthesized from compound 12f (0.1 g, 0.28 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 13f was obtained as a light brown gum (0.066 g, 61%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.94–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 5H), 7.75–2.69 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.45 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 2H), 7.40–7.37 (m, NH-guanidine, 1H), 7.31–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl and NH-guanidine, 6H), 4.75–4.71 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl), 2H), 3.55–3.47 (t, γ-CH1H2- of guanidine 2H), 3.11–3.07 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl, 2H), 2.86–2.78 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH1H2-phenyl, 2H), 2.45–2.37 (t, α-CH1H2- of guanidine, 2H), 1.75–1.70 (m, β-CH2- of guanidine 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.8, 159.1, 158.9, 158.7, 158.5, 156.99, 156.9, 139.1, 138.5, 135.7, 135.2, 133.0, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.8, 128.69, 128.6, 128.45, 128.42, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.8, 127.7, 127.6, 127.58, 127.55, 127.5, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.0, 124.8, 50.7, 50.2, 48.3, 47.67, 47.6, 47.5, 40.3, 40.2, 34.0, 33.2, 31.5, 29.3, 28.7, 24.3, 24.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3342, 3157, 2320, 2126, 1619, 1422, 1365, 1173,1125, 815, 748, 719; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H28N4O [M]+: 389.2336; found:389.2338.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-3-(dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) propenamide (14a). The title compound 14a was synthesized from compound 8 (0.1 g, 0.33 mmol) according to the protocol H. The product 14a was obtained as a white solid (0.095 g, 71%); mp 231.9–233.4 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.89–10.80 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.94–7.86 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.76–7.72 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.47 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.42–7.40 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.16–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.08–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.97–6.91 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.78–4.77 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.59–3.53 (m, β-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.99–2.87 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(indole) N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.89–2.52 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- N,N- dimethylpropane and α-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 4H), 2.31–2.25 (s, N-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.7, 170.6, 136.2, 135.7, 135.3, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.57, 127.54, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.2, 126.09, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.1, 125.0, 123.3, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 118.0, 111.48, 111.4, 111.3, 110.8, 54.4, 50.9, 47.4, 46.8, 44.2, 44.0, 29.8, 29.1, 23.8, 23.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3237, 3050, 2921, 2455, 2114, 1921, 1674, 1627, 1455, 1365, 1197, 1123, 1009, 963, 816, 741; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H29N3O [M]+: 400.2383; found: 400.2380.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-4-(dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) butanamide (14b). The title compound 14b was synthesized from compound 8 (0.4 g, 1.33 mmol) according to the protocol H. The product 14b was obtained as a white solid (0.27 g, 49%); mp 108.6–109.2 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.87–10.79 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.94–7.86 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.74–7.68 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.46 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.41–7.37 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.35–7.31 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.14–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.09–7.02 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.98–6.90 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.77–4.74 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N- dimethylbutan, 2H), 3.58–3.51 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(indole) N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.97–2.90 (m, γ-CH2 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.45–2.09 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- N,N- dimethylbutane, α-CH2 of N,N- dimethylbutane and N-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 10H), 1.75–1.63 (p, β-CH2 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.9, 136.2, 136.1, 136.0, 135.5, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.56, 127.5, 127.4, 127.1, 126.9, 126.3, 126.2, 126.08, 126.0, 125.8, 125.7, 125.1, 124.8, 123.2, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.17, 118.1, 111.5, 111.4, 111.3, 110.8, 57.8, 50.9, 47.6, 47.4, 46.8, 44.38, 44.3, 30.7, 29.9, 29.3, 24.0, 23.2, 22.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3109, 3057, 2774, 2455, 2343, 2114, 1799, 1635, 1455, 1413, 1338, 1218, 1137, 1017, 973, 818, 733; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H31N3O [M]+: 414.2539; found: 414.2535.
4-(Dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl-butanamide (14c). The title compound 14c was synthesized from compound 9 (0.4 g, 1.5 mmol) according to the protocol H. The product 14c was obtained as a white solid (0.447 g, 78%); mp 46.6–48.2 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.96–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.78–7.72 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.49 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.42–7.40 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.75 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2(phenyl)N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.56–3.51 (m, β-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.04–2.98 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(phenyl) N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.89–2.79 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl- N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.76–2.65 (t, α-CH1H2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.54–2.52 (s, N-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethyl-propane, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.3, 170.2, 139.0, 138.6, 135.4, 135.0, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.64, 127.6, 127.56, 127.5, 126.47, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.1, 124.8, 53.9, 53.8, 50.7, 48.3, 47.6, 47.5, 43.4, 33.9, 33.2, 28.8, 28.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3055, 2933, 2110, 1624, 1454, 1363, 1149, 1018, 957, 829, 747; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H28N2O [M]+: 361.2274; found: 361.2271.
3-(Dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl-propanamide (14d)
The title compound 14d was synthesized from compound 9 (0.4 g, 1.5 mmol) according to the protocol H. The product 14d was obtained as a white solid (0.447 g, 49%), mp 144.9–145.3 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.95–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.76–7.69 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.53–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.75–4.72 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)N,N- dimethylbutan, 2H), 3.56–3.48 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(phenyl) N,N- dimethylbutane 2H), 2.96–2.79 (m, γ-CH2 of N,N-dimethylbutane and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl-N,N-dimethylbutane, 4H), 2.74–2.70 (s, N-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 6H), 2.47–2.38 (t, α-CH1H2 of N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H), 1.86–1.79 (m, β-CH2 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.2, 171.1, 139.1, 138.6, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.47, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.7, 127.6, 127.55, 127.5, 126.44, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.06, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.0, 124.7, 56.7, 56.6, 50.6, 48.2, 47.7, 47.6, 42.5, 42.4, 33.9, 33.3, 29.4, 28.8, 19.96, 19.9; IR (ATR): vmax 3026, 2934, 2776, 2486, 2113, 1602, 1475, 1369, 1281, 1204, 1174, 828, 752; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C25H30N2O [M]+: 375.2431; found: 375.2431.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-3-(dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) propenamide (15a). The title compound 15a was prepared from compound 14a (0.1 g, 0.25 mmol) according to the general procedure I. The product 15a was obtained as a white gum (0.091 g, 91%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.96–10.85 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 10.22–10.15 (s, H-N- 2CH3, 1H), 7.96–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79–7.77 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.41 (m, ArH-naphthyl and ArH-indole, 4H), 7.36–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.21–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.02 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.98–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.80–4.79 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.59–3.53 (m, β-CH1H2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.37–3.18 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(indole) N,N-dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.03–2.98 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.91–2.85 (m, α-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.77–2.63 (s, HN-CH3CH3 of N,N-dimethylpropane, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.4, 169.3, 136.2, 136.1, 135.4, 134.8, 133.0, 132.9, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.68, 127.6, 127.57, 127.5, 127.0, 126.9, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.44, 125.4, 123.5, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.3, 118.2, 111.5, 111.4, 111.2, 110.7, 53.1, 52.9, 50.7, 47.6, 47.5, 46.6, 42.4, 42.3, 42.1, 42.0, 27.7, 26.9, 23.7, 23.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3393, 3219, 3049, 2917, 2848, 2672, 2467, 1620, 1456, 1363, 1228, 1144, 1007, 962, 816, 741; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H29N3O [M]+: 400.2383; found: 400.2380.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-4-(dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) butanamide (15b). The title compound 15b was prepared from compound 14b (0.1 g, 0.24 mmol) according to the general procedure I. The product 15b was obtained as a colorless gum (0.1 g, 100%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.95–10.84 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 10.56–10.50 (m, H-N-2CH3, 1H), 7.94–7.88 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.76–7.71 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.46 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.42–7.40 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.36–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.18–7.10 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.08–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.97–6.90 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.78–4.76 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N-dimethylbutan, 2H), 3.58–3.51 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(indole)-N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 3.04–2.96 (m, γ-CH2 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.91–2.81 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.72–2.70 (s, HN-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 6H), 2.55–2.42 (t, α-CH1H2 of N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H), 1.95–1.81 (m, β-CH2 of N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.0, 136.2, 136.1, 135.8, 135.3, 133.0, 132.9, 132.3, 132.2, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.5, 127.1, 127.0, 126.3, 126.2, 126.1, 125.9, 125.7, 125.2, 125.0, 123.3, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.2, 118.1, 111.5, 111.42, 111.4, 110.8, 56.2, 56.1, 50.8, 47.6, 47.4, 46.8, 41.97, 41.9, 29.6, 28.9, 23.7, 23.2, 19.6, 19.4; IR (ATR): vmax 3249, 3049, 2964, 2691, 2343, 2109, 1612, 1456, 1363, 1228, 1009, 965, 815, 742; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H31N3O [M]+: 414.2539; found: 414.2537.
3-(Dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl-propanamide(15c). The title compound 15c was prepared from compound 14c (0.1 g, 0.27 mmol) according to the general procedure I. The product 15c was obtained as a white gum (0.1 g, 100%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.54–9.47 (s, H-N-2CH3, 1H), 7.96–7.88 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79–7.75 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.43–7.41 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.77–4.76 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2(phenyl)N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.55–3.51 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(phenyl) N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 3.33–3.26 (m, β-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 2H), 2.94–2.79 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl-N,N-dimethylpropane and α-CH2 of N,N- dimethylpropane, 4H), 2.76–2.75 (s, HN-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethyl-propane, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.6, 169.5, 138.9, 138.5, 135.3, 134.7, 133.0, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.9, 128.59, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.67, 127.6, 127.56, 127.5, 126.49, 126.4, 126.29, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.2, 125.0, 53.18, 53.1, 50.6, 48.3, 47.6, 47.5, 42.5, 42.4, 33.8, 33.1, 27.6, 27.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3394, 3059, 2930, 2105, 1613, 1471, 1364, 1273, 1240, 1161, 1061, 948, 829, 754; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C24H28N2O [M]+: 361.2274; found: 361.2274.
4-(Dimethylamino)-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-N-phenethyl-butanamide (15d)
The title compound 15d was prepared from compound 14d (0.08 g, 0.2 mmol) according to the general procedure I. The product 15d was obtained as a white solid (0.08 g, 100%); mp 131.7–132.9 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.43–9.38 (s, H-N-2CH3, 1H), 7.95–7.88 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.70 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.53–7.49 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.75–4.72 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)N,N-dimethylbutan, 2H), 3.56–3.48 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(phenyl) N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 3.03–2.96 (m, γ-CH2 of N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.88–2.80 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl- N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 2.79–2.75 (s, HN-CH3CH3 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 6H), 2.49–2.40 (t, α-CH1H2 of N,N- dimethylbutane, 2H), 1.89–1.81 (m, β-CH2 of N,N-dimethylbutane, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.1, 171.0, 139.1, 138.6, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.47, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.59, 127.5, 126.44, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.06, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.0, 124.7, 56.5, 56.4, 50.6, 48.2, 47.7, 47.6, 42.3, 42.2, 33.9, 33.3, 29.3, 28.7, 19.7, 19.6; IR (ATR): vmax 3021, 2776, 2342, 2106, 1620, 1459, 1413, 1360, 1280, 1195, 1160, 827, 756; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C25H30N2O [M]+: 375.2431; found: 375.2424.
3-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl) (naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) amino)-N,N,N-trimethyl-3-oxopropan-1-aminium (16a). The title compound 16a was prepared from compound 14a (0.05 g, 0.13 mmol) according to the general procedure J. The product 16a was obtained as a yellow solid (0.043g, 82%) mp 98.3–99.5 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.91–10.79 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.97–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79–7.75 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.56–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.43–7.41 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.37–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.18–7.11 (m, ArH-indole,1H), 7.09–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.99–6.88 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.83–4.80 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N,N- trimethylpropan, 2H), 3.70–3.53 (m, β-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 2H), 3.44–3.21 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(indole) N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 2H), 3.08–2.66 (m, N-3CH3, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- N,N,N- trimethylpropane and α-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 13H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.6, 169.5, 168.5, 136.2, 136.1, 135.4, 135.3, 134.9, 134.8, 132.99, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 127.64, 127.6, 127.57, 127.5, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.29, 126.2, 126.1, 126.06, 126.0, 125.8, 125.5, 125.5, 125.2, 125.1, 123.7, 123.4, 122.72, 122.7, 121.1, 120.9, 118.5, 118.4, 118.3, 118.2, 111.6, 111.5, 111.4, 111.3, 111.2, 110.8, 110.7, 61.9, 61.6, 53.3, 53.2, 52.4, 52.2, 52.16, 52.1, 50.7, 47.6, 47.4, 47.3, 47.0, 46.8, 46.4, 42.6, 42.3, 27.6, 26.8, 26.6, 25.9, 23.6, 23.4, 23.1, 23.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3386, 3248, 2919, 2704, 2321, 1622, 1452, 1363, 1230, 1158, 1092, 920, 820, 741; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H32N3O [M] +: 414.2539; found: 414.2533.
4-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl) (naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) amino)-N,N,N-trimethyl-4-oxobutan-1-aminium (16b). The title compound 16b was prepared from compound 14b (0.06 g, 0.14 mmol) according to the general procedure J. The product 16b was obtained as a white solid (0.06 g, 97%); mp 92.3–93.1 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.88–10.79 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.95–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.70 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.53–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.43–7.40 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.37–7.32 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.16–7.11 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.10–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.99–6.91 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.80–4.77 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)N,N,N- trimethylbutan, 2H), 3.62–3.52 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(indole) N,N,N- trimethylbutane, 2H), 3.40–3.23 (m, γ-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylbutane, 2H), 3.06–2.75 (m, N-3CH3 and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole- N,N,N- trimethyl butane, 11H), 2.53–2.39 (m, α-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylbutane, 2H), 2.00–1.75 (m, β-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylbutane 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.0, 170.8, 170.7, 136.2, 136.1, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.54, 127.5, 127.1, 126.9, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.0, 124.8, 124.7, 123.3, 123.2, 122.6, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.2, 118.1, 111.5, 111.3, 110.9, 110.8, 64.9, 56.5, 52.24, 52.2, 52.1, 50.8, 47.6, 47.3, 47.0, 42.4, 42.3, 29.1, 28.4, 23.7, 23.2, 18.2, 18.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3426, 3241, 3048, 2933, 2704, 2303, 1622, 1455, 1364, 1227, 1159, 1020, 954, 819, 746; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C28H34N3O [M] +: 428.2696; found: 428.2689.
N,N,N-Trimethyl-3-((naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)(phenethyl)amino)-3-oxopropan-1-aminium (16c). The title compound 16c was prepared from compound 14c (0.1 g, 0.27 mmol) according to the general procedure J. The product 16c was obtained as a yellowish solid (0.1 g, 98%); mp 50.2–52.1 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) 7.97–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79–7.74 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.55–7.40 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.34–7.17 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.80–4.76 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)N,N,N- trimethylpropan, 2H), 3.67–3.26 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-(phenyl)N,N,N-trimethylpropane and β-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 4H), 3.06–2.76 (m, N-3CH3, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-N,N,N-trimethylpropane and α-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 13H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.7, 169.6, 168.5, 139.0, 138.9, 138.6, 138.5, 135.3, 135.2, 134.8, 134.7, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.3, 132.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.58, 128.5, 128.43, 128.4, 128.1, 128.0, 127.64, 127.6, 127.55, 127.52, 126.5, 126.48, 126.4, 126.3, 126.25, 126.2, 126.15, 126.1, 126.08, 126.0, 125.8, 125.4, 125.3, 125.1, 124.9, 61.7, 53.28, 53.25, 52.46, 52.44, 52.4, 50.59, 50.5, 48.2, 47.9, 47.6, 47.58, 47.5, 47.0, 42.6, 42.5, 33.75, 33.7, 33.1, 33.0, 27.6, 26.9, 26.6, 26.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3053, 2922, 2682, 2320, 1625, 1454, 1363, 1236, 1150, 950, 829, 743; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C25H31N2O [M] +: 375.2431; found: 375.2428.
N,N,N-Trimethyl-4-((naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)(phenethyl)amino)-4-oxobutan-1-aminium (16d). The title compound 16d was prepared from compound 14d (0.1 g, 0.26 mmol) according to the general procedure J. The product 2–19 was obtained as a yellowish gum (0.097 g, 96%); mp 46.7–48.1 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.95–7.87 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.70 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.54–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.33–7.18 (m, ArH-phenyl, 5H), 4.75–4.73 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(phenyl)N,N,N- trimethylbutan, 2H), 3.57–3.48 (t, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-(phenyl)N,N,N-trimethylbutane, 2H), 3.06–2.74 (m, N-3CH3, γ-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylbutane and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-phenyl- N,N,N- trimethylbutane, 13H), 2.48–2.39 (t, α-CH1H2 of N,N,N- trimethylbutane, 2H), 1.87–1.80 (m, β-CH2 of N,N,N- trimethylpropane, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 171.1, 171.0, 139.1, 138.6, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.2, 132.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.47, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.58, 127.54, 127.53, 126.4, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 126.06, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.0, 124.7, 56.6, 56.5, 52.2, 50.6, 48.2, 47.69, 47.6, 42.3, 42.2, 33.9, 33.3, 29.3, 28.7, 19.7, 19.6, 18.0; IR (ATR): vmax 3435, 3026, 2928, 2703, 2460, 1601, 1474, 1367, 1291, 1228, 1173, 1031, 964, 828, 751; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H33N2O [M] +: 389.2587; found: 389.2579.
Di-tert-butyl(5-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)amino)-5-oxopentane-1,4-diyl) (S)-dicarbamate (18a). The title compound 18a was synthesized from compound 8 (0.5 g, 1.6 mmol) and Boc-Orn(Boc)-OH (0.55 g, 1.6 mmol) according to the protocol C. The product 18a was obtained as a white solid (0.84 g, 82%); mp 68.1–70.2 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.87–10.77 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.91–7.82 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.73 (s, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.46 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.34–7.33 (d, α-CH-NH-Boc, 1H), 7.31–7.30 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.17–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 3H), 6.96–6.88 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.65–6.72 (s, δ-CH2-NH-Boc, 1H), 4.86–4.60 (s, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Boc-Orn(Boc), 2H), 4.52–4.38 (m, α-CH of Boc-Orn(Boc), 1H), 3.78–3.38 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 3.05–2.79 (m, δ-CH2- of Boc-Orn(Boc) and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole 4H), 1.64–1.18 (m, β-CH2, γ-CH2, of Boc-Orn(Boc) and 2(CH3)3 of Boc-Orn(Boc), 22H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 172.7, 171.8, 155.6, 155.5, 155.4, 136.2, 135.6, 135.0, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.1, 128.1, 128.0, 127.58, 127.5, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.2, 126.1, 125.8, 125.77, 125.74, 125.7, 125.5, 123.1, 122.6, 120.99, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.15, 118.1, 111.4, 111.39, 111.3, 110.8, 79.1, 78.0, 77.9, 77.3, 50.4, 50.3, 50.2, 48.1, 47.5, 46.2, 29.1, 28.9, 28.2, 28.1, 25.9, 25.8, 24.4, 22.8; IR (ATR): vmax 3297, 2972, 2927, 2320, 2101, 1688, 1627, 1502, 1451, 1363, 1245, 1159, 1011, 857, 813, 739; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C36H46N4O5 [M + Na]+: 637.3361; found: 637.3363.
Di-tert-butyl(6-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl) (naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) amino)-6-oxohexane-1,5-diyl) (S)-dicarbamate (18b). The title compound 18b was synthesized from compound 8 (0.2 g, 0.66 mmol) and Boc-Lys(Boc)-OSu (0.29 g, 0.66 mmol) according to the protocol E. The product 18b was obtained as a white solid (0.127 g, 63%); mp 51.2–53.6 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.86–10.76 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.92–7.82 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.77–7.69 (d, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.44 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.35–7.33 (m, α-CH-NH-Boc, 1H), 7.32–7.30 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.15–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 3H), 6.97–6.88 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.76–6.70 (t, ε-CH2-NH-Boc, 1H), 4.84–4.69 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Boc-Lys(Boc), 2H), 4.46–4.35 (t, α-CH of Boc-Lys(Boc), 1H), 3.80–3.35 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 2H), 3.05–2.81 (m, ε-CH2- of Boc-Lys(Boc) and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 4H), 1.54–1.24 (m, β-CH2, γ-CH2, δ-CH2 of Boc-Lys(Boc) and 2(CH3)3 of Boc-Lys(Boc), 24H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 172.8, 172.0, 155.7, 155.5, 155.4, 136.1, 135.7, 135.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.1, 128.1, 127.9, 127.56, 127.54, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.2, 126.1, 125.8, 125.75, 125.7, 125.6, 125.5, 123.2, 122.6, 120.99, 120.9, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 118.0, 111.4, 111.39, 111.3, 110.8, 78.0, 77.9, 50.6, 50.5, 50.3, 48.0, 47.5, 46.3, 33.3, 31.3, 31.0, 29.3, 29.2, 28.26, 28.2, 28.1, 24.4, 22.8, 22.6; IR (ATR): vmax 3308, 2929, 1688, 1631, 1506, 1453, 1364, 1245, 1161, 1011, 859, 814, 740; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C37H48N4O5 [M + Na]+: 651.3516; found: 651.3512.
(S)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-2,5-diamino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) pentanamide (TFA salt) (19a). The title compound 19a was synthesized from compound 18a (0.2 g, 0.32 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 19a was obtained as a yellowish gum (0.076 g, 57%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.93–10.83 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 8.39 -8.36 (t, α-CH-+NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.99–7.78 (m, δ-CH2-+NH3 CF3COO and ArH-naphthyl, 7H), 7.57–7.53 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.48–7.42 (m, ArH-naphthyl and ArH-indole, 2H), 7.36–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.21–7.09 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.96–6.88 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 5.00–4.92 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Orn, 1H), 4.79–4.62 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Orn, 1H), 4.59–4.43 (m, α-CH of Orn, 1H), 3.81–3.24 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Orn, 2H), 3.04–2.74 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Orn and δ-CH2- of Orn, 4H), 1.81–1.61 (m, β-CH2,γ-CH2, of Orn, 4H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 167.8, 167.5, 157.5, 157.3, 157.1, 156.8, 135.2, 135.1, 133.6, 133.1, 131.9, 131.8, 131.4, 131.3, 127.39, 127.3, 126.65, 126.6, 126.5, 125.9, 125.7, 125.5, 125.3, 125.2, 125.0, 124.98, 124.9, 124.5, 122.3, 121.8, 120.1, 120.0, 118.5, 117.4, 117.2, 117.1, 117.0, 116.6, 114.6, 112.6, 110.5, 110.4, 109.8, 109.3, 49.4, 48.5, 48.4, 47.0, 46.3, 45.3, 38.3, 38.2, 38.1, 37.4, 37.3, 27.0, 26.8, 23.2, 21.8, 21.6, 21.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3405, 3043, 2931, 2082, 1655, 1524, 1430, 1367, 1176, 1126, 797, 743; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H30N4O [M]+: 415.2492; found: 415.2488.
(S)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-2,6-diamino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) hexanamide (TFA salt) (19b). The title compound 19b was synthesized from compound 18b (0.1 g, 0.15 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 19b was obtained as a brown gum (0.06 g, 89%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.94–10.86 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 8.34–8.32 (s, α-CH-+NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.98–7.85 (m, ε-CH2-+NH3 CF3COO and ArH-naphthyl, 6H), 7.80–7.97 (d, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.56–7.51 (m, ArH-naphthyl 2H), 7.48–7.42 (m, ArH-naphthyl and ArH-indole, 2H), 7.37–7.32 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.21–7.11 (dd, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.08–7.05 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.95–6.89 (dt, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.95–4.92 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Lys, 1H), 4.76–4.62 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)- Lys, 1H), 4.47–4.33 (m, α-CH of Lys, 1H), 3.84–3.27 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Lys, 2H), 3.07–3.82 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Lys, 2H), 2.74–2.68 (m, ε-CH2-Lys, 2H), 1.76–1.62 (m, β-CH2 of Lys, 2H), 1.56–1.44 (m, δ-CH2 of Lys, 2H), 1.41–1.23 (m, γ-CH2 of Lys, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 168.9, 168.7, 158.4, 158.2, 158.0, 157.8, 136.2, 136.1, 134.8, 134.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.3, 128.3, 128.2, 127.6, 127.59, 127.5, 127.0, 126.8, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.4, 123.3, 122.9, 121.1, 121.0, 119.7, 118.4, 118.2, 118.0, 117.7, 115.8, 113.8, 111.5, 111.4, 110.8, 110.3, 50.2, 49.7, 49.5, 48.0, 47.4, 46.0, 39.9, 39.8, 39.6, 39.5, 39.3, 39.2, 39.1, 38.4, 38.3, 30.3, 30.2, 26.6, 26.5, 24.1, 22.6, 21.0, 20.7; IR (ATR): vmax 3399, 3049, 2935, 2088, 1774, 1654, 1523, 1430, 1367, 1127, 798, 743; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H32N4O [M]+: 429.2648; found: 429.2644.
N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-2,5-diguanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) pentanamide (TFA salt) (20a). The title compound 20a was synthesized from compound 19a (0.1 g, 0.24 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 20a was obtained as a white gum (0.045 g, 38%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.93–10.79 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 8.32–8.28 (dd, +NH3 CF3COO, 1H), 7.98–7.86 (m, ArH-Nph, 3H), 7.81–7.70 (m, ArH-naphthyl NH-guanidine, 3H), 7.57–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.46–7.31 (m, ArH-naphthyl NH-guanidine, 3H), 7.20–7.02 (m, NH-guanidine and ArH-indole, 5H), 6.95–6.87 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 5.03–4.42 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole), and α-CH of diguanidine, 3H), 3.82–2.78 (m, δ-CH2- of digunidine, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 6H), 1.78–1.42 (m, β-CH2,γ-CH2, of diguanidine, 4H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 169.8, 169.6, 158.5, 158.3, 158.1, 157.9, 156.7, 156.09, 156.0, 136.2, 136.1, 134.9, 134.1, 132.9, 132.8, 132.4, 132.2, 128.5, 128.3, 127.6, 127.58, 127.5, 126.9, 126.8, 126.6, 126.42, 126.4, 126.2, 126.0, 125.7, 125.7, 125.2, 123.2, 122.7, 121.1, 121.0, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 116.2, 111.5, 111.4, 110.9, 110.3, 50.5, 50.2, 50.1, 47.9, 47.1, 46.2, 30.0, 29.8, 24.2, 24.1, 23.8, 22.8; IR (ATR): vmax 3344, 3183, 2321, 1620, 1427, 1365, 1128, 799, 743, 720; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C28H34N8O [M]+: 499.2928; found: 499.2921.
(S)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-2,6-diguanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)hexanamide (TFA salt) (20b). The title compound 20b was synthesized from compound 19b (0.2 g, 0.46 mmol) according to the protocol G. The product 20b was obtained as a yellowish solid (0.09 g, 39%); mp 48.2–50.6 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.93–10.82 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.97–7.86 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.79–7.65 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 4H), 7.56–7.50 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 3H), 7.46–7.31 (m, ArH-naphthyl and ArH-indole, 4H), 7.18–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 3H), 6.95–6.89 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 4.97–4.69 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole), and α-CH of diguanidine, 3H), 3.61–3.42 (m, ε-CH2- of digunidine, 2H), 3.08–2.82 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 4H), 1.71–1.24 (m, β-CH2, δ-CH2 and γ-CH2 of diguanidine, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 170.0, 169.8, 158.7, 158.4, 158.2, 158.0, 156.7, 156.1, 156.0, 136.2, 136.1, 134.9, 134.2, 132.89, 132.8, 132.3, 132.2, 128.4, 128.2, 127.63, 127.6, 127.57, 127.5, 127.0, 126.8, 126.5, 126.37, 126.3, 126.1, 125.9, 125.8, 125.5, 125.1, 123.2, 122.8, 121.0, 120.9, 119.7, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 117.7, 115.7, 113.8, 111.48, 111.4, 111.0, 110.3, 50.5, 50.45, 50.4, 47.8, 47.0, 46.3, 40.7, 40.6, 32.3, 32.2, 28.48, 28.4, 24.1, 22.7, 21.4, 21.1; IR (ATR): vmax 3342, 3186, 2947, 2323, 2112, 1619, 1427, 1365, 1177, 1130, 800, 720; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C29H36N8O [M]+: 512.3084; found: 512.3077.
Tert-butyl(S)-(1-((2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl) (naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) amino)-1-oxo-5-(3-((2,2,4,6,7-pentamethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-5-yl) sulfonyl)guanidino) pentan-2-yl) carbamate (21). The title compound 21 was synthesized from compound 8 (0.2 g, 0.66 mmol) and Fmoc-Arg (Pbf)-OH (0.43 g, 0.66 mmol) according to the protocol C. The product 21 was obtained as a beige solid (0.84 g, 82%); mp 117.5–119.2 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.82–10.76 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.90–7.69 (m, ArH and α-CH-NH-Fmoc, 9H), 7.49–7.40 (m, ArH, 5H), 7.35–7.24 (m, ArH and NH-guanidine, 4H), 7.12–7.02 (m, ArH-indole, 2H), 6.93–6.88 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.63 (s, NH-guanidine, 1H), 6.39 (s, NH-guanidine, 1H), 4.84–4.64 (m, Ar-CH2-N-2CH2-(indole)-Fmoc-Arg(Pbf), 2H), 4.54–4.45 (m, α-CH of Fmoc-Arg(Pbf),1H), 4.33–4.15 (m, NH-(C=O)-O-CH2-fluorenyl, 2H), 3.71–3.32 (m, CH2 of fluorenyl five ring and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 4H), 3.02–2.79 (m, CH2 of furan, δ-CH2- of Fmoc-Arg(Pbf) and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole, 6H), 2.48–2.42 (s, 2CH3 of benzofuran benzene ring, 6H), 1.96 (s, CH3 of benzofuran benzene ring, 3H), 1.62–1.21 (m, β-CH2, γ-CH2 of Fmoc-Arg(Pbf) and 2CH3 of furan, 10H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 172.0, 171.5, 157.4, 156.1, 156.0, 143.8, 143.77, 143.7, 140.7, 137.2, 136.2, 136.1, 135.5, 132.8, 132.3, 132.1, 131.4, 128.9, 128.2, 128.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0, 126.9, 126.3, 126.1, 125.9, 125.8, 125.7, 125.3, 124.3, 123.2, 122.7, 121.3, 121.0, 120.9, 120.1, 120.0, 118.3, 118.2, 118.1, 118.0, 116.2, 111.4, 111.3, 110.7, 86.2, 65.8, 50.5, 48.0, 47.4, 46.66, 46.6, 42.3, 29.0, 28.2, 24.3, 22.9, 18.9, 17.5, 12.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3330, 2928, 2321, 2112, 1712, 1621, 1545, 1449, 1241, 1089, 812, 728; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C55H58N6O6S [M]+: 931.4211; found: 931.4207.
(S)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl)-2-amino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-5-(3-((2,2,4,6,7-pentamethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-5-yl) sulfonyl) guanidino)pentanamide (22). Compound 21 (0.25 g, 0.27 mmol) was added to a solution of 1.1 mL of piperidine in 4 mL of DMF and the reaction mixture was left to stir overnight. It was then extracted with ethyl acetate, H2O, and brine and the extract was dried over NaSO4. Filtration and evaporation of the solvent in vacuo gave the crude product which was purified by flash chromatography using DCM: MeOH 2–7%. The pure compound was dried under vacuum to give a white solid (0.14 g, 74%); mp 112.3–113.1 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.85 -10-77 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 7.92–7.83 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 3H), 7.72 -7.70 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.52–7.47 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.47–7.43 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 1H), 7.41–7.35 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.34–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.14–7.08 (s, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.04 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.95–6.89 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.67–6.54 (d, NH-guanidine, 2H), 4.90–4.88 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)-Arg(Pbf), 1H), 4.83–4.80 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)-Arg(Pbf), 1H), 3.76–3.66 (m, α-CH of Arg(Pbf), 1H), 3.54–3.29 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH1H2-CH2-indole-Arg(Pbf), 2H), 3.06–2.80 (m, δ-CH2- of Arg(Pbf) Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Arg(Pbf) and CH2 of furan, 6H), 2.47 (s, CH3 of benzofuran benzene ring, 3H), 2.42 (s, CH3 of benzofuran benzene ring, 3H), 1.97 (s, CH3 of benzofuran benzene ring, 3H), 1.58–1.23 (m, β-CH2,γ-CH2 of Arg(Pbf) and 2CH3 of furan, 10H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 157.4, 156.0, 137.2, 136.2, 136.1, 135.7, 135.2, 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 132.1, 131.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 127.57, 127.5, 127.0, 126.9, 126.3, 126.2, 126.0, 125.96, 125.9, 125.7, 125.3, 125.2, 124.3, 123.2, 122.7, 121.0, 120.9, 118.4, 118.3, 118.1, 118.0, 116.2, 111.4, 111.37, 111.3, 110.7, 86.26, 86.2, 50.4, 50.3, 50.0, 47.6, 47.1, 46.5, 42.4, 28.26, 28.2, 24.4, 23.0, 18.9, 17.5, 12.26, 12.2; IR (ATR): vmax 3325, 2926, 2343, 2115, 1922, 1618, 1544, 1454, 1367, 1242, 1089, 992, 901, 813, 741; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C40H48N6O4S [M]+: 709.3531; found: 709.3523.
(S)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-2-amino-5-guanidino-N-(naphthalen-2-ylmethyl) pentanamide (TFA salt) (23). The title compound 23 was synthesized from compound 22 (0.09 g, 0.127 mmol) according to the protocol F. The product 23 was obtained as a white gum (0.046 g, 80%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.92–10.81 (s, NH-indole, 1H), 8.33–8.29 (dd, α-CH+NH3 CF3COO, 3H), 7.97–7.84 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 4H), 7.80–7.77 (m, ArH-naphthyl and NH-guanidine, 2H), 7.59–7.48 (m, ArH-naphthyl, 2H), 7.45 (s, NH-guanidine, 1H), 7.41–7.39 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.36–7.31 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.20–7.08 (dd, ArH-indole, 1H), 7.07–7.03 (m, ArH-indole, 1H), 6.95–6.88 (t, ArH-indole, 1H), 5.00–4.97 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)-Arg, 1H), 4.70–4.59 (s, Ar-CH1H2-N-2CH2-(indole)-Arg, 1H), 4.55–4.39 (q, α-CH of Arg, 1H), 3.82–3.22 (m, Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Arg, 2H), 3.14–2.78 (m, δ-CH2- of Arg and Ar-CH2-N-CH2-CH2-indole-Arg, 4H), 1.79–1.49 (m, β-CH2,γ-CH2 of Arg, 4H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 168.9, 168.6, 158.7, 158.5, 158.2, 158.0, 156.8, 156.7, 136.2, 136.1, 134.7, 134.0, 132.88, 132.8, 132.4, 132.3, 128.4, 128.3, 127.65, 127.6, 127.59, 127.5, 126.9, 126.7, 126.55, 126.5, 126.4, 126.2, 126.06, 126.0, 125.8, 125.5, 123.3, 122.8, 121.1, 121.0, 119.7, 118.4, 118.2, 118.1, 118.0, 117.7, 115.7, 113.7, 111.5, 111.4, 110.8, 110.3, 50.4, 49.6, 49.5, 48.0, 47.3, 46.1, 28.2, 28.0, 24.2, 24.1, 23.7, 22.7; IR (ATR): vmax 3353, 3183, 2933, 2343, 2093, 1650, 1430, 1366, 1176, 1128, 798, 744; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C27H32N6O [M]+: 457.2711; found: 457.2709.

3.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The antimicrobial activity of the compounds was evaluated by a broth microdilution assay using the procedure that was described by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [62]. Briefly, bacteria were grown to the mid-log phase in Muller Hinton broth (MHB) with shaking at 120 rpm and incubated at 37 °C for 12–16 h. Following incubation, the bacteria were washed three times in PBS pH 7.4 at 3500 g for 10 min. After washing, the bacteria were diluted with fresh MHB. The turbidity of the bacterial suspensions was adjusted so that OD660 nm was 0.1, which gave 1 × 108 CFU mL−1, and then further diluted to achieve 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 as a final bacterial concentration. Each compound was diluted (250–3.9 µM) through two-fold dilution. The wells in the microtiter plates were loaded with 100 µL of inoculum containing 5 × 105 CFU mL−1 bacteria. The wells without any compound and containing only bacteria were used as negative controls (i.e., no inhibition of growth). The wells with media only were set as blank. The microtiter plate was wrapped with paraffin to prevent evaporation and incubated with shaking at 120 rpm at 37 °C for 18–24 h. After incubation, a spectrophotometric reading was taken. The well at the lowest concentration without any bacterial growth and showing zero spectrophotometric reading was regarded as the MIC of the compounds. The MIC data of all the compounds were compared with that of ciprofloxacin (brand names Ciproxin, Ciloxan, and Cetraxal), which is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and was repeated in three independent experiments.

3.5. Cytoplasmic Membrane Permeability Assay

The method was adopted from Wu et al. [63] with slight modification. The bacterial cytoplasmic membrane permeability was determined using membrane potential sensitive dye diSC3–5 (3,3′-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide) which penetrates inside the bacterial cells depending on the membrane potential gradient of the cytoplasmic membrane. Bacteria were grown in MHB to the mid-log phase by incubating with shaking at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Following incubation, the bacteria were washed with 5 mM HEPES containing 20 mM glucose pH 7.2 and resuspended in the same buffer to an OD600 0.05–0.06 which gave 1 × 107 CFU ml−1. The dye diSC3–5 was added at 4 µM to the bacterial suspension. The suspensions were incubated at room temperature for 1 h in the dark for maximum dye uptake by the bacterial cells. Then, 100 mM KCl was added to balance the K+ outside and inside the bacterial cell to prevent further uptake or outflow of the dye. A total of 100 µL of bacterial suspension was added in a 96-well microtiter plate and with an equal volume of antimicrobial compounds. DMSO (20%) was set as a positive control while dye and only bacterial cells were set as negative control. Fluorescence was measured with a luminescence spectrophotometer at 3 min intervals at an excitation wavelength of 621 m and an emission wavelength of 670 nm.

3.6. Viable Cell Count Assay

The number of viable cells was confirmed by serially diluting aliquots of bacteria in D/E neutralizing broth (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA) and plating these onto Tryptic Soy Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing phosphatidylcholine (0.7 g L−1) and Tween 80 (5 mL L−1). The plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight and numbers of live bacteria were enumerated and expressed as CFU mL−1. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

3.7. Lysis of Horse Red Blood Cells

The haemolytic activities of the compounds that showed MIC ≤ 26 μg mL−1 (15 compounds) were determined using horse red blood cells (HRBCs; Sigma) as described previously [60]. The HRBCs were washed three times with PBS at 470× g for 5 min. The compounds (100 µM, 50 µM, and 25 µM, in PBS) were added to the washed HRBCs and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. After incubation, the cells were pelleted at 1057× g for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed to assess the release of haemoglobin by measuring OD540nm. HRBCs in PBS and HRBCs in distilled water were used as negative (diluent) and positive controls to achieve 0% and 100% lysis, respectively. The relative OD of HRBCs that were treated with the 15 compounds were compared to those that were treated with distilled water and were used to determine the relative percentage of haemolysis. There were two separate experiments that were carried out in triplicate.
% haemolysis = (absorbance of test compound) − (absorbance of diluent)/(absorbance of positive control) − (absorbance of diluent) × 100

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, new short peptoids based on a tryptamine structural scaffold have been developed. The systematic tuning of hydrophobicity and cationic charge of the peptoids resulted in moderate to excellent antibacterial activities. Compounds 20b and 22 showed excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus (3.2 µg/mL and 2.1 µg/mL) without cytotoxicity against horse red blood cells. Based on the results of the cytoplasmic membrane permeability assay, the compounds may exhibit membrane damage mechanisms that are similar to most AMPs. These peptoids showed very good antibacterial activity in microbial keratitis bacterial strains which are resistant to ciprofloxacin. These short peptoids are worthy of further development in order to understand their mechanism of action on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains.

Supplementary Materials

The following Supplementary Materials can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11081074/s1, Supplementary Files: Supporting Data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B., R.K., and N.K.; methodology, G.B., R.K., and M.Y.; resources, N.K., M.W., and D.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B., and R.K.; writing—review and editing, G.B., and R.K.; supervision, N.K, R.K., M.W., and D.S.B.; funding acquisition, G.B., N.K., M.W., and D.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Discovery Project from Australian Research Council grant (DP 180100845).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the NMR and BMSF facilities at UNSW Australia for supporting the characterization of the synthesized compounds. We also thank Madeeha Afzal for providing various microbial keratitis S. aureus strains for our study. The authors would like to acknowledge the Saudi Ministry of Education and Jeddah University for an Endowment Fund and financial support given to G. Bahatheg.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Carretto, E.; Visiello, R.; Nardini, P. Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus. Pet-to-Man Travel. Staphylococci A World Prog. 2018, 85, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mulani, M.S.; Kamble, E.E.; Kumkar, S.N.; Tawre, M.S.; Pardesi, K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tong, S.Y.C.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus Aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Khoo, P.; Cabrera-Aguas, M.P.; Nguyen, V.; Lahra, M.M.; Watson, S.L. Microbial Keratitis in Sydney, Australia: Risk Factors, Patient Outcomes, and Seasonal Variation. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miller, D.; Diaz, M.G.; Perez, E.M.; Forster, R.K.; Alfonso, E.C. No Title Frequency and Spectrum of Mixed Bacterial/Nonbacterial Cornea Ulcers in South Florida. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 2683. [Google Scholar]
  7. Asbell, P.A.; Sanfilippo, C.M.; Sahm, D.F.; Decory, H.H. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance among Ocular Microorganisms in the United States from 2009 to 2018. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kalkhoran, S.; Benowitz, N.L.; Rigotti, N.A. Antibiotic Resistance in the Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Keratitis: A 20-Year Review HHS Public Access. Rev. Col. Am. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2964–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Getahun, E.; Gelaw, B.; Assefa, A.; Assefa, Y.; Amsalu, A. Bacterial Pathogens Associated with External Ocular Infections alongside Eminent Proportion of Multidrug Resistant Isolates at the University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lalitha, P.; Manoharan, G.; Karpagam, R.; Prajna, N.V.; Srinivasan, M.; Mascarenhas, J.; Das, M.; Porco, T.C.; Lietman, T.M.; Cevallos, V.; et al. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterial Keratitis Isolates from South India. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, H.Y.; Chu, H.S.; Wang, I.J.; Chen, W.L.; Hu, F.R. Microbial Keratitis in Taiwan: A 20-Year Update. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 205, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nithya, V.; Rathinam, S.; Siva Ganesa Karthikeyan, R.; Lalitha, P. A Ten Year Study of Prevalence, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern, and Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Causing Ocular Infections in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital in South India. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 69, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Solomon, R.; Donnenfeld, E.D.; Perry, H.D.; Snyder, R.W.; Nedrud, C.; Stein, J.; Bloom, A. Penetration of Topically Applied Gatifloxacin 0.3%, Moxifloxacin 0.5%, and Ciprofloxacin 0.3% into the Aqueous Humor. Ophthalmology 2005, 112, 466–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lalitha, P.; Srinivasan, M.; Manikandan, P.; Jayahar Bharathi, M.; Rajaraman, R.; Ravindran, M.; Cevallos, V.; Oldenburg, C.E.; Ray, K.J.; Toutain-Kidd, C.M.; et al. Relationship of in Vitro Susceptibility to Moxifloxacin and in Vivo Clinical Outcome in Bacterial Keratitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kaye, S.; Tuft, S.; Neal, T.; Tole, D.; Leeming, J.; Figueiredo, F.; Armstrong, M.; McDonnell, P.; Tullo, A.; Parry, C. Bacterial Susceptibility to Topical Antimicrobials and Clinical Outcome in Bacterial Keratitis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mojsoska, B.; Jenssen, H. Peptides and Peptidomimetics for Antimicrobial Drug Design. Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 366–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Epand, R.M.; Walker, C.; Epand, R.F.; Magarvey, N.A. Molecular Mechanisms of Membrane Targeting Antibiotics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2016, 1858, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Teixeira, V.; Feio, M.J.; Bastos, M. Role of Lipids in the Interaction of Antimicrobial Peptides with Membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 2012, 51, 149–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gagnon, M.C.; Strandberg, E.; Grau-Campistany, A.; Wadhwani, P.; Reichert, J.; Bürck, J.; Rabanal, F.; Auger, M.; Paquin, J.F.; Ulrich, A.S. Influence of the Length and Charge on the Activity of α-Helical Amphipathic Antimicrobial Peptides. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 1680–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, Z.; Vasil, A.I.; Hale, J.D.; Hancock, R.E.W.; Vasil, M.L.; Hodges, R.S. Effects of Net Charge and the Number of Positively Charged Residues on the Biological Activity of Amphipathic α-Helical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. Biopolym.-Pept. Sci. Sect. 2008, 90, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nakajima, Y. Mode of Action and Resistance Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Macrolides. Macrolide Antibiot. Chem. Biol. Pract. Second Ed. 2003, 55, 453–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yin, L.M.; Edwards, M.A.; Li, J.; Yip, C.M.; Deber, C.M. Roles of Hydrophobicity and Charge Distribution of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides in Peptide-Membrane Interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 7738–7745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D.; Kubicek-Sutherland, J.Z. Mechanisms and Consequences of Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 26, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jenssen, H.; Hamill, P.; Hancock, R.E.W. Peptide Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 491–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Haney, E.F.; Hancock, R.E.W. Peptide Design for Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Applications. Biopolymers 2013, 100, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mojsoska, B.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Jenssen, H. Structure-Activity Relationship Study of Novel Peptoids That Mimic the Structure of Antimicrobial Peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4112–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Appella, D.H.; Christianson, L.A.; Karle, I.L.; Powell, D.R.; Gellman, S.H. β-Peptide Foldamers: Robust Helix Formation in a New Family of β-Amino Acid Oligomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13071–13072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zuckermann, R.N.; Kerr, J.M.; Moosf, W.H.; Kent, S.B.H. Efficient Method for the Preparation of Peptoids [Oligo(N-Substituted Glycines)] by Submonomer Solid-Phase Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10646–10647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, R.P.; Gellman, S.H.; DeGrado, W.F. β-Peptides: From Structure to Function. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hintermann, T.; Gademann, K.; Jaun, B.; Seebach, D. γ-Peptides Forming More Stable Secondary Structures than α-Peptides: Synthesis and Helical NMR-Solution Structure of the γ-Hexapeptide Analog of H-(Val-Ala-Leu)2-OH. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 983–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hanessian, S.; Luo, X.; Schaum, R.; Michnick, S. Design of Secondary Structures in Unnatural Peptides: Stable Helical γ- Tetra-, Hexa-, and Octapeptides and Consequences of α-Substitution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8569–8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Patch, J.A.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Seurynck, S.L.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Barron, A.E. Oligo(N-Subsitituted) Glycines:The Many Roles of Peptoids in Drug Discovery. In Pseudo- Peptides in Drug Discovery; Nielsen, P.E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag, GmbH Co. KgaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  33. Patch, J.A.; Barron, A.E. Mimicry of Bioactive Peptides via Non-Natural, Sequence-Specific Peptidomimetic Oligomers. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andreev, K.; Martynowycz, M.W.; Gidalevitz, D. Peptoid Drug Discovery and Optimization via Surface X-Ray Scattering. Biopolymers 2019, 110, e23274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chan, B.A.; Xuan, S.; Li, A.; Simpson, J.M.; Sternhagen, G.L.; Yu, T.; Darvish, O.A.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, D. Polypeptoid Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. Biopolymers 2018, 109, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miller, S.M.; Simon, R.J.; Ng, S.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Kerr, J.M.; Moos, W.H. Proteolytic Studies of Homologous Peptide and N-Substituted Glycine Peptoid Oligomers. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2657–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Holder, J.R.; Bauzo, R.M.; Xiang, Z.; Scott, J.; Haskell-Luevano, C. Design and Pharmacology of Peptoids and Peptide-Peptoid Hybrids Based on the Melanocortin Agonists Core Tetrapeptide Sequence. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 4505–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kwon, Y.U.; Kodadek, T. Quantitative Comparison of the Relative Cell Permeability of Cyclic and Linear Peptides. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hinshaw, J.C.; Prestwich, G.D. The Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Molecules That Enable or Enhance Cellular Uptake: Peptoid Molecular Transporters. Chemtracts 2001, 14, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
  40. Olsen, C.A.; Ziegler, H.L.; Nielsen, H.M.; Frimodt-Møller, N.; Jaroszewski, J.W.; Franzyk, H. Antimicrobial, Hemolytic, and Cytotoxic Activities of β-Peptoid- Peptide Hybrid Oligomers: Improved Properties Compared to Natural AMPs. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Andreev, K.; Bianchi, C.; Laursen, J.S.; Citterio, L.; Hein-Kristensen, L.; Gram, L.; Kuzmenko, I.; Olsen, C.A.; Gidalevitz, D. Guanidino Groups Greatly Enhance the Action of Antimicrobial Peptidomimetics against Bacterial Cytoplasmic Membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2014, 1838, 2492–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mojsoska, B.; Carretero, G.; Larsen, S.; Mateiu, R.V.; Jenssen, H. Peptoids Successfully Inhibit the Growth of Gram Negative E. Coli Causing Substantial Membrane Damage. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Molchanova, N.; Nielsen, J.E.; Sørensen, K.B.; Prabhala, B.K.; Hansen, P.R.; Lund, R.; Barron, A.E.; Jenssen, H. Halogenation as a Tool to Tune Antimicrobial Activity of Peptoids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Molchanova, N.; Hansen, P.R.; Franzyk, H. Advances in Development of Antimicrobial Peptidomimetics as Potential Drugs. Molecules 2017, 22, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ng, S.; Goodson, B.; Ehrhardt, A.; Moos, W.H.; Siani, M.; Winter, J. Combinatorial Discovery Process Yields Antimicrobial Peptoids. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 1781–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bang, J.K.; Nan, Y.H.; Lee, E.K.; Shin, S.Y. A Novel Trp-Rich Model Antimicrobial Peptoid with Increased Protease Stability. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 2509–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ghosh, C.; Manjunath, G.B.; Akkapeddi, P.; Yarlagadda, V.; Hoque, J.; Uppu, D.S.S.M.; Konai, M.M.; Haldar, J. Small Molecular Antibacterial Peptoid Mimics: The Simpler the Better! J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 1428–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mutulis, F.; Mutule, I.; Lapins, M.; Wikberg, J.E.S. Reductive Amination Products Containing Naphthalene and Indole Moieties Bind to Melanocortin Receptors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Moehle, K.; Hofmann, H.J. Peptides and Peptoids—A Quantum Chemical Structure Comparison. Biopolymers 1996, 38, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Simon, R.J.; Kania, R.S.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Huebner, V.D.; Jewell, D.A.; Banville, S.; Ng, S.; Wang, L.; Rosenberg, S.; Marlowe, C.K.; et al. Peptoids: A Modular Approach to Drug Discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 9367–9371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bradley, E.K.; Kerr, J.M.; Richter, L.S.; Figliozzi, G.M.; Goff, D.A.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Spellmeyer, D.C.; Blaney, J.M. NMR Structural Characterization of Oligo-N-Substituted Glycine Lead Compounds from a Combinatorial Library. Mol. Divers 1997, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laursen, J.S.; Engel-Andreasen, J.; Fristrup, P.; Harris, P.; Olsen, C.A. Cis -Trans Amide Bond Rotamers in β-Peptoids and Peptoids: Evaluation of Stereoelectronic Effects in Backbone and Side Chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2835–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Guan, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, G.; Zhang, J.; Wan, X. Thermoswitching of Helical Inversion of Dynamic Polyphenylacetylenes through Cis-Trans Isomerization of Amide Pendants. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 4592–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huggins, M.T.; Kesharwani, T.; Buttrick, J.; Nicholson, C. Variable Temperature NMR Experiment Studying Restricted Bond Rotation. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 97, 1425–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Laplante, S.R.; Fader, L.D.; Fandrick, K.R.; Fandrick, D.R.; Hucke, O.; Kemper, R.; Miller, S.P.F.; Edwards, P.J. Assessing Atropisomer Axial Chirality in Drug Discovery and Development. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7005–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shanan-Atidi, H.; Bar-Eli, K.H. A Convenient Method for Obtaining Free Energies of Activation by the Coalescence Temperature of an Unequal Doublet. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 961–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Frank, J.H.; Powder-George, Y.L.; Ramsewak, R.S.; Reynolds, W.F. Variable-Temperature 1H-NMR Studies on Two C-Glycosylflavones. Molecules 2012, 17, 7914–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Afzal, M.; Vijay, A.K.; Stapleton, F.; Willcox, M.D.P. Susceptibility of Ocular Staphylococcus Aureus to Antibiotics and Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Willcox, M.D.P. Management and Treatment of Contact Lens-Related Pseudomonas Keratitis. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2012, 6, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sims, P.J.; Waggoner, A.S.; Wang, C.H.; Hoffman, J.F. Mechanism by Which Cyanine Dyes Measure Membrane Potential in Red Blood Cells and Phosphatidylcholine Vesicles. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 3315–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yasir, M.; Dutta, D.; Willcox, M.D.P. Mode of Action of the Antimicrobial Peptide Mel4 Is Independent of Staphylococcus Aureus Cell Membrane Permeability. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wiegand, I.; Hilpert, K.; Hancock, R.E.W. Agar and Broth Dilution Methods to Determine the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Antimicrobial Substances. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, M.; Maier, E.; Benz, R.; Hancock, R.E.W. Mechanism of Interaction of Different Classes of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides with Planar Bilayers and with the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia Coli. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 7235–7242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The difference between peptide and peptoid in terms of configuration and features.
Figure 1. The difference between peptide and peptoid in terms of configuration and features.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g001
Figure 2. Peptoid mimics that were synthesized by various research groups with the activity of the most active molecules.
Figure 2. Peptoid mimics that were synthesized by various research groups with the activity of the most active molecules.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g002
Figure 3. Synthetic antimicrobial peptide mimics that were reported by our group.
Figure 3. Synthetic antimicrobial peptide mimics that were reported by our group.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g003
Scheme 1. General synthetic scheme to synthesize naphthyl-based peptoids. Reaction conditions (a) 7a or 7b (1 equiv.), TMOF, rt, 1.5 h, AcOH, NaCNBH3 (0.3 equiv.) 20 min rt. (b) 10a10c (1.0–2.0 equiv.), coupling reagent (HATU 1.1 equiv.), (EDC 3.0 equiv.) or (HBTU 2.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) or Et3N (3.0 equiv.), DMF, rt, 2–3 h. (c) DCM (1–3 mL), (0.1–0.3 mL) of thioanisole (TA) and 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), TFA (1–3 mL). rt, 1–3 h. (d) pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine. HCl (1.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF stir at rt overnight. (e) 10d or 10e (1.1 equiv.), HATU (1.1 equiv.) and DMF rt, overnight. (f) 1 N HCl, rt, 30 min. (g) CH3I (2.0 equiv.), CH3CN, rt, overnight.
Scheme 1. General synthetic scheme to synthesize naphthyl-based peptoids. Reaction conditions (a) 7a or 7b (1 equiv.), TMOF, rt, 1.5 h, AcOH, NaCNBH3 (0.3 equiv.) 20 min rt. (b) 10a10c (1.0–2.0 equiv.), coupling reagent (HATU 1.1 equiv.), (EDC 3.0 equiv.) or (HBTU 2.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) or Et3N (3.0 equiv.), DMF, rt, 2–3 h. (c) DCM (1–3 mL), (0.1–0.3 mL) of thioanisole (TA) and 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), TFA (1–3 mL). rt, 1–3 h. (d) pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine. HCl (1.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF stir at rt overnight. (e) 10d or 10e (1.1 equiv.), HATU (1.1 equiv.) and DMF rt, overnight. (f) 1 N HCl, rt, 30 min. (g) CH3I (2.0 equiv.), CH3CN, rt, overnight.
Antibiotics 11 01074 sch001
Scheme 2. General synthetic scheme to synthesize naphthyl-indole based diamino and guanidine peptoids (series V). Reaction conditions: (b) 17a and 17c (1.0 equiv.), coupling reagent (HATU 1.1 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF, rt, 2–3 h. (c) DCM (1–2 m), (0.1–0.2 mL) of thioanisole (TA) and 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), TFA (1–2 mL). rt, 1-3 hrs. (d) pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine. HCl (1.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF stir at rt overnight. (h) 17b (1.0 equiv.), Et3N (3.0 equiv.), DMF 5 mL. (i) 1.1 mL of piperidine and 4 mL of DMF overnight at rt.
Scheme 2. General synthetic scheme to synthesize naphthyl-indole based diamino and guanidine peptoids (series V). Reaction conditions: (b) 17a and 17c (1.0 equiv.), coupling reagent (HATU 1.1 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF, rt, 2–3 h. (c) DCM (1–2 m), (0.1–0.2 mL) of thioanisole (TA) and 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), TFA (1–2 mL). rt, 1-3 hrs. (d) pyrazole-1H-carboxamidine. HCl (1.0 equiv.), DIPEA (3.0 equiv.) and DMF stir at rt overnight. (h) 17b (1.0 equiv.), Et3N (3.0 equiv.), DMF 5 mL. (i) 1.1 mL of piperidine and 4 mL of DMF overnight at rt.
Antibiotics 11 01074 sch002
Figure 4. The 1H NMR spectra of compound 12a at variable temperatures (298–502 K) in DMSO-d6.
Figure 4. The 1H NMR spectra of compound 12a at variable temperatures (298–502 K) in DMSO-d6.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g004
Figure 5. Expanded 1HNMR spectra of the major (M) and the minor (m) isomers for compound 12a over 298–502 K in DMSO-d6, CH2-naphthyl region on right and NH-indole on left. (*) the coalescence temperature.
Figure 5. Expanded 1HNMR spectra of the major (M) and the minor (m) isomers for compound 12a over 298–502 K in DMSO-d6, CH2-naphthyl region on right and NH-indole on left. (*) the coalescence temperature.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g005
Figure 6. The chemical shift between CH2- naphthyl doublet signals in 1HNMRspectra in DMSO-d6 at 298 K compounds 12a12c.
Figure 6. The chemical shift between CH2- naphthyl doublet signals in 1HNMRspectra in DMSO-d6 at 298 K compounds 12a12c.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g006
Figure 7. SAR of the most active compounds against E. coli K12.
Figure 7. SAR of the most active compounds against E. coli K12.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g007
Figure 8. Antibacterial SAR of compounds that showed potent and good activity against S. aureus 38.
Figure 8. Antibacterial SAR of compounds that showed potent and good activity against S. aureus 38.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g008
Figure 9. (a) S. aureus cytoplasmic membrane disruption that was promoted by 20b and 22 (3.9 µM, 7.8 µM, 15.6 µM, 62.4 µM) at different concentrations. 20% DMSO was used as a positive control. (b) S. aureus cell viability count in the presence of 20b and 22 at same concentrations that were used for cytoplasmic membrane disruption.
Figure 9. (a) S. aureus cytoplasmic membrane disruption that was promoted by 20b and 22 (3.9 µM, 7.8 µM, 15.6 µM, 62.4 µM) at different concentrations. 20% DMSO was used as a positive control. (b) S. aureus cell viability count in the presence of 20b and 22 at same concentrations that were used for cytoplasmic membrane disruption.
Antibiotics 11 01074 g009
Table 1. Antibacterial activity (MIC) and hemolytic activity of the compounds.
Table 1. Antibacterial activity (MIC) and hemolytic activity of the compounds.
Series No.IDRnMIC (μg mL−1)HC50 (μg mL−1)
S. aureus 38E. coli K12 S. aureus 111S. aureus 112
(I)12aIndole121.844.65NTNT>50
12bIndole222.722.7NTNT19
12cIndole31212NTNT10
12dPhenyl139.7>79.5NTNTNT
12ePhenyl2>41.5>83NTNTNT
12fPhenyl386.55>86.5NTNTNT
(II)13aIndole16.224.42.44.7>50
13bIndole26.425.32.54.921
13cIndole36.613.32.65.121
13dPhenyl111.245NTNT>50
13ePhenyl211.646.7NTNT>50
13fPhenyl36.148.54.69.7>50
(III)15aIndole250>100NTNTNT
15bIndole351.6>103.3NTNTNT
15cPhenyl29090NTNTNT
15dPhenyl393.5>93.5NTNTNT
(IV)16aIndole251.7103.5NTNTNT
16bIndole353.5107NTNTNT
16cPhenyl293.8>93.8NTNTNT
16dPhenyl3>97.3>97.3NTNTNT
(V)19aIndole251.751.7NTNT>50
19bIndole326.253.5NTNT>50
20aIndole215.562.3NTNT>50
20bIndole33.9643.23.2>50
22Indole25.5>1772.12.1>50
23Indole27.111411.411.4>50
Ciprofloxacin* 0.10.02128256NT
*, data from Afzal et al. [58], NT (not tested), MICs = most active peptoids against E. coli K, MICs = Most active peptoids against S. aureus strains compared to ciprofloxacin, MICs = compounds with a good activity against S. aureus strains. HC50 = concentration causing 50% lysis of horse red blood cells.
Table 2. MIC values of compounds 20b and 22 against 12 S. aureus strains that were isolated from keratitis.
Table 2. MIC values of compounds 20b and 22 against 12 S. aureus strains that were isolated from keratitis.
S. aureus StrainAntimicrobial Compound
20b (μg mL−1)22 (μg mL−1)Ciprofloxacin
(≤1, 2, ≥4) * (μg mL−1)
1063.22.1128
1073.22.164
1083.22.11
1093.22.1128
1103.22.1128
1113.22.1128
1123.22.1256
1133.22.1128
1146.42.18
M5.016.42.164
M43.013.22.1128
M71.013.22.14
* break points for ciprofloxacin form CLSI; data from Afzal et al. [58].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bahatheg, G.; Kuppusamy, R.; Yasir, M.; Black, D.S.; Willcox, M.; Kumar, N. Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081074

AMA Style

Bahatheg G, Kuppusamy R, Yasir M, Black DS, Willcox M, Kumar N. Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(8):1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bahatheg, Ghayah, Rajesh Kuppusamy, Muhammad Yasir, David StC. Black, Mark Willcox, and Naresh Kumar. 2022. "Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies" Antibiotics 11, no. 8: 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081074

APA Style

Bahatheg, G., Kuppusamy, R., Yasir, M., Black, D. S., Willcox, M., & Kumar, N. (2022). Short Tryptamine-Based Peptoids as Potential Therapeutics for Microbial Keratitis: Structure-Function Correlation Studies. Antibiotics, 11(8), 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop