1. Introduction
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory and destructive disease of the tooth-surrounding tissue which can lead to tooth loss. It is associated with a shift of an eubiotic to a dysbiotic microbiota within the plaque biofilm [
1,
2]. The most significant periodontopathogens in the pathogenesis of periodontitis include
Porphyromonas gingivalis,
Tannerella forsythia, and
Treponema denticola. These obligate anaerobes thrive in the protein-rich environment of the deep periodontal pockets by modulating the host’s immune response. Without treatment, sustained inflammation can lead to the destruction of both soft and hard tissues, ultimately resulting in tooth loss [
1].
Despite the medical advances made in recent years in the fields of antimicrobials and other periodontal treatments, the prevalence of periodontitis in the adult dentate population is estimated to be more than 60% with severe cases at 23.6% [
3,
4]. Thereby a successful treatment with the aim of controlling the disease in an acceptable state depends strongly on patient compliance, the severity of the disease itself, and other individual risk factors, e.g., smoking, diet, and the existence of other diseases [
5,
6,
7]. Due to the association of periodontitis with several systemic conditions [
8,
9,
10], the healthcare costs generated by this disorder are significant and underline the need for novel and more efficient treatment and maintenance strategies [
11]. The current standardized periodontal therapy is performed stepwise, the first step focuses on supragingival biofilm removal and risk factor control, the second step (cause-related therapy) includes subgingival biofilm and calculus removal [
5]. Among others, locally administered antibiotics might be considered adjuncts to instrumentation, whereas the use of adjunctive systemic antibiotics may only be considered in young patients with generalized periodontitis stage III [
5,
12].
The use of systemic antibiotic therapy in severe periodontitis treatment has been found to result in improved clinical attachment gain and the reduction of probing depth [
13]. The most applied is the combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole [
14,
15]. That, coupled with the high oral dose administration necessary to reach minimum inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotics in the periodontal pockets, is often associated with systemic side effects [
16]. It is estimated that more than one in twenty-five patients treated with systemic antibiotic therapy will experience one of the following: allergic reactions, gastrointestinal problems, central nervous system problems, nephritis, and among other symptoms. About 27% of patients treated with doxycycline have experienced nausea. Furthermore, systemic antibiotic usage contributes to antibiotic resistance, which at the current rate progresses faster than the development of novel antibiotics [
16].
In contrast, topical antimicrobials used in periodontal therapy allow for the bypassing of these issues [
17,
18,
19]. Antibiotics can be applied as in situ forming implants, gels (Atridox
®, containing doxycycline, Ligosan
®, containing doxycycline), or preformed microspheres (Arestin
®, containing minocycline) that are placed directly into the periodontal space. Depending on the polymers used as vehicles in such treatment, antibiotics are steadily released directly into the inflamed area over a period of days to up to three weeks. Among the commercially available products, Actisite
® (removed from the market), ethylene/vinyl acetate polymer fibres releasing tetracycline hydrochloride [
20], were placed into periodontal pockets for 10 days, have been shown to benefit patients only marginally, and required mechanical removal after the treatment period [
19,
21]. In contrast, while self-degrading delivery systems containing doxycycline (Atridox
®) or metronidazole (Elyzol
®) offer patients in principle greater benefits in controlling pathogen growth and the clinical symptoms, their applications necessitate the use of specialized equipment or skills. Unfortunately, Atridox
® as well as Elyzol
® are no longer marketed in the European Union. By far the most promising adjunct topical treatment currently available on the market (only in the U.S.) is Arestin
®, microspheres releasing minocycline hydrochloride, that has been shown to release the antibiotic for about 21 days in vitro [
22]. And it can significantly improve patient benefits (such as reducing pocket depth or bleeding on probing) when compared to scaling and root planing (SRP) alone [
23,
24,
25]. Application of Arestin
® also requires specialized equipment, but clear benefits provided by minocycline treatment warrant further optimization of antibiotic carriers to simplify the treatment procedures. Despite the much lower risks for systemic side effects, locally applied antibiotics also might lead to unwanted actions. For Arestin
®, several possible adverse events are described, which include, e.g., tooth disorders, dental pain, headache, pharyngitis, etc. [
26].
Recently, we reported on the technological development of a novel pharmaceutical composition (minocycline-threads, MIN-T) containing minocycline in a defined complex with magnesium stearate (minocycline lipid complex, MLC) [
27,
28]. This new formulation is characterized by a long in vitro release of 42 days, which was microbiologically proven in a model simulating the flow of gingival crevicular fluid [
22]. All in all, MIN-T combines several advantages: it doubles the time of controlled release in vitro as compared to Arestin
®, it is biodegradable (no removal by the dentist necessary), and is easily applicable as a flexible thread into the periodontal pockets with dimensions of 0.6 mm in thickness and 4 mm in length. To further characterize this completely new formulation before transferring into the clinics, MIN-T was characterized in a battery of different in vitro as well as in vivo tests, which are presented in the following. Thereby, the degradation of MIN-T was investigated using laser and electron scanning microscopy. The susceptibility pattern and the potential development of resistance against the active pharmaceutical ingredient minocycline were determined for clinical isolates of relevant periodontal pathogens. Finally, the in vivo efficacy as well as the tolerability and the systemic pharmacokinetic properties of MIN-T were tested after a local application in two animal models.
3. Discussion
The aim of this study was the non-clinical investigation of a novel adjunctive approach for the local placement of an antibiotic in periodontitis therapy. Thereby, a locally applied antibiotic has several advantages compared with systemic application, mainly because of drastically reduced side effects and less generation of resistance [
18]. Minocycline as an active pharmaceutical ingredient has been used in different formulations for decades as an adjuvant for therapy [
32,
33]. The use of such a well-known active substance with the intended dosage and indication has the advantage of giving certainty concerning efficacy and low to non-toxic effects [
23,
24,
25]. Nevertheless, a novel formulation was developed to add certain advantages to a new product. It releases the antibiotic over several weeks in the periodontal pocket. This need for a bacterial-free environment is reflected by the finding of a recolonization of the periodontal pockets within 60 days after SRP alone [
34] and a higher efficacy of chlorhexidine chips compared to chlorhexidine gels as adjunctive therapy in periodontitis, where the chips have a prolonged release of the antiseptic compared with the gels [
35,
36]. A prolonged time frame with no bacterial reinfection enables wound healing and the reduction of local inflammation for a prolonged period. The later effect is supported by the immunomodulating activity of minocycline, which is clearly an add-on effect compared to other anti-infectives, like chlorhexidine [
37,
38,
39,
40]. Of course, locally applied antibiotics are still antibiotics with all pros and cons, e.g., a possible development of resistances. For that reason, the usage of such compounds should always be carefully considered according to a proper benefit. Other disadvantages of such a solution might be reaching a sufficient concentration of the antimicrobial at the respective site due to difficulties placing the drug properly and a continuous crevicular flow. It might be challenging for dental professionals to place the drug, in part because special equipment is needed, and even still the drugs are often expensive [
41].
Although no relevant toxic events are assumed for the active ingredient, the novel formulation must be examined for its proof-of-concept, as well as for a possible systemic burden of minocycline after a local application. In that regard, toxicity that may be related to the excipients used must be investigated [
42]. In addition to this, the status of possible resistance of relevant oral pathogens against minocycline is also of high interest. Because of its long clinical use, the probability of existing resistance against minocycline is high [
43,
44,
45]. Finally, the behaviour of the formulation after placement into periodontal pockets is of high interest. From a material as well as a pharmaceutical point of view, it is important to understand how exactly the formulation disappears in the pocket.
In general, the presented study was able to find answers to most of the aforementioned questions. First, MIN-T was successfully tested in two different animal models, both of which are well-established in the scientific community for the investigation of periodontitis. The chamber mouse model demonstrated a dose-dependent effect on survival rates. Due to technical constraints, the formulation had to be placed into the chamber before its implantation. Of course, this does not reflect any relevant clinical situation where the drug is applied after a detected infection. On the other hand, such an approach has the advantage of showing a controlled release over the entire duration of the experiment. The positive outcomes in treated animals indicate the formulation’s capability for sustained release of minocycline over several weeks. According to the protocol,
P. gingivalis inoculation occurred 10 days post-implantation, during which the formulation was already present in the newly formed connective tissue within a serum-rich environment. Under these conditions, minocycline is known to convert into its less microbiologically active epimer, 4-epiminocycline, and undergo further degradation [
46,
47,
48]. This is suppressed, as already described in the former in vitro studies [
22,
27] in which the developed innovative complex of minocycline with magnesium stearate stabilizes the active ingredient, finally enabling a microbiological activity throughout the whole 17-day experiment. The significant systemic reduction in key inflammatory markers (IL-6 and TNFα) highlights clearly the impact of successfully treating a local infection and corresponds well with findings in humans, where periodontitis-affected patients have higher levels of inflammation markers compared with periodontal healthy people [
49,
50,
51,
52]. Furthermore, even the highest dose of the locally administered antibiotic formulation (80 mg/kg) did not result in significant systemic levels of the active molecule, thereby protecting the local and systemic microbiomes from damage and potential development of antibiotic resistance.
Although the chamber model is widely used to investigate and evaluate treatments targeting
P. gingivalis [
53,
54], in general, the rat periodontitis model more accurately replicates periodontal pathology, such as tissue degradation and bone loss, despite its limitations [
55,
56]. One such limitation involves, again, the suboptimal placement of the MIN-T formulation. Again, technical issues were responsible for an experimental regime, which does not reflect a clinical situation at all. Because no applicable periodontal pockets can be formed in the animal model which corresponds to the given size and dimensions of the new MIN-T formulation, the threads must be grounded and injected once at six distinctive places directly into the periodontal tissue. This grinding significantly affects the dissolution and release rate of the antibiotic due to the increased surface area of the resulting particles compared to the original compact form. In addition, an injection of MIN-T into the small space of the gingival tissue always entails the risk of minor injuries. Therefore, an infection before the application of MIN-T (e.g., oral gavage model) would most likely lead to an invasion of the bacteria due to the previously occurred micro-injuries into the periodontal tissues or even blood vessels. Such a procedure could contribute to the development of an undesirable inflammatory state. Despite these less-than-ideal circumstances, the model still demonstrated the formulation’s applicability. The stabilization of the antibiotic by magnesium stearate embedded in the MIN-T formulation maintained a sufficient compound level for an effective antibiotic response over the whole 32 days, even though the animals were challenged with freshly prepared
P. gingivalis suspension every second day after the application. In addition, minocycline was released from the tissue sufficiently. Interestingly, in the control group no toxic effect was detected from the microinjection itself. Thereby, MIN-T had a remarkable effect on reducing bone loss compared to the untreated periodontitis group (PG), with statistical significance at the
p < 0.0001 level.
On the other hand, the histopathological results present some complexities. In both humans and animals, bones are classified by shape into categories such as long (e.g., tibia), short (e.g., fingers), irregular (e.g., vertebrae), and flat (e.g., skull) [
57]. Additionally, bone tissues are histologically distinguished into two types: compact and spongy, which differ in structure and metabolic activity [
57]. Notably, remodeling in compact bone is less dynamic than in trabecular (spongy) bone. Pathological conditions typically lead to a reduction in the bone volume fraction (bone volume/tissue volume, BV/TV), characterized by a thinning of the bone structure, as well as the deterioration of other microstructural parameters such as trabecular thinning, increased trabecular separation, and a decrease in the trabecular number [
57].
The present study shows that the bone volume fraction BV/TV in the maxilla of the treated animal group (PG+MIN-T) was significantly reduced in both infected groups (PG and PG-MIN-T) compared to the control group (CG). This clearly indicates the above-mentioned typical reduction of that value after an infection with P. gingivalis, whereas a treatment with MIN-T was not able to inhibit the loss of the tissue. This is in contrast with other results of the study. As mentioned, the µCT clearly indicates a lower total bone loss by showing a significantly reduced CEJ-ABC distance (mm) in the PG+MIN-T group compared to the PG group. Whereas these results are statistically relevant, the difference between the PG group and the CG group is much higher compared to the PG and PG+MIN-T group. This fits clearly into the picture that an infection with P. gingivalis always affects the jawbone of the animals regardless of the application of an antibiotic or not. The treatment can only minimize the effect but not fully block bone loss on the organ (µCT) as well as on the tissue (BV/TV-values) level. In addition, no differences were observed in trabecular thickness or trabecular number in the maxilla between the two disease-affected groups, PG and PG+MIN-T.
Interestingly, in the PG+MIN-T group, the size of the intertrabecular spaces in the maxillary bone was significantly larger, compared to the control (CG) and non-treated (PG) groups. This may suggest a potential weakening of the trabecular bone microarchitecture as a first impression. The trabecular space (Tb.Sp) parameter is thereby only one of several indicators describing the microarchitecture of the trabecular bone. If an increase in Tb.Sp would be associated with a thinning of the beads (a decrease in trabecular thickness, Tb.Th) and a decrease in the number of bone beads (Tb.N.), then this would indicate a significant deterioration in bone structure. The study results clearly show that MIN-T is not affecting other parameters, such as Tb.N and Tb.Th. Following this information, the application of MIN-T seems not to have a significant negative influence on the microarchitecture of the trabecular bone. For a complete picture, bone strength tests will be a valuable source of information. Therefore, it is planned to expand the analyses to include such techniques in future studies. Additionally, the non-treated periodontitis group PG exhibited a decrease in the percentage of maturated coarse-fibrous collagen and a significant increase in the percentage of fine-fibrous collagen as well as the ratio of young fine-fibrous to maturated coarse-fibrous collagen bundles within the trabecular bone of the maxilla, compared to both control and treated animals PG+MIN-T. This might indicate disturbances in the collagen network of the trabecular bone in the jaws of infected rats, suggesting that drug administration positively affects bone turnover by eradicating bacteria, and indicating induction of new collagen synthesis following an anti-infective treatment.
Moreover, the percentage of coarse-fibrous collagen (%Mcompact) in the compact bone of the maxilla was significantly increased in both untreated (PG) and treated (PG+MIN-T) animals compared to controls (CG), signaling a compromised bone structure in this area of the maxilla due to an infection with P. gingivalis. In summary, while the administration of MIN-T does not enhance the microarchitecture of the trabecular bone in the maxilla, it also does not significantly deteriorate it. Furthermore, drug administration does not significantly impact collagen synthesis, which could potentially increase the stability of collagen fibres and improve the condition of the trabecular bone.
Again, the systemic burden of animals with the antibiotic was investigated. At a dosage of 20 mg/kg, no minocycline was detected in the systemic circulation. So, all in all, it can be assumed that in humans the systemic burden will be neglectable in that regard, too. This is in accordance with reports for comparable products. A 15% doxycycline containing in situ forming gel was applied in a phase I clinical study in dental pockets. Besides high initial local concentrations in GCF and saliva, 19 out of 20 patients were tested negative at all time points for serum levels of the tetracycline derivative [
58].
Furthermore, in an additional experiment, it could be shown that the current susceptibility of relevant human oral pathogens against minocycline is not diminished. The determined MICs are in agreement with recently published values [
44] and did not change during the passages, with one exception. In one
F. nucleatum strain a clear increase of four steps in susceptibility was observed. However, the values were still very low, and the effect was stable through all following passages and did not increase. Therefore, that strain would also not count as resistant, and the efficacy of MIN-T is not affected due to a sufficient minocycline concentration above the MIC.
Finally, it was possible to demonstrate the degradation and disappearance behaviour of the thread after application. First, the MIN-T swells significantly in a very few hours and keeps that volume for several days. This might enhance the residence feature of the threads because the higher volume might lead to a better filling of and therefore an enhanced adhesion in the periodontal pocket. This behaviour can be explained by the penetration of water into the formulation, due to the polar polyethylene glycol (PEG) groups. This penetration is also clearly reflected by the formation of pores visible at the surface of the threads. The resulting more aqueous surroundings lead to the start of the hydrolytic degradation of the poly(lactic/glycolic)-PEG block-polymer. It is known that degradation and release processes from PLGA polymers are complex [
59]. The released monomers are alpha-hydroxy acids, which might cause very low pH values and autocatalytic polymer degradation [
60]. It has been shown that polymer degradation of PLGA-PEG polymers compared to PLGA polymers starts earlier due to the initial higher water penetration, but is ultimately slower because autocatalysis can be avoided [
61]. In addition, the minocycline-lipid-complex shields minocycline against the aqueous phase, resulting in a very slow release of the active ingredient and also stabilizes the drug against degradation in an aqueous environment. Again, the acidic conditions are responsible for the degradation of the MLC itself. All mentioned processes led to a time-controlled degradation of the formulation. This degradation is reflected by the stepwise disaggregation of the solid thread to particles of different sizes on day 38, whereas following the degradation itself, it was not possible due to technical reasons. In the end, due to the increased formation of water-soluble degradation products, polymer will more rapidly disappear and the clearance from the periodontal pocket will be enhanced. This results in a short time with concentrations of minocycline below the needed MIC. The presented data nicely illustrate the findings of Schmid et al. [
22], who showed antimicrobial activity of MIN-T for the duration of 42 days in vitro by simulating an SCF-flow. In the end, only the planned clinical studies will show the real behaviour in humans.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Generation of the Threads
The pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and characterization of the PEG-PLGA and minocycline lipid complex (P-MLC) extrudates have been described in previous publications [
27,
28]. In short, minocycline (Ontario Chemicals Inc., Guelph, ON, Canada) was chelated with magnesium stearate (Magnesia GmbH, Lüneburg, Germany) in a molar ratio of 1:2. Subsequently, the complex was mixed with the desired PEG-PLGA
6P polymer (Seqens SAS, Aramon, France) and cryo-milled. The used PEG-PLGA thereby contains a lactide/glycolide ratio of 50%/50% with an overall molweight of around 40 kDa and ca. 11% of substituted PEG as an end group of the PLGA co-block-polymer. This composition was utilized for the hot melt extrusion with a 600 μm device (ThreeTec, Seon, Switzerland). The extrudates contained 11.5% (
m/
m) of minocycline. All minocycline formulations were also kept thoroughly in the dark throughout the experiments.
4.2. In Vitro Swelling and Degradation Studies
The swelling behaviour and degradation of the formulation were investigated on the extrudates. For the latter experiments, the extrudates were stored in PBS (pH 6.8, 4 mL) without light exposure at 37 °C for up to 38 days under slight shaking (80 rpm). The extrudates were observed by a laser scanning microscope (LSM) or a scanning electron microscope (SEM) before and after different exposure times.
The swelling behaviour of the threads was documented by a laser scanning microscope (VK-1000/1050, Keyence Germany GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) before experimentation, and after 2, 3, 4, 7, 9 and 11 days, respectively. These time points were chosen according to pre-studies. After day 4, no further swelling was observed, and the experiment was finished on day 11. Samples were taken out at each time point from the PBS buffer, immediately investigated by LSM, and placed back into the PBS buffer. The volume increase of the thread was calculated by image evaluation software (Multifile Analyzer, Keyence, Germany GmbH).
Further, the surface morphology of the extrudates was documented before experimentation, after 3 h, and then after 3, 22, and 38 days, respectively, by SEM (Quanta 3D FEG from FEI company). One sample was taken out at each time point from the PBS buffer and immediately prepared for investigation using SEM analysis. Samples were prepared using Nanosuit technology (NanoSuit® from NanoSuit Inc., Hamamtsu, Japan) to obtain a conductive layer on the surface. The following magnifications were used: 200× and 10,000×.
4.3. Determination of Resistance
A potential development of resistance against minocycline (minocycline hydrochloride) was studied in several relevant oral strains. In all 11 clinical isolates (three P. gingivalis, four F. nucleatum, and four oral streptococci) were included.
The cultivation of a subgingival biofilm and isolation of respective bacterial strains was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Canton Bern (KEK 096/15). Only samples from individuals who did not receive antibiotic treatment 2 months before the date of collection were included. Identity was confirmed by PCR using species-specific primers. Bacterial strains were kept frozen at −80 °C. About one week before experiments, they were sub-cultured and passaged 2–3 times on tryptic-soy-agar plates with 5% sheep blood.
The method of inducing resistance was adapted to the previously described procedures [
29,
30,
31]. In short, the strains were passaged on Wilkins–Chalgren agar plates (Oxoid) with subinhibitory MIC concentrations (about
1/
4–
1/
8 MIC) of minocycline up to 50 passages. Before and after every 10 passages, MICs were determined by using the microdilution technique.
4.4. Animal Models
All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the 1st Regional Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation, Kraków, Poland (approval number: 167/2021) and carried out in rooms with high efficiency particle accumulation-filtered air within the animal facility at the Jagiellonian University (Krakow, Poland). Specific pathogen-free (SPF) female BALB/c mice (8–12 weeks old) and female Wistar rats (8 weeks old) were purchased from Janvier Labs (France). All animals were housed in individually ventilated cages; the average temperature in animal rooms and treatment room was: 22 ± 2 °C; average humidity in animal rooms and treatment room was: 55 ± 10%; light cycle consisted of: 12 h of day and 12 h of night. All animals were fed a standard laboratory diet and allowed water ad libitum. The health status of animals was monitored in accordance with the Federation for Laboratory Animal Science Associations guidelines.
Bacteria used for the infection in the animal models were handled as followed: P. gingivalis wild-type (W83; ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) were plated on tryptic soy broth (TSB) agar plates (5% sheep blood, supplemented with l-cysteine (0.5 mg/mL), hemin (5 μg/mL), and vitamin K (0.5 μg/mL)) and grown under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 7 days. Two days before infection, bacteria were inoculated in TSB with hemin, vitamin K, and l-cysteine and grown (1st day–preculture, 2nd day–culture) until a mid-log phase OD600 of 0.6. On the day of infection, bacteria were washed twice in sterile PBS and prepared at a final concentration of 2 × 108 bacteria/0.1 mL in sterile PBS/mice (subcutaneous chamber model) or 1 × 1010 bacteria/1 mL in sterile PBS + 2% methylcellulose/rat (periodontitis/oral gavage model) and used immediately for infection. Before each infection, bacteria were prepared from a fresh bacteria culture.
4.5. Mice Subcutaneous Chamber Model
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) 8–12-week-old BALB/c were purchased from Janvier Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France). In line with an established protocol [
62], titanium chambers were surgically implanted subcutaneously into the backs of the animals (dorsolumbar region, 42 mice in total), after placing MIN-T in six different dosages (0 (control group), 1, 10, 25, 40, 80 mg/kg body weight/7 animals per group) into the chambers. After the complete healing of the incisions (10 days) and the interior encapsulation of the coil by a thin vascularized layer of fibrous connective tissue, 0.1 mL suspensions of
P. gingivalis were injected into the lumen of the chamber. Based on previous tests, a lethal dosage containing 2 × 10
8 of
P. gingivalis from an overnight culture in 100 μL of PBS was chosen. Chamber fluids (10 μL) were aspirated using a hypodermic needle (25G) at 24, 72, 120, and 168 h intervals and analyzed for the presence and levels of minocycline by an already established HPLC-based method.
P. gingivalis CFUs were measured to determine the viability of the pathogens. All surviving animals were sacrificed on day 7 and the blood was collected from the venous sinus for the evaluation of minocycline systemic levels and inflammatory markers (
Figure S3).
4.6. Rat Periodontitis Model
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) 8 week old female Wistar rats purchased from Janvier Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were used in the experiment (ten per group for the
P. gingivalis challenge only (PG) and
P. gingivalis + MIN-T (PG+MIN-T) and three per group for MIN-T only (CG)). In line with an existing scientific protocol [
63], the animals were pre-treated with an antibiotic mix containing sulfamethoxazole (870 μg/mL) and trimethoprim (170 μg/mL) for 8 days. After this, in two groups (CG, PG+MIN-T), the MIN-T formulation was provided. Because of the dimensions of the threads, the formulation needed to be ground for the application. Then, a total of six microinjections (35 μL per site-inner outer with 30G cannulas) in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd molar of the upper jaw were done, two for each tooth. This resulted in a final dosage of 20 mg/kg. Thereby, the experiment was limited to the upper jaw due to technical limitations. After this, animals from the PG and PG+MIN-T groups were challenged a total of six times with 1 × 10
10 CFU each time every second day (for a total of 12 days for the challenge).
After 32 days the animals were sacrificed, and the alveolar bone loss was measured by micro-computed tomography (μCT) as the distances from the cemento–enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest (ABC). In addition, the blood of the animals was collected to determine the systemic burden of minocycline after 32 days (
Figure S4).
4.6.1. Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis
To determine bone loss High Resolution Animal Computed Tomography (Micro-CT, MILabs, The Netherlands) was used. All animals were scanned at two time points (before treatment (T0) and on the day of termination of the experiment (TEND)). Imaging was performed at an ultra-focus magnification, 50 kV source voltage, and 0.21 mA current. Three-dimensional images were obtained using the PMODE software (vers. 4.3; Fällanden, Switzerland). To assess the alveolar bone loss, a linear distance from CEJ to ABC of each tooth of the lower and upper jaw was measured. Each measurement was performed three times, and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The results are presented as the distance after subtracting the basal measurement (T0) from the measurement obtained at the endpoint of the procedure (TEND).
4.6.2. Bone Density
Maxillary bones from every animal were isolated, soft tissue was removed and decalcification in an Osteomall commercial decalcifier (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was performed. Decalcified samples were dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions and embedded in paraffin. From each rat, coronal (frontal) sections (5 µm thickness) from the first molar, second molar, and third molar region were cut with a microtome. For the trabecular bone, Toluidine blue staining was performed. To differentiate collagen type in trabecular and compact bone picrosirius red (PSR) staining was employed. The sections were analyzed with an Olympus CX43 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with filters providing circularly polarized illumination. Objective magnification of 4× and 10× was used to collect images. The bone microarchitecture was assessed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The following parameters were determined: bone volume (BV/TV), mean trabecular thickness (Tb.Th mean), maximal trabecular thickness (Tb.Th max), mean trabecular space (Tb.Sp mean), maximal trabecular space (Tb.Sp max), and trabecular number (Tb.N), as well as the distribution of thin (immature) collagen fibres, the distribution of thick (mature) collagen fibres, and the proportion of the mature and immature collagen fibres in the trabecular and the compact bone. The analysis was done about all molars, and corresponding values are presented in
Tables S2 and S3. For these histological analyses, ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used, according to the literature [
64].
4.7. Analytical Methods
4.7.1. qPCR Analysis of P. gingivalis in Mice Chamber Fluids
DNA was extracted from chamber fluid using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TaqMan qPCR was performed with Kapa Probe fast qPCR Mix (Rox Low) on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System C1000 Touch ThermalCycler with the forward (5′-AGCAACCAGCTACCGTTTAT-3′) and reverse (5′-GTACCTGTCGGTTTACCATCTT-3′) primers and 6-FAM-TACCATGTTTCGCAGAAGCCCTGA-TAMRA as the detection probe. The primers were based on a single copy of P. gingivalis arginine-specific cysteine-proteinase gene. The samples were run in duplicate in a total volume of 10 μL, containing 100 ng of DNA. TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2×) (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), and the specific set of primers (final concentration, 5 μM) and probe (final concentration, 4 μM) (GenoMed S.A., Warszawa, Poland), corresponding to 562.5 nM of forward and reverse primers and 100 nM of the probe. After an initial incubation step of 2 min at 50 °C and denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, 40 PCR cycles (95 °C for 20 s and 60 °C for 30 s) were performed. The number of copies of the P. gingivalis genome was calculated by matching Cq values with a standard curve prepared from serial dilutions of cultured P. gingivalis W83 (WT).
4.7.2. Chamber Fluid Minocycline Concentration (Mice)
To 4 μL of chamber fluid, phase A (0.1% TFA in distilled water) was added to receive a final volume of 65 μL. Proteins were precipitated in the presence of 13% TCA on ice for 30 min, and samples were centrifuged for 15 min (13,000 g) at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and 50 μL of sample was injected onto the column (Phenomenex, Aeris 3.6 μm Peptide XB-C18, LC 150 mm × 4.6 mm) and separated by using a Shimadzu NexeraX2 system. Post injection, the column was rinsed with 5% phase B (80% acetonitrile, 0.08% TFA) for two column volumes and then minocycline was eluted in a rising gradient of phase B (5–30% in 15 min at 1.5 mL/min) for each sample. Minocycline was detected at 355 nm. After each run, the column was rinsed with 100% phase B for 5 min at 1.5 mL/min and then equilibrated for another 5 min with 5% phase B at 1.5 mL/min. The minocycline amount in the sample was calculated based on a standard curve (AUC).
4.7.3. Serum Cytokine Measurement (Mice)
Concentrations of IL6 and TNFα in serum were measured using a commercially available kit (Milliplex MAP Mouse High Sensitivity T-cell Magnetic Bead Panel cat. MHSTCMAG-70pk, Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In short, standards, internal controls, and samples were pipetted into the wells. Beads suspended in the assay buffer were added and the plate was incubated overnight at 4 °C on an orbital shaker. Then, the plate was placed on a magnet and beads were washed three times with the buffer before the detection antibodies were added and the plate was incubated for another hour at room temperature on a shaker. Streptavidine-phycoerythrin was added and samples were incubated for a further 30 min at room temperature. Beads were washed three times, suspended in Drive Fluid PLUS, and the signal was measured on a MAGPIX instrument (Luminex xMAP, Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Feldkirchen, Germany) using xPONENT software (ver. 4.1).
4.7.4. Serum Concentration of Minocycline (Mouse and Rat)
As an analytical standard minocycline-HCl was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) as a pharmaceutical secondary standard. The internal standard Minocycline-D7 was purchased from TRC (Toronto, ON, Canada).
Minocycline itself was quantified by LC-MS/MS by using calibration curves and normalization related to the deuterated internal standard minocycline-D7.
The working solutions for the calibration standards were prepared by diluting minocycline with ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v). The concentration of minocycline in the working solutions covered a range of 5 ng/mL to 1000 ng/mL (rat serum) and 20 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL (mouse serum), respectively. The working solution of the internal standard was prepared by diluting minocycline-D7 with ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v) to a final concentration of 10 ng/mL.
The preparation of the study samples was based on protein precipitation. Briefly, 60 µL of the internal standard working solution was spiked with 20 µL of ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v) and 20 µL of the serum sample, followed by incubation at 5 °C for 10 min. The samples were vortexed, centrifuged and the supernatant was further processed by using centrifugal filter devices. Finally, 30 µL of the filtrate was diluted with 60 µL water and transferred into HPLC vials. Calibration samples were prepared by spiking 60 µL of the internal standard working solution with 20 µL of the calibration working solution and 20 µL blank matrix. Blanks were prepared by spiking 60 µL of the internal standard working solution with 20 µL of ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v) and 20 µL blank matrix. Double blanks were prepared by spiking 60 µL of ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v) with 20 µL of ACN/H2O (90/10; v/v) and 20 µL blank matrix. Calibration samples, blanks, and double blanks were processed as described for the study samples.
The quantification of minocycline was based on its separation by UPLC (1290 Infinity II, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) on a C
18 stationary phase (Acquity UPLC CSH C18 with 1.7 µm, 130 Å, 100 × 2.1 mm, Waters, Eschborn, Germany) at 30 °C using a gradient elution with a mobile phase system consisting of 5 mM ammonium acetate in H
2O (pH 2.7) and 5 mM ammonium acetate in H
2O/MeOH (5/95;
v/
v). The mass spectrometry analysis was carried out on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (QTRAP 5500+, AB Sciex Germany GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) using electrospray ionization (ESI) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The MRM transitions are summarized below (
Table 2).
Data acquisition and processing was carried out using Analyst 1.7.2 (SCIEX), SCIEX OS 2.1 (SCIEX) and Excel 16.0 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). The concentration of the analytes was calculated by applying the internal standardization method. The calculation of the minocycline quantities was based on the area ratio of the analyte to the internal standard plotted against the respective concentration ratios of the calibrants. Data points were fitted with a weighting factor of 1/×2 using linear regression with the method of least squares.