Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Performance of Calcium Dihydroxide (Ca(OH)2) Coating on Ti for Potential Metallic Orthopedic Implant Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Residues in Poultry Litter: Assessing the Association of Antimicrobial Persistence with Resistant Escherichia coli Strains
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Some African Countries and Their Possible Impact on Human Health

by
Oluwaseun Mary Oladeji
1,*,
Liziwe Lizbeth Mugivhisa
1 and
Joshua Oluwole Olowoyo
2
1
Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, P.O. Box 139, Pretoria 0204, South Africa
2
Department of Health Sciences and The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010090
Submission received: 17 December 2024 / Revised: 9 January 2025 / Accepted: 10 January 2025 / Published: 14 January 2025

Abstract

:
This review investigates the levels of antibiotic residues in animal products, types of antibiotics, and their possible impact on human health in Africa. The literature search involved the use of a systematic survey using data that were published from Africa from 2015 to 2024. The search terms used the Boolean operators with keywords such as antibiotics, antibiotic residues, antibiotics in animal products in Africa, and impact on human health. Only research conducted in Africa was used in the present study. The findings showed that the most prevalent groups of antibiotic residues were aminoglycoside, macrolides, β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines sulfonamides, and phenicols. Tetracycline showed the most prevalent antibiotic residue with 43% mostly from East Africa, followed by sulfonamides at 19%, and β-lactams at 16%; most of the antibiotic residue levels were higher than the World Health Organization permissible limit. Noncompliance with withdrawal periods and maximum residue limits for antibiotics used in food-producing animals may lead to negative outcomes such as allergic reactions, teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, microbiome alterations, and, most notably, antibiotic resistance. As a result, there is a need for constant monitoring of antibiotic residues in animal products in addition to the consideration of alternatives to antibiotics in order to avoid their health implications.
Key Contribution: Antibiotic residues in African animal products may pose a substantial risk to human health because they contribute to antibiotic resistance, making bacterial infections more difficult to cure. Furthermore, these residues might trigger allergic reactions and disturb the natural microbiome, resulting in long-term health issues.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics are naturally occurring, semi-synthetic, and synthetic agents with antibacterial activity, administered orally, parenterally, or topically [1]. They are employed in both human and veterinary medicine for the prevention and treatment of various diseases, as well as for enhancing growth in cattle [2]. Since their inception in the 1930s, antibiotics have predominantly been utilized to treat or prevent diseases in humans and animals, while also significantly contributing to both food production and contamination through antibiotic residues [3]. The growth-enhancing properties of antibiotics were identified in the 1940s, when animals consuming dried Streptomyces aureofaciens mycelia with chlortetracycline residues exhibited improved growth [4]. In addition to their therapeutic advantages, the 1950 discovery of their ability to promote growth and improve feed efficiency in animals led to their widespread use as feed additives [5]. Antibiotics can accelerate growth by diminishing gut mucous membranes, altering intestinal motility, creating advantageous conditions for good gut microbiota by eradicating pathogenic bacteria, and promoting protein catabolism for muscle growth [6]. They promote growth by reducing immune system activity, hence decreasing nutrient loss and toxic generation [7]. Animals provided antibiotics in their meal often demonstrate a 4–5% rise in body weight compared to animals not receiving drugs [4]. Despite the growth-enhancing properties of antibiotics, they are among the most effective medications for the treatment of different diseases in animals, though their uncontrolled usage may lead to the storage of antibiotics in muscles or other organs of the animals [8,9].
Epidemiological and experimental studies indicate that the effects of antibiotics may accumulate over time in humans, implying that over reliance on antibiotics could foster resistance in the human microbiome [10]. Overreliance on and excessive use of antibiotics for disease treatment may disrupt the delicate equilibrium of beneficial bacteria, thus diminishing diversity and resilience over time. This accumulation may result in a human microbiome that is more susceptible to infections and less capable of responding successfully to new medication [11]. Furthermore, the transmission of these microbiome alterations from parents to their children may set off a cycle in which succeeding generations inherit reduced microbiomes, thereby increasing susceptibility to chronic diseases and antibiotic-resistant infections [12].
One of the greatest threats to public health that faces the whole human population all over the world is the persistent risk of antibiotic contamination [13]. Regardless of national boundaries in terms of geographical location, economy, or legislation, these residues are increasingly becoming a problem. Agricultural industries use a significant amount (50%) of antibiotics for animal production either to treat or prevent possible disease outbreaks in order to maintain animal health [14]. Over the years, several African nations, such as Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan, and Tanzania, have reported cases of antimicrobial residues [15]. Tetracycline residues were detected in 44% of fresh chicken samples (meat and liver) in Egypt, according to a study that examined the prevalence of these residues (oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline, and doxycycline). The levels of these residues ranged from 38% to 52%. The concentrations of these residues varied from 38% to 52%. There were certain values that exceeded the maximum residue limits set by the Codex, which are 200 μg/kg for chicken meat and 600 μg/kg for liver, respectively. These values were determined by the aggregate of the tetracycline group [16]. The contaminated concentration varied from 103 μg/kg to 8148 μg/kg. When it comes to antibiotic residues found in foods derived from animals, tetracyclines constitute the majority, accounting for 41%, followed by β-lactams, which account for 18% [7]. Considered in light of the fact that these medications are often utilized in the treatment of animals across Africa, this is not surprising. β-Lactams exhibit instability owing to their intrinsic hydrolysis reaction, which may explain their reduced predominance [15]. This paper reviews the prevalence and levels of antibiotic residues in animal-derived food products in Africa from 2015 to 2024 and also highlights the possible health risk. This paper reviews the current trend in antibiotic residues in livestock from African counties. It is the view of the authors that this review will provide needed information to policy makers on the need to have regulations in place guiding the use of antibiotics for livestock production.

2. Results and Discussion

Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Africa

Table 1 below shows the concentrations and prevalence of antibiotic residues in animal products in Africa from 2015 to 2024. The results published at the time of compiling this report were only from 10 countries in Africa, comprising 4 countries from West Africa (Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana, and Benin), 2 from East Africa (Kenya and Ethiopia), 1 from North Africa (Egypt), and 3 from Southern Africa (South Africa, Zambia, and Tanzania). The result presented showed a dearth in information from this region of the world, which may necessitate further research from this region. Previous reports from published work have suggested that research in the field of Environmental Health Science has been limited in this region, which could be attributed to a lack of funding or insufficient information from this region [17]. For instance, most of the reported information on antibiotic residues was from either Nigeria or South Africa. There were about 5 different research studies from Nigeria, 3 from Ethiopia, and 2 from Ghana and South Africa, respectively.
The antibiotic residues detected in milk samples are tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and chlortetracycline, with the concentrations varying from 0.500 μg/kg to 1.569 μg/kg, which were lower than the MRL limit, whereas no samples revealed doxycycline residues [32], as seen in Table 1. From Table 1, it can also be noted that the average concentrations of penicillin G and oxytetracycline residues in the beef were recorded to be 17.58 and 0.24 μg/kg, respectively, according to the study from Cameroon [20]. This concentration is below the MRLs of 50 μg/kg and 600 μg/kg, perhaps due to the low doses of antimicrobials often supplied by pastoralists to optimize the quantity of doses accessible [20]. This study is also similar to one reported from Ethiopia, where penicillin was not discovered and the oxytetracycline levels were lower than MRL [24]; the study conducted in Ethiopia revealed higher oxytetracycline concentrations [23]. The fact that most farmers in the northern region do not follow the dosage instructions for the veterinary medications given to their livestock may help to explain the high percentage of contaminated carcasses [20]. Table 1 further shows that the prevalence of antibiotic residues found in beef (70%) was more than those reported in the northern region of Cameroon (20.30%), according to a study by Mouiche et al. [21]. The overuse of antibiotics, disregard for the time required for withdrawal following antibiotic administration, and disregard for veterinarian advice before antibiotic usage could all contribute to this [19,20]. Currently, there is no definitive legislation regarding the use of antibiotics in animals, and sick animals who do not respond to treatment are frequently murdered for human consumption [40].
Table 1 also shows a study conducted in Ethiopia that aimed to identify specific antibiotic residues in the kidney and red meat of beef cattle butchered at the Nekemte Municipal Abattoir. Oxytetracycline residues were detected in 50% of the samples (15%), whereas tetracycline was present in all 60 (100%) of the analyzed meat samples. Penicillin G, enrofloxacin, sulphadiazine, and doxycycline were not detected in all the samples analyzed in this study. The oxytetracycline residual levels in the kidney and muscle samples ranged from 0.00 to 463.35 µg/kg and 0.00 to 354.55 µg/kg, respectively. In total, 10 percent of the kidney and 3.33 percent of the muscle samples analyzed revealed oxytetracycline residues exceeding the permissible limits. This study’s findings indicated a high level of antimicrobial residue, which suggests that the bacteria may be resistant to antibiotics. This signifies concerted efforts to reduce the impact of the diseases’ resistance on animal and human health [25].
In Nigeria, a report from the study of Anueyiagu et al. [41] indicated that 55.2% (53/96) of the examined animal organs were positive for antibiotic residues, whereas 44.8% (43/96) were negative. The liver exhibited the highest incidence of antibiotic residues at 68.8% (22/32), followed by the kidneys at 56.3% (18/32) and the muscles at 40.6% (13/32) [41], which raised possible concerns for public health. The increased frequency of antibiotic residues in the meat samples may be attributed to cover prescription, overuse, and disregard for the withdrawal time in veterinary practice. On the other hand, antimicrobial medication therapy is thought to be a significant source of antibacterial residue in pigs [42]. Pig farmers’ self-medication practices and the unrestricted availability of antimicrobial medications are the root causes of this issue. Pigs exposed to veterinary medications in an unapproved and careless manner without following recommended dosages are more likely to accumulate violative residues in their tissues. In South Africa, Ramatla et al. [35] investigated antibiotic residues in raw meat using different analytical methods. As shown in Table 1, this study found that the levels of ciprofloxacin and streptomycin residues were higher than the Codex/SA MRL suggested limit, and that the residues of tetracycline, sulfonamide, and streptomycin were positive. Also, Ndlovu et al.’s [36] study demonstrated that the maximum residue levels (MRLs) set by Codex Alimentarius for erythromycin, sulfamethazine, and amoxicillin exceeded the recommended limit. Tetracycline and streptomycin were also identified; however, these levels were below the approved maximum residue limits (MRLs). Approximately 76.6% of samples were over the designated maximum residue limit for sulfamethazine, while 10% exceeded that limit for erythromycin.
Overall, differences in antibiotic residue levels in animal products may be due to animal exposure to antibiotics weeks or days before slaughter, illicit antimicrobial use, excessive drug administration, insufficient farmer knowledge, and/or noncompliance with drug label instructions. This may have to do with the absence of facilities for detection and regulatory agencies that set maximum residue limits (MRLs) to regulate the amount of drug residues in food [43]. This could also be due to the overuse of large amounts of drugs without a professional prescription, the relatively low cost of antibiotics, and the inappropriate administration of antibiotics. Furthermore, this may be due to a lack of awareness and outreach, which could lead to drug addiction and usage, as well as a failure to stick to discontinuation periods [44].
Figure 1 shows the prevalence of antibiotics by group from the available data obtained during this study. From Figure 1, it can be seen that aminoglycoside is the most frequently used antibiotic from the region, followed by macrolides and β-lactams, respectively. From the literature, aminoglycosides are used mostly for the treatment of bacterial infection in livestock. They are often used as a prophylactic to prevent disease outbreaks in livestock, and this might have accounted for the high percentage noted in this study [45]. Apart for its usage as prophylaxis, it has also been used as a growth promoter in some countries, though, recently, a study suggested that this has been largely discouraged owing to the abuse of this drug by the farmers [46]. The study of Ojo et al. [47] from Nigeria showed that 71.4% of poultry farmers in the country used aminoglycosides for farm production, while a study conducted by Kagira et al. [48] previously reported that 61.1% of livestock farmers are using aminoglycosides for livestock production. A similar finding was also reported from South Africa by Kimera et al. [49], that 45 > 5% of farmers rearing cattle used aminoglycosides for their cattle farming. Aminoglycoside residues in meat have been documented to pose serious health risks to consumers, especially in individuals with compromised immune systems [50]. On the other hand, macrolides usage is also common in Africa, and according to Ojo et al. [47], 63.2% of farmers in Nigeria engaging in poultry farming use tylosin and erythromycin, which are classes of macrolides as antibiotics in their poultry production. Apart from the health issue that the residue may pose to human health, macrolides have been reported to accumulate in soil and water and may be bioaccumulated by plants or fish [49,51].

3. Impact of Antibiotic Residues on Human Health

Antibiotics administered in animal feed can provide health risks due to their excretion in trace levels into consumable animal tissues. Certain medications can elicit hazardous reactions in consumers directly, while others may induce allergic or hypersensitive responses [52]. β-lactam antibiotics may lead to cutaneous eruptions, dermatitis, gastrointestinal issues, and anaphylaxis, even at low doses. These drugs include the antibiotic classes of penicillin and cephalosporin [53]. The immediate effects may include the emergence of resistance within the normal flora of the human gastrointestinal tract due to the consumption of antibiotic-contaminated meat products, potentially resulting in an outbreak of resistant diarrheal diseases (Figure 2). Furthermore, there is an elevated risk of resistance colonization or infection in humans resulting from their exposure to farm animals administered antibiotics. The indirect and long-term dangers include microbiological effects, cancer potential, reproductive implications, and teratogenic effects [54]. Human health issues that may arise from subchronic exposure levels include allergic reactions in sensitive populations, toxicity, and carcinogenic effects. These effects encompass hypersensitivity reactions, the emergence of resistant strains of bacteria, carcinogenic effects, and possible detrimental impacts on human gut microbiota [55,56]. In terms of human health risks, antibiotic residues may stimulate the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to humans, cause allergies (penicillin), and cause other severe pathologies such as bone marrow toxicity, cancer (furazolidone, oxytetracycline, and sulfamethazine), reproductive disorders (chloramphenicol), mutagenic effects, anaphylactic shock, and nephropathy (gentamicin) [4]. Microbiological impacts are one of the most serious health risks for humans.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria from animal waste utilized as fertilizer may lead to water supply contamination and modifications in human microbiota [57]. Animal waste frequently harbors microorganisms that have acquired resistance to antibiotics as a result of the extensive application of these medications in animals. When animal dung is sprayed onto crops, resistant bacteria may be transported to the soil and may contaminate local water sources via runoff, particularly after intense rainfall or irrigation. Research indicates that the existence of resistant bacteria in water systems elevates the danger of human exposure via drinking water, recreational activities, and agricultural products [58]. Prolonged exposure to these pollutants can result in heightened antibiotic resistance among human bacterial flora, complicating the treatment of prevalent diseases. Resistant bacteria infiltrating the human gut may supplant beneficial bacteria, potentially resulting in dysbiosis, which has been associated with numerous health complications, including inflammatory bowel illnesses and weakened immunity [59]. Moreover, these bacteria can transfer their resistance genes to other microorganisms in the human microbiome, thereby increasing the incidence of resistant bacteria [60,61].
Figure 2. Depiction of potential transfer of antibiotic residues across several ecosystems (adapted from [62]).
Figure 2. Depiction of potential transfer of antibiotic residues across several ecosystems (adapted from [62]).
Antibiotics 14 00090 g002

3.1. Antibiotic Resistance

One of the most serious concerns posed by antibiotic residues is the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. When antibiotics are used extensively in agriculture, residues might remain in food products and the environment, allowing bacteria to adapt and acquire resistance [63]. These resistant bacteria possess the capacity to infect humans, resulting in illnesses that are more difficult to manage with conventional remedies. Resistant microorganisms may infiltrate the human body via physical contact or indirectly through eggs, meat, or milk [64,65]. As bacteria of animal origin, they may invade human endogenous flora or add to the reservoir of resistance genes already existing in man. Low dosages of antibiotics have been shown to probably lead to bacterial adaptability, thereby increasing their resistance and severity [66,67]. It is well known that the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a serious danger to human health in many different ways, including hypersensitivity reactions, toxicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity [68,69].
Resistance could be transferred from animals to humans when consuming contaminated meat, milk, or eggs that are not properly cooked or handled, and using manure containing antibiotic residues as fertilizer can spread resistance from animals to humans and back again through soil and water contamination. The use of antibiotics in cattle production has been linked to the development of human antibiotic resistance [57]. The emergence of such resistance poses a direct threat to human health, as pathogens become increasingly resistant to standard antibiotics, complicating treatment options. According to Vieira et al. [70], there is a strong correlation between resistant Escherichia coli in food animals (poultry and pigs) and those in human infections, suggesting that many resistant bacteria in human bloodstream infections originate from food animals. Animals treated with low prophylactic antibiotic levels may develop microorganisms resistant to this antibiotic during the production or consumption of animal-derived food. It has been established that humans develop antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Staphylococcus from animal-derived food [57]. These pathogens are commonly transmitted to humans through the consumption of contaminated food, leading to infections that are difficult to treat due to resistance to multiple antibiotic classes [54,71]. As these resistant strains become more prevalent, they present a significant risk to both animal and human health, further emphasizing the need for alternative approaches to antibiotic use in agriculture.

3.2. Allergic Reactions

Some individuals may exhibit sensitivity to specific antibiotics and may experience allergic reactions when exposed to antibiotic residues in food. Recent studies have found that antibiotic residues can cause allergic reactions. The bulk of recorded allergies are to beta-lactam antibiotic residues, most notably penicillin and cephalosporins [72]. Erythema multiforme, skin rashes, thrombocytopenia, acute interstitial nephritis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, vasculitis, hemolytic anemia, serum sickness, and toxic epidermal necrolysis are some of the symptoms that can follow [73]. Allergic reactions have been documented in patients who consumed milk [73], meat [74], and pork, all of which included penicillin residues. Moreover, certain investigations have indicated that residues of aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines may elicit allergic reactions [4]

3.3. Hepatotoxicity Effect

The hepatotoxic effects of certain antibiotics are well documented. Antibiotics like amoxicillin–clavulanate, oxacillin, flucloxacillin, penicillin, and cloxacillin have been linked to cholestatic hepatitis (Hautekeete, [75]). Tetracyclines have been documented to induce hepatotoxicity in animals, especially in livestock and veterinary contexts [76]. Research indicates that elevated doses or the extended administration of tetracyclines in animals, including poultry and cattle, may result in hepatic injury, including cholestasis and fatty liver [77]. Tetracycline may cause acute fatty liver during pregnancy, whereas erythromycin and other macrolides may cause cholestatic hepatitis. Nitrofurantoin has been associated with chronic hepatitis that resembles autoimmune hepatitis [75,78]; studies in laboratory animals have demonstrated that prolonged exposure can cause liver damage akin to that observed in humans, exhibiting signs of cholestatic and hepatocellular injury. Ceftriaxone can generate gallstones, and quinolones and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim are linked to significant hepatotoxicity, especially in individuals with AIDS. It is anticipated that large amounts of antibiotic residues may also have detrimental effects on the liver.

3.4. Destruction of Normal or Useful Intestinal Flora and Indigestion

The administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics has been linked to the disturbance of the gut microbiota. The intestinal microbiota significantly influences human physiology. They regulate and prevent the colonization of pathogenic microorganisms in the gastrointestinal system. Drugs frequently associated with the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases in humans include streptomycin, tylosin, metronidazole, nitroimidazole, and vancomycin [79]. Studies have shown that antimicrobials used for medicinal purposes may modify the ecological composition of gut flora [11]. The gut microbiota comprises numerous bacteria, almost 1000 species, that significantly influence human physiology and health; the bacteria that dwell in the gut function as a barrier, inhibiting germs from colonizing and inducing sickness [80]. Antibiotic residues can kill certain types of bacteria or reduce the number of germs overall. The extent of change, however, is contingent upon the dosage of the antimicrobial agent, method of administration, its bioavailability, metabolic processes, duration of exposure to the drug, and its distribution within the body, including the route of excretion. Children who are exposed to antibiotic residues during their youth experience alterations in the maturation and colonization of their gut microbiota [81], which can result in problems including obesity and an increased risk of allergies [8]. Alzheimer’s disease, inflammatory bowel disease, Anorexia, autism, depression, and Parkinson’s disease are among the neurological conditions that might result from a disruption of microbial homeostasis [82]. Since superbugs cannot be cured, the diseases they cause will be fatal if gut bacteria become resistant to antibiotics and proliferate [83]. Clostridium difficile is also considered to be part of the normal gut microbiota, although the more dominant anaerobes inhibit its growth. Thus, the rate of C. difficile colonization in the human gut varies by age group, with the highest rate occurring in early infancy and decreasing with age [84].

3.5. Carcinogenicity and Other Effects

The term carcinogenic denotes any chemical or agent that can modify the genetic structure of an organism, leading to uncontrolled proliferation and malignancy, whereas carcinogen specifically refers to any substance that facilitates carcinogenesis, the process of cancer creation, or exhibiting carcinogenic activity [85]. Antibiotic residues operate by covalently attaching to intracellular components such as DNA, proteins, RNA, phospholipids, glycogen, and glutathione [86]. Sulfamethazine, oxytetracycline, and furazolidone are among the antibiotic residues that can cause cancer [4,7,87]. Apart from their carcinogenic qualities, there have also been reports of other side effects, including nephropathy (mostly associated with gentamicin) and bone marrow toxicity (primarily linked to chloramphenicol) [88]. Beyond these detrimental effects, antibiotic resistance, a secondary consequence of antibiotic residues in food, represents the most severe issue. The WHO projects that, in the absence of intervention, drug-resistant diseases may cause 10 million deaths per year by 2050, leading to economic repercussions akin to those of the 2008–2009 global financial crisis [89].

4. Conclusions and Recommendation

This review provides significant insights into the presence and prevalence of antibiotic residues in animal products in Africa and their health implications. The presence of antibiotic residues in food poses a significant public health risk. While crucial in agriculture, their use should be matched with stringent rules to prevent repercussions such as direct toxicity and antibiotic resistance. Comprehensive antibiotic utilization datasets should be established to detect global hotspots of disproportionate antimicrobial usage. Moreover, it is imperative to construct risk assessment methodologies for the prevention of diseases, including the development and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Similarly, cost-effective and user-friendly technologies must be developed for the quick detection of antibiotic residues in animal products. Ultimately, more beneficial methods like probiotics and herbal treatments ought to be employed. The current study emphasized the need for relevant authorities to take steps to protect consumer health. Controlling antibiotic levels that exceeded maximum residual limits requires a collaborative and coordinated effort by government officials, veterinarians, and animal producers. The animal farm owner, manager, or herder must work with the farm veterinarian to develop treatment procedures that assure the appropriate use of antibiotics. When antibiotics are administered, protocols must be set to teach workers on how to handle the animal safely to avoid unintentional meat residues. Animals undergoing treatment must be recognized, and antibiotic administration must be documented to prevent residues. This indicates the need for relevant authorities to take steps to protect consumer health. Controlling antibiotic levels that exceeded maximum residual limits requires a collaborative and coordinated effort by government officials, veterinarians, and animal producers. The animal farm owner, manager, or herder must work with the farm veterinarian to develop treatment procedures that assure the appropriate use of antibiotics. When antibiotics are administered, protocols must be set to teach workers about how to handle the animal safely in order to avoid unintentional meat residues.

5. Limitations of This Study

This review does not have detailed information on the levels of antibiotic residues in different parts of Africa, which makes it harder to find high-risk areas. It also does not give specific plans or steps for putting the suggested risk assessment methods and detection tools into action.

6. Materials and Methods

This review adopted a systematic literature review approach using published data from research studies focused on antibiotics in livestock products in Africa from 2015 to 2024. Relevant studies published from 2015 to 2024 that were focused on antibiotics only and mainly conducted in Africa were included in this review. For the literature search, we used Boolean operators such as OR, AND, and NOT as the main tool, and the search involved using key search terms such as antibiotics, antibiotic residues, antibiotics in animal products in Africa, and impact on human health. The search was conducted in major databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, Scopus, and PubMed. Each database was searched separately, and the results were compiled and compared for comprehensiveness. For the initial survey, a total of 335 searches were returned, which was further screened down to 167, as seen in Figure 3, following the eligibility criteria listed below:
Eligibility criteria
Articles that met the following criteria were eligible for this review:
  • Those where the antibiotics analyzed were specified;
  • Those where the concentrations of antibiotic residues in animal products in Africa were quantified;
  • The impact of the antibiotic residues on human health;
  • Research activities mainly carried out in Africa;
  • Published papers that dealt with antibiotics in livestock only.
Data extraction
Table 2 displays the maximum antibiotic residue limit. For ease of comparison, the concentrations of antibiotic residues were converted to µg/kg and summarized, along with the following details: the country in which the study was conducted, the organs used, the first author, and the year of publication. For convenience, countries were arranged in alphabetical order in the table.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.M.O. and J.O.O.; methodology, O.M.O.; software, J.O.O.; validation, O.M.O., L.L.M. and J.O.O.; formal analysis, O.M.O.; investigation, O.M.O.; data curation, O.M.O. and J.O.O.; writing—original draft preparation, O.M.O.; writing—review and editing, L.L.M. and J.O.O.; visualization, J.O.O.; supervision, J.O.O.; project administration, J.O.O.; funding acquisition, J.O.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are provided in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Stojković, D.; Petrović, J.; Carević, T.; Soković, M.; Liaras, K. Synthetic and Semisynthetic Compounds as Antibacterials Targeting Virulence Traits in Resistant Strains: A Narrative Updated Review. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Phillips, I.; Casewell, M.; Cox, T.; De Groot, B.; Friis, C.; Jones, R.; Nightingale, C.; Preston, R.; Waddell, J. Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 28–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kasimanickam, V.; Kasimanickam, M.; Kasimanickam, R. Antibiotics use in food animal production: Escalation of antimicrobial resistance: Where are we now in combating AMR? Med. Sci. 2021, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bacanlı, M.; Başaran, N. Importance of antibiotic residues in animal food. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 125, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, J.; Ying, G.-G.; Deng, W.-J. Antibiotic residues in food: Extraction, analysis, and human health concerns. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7569–7586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patangia, D.V.; Anthony Ryan, C.; Dempsey, E.; Paul Ross, R.; Stanton, C. Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen 2022, 11, e1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Darwish, W.S.; Eldaly, E.A.; El-Abbasy, M.T.; Ikenaka, Y.; Nakayama, S.; Ishizuka, M. Antibiotic residues in food: The African scenario. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2013, 61, S13–S22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, J.; Yousif, M.; Li, Z.; Wu, Z.; Li, S.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z. Effects of antibiotic residues in milk on growth, ruminal fermentation, and microbial community of preweaning dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 2298–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rahman, M.S.; Hassan, M.M.; Chowdhury, S. Determination of antibiotic residues in milk and assessment of human health risk in Bangladesh. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sonnenburg, E.D.; Smits, S.A.; Tikhonov, M.; Higginbottom, S.K.; Wingreen, N.S.; Sonnenburg, J.L. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature 2016, 529, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Francino, M. Antibiotics and the human gut microbiome: Dysbioses and accumulation of resistances. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 164577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.; Tapiainen, T.; Brinkac, L.; Lorenzi, H.A.; Moncera, K.; Tejesvi, M.V.; Salo, J.; Nelson, K.E. Vertical transmission of gut microbiome and antimicrobial resistance genes in infants exposed to antibiotics at birth. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 224, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahmed, S.K.; Hussein, S.; Qurbani, K.; Ibrahim, R.H.; Fareeq, A.; Mahmood, K.A.; Mohamed, M.G. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2024, 2, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rahman, M.M.; Alam Tumpa, M.A.; Zehravi, M.; Sarker, M.T.; Yamin, M.; Islam, M.R.; Harun-Or-Rashid, M.; Ahmed, M.; Ramproshad, S.; Mondal, B. An overview of antimicrobial stewardship optimization: The use of antibiotics in humans and animals to prevent resistance. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Van, T.T.H.; Yidana, Z.; Smooker, P.M.; Coloe, P.J. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 20, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Salama, N.; Abou-Raya, S.; Shalaby, A.; Emam, W.; Mehaya, F. Incidence of tetracycline residues in chicken meat and liver retailed to consumers. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2011, 4, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olowoyo, J.; Okoya, A.; Adesiyan, I.; Awe, Y.; Lion, G.; Agboola, O.; Oladeji, O. Environmental health science research: Opportunities and challenges for some developing countries in Africa. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2024, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mensah, S.; Dakpogan, H.; Aboh, A.; Sika, K.C.; Abléto, M.; Adjahoutonon, K.B.; Koudandé, O.; Sanders, P.; Mensah, G. Occurrence of antibiotic residues in raw fish Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus from intensive rearing system in Benin. Veterinaria 2019, 68, 91–94. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guetiya Wadoum, R.; Zambou, N.; Anyangwe, F.; Njimou, J.; Coman, M.; Verdenelli, M.C.; Cecchini, C.; Silvi, S.; Orpianesi, C.; Cresci, A. Abusive use of antibiotics in poultry farming in Cameroon and the public health implications. Br. Poult. Sci. 2016, 57, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vougat Ngom, R.R.B.; Garabed, R.B.; Rumbeiha, W.K.; Foyet, H.S.; Schrunk, D.E.; Shao, D.; Zoli Pagnah, A. Penicillin-G and oxytetracycline residues in beef sold for human consumption in Maroua, Cameroon. Int. J. Food Contam. 2017, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mouiche, M.M.M.; Okah-Nnane, N.H.; Moffo, F.; Djibo, I.; Mapiefou, N.P.; Mpouam, S.E.; Mfopit, Y.M.; Mingoas, J.-P.K.; Tebug, S.F.; Ndukum, J.A. Antibiotic Residues in Foods of Animal Origin in Cameroon: Prevalence, Consumers’ Risk Perceptions, and attitudes. J. Food Prot. 2024, 87, 100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fahim, H.M. Evaluate antibiotic residues in beef and effect of cooking and freezing on it. Benha Vet. Med. J. 2019, 36, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohammed, N.; Adare Mengistu, D.; Abdurehman, A.; Belina, D.; Mengistu, S. Determination of tetracycline residues in kidney and muscle of beef cattle slaughtered in Dire Dawa and Harar municipal abattoirs, Eastern Ethiopia. Environ. Health Insights 2022, 16, 11786302221109720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Uma, G.; Ashenef, A. Determination of some antibiotic residues (tetracycline, oxytetracycline and penicillin-G) in beef sold for public consumption at Dukem and Bishoftu (Debre Zeyit) towns, central Ethiopia by LC/MS/MS. Cogent Food Agric. 2023, 9, 2242633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdeta, D.; Tafesse, M.; Bacha, B. Detection of selected antimicrobial residues in red meat and kidney of beef cattle slaughtered at Nekemte municipal abattoir, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Sci. 2024, 10, e1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mingle, C.L.; Darko, G.; Borquaye, L.S.; Asare-Donkor, N.K.; Woode, E.; Koranteng, F. Veterinary drug residues in beef, chicken, and egg from Ghana. Chem. Afr. 2021, 4, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kosgey, A.; Shitandi, A.; Marion, J.W. Antibiotic residues in milk from three popular Kenyan milk vending machines. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ouma, J.; Gachanja, A.; Mugo, S.; Gikunju, J. Antibiotic residues in milk from Juja and Githurai markets in Kenya by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chem. Afr. 2021, 4, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Odundo, F.; Ngigi, A.; Magu, M. Sulfonamides and β-lactam antibiotic residues and human health risk assessment in commercial chicken meat sold in Nairobi City, Kenya. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Olatoye, I.O.; Daniel, O.F.; Ishola, S.A. Screening of antibiotics and chemical analysis of penicillin residue in fresh milk and traditional dairy products in Oyo state, Nigeria. Vet. World 2016, 9, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yusuf, M.; Kabir, J.; Bello, M.; Babashani, M. Occurrence of tetracycline residues in raw milk from dairy farms in Kano state, Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Congress of the Nigerian Veterinary Medical Association (Kano, 2017), Kano, Nigeria, 30 July–4 August 2017; p. 155. [Google Scholar]
  32. Oluwafemi, F.; Oluwabamiwo, B.F.; Oluwatosin, O.O.; Akinrinade, O.R.; Kolapo, A.L. Assessment of microbiological and residual antibiotics status in milk sold in Abeokuta, Ogun State. Nigeria. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 6, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adama, J.; Mande, L.; Usman, A. Detection of antimicrobial drug residues in edible tissues from Bunaji cattle slaughtered in Minna modern abattoir. Niger. J. Anim. Prod. 2020, 47, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lateefat, H.M.; Olaniyi, O.A.; Yusuf, A.B.; Azaman, I.; Raimi, M.O. Elixirs of life, threats to human and environmental well-being: Assessment of antibiotic residues in raw meat sold within central market Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna State, Nigeria. BioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramatla, T.; Ngoma, L.; Adetunji, M.; Mwanza, M. Evaluation of antibiotic residues in raw meat using different analytical methods. Antibiotics 2017, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ndlovu, K.; Mwanza, M.; Nleya, N.; Ngoma, L. Detection and quantification of antibiotic residues in goat milk in Mahikeng Local Municipality. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2024, 95, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kimera, Z.I.; Mdegela, R.H.; Mhaiki, C.J.; Karimuribo, E.D.; Mabiki, F.; Nonga, H.E.; Mwesongo, J. Determination of oxytetracycline residues in cattle meat marketed in the Kilosa district, Tanzania: Research communication. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2015, 82, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mgonja, F.; Mosha, R.; Mabiki, F.; Choongo, K. Oxytetracycline residue levels in beef in Dodoma region, Tanzania. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2017, 11, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nchima, G.; Choongo, K.; Muzandu, K.; Nalubamba, K.; Muma, J.; Bumbangi, F.; Monga, G.; Kangwa, H. Determination of oxytetracycline and sulphamethazine residues in marketed beef from selected parts of Zambia to assess compliance with maximum residual limits. Am. J. Res. Commun 2017, 5, 42–64. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mouiche, M.M.M.; Moffo, F.; Akoachere, J.-F.T.K.; Okah-Nnane, N.H.; Mapiefou, N.P.; Ndze, V.N.; Wade, A.; Djuikwo-Teukeng, F.F.; Toghoua, D.G.T.; Zambou, H.R. Antimicrobial resistance from a one health perspective in Cameroon: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Anueyiagu, K.; Nandi, S.; Uzochukwu, I.; Sule, S. Prevalence of antibiotic residues in body organs of pigs slaughtered in Jos, Nigeria. Afr. J. Clin. Exp. Microbiol. 2022, 23, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Monger, X.; Gilbert, A.; Saucier, L.; Vincent, A. Antibiotic resistance: From pig to meat. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kebede, G.; Zenebe, T.; Disassa, H.; Tolosa, T. Review on detection of antimicrobial residues in raw bulk milk in dairy farms. Afr. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2014, 6, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rware, H.; Monica, K.K.; Idah, M.; Fernadis, M.; Davis, I.; Buke, W.; Solveig, D.; Daniel, K.; Duncan, C.; Morten, B. Examining antibiotic use in Kenya: Farmers’ knowledge and practices in addressing antibiotic resistance. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2024, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Martínez-López, B.; Perez, A.M.; Feliziani, F.; Rolesu, S.; Mur, L.; Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J.M. Evaluation of the risk factors contributing to the African swine fever occurrence in Sardinia, Italy. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Marshall, B.M.; Levy, S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 718–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ojo, O.O.; Awonuga, D.; Dedeke, I.O.F.; Nwadike, V.U.; Adenaya, O.R.; Odelola, O.I. Prevalence of Group B Streptococcus Colonisation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Health Facility in Ogun State, Southwest Nigeria. J. West Afr. Coll. Surg. 2019, 9, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Kagira, J.; Ngotho, M.; Mugo, E.; Kiplimo, M.; Maina, N. Occurrence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from milk of dairy cows in small-holder farms in Juja sub-county, Kenya. Asian J. Res. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kimera, Z.I.; Mshana, S.E.; Rweyemamu, M.M.; Mboera, L.E.; Matee, M.I. Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment: An African perspective. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Odey, T.O.J.; Tanimowo, W.O.; Afolabi, K.O.; Jahid, I.K.; Reuben, R.C. Antimicrobial use and resistance in food animal production: Food safety and associated concerns in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. Microbiol. 2024, 27, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akbari, M.Z.; Xu, Y.; Lu, Z.; Peng, L. Review of antibiotics treatment by advance oxidation processes. Environ. Adv. 2021, 5, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ngangom, B.L.; Tamunjoh, S.S.A.; Boyom, F.F. Antibiotic residues in food animals: Public health concern. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 411–415. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pandey, N.; Cascella, M. Beta-lactam antibiotics. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bacanlı, M.G. The two faces of antibiotics: An overview of the effects of antibiotic residues in foodstuffs. Arch. Toxicol. 2024, 98, 1717–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Founou, L.L.; Founou, R.C.; Essack, S.Y. Antibiotic resistance in the food chain: A developing country-perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Founou, L.L.; Amoako, D.G.; Founou, R.C.; Essack, S.Y. Antibiotic resistance in food animals in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 648–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Landers, T.F.; Cohen, B.; Wittum, T.E.; Larson, E.L. A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep. 2012, 127, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manyi-Loh, C.; Mamphweli, S.; Meyer, E.; Okoh, A. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: Potential public health implications. Molecules 2018, 23, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Van Boeckel, T.P.; Pires, J.; Silvester, R.; Zhao, C.; Song, J.; Criscuolo, N.G.; Gilbert, M.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Laxminarayan, R. Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low-and middle-income countries. Science 2019, 365, eaaw1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Berendonk, T.U.; Manaia, C.M.; Merlin, C.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Cytryn, E.; Walsh, F.; Bürgmann, H.; Sørum, H.; Norström, M.; Pons, M.-N. Tackling antibiotic resistance: The environmental framework. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. McEachran, A.D.; Blackwell, B.R.; Hanson, J.D.; Wooten, K.J.; Mayer, G.D.; Cox, S.B.; Smith, P.N. Antibiotics, bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes: Aerial transport from cattle feed yards via particulate matter. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharma, C.; Rokana, N.; Chandra, M.; Singh, B.P.; Gulhane, R.D.; Gill, J.P.S.; Ray, P.; Puniya, A.K.; Panwar, H. Antimicrobial resistance: Its surveillance, impact, and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 4, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Okaiyeto, S.A.; Sutar, P.P.; Chen, C.; Ni, J.-B.; Wang, J.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Zhang, J.-S.; Xu, M.-Q.; Fang, X.-M.; Zhang, C. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in food systems: Current status, resistance mechanisms, and mitigation strategies. Agric. Commun. 2024, 2, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khan, S.A.; Imtiaz, M.A.; Sayeed, M.A.; Shaikat, A.H.; Hassan, M.M. Antimicrobial resistance pattern in domestic animal-wildlife-environmental niche via the food chain to humans with a Bangladesh perspective; a systematic review. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Stanley, D.; Batacan Jr, R.; Bajagai, Y.S. Rapid growth of antimicrobial resistance: The role of agriculture in the problem and the solutions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 6953–6962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dopcea, G.N.; Dopcea, I.; Nanu, A.E.; Diguţă, C.F.; Matei, F. Resistance and cross-resistance in Staphylococcus spp. strains following prolonged exposure to different antiseptics. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 21, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Puangseree, J.; Jeamsripong, S.; Prathan, R.; Pungpian, C.; Chuanchuen, R. Resistance to widely-used disinfectants and heavy metals and cross resistance to antibiotics in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs, pork and pig carcass. Food Control 2021, 124, 107892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hao, R.; Zhao, R.; Qiu, S.; Wang, L.; Song, H. Antibiotics crisis in China. Science 2015, 348, 1100–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Caniça, M.; Manageiro, V.; Abriouel, H.; Moran-Gilad, J.; Franz, C.M. Antibiotic resistance in foodborne bacteria. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 84, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vieira, A.R.; Collignon, P.; Aarestrup, F.M.; McEwen, S.A.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Hald, T.; Wegener, H.C. Association between antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from food animals and blood stream isolates from humans in Europe: An ecological study. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. van den Bogaard, A.E.; Stobberingh, E.E. Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics: Links between animals and humans. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2000, 14, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bayou, K.; Haile, N. Review on antibiotic residues in food of animal origin: Economic and public health impacts. Appl. J. Hyg. 2017, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kyuchukova, R. Antibiotic residues and human health hazard-review. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 26, 664–668. [Google Scholar]
  74. Baynes, R.E.; Dedonder, K.; Kissell, L.; Mzyk, D.; Marmulak, T.; Smith, G.; Tell, L.; Gehring, R.; Davis, J.; Riviere, J.E. Health concerns and management of select veterinary drug residues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 88, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hautekeete, M.L.; Geerts, A. The hepatic stellate (Ito) cell: Its role in human liver disease. Virchows Arch. 1997, 430, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M.; Patyra, E.; Grelik, A.; Chyłek-Purchała, M.; Kozak, B.; Kwiatek, K. Contamination of animal feed with undeclared tetracyclines—Confirmatory analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry after microbiological plate test. Molecules 2020, 25, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Riviere, J.E.; Papich, M.G. Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  78. van Gerven, N.M.; de Boer, Y.S.; Mulder, C.J.; van Nieuwkerk, C.M.; Bouma, G. Auto immune hepatitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Falowo, A.B.; Akimoladun, O.F. Veterinary drug residues in meat and meat products: Occurrence, detection and implications. Vet. Med. Pharm. 2019, 3, 10-5772. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang, Y.-J.; Li, S.; Gan, R.-Y.; Zhou, T.; Xu, D.-P.; Li, H.-B. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7493–7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, Y.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; Song, R.; Tan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Sources, environmental fate, and ecological risks of antibiotics in sediments of Asia’s longest river: A whole-basin investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 14439–14451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Piñeiro, S.A.; Cerniglia, C.E. Antimicrobial drug residues in animal-derived foods: Potential impact on the human intestinal microbiome. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 44, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ben, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, M.; Liu, L.; Wong, M.H.; Zheng, C. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sehgal, K.; Khanna, S. Gut microbiome and Clostridioides difficile infection: A closer look at the microscopic interface. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2021, 14, 1756284821994736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Birkett, N.; Al-Zoughool, M.; Bird, M.; Baan, R.A.; Zielinski, J.; Krewski, D. Overview of biological mechanisms of human carcinogens. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2019, 22, 288–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Beyene, T. Veterinary drug residues in food-animal products: Its risk factors and potential effects on public health. J. Vet Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Treiber, F.M.; Beranek-Knauer, H. Antimicrobial residues in food from animal origin—A review of the literature focusing on products collected in stores and markets worldwide. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arsène, M.M.J.; Davares, A.K.L.; Viktorovna, P.I.; Andreevna, S.L.; Sarra, S.; Khelifi, I.; Sergueïevna, D.M. The public health issue of antibiotic residues in food and feed: Causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Vet. World 2022, 15, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mbarga Manga, J.A.; LA, S.; Viktorovna, P.I. Evaluation of apparent microflora and study of antibiotic resistance of coliforms isolated from the shells of poultry eggs in Moscow-Russia. J. Adv. Microbiol. 2021, 20, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  90. Commission, E. Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 15, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Showing the prevalence of antibiotic residues in this study.
Figure 1. Showing the prevalence of antibiotic residues in this study.
Antibiotics 14 00090 g001
Figure 3. Meta-analysis flowchart for the eligibility of the information source.
Figure 3. Meta-analysis flowchart for the eligibility of the information source.
Antibiotics 14 00090 g003
Table 1. Prevalence of antibiotic residues in animal products consumed in some African countries.
Table 1. Prevalence of antibiotic residues in animal products consumed in some African countries.
CountryRegionSourceAnimal ProductAntibioticsConcentration (µg/kg)References
BeninWest AfricaFishMusclesAmphenicols,
Macrolids
Tetracycline
Not detected
Detected
[18]
CamerounMiddle AfricaChickenLiver
Muscle
Tetracycline150 ± 30
62.4 ± 15.3
[19]
CamerounMiddle AfricaCowBeef Penicillin
Oxytetracycline
17.580
240
[20]
CameroonMiddle Africa Raw egg, raw milk and beefAntibiotic presentDetected[21]
Egypt CowRaw beefGentamicin
β-lactam
Ciprofloxacin
Erythromycin
Oxytetracyclines
Sulfonamide
46–112.7
20–67.73
56.46–81.91
34.29–45.54
19.9–119
12.67–19.33
[22]
EgyptNorthern AfricaCowBeefAminoglycoside
Penicillin G
Ciprofloxacin
Macrolides
Oxytetracycline
Sulfonamide
46–76
20–55
56.45–81.91
29.29–41.38
19.9–86.7
12.67–19.33
[22]
EthiopiaEast AfricaCattleKidney
Muscle
Tetracycline16–43
6–43
[23]
EthiopiaEast AfricaCowBeefTetracycline
Penicillin G
Oxyteracycline
9.35
Not Detected
15.99 ± 13.2–22.32 ± 2.38
[24]
Ethiopia East Africa Kidney
Muscle
Oxytetracycline
Doxycycline, Sulphadiazine, penicillin G, and Enrofloxacin
0–463.35
0–354.55
[25]
GhanaWest AfricaCow, ChickenBeef
Chicken
Egg
Tetracycline, Oxytetracycline, Chlortetracycline, Amoxicillin, Cefazolin,
penicillin G), sulfamethoxazole, sulfadoxine, sulfathiazole
81.35
76.94
234.43
35.76
47.02
41.02
103.98
46.05
68.63
[26]
KenyaEast Africa Milkβ-lactam Detected[27]
KenyaEast Africa MilkAmoxicillin
Cloxacillin
Tetracycline
Sulfamethoxazole
Trimethoprim
6.7
53.3
30.6
5.0
6.2
[28]
KenyaEast AfricaChickenMeatSulfonamide
Sulfadiazine
Sulfamethazine
39.91–101.39
35.21
39.34
[29]
NigeriaWest Africa Fresh Milk
Cheese
Fermented Milk
Penicillin G15.22 ± 0.61
7.60 ± 0.60
8.24 ± 0.50
[30]
NigeriaWest Africa MilkTetracyclineDetected[31]
NigeriaWest Africa MilkTetracycline, oxytetracycline
chlortetracycline
Doxycycline
0.01–1.57
Not detected
[32]
NigeriaWest AfricaCattleMeat
Liver
Kidney
Oxytetracycline
Above MRL
[33]
NigeriaWest AfricaCattleBeefTetracycline
Ciprofloxacin
Oxytetracycline
17.57 ± 6.20–594 ± 47.71
22.4 ± 5.20–82.77 ± 12.60
227.2 ± 16.45–474.4 ± 119.74
[34]
South AfricaSouthern AfricaChicken
Cow
Pig
Chicken
Muscle
Liver
Beef
Muscle
Liver
Kidney



Muscle
Kidney
Liver

Muscle
Liver

Muscle
Liver
Kidney

Muscle
Liver
Kidney

Muscle
Liver

Muscle
Liver
Kidney

Muscle
Liver
Kidney

Muscle
Liver

Muscle
Liver
Kidney

Muscle
Liver
Kidney
Ciprofloxacin










Streptomycin










Sulfonamide










Tetracycline
89.6–175.9
152.2–289.1

89.6–146.1
145.2–316.5
98.2–197.0

42.6–95.8
72.5–140.2
220.0–355.6
98.4–452.9
368.8–986.4

625.9–989.2
498.2–920.1
614.2–1280.6

620.3–875.8
196.5–535.9
14.2–1052.6

32.5–65.9
45.8–81.6


19.8–87.9
37.6–73.9


48.2–69.9
52.8–92.8

41.2–82.1
42.56–286.2

26.6–61.5
41.2–221.6
41.2–359.2

46.67–86.9
101.3–489.1
43.7–255.9



[35]
South AfricaSouthern AfricaGoatMilkTetracycline and StreptomycinBelow MRLs[36]
TanzaniaEast AfricaChickenMuscle
Liver
Kidney
Tetracycline2604.1 ± 703.7
3434.4 ± 604.4
3533.1 ± 803.6
[37]
TanzaniaEast AfricaCowBeefOxytetracycline0.69 ± 0.09[38]
ZambiaEast AfricaCowBeefOxytetracycline
Sulfamethazine
27.26–481.61
11.92–259.98
[39]
Table 2. Maximum allowable residue limits of antibiotics in products of animal origin [90].
Table 2. Maximum allowable residue limits of antibiotics in products of animal origin [90].
AntibioticsAnimal SpeciesTissuesMRL (μg/kg)
Ampicillin All food-producing species Milk
Liver
Fat
Kidney
Muscle
4
50
50
50
50
Amoxicillin All food-producing species Milk
Liver
Fat
Kidney
Milk
4
50
50
50
50
Avilamycin Poultry, porcine, rabbit Kidney
Liver
Fat
Muscle
200
300
100
50
Benzylpenicillin All food-producing species Milk
Liver
Fat
Kidney
Muscle
4
50
50
50
50
Bacitracin Bovine Milk 100
Cefapirin Bovine Muscle
Fat
Kidney
Milk
50
50
100
60
Clavulanic acid Bovine, porcine Kidney
Fat
Liver
Muscle
400
100
200
100
Cefacetrile Bovine Milk 125
Cefazolin Bovine, ovine, caprine Milk 50
Cloxacillin All food-producing species Milk
Liver
Fat
Kidney
Muscle
30
300
300
300
300
Chlortetracycline All food-producingspecies Muscle
Liver
Kidney
Milk
Eggs
100
300
600
100
200
Clavulanic acid Bovine, porcine Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
100
100
200
400
Cloxacillin All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
300
300
300
300
30
Colistin All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
Eggs
150
150
150
200
50
300
Doxycycline Bovine Porcine, poultry Muscle
Liver
Kidney
100
300
600
Not for use in animals from which milk is produced for human consumption
Muscle
Skin and fat
Liver
Kidney
100
300
300
600
Not for use in animals from which eggs are produced for human consumption  
Dicloxacillin All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
300
300
300
300
30
Erythromycin A All other food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
Eggs
200
200
200
200
40
150
Gentamicin Bovine, porcine Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
50
50
200
750
100
Kanamycin A All food-producing species except fin fish Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
100
100
600
2500
150
Oxytetracycline All food-producing species Muscle
Liver
Kidney
Milk
Eggs
100
300
600
100
200
Oxacillin All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
300
300
300
300
30
Sulfonamides All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
100
100
100
100
Streptomycin All ruminants, porcine, rabbit Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
500
500
500
1000
Tylosin A All food-producing species Muscle
Fat
Liver
Kidney
Milk
Egg
100
100
100
100
50
200
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oladeji, O.M.; Mugivhisa, L.L.; Olowoyo, J.O. Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Some African Countries and Their Possible Impact on Human Health. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010090

AMA Style

Oladeji OM, Mugivhisa LL, Olowoyo JO. Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Some African Countries and Their Possible Impact on Human Health. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oladeji, Oluwaseun Mary, Liziwe Lizbeth Mugivhisa, and Joshua Oluwole Olowoyo. 2025. "Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Some African Countries and Their Possible Impact on Human Health" Antibiotics 14, no. 1: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010090

APA Style

Oladeji, O. M., Mugivhisa, L. L., & Olowoyo, J. O. (2025). Antibiotic Residues in Animal Products from Some African Countries and Their Possible Impact on Human Health. Antibiotics, 14(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop