Next Article in Journal
Effect of Thicknesses of Liquid Crystal Layers on Shift of Resonance Frequencies of Metamaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Use of Chromium Coating for Inner-Side Fuel Cladding Protection: Thickness Identification Based on Fission Fragments Implantation and Damage Profile
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Electroless Nickel–Boron Deposit from Optimized Stabilizer-Free Bath
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Protective Coatings for Accident Tolerant Zr-Based Fuel Claddings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/coatings11050577
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Temperature Oxidation of Cr-Coated Resistance Upset Welds Made from E110 Alloy

by
Dmitrii Sidelev
*,
Sergey Ruchkin
and
Egor Kashkarov
School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(5), 577; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050577
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 9 May 2021 / Accepted: 14 May 2021 / Published: 15 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Coatings for Accident Tolerant Fuel Claddings)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The resistance upset welds (RUW) made from E110 alloy without and with Cr coatings were oxidized in air atmosphere at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min. The cross-section microstructure, elemental composition and hardness were studied before and after oxidation using optical and scanning electron microscopy, and indentations in welding region. The RUW welding does not noticeably change oxidation kinetics of E110 alloy. The most crucial effect has surface non-regularities formed after welding, which prevent uniform coating deposition on full surface of welded cladding tube and end plug. Cr coating deposition can strongly reduce oxidation of welded E110 alloy, while additional post-processing treatment should be applied to improve surface morphology after RUW welding. Several suggestions favorable to development of ATF Zr-based claddings using Cr coating deposition on welded nuclear rods were discussed.

1. Introduction

Currently, accident tolerant fuel (ATF) is being developed to improve safety of light or pressurized water reactors [1,2]. The short-term ATF strategy is aimed to improve safety of already produced Zr-based alloy claddings by deposition of protective coatings. A lot of deposition methods such as magnetron sputtering, cold spraying, laser cladding, arc evaporation and various coating materials (Cr, FeCrAl, CrN, etc.) are still being studied to develop ATF claddings resistant under conditions simulating normal and accidental operation of nuclear reactors [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Nevertheless, the last published data showed that Zr-based alloys can be protected by magnetron deposited Cr coating during high temperature (HT) oxidation for a long-term period [9]. Such an approach seems to be one of the best prospects for short-term development of ATF. The high potential of Cr coatings can be also confirmed by the participation of industrial/research institutes such as CEA (France), VNIINM (Russia), KIT (Germany) and others [7,9,10,11] in several full-scale tests of ATF Zr-based claddings with UO2 fuel in nuclear reactors.
A nuclear fuel rod consists of uranium-based fuel placed in Zr cladding tube (~Ø9 mm and wall thickness ~0.5 mm) with two end plugs. Welding is necessarily applied to join end plugs to a cladding tube at both sides to ensure leak tightness of fuel rods. Different welding methods such as electron-beam welding (EBW), laser beam welding (LBW), tungsten inert gas welding (TIG) and resistance upset-butt welding (RUW) can be used. Therefore, the special attention of ATF development should be devoted to estimate oxidation behavior of Zr-based alloy welds especially in the loss of coolant accident conditions (LOCA). Oxidation tests of EBW, LBW, TIG and RUW welds of Zr-based alloys were studied in several works [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Vandegrift et al. concluded the most protective behavior of EBW welds of Zr-1Nb alloy in comparison with TIG welds and/or made from Zircaloys (Zry-3 and Zry-4) at HT isothermal and transient conditions in both dry and humid air [12]. Laser processing of Zr-based alloys usually reduces their corrosion resistance in autoclave tests [14,16,18]. Segregation of Nb, Fe or Sn at grain boundaries results in secondary phases precipitations such as Zr(Fe,Cr)2 which affect the oxidation kinetics of Zr-based alloy welds [17,19]. Additional post-processing can be applied to improve homogeneity of weld microstructure and distribution of secondary phases. The heat treatment at 577 °C for 5 h in vacuum resulted in good ductility and strength of LBW welds similar to bulk Zr-based alloys [20]. Corrosion resistance of EBW welds can be improved using electron beam thermocycling treatment coupled with annealing at 580 °C and mechanical treatment/surface etching [21]. Amorphization of LBW welds made from Zry-4 under low dose Kr+ irradiation was used to improve their corrosion resistance [22]. Using a distributed heat source had a positive effect on structure and corrosion resistance of EBW welds made of Zr-2.5%Nb alloy [23]. Despite special post-treatment processing, the welds made from Zr-based alloys demonstrate poor corrosion resistance. Coating deposition was applied to protect welds from Al-, Mg-based alloys and steels and considered only for relatively low temperatures [24,25,26]. Zirconia has a non-protective behavior during HT oxidation; therefore, additional approaches are developing to enhance corrosion resistance of welds for application in ATF nuclear fuel materials. Currently, there are no literature or experimental data concerning the oxidation behavior of RUW welds made from Zr-Nb alloys under high temperatures (800 °C and more). The behavior of coated Zr-Nb welds under HT oxidation has not yet been studied.
The aim of this study is to determine the role of Cr coating deposition on oxidation behavior of resistance upset welds made from E110 alloy. The RUW welds were selected as such type of welding is currently used in technological process of nuclear fuel production in Russia (Rosatom, PJSC (NCCP), Novosibirsk, Russia). Therefore, the samples of RUW welds without and with 10 μm thick Cr coatings were prepared and their oxidation behavior was analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

The E110 (0.9–1.1 wt.% Nb, 0.06–0.1 wt.% O, Zr balance) alloy samples with RUW welds were prepared by PJSC (NCCP), their geometry and outer view are shown in Figure 1. Chromium coatings were deposited onto the welded samples by using the vacuum installation equipped with multi-cathode magnetron sputtering systems. The detailed description of the installation is presented in previous study [27]. Firstly, the samples were rinsed with acetone in an ultrasonic bath and dried by compressed air for 2 min. Then, the samples were fixed to the substrate-holder and placed in vacuum chamber, which was evacuated up to the base pressure of 2 × 10−3 Pa. The special substrate-holders were used to deposit Cr coating on outer surface of the samples (the inner surface remained uncoated). Prior to deposition, the samples were etched by Ar+ ions using an ion source with closed electron drift for 20 min. The following etching parameters were used: Ar pressure of 0.15 Pa, accelerated voltage of 2.5 kV and ion current of 40 mA. The multi-cathode magnetron sputtering system with three disk Cr (99.95%, Ø90 mm) targets was used for deposition. The temperature of the samples was measured and controlled using an Optris CTlaser 3MH1CF4 (Optris GmbH, Berlin, Germany) infrared pyrometer (spectral range—2.3 μm) during coating deposition. According to our previous results [28], thick and dense Cr coating can protect Zr-Nb alloy from oxidation at high temperatures during a long-term period. Similar results were also shown in the literature [7,9]. Thus, the deposition mode of the Cr coating was selected based on the previous studies of Cr coating deposition on flat samples made from Zr-Nb alloy and its oxidation performance. The deposition parameters are shown in Table 1. Two types of the coated samples were obtained. The first type of the samples had a Cr coating on full outer surface, while the second type—Only on a cladding surface (end plug and RUW weld were uncoated). The appearance of the samples is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Oxidation Test

An atmospheric furnace ATS 3210 (Applied Test Systems Inc., Butler, PA, USA) was used to perform HT oxidation tests at 1100 °C for different isothermal periods. The furnace was pre-heated up to 500 °C and the samples were loaded in the chamber. The alumina tube holders were used. The samples were heated up to 1100 °C with the rate of ~21 °C/min and then were oxidized for 2, 10 and 30 min. After HT oxidation, the chamber was opened and the samples were naturally cooled to room temperature (~22 °C/min). The appearance of the samples in the furnace before and after oxidation is shown in Figure 1. The samples were necessarily photographed before and after each oxidation test.

2.3. Sample Characterization

The mass gain of the samples was measured using an analytical balance machine Sartorius CP124S (Goettingen, Germany) with an accuracy of 10−4 g. The thickness of the as-deposited Cr coating and elemental composition of the samples after oxidation were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector (LEO EVO 50, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). To control thickness of as-deposited Cr coatings and their microstructure, polished Si (110) substrate was also used in the deposition experiment. Figure 2 shows the cross-section of Cr coating deposited on Si substrate. The Cr coating had dense and columnar microstructure. The thickness of the coating was uniform and equal to 9.8 ± 0.4 μm.
The microstructure of the as-received and oxidized samples were studied by an optical microscopy using AXIOVERT 200MAT (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Hardness was measured on the cross-section of the samples with a load of 0.5 N using Vickers micro-hardness tester Pruftechnik KB-30S (Hochdorf-Assenheim, Germany). The Vickers pyramid from diamond was used as the indenter. The hardness measurements were performed in a welding region before and after the oxidation tests. The distance between indentations was equal to ~100 μm (it was higher than 3d, where d—averaged length of diagonals). The dwell time was 15 s. In total, 36 indentations were done for each sample, and the distribution of hardness in a welding region was plotted.

3. Results

3.1. As-Received Samples

Figure 3 presents the SEM images of the cross-section of the as-received RUW weld made from E110 alloy.
There was no difference in microstructure of welding region and end plug or cladding tube. The microstructure of the weld region consists of non-equiaxed coarse grains with the average size of ~10–12 μm. The elemental analysis by EDS technique showed uniform distribution of Zr and Nb over welding region without any Nb precipitations. Similar microstructure behavior of Zr-Nb and Zr-Sn alloys were also found after EBW welding in [29]. Most likely that the temperature during welding process was enough for dissolution any precipitates in zirconium matrix.

3.2. Weight Gain Measurements

Table 2 shows the outer view of the samples after oxidation. White-colored film was grown on the surface of the uncoated sample after oxidation indicating the formation of zirconia scale. The coated sample had dark-green color that is usually observed for chromia scale. The sample with partially Cr coating had a sharp border of zirconia and chromia that corresponds to the initial position of uncoated and Cr-coated surfaces. Moreover, local oxidation (white-colored area) was found in a burr of RUW welds for the fully Cr-coated samples. These regions are additionally highlighted by red arrows in Table 2 for each sample (after 2, 10, and 30 min oxidation). The samples had similar outer view after 10 min oxidation, but swelling of all samples in bottom part (in region of cladding tube) was found. This effect was caused by oxidation of the inner uncoated area of the tube. The changes of sample geometry were observed in other studies [4], where an inner surface of the tubes was uncoated. The severe degradation of the uncoated sample was found after 30 min oxidation test. The failure of this sample in bottom part was due to its geometry where a thin wall of a cladding tube rapid oxidized on a three sides (outer, internal and face surfaces). At the same time, swelling of the Cr-coated samples in bottom became more pronounced.
Due to complex geometry of the samples, mass gain after oxidation was calculated and compared only to the uncoated and fully Cr-coated samples to estimate protective properties of Cr coating (Figure 4) using the next equation:
Mass   gain = m 1100 − m 0 m 0 × 100 %
where m1100—mass of the sample after oxidation at 1100 °C, m0—initial mass of the sample.
Figure 4 shows higher mass gain of the uncoated samples than for the Cr-coated samples. Moreover, the mass gain increased with the change of oxidation time from 2 to 30 min. However, the Cr-coated sample had lower mass gain after 30 min oxidation (2.0%) than that after 10 min (2.3%). Such result can be caused by spalling of zirconia from the inner surface of this sample during oxidation test. In common, the obtained results present the decrease in oxidation rate of Cr-coated samples by ~2.5–5.0 times in comparison with the uncoated ones for the considered oxidation conditions. The significant decrease in mass gain of Cr-coated Zr-based alloys under HT oxidation was found in other studies: in 9 times in air at 1100 °C for 20 min [27], in 8–11 times in a steam at 1100 °C for 850 s [7], in 2–4 times in a steam at 1200 °C for 1500 s [9].

3.3. Cross-Section Microstructure of the Samples

Figure 5 and Figure 6 show cross-section microstructures of the uncoated and fully Cr-coated samples after oxidation at 1100 °C. The uncoated sample was predominantly oxidized on its outer surface, while lower oxidation was observed on the internal surface. The most pronounced and crucial oxidation was found in a weld burr region (up to 800 μm) and end plug (~1 mm). The thickness of oxide layers was less (50–500 μm) in other regions.
According to Figure 6, high oxidation was observed in a weld burr region of the uncoated samples. The thickness of oxide layers increased from 300 to 800 µm as the oxidation time was changed from 2 to 30 min. The high non-uniformity of the oxide layer formed on the uncoated sample can be additionally caused by “nitrogen effect” [30,31]. The latter strongly accelerates oxidation kinetics of Zr-based alloys due to ZrN→ZrO2 transformation accompanied by high volume expansion (~48%). The accelerated degradation of Zircalloy-4 and M5 alloys in air were also found in [31], where the significant role on oxidation rate and non-uniformity was belonged to re-oxidation process of ZrN to ZrO2. This was usually pronounced at temperatures higher than 800 °C.
In the case of fully Cr-coated samples, outer surface of the samples had protective chromia scale under the considered oxidation conditions excluding the region of weld burr. This effect was clearly seen in the appearance of the samples after oxidation tests (Table 2). For both types of the samples, the formation of different surface morphology in a weld burr region during welding should be taken into account, when performing the comparative analysis. Thus, it also can influence the oxidation behavior (see Figure 6b).
The ZrN and ZrO2 grains were clearly seen in the uncoated regions of the samples at higher optical resolution (Figure 7). While the fully Cr-coated sample had the multilayered structure of Cr2O3 oxide layer/residual Cr layer/Cr-Zr interdiffusion layer/E110 alloy which is typically observed in oxidized Cr-coated Zr-based alloys during protective scale (Figure 7c) [9,28]. The cross-section microstructure of the partial Cr-coated sample is presented in Figure 7b. The Cr coating was still adherent at the border of coated/uncoated regions of the sample even at 1100 °C up to 30 min. Moreover, oxide layer was predominantly grown in the depth, while less kinetics was observed in the side direction (underneath the Cr coating). It indicates high coating adhesion of Cr to Zr-based alloys, which is typical for magnetron sputtering technologies and in the case of using special pre-treatment procedures like ion cleaning, preliminary heating, etc. [32,33].

3.4. Elemental Composition of the Samples

Figure 8 shows elemental compositions over depth of the uncoated and Cr-coated samples after 30 min oxidation at 1100 °C. According to EDS line-scans, the uncoated sample was strongly oxidized. A lot of microcracks were found on its surface. The O and N signals were found at the depth of 500 µm and more in E110 alloy. At the same time, the penetration depth of oxygen and nitrogen was less ~5 μm in the case of the Cr-coated samples. It corresponds to one half of the thickness of the as-deposited Cr coatings. No sign of O or N were found in the E110 alloy, when the fully Cr-coated sample was studied. However, a thin (1.5–2.5 μm) diffusion layer of Cr and Zr was detected underneath the residual Cr layer.

3.5. Hardness Distributions

Figure 9 shows hardness maps of the cross-section of the RUW welds made from E110 alloy before and after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min. The hardness of the as-received sample in the welding region was uniform and equal to 185–215 HV, which corresponds to the value for bulk Zr-Nb alloys [34]. The increase in hardness up to ~300, 350 and 420 HV was found for the uncoated samples after 2, 10 and 30 min oxidation, respectively. The oxygen and nitrogen diffusion results in the increase in hardness of Zr-based alloy due to the formation of α-Zr(O) or α-Zr(N) phases under HT oxidation [35]. The hardness maps for Cr-coated welds demonstrate high protective properties of the coating. The average hardness values in the weld region are slightly decreased to ~145–190 HV after oxidation that can be caused by thermal treatment (grain growth).

4. Discussion

The oxidation behavior of the uncoated and Cr-coated RUW welds made from E110 alloy was studied. Oxidation tests were performed in air atmosphere at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min. The uncoated samples were strongly oxidized due to non-protective scale of zirconia at high temperatures. The presence of N in atmosphere accelerated oxidation rate of the samples and resulted in the non-uniform growth of oxide layer over the cross-section of the samples. Cracking and spallation of zirconia layers can cause breakaway oxidation of Zr-based alloys that was also found in other studies during high-temperature (800–1200 °C) oxidation, especially in nitrogen-content atmosphere [27,31,36]. Nevertheless, the comparison of oxide thickness in welding zone, end plug and cladding tube showed the predominantly oxidation in the region of weld burr.
The geometry of the samples can also have influence on oxidation rate in different regions of the uncoated samples. Zirconium oxidation is an exothermic reaction (ΔH = −584.5 kJ/mol at 1200 °C) [27] that can result in non-uniform heating of the samples during HT oxidation. Taking into account the equal (or similar) surface area of cladding tube and end plug, a thin-wall cladding tube can be heated up to higher temperatures than end plug having higher volume. This effect can also influence on oxidation kinetics of the investigated samples that was clearly observed in their appearance (Table 2).
The deposition of 10 μm-thick Cr coatings effectively prevented the oxidation of welded E110 alloy under the considered conditions. The formation of protective scale of chromia with the thickness of ~5 μm and Cr-Zr diffusion layer at the “Cr coating-E110 alloy” interface were found after the oxidation test at 1100 °C for 30 min. According to EDS line-scans and hardness maps (Figure 8 and Figure 9), oxygen and nitrogen can diffuse to the welding region with the formation of hard and brittle solid solutions of α-Zr(O) and α-Zr(N). Therefore, the double increase (up to 420 HV) of hardness was found in the region of RUW weld for the uncoated samples after 30 min HT oxidation. The above-mentioned results showed enough coating thickness (10 μm) of Cr to protect the welded E110 alloy under 30 min oxidation at 1100 °C. Such or some higher coating thickness (10–15 μm) was also suggested as an optimum for steam oxidation at 1100–1200 °C by other authors [7,9]. Nevertheless, the Cr-Zr interdiffusion can be a problem of coated nuclear rods at HT oxidation conditions, so a coating thickness can be increased. The protective coating can be consumed by diffusion and dissolution of Cr in Zr-based alloys at high temperatures [10]. Moreover, the melting temperature of liquid eutectic Cr2Zr phase is in the range of 1305–1332 °C [9,37,38,39], so surface of Cr-coated cladding can melt that results in loss of protectiveness and cause oxidation of zirconium. Thus, a barrier sublayer (e.g., Mo, Ta, etc.) should be additionally applied for prevention of Cr-Zr interdiffusion at temperatures higher 1300 °C [39,40].
Despite high protectiveness of the Cr coatings presented in Section 3.3., the local oxidation can occur in the region of weld burr (Figure 10). Thus, the additional post-treatment of the RUW welds should be needed to decrease surface roughness of weld burr and uniform coating deposition. For this purpose, mechanical processing, chemical etching [21] or ion-plasma treatment [41] can be considered.
It should be noted that lower oxidation kinetics of E110 alloy in the border of uncoated and Cr-coated regions also like as lower oxide thickness in the defect region of weld burr in the case of the fully Cr-coated samples. The oxide layer predominantly formed into the depth of E110 alloy than in side direction (under the protective coating). However, the deposition of Cr coating onto full surface of the samples seems to be better than partially coating deposition (only on cladding tube). The obtained results can be used for development of coating technology for ATF Zr-based claddings.

5. Conclusions

The oxidation behavior of RUW-welded samples made from E110 alloy with and without Cr coatings was investigated. The comparative analysis of their cross-section microstructures, elemental distributions over a depth, hardness before and after oxidation in air at 1100 °C revealed the following conclusions.
  • The RUW welding of E110 alloy does not change oxidation kinetics at high temperatures. The surface non-regularities in the region of weld burr have the most pronounced effect on oxidation rate.
  • The Cr coatings can protect RUW-welded samples from oxidation at high temperatures. Partial coating deposition on Zr claddings, especially in the case of uncoated weld, leads to uneven oxidation and material degradation in the area of the end plug/Zr cladding tube. Therefore, the coating deposition on the full surface of nuclear fuel rods after welding of end plugs and cladding seems to be advantageous for development of ATF Zr-based claddings.
  • Additional post-treatment procedures like mechanical processing, chemical etching or ion-plasma treatment should be considered for surface smoothing of nuclear fuel rod after RUW welding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.; validation, E.K.; formal analysis, D.S. and E.K.; investigation, D.S., E.K. and S.R.; resources, D.S. and E.K.; data curation, S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.; writing—review and editing, E.K.; visualization, S.R.; supervision, D.S.; project administration, D.S. and E.K.; funding acquisition, D.S. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 19-79-10116.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Sergey Buymov and Petr Yurin (PJSC “NCCP”) for the sample preparation by resistance upset welding. The authors thank Maksim. Krinitcyn (Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science SB RAS) for the optical measurements. The authors are grateful to Tomsk Polytechnic University Enhancement Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goldner, F. Development Strategy for advanced LWR Fuels with Enhanced Accident Tolerance; USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tang, C.; Stueber, M.; Seifert, H.J.; Steinbrueck, M. Protective coatings on zirconium-based alloys as accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) claddings. Corros. Rev. 2017, 35, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, H.-G.; Kim, I.-H.; Jung, Y.-I.; Park, D.-J.; Park, J.-Y.; Koo, Y.-H. Adhesion property and high-temperature oxidation behavior of Cr-coated Zircaloy-4 cladding tube prepared by 3D laser coating. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 465, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuprin, A.S.; Belous, V.A.; Voyevodin, V.N.; Bryk, V.V.; Vasilenko, R.L.; Ovcharenko, V.D. Vacuum-arc chromium-based coatings for protection of zirconium alloys from the high-temperature oxidation in air. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 465, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, J.H.; Kim, H.-G.; Park, J.; Jung, Y.-I.; Park, D.-J.; Koo, Y.-H. High temperature steam-oxidation behavior of arc ion plated Cr coatings for accident tolerant fuel claddings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 280, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sevecek, M.; Gurgen, A.; Seshadri, A.; Che, Y.; Wagih, M.; Phillips, B.; Champagne, V.; Shirvan, K. Development of Cr cold spray-coated fuel cladding with enhanced accident tolerance. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2018, 50, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brachet, J.C.; Idarraga-Trujillo, I.; Le Flem, M.; Le Saux, M.; Vandenberghe, V.; Urvoy, S.; Rouesne, E.; Guilbert, T.; Toffolon-Masclet, C.; Tupin, M.; et al. Early studies on Cr-coated zircaloy-4 as enhanced accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings for light water reactor. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 517, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krejcí, J.; Kabatova, J.; Manoch, F.; Kocí, J.; Cvrcek, L.; Malek, J.; Krum, S.; Sutta, P.; Bublíkova, P.; Halodova, P.; et al. Development and testing of multicomponent fuel cladding with enhanced accidental performance. Nucl. Eng. Tech. 2020, 52, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brachet, J.C.; Rouesne, E.; Guilbert, T.; Ribis, J.; Le Saux, M.; Nony, G.; Palancher, H.; David, A.; Bischoff, J.; Augereau, J.; et al. High temperature steam oxidation of chromium-coated zirconium-based alloys: Kinetics and process. Corros. Sci. 2020, 167, 108537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, J.; Stegmaier, U.; Tang, C.; Steinbruck, M.; Grobe, M.; Wang, S.; Seifert, H.J. High temperature Cr-Zr interaction of two types of Cr-coated Zr alloys in inert gas environment. J. Nucl. Mater. 2021, 547, 152806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mokrushin, A.A. Results of corrosion and thermomechanical tests of ATF-cladding samples. In Proceedings of the 25th International QUENCH Workshop, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany, 22–24 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vandegrift, J.; Pargac, C.J.; Coryell, B.; Butt, D.P.; Jaques, B.J. Oxidation behavior of welded Zry-3, Zry-4, and Zr-1Nb tubes. Nucl. Mater. Energy 2019, 21, 100714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Slobodyan, M.S.; Kudiiarov, V.N.; Lider, A.M. Effect of energy parameters of pulsed laser welding of Zr-1%Nb alloy on metal contamination with gases and properties of welds. J. Mater. Processl Technol. 2019, 45, 472–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Slobodyan, M.S.; Pavlov, S.K.; Remnev, G.E. Corrosion and high-temperature steam oxidation of E110 alloy and its laser welds after ion irradiation. Corros. Sci. 2019, 152, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sakamiti, G.P.; Mota de Siqueira, R.H.; Carvalho, S.M.; Meireles, J.B.; Fernandes de Lima, M.S. Weldability of a zirconium alloy comparing resistance and pulsed laser methods. Nucl. Mat. Energy 2019, 20, 100693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reitz, W.; Rawers, J. Effect of laser surface melted zirconium alloys on microstructure and corrosion resistance. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2437–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, C.; Li, L.; Tao, W. Weld Bead Size, Microstructure and corrosion behavior of zirconium alloys joints welded by pulsed laser spot welding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 3783–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cai, C.; Li, L.; Peng, G. Comparative study of oxides formed on fusion zone and base metal of laser welded Zr-1.0Sn-1.0Nb-0.1Fe alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2019, 28, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, K.-Y.; Tsai, C.-H. The effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and the corrosion resistance of Zircaloy-4 in 450 °C steam. J. Nucl. Mater. 1985, 136, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goncharov, G.B.; Grabin, V.F.; Korol, A.M.; Adeeva, L.I. Structure and properties of welded joints in laser and arc welding Zr-2.5% Nb alloy. J. Weld. Inter. 2009, 7, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Semenov, A.N.; Plyshevskii, M.I.; Melyukov, V.V. Properties of welded joints from alloy Zr-2.5%Nb after electron-beam local thermocycling. Met. Sci. Heat. Treat. 2014, 55, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wan, Q.; Baib, X.; Zhanga, X. Impact of high dose krypton ion irradiation on corrosion behavior of laser beam welded zircaloy-4. Mater Res. Bull. 2006, 41, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Semenov, A.N.; Plyshevskii, M.I.; Gordo, V.P.; Rassoshkina, N.S.; Melyukov, V.V.; Korepanov, A.G. Optimization of the heating source in electron beam welding of zirconium pipes. J. Weld. Inter. 2013, 27, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gnedenkov, A.S.; Sinebryukhov, S.L.; Mashtalyar, D.V.; Vyaliy, I.E.; Egorkin, V.S.; Gnedenkov, S.V. Corrosion of the welded aluminium alloy in 0.5 M NaCl solution. Part 2: Coating protection. Materials 2018, 11, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prasad Rao, K.; Janaki Ram, G.D.; Stucker, B.E. Improvement in corrosion resistance of friction stir welded aluminum alloys with micro arc oxidation coatings. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 998–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aliasghari, S.; Rogov, A.; Skeldon, P.; Zhou, X.; Yerokhin, A.; Aliabadi, A.; Ghorbani, M. Plasma electrolytic oxidation and corrosion protection of friction stir welded AZ31B magnesium alloy-titanium joints. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 393, 125838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sidelev, D.V.; Kashkarov, E.B.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Krivobokov, V.P. Nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) coatings deposited by magnetron sputtering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 369, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kashkarov, E.; Sidelev, D.; Syrtanov, M.; Tang, C.; Steinbrück, M. Oxidation kinetics of Cr-coated zirconium alloy: Effect of coating thickness and microstructure. Corros. Sci. 2020, 175, 108883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, X. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of Zr-702 joined by electron beam welding. Vacuum 2015, 121, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Steinbrueck, M.; Silva, F.O.; Grosse, M. Oxidation of Zircaloy-4 in steam-nitrogen mixtures at 600–1200 °C. J. Nucl. Mater. 2017, 490, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duriez, C.; Dupont, T.; Schmet, B.; Enoch, F. Zircaloy-4 and M5 high temperature oxidation and nitriding in air. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 380, 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, W.; Chen, H.; Liu, X.; Tang, D.; Deng, X.; Zou, S.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, X.; Lei, M. Thermal shock resistance of TiN-, Cr-, and TiN/Cr-coated zirconium alloy. J. Nucl. Mat. 2019, 526, 151777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Q.; Xiang, Y.; Li, Z.; He, H.; Zhong, Y.; Zhu, C.; Liu, N.; Yang, Y.; Liao, J.; Chang, H.; et al. Microstructure evolution and adhesion properties of thick Cr coatings under different thermal shock temperatures. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 417, 127224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, H.L.; Matsukawa, Y.; Kano, S.; Duan, Z.G.; Murakami, K.; Abe, H. Investigation on microstructural evolution and hardening mechanism in dilute Zr-Nb binary alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 2016, 481, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kearns, J. The Use of Microhardness in the Determination of the Diffusivity of Oxygen in Alpha Zirconium; USDOC Office of Technical Services: Washington DC, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kashkarov, E.B.; Sidelev, D.V.; Rombaeva, M.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Bleykher, G.A. Chromium coatings deposited by cooled and hot target magnetron sputtering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 389, 125618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yeom, H.; Maier, B.; Johnson, G.; Dabney, T.; Lenling, M.; Sridharan, K. High temperature oxidation and microstructural evolution of cold spray chromium coatings on Zircaloy-4 in steam environments. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 526, 151737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krejčí, J.; Ševeček, M.; Kabátová, J.; Manoch, F.; Kočí, J.; Cvrček, L.; Málek, J.; Krum, S.; Šutta, P.; Bublíková, P. Experimental behavior of chromium-based coatings. In Proceedings of the TopFuel 2018, Prague, Czech Republic, 30 September–4 October 2018; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328066345 (accessed on 8 May 2021).
  39. Kashkarov, E.; Afornu, B.; Sidelev, D.; Krinitcyn, M.; Gouws, V.; Lider, A. Recent advances in protective coatings for accident tolerant Zr-based fuel claddings. Coatings 2021, 11, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Michau, A.; Ougier, M.; Maskrot, H.; Brachet, J.-C.; Guilbert, T.; Palancher, H.; Bischoff, J.; Pouillier, E. Interlayers for Cr-coated nuclear fuel claddings: Preliminary study of Mo. Proceedings of NuMat 2020, Ghent, Belgium, 26–29 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalin, B.A.; Volkov, N.V.; Valikov, R.A.; Yashin, A.S. Effect of ion polishing on corrosion resistance of the cladding of fuel elements from E110 alloy in the steam water environment. Inorg. Mat. Appl. Res. 2017, 8, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coatings 11 00577 g001 550
Figure 1. The photographs of the samples (a) before and (b) after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2 min: left sample—partially Cr-coated; central sample—uncoated; right sample—fully Cr-coated.
Figure 1. The photographs of the samples (a) before and (b) after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2 min: left sample—partially Cr-coated; central sample—uncoated; right sample—fully Cr-coated.
Coatings 11 00577 g001
Coatings 11 00577 g002 550
Figure 2. The cross-section of the as-deposited Cr coating on Si substrate.
Figure 2. The cross-section of the as-deposited Cr coating on Si substrate.
Coatings 11 00577 g002
Coatings 11 00577 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The SEM images of the cross-section of the as-received RUW weld. The red square indicates measurement position at (b) higher resolution. (c) The EDS-maps of Zr, Nb and O in the welding region.
Figure 3. (a) The SEM images of the cross-section of the as-received RUW weld. The red square indicates measurement position at (b) higher resolution. (c) The EDS-maps of Zr, Nb and O in the welding region.
Coatings 11 00577 g003
Coatings 11 00577 g004 550
Figure 4. Mass gain of uncoated samples and with full Cr coating after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min. (*) Spalling of zirconia from the inner surface of this sample.
Figure 4. Mass gain of uncoated samples and with full Cr coating after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min. (*) Spalling of zirconia from the inner surface of this sample.
Coatings 11 00577 g004
Coatings 11 00577 g005 550
Figure 5. Optical images of cross-section microstructures of (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples after oxidation at 1100 °C for 30 min.
Figure 5. Optical images of cross-section microstructures of (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples after oxidation at 1100 °C for 30 min.
Coatings 11 00577 g005
Coatings 11 00577 g006 550
Figure 6. Optical photographs of cross-section microstructures of the (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples in the region of RUW welds after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min.
Figure 6. Optical photographs of cross-section microstructures of the (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples in the region of RUW welds after oxidation at 1100 °C for 2, 10 and 30 min.
Coatings 11 00577 g006
Coatings 11 00577 g007 550
Figure 7. Optical images of cross-section microstructures of the (a) uncoated, (b) partially and (c) fully Cr-coated samples in the region of cladding tube after oxidation at 1100 °C for 30 min.
Figure 7. Optical images of cross-section microstructures of the (a) uncoated, (b) partially and (c) fully Cr-coated samples in the region of cladding tube after oxidation at 1100 °C for 30 min.
Coatings 11 00577 g007
Coatings 11 00577 g008 550
Figure 8. EDS-line scans of the (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples after 30 min oxidation at 1100 °C. White dashed lines indicate the measurement position.
Figure 8. EDS-line scans of the (a) uncoated and (b) Cr-coated samples after 30 min oxidation at 1100 °C. White dashed lines indicate the measurement position.
Coatings 11 00577 g008
Coatings 11 00577 g009 550
Figure 9. Hardness map (in HV) of the cross-section of RUW welds before and after oxidation at 1100 °C.
Figure 9. Hardness map (in HV) of the cross-section of RUW welds before and after oxidation at 1100 °C.
Coatings 11 00577 g009
Coatings 11 00577 g010 550
Figure 10. Oxidation of Cr-coated RUW weld in a weld burr region.
Figure 10. Oxidation of Cr-coated RUW weld in a weld burr region.
Coatings 11 00577 g010
Table
Table 1. Deposition mode.
Table 1. Deposition mode.
Q, W/cm2P, Pat, minUsub, Vjsub, mA/cm2Tsub, °Ch, μm
39.10.25192−10020<3909.8 ± 0.4
Note: Q—target power density, P—operation pressure, t—deposition time, Usub—substrate bias voltage, jsub—ion current density on the substrate, Tsub—substrate temperature, h—coating thickness.
Table
Table 2. The outer view of the samples after oxidation.
Table 2. The outer view of the samples after oxidation.
TitleUncoatedPartially Cr-CoatedFully Cr-Coated
2 min oxidation Coatings 11 00577 i001 Coatings 11 00577 i002 Coatings 11 00577 i003
10 min oxidation Coatings 11 00577 i004 Coatings 11 00577 i005 Coatings 11 00577 i006
30 min oxidation Coatings 11 00577 i007 Coatings 11 00577 i008 Coatings 11 00577 i009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sidelev, D.; Ruchkin, S.; Kashkarov, E. High-Temperature Oxidation of Cr-Coated Resistance Upset Welds Made from E110 Alloy. Coatings 2021, 11, 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050577

AMA Style

Sidelev D, Ruchkin S, Kashkarov E. High-Temperature Oxidation of Cr-Coated Resistance Upset Welds Made from E110 Alloy. Coatings. 2021; 11(5):577. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sidelev, Dmitrii, Sergey Ruchkin, and Egor Kashkarov. 2021. "High-Temperature Oxidation of Cr-Coated Resistance Upset Welds Made from E110 Alloy" Coatings 11, no. 5: 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050577

APA Style

Sidelev, D., Ruchkin, S., & Kashkarov, E. (2021). High-Temperature Oxidation of Cr-Coated Resistance Upset Welds Made from E110 Alloy. Coatings, 11(5), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11050577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop