Next Article in Journal
TiN/NbN Nanoscale Multilayer Coatings Deposited by High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering to Protect Medical-Grade CoCrMo Alloys
Next Article in Special Issue
Measurement of Ion Energy Distribution and Deposition of Ti Thin Films Using ABPPS Technology on Glass Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Atmospheric-Pressure Air Plasma Jet and Its Striation Discharge Mode for Treatment of Thermally Sensitive Materials

Coatings 2021, 11(7), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070866
by Yong-Cheol Hong
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Coatings 2021, 11(7), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070866
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 5 July 2021 / Accepted: 14 July 2021 / Published: 20 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Modification by Plasma-Based Processes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

I wish to submit the revised article for publication in Coatings, titled “Atmospheric-pressure air plasma jet for modification of thermally sensitive surfaces.” The revised and added parts in the manuscript were underlined.

Reviewer 2 Report

Atmospheric pressure plasma jet operating with air is described in the manuscript. The striated discharge patterns are optically and numerically analyzed.

The manuscript is well structured and interesting to the reader. It appears to be a continuation of the previous work on atmospheric pressure nitrogen plasma jets by the author.

I suggest minor improvements as follows:

  • The abstract is missing “mechanism of striation explained”, maybe include in the last sentence
  • Line 19, maybe include an additional reference for “material modifications”, I suggest Resnik, M., Kovač, J., Štukelj, R., Kralj-Iglič, V., Humpolíček, P., & Junkar, I. (2020). Extracellular vesicle isolation yields increased by low-temperature gaseous plasma treatment of polypropylene tubes. Polymers, 12(10), 2363.
  • Line 44 and 45 – power supplier, Figure 1 – power supply, consider unifying, in my opinion, power supply is more common
  • Line 69 and 71 – the Ohm symbol is not the same size
  • Line 107 and 119 – LPM is used while in the rest of the manuscript SLM is used, in my opinion, units should be unified to SLM (more common in plasma physics)

Author Response

I wish to submit the revised article for publication in Coatings, titled “Atmospheric-pressure air plasma jet for modification of thermally sensitive surfaces.” The revised and added parts in the manuscript were underlined.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

  1. The title says "Atmospheric pressure air plasma jet for modification of thermally sensitive surfaces." But the content is nothing about APPJ treatment on thermally sensitive materials. The title is misleading.
  2. What kind of air was used? Was it dried? Was it purified?
  3. Because the author claims APPJ for thermally sensitive materials treatment. The temperature data should be presented. For instance, working temperature should be measured as a function of distance from the jet. Or at least, the IR thermography should be presented.
  1. At what location was the optical emission spectra measured?
  2. N2 first positive system is missing. Why?

Author Response

I wish to submit the revised article for publication in Coatings, titled “Atmospheric-pressure air plasma jet for modification of thermally sensitive surfaces.” The revised and added parts in the manuscript were underlined.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have adequately responded to the reviewers' comments.

Back to TopTop