Next Article in Journal
Low Fluorinated Oligoamides for Use as Wood Protective Coating
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Thin Films and Nanostructures by MOCVD: Fabrication, Characterization and Applications—Volume II”
Previous Article in Journal
New Corrosion Inhibitors Based on Perylene Units in Epoxy Ester Resin Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
MOCVD of II-VI HRT/Emitters for Voc Improvements to CdTe Solar Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Spectroscopic Study of Aluminum Nitride Grown by MOCVD in H2 and N2 Reaction Environment

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(7), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070924
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 21 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022

Abstract

:
We report a comparative spectroscopic study on the thin films of epitaxial aluminum nitride (AlN) on basal plane sapphire (Al2O3) substrates grown in hydrogen (H2) and nitrogen (N2) gas reaction environments. AlN films of similar thicknesses (~3.0 µm) were grown by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) for comparison. The impact of the gas environment on the AlN epilayers was characterized using high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HR-XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman scattering (RS), secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), cathodoluminescence (CL), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The study showed that AlN layers grown in a N2 environment have 50% less stress (~0.5 GPa) and similar total dislocation densities (~109/cm2) as compared to the films grown in a H2 environment. On the other hand, AlN films grown in a H2 gas environment have about 33% lesser carbon and 41% lesser oxygen impurities than films grown in a N2 growth environment. The possible mechanisms that influenced the structural quality and impurity incorporation for two different gas environments to grow AlN epilayers in the MOCVD system on sapphire substrates were discussed.

1. Introduction

Aluminum nitride (AlN) belongs to the family of III-Nitride materials with the largest bandgap (6.2 eV) for any semiconductor material that has the native substrate; in addition, it has high thermal, chemical, mechanical stability, and very high Baliga (BFOM) [1,2,3]. Due to these properties and ease to grow on sapphire substrates, AlN is highly desired for its applications in high-power photonic and electronic devices [3]. For these devices, high-quality AlN films on sapphire substrate with low dislocation density are used as low-cost templates that allow to grow low dislocation density device structures, as high dislocations adversely affect their performance [4,5,6]. The state-of-the-art method to grow low-cost AlN templates is metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) with sapphire as a substrate [4]. The precursors to grow AlN using MOCVD are trimethyl-aluminum (TMA)/triethyl-aluminum (TEA) as aluminum source and ammonia (NH3) to be used as nitrogen (N2) source [5]. These precursors are precisely delivered on the substrate’s surface in a reaction or growth chamber by hydrogen (H2) that acts as a carrier/push gas. Thus, the MOCVD process inside the growth chamber would occur in an H2 environment. An alternative to that approach is to use N2 as carrier/push gas since N2 gas is cheaper and safer to use than H2 gas. The use of N2 as a carrier gas in AlN growth was first reported on SiC substrates in 2007 [6]. The first report of AlN growth on sapphire substrates with N2 as a carrier gas was published in 2012, which reported low-quality samples [7]. Recently, we have reported that N2 gas can be used as an alternative to H2 carrier gas to grow high-quality AlN films with dislocation densities of 109/cm2 for 4 µm thick sample, a cheaper and safer approach [8,9]. Thus, a comparative spectroscopic study is warranted to understand the AlN material growth accomplished in these two different gas environments.
This paper reports the spectroscopic comparison of 3 μm thick AlN samples on a sapphire substrate produced by the MOCVD process with N2 and H2 as carrier gases. The grown samples were characterized using spectroscopic techniques to understand the impurity incorporation, stress-strain, dislocations, and surface morphology.

2. Experimental Methods

The AlN samples used for this study were grown using the MOCVD process. A general schematic is shown in Figure 1 and their details were presented in our recently published papers [8,9]. Trimethyl aluminum (TMA) and ammonia (NH3) were used as aluminum (Al) and nitrogen (N) precursors. The growth process consists of a 2-step process: a low temperature (~950 °C) high V/III ratio (~4000) precursor pulsed rough buffer layer, followed by a low V/III ratio (~1000) high temperature (~1250 °C) continuous growth step. We restricted the thickness of the AlN layers to 3 µm for comparison. In the case of the AlN sample grown with the H2 carrier gas, an additional low-temperature interlayer was introduced to reduce the crack and achieve the 3 µm thickness (repetition of steps in Figure 1 after 1.5 µm thickness). Susceptor rotation was introduced for the growth uniformity on the substrate.
The grown AlN films were characterized for their surface morphology, dislocation densities, residual stress, and impurities. The surface morphology of grown AlN was observed with Digital Nanoscope 3100 atomic force microscopy (AFM, Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY, USA). The Philips X’pert MRD triple-axis diffractometer (Philips, Eindhover, The Netherlands) with Cu-Kα1 X-ray source was used to calculate dislocation densities. A scanning electron microscope Zeiss Supra 25 FE-SEM (Carl Zeiss, Munich, Germany) was used to study the AlN samples’ cross-section along the growth direction. Residual stress in the samples was measured by Raman spectroscopy using Horiba Raman Spectroscope (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) with a 638 nm red excitation laser with 25% power with 2400 g/mm grating and 100 µm diameter aperture and 50 µm slit size in backscattered mode with a spectral resolution of 0.5 cm−1. A Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) set up with a monochromatic Al Kα source (1.5 keV) at a 45° incident angle was used for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the samples. Argon ions were used to analyze the samples’ depth with an etch rate of 3 nm/min. XPS Peak 41 software was used to carry out the curve fitting with Gaussian and Lorentzian functions, where Shirley-type background was subtracted [10,11]. The Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS) measurements were performed at the Georgia Tech. Material Characterization Facility using an IONTOF TOF-SIMS 5-300 instrument (IONTOF, Münster, Germany). The Time of Flight (ToF) SIMS machine uses two ion guns: one for sputtering only and another one for analysis purposes. For sputtering, cesium ions were used with an energy of 2 keV for creating a crater and bismuth ions with 25 keV for analyzing the sputtered area along the way. To measure these samples, they were mounted on a sample holder using Cu tape, and the sputtering created a crater area of 300 μm2; the area of analysis by the bismuth ions was 150 μm2. Room-temperature cathodoluminescence (CL) measurements were carried out using a monochromatic CL imaging system housed in a Jeol JSM 5900LV high-resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (Jeol SEM, Peabody, MA, USA) using a 10 kV accelerating potential.

3. Results and Discussions

The growth of AlN samples used for this study was initiated with the deposition of the AlN rough layer (thickness ~0.3 µm) at low temperatures (950 °C), which acts as a buffer layer. On top of buffer layers, high temperature (1250 °C) AlN was grown to produce a 3 µm thick layer with an atomically smooth surface. The AFM images of 2 µm × 2 µm dimensions for 3.0 μm AlN layers are shown in Figure 2a,b using H2 and N2 as carrier gases, respectively. Both the samples have a similar root mean square (RMS) surface roughness. We have demonstrated before that the carrier gases, N2 and H2, (growth environments) produce different morphologies of the buffer layers [8,9]. The growth environment-dependent morphologies stem from the differences in thermal conductivity of the substrates, the decomposition rates, and the diffusion coefficients of precursors due to differences in carrier gases [12]. We reported that the morphology of the buffer layer produced with the N2 carrier gas has two distinct types of islands that help reduce strain in the thick, high temperature, fully coalesced layers without any interlayer [13]. The AlN buffer layer produced with the H2 carrier gas, surface morphology is more like single-mode islands; thus, an early coalescence in subsequent high-temperature AlN layers happens, resulting in cracks around thicknesses >1.5 µm. A low-temperature interlayer was introduced to achieve a thickness of 3 µm for AlN layers grown with the H2 carrier gas, a proven method to mitigate the cracking [14].
Figure 3 shows the cross-section SEM images of 3 μm samples grown with (a) H2 carrier gas and (b) with N2 carrier gas. We observed that the void terminates close to the sapphire substrate for samples grown with the H2 carrier gas due to early coalescence. Thus, we have to incorporate a low temperature 0.1 µm thick interlayer at the thickness of 1.5 µm to achieve a 3 µm AlN thick layer. We have shown that the low-temperature buffer layer grown in the N2 environment has two distinct islands that impede early coalescence; thus, Figure 3b shows the termination of voids at the larger thickness parallel to the growth directions, which helps to grow thick crack-free AlN samples without the low-temperature interlayer.
The 3 µm AlN samples were thoroughly analyzed with X-ray diffraction; the details of the method were reported in the reference [8,9]. Figure 4 shows the X-ray rocking curve measurement data for the (10–12) plane for AlN samples. The full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of the asymmetric (10–12) scan of III-nitrides (AlN, GaN, and AlGaN) can indicate the total dislocation density of the material. The FWHM of (10–12) (off-axis) ω scan for 3 µm samples grown with H2 carrier gas was ~330 arcsec whereas it was 307 arcsec for 3 µm samples grown with N2 carrier gas. The calculated screw dislocations were in the order of 107 cm−2, and total dislocation density was in the order of lower 109 cm−2 (using the Williamson and Hall method) [9,15,16]. The slightly lower off-axis value can be caused by the delayed coalescence or the absence of low-temperature interlayer in the AlN samples grown in N2 gas environment. The uncoalesced layers can act as a secondary buffer layer to grow slightly reduced dislocation high-quality thick AlN; however, the differences in dislocation densities in both cases are within the margins of error in the calculations.
The XPS survey scans (presented in Supplementary Material) and high-resolution (HR) scans were recorded at two locations—the surface and 5 nm depth from the surface of the samples. The removal of the first atomic layers was performed by Ar+ ion sputtering. We analyzed the scan at a depth of 5 nm only because of ambiguities in the surface scan due to surface contamination associated with sample handling. The Binding Energy (BE) of all XPS spectra of two AlN thin films was corrected with respect to the carbon 1 s (C1s) peak at 284.6 eV to avoid charging effects. The survey scan showed that XPS spectra were composed of aluminum, nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, and maybe hydrogen. There is a chance that both samples might have contained some hydrogen, but hydrogen cannot be detected as it only has one electron and a small photoionization cross-section. Figure 5a,b show the deconvoluted C1s peak for the AlN samples grown with N2 and H2 carrier gases, respectively. The main peak contribution of the spectra of C1s measured at the surface of AlN is at 284.6 eV, characteristics of adventitious C. We observed that the intensity of C1s dropped significantly at 5 nm depth, leading to the actual amount of C in the sample. The C1s spectra can be deconvoluted into four different chemical states, namely C=C at 284.6 eV, C-C/C-N close to 286.6 eV, C-O close to 288.4 eV, and O-C=O bond close to 288.6 eV [10,11]. The XPS high-resolution scan of aluminum 2 p (Al2p) chemical state at 5 nm depth is shown in Figure 5c,d for AlN samples grown in N2 and H2 with carrier gases, respectively. The atomic concentration of Al is higher in the case of H2 carrier (Table 1). In both cases (N2 and H2 carrier), the Al 2p peaks are composed from two contributions: one at 72.9 eV BE and one at 74.0 eV BE. It is expected that the Al 2p peak around 73 eV is the characteristics for AlN and the one at 74 eV could be either AlN or some oxidized Al [17]. Note that the deconvoluted peak positions are the same for both deconvoluted peaks confirming the same type of ionic bonding states in both samples [18,19]. Figure 4f and Figure 5e show the HR O 1s peak for the cases of N2 and H2 carrier gases, respectively. The HR O 1s peak can be deconvoluted and fitted at least with three chemical states at BE 530.5, 531.8, and 533.4 eV. The peak at 530.5 eV can be attributed to Al-O bonds and the peaks from 531.8 eV and 533.4 eV to carbon-oxygen bonds and hydroxyls [20]. The O 1s peak associated with Al indicated that the oxygen is dissolved into the AlN layer, oxidizing part of the Al and part of the carbon contamination. We observed that the metal oxide formation before and after etching was mostly similar without any presence of nonbonding oxygen, which was previously reported by Liang et al., which was created during etching. Figure 5g,h show the deconvoluted HR N1s peak for both samples. It is evident that the peak consists of entirely AlN contributions which are expected to be recorded in the range between 396 eV and 398 eV [17].
Table 1 shows the XPS detected elements after 5 nm Ar ion etching where components are expressed in terms of atomic concentration (AC) in percentage. We observed that both samples exhibited the presence of C and O. In the case of sample grown in the H2 gas environment, the amount of oxygen was slightly less than the sample grown in the N2 gas environment. In contrast, the amount of Al was much higher in the case of the sample grown in H2 gas environment, which can be expressed as the Al-N stoichiometric ratio that is closer to the ideal case. The source of the C and O containing impurities can be the following: (a) oxygen/carbon incorporation during the growth process from the growth precursors and carrier gases, (b) impurities absorbed when sample exposed to air, (c) Ar+ ion sputtering to check the elements at 5 nm depth, or (d) from the XPS chamber [21].
To further investigate the presence of impurities and at different depths from the sample surface in the AlN films, the secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) was utilized in time-of-flight (ToF) mode. Figure 6 shows the average relative SIMS detected counts for Al2+, Al+, H+, N+, and O+ (with respect to Al+ normalized to (1) for both AlN samples grown with N2 carrier and H2 carrier gases. No significant change was observed in the composition of various compounds up to 0.8 µm (and beyond data are not shown here). The normalized count values for O+ and C+ in case of the sample grown using H2 carrier gas was much less. Compared to N2 grown samples, H2 grown samples have 33–39% less C, 33% less H, 41% less O; a similar trend was observed in XPS analysis of these samples. The percentage difference of oxygen was close in case of SIMS and XPS measurements, but there was a difference for carbon. This may arise due to measurement techniques. Moreover, XPS measurement was taken at 5 nm depth, whereas the SIMS profile was taken up to a much higher depth.
To further understand the presence of impurities, the samples were studied by cathodoluminescence (CL). In III-nitride semiconductors near band edge emissions, such as free exciton or bound exciton recombination, are characteristics of high-quality materials with lower impurity concentration and lower defect density [22,23]. Figure 7 shows CL spectra of the AlN sample grown with the N2 carrier gas, H2 carrier gas, and the HVPE grown free-standing AlN. The peak close to 6.0 eV dominates in all the samples. Davis et al. simulated the CL spectra for aluminum gallium nitride, AlxGa1-xN, samples, where x is the composition of the aluminum [24]. For x = 1, in those calculations, the pure AlN near band edge emission is close to 6.0 eV, which matches our measurements. If we closely observe these peaks, we can see that hump-like peaks are present in all the samples close to 3.8 eV, which is well known for oxygen presence [22]. We grew our samples on sapphire substrates, so to exclude the idea that this peak can come from sapphire substrate oxygen signal, we measured the free-standing AlN grown by hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE) which is from Crystal IS. We observed a peak close to the 3.8 eV for the free-standing AlN sample, confirming that the source of the oxygen-related peak was the AlN, not the sapphire substrate. In addition, the electron penetration depth was only a few nm in the AlN samples in the case of 10 kV accelerating voltage. Thus, there was less probability of incident electrons reaching the sapphire substrate. Thus, we can conclude with certainty that the source of oxygen signal was from the oxygen impurities in the AlN samples. According to Youngman et al., the luminescence peak position from oxygen-related defects in AlN shifts from 4 eV to 3.3 eV as the oxygen increased from less than 0.1 to about 0.8% [25]. We assigned the peak at 3.8 eV, which agrees with the previously reported data [22]. The near band edge emission (NBE) peak (~6.0 eV) peak arose from the free excitons or excitons bound to the shallow donor or acceptor impurities. The NBE peak of the samples grown with N2 and H2 carrier shows a blue shift with respect to HVPE grown free-standing AlN sample, which is related to stress in the MOCVD grown samples. In the next section, we evaluate the stress in these films by Raman spectroscopy measurement.
The impurities, point defects, and extended defects alter the stress values in the epitaxially grown films. Raman spectroscopy has been previously demonstrated as an effective tool to calculate stress in thin films [26]. In the case of AlN, high-resolution phonon linewidth can provide the crystalline quality of the thin films. It has been previously reported that for single-crystal bulk AlN, the FWHM of E2 (high) phonon mode is 3 cm−1 [27]. For a 3 μm AlN sample grown with N2 carrier gas, the E2 (high) phonon linewidth was 3.8 cm−1; on the other hand, a 3 μm AlN sample grown with H2 carrier was 5 cm−1. We employed the biaxial stress coefficient to calculate stress based on the Raman shift. Biaxial stress coefficient ( k = Δ ω E 2 ( h i g h ) σ x x ) depends on the growth technique [26]. We considered 657.04 cm−1, the free-standing sample E2 (high) as the stress-free frequency, and calculated the stress based on k = −4.04 ± 0.3 cm−1/GPa [26]. Figure 8 shows the normalized Raman spectra of E2(high) phonon mode where the blue shift towards the right for the grown samples indicates compressive stress. The compressive stress in AlN film results from the lattice mismatch between sapphire substrate, thermal expansion coefficient mismatch, and stress generated during the coalescence process and impurities [28]. We have previously demonstrated that, due to the delayed coalescence, the N2 carrier grown samples show less compressive stress [8,9]. The formation of voids closer to the interface for the AlN sample grown using H2 carrier gas causes early coalescence, which leads to addition of another low temperature buffer layer to gain similar thickness and higher stress.

4. Conclusions

We presented the spectroscopic comparison of 3 μm thick AlN thin film on basal plane sapphire (Al2O3) substrates grown in H2 and N2 gas environments. Both samples have good crystalline quality as depicted by XRD measurement with FWHM of off-axis peak for (10–12) planes of 307 and 330 arcsec in N2 and H2, respectively. XPS and SIMS measurements showed comparatively higher impurities of C, O in samples grown in the N2 growth environment whereas Raman’s study showed lower stress in AlN layers grown in the N2 growth environment. The FWHM of AlN E2(high) phonon values were 3.8 cm−1 and 5 cm−1 for samples produced in N2 and H2 environments and higher impurities concentrations that may result in less stress. There are specific differences in the samples grown with H2 and N2 carrier gases that can affect the device performance; thus, the selection of the gas should be made according to device design. We speculate that growing electronic devices on top of AlN templates produced with N2 carrier gas may have some advantages due to slightly better crystalline quality. Similarly, we expect some advantages of growing photonic devices on AlN produced with H2 carrier gas where the light extraction is through the AlN/sapphire, due to diminishing light absorption/scattering. Further studies are needed to confirm these.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings12070924/s1, Figure S1: XPS survey scan for AlN sample grown using N2 carrier gas at 5 nm.; Figure S2: XPS survey scan for AlN sample grown using H2 carrier gas at 5 nm, Figure S3: Full Raman spectra for AlN sample grown using N2 carrier gas, Figure S4: Full Raman spectra for AlN sample grown using H2 carrier gas.

Author Contributions

S.H.: Conceptualization of this study, experimentation, data curation, methodology, writing—original draft, M.U.J.: revision, S.G.K.: XPS measurement and visualization, M.G.: SEM and CL measurement and visualization, I.A.: conceptualization of this study, visualization, editing, revision, PI of this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) award No. 2124624 managed by Dominique M. Dagenais and the SCEEE research initiation grant for 2021–2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors recognize the infrastructure support of the Photonics and Microelectronics Lab of the University of South Carolina Electrical Engineering department.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hasan, S.; Jewel, M.U.; Karakalos, S.G.; Gaevski, M.; Ahmad, I. Substantial P-Type Conductivity of AlN Achieved via Beryllium Doping. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Long, H.; Dai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Tan, B.; Zhang, S.; Xu, L.; Shan, M.; Feng, Z.C.; Kuo, H.; et al. High quality 10.6 μ m AlN grown on pyramidal patterned sapphire substrate by MOCVD. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsao, J.Y.; Chowdhury, S.; Hollis, M.A.; Jena, D.; Johnson, N.M.; Jones, K.A.; Kaplar, R.J.; Rajan, S.; van de Walle, C.G.; Bellotti, E.; et al. Ultrawide-Bandgap Semiconductors: Research Opportunities and Challenges. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1600501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Adivarahan, V.; Khan, A.; Ahmad, I.; Zhang, B.; Lunev, A. Semiconductor and Template for Growing Semiconductors. Google Patents US9859457B2, 2 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen, K.; Annapragada, A.; Ho, K.; Huh, J.-S.; Patnaik, S.; Salim, S. Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition: Examples of the Influence of Precursor Structure on Film Properties. J. Phys. 1991, 2, C2-243–C2-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kakanakova-Georgieva, A.; Kasic, A.; Hallin, C.; Monemar, B.; Janzén, E. Performance of III-nitride epitaxy in a low V-to-III gas-flow ratio range under nitrogen ambient in a hot-wall MOCVD system. Phys. Status Solidi C Conf. 2005, 2, 960–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miyagawa, R.; Yang, S.; Miyake, H.; Hiramatsu, K. Effects of carrier gas ratio and growth temperature on MOVPE growth of AlN. Phys. Status Solidi Curr Top. Solid State Phys. 2012, 9, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasan, S.; Mamun, A.; Hussain, K.; Gaevski, M.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, A. Investigation of MOCVD grown crack-free 4 μm thick aluminum nitride using nitrogen as a carrier gas. MRS Adv. 2021, 6, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hasan, S.; Mamun, A.; Hussain, K.; Gaevski, M.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, A. Growth evolution of high-quality MOCVD aluminum nitride using nitrogen as carrier gas on the sapphire substrate. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 36, 4360–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Briggs, D. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In Handbook of Adhesion, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 621–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Siokou, A.; Ravani, F.; Karakalos, S.; Frank, O.; Kalbac, M.; Galiotis, C. Surface refinement and electronic properties of graphene layers grown on copper substrate: An XPS, UPS and EELS study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 9785–9790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, X.; Ye, T.; Wang, S.; Shi, Y.; Fan, L.; Liu, L.; Zhang, G.; Shi, X.; Wei, M.; Zhou, H.; et al. Surface morphology of GaN nucleation layer grown by MOCVD with different carrier gas. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, Y.; Fang, Y.; Yin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, B.; Li, J.; Lu, W.; Feng, Z. Improved structural quality of AlN grown on sapphire by 3D/2D alternation growth. J. Cryst. Growth 2017, 464, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cho, Y.J.; Ren, Y.; Xing, H.G.; Jena, D. High-mobility two-dimensional electron gases at AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown on GaN bulk wafers and GaN template substrates. Appl. Phys. Express 2019, 12, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, C.; Fareed, Q.; Yang, J.; Khan, M.A. AlN/AlGaN superlattices as dislocation filter for low-threading-dislocation thick AlGaN layers on sapphire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 604–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Metzger, T.; Höpler, R.; Born, E.; Ambacher, O.; Stutzmann, M.; Stömmer, R.; Schuster, M.; Göbel, H.; Christiansen, S. Defect structure of epitaxial GaN films determined by transmission electron microscopy and triple-axis X-ray diffractometry. Philos. Mag. A Phys. Condens. Matter. Struct. Defects Mech. Prop. 1998, 77, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Motamedi, P.; Cadien, K. XPS analysis of AlN thin films deposited by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 315, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alexander, M.R.; Thompson, G.E.; Zhou, X.; Beamson, G.; Fairley, N. Quantification of oxide film thickness at the surface of aluminium using XPS. Surf. Interface Anal. 2002, 34, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rosenberger, L.; Baird, R.; McCullen, E.; Auner, G.; Shreve, G. XPS analysis of aluminum nitride films deposited by plasma source molecular beam epitaxy. Surf. Interface Anal. 2008, 40, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, H.; Shiraz, M.H.A.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J. Atomic layer deposited aluminum oxynitride coating for high-performance Si anode in lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 578, 151982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, J.; Chen, D.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Talwar, D.; He, T.; Ferguson, I.; He, K.; Wan, L.; Feng, Z. Comparative spectroscopic studies of MOCVD grown AlN films on Al2O3 and 6H–SiC. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 857, 157487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, X.; Hossain, F.; Wongchotigul, K.; Spencer, M.G. Near band-edge transition in aluminum nitride thin films grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 72, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Silveira, E.; Freitas, J.A.; Kneissl, M.; Treat, D.W.; Johnson, N.M.; Slack, G.A.; Schowalter, L.J. Near-bandedge cathodoluminescence of an AIN homoepitaxial film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 3501–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bremser, M.D.; Perry, W.G.; Zheleva, T.; Edwards, N.V.; Nam, O.H.; Parikh, N.; Aspnes, D.E.; Davis, R.F. Growth, doping and characterization of AlxGa1− xN thin film alloys on 6H-SiC (0001) substrates. Mater. Res. Soc. Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 2022, 1, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Youngman, R.A.; Harris, J.H. Luminescence Studies of Oxygen-Related Defects in Aluminum Nitride. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 3238–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, J.G.; Kimura, A.; Kamei, Y.; Hasuike, N.; Harima, H.; Kisoda, K.; Simahara, Y.; Miyake, H.; Hiramatsu, K. Raman scattering spectroscopy of residual stresses in epitaxial AlN films. Appl. Phys. Express 2011, 4, 031001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuball, M.; Hayes, J.M.; Prins, A.D.; Van Uden, N.W.; Dunstan, D.J.; Shi, Y.; Edgar, J.H. Raman scattering studies on single-crystalline bulk AlN: Temperature and pressure dependence of the AlN phonon modes. J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 231, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rong, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.P.; Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Xu, F.; Tan, P.; Shen, B. Residual stress in AlN films grown on sapphire substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 93, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the MOCVD growth process of AlN showing (a) a low temperature precursor pulsed growth, (b) a high temperature continuous growth. N2 carrier-based growth involves a simpler approach consist of process (a + b). To avoid cracking in similar thickness, the H2 carrier-based process involves process (a + b + a + b).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the MOCVD growth process of AlN showing (a) a low temperature precursor pulsed growth, (b) a high temperature continuous growth. N2 carrier-based growth involves a simpler approach consist of process (a + b). To avoid cracking in similar thickness, the H2 carrier-based process involves process (a + b + a + b).
Coatings 12 00924 g001
Figure 2. AFM images of 3 µm thick AlN layers grown by using (a) H2 as a carrier gas and (b) a similar layer with N2 as a carrier gas (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [9]. 2021, Springer Nature).
Figure 2. AFM images of 3 µm thick AlN layers grown by using (a) H2 as a carrier gas and (b) a similar layer with N2 as a carrier gas (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [9]. 2021, Springer Nature).
Coatings 12 00924 g002
Figure 3. Cross-section SEM images show the voids’ formation for 3 μm thick AlN samples were grown with (a) H2 as a carrier gas and (b) N2 as a carrier gas (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [9]. 2021, Springer Nature).
Figure 3. Cross-section SEM images show the voids’ formation for 3 μm thick AlN samples were grown with (a) H2 as a carrier gas and (b) N2 as a carrier gas (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [9]. 2021, Springer Nature).
Coatings 12 00924 g003
Figure 4. X-ray rocking curve of (10–12) plane for AlN sample grown in different carrier gases.
Figure 4. X-ray rocking curve of (10–12) plane for AlN sample grown in different carrier gases.
Coatings 12 00924 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of high-resolution XPS spectra of AlN showing the chemical states of C1s grown with (a) N2, (b) H2, Al2p grown with (c) N2, (d) H2; O1s with (e) N2, (f) H2; and N1s with (g) N2, (h) H2 carrier gases.
Figure 5. Comparison of high-resolution XPS spectra of AlN showing the chemical states of C1s grown with (a) N2, (b) H2, Al2p grown with (c) N2, (d) H2; O1s with (e) N2, (f) H2; and N1s with (g) N2, (h) H2 carrier gases.
Coatings 12 00924 g005aCoatings 12 00924 g005b
Figure 6. Depth profile for AlN SIMS spectra for different ions for AlN grown with (a) N2 carrier gas, (b) H2 carrier gas sample.
Figure 6. Depth profile for AlN SIMS spectra for different ions for AlN grown with (a) N2 carrier gas, (b) H2 carrier gas sample.
Coatings 12 00924 g006
Figure 7. Cathodoluminescence (CL) data for AlN samples grown with N2 and H2 carrier gases and HVPE grown free-standing AlN show the near band edge emissions.
Figure 7. Cathodoluminescence (CL) data for AlN samples grown with N2 and H2 carrier gases and HVPE grown free-standing AlN show the near band edge emissions.
Coatings 12 00924 g007
Figure 8. Normalized Raman data of AlN samples grown in N2, H2 carrier gases, and free-standing AlN grown by HVPE.
Figure 8. Normalized Raman data of AlN samples grown in N2, H2 carrier gases, and free-standing AlN grown by HVPE.
Coatings 12 00924 g008
Table 1. Atomic concentration (AC) of AlN samples at the depth of 5 nm grown in N2 and H2 environments as calculated by quantification of the XPS results.
Table 1. Atomic concentration (AC) of AlN samples at the depth of 5 nm grown in N2 and H2 environments as calculated by quantification of the XPS results.
AC of
AlN
Grown in N2 Environment (%) Grown in H2 Environment (%)
Al24.829.4
C12.312.9
N43.642.3
O19.315.4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, S.; Jewel, M.U.; Karakalos, S.G.; Gaevski, M.; Ahmad, I. Comparative Spectroscopic Study of Aluminum Nitride Grown by MOCVD in H2 and N2 Reaction Environment. Coatings 2022, 12, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070924

AMA Style

Hasan S, Jewel MU, Karakalos SG, Gaevski M, Ahmad I. Comparative Spectroscopic Study of Aluminum Nitride Grown by MOCVD in H2 and N2 Reaction Environment. Coatings. 2022; 12(7):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasan, Samiul, Mohi Uddin Jewel, Stavros G. Karakalos, Mikhail Gaevski, and Iftikhar Ahmad. 2022. "Comparative Spectroscopic Study of Aluminum Nitride Grown by MOCVD in H2 and N2 Reaction Environment" Coatings 12, no. 7: 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070924

APA Style

Hasan, S., Jewel, M. U., Karakalos, S. G., Gaevski, M., & Ahmad, I. (2022). Comparative Spectroscopic Study of Aluminum Nitride Grown by MOCVD in H2 and N2 Reaction Environment. Coatings, 12(7), 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop