Next Article in Journal
A New Green Coating for the Protection of Frescoes: From the Synthesis to the Performances Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Room Temperature Synthesis of Branched ZnO Nanowires Array with Tunable Morphology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles for Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

by
Apichaya Worawong
* and
Wandee Onreabroy
*
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(2), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020276
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023

Abstract

:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging technique that is widely used for the identification of internal organs, and for the medical diagnosis of tumors and cancer in the body. In general, gadolinium is used as a contrast agent to enhance image contrasting in MRI. In this study, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using a co-precipitation method with a calcination temperature of 500 °C. The nanoparticles were then coated with chitosan and treated under an external magnetic field of 400 mT. X-ray diffractometer results showed that the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles had a pure phase of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 at the (3 1 1) plane, with an average particle size of 26 nm. The presence of chitosan on the Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, which showed the primary amine and secondary amine functional groups of chitosan. Here, coating the nanoparticle with chitosan not only prevented nanoparticle agglomeration, but also improved the particle surface charge and reduced the particle toxicity for in vivo testing. Vibrating sample magnetometer results showed that the maximum magnetization value of the magnetic field-assisted process was increased to 8.85 emu/g. Finally, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance increased the average brightness in MRI of mouse liver by 21% compared to using gadolinium.

1. Introduction

Magnetic nanoparticles are used in magnetic separation, catalysts, drug delivery [1], hyperthermia therapy [2] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [3,4]. In clinical practice, MRI contrast agents are divided into two parts, T1 and T2 agents. T1 agents, such as the paramagnetic metal gadolinium (Gd3+) type, can alter the longitudinal (T1) relaxation times of water protons to produce a bright positive signal intensity in images, and increase the clarity of cells. The Dotarem brand drug is a gadolinium-based contrast agent frequently used in MRI. All obtainable gadolinium-based contrast agents are chelates that contain the gadolinium ion (Gd3+). The gadolinium parts of the lanthanide group of elements are high in toxicity due to free gadolinium. The T1 relaxivity of gadolinium is 4.2 L/mmol s−1 in blood [5]. T2 agents, such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION), are used to alter the transverse (T2) relaxation times of water protons. T2 agents provide a dark negative signal intensity in images, and can be used to visualize stem cells grafted in organs that appear as high signal intensity. In practice, T2 agents appear to be a preferent MRI contrast agent for monitoring internal organs due to their high sensitivity and excellent biocompatibility [4]. Therefore, in this research, we focused on the synthesis of superparamagnetic-based nanoparticles as the T2 agent. The diameters of some metals and metal oxide nanoparticles, which exhibit superparamagnetic properties, are as small as 10–20 nm [6]. When a superparamagnetic is placed under an external magnetic field, the magnetic moment is aligned with the external magnetic field’s. However, without an external magnetic field, a superparamagnetic has zero magnetization values, similar to those of paramagnets [6,7].
There are many methods for the preparation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, such as co-precipitation [8], sol-gel [9], hydrothermal [10], ball milling, combustion [11], etc. However, the most reasonable method for the synthesis of superparamagnetic nanoparticles is co-precipitation, due to its ease of production on a large scale, its crystallite-size adjustment and magnetization value control. Previously, it was also reported that the co-precipitation method, with the help of an external magnetic field, could enlarge the unit cell size and enhance the saturation magnetization (Ms), remanence magnetization (Mr) and coercivity (Hc) of the nanoparticles [12,13,14]. There are many types of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, e.g., Fe3O4 [15], CoFe2O4 [12] and CoxZnyFe2O4 [16]. Among these nanomaterials, CoxZnyFe2O4 seems to be the most interesting material, as it provides the highest Ms and Mr, which are good for contrast enhancement in MRI. However, CoxZnyFe2O4 nanoparticles are intrinsically toxic to living organisms; therefore, coating the particles with a biocompatible material is crucial. There have been many materials used to coat CoxZnyFe2O4 nanoparticles, such as dextrin [17], silica [18] and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [19].
Currently, there are several studies related to the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles that have been applied to medical applications. Dextran-coated Co0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using the heat treatment method, in order to improve the received MRI signals as a result of the quality of tissue relaxation [20]. Moreover, dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA)-coated Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using the thermal decomposition method for use as suitable contrast agents for both T2- and T2*-weighted MRI in an in vivo study of rat liver [21]. Sattarahmady et al. [17] showed that the relaxivity of dextrin-coated Zn0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles was 79 mM−1·s−1 with 1.5 T of MRI. They also found that dextrin-coated Zn0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles offered an Ms value of 24 emu/g. However, its Hc value (17 emu/g) was still too high to be a superparamagnetic material. Moreover, Ahmad et al. [18] reported that silica-coated Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4 nanoparticles provided a suitable Ms value for MRI. The transverse relaxivity (T2) of the nanoparticles was 126.86 mM−1·s−1 in 4.7 T of MRI. Moreover, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated Gd2O3, which has high paramagnetic properties, is suitable for use in medical applications. Gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) has been studied in the development of radio-thermal combined cancer therapies, due to the high longitudinal relaxation rate of Gd2O3 as the imaging agent [22].
Examples of the research related to cobalt–zinc ferrite (Co1−xZnxFe2O4) nanoparticle synthesis via different methods for medical application are shown in Table 1.
The medical applications of magnetic nanoparticles are still being developed for use in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors and cancer. This research is focused on synthesizing chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with superparamagnetic properties and a high magnetization value from being treated with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance. Chitosan coating not only increases the dispersion of magnetic particles, but also has no toxicity. This has led to the application of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles assays to mice in the study of MRI imaging contrast enhancement. Chitosan is non-toxic because of its hydrophilic amino groups, biocompatibility, high responsiveness to chemical modification, high water permeability and cost effectiveness. Therefore, chitosan has been used to coat nanometer-sized materials for biomedical applications such as biosensors, drug delivery and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [23]. Magnetic nanoparticle research in the medical field continues to challenge particle size control, particle agglomeration reduction, non-toxicity and optimum magnetic values [24].
In this research, Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized using the co-precipitation method with the help of an external magnetic field (400 mT) were reported. The contents of zinc ions and the calcine temperature were varied and investigated. The particles were then coated with chitosan to improve their biocompatibility. The chitosan-coated particles were characterized via X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and acute toxicity testing for their crystal structure, particle size, chemical functionalized groups, magnetic properties and biocompatibility, respectively. The chitosan-coated nanoparticles were then applied for MRI usage in animal testing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4

Cobalt–zinc ferrite (Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4) nanoparticles were synthesized using the co-precipitation method and mixed with cobalt (II) nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), zinc (II) nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O) and iron(III) nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O), whose reagent grades were 98%; they were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MI, USA). This mixture powder was stirred at 80 °C for 60 min. Next, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was gradually added to the precipitate and stirred up to 80 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, the precipitated powders were washed with acetone at a calcine temperature of 200 °C to remove moisture, carbonaceous matter and all remaining substances of the oxides. The powders were then calcined at a temperature of 500 °C for 2 h (rate 3 °C/min), and received Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.
Chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were prepared by adding 2% chitosan with 1% acetic acid in 50 mL of deionized water. Next, the sample was sonicated for 30 min and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min, and then at 3500 rpm for 15 min. Finally, the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were deposited into a plastic tube and treated under 400 mT of magnetic field assistance in the same easy direction for 20 min. The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were placed between magnetic-fielded iron platforms from an induction coil wrapped around the iron platforms with direct electric current. The direction of the magnetic field moving from the lower to the upper iron platform ( H ) is shown in Figure 1, which is the same direction as the magnetic field from the north pole to the south pole.

2.2. Characterization

The crystal structure and phases of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance were characterized with an XRD (Rigaku, Austin, TX, USA) X-ray powder diffractometer using Cu K-α (λ = 1.544 Å). The crystallite sizes of the nanocrystalline samples were measured with X-ray line-broadening analyses using the Debye–Scherrer formula. The morphologies and particle sizes of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL-JEM-2100 Plus, Tokyo, Japan). The chemical composition of the chitosan coating was studied with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Perkin Elmer System 2000, Waltham, MA, USA) absorption bands using KBr pellets in the range of 500–4000 cm−1. Their magnetic properties were measured at room temperature with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) within the magnetic field of ±8.5 kOe.

2.3. Biocompatibility

The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were tested for acute toxicity in Wistar rats using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 10993-11) biological evaluation of medical devices part 11 test for systemic toxicity 2017 (ethics committee name: National Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, approval code: non-GLP2019-22, approval date: 24 September 2019).
This study was handled by Jiraporn Tangthong, study director at the National Laboratory Animal Center (NLAC), Mahidol University. Wistar rats are often used in studies and research in various fields, such as nutrition, pathology, pharmacology and physiology.
Source of animals: The animals were reserved from the Animal Production Office, National Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, recorded on the “Laboratory Animal Reservation Checklist” according to the “Laboratory Animal Reservation, Receiving and Management” standard operating procedure, SOP-G.RA-059, and recorded on the “Laboratory Animal Reservation Checklist” work sheet, F-G.RA-059/02.
Animal welfare: Guidelines from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academic Press 2011; 8th edition NIH publication number #85–23, revised 2011) were strictly followed throughout the study. The study was approved by the National Laboratory Animal Center Animal Care and Use Committee (NLAC-ACUC), Mahidol University, Thailand.
Housing conditions: The animals were housed in the Experimental Building (Building 7), Animal 1, Mini Room 3. The mini room was used according to the “Operation and Maintenance of Mini Room” standard operating procedure, SOP-E.RA-004, and recorded on the “Mini Room Use Log” work sheet, F-E.RA-004/01. The conditions were as follows: temperature 22 ± 3 °C; humidity 30–70%; and standard fluorescent light, 12:12 (light:dark). The temperature and humidity in the mini room was measured daily by data logger and recorded on the “Environmental Monitoring Record” work sheet, F-G.RA-025/05.
Gross necropsy: All animals in the systemic toxicity study were subjected to a full, detailed gross necropsy, which included careful examination of the external surface of the body and all orifices, along with the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities and skin layer.
The experiment used 20 female Wistar rats that were divided into three groups. Group 1 (five rats) were injected with normal saline for control items. Group 2 (five rats) were injected with 0.1 mL of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. Only group 1 and group 2 were tested at first, in order to reduce the number of rat deaths. The last group of 10 rats were injected with 0.1 mL of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. After injection, all of the rats were observed at 4, 24, 48 and 72 h.

2.4. Animal Testing

The animal testing of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 in MRI was conducted in collaboration with the Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital. The consultant radiologist was Witaya Sungkarat and the veterinarian was Coopet Nitsakulthong, from Chulalongkorn University Laboratory Animal Center. Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were studied to enhance contrast agents by Intera Achieva 3 T (Philips) (ethics committee name: Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, approval code: 001/2562, approval date: 6 February 2019).
The experimental design for animal testing with MRI used Mlac:ICR (Mus musculus) females, 17–24 g and aged 4–5 weeks.
Housing conditions: The Mlac:ICR was housed in a controlled environment. The ventilation, temperature and humidity were controlled by an HVAC (heating, ventilating, air conditioning) system. The temperature range was controlled at approximately 22 ± 2 °C. The relative humidity range was approximately 55 + 10%. Air changes per hour were 15–20 ACH. The light:dark cycle was adjusted to 12:12 h. Mice are sensitive to noise, so the noise level was maintained at <85 db.
The experimental design for the animal testing of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 in MRI was divided into four conditions. All mice were injected with Zoletil 40 mg/kg and Xylazine 2 mg/kg. In the first condition, the mouse was normal, without any substances. In the second condition, the mouse was injected with 0.01 mL of gadolinium. In the third condition, the mouse was injected with 0.01 mL of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles. In the last condition, the mouse was injected with 0.01 mL of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Characterization

The crystal structure, phase and crystallite size of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with magnetic field assistance (400 mT) were investigated using XRD. The XRD peaks of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance matched with those of the cobalt–zinc ferrite phase (Figure 2). The (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (2 2 2), (4 0 0), (4 2 2), (5 1 1) and (4 4 0) planes corresponded to spinel ferrites with cubic symmetry, demonstrating the formation of the Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 phase. The strongest peak was the (3 1 1) plane growth along this direction, and every peak matched JCPDF file no. 80-6488 for Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. The average crystallite size was estimated using the Debye–Scherrer equation (Equation (1)) from full-width at half maximum; FWHM of the (3 1 1) plane:
D = 0.9 λ β cos θ
where D is the average crystallite size, β represents full width at half maximum of peaks and θ denotes the Bragg’s angle [25]. The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with magnetic field assistance (400 mT) were approximately 12 nm, whereas zinc ion x = 0.5 had a small crystallite size of approximately 10–17 nm because the Zn2+ ions were not completely the normal spinel, and the Co2+ ions transferred to the tetrahedral sites [26]. However, zinc ions less than x = 0.5 mostly occupied the tetrahedral sites, but zinc ions more than x = 0.5 gradually occupied octahedral sites. Therefore, the lattice parameter increased with the Zn content. The variation in the ionic size of Co2+ (0.72 Å) was lower than that of Zn2+ (0.74 Å) [27]. Accordingly, the study of the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0 and 0.5) nanoparticles confirmed the spinel cubic ferrite structure [28]. In agreement with the research, the Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0 to 0.5) nanoparticles were prepared using the microwave combustion method [27]. The XRD patterns confirmed the formation of a single-phase CoFe2O4 inverse spinel structure without impurities. The lattice parameter increased from 8.380 to 8.396 Å with an increasing Zn2+ fraction.
When comparing the XRD pattern, other studies with magnetic field-assisted processes found no change in all peaks. The XRD pattern of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles was synthesized using the combustion method, with a 1 T magnetic field-assisted compaction process that resulted in a pure cubic spinel phase. Every peak matched JCPDF file no. 22-1086 for cobalt ferrite, before and after applying the magnetic field-assisted compaction process [25]. Furthermore, the study of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles using the reverse co-precipitation method with alternative magnetic field assistance showed that the XRD patterns of all samples indicated no phase impurity, and that all peaks were attributed to the cubic symmetry spinel, and applying the magnetic field could change the structure [12]. In addition, in Rietveld analysis, the increased applied magnetic field affected more reverse spinel structures. The magnetic field-assisted process affected the increase in crystallite size and the occupation of Co2+ in the octahedral site of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles, as shown using the Rietveld method. The higher Co2+ (0.0745 nm) occupied the octahedral site, with a higher ionic radius in the magnetic field-assisted process. Related magnetite research improved the magnetic properties and crystallinity via the magnetic field-assisted process from the Lorentz force reaction. The crystallite sizes of the Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were controlled by adjusting the partial substitution of zinc, calcine temperature, pH value and rate of ferrite formation. The particles sizes and maximum magnetization values are hereby discussed in terms of TEM and VSM, respectively.
The morphology of the particles was characterized using TEM, and the particle size was measured with the Image-Pro Plus software. The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles at a calcine temperature of 500 °C and an applied magnetic field of 400 mT were spherical shapes, with an average core size of 26 ± 1.86 nm (Figure 3a,b) and a chitosan thickness of approximately 2 nm (Figure 3c). Uniform Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles may be convenient for attaching the negative charge of target cells or cancer cells. The existence of the chitosan coating on the surface of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 was confirmed via FTIR.
The FTIR spectra of chitosan-coated Co1−xZnxFe2O4 with x = 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 nanoparticles at 500 °C had hydroxyl groups at wavenumbers 3440 to 3220 cm−1 and 1650 to 1630 cm−1 from water (Figure 4), and metal–oxygen bonds at 610 to 580 cm−1 and 440 to 410 cm−1 [8]. Chitosan coating showed the primary amine at 3410 cm−1 and the secondary amine at 1654 cm−1. Consequently, the wavenumber 3410 cm−1 was defined as the OH-stretching vibration of pure chitosan [29]. FTIR measurements were carried out on all three samples to confirm the same chitosan coating results. The FTIR spectra of chitosan-coated Co1−xZnxFe2O4 with x = 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 nanoparticles showed the presence of primary amine and secondary amine from chitosan. The chitosan coating of the Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles needed to be checked first, in order to ensure that the particles were well dispersed with the functional groups of chitosan coating before treatment with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance. The magnetic properties of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance were measured using VSM analysis.
The magnetic properties of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles (with and without 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance) were compared with those of a commercial drug (Gd from Dotarem®) (Figure 5). The Mm and Hc values of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance (red line, Figure 5) were 8.85 emu/g and 1.41 Oe, respectively. The high Mm and low Hc values of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance indicated that their magnetic properties are close to those of superparamagnetic material. In addition, the Mm and Hc values of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without the 400 mT of magnetic field assistance (green line, Figure 5) were approximately 7.39 emu/g and 140 Oe, respectively. Here, the Hc value was too high for superparamagnetic material. Moreover, the results showed that the Mm of Gd from Dotarem® was very low at 0.08 emu/g (pink line, Figure 5), because of its paramagnetic characteristics. The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance were studied for acute toxicity in laboratory animals to confirm their biocompatibility.

3.2. Biocompatibility Study

The bodyweight of the Wistar rats injected with the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles increased along the same trend as that of the control group (Figure 6). This implied that the control group and the nanoparticle-injected groups had no differences in biological responses, no abnormal symptoms and no deaths. After the gross necropsy of all the Wistar rats, there were no changes found in the macroscopic examination of all organs. These results were in agreement with a previous report stating that the biocompatibility of Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles was up to 70% of mean cell viability at concentrations of 0.05 g/mL [30].
Thus, the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance did not affect acute systemic toxicity in Wistar rats. Therefore, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance can be used for MRI imaging in animal testing.

3.3. MRI Application

Typical studies of visceral MRI images require a magnetic resonance monitor with a high magnetic field strength of 3 tesla or higher, so that detailed and high-definition images can be distinguished, and slight differences in the tissues are evident. This requires a minimum of three weighted images, including T1, T2 and proton density-weighted (PDW) images, and must be interpreted by a skilled radiologist. T1 is an anatomy scan because the boundaries of tissues can be clearly distinguished. Fluid is black, solid organs and muscles are gray, but fat is bright. However, T2 is a pathology scan because the area of fluid collection or edematous tissue is more prominently bright compared with nearby tissues. T2 is a specific property of each tissue type, with the number of protons present in different tissues with different T2 values; for example, lipid core, fibrous cap, normal tissue and calcium have T2 values of 28.1 ms, 51.2 ms, 48.2 ms and 52 ms, respectively. Therefore, the image of the T2 value map is of the fat pad. Therefore, it may be possible to classify the components inside the fat pad, which is different from the old method that relied on the advantage difference from the intensity of the signal on the image (image intensity contrast) [31].
Gadolinium decreased the T1 and T2 values of the neighboring water protons. These effects increased the signal intensity of the T1-weighted images but reduced the signal intensity of the T2-weighted images. Lower gadolinium was associated with T1 shortening, but higher gadolinium concentrations resulted in T2 shortening. The amount of gadolinium must be controlled to reduce the risk of toxicity in the human body. Examples of magnetic substances used to enhance contrasts in MRI include high-spin manganese (II) and superparamagnetic iron oxide, which greatly affected the T2 relaxation [32].
The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles at a calcine temperature of 500 °C were pure phase, small particle size, high Mm value and low Hc value, as a result of the improvement in their magnetic properties via the magnetic field-assisted process. Moreover, the chitosan coating increased the distribution of the particles, and it was safety tested for acute toxicity in mice. Therefore, the Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were used in an MRI application to test the ability of the contrast agents. The study compared the MRI images of normal mice injected with gadolinium and chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance, with those of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance. The mean contrast from mice liver using a 3D technique was echo time (TE) = 22 ms and repetition time (TR) = 350 ms. The mean contrast was the average brightness of the organs we studied compared with the total of the MRI images. The mean of normal mice was 406.29 per area of 82 mm2 (Figure 7a) when the injection of gadolinium was 664.11 per area of 79 mm2 (Figure 7b). However, the mean of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance injected to mice was 490.82 per area of 147 mm2 (Figure 7c). Moreover, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance injected increased the mean of contrast to 808.18 per area of 82 mm2 (Figure 7d). However, this study did not increase the concentration of the substance to find the T1 and T2 values; therefore, we could not calculate the relaxivity values of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.
However, research related to silica-coated Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4 nanoparticles used in 4.7 T of MRI found that r1 and r2 were 0.07 and 126.86 mM−1·s−1, respectively. The value of r1 was very small compared with r2, which was a regular spherical magnetic nanoparticle agent [16]. Therefore, the r2/r1 ratio had to be reduced while the value of r1 as positive contrast agents increased [33]. The relaxation time (T1) of Gd-DOTA from Dotarem® 0.5 mol/l with a metal chelate of 278.3 mg/mL used in 0.47 T of MRI was 4.3 mM−1·s−1 [34]. The longitudinal relaxivity (r1) of Dotarem® was 5.14, 3.70 and 3.90 mM−1·s−1 from 3 T, 7 T and 9.4 T MRI, respectively [35]. Furthermore, a study of the high signal in a T2*-weighted image from implanted cells labeled rat mesenchymal stem cells by silica-coated cobalt zinc ferrite nanoparticles was clearer in anatomical detail in a larger area than iron oxide nanoparticles [36]. Results of the in vitro condition of human prostate cancer cells presented r2/r1 values of 59 and 50 for cobalt zinc ferrite nanoparticles coated with dimercaptosuccinic acid, respectively [37]. Moreover, the magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) technique was used with gadolinium to enhance MRI images in the brain [38].
The histogram shows a mean contrast from the MRI images of both the liver and kidney organs of the mice with 2D and 3D techniques (Figure 8). The chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance (red) resulted in the highest mean contrast, comparing all organs and both techniques. The mean contrast of the liver organ tended to decrease with the injection of gadolinium (pink), chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (green), and with normal mice (black), respectively, because the gadolinium-based contrast agent infiltrated into the liver organs faster than the kidneys. However, the mean contrast of two kidneys with the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (green) was higher than those for the injection of gadolinium (pink), and for normal mice (black).

4. Conclusions

In summary, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were successfully synthesized. The spinel phase of a cubic unit cell and small crystallite sizes of 12 nm were obtained. The core size of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles was approximately 26 ± 1.86 nm. Treating the chitosan-coated nanoparticles with a 400 mT magnetic field resulted in their magnetic properties being close to that of superparamagnetic material, as confirmed by their high Mm (8.85 emu/g) and low Hc (1.41 Oe) values. The improvement in the magnetic properties of the chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles is beneficial for contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging. The nanoparticles were also shown to be non-toxic in the acute toxicity tests on rats. Finally, chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance could enhance the brightness of MRI images up to 21% compared with those of gadolinium-injected mice.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings13020276/s1, Video S1: MRI Measurement of 3 mice, (a) Normal mice; (b) CoZnFe2O4 with apply 400 mT; (c) CoZnFe2O4 without apply. Video S2: MRI Measurement of both mice injected with gadolinium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W. and W.O.; methodology, A.W.; software, A.W. and W.O.; validation, A.W. and W.O.; formal analysis, A.W. and W.O.; investigation, A.W. and W.O.; resources, W.O.; data curation, A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W.; writing—review and editing, A.W. and W.O.; visualization, A.W.; supervision, W.O.; project administration, W.O.; funding acquisition, W.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the financial support received from the Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand, and the assistance of Pongsakorn Jantaratana, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Kasetsart University, with the VSM measurement.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by ethic committee name: Institute of Animals for Scientific Purposes Development (IAD) National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT), approval code: U 1-08123-2562, approval date: 27 February 2019. Wistar rats using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 10993-11) biological evaluation of medical devices part 11 test for systemic toxicity 2017 (ethics committee name: National Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, approval code: non-GLP2019-22, approval date: 24 September 2019). Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles were studied to enhance contrast agents by Intera Achieva 3 T (Philips) (ethics committee name: Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, approval code: 001/2562, approval date: 6 February 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chan, M.H.; Li, C.H.; Chang, Y.C.; Hsiao, M. Iron-Based Ceramic Composite Nanomaterials for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia and Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Darwish, M.S.A.; Kim, H.; Lee, H.; Ryu, C.; Lee, J.Y.; Yoon, J. Engineering Core-Shell Structures of Magnetic Ferrite Nanoparticles for High Hyperthermia Performance. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nica, V.; Caro, C.; Páez-Muñoz, J.M.; Leal, M.P.; Garcia-Martin, M.L. Bi-Magnetic Core-Shell CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4 Nanoparticles for In Vivo Theranostics. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, L.; Jiang, W.; Luo, K.; Song, H.; Lan, F.; Wu, Y.; Gu, Z. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents for non-invasive stem cell labeling and tracking. Theranostics 2013, 3, 595–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bellin, M.F.; Van Der Molen, A.J. Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: An overview. Eur. J. Radiol. 2008, 66, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, S.; Hossain, M.K. Classification and properties of nanoparticles. In Nanoparticle-Based Polymer Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 15–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rubel, M.H.K.; Hossain, M.K. Chapter: 10 Crystal Structures and Properties of Nanomagnetic Materials, Fundamentals of Low Dimensional, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2022; pp. 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mozaffari, M.; Manouchehri, S.; Yousefi, M.H.; Amighian, J. The effect of solution temperature on crystallite size and magnetic properties of Zn substituted Co ferrite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sanpo, N.; Berndt, C.C.; Wen, C.; Wang, J. Transition metal-substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J. Acta. Biomater. 2013, 9, 5830–5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. He, H.Y.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J.F.; Lu, J. Rapid photodegradation of methyl blue on magnetic Zn1−xCoxFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesis by hydrothermal process. J. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 136, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yadav, R.S.; Havlica, J.; Hnatko, M.; Šajgalík, P.; Alexander, C.; Palou, M.; Bartoníčková, E.; Boháč, M.; Frajkorová, F.; Masilko, J.; et al. Magnetic properties of Co1−xZnxFe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by starch-assisted sol-gel autocombustion method and its ball milling. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 378, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Samadia, M.S.; Shokrollahia, H.; Zamanianb, A. The magnetic-field-assisted synthesis of the Co-ferrite nanoparticles via reverse co-precipitation and their magnetic and structural properties. J. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 215, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Hu, K.; Chen, B.; Liang, Y.; Fan, F.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N. Fe3O4@PSC nanoparticle clusters with enhanced magnetic properties prepared by alternating-current magnetic field assisted co-precipitation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 520, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shibaev, A.V.; Shvets, P.V.; Kessel, D.E.; Kamyshinsky, R.A.; Orekhov, A.S.; Abramchuk, S.S.; Khokhlov, A.R.; Philippova, O.E. Magnetic-field-assisted synthesis of anisotropic iron oxide particles: Effect of pH. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, C.; Leung, C.W.; Pong, P.W.T. Magnetic-Field-Assisted Assembly of Anisotropic Superstructures by Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Magnetism. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mohamed, W.S.; Alzaid, M.; Abdelbaky, M.S.M.; Amghouz, Z.; Granda, S.G.; Abu-Dief, A.M. Impact of Co2+ Substitution on Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of CoxZn1−xFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sattarahmady, N.; Zarea, T.; Mehdizadeh, A.R.; Azarpira, N.; Heidari, M.; Lotfi, M.; Heli, H. Dextrin-coated zinc substituted cobalt-ferrite nanoparticles as an MRI contrast agent: In vitro and in vivo imaging studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 129, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmad, A.; Bae, H.; Kim, C.; Rhee, I. Characterization of zinc-doped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles for application as heat generators in magnetic hyperthermia and MRI contrast agents. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2019, 74, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gözüak, F.; Köseoğlu, Y.; Baykal, A.; Kavas, H. Synthesis and characterization of CoxZn1−xFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles via a PEG-assisted route. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 2170–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Safari, R.; Hadi, H. Use of Dextran-Coated Cobalt–Zinc Ferrite Nanoparticles to Improve Image Quality in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Non-Clinical Approach. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 95, 2643–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ansari, L.; Sharifi, I.; Ghadrijan, H.; Azarpira, N.; Momeni, F.; Zamani, H.; Rasouli, N.; Mohammadi, M.; Mehdizadeh, A.; Abedi-Firouzjah, R. Synthesis, Characterization and MRI Application of Cobalt-Zinc Ferrite Nanoparticles Coated with DMSA: An In-vivo Study. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2021, 52, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hossain, M.K.; Khan, M.I.; El-Denglawey, A. A review on biomedical applications, prospects, and challenges of rare earth oxides. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hoque, M.D.A.; Ahmed, M.R.; Rahman, G.T.; Rahman, M.T.; Islam, M.A.; Khan, M.A.; Hossain, M.K. Fabrication and comparative study of magnetic Fe and α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles dispersed hybrid polymer (PVA+Chitosan) novel nanocomposite film. Results Phys. 2018, 10, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anik, M.I.; Hossain, M.K.; Hossain, I.; Ahmed, I.; Doha, R.M. Biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles. In Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Hybrid Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 463–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Indla, S.; Chelvane, A.; Lodh, A.; Das, D. Enhancement in magnetostrictive properties of cobalt ferrite by magnetic field assisted compaction technique. J. Alloys Comp. 2019, 779, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Coppola, P.; da Silva, F.G.; Gomide, G.; Paula, F.L.O.; Campos, A.F.C.; Perzynski, R.; Kern, C.; Depeyrot, J.; Aquino, R. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Mixed Zinc–Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles: Structural and Magnetic Properties. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2016, 18, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sundararajan, M.; Kennedy, L.J.; Aruldoss, U.; Pasha, S.k.K.; Vijaya, J.J.; Dunn, S. Microwave combustion synthesis of zinc substituted nanocrystalline spinel cobalt ferrite: Structural and magnetic studies. J. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 2015, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yadav, R.S.; Kuřitka, I.; Havlica, J.; Hnatko, M.; Alexander, C.; Masilko, J.; Kalina, L.; Hajdúchová, M.; Rusnak, J.; Enev, V. Structural, magnetic, elastic, dielectric and electrical properties of hotpress sintered Co1−xZnxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.5) spinel ferrite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 447, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, M.; Yu, Y.; Fan, G.; Chen, G.; Jin, Y.M.; Tang, W.; Jia, W. The synthesis and characterization of monodispersed chitosan-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles via a facile one-step solvothermal process for adsorption of bovine serum albumin. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sanpo, N.; Tharajak, J.; Li, Y.; Berndt, C.C.; Wen, C.; Wang, J. Biocompatibility of transition metal-substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2014, 16, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chunpenmongkol, S.; Wantanajittikul, K.; Rerkasem, K.; Ya-in, C.; Saekho, S. Classification of carotid atherosclerotic plaque components using T2 mapping technique from magnetic resonance imaging. J. Assoc. Med. Sci. 2014, 47, 37–44. Available online: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/59987 (accessed on 27 March 2021).
  32. Xiao, Y.D.; Paudel, R.; Liu, J.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Z.S.; Zhou, S.K. MRI contrast agents: Classification and application (review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Israel, L.L.; Galstyan, A.; Holle, E.; Ljubimova, J.Y. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for imaging, targeting and treatment of primary and metastatic tumors of the brain. J. Control Release 2020, 320, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Junior, J.E.; Santos, A.C.D.; Koenigkam-Santos, M.; Nogueira-Barbosa, M.H.; Muglia, V.F. Complications from the use of intravenous gadoliniumbased contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol. Bras. 2008, 4, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, C.T.; Chandrasekharan, P.; He, T.; Poh, Z.; Raju, A.; Chuang, K.H.; Robins, E.G. An intravascular MRI contrast agent based on Gd (DO3A-Lys) for tumor angiography. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Novotna, B.; Herynek, V.; Rossner Jr, P.; Turnovcova, K.; Jendelova, P. The effects of grafted mesenchymal stem cells labeled with iron oxide or cobalt-zinc-iron nanoparticles on the biological macromolecules of rat brain tissue extracts. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 4519–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ghasemian, Z.; Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D.; Manouchehri, S. Cobalt zinc ferrite nanoparticles as a potential magnetic resonance imaging agent: An in vitro study. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2015, 7, 64–68. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483316/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  38. Elster, A.D.; Burdette, J.H. Chapter 3—Image contrast. In Questions and Answers in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2001; p. 1272. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. An instrument used to modify compression under the magnetic field-assisted process, and a magnetic field direction simulation.
Figure 1. An instrument used to modify compression under the magnetic field-assisted process, and a magnetic field direction simulation.
Coatings 13 00276 g001
Figure 2. Indexed X-ray diffraction pattern for chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticle calcined powders at 500 °C with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance.
Figure 2. Indexed X-ray diffraction pattern for chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticle calcined powders at 500 °C with 400 mT of magnetic field assistance.
Coatings 13 00276 g002
Figure 3. TEM images and a histogram image (a) of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance at a magnification of (b) ×100,000 and (c) ×250,000.
Figure 3. TEM images and a histogram image (a) of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance at a magnification of (b) ×100,000 and (c) ×250,000.
Coatings 13 00276 g003
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of chitosan-coated Co1−xZnxFe2O4 with x = 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 nanoparticles at a calcine temperature of 500 °C.
Figure 4. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of chitosan-coated Co1−xZnxFe2O4 with x = 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9 nanoparticles at a calcine temperature of 500 °C.
Coatings 13 00276 g004
Figure 5. Room temperature magnetization curve of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles (with and without 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance) and Gd from Dotarem® (Guerbet, Roissy CdG Cedex, France).
Figure 5. Room temperature magnetization curve of chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles (with and without 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance) and Gd from Dotarem® (Guerbet, Roissy CdG Cedex, France).
Coatings 13 00276 g005
Figure 6. Wistar rat body weight changes in acute systemic toxicity with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 6. Wistar rat body weight changes in acute systemic toxicity with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles.
Coatings 13 00276 g006
Figure 7. Three-dimensional MRI images of mice liver from (a) normal mice; (b) mice injected with gadolinium; (c) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance; and (d) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance. In Supplementary Materials you can find the whole MRI measurement (Video S1) of mice liver from (a) normal mice (left), (b) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance (middle), (c) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (right); and Video S2 of mice liver from (b) both mice injected with gadolinium.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional MRI images of mice liver from (a) normal mice; (b) mice injected with gadolinium; (c) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance; and (d) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance. In Supplementary Materials you can find the whole MRI measurement (Video S1) of mice liver from (a) normal mice (left), (b) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance (middle), (c) mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (right); and Video S2 of mice liver from (b) both mice injected with gadolinium.
Coatings 13 00276 g007
Figure 8. Mean of contrast histogram inferred from 3D and 2D MRI images of mice liver and kidneys from normal mice (black), mice injected with gadolinium (pink), mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (green), and mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance (red).
Figure 8. Mean of contrast histogram inferred from 3D and 2D MRI images of mice liver and kidneys from normal mice (black), mice injected with gadolinium (pink), mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles without external magnetic field assistance (green), and mice injected with chitosan-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles with 400 mT of external magnetic field assistance (red).
Coatings 13 00276 g008
Table 1. Literature review of synthesis methods for cobalt–zinc ferrite (Co1−xZnxFe2O4) and features.
Table 1. Literature review of synthesis methods for cobalt–zinc ferrite (Co1−xZnxFe2O4) and features.
SynthesisMethodParticle Sizes (nm)Magnetic
Properties
ApplicationsRef.
Dextrin-coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4Co-
precipitation
3.9SuperparamagneticMRI contrast agent[17]
Silica-coated Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4Hydrothermal technique90SuperparamagneticMRI contrast agent and magnetic hyperthermia[18]
Dextran-coated Co0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4Heat treatment method34Superpara-magneticMRI contrast agent[20]
DMSA-coated Co0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4Thermal
decomposition method
8Superpara-magneticMRI contrast agent[21]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Worawong, A.; Onreabroy, W. Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles for Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Coatings 2023, 13, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020276

AMA Style

Worawong A, Onreabroy W. Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles for Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Coatings. 2023; 13(2):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Worawong, Apichaya, and Wandee Onreabroy. 2023. "Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles for Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging" Coatings 13, no. 2: 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020276

APA Style

Worawong, A., & Onreabroy, W. (2023). Synthesis of Chitosan-Coated Co0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles for Contrast Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Coatings, 13(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop