Next Article in Journal
Heparin with Different Molecular Weight on Hemocompatibility and Adsorption of Activated Carbon
Next Article in Special Issue
Quasi Non-Destructive Quality Assessment of Thermally Sprayed AISI 316L Coatings Using Polarization Measurements in 3.5% NaCl Gel Electrolyte
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Sustainable Detection of Machining Surface Defects under the Influence of Environmental Interference
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Porous MgF2 Coating by a Sol–Gel Method Accompanied by Phase Separation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/coatings13071246
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings with Electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 Molten Salts

by
Wenjuan Qi
1,
Desheng Ding
1,
Weijie Luo
1,
Weiliang Jin
2,
Qian Kou
1,
Chuntao Ge
1 and
Saijun Xiao
1,*
1
School of Metallurgy Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
2
Department of Metallurgy, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(7), 1246; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13071246
Submission received: 16 June 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 14 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Novel Coatings)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The hardness and wear resistance of amorphous Al–Mn alloy coatings can be improved by incorporating ceramic particles into them to extend their application. In this paper, Al–Mn/WC composite coatings have been prepared with electrodeposition in stirred AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 molten salts at 180 °C with the addition of WC particles. The effects of stirring speed (400–700 rpm) and cathode current density (15–75 mA/cm2) on the produced Al–Mn/WC composite coatings have been studied. At 600 rpm and 700 rpm, the Al–Mn/WC composite coatings exhibited the best uniform distribution of the embedded WC particles, with the tested microhardness value up to 650 HV0.1, compared with 530 HV0.1 of the Al–Mn alloy. Moreover, under various cathode current densities, the best quality of the Al–Mn/WC composite coating was obtained at 55 mA/cm2, with a homogeneous distribution of WC particles and the highest microhardness value (670 HV0.1). It is expected that this method could be extended to be applied for the preparation of aluminum-based and magnesium-based ceramic composite coatings.

1. Introduction

Amorphous Al–Mn alloy coatings have attracted considerable interest due to their promising chemical, physical, mechanical and corrosion-resistant properties [1,2,3], and they have been utilized to protect metals such as steels [4], magnesium alloys [5] and NdFeB magnets [6] against corrosion.
By improving the hardness and wear resistance of Al–Mn alloys, their applications can be broadened [7,8]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that Al-based composite coatings containing ceramic particles have increased hardness and improved wear resistance, and are capable of protecting metal substrates under harsh environments [9,10,11]. Currently, incorporated particles such as diamonds [12], SiO2 [13], Al2O3 [14], SiC [15], WC [16], TiB2 [17] and CNT (carbon nanotubes) [18] are being used to prepare composite coatings. Therefore, it is worthwhile to explore the possibility of incorporating ceramic particles into amorphous Al–Mn alloy coatings in order to improve their quality.
Amorphous Al–Mn alloy coatings can be prepared using both molten salt electrodeposition [19,20,21,22] and room-temperature ionic solution electrodeposition [23,24,25]. Since room-temperature ionic solutions are highly volatile, expensive [24], mostly toxic and poorly biodegradable, and the synthesis of ionic liquids includes several steps involving highly toxic reagents [26], it is more advantageous to prepare Al–Mn alloys with electrodeposition in low-temperature inorganic molten salts. As an example, M. Jafarian et al. electrodeposited Al, Mn and Al–Mn alloys on aluminum electrodes in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl molten salts [20]. Ting-ting Cai [27] obtained good quality Al–Mn coatings with electrodeposition in an AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 (0.5–2.0 wt.%) melt at 200–220 °C under cathode current densities of 26.7–48.0 mA/cm2.
Our group has produced Al/TiC nanocomposite coatings with electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl molten salts with the addition of TiC nanoparticles [28]. TiC nanoparticles have been successfully incorporated into Al coatings with a uniform distribution, and the hardness of Al/TiC composite coatings was significantly improved compared with pure Al coatings; thus, this method can be extended to prepare Al–Mn-based composite coatings. Therefore, this paper focuses on investigating the possibility of electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 molten salts at 180 °C with the introduction of WC particles to prepare Al–Mn-based composite coatings incorporated with WC particles under a stirring state. Moreover, the effects of stirring speed and cathode current density on the incorporation of WC particles into Al–Mn coatings and their mechanical properties have been investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of NaCl–KCl Solid Salts Containing WC Particles

The procedure for preparing NaCl–KCl solid salts containing WC particles is illustrated in Figure 1. Using a planetary ball mill (HLXPM-φ10 × 4, Hengle, Wuhan, China), NaCl (99%, Sinopharm, Shanghai, China) and KCl (99%, Sinopharm) were pre-dried in an oven for 48 h at 200 °C, mixed in a mole ratio of 1:1, and then ball milled in a 316 stainless steel grinding jar for 2 h. WC particles (average size, 400 nm, Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were blended with ball-milled NaCl–KCl salts at a mass ratio of 1:1, ultrasonically dispersed in acetone for 2 h (100 kHz), and finally dried at 120 °C for 1 h in a vacuum drying oven to obtain NaCl–KCl solid salts containing WC particles.

2.2. Electrodeposition Process for Producing Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings

An AlCl3–NaCl–KCl mixture with a molar ratio of 66:17:17 was selected as the electrolyte. AlCl3 (99%, Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) was weighed and ground in a glove box protected by an argon atmosphere and mixed with KCl and NaCl in the glove box. Then, 1.5 wt.% MnCl2 (>99%, Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) was added to obtain AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 salts. MnCl2 was dried in a vacuum oven at 200 °C for 10 h before use.
As shown in Figure 2, an AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 mixture was placed in a quartz crucible under an argon atmosphere, which was heated to 180 °C in an oil bath. After it was melted, NaCl–KCl solid salts containing WC particles were added to the molten salts through the filling hole and stirred using a mechanical stirring paddle to form AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 molten salts in which the WC particles can be well suspended. A 25 mm × 5 mm × 0.5 mm sheet of 304 stainless steel was used as the cathode and a 25 mm × 5 mm × 3 mm sheet with high purity (99.999 wt.%) aluminum was used as the anode. The cathode and anode were positioned symmetrically and parallel to each other, with the stirring paddle placed in the center. After electrodeposition, the cathodes were removed, cleaned in deionized water, dried, and characterized.
The effect of different stirring speeds (400 rpm, 500 rpm, 600 rpm and 700 rpm) on the electrodeposition of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings was studied in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 molten salts under a current density of 55 mA/cm2 with a WC particle concentration of 20 g/L at 180 °C.
In addition, the influence of different cathode current densities (15 mA/cm2, 35 mA/cm2, 55 mA/cm2 and 75 mA/cm2) on the produced Al–Mn/WC composite coatings was investigated in the same molten salts under a rotating speed of 700 rpm with a WC particle concentration of 30 g/L at 180 °C. In order to pass the same charge at different current densities, the electrodeposition time was 37 min, 16 min, 10 min and 7.5 min, respectively.

2.3. Characterization of WC Raw Materials and Coatings

The WC raw material and the surface and cross-sectional morphologies of the composite coatings were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Regulus 8220, HITACHI and JSM-6510, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD, Tokyo, Japan) (Smart Lab, Rigaku, voltage: 40 kV, current: 40 mA, scan rate: 10°/min) was used to analyze their phase composition. A Vickers microhardness tester (Q30A+, Qness, Salzburg, Austria) was employed to measure the Vickers hardness using a load of 0.98 N with a dwell time of 10 s. Six indentation tests on various parts of each coating were conducted to ensure reliability.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings at Various Rotating Speeds

The as-received WC particles were characterized by XRD and SEM, with the results shown in Figure 3. From the XRD analysis results in Figure 3a, it is obvious that the WC particles were pure. In addition, from Figure 3b, it can be found that the WC particles had a particle size smaller than 500 nm, with a relatively uniform particle size distribution.
Electrodeposition was carried out in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 molten salts with the addition of WC particles (20 g/L) at 180 °C under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2. The rotating rate of the mechanical stirring paddle ranged from 400 rpm to 700 rpm. A photograph depicting the typical appearance of the produced coating (under a rotating rate of 500 rpm) is shown in Figure 4a, exhibiting a relatively flat and metallic appearance. Figure 4b presents the XRD results of the obtained composite coatings at various stirring rates. For the XRD result corresponding to no addition of WC particles, there existed an amorphous hump with 2θ in the range of 40–48°, which corresponded to amorphous Al–Mn [27]. Moreover, diffraction peaks for 304 stainless steel substrates and Al can also be detected. After the introduction of WC particles, diffraction peaks of WC can be detected, indicating successful incorporation of WC particles into the Al–Mn alloy at a stirring rate from 400 rpm to 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C.
Subsequently, the surface morphologies of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings prepared at different stirring speeds were analyzed with SEM (backscattered electron mode) as shown in Figure 5, in which the bright white areas corresponded to the WC particles embedded in the coatings. At a rotating rate of 400 rpm (Figure 5a), it can be seen that the incorporated WC particles tended to aggregate. When it was increased to 500 rpm, the agglomeration of WC particles decreased, and an increased amount of WC particles was embedded. With the increase in the stirring rate to 600 and 700 rpm, a better distribution of WC particles was demonstrated.
The cross-sectional SEM images of the Al–Mn/WC composite coatings prepared at different rotating speeds are presented in Figure 6. It can be seen that the Al–Mn/WC coatings were dense and well bonded to the substrate. The change in the stirring rate had an insignificant effect on the thickness of the composite coatings. At 400 rpm, there existed severe aggregation of WC particles, especially on the surface, corresponding to the result in Figure 5a, resulting in a slightly reduced thickness. An uneven distribution of WC particles was also observed. At 500 rpm, the distribution of WC particles became more uniform. The further increase in the stirring rate to 600 rpm and 700 rpm resulted in reduced aggregation of WC particles and more even distribution of them in the coatings, which is in agreement with the SEM analysis results of the Al–Mn/WC surface as shown in Figure 5c,d.
Furthermore, the microhardness of these samples was tested to evaluate the effect of incorporating WC particles into the Al–Mn alloy. At the same time, it was noticed that the Mn content in the Al–Mn/WC composite coatings produced at different speeds fluctuated within the range of 28~32 wt.%. To avoid the effect of Mn content change on the values of hardness, the hardness of Al–Mn coatings with different Mn content was measured and analyzed, with the results presented in Figure 7a. As the Mn content increased, the hardness of the Al–Mn coating increased gradually. However, at a Mn content of 27 wt.%, the hardness growth rate became slower, which was in agreement with the results reported by Uchida [29]. In Figure 7a, it can be seen that the hardness did not vary significantly with the Mn content in the range of 28 wt.% to 32 wt.%, ranging from 510 HV0.1 to 530 HV0.1.
At various stirring speeds, Figure 7b presents the microhardness of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings. The hardness of the Al–Mn/WC composite coatings increased with the increase in stirring speed. With a rotating speed of 600 rpm and 700 rpm, the value of the microhardness could reach 650 HV0.1. It was also higher than 530 HV0.1 for the Al–Mn coating. As a result, the variation in hardness of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings prepared at different rotating speeds is mainly due to the enhanced inclusion of WC particles in the coating with a more uniform distribution.
During the electrodeposition, as the stirring speed increases, the frequency of collision between WC particles and the electrode surface increases, leading to increased chances for WC particles to be captured by electrodeposited Al–Mn. On the other hand, employment of stirring speeds that are too high increase the impact of molten salt fluid on the electrode surface, which allows WC particles that have been captured by the electrode surface to detach from it and reenter into the molten salts [30,31]. In the present study, at a low stirring rate, the gravitational effect of WC particles dominates due to their high density (15.77 g/cm3). Thus, they do not suspend well in the molten salts, resulting in a relatively small amount of WC incorporated in the Al–Mn coating. As the stirring rate increases, the WC particles overcome these gravitational effects, resulting in better suspension and an increase in WC amount in the Al–Mn coating. When the speed is further raised to 700 rpm, although the frequency of collisions between WC particles and the electrode increases, the large impact of the molten salt fluid probably causes WC particles that are captured on the electrode surface to divorce from it again. As a result, at 600 rpm and 700 rpm, the incorporation results are similar, demonstrating a good distribution of WC particles and the highest coating hardness. Simultaneously, the incorporation of WC particles in the Al–Mn coating leads to an improved value of hardness, compared with that of the Al–Mn coating.

3.2. Preparation of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings at Various Current Densities

Electrodeposition was conducted with a WC particles concentration of 30 g/L at cathode current densities of 15–75 mA/cm2. In this case, a stirring rate of 700 rpm was selected according to the experimental results in Section 3.1. The XRD pattern results of the obtained composite coatings are shown in Figure 8 (not including the result for the composite coating at 15 mA/cm2 because of its poor quality). It can be observed that there existed an amorphous region between 40 and 48º, corresponding to the formation of Al–Mn, and diffraction peaks of WC, stainless steel substrates and Al, demonstrating successful incorporation of WC particles into the Al–Mn alloy at current densities from 35 to 75 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C.
The surface morphologies of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings prepared with electrodeposition at varying current densities are shown in Figure 9. Locations with bright white particles corresponded to WC particles. As shown in Figure 9, the content of WC particles in the Al–Mn/WC composite coating increased with elevated current density, and the WC particles were dispersed most uniformly at the current density of 55 mA/cm2.
SEM analysis of the cross-sections of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings prepared with electrodeposition at various current densities was conducted, and the obtained results are shown in Figure 10. It can be observed that the thickness of the Al–Mn/WC coating prepared under a current density of 15 mA/cm2 was smaller than those under other conditions, based on the same passed charge under different cathode current densities. This coating contained a small amount of incorporated WC particles, with poor adhesion. Increasing the current density to 30 mA/cm2 and 55 mA/cm2 resulted in enhanced thickness of the coating as well as the content of WC particles. These coatings, with good adhesion, coherence and high compactness, included uniform distributions of WC particles. As the current density increased to 75 mA/cm2, the flatness of the coating was reduced, with a degraded distribution of WC particles and their amount was decreased slightly.
Under different current density conditions, the Mn content of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings ranged from 29 wt.% to 32 wt.%. According to Figure 7a, the hardness of Al–Mn coatings within this Mn content range was between 520 HV0.1 and 530 HV0.1, which indicated that Mn content variation had no significant effect on coating hardness in this range. As shown in Figure 11, the hardness value of composite coatings obtained at 35–75 mA/cm2 was tested and analyzed, among which the hardness of the Al–Mn/WC coating at 55 mA/cm2 was the highest, reaching 670 HV0.1. At 75 mA/cm2, the hardness value was lower than that of the coating at 55 mA/cm2, with a wider error bar, exhibiting larger instability. These results were in agreement with SEM analysis results shown in Figure 10.
The cathode current density has a large effect on the quality and the incorporation of particles for the coating. The growth rate of the coating controlled by the cathode current density should match the transporting rate of particles towards the electrode dominated by the stirring rate, in order to form a coating with a uniform distribution of particles in it. As can be seen from Figure 9 and Figure 10, at the 15 mA/cm2 current density, most WC particles delivered to the cathode surface are probably returned to the molten salts by the stirring fluid before they are completely embedded into the Al–Mn coating, due to its relatively slow growth rate, so the Al–Mn/WC composite coating contains a small amount of WC particles. Furthermore, these detached WC particles also remove some of the deposited Al–Mn metal, reducing the current efficiency and making the Al–Mn/WC composite coating thin. In addition, such low current density leads to electrodepositing a coating with poor quality. By increasing the current density, the WC particles on the cathode surface are easy to be embedded and covered by the relatively quick deposition of the Al–Mn metal, improving particle incorporation efficiency and current efficiency [32]. However, with a further increase in the current density to 75 mA/cm2, the Al–Mn alloy is deposited extremely quickly, while perhaps the transporting rate of WC particles using mechanical stirring could not catch up with the deposition speed of Al–Mn [33]. In this case, the amount of embedded WC particles is slightly reduced. Moreover, a high current density tends to cause concentration polarization [34], forming dendrites and uneven coating surfaces for the deposited Al–Mn/WC coating, as illustrated in Figure 10d. Therefore, the quality of the Al–Mn/WC composite coating at 55 mA/cm2 is the best, and the dispersion of the WC particles is the most homogeneous, demonstrating the highest microhardness.

4. Conclusions

We have conducted investigations on electrodepositing Al–Mn/WC composite coatings in an AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C with the introduction of WC particles under a stirring state. The conclusions are as follows.
(1)
With the assistance of mechanical stirring, Al–Mn/WC composite coatings can be prepared using electrodeposition with an enhanced value of microhardness compared with Al–Mn alloy coatings.
(2)
At different rotating speeds between 400 rpm and 700 rpm, a better distribution of incorporated WC particles caused by the increased rotating speeds was found, due to the better suspension of WC particles. At 600 rpm and 700 rpm, the highest microhardness value of the Al–Mn/WC composite coatings was reached at 650 HV0.1, compared with 530 HV0.1 of Al–Mn coatings with a similar Mn content.
(3)
Under various cathode current densities ranging from 15 mA/cm2 to 55 mA/cm2, the amount of embedded WC particles and their distribution in Al–Mn/WC composite coatings have been improved. A further increase to 75 mA/cm2 resulted in a slightly reduced amount of embedded WC particles and an uneven distribution of them. Therefore, the highest microhardness value (670 HV0.1) was obtained at 55 mA/cm2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Q. and S.X.; Methodology, W.Q., D.D., W.J., Q.K., C.G. and S.X.; Validation, W.Q.; Formal analysis, W.L. and W.J.; Resources, D.D., Q.K. and C.G.; Data curation, W.Q.; Writing—original draft, W.Q.; Writing—review & editing, S.X.; Supervision, S.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Programme for college students in the Anhui Province (S202110360154).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Programme for college students in the Anhui Province (S202110360154).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peng, D.; Cong, D.; Song, K.; Ding, X.; Wang, X.; Bai, Y.; Yang, X.; Yin, C.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, J.; et al. Mirror-like Bright Al-Mn Coatings Electrodeposition from 1-Ethyl-3 Methylimidazolium Chloride-AlCl3-MnCl2 Ionic Liquids with Pyridine Derivatives. Materials 2021, 14, 6226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reffass, M.; Berziou, C.; Rebere, C.; Billard, A.; Creus, J. Corrosion behaviour of magnetron-sputtered Al1−xMnx coatings in neutral saline solution. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 3615–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mraied, H.; Cai, W.; Sagüés, A.A. Corrosion resistance of Al and Al-Mn thin films. Thin Solid Films 2016, 615, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dobruchowska, E.; Gilewicz, A.; Warcholinski, B.; Libralesso, L.; Batory, D.; Szparaga, L.; Murzynski, D.; Ratajski, J. Al-Mn based coatings deposited by cathodic arc evaporation for corrosion protection of AISI 4140 alloy steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 362, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Yan, C.; Wang, F. Electrodeposition of Al–Mn alloy on AZ31B magnesium alloy in molten salts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4926–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ding, J.; Xu, B.; Ling, G. Al-Mn coating electrodeposited from ionic liquid on NdFeB magnet with high hardness and corrosion resistance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 305, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schaedler, T.A.; Chan, L.J.; Clough, E.C.; Stilke, M.A.; Hundley, J.M.; Masur, L.J. Nanocrystalline Aluminum Truss Cores for Lightweight Sandwich Structures. JOM 2017, 69, 2626–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hilty, R.D.; Masur, L.J. On the Formation of Lightweight Nanocrystalline Aluminum Alloys by Electrodeposition. JOM 2017, 69, 2621–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Walsh, F.C.; Wang, S.; Zhou, N. The Electrodeposition of Composite Coatings: Diversity, Applications and Challenges. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 20, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sankara Narayanan, T.S.N.; Seshadri, S.K. Electro- and Electroless Deposited Composite Coatings: Preparation, Characteristics, and Applications; American Cancer Society: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012; Volume 20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Low, C.T.J.; Wills, R.G.A.; Walsh, F. Electrodeposition of composite coatings containing nanoparticles in a metal deposit. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fu, Y.Y.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhang, B.T.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, H. Fabrication of nanodiamond reinforced aluminum composite coatings by flame spraying for marine applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 17, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, L.; Xu, Y.; Gao, L.; Suo, X.; Gong, J.; Li, H. Cold-Sprayed Aluminum-Silica Composite Coatings Enhance Antiwear/Anticorrosion Performances of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 3215340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yang, W.M.; Li, X.Y.; Du, D.X.; Cao, Y.; Leng, Y. Structure of Al-based composite coatings prepared by thermal diffusion of the arc-ion plating Al coatings. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2019, 33, 1940021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, P.; Gao, Z.; Li, J.Z.; Cheng, D.; Niu, J. Research on reaction brazing of Ti layer-coated SiCp/Al composites using Al-based filler metal foil. Compos. Interfaces 2019, 26, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, C.G.; Li, S.; Liu, C.M.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, P.; Guo, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Effect of WC addition on microstructure and tribological properties of bimodal aluminum composite coatings fabricated by laser surface alloying. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 234, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, F.; Qin, Q.; Shi, T.; Chen, C.; Guo, Z. Surface strengthening aluminum alloy by in-situ TiC-TiB2 composite coating. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 4243–4252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khasenova, R.S.; Komarov, S.V.; Zadorozhnyy, V.Y. Mechanical plating of Al/CNT composite coatings on aluminum substrates. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 707, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.C.; Nan, S.H.; Jiang, Q. Study of the electrodeposition of Al–Mn amorphous alloys from molten salts. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1998, 106, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jafarian, M.; Maleki, A.; Danaee, I.; Gobal, F.; Mahjani, M.G. Electrodeposition of Al, Mn, and Al–Mn Alloy on aluminum electrodes from molten salt (AlCl3–NaCl–KCl). J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stafford, G.R. Electrodeposition of an aluminum-manganese metallic glass from molten salts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, Y.K.; Liu, J.; Qu, S.; Deng, Y.; Han, X.; Hu, W.; Zhong, C. Electrodeposition of alloys and compounds from high-temperature molten salts. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 690, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, J.; Xu, B.; Ling, G. Amorphous Al–Mn coating on NdFeB magnets: Electrodeposition from AlCl3–EMIC–MnCl2 ionic liquid and its corrosion behavior. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 134, 1067–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ispas, A.; Vlaic, C.A.; Camargo, M.K.; Bund, A. Electrochemical Deposition of Aluminum and Aluminum-Manganese Alloys in Ionic Liquids. ECS Trans. 2016, 75, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maniam, K.K.; Paul, S. A Review on the Electrodeposition of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys in Ionic Liquids. Coatings 2021, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jesus, S.; Filho, R.M. Are ionic liquids eco-friendly? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cai, T.T. Study of Al-Mn Alloy Plating on Steel Surface and Its Corrosion Resistance. Master’s Thesis, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ding, D.S.; Jin, W.L.; Luo, W.J.; Ge, C.T.; Kou, Q.; Xiao, S.J.; Zhang, J. Preparation of Al/TiC Nanocomposite Coatings on 304 Stainless Steel via Electrodeposition in Inorganic Molten Salts. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021, 16, 21114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Uchida, J.; Shibuya, A.; Tsuda, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Seto, H. Al-Mn electroplating by molten salt electrolysis. J. Surf. Fish. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 42, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhan, C.W.; Ge, Y.L.; Tian, L.X.; Wang, S.X.; Yang, Y.K.; Lian, Z.P.; Du, L. Effect of stirring speed and particle size on the amount of Ni-CBN composite by composite electrodeposition and analysis of the mechanism. Electroplat. Finish. 2022, 44, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cui, P.F.; Zhang, K.Y.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Li, Y.G.; Yang, K.L. Effect of stirring rate on the corrosion resistance of electrodeposited Ni-Sn/TiO2 composite coatings. Steel Vanadium Titan. 2020, 41, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, Q.; Tan, J.; Xie, F.K.; Meng, L.D.; Zang, Y.; Zhu, X.Y. Effect of current density on the organization and properties of Co-Ni-Cr3C2 composite plating by jet electrodeposition. Surf. Technol. 2020, 49, 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sadowska-mazur, J.; Warwick, M.E. A preliminary study of the electrodeposition of tin and non-metallic particles. Plat. Surf. Finish. 1985, 72, 120–125. [Google Scholar]
  34. Léo, F.; Vincent, B.; Vincent, F.; Henri, S.; Christophe, T. Equivalent Electrical Model for High Current Density Zinc Electrodeposition: Investigation through Polarization Curves and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2023, 18, 100185. [Google Scholar]
Coatings 13 01246 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation process of NaCl–KCl solid salts containing WC particles.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation process of NaCl–KCl solid salts containing WC particles.
Coatings 13 01246 g001
Coatings 13 01246 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the molten salt electrodeposition device under mechanical stirring. 1. Argon gas inlet; 2. outlet; 3. silicone oil; 4. stainless steel cathode; 5. aluminum anode; 6. rotating rod; 7. molten salts electrolyte; 8. stirring paddle.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the molten salt electrodeposition device under mechanical stirring. 1. Argon gas inlet; 2. outlet; 3. silicone oil; 4. stainless steel cathode; 5. aluminum anode; 6. rotating rod; 7. molten salts electrolyte; 8. stirring paddle.
Coatings 13 01246 g002
Coatings 13 01246 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD (a) and SEM (b) images of the as-received WC particles.
Figure 3. XRD (a) and SEM (b) images of the as-received WC particles.
Coatings 13 01246 g003
Coatings 13 01246 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Typical appearance (500 rpm) and (b) XRD patterns (400–700 rpm) of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L).
Figure 4. (a) Typical appearance (500 rpm) and (b) XRD patterns (400–700 rpm) of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L).
Coatings 13 01246 g004
Coatings 13 01246 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of the surface of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L) ((a) 400 rpm; (b) 500 rpm; (c) 600 rpm; (d) 700 rpm).
Figure 5. SEM images of the surface of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L) ((a) 400 rpm; (b) 500 rpm; (c) 600 rpm; (d) 700 rpm).
Coatings 13 01246 g005
Coatings 13 01246 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of the cross-sections of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L) ((a) 400 rpm; (b) 500 rpm; (c) 600 rpm; (d) 700 rpm).
Figure 6. SEM images of the cross-sections of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under a cathode current density of 55 mA/cm2 in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 20 g/L) ((a) 400 rpm; (b) 500 rpm; (c) 600 rpm; (d) 700 rpm).
Coatings 13 01246 g006
Coatings 13 01246 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Microhardness of the Al–Mn coating at different Mn contents; (b) Microhardness of the Al–Mn/WC composite coating at different stirring speeds.
Figure 7. (a) Microhardness of the Al–Mn coating at different Mn contents; (b) Microhardness of the Al–Mn/WC composite coating at different stirring speeds.
Coatings 13 01246 g007
Coatings 13 01246 g008 550
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under cathode current densities of 35–75 mA/cm2 with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings with electrodeposition under cathode current densities of 35–75 mA/cm2 with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L).
Coatings 13 01246 g008
Coatings 13 01246 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of the surface of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings using electrodeposition with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L) ((a) 15 mA/cm2; (b) 35 mA/cm2; (c) 55 mA/cm2; (d) 75 mA/cm2).
Figure 9. SEM images of the surface of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings using electrodeposition with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L) ((a) 15 mA/cm2; (b) 35 mA/cm2; (c) 55 mA/cm2; (d) 75 mA/cm2).
Coatings 13 01246 g009
Coatings 13 01246 g010 550
Figure 10. SEM images of the cross-sections of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings using electrodeposition with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L) ((a) 15 mA/cm2; (b) 35 mA/cm2; (c) 55 mA/cm2; (d) 75 mA/cm2).
Figure 10. SEM images of the cross-sections of the obtained Al–Mn/WC composite coatings using electrodeposition with a stirring rate of 700 rpm in the AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 melt at 180 °C (WC particle concentration, 30 g/L) ((a) 15 mA/cm2; (b) 35 mA/cm2; (c) 55 mA/cm2; (d) 75 mA/cm2).
Coatings 13 01246 g010
Coatings 13 01246 g011 550
Figure 11. Microhardness of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings obtained at different cathode current densities.
Figure 11. Microhardness of Al–Mn/WC composite coatings obtained at different cathode current densities.
Coatings 13 01246 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, W.; Ding, D.; Luo, W.; Jin, W.; Kou, Q.; Ge, C.; Xiao, S. Production of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings with Electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 Molten Salts. Coatings 2023, 13, 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13071246

AMA Style

Qi W, Ding D, Luo W, Jin W, Kou Q, Ge C, Xiao S. Production of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings with Electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 Molten Salts. Coatings. 2023; 13(7):1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13071246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Wenjuan, Desheng Ding, Weijie Luo, Weiliang Jin, Qian Kou, Chuntao Ge, and Saijun Xiao. 2023. "Production of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings with Electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 Molten Salts" Coatings 13, no. 7: 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13071246

APA Style

Qi, W., Ding, D., Luo, W., Jin, W., Kou, Q., Ge, C., & Xiao, S. (2023). Production of Al–Mn/WC Composite Coatings with Electrodeposition in AlCl3–NaCl–KCl–MnCl2 Molten Salts. Coatings, 13(7), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13071246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop