Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of DNA Binding with One Finger (Dof) Gene Family in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) and Analysis of Its Expression Pattern after Exogenous Hormone Stimulation
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Subacromial Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Variability of Bacterial Homopolysaccharide Production and Properties during Food Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Obesity: Treatments, Conceptualizations, and Future Directions for a Growing Problem
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/biology11020172
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exercise Effects on the Biomechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon—A Narrative Review

by
Changxiao Yu
1,
Liqin Deng
1,
Li Li
2,
Xini Zhang
1,* and
Weijie Fu
1,3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
2
Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
3
Shanghai Frontiers Science Research Base of Exercise and Metabolic Health, School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020172
Submission received: 1 December 2021 / Revised: 1 January 2022 / Accepted: 18 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Response and Adaptation during Human Exercise: From Physiology, Metabolism and Musculoskeletal Modelling to Understand Functional Disorders)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Achilles tendon influences the running economy because of its ability to store and release strain energy, and it remains one of the most vulnerable tendons among athletes and recreational runners. Exercised-related mechanical loading appears to induce changes in the Achilles tendon morphology and mechanical material properties. Both acute and relatively long-term exercise induces tendon adaptation, although biomechanical changes, e.g., cross-sectional area, plantarflexion moment, Young’s modulus, and stiffness, in response to exercise duration, type, and loading-regimes differ widely. Furthermore, a strong Achilles tendon can be developed by chronic exposure to habitual mechanical loading from daily exercise, which is associated with greater energy storage, release and overall health.

Abstract

The morphological and mechanical properties (e.g., stiffness, stress, and force) of the Achilles tendon (AT) are generally associated with its tendinosis and ruptures, particularly amongst runners. Interest in potential approaches to reduce or prevent the risk of AT injuries has grown exponentially as tendon mechanics have been efficiently improving. The following review aims to discuss the effect of different types of exercise on the AT properties. In this review article, we review literature showing the possibility to influence the mechanical properties of the AT from the perspective of acute exercise and long-term training interventions, and we discuss the reasons for inconsistent results. Finally, we review the role of the habitual state in the AT properties. The findings of the included studies suggest that physical exercise could efficiently improve the AT mechanical properties. In particular, relatively long-term and low-intensity eccentric training may be a useful adjunct to enhance the mechanical loading of the AT.

1. Introduction

Modern human morphology has been proposed to reflect numerous features related to the evolution, from walking to running, that occurred two million years ago [1]. Along with features such as larger joint surfaces, shorter toes, and a medial longitudinal plantar arch, the Achilles tendon (AT) lengthened significantly. This is significant as the tendon stores significant elastic strain energy during the initial stance phase of running and then releases the energy through recoil during the subsequent propulsion [2,3]. These reports suggested that the external mechanical loads can be adapted by adjusting AT elastic modulus, stiffness, and size based on the nature structure [4]. As the strongest and thickest tendon in the human body, the mechanical loading of the AT is great because of the large internal plantar flexor moment that occurs at the ankle during the stance phase of running [5]. Previous studies have shown that the AT can load up to four times the body’s weight when walking, and 12.5 times the body’s weight when running and jumping [6,7,8].
As one of the most common sports injuries, Achilles tendinopathy accounts for 8–15% of all running injuries [9], with a high lifetime risk of 52% among elite male runners [10]. This injury will compromise sports performance, may prevent active, athletic individuals from participating in physical activities, can interfere with daily living, and may possibly lead to tendon rupture [11,12]. Unfortunately, conservative treatment is not always successful and can lead to surgical intervention (25–45% of patients) [13], with a cost ranging from $10,000 to as much as $31,000 (https://www.howmuchisit.org/achilles-tendon-surgery-cost/) (accessed on 26 November 2021). In 3–5% of cases, it can be career-ending for athletes, resulting in a health and personal cost both immediately and in the future [7]. From recreational to elite athletes, the reduction in physical activity can result in overall physical deconditioning and can increase the risk of cardiovascular problems in time [14,15,16].
Achilles tendinopathy causes pain, swelling, and thickening in the AT, and ultimately impairs health-promoting activities [17]. It most often occurs in the mid-substance of the tendon (55–65%) and less commonly at the insertion (20–25%) [18]. The cause is not fully understood but is essentially a maladaptive response to increased or excessive loading that leads to progressive weakening and dysfunction of the specific tendon area and then to disrepair and degenerative changes [7]. Previous Delphi studies [11,12] identified several factors related to Achilles tendinopathy in an active, athletic population. These included previous tendinopathy or injuries, advancing age, sex, and antibiotic treatment. Moreover, training errors, hard running surfaces, poor ankle strength and flexibility are risk factors for inducing Achilles tendinopathy [19]. It is worth noting that ultrasound is both specific and sensitive enough for assessing the tendon structure, especially for the diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy [20,21]. Based on the ultrasound imaging technology, a more recent study found that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the AT could have the potential to be an effective method for assessing the risk of high Achilles tendinopathy based on the correlation between the CSA and height, sex, height, miles run per week, and BMI [5].
Considering that there are modifiable (e.g., running distance, duration) and unmodifiable (e.g., age, sex) factors affecting the AT injuries, prevention strategies need to be proposed and used. Both concentric and eccentric strengthening training have been advocated for improving AT function in the past [22,23,24]. Alfredson et al. [23] found that 12 weeks of eccentric training for the calf muscle could significantly reduce pain during running activity and increase the muscle strength for patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis. Another study supports that this training method may improve clinical results for these patients [24]. However, more recently, both isometric and functional strengthening have been promoted. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine the effect of different exercise regimens on the human AT. We begin by reviewing the acute effect of different types of exercise on the tendon. We then assess the effect of differing training regimens on the AT properties. This would be followed by a review of how different habituated states influence the tendon. In the end, we identify gaps in our knowledge and make suggestions for future directions. The overall aim of this paper is to increase awareness of the optimal ways for sports enthusiasts to enhance their AT properties and maintain their healthy state to reduce injury risk.

2. Methods

In this narrative review, databases including PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from October 1960 to October 2021 were searched for the following terms: “Achilles tendon” OR “AT” AND “exercise” OR “training” AND “mechanical properties” OR “material properties”. All articles searched in the databases were imported into the EndNote (EndNote X7, Stanford, CA, USA). Then, full publications and abstracts were screened and all relevant papers retrieved. The search was restricted to full-text accounts written in English. Following this process, the authors manually searched the reference lists of all selected papers and used the “cited by” feature available in three of the databases to check for additional papers not found in the initial search.
To limit the number of included studies, papers considered for this review needed to satisfy one of the following inclusion criteria: (1) address the effect of acute exercise on human AT mechanical properties; (2) address the effect of long-term training on changes in human AT mechanical properties; (3) address the effect of a habitual state (sports activity, footwear, etc.) on the human AT properties. In addition, the participants must be healthy adults without any musculoskeletal injury or psychiatric disorders. All these procedures were in line with published guidelines for writing a narrative review [25].
As shown in Figure 1, the selection process is visualized in the PRISMA flow diagram. The electronic search yielded a total of 4375 studies, of which 53 (acute effect, 18; training effect, 21; habituated effect, 14) were included. After the removal of duplicates, 1842 studies were manually reviewed. A total of 1763 studies were excluded after assessing title and abstract review, then full-text articles of the remaining 79 studies were screened based on the eligibility criteria.

3. Practical Considerations

3.1. Effects of Acute Exercise on the Achilles Tendon

A summary of the characteristics of five studies examining the AT biomechanical response to the acute interventions can be found in Table 1. Previous studies have indicated that adaptive changes in the mechanical properties of connective tissues, such as the AT, are affected by external loads [26,27]. The average peak strain in the AT during walking, running, and hopping were 4.6%, 5.8%, and 8.3%, respectively [28,29]. In addition, these studies also found that the AT has high compliance under large external forces, and its length changes considerably during movement. The external mechanical load imposed externally to fibrous connective tissues could influence the length and stretching velocity of the tendons, increasing the high compliance of the AT [30]. Previous investigations have shown that the low braking forces, large vertical and propulsive forces [2], and increased internal force [4] of the triceps surae during the stance phase of running are significantly related to reduced AT injuries, given the superior mechanical and material properties of the AT [31] and the basic factors of AT injury prevention.
Changes in tendon mechanical behavior, e.g., an increase in tendon compliance, have been shown to occur in response to acute intense exercise. A systematic review confirmed that the mechanical and morphological properties of the AT were affected by acute exercise patterns [36]. Previous studies suggested that for the AT specificity, it would be valuable to know the time taken to return to baseline values in women compared to men, which may explain the cause of the lower AT injury rates among women [31,37,38]. For instance, passive stretching decreased stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius tendon acutely, with women demonstrating a far greater increase in compliance (22.4%) compared with men (8.8%) after 5 min of a passive dorsiflexion stretch [37]. It may be due to the woman’s tendon being less stiff at baseline before intervention based on the relevant studies [38,39]. An increase in tendon compliance responds to an acute loading protocol, however, when this acute response to load returns to baseline is not yet confirmed. The study of Zhou et al. [40] reported that the distal, middle, and proximal regions of the AT stiffness increased by 19.53%, 17.01%, and 25.73% after acute 5-minute static stretching, respectively. From the perspective of mechanical properties, these results suggest that the AT has high compliance through acute static stretching intervention, but that the tendon architecture was independent of changes in tendon stiffness [40].
Isometric plantarflexion yields an immediate decrease in stiffness that quickly plateaus with the addition of continued activity. Ten 4-s isometric plantarflexion contractions resulted in decreased tendon stiffness after the first five contractions but did not increase significantly thereafter in a sample of six men [34]. Similarly, a decreased tendon stiffness (−10.9%) was observed after six 8-s MVIC of the plantar flexors with no further decrease after an additional three 60-s of static stretching in eight men and women [33]. The stiffness of the AT decreased in non-stretch-shortening circles (SSC) training, such as isometrics contraction and static stretching training, but did not significantly change in SSC training, such as running and hopping performances [32]. This result is similar to the results of in vivo animal experiments and suggests that the SSC effect is negligible in response to tendon elongation in real life [41,42]. Furthermore, the mechanical behavior of tendons that occurs in response to acute stimuli seems to have gender-specific effects. In general, the tendons of women are less stiff at baseline before exercise intervention, namely, the higher viscoelastic properties of tendon structures in women, which means that women have a higher compliance compared to men [38]. One previous study investigated the effect of the gender factor on the AT mechanical characteristics and metrical properties during 100 toe jumps with 20% body mass, and reported the increased elongation (+32.2%), reduced AT stiffness (−30.3%) and reduced Young’s modulus (−32.1%) after that isometrics contraction exercise only in women; these responses for women may be a protective mechanism against large loads in acute exercise [31]. These results, along with the above-mentioned ones [37,38], indicated that a female’s tendon might be more compliant in response to an intense bout of loading, which might effectively reduce the risk of AT injuries and, in part, explain the large discrepancy in tendon disorders and rupture rates between genders. The hormonal differences between genders have been indicated to affect tendonous tissue, as estrogen has previously been shown to inhibit collagen synthesis, and thus affects tendon tissue properties [43]. Thus, the fact that the tendon collagen fractional synthesis rate is lower in women could, therefore, be responsible for the increased elongation and reduced stiffness of the AT [37]. However, the more specific mechanisms that cause the differences in mechanical properties of the AT between genders are unknown. This needs to be further discussed in future studies.
On the other hand, past studies have suggested that the properties of the AT could be affected by running strike patterns [6,44,45]. The plantarflexion torque exerted to resist dorsiflexion torque during running with a forefoot strike pattern was larger than that exerted to resist dorsiflexion torque during running with a rearfoot strike pattern and is important for energy release and absorption by plantar flexors [46]. Lyght et al. [6] reported that the strain and stress associated with a rearfoot strike pattern were lower than those associated with a forefoot strike pattern because the large knee flexion angle can be attributed to the short distance between the center of mass and the heel. A spring-like running posture is beneficial for shock absorption. Therefore, the authors suggested that the rearfoot strike pattern can reduce AT strain, stress, and strain rate compared to the forefoot strike pattern. Besides, increasing the stepping frequency by 5%, namely shortening the strike length, can reduce the peak AT stress and strain at a fixed speed of 3.5 m/s, regardless of foot strike pattern [6]. The muscle-tendon biomechanical differences of plantar flexors between the forefoot and rearfoot striking have been taken into account. Yong et al. [45] found forefoot striking can effectively reduce tendon energy storage of the soleus and increase the gastrocnemius muscle activation compared to the rearfoot striking running pattern. These results demonstrated that the increased eccentric contraction from the progressive strengthening plantar flexors program can reduce the risk of injuries during forefoot striking. However, Kubo et al. [47] failed to find significant differences after investigating the relationship between foot strike patterns and the AT properties in long-distance runners. Therefore, the properties of AT are largely affected by acute changes in running strike patterns. Relationships among internal mechanisms should be studied in the future.
Existing studies have ascribed reduced AT stiffness to a prolonged run [48], different running strike patterns, or non-SSC training. Decreased stiffness could instantly increase the risk of AT injuries and affect the properties of the AT complex. SSC training does not exert an acute effect on AT properties [49]. Nevertheless, the acute effect of exercise intensity on the mechanical properties of AT remains unclear. Additionally, whether changes originate from muscle or the AT itself requires exploration.

3.2. Effects of Training Effects on the Achilles Tendon

Table 2 describes the studies relevant to this section. Although training has an acute effect on the AT, over-exercising presents a high risk of injuries. Present studies emphasized the adaptive potential of tendons to increased mechanical loading applied repetitively and statically, which was consistently shown despite the variety of long-term training protocols [50,51]. Arampatzis’ group found that after 14 weeks of isometric (rep) with 90% MVC exercise intervention, an increase in (1) tendon-aponeurosis stiffness [30,52,53], (2) tendon elastic modulus [30,52,53], (3) AT CSA [30,52,53], and (4) plantarflexion moment (PF) and tendon force [54] were found at high strain magnitude (high strain) with a low strain frequency (low reps). In addition, Fletcher et al. [55] did find an increase in the AT stiffness (+18.6%) and PF moment (+21.6%) after 20 s isometric (static) training with 80% MVC. It is, however, noteworthy that the training week (8w) was reduced along with only one repetition. A most recent study [50] also reported the adaptive change in the AT properties (AT stiffness: +36.1% and CSA: +7.8%) following low-load resistance training (20–35% of 1RM) with partial blood flow restriction.
In contrast, the effect of plyometric training on tendon properties still seems ambiguous [59], since the six plyometric training interventions [53,60,61,62,63,64] reported controversial results. The changes in tendon stiffness and Young’s module ranged from +19.4% [64] to −9.4% [63], and +23.9% [53] to −19.2% [63]. However, only the 27% increase in AT stiffness reported by Fouré et al. [60,61,62] reached statistical significance. The different jumping exercises, uncontrolled or comparably low (40% repetition maximum [64]) tendon load magnitude and dissimilar intervention durations (8 to 14 weeks) might be the reason for the inhomogeneous findings. Comparing dynamic (concentric-eccentric) and isometric training with plyometric training, Kubo et al. [49,64] and Bohm et al. [53] reported a statistically significant increase of the AT stiffness solely following the dynamic and isometric but not after the plyometric training.
Overall, since only four studies using running as the type of training have been involved, we cannot give a preliminary conclusion. One study’s [56] aim was to investigate the effect of habitual exercise on the structural properties of the AT in sedentary participants, the results showed that a total training stimulus of approx. 9 months of running (30–50 min habitual running for 2–3 times per week) in previously untrained subjects did not result in any significant changes in AT stiffness (+7.3%) and CSA (−0.3%). Meanwhile, another study [57] was to determine the effect of transition of running style on the AT mechanical properties over a 12-week intervention, its results seem to demonstrate an increase in AT properties (stiffness, module, CSA) in men after a 12-week minimalist running transition program and 6-month follow-up. The viscoelastic property of the AT plays a crucial role in improving stiffness and running economy while transitioning to the forefoot strike pattern given the shortened contact time and contracting velocity of plantar flexors [57]. In agreement with the recent findings, Zhang et al. [51] investigated the effect of 12-week transition training on the AT loading; they found the peak AT force could significantly increase for habitual rearfoot strikers when they were switching to the forefoot strike pattern with minimalist shoes compared with the control group who could choose the strike pattern after 12-week transition training. In addition, a study reported that after 6 months of repeated 2 km runs, as one type of rigorous endurance training program, the new elite infantries had a significant increase in the AT CSA [58] (see Table 2).
Lastly, regarding the duration of the exercise intervention, most of the above-mentioned studies featuring an exercise duration of 12–14 weeks found significant adaptations of AT properties [30,52,53,57,64,65,66], indicating that tendons already respond to increased mechanical loading within 3 months. However, one study [49] showed that AT stiffness increased significantly by 18.8 ± 10.4% for 8 weeks (4 days/w) con-ecc weight (reps) training with 70% RM. These results suggested that resistance training can effectively improve the stiffness of the tendon structures, as well as the strength and size of the muscles [49]. What is more, another more recent study [67] showed that AT stiffness and Young’s modulus improved by 25.0% (p = 0.004; ES = 1.73; CI 95% = 0.85–2.52) and 20.1% (p < 0.044; ES = 1.31; CI 95% = 0.49–2.06) after 4 weeks of high-load voluntary plantarflexion training, respectively; meanwhile a significant increased CSA (+14.7%) was observed after 8 weeks and contributed to a further increase in the AT stiffness (+62.1%) and Young’s modulus (+26.1%). The authors reported that the increased tendon stiffness may be due to the adaptations in the AT properties after 4-week high-load training. In agreement with the speculation, a literature review confirmed that the changes in tendon stiffness caused by the training intervention seem to be attributed more to the adaptability of the AT material than to the morphological properties [68].
Collectively, the AT can experience positive biomechanical adaptation when exposed to mechanical loading within a specific training volume. However, such AT strain depends on many factors known to differ between individuals [69] and seems to have a preferred strain limit to maintain the increase in triceps surae muscle strength during muscle strength training [70]. Further works are warranted to elucidate the specific mechanical loading conditions (e.g., magnitude, duration, rate, frequency) by ensuring that AT strains occur within the optimal range that elicit maximal positive (e.g., anabolic) adaptation.

3.3. Effects of Habituated States on the Achilles Tendon

As shown in Table 3, the differences in the AT properties (stiffness, Young’s Modulus, CSA, and strength) between runners and non-runners are obvious. To enhance mechanical properties of the AT (e.g., higher tendon stiffness, larger CSA, and Young’s modulus), a variety of habitual physical activities and exercises have been adopted [27,71,72,73]. Current studies posited that the homeostasis of connective tissues, such as tendons and ligaments, were affected by the mechanism of force transmission due to cyclic strain, which adjusted the adaptive progression and feedback of the AT during exercise under regulation by mechanical stimulus [27,71,72,73].
The influence of mechanical loading associated with exercise on the AT properties has been assessed by comparing the AT between cohorts of individuals habitually exposed to different activities. Male runners were shown to have a significantly larger CSA [75], especially at the most distal part of the tendon (+36.0%) [74]; while the sprinters also had higher AT stiffness and maximal tendon forces than the endurance runners and non-active participants [54]. Furthermore, male athletes who frequently performed weight-bearing exercises (e.g., running, jumping) were found to have a larger AT CSA than athletes in non-weight-bearing sports (e.g., kayakers) [76]. This study reported that the increased AT CSA would be subjected to intermittent high-tension tendon loading. However, the effect of different training methods on tendon characteristics and injury risk needs further study. Another study found that the AT in the jump leg of male collegiate-level jumpers was much stiffer (17.8% and 24.4% greater stiffness and Young’s modulus, respectively) compared to the non-jump leg [77]. From the perspective of pathology, the increased AT stiffness can improve the transmission of muscle-generated forces [30,54] and reduce the risk of accumulating damage and performance failing [78]. Thus, compared to non-runners, habituated runners with high ankle plantar flexor strength may show improved adaptations to high mechanical loads during graded voluntary 10-s isometric plantarflexion efforts because of the increased AT stiffness, which would enable more direct transmission of muscle force [75].
Not surprisingly, the greater AT CSA, Young’s modulus, and stiffness of the individuals in the running, jumping, and sprinting events represent a favorable adaptation in response to the habitual loading of running. Regarding running, among the runners with different foot strike patterns (FSP: forefoot—FFS, midfoot—MFS, and rearfoot—RFS), Kernozek et al. [79] found habitual FFS/MFS runners did not have greater CSA despite higher AT loading according to a cross-sectional study that was conducted by recruiting female runners. In addition, Kubo et al. [47] reported no significant differences in the CSA and stiffness of AT by recruiting trained male long-distance participants. It is, however, noteworthy that the FSP during shod running was determined at a velocity of 18 km/h which was much higher than most of the other running studies. Being inconsistent with Kubo et al., a previous study [80] showed the AT in minimalist shod runners (MFS/FFS) adapted by increasing +9.2% CSA, +90.5% stiffness, and +89.8% Young’s modulus compared to traditionally shod runners (RFS), which seems more in accordance with the understanding of mechanical adaptation of the tendon to different AT loading patterns among runners with different FSP [81]. This inspired us that multiple exercise and training modalities combined with a step-by-step approach could lead to AT biomechanical adaptations, so may do minimalist running.

4. Conclusions

Firstly, high compliance of the AT was observed after the acute exercise intervention. Moreover, there are gender-specific effects in response to the acute loading. Specifically, the stiffness and Young’s modulus of the AT show significantly lower in women compared to men, which may be an important cause of fewer AT injuries in women. Secondly, periodic plyometric training can improve the morphological adaptability of the AT, but the exercise type, intensity, and duration are the three key factors that restrict the effectiveness of training. Finally, habitual running can effectively improve the mechanical properties of the AT (e.g., greater stiffness, CSA, and Young’s modulus). In particular, the high stiffness of the AT is conducive to enhancing the transmission of muscle strength, thereby improving the running economy. Future research is required to explore more training methods to improve the biomechanical adaptability of the AT from the perspective of mechanism and multiple influencing factors and reduce the risk of AT-related injuries.

Author Contributions

C.Y. and L.D. constructed the idea for research; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.Y., L.D., L.L., X.Z. and W.F.; project administration, X.Z. and W.F.; funding acquisition, W.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFF0302100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772201, 119320131), the “Outstanding Young Scholar” Program of Shanghai Municipal, and the Dawn Program of Shanghai Education Commission, China (19SG47).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No applicable.

Acknowledgments

W.F. would like to thank Irene Davis, professor at Harvard Medical School, for her help in writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bramble, D.M.; Lieberman, D.E. Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature 2004, 432, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lorimer, A.V.; Hume, P.A. Stiffness as a risk factor for Achilles tendon injury in running athletes. Sports Med. 2016, 46, 1921–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pinto, M.S.; Sánchez, C.; Martins, N.; Menegaldo, L.L.; Pompeu, F.; de Oliveira, L.F. Effect of Achilles tendon mechanics on the running economy of elite endurance athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 2021, 42, 1128–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kharazi, M.; Bohm, S.; Theodorakis, C.; Mersmann, F.; Arampatzis, A. Quantifying mechanical loading and elastic strain energy of the human Achilles tendon during walking and running. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kudron, C.; Carlson, M.J.; Meron, A.; Sridhar, B.; Brakke Holman, R. Using ultrasound measurement of the Achilles tendon in asymptomatic runners to assist in predicting tendinopathy. J. Ultrasound Med. 2020, 39, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lyght, M.; Nockerts, M.; Kernozek, T.W.; Ragan, R. Effects of foot strike and step frequency on Achilles tendon stress during running. J. Appl. Biomech. 2016, 32, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lorimer, A.V.; Hume, P.A. Achilles tendon injury risk factors associated with running. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 1459–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Komi, P.V. Relevance of in vivo force measurements to human biomechanics. J. Biomech. 1990, 23, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Munteanu, S.E.; Barton, C.J. Lower limb biomechanics during running in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy: A systematic review. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2011, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kujala, U.M.; Sarna, S.; Kaprio, J. Cumulative incidence of Achilles tendon rupture and tendinopathy in male former elite athletes. Clin. J. Sport Med. Off. J. Can. Acad. Sport Med. 2005, 15, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. O’Neill, S.; Watson, P.J.; Barry, S. A delphi study of risk factors for Achilles tendinopathy- opinions of world tendon experts. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016, 11, 684–697. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahieu, N.N.; Witvrouw, E.; Stevens, V.; Van Tiggelen, D.; Roget, P. Intrinsic risk factors for the development of Achilles tendon overuse injury: A prospective study. Am. J. Sports Med. 2006, 34, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. de Vos, R.J.; Weir, A.; van Schie, H.T.; Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.; Verhaar, J.A.; Weinans, H.; Tol, J.L. Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010, 303, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Manca, M. Physical activity exercise and cardiovascular health. Brit. J. Sport Med. 2006, 40, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lagas, I.F.; Fokkema, T.; Verhaar, J.A.; Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.; van Middelkoop, M.; de Vos, R.J. Incidence of Achilles tendinopathy and associated risk factors in recreational runners: A large prospective cohort study. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2020, 23, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Warburton, D.E.; Nicol, C.W.; Bredin, S.S. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ 2006, 174, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Scott, A.; Huisman, E.; Khan, K. Conservative treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy. CMAJ 2011, 183, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Soma, C.A.; Mandelbaum, B.R. Achilles tendon disorders. Clin. Sports Med. 1994, 13, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maffulli, N.; Sharma, P.; Luscombe, K.L. Achilles tendinopathy: Aetiology and management. J. R. Soc. Med. 2004, 97, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Paavola, M.; Paakkala, T.; Kannus, P.; Järvinen, M. Ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of Achilles tendon injuries and related disorders. Acta. Radiol. 1998, 39, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Neuhold, A.; Stiskal, M.; Kainberger, F.; Schwaighofer, B. Degenerative Achilles tendon disease: Assessment by magnetic resonance and ultrasonography. Eur. J. Radiol. 1992, 14, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alfredson, H.; Lorentzon, R. Chronic Achilles tendinosis: Recommendations for treatment and prevention. Sports Med. 2000, 29, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alfredson, H.; Pietilä, T.; Jonsson, P.; Lorentzon, R. Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis. Am. J. Sports Med. 1998, 26, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fahlström, M.; Jonsson, P.; Lorentzon, R.; Alfredson, H. Chronic Achilles tendon pain treated with eccentric calf-muscle training. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2003, 11, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Green, B.N.; Johnson, C.D.; Adams, A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. J. Chiropr. Med. 2006, 5, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lepley, A.S.; Joseph, M.F.; Daigle, N.R.; Digiacomo, J.E.; Galer, J.; Rock, E.; Rosier, S.B.; Sureja, P.B. Sex differences in mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon: Longitudinal response to repetitive loading exercise. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018, 32, 3070–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, X.; Deng, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Fu, W. Acute shoe effects on Achilles tendon loading in runners with habitual rearfoot strike pattern. Gait Posture 2020, 82, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lichtwark, G.A.; Wilson, A.M. In vivo mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon during one-legged hopping. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208, 4715–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lichtwark, G.A.; Wilson, A.M. Interactions between the human gastrocnemius muscle and the Achilles tendon during incline, level and decline locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 209, 4379–4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arampatzis, A.; Karamanidis, K.; Albracht, K. Adaptational responses of the human Achilles tendon by modulation of the applied cyclic strain magnitude. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 210, 2743–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Joseph, M.F.; Lillie, K.R.; Bergeron, D.J.; Cota, K.C.; Yoon, J.S.; Kraemer, W.J.; Denegar, C.R. Achilles tendon biomechanics in response to acute intense exercise. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Farris, D.J.; Trewartha, G.; Mcguigan, M.P. The effects of a 30-min run on the mechanics of the human Achilles tendon. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 112, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kay, A.D.; Blazevich, A.J. Isometric contractions reduce plantar flexor moment, Achilles tendon stiffness and neuromuscular activity but remove the subsequent effects of stretch. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maganaris, C.N. Tendon conditioning: Artefact or property? Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Morse, C.I.; Degens, H.; Seynnes, O.R.; Maganaris, C.N.; Jones, D.A. The acute effect of stretching on the passive stiffness of the human gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Obst, S.J.; Barrett, R.S.; Newsham-West, R. Immediate effect of exercise on achilles tendon properties: Systematic review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2013, 45, 1534–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Burgess, K.E.; Graham-Smith, P.; Pearson, S.J. Effect of acute tensile loading on gender-specific tendon structural and mechanical properties. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kubo, K.; Kanehisa, H.; Fukunaga, T. Gender differences in the viscoelastic properties of tendon structures. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 88, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Deng, L.; Xiao, S.; Li, L.; Fu, W. Sex differences in the morphological and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z. Non-uniform stiffness within Gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex observed after static stretching. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2019, 18, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Fukutani, A.; Sawatsky, A.; Leonard, T.; Herzog, W. Contribution of the Achilles tendon to force potentiation in a stretch-shortening cycle. J. Exp. Biol. 2019, 222, jeb204032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lieber, R.L.; Leonard, M.E.; Brown-Maupin, C.G. Effects of Muscle Contraction on the Load-Strain Properties of Frog Aponeurosis and Tendon. Cells Tissues Organs 2000, 166, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kjaer, M.; Magnusson, P.; Krogsgaard, M.; Boysen Møller, J.; Olesen, J.; Heinemeier, K.; Hansen, M.; Haraldsson, B.; Koskinen, S.; Esmarck, B.; et al. Extracellular matrix adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to exercise. J. Anat. 2006, 208, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kulmala, J.P.; Avela, J.; Pasanen, K.; Parkkari, J. Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2013, 45, 2306–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yong, J.R.; Dembia, C.L.; Silder, A.; Jackson, R.W.; Fredericson, M.; Delp, S.L. Foot strike pattern during running alters muscle-tendon dynamics of the gastrocnemius and the soleus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lieberman, D.E.; Venkadesan, M.; Werbel, W.A.; Daoud, A.I.; D’Andrea, S.; Davis, I.S.; Mang’eni, R.O.; Pitsiladis, Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 2010, 463, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kubo, K.; Miyazaki, D.; Tanaka, S.; Shimoju, S.; Tsunoda, N. Relationship between Achilles tendon properties and foot strike patterns in long-distance runners. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2015, 33, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fletcher, J.R.; MacIntosh, B.R. Changes in Achilles tendon stiffness and energy cost following a prolonged run in trained distance runners. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kubo, K.; Kanehisa, H.; Fukunaga, T. Effects of resistance and stretching training programmes on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J. Physiol. 2002, 538, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Centner, C.; Lauber, B.; Seynnes, O.R.; Jerger, S.; König, D. Low-load blood flow restriction training induces similar morphological and mechanical Achilles tendon adaptations compared to high-load resistance training. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 127, 1660–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, X.; Deng, L.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, S.; Li, L.; Fu, W. Effects of 12-week transition training with minimalist shoes on Achilles tendon loading in habitual rearfoot strike runners. J. Biomech. Eng. 2021, 128, 110807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arampatzis, A.; Peper, A.; Bierbaum, S.; Albracht, K. Plasticity of human Achilles tendon mechanical and morphological properties in response to cyclic strain. J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 43, 3073–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bohm, S.; Mersmann, F.; Tettke, M.; Kraft, M.; Arampatzis, A. Human Achilles tendon plasticity in response to cyclic strain: Effect of rate and duration. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 4010–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Arampatzis, A.; Karamanidis, K.; Morey-Klapsing, G.; De Monte, G.; Stafilidis, S. Mechanical properties of the triceps surae tendon and aponeurosis in relation to intensity of sport activity. J. Biomech. 2007, 40, 1946–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fletcher, J.R.; Esau, S.P.; Macintosh, B.R. Changes in tendon stiffness and running economy in highly trained distance runners. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 110, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hansen, P.; Aagaard, P.; Kjaer, M.; Larsson, B.; Magnusson, S.P. Effect of habitual running on human Achilles tendon load-deformation properties and cross-sectional area. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 2375–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Joseph, M.F.; Histen, K.; Arntsen, J.; L’Hereux, L.; Defeo, C.; Lockwood, D.; Scheer, T.; Denegar, C.R. Achilles tendon adaptation during transition to a minimalist running style. J. Sport Rehabil. 2016, 26, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Milgrom, Y.; Milgrom, C.; Altaras, T.; Globus, O.; Zeltzer, E.; Finestone, A.S. Achilles Tendons Hypertrophy in Response to High Loading Training. Foot Ankle Int. 2014, 35, 1303–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ishigaki, T.; Kubo, K. Effects of eccentric training with different training frequencies on blood circulation, collagen fiber orientation, and mechanical properties of human Achilles tendons in vivo. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 118, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fouré, A.; Nordez, A.; Cornu, C. Plyometric training effects on Achilles tendon stiffness and dissipative properties. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 109, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Fouré, A.; Nordez, A.; Guette, M.; Cornu, C. Effects of plyometric training on passive stiffness of gastrocnemii and the musculo-articular complex of the ankle joint. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 19, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fouré, A.; Nordez, A.; Mcnair, P.; Cornu, C. Effects of plyometric training on both active and passive parts of the plantarflexors series elastic component stiffness of muscle–tendon complex. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Houghton, L.A.; Dawson, B.T.; Rubenson, J. Effects of plyometric training on Achilles tendon properties and shuttle running during a simulated cricket batting innings. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2013, 27, 1036–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Kubo, K.; Morimoto, M.; Komuro, T.; Yata, H.; Tsunoda, N.; Kanehisa, H.; Fukunaga, T. Effects of plyometric and weight training on muscle-tendon complex and jump performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1801–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Z.; Wang, X.; Fu, W. Alterations in running biomechanics after 12 week gait retraining with minimalist shoes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Zhang, X.; Luo, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Fu, W. Ultrasound-based mechanical adaptation of achilles tendon after 12-week running with minimalist shoes. J. Med. Imag. Health In. 2020, 10, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Geremia, J.M.; Baroni, B.M.; Bobbert, M.F.; Bini, R.R.; Lanferdini, F.J.; Vaz, M.A. Effects of high loading by eccentric triceps surae training on Achilles tendon properties in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 118, 1725–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bohm, S.; Mersmann, F.; Arampatzis, A. Human tendon adaptation in response to mechanical loading: A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise intervention studies on healthy adults. Sports Med. 2015, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Pizzolato, C.; Lloyd, D.G.; Zheng, M.H.; Besier, T.F.; Shim, V.B.; Obst, S.J.; Newsham-West, R.; Saxby, D.J.; Barrett, R.S. Finding the sweet spot via personalised Achilles tendon training: The future is within reach. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019, 53, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Urlando, A.; Hawkins, D. Achilles Tendon Adaptation during Strength Training in Young Adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1147–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, H.C.; Thampatty, B.P. An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2006, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hjerrild, J.N.; Wobbe, A.; Stausholm, M.B.; Larsen, A.E.; Josefsen, C.O.; Malmgaard-Clausen, N.M.; Dela, F.; Kjaer, M.; Magnusson, S.P.; Hansen, M.; et al. Effects of long-term physical activity and diet on skin glycation and Achilles tendon structure. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Michael, C.; Konstantina, I.; Lucie, R.; Steffen, M.; Tilman, E.; Frank, M. Physiological tendon thickness adaptation in adolescent elite athletes: A longitudinal study. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Magnusson, S.P.; Kjaer, M. Region-specific differences in Achilles tendon cross-sectional area in runners and non-runners. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 90, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rosager, S.; Aagaard, P.; Dyhre-Poulsen, P.; Neergaard, K.; Kjaer, M.; Magnusson, S.P. Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis and tendon in runners and non-runners. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2002, 12, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kongsgaard, M.; Aagaard, P.; Kjaer, M.; Magnusson, S.P. Structural Achilles tendon properties in athletes subjected to different exercise modes and in Achilles tendon rupture patients. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 99, 1965–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bayliss, A.J.; Weatherholt, A.M.; Crandall, T.T.; Farmer, D.L.; McConnell, J.C.; Crossley, K.M.; Warden, S.J. Achilles tendon material properties are greater in the jump leg of jumping athletes. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2016, 16, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bojsen-Møller, J.; Magnusson, S.P.; Rasmussen, L.R.; Kjaer, M.; Aagaard, P. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinous structures. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 99, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kernozek, T.W.; Knaus, A.; Rademaker, T.; Almonroeder, T.G. The effects of habitual foot strike patterns on Achilles tendon loading in female runners. Gait Posture 2018, 66, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Histen, K.; Arntsen, J.; L’Hereux, L.; Heeren, J.; Wicki, B.; Saint, S.; Aerni, G.; Denegar, C.R.; Joseph, M.F. Achilles tendon properties of minimalist and traditionally shod runners. J. Sport Rehabil. 2017, 26, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Almonroeder, T.; Willson, J.D.; Kernozek, T.W. The effect of foot strike pattern on Achilles tendon load during running. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 41, 1758–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 11 00172 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of the narrative review.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of the narrative review.
Biology 11 00172 g001
Table
Table 1. Effects of plantar flexor acute exercise on the AT mechanical properties.
Table 1. Effects of plantar flexor acute exercise on the AT mechanical properties.
Study InformationParticipantsTime of AssessmentOutcome Measure and Results
AuthorsDesignExercise TypeExercise ProtocolN (M/W)Age (Years)Training Status
Farris et al. [32]ParallelRunningA single 30-min at 12 kmph12 (M)27 ± 5N/DBefore, immediately after the interventionAT stiffness- andpeak AT strain-
Joseph et al. [31]CrossJumpingLoad equalling 20% body mass31 (17M/14W)24.1 ± 2ActiveRest, immediately after intervention and a fatigue protocolAT elongation↑, stiffness↓ and Young’s modulus ↓(W)
Kay & Blazevich [33]CrossMVICPassive and active concentric trials16 (8M/8W)20.2 ± 2.6ActiveBefore, real-time, immediately after the intervention AT stiffness↓
Maganaris et al. [34]CrossCyclingIncreasing load6 (M)23 ± 2N/DBefore, immediately after each intervention AT length-
Morse et al. [35]CrossPassive stretchingROM at deg s−1 for 1 min8 (M)20.5 ± 0.9ActiveBefore, immediately after the interventionAT length-
Note: Cross, crossover design. MIVC, maximal isometric voluntary contraction. ROM, range of motion. M/W, men/women. N/D, not described. ↑/↓, significant increase/decrease. -, no significant difference.
Table
Table 2. Effects of running training programs on the AT adaptation.
Table 2. Effects of running training programs on the AT adaptation.
AuthorParticipants (n)Age (Years)Training ProgramInstrumentArea of MeasuresOutcome Measure and Results
Hansen et al. [56]11 (7M/4W) untrained healthy individuals29 ± 1 (M);
26 ± 1 (W)		About 9 months of habitual runningultrasound; MRITriceps surae and ATAT CSA-
Joseph et al. [57]22 (7M/15W) traditionally shod runners21.1 ± 3.3 (M); 22.4 ± 6.4 (W)12-week transition with minimalist shoe runningUltrasound; ATAT CSA↑;
AT force↑, elongation↓ and stiffness↑;
Young’s modulus↑
Milgrom et al. [58]55 (M) new elite infantries19.7 ± 0.8 (M)6-month military trainingUltrasound;ATAT CSA↑
Zhang et al. [51]17 (M) habitual recreational runners30.6 ± 6.8 (M)12-week transition training with the minimalist in habitual rearfoot strike runnersUltrasound; AT and ankle jointAT force↑;
AT CSA↑
Note: M/W, men/women. CSA, the cross-sectional area. N/D, not described. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. ↑/↓, significant increase/decrease. -, no significant difference.
Table
Table 3. The differences in the AT stiffness, Young’s modulus, CSA and strength between runners and non-runners.
Table 3. The differences in the AT stiffness, Young’s modulus, CSA and strength between runners and non-runners.
AuthorParticipants (n)Age (Years)Test MethodsDependent Variables
StiffnessYoung’s ModulusCSAStrength
Arampatzis et al. [54]Non active (10); endurance runners (28); sprinters (28)26 ± 5 (M);Hold 2–3 s isometric MVC plantarflexionNon active < endurance runners < sprinters *N/DN/DNon active < endurance runners < sprinters *
Magnusson et al. [74] Runners (6); non-runners (6)36 ± 7 (M); 34 ± 3 (M)MRIN/DN/DNon-runners < runners *N/D
Rosager et al. [75]Runners (5); non-runners (5)34 ± 6 (M); 33 ± 8 (M)graded voluntary 10 s isometric plantarflexionNon-runners < runnersNon-runners > runnersNon-runners < runners *Non-runners < runners
Note: M/W, men/women. CSA, the cross-sectional area. N/D, not described. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. *, statistically significant differences between runners or sprinters and other group(s).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, C.; Deng, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Fu, W. Exercise Effects on the Biomechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon—A Narrative Review. Biology 2022, 11, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020172

AMA Style

Yu C, Deng L, Li L, Zhang X, Fu W. Exercise Effects on the Biomechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon—A Narrative Review. Biology. 2022; 11(2):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Changxiao, Liqin Deng, Li Li, Xini Zhang, and Weijie Fu. 2022. "Exercise Effects on the Biomechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon—A Narrative Review" Biology 11, no. 2: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020172

APA Style

Yu, C., Deng, L., Li, L., Zhang, X., & Fu, W. (2022). Exercise Effects on the Biomechanical Properties of the Achilles Tendon—A Narrative Review. Biology, 11(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop