Next Article in Journal
Effect of CB1 Receptor Deficiency on Mitochondrial Quality Control Pathways in Gastrocnemius Muscle
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Pathways and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Refractory Asthma
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Climatic Niche Evolution of the Genus Falco (Aves: Falconidae) in Europe
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/biology13020115
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Rho-Kinase Inhibition of Active Force and Passive Tension in Airway Smooth Muscle: A Strategy for Treating Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma

by
Yuto Yasuda
1,
Lu Wang
1,
Pasquale Chitano
1 and
Chun Y. Seow
1,2,*
1
Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(2), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020115
Submission received: 20 December 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 9 February 2024 / Published: 11 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms and New Targets of Refractory Asthma)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The effects of a rho-kinase inhibitor alone and in combination with a bronchodilator in the presence of a small-amplitude oscillatory strain on the mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle were described in this brief review. Findings from relevant studies provide a strong basis for human trials using rho-kinase alone or in combination with other interventions in the treatment of asthma.

Abstract

Rho-kinase inhibitors have been identified as a class of potential drugs for treating asthma because of their ability to reduce airway inflammation and active force in airway smooth muscle (ASM). Past research has revealed that, besides the effect on the ASM’s force generation, rho-kinase (ROCK) also regulates actin filament formation and filament network architecture and integrity, thus affecting ASM’s cytoskeletal stiffness. The present review is not a comprehensive examination of the roles played by ROCK in regulating ASM function but is specifically focused on passive tension, which is partially determined by the cytoskeletal stiffness of ASM. Understanding the molecular basis for maintaining active force and passive tension in ASM by ROCK will allow us to determine the suitability of ROCK inhibitors and its downstream enzymes as a class of drugs in treating airway hyperresponsiveness seen in asthma. Because clinical trials using ROCK inhibitors in the treatment of asthma have yet to be conducted, the present review focuses on the in vitro effects of ROCK inhibitors on ASM’s mechanical properties which include active force generation, relaxation, and passive stiffness. The review provides justification for future clinical trials in the treatment of asthma using ROCK inhibitors alone and in combination with other pharmacological and mechanical interventions.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a complex disease with multiple causes. The fact that a beta2 agonist can relieve acute asthma exacerbation indicates that the dysfunction of airway smooth muscle (ASM) is one of the causes [1]. It is known that ASM is the main effector of the exaggerated airway narrowing that is responsible for the bulk of acute asthma symptoms and that chronic airway inflammation could underlie ASM dysfunction [2]. However, airway hyperresponsiveness associated with asthma is only partially attenuated even when airway inflammation is treated successfully [3], suggesting that it is related to a fundamental structural or functional change in the muscle and/or airways. Although ASM is central to the pathogenesis of asthma and airway hyperresponsiveness, it is unclear how much, and which exact changes in the muscle, contribute to these phenotypes.
It has been observed long ago that in non-asthmatic subjects, experimentally induced bronchoconstriction can be reversed by allowing the subjects to take deep inspirations (DIs) [4,5]. A DI refers to a full lung inflation, i.e., from functional residual capacity (FRC) to total lung capacity (TLC). The bronchodilatory effect of DI is, however, largely diminished in asthmatic subjects [6], especially in subjects with severe asthma [7]. The distinct difference in the responses between asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects to a deep inspiration (DI) has provided us with a unique window of opportunity to look into the mechanisms underlying asthma pathophysiology. DIs taken before bronchochallenge are also known to reduce the subsequently induced bronchoconstriction in non-asthmatic subjects; this is known as the bronchoprotective effect of DI, which is also diminished or abolished in asthmatic subjects [8,9,10]. Big breaths with amplitudes less than a full lung inflation have been shown to be ineffective in preventing bronchoconstriction in subsequently challenged subjects; to observe the bronchoprotective effect of DI in non-asthmatic subjects, a prior full-amplitude DI is required [11]. This suggests that there is a threshold in the amount of lung inflation only above which the bronchoprotective effect of DI can be observed. This raises an interesting speculation that this threshold is higher in asthmatics. This higher threshold could be a result of altered ASM mechanical properties, stiffer airways due to airway remodeling, or weakened airway-parenchymal coupling due to inflammation, among other causes [2].
Enhanced signaling in the rho-kinase (ROCK) pathway has been implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma. There are many excellent reviews on the topics of ROCK involvement in airway hyperresponsiveness, airway remodeling, and lung inflammation [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The present mini-review focuses on the evidence supporting the hypothesis that the lack of a DI-induced bronchoprotective effect in asthmatics is at least partially caused by a change in the ROCK-regulated passive stiffness of ASM, which stems from the structural properties of the cytoskeleton of ASM and is separated from the force-generating actomyosin contractile apparatus. A corollary of the hypothesis is that passive ASM stiffness can be a drug target for treating asthma [20].

2. Canonical Models of Signaling Pathways Regulating ASM Contraction and Cytoskeletal Stiffness

A giant step forward in our understanding of smooth muscle activation and contraction was the discovery that phosphorylation of the 20 kilo-Dalton regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20) is a key step in the activation of myosin crossbridges and the ensuing actomyosin interaction that produces muscle contraction [21,22]. Subsequently, a calcium-dependent activation pathway has been established [23]. That is, stimulation of smooth muscle leads to an increase in the intracellular calcium concentration; calcium binds to calmodulin and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK); the calcium–calmodulin–MLCK complex, which is the active form of the MLCK, then phosphorylates MLC20. Activation of smooth muscle through the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) also activates ROCK, which inhibits myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) and indirectly enhances MLC20 phosphorylation (Figure 1).
Inhibition of MLCP is not the only function of ROCK. As depicted in Figure 1, ROCK is an up-stream enzyme that regulates many branches of signaling pathways not associated with MLC20 phosphorylation in smooth muscle. ROCK is activated by the small GTPase RhoA. One of the downstream kinases from ROCK is LIM-kinase (LIMK). Phosphorylation of LIMK by ROCK activates the kinase, which in turn phosphorylates cofilin thus inhibiting cofilin’s actin-filament-severing function [24]. As a result, ROCK, through LIMK, promotes actin filament polymerization and strengthens the actin cytoskeleton in smooth muscle.
Phosphorylation of p21-activated kinase (PAK) by ROCK is another pathway that regulates actin polymerization and cytoskeletal stability in smooth muscle (Figure 1). Paxillin phosphorylation by PAK leads to a sequence of events resulting in the activation of the small GTPase Cdc42, which in turn activates the neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASp) and finally actin polymerization by the actin-related-protein-2/3 complex (Arp2/3) [25].
Figure 1 depicts an abbreviated version of the signaling pathways regulating smooth muscle activation. More comprehensive descriptions of the pathways can be found in many review articles such as the one by Puetz et al. [26].

3. Two Compartments of ASM

The active force generated by ASM has been shown to be directly proportional to the amount of MLC20 phosphorylation when other force-maintenance mechanisms are excluded [27]. One of the force-maintenance mechanisms is the latch–bridge mechanism [28]. More recent studies have revealed the critical role of the cytoskeleton in the maintenance of actively developed force in ASM [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Interestingly, these studies also showed that disruption of cytoskeletal integrity can lead to a reduction in the externally measured active force without affecting the degree of MLC20 phosphorylation. The results suggest that the contractile machinery in smooth muscle can be divided into two compartments. One of them is the contraction or force-generating mechanism consisting of myosin and actin filaments that slide relative to each other due to the cyclic interaction of myosin crossbridges with actin filaments. For this mechanism to function, the myosin crossbridges need to be activated, i.e., phosphorylated.
The other compartment is the cytoskeleton which structurally supports the actomyosin contractile units and also provides mechanical coupling for force transmission within and outside of a muscle cell [35]. Although both compartments are crucial for the functions of smooth muscle, such as constricting an airway or blood vessel, the contractile domain has historically received more attention from researchers than the cytoskeletal domain has. This is also reflected in the treatment of diseases related to smooth muscle dysfunction. For example, the use of beta2 agonists for asthma treatment and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for treating hypertension. Drug targets in the cytoskeletal domain have largely been ignored.

4. “Passive” Tension in ASM

When smooth muscle tissue is stretched, tension rises even when the muscle is not activated. This tension is traditionally called passive tension and is thought to stem from the extracellular matrix within which the muscle cells are embedded [36]. This notion is challenged by the observation that in ASM tissue preparations there is a calcium-sensitive component of the passive tension [37]. That is, when a relaxed ASM tissue is incubated in a zero-calcium Krebs solution, the muscle becomes more compliant; and when calcium is reintroduced to the Krebs solution, muscle stiffness is restored, even though the muscle is relaxed and without resting tension. To determine whether this calcium-sensitive component of stiffness is intracellular or extracellular in origin, Raqeeb et al. [37] used a non-specific calcium channel blocker (SKF-96365) to block calcium entry into the muscle cells incubated in a calcium-containing Krebs solution; they found that the ASM tissue preparation became more compliant, demonstrating that the calcium-sensitive component of the muscle stiffness resides within the ASM cells. More interestingly, they showed that the calcium-sensitive “passive” stiffness can be inhibited by ROCK inhibition, and yet totally insensitive to inhibition of MLCK. This is consistent with the notion that active force and cytoskeletal stiffness are regulated by separate signaling pathways, such as that depicted in Figure 1, and suggests that the ROCK-sensitive “passive” stiffness is related to the integrity of the cytoskeleton.
Tissue preparations of ASM, such as a tracheal smooth muscle strip or a bronchial ring, include nerve endings containing acetylcholine (ACh). Calcium can trigger the release of ACh from the nerve endings, leading to activation of GPCR by ACh. To determine whether the calcium-sensitive stiffness of relaxed ASM is mediated by ACh, Lan et al. [38] used a membrane-permeated trachealis preparation which was severely “skinned”, resulting in extensive loss of myosin from the muscle cells. They showed that the actin filaments were largely retained inside the skinned ASM cells. Therefore, they essentially created a cytoskeletal preparation where the cytoskeletal stiffness can be measured without the “contamination” of active stiffness stemming from actomyosin interaction. Another useful feature of the preparation was that it still contained cell membranes (even though punctuated with holes) with functioning GPCR embedded. With such a preparation, it has been shown that cytoskeletal stiffness increases with ACh stimulation even in the absence of calcium, suggesting that the calcium-sensitive component of the passive stiffness in ASM tissue preparations can be mediated by ACh activation of GPCR. More interestingly, this zero-calcium, ACh-sensitive stiffness can be inhibited by ROCK inhibitors but is insensitive to MLCK inhibition [38]. If the zero-calcium, ACh-sensitive stiffness can be used as a surrogate measurement for cytoskeletal stiffness, the results suggest that ROCK is a key enzyme that regulates the cytoskeletal integrity and its ability to structurally support the contractile machinery and to transmit force.

5. Maintenance of Active Force in ASM Regulated by ROCK in the Mechanically Dynamic Environment

ASM resides in a living breathing lung and is constantly under cyclic stress and strain due to tidal breathing and occasional DIs. It has been shown that the amount of stretch experienced by ASM in DIs is substantial and it results in a temporary but significant loss of the ability of ASM to generate force [39]. Breathing is therefore an important mechanism in the prevention of maximal contraction of ASM and thus in the maintenance of airway patency in a healthy lung. In vitro experiments have shown that ROCK is critical in the maintenance of actively developed force in ASM. In the presence of a ROCK inhibitor, ASM is not able to maintain the actively developed force even with the continuous presence of a contractile stimulus, especially when the muscle is under cyclic strain mimicking tidal breathing [40]. Studies by Wang et al. [41,42] corroborate the findings, where they found synergistic effects of a ROCK inhibitor combined with small amplitude length oscillation (mimicking tidal breathing) that resulted in ASM relaxation. The findings suggest that ROCK plays an important role in strengthening ASM contractility and making the muscle less susceptible to mechanical perturbations that tend to reduce contractility. This role makes ROCK precarious in that overprotection of the muscle from the relaxant effect of cyclic strain may reduce the beneficial effects of DIs in bronchodilation and bronchoprotection.

6. Overactive ROCK Signaling in Asthma

It is well-known that RhoA/ROCK is involved in the pathophysiology of asthma, especially in airway hyperresponsiveness, airway remodeling and pulmonary inflammation. In an ovalbumin-sensitized rat model of asthma, it has been shown that the expressions of RhoA and ROCK mRNA and proteins are significantly increased [43]. Increased protein expression of RhoA, ROCK, MLC20, and MLCK has also been found in the lungs of a murine model of asthma [44,45]. In human asthmatics, the amount of ROCK in the peripheral blood has been found to be elevated [46]. More recently the protein expression of both isoforms of ROCK, ROCK1, and ROCK2, have been measured in airways and lung section from human asthmatics and age-matched controls. Both isoforms were found to be elevated in the bronchial smooth muscle and in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle from human asthmatic lungs [47]. It appears, therefore, that over-active ROCK signaling is a consistent feature of asthma pathology.
In a mouse (ovalbumin-sensitized) model of asthma, it has been shown that inhibition of ROCK resulted in a reduction in lung resistance and suppression of airway hyperresponsiveness [44,48,49]. In ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs, ROCK inhibitor reversed histamine- and PGF2alpha-induced airway hyperresponsiveness [50]. Also, in a guinea pig model of ovalbumin-induced chronic allergic airway inflammation, specific airway resistance has been shown to be reduced, in concomitance with the reduction of multiple markers of inflammation and remodeling, by ROCK inhibition [51]. Other studies show the involvement of ROCK in inflammatory pathways linked to airway hyperresponsiveness. Interleukin-17A, a cytokine released by T helper 17 cells, can increase bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine or KCL through RhoA/ROCK2 signaling [52], a finding consistent with ROCK inhibition of MLCP and thus enhanced ASM contractility. In rodent models of asthma, inhibition of ROCK suppresses pulmonary eosinophilia and the release of chemokines and cytokines [53,54,55], extracellular matrix remodeling [49], as well as airway inflammation [51,56,57]. Recently, interleukin-27 has been shown to down-regulate Rho/ROCK and reduce airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma [58].
ROCK inhibition has been shown to reduce the release of cytokines from peripheral T cells isolated from human subjects [59]. Interestingly, interleukin-13 (IL-13) has been shown to up-regulate RhoA, which is an activator of ROCK [60]. It appears, therefore, that there is a positive feedback loop between cytokines and RhoA/ROCK that is promoted by the inflammatory environment known to exist in asthmatic lungs. Fasudil, a specific ROCK inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the level of cytokines, including IL-13, in ovalbumin-sensitized mice [55]. In the same study, it has also been shown that fasudil-inhibited house-dust-mite-extract-induced MUC5AC expression in airway epithelial cells. Since IL-13 plays a critical role in MUC5AC expression [61,62], it appears that ROCK also plays a role in mucus secretion by regulating IL-13 signaling pathways. Interestingly, the involvement of ROCK seems to vary according to the cell type mediating the inflammatory response; a study in a must cell-dependent model of allergic airway disease shows that genetically reduced expression of ROCK as well as inhibition of ROCK do not affect airway inflammation but reduce airway hyperresponsiveness in ovalbumin-sensitized mice [63]. Taken together, there is strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that over-expression and/or enhanced activity of ROCK is associated with asthma etiology.

7. Therapeutic Strategies for Asthma Based on Inhibition of ROCK and Its Downstream Enzymes in ASM

Evidence discussed in the above sections supports a view that an overactive RhoA/Rock signaling is associated with airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, thus playing a role in the asthma pathology. These aspects have been covered by many reviews to which we refer the reader [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In this section, we will focus on the role of ASM in asthma etiology due to altered RhoA/ROCK signaling that contributes to the muscle’s dysfunction, and more specifically, to the mechanical properties of ASM cytoskeleton. We will also discuss mitigation strategies based on ROCK inhibition.
It has been shown that the ASM from intrapulmonary airways in human asthmatic lungs is hyperreactive and is characterized by an upregulation of many structural proteins [64]. This is consistent with an increase in structural integrity and force transmission capacity in asthmatic ASM. Interestingly, a study by Duan et al. [65] has shown that overexpression of ADAM33 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 33) increases the contractility of ASM cells as well as the ASM cell stiffness. The study has also found that these changes can be abolished by H1152, a ROCK inhibitor. These results are consistent with the observation that ASM from human asthmatics is more “robust” in that it is more resistant to strain-induced decrease in contractility [66]. More specifically, it has been observed that oscillatory strain mimicking DIs causes less reduction in contractility in ASM from asthmatics compared with that from non-asthmatics [66]. Because the lack of a bronchodilatory response to DIs is one of the hallmarks of human asthma, restoring the bronchodilatory DI response in asthmatics could be a productive strategy in treating the disease.
Because ROCK signaling is intimately linked to the regulation of cytoskeletal stiffness of ASM [37,38] and ROCK is overexpressed in asthmatics [47], ROCK inhibitors are the natural candidates for weakening the cytoskeleton and making the ASM more amenable to the disruptive effect of oscillatory strains (such as DIs) that reduce the muscle contractility (thus maintaining airway patency). For the same reason, i.e., effect on cell stiffness and overexpression in hypertension, ROCK inhibitors have received much attention in the development of cardiovascular medicine [67]. Besides asthma and hypertension, the therapeutic potential of ROCK inhibitors extends to cancer, erectile dysfunction, glaucoma, insulin resistance, kidney failure, neuronal degeneration, and osteoporosis [68,69]. In fact, at least two ROCK inhibitors (fasudil and ripasudil) are in clinical use in Japan and China [68]. However, because ROCK is an upstream enzyme for many important enzymes in cell signaling, unwanted side effects of ROCK inhibitors are difficult to avoid. One of the systemic side effects of ROCK inhibitor is vasodilation and hypotension [70]. The systemic side effects also lead to local side effects, such as conjunctival hyperemia and subconjunctival hemorrhage [71]. The unwanted systemic side effects of ROCK inhibitors may to some degree be avoided by inhalation of the drug in the treatment of asthma, but the drug effect on the pulmonary circulation will be difficult to avoid. This brings out the importance of using inhibitors of enzymes downstream of ROCK, such as LIMK and PAK (Figure 1), or even further down the signaling pathway [35], such as reduction in N-WASP activation [34]. Inhibition of downstream enzymes from ROCK in the treatment of asthma is a largely unexplored field.

8. Combinational Therapy for Asthma Using ROCK Inhibitors and Other Interventions

Experimental evidence has suggested an exciting potential therapy for asthma using a ROCK inhibitor in combination with a bronchodilator. The greatest advantage of using a combinational therapy is that the dosages of the ROCK inhibitor and the bronchodilator can be minimized to reduce side effects. Wang et al. [41] have demonstrated that the combination of low doses of H1152 (a ROCK inhibitor) and salbutamol, each by itself causing insignificant relaxation in ASM, results in a synergistic effect leading to a significant muscle relaxation. It can be envisaged in a future therapy in which asthmatic patients could inhale a mix of nebulized ROCK inhibitor and bronchodilator to relieve asthma exacerbation.
Wang et al. have also demonstrated that the combination of low dose H1152 with small amplitude of length oscillation, again each by itself causing insignificant ASM relaxation, results in a similar synergistic effect that leads to a significant muscle relaxation [41]. The synergy is even more pronounced when the combination of interventions includes H1152, salbutamol, and length oscillation. This three-factor combination augments muscle relaxation to a level greater than 50%, while each intervention by itself causes <5% (statistically insignificant) relaxation [41].
Again, it can be envisaged that a nebulized ROCK inhibitor in combination with a bronchodilator such as salbutamol can be delivered to asthmatic patients through positive oscillatory pressure ventilation. Tidal breathing provides small amplitude oscillatory strain on the ASM. Small-amplitude-high-frequency pressure oscillation superimposed on low-frequency oscillation (mimicking tidal breathing) has been shown to be effective in relaxing ASM [72]. Such a combination of small-amplitude-high-frequency pressure oscillation with low doses of a ROCK inhibitor and a bronchodilator could be an effective therapy for severe asthma. This is a promising strategy within the context of the recently emerged mechano-pharmacological approach in the treatment of asthma.

9. Limitations and Future Research Direction

Before ROCK inhibitors can be used as a standard treatment for asthma, more studies on human patients need to be carried out. There have been numerous clinical trials using ROCK inhibitors for treating various diseases (See Table 1). However, no such trials for asthma treatment have been conducted.
In reviewing the trials listed in Table 1, except for treating Raynaud’s disease [79], all trials showed a significant improvement in symptoms when the Rho/ROCK signaling was downregulated by ROCK inhibitors. More importantly, none of the trial studies reported severe adverse effects. However, it should be pointed out that all trials conducted so far have been designed to investigate short term effects (from days to months), it is not clear whether treatment efficacy will persist in the long run and whether severe side effects from ROCK inhibitor treatment will arise in a long-term trial.
It is obvious that an important future direction for asthma research is to carry out clinical trials using ROCK inhibitors to relieve or even prevent asthma exacerbation. Inhalation of nebulized drugs minimizes systemic effects and should reduce side effects. Another way to minimize side effects is to use combinational therapy. As mentioned above, a ROCK inhibitor combined with a bronchodilator (such as salbutamol) dramatically reduces the effective concentrations of both drugs and at the same time achieves more ASM relaxation [41]. Studies also suggest that the synergistic effect of the combinational therapy can be further amplified when a ROCK inhibitor, a bronchodilator, and low-amplitude, high-frequency pressure oscillation are applied simultaneously during mechanical ventilation in the treatment of severe asthma [41,72]. Studies such as these provide theoretical bases for clinical trials. Because ROCK is a relatively upstream enzyme controlling a multitude of cell signaling, targeting enzymes downstream from ROCK (such as LIMK) should be a more sensible choice in future clinical trials.

10. Conclusions

ROCK inhibitors are a potential next-generation class of drugs in the treatment of asthma because of their bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory properties. An additional property of ROCK inhibitors is their ability to reduce ASM cytoskeletal stiffness which is important in restoring the bronchodilatory and bronchoprotective effects of DIs in asthmatic patients. Evidence from in vitro experiments on ASM suggests that a combination of a nebulized ROCK inhibitor with a bronchodilator in the presence of high-frequency positive-pressure oscillation applied to the lung should be more effective than a ROCK inhibitor alone in reversing bronchoconstriction during asthma exacerbation.

Author Contributions

Y.Y. and C.Y.S. summarized the literature and drafted the manuscript. L.W. and P.C. edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a project grant awarded to C.Y.S. from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a discovery grant awarded to C.Y.S. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AChAcetylcholine
Arp2/3Actin-related-protein-2/3 complex
ASMAirway smooth muscle
DIDeep inspiration
FRCFunctional residual capacity
GPCRG-protein-coupled receptors
LIMKLIM kinase
MLC2020 kilo-Dalton regulatory myosin light chain
MLCKMyosin light chain kinase
MLCPMyosin light chain phosphatase
N-WASPNeuronal Wiskott—Aldrich syndrome protein.
PAKp21-activated kinase
ROCKRho-kinase
TLCTotal lung capacity

References

  1. Reddel, H.K.; Bacharier, L.B.; Bateman, E.D.; Brightling, C.E.; Brusselle, G.G.; Buhl, R.; Cruz, A.A.; Duijts, L.; Drazen, J.M.; FitzGerald, J.M.; et al. Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: Executive Summary and Rationale for Key Changes. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 205, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. An, S.S.; Bai, T.R.; Bates, J.H.; Black, J.L.; Brown, R.H.; Brusasco, V.; Chitano, P.; Deng, L.; Dowell, M.; Eidelman, D.H.; et al. Airway smooth muscle dynamics: A common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 834–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Juniper, E.F.; Kline, P.A.; Vanzieleghem, M.A.; Ramsdale, E.H.; O’Byrne, P.M.; Hargreave, F.E. Effect of long-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide) on airway hyperresponsiveness and clinical asthma in nonsteroid-dependent asthmatics. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990, 142, 832–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nadel, J.A.; Tierney, D.F. Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 1961, 16, 717–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. King, G.G.; Moore, B.J.; Seow, C.Y.; Paré, P.D. Time course of increased airway narrowing caused by inhibition of deep inspiration during methacholine challenge. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fish, J.E.; Ankin, M.G.; Kelly, J.F.; Peterman, V.I. Regulation of bronchomotor tone by lung inflation in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 1981, 50, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scichilone, N.; Marchese, R.; Soresi, S.; Interrante, A.; Togias, A.; Bellia, V. Deep inspiration-induced changes in lung volume decrease with severity of asthma. Respir. Med. 2007, 101, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kapsali, T.; Permutt, S.; Laube, B.; Scichilone, N.; Togias, A. Potent bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration and its absence in asthma. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 89, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Skloot, G.; Togias, A. Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection by deep inspiration and their relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2003, 24, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wong, R.S.; Larcombe, A.N.; Fernandes, L.B.; Zosky, G.R.; Noble, P.B. The mechanism of deep inspiration-induced bronchoprotection: Evidence from a mouse model. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Crimi, E.; Pellegrino, R.; Milanese, M.; Brusasco, V. Deep breaths, methacholine, and airway narrowing in healthy and mild asthmatic subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 1384–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gosens, R.; Schaafsma, D.; Nelemans, S.A.; Halayko, A.J. Rho-kinase as a drug target for the treatment of airway hyperrespon-siveness in asthma. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fernandes, L.B.; Henry, P.J.; Goldie, R.G. Rho kinase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2007, 1, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kume, H. RhoA/Rho-kinase as a therapeutic target in asthma. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 2876–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schaafsma, D.; Gosens, R.; Zaagsma, J.; Halayko, A.J.; Meurs, H. Rho kinase inhibitors: A novel therapeutical intervention in asthma? Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 585, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chiba, Y.; Matsusue, K.; Misawa, M. RhoA, a possible target for treatment of airway hyperresponsiveness in bronchial asthma. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 114, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Luo, W.; Liu, C.T.; Yang, Q.H.; Yu, Q.; Wang, T. New angle of view on the role of rho/rho kinase pathway in human diseases. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014, 13, 378–395. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Saradna, A.; Ratan, R.; Ke, X.; Tu, W.; Do, D.C.; Hu, C.; Gao, P. RhoA/Rho-kinases in asthma: From pathogenesis to therapeutic targets. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2020, 9, e01134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, Q.; Shi, W. Rho/ROCK-MYOCD in regulating airway smooth muscle growth and remodeling. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2021, 321, L1–L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Seow, C.Y. Passive stiffness of airway smooth muscle: The next target for improving airway distensibility and treatment for asthma? Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 26, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sobieszek, A. Ca-linked phosphorylation of a light chain of vertebrate smooth-muscle myosin. Eur. J. Biochem. 1977, 73, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ikebe, M.; Onishi, H.; Watanabe, S. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of a light chain of the chicken gizzard myosin molecule. J. Biochem. 1977, 82, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pfitzer, G. Invited review: Regulation of myosin phosphorylation in smooth muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maekawa, M.; Ishizaki, T.; Boku, S.; Watanabe, N.; Fujita, A.; Iwamatsu, A.; Obinata, T.; Ohashi, K.; Mizuno, K.; Narumiya, S. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 1999, 285, 895–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, W.; Bhetwal, B.P.; Gunst, S.J. Rho kinase collaborates with p21-activated kinase to regulate actin polymerization and contraction in airway smooth muscle. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 3617–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Puetz, S.; Lubomirov, L.T.; Pfitzer, G. Regulation of smooth muscle contraction by small GTPases. Physiology 2009, 24, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Luo, L.; Wang, L.; Paré, P.D.; Seow, C.Y.; Chitano, P. The Huxley crossbridge model as the basic mechanism for airway smooth muscle contraction. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2019, 317, L235–L246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hai, C.M.; Murphy, R.A. Cross-bridge phosphorylation and regulation of latch state in smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 1988, 254, C99–C106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, W.; Huang, Y.; Gunst, S.J. The small GTPase RhoA regulates the contraction of smooth muscle tissues by catalyzing the assembly of cytoskeletal signaling complexes at membrane adhesion sites. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 33996–34008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, Y.; Day, R.N.; Gunst, S.J. Vinculin phosphorylation at Tyr1065 regulates vinculin conformation and tension development in airway smooth muscle tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 3677–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, Y.; Gunst, S.J. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) regulates actin polymerization and contraction in airway smooth muscle by a vinculin-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 11403–11416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, W.; Huang, Y.; Gunst, S.J. p21-Activated kinase (Pak) regulates airway smooth muscle contraction by regulating paxillin complexes that mediate actin polymerization. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 4879–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, W.; Gunst, S.J. Non-muscle (NM) myosin heavy chain phosphorylation regulates the formation of NM myosin filaments, adhesome assembly and smooth muscle contraction. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 4279–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Tang, D.D. Ste20-like Kinase-mediated Control of Actin Polymerization Is a New Mechanism for Thin Filament-associated Regulation of Airway Smooth Muscle Contraction. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2020, 62, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Seow, C.Y.; An, S.S. The Force Awakens in the Cytoskeleton: The Saga of a Shape-Shifter. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2020, 62, 550–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, T.; He, C.; Venado, A.; Zhou, Y. Extracellular Matrix Stiffness in Lung Health and Disease. Compr. Physiol. 2022, 12, 3523–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Raqeeb, A.; Jiao, Y.; Syyong, H.T.; Paré, P.D.; Seow, C.Y. Regulatable stiffness in relaxed airway smooth muscle: A target for asthma treatment? J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 112, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lan, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Pascoe, C.D.; Norris, B.A.; Liu, J.C.; Solomon, D.; Paré, P.D.; Deng, L.; Seow, C.Y. Rho-kinase mediated cytoskeletal stiffness in skinned smooth muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 1540–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, S.J.; Wang, L.; Chitano, P.; Coxson, H.O.; Paré, P.D.; Seow, C.Y. Airway diameter at different transpulmonary pressures in ex vivo sheep lungs: Implications for deep inspiration-induced bronchodilation and bronchoprotection. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2021, 321, L663–L674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lan, B.; Deng, L.; Donovan, G.M.; Chin, L.Y.; Syyong, H.T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Pascoe, C.D.; Norris, B.A.; Liu, J.C.; et al. Force maintenance and myosin filament assembly regulated by Rho-kinase in airway smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2015, 308, L1–L10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, L.; Chitano, P.; Paré, P.D.; Seow, C.Y. Mechanopharmacology and Synergistic Relaxation of Airway Smooth Muscle. J. Eng. Sci. Med. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 2, 0110041–0110047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Chitano, P.; Seow, C.Y. Mechanopharmacology of Rho-kinase antagonism in airway smooth muscle and potential new therapy for asthma. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 104995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wei, B.; Shang, Y.X.; Li, M.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, H. Cytoskeleton changes of airway smooth muscle cells in juvenile rats with airway remodeling in asthma and the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway mechanism. Genet. Mol. Res. 2014, 13, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Witzenrath, M.; Ahrens, B.; Schmeck, B.; Kube, S.M.; Hippenstiel, S.; Rosseau, S.; Hamelmann, E.; Suttorp, N.; Schütte, H. Rho-kinase and contractile apparatus proteins in murine airway hyperresponsiveness. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008, 60, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, F.Q.; Zhu, S.Y.; He, C.X.; Gu, M.X. Effects of fasudil on the expression of Rho kinase-1 and airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. Chin. J. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2009, 32, 847–849. [Google Scholar]
  46. Deng, X.; Zhu, H.; Wu, S. Measurement of Rho-kinase and CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood in asthmatic patients. J. Cent. South Univ. Med. Sci. 2014, 39, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, L.; Chitano, P.; Paré, P.D.; Seow, C.Y. Upregulation of smooth muscle Rho-kinase protein expression in human asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 1901785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hashimoto, K.; Peebles, R.S., Jr.; Sheller, J.R.; Jarzecka, K.; Furlong, J.; Mitchell, D.B.; Hartert, T.V.; Graham, B.S. Suppression of airway hyperresponsiveness induced by ovalbumin sensitisation and RSV infection with Y-27632, a Rho kinase inhibitor. Thorax 2002, 57, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Possa, S.S.; Charafeddine, H.T.; Righetti, R.F.; da Silva, P.A.; Almeida-Reis, R.; Saraiva-Romanholo, B.M.; Perini, A.; Prado, C.M.; Leick-Maldonado, E.A.; Martins, M.A.; et al. Rho-kinase inhibition attenuates airway responsiveness, inflammation, matrix remodeling, and oxidative stress activation induced by chronic inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2012, 303, L939–L952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schaafsma, D.; Bos, I.S.; Zuidhof, A.B.; Zaagsma, J.; Meurs, H. Inhalation of the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 reverses allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness after the early and late asthmatic reaction. Respir. Res. 2006, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Franova, S.; Molitorisova, M.; Kalmanova, L.; Palencarova, J.; Joskova, M.; Smiesko, L.; Mazerik, J.; Sutovska, M. The anti-asthmatic potential of Rho-kinase inhibitor hydroxyfasudil in the model of experimentally induced allergic airway inflammation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 938, 175450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kudo, M.; Melton, A.C.; Chen, C.; Engler, M.B.; Huang, K.E.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y.; Bernstein, X.; Li, J.T.; Atabai, K.; et al. IL-17A produced by αβ T cells drives airway hyper-responsiveness in mice and enhances mouse and human airway smooth muscle contraction. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Henry, P.J.; Mann, T.S.; Goldie, R.G. A rho kinase inhibitor, Y-27632 inhibits pulmonary eosinophilia, bronchoconstriction and airways hyperresponsiveness in allergic mice. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 18, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Taki, F.; Kume, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Ohta, H.; Aratake, H.; Shimokata, K. Effects of Rho-kinase inactivation on eosinophilia and hyper-reactivity in murine airways by allergen challenges. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xie, T.; Luo, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, M.; Li, G. Rho-kinase inhibitor fasudil reduces allergic airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion by regulating STAT6 and NFκB. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Schaafsma, D.; Bos, I.S.; Zuidhof, A.B.; Zaagsma, J.; Meurs, H. The inhaled Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 protects against allergen-induced acute bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2008, 295, L214–L219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dos Santos, T.M.; Righetti, R.F.; Camargo, L.D.N.; Saraiva-Romanholo, B.M.; Aristoteles, L.; de Souza, F.C.R.; Fukuzaki, S.; Alonso-Vale, M.I.C.; Cruz, M.M.; Prado, C.M.; et al. Effect of Anti-IL17 Antibody Treatment Alone and in Combination With Rho-Kinase Inhibitor in a Murine Model of Asthma. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, C.; Sun, Y.; Liu, N.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Lu, D.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, C. IL-27 attenuates airway inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in allergic asthmatic mice possibly via the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2022, 33, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Aihara, M.; Dobashi, K.; Iizuka, K.; Nakazawa, T.; Mori, M. Effect of Y-27632 on release of cytokines from peripheral T cells in asthmatic patients and normal subjects. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chiba, Y.; Nakazawa, S.; Todoroki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Sakai, H.; Misawa, M. Interleukin-13 augments bronchial smooth muscle contractility with an up-regulation of RhoA protein. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 40, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kuperman, D.A.; Huang, X.; Koth, L.L.; Chang, G.H.; Dolganov, G.M.; Zhu, Z.; Elias, J.A.; Sheppard, D.; Erle, D.J. Direct effects of interleukin-13 on epithelial cells cause airway hyperreactivity and mucus overproduction in asthma. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Rho-kinase inhibitor attenuates airway mucus hypersecretion and inflammation partly by downregulation of IL-13 and the JNK1/2-AP1 signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kasahara, D.I.; Ninin, F.M.; Wurmbrand, A.P.; Liao, J.K.; Shore, S.A. Abrogation of airway hyperresponsiveness but not inflammation by rho kinase insufficiency. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ijpma, G.; Kachmar, L.; Panariti, A.; Matusovsky, O.S.; Torgerson, D.; Benedetti, A.; Lauzon, A.M. Intrapulmonary airway smooth muscle is hyperreactive with a distinct proteome in asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 1902178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Duan, Y.; Long, J.; Chen, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, J.; Jin, Y.; Lin, F.; Zhong, J.; Xu, R.; Mao, L.; et al. Overexpression of soluble ADAM33 promotes a hypercontractile phenotype of the airway smooth muscle cell in rat. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 349, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chin, L.Y.; Bossé, Y.; Pascoe, C.; Hackett, T.L.; Seow, C.Y.; Paré, P.D. Mechanical properties of asthmatic airway smooth muscle. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shimokawa, H.; Rashid, M. Development of Rho-kinase inhibitors for cardiovascular medicine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feng, Y.; LoGrasso, P.V.; Defert, O.; Li, R. Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors and Their Therapeutic Potential. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 2269–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Defert, O.; Boland, S. Rho kinase inhibitors: A patent review (2014–2016). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017, 27, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Löhn, M.; Plettenburg, O.; Kannt, A.; Kohlmann, M.; Hofmeister, A.; Kadereit, D.; Monecke, P.; Schiffer, A.; Schulte, A.; Ruetten, H.; et al. End-organ protection in hypertension by the novel and selective Rho-kinase inhibitor, SAR407899. World J. Cardiol. 2015, 7, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Al-Humimat, G.; Marashdeh, I.; Daradkeh, D.; Kooner, K. Investigational Rho Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Glaucoma. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021, 13, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jo-Avila, M.; Al-Jumaily, A.M.; Lu, J. Relaxant effect of superimposed length oscillation on sensitized airway smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2015, 308, L479–L484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Williams, R.D.; Novack, G.D.; van Haarlem, T.; Kopczynski, C. Ocular hypotensive effect of the Rho kinase inhibitor AR-12286 in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 152, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sit, A.J.; Gupta, D.; Kazemi, A.; McKee, H.; Challa, P.; Liu, K.C.; Lopez, J.; Kopczynski, C.; Heah, T. Netarsudil Improves Trabecular Outflow Facility in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Phase 2 Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 226, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Walters, T.R.; Ahmed, I.I.K.; Lewis, R.A.; Usner, D.W.; Lopez, J.; Kopczynski, C.C.; Heah, T. Once-Daily Netarsudil/Latanoprost Fixed-Dose Combination for Elevated Intraocular Pressure in the Randomized Phase 3 MERCURY-2 Study. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma 2019, 2, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Stalmans, I.; Lim, K.S.; Oddone, F.; Fichtl, M.; Belda, J.I.; Hommer, A.; Laganovska, G.; Schweitzer, C.; Voykov, B.; Zarnowski, T.; et al. MERCURY-3: A randomized comparison of netarsudil/latanoprost and bimatoprost/timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2024, 262, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tanihara, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Aihara, M.; Koizumi, N.; Minami, H.; Kojima, S.; Isobe, T.; Kanazawa, M.; Suganami, H. Crossover Randomized Study of Pharmacologic Effects of Ripasudil-Brimonidine Fixed-Dose Combination Versus Ripasudil or Brimonidine. Adv. Ther. 2023, 40, 3559–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lindstrom, R.L.; Lewis, A.E.; Holland, E.J.; Sheppard, J.D.; Hovanesian, J.A.; Senchyna, M.; Hollander, D.A. Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Parallel-Group Study of Two Dosing Regimens of Netarsudil for the Treatment of Corneal Edema Due to Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 38, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Fava, A.; Wung, P.K.; Wigley, F.M.; Hummers, L.K.; Daya, N.R.; Ghazarian, S.R.; Boin, F. Efficacy of Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Care Res. 2012, 64, 925–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fukumoto, Y.; Yamada, N.; Matsubara, H.; Mizoguchi, M.; Uchino, K.; Yao, A.; Kihara, Y.; Kawano, M.; Watanabe, H.; Takeda, Y.; et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a rho-kinase inhibitor in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ. J. 2013, 77, 2619–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fujita, H.; Fukumoto, Y.; Saji, K.; Sugimura, K.; Demachi, J.; Nawata, J.; Shimokawa, H. Acute vasodilator effects of inhaled fasudil, a specific Rho-kinase inhibitor, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Vessels 2010, 25, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cutler, C.; Lee, S.J.; Arai, S.; Rotta, M.; Zoghi, B.; Lazaryan, A.; Ramakrishnan, A.; DeFilipp, Z.; Salhotra, A.; Chai-Ho, W.; et al. Belumosudil for chronic graft-versus-host disease after 2 or more prior lines of therapy: The ROCKstar Study. Blood 2021, 138, 2278–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahmadieh, H.; Nourinia, R.; Hafezi-Moghadam, A.; Sabbaghi, H.; Nakao, S.; Zandi, S.; Yaseri, M.; Tofighi, Z.; Akbarian, S. Intravitreal injection of a Rho-kinase inhibitor (fasudil) combined with bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy for diabetic macular oedema: A pilot randomised clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 103, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kishi, T.; Hirooka, Y.; Masumoto, A.; Ito, K.; Kimura, Y.; Inokuchi, K.; Tagawa, T.; Shimokawa, H.; Takeshita, A.; Sunagawa, K. Rho-kinase inhibitor improves increased vascular resistance and impaired vasodilation of the forearm in patients with heart failure. Circulation 2005, 111, 2741–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nohria, A.; Grunert, M.E.; Rikitake, Y.; Noma, K.; Prsic, A.; Ganz, P.; Liao, J.K.; Creager, M.A. Rho kinase inhibition improves endothelial function in human subjects with coronary artery disease. Circ. Res. 2006, 99, 1426–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Otsuka, T.; Ibuki, C.; Suzuki, T.; Ishii, K.; Yoshida, H.; Kodani, E.; Kusama, Y.; Atarashi, H.; Kishida, H.; Takano, T.; et al. Administration of the Rho-kinase inhibitor, fasudil, following nitroglycerin additionally dilates the site of coronary spasm in patients with vasospastic angina. Coron. Artery Dis. 2008, 19, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Segain, J.P.; Raingeard de la Blétière, D.; Sauzeau, V.; Bourreille, A.; Hilaret, G.; Cario-Toumaniantz, C.; Pacaud, P.; Galmiche, J.P.; Loirand, G. Rho kinase blockade prevents inflammation via nuclear factor kappa B inhibition: Evidence in Crohn’s disease and experimental colitis. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1180–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fehlings, M.G.; Kim, K.D.; Aarabi, B.; Rizzo, M.; Bond, L.M.; McKerracher, L.; Vaccaro, A.R.; Okonkwo, D.O. Rho Inhibitor VX-210 in Acute Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Design of the SPinal Cord Injury Rho INhibition InvestiGation (SPRING) Clinical Trial. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zanin-Zhorov, A.; Weiss, J.M.; Trzeciak, A.; Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Nyuydzefe, M.S.; Arencibia, C.; Polimera, S.; Schueller, O.; Fuentes-Duculan, J.; et al. Cutting Edge: Selective Oral ROCK2 Inhibitor Reduces Clinical Scores in Patients with Psoriasis Vulgaris and Normalizes Skin Pathology via Concurrent Regulation of IL-17 and IL-10. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 3809–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Shibuya, M.; Hirai, S.; Seto, M.; Satoh, S.; Ohtomo, E. Effects of fasudil in acute ischemic stroke: Results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial. J. Neurol. Sci. 2005, 238, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 13 00115 g001
Figure 1. Simplified signaling pathways regulating smooth muscle activation and contraction. The pathway on the right (blue) mainly regulates phosphorylation of MLC20. This is achieved through activation of MLCK by calcium and calmodulin. Once MLC20 is phosphorylated, the myosin crossbridges are able to interact with actin filaments to generate force. The pathway on the left (green) regulates actin polymerization and actin filament stabilization which are important in strengthening the cytoskeleton that facilitates force generation and transmission. The small GTPase RhoA activates ROCK, which in turn activates LIMK leading to inhibition of cofilin and its actin filament severing function. This pathway therefore promotes actin filament formation and stabilization. The other branch of ROCK signaling is through activation of p21-activated kinase (PAK), which leads to phosphorylation of paxillin, activation of the small GTPase cDc42, and N-WASP activation, and eventually actin filament formation and stabilization. More details of the description of the signaling pathways are presented in the main text. +, stimulatory; -, inhibitory; ROCK: Rho-kinase; MLC20: regulatory myosin light chain; MLCK: myosin light chain kinase; MLCP: myosin light chain phosphatase; LIMK: LIM kinase; N-WASP: neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein; PAK: p21-activated kinase.
Figure 1. Simplified signaling pathways regulating smooth muscle activation and contraction. The pathway on the right (blue) mainly regulates phosphorylation of MLC20. This is achieved through activation of MLCK by calcium and calmodulin. Once MLC20 is phosphorylated, the myosin crossbridges are able to interact with actin filaments to generate force. The pathway on the left (green) regulates actin polymerization and actin filament stabilization which are important in strengthening the cytoskeleton that facilitates force generation and transmission. The small GTPase RhoA activates ROCK, which in turn activates LIMK leading to inhibition of cofilin and its actin filament severing function. This pathway therefore promotes actin filament formation and stabilization. The other branch of ROCK signaling is through activation of p21-activated kinase (PAK), which leads to phosphorylation of paxillin, activation of the small GTPase cDc42, and N-WASP activation, and eventually actin filament formation and stabilization. More details of the description of the signaling pathways are presented in the main text. +, stimulatory; -, inhibitory; ROCK: Rho-kinase; MLC20: regulatory myosin light chain; MLCK: myosin light chain kinase; MLCP: myosin light chain phosphatase; LIMK: LIM kinase; N-WASP: neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein; PAK: p21-activated kinase.
Biology 13 00115 g001
Table 1. A list of some clinical trials using ROCK inhibitors for treating various diseases.
Table 1. A list of some clinical trials using ROCK inhibitors for treating various diseases.
Clinical Trials—Relevant DiseasesReferences
Glaucoma and ocular hypertension[73,74,75,76,77,78]
Raynaud’s disease[79]
Pulmonary arterial hypertension[80,81]
Chronic graft-versus-host disease[82]
Diabetic macular oedema[83]
Coronary artery disease and heart failure[84,85,86]
Crohn’s disease[87]
Spinal cord injury[88]
Psoriasis vulgaris[89]
Acute ischemic stroke[90]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yasuda, Y.; Wang, L.; Chitano, P.; Seow, C.Y. Rho-Kinase Inhibition of Active Force and Passive Tension in Airway Smooth Muscle: A Strategy for Treating Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma. Biology 2024, 13, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020115

AMA Style

Yasuda Y, Wang L, Chitano P, Seow CY. Rho-Kinase Inhibition of Active Force and Passive Tension in Airway Smooth Muscle: A Strategy for Treating Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma. Biology. 2024; 13(2):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yasuda, Yuto, Lu Wang, Pasquale Chitano, and Chun Y. Seow. 2024. "Rho-Kinase Inhibition of Active Force and Passive Tension in Airway Smooth Muscle: A Strategy for Treating Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma" Biology 13, no. 2: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020115

APA Style

Yasuda, Y., Wang, L., Chitano, P., & Seow, C. Y. (2024). Rho-Kinase Inhibition of Active Force and Passive Tension in Airway Smooth Muscle: A Strategy for Treating Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma. Biology, 13(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop