Next Article in Journal
Fetal Mammary Gland Development and Offspring’s Breast Cancer Risk in Adulthood
Previous Article in Journal
Twinning and Individuation: An Appraisal of the Current Model and Ethical Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Population Genetic Characteristics of Siberian Roe Deer in the Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystem of the Greater Khingan Mountains, Northeast China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ammopiptanthus nanus Population Dynamics: Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Variation and Ecological Distribution Patterns

1
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable, Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
3
Turpan Eremophytes Botanic Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 838008, China
4
Xinjiang Key Lab of Conservation and Utilization of Plant Gene Resources, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2025, 14(2), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020105
Submission received: 26 December 2024 / Revised: 16 January 2025 / Accepted: 18 January 2025 / Published: 21 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Variability within and between Populations)

Simple Summary

The tertiary relict plant Ammopiptanthus nanus is classified as a level II endangered plant in China, whose survival is threatened by human activities and climate change. The population structure of 129 wild specimens of A. nanus from 8 populations was analyzed using EST-SSR molecular markers in this research. Results indicate that the genetic variation of A. nanus is significantly affected by wind speed, and there are 6 independent populations of A. nanus in the wild. This discovery underscores the importance of establishing nature reserves, developing seed banks for breeding, and monitoring pests. These measures can help prevent the decline of this species, thereby preserving our valuable biodiversity.

Abstract

Ammopiptanthus nanus, a Tertiary-era endangered plant, is of great scientific value. In this research, we focus on A. nanus population dynamics in an effort to bridge the divide between micro genetic variation and a macroscopic ecological pattern of distribution. The population structure of 129 wild specimens of A. nanus from eight populations was analyzed using EST-SSR molecular markers in this research. The Mantel test and RDA analysis have been used in this research to investigate the factors that influence the genetic diversity of A. nanus. Using 15 pairs of SSR primers, a total of 227 alleles were detected in 129 samples from 8 populations. The mean number of alleles was 17, and the average expected heterozygosity was 0.405. It is shown that wild A. nanus is divided into six individual populations. A. nanus are significantly affected by wind speed in terms of the variation of genetics. It is suggested that a nature conservation area for A. nanus be established as soon as possible, based on our results and the current natural distribution of the species. It is necessary to focus on the issue of pests and diseases while simultaneously preventing the continuation of anthropogenic woodcutting and disaster. Manual seedling collection should be employed in regions where the environment permits. Through making use of manual breeding techniques, this will contribute to the growth of the natural population of A. nanus.

1. Introduction

Plant genetic diversity is a cornerstone of biodiversity, encompassing the spectrum of genetic variation among individuals within populations. It is not only a vital component but also the foundation of biological diversity [1]. This diversity arises from the mutations and accumulations of genetic material as species evolve, thereby shaping their capacity to adapt to environmental changes and their potential for evolutionary innovation [2]. A species with richer genetic diversity wields a stronger adaptability to its surroundings and possesses a more robust potential for evolution [3]. Consequently, this diversity plays an integral role in influencing the resilience and stability of ecosystems.
The only broad-leaved evergreen shrub in the gravelly deserts of Xinjiang, Mongolia, China, Ammopiptanthus is classified under the APG IV system as belonging to Fabaceae, Papilionoideae, and Tr. sophoreae. The scientific name of Ammopiptanthus is derived from the Ancient Greek words ἄμμoς (ámmos, meaning “sand”) and Piptanthus, which is the genus from which Piptanthus is divided. According to Mr. Zheng Sixu, Ammopiptanthus was distinguished from Piptanthus in 1959 by virtue of its alternate flowers, stipules, and petioles [4]. Ammopiptanthus mongolicus and Ammopiptanthus nanus are the sole two species of this genus in existence, and they are both ancient Tertiary relict species. A. nanus is even more uncommon and is primarily found in Wuqia County, Xinjiang, China, with a concentration on both sides of the Tianshan Mountains [5]. These Tertiary Fabaceae relict plants are of significant scientific value for the study of the Central Asian region’s paleogeography, paleoclimate changes, and ancient flora changes [6]. A. nanus originated in the ancient Mediterranean tropics, and maintains normal growth and development processes and biological and ecological characteristics of the fragile ecosystem in desert areas, and plays an important role in the maintenance of said ecosystem [7]. It is also an excellent material used as a greening ornamental and for wind and sand stabilization in arid areas. It is highly adaptable, and is able to withstand −30~50 °C temperature conditions, drought stress, salt stress, and wind and sand erosion [8]. It is also utilized as medicine by the local Kirghiz people in Wuqia County. The branches and leaves of the plant have a bitter taste and contain a variety of alkaloids that can be used for medicinal purposes. These alkaloids have the ability to dispel wind-dampness and activate blood circulation to disperse traces. Additionally, the plant can be used as an insecticide and fuel [9].
The sole broad-leaved evergreen shrub in Xinjiang is A. nanus. A. nanus is capable of thriving in the stony Gobi and extremely arid barren mountains, where it plays a critical role in improving soil, preventing winds, and fixing sands [10]. It has a large root system, good nitrogen-fixing capacity, and physiological and ecological characteristics that are well-suited to harsh habitats. It can endure stony slopes, stream scouring channels, and gravelly river rambles at an altitude of 1800–2600 m due to its well-developed root system [11]. A. nanus has strong economic value and use value in addition to its high ecological value and research value. It is a dominant and established species that guarantees the stability of the community structure in its arid distribution area [12]. The distribution area of A. nanus is located in the minority gathering area of Xinjiang, Wuqia County, where the Kyrgyz population comprises 70% of the total. The Kyrgyz are known for their traditional form of subsistence, which involves herding. In addition to serving as fuel wood for the local ethnic minorities, A. nanus is also highly valued as a medicinal plant. Local Uyghurs in Wuqia County, Xinjiang, also consume its flowers and seeds in addition to the stems and foliage as medicinal substances [13]. This suggests that it may exhibit low toxicity, and the medicinal value of A. nanus requires further rationalization and development. In the interim, the A. nanus community, which has a restricted global distribution, is in dire need of more rational and effective countermeasures to ensure the conservation of germplasm resources. These countermeasures should be founded on a variety of methods, including comprehensive sample collection and genetic structure analysis.
Microsatellite sequence marker is another term for simple sequence repeat (SSR) [14]. SSR molecular markers are typically comprised of tandem repeats of 1–6 bases, and the sequences are typically less than 100 bp in length. In terms of genetic marker technology, SSR molecular markers have demonstrated high polymorphism and excellent reproducibility, as they are based on PCR reactions. The primary benefits of SSR molecular markers are as follows: they exhibit simple repetition, as SSR molecular markers are composed of short sequence repeat units, which typically range from two to six base pairs; they possess high polymorphism, due to the fact that they have varying repeat numbers and combinations based on the individual; they are numerous and can encompass the entire genome, revealing a high degree of polymorphism; and they are characterized by their straightforward, rapid, and cost-effective amplification and detection processes. SSR molecular markers also show potential in the study of adaptive evolution in plants. By analyzing SSR molecular markers within a specific gene region, it is possible to investigate the level of genetic diversity and confirm the adaptation of plants to environmental stresses [15]. This information will also be beneficial and instructive for future genetic conservation efforts, given the unique ecological environment in which A. nanus is situated.
Our research was conducted to establish a scientific foundation for the conservation and sustainable management of A. nanus, a species that is naturally distributed in Xinjiang. To achieve this, we employed EST-SSR markers to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of this species, and we analyzed the results in the context of meteorology and geography.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

A total of 129 samples of A. nanus plants were collected from eight distinct populations in this research. It is necessary to note that A. nanus exists in an extremely small population. The natural environment in which it is placed has emerged as harsh, and its distribution range is particularly limited. There are numerous difficulties associated with habitat surveys and sample collection. We were only able to obtain samples from eights populations because of the limited options posed by the habitat conditions. At random, healthy A. nanus individuals were selected from each population, and the leaves were collected and desiccated on silica gel. Subsequently, they were stored in a −20 °C refrigerator as a reserve. Environmental information was recorded for each population during the sampling procedure (Figure 1, Table 1).

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

The SSR primer sequences were derived from our previously published EST-SSR primers [16], which have been evaluated for reliability in practical applications. Utilizing the DNAsecure plant kit (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), DNA was extracted from A. nanus plant material in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines (Table 2).
The 129 A. nanus DNAs that were extracted were employed as templates in a 25 µL SSR-PCR reaction system. The templates employed were 1 µL of DNA template, 1 µL of upstream and downstream primers, 12.5 µL of Taq mix, and 9.5 µL of ddH2O. The PCR products were pre-denatured at 95 °C for 3 min, denatured at 95 °C for 15 s, annealed at 56 °C for 30 s, and extended at 72 °C for 15 s for a total of 30 cycles.
The PCR products were stored in a refrigerator that was shielded from light at a temperature of 4 °C. The PCR products were separated using agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with the nucleic acid reagent SYBR Gold Molecular Probes (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) solution. Ultimately, the Bio-rad gel imaging system was employed to capture and record the images.
Capillary electrophoresis was employed to analyze the PCR products and to conduct statistical analyses of the amplified fragment size and peak electrophoresis plots. The results were recorded in an Excel format document, and any missing values were denoted as 0. The data served as the foundation for the genetic structure analysis, genetic diversity analysis, and correlation analysis of environmental factors on genetic diversity.

2.3. Data Analysis

The level of gene richness and genetic diversity within the population is reflected in the average number of alleles (Na) and effective number of alleles (N) among the genetic diversity parameters. The proportion of genotypic heterozygosity in the population was evaluated using the following metrics: expected heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and unbiased heterozygosity (uHe). The Shannon Information Index (I) is a measure of the complexity of genotypes and gene frequencies within a population. Utilizing GenAlEx 6.51 software [17], we conducted an analysis of the genetic diversity of A. nanus populations and computed numerous population-level genetic diversity parameters in this investigation. A molecular analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to disentangle the sources of genetic variance, and principal component analysis (PCoA) was employed to generate Nei genetic distances and gene flow matrices between populations. Additionally, a phylogenetic tree of A. nanus was generated using MEGA 11 software [18]. The following parameters were assessed: number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), Shannon index (I), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), gene flow (Nm), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe), fixation index (F), and index of genetic differentiation (Fst). Utilizing the allele frequency analysis function of CERVUS 3.0.7 software [19], fundamental parameters, including polymorphic information content, were assessed after the sequencing results of 15 pairs of microsatellite primers were analyzed.
Fis, Fit, and Fst are critical parameters for evaluating the extent of genetic differentiation among populations. The Fst index, which is the most frequently employed index, is capable of accurately representing the heterozygosity of alleles in a population. The genetic structure of the populations is entirely consistent and there is no genetic differentiation when the value of Fst is 0, whereas when the value of Fst is 1, it indicates that there is complete differentiation among the populations. In general, the genetic differentiation among populations is not obvious and can be disregarded when the value of Fst is between 0 and 0.05. The genetic differentiation among the populations is moderate when the value of Fst is between 0.05 and 0.15. The genetic differentiation among the populations is large when the value of Fst is between 0.15 and 0.25. The genetic differentiation among the populations is very large when the value of Fst is greater than 0.25.
The software Bottleneek v 1.2.02 [20] was employed to determine whether A. nanus populations had recently encountered bottleneck effects. The two-phased model of mutation (TPM) was selected as the computational model. In order to identify A. nanus, the Wilcoxon marking test and the sign test were implemented. The assay’s accuracy was guaranteed by setting the number of calculations to 10,000 [21]. This was further enhanced by examining whether the heterozygosity excess was substantial within each population and whether it experienced a bottleneck effect using a graphical representation of pattern migration.
A total of 11 topographic variables (Table 3) and 25 climatic variables (Table 4) were chosen as alternative variables for the model, with the climatic variables being sourced from the WorldClim database [22], on the basis of the field survey and historical literature references [23]. The elevation, slope, and slope direction variables were determined from the 30 m resolution DEM data that were obtained from the Geospatial Data Cloud Platform of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Computer Network Information Center (CNIC) [24]. The distance to rivers was calculated using Euclidean distance by downloading 1:1 million national river data, and the elevation, slope, and slope direction variables were calculated using DEM data with a 30 m resolution downloaded from the Geospatial Data Cloud Platform of the Computer Network Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CNIC). The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was adopted from the 30 m yearly maximum NDVI data in China from 2000 to 2020, produced by the remote sensing team of land use and global change at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Resources of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGRS) [25].
The 36 environmental variable layers’ raster size, unified coordinate system, and layer boundaries were unified and cropped in ArcGIS V 10.8 software in accordance with the administrative boundaries of the Xinjiang Region. The autocorrelation analysis of the 36 variables was conducted using the R package “vif” to eliminate the 16 variables with high correlation and retain the other 20 variables for the subsequent analysis [26].
Mantel tests permit assessment of the correlation between genetic differentiation and geographic distance and the analysis of multivariate data [27]. Redundancy analysis is primarily pertinent to the analysis of linear relationships and can effectively manage and analyze complex datasets that contain a large number of genetic markers and environmental predictors. Two methods of analysis were employed to examine the correlation between environmental factors and genetic diversity.
The genetic diversity of Rough Stemmed Bully in the four main deserts was correlated with each environmental factor using the R package “linkET” in the Mantel test [28]. The R package “ggplot2” was employed to generate the graphs [29]. The statistical significance of the edges was indicated by the hue, while the width of the edges corresponded to the Mantel’s r statistic for the corresponding distance correlation. The genetic diversity index was selected as the genetic factor for the redundancy analysis, alongside climatic data and geographic data (latitude and longitude of the sampling site). The R package “vegan” was employed to conduct a redundancy analysis (Table 5) [30].

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity Analysis of A. nanus

Using 15 pairs of SSR primers, an analysis of 129 samples collected from eight populations was conducted. The results indicated that the 15 primer pairs contained a total of 227 alleles, and the number of alleles varied substantially across the loci, ranging from a minimum of 3 (F14 and F15) to a maximum of 45 (F4). These loci were highly polymorphic in the population, as evidenced by the mean number of alleles, which was 17. The majority of the loci exhibited a high level of total genetic diversity, with a mean value of 0.503 and a range of total genetic diversity (Ht) from 0.007 (F15) to 0.957 (F4). This indicates that the population had a significant level of genetic diversity. The expected heterozygosity (He) is indicative of the anticipated frequency of heterozygotes in the population, and a high level of genetic diversity was exhibited, with a mean value of 0.405. The observed heterozygosity (Ho), which is the actual observed frequency of heterozygotes, had a mean value of 0.232. This value is typically lower than the expected heterozygosity, which may be attributed to heterozygous deletions caused by inbreeding or genetic drift.
The value of Fis is indicative of the population’s degree of heterozygote deletion within the population. The average Fis value was 0.586, which suggested that heterozygous deletions were present in the majority of the loci. Positive values are indicative of heterozygous deletions. The average fit value was 0.658, which suggested that there was a degree of genetic differentiation among populations. The average Fst value was 0.199, which indicated that the differentiation among populations accounted for a proportion of the total genetic variation. This value is used to characterize the proportion of genetic variation among populations. The Nm value is a metric that is employed to estimate gene flow and represents the number of individuals that migrate between populations. The average effective number of migrants was 2.196, which may suggest that there exists a certain amount of genetic exchange between populations. The PIC value is employed to quantify the polymorphism of genetic markers, with higher values suggesting that the genetic markers are more beneficial. The average PIC value was 0.509, suggesting that these markers have a higher level of information content for genetic analysis (Table 6).
The extent of genetic variation was demonstrated by the fact that the number of effective alleles (Na) varied from 1.667 (Pop 2) to 9.467 (Pop 6) in the eight populations that were collected. In the field of population genetics, the effective population size (Ne) is a critical parameter that reflects the genetic diversity of the population and the impact of genetic drift. The Ne values varied from 0.347 (Pop 2) to 1.468 (Pop 6). The Shannon Information Index (I) is a metric that reflects the diversity of allelic variants within a population, with values ranging from 0.543 (Pop 4) to 1.203 (Pop 7). The proportion of heterozygotes that are genuinely observed in a sample is known as observed heterozygosity (Ho). The values of Ho for different populations ranged from 0.134 (Pop 8) to 0.389 (Pop 6). The expected proportion of heterozygotes (He) is determined by the allele frequencies. It ranged from 0.292 (Pop 4) to 0.578 (Pop 6). Another measure of the expected proportion of heterozygotes is unweighted expected heterozygosity (uHe), which ranged from 0.333 (Pop 4) to 0.595 (Pop 6). The informational value of genetic markers in population genetics investigations is quantified by polymorphic information content (F), which ranged from 0.355 (Pop 4) to 0.754 (Pop 7). The percentage of private alleles (PPB) is the proportion of alleles that are exclusive to a specific population. The PPB values for the studied populations ranged from 33.33% (Pop 2 and Pop 3) to 100.00% (Pop 7). Particularly, the mean value of 74.17% suggests that the diverse natural populations of A. nanus possess more exclusive alleles. The genetic adaptability and uniqueness of the populations may be suggested by the presence of private alleles and genetic differentiation among populations. Special conservation measures may be necessary to preserve the genetic diversity of populations with high PPB values. Furthermore, the presence of higher He and uHe values suggests that these populations possess a greater degree of genetic variation, which is crucial for the long-term survival of the population and the facilitation of adaptive evolution (Table 7).

3.2. Genetic Relationship and Population Structure Analysis

Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) is used to analyze and illustrate the similarities or distances between individuals or populations. Figure 2 displays the PCoA results for the 129 studied A. nanus samples. The genetic distances between populations can be estimated by examining the differences in distributions on the axes. The PCoA can be used to observe the genetic clustering of various populations. The eight populations of A. nanus were not clearly classified, but they exhibited a certain degree of regularity, which is representative of a local clustering trend. Populations 1, 6, 7, and 8 exhibited clustering.
On the other hand, Structure Harvester was used to evaluate the population’s genetic composition. The number of groupings is denoted by K in Bayesian cluster analysis. The population is most likely to be divided into six genetically relatively independent groups, as our calculation yielded K = 6 (Figure 3). The structure clustering plot from K = 2 to K = 8 indicated that the populations of A. nanus exhibited various levels of genetic exchange (Figure 4).
Nei genetic distance (Table 8) and Fst values (Table 9) are measures of genetic differences between populations. Differences in allele frequencies are the basis for their computation. It is feasible to assess the critical parameters of genetic disparities and population similarity through their utilization. Based on these two matrices, we discovered that the genetic distance between Pop 6 and Pop 1 was the smallest, suggesting that they are genetically the least distinct. The genetic distance between Pop 2 and Pop 7 was the greatest, suggesting that they are the most genetically distinct. The relatively large genetic distance between Pop 8 and all other populations suggested that it is genetically distinct from the other populations in a substantial manner (Figure 5).
The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method was employed to construct phylogenetic trees between 129 A. nanus samples using MEGA11 v11.0.13 software. The evolutionary relationships between individuals were investigated by minimizing the sum of the distances between all nearest neighbors in the tree. The results were also consistent with those of previous PCoA and structure analyses. Each population contained a certain degree of intermixing (Figure 6).
AMOVA analyses enabled a more precise evaluation of the extent of genetic differentiation among various populations of A. nanus and the determination of its percentage of the total genetic variance (Table 10). Only 1% of the variation in the 129 samples collected from the eight populations was attributed to population differences. Within-population variation accounted for the overwhelming majority (99%) of the variation. Between-individual variation accounted for up to 77% of the variation, while intra-individual variation accounted for an additional 22%.
The Wilcoxon’s signed-rank p-value test demonstrated that the TPM model maintained a “L” distribution pattern for all eight populations of A. nanus. This suggests that the genetic structure of A. nanus is comparatively stable and has not been subjected to any bottleneck effects in the recent past (Table 11).

3.3. A. nanus Relationship Between Genetic Diversity and Environmental Factors

To explore the associations between environmental factors and genetic diversity in A. nanus, we employed the Mantel test to evaluate the correlation between genetic differentiation and geographic distance, and explore evolutionary hypotheses and analyze multivariate data. The genetic diversity index of A. nanus was correlated with SSR molecular markers and environmental factors, as evidenced by the Mantel test results. A significant correlation was observed between observed heterozygosity (Ho) and longitude, suggesting that geographic location may be a significant factor in the regulation of Shannon Information Index in A. nanus populations. It was also found that anticipated heterozygosity (He) and Shannon Information Index (I) would exhibit a significant correlation with the daily mean temperature range. In January, wind speed exhibited significant correlations (p < 0.01) with effective population size (Ne), expected heterozygosity (He), and Shannon Information Index (I) (Figure 7).
In order to investigate the direct and indirect relationships between variables, we also used redundancy analysis to explore the association between genetic variation and specific environmental factors. The results of RDA analysis showed that wind speed had a very significant effect on genetic variation in A. nanus, which was similar to the results of the Mantel test. The other sections also showed that longitude, solar radiation, precipitation, and vegetation cover all had an effect on genetic variation (Figure 8).
In order to find out more about the effect of wind speed on the genetic diversity of A. nanus, we used bilinear analysis to create Figure 9. The figure includes six sub-figures that show the association between wind speed and different genetic diversity indicators.
The figure shows that Na revealed a certain upward trend as wind speed increased. The fitted curve of wind speed (red points) in July shows a more significant positive correlation (p = 0.028). Ne showed a similar signal; however, the correlation was relatively weak (p = 0.046). The relationship between Ho and wind speed was more complicated. The fitted curve of wind speed in July had a trend of increasing and then decreasing, as well as a trend of increasing and then decreasing. The correlation between wind speed and Ho in January was not significant (p = 0.47), but the fitted curve for wind speed in July exhibited an increasing and then decreasing trend. On the one hand, the relationship between Ho and wind speed was more complicated. On the other hand, He and I showed a trend toward higher wind speed, though the correlation was not particularly strong.
These findings give more proof supporting the results we reached based on the Mantel test and RDA analysis. The genetic diversity of A. nanus was significantly influenced by wind speed, and the response of various genetic diversity indicators to wind speed varied accordingly. This supplies more intuitive evidence to help with an expanded understanding of the process in which environmental factors affect the genetic structure and diversity of A. nanus.

4. Discussion

The significance of genetic diversity in the preservation of habitat diversity and species diversity is now widely acknowledged [31]. Additionally, genetic diversity is acknowledged as a critical element of species resistance and ecosystem resilience. Modern molecular biology has provided us with a greater number of methods to acquire information [32]. Molecular marker technology is considered one of the most effective bases for determination in the conservation and identification of rare and endangered plants [33]. The utilization of EST-SSR molecular markers to examine the genetic diversity and structure of A. nanus will not only facilitate our comprehension of the mechanism of endangerment of A. nanus, but also serve as a valuable genetic foundation for the development of conservation strategies and management units.
It is obvious that the genetic diversity of A. nanus is closely linked with its endangerment process when the historical research is compared to the genetic diversity indicators in the present study [34]. Genetic differentiation and diversity loss have been severely exacerbated by habitat fragmentation, which has impeded gene exchange between populations. This not only restricts the adaptive evolution of populations but also elevates the likelihood of harmful recessive gene purity [35]. Conducting a comprehensive examination of this association will enable us to identify the primary factors that are responsible for the decrease in their genetic diversity [36]. The scientific foundation for the development of effective conservation measures, such as the establishment of ecological corridors to facilitate gene flow and the protection of critical habitats to maintain population size, will be established by identifying the specific gene loci or genetic processes in A. nanus that have been negatively impacted by human activities or environmental changes in order to ensure the continued existence of A. nanus and to reverse the decline in its genetic diversity.
Unfortunately, A. nanus is endangered as a consequence of the disaster of its natural habitat, human disturbance, and the limited extent of its range [37]. This has led to a decrease in populations and an elevated risk of genetic drift and inbreeding [38]. Research shows that endangered species are frequently associated with diminished genetic diversity, which renders them more susceptible to environmental changes and increases the susceptibility of populations to threats such as disease and climate change [39]. In the instance of A. nanus, the absence of genetic diversity may result in small populations struggling to produce sufficient genetic variation to deal with new environmental challenges, including altering precipitation patterns and increasing temperatures. Therefore, genetic diversity research is essential for the evaluation of the extent of endangerment and the development of scientific conservation strategies. Comprehending the current level of genetic diversity will enable potential genetic risks to be identified in a timely manner, and targeted measures can thereby be implemented to prevent further loss of genetic diversity [40].
A. nanus, an ancient relic species from the Tertiary period, has undergone a protracted period of geological and climatic changes. This antiquity has allowed it to accumulate distinctive genetic information [41]. It has adapted to the complex and variable environment of Central Asia throughout its evolutionary voyage. The genetic material of A. nanus frequently exhibits a protracted process of adaptation, which leads to specific gene combinations and allele distribution patterns [42]. Investigation of the genetic diversity of A. nanus will contribute to the understanding of its mechanisms of conservation and the evolution of its archaic genetic information. Additionally, it will facilitate comprehension of which distinctive genetic characteristics have been preserved and enhanced through extended periods of natural selection. The findings of this significant investigation may also offer valuable insights into the evolutionary trajectory of relict plants in the ancient Mediterranean. The genetic underpinnings of A. nanus’s adaptations to its primordial environment can be elucidated through the examination of the diversity of wild populations. This analysis will also establish a foundation for predicting the species’ capacity to adapt to future environmental changes.
In our previous research on A. nanus, we analyzed the genetic diversity of A. nanus under the condition of translocation conservation using transcriptome sequencing, established EST-SSR markers, and analyzed the efficacy of ex situ conservation in A. nanus. Our findings indicate that the current ex situ conservation of A. nanus requires reinforcement, and the majority of the germplasm resources are not included in the translocation conservation [22]. However, the genetic structure and diversity of A. nanus’s wild populations have not been thoroughly investigated. In order to ensure the preservation of endangered species, it is imperative that we assess the prospective genetic diversity of populations [43]. Genetic diversity is frequently weakened in threatened or range-restricted species, which requires analysis of the genetic structure and diversity of their natural populations.
ISSR molecular markers have been used to measure the genetic diversity and differentiation levels of 120 materials from six populations of A. nanus in previous research [44]. The results showed that there were significant barriers to gene flow among populations, high genetic divergence among populations, and high genetic similarity among individuals within A. nanus populations. We discovered that the genetic diversity of A. nanus have decreased gradually over time, which suggests that the unique genetic resources of A. nanus are decreasing. This exhibits a significant challenge for endangered and protected plants with limited distribution ranges. The present research is more representative of the overall genetic status of A. nanus and has a wider coverage than previous studies, which have had limited sample collections. EST-SSR markers are highly variable and highly accurate, which can more accurately supply genetic differences within and among populations in the context of research methodology. The polymorphism of various loci was elucidated, and 227 alleles were identified by analyzing 15 pairs of EST-SSR primers in this research.
It is interesting to note that when all existing A. nanus populations were evaluated for genetic diversity in this study using EST-SSR, genetic differentiation between populations was not significant, and the main genetic differences existed between individuals. This may stem from the conserved nature of expressed sequence tags, and the genetic similarity shown in A. nanus for adaptation to microclimates. Bottleneck analyses also showed this, with A. nanus having a relatively stable genetic structure.
Morphology and essential ecological surveys were the constraints that have limited previous investigations, making them incapable of supplying information about the potential genetic diversity and population structure of the species [45]. Our research was able to capture more subtle genetic differences among populations as a result of the expansion of the sample range, which is necessary for the development of precise conservation strategies. The conclusions of genetic analyses indicate that our survey identified only six populations of A. nanus in the wild, and the natural population differentiation of A. nanus appears to be limited. This may be due to the longer lifespan of individuals and a lower turnover of offspring. The results of this study suggest that special conservation measures, such as increased captive breeding and gene introgression, can be applied for enhancing genetic diversity in populations with low genetic diversity.
The establishment of nature reserves is of great significance as it can provide these populations with a relatively stable living environment, effectively reducing external disturbances and preventing further isolation and loss of genetic diversity that may result from habitat destruction and human activities [46]. For Population 2, which exhibited low genetic diversity, the establishment of a protected area is crucial for safeguarding its existing gene pool. This could prevent the loss of its unique alleles due to habitat fragmentation or excessive human exploitation, thereby maintaining its survival and reproduction capabilities in the natural environment and facilitating the natural recovery of the population and gene exchange.
From the angle of population propagation, A. nanus is confronted with difficulties in the form of a lack of natural regeneration and a declining population size in the wild [47]. Notably, the effective population size of certain populations is rather small. For instance, the effective population size of Population 2 was found to be only 0.347. Manual breeding collection strategies can play a vital role in increasing the population size and expanding the gene pool. During the seed collection process, particular attention should be paid to collecting seeds from diverse populations to fully capitalize on the genetic differences among them and enhance the genetic diversity of the offspring. For example, seeds from populations with high genetic diversity, such as Population 6, can be rationally mixed with those from other populations for breeding purposes. This approach can introduce novel gene combinations, improve the adaptability of the entire species to environmental changes, mitigate the genetic risks associated with inbreeding, and enhance the survival and vitality of the populations [48].
Multiple points of observation can be established between different populations to improve gene flow. When samples are collected on a regular basis for genetic analysis, the genetic data from different periods can be compared to evaluate the direction and intensity of gene flow. At the same time, ecological corridors are established between populations, and the corridors are planted with companion plants that A. nanus prefers in order to establish favorable conditions for gene exchange. Significant emphasis should be placed on the choosing of individuals with representative genotypes, excellent health, and a diverse genetic history for artificial breeding. In order to avoid inbreeding, the breeding group’s size should be limited during the reproductive process. Breeding regions should be chosen in locations with climatic conditions that are equivalent to A. nanus’s native habitat. Regular health exams and growth records of breeding individuals should be conducted by professional conservationists, and the systematic development of captive growth should be ensured. The overall feasibility and efficacy of conservation measures should be improved.
Resequencing technology will be employed to screen the primary germplasm resources of A. nanus in the following stage of our research. Through the resequencing analysis of A. nanus in a number of ecological environments and geographic regions, we will establish the ability to perform an extensive review of the genetic differentiation mechanisms and the evolutionary history of its populations. A detailed genetic map of A. nanus can be created based on the significant genetic data obtained from resequencing. This offers empirical evidence to support the scientific development of the biological evolution theory. These main germplasm resources will serve as valuable resources for the subsequent conservation and utilization of A. nanus, which guarantees the species’ future viability and evolutionary potential.
Regarding natural factors, it has been determined that wind speed exerts an extremely significant influence on the genetic variation of A. nanus. Additionally, longitude, solar radiation, precipitation, and vegetation coverage also have notable effects. In the process of conservation, areas characterized by relatively suitable wind speed, favorable climatic conditions, and good vegetation coverage should be selected as key conservation and restoration zones. During vegetation restoration efforts, it is essential to create a microenvironment conducive to the growth and reproduction of A. nanus. This can help to reduce the continuous impact of adverse environmental factors on its genetic diversity and assist in maintaining a stable genetic structure and high adaptability [49].
It is important to note that although our study did not directly investigate the impacts of pests and diseases on the genetic diversity of A. nanus, considering its small population size and the endangered status of some populations, any infestation by pests and diseases could potentially cause severe damage to its genetic diversity [50]. Therefore, the establishment of a pest and disease monitoring system is of utmost importance. This system should be capable of promptly detecting and effectively dealing with such problems to protect the integrity and genetic stability of its populations. Regular inspections of the health status of A. nanus plants and the utilization of environmentally friendly pest control methods, such as biological control or low-toxicity pesticides, are necessary to ensure the healthy growth of populations and avoid sudden population declines and genetic information loss due to pests and diseases [51].
International cooperation holds great promise for expanding genetic resources through the introduction of seed resources from different populations in other countries [52]. Given the endangered status of A. nanus and its limited genetic resources, international cooperation can introduce the genetic resources of A. nanus from regions like Kyrgyzstan to enrich its gene pool [53]. By collaborating with international research institutions, sharing research findings and genetic materials, and learning advanced conservation techniques and experiences, novel ideas and methods for the conservation of A. nanus can be developed. This could enhance its ability to cope with environmental changes and genetic risks and promote its status and role in global biodiversity conservation [54].

5. Conclusions

The genetic diversity and population structure of A. nanus were accurately analyzed using EST-SSR markers in this research, and the effects of environmental factors were investigated. Results showed that A. nanus populations exhibited a significant degree of genetic diversity, as evidenced by the identification of 227 alleles by 15 pairs of SSR primers and the high diversity at each locus. However, the observed heterozygosity was lower than the projected heterozygosity. Eight populations could be classified into six relatively independent groups, with a certain proportion of inter-population differentiation. The intra-population variation accounted for the majority of the total variance, and the genetic structure was found to be relatively stable in the recent past. Also, longitude, solar radiation, precipitation, and vegetation cover, in addition to wind speed, were found to significantly affect genetic variation in A. nanus.
These research findings lay a solid foundation for subsequent conservation work, enabling it to be carried out precisely. By integrating multiple strategies, the genetic resources and ecological niche of A. nanus can be effectively protected, contributing to the stable continuation of the A. nanus population and the maintenance of ecological balance. The protection of genetic diversity and the reduction of external disturbances can be accomplished through the establishment of nature reserves. The genetic diversity of the population can be expanded through the setting up of an artificial reproduction collection strategy. The impact of unfavorable environmental factors can be lessened by selecting suitable places for focused conservation and restoration. Population health and genetic stability can be conserved through the use of pest and disease monitoring systems. In the meantime, the collection of genes can be expanded through international cooperation that includes the sharing of genetic resources and other methods. This will enhance the status of A. nanus in the conservation of global biodiversity. Future research may expand the sample range and carry out a deeper investigation of the specific mechanisms by which environmental factors effect genetic diversity. This will offer a more comprehensive scientific basis for the sustainable government and conservation of A. nanus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.S. and J.W.; Data curation, X.L.; Formal analysis, D.Z.; Funding acquisition, W.S.; Investigation, X.W.; Methodology, T.L.; Software, M.W.; Validation, J.L. (Jiayi Lu) and S.L.; Writing—original draft, J.L. (Jingdian Liu) and M.W.; Writing—review and editing, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bayingolin Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture Wild Plant Resources Benthic Survey Project (DZXJZB2024059) and The Second Comprehensive Scientific Study of the Tibetan Plateau: Survey Evaluation of Saussurea involucrata and Ammopiptanthus nanus (2019QZKK05020207).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ramanatha, R.V.; Hodgkin, T. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 68, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salgotra, R.K.; Chauhan, B.S. Genetic diversity, conservation, and utilization of plant genetic resources. Genes 2023, 14, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hamrick, J.L.; Godt, M.W. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1996, 351, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu, L. The Red Book of Chinese Plants: Rare and Endangered Plants; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992; Volume 1, p. 256. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Shi, W.; Su, Z.; Pan, B.; Wu, S. Using DNA data to determine the taxonomic status of Ammopiptanthus kamelinii in Kyrgyzstan (Thermopsideae, Leguminosae). Phytotaxa 2018, 360, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, X.; Yuan, L. A preliminary investigation on the cultivation technology and garden application of Ammopiptanthus nanus introduction. J. Tarim Univ. 2016, 28, 88–94, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, M.; Wu, S.; Pan, B.; Wang, D. Geographical distribution and habitat characteristics of Ammopiptanthus in China. Geogr. Arid Reg. 2017, 40, 380–387. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, C.; Yu, Q.; Li, A. Progress and Prospects of Research on the Solanaceous Plant Ammopiptanthus. Chin. Wild Plant Resour. 2004, 5, 21–23, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Yin, L.K.; Wang, Y. Biological Characterization of Flowering in Ammopiptanthus. Chin. Bull. Bot. 1993, 2, 54–56, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, Y.; He, Q.; Wang, X.; Xu, M.; Mishima, S.; Wang, X.; Yu, L.; Feng, X.; Ando, Y.; Huang, S.; et al. Research on the growth and renewal status of natural Ammopiptanthus and prospects for its utilization. Ningxia Agric. For. Sci. Technol. 2004, 3, 28–31, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, W. Studies on the Chemical Composition of Ammopiptanthus. Master’s Thesis, Xinjiang Normal University, Ürümqi, China, 2011. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, Y. Transcriptomics-Based Response to Drought Stress in Ammopiptanthus Nanus Seedling and Functional Studies of AnEXPA1 and AnEXPA2. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2020. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Shi, W.; Pan, B.; Zhang, Q. Comparison of the content of 15 inorganic elements in leaves of Saxifraga saxifraga in Xinjiang and Saxifraga saxifraga in Mongolia and their habitat soils. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2009, 15, 660–665. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boccacci, P.; Aramini, M.; Ordidge, M.; van Hintum, T.J.L.; Marinoni, D.T.; Valentini, N.; Sarraquigne, J.P.; Solar, A.; Rovira, M.; Bacchetta, L. Comparison of selection methods for the establishment of a core collection using SSR markers for hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) accessions from European germ plasm repositories. Tree Genet. Genomes 2021, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Z.; Bo, W.; An, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z. Differences of EST-SSR and genomic-SSR markers in assessing genetic diversity in poplar. For. Stud. China 2012, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, T.; Wang, J.; Shi, W. Identification of the efficacy of ex situ conservation of Ammopiptanthus nanus based on its ETS-SSR markers. Plants 2023, 12, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Peakall, R.O.D.; Smouse, P.E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalinowski, S.T.; Taper, M.L.; Marshall, T.C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 1099–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Peery, M.Z.; Kirby, R.; Reid, B.N.; Stoelting, R.; Doucet-Bëer, E.; Robinson, S.; Vásquez-Carrillo, C.; Pauli, J.N.; Palsbøll, P.J. Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 3403–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Campoy, J.A.; Lerigoleur-Balsemin, E.; Christmann, H.; Beauvieux, R.; Girollet, N.; Quero-García, J.; Dirlewanger, E.; Barreneche, T. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, population structure and construction of a core collection of Prunus avium L. landraces and bred cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shi, W.; Liu, P.L.; Duan, L.; Pan, B.; Su, Z. Evolutionary response to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau uplift: Phylogeny and biogeography of Ammopiptanthus and tribe Thermopsideae (Fabaceae). PeerJ 2017, 5, e3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. The Data Set Is Provided by Geospatial Data Cloud Site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Available online: http://www.gscloud.cn (accessed on 10 July 2024).
  25. Yang, J.; Dong, J.; Xiao, X.; Dai, J.; Wu, C.; Xia, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, M.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Divergent shifts in peak photosynthesis timing of temperate and alpine grasslands in China. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 233, 111395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Imdadullah, M.; Aslam, M.; Altaf, S. mctest: An R Package for Detection of Collinearity among Regressors. R J. 2016, 8, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diniz-Filho, J.A.; Soares, T.N.; Lima, J.S.; Dobrovolski, R.; Landeiro, V.L.; Telles, M.P.; Rangel, T.F.; Bini, L.M. Mantel test in population genetics. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2013, 36, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, H. LinkET: Everything Is Linkable. R Package, Version 0.0.3, Github Repository: Shenzhen, China, 2021. Available online: https://github.com/Hy4m/linkET (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  29. Wickham, H.; Chang, W.; Wickham, M.H. Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Version 2016, 2, 1–89. [Google Scholar]
  30. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.; Wagner, H.; et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package. Version 2013, 2, 1–295. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yin, J.; Zhang, J. Several Common Genetic Markers Methods Applied in the Research of Genetic Evolution. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2007, 35, 10965–10968. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wei, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Ma, Q.; Wang, J.; Shi, W. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis of Zygophyllum loczyi in Northwest China’s Deserts Based on the Resequencing of the Genome. Genes 2023, 14, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Niu, Y.L.; Bhatt, A.; Peng, Y.; Chen, W.; Gao, Y.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, W.; Song, M.; Yu, Z. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of Emmenopterys henryi Oliv., an endangered relic species endemic to China. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Duan, Y.; Zhang, K. Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic Evolution of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Ammopiptanthus. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2020, 40, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar]
  35. Barragan, A.C.; Collenberg, M.; Schwab, R.; Kersten, S.; Kerstens, M.H.; Požárová, D.; Bezrukov, I.; Bemm, F.; Kolár, F.; Weigel, D. Deleterious phenotypes in wild Arabidopsis arenosa populations are common and linked to runs of homozygosity. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2024, 14, jkad290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Govindaraj, M.; Vetriventhan, M.; Srinivasan, M. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int. 2015, 1, 431487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Si, S.; Li, X.; Long, L. Plant Diversity and its Conservation Countermeasures in the Desertified Areas of Northern China. J. Desert Res. 1999, 19, 272–277. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jain, S.K. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1976, 1, 469–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carr, D.E.; Dudash, M.R. Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wu, F.Q.; Shen, S.K.; Zhang, X.J.; Wang, Y.H.; Sun, W.B. Genetic diversity and population structure of an extremely endangered species: The world’s largest Rhododendron. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plu082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, Z.; Wang, J. Research progress on the causes of endangered dwarf A. nanus and conservation strategies. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 675, 187+190, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  42. Feng, L.; Teng, F.; Li, N.; Zhang, J.C.; Zhang, B.J.; Tsai, S.N.; Yue, X.L.; Gu, L.F.; Meng, G.H.; Deng, T.Q.; et al. A reference-grade genome of the xerophyte Ammopiptanthus mongolicus sheds light on its evolution history in legumes and drought-tolerance mechanisms. Plant Commun. 2024, 5, 100891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schemske, D.W.; Husband, B.C.; Ruckelshaus, M.H.; Goodwillie, C.; Parker, I.M.; Bishop, J.G. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 1994, 1, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, A.; Ma, M.; Li, H.; He, S.; Wang, S. Genetic Diversity and Population Differentiation of a Chinese Endangered Plant Ammopiptanthus nanus (M. Pop.) Cheng f. Genes 2023, 14, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hao, W.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Research progress on rare and endangered plant Ammopiptanthus nanus. Plant Sci. J. 2019, 37, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
  46. Järvinen, O. Conservation of endangered plant populations: Single large or several small reserves? Oikos 1982, 1, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, P.; Yong, X.; Hu, G.; Lv, T.; Jiao, P. RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity of the endangered plant Ammopiptanthus nanus. Arid. Zone Resour. Environ. 2016, 30, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nebot, A.; Cogoni, D.; Fenu, G.; Bacchetta, G. Breeding system and inbreeding depression in a translocated population of the endangered plant Dianthus morisianus (Caryophyllaceae). Flora 2020, 262, 151488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, C.J.; Wan, J.Z.; Mu, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.X. Management planning for endangered plant species in priority protected areas. Biodivers. Conserv. 2015, 24, 2383–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chadès, I.; Martin, T.G.; Nicol, S.; Burgman, M.A.; Possingham, H.P.; Buckley, Y.M. General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8323–8328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. McCallum, H.; Dobson, A. Detecting disease and parasite threats to endangered species and ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sajeva, M.; Carimi, F.; McGough, N. The convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (CITES) and its role in conservation of cacti and other succulent plants. Funct. Ecosyst. Communities 2007, 1, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shi, W.; Su, Z.H.; Liu, P.L.; Pan, B.R.; Zhao, Y.F.; Wang, J.C. Molecular, Karyotypic, and Morphological Evidence for Ammopiptanthus (Fabaceae) Taxonomy1. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2017, 102, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brooks, T.M.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Da Fonseca, G.A.; Gerlach, J.; Hoffmann, M.; Lamoreux, J.F.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Pilgrim, J.D.; Rodrigues, A.S. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 2006, 313, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution point and elevation data from 8 A. nanus populations.
Figure 1. Distribution point and elevation data from 8 A. nanus populations.
Biology 14 00105 g001
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of 129 A. nanus base on genetic distance.
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of 129 A. nanus base on genetic distance.
Biology 14 00105 g002
Figure 3. Bayesian model-based genetic structure analysis of A. nanus. The blue dots show the Delta K values corresponding to different K values. The red vertical line marks the peak of Delta K at K = 6.
Figure 3. Bayesian model-based genetic structure analysis of A. nanus. The blue dots show the Delta K values corresponding to different K values. The red vertical line marks the peak of Delta K at K = 6.
Biology 14 00105 g003
Figure 4. Ancestral clustering for K = 2 to K = 8. Each A. nanus individual is expressed as a line segment, where black lines are used to distinguish from 8 different populations. Different colors represent different clustering groups. For example, at K = 2, there are only two colors (e.g., blue and orange), indicating that all individuals are divided roughly into two clustering groups. When K = 3, a third color (e.g., purple) is present, which indicates that individuals are divided into three clustering groups, and so on.
Figure 4. Ancestral clustering for K = 2 to K = 8. Each A. nanus individual is expressed as a line segment, where black lines are used to distinguish from 8 different populations. Different colors represent different clustering groups. For example, at K = 2, there are only two colors (e.g., blue and orange), indicating that all individuals are divided roughly into two clustering groups. When K = 3, a third color (e.g., purple) is present, which indicates that individuals are divided into three clustering groups, and so on.
Biology 14 00105 g004
Figure 5. Pairwise population matrix of Nei genetic distance and Fst values of A. nanus populations.
Figure 5. Pairwise population matrix of Nei genetic distance and Fst values of A. nanus populations.
Biology 14 00105 g005
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of 129 A. nanus samples. Different colors represent different populations.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of 129 A. nanus samples. Different colors represent different populations.
Biology 14 00105 g006
Figure 7. Mantel test of A. nanus based on SSR molecular markers. An asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance: * represents statistical significance at the 95% confidence level (p-value < 0.05), ** at the 99% confidence level (p-value < 0.01), and *** at the 99.9% confidence level (p-value < 0.001).
Figure 7. Mantel test of A. nanus based on SSR molecular markers. An asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance: * represents statistical significance at the 95% confidence level (p-value < 0.05), ** at the 99% confidence level (p-value < 0.01), and *** at the 99.9% confidence level (p-value < 0.001).
Biology 14 00105 g007
Figure 8. Redundancy analysis of A. nanus based on SSR molecular markers. On the horizontal axis, 92.91% of the data variance is explained, while on the vertical axis, 5.64% of the variance is revealed.
Figure 8. Redundancy analysis of A. nanus based on SSR molecular markers. On the horizontal axis, 92.91% of the data variance is explained, while on the vertical axis, 5.64% of the variance is revealed.
Biology 14 00105 g008
Figure 9. Bilinear analysis of the effect of wind speed on genetic diversity in A. nanus.
Figure 9. Bilinear analysis of the effect of wind speed on genetic diversity in A. nanus.
Biology 14 00105 g009
Table 1. A detailed distribution point and elevation data from different A. nanus populations.
Table 1. A detailed distribution point and elevation data from different A. nanus populations.
PopLatitudeLongitudeElevation
175.06375539.7019132157
274.97730539.7653732464
375.01199339.6946052200
475.00409339.7067622225
575.02119339.6565122093
675.31048739.8173382453
775.30339339.8250232485
875.58472739.8350072183
Table 2. EST-SSR primers sequence information for A. nanus.
Table 2. EST-SSR primers sequence information for A. nanus.
SSR Primer PairSSR Primer Sequence (5′-3′)Fluorescence Tag
c11315F:ACTGCACCTGTCCAGATTCC5′HEX
R:TTGATTCGCTGTCTCCCTCT
c23139F:AGCATGCATGTGCCTTTTTA5′HEX
R:ATCGGGAGAGCAACAGTACG
c23483F:AACGCGTCCCATTCTCTCT5′HEX
R:TCATCTTTCAAAAGGGGCAC
c23540F:GATCAGCTTCTCACCCGAAG5′HEX
R:TCTGGGTCTCTTGGCCTCTA
c24361F:AATGCATGATTGATTGTCACTG5′HEX
R:TTGCGGACTGCAACAATTAG
c24982F:CCGTCTTGCAGGTTTCAAGT5′HEX
R:TTACCGGCCATAGATTGAGG
c32449F:TCAATCTTCGTAGCTTTCCCA5′HEX
R:GCTCCAAAGTCCACCACATT
c34776F:CCACTTTGGCTCATTGCTTT5′HEX
R:CTGAAGGGAGTGTGGCATTT
c34960F:GACCCATCAAAACATGACCC5′HEX
R:GGACCTCAGGATGGTCAAGA
c35322F:TTGTTACAAAAGCCGATCCC5′HEX
R:TAGGAATGACTCCCACTGCC
c44083F:TGAAGAGACGCAATGGTGAG5′HEX
R:ATGCCCAACTTGGATAGTGC
c44298F:AGCTGTCTTCCCAGTACCGA5′HEX
R:ATGGTGAGCACAACCATGAA
c44674F:TAATTGACCTCGAACCTCCG5′HEX
R:TGGAGGAGAAGGGGGTTACT
c52855F:GAAAGGTTGGGGATTTTGGT5′HEX
R:AGTGGGTGAGGGTGAAACTG
c52997F:CAATATCCAAAGGTGGGGTG5′HEX
R:GCTACGTCTCGTGCTAGCCT
Table 3. Topographical factor information.
Table 3. Topographical factor information.
Factor CodeUnitDescribe
AltitudemAltitude (above sea level)
Slope°Slope of the earth’s surface
Aspect-Aspect of the earth’s surface
Soil_ph-PH value of soil (×10)
Soil_symbol-Type of soil
Sand%Percentage of sand soils in the soil
Silt%Percentage of silt soils in the soil
Clay%Percentage of clay soils in the soil
CLCD-China Land Cover Dataset
NDVI-Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
River-Euclidean distance from the river
Table 4. Bioclimatic factor information.
Table 4. Bioclimatic factor information.
Factor CodeUnitDescribe
Bio_1°CAnnual Mean Temperature
Bio_2°CMean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly (max temp–min temp))
Bio_3ratioIsothermality (BIO2/BIO7) (×100)
Bio_4standard deviationTemperature Seasonality (standard deviation ×100)
Bio_5°CMax Temperature of Warmest Month
Bio_6°CMin Temperature of Coldest Month
Bio_7°CTemperature Annual Range (BIO5-BIO6)
Bio_8°CMean Temperature of Wettest Quarter
Bio_9°CMean Temperature of Driest Quarter
Bio_10°CMean Temperature of Warmest Quarter
Bio_11°CMean Temperature of Coldest Quarter
Bio_12mmBIO12 = Annual Precipitation
Bio_13mmPrecipitation of Wettest Month
Bio_14mmPrecipitation of Driest Month
Bio_15coefficient of variationPrecipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)
Bio_16mmPrecipitation of Wettest Quarter
Bio_17mmPrecipitation of Driest Quarter
Bio_18mmPrecipitation of Warmest Quarter
Bio_19mmPrecipitation of Coldest Quarter
Srad_01kJ m−2 d−1Solar radiation in January
Srad_07kJ m−2 d−1Solar radiation in July
Wind_01M·s−1Wind speed in January
Wind_07M·s−1Wind speed in July
Vapr_01kPaWater vapor pressure in January
Vapr_07kPaWater vapor pressure in July
Table 5. VIFs of the remained variables.
Table 5. VIFs of the remained variables.
Serial NumberVariablesVIF
1Clay2.044992
2CLCD2.32225
3NDVI2.553379
4Slope2.337304
5Aspect1.008888
6River1.77
7Silt2.329704
8Soil_ph1.288701
9Soil_symbol2.343339
10Bio_136.116687
11Bio_145.201887
12Bio_159.157776
13Bio_165.16566
14Bio_174.412978
15Bio_187.540101
16Bio_197.859912
17Bio_207.236885
18Bio_218.331089
19Bio_225.92738
20Bio_235.764699
Table 6. Statistical values of microsatellite markers in 129 samples of A. nanus.
Table 6. Statistical values of microsatellite markers in 129 samples of A. nanus.
LocusNaHtMean HeMean HoFisFitFstNmPIC
F1280.9140.8570.6690.2200.2680.0623.7580.914
F2160.3190.2790.0670.7580.7890.1281.7070.39
F3320.8530.5630.670−0.1900.2150.3400.4860.824
F4450.9570.8650.5760.3350.3980.0962.3580.964
F5360.9200.8290.6440.2230.2990.0992.2870.918
F660.1480.1330.0170.8700.8830.1002.2570.166
F7100.4660.3060.0510.8350.8910.3420.4800.444
F8180.5610.4110.0990.7590.8230.2670.6850.527
F9100.3150.2390.0760.6800.7570.2420.7820.351
F10310.8470.7430.4520.3910.4660.1231.7860.859
F1170.1610.1420.0280.8030.8270.1181.8620.203
F1260.3770.2720.0140.9470.9620.2780.6490.365
F1340.5050.3150.1050.6660.7920.3760.4140.44
F1430.1890.1150.0001.0001.0000.3930.3850.252
F1530.0070.0070.0040.4890.4990.01913.0480.015
Mean170.5030.4050.2320.5860.6580.1992.1960.509
SE3.5790.084 0.076 0.072 0.086 0.070 0.032 0.816 0.080
Table 7. Summary of genetic statistics of 129 A. nanus species at population level.
Table 7. Summary of genetic statistics of 129 A. nanus species at population level.
PopNNaNeIHoHeuHeFPPB
125.5336.5334.2651.0310.2470.4430.4520.57673.33%
22.0001.6671.6440.3470.2330.2080.278−0.09333.33%
313.7334.4672.7310.8070.2190.3690.3830.53473.33%
44.0002.3332.1450.5430.2170.2920.3330.35546.67%
512.0005.4003.1550.9300.2390.3890.4060.41786.67%
617.9339.4674.9871.4680.3890.5780.5950.42486.67%
733.8008.5334.8261.2030.1740.5040.5120.754100.00%
816.8674.4002.8570.9220.1340.4580.4730.72793.33%
Mean15.7335.3503.3260.9060.2320.4050.4290.52474.17%
SE0.9060.5380.3440.0820.0290.0310.0320.0418.21%
Table 8. Pairwise matrix of Nei genetic distance of A. nanus populations.
Table 8. Pairwise matrix of Nei genetic distance of A. nanus populations.
Pop12345678
10.000
20.1460.000
30.1090.1140.000
40.1160.1420.1590.000
50.0840.1410.1690.1240.000
60.0550.1790.1640.1520.0910.000
70.1060.3130.2970.1910.1800.1350.000
80.2780.4650.3060.4440.4440.2930.2970.000
Table 9. Pairwise population Fst values of A. nanus populations.
Table 9. Pairwise population Fst values of A. nanus populations.
Pop12345678
10.000
20.1450.000
30.0720.1120.000
40.1040.1860.1400.000
50.0610.0960.0960.0760.000
60.0360.1370.0930.1030.0590.000
70.0700.1880.1420.1220.0960.0580.000
80.1340.2650.1590.2330.2010.1140.1120.000
Table 10. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of A. nanus.
Table 10. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of A. nanus.
SourceDFSSMSEst. Var.Proportion
Among Pops7109.60515.6580.0881%
Among Indiv1211569.54612.9715.66277%
Within Indiv129212.5001.6471.64722%
Total2571891.651 7.398100%
Table 11. Results of bottleneck effect in A. nanus populations, based on SSR markers.
Table 11. Results of bottleneck effect in A. nanus populations, based on SSR markers.
PopWilcoxon’s Signed-Rank Test (TPM)MODE-SHIFT
10.57715L-shaped
20.03125L-shaped
30.05371L-shaped
40.03906L-shaped
50.00305L-shaped
60.00671L-shaped
70.05536L-shaped
80.63673L-shaped
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Wei, M.; Lu, J.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Lu, T.; Shi, W. Ammopiptanthus nanus Population Dynamics: Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Variation and Ecological Distribution Patterns. Biology 2025, 14, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020105

AMA Style

Liu J, Wei M, Lu J, Liu S, Li X, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang D, Lu T, Shi W. Ammopiptanthus nanus Population Dynamics: Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Variation and Ecological Distribution Patterns. Biology. 2025; 14(2):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jingdian, Mengmeng Wei, Jiayi Lu, Shiqing Liu, Xuerong Li, Xiyong Wang, Jiancheng Wang, Daoyuan Zhang, Ting Lu, and Wei Shi. 2025. "Ammopiptanthus nanus Population Dynamics: Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Variation and Ecological Distribution Patterns" Biology 14, no. 2: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020105

APA Style

Liu, J., Wei, M., Lu, J., Liu, S., Li, X., Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, D., Lu, T., & Shi, W. (2025). Ammopiptanthus nanus Population Dynamics: Bridging the Gap Between Genetic Variation and Ecological Distribution Patterns. Biology, 14(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop