Next Article in Journal
A C/X/Ku/K-Band Precision Compact 6-Bit Digital Attenuator with Logic Control Circuits
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Performance Analysis of Vibration Prediction Using RNN Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
IoT-Inspired Reliable Irregularity-Detection Framework for Education 4.0 and Industry 4.0
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

Electronics 2022, 11(21), 3618; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213618
by Gnanavel Sakkarvarthi 1, Godfrey Winster Sathianesan 1,*, Vetri Selvan Murugan 2, Avulapalli Jayaram Reddy 3, Prabhu Jayagopal 3,* and Mahmoud Elsisi 4,5,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(21), 3618; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213618
Submission received: 8 October 2022 / Revised: 31 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 6 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reliable Industry 4.0 Based on Machine Learning and IoT)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

Gnanavel Sakkarvarthi, Godfrey Winster Sathianesan, Vetri Selvan murugan, Avulapalli Jayaram Reddy, Prabhu Jayagopal, and Mahmoud Elsisi

 

electronics-1987326

 

 

The proposed paper is focused on a deep learning approach for detection and classification of possible tomato crop disease. The authors propose an ad-hoc architecture and compare the results with state of the art neural networks such as VGG 19 and ResNet 152.

Due to the criticisms listed below, I recommend a rejection:

·         Several sentences are unclear or meaningless, see introduction, lines 41-43, 55-57, 60-62 and 65, for examples.

 

·         The State of the art section is very poor, I recommend the author to consider reviews about deep learning in clinical applications, some examples are listed below:

 

R. Zemouri, N. Zerhouni, and D. Racoceanu, “Deep learning in the biomedical applications: Recent and future status,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, 2019.

 

G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B. E. Bejnordi, A. A. Adiyoso Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J. A.W.M. van der Laak, B. van Ginneken, and C. I. S´anchez, “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017.

 

 

·         Most of the figures and graphs do not add any important information about the proposed framework (Figs. 3,4 and 6, for example).

 

·         Most of the figures present results of both training and validation tests. There is no need of include training losses and accuracies, typically just performances of test set are sufficient.

 

·         The novelty of the work seems to be very weak. Neither new technique or application is proposed, therefore, in my opinion, this study is barely considerable for a conference. My advice is to reduce the length of the paper removing all the negligible figures and submit this work to an appropriate conference.

 

 

 

Additional minor comments:

 

·         Please rearrange the position of tables and figures in order to increase the readability of the paper.

 

·         The paper requires a complete revision to be presented at an English conference or published in an English journal. It is recommended that the authors find a local professional or academic who shares their first language to assist them.

Author Response

Query Response

Title: Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

 

Reviewer 1 comments

S.No

Query

Response

1

·         Please rearrange the position of tables and figures in order to increase the readability of the paper.

Rearranged the position of tables and figures.

2

·         Several sentences are unclear or meaningless, see introduction, lines 41-43, 55-57, 60-62 and 65, for examples.

We have changed the meaningful sentence

 

Reviewer 2 Report

See comments reported in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Query Response

Title: Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

 

Reviewer 2 comments

S.No

Query

Response

1

Insert correct punctuation in the text

Corrected

2

Use carefully capital and small letters

Corrected

3

Detach some words that are attached

Incorporated

4

Give a space after the period at the end of each sentence in the text: in many cases the period is attached to the first letter of the following sentence

Corrected

5

Use correct English grammar and form: a native English speaker should read all the text

Updated correct English grammar

6

Paragraphs should be rewritten, formatting them properly

Formatted properly

7

Row 213 reports the term <<table…”>>: what table?

Figure 1 updated

8

Row 238 reports: << The size of the max pooling filter is 2X2. With strides 2. As shown in table 1. >>:what does this mean?

Meaning of 2 updated.

9

Row 244 reports: << The total number of extracted parameters are 1060138 >>: I think is best "is", not

"are"

Is updated

10

Row 294 reports: << The result shown in figÂ… >>: what figure?

Figure number included.

11

Row 291 reports: << The model obtained the testing accuracy and loss are 0.4944 and 1.0017

respectively >>: clarify the meaning of this sentence

Clarified the meaning of the sentence

12

In the text, the accurate definition of terms "accuracy" and "loss" is missing

Included

13

In Table 2, the value <<19s 289ms>> should be written as 19,289 s or 19,289 ms, and so on

Updated as per reviewer suggestion

14

1.           Emre ozbIlge,Mehtap Köse Ulukok,onsen Toygar, And Ebru OzbIlge," Tomato Disease Recognition Using a Compact Convolutional Neural Network",IEEE Access, 2022, 10, pp. 77213-77224

2.           Piyush Juyal and Sachin Sharma, "Detecting the Infectious area along with Disease using Deep Learning in tomato Plant Leaves ",Proc. of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS), 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICISS49785.2020.9316108

 

3.           Prajwala TM, Alla Pranathi, Kandiraju Sai Ashritha, Nagaratna B. Chittaragi*, Shashidhar G. Koolagudi “Tomato Leaf Disease Detection using Convolutional Neural Networks”, in: Proc. of Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU), 2020, pp. 1-5,doi: 10.1109/ASYU50717.2020.9259832

 

These three paper refer and included in reference section.

15

Supplemented the conclusions with more experimental information

Conclusion updated .

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The article is good, however: 1. What's new? 2. Very few references that don't. Which makes it impossible to know the real state of the art of the subject.

Author Response

Query Response

Title: Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

Reviewer 3 comments

The article is good, however: 1. What's new?

  1. Very few references that don't.

S.No

Query

Response

1

What's new?

10 different diseases are detected and CNN model is used to identify the diseases

2

Very few references that don't.

Updated

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

Gnanavel Sakkarvarthi, Godfrey Winster Sathianesan, Vetri Selvan murugan, Avulapalli Jayaram Reddy, Prabhu Jayagopal, and Mahmoud Elsisi

 

electronics-1987326, round 2

 

 

Most of the criticism listed in the first round revision have not been addressed, therefore I remain of the same opinion. Due to criticism (mainly related to the novelty of the approach) I recommend a rejection. However, you can found my comments below:

 

·         The novelty of the work seems to be very weak. Neither new technique or application is proposed, therefore, in my opinion, this study is barely considerable for a conference. My advice is to reduce the length of the paper removing all the negligible figures and submit this work to an appropriate conference.

 

·         Most of the figures and graphs do not add any important information about the proposed framework (Figs. 3,4 and 6, for example).

 

·         Most of the figures present results of both training and validation tests. There is no need of include training losses and accuracies, typically just performances of test set are sufficient.

 

Additional minor comments:

 

·         Please rearrange the position of tables and figures in order to increase the readability of the paper (typically figures and tables are placed in the top part of a page).

 

·         The paper requires a complete revision to be presented at an English conference or published in an English journal. It is recommended that the authors find a local professional or academic who shares their first language to assist them.

 

·         Be careful about figures resolutions. For example, in Fig. 4 the bottom graph present different resolution compared to the upper two, the same occurs for Figs. 5(a) and 5(b).

Author Response

Query Response

Title: Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

 

Reviewer 1 comments

round 1

S.No

Query

Response

 

 Several sentences are unclear or meaningless, see introduction, lines 41-43, 55-57, 60-62 and 65, for examples.

Lines 41-43, 55-57, 60-62 and 65  have been removed from the article as per reviewer commands and  it’s  not relevant to this work

2

The State of the art section is very poor, I recommend the author to consider reviews about deep learning in clinical applications, some examples are listed below:

We added author suggested article.

3

R. Zemouri, N. Zerhouni, and D. Racoceanu, “Deep learning in the biomedical applications: Recent and future status,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, 2019.

 

Referred this article and added.

4

28. G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B. E. Bejnordi, A. A. Adiyoso Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J. A.W.M. van der Laak, B. van Ginneken, and C. I. S´anchez, “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005

Referred this article and added.

5

Most of the figures and graphs do not add any important information about the proposed framework (Figs. 3,4 and 6, for example).

 Figure 3 show the Confusion matrix of validation and training in different epochs, figure 4 shown the performance of CNN model in graphical representation and Figure 6. Graphical representation of transfer learning techniques.

This figure helps to understand different epochs, CNN performance and transfer learning techniques.

6

Most of the figures present results of both training and validation tests. There is no need of include training losses and accuracies, typically just performances of test set are sufficient.

For detailed explanation, information on training and losses is included

7

·        Please rearrange the position of tables and figures in order to increase the readability of the paper.

Rearranged the position of tables and figures appropriate  places

8

·         The paper requires a complete revision to be presented at an English conference or published in an English journal. It is recommended that the authors find a local professional or academic who shares their first language to assist them.

 

We have revised the English version


round 2

S.No

Query

Response

1

Most of the criticism listed in the first round revision have not been addressed, therefore I remain of the same opinion

Above all the first round comments revised.

 

2

·         Most of the figures and graphs do not add any important information about the proposed framework (Figs. 3,4 and 6, for example).

 

Figure 3 show the Confusion matrix of validation and training in different epochs, figure 4 shown the performance of CNN model in graphical representation and Figure 6. Graphical representation of transfer learning techniques.

This figure helps to understand different epochs, CNN performance and transfer learning techniques.

 

·         Most of the figures present results of both training and validation tests. There is no need of include training losses and accuracies, typically just performances of test set are sufficient.

For detailed explanation, information on training and losses is included

 

Please rearrange the position of tables and figures in order to increase the readability of the paper (typically figures and tables are placed in the top part of a page).

Rearranged the position of tables and figures appropriate  places

 

·         Be careful about figures resolutions. For example, in Fig. 4 the bottom graph present different resolution compared to the upper two, the same occurs for Figs. 5(a) and 5(b).

Resolution is improved

       

 

Round 3

Reviewer 1 Report

Detection and Classification of Tomato Crop Disease Using Convolutional Neural Network

Gnanavel Sakkarvarthi, Godfrey Winster Sathianesan, Vetri Selvan murugan, Avulapalli Jayaram Reddy, Prabhu Jayagopal, and Mahmoud Elsisi

 

electronics-1987326, round 3

 

Most of my previous comments have been addressed. For what concerns me, the novelty of the paper remains weak, but the quality of the paper has improved by far. Therefore, the manuscript can be accepted.

Back to TopTop