Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Identification Phase
2.2. Screening Phase
2.3. Eligibility and Inclusion Phase
2.4. Synthesis Phase
- Reinforcement Learning and Multi-Agent Systems in Energy Management—Focus on reinforcement learning, deep learning, and multi-agent approaches in microgrid energy management.
- Intelligent Control and Predictive Modeling in Microgrids—Research on control strategies, predictive models, and intelligent systems within microgrids, including DC grid applications.
- Energy Storage and Stochastic Optimization in Microgrids—Studies involving energy management, storage solutions, renewable energy integration, and stochastic optimization in multi-microgrid systems.
- Optimal Operation and Power Management using AI—Exploration of microgrid operation, power optimization, and scheduling using AI-based approaches.
- Real-Time Scheduling and Multi-Scale Energy Management—Focus on real-time scheduling, multi-scale considerations, and energy management strategies in microgrids.
- Day-Ahead Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms in Microgrids—Investigations into day-ahead scheduling, optimal algorithms, and energy management in microgrid systems.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Reinforcement Learning and Multi-Agent Systems
3.1.1. Current Context
3.1.2. Research Opportunities and Future Directions
- Hybrid RL–MAS Frameworks: One promising research direction is the development of hybrid frameworks combining RL and MASs for managing distributed energy resources (DERs) within interconnected microgrids. These frameworks should consider energy price dynamics and renewable variability, optimizing internal operations and interactions between multiple microgrids [68,69,70,71]. Such systems could also focus on cooperation and controlled competition, where MAS models facilitate energy exchange and coordination among microgrids while optimizing energy flows and reducing costs [72,73,74,75,76].
- Electric Vehicle Integration: Another significant opportunity lies in applying RL–MAS frameworks to microgrids with high electric vehicle penetration, where energy demand is volatile and complex. RL strategies could optimize charging and discharging patterns, ensuring better integration of electric vehicles into microgrid systems [77,78]. In addition, transfer learning techniques could be explored to accelerate the deployment of these models across different environments [79,80,81,82].
3.1.3. Shortcomings in Reinforcement Learning and Multi-Agent Systems
3.2. Intelligent Control and Predictive Modeling
3.2.1. Current Context
3.2.2. Research Opportunities
3.2.3. Shortcomings of Intelligent Control and Predictive Modeling
3.3. Energy Storage and Stochastic Optimization
3.3.1. Current Context
3.3.2. Research Opportunities
3.3.3. Shortcomings of Energy Storage and Stochastic Optimization
3.4. Optimal Operation and Power Management
3.4.1. Current Context
3.4.2. Research Opportunities
3.4.3. Shortcomings of Optimal Operation and Power Management
3.5. Real-Time Scheduling and Multi-Scale Energy Management
3.5.1. Current Context
3.5.2. Research Opportunities
- Development of Optimization Algorithms: New research opportunities arise as power grids become more complex in topology and elements and integrate more DERs. A key area of interest is the development of optimization algorithms that can efficiently manage multiple temporal and spatial scales within the energy system. These algorithms must be capable of operating under conditions of uncertainty, dynamically adapting to variations in generation and demand [83]. Research in this area could focus on improving system resilience against disturbances, such as grid failures or extreme events, ensuring the system can recover quickly and maintain operational stability.
- Internet of Things: Another significant opportunity lies in integrating emerging technologies, such as the IoT and cloud computing, into energy management systems. These technologies can offer scalable and flexible real-time data collection and analysis solutions, crucial for informed decision-making and system-wide optimization [95]. Moreover, implementing advanced energy storage systems, such as solid-state batteries or supercapacitors, can complement real-time management by enabling better integration of renewable energy sources and enhancing grid stability [81].
3.5.3. Prospective Topics for Future Research Papers of Real-Time Scheduling and Multi-Scale Energy Management
3.5.4. Shortcomings of Real-Time Scheduling and Multi-Scale Energy Management
3.6. Day-Ahead Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
3.6.1. Current Context
3.6.2. Research Opportunities
- Predictive Scheduling Algorithms: There is a growing opportunity to develop predictive scheduling algorithms that leverage AI techniques to integrate weather forecasts and consumption patterns for optimizing energy generation and storage. These algorithms can continuously improve their predictive accuracy by learning from historical and real-time data, allowing microgrids to better prepare for fluctuations in demand and renewable energy output [98,99,100]. For example, AI models can be trained to predict solar and wind energy generation with higher precision, enabling more effective day-ahead planning [60,79]. Additionally, these algorithms could incorporate real-time sensor data to adjust scheduling decisions dynamically, further enhancing the flexibility and resilience of microgrid operations [17].
- Robust Optimization: Another critical area of research involves developing robust optimization algorithms to handle generation and demand forecasting uncertainties. Given the stochastic nature of renewable energy sources, these algorithms must maintain effective day-ahead schedules even when actual conditions deviate significantly from predictions [85,101]. Robust optimization techniques can help microgrids mitigate the risks associated with over or under-estimating energy availability, ensuring a more reliable power supply and reducing costly backup generation [96,102]. Exploring hybrid optimization methods that combine elements of deterministic and stochastic approaches could also lead to more resilient and adaptive scheduling strategies [64,89].
3.6.3. Policy and Practical Recommendations
- Policy Recommendations: Promote AI Integration in Microgrid Regulations: Governments and regulatory bodies should encourage incorporating AI-driven technologies within energy policies. Creating incentives for deploying AI solutions in microgrid management can enhance the efficiency of renewable energy integration, helping to meet sustainability goals [2,4].
- Standardization of Data and Interoperability: Establishing industry-wide standards for data sharing and communication between different energy systems and AI platforms will be crucial. This will enable more seamless integration of AI into microgrid operations and enhance real-time optimization of energy use [9,17].
- Support for R&D Initiatives: Policymakers should allocate funding for research and development in AI and energy storage technologies. Support for pilot projects and collaborative research initiatives between academia and industry can accelerate developing and deploying advanced microgrid systems [7,12].
- Practical Recommendations: Adoption of AI for Predictive Energy Management: Energy providers and microgrid operators should adopt AI-driven predictive control systems that can optimize demand forecasting, energy storage management, and distributed generation, particularly in areas with high penetration of renewable energy [3,8].
- Integration of Occupancy and Behavior Data: Incorporating occupancy behavior data into AI models can improve the accuracy of energy demand predictions, allowing for more responsive and adaptive microgrid operations. This can significantly enhance energy efficiency in residential and commercial buildings [15,22].
- Focus on Energy Storage Optimization: Operators should invest in advanced energy storage technologies and integrate AI-based stochastic optimization methods to manage energy variability more effectively. This will ensure better stability and resilience, especially in regions relying heavily on intermittent renewable sources [11,14].
3.6.4. Prospective Topics for Future Research Papers
3.6.5. Shortcomings of Day-Ahead Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mu, C.; Shi, Y.; Xu, N.; Wang, X.; Tang, Z.; Jia, H.; Geng, H. Multi-Objective Interval Optimization Dispatch of Microgrid via Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2024, 15, 2957–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neeraj, N.; Gupta, P.; Tomar, A. Industry 4.0 Based Efficient Energy Management in Microgrid. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2023, 82, 287–296. [Google Scholar]
- Witharama, W.M.N.; Bandara, K.M.D.P.; Azeez, M.I.; Bandara, K.; Logeeshan, V.; Wanigasekara, C. Advanced Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Microgrid Scheduling Considering Solar and Load Forecasting, Battery Degradation, and Demand Response Dynamics. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 83269–83284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajjour, S.; Chandel, S.S. A comprehensive review on sustainable energy management systems for optimal operation of future-generation of solar microgrids. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 58, 103377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, G.; Gong, Y. Multi-Microgrid Energy Management Strategy Based on Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Prioritized Experience Replay. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.R.; Raju, D.K.; Raghav, L.P.; Kumar, R.S. State-of-the-art review on energy management and control of networked microgrids. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 57, 103248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darshi, R.; Shamaghdari, S.; Jalali, A.; Arasteh, H. Decentralized energy management system for smart microgrids using reinforcement learning. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2023, 17, 2142–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Ni, Z.; Zhong, X. Microgrid energy scheduling under uncertain extreme weather: Adaptation from parallelized reinforcement learning agents. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 152, 109210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Sun, S.; Tao, P.; Li, F.; Ding, J.; Li, H. A Deep Learning-Based Microgrid Energy Management Method Under the Internet of Things Architecture. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simul. 2024, 16, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, N.; Guan, Y. Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Method for Microgrid Optimization Scheduling. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Khazaei, J. A Two-Stage Deep Learning Approach for Solving Microgrid Economic Dispatch. IEEE Syst. J. 2023, 17, 6237–6247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, K.; Zhou, J.; Tsianikas, S.; Coit, D.W.; Ma, Y. Long-term microgrid expansion planning with resilience and environmental benefits using deep reinforcement learning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Yang, W.; Song, Z.; Chen, Z.; Lin, D. Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Bi-layer Optimal Scheduling for Microgrids Considering Flexible Load Control. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 9, 949–962. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, W.; Sun, H.; Mei, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H. Forecast-driven stochastic optimization scheduling of an energy management system for an isolated hydrogen microgrid. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 277, 116640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominguez-Barbero, D.; Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Sanz-Bobi, M.A. Twin-delayed deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm for the energy management of microgrids. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 125, 106693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Yin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. Carbon peak management strategies for achieving net-zero emissions in smart buildings: Advances and modeling in digital twin. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 64, 103661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Tyagi, B. A machine learning-based stochastic optimal energy management framework for a renewable energy-assisted isolated microgrid system. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2024, 19, 2294869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Li, X. Microgrid Optimal Energy Scheduling Considering Neural Network Based Battery Degradation. Ieee Trans. Power Syst. 2024, 39, 1594–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Zhao, P.; Gu, C.; Li, J.; Cheng, S.; Xu, M. Battery Protective Electric Vehicle Charging Management in Renewable Energy System. Ieee Trans. Ind. Inform. 2023, 19, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.M.; Shareef, H.; Al Hassan, E.S.F. Deep Learning Technique for Forecasting Solar Radiation and Wind Speed for Dynamic Microgrid Analysis. Prz. Elektrotech. 2023, 99, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qaiyum, S.; Margala, M.; Kshirsagar, P.R.R.; Chakrabarti, P.; Irshad, K. Energy Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated with Microgrid Data Analysis Using Deep Learning Feature Selection and Classification Techniques. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Wu, H. Multi-Microgrid Collaborative Optimization Scheduling Using an Improved Multi-Agent Soft Actor-Critic Algorithm. Energies 2023, 16, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darshi, R.; Shamaghdari, S.; Jalali, A.; Arasteh, H. Decentralized Reinforcement Learning Approach for Microgrid Energy Management in Stochastic Environment. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2023, 2023, 1190103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, H.; Gan, M.; Wu, X.; Xie, K.; Fan, Z.; Xie, C.; Shi, Y.; Huang, L. Real-time Energy Management of Low-carbon Ship Microgrid Based on Data-driven Stochastic Model Predictive Control. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 9, 1482–1492. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.; Xu, T.; Xu, H.; Gao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, K. Robust multi-objective load dispatch in microgrid involving unstable renewable generation. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 148, 108991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Guo, W.; Wang, Q.; Tao, P.; Li, G.; Zhao, Z. Optimal scheduling of microgrids considering real power losses of grid-connected microgrid systems. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 11, 1324232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Bu, J.; Yin, M. Learning assisted column generation for model predictive control based energy management in microgrids. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tightiz, L.; Dang, L.M.; Yoo, J. Novel deep deterministic policy gradient technique for automated micro-grid energy management in rural and islanded areas. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 82, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Su, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Y. Two stage robust economic dispatching of microgrid considering uncertainty of wind, solar and electricity load along with carbon emission predicted by neural network model. Energy 2024, 300, 131571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Seon, J.; Sun, Y.G.; Kim, S.H.; Kyeong, C.; Kim, D.I.; Kim, J.Y. Novel Architecture of Energy Management Systems Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning in Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2024, 15, 1646–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulu, M.L.T.; Carpanen, R.P.; Tiako, R. A Comprehensive Review: Study of Artificial Intelligence Optimization Technique Applications in a Hybrid Microgrid at Times of Fault Outbreaks. Energies 2023, 16, 1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q. Generating adversarial deep reinforcement learning -based frequency control of Island City microgrid considering generalization of scenarios. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 1377465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, X. Data-Based Optimal Microgrid Management for Energy Trading With Integral Q-Learning Scheme. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 16183–16193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbulut, O.; Cavus, M.; Cengiz, M.; Allahham, A.; Giaouris, D.; Forshaw, M. Hybrid Intelligent Control System for Adaptive Microgrid Optimization: Integration of Rule-Based Control and Deep Learning Techniques. Energies 2024, 17, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, M. Machine learning optimization for hybrid electric vehicle charging in renewable microgrids. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Wang, Z.; He, Y. A Deep Neural Network-Based Optimal Scheduling Decision-Making Method for Microgrids. Energies 2023, 16, 7635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babu, P.A.; Iqbal, J.L.M.; Priyanka, S.S.; Reddy, M.J.; Kumar, G.S.; Ayyasamy, R. Power Control and Optimization for Power Loss Reduction Using Deep Learning in Microgrid Systems. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2024, 52, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Xiao, X.; Gao, Y.; Xia, Y.; Dragicevic, T.; Wheeler, P. Emerging Information Technologies for the Energy Management of Onboard Microgrids in Transportation Applications. Energies 2023, 16, 6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaturvedi, S.; Bui, V.-H.; Su, W.; Wang, M. Reinforcement Learning-Based Integrated Control to Improve the Efficiency of DC Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2024, 15, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusuf, J.; Hasan, A.S.M.J.; Garrido, J.; Ula, S.; Barth, M.J. A comparative techno-economic assessment of bidirectional heavy duty and light duty plug-in electric vehicles operation: A case study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 95, 104582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, M. Day-ahead scheduling of isolated microgrid integrated demand side management. Soft Comput. 2024, 28, 5015–5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, F.; Lin, X.; Zhang, R.; Yang, Q. Multi-objective optimal scheduling of charging stations based on deep reinforcement learning. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 10, 1042882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Cheng, L. CuEMS: Deep reinforcement learning for community control of energy management systems in microgrids. Energy Build. 2024, 304, 113865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.; Tsuji, T. Battery Scheduling Control of a Microgrid Trading with Utility Grid Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2023, 18, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, W.; Kordabad, A.B.; Gros, S. Energy management in residential microgrid using model predictive control-based reinforcement learning and Shapley value. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 119, 105793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, W.; Sun, H.; Mei, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Ding, Y. Stochastic optimal scheduling strategy for a campus-isolated microgrid energy management system considering dependencies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 292, 117341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Cheng, Y. Deep Meta-Reinforcement Learning-Based Data-Driven Active Fault Tolerance Load Frequency Control for Islanded Microgrids Considering Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 10295–10303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, G.; Xu, R. A Data-Driven Energy Management Strategy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Microgrid Systems. Cogn. Comput. 2023, 15, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shyni, R.; Kowsalya, M. HESS-based microgrid control techniques empowered by artificial intelligence: A systematic review of grid-connected and standalone systems. J. Energy Storage 2024, 84, 111012. [Google Scholar]
- Elkholy, M.; Yona, A.; Ueda, S.; Said, T.; Senjyu, T.; Lotfy, M. Experimental Investigation of AI-Enhanced FPGA-Based Optimal Management and Control of an Isolated Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2024, 10, 3670–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hryniow, K.; Sarwas, G.; Grzejszczak, P.; Zdanowski, M.; Iwanowski, M.; Slawinski, M.; Czajewski, W. Research on predictive algorithms for the energy management of a DC microgrid with a photovoltaic installation. Prz. Elektrotech. 2024, 100, 211–215. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, N.; Duan, W.; Fan, X. Hydrogen-fueled microgrid energy management: Novel EMS approach for efficiency and reliability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 80, 1466–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhasnawi, B.; Almutoki, S.; Hussain, F.; Harrison, A.; Bazooyar, B.; Zanker, M.; Bureš, V. A new methodology for reducing carbon emissions using multi-renewable energy systems and artificial intelligence. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 114, 105721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinata, N.; Ramli, M.; Jambak, M.; Sidik, M.; Alqahtani, M. Designing an optimal microgrid control system using deep reinforcement learning: A systematic review. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2024, 51, 101651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkholy, M.; Senjyu, T.; Elymany, M.; Gamil, M.; Talaat, M.; Masrur, H.; Ueda, S.; Lotfy, M.E. Optimal resilient operation and sustainable power management within an autonomous residential microgrid using African vultures optimization algorithm. Renew. Energy 2024, 224, 120247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Pei, W. Federated dueling DQN based microgrid energy management strategy in edge-cloud computing environment. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2024, 38, 101329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, W.; Yang, Q.; Li, W.; Zomaya, A.Y. Machine-Learning-Based Real-Time Economic Dispatch in Islanding Microgrids in a Cloud-Edge Computing Environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 13703–13711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyedi, Y.; Karimi, H.; Mahseredjian, J. A Data-Driven Method for Prediction of Post-Fault Voltage Stability in Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2022, 37, 3758–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez-Barbero, D.; García-González, J.; Sanz-Bobi, M.Á.; García-Cerrada, A. Energy management of a microgrid considering nonlinear losses in batteries through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Appl. Energy 2024, 368, 123435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bose, S.; Zhang, Y. Load Restoration in Islanded Microgrids: Formulation and Solution Strategies. IEEE Trans. Control. Netw. Syst. 2024, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Yang, X.; Wu, X. Role of net-zero renewable-based transportation systems in smart cities toward enhancing cultural diversity: Realistic model in digital twin. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 65, 103715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, H.; Qin, Z.; Dong, N.; Qin, Y.; Ye, M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Cao, J. Data-Driven Dynamical Control for Bottom-up Energy Internet System. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2022, 13, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.J.; Kim, M.K. A novel deep learning-based forecasting model optimized by heuristic algorithm for energy management of microgrid. Appl. Energy 2023, 332, 120525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaprakdal, F.; Yılmaz, M.B.; Baysal, M.; Anvari-Moghaddam, A. A Deep Neural Network-Assisted Approach to Enhance Short-Term Optimal Operational Scheduling of a Microgrid. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razak, M.A.A.; Othman, M.M.; Musirin, I.; Yahya, M.A.; Zakaria, Z. Significant Implication of Optimal Capacitor Placement and Sizing for a Sustainable Electrical Operation in a Building. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, X.; Batool, K. Optimizing multi-objective design, planning, and operation for sustainable energy sharing districts considering electrochemical battery longevity. Renew. Energy 2024, 229, 120705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suanpang, P.; Jamjuntr, P. Machine Learning Models for Solar Power Generation Forecasting in Microgrid Application Implications for Smart Cities. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, P.; Ke, S.; Yang, J.; Wen, Y.; Xie, L.; Li, Y.; Kamel, S. A frequency cooperative control strategy for multimicrogrids with EVs based on improved evolutionary-deep reinforcement learning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 159, 109991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Meng, F.; Wang, R.; Zhu, W.; Zeng, X.-J. A stochastic MPC based approach to integrated energy management in microgrids. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piotrowski, P.; Parol, M.; Kapler, P.; Fetliński, B. Advanced Forecasting Methods of 5-Minute Power Generation in a PV System for Microgrid Operation Control. Energies 2022, 15, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, L.; Martelli, E.; Manzolini, G. An efficient robust optimization model for the unit commitment and dispatch of multi-energy systems and microgrids. Appl. Energy 2020, 261, 113859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, N.; Khazali, A.; Mazidi, M.; Ahmadi, A. Economic energy and reserve management of renewable-based microgrids in the presence of electric vehicle aggregators: A robust optimization approach. Energy 2020, 201, 117629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muriithi, G.; Chowdhury, S. Optimal Energy Management of a Grid-Tied Solar PV-Battery Microgrid: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. Energies 2021, 14, 2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Xiang, C.; Yu, M.; Tan, K.T.; Lee, T.H. Online Optimal Power Scheduling of a Microgrid via Imitation Learning. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 861–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, F.; Ji, C.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, X. Tri-stage optimal dispatch for a microgrid in the presence of uncertainties introduced by EVs and PV. Appl. Energy 2021, 304, 117881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawa, M.; Al-Turki, Y.; Sedraoui, K.; Dadfar, S.; Khaki, M. Optimal operation and stochastic scheduling of renewable energy of a microgrid with optimal sizing of battery energy storage considering cost reduction. J. Energy Storage 2023, 59, 106475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomin, N.; Shakirov, V.; Kozlov, A.; Sidorov, D.; Kurbatsky, V.; Rehtanz, C.; Lora, E.E. Design and optimal energy management of community microgrids with flexible renewable energy sources. Renew. Energy 2022, 183, 903–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashtari, B.; Bidgoli, M.A.; Babaei, M.; Ahmarinejad, A. A two-stage energy management framework for optimal scheduling of multi-microgrids with generation and demand forecasting. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 12159–12173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huy, T.H.B.; Le, T.-D.; Phu, P.V.; Park, S.; Kim, D. Real-time power scheduling for an isolated microgrid with renewable energy and energy storage system via a supervised-learning-based strategy. J. Energy Storage 2024, 88, 111506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.M.U.; Alotaibi, M.A.; Chowdhury, A.H.; Rahman, M.; Alam, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Abido, M.A. Home Energy Management for Community Microgrids Using Optimal Power Sharing Algorithm. Energies 2021, 14, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuruvila, A.P.; Zografopoulos, I.; Basu, K.; Konstantinou, C. Hardware-assisted detection of firmware attacks in inverter-based cyberphysical microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 132, 107150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, G.; Shang, C.; Fan, S.; Hu, X.; Cheng, H. A Hierarchical Energy Scheduling Framework of Microgrids With Hybrid Energy Storage Systems. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 2472–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Zang, C.; Zeng, P.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, S. Deep reinforcement learning for real-time economic energy management of microgrid system considering uncertainties. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1163053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Q.; Hussain, S.; Luo, F.; Wang, Z.; Jin, X. An Online Reinforcement Learning-based Energy Management Strategy for Microgrids with Centralized Control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2024, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marino, C.A.; Chinelato, F.; Marufuzzaman, M. AWS IoT analytics platform for microgrid operation management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 170, 108331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hai, T.; Zhou, J.; Muranaka, K. Energy management and operational planning of renewable energy resources-based microgrid with energy saving. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 214, 108792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchesano, M.G.; Guizzi, G.; Vespoli, S.; Ferruzzi, G. Battery Swapping Station Service in a Smart Microgrid: A Multi-Method Simulation Performance Analysis. Energies 2023, 16, 6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazidi, M.; Rezaei, N.; Ghaderi, A. Simultaneous power and heat scheduling of microgrids considering operational uncertainties: A new stochastic p-robust optimization approach. Energy 2019, 185, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Wang, J.; Song, G.; Han, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Cao, Z. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach for Residential Microgrid Energy Scheduling. Energies 2019, 13, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraji, J.; Ketabi, A.; Hashemi-Dezaki, H.; Shafie-Khah, M.; Catalao, J.P.S. Optimal Day-Ahead Self-Scheduling and Operation of Prosumer Microgrids Using Hybrid Machine Learning-Based Weather and Load Forecasting. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 157284–157305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Zhang, S. Smart cities stochastic secured energy management framework in digital twin: Policy frameworks for promoting sustainable urban development in smart cities. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 65, 103720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, H.; Tan, Z. Capacity optimization of hybrid energy storage system for flexible islanded microgrid based on real-time price-based demand response. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 136, 107581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Yang, Z. Optimal Scheduling of Isolated Microgrids Using Automated Reinforcement Learning-Based Multi-Period Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2022, 13, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Lyu, X.; Lai, C.S.; Xu, Z.; Chen, M. A retroactive approach to microgrid real-time scheduling in quest of perfect dispatch solution. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2019, 7, 1608–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Yu, W.; Xu, Z.; Ge, Q.; Li, Z.; Meng, Y. Multi-time scale optimization scheduling of microgrid considering source and load uncertainty. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 216, 109037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.S.; Raghav, L.P.; Raju, D.K.; Singh, A.R. Impact of multiple demand side management programs on the optimal operation of grid-connected microgrids. Appl. Energy 2021, 301, 117466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Shen, X.; Chen, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wennersten, R. Optimal Energy Management of Data Center Micro-Grid Considering Computing Workloads Shift. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 102061–102075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niknami, A.; Askari, M.T.; Ahmadi, M.A.; Nik, M.B.; Moghaddam, M.S. Resilient day-ahead microgrid energy management with uncertain demand, EVs, storage, and renewables. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2024, 20, 100763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Lou, C.; Xu, X.; Yang, J.; Cunningham, J.; Zhang, L. Distributionally robust decarbonizing scheduling considering data-driven ambiguity sets for multi-temporal multi-energy microgrid operation. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2024, 38, 101323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuai, H.; Fang, J.; Ai, X.; Tang, Y.; Wen, J.; He, H. Stochastic Optimization of Economic Dispatch for Microgrid Based on Approximate Dynamic Programming. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 10, 2440–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geramifar, H.; Shahabi, M.; Barforoshi, T. Coordination of energy storage systems and DR resources for optimal scheduling of microgrids under uncertainties. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2017, 11, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuai, H.; He, H. Online Scheduling of a Residential Microgrid via Monte-Carlo Tree Search and a Learned Model. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.A.E.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Saied, E.M.M.; Hadi, H.A. Hybrid cheetah particle swarm optimization based optimal hierarchical control of multiple microgrids. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parol, M.; Piotrowski, P.; Kapler, P.; Piotrowski, M. Forecasting of 10-Second Power Demand of Highly Variable Loads for Microgrid Operation Control. Energies 2021, 14, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Database | Query String | N° of Returned Documents | Removal of Duplicates | Final Sample for Screening Phase |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scopus | (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“microgrid”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“operation”)) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Artificial Intelligence”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Machine Learning”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“IoT”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Deep Learning”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Reinforcement Learning”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Stochastic”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Meta-Heuristic”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Scheduling”)) AND PUBYEAR > 2013 AND PUBYEAR < 2025 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”)) | 2285 | 29 | 2256 |
Web of Science | (ALL=(“microgrid”) AND ALL=(“operation”)) AND (ALL=(“Artificial Intelligence”) OR ALL=(“Machine Learning”) OR ALL=(“IoT”) OR ALL=(“Deep Learning”) OR ALL=(“Reinforcement Learning”) OR ALL=(“Stochastic”) OR ALL=(“Meta-Heuristic”)OR ALL=(“Scheduling”)) Refined By: Publication Years: 2024 or 2023 or 2022 or 2021 or 2020 or 2019 or 2018 or 2017 or 2016 or 2015 or 2014; Document Types: Article | 1920 | 1494 * | 426 |
Total items | 4205 | 1523 | 2682 |
Criterion | Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|---|
Publication Type | Peer-reviewed journal articles | Conference papers, editorials, review articles, book chapters, theses, white papers, non-peer-reviewed materials |
Language | English | Non-English |
Publication Date | 2014–2024 | Articles published before 2014 |
Accessibility | Full-text access via institutional subscription or open access | Articles without full-text access |
Research Focus | Studies on the integration of emerging technologies (AI, IoT, machine learning, smart grids, etc.) in microgrid operation | Articles that do not focus on microgrids, emerging technologies, or machine learning in energy management, or articles focusing solely on non-technological aspects of energy systems (e.g., policy, economics without tech analysis) |
N° | Criterion | Description and Evaluation Metrics |
---|---|---|
1 | Relevance to Emerging Technologies in Microgrids | How well the study addresses the integration of emerging technologies (AI, IoT, etc.) and machine learning in microgrid operation. (1: Somewhat Relevant, 2: Relevant, 3: Central Focus) |
2 | Methodological Rigor | The robustness and appropriateness of the research methodology employed in the study. (1: Foundational, 2: Adequate, 3: Comprehensive) |
3 | Experimental Validation and Real-world Application | The extent to which the study includes experimental results, simulations, case studies, or real-world implementations. (1: Preliminary, 2: Moderate, 3: Extensive) |
4 | Novelty and Contribution | The originality and significance of the study’s contributions to the field. (1: Incremental, 2: Significant, 3: Highly Innovative) |
5 | Clarity and Technical Depth | The clarity of writing, technical detail, and completeness of the information provided in the study. (1: Clear, 2: Thorough, 3: Exceptionally Detailed) |
Ref. | Key Findings/Opportunities | Promising Research Areas | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
[9] | RL algorithms enable real-time adaptive management, optimizing resource utilization and improving grid stability. | Developing hybrid RL–MAS frameworks for the efficient management of distributed energy resources in interconnected microgrids. | Managing the complexity of high-dimensional and nonlinear dynamics in real-time operations. |
[59] | MASs facilitate decentralized management, enhancing operational efficiency and resilience in microgrids. | Advancing DRL algorithms to handle the complexities of real-time microgrid operations, focusing on high-dimensional data management. | Balancing the need for energy resource optimization with ensuring overall system resilience and reliability. |
[60] | RL strategies are effective in managing extreme events and faults within microgrids, enabling autonomous adaptation to adverse conditions. | Exploring resilient strategies for microgrid fault management under extreme conditions, utilizing autonomous learning and adaptation. | Addressing the uncertainties in renewable energy generation and demand forecasts, particularly under extreme conditions. |
[61] | MASs have been shown to improve the operational stability of microgrids in complex and stochastic environments, ensuring continuous operation. | Enhancing the application of MASs in rural and isolated microgrids, addressing specific operational challenges and improving resilience. | Adapting MAS frameworks to diverse and challenging operational environments, such as rural or isolated microgrids. |
[62] | Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) techniques manage high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamics, offering promising avenues for real-time interaction management. | Investigating the integration of transfer learning in EV-integrated microgrids to improve model adaptability and operational efficiency. | Improving the accuracy of predictive models, especially in the context of high variability and stochastic environments. |
[63] | Cooperation among MGs using MASs can optimize energy exchange, balancing supply and demand in real-time scenarios. | Expanding the use of stochastic optimization for energy storage integration, focusing on cost efficiency and system reliability. | Reducing the costs associated with implementing advanced DRL and MAS techniques in microgrid operations. |
[64] | Controlled competition among agents in MGs drives operational efficiency, reducing costs and maximizing the utilization of renewable resources. | Implementing decentralized intelligence in distributed storage systems to optimize local energy management and reduce grid dependency. | Overcoming scalability challenges in distributed storage systems, particularly in managing local energy demands efficiently. |
[65] | MAS frameworks can be tailored to specific contexts, such as rural or isolated MGs, addressing unique challenges and leveraging localized benefits. | Developing AI-based robust day-ahead scheduling models that account for renewable energy variability and demand fluctuations. | Enhancing the robustness of day-ahead scheduling under variable conditions, ensuring consistent and reliable operations. |
[66] | Hybrid frameworks combining RL and MASs can efficiently manage distributed energy resources in interconnected microgrids, improving system-wide stability. | Combining predictive analytics with stochastic optimization techniques to create hybrid scheduling frameworks for microgrids. | Balancing the trade-offs between forecasting accuracy and operational flexibility in hybrid scheduling models. |
[25] | RL strategies tailored for electric vehicles improve their integration into MGs by learning from charging and discharging patterns. | Designing dynamic real-time scheduling frameworks using AI, enhancing the flexibility and responsiveness of microgrid operations. | Ensuring the system’s resilience while minimizing operational costs, particularly in real-time scheduling processes. |
[67] | Transfer learning can be utilized to accelerate the deployment of RL and MAS models across different operational environments, enhancing adaptability. | Investigating MAS-based fault management in interconnected networks, focusing on improving resilience under variable conditions. | Managing the variability of renewable energy sources in fault management strategies, ensuring consistent system performance. |
[94] | MASs enhance fault response in interconnected networks, allowing different microgrids to cooperate and maintain stability during adverse conditions. | AI integrated with predictive models for robust microgrid operations. | Ensuring accuracy in real-time predictive control. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Arévalo, P.; Ochoa-Correa, D.; Villa-Ávila, E. Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency. Electronics 2024, 13, 3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183754
Arévalo P, Ochoa-Correa D, Villa-Ávila E. Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency. Electronics. 2024; 13(18):3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183754
Chicago/Turabian StyleArévalo, Paul, Danny Ochoa-Correa, and Edisson Villa-Ávila. 2024. "Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency" Electronics 13, no. 18: 3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183754
APA StyleArévalo, P., Ochoa-Correa, D., & Villa-Ávila, E. (2024). Optimizing Microgrid Operation: Integration of Emerging Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Energy Efficiency. Electronics, 13(18), 3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183754