The Way of Expanding Technology Acceptance—Open Innovation Dynamics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background of The Study and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Energy Consumption Management
2.2. Users’ Acceptance of A Technology Supporting Energy Efficiency Management
2.3. Research Issues and Hypotheses
3. Methodology
3.1. Case Study Background
3.2. Research Participants
3.3. Instruments
3.4. Design
- (1)
- The sensor was clipped on either side of the live wire of an extension cord or directly on the supply side of the circuit breaker panel to avoid cancellation of current that would result in a zero measurement.
- (2)
- The collection of data for the individual load was done for at least 30 min or until a pattern of load measurement was observed. A commercial clamp ammeter was also clipped on one side of the live wire to get an independent measure of the current flowing in the wire. Furthermore, readings obtained from the commercial clamp ammeter shall be compared to that of the proposed EECMS device for revalidation purposes. In testing the precision of the proposed EECMS device, only the measured current was considered since the clamp ammeter can only display current and not power consumption.
- (3)
- To check the accuracy of the proposed EECMS device, the sensor was clipped on one wire of the supply side of the panel. Taking note of the time it was clipped, an initial reading of the electric meter was made and recorded. Another reading obtained after two hours was noted to get the total kilowatt-hour consumption. These readings are then compared to the reading results taken from the electric meter and the output generated by the EECMS to check whether discrepancies of output were evident.
- (4)
- The proposed EECMS device was installed for approximately two weeks, while the reading of the electric meter was done every morning to test the accuracy of the device output. Note that the device was tested using different electrical loads with the following duration of each load type (see Table 3).
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. The Proposed EECMS Device
4.2. User Acceptance on The Proposed EECMS Device
4.3. Interrelationships Among User Acceptability Extended TAM Constructs
5. Managerial Implications
6. Conclusions and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sharma, S.S. The relationship between energy and economic growth: Empirical evidence from 66 countries. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 3565–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Huang, L. Individual new energy consumption and economic growth in China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13 June 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, B.; Luo, B. Rural household energy consumption characteristics and determinants in China. Energy 2019, 182, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.C. Energy consumption in elementary and high schools in Taiwan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatasou, S.; Santamouris, M. Socio-economic status and residential energy consumption: A latent variable approach. Energy Build. 2019, 198, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gustavsson, L.; Joelsson, A.; Sathre, R. Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, S.K.; Son, Y.H.; Bong, T.H.; Park, J.S. Characterization of CO2 emissions during construction of reservoir embankment elevation in South Korea. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2014, 19, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shindell, D.; Faluvegi, G.; Seltzer, K.; Shindell, C. Quantified, localized health benefits of accelerated carbon dioxide emissions reductions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiawan, Y.; Kurniawan, R.; Managi, S. Are carbon dioxide emission reductions compatible with sustainable wellbeing? Appl. Energy 2019, 242, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiik, M.K.; Fufa, S.M.; Kristjansdottir, T.; Andresen, I. Lessons learnt from embodied GHG emission calculations in zero emission buildings (ZEBs) from the Norwegian ZEB research centre. Energy Build. 2018, 165, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, R.; Samdal, M. (Eds.) ZEB ZEB Final Report 2009-2017; SINTEF and NTNU: Oslo, Norway, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, T. Modelling the through-life costs and benefits of detached zero (net) energy housing in Melbourne. Energy Build. 2014, 70, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katafygiotou, M.C.; Serghides, D.K. Analysis of structural elements and energy consumption of school building stock in Cyprus: Energy simulations and upgrade scenarios of a typical school. Energy Build. 2014, 72, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekkia, T.; Airaksinen, M.; Saari, A. Effect of energy measures on the values of energy efficiency indicators in Finnish daycare and school buildings. Energy Build. 2017, 139, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE). The Second National Master Plan for Energy. Available online: english.motie.go.kr/search/search.do?site=eng&kwd=basic+plan&category=c1&reSrchFlag=¤tPage=1&detailSearch=&srchFd=&sort=d&date=&startDate=&endDate=&preCondi=&rowPerPage=10&fdTot=%24param.fdTot&fdTitle=%24param.fdTitle&fdContent=%24param.fdContent&fdFile=%24param.fdFile (accessed on 24 January 2020).
- Le, V.T.; Pitts, A. A survey on electrical appliance use and energy consumption in Vietnamese households: Case study of Tuy Hoa city. Energy Build. 2019, 197, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.H.; Han, B.; Lu, M.L. Measurement of energy rebound effect in households: Evidence from residential electricity consumption in Beijing, China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkhout, P.H.G.; Muskens, J.C.; Velthuijsen, J.W. Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 2000, 28, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assawamartbunlue, K.; Surawattanawan, P.; Luknongbu, W. Specific energy consumption of cement in Thailand. Energy Procedia 2019, 156, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Energy. Philippine Energy Plan 2012–2030. Policies, Regulations, Action Plans. 27 November 2013. Available online: https://www.doe.gov.ph/pep/philippine-energy-plan-2012-2030 (accessed on 20 August 2019).
- Anastasi, G.; Corucci, F.; Marcelloni, F. An Intelligent System for Electrical Energy Management in Buildings. In Proceedings of the 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Cordoba, Spain, 22–24 November 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, J.E.; Shunturov, V.; Janda, K.; Platt, G.; Weinberger, K. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2007, 8, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.H.; Lee, S.; Hwang, J. Real-time energy monitoring and controlling system based on Zigbee sensor networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2011, 5, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weiss, M.; Guinard, D. Increasing Energy Awareness through Web-Enabled Power Outlets. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Limassol, Cyprus, 1–3 December 2010; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss, M.; Staake, T.; Mattern, F.; Fleisch, E. PowerPedia: Changing energy usage with the help of a community-based smartphone application. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2011, 16, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.D.; He, W.; Li, S. Internet of Things in Industries: A survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangwar, H.; Date, H.; Ramaswamy, R. Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2015, 28, 107–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, J.; Lin, S.C. A behavioral model of managerial perspectives regarding technology acceptance in building energy management systems. Sustainability 2016, 8, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, E.S.; Hwang, B.; Ko, K.; Kim, D. Consumer Acceptance Analysis of the Home Energy Management System. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Froehlich, J. Promoting Energy Efficient Behaviors in the Home through Feedback: The Role of Human-Computer Interaction. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Promoting-Energy-Efficient-Behaviors-in-the-Home-%3A-Froehlich/b353062043c1b22101e84878b6d749bf3d0fb398 (accessed on 24 January 2020).
- Chetty, M.; Tran, D.; Grinter, R. Getting to Green: Understanding Resource Consumption in the Home. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Dubai, UAE, 21–22 December 2008; pp. 242–251. [Google Scholar]
- Aslam, S.; Iqbal, Z.; Javaid, N.; Ali Khan, Z.; Aurangzeb, K.; Haider, S.I. Towards efficient energy management of smart buildings exploiting heuristic optimization with real-time and critical peak pricing schemes. Energies 2015, 10, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Figueriredo, J.; da Costa, J.S. A SCADA system for energy management in intelligent buildings. Energy Build. 2012, 49, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karlin, B.; Zinger, J.F.; Ford, R. The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 141, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Himang, M.M.; Mendoza, E., Jr.; Manalastas, R.; Ocampo, L.; Himang, C.M. Modeling the success of Windows Domain Network (WDN) using the DeLone & McLean information system (IS) success model: A university case. Int. J. Sociotechnol. Knowl. Dev. 2019, 11, 30–55. [Google Scholar]
- Berges, M.E.; Goldman, E.; Scott Matthews, H.; Soibelman, L. Enhancing electricity audits in residential buildings with nonintrusive load monitoring. J. Ind. Ecol. 2010, 14, 844–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulaiman, M.S. Integration of Legacy Appliances into the Smart Home. Master’s Thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ferdoush, S.; Li, X. Wireless sensor network system design using Raspberry Pi and Arduino for environmental monitoring applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 34, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hargreaves, T.; Nye, M.; Burgess, J. Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 6111–6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuiderwjik, A.; Janssen, M.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Gov. Inf. Q. 2015, 32, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Au, Y.A.; Zafar, H. A Multi-Country Assessment of Mobile Payment Adoption; Working Paper Series No. 0055IS-296-2008; College of Business, University of Texas: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.-W. Developing an explorative model for SaaS adoption. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 15057–15064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, W.R.; He, J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2006, 44, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Mathieson, K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.-D.; Gillenson, D.L.; Sherrell, M. Enticing On-Line Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective. Inf. Manag. 2002, 39, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Estriegana, R.; Medina-Merodio, J.; Barchino, R. Analysis of competence acquisition in a flipped classroom approach. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2019, 27, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Šumak, B.; Heričko, M.; Pušnik, M. A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011, 27, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemay, D.J.; Morin, M.M.; Bazelais, P.; Doleck, T. Modeling students’ perceptions of simulation-based learning using the technology acceptance model. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2018, 20, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, R.; Siddiq, F.; Tondeur, J. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 2019, 128, 13–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Wen, H. How is motivation generated in collaborative consumption: Mediation effect in extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alalwan, A.A.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Rana, N.P.; Tamilmani, K.; Dwidevi, Y.K. Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technol. Soc. 2018, 55, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, Y.T.; Wang, S.C.; Yan, K.Q.; Chang, C.M. Precise positioning of marketing and behavior intentions of location-based mobile commerce in the internet of things. Symmetry Plus 2017, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, Y.J.; Gam, H.J.; Banning, J. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the technology acceptance model. Fash. Text. 2017, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Lamb, P. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2006, 11, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hyllegard, K.H.; Yan, R.N.; Ogle, J.P.; Lee, K.H. Socially responsible labeling: The impact of hang tags on consumers’ attitudes and patronage intentions toward an apparel brand. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2012, 30, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tommasetti, A.; Singer, P.; Troisi, O.; Maione, G. Extended Theory of Planned Behavior (ETPB): Investigating customers’ perception of restaurants’ sustainability by testing a structural equation model. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michels, M.; Bonke, V.; Musshoff, O. Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in dairy herd management. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9422–9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.J.; Kim, T.U.; Chung, J.Y. User Acceptance of the Mobile Internet. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mobile Business, Athens, Greece, 8–9 July 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Yao, J.E.; Yu, C.S. Personal innovativeness, social influences, and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2005, 14, 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parveen, F.; Sulaiman, A. Technology complexity, personal innovativeness and intention to use wireless internet using mobile devices in Malaysia. Int. Rev. Bus. Res. Pap. 2008, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Das, C. A Study on Validity of Modified Technology Acceptance Model of Mobile; RTM Nagpur University: Nagpur, India, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, J.C.; Lin, P.H.; Hsieh, P.C. The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 67, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, H.; Park, Y.; Kim, C.; Chou, J.S. Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 2012, 28, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, A.A.; Razak, F.Z.A.; Bakar, A.A.; Abdullah, W.S.W. The effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on continuance intention to use e-government. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 35, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abbas, H.A.; Hamdy, H.I. Determinants of continuance intention factor in Kuwait communication market: Case study of Zain-Kuwait. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 49, 648–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, H.H.; Chen, S.C.; Kuo, M.H. A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia Soc. Behav. 2015, 176, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Faham, E.; Asghari, H. Determinants of behavioral intention to use e-textbooks: A study in Iran’s agricultural sector. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 165, 104935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.T.; Chiang, C. Perceived Innovativeness, Perceived Convenience and TAM: Effects on Mobile Knowledge Management. In Proceedings of the 2009 Third International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Qingdao, China, 4–6 June 2009; pp. 413–420. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Loehlin, J.C. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, W.W.L. SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management development research. J. Manag. Dev. 2001, 20, 650–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.J.; Dacin, P.A. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. J. Mark. 2007, 61, 244–249. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, R.; Prasad, J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf. Syst. Res. 1988, 9, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, J.; Gaynor, A.T.; Chen, S.; Kang, Z.; Suresh, K.; Takezawa, A.; Cheng, L. Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2018, 57, 2457–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witkowski, K. Internet of things, big data, Industry 4.0—Innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management. Procedia Eng. 2017, 182, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atzori, L.; Iera, A.; Morabito, G. The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 2010, 54, 2787–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4. In 0 Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016; pp. 3928–3937. [Google Scholar]
- Bagozzi, R.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; Will, A. SmartPLS 2.0. 2005. Available online: www.smartpls.de (accessed on 1 September 2019).
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garson, G.D. Path Analysis. Available online: http://www.statisticalassociates.com/pathanalysis.htm (accessed on 24 January 2019).
- Yun, J.J.; Liu, Z. Micro-and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trejo-Perea, M.; Rios Moreno, G.J.; Castañeda-Miranda, A.; Vargas-Vazquez, D.; Carrillo-Serrano, R.V.; Herrera-Ruiz, G. Development of a real-time energy monitoring platform user-friendly for buildings. Procedia Technol. 2013, 7, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ehrhardt-Martinez, K.; Donnelly, K.A.; Laitner, J.A. Advanced Metering Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities; American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Leng, G.S.; Lada, S.; Muhammad, M.Z.; Ibrahim, A.A.H.A.; Amboala, T. An exploration of social networking sites (SNS) adoption in Malaysia using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Intrinsic Motivation. J. Internet Bank. Commer. 2011, 16, 1–27. Available online: http://www.icommercecentral.com/open-access/an-exploration-of-social-networking-sites-sns-adoption-in-malaysia-using-technology-acceptance-model-tam-theory-of-planned-behavior-tpb-and-intrinsic-motivation.php?aid=38251 (accessed on 1 September 2019).
- Wilhite, H. Energy consumption as cultural practice: Implications for the theory and policy of sustainable energy use. In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2013; pp. 60–72. [Google Scholar]
- Wilhite, H.; Ling, R. Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy Build. 1995, 22, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, D.; Akman, I.; Mishra, A. Theory of Reasoned Action application for green information technology acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 36, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, H.; Vasseur, V.; Fan, Y.; Xu, J. Exploring reasons behind careful-use, energy-saving behaviours in residential sector based on the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence from Changchun, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, M.; Warren-Myers, G.; Paladino, A. Using the theory of planned behaviour to predict intentions to purchase sustainable housing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos-Feliscuzo, L.T.; Himang, C.M. Library periodical indexing software evaluation using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 25, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trappey, A.J.; Trappey, C.V.; Govindarajan, U.H.; Chuang, A.C.; Sun, J.J. A review of essential standards and patent landscapes for the Internet of Things: A key enabler for Industry 4.0. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2017, 33, 208–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, B.; Yang, S.; Kao, H.A.; Lee, J. Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in Industry 4.0 environment. IFAC Pap. Line 2015, 48, 1622–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rüßmann, M.; Lorenz, M.; Gerbert, P.; Waldner, M.; Justus, J.; Engel, P.; Harnisch, M. Industry 4.0: The Future Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. Boston Consult. Group 2015, 9, 54–89. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, T.; Barreto, L.; Amaral, A. Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Ashok, M.; Day, M.; Narula, R. Buyer (dis) satisfaction and process innovation: The case of information technology services provision. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 68, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallant, J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS, 4th ed.; Open University Press/McGrawHill: Maidenhead, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.; Black, W.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R.; Tatham, R. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Uppersaddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Aldás-Manzano, J.; Lassala-Navarré, C.; Ruiz-Mafé, C.; Sanz-Blas, S. The role of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in online banking usage. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2009, 27, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type of Meter | Meter Brand/Model |
---|---|
Whole-house | The Energy Detective (TED) |
Power Cost MonitorTM | |
Plug-load meters | Powerkuff Monitor |
WattsUp? PRO | |
Packaged solutions | Kill-a-watt |
AlertMe |
Type | Features | Reference |
---|---|---|
PowerPedia | A mobile application that allows users to assess and determine the electricity consumption of individual devices as well as the energy efficiency of the appliances. It also enables users to identify and compare their consumption with that of others. | [38] |
Building Energy Management System | Integrates users’ responses in building controlling and monitoring remotely. | [39,40] |
Home Energy Management System | Home Energy Management System (HEMS) is a product utilizing the smart grid. It provides real-time information of supplied electricity price, the electricity consumption of each household, and the electricity rate of each household. It also has a function that notifies the consumers when they have already exceeded the limit preset by the user through a warning sound or automatically turning off the power to prevent unnecessary power use. | [23] |
Load Description | EMS Device | Clamp Ammeter |
---|---|---|
Appliances | 360 min per appliance | 6 min per appliance |
Circuit breaker A | 960 min per circuit breaker | 6 min per circuit breaker |
Circuit breaker B | 960 min per circuit breaker | 6 min per circuit breaker |
Circuit breaker C | 600 min per circuit breaker | 6 min per circuit breaker |
Main circuit breaker | 4320 min | 6 min per circuit breaker |
Components | Specifications |
---|---|
Laptop Computer | Operating System: Mac OS Sierra version 10.6.12 or later Processor: 1.6 GHz intel core i5 Memory: 4GB, 1600 Mhz Hard Drive: 250 GB Networking Hardware: 10/100/1000 Ethernet adapter |
Smartphone | Platform: IOS 1.3GHz dual-core Apple A7 (64-bit ARMv8) processor, 1GB of RAM. Platform: Android 5.1 RAM. 1.5GB. |
Photon particle microcontroller | Particle PØ Wi-Fi module Broadcom BCM43362 Wi-Fi chip 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi STM32F205RGY6 120Mhz ARM Cortex M3 1MB flash, 128KB RAM On-board RGB status LED (ext. drive provided) 18 Mixed-signal GPIO and advanced peripherals |
SCT 013 000 current sensor | Input Current: 0~100A AC Output Mode: 0~50mA Non-linearity: ±3% Turn Ratio: 100A:0.05A Resistance Grade: Grade B Work Temperature: −25 °C–+70 °C |
Extension cord | #12 Stranded copper wire 3-gang outlet |
WI-FI | Globe/Smart Broadband Mobile data hotspot |
Load Source | Load Current Measured Using EECMS (Amperes) | Load Current Measured Using Clamp Ammeter (Amperes) | Interpretation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Std. Dev (σ) | Confidence Interval (CI) | Std. Dev. (σ) | Confidence Interval (CI) | ||||||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||
1. Appliance A | 0.160 | 0.002 | 0.164 | 0.165 | 0.160 | 0.009 | 0.153 | 0.167 | Not significant |
2. Appliance B | 0.426 | 0.522 | 0.394 | 0.458 | 0.420 | 0.468 | 0.339 | 0.501 | Not significant |
3. Appliance C | 0.494 | 0.017 | 0.486 | 0.501 | 0.486 | 0.005 | 0.483 | 0.490 | Not significant |
4. Appliance D | 0.364 | 0.011 | 0.361 | 0.367 | 0.346 | 0.012 | 0.340 | 0.352 | Not significant |
5. Appliance E | 0.294 | 0.005 | 0.293 | 0.296 | 0.285 | 0.007 | 0.281 | 0.288 | Not significant |
Load Description | Load Current in Amperes Measured Using Eecms | Load Current in Amperes Measured Using Clamp Ammeter | Interpretation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD (σ) | Confidence Interval (CI) | SD (σ) | Confidence Interval (CI) | ||||||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||
1. CB1 (LO 2) | 0.258 | 0.423 | 0.189 | 0.326 | 0.257 | 0.005 | 0.255 | 0.260 | Not significant |
2. CB 2 (LO 3) | 0.701 | 0.222 | 0.658 | 0.745 | 0.700 | 0.008 | 0.694 | 0.706 | Not significant |
3. CB 3 (LO 4) | 0.866 | 0.974 | 0.611 | 1.121 | 0.863 | 0.006 | 0.855 | 0.870 | Not significant |
4. CB 4 (LO & CO) | 0.526 | 1.054 | 0.486 | 0.566 | 0.526 | 0.005 | 0.520 | 0.532 | Not significant |
5. CB 5 (ACU) | 8.189 | 11.95 | 7.587 | 8.792 | 8.181 | 0.026 | 8.134 | 8.227 | Not significant |
6. CB 6 (LO & CO) | 1.099 | 1.255 | 1.023 | 1.176 | 1.091 | 0.070 | 0.944 | 1.238 | Not significant |
7. CB 7 (ACU) | 4.090 | 7.289 | 3.841 | 4.340 | 4.091 | 0.030 | 4.019 | 4.163 | Not significant |
Hypothesized Path | t-Value | p-Value | Result of Hypotheses |
---|---|---|---|
H1: economic benefits → perceived usefulness | 0.554 | 0.580 | Not Supported |
H2: environmental responsibility → perceived usefulness | 7.546 | 0.000 | Supported |
H3: social contribution → perceived usefulness | 3.794 | 0.000 | Supported |
H4: innovativeness → perceive ease of use | 19.057 | 0.000 | Supported |
H5: perceived ease of use → perceived usefulness | 2.841 | 0.005 | Supported |
H6: perceived ease of use → behavioral intention | 4.468 | 0.000 | Supported |
H7: perceived usefulness → behavior intention | 8.695 | 0.000 | Supported |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Casquejo, M.N.; Himang, C.; Ocampo, L.; Ancheta, R., Jr.; Himang, M.; Bongo, M. The Way of Expanding Technology Acceptance—Open Innovation Dynamics. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010008
Casquejo MN, Himang C, Ocampo L, Ancheta R Jr., Himang M, Bongo M. The Way of Expanding Technology Acceptance—Open Innovation Dynamics. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020; 6(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010008
Chicago/Turabian StyleCasquejo, Ma. Nanette, Celbert Himang, Lanndon Ocampo, Rosein Ancheta, Jr., Melanie Himang, and Miriam Bongo. 2020. "The Way of Expanding Technology Acceptance—Open Innovation Dynamics" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010008
APA StyleCasquejo, M. N., Himang, C., Ocampo, L., Ancheta, R., Jr., Himang, M., & Bongo, M. (2020). The Way of Expanding Technology Acceptance—Open Innovation Dynamics. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010008