Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Background
2.1. Global Construction Industry
2.2. Artificial Intelligence and the Subfields
2.3. Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Construction
2.4. Disruption of Artificial Intelligence
3. Methodology
4. Results
4.1. General Observations
4.2. Artificial Intelligence Adoption Opportunities and Challenges
4.2.1. Opportunities
Waste Management and Resources
Estimation and Scheduling
Construction Site Analytics
Job Creation
Supply Chain Management
Health and Safety
Construction Contracts
4.2.2. Challenges
Cultural Issues
Security
Higher Initial Costs
Project Uniqueness
Robotics
Institutional Barrier
Information Sharing
4.3. Prominent Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Construction
4.3.1. Planning Phase
4.3.2. Design Phase
4.3.3. Construction Phase
5. Discussion
5.1. Key Findings
5.2. Research Contributions
- A new body of knowledge concerning AI technologies practices in construction.
- An understanding of the potential and existing application of AI analysis in the construction industry.
- A review on the opportunities and challenges that the construction industry encounters when they implement AI.
- A groundwork for future research based on the data findings.
- An analysis of the use of new technologies on construction sites in planning, design, and construction stages.
5.3. Research Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bamgbade, J.; Nawi, M.; Kamaruddeen, A.; Adeleke, A.; Salimon, M. Building sustainability in the construction industry through firm capabilities, technology and business innovativeness: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2019, 23, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Li, Z.; Ning, X.; Li, L. Gauging the impacts of urbanization on CO2 emissions from the construction industry: Evidence from China. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 288, 112440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahbub, P.; Goonetilleke, A.; Ayoko, G.; Egodawatta, P.; Yigitcanlar, T. Analysis of build-up of heavy metals and volatile organics on urban roads in Gold Coast, Australia. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 2077–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Javed, A.; Pan, W.; Chen, L.; Zhan, W. A systemic exploration of drivers for and constraints on construction productivity enhancement. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2018, 8, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Next Normal in Construction. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Capital%20Projects%20and%20Infrastructure/Our%20Insights/The%20next%20normal%20in%20construction/The-next-normal-in-construction.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- Young, D.; Panthi, K.; Noor, O. Challenges involved in adopting BIM on the construction jobsite. Built Environ. 2021, 3, 302–310. [Google Scholar]
- Adwan, E.; Al-Soufi, A. A review of ICT technology in construction. Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2016, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Yun, J.J.; Lee, D.; Ahn, H.; Park, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. Not deep learning but autonomous learning of open innovation for sustainable artificial intelligence. Sustainability 2016, 8, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Cugurullo, F. The sustainability of artificial intelligence: An urbanistic viewpoint from the lens of smart and sustainable cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T. Greening the artificial intelligence for a sustainable planet: An editorial commentary. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chien, C.F.; Dauzère-Pérès, S.; Huh, W.T.; Jang, Y.J.; Morrison, J.R. Artificial intelligence in manufacturing and logistics systems: Algorithms, applications, and case studies. Residential 2020, 58, 2730–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koskela, L.; Ballard, G.; Howell, G. Achieving change in construction. In Proceedings of the International Group of Lean Construction 11th Annual Conference, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 22–24 July 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Blanco, J.; Fuchs, S.; Parsons, M.; Ribeirinho, M.J. Artificial intelligence: Construction technology’s next frontier. Build. Econ. 2018, 9, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
- Yun, J.J. How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2015, 1, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, H.S. Technology convergence, open innovation, and dynamic economy. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2012, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. Business models in the industry 4.0 environment: Results of Web of Science bibliometric analysis. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2022, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaguer, C. Nowadays trends in robotics and automation in construction industry: Transition from hard to soft robotics. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, New Orleans, LA, USA, 26 April–1 May 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Vaquero, T.S.; Silva, J.R.; Beck, J.C. Post-design analysis for building and refining AI planning systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2013, 26, 1967–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naser, M.Z. AI-based cognitive framework for evaluating response of concrete structures in extreme conditions. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2019, 81, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, A.K.; Janmaijaya, M.; Abraham, A.; Muhuri, P.K. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018). Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2019, 85, 517–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadpour, A.; Karan, E.; Asadi, S. Artificial intelligence techniques to support design and construction. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC, Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Xin, X.; Tu, Y.; Stojanovic, V.; Wang, H.; Shi, K.; He, S.; Pan, T. Online reinforcement learning multiplayer non-zero sum games of continuous-time Markov jump linear systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2022, 412, 126537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bughin, J.; Hazan, E.; Ramaswamy, S.; Chui, M.; Allas, T.; Dahlstrom, P.; Trench, M. Artificial Intelligence: The Next Digital Frontier; McKinsey Global Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien, W.J. Fiatech: The next generation of the capital projects technology roadmap. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 02517003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, M.; Kumar, S. Scope of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) in Future Technology as Artificial Intelligence. J. Adv. Res. Electron. Eng. Technol. 2021, 7, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
- Greco, M.; Grimaldi, M.; Locatelli, G.; Serafini, M. How does open innovation enhance productivity? An exploration in the construction ecosystem. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 168, 120740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, S.; Barrett, A.; Yampolskiy, R.V. Modeling and interpreting expert disagreement about artificial superintelligence. Informatica 2017, 41, 419–428. [Google Scholar]
- Goertzel, B.; Wang, P. A foundational architecture for artificial general intelligence, Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architect. Adv. Artif. Gen. Intell. Concepts Archit. Algorithms 2007, 6, 36. [Google Scholar]
- Na, S.; Heo, S.; Han, S.; Shin, Y.; Roh, Y. Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) Framework. Buildings 2022, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froese, T.; Han, Z.; Alldritt, M. Study of information technology development for the Canadian construction industry. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2007, 34, 817–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, P.; Kar, A.K.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: Insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 2, 10479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Chi, H.L.; Wang, X.; Ding, L. Automation and robotics in construction and civil engineering. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2015, 79, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mahbub, R. An Investigation into the Barriers to the Implementation of Automation and Robotics Technologies in the Construction Industry. Ph.D. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- McKinsey State of Machine Learning and AI. Available online: https://www.Forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2017/07/09/mckinseys-state-of-machine-learning-and-ai-2017 (accessed on 21 June 2021).
- Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Yun, J.J.; Pyka, A.; Won, D.; Kodama, F.; Schiuma, G.; Zhao, X. How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2018, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, S.; Sulankivi, K.; Kiviniemi, M.; Romo, I.; Eastman, C.M.; Teizer, J. BIM-based fall hazard identification and prevention in construction safety planning. Saf. Sci. 2015, 72, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinosho, T.D.; Oyedele, L.O.; Bilal, M.D.; Ajayi, A.O.; Delgado, M.D.; Akinade, O.O.; Ahmed, A.A. Deep learning in the construction industry: A review of present status and future innovations. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 5, 101827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faghihi, V.; Nejat, A.; Reinschmidt, K.F.; Kang, J.H. Automation in construction scheduling: A review of the literature. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 1845–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amusan, L.M.; Aigbavboa, C.; Fayomi, O.S.; Owolabi, J.D. Lean Thinking and Industrial 4.0 Approach to Achieving Construction 4.0 for Industrialization and Technological Development. Buildings 2020, 20, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
- Yaseen, Z.M.; Ali, Z.H.; Salih, S.Q.; Al-Ansari, N. Prediction of risk delay in construction projects using a hybrid artificial intelligence model. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gondia, A.; Siam, A.; El-Dakhakhni, W.; Nassar, A. Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04019085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A. How can smart mobility innovations alleviate transportation disadvantage? Assembling a conceptual framework through a systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.C.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in building smarter cities: Insights from a systematic review of the literature. Energies 2020, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Delgado, J.M.D.; Oyedele, L.; Ajayi, A.; Akanbi, L.; Akinade, O.; Bilal, M.; Owolabi, H. Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, D. The robots are coming: Probing the impact of automation on construction and society. Constr. Res. Innov. 2019, 10, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, V.S.; Matus, K.J. Towards a responsible integration of artificial intelligence technology in the construction sector. Sci. Public Policy 2020, 47, 689–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schönbeck, P.; Löfsjögård, M.; Ansell, A. Quantitative review of construction 4.0 Technology presence in construction project research. Buildings 2019, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eber, W. Potentials of artificial intelligence in construction management. Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. 2020, 12, 2053–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajayi, A.L.; Oyedele, H.; Owolabi, O.; Akinade, M.; Bilal, M.; Davila Delgado, J.M.; Akanbi, L. Deep learning models for health and safety risk prediction in power infrastructure projects. Risk Anal. 2020, 40, 2019–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, B.; Jung, K.; Han, C.S.; Hong, D. A survey of climbing robots: Locomotion and adhesion. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2010, 11, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aparicio, C.; Balzan, A.; Trabucco, D. Robotics in construction: Framework and future directions. Int. J. High-Rise Build. 2020, 9, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Z.H.; Chen, A.Y.; Hsieh, S.H. Temporal image analytics for abnormal construction activity identification. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, N.L.; Cardoso, J.A.F.; Brea, A.F. Green jobs: The present and future of the building industry. Evol. Anal. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 266. [Google Scholar]
- Oyedele, K.W. Clients’ assessment of architects’ performance in building delivery process: Evidence from Nigeria. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2090–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajayi, L.O.; Oyedele, M.; Bilal, O.O.; Akinade, H.A.; Alaka, H.A. Critical management practices influencing on-site waste minimization in construction projects. Waste Manag. 2017, 59, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winge, S.; Albrechtsen, E.; Mostue, B.A. Causal factors and connections in construction accidents. Science 2019, 112, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyedele, A.; Ajayi, L.; Oyedele, J.M.D.; Delgado, L.; Akanbi, O.; Akinade, H.; Owolabi, M. Deep learning and Boosted trees for injuries prediction in power infrastructure projects. Soft Comput. 2021, 110, 107587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaka, H.A.; Oyedele, L.O.; Owolabi, H.A.; Bilal, M.; Ajayi, S.O.; Akinade, O.O. Insolvency of small civil engineering firms: Critical strategic factors. Educ. Pract. 2017, 143, 04016026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigham, G.F.; Adamtey, S.; Onsarigo, L.; Jha, N. Artificial intelligence for construction safety: Mitigation of the risk of fall. In Proceedings of the SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2–3 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hager, I.; Golonka, A.; Putanowicz, R. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Eng. 2016, 151, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paoletti, I.; Elza, M. Adaptive manufacturing: A new perspective for construction industry. Digit. Constr. Ind. 2016, 5, 341–350. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro, M.S.; Singh, C. Why Should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. ACM 2016, 2, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar]
- Nagendra, S.; Rafi, N. Application of artificial intelligence in construction management. Int. J. Res. Eng. Sci. Manag. 2018, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Binder, A.; Montavon, G.; Lapuschkin, S.; Müller, K.R.; Samek, W. Layer-wise relevance propagation for neural networks with local renormalization layers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Barcelona, Spain, 6–9 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Oyedele, B.E.; Jaiyeoba, K.O.; Kadiri, S.O.; Folagbade, I.K.; Tijani, R.O. Salami, Critical factors affecting construction quality in Nigeria: Evidence from industry professionals. Urban Dev. 2015, 6, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Y.; Zhang, L. Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Autom. Constr. 2021, 122, 103517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardie, M.; Miller, G.; Manley, K.; McFallan, S. Experience with the management of technological innovations within the Australian construction industry. Technol. Manag. A Unifying Discip. Melting Bound. 2005, 7, 244–250. [Google Scholar]
- Zavadskas, E.K. Automation and robotics in construction: International research and achievements. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasegawa, Y. Construction automation and robotics in the 21st century. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Tokyo, Japan, 3–5 October 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Afzal, F.; Yunfei, S.; Nazir, M.; Bhatti, S.M. A review of artificial intelligence-based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2019, 14, 300–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, T.H.; Khund, M.A.; Memon, N.A.; Memon, A.H.; Imad, H.U.; Khahro, S.H. Application of artificial intelligence in construction waste management. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management, Cambridge, UK, 2–4 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Poh, C.Q.; Ubeynarayana, C.U.; Goh, Y.M. Safety leading indicators for construction sites: A machine learning approach. Autom. Constr. 2018, 93, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taillandier, F.; Taillandier, P.; Tepeli, E.; Breysse, D.; Mehdizadeh, R.; Khartabil, F. A multi-agent model to manage risks in construction project (SMACC). Autom. Constr. 2015, 58, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, G. Applications of artificial intelligence in construction management. Int. J. Res. Eng. IT Soc. Sci. 2019, 3, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
- Han, C.S. Human-robot cooperation technology an ideal midway solution heading toward the future of robotics and automation in construction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Seoul, Korea, 29 June–2 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, S.; Ma, Z.; Skibniewski, M.; Guo, J.; Yun, L. Application of automation and robotics technology in high-rise building construction: An overview. In Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC, Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez, S.; Jardon, A.; Navarro, J.M.; Gonzalez, P. Building industrialization: Robotized assembly of modular products. Assem. Autom. 2008, 28, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumaraswamy, M.M.; Ng, S.T.; Ugwu, O.O.; Palaneeswaran, E.; Rahman, M.M. Empowering collaborative decisions in complex construction project scenarios. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2004, 11, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kildienė, S.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Tamošaitienė, J. Complex assessment model for advanced technology deployment. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2014, 20, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kingston, J.K. Artificial intelligence and legal liability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, UK, 13–15 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Meng, X.; Tam, C. Building information modeling-based building design optimization for sustainability. Energy Build. 2015, 105, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zied, K. An Augmented Framework for Practical Development of Construction Robots. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2007, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skibniewski, M.J.; Zavadskas, E.K. Technology development in construction: A continuum from distant past into the future. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2013, 19, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catelain, M. How does artificial intelligence help to avoid disputes in construction? PM World J. 2019, 8, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Chunyaem, W.; Charoensiriwath, C.; Panuwatwanich, K.; Saito, S.; Padungtin, P. Application of artificial intelligence to automate construction materials data classification. In Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 29 June–2 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Brilakis, I.; Park, M.W.; Jog, G. Automated vision tracking of project related entities. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2011, 25, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elfaki, O.; Alatawi, S.; Abushanndi, E. Review article using intelligent techniques in construction project cost estimation. Adv. Eng. 2014, 6, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Corrado, V.; Fabrizio, E.; Gasparella, A.; Patuzzi, F. A Simulation method for measuring building physics properties. In Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2019 16th Conference of IBPSA, Rome, Italy, 2–4 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.A.; Nadeem, A. Towards digitizing the construction industry: State of the art of construction 4.0. In Proceedings of the ISEC, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 19–20 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez, P.; Al-Hussein, M.; Ahmad, R. A scientometrics analysis and critical review of computer vision applications for construction. Autom. Constr. 2019, 107, 102947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darko, A.; Chan, A.P.; Adabre, M.A.; Edwards, D.J.; Hosseini, M.R.; Ameyaw, E.E. Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: Scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whyte, J.K.; Hartmann, T. How digitizing building information transforms the built environment. Build. Res. Inf. 2017, 45, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, W.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Erol, I.; Liu, A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginzburg, A.; Kuzina, O.; Ryzhkova, A. Unified resources marking system as a way to develop artificial intelligence in construction. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 365, 062021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Pan, Y.; Luo, X. Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis. Autom. Constr. 2019, 103, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artificial Intelligence in the Construction Industry. Available online: https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Artificial-intelligence-in-the-construction-industry.htm (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Xiao, C.; Liu, Y.; Khnoukh, A. Bibliometric review of artificial intelligence (AI) in construction engineering and management. In Proceedings of the ICCREM 2018 Innovative Technology and Intelligent Construction, Charleston, SC, USA, 9–10 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Moselhi, O.; Alshibani, A. Optimization of earthmoving operations in heavy civil engineering projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadi, A.; Alsubaey, M.; Makatsoris, C. A machine learning approach for predicting delays in construction logistics. Int. J. Adv. Logist. 2015, 4, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neelamkavil, J. Automation in the prefab and modular construction industry. In Proceedings of the 26th ISARC, Austin, TX, USA, 24–27 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Oesterreich, T.D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the implications of digitization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 2016, 83, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dave, B.; Kubler, S.; Pikas, E.; Holmström, J.; Singh, V.; Främling, K.; Koskela, L. Intelligent products: Shifting the production control logic in construction (with Lean and BIM). In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Perth, Australia, 29–31 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Butler, L.; Windle, E.; Desouza, K.C.; Mehmood, R.; Corchado, J.M. Can building “artificially intelligent cities” safeguard humanity from natural disasters, pandemics, and other catastrophes? An urban scholar’s perspective. Sensors 2020, 20, 2988. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, K.N.; Agrawal, V.M. Automation and robotics in the construction industry: A review. Fut. Eng. Technol. 2019, 14, 49. [Google Scholar]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Kankanamge, N.; Regona, M.; Ruiz Maldonado, A.; Rowan, B.; Ryu, A.; Li, R.Y.M. Artificial intelligence technologies and related urban planning and development concepts: How are they perceived and utilized in Australia? J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2020, 6, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monroe, D. AI, explain yourself. Commun. ACM 2018, 61, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parveen, R. Artificial intelligence in construction industry: Legal issues and regulatory challenges. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 957–962. [Google Scholar]
- Wahbeh, W.; Kunz, D.; Hofmann, J.; Bereuter, P. Digital twinning of the built environment. SPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2020, 1, 231–237. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, M.Y.; Hoang, N.D. Interval estimation of construction cost at completion using least squares support vector machine. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2014, 20, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, B.H. Intelligent enterprises for construction: Bridging the technology and knowledge gaps through innovation and education. In Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kassens-Noor, E.; Hintze, A. Cities of the future? The potential impact of artificial intelligence. AI 2020, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, H.; Kim, C.; Kim, H.; Han, S.H.; Kim, M.K. Trend analysis of research and development on automation and robotics technology in the construction industry. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2020, 14, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kankanamge, N.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Goonetilleke, A. Public perceptions on artificial intelligence driven disaster management: Evidence from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 65, 101729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Corchado, J.M.; Mehmood, R.; Li, R.Y.M.; Mossberger, K.; Desouza, K. Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2021, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Mehmood, R.; Corchado, J.M. Green artificial intelligence: Towards an efficient, sustainable and equitable technology for smart cities and futures. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leu, S.S.; Hung, T.H. An optimal construction resource leveling scheduling simulation model. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2002, 29, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.; Li, H.; Guo, H.; Chan, N.; Kong, S.; Chan, G.; Skitmore, M. Construction virtual prototyping: A survey of use. Constr. Innov. 2009, 9, 420–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elmousalami, H.H. Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for project conceptual cost prediction: A case study and comparative analysis. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020, 68, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraj, I.; Alshawi, M.; Aouad, G.; Child, T.; Underwood, J. An industry foundation classes Web-based collaborative construction computer environment: WISPER. Autom. Constr. 2020, 10, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golubchikov, O.; Thornbush, M. Artificial intelligence and robotics in smart city strategies and planned smart development. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Chen, C.; Cai, Y.; Yu, T.; Wanng, H. BIM-based visualization research in the construction industry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Vilutiene, T.; Kalibatiene, D.; Hosseini, M.R.; Pellicer, E.; Zavadskas, E.K. Building information modelling (BIM) for structural engineering. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 3, 5290690. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, H.C.; Chang, S.; Chen, C.C.; Wu, I.C. Knowledge-based system for resolving design clashes in building information models. Autom. Constr. 2020, 110, 103001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edirisinghe, R. Digital skin of the construction site. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2018, 26, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gambao, E.; Balaguer, C. Robotics and automation in construction. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2002, 9, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regona, M.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Xia, B.; Li, R.Y.M. Artificial Intelligent Technologies for the Construction Industry: How Are They Perceived and Utilized in Australia? J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2022, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, H.; Hallowell, M.R.; Tixier, A.J. AI-based prediction of independent construction safety outcomes from universal attributes. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mouloodi, S.; Rahmanpanah, H.; Gohari, S.; Burvill, C.; Tse, K.M.; Davies, H.M. What can artificial intelligence and machine learning tell us? A review of applications to equine biomechanical research. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 123, 104728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abioye, S.O.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akanbi, L.; Ajayi, A.; Delgado, J.M.D.; Bilal, M.; Ahmed, A. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 103299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, Y.; Lee, M. Smart city 4.0 from the perspective of open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2019, 5, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Wilson, M.; Kamruzzaman, M. Disruptive impacts of automated driving systems on the built environment and land use: An urban planner’s perspective. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2019, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Newman, C.; Edwards, D.; Martek, I.; Lai, J.; Thwala, W.D.; Rillie, I. Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: A bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2020, 10, 557–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskuriy, R.; Selamat, A.; Maresova, P.; Krejcar, O.; David, O.O. Industry 4.0 for the construction industry: Review of management perspective. Economies 2019, 7, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hatami, M.; Flood, I.; Franz, B.; Zhang, X. State-of-the-art review on the applicability of AI methods to automated construction manufacturing. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2019 Data Sens. Anal. 2019, 3, 368–375. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, C.J.; Oyekan, J.; Stergioulas, L.; Griffin, D. Utilizing industry 4.0 on the construction site: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics. 2020, 17, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Rong, S.; Wang, R.; Yu, S. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning for nonlinear relationship analysis and process control in drinking water treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostoka, Z.; Locovs, J.; Gaile-Sarkane, E. Open innovation of new emerging small economies based on university-construction industry cooperation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complex. 2019, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andersson, E.; Lundblad, J.; Jansson, B. The yield of an open innovation arena for occupational health and safety ideas in the Swedish construction industry. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2011, 2, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spithoven, A.; Clarysse, B.; Knockaert, M. Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation 2010, 30, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooke, P.; Yun, J.; Zhao, X.; Kim, Y. The digital, quaternary or 4.0 web economy: Aspects, effects and implications. Int. J. Knowl.-Based Dev. 2019, 10, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Application | AI Technology | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Big data and data analytics | Machine learning | Risk detection and assessment are improved by using new technologies that predict incidents and issue early warnings. Smart wearables can collect data for analytics, and AI algorithms address possible issues on-site and create new strategies that increase efficiency. In addition, data analytics can be used for decision making and strategy building. |
Robotic and automation | Machine learning | Robotics is becoming more apparent on construction sites and will be highly specific (e.g., bricklaying, painting, and loading). The technology will benefit sites, as it reduces the time spent on repetitive tasks and helps protect workers from dangerous building environments. Aerial drones are frequently used to survey sites and collect data that allow surveyors to generate 3D models of buildings. |
Data and system integration | Pattern recognition | Digital automated approaches can enhance safety management by stepping in related education, planning, and inspection processes. When combined with virtual reality, these become even more powerful as they ensure personnel safety in real-time. |
Mobility and wearable | Automation | Smart wearable technologies detect movement, spatio-temporal activity, and thoracic posture of workers. These systems provide real-time data on-site, which reduces the risk of collisions between workers and heavy equipment. |
Primary Data | Secondary Data | ||
---|---|---|---|
Inclusionary | Exclusionary | Inclusionary | Exclusionary |
Journal articles Peer-reviewed Full-text available online Published in English Government reports Conferences | Duplicate records Books and chapter Industry reports | AI in construction Opportunities and challenges in construction Relevant to the research objective | Not AI in construction-related Irrelevant research objectives |
Selection Criteria |
---|
|
No | Opportunities | Challenges |
---|---|---|
1 | Provide a competitive advantage to businesses that use AI, as it will reduce economic costs | AI applications are highly specialized and need constant algorithms training to identify patterns |
2 | Increase productivity and efficiency of on-site personnel | The fragmented nature of the construction industry may result in data scarcity |
3 | Reduce the time spent on repetitive tasks by using big data | High initial costs in the research and development of AI platforms |
4 | Identify high-risk issues and automatically classify them into actionable categories | AI platforms need investment constantly to keep data up to date |
5 | Improve current work processes | Implementation of AI requires businesses to move away from traditional ideas |
6 | Increase the consistency in project related work that will result in higher quality | Security and reliability of a large amount of data |
7 | Avoid possible delays through predictive modeling | Multi-point responsibility between stakeholders may reduce accountability |
8 | Extract data from the complex document and categorize them based on patterns easily | Non-standardization of a construction project makes it difficult to implement AI |
9 | Reduce the probability of on-site accidents and mitigate safety risks | Require an AI expert that will involve additional costs |
10 | Increase accuracy of plans and allow for better verification | High resistance from industry bodies |
11 | Produce outcomes that can be easily understandable by all stakeholders, which enhances efficient communication | Ethical, moral, and legal issues that are yet to be addressed by the government or institutional bodies |
12 | Enhance consistency and reliability, as AI is highly unlikely to make mistakes (provided data are correct) | High impact on traditional skills and may impact job availability |
Title | Lead Author | Year | Journal | Subset of AI | Opportunities (See Table 4) | Challenges (See Table 4) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: a review of present status, opportunities and future challenges | Abioye Sofiat | 2021 | Building Engineering | Machine learning | 1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,12 | 1,3,5,8,9 |
Towards a semantic construction digital twin: directions for future research | Calin Boje | 2020 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 2,3,4,5,6,11 | 1,4,7,9 |
Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for project conceptual cost prediction: a case study and comparative analysis | Haytham Elmousalami | 2020 | IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management | Neural networks | 1,2,3,5,6,7,9,12 | 1,2,3,4,9,10,12 |
Potentials of artificial intelligence in construction management. organization, technology and management in construction | Wolfgang Eber | 2020 | Organization, Technology, and Management in Construction | Deep learning | 1,2,3,5,6,10,12 | 1,2,9 |
Application of artificial intelligence in construction project management | Venkata Nagendra | 2018 | International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,11,12 | 1,4,7,8,9 |
Fintech: the next generation of the capital projects technology roadmap | William John O’Brien | 2017 | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | Neural networks | 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9 | 1,3,7,9 |
Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry | Thuy Duong Oesterreich | 2016 | Computer in Industry | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12 | 1,7,9,11 |
A multi-agent model to manage risks in construction project (SMACC) | Franck Taillandier | 2015 | Automation in Construction | Neural networks | 1,2,5,6,8 | 1,2,3,6,8,9 |
Automation in construction scheduling: a review of the literature | Vahid Faghihi | 2015 | International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Neural networks | 2,3,4,5,7,9 | 1,8,9 |
Interval estimation of construction cost at completion using least squares support vector machine | Min-Yuan Cheng | 2014 | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management | Machine learning | 2,3,5,6,7,10 | 1,2,3,5,9 |
Using intelligent techniques in construction project cost estimation: 10-year survey | Abdelrahman Osmann Elfaki | 2014 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,12 | 1,2,3,4,6,9 |
Automated vision tracking of project related entities | Ioannis Brilakis | 2011 | Advanced Engineering Informatics | Machine learning | 2,4,5,8 | 1,2,3,9 |
Construction virtual prototyping: a survey of use | Ting Huang | 2009 | Construction Innovation | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,11 | 1,2,6,7,9 |
An augmented framework for practical development of construction robotics | Khaled Zied | 2007 | Advanced Robotics Systems | Neutral networks | 2,3,5,6,7,10 | 1,2,3,5,9 |
An optimal construction resource leveling scheduling simulation model | Sou-Sen Leu | 2002 | Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering | Neural networks | 2,5,6,7 | 1,2,3,4,8,9,12 |
An industry foundation classes web-based collaborative construction computer environment: WISPER | Ihsan Faraj | 2000 | Automation in Construction | Neural networks | 2,3,5,7,9,10,12 | 1,2,6,9 |
Title | Lead Author | Year | Journal | Subset of AI | Opportunities (See Table 4) | Challenges (See Table 4) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital twinning of the built environment: an interdisciplinary topic for innovation in didactics | Wissam Wahbeh | 2020 | ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,8,10,12 | 1,2,4,8 |
Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities | Amos Darko | 2020 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12 | 1,2,3,4,7,8 |
Artificial intelligence and robotics in smart city strategies and planned smart development | Oleg Golubchikov | 2020 | Smart Cities | Neural networks | 1,2,5,6,8.9,12 | 1,2,4,6,9,10,11,12 |
Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions | Purva Grover | 2020 | Annals of Operations Research | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,11,12 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,12 |
BIM-based visualization research in the construction industry: a network analysis | Zezhou Wu | 2019 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | Neural networks | 1,2,3,4,5,8,11,12 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12 |
Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: a review and bibliometric analysis | Hao Wang | 2019 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,8,9,10,12 | 1,2,3,7,8 |
A review of artificial intelligence-based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies | Farman Afzal | 2019 | International Journal of Managing Projects in Business | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12 | 1,2,3,4,9 |
Building information modeling (BIM) for structural engineering: a bibliometric analysis of the literature | Tatjana Vilutiene | 2019 | Advances in Civil Engineering | Machine learning | 1,2,4,5,8,10,11,12 | 1,2,3,7,9 |
Open innovation of new emerging small economies based on university-construction industry cooperation | Zane Rostoka | 2019 | Open Innovation: Technologies, Market and Complexity | Neutral networks | 1,2,5,6,8.9,12 | 1,2,4,6,9,10,11,12 |
Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable build environment: a review and bibliometric analysis | Hao Wang | 2019 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,8,9,10,12 | 1,2,3,7,8 |
Knowledge-based system for resolving design clashes in building information models | Hesieh-Chih Hsu | 2015 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,4,5,7,9,12 | 1,2,3,4,8,9 |
Complex assessment model for advanced technology deployment | Simona Kildiene | 2014 | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management | Machine learning | 1,5,6,8,9,12 | 1,2,7,8,9 |
Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future | Miroslaw Skibniewski | 2013 | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management | Neural networks | 1,2,3,5,7,10,12 | 1,2,6,9 |
Title | Lead Author | Year | Journal | Subset of AI | Opportunities (See Table 4) | Challenges (See Table 4) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative review of construction 4.0 technology presence in construction project research | Pia Schonbeck | 2020 | Buildings | Machine learning | 1,2,5,6,10,11,12 | 1,2,5,7 |
Lean thinking and industrial 4.0 approach to achieving construction 4.0 for industrialisation and technological development | Lekan Amusan | 2020 | Buildings | Neural networks | 1,2,3,4,5,7,9,11,12 | 1,2,4,5,6,7 |
Automation and robotics in the construction industry: a review | KN Narasimha Prasad | 2019 | Future Engineering and Technology | Neural networks | 1,2,5,12 | 1,2,3,8,10,11 |
Artificial intelligence for construction safety: mitigation of the risk of fall. advances in intelligent systems and computing | George Bigham | 2019 | Intelligent Systems and Applications | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12 | 1,2,3,4,5,7 |
How does artificial intelligence help to avoid disputes in construction? | Mathis Catelain | 2019 | PM World Journal | Machine learning | 1,2,4,5,6,8 | 1,2,6,9,12 |
Robotics and automated systems in construction: understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption | Juan Manuel Davila Delgado | 2019 | Journal of Building Engineering | Neural networks | 1,2,5,6,8,10 | 1,2,3,8,9,12 |
Digital skin of the construction site: smart sensor technologies towards the future smart construction site | Ruwini Edirisinghe | 2018 | Engineering Construction & Architectural Management | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12 | 1,2,4,9,12 |
Safety leading indicators for construction sites: a machine learning approach | Clive Poh | 2018 | Automation in Construction | Neural networks | 1,2,3,5,7 | 1,2,8,12 |
Unified resources marking system as a way to develop artificial intelligence in construction | Alexander Ginzburg | 2018 | Material Science and Engineering | Deep learning | 1,2,5,12 | 1,2,5,9 |
Digital skin of the construction site: smart sensor technologies towards the future smart construction site | Ruwini Edirisinghe | 2018 | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management | Machine learning | 1,2,4,5,6,8 | 1,2,6,9,12 |
Automation and robotics in construction and civil engineering | Mi Jeong Kim | 2015 | Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems | Machine learning | 1,2,3,4,5,6,10 | 1,2,7,9 |
“Human-robot cooperation technology” an ideal midway solution heading toward the future of robotics and automation in construction | Chang-soo Han | 2011 | Automation in Construction | Machine learning | 1,2,5,6 | 1,2,6,8 |
Trend analysis of research and development on automation and robotics technology in the construction industry | Hyojoo Son | 2010 | Journal of Civil Engineering | Neural networks | 1,2,4,5,6,7,10,11,12 | 1,2,3,6,9,12 |
Study of information technology development for the Canadian construction industry | Thomas Froese | 2007 | Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering | Machine learning | 1,2,3,5,9,11 | 1,2,4,6 |
Construction automation and robotics in the 21st century | Yukio Hasegawa | 2006 | Engineering Construction & Architectural Management | Machine learning | 1,2,5 | 1,2,3,4 |
Experience with the management of technological innovations within the Australian construction industry | Mary Hardie | 2005 | Journal of Building Engineering | Machine learning | 1,2,5,7 | 1,2,4,6,9 |
Robotics and automation in construction | Ernesto Gambao | 2002 | IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine | Neural networks | 1,2,3,5,6,812 | 1,2,3,4,5 |
Application | AI Technology | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Automated scheduling | Machine learning | Evaluate interminable data combinations and alternatives based on comparable projects and optimize the most efficient critical construction path to meet the milestones, identify future events, project delivery alternatives, and improve the overall project preparation. |
Retail supply chain | Automation | Increase predictability of materials being received on-site and reduce manufacturing downtime that may impact project-related costs, logistic burdens, and material variability. Gradient boosting trees can be directly applied as modularization and prefabrication become more prevalent in the construction industry. There is a surge in offsite construction as materials and supply chains are coordinated and become more effective to control the costs and cash flow of a project. |
Digital twin | Automation | The lack of transparency and proactive problem solution has a direct negative effect on productivity gains. Digital twin technology can capture real-time data that give stakeholders a real-time comparison of the progress from initial designs. |
Storing space | Pattern recognition | A digital map that is constantly updated and shows the location of stored materials and machines. The visual data can be accessed on a digital map that is up to date and reduces the time spent to find a specific item. |
Robotics and modularization | Deep learning | The construction industry is beginning to transition to manufacturing-like systems that allow for mass production. Robotic technology such as bricklaying and welding robots, self-driving heavy machines make construction safer, and wearable robotics improves the mobility of workers. Furthermore, modular construction technology will include applications that turn a 2D drawing or 3D model into a prefabricated building component. |
Analytical platforms | Pattern recognition | Enhanced analytical platforms that gather data from sensors to understand signals and algorithm patterns to deploy real-time solutions, reduce costs, highlight risk mitigation strategies, and avoid unplanned downtimes incidents. |
Automated image recognition | Automation | Video data are collected on-site to identify unsafe working behaviors and priorities safety education by aggregating data. In addition, video imagery can detect people and find those who are not registered on a construction site. |
Predictive AI algorithms | Pattern recognition | Forecast project risk, constructability, structural stability and provide insight during the decision-making stage of various technical solutions. In addition, predictive AI can improve construction profit margins by reducing uncertainties and enhancing project value by using linear/quadratic discriminant algorithms. Furthermore, it can detect dangerous situations early by using machine learning algorithms and pattern recognition. |
Design optimization | Machine learning | The supervised learning algorithm that uses clustering to classify essential data is necessary for making a recommendation. These applications are beneficial to project stakeholders as they inform them based on several criteria, such as total cost of ownership, time to complete the project, and the likelihood of defective mistakes during construction. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Regona, M.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Xia, B.; Li, R.Y.M. Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
Regona M, Yigitcanlar T, Xia B, Li RYM. Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022; 8(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
Chicago/Turabian StyleRegona, Massimo, Tan Yigitcanlar, Bo Xia, and Rita Yi Man Li. 2022. "Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
APA StyleRegona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. M. (2022). Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045