Next Article in Journal
Co-Expression of Lipid Transporters Simultaneously Enhances Oil and Starch Accumulation in the Green Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under Nitrogen Starvation
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolites That Confirm Induction and Release of Dormancy Phases in Sweet Cherry Buds
Previous Article in Journal
A Study of the Interaction between Xanthine Oxidase and Its Inhibitors from Chrysanthemum morifolium Using Computational Simulation and Multispectroscopic Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melatonin from Microorganisms, Algae, and Plants as Possible Alternatives to Synthetic Melatonin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/metabo13010114
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Quorum Sensing Molecules in Bacterial–Plant Interactions

by
Jan Majdura
,
Urszula Jankiewicz
,
Agnieszka Gałązka
and
Sławomir Orzechowski
*
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010114
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Metabolites from Natural Sources)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Quorum sensing (QS) is a system of communication of bacterial cells by means of chemical signals called autoinducers, which modulate the behavior of entire populations of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Three classes of signaling molecules have been recognized, Al-1, Al-2, Al-3, whose functions are slightly different. However, the phenomenon of quorum sensing is not only concerned with the interactions between bacteria, but the whole spectrum of interspecies interactions. A growing number of research results confirm the important role of QS molecules in the growth stimulation and defense responses in plants. Although many of the details concerning the signaling metabolites of the rhizosphere microflora and plant host are still unknown, Al-1 compounds should be considered as important components of bacterial–plant interactions, leading to the stimulation of plant growth and the biological control of phytopathogens. The use of class 1 autoinducers in plants to induce beneficial activity may be a practical solution to improve plant productivity under field conditions. In addition, researchers are also interested in tools that offer the possibility of regulating the activity of autoinducers by means of degrading enzymes or specific inhibitors (QSI). Current knowledge of QS and QSI provides an excellent foundation for the application of research to biopreparations in agriculture, containing a consortia of AHL-producing bacteria and QS inhibitors and limiting the growth of phytopathogenic organisms.

1. Introduction

Quorum sensing (QS) is a bacterial mechanism responsible for cell communication through chemical signals. This phenomenon occurs when there is a sufficiently high density of cells in a specific bacterial habitat. It was discovered and described about half a century ago in the Gram-negative bacterium Vibrio fisheri [1,2].
It has now been proven that this chemical communication system occurs in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This phenomenon involves the production and transport of signaling molecules, known as autoinducers (AI), into the intercellular space. AI molecules, depending on their structure, can be transported from the cytoplasm to the outside of the cell by diffusion or active transport. When the concentration of signaling molecules exceeds a threshold, changes in gene expression and metabolic effects occur throughout the bacterial population. QS molecules are responsible for both interspecies communication and interaction with higher organisms; they also regulate cellular processes, such as replication of bacterial DNA, energy metabolism, synthesis of enzymes, polysaccharides and antibiotics’ conjugative transfer of plasmids, bioluminescence, and the motility of microorganisms [3,4,5]. Data from the literature demonstrate that signaling molecules can significantly affect the expression of genes essential for bacterial life and growth. These are genes responsible for, among other things, adaptations to a particular environment, bacterial biofilm organization, horizontal gene transfer, synthesis of toxins and virulence factors, and other compounds involved in interactions between different species [4,6,7,8]. In addition, the type and quality of the bacterial habitat are associated with the concentration of signaling molecules, and consequently with the expression of genes responsible for bacterial adaptation to environmental conditions. This makes autoinducers a necessary and essential tool for evolution to effectively control gene expression, and thus, the behavior of the entire bacterial population [9]. The bacterial autoinducers used in communication have different molecular structures, which determines their classification into classes. These differences exist not only between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, but also between different bacterial species [10]. Previously, Gram-positive bacteria were thought to use peptides as autoinducers and Gram-negative bacteria used N-acyl-L-homoserine (AHL)-lactones. However, studies in recent years have shown that both groups of bacteria have the ability to synthesize AHL [11,12,13,14].
It is this type of signaling molecule—AHL—that plays an important role in bacterial–plant interactions. Both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria use autoinducer-2 (AI-2) for interspecific communication, and the derivative of 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentodione [15]. The presence of these autoinducers in the rhizosphere zone of plants may induce growth-promoting effects and the plant’s resistance to phytopathogens [16,17,18]. Increasing knowledge of the role of QS molecules in bacterial–plant interactions is driven by the need for applications. Degradative enzymes or inhibitors appear to be extremely useful in regulating this specific communication. Therefore, information on QS molecules and their effects on plant growth was compiled in this work. Information has also been compiled on how QS exerts control by quenching chemical signals.

2. Types and Importance of Signaling Molecules

The previously known QS signaling molecules have been divided into three classes: AI-1, AI-2 and AI-3. The autoinducers from each group differ in their chemical structure and functions [10,19]. According to this classification, the AI-1 group is responsible for interspecies communication, AI-2 for interspecies communication, and the AI-3 group for interactions with higher organisms. AI-1 autoinducers are categorized in terms of their molecular structure as N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones (AHLs). Such a molecule is composed of a homoserine lactone (HSL) with a fatty acid placed in the α position. The variation in structure in this group of structures is due to the different number of carbon atoms from 4 to 18 but also to the degree of oxidation, hydroxylation, and the number of unsaturated bonds (Figure 1A). Natural AHLs with fatty acid chain lengths of six to eight carbon atoms are the most abundant [20,21,22,23]. The shortest signaling molecules, consisting of four carbon atoms in the chain, were detected in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N-butyryl-L-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL) and Vibrio harveyi (N-3-hydroxy-butyryl-L-homoserine lactone (3-hydroxy-C4-HSL) [24,25]. Long AHL chains with 14 to 18 carbon atoms are characterized by one or two double bonds and are synthesized by many bacteria e.g., Rhodobacter capsulatus, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae [26,27,28,29]. Data from the literature suggest a relationship between the length of the fatty acid carbon chain and the properties of the AI as well as its transport outside the cell. Short AHLs with up to six carbon atoms can be transported out of the cell by diffusion, whereas AHLs with more than six carbon atoms in the structure require transporters, such as proton pumps, to ensure their active transport out of the cell through the cell membrane [30,31]. The stability of AHL and its derivatives is highly dependent on the pH of the surrounding environment. These molecules are stable at a pH of 7.0, while an increasing pH causes their hydrolysis [32,33,34].
The autoinducers of the second group were detected in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Al-2 has been found to exacerbate the symptoms of acute pneumonia, caused by P. aeruginosa [35]. Al-2 is transported out of the cell into the environment by active transport due to the size of the molecules [36]. A well-studied AI-2 is the furanosyl borate diester discovered in V. harveyi (Figure 1(BI)) [37].
The autoinducer AI-3, a pyrazinone derivative, was isolated from the culture of Escherichia coli (EHEC) serotype O157: H7 (Figure 1(BII)) [38].The presence of such molecules was also observed in cultures of Shigella sp. and Salmonella sp., as well as in normal intestinal bacterial flora. They enable commensal bacteria to communicate with host cells and with bacteria of another species [39,40].
In addition to these three well-known types of molecules in bacterial communication, autoinducers of a different structure, often characteristic of specific species of bacteria, were also identified. These are, i.e., 3OH palmitic acid methyl ester (3-OH PAME), cyclic dipeptides, quinolone signal molecule in Pseudomonas (Figure 1(BIII), PQS), diffusible signal factor (DSF), and cholerae autoinducer-1 (CAI-1) [15,41,42]. Indole is an interesting example of an autoinducer involved in bacterial–host interactions [43].

3. Mechanism of the Synthesis and Action of Autoinducers

The pathways of autoinducer biosynthesis, especially Al-1, have been well characterized in many bacterial strains [44,45]. Enzymes from three families, LuxI, HdtS and LuxM, are involved in this process. The best-characterized LuxI is highly conserved, which may indicate limitations in the diversity of AHL-type molecules. In contrast, the LuxR protein, a transcription regulator, has a highly variable sequence during Luxl synthesis [22,46].
AHL synthases, LuxI catalyze the reaction of AHL synthesis using substrates such as S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) and a fatty acid carried by the carrier protein ACP and, in addition, can use acyl-coenzyme A as substrates. Enzymes of the HdtS family are involved in the synthesis of unsubstituted AHL molecules and more complex AIs such as N-(3-OH-7-cis-tetradecenoyl)-HSL [15,20,47]. The first step of the AI-1 synthesis pathway is the binding of SAM to the active center of AHL synthase. This is followed by the transfer of the acyl group from acyl-ACP to the SAM–AHL synthase complex and the formation of an amide bond with the amino group of SAM. The next step is the formation of an ester bond in the homoserine moiety and the formation of two lactone products N-acyl-L-homoserine and 5’-methylthioadenosine (MTA). MTA is a byproduct of this reaction, but can be used by many bacteria, with the involvement of the enzyme 5’-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase (MTAN), to produce adenine and 5-methylthioribose phosphate (MTR-1-P), which is used by bacteria to synthesize SAM [48]. The synthesis of these signaling molecules involves AI-2, which synthesizes S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) from SAM. SAH is then converted to S-ribosylhomoserine (SRH) by the enzyme MTAN. This compound is the precursor of tetrahydrofuran in AI-2 molecules (Figure 2) [49,50].
In recent years, a mechanism for the biosynthesis of the Al-3 signaling molecule has been proposed. It is known that the substrate-amino acid derivatives—for the biosynthesis of this pyrazinone molecule—are provided by threonine dehydrogenase and tRNA synthetases. An important role for aminoacyl-AMP (abortive tRNA synthetase products), after spontaneous reaction with aminoketones, in modulating Al-3 transcription has also been demonstrated [38].

Mechanism of Action of AI-1 Autoinducers in Gram-Negative Bacteria

The molecular mechanisms of the QS phenomenon often depend on the species and the environment in which they occur. The bacterium V. fischeri has two QS systems that use AHL as signaling molecules: lux (LuxR/LuxI) and ain (AinS/AinR). AI-1 molecules are synthesized by LuxI or LuxM enzymes, and AI-2 molecules are synthesized by LuxS enzyme. LuxI synthase participates in the formation of 3-oxo-C6-HSL, which binds to the activator protein LuxR. The 3-oxo-C6-HSL-LuxR complex, thus formed interacts with the promoter of the luxICDABEG operon and induces the expression of these genes [46,51]. The LuxR/LuxI system is responsible for the expression of luminescence in vivo and the maintenance of the microsymbiont within the host organ. The second QS system of V. fischeri is based on the AinS protein with AHL synthase activity, which belongs to the LuxM family. This enzyme synthesizes N-octanoyl-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL), which is recognized by the transcription factor AinR [52]. At low bacterial cell population densities, the genes responsible for the luminescence phenomenon are repressed by the LuxO protein, which is a negative regulator of the gene encoding the transcriptional regulator LitR. As the bacterial population density increases, the signaling molecule is synthesized by AinS. As the bacterial population density increases, the signaling molecule synthesized by AinS causes two effects: the induction of luminescence gene expression through its direct interaction with LuxR and the inactivation of LuxO protein and an increase in the transcription level of the litR gene. LitR positively regulates luxR transcription, and thus, functionally links the two lux and ain systems, ensuring the gradual induction of luminescence-related gene expression as the bacterial population density increases under symbiosis conditions. The ain system is essential for the initiation of colonization of the host organism and is responsible for bacterial motility, while the lux system is involved only in the later stages of symbiotic interactions. Due to the action of these two QS systems, V. fischeri is able to establish symbiotic relationships with the squid Euprymna scolopes when the population of these bacteria reaches a threshold level and the expression of genes regulated by these mechanisms follows. Such regulation of colonization factor gene expression is expressed only when it is beneficial to the bacterial cells, avoiding costly metabolic processes while in an aqueous environment [53,54].
The second well-described mechanism of action of the QS system occurs in bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas, particularly P. aeruginosa. This bacterial species is an opportunistic pathogen, exhibits high antibiotic resistance, and is a frequent contributor to nosocomial infections. The QS system of P. aeruginosa bacteria is responsible for controlling the synthesis of virulence factors of this bacterium, including LasA protease and aprA, LasB and rhamnosyltransferase, lectin pyocyanin, and toxin A [55,56,57,58]. In this bacterial species, there are three major cooperating systems, two of which utilize N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHL) as signaling molecules, referred to as the las system and the rhl system, respectively. The third system, QS, is called the pqs system and is related to the other two systems. Together, these three systems form a complex quorum sensing system and are interdependent. Among the QS mentioned above, the las system is at the top of the QS hierarchy and is required for optimal activation of the rhl and pqs systems QS. The las system includes two proteins, LasI (synthase) and LasR, while the rhl system includes the proteins RhlI (synthase) and RhlR [59]. Another example is the phytopathogenic soil bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which uses the determinants of the QS system belonging to the LuxR/LuxI class. In this species, the QS system controls the translocation of Ti plasmid, for which the regulatory proteins Tral and TraR are responsible. The LuxI-like protein TraI synthesizes N-acyl homoserine lactone molecules that act as diffusible QS signals. When a certain threshold concentration is exceeded, these molecules bind and activate the transcriptional regulator TraR [60]. In contrast, the secretion of exoenzymes responsible for the destruction of cell wall structures in the phytopathogenic bacterium Ervinia carotovora is controlled by a system of proteins corresponding to the LuxI/LuxR system [61,62]. Bacteria of the genus Serratia are equipped with four QS systems of LuxI/LuxR depending on the species: SwrI/SwrR, SmaI/SmaR and SpnI/SpnR and the best studied SprI/SprR, typical of S. proteamaculans [55,63].

4. QS System Inhibitors and Degrading Enzymes

The QS system inhibitor (QSI) is a natural or synthetic compound that has the ability to silence QS mechanisms, also known as quorum quenching (QQ). QQ can be achieved in several ways: inhibition of the synthesis of signaling molecules, enzymatic degradation of molecules, blocking of receptors that recognize AHL molecules, inhibition of gene expression, and interception of AIs by antibodies and macromolecules such as cyclodextrins [64,65].
AHL synthesis can be inhibited by introducing analogs of SAM, which is essential for AI production, into the cytoplasm, and using purine nucleotide analogs or homoserine lactone derivatives. Degradation of AHL can occur by chemical (alkaline pH reversible process), enzymatic or metabolic means. In contrast, the use of AHL-antagonistic molecules, which can compete for a binding site in the receptor, can effectively block the interaction between the signal molecule and the receptor [55].
We can divide QS inhibitors into QSIs of natural and synthetic origin. Natural QSIs can be further divided into those derived from marine organisms, plants, bacteria or animals [56,57].
Table 1 shows selected natural and synthetic QS inhibitors together with their mechanism of action and effective concentrations.
Among marine organisms, the most important group of QSI-synthesizing organisms is that of marine cyanobacteria. An example of such a bacterium is Delisea pulchra, which synthesizes halogenated furanones [80]. These are compounds that act as competitive analogs of AHL. This is possible due to their structural similarity to short AIs. Studies have shown that they compete with signaling molecules for a binding site in the receptor, but also induce its degeneration in direct interaction with LuxR protein, leading to disruption in the expression of genes dependent on the mechanism’s QS. The result of halogenated furanones is the inhibition of biofilm production by bacteria. Although they are QSIs capable of inhibiting the QS systems of many bacteria, they show toxicity to host cells at higher concentrations [81,82,83].
In the literature, compounds of plant origin are often considered as one of the most important groups of QSIs. They are characterized by the fact that their chemical structure has many similarities to AHL and they are able to degrade protein transcriptional regulators. Another important factor is their ubiquity; they are found in herbs, vegetables and fruits. In terms of chemical structure, QSIs belong to polyphenols, terpenes, alkaloids, and coumarins [84]. Important producers of QSI are plants from the Brassicaceae family, ginger plants, legumes, and medicinal plants. Plants from the Brassicaceae family produce sulforaphane, which inhibits the activity of the transcriptional regulator LasR and whose antagonistic activities against AI have been confirmed in P. aeruginosa [85]. Inhibitors containing sulfur in their composition are the focus of interest. These are substances derived from garlic, onions, leeks, and cabbage, kale, and broccoli [64,86]. Inhibitors of biofilm formation extracted from plants include eugenol and ajoene (Figure 3) [67,84].
In animals and bacteria, there are three main types of enzymes that can perform QSI functions: AHL lactonases, AHL acylases, and AHL oxidoreductases [64,81,87]. The ability to synthesize the above enzymes has been detected in bacteria from the following groups: Actinobacteria (Rhodococcus, Streptomyces), Firmicutes (Arthrobacter, Oceanobacillus, Bacillus), Bacteroides (Tenacibaculum), Cyanobacteria (Anabaena), Proteobacteria (Comomonas, Acinetobacter, A. tumefaciens, K. pneumoniae, Ralstonia, Alteromonas, Stappia, V. paradaoxus, Halomonas, Hyphomonas), and in animals such as rats, mice and the freshwater fish Danio rerio [64]. AHL lactonases degrade AHL molecules by reversibly hydrolyzing the ester bonds in the lactone ring of homoserine, resulting in products that are acyl-homoserine derivatives (AHS). The next type of AI-degrading enzymes are AHL acylases, which perform irreversible hydrolysis of the amide bond between the L-homoserine lactone and the acyl side chain. This reaction leads to the release of the corresponding fatty acids and homoserine lactone [81]. They are characterized by substrate specificity, usually for long-chain AHLs. The most important difference between the hydrolysis performed by AHL acylases and that performed by AHL lactonases is the formation of a product that cannot be spontaneously converted into a functional AHL molecule [88]. The last type of enzymes with a QSI role are AHL oxidoreductases. Representatives of this group oxidize or reduce functional groups in the acyl side chains of AHL molecules [88,89,90].
An interesting group of QSI producers are soil bacteria, whose ability to degrade QS signaling molecules can effectively prevent the emergence of pathogens and purify the soil of the rhizosphere [91]. In particular, Gram-positive members of the genus Bacillus spp. secrete large amounts of AHL lactonases, which can attenuate the virulence of the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora and Aeromonas hydrophila YJ-1 [92,93,94]. Bacillus spp., and other Gram-positive bacteria that do not produce AHL, show growth inhibition at a high concentration of 3-oxo-C12-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C12-HSL), so the ecological role of QSI in Gram-positive bacteria is likely to be the detoxification of high concentrations of AHL [95]. There are examples in the literature of the use of AHL-degrading bacteria for biocontrol against plant pathogens. One example is the bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis, whose colonization of potato roots resulted in resistance to Pectobacterium [96].

4.1. Use of Genetic Engineering and Protein Engineering Methods to Obtain Stable and Active Quorum Quenching Enzymes

Intensive research into enzymes capable of degrading or modifying acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) is stimulated by the requirement to develop an effective antimicrobial mechanism to interrupt the bacterial QS process. Such solutions would be useful for human as well as animal and plant health care. Therefore, new methods to obtain and stabilize the activity of Quorum Quenching Enzymes are still under investigation [47,88,97,98]. Recombinant proteins obtained by genetic engineering or improved by protein engineering techniques are increasingly used for such studies. An example of such an enzyme is the recombinant thermostable AHL lactonase AiiM, which was stabilized by electrospinning (ES) an aqueous polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution. The test protein was genetically modified by adding a maltose-binding protein (MBP). Immobilization of the AiiM-MBP-lactonase complex resulted in long-term quorum quenching activity against the opportunistic pathogen S. marcescens AS-1 [99]. The efficacy of recombinant lactonase in the form of a hydrogel in controlling burn wound infections caused by a multidrug-resistant (MDR) strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also demonstrated. These observations raise hopes for a new strategy to eradicate and control wound infections caused by P. aeruginosa [100]. Another interesting example is the use of the recombinant lactonase Ai-iAQSI-1 from Bacillus sp. to inhibit the virulence of Aeromonas hyrophila, an opportunistic pathogen that lives in freshwater and marine environments. The results of this experiment show that the delivery of the exogenous AiiAQSI-1 protein as a component of feed is effective and opens a new avenue in antibacterial therapy [101]. The recombinant lactonase LcAiiK has also shown great efficacy in reducing infections caused by A. hydrophila in aquatic cultures [102]. The N-acylhomoserine lactonase-based hybrid AhlX@Ni3(PO4)2 has also been successfully used in the biological control of diseases caused by Erwinia carotovora and Burkholderia glumae [103].
Protein engineering usually employs the technique of high-throughput screening (HTS), which allows libraries to be created, and thus, enables suitable sequences to be selected. Two approaches are usually used: the use of error prone PCR (epPCR) or rational design approaches [47,104]. The epPCR technique was used to generate a mutant library of the marine-derived quorum quenching (QQ) lactonase. The resulting mutant enzymes showed increased activity in blocking QS signaling in the pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum, which causes the soft rot of cabbage [105]. Rational design relies heavily on prior knowledge of the protein’s sequence, structure, and functional data to design specific mutations [106]. This approach has been used to design His6-OPH lactonase with enhanced catalytic performance [107], hyperthermostable lactonase [108], and lactonase with altered substrate specificity [109]. The use of these advanced techniques enables the synthesis of stable and active enzymes, which increases the efficiency in silencing the QS signal.

4.2. QSI Applications in Agriculture

AHLs are commonly used by both beneficial and pathogenic rhizobacteria to optimize their beneficial activity or virulence. Therefore, the main plant strategy to avoid or reduce QS-regulated bacterial virulence is to block the receptor using structural analogs of QS signaling molecules categorized as QSIs. For this reason, papers on the use of bacteria to help plants degrade AHL can be found in the literature. Among the Azospirillum brasilense strains, which are very often successfully used as plant growth promoting bacteria in practical agriculture in South America [110], the production of AHL autoinducers is very rare [111]. Recently, it was shown that A. brasilense Az39 is able to degrade unsubstituted AHLs and AHLs with hydroxyl and ketone groups [112]. It can be speculated that this AHL-degrading activity promotes the competitiveness of Az39 in root colonization and may contribute to the control of plant pathogens dependent on AHL activity. Thus, disruption of QS communication within the rhizosphere community may contribute to the inhibition of pathogen development and the increased competitiveness of plant growth-promoting bacteria such as A. brasilense Az39.

5. Effects of AHL Compounds on Plant Growth and Health

During the evolution of land plants, plant-associated microbiomes have evolved and been integrated into plant microbial holobionts. The functions of these plant holobionts rely on the expression of genes from all partners. The assembly of the holobiont depends on the emission and perception of signals between the microbes and plants. Presumably, QS molecules are among these signals [113]. The synthesis of AHL molecules released into the environment is subject to self-induction once a threshold is exceeded. This leads to the expression of new cellular phenotypes related to biofilm formation, virulence, symbiosis, and plant interaction. Due to the colonization of plant roots by bacteria, plants have evolved mechanisms to alter their gene expression profile during coevolution, which may subsequently enhance their defense mechanisms against pathogens or lead to cooperation with bacterial saprotrophs [114]. From the literature data, it appears that the effects of AHL-plant interactions vary widely and depend on the structure of the AHL molecule, as summarized in Table 2.

5.1. Effects of AHL on Plant Root Morphology

It has been determined that the contact of AHL molecules with a short carbon chain can result in changes in the morphology and phytohormonal balance of roots [115,127]. C10-HSL induced root shortening, and increased the formation of lateral roots and trichomes [121]. In contrast, C6-HSL and C8-HSL increased root length [115,128]. In A. thaliana, genes encoding GCR1/GPA1, which are involved in the cell-to-cell transmission of extracellular environmental signals via G proteins, were identified as the genetic basis for the stimulation of root growth by short C6- and C8-HSL. Mutants in GCR1 were insensitive to root growth stimulation by C6- and C8-HSL, while overexpression resulted in enhanced root growth effects [117]. The bacterium Acidovorax radicis N35, which produces OH-C10-HSL, is included in the group of plant growth-promoting bacteria. The results obtained in luxI deletion mutants suggest that AHL is important in the process of root colonization by these bacteria [129,130]. Significant differences in the interactions with barley plants were also shown. Although the wild type producing AHL induced a change in the expression profile in the plant to stimulating and priming, the AHL deletion mutant resulted in increased expression of defense responses, such as flavonoid biosynthesis [130].

5.2. Effects of AHL on the Expression of Plant Genes Associated with Defense Mechanisms

One of the more intrusive types of these interactions is the induction of defense mechanisms in plants in the presence of AHL. In AHL–plant interactions, the expression of certain plant genes is stimulated, resulting in an enhanced defense against pathogens and growth stimulation [127]. In tomatoes inoculated with Serratia liquefaciens MG1 and P. putida IsoF strains, producing C6- and C8-HSL, defense and biological control activities against the fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata have been identified [123]. In plants inoculated with MG1 and wild-type IsoF cells, salicylic acid increased in leaves and induction of SA and ethylene (ET)-dependent defense genes (PR1a and chitinase) was observed. No similar effects were detected after inoculation with S. liquefaciens mutants lacking AHL. Moreover, it could be shown that C6- and C8-HSL alone were capable of inducing disease suppression under axenic conditions [123]. Thus, in this system, AHLs are capable of initiating and inducing defense activity in tomato plants. Using fluorescently labeled S. liquefaciens MG1 AHLs in combination with AHL reporter bacteria, the production and distribution of AHLs in situ can be monitored in detail [131]. The role of these signaling molecules in the colonization of plant roots by bacteria has also been established. Shrestha and co-workers showed that both 3-oxo-C14-HSL and a combination of other long-chain AHLs induce not only the expression of several plant defense-related genes, but also resistance to the pathogen P. syringae [132].

5.3. Enhancing Resistance to Pathogens and Insects

Several experimental approaches have shown that water-soluble AHLs are taken up by plants through the plant’s vascular system into the shoot during the process of cellular energy consumption [125,126]. AHL uptake has only been found in plants such as A. thaliana, wheat and barley, which are devoid of AHL-degrading enzymes such as lactonases. In plant shoots, hydrophilic AHLs are able to modify the activity of several enzymes, including antioxidant capacity and xenobiotic phase II detoxifying enzymes to improve stress tolerance [126]. Although hydrophobic AHLs (e.g., 3-oxo-C14-HSL) are not absorbed by plants, they confer resistance to the absolute biotrophic fungus Golovinomyces orontii in A. thaliana and Blumeria graminis and to the hemibiotrophic bacterial pathogen P. syringens pv. tomato DC3000 [16]. It has been shown that in the presence of the bacterial elicitor flg22, there is an increase in the activity of the protein kinases AtMPK3 and 6, and an increase in the expression of WRKY22 and 29 plus PR1a. Most interestingly, AtMPK6 was required to induce AHL-induced resistance, as deletion mutants did not show an inducible resistance phenotype [16]. The AHL-dependent stimulation of antioxidant gene expression and plant defense activity by hydrophobic AHLs with long carbon chains (3-oxo-C12-HSL or 3-oxo-C14-HSL) occurs through the oxylipin and salicylic acid signaling pathway [128]. Moreover, a role for AHL in pest control was recently demonstrated by inoculating two barley lines with the 3-oxo-C14-HSL-producing bacterium Ensifer meliloti. Inoculation of wild-type E. meliloti resulted in a reduced feeding and reproductive response of Rhopalosiphum padiaphids compared to the AHL-negative mutant and control [133]. This effect of AHL, in turn, reduces the transmission of plant viruses, and thus, contributes to plant health. The first successful field trials with wheat and the application of C6-HSL showed growth stimulation and the potential for practical application to improve crop yield [134]. In addition, C4-HSL applied with carbon nanofibers induced increased growth, stress tolerance and resistance to the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum in Cicer arientinum [135].

5.4. Participation of QS Molecules in the Nitrogen Cycle

Nitrogen is found in such vital molecules as nucleic acids and proteins, making it one of the essential elements for the existence of all life forms. The availability of nitrogen in the soil is a critical factor in plant growth and yield. Both an excess and a deficiency of this element are harmful to plants. Nitrogen is generally supplied to the soil as a component of mineral and organic fertilizers, acid rain, and as a result of biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen involving nitrogenase produced by some symbiotic and free-living microorganisms. Much of the organic nitrogen in soil consists of macromolecular compounds (chitin, proteins, nucleotides) that are available to plants only after enzymatic depolymerization. The extent of synthesis of these enzymes depends on QS signals and can regulate soil nitrogen cycling and plant nitrogen supply. Diazotrophic bacteria secrete AHLs that are involved in plant–bacteria communication by regulating the rate of the enzymatic hydrolysis of chitin and proteins in soil [136,137]. Nitrogen is a dynamic component that undergoes many transformations in the soil, including its incorporation into organic compounds, ammonification, nitrification, denitrification. The above processes form the nitrogen cycle in nature. In agriculture, there is a tendency to excessive nitrogen fertilization, which leads to water pollution and excessive greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the interest of scientists in this field is focused on finding mechanisms to regulate the processes involved in nitrogen transformation in nature. The main microbial processes in the nitrogen cycle, nitrification and denitrification, are regulated by QS-lactone homoserine molecules of different lengths. The authors of many studies emphasize the importance of QS-dependent nitrification and denitrification for the removal of nitrogen from polluted waters [138,139,140,141].

6. The Use of Metagenomics to Study QS and QSI (or QQ) Diversity

Advanced research on QS molecules and quorum-quenching molecules is currently focused on the study of metagenomes, especially in soil and marine environments. These are independent of bacterial laboratory cultures. This methodological approach exploits the full genetic potential present in a given microbial habitat and allows the assessment of the abundance and diversity of signaling molecules and their inhibitors. Unfortunately, the results of studies in which compounds are extracted and identified from bacterial cultures are limited by the lack of information on uncultured microbial species, which in some environments, constitute more than 99% of the organisms. It is anticipated that the number of new QS and QQ systems identified by metagenomic methods will exceed the number identified from single cultures of microorganisms [142,143,144,145]. The usefulness of metagenomic studies is confirmed by many examples in the literature; for example, interesting metagenomic studies on the microbial community, and the distribution of QS and QQ genes in particles of organic material collected from the Yellow Sea. Community structure was shown to be dependent on sampling depth. It was found that luxI and luxR were positively correlated with temperature, while the presence of AHL acylase was positively correlated with depth, SiO42−, PO43−, and NO3−, but negatively correlated with temperature and pH [146]. Pyrosequencing of rhizosphere samples from hydroponic potato cultures revealed that the degradation of quorum sensing (AHL) signals in the pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium by Rhodococcus erythropolis leads to the stimulation of potato growth [147]. Metagenomic libraries are becoming a valuable tool for the synthesis of new quorum quenching enzymes. One example is the thermostable esterase Est816 from the Tuban basin [148]. On the other hand, the construction of a metagenomic library consisting of several clones from hypersaline soils allowed the identification of the AHL-degrading enzyme with a new family related to the cysteine hydrolase (CHase) group [145]. The analysis of a metagenomic library from pasture soils allowed the identification of a new metallohydrolase with NAHL lactonase activity [149]. A dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) active in the inactivation of N-(3-oxo-dodecanoyl)-L-homoserine was obtained from a soil metagenome library. The enzyme was found to be effective in reducing the virulence level of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [150]. Based on these literature data, it can be concluded that metagenome research is a very promising prospect and should be continued to obtain new molecules related to QS and QQ.

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The prevailing trend in agriculture promotes the development of biological, environmentally friendly methods based on the use of biological control measures. The QS, QSI and QQ enzymes are also part of this trend. The results obtained so far on the effect of QS molecules (essentially AHL) on plants allow us to draw promising conclusions for protecting and increasing the productivity of agricultural crops. The significant effect of AHL-type molecules on plant growth stimulation and resistance to pathogenic organisms is evident. Researchers’ attention is focused on the practical application of QS inhibitors that have the potential to reduce the effectiveness of phytopathogens. Both natural and synthetic inhibitors could be used in practice. Research on the potential use of QS molecules and their inhibitors in agriculture should continue.

Author Contributions

All authors participated equally in the preparation of the text of this work. J.M. made the diagrams and tables placed in the manuscript. Conceptualization: all authors, writing—review and editing: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nealson, K.H.; Platt, T.; Hastings, J.W. Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J. Bacteriol. 1970, 104, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nealson, K.H.; Hastings, J.W. Bacterial Bioluminescence: Its Control and Ecological Significance. Microbiol. Rev. 1979, 43, 496–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum Sensing Signal-Response Systems in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ruhal, R.; Kataria, R. Biofilm Patterns in Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 251, 126829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, L.; Zeng, X.; Zheng, J.; Zou, Y.; Qiu, S.; Dai, Y. AHL-Mediated Quorum Sensing to Regulate Bacterial Substance and Energy Metabolism: A Review. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 262, 127102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wagner, V.E.; Bushnell, D.; Passador, L.; Brooks, A.I.; Iglewski, B.H. Microarray Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum-Sensing Regulons: Effects of Growth Phase and Environment. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 2080–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Platt, T.G.; Fuqua, C. What’s in a Name? The Semantics of Quorum Sensing. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Mukherjee, S.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial Quorum Sensing in Complex and Dynamically Changing Environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hansen, M.R.; Jakobsen, T.H.; Bang, C.G.; Cohrt, A.E.; Hansen, C.L.; Clausen, J.W.; le Quement, S.T.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Givskov, M.; Nielsen, T.E. Triazole-Containing N-Acyl Homoserine Lactones Targeting the Quorum Sensing System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 1638–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Williams, P.; Winzer, K.; Chan, W.C.; Cámara, M. Look Who’s Talking: Communication and Quorum Sensing in the Bacterial World. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1119–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biswa, P.; Doble, M. Production of Acylated Homoserine Lactone by Gram-Positive Bacteria Isolated from Marine Water. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 343, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bose, U.; Ortori, C.A.; Sarmad, S.; Barrett, D.A.; Hewavitharana, A.K.; Hodson, M.P.; Fuerst, J.A.; Shaw, P.N. Production of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactones by the Sponge-Associated Marine Actinobacteria Salinispora arenicola and Salinispora pacifica. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Charlesworth, J.C.; Watters, C.; Wong, H.L.; Visscher, P.T.; Burns, B.P. Isolation of Novel Quorum-Sensing Active Bacteria from Microbial Mats in Shark Bay Australia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yin Wong, S.; Charlesworth, J.C.; Benaud, N.; Burns, B.P.; Ferrari, B.C. Communication within East Antarctic Soil Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 86, e01968-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Nair, S.K. Quorum Sensing: How Bacteria Can Coordinate Activity and Synchronize Their Response to External Signals? Protein Sci. 2012, 21, 1403–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schikora, A.; Schenk, S.T.; Stein, E.; Molitor, A.; Zuccaro, A.; Kogel, K.H. N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Confers Resistance toward Biotrophic and Hemibiotrophic Pathogens via Altered Activation of AtMPK6. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1407–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Bai, X.; Todd, C.D.; Desikan, R.; Yang, Y.; Hu, X. N-3-Oxo-Decanoyl-l-Homoserine-Lactone Activates Auxin-Induced Adventitious Root Formation via Hydrogen Peroxide- and Nitric Oxide-Dependent Cyclic GMP Signaling in Mung Bean. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Jia, Z.; Song, C.; Huang, Y.; Ma, H.; Song, S. N-3-Oxo-Octanoyl-Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Priming of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae Requires. the Salicylic Acid Signaling Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dow, L. How Do Quorum-Sensing Signals Mediate Algae–Bacteria Interactions? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Churchill, M.E.A.; Chen, L. Structural Basis of Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Dependent Signaling. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 68–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Decho, A.W.; Norman, R.S.; Visscher, P.T. Quorum Sensing in Natural Environments: Emerging Views from Microbial Mats. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Prescott, R.D.; Decho, A.W. Flexibility and Adaptability of Quorum Sensing in Nature. Trends Microbiol. 2020, 28, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Dong, D.; Hu, H.; Wu, B.; Ren, H. AHLs-Mediated Quorum Sensing Threshold and Its Response towards Initial Adhesion of Wastewater Biofilms. Water Res. 2021, 194, 116925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boşgelmez-Tinaz, G.; Ulusoy, S. Characterization of N-Butanoyl-l-Homoserine Lactone (C4-HSL) Deficient Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Pathog. 2008, 44, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Werner, K.M.; Perez, L.J.; Ghosh, R.; Semmelhack, M.F.; Bassler, B.L. Caenorhabditis elegans Recognizes a Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Signal Molecule through Theawcon Neuron. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 26566–26573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schaefer, A.L.; Taylor, T.A.; Beatty, J.T.; Greenberg, E.P. Long-Chain Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Regulation of Rhodobacter capsulatus Gene Transfer Agent Production. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 6515–6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yin, W.F.; Purmal, K.; Chin, S.; Chan, X.Y.; Chan, K.G. Long Chain N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Production by Enterobacter sp. Isolated from Human Tongue Surfaces. Sensors 2012, 12, 14307–14314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lau, Y.Y.; Sulaiman, J.; Chen, J.W.; Yin, W.F.; Chan, K.G. Quorum Sensing Activity of Enterobacter Asburiae Isolated from Lettuce Leaves. Sensors 2013, 13, 14189–14199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. dos Reis Ponce, A.; Martins, M.L.; de Araujo, E.F.; Mantovani, H.C.; Vanetti, M.C.D. AiiA Quorum-Sensing Quenching Controls Proteolytic Activity and Biofilm Formation by Enterobacter Cloacae. Curr. Microbiol. 2012, 65, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rice, S.A.; Koh, K.S.; Queck, S.Y.; Labbate, M.; Lam, K.W.; Kjelleberg, S. Biofilm Formation and Sloughing in Serratia Marcescens Are Controlled by Quorum Sensing and Nutrient Cues. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3477–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Papadopoulos, C.J.; Carson, C.F.; Chang, B.J.; Riley, T.V. Role of the MexAB-OprM Efflux Pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Tolerance to Tea Tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) Oil and Its Monoterpene Components Terpinen-4-Ol, 1,8-Cineole, and α-Terpineol ∇. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1932–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Xu, F.; Byun, T.; Dussen, H.-J.; Duke, K.R. Degradation of N-acylhomoserine lactones, the bacterial quorum-sensing molecules, by acylase. J. Biotechnol. 2003, 101, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zhao, B.H.; Zhang, K.; Liang, D.B.; Wei, J.; Wang, X.J.; Li, J.; Chen, G.H. Effects of PH on AHL Signal Release and Properties of ANAMMOX Granules with Different Biomass Densities. Environ. Sci. 2019, 5, 1723–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ziegler, E.W.; Brown, A.B.; Nesnas, N.; Palmer, A.G. Abiotic Hydrolysis Kinetics of N-Acyl-L-Homoserine Lactones: Natural Silencing of Bacterial Quorum Sensing Signals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 2850–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, H.; Li, X.; Ai, Q.; Tan, L. Autoinducer-2 promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 acute lung infection via the IL-17A pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 948646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kaur, A.; Capalash, N.; Sharma, P. Quorum Sensing in Thermophiles: Prevalence of Autoinducer-2 System. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gutierrez, J.A.; Crowder, T.; Rinaldo-Matthis, A.; Ho, M.C.; Almo, S.C.; Schramm, V.L. Transition State Analogs of 5′-Methylthioadenosine Nucleosidase Disrupt Quorum Sensing. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, C.S.; Gatsios, A.; Cuesta, S.; Lam, Y.C.; Wei, Z.; Chen, H.; Russell, R.M.; Shine, E.E.; Wang, R.; Wyche, T.P.; et al. Characterization of Autoinducer-3 Structure and Biosynthesis in E. coli. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Reading, N.C.; Sperandio, V. Quorum Sensing: The Many Languages of Bacteria. Quorum Sensing: The Many Languages of Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 254, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sperandio, V.; Torres, A.G.; Jarvis, B.; Nataro, J.P.; Kaper, J.B. Bacteria-host communication: The language of hormones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8951–8956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Flavier, A.B.; Clough, S.J.; Schell, M.A.; Denny, T.P. Identification of 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester as a novel autoregulator controlling virulence in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 26, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. LaSarre, B.; Federle, M.J. Exploiting Quorum Sensing To Confuse Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 73–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, J.; Jayaraman, A.; Wood, T.K. Indole Is an Inter-Species Biofilm Signal Mediated by SdiA. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Tobias, N.J.; Brehm, J.; Kresovic, D.; Brameyer, S.; Bode, H.B.; Heermann, R. New Vocabulary for Bacterial Communication. ChemBiochem 2020, 21, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kumar, L.; Patel, S.K.S.; Kharga, K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P.; Pandohee, J.; Kulshresha, S.; Harjai, K.; Chhibber, S. Molecular Mechanisms and Applications of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Bacteria. Molecules 2022, 27, 7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Whitehead, N.A.; Barnard, A.M.L.; Slater, H.; Simpson, N.J.L.; Salmond, G.P.C. Quorum-sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 25, 365–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Billot, R.; Plener, L.; Jacquet, P.; Elias, M.; Chabrière, E.; Daudé, D. Engineering Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Interfering Enzymes toward Bacterial Control. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 12993–13007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Montebello, A.N.; Brecht, R.M.; Turner, R.D.; Ghali, M.; Pu, X.; Nagarajan, R. Acyl-ACP Substrate Recognition in Burkholderia Mallei Bmai1 Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Synthase. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 6231–6242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guan, R.; Ho, M.C.; Almo, S.C.; Schramm, V.L. Methylthioinosine Phosphorylase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Structure and Annotation of a Novel Enzyme in Quorum Sensing. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Winzer, K.; Hardie, K.R.; Burgess, N.; Doherty, N.; Kirke, D.; Holden, M.T.G.; Linforth, R.; Cornell, K.A.; Taylor, A.J.; Hill, P.J.; et al. LuxS: Its role in central metabolism and the in vitro synthesis of 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone. Microbiology 2002, 148 Pt 4, 909922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Verma, S.C.; Miyashiro, T. Quorum Sensing in the Squid-Vibrio Symbiosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 16386–16401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kimbrough, J.H.; Stabb, E.V. Comparative Analysis Reveals Regulatory Motifs at the AinS/AinR Pheromone-Signaling Locus of Vibrio fischeri. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lupp, C.; Ruby, E.G. Vibrio Fischeri Uses Two Quorum-Sensing Systems for the Regulation of Early and Late Colonization Factors. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3620–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Girard, L. Quorum Sensing in Vibrio spp.: The Complexity of Multiple Signalling Molecules in Marine and Aquatic Environments. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 451–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lipa, P.; Kozieł, M.; Janczarek, M. Zjawisko Quorum Sensing bakterii Gram-ujemnych: Cząsteczki sygnałowe i inhibitory oraz ich potencjalne zastosowanie terapeutyczne [Quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria: Signal molecules, inhibitors and their potential therapeutic application]. Postepy Biochem. 2017, 63, 242–260. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, Y.; Qu, H.P.; Liu, J.L.; Wan, H.Y. Correlation between Group Behavior and Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Patients with Hospitalacquired Pneumonia. J. Thorac. Dis. 2014, 6, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, J.; Zhang, L. The Hierarchy Quorum Sensing Network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Soukarieh, F.; Williams, P.; Stocks, M.J.; Cámara, M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing Systems as Drug Discovery Targets: Current Position and Future Perspectives. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 10385–10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Li, Q.; Mao, S.; Wang, H.; Ye, X. The Molecular Architecture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum-Sensing Inhibitors. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lang, J.; Faure, D. Functions and Regulation of Quorum-Sensing in Agrobacterium Tumefaciens. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Matejczyk, M.; Suchowierska, M. Charakterystyka zjawiska quorum sensing i jego znaczenie w aspekcie formowania i funkcjonowania biofilmu w inżynierii środowiska, budownictwie, medycynie oraz gospodarstwie domowym. Civ. Environ. Eng. 2011, 2, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  62. Jones, S.; Yu, B.; Bainton, N.J.; Birdsall, M.; Bycroft, B.W.; Chhabra, S.R.; Cox, A.J.R.; Golby, P.; Reeves, P.J.; Stephens, S. The Lux Autoinducer Regulates the Production of Exoenzyme Virulence Determinants in Erwinia carotovora and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 2477–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. van Houdt, R.; Givskov, M.; Michiels, C.W. Quorum Sensing in Serratia. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 31, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kalia, V.C. Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: An Overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 224–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kalia, V.C.; Patel, S.K.S.; Kang, Y.C.; Lee, J.K. Quorum Sensing Inhibitors as Antipathogens: Biotechnological Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 68–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bai, Y.-B.; Shi, M.-Y.; Wang, W.-W.; Wu, L.-Y.; Bai, Y.-T.; Li, B.; Zhou, X.-Z.; Zhang, J.-Y. Novel Quorum Sensing Inhibitor Echinatin as an Antibacterial Synergist against Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1003692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Joshi, J.R.; Khazanov, N.; Senderowitz, H.; Burdman, S.; Lipsky, A.; Yedidia, I. Plant Phenolic Volatiles Inhibit Quorum Sensing in Pectobacteria and Reduce Their Virulence by Potential Binding to ExpI and ExpR Proteins. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pun, M.; Khazanov, N.; Galsurker, O.; Weitman, M.; Kerem, Z.; Senderowitz, H.; Yedidia, I. Phloretin, an Apple Phytoalexin, Affects the Virulence and Fitness of Pectobacterium Brasiliense by Interfering with Quorum-Sensing. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zheng, C.J.; Sohn, M.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, W.G. Meleagrin, a New Fabi Inhibitor from Penicillium chryosogenum with at Least One Additional Mode of Action. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0078922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Dobretsov, S.; Teplitski, M.; Bayer, M.; Gunasekera, S.; Proksch, P.; Paul, V.J. Inhibition of Marine Biofouling by Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Biofouling 2011, 27, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jack, A.A.; Khan, S.; Powell, L.C.; Pritchard, M.F.; Beck, K.; Sadh, H.; Sutton, L.; Cavaliere, A.; Florance, H.; Rye, P.D.; et al. Alginate Oligosaccharide-Induced Modification of the LasI-LasR and RhlI-RhlR Quorum-Sensing Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AntiMicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02318-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Khan, S.; Tøndervik, A.; Sletta, H.; Klinkenberg, G.; Emanuel, C.; Onsøyen, E.; Myrvold, R.; Howe, R.A.; Walsh, T.R.; Hill, K.E.; et al. Overcoming drug resistance with alginate oligosaccharides able to potentiate the action of selected antibiotics. AntiMicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 5134–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Karnjana, K.; Nobsathian, S.; Soowannayan, C.; Zhao, W.; Tang, Y.J.; Wongprasert, K. Purification and Evaluation of N-Benzyl Cinnamamide from Red Seaweed Gracilaria Fisheri as an Inhibitor of Vibrio harveyi AI-2 Quorum Sensing. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Shi, W.P.; Zeng, H.; Wan, C.X.; Zhou, Z.B. Amicoumacins from a Desert Bacterium: Quorum Sensing Inhibitor against Chromobacterium violaceum. Nat. Prod Res. 2020, 32, 5508–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kamarudheen, N.; Rao, K.V.B. Fatty Acyl Compounds from Marine Streptomyces Griseoincarnatus Strain HK12 against Two Major Bio-Film Forming Nosocomial Pathogens; an in Vitro and in Silico Approach. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 127, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kapadia, C.; Kachhdia, R.; Singh, S.; Gandhi, K.; Poczai, P.; Alfarraj, S.; Ansari, M.J.; Gafur, A.; Sayyed, R.Z. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits quorum-sensing mechanisms of soft rot pathogen Lelliottia amnigena RCE to regulate its virulence factors and biofilm formation. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 977669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Taha, M.N.; Saafan, A.E.; Ahmedy, A.; el Gebaly, E.; Khairalla, A.S. Two Novel Synthetic Peptides Inhibit Quorum Sensing-Dependent Biofilm Formation and Some Virulence Factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jia, X.-M.; Cheng, C.; Liu, T.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Guo, B.; Tang, L.; Yang, Y.-Y. Synthesis and Antibiofilm Evaluation of N-Acyl-2-Aminopyrimidine Derivatives against Acinetobacter baumannii. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2022, 76, 117095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yoshihara, A.; Shimatani, M.; Sakata, M.; Takemura, C.; Senuma, W.; Hikichi, Y.; Kai, K. Quorum Sensing Inhibition Attenuates the Virulence of the Plant Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 3050–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Manefield, M.; de Nys, R.; Read, R.; Steinberg, P.; Kjelleberg, S.; Wales, S. Evidence That Halogenated Furanones from Delisea Pulchra Inhibit Acylated Homoserine Lactone (AHL)-Mediated Gene Expression by Displacing the AHL Signal from Its Receptor Protein. Microbiology 1999, 145, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Huang, J.; Shi, Y.; Zeng, G.; Gu, Y.; Chen, G.; Shi, L.; Hu, Y.; Tang, B.; Zhou, J. Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Based Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching Hold Promise to Determine the Performance of Biological Wastewater Treatments: An Overview. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Delago, A.; Mandabi, A.; Meijler, M.M. Natural Quorum Sensing Inhibitors—Small Molecules, Big Messages. Isr J. Chem. 2016, 56, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lyons, T.; Gahan, C.G.M.; O’Sullivan, T.P. Structure-Activity Relationships of Furanones, Dihydropyrrolones and Thiophenones as Potential Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2020, 12, 1925–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Joshi, J.R.; Khazanov, N.; Charkowski, A.; Faigenboim, A.; Senderowitz, H.; Yedidia, I. Interkingdom Signaling Interference: The Effect of Plant-Derived Small Molecules on Quorum Sensing in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2021, 59, 153–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bouyahya, A.; Dakka, N.; Et-Touys, A.; Abrini, J.; Bakri, Y. Medicinal Plant Products Targeting Quorum Sensing for Combating Bacterial Infections. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Deryabin, D.; Galadzhieva, A.; Kosyan, D.; Duskaev, G. Plant-Derived Inhibitors of AHL-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Bacteria: Modes of Action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Chen, F.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, Z.; Li, X. Quorum Quenching Enzymes and Their Application in Degrading Signal Molecules to Block Quorum Sensing-Dependent Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17477–17500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fetzner, S. Quorum Quenching Enzymes. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 201, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Uroz, S.; Dessaux, Y.; Oger, P. Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching: The Yin and Yang of Bacterial Communication. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lord, D.M.; Baran, A.U.; Wood, T.K.; Peti, W.; Page, R. BdcA, a Protein Important for Escherichia coli Biofilm Dispersal, Is a Short-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase That Binds Specifically to NADPH. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e0105751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Molina, L.; Constantinescu, F.; Michel, L.; Reimmann, C.; Duffy, B.; Défago, G. Degradation of Pathogen Quorum-Sensing Molecules by Soil Bacteria: A Preventive and Curative Biological Control Mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 45, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Singh, A.A.; Singh, A.K.; Nerurkar, A. Disrupting the Quorum Sensing Mediated Virulence in Soft Rot Causing Pectobacterium carotovorum by Marine Sponge Associated Bacillus sp. OA10. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2021, 37, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhou, S.; Yu, Z.; Chu, W. Effect of Quorum-Quenching Bacterium Bacillus sp. QSI-1 on Protein Profiles and Extracellular Enzymatic Activities of Aeromonas hydrophila YJ-1. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chu, W.; Zhou, S.; Zhu, W.; Zhuang, X. Quorum Quenching Bacteria Bacillus sp. QSI-1 Protect Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) from Aeromonas hydrophila Infection. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Prazdnova, E.V.; Gorovtsov, A.V.; Vasilchenko, N.G.; Kulikov, M.P.; Statsenko, V.N.; Bogdanova, A.A.; Refeld, A.G.; Brislavskiy, Y.A.; Chistyakov, V.A.; Chikindas, M.L. Quorum-Sensing Inhibition by Gram-Positive Bacteria. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Barbey, C.; Crepin, A.; Bergeau, D.; Ouchiha, A.; Mijouin, L.; Taupin, L.; Orange, N.; Feuilloley, M.; Dufour, A.; Burini, J.-F.; et al. In Planta Biocontrol of Pectobacterium Atrosepticum by Rhodococcus Erythropolis Involves Silencing of Pathogen Communication by the Rhodococcal Gamma-Lactone Catabolic Pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Grandclément, C.; Tannières, M.; Moréra, S.; Dessaux, Y.; Faure, D. Quorum Quenching: Role in Nature and Applied Developments. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 40, 86–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sikdar, R.; Elias, M. Quorum Quenching Enzymes and Their Effects on Virulence, Biofilm, and Microbiomes: A Review of ReCent. Advances. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2020, 18, 1221–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Okano, C.; Murota, D.; Nasuno, E.; Iimura, K.I.; Kato, N. Effective Quorum Quenching with a Conformation-Stable Recombinant Lactonase Possessing a Hydrophilic Polymeric Shell Fabricated via Electrospinning. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sakr, M.M.; Elkhatib, W.F.; Aboshanab, K.M.; Mantawy, E.M.; Yassien, M.A.; Hassouna, N.A. In Vivo Evaluation of a Recombinant N-Acylhomoserine Lactonase Formulated in a Hydrogel Using a Murine Model Infected with MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate, CCASUP2. AMB Express 2021, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, B.; Zhuang, X.; Guo, L.; McLean, R.J.C.; Chu, W. Recombinant N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Lactonase AiiAQSI-1 Attenuates Aeromonas hydrophila Virulence Factors, Biofilm Formation and Reduces Mortality in Crucian carp. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Dong, W.; Cai, Y.; Xu, Z.; Fu, B.; Chen, Q.; Cui, Y.; Ruan, Z.; Liang, Y.; Peng, N.; Zhao, S. Heterologous Expression of AHL Lactonase AiiK by Lactobacillus casei MCJΔ1 with Great Quorum Quenching Ability against Aeromonas hydrophila AH-1 and AH-4. Microb. Cell Fact 2020, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, Y.; Liu, P.; Wu, J.; Yan, W.; Xie, S.; Sun, X.; Ye, B.C.; Chu, X. N-Acylhomoserine Lactonase-Based Hybrid Nanoflowers: A Novel and Practical Strategy to Control Plant Bacterial Diseases. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lane, M.D.; Seelig, B. Advances in the Directed Evolution of Proteins. Curr. Opin Chem. Biol. 2014, 22, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Wang, J.; Lin, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Feng, T.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y. Activity Improvement and Vital Amino Acid Identification on the Marine-Derived Quorum Quenching Enzyme MOML by Protein Engineering. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Murugayah, S.A.; Gerth, M.L. Engineering Quorum Quenching Enzymes: Progress and Perspectives. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Aslanli, A.; Lyagin, I.; Efremenko, E. Novel Approach to Quorum Quenching: Rational Design of Antibacterials in Combination with Hexahistidine-Tagged Organophosphorus Hydrolase. Biol. Chem. 2018, 399, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jacquet, P.; Hiblot, J.; Daudé, D.; Bergonzi, C.; Gotthard, G.; Armstrong, N.; Chabrière, E.; Elias, M. Rational Engineering of a Native Hyperthermostable Lactonase into a Broad Spectrum Phosphotriesterase. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kyeong, H.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.S. Design of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactonase with High Substrate Specificity by a Rational Approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4735–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cassán, F.; Diaz-Zorita, M. Azospirillum sp. in Current Agriculture: From the Laboratory to the Field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Vial, L.; Cuny, C.; Gluchoff-Fiasson, K.; Comte, G.; Oger, P.M.; Faure, D.; Dessaux, Y.; Bally, R.; Wisniewski-Dyé, F. N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum-Sensing in Azospirillum: An Exception Rather than a Rule. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 58, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Gualpa, J.; Lopez, G.; Nievas, S.; Coniglio, A.; Halliday, N.; Cámara, M.; Cassán, F. Azospirillum Brasilense Az39, a Model Rhizobacterium with AHL Quorum-Quenching Capacity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1850–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, R.; Vivanco, J.M.; Shen, Q. The Unseen Rhizosphere Root–Soil–Microbe Interactions for Crop Production. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 37, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hartmann, A. Quorum Sensing N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Signal Molecules of Plant Beneficial Gram-Negative Rhizobacteria Support Plant Growth and Resistance to Pathogens. Rhizosphere 2020, 16, 100258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. von Rad, U.; Klein, I.; Dobrev, P.I.; Kottova, J.; Zazimalova, E.; Fekete, A.; Hartmann, A.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Durner, J. Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to N-Hexanoyl-DL-Homoserine-Lactone, a Bacterial Quorum Sensing Molecule Produced in the Rhizosphere. Planta 2008, 229, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jin, G.; Liu, F.; Ma, H.; Hao, S.; Zhao, Q.; Bian, Z.; Jia, Z.; Song, S. Two G-Protein-Coupled-Receptor Candidates, Cand2 and Cand7, Are Involved in Arabidopsis Root Growth Mediated by the Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Signals N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactones. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 417, 991–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, F.; Bian, Z.; Jia, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Song, S. The GCR1 and GPA1 Participate in Promotion of Arabidopsis Primary Root Elongation Induced by N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactones, the Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Signals. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, C.; Jia, Z.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Song, S. Involvement of Calmodulin in Regulation of Primary Root Elongation by N-3-Oxo-Hexanoyl Homoserine Lactone in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Zhao, Q.; Li, M.; Jia, Z.; Liu, F.; Ma, H.; Huang, Y.; Song, S. AtMYB44 Positively Regulates the Enhanced Elongation of Primary Roots Induced by N-3-Oxo-Hexanoyl-Homoserine Lactone in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Liu, X.; Bimerew, M.; Ma, Y.; Müller, H.; Ovadis, M.; Eberl, L.; Berg, G.; Chernin, L. Quorum-Sensing Signaling Is Required for Production of the Antibiotic Pyrrolnitrin in a Rhizospheric Biocontrol Strain of Serratia plymuthica. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 270, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Ortíz-Castro, R.; Martínez-Trujillo, M.; López-Bucio, J. N-Acyl-L-Homoserine Lactones: A Class of Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Signals Alter Post-Embryonic Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 1497–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Veliz-Vallejos, D.F.; van Noorden, G.E.; Yuan, M.; Mathesius, U. A Sinorhizobium Meliloti-Specific N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Signal Increases Nodule Numbers in Medicago truncatula Independent of Autoregulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Schuhegger, R.; Ihring, A.; Gantner, S.; Bahnweg, G.; Knappe, C.; Vogg, G.; Hutzler, P.; Schmid, M.; van Breusegem, F.; Eberl, L.; et al. Induction of Systemic Resistance in Tomato by N-Acyl-L-Homoserine Lactone-Producing Rhizosphere Bacteria. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Schenk, S.T.; Schikora, A. AHL-Priming Functions via Oxylipin and Salicylic Acid. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sieper, T.; Forczek, S.; Matucha, M.; Krämer, P.; Hartmann, A.; Schröder, P. N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Uptake and Systemic Transport in Barley Rest upon Active Parts of the Plant. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Götz-Rösch, C.; Sieper, T.; Fekete, A.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Hartmann, A.; Schröder, P. Influence of Bacterial N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactoneson Growth Parameters, Pigments, Antioxidative Capacities and the Xenobiotic Phase II Detoxification Enzymesin Barley and Yam Bean. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Schikora, A.; Schenk, S.T.; Hartmann, A. Beneficial Effects of Bacteria-Plant Communication Based on Quorum Sensing Molecules of the N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Group. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 90, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Schenk, S.T.; Hernández-Reyes, C.; Samans, B.; Stein, E.; Neumann, C.; Schikora, M.; Reichelt, M.; Mithöfer, A.; Becker, A.; Kogel, K.H.; et al. N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Primes Plants for Cell Wall Reinforcement and Induces Resistance to Bacterial Pathogens via the Salicylic Acid/Oxylipin Pathway. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2708–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Li, D.; Rothballer, M.; Schmid, M.; Esperschütz, J.; Hartmann, A. Acidovorax radicis sp. nov., a Wheat-Root-Colonizing Bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 2589–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Han, S.; Li, D.; Trost, E.; Mayer, K.F.; Corina, V.; Heller, W.; Schmid, M.; Hartmann, A.; Rothballer, M. Systemic Responses of Barley to the 3-Hydroxy-Decanoyl-Homoserine Lactone Producing Plant Beneficial Endophyte Acidovorax Radicis N35. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Gantner, S.; Schmid, M.; Dürr, C.; Schuhegger, R.; Steidle, A.; Hutzler, P.; Langebartels, C.; Eberl, L.; Hartmann, A.; Dazzo, F.B. In Situ Quantitation of the Spatial Scale of Calling Distances and Population Density-Independent N-Acylhomoserine Lactone-Mediated Communication by Rhizobacteria Colonized on Plant Roots. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 56, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Shrestha, A.; Grimm, M.; Ojiro, I.; Krumwiede, J.; Schikora, A. Impact of Quorum Sensing Molecules on Plant Growth and Immune System. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wehner, G.; Schikora, A.; Ordon, F.; Will, T. Priming Negatively Affects Feeding Behaviour and Aphid Biomass of Rhopalosiphum padi on Barley. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Moshynets, O.V.; Babenko, L.M.; Rogalsky, S.P.; Iungin, O.S.; Foster, J.; Kosakivska, I.V.; Potters, G.; Spiers, A.J. Priming Winter Wheat Seeds with the Bacterial Quorum Sensing Signal N-Hexanoyl-L-Homoserine Lactone (C6-HSL) Shows Potential to Improve Plant Growth and Seed Yield. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Gupta, G.S.; Kumar, A.; Verma, N. Bacterial Homoserine Lactones as a Nanocomposite Fertilizer and Defense Regulator for Chickpeas. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Deangelis, K.M.; Lindow, S.E.; Firestone, M.K. Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Nitrogen Cycling in Rhizosphere Soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 66, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Saraf, M.; Sharma, S. Quorum Sensing Enhances Nitrogen Uptake in Plant. In Soil Nitrogen Ecology, 1st ed.; (Soil Biology Book 62); Cruz, C., Vishwakarma, K., Choundhacy, D.K., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 62, pp. 371–388. [Google Scholar]
  138. Mellbye, B.L.; Giguere, A.T.; Bottomley, P.J.; Sayavedra-Soto, L.A. Quorum Quenching of Nitrobacter Winogradskyi Suggests That Quorum Sensing Regulates Fluxes of Nitrogen Oxide(s) during Nitrification. mBio 2016, 7, e01753-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Gao, J.; Zhuang, G.; Zhuang, X. Effects of Exogenous Short-Chain N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone on Denitrifying Process of Paracoccus Denitrificans. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2017, 54, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, N.; Gao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhuang, X.; Zhuang, G. Realizing the Role of N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Nitrification and Denitrification: A Review. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Fang, A.; Lou, Y.; Xie, G.; Ren, N.; Xing, D. Quorum Sensing Systems Regulate Heterotrophic Nitrification-Aerobic Denitrification by Changing the Activity of Nitrogen-Cycling Enzymes. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2020, 2, 100026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kimura, N. Metagenomic Approaches to Understanding Phylogenetic Diversity in Quorum Sensing. Virulence 2014, 5, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Schipper, C.; Hornung, C.; Bijtenhoorn, P.; Quitschau, M.; Grond, S.; Streit, W.R. Metagenome-Derived Clones Encoding Two Novel Lactonase Family Proteins Involved in Biofilm Inhibition in Pseudomonas aefuginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. The Metagenomics Worldwide Research. Curr. Genet. 2017, 63, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Torres, M.; Uroz, S.; Salto, R.; Fauchery, L.; Quesada, E.; Llamas, I. HqiA, a Novel Quorum-Quenching Enzyme Which Expands the AHL Lactonase Family. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Su, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Yu, M. Metagenomic Insights Into the Microbial Assemblage Capable of Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Particulate Organic Matter in the Yellow Sea. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 602010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cirou, A.; Uroz, S.; Chapelle, E.; Latour, X.; Orange, N.; Faure, D.; Dessaux, Y. Quorum Sensing as a Target for Novel Biocontrol Strategies Directed at Pectobacterium. In ReCent. Developments in Management of Plant Diseases; Gisi, U., Chet, I., Gullino, M.L., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  148. Liu, X.; Cao, L.C.; Fan, X.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Xie, W. Engineering of a Thermostable Esterase Est816 to Improve Its Quorum-Quenching Activity and the Underlying Structural Basis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Riaz, K.; Elmerich, C.; Moreira, D.; Raffoux, A.; Dessaux, Y.; Faure, D. A Metagenomic Analysis of Soil Bacteria Extends the Diversity of Quorum-Quenching Lactonases. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bijtenhoorn, P.; Mayerhofer, H.; Müller-Dieckmann, J.; Utpatel, C.; Schipper, C.; Hornung, C.; Szesny, M.; Grond, S.; Thürmer, A.; Brzuszkiewicz, E.; et al. A Novel Metagenomic Short-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation and Virulence on Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 13 00114 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of the different types of autoinducers: (A) (I) Al-1 unsubstituted homoserine lactone (C6 HSL); (II) Al-1 oxidized homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL); (III) hydroxylated homoserine lactone (3-hydroxy-C6-HSL). (B) (I) Al-2 (furanosyl borate diester); (II) Al-3 (Phevalin, a member of the class of pyrazinones); (III) other unclassified autoinducers (quinolone derivative, PQS).
Figure 1. Structure of the different types of autoinducers: (A) (I) Al-1 unsubstituted homoserine lactone (C6 HSL); (II) Al-1 oxidized homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL); (III) hydroxylated homoserine lactone (3-hydroxy-C6-HSL). (B) (I) Al-2 (furanosyl borate diester); (II) Al-3 (Phevalin, a member of the class of pyrazinones); (III) other unclassified autoinducers (quinolone derivative, PQS).
Metabolites 13 00114 g001
Metabolites 13 00114 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of the biosynthetic pathway of Al-1 and Al-2 signaling molecules. SAM-S-adenosyl-L-methionine, MTA-5’-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase, MTAN-5’-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase, SAH-S-adenosylhomocysteine, SRH-S-ribosylhomoserine (SRH).
Figure 2. Schematic of the biosynthetic pathway of Al-1 and Al-2 signaling molecules. SAM-S-adenosyl-L-methionine, MTA-5’-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase, MTAN-5’-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase, SAH-S-adenosylhomocysteine, SRH-S-ribosylhomoserine (SRH).
Metabolites 13 00114 g002
Metabolites 13 00114 g003 550
Figure 3. Structure of plant-derived QS inhibitors. (I) Eugenol (from cloves and cinnamon); (II) Ajoene (from garlic).
Figure 3. Structure of plant-derived QS inhibitors. (I) Eugenol (from cloves and cinnamon); (II) Ajoene (from garlic).
Metabolites 13 00114 g003
Table
Table 1. Mode of action of selected natural and synthetic QS inhibitors.
Table 1. Mode of action of selected natural and synthetic QS inhibitors.
Type of Source OrganismsInhibitorsSourceQSI Sensitive MicroorganismEffective Concentration of QS InhibitionActionApplicationReferences
Higher plantsechinatinGlycyrrhiza L.Escherichia coli O157:H750 µMInhibition of biofilm formation.
Inhibition of EPS 1 production.
Inhibition of bacterial motility.
Reduction in the expression of QS-regulated genes (luxS, pfs, lsrB, lsrK, lsrR, flhC, flhD, fliC, csgD, and stx2).		Antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant
E. coli;
potential for treating
E. coli infection.		[66]
carvacrol and
eugenol		Carvacol from aromatic plants, thyme and oregano.
Eugenol from cinnamon and clove oils		P. carotovorum subsp. brasiliense
Pcb1692
P. aroidearum PC1		250 μMReduction of biofilm formation.
Inhibit secretion of PCWDEs 2 (i.e., pectate lyase (Pel), polygalacturonase (Peh), and protease (Prt)).
Inhibition of AHL production, potentially via direct interaction with ExpI/ExpR proteins.
Downregulation of QS-regulated genes (rsmA, acrD and nssA).		Potential for soft rot disease control.[67]
phloretinapplePectobacterium
brasiliense		200 µMReduction of biofilm formation.
Reduction of bacterial motility.
Reduction of the secretion of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes.
Reduction in AHLs 3 production.
Inhibition of expi activity.
Downregulation of QS-regulated genes (expI, expR, luxS, rsmB), plant cell wall-degrading enzymes genes (pel, peh and prt) and motility genes (motA, fim, fliA, flhC and flhD).		Potential for plant-pathogenic bacteria control.[68]
Marine
organisms		meleagrinPenicillum chrysogeniumChromobacterium violaceum138.42 µMInhibition of bacterial enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI).Antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant human pathogens;
potential for treating pathogenic infection.		[69,70]
alginate
oligomer
(OligoG
CF-5/20)		Laminaria
hyperborea		Pseudomonas
aeruginosa		2%Inhibition of biofilm formation.
Inhibition of bacterial motility.
Reduction in AHLs’ production.
Alteration in the extracellular production of the pseudomonal virulence factors pyo-
cyanin, rhamnolipids, elastase, and total protease.
Reduction in the expression of both the las and rhl systems.		Control chronic
infections and biofilm-associated problems of P. aeruginosa.		[71,72]
N-benzyl cinnamamideGracilaria fisheriVibrio harveyi1.66 mg/mLInhibition of biofilm formation.
RReduction in bioluminescence via inhibition of AI-2 signaling.		Potential antimicrobial drug against
V. harveyi.		[73]
BacteriaAmicoumacinsTRM B-02 Taklimakan desert bacteriumChromobacterium
violaceum		31.25 µg/mLInhibition of the violacein biosynthetic pathway via downregulation of the expression of violacein operon A (vioA), vioB, vioD and vioE and upregulation of the expression of violacein operon C vioC, competitively inhibiting the binding of FAD 4 with the vioD enzyme.Antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant human pathogens;
potential for treating pathogenic infection.		[74]
Fatty acyl compoundsStreptomyces griseoincarnatus HK12Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
Staphylococcus aureus		100 μg/mLBinding to the conserved sites of substrate binding in the quorum sensing system, LasI.Antimicrobial agents against crucial nosocomial respiratory pathogen.[75]
Cyclic
dipeptides (CDPs)		Pseudomonas aeruginosa RKCLelliottia amnigena RCE10 mg/mLRegulation diverse metabolites of the pathogen diketopiperazine. Inhibition of QS-mediated pathogenicity via competitive binding with receptorsPotential for soft rot disease control.[76]
Synthetic compoundssynthetic peptides (LIVRHK and
LIVRRK)		 Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
PAO1		100 μg/mLInhibition of biofilm formation.
Inhibits the production of virulence factors, including pyocyanin, protease, and rhamnolipids.
downregulation of the expression of genes lasI, lasR, rhlI, and rhlR.		Control chronic
infections and biofilm-associated problems of
P. aeruginosa.		[77]
N-acyl-2-aminopyrimidine
derivatives		 Acinetobacter
baumannii		3.8 μMInhibition of biofilm formation.
Reduction in EPS production.
Reduction of bacterial motility.		Antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant human pathogens;
potential for treating pathogenic infection.		[78]
PQIs (phc quorum sensing inhibitors) Ralstonia solanacearum
OE1-1		41.2 nM–
731 μM
depends on (R)- or (S)-
enantiomers		Act as competitive antagonists of 3-OH MAME 5.
Inhibition of QS-dependent gene expression; repression
inhibition of the production of ralfuranone and EPS.		Potential for plant-pathogenic bacteria control.[79]
1 EPS—extracellular polysaccharide; 2 PCWDEs—plant cell wall-degrading enzymes; 3 AHLs—N-acyl-homoserine lactones; 4 FAD—flavin adenine dinucleotide; 5 3-OH MAME—(R)-methyl 3-hydroxymyristate.
Table
Table 2. The effects of the interactions of AHL molecules with different carbon chain lengths.
Table 2. The effects of the interactions of AHL molecules with different carbon chain lengths.
AutoinducerPlantImpact EffectsReferences
C6-HSL
3O-C6-HSL
3O-C8-HSL		Arabidopsis thalianaMain root growth stimulation.[115,116,117,118,119]
3O-C10-HSLVigna radiataAdventitious roots growth stimulation.[17]
C4-HSL
C6-HSL
3OHC4-HSL
3OHC6-HSL		Phaseolus L.
Solanum lycopersicum		Systemic resilience similar to ISR.[120]
C10-HSLArabidopsis thalianaInhibition of main root growth.
Adventitious roots growth stimulation.
Root hairs growth stimulation.		[121]
3O-C8-HSL
3O-C14-HSL		Arabidopsis thalianaIncreased resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.[16,18]
3O-C14-HSLMedicago truncatulaIncreased root nodulation.[122]
C4-HSL
C6-HSL		Solanum lycopersicumIncreasing the content of salicylic acid.
PR1a induction.
Chitinase induction.		[123]
C6-HSL
C8-HSL		Arabidopsis thalianaRoot growth stimulation by GCR1/GPA1 genes.[117]
3-okso-C14-HSLArabidopsis thalianaStimulating the expression of antioxidant and defense genes through the oxylipin and salicylic acid pathway.[124]
C8-HSL
C10-HSL		Hordeum L.
Triticum L.		Root stimulation.
Increasing the production of phase II antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes.		[125,126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Majdura, J.; Jankiewicz, U.; Gałązka, A.; Orzechowski, S. The Role of Quorum Sensing Molecules in Bacterial–Plant Interactions. Metabolites 2023, 13, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010114

AMA Style

Majdura J, Jankiewicz U, Gałązka A, Orzechowski S. The Role of Quorum Sensing Molecules in Bacterial–Plant Interactions. Metabolites. 2023; 13(1):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majdura, Jan, Urszula Jankiewicz, Agnieszka Gałązka, and Sławomir Orzechowski. 2023. "The Role of Quorum Sensing Molecules in Bacterial–Plant Interactions" Metabolites 13, no. 1: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010114

APA Style

Majdura, J., Jankiewicz, U., Gałązka, A., & Orzechowski, S. (2023). The Role of Quorum Sensing Molecules in Bacterial–Plant Interactions. Metabolites, 13(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop