Next Article in Journal
Colocalization Analysis of Peripheral Myelin Protein-22 and Lamin-B1 in the Schwann Cell Nuclei of Wt and TrJ Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Impacts of Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal Antibiotics on the Mitochondria of the Age-Related Macular Degeneration Cybrid Cell Lines
Previous Article in Journal
Histamine Intolerance—A Kind of Pseudoallergic Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complement Factor H Loss in RPE Cells Causes Retinal Degeneration in a Human RPE-Porcine Retinal Explant Co-Culture Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/biom12030455
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity

by
Jie Yan
1,2,
Alexander Günter
3,
Soumyaparna Das
1,
Regine Mühlfriedel
3,
Stylianos Michalakis
4,
Kangwei Jiao
5,
Mathias W. Seeliger
3,* and
François Paquet-Durand
1,*
1
Cell Death Mechanism Group, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2
Graduate Training Centre of Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
3
Division of Ocular Neurodegeneration, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
4
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80539 München, Germany
5
Key Laboratory of Yunnan Province, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming 650051, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(3), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030455
Submission received: 4 February 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 10 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell and Organ Cultures for Studying Retinal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are a group of blinding diseases, typically involving a progressive loss of photoreceptors. The IRD pathology is often based on an accumulation of cGMP in photoreceptors and associated with the excessive activation of calpain and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Inhibitors of calpain or PARP have shown promise in preventing photoreceptor cell death, yet the relationship between these enzymes remains unclear. To explore this further, organotypic retinal explant cultures derived from wild-type and IRD-mutant mice were treated with inhibitors specific for calpain, PARP, and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs). The outcomes were assessed using in situ activity assays for calpain and PARP and immunostaining for activated calpain-2, poly (ADP-ribose), and cGMP, as well as the TUNEL assay for cell death detection. The IRD models included the Pde6b-mutant rd1 mouse and rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant mice, which lack the beta subunit of the rod cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channel and are partially protected from rd1 degeneration. We confirmed that an inhibition of either calpain or PARP reduces photoreceptor cell death in rd1 retina. However, while the activity of calpain was decreased by the inhibition of PARP, calpain inhibition did not alter the PARP activity. A combination treatment with calpain and PARP inhibitors did not synergistically reduce cell death. In the slow degeneration of rd1*Cngb1−/− double mutant, VGCC inhibition delayed photoreceptor cell death, while PARP inhibition did not. Our results indicate that PARP acts upstream of calpain and that both are part of the same degenerative pathway in Pde6b-dependent photoreceptor degeneration. While PARP activation may be associated with CNG channel activity, calpain activation is linked to VGCC opening. Overall, our data highlights PARP as a target for therapeutic interventions in IRD-type diseases.

1. Introduction

Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are a genetically diverse group of diseases that typically result in progressive photoreceptor cell death, severe visual handicap, and blindness [1]. The most common disease within the IRD group is retinitis pigmentosa (RP) [2], in which patients initially experience night blindness and gradual constriction of the visual field due to primary loss of rod photoreceptors. This is followed by secondary degeneration of cone photoreceptors, eventually resulting in complete blindness [3]. Approximately one in four thousand people are affected by RP [2]. IRD-type blinding diseases are generally considered to be untreatable [4]. The second messenger cyclic-guanosine-monophosphate (cGMP) has been found to play a central role in the pathobiology of many genetically distinct types of IRD [5], and excessive cGMP-signaling may be directly or indirectly associated with the activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels, and calpain-type proteases [5,6,7].
One of the best studied animal models for IRD is the rd1 mouse (retinal degeneration 1), a naturally occurring mouse model first described by Keeler in the early 1920s [8]. In rd1 mice, the gene encoding for the beta subunit of the rod photoreceptor-specific phosphodiesterase-6 (PDE6) is mutated [9], causing PDE6 dysfunction, accumulation of cGMP in rod photoreceptors, and primary rod cell death, followed by secondary cone photoreceptor cell loss [10,11]. The degeneration of rods in the rd1 mouse is associated with a prominent activation of both PARP and calpain [12,13]. In humans, 4 to 5% of IRD patients carry mutations in PDE6 genes, making it seem likely that they will also suffer from high cGMP levels and the corresponding up-regulation of downstream cGMP-signaling targets [14].
PARP is a DNA repair enzyme [15] and catalyzes ADP-ribose transfer to target proteins [16]. It can sequentially add ADP-ribose units from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) to form polymeric ADP-ribose (PAR) chains [17]. The enzymatic activity of PARP has been related to a variety of different cellular functions, including DNA repair and transcription, regulation of gene expression, metabolism, and aging [18]. However, PARP may also be the primary driver for a specific form of cell death, termed PARthanatos [19]. The current view is that in IRD nonapoptotic cGMP-dependent cell death is characterized by PARP over-activation and the accumulation of PAR [14], indicating a possible crosstalk between cGMP signaling and PARthanatos [6].
Calpain is a Ca2+-dependent thiol protease, which has been implicated in fundamental cellular processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation [20]. The Ca2+ influx required for calpain activation may occur via CNG channels located in the plasma membrane of the photoreceptor outer segment. These channels are gated by cGMP, which is often elevated in retinal degeneration [7,21,22]. The activation of CNG channels leads to a depolarization of the photoreceptor plasma membrane, which activates synaptic voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs), increasing the synaptic and cytosolic Ca2+ levels [23]. The influx of Ca2+ via CNG channels and/or VGCC is thought to cause the activation of calpain-type proteases, which may promote cell destruction [24,25,26,27].
In IRD, PARP and calpain have been suggested to be part of two independent cell death subroutines, both of which are triggered by elevated levels of cGMP [5]. On the other hand, PARP is known to be cleaved by calpain, indicating that calpain could potentially control PARP activity [28,29]. Conversely, in a model for NMDA toxicity in rat primary cortical neurons, PARP was found to regulate the calpain activity via mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis [30]. We hypothesized that PARP and calpain crosstalk could also occur during cGMP-dependent cell death in IRD. To investigate this possibility, we used specific inhibitors for PARP, calpain, and VGCC to block the corresponding downstream pathways and assessed the contribution of the rod CNG channel via knockout of its beta subunit. Through these interventions, we show that (1) calpain and PARP are part of the same degenerative pathway triggered by high levels of cGMP in photoreceptors and that (2) PARP controls calpain activity, likely indirectly via CNG channel activity and excessive demands on energy metabolism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

For retinal explant cultures C3H/HeA Pde6b rd1/rd1 animals (rd1), their congenic wild-type C3H/HeA Pde6b+/+ counterparts (wt) [31], and B6.129SvJ;C3H/HeA-CNGB1tm double-mutant mice (rd1*Cngb1−/−) were used [22].The rd1*Cngb1−/− double mutants were generated by an intercross of rd1 and Cngb1−/−. Animals were used regardless of gender. The stock has been maintained by repeated backcrossing over 10 generations to make a congenic inbred strain, homozygous for both gene mutations. Animals were housed under standard white cyclic lighting and had free access to food and water. Animal protocols compliant with §4 of the German law of animal protection were reviewed and approved by the Tübingen University committee on animal protection (Einrichtung für Tierschutz, Tierärztlicher Dienst und Labortierkunde, Registration No. AK02/19M).

2.2. Retinal Explant Culture

To assess the effects of Olaparib, calpastatin, and D-cis-diltiazem on calpain activity, activated calpain-2, PARP activity, PAR, and photoreceptor degeneration, rd1 and rd1*Cngb1−/− retinas were explanted at postnatal day 5 (P5). The explants were cultured on a polycarbonate membrane (Corning-Costar Transwell permeable support, 24-mm insert, #CLS3412) with complete medium (Gibco R16 medium with supplements) [32]. The R16 medium was changed every two days with treatment at either P7 and P9 for rd1 or at P7, P9, P11, P13, and P15 for rd1*Cngb1−/− explants. Except for the wt situation, the two retinas obtained from a single animal were split across different experimental groups so as to maximize the number of independent observations acquired per animal. The cultures were treated with 20-µM calpastatin, 1-µM Olaparib, 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem, and 20-µM calpastatin combined with 1-µM Olaparib, respectively. In these treatments, Olaparib was dissolved in DMSO at a final medium concentration of 0.1% DMSO. Cultures were ended on P11 (rd1) and P17 (rd1*Cngb1−/−) by either fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) or without fixation and direct freezing on liquid N2. The explants were embedded in Tissue-Tek (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) and sectioned (12 µm) in a cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CryoStar NX50 OVP, Runcorn, UK).

2.3. TUNEL Staining

The TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) labeled dying cells. Histological sections from retinal explants were dried and stored at −20 °C. The sections were rehydrated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 M) and incubated with proteinase K (1.5 µg/µL) diluted in 50-mM TRIS-buffered saline (TBS; 1-µL enzyme in 7-mL TBS) for 5 min. This was followed by 3 times 5-min TBS washing and incubation with blocking solution (10% normal goat serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 1% fish gelatin in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.03% Tween-20). TUNEL staining solution was prepared using 10 parts of blocking solution, 9 parts of TUNEL labeling solution, and 1 part of TUNEL enzyme. After blocking, the sections were incubated with TUNEL staining solution overnight at 4°C. Finally, the sections were washed 2 times with PB, mounted using Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA), and imaged under a Zeiss (ApoTome 2) microscope for further analysis.

2.4. Calpain-Activity Assay

This assay allows resolving the overall calpain activity in situ on unfixed tissue sections. Retinal tissue sections were incubated and rehydrated for 15 min in a calpain reaction buffer (CRB) (5.96-g HEPES, 4.85-g KCl, 0.47-g MgCl2, and 0.22-g CaCl2 in 100-mL ddH2O; pH 7.2) with 2-mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The tissue sections were incubated for 2.5 h at 37 °C in CRB with tBOC-Leu-Met-CMAC (25-µM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A6520). Then, the section was washed with PBS and incubated with ToPro (1:1000 in PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, OR, USA) for 15 min. Afterwards, the tissue sections were washed twice in PBS (5 min) and mounted using Vectashield without DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for immediate visualization under the ZEISS ApoTome 2.

2.5. PARP Activity Assay

This assay allows resolving the overall PARP activity in situ on unfixed tissue sections [33]. Retinal tissue sections were incubated and rehydrated for 10 min in PBS. The reaction mixture (10-mM MgCl2, 1-mM dithiothreitol, and 50-μM 6-Fluo-10-NAD+ (Biolog, Cat. Nr.: N 023) in 100-mM Tris buffer with 0.2% Triton X100, pH 8.0) was applied to the sections for 3 h at 37 °C. After three 5-min washes in PBS, the sections were mounted in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for immediate visualization under the ZEISS ApoTome 2.

2.6. PAR DAB Staining

For the detection of PAR DAB staining, we used fixed sections. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining commenced with the quenching of endogenous peroxidase activity using 40% MeOH and 10% H2O2 in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 (PBST) for 20 min. The sections were further incubated with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBST for 30 min, followed by anti-PAR antibody (1:200; Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) incubation overnight at 4 °C. Incubation with the biotinylated secondary antibody (1:150, Vector in 5% NGS in PBST) for 1 h was followed by the Vector ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, solution A and solution B in PBS, 1:150 each) for 1 h. DAB staining solution (0.05-mg/mL NH4Cl, 200-mg/mL glucose, 0.8-mg/mL nickel ammonium sulphate, 1-mg/mL DAB, and 0.1 vol. % glucose oxidase in phosphate buffer) was applied evenly, incubated for precisely 3 min, and immediately rinsed with phosphate buffer to stop the reaction. The sections were mounted in Aquatex (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.7. Calpain-2/cGMP Immunohistochemistry

Sections were rehydrated with PBS for 15 min. The sections were then incubated with blocking solution (10% NGS, 1% BSA 911, and 0.3% PBST) for 1 h. The primary antibodies anti-calpain-2 (ab39165; 1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and cGMP (1:250; kindly provided by Harry Steinbusch, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands) were diluted in blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Rinsing with PBS for 3 times 10-min each was followed by incubation with the secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, AlexaFluor568 (A11036), diluted 1:300 in PBS) for 1 h. The sections were further rinsed with PBS for 3 times 10-min each and mounted with Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA).

2.8. Microscopy and Image Analysis in Retinal Cultures

The images of organotypic explant cultures were captured using a Zeiss Imager Z.2 fluorescence microscope, equipped with ApoTome 2, an Axiocam 506 mono camera, and HXP-120V fluorescent lamp (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany). The excitation (λExc.)/emission (λEm.) characteristics of the filter sets used for the different fluorophores were as follows (in nm): DAPI (λExc. = 369 nm, λEm = 465 nm), AF488 (λExc. = 490 nm, λEm = 525 nm), AF568 (λExc. = 578 nm, λEm = 602 nm), and ToPro (λExc. = 642 nm, λEm = 661 nm). The Zen 2.3 blue edition software (Zeiss) captured images (tiled and z-stack, 20× magnification). Sections of 12-µm thickness were analyzed using 12–15 Apotome Z-planes. For the quantification of positive cells in the retinal ONL, we proceeded as follows: The number of cells in six different rectangular ONL areas was counted manually based on the number of DAPI-stained nuclei and used to calculate an average ONL cell size. This average ONL cell size was then used to rapidly calculate the total number of cells in a given ONL area. The percentage of positive cells was calculated by dividing the absolute number of positive cells by the total number of ONL cells.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data was compared by the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Multiple comparisons were made using the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance test. All calculations were performed with GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA); p < 0.05 was considered significant. The figures were prepared using Photoshop CS5 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). The diagram was created with BioRender.com.

3. Results

3.1. Calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, and Olaparib Reduce Calpain Activity in Photoreceptors

To investigate whether and how PARP and calpain could interact with each other, we treated organotypic retinal explants with well-validated and highly selective inhibitors for calpain (i.e., calpastatin) [34] and PARP (i.e., Olaparib) [35]. In addition, we used D-cis-diltiazem to block L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) [36]. As readouts, we used in situ activity assays for calpain and PARP, immunolabeling for activated calpain-2 and poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR), as well as the TUNEL assay, to detect cell death. Retinal explant cultures were derived from wt and rd1 animals, explanted at postnatal day 5 (P5), and treated from P7 to P11.
In the wt retina, calpain activity and calpain-2 activation were generally relatively low when compared with rd1, in which both markers labeled large numbers of positive cells in the ONL (Figure 1a and Appendix A Scheme A1a). In rd1, treatment with calpastatin and D-cis-diltiazem, as expected, reduced both the calpain activity and calpain-2 activation (p < 0.0001, Figure 1d and Appendix A Scheme A1d). The solvent DMSO used for Olaparib dissolution did not affect the calpain activity (Appendix A Scheme A2a–c). Surprisingly, when the retinal explants were treated with Olaparib, the calpain activity and calpain-2 activation in the ONL was also significantly decreased (p = 0.0012, Figure 1e,g and Appendix A Scheme A1e,k). However, the combined treatment with calpastatin and Olaparib did not reduce cell death any further compared to the calpastatin or Olaparib single treatments (Figure 1f).

3.2. PARP Activity in rd1 Photoreceptors Is Reduced by Olaparib and D-cis-diltiazem but Not by Calpastatin

The reduction of calpain activity after Olaparib treatment suggested that PARP activity controlled calpain activation. To further investigate the effects of PARP activity on calpain, we assessed PARP activity on unfixed retinal tissue sections [33] and stained PFA-fixed retinal tissues for poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) to evaluate PARP activity also indirectly [13]. Calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and calpastatin combined with Olaparib were used to treat organotypic retinal explant cultures derived from rd1 mice. Untreated explant cultures from wt and rd1 animals were used as the control.
In untreated wt retina the numbers of photoreceptors in the ONL displaying PARP activity were very low when compared to untreated rd1 retina (Figure 2a,b). Calpastatin did not reduce the numbers of ONL cells positive for PARP activity or PAR (Figure 2c, quantification in Figure 2g, and Appendix A Scheme A1h,l) when compared to the rd1 untreated control. Interestingly, D-cis-diltiazem significantly reduced the PARP activity (p < 0.001, Figure 2d,g) and PAR generation (p < 0.01, Appendix A Scheme A1i,l) in rd1 organotypic retinal explant cultures. As expected, Olaparib significantly decreased the PARP activity (p < 0.0001, Figure 2e,g) and PAR-positive cells (p < 0.05, Appendix A Scheme A1j,l), while its solvent DMSO had no effect (Appendix A Scheme A2d–f). However, the combination treatment with calpastatin and Olaparib did not reduce the PARP activity further (Figure 2f,g) compared with the Olaparib single treatment.
Together, our data up to this point (Section 3.1 and Section 3.2) indicated that calpain activity was regulated by PARP and that PARP activity in turn might be controlled by VGCC.

3.3. rd1 Photoreceptor Degeneration Is Delayed by Calpastatin and Olaparib but Not by D-cis-diltiazem

To further investigate the effects of calpain, VGCC, and PARP inhibition on the progression of rd1 photoreceptor cell death, we used the TUNEL assay to quantify the numbers of dying cells in the ONL. Since DMSO was used as a solvent for Olaparib, we also tested for the effects of DMSO alone on cell death and found that DMSO had no significant effect (Appendix A Scheme A2g–i).
In wt retinal explants, a relatively low number of ONL cells (i.e., photoreceptors) were positive for the TUNEL assay compared with their rd1 counterparts (Figure 3a,b). Calpastatin treatment (Figure 3c) led to a significant reduction of cell death in rd1 retina (calpastatin: p = 0.0057, quantification in Figure 3g) when compared to the untreated rd1 control. In contrast, D-cis-diltiazem treatment did not reduce the number of TUNEL-positive dying cells in rd1 ONL (Figure 3d). Yet, the Olaparib treatment did result in a significant reduction of ONL cell death (Olaparib: p < 0.0001, Figure 3e,g). The combination treatment with calpastatin and Olaparib reduced cell death in the ONL (calpastatin and Olaparib: p < 0.0001, Figure 3f,g), albeit without showing an additional effect compared with either of the two compounds applied alone. These results provided a strong indication that PARP and calpain were part of the same photoreceptor degenerative pathway.
As an additional control, to rule out possible off-target effects of notably D-cis-diltiazem or Olaparib on cGMP synthesis in photoreceptors, we performed an immunostaining for cGMP on rd1 retinal explant cultures. The cGMP staining and its quantification did not indicate any treatment-related alterations in cGMP accumulation in ONL cells (Appendix A Scheme A3).

3.4. Calpain-2 Activation Is Controlled by Both CNG Channel and VGCC Activity

To further investigate the role of the CNG channel for the activation of calpain and PARP, we used rd1*Cngb1−/− mice, i.e., rd1 mice, in which the rod photoreceptor CNG channel was not functional. These animals were generated by crossbreeding the Pde6b mutant rd1 mice with mice that lack the gene encoding for the beta subunit of the rod CNG channel [22]. Without the Cngb1 subunit rod, CNG channels are not properly formed, and rods essentially lose their ability to generate cGMP-gated currents and responses to light [37]. Previously, we showed that the photoreceptors of rd1*Cngb1−/− mice are partially protected from cell death, with the peak of cell death shifting from P13 in rd1 retinas to approximately P18 in rd1*Cngb1−/− retinas [22]. To account for this slower retinal degeneration phenotype in the double-mutant retina, we performed D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib treatments on organotypic retinal tissue cultures derived from rd1*Cngb1−/− animals at P7 and cultured until P17. To assess how the inhibitors affected calpain, we used a calpain activity assay and immunostaining for activated calpain-2.
The double-mutant rd1*Cngb1−/− mice had a significantly lower number of calpain-positive cells in the ONL than rd1 mice (Figure 4a–d, cf. Figure 1). However, even in the absence of functional rod CNG channels, there were still more calpain-positive cells in the ONL of the rd1*Cngb1−/− retina than in the wt retina (Figure 4a–d). While treatment with D-cis-diltiazem did not decrease the overall calpain activity in double-mutant retina (Figure 4e), it did significantly reduce calpain-2 activation (p = 0.0026, Figure 4f) when compared to the rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated control. As opposed to the rd1 single mutant situation, in the double-mutant retina, Olaparib failed to reduce the calpain activity and calpain-2 activation. Overall, this data suggested that CNG channel function was required for the PARP-mediated activation of calpain, while calpain-2 activation was dependent on VGCC activity.

3.5. D-cis-diltiazem Reduced PARP Activity in the rd1*Cngb1−/− Retina

To dissect the contribution of the CNG channel and the VGCC to the activation of PARP in degenerating rd1 photoreceptors, we quantified the PARP activity on unfixed retinal tissue sections and assessed the PAR accumulation on fixed tissue sections from organotypic retinal explant cultures derived from rd1*Cngb1−/− mice. These cultures were then exposed to either D-cis-diltiazem or Olaparib, with untreated wt explants serving as additional controls.
In wt retina, both the numbers of ONL cells displaying PARP activity and PAR accumulation were much lower (Figure 5a,b, cf. Figure 2 and Appendix A Scheme A1) when compared to rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina (Figure 5c,d; quantification in Figure 5i,j). Nevertheless, rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina displayed fewer PARP activity and PAR-positive cells in the ONL when compared with rd1 single mutants (cf. Figure 5 with Figure 2), indicating that CNG channels might be related to the regulation of PARP activity. When treated with D-cis-diltiazem, the percentages of photoreceptors showing PARP activity and PAR accumulation were significantly decreased in rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (Figure 5e,f; PARP activity assay: p = 0.0011; PAR staining: p < 0.0001). When treated with Olaparib, rd1*Cngb1−/− retina showed a similar marked reduction of PARP activity and PAR accumulation (Figure 5g,h; p < 0.0001). This data again hinted at a relationship between VGCC opening and PARP activity.

3.6. Effect of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on rd1*Cngb1−/− Photoreceptor Degeneration

To evaluate the effect of VGCC and PARP inhibition on photoreceptor degeneration, we performed TUNEL staining to label cell death on organotypic retinal explant cultures derived from rd1*Cngb1−/− mice and treated these with either D-cis-diltiazem or Olaparib.
Remarkably, D-cis-diltiazem significantly reduced the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the ONL of rd1*Cngb1−/− retina when compared to the untreated control (p = 0.0134, Figure 6b,c, quantification in e). In contrast, Olaparib did not show a similar effect on cell death in the rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (Figure 6b,d). These results indicated that, in the absence of rod CNG channel function, the cell death of photoreceptors depended on VGCC, but not on PARP, activity.

4. Discussion

In IRDs, excessive activation of PARP and calpain is closely related to the execution of cGMP-induced cell death [5], yet it has been unclear whether these two enzymes act independently or in concert within the same cell death pathway. Our present study confirms that PARP and calpain take part in the same pathway and that PARP activity occurs upstream of calpain activity. We also show that the two major Ca2+ sources in photoreceptors, the CNG channel and VGCC, contribute to PARP activation.

4.1. Calpain Activation Occurs Downstream of PARP

Calpains belong to a family of Ca2+-dependent thiol proteases of which fifteen members have been identified to date [20]. The best-characterized calpains in the central nervous system are two distinct heterodimeric subtypes: calpain-1 and calpain-2 [38], also known as μ-calpain and m-calpain, since they are activated by 3–50-μM Ca2+, (i.e., micromolar Ca2+) and 0.4–0.8-mM Ca2+ (i.e., millimolar Ca2+), respectively [39]. Calpain-1 and calpain-2 are thought to play opposing roles in neurodegeneration, with the activation of calpain-1 counteracting degeneration of neurons and calpain-2 promoting it [25,40,41]. Typically, these two calpains are not active at the same time and may even inactivate each other [24,42]. Our immunostaining for activated calpain-2 suggests that, in degenerating photoreceptors, most of the signal detected by the in situ calpain activity assay stems from calpain-2 activity. From non-photoreceptor cells, activated calpains are known to degrade substrate proteins, such as α-spectrin, Bcl-2 family members, RIP kinase, apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), and PARP-1 [28,29,38,43,44]. Calpastatin as the endogenous inhibitor of calpains, inhibits predominantly calpain-1 and calpain-2 but also reduces the activity of calpain-8 and calpain-9 [45]. Accordingly, the application of calpastatin in our experiments decreased both the calpain activity and calpain-2 immunosignal and delayed photoreceptor degeneration in rd1 retinal explants, as demonstrated by the TUNEL assay. This data is consistent with previous research [26] and highlights the importance of calpain-dependent proteolysis for photoreceptor degeneration.
Based on previous reports that found calpain to be able to cleave PARP, our initial hypothesis was that calpain might act upstream of PARP during photoreceptor degeneration [28,29]. However, treatment of retinal explants with calpastatin had no effect on PARP activity or the accumulation of PAR. Yet, the other way around, the PARP inhibitor Olaparib strongly decreased calpain activity. Together, this provided a strong indication that activation of PARP occurred upstream of calpain.

4.2. VGCC and CNG Channel Contribute to Calpain Activation

When compared with the calpastatin treatment, D-cis-diltiazem had a very similar effect on calpain activity in rd1 retina, suggesting that the L-type calcium channel found in the cell bodies and at the synaptic terminals of rods was involved in providing the Ca2+ required for calpain activation. Even in the absence of Cngb1 expression, photoreceptor calpain activity can be observed, further supporting the role of VGCCs in calpain activation [46]. D-cis-diltiazem administration also significantly reduced rd1 PARP activity. However, D-cis-diltiazem did not significantly reduce the TUNEL signal in rd1 retinal explants, in line with previous studies that found that pharmacological inhibition or genetic inactivation of VGCCs had only a short-term effect, if at all, on delaying rd1 photoreceptor degeneration [27,47,48]. Since D-cis-diltiazem may also produce oxidative stress in depolarized rods, this may have offset the beneficial effects of the reduction of PARP and calpain activity [36].
The major Ca2+ source in rod photoreceptor outer segments is the rod CNG channel, a heterotetrametric cGMP-gated cation channel assembled by three Cnga1 and one Cngb1 subunits [49]. Loss of the Cngb1 subunit leads to degradation of the Cnga1 subunit and, essentially, loss of the rod CNG channel, thus eliminating the cGMP-gated dark current and preventing the rods from responding to light by hyperpolarization [49]. In the rd1 model, the aberrantly high levels of cGMP lead to over-activation of the CNG channels and, thus, to increased Na+- and Ca2+- influx and persistent depolarization [7]. Paradoxically, in the Cngb1 knockout model, where rods lose the ability of light-dependent hyperpolarization, the resting membrane potential remains essentially unchanged, and the cells are constantly depolarized [46]. In rd1 rod photoreceptors, the strong Na+- and Ca2+- influx that the CNG channel mediates in its open state needs to be counterbalanced, a function that is fulfilled by the ATP-driven Na+/K+ exchanger (NKX). Importantly, NKX activity alone represents at least 50% of the total ATP expenditure of a photoreceptor, thereby linking CNG channel activity to energy metabolism [50,51].
Genetic deletion of the Cngb1 subunit of the rod CNG channel affords robust rd1 photoreceptor neuroprotection [22], even though genetic deletion of Cngb1 or the L-type channel Cacna1f [52] alone led to photoreceptor degeneration, albeit with slow rates of progression. Moreover, the combined inhibition of VGCC and the CNG channel could interrupt Ca2+ homeostasis and cause severe photoreceptor degeneration [53]. On the other hand, when we used D-cis-diltiazem on rd1*Cngb1−/− mice, photoreceptor cell death was reduced, suggesting that D-cis-diltiazem could potentially exert therapeutic effects in the absence of CNG channel function. Although D-cis-diltiazem has been reported to partially inhibit CNG channels in rod outer segments [54,55], our data indirectly rule out that it had an effect on rod degeneration in rd1 retinal explants.

4.3. PARP Regulates Calpain via a Pathway That Depends on CNG Channel Function

An abnormal activation of PARP in degenerating photoreceptors is well-documented [5,6,56,57], and accordingly, the PARP inhibitor Olaparib decreased photoreceptor cell death, consistent with previous studies [13,58,59,60,61]. PARP inhibitors are primarily used for cancer therapy due to their ability to prevent DNA repair, and several PARP inhibitors are being tested clinically or have already been approved for clinical use [62]. Notably, Olaparib became the first PARP inhibitor to be approved by the FDA to treat metastatic breast cancer in January 2018 [63]. Currently, Olaparib is the most specific PARP inhibitor available and has no binding to 392 unique human kinases [64]. Among the known off targets is inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 (IMPDH2) [65], which shares 84% sequence homology with IMPDH1, an isozyme that is strongly expressed in the retina [66]. Since IMPDH1 catalyzes the rate-limiting step of GTP production, the substrate employed by retinal guanylate cyclase (retGC) for cGMP synthesis [14], an off-target inhibition of IMPDH1 by Olaparib could potentially reduce cGMP production [67]. However, our cGMP immunostaining revealed that the number of cGMP-positive cells in the rd1 retina was not decreased in the Olaparib-treated group when compared to the control, suggesting that interactions of Olaparib with IMPDH1 were not responsible for the effects observed.
PARP activity consumes large amounts of NAD+ with important ramifications for cell metabolism. Since the biosynthesis of NAD+ occurs directly from nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) and ATP via nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferases (NMNATs), excessive consumption of NAD+ can lead to ATP depletion [68]. Additionally, NAD+ is a key substrate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and its deficiency could result in mitochondrial dysfunction [69], which can further aggravate ATP depletion [70]. Moreover, PARP joins ADP-ribose units from NAD+ to form PAR [17], high levels of which may also induce mitochondrial dysfunction [71]. The dysfunction induced by NAD+ depletion and/or PAR accumulation may depolarize the mitochondrial membrane potential and open the mitochondrial permeability transition pore [72], which could then release mitochondrial Ca2+ to the cytoplasm and activate Ca2+-dependent proteases [73,74,75]. Therefore, it appears likely that PARP inhibition, through reduced NAD+ consumption and PAR generation, will alleviate mitochondrial stress. This, in turn, should increase the availability of ATP that may be used to, for instance, drive the plasma membrane Ca2+- ATPase (PMCA), which, in turn, will reduce the intracellular Ca2+- levels and, thus, calpain activity.
In rd1*Cngb1−/− mice, the lack of CNGB1 strongly reduces the Na+- and Ca2+- influx [7,76]. In rd1*Cngb1−/− retina, Olaparib treatment did not reduce the calpain activity, calpain-2 activation, or photoreceptor cell death. This points to a mechanism where CNG channel function is essential for PARP-dependent activation of calpain and the execution of photoreceptor cell death. On the other hand, in rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal explants, D-cis-diltiazem treatment reduced PARP activity. This suggests that, in the absence of CNG channel function, PARP activity is dependent, at least in part, on VGCC-mediated Ca2+- influx. Indeed, PARP activity has been associated with elevated intracellular Ca2+- levels [77,78,79], and it is thus conceivable that both CNG channels and/or VGCCs contribute to PARP activation. The exact nature of this detrimental interaction between CNG channels, VGCCs, and PARP remains unclear but could potentially be related to alterations of Na+- and Ca2+- homeostasis and the increased demands on cellular metabolism that this represents. Moreover, because of the rapid degeneration phenotype in rd1 mice, the results obtained here relate to retina that is still not fully developed and immature. Future studies may reveal to what extent the results obtained in early postnatal retina can be extended to mature adult retina and, if so, how this may apply to IRD patients. At any rate, in genetically very heterogenous IRDs, these findings, together with the fact that cGMP-induced cell death may show an overlap with PARthanatos [6], highlight PARP as a promising target for the development of mutation-independent therapies.

4.4. Connecting VGCCs and CNG Channels with the Activity of PARP and Calpain

In the following we will attempt to summarize the main results of this study and provide an overview of how the various experimental conditions may have affected the metabolism in the photoreceptor outer segment, inner segment, cell body, and nucleus and how, in turn, this may promote photoreceptor survival. As discussed above, high cGMP observed in degenerating rd1 rod photoreceptors activates the CNG channel in the outer segment, leading to Ca2+- influx and depolarization [7], which then can activate VGCCs in the cell body, causing more Ca2+- influx (Figure 7). In the cell body, Ca2+- extrusion depends largely on the ATP-driven plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA) [51]. A lack of ATP in degenerating rods may cause a decrease of PMCA activity and further potentiate the accumulation of intracellular Ca2+. In either case, high Ca2+ levels may activate calpain-type proteases [73], notably calpain-2, which is considered to promote neuronal degeneration [38]. Independent of CNG channels, high cGMP levels can also activate cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG), which may be associated with histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in the nucleus, leading to chromatin condensation and DNA damage [6]. This, in turn, may trigger the over-activation of PARP [6] and cause the execution of a PARthanatos-related form of cell death [19,80] (Figure 7).
Treatment with calpain inhibitors, such as calpastatin, may decrease proteolytic damage and thereby prolong photoreceptor survival. Further upstream, blocking VGCCs with D-cis-diltiazem will reduce the Ca2+-levels in the photoreceptor cell body and prevent calpain activation. Moreover, since VGCCs appear to be involved in PARP activation, reduced PARP activity and PAR levels likely alleviate mitochondrial stress, allowing the cell to maintain ATP production. This becomes evident through the use of the PARP inhibitor Olaparib, which decreases PAR generation. This, in turn, may preserve mitochondrial function and intracellular ATP levels, enabling PMCA to extrude Ca2+ and keep the calpain activity low (Figure 7).

5. Conclusions

In IRDs, the activities of calpain and PARP are both closely associated with photoreceptor degeneration, and PARP is a known target for calpain-dependent cleavage. However, here, we demonstrate that, in cGMP-induced photoreceptor degeneration, PARP regulates calpain activity, likely in an indirect fashion, via NAD+/ATP depletion or PAR-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. In addition, PARP activity is likely to be controlled by the activities of the VGCC and CNG channels. Overall, these results suggest PARP as a particularly attractive target for future therapeutic interventions in IRDs. The availability of a number of clinically tested PARP inhibitors [81,82] further enhances the perspectives for clinical translation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.P.-D. and K.J.; formal analysis, J.Y., A.G. and S.D.; investigation, J.Y.; resources, F.P.-D., R.M., S.M. and M.W.S.; data curation, J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.Y., K.J., R.M., S.M., A.G., M.W.S. and F.P.-D.; visualization, J.Y.; supervision, F.P.-D.; project administration, F.P.-D.; and funding acquisition, F.P.-D., K.J. and M.W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF; TargetRD: 16GW0267K and 16GW02678), the German Research Council (DFG: MU 4138/2-1), Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects (No. 2019FB093), and the Charlotte and Tistou Kerstan Foundation. The APC was partially covered by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the University of Tübingen.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the ARVO statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research and complied with the regulations of the German law on animal protection. The experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Tübingen University committee on animal protection (Einrichtung für Tierschutz, Tierärztlicher Dienst und Labortierkunde) and registered under AK02/19M.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Norman Rieger for the excellent technical assistance and Soumaya Belhadj for advice on the calpain activity assay. Figure 7 was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com accessed on 4 February 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a1 550
Scheme A1. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, and Olaparib on calpain-2 activation and PAR. Calpain-2 immunostaining (yellow; a–e) and PAR DAB staining (black, f–j) were performed on wt and rd1 retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1 retina (untr.; b,g) was compared to retina treated with calpastatin (c,h), D-cis-diltiazem (d,i), and Olaparib (e,j), respectively. The scatter plots show the percentages of ONL-positive cells for calpain-2 (k) and PAR (l) in wt and treated rd1 retina, compared with rd1 control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed between the control and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). In rd1 retina, all treatments decreased the numbers of cells positive for calpain-2, while the number of PAR-positive cells were not reduced by CAST20. In calpain-2 immunostaining: Untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1: 15/15; CAST20 rd1: 10/10; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10. In PAR DAB staining: untr. wt: 4/2; untr. rd1: 16/16; CAST20 rd1: 6/6; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.01, *** = p ≤ 0.001, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Scheme A1. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, and Olaparib on calpain-2 activation and PAR. Calpain-2 immunostaining (yellow; a–e) and PAR DAB staining (black, f–j) were performed on wt and rd1 retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1 retina (untr.; b,g) was compared to retina treated with calpastatin (c,h), D-cis-diltiazem (d,i), and Olaparib (e,j), respectively. The scatter plots show the percentages of ONL-positive cells for calpain-2 (k) and PAR (l) in wt and treated rd1 retina, compared with rd1 control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed between the control and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). In rd1 retina, all treatments decreased the numbers of cells positive for calpain-2, while the number of PAR-positive cells were not reduced by CAST20. In calpain-2 immunostaining: Untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1: 15/15; CAST20 rd1: 10/10; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10. In PAR DAB staining: untr. wt: 4/2; untr. rd1: 16/16; CAST20 rd1: 6/6; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.01, *** = p ≤ 0.001, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a1
Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a2 550
Scheme A2. Effect of DMSO on calpain activity, PARP activity, and TUNEL staining in rd1 retinal explants. Calpain activity (blue), PARP activity (green), and TUNEL (magenta) were used in rd1 retinal explant cultures. ToPro (red) and DAPI (grey) were used as nuclear counterstains. rd1 control retina (untr.; a,d,g) was compared to retina treated with 0.1% DMSO (DMSO; b,e,h). There was no difference between positive cells detected in the rd1 outer nuclear layer (ONL), with or without DMSO. The scatter plot (e) shows the percentage of calpain activity (c), PARP activity (f), and TUNEL-positive cells (i). In the calpain activity assay, untr. rd1: 16 explants derived from 16 different animals; DMSO rd1: 6/6. In the PARP activity assay, untr. rd1: 18/18; DMSO rd1: 6/6. In the TUNEL assay, untr. rd1: 27/27; DMSO rd1: 6/6; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Scheme A2. Effect of DMSO on calpain activity, PARP activity, and TUNEL staining in rd1 retinal explants. Calpain activity (blue), PARP activity (green), and TUNEL (magenta) were used in rd1 retinal explant cultures. ToPro (red) and DAPI (grey) were used as nuclear counterstains. rd1 control retina (untr.; a,d,g) was compared to retina treated with 0.1% DMSO (DMSO; b,e,h). There was no difference between positive cells detected in the rd1 outer nuclear layer (ONL), with or without DMSO. The scatter plot (e) shows the percentage of calpain activity (c), PARP activity (f), and TUNEL-positive cells (i). In the calpain activity assay, untr. rd1: 16 explants derived from 16 different animals; DMSO rd1: 6/6. In the PARP activity assay, untr. rd1: 18/18; DMSO rd1: 6/6. In the TUNEL assay, untr. rd1: 27/27; DMSO rd1: 6/6; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a2
Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a3 550
Scheme A3. Photoreceptor accumulation of cGMP in different experimental conditions. cGMP immunostaining (red) was used in wt and rd1 retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. In wt retina (untr.; a), only a few cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were labeled cGMP-positive. rd1 control retina (untr.; b) was compared to retina treated with either 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, c) or 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, d). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed between control, 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). Note the large numbers of cGMP expressed in the rd1 ONL. The scatter plot (e) shows the percentage of cGMP-positive cells in the ONL. Neither D-cis-diltiazem or Olaparib reduced the cGMP-positive cells. Untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1: 13/13; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Scheme A3. Photoreceptor accumulation of cGMP in different experimental conditions. cGMP immunostaining (red) was used in wt and rd1 retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. In wt retina (untr.; a), only a few cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were labeled cGMP-positive. rd1 control retina (untr.; b) was compared to retina treated with either 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, c) or 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, d). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed between control, 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). Note the large numbers of cGMP expressed in the rd1 ONL. The scatter plot (e) shows the percentage of cGMP-positive cells in the ONL. Neither D-cis-diltiazem or Olaparib reduced the cGMP-positive cells. Untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1: 13/13; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 sch0a3

References

  1. Duncan, J.L.; Pierce, E.A.; Laster, A.M.; Daiger, S.P.; Birch, D.G.; Ash, J.D.; Iannaccone, A.; Flannery, J.G.; Sahel, J.A.; Zack, D.J.; et al. Technology, Inherited retinal degenerations: Current landscape and knowledge gaps. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bertelsen, M.; Jensen, H.; Bregnhøj, J.F.; Rosenberg, T. Prevalence of generalized retinal dystrophy in Denmark. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014, 21, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hartong, D.T.; Berson, E.L.; Dryja, T.P. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet 2006, 368, 1795–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sahel, J.A.; Marazova, K.; Audo, I. Clinical characteristics and current therapies for inherited retinal degenerations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a017111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arango-Gonzalez, B.; Trifunović, D.; Sahaboglu, A.; Kranz, K.; Michalakis, S.; Farinelli, P.; Koch, S.; Koch, F.; Cottet, S.; Janssen-Bienhold, U.; et al. Identification of a common non-apoptotic cell death mechanism in hereditary retinal degeneration. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yan, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Paquet-Durand, F. Programmed Non-Apoptotic Cell Death in Hereditary Retinal Degeneration: Crosstalk between cGMP-Dependent Pathways and PARthanatos? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Das, S.; Chen, Y.; Yan, J.; Christensen, G.; Belhadj, S.; Tolone, A.; Paquet-Durand, F. The role of cGMP-signalling and calcium-signalling in photoreceptor cell death: Perspectives for therapy development. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2021, 473, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Keeler, C.E. The inheritance of a retinal abnormality in white mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1924, 10, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bowes, C.; Li, T.; Danciger, M.; Baxter, L.C.; Applebury, M.L.; Farber, D.B. Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the β subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase. Nature 1990, 347, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Farber, D.B.; Lolley, R.N. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate: Elevation in degenerating photoreceptor cells of the C3H mouse retina. Science 1974, 186, 449–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paquet-Durand, F.; Hauck, S.M.; Van Veen, T.; Ueffing, M.; Ekström, P. PKG activity causes photoreceptor cell death in two retinitis pigmentosa models. J. Neurochem. 2009, 108, 796–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paquet-Durand, F.; Azadi, S.; Hauck, S.M.; Ueffing, M.; van Veen, T.; Ekström, P. Calpain is activated in degenerating photoreceptors in the rd1 mouse. J. Neurochem. 2006, 96, 802–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Paquet-Durand, F.; Silva, J.; Talukdar, T.; Johnson, L.E.; Azadi, S.; van Veen, T.; Ueffing, M.; Hauck, S.M.; Ekström, P. Excessive activation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase contributes to inherited photoreceptor degeneration in the retinal degeneration 1 mouse. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 10311–10319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Power, M.; Das, S.; Schütze, K.; Marigo, V.; Ekström, P.; Paquet-Durand, F. Cellular mechanisms of hereditary photoreceptor degeneration–Focus on cGMP. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 74, 100772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ko, H.L.; Ren, E.C. Functional aspects of PARP1 in DNA repair and transcription. Biomolecules 2012, 2, 524–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Morales, J.; Li, L.; Fattah, F.J.; Dong, Y.; Bey, E.A.; Patel, M.; Gao, J.; Boothman, D.A. Review of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mechanisms of action and rationale for targeting in cancer and other diseases. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2014, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bai, P. Biology of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases: The factotums of cell maintenance. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Curtin, N.J.; Szabo, C. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition: Past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 711–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. David, K.K.; Andrabi, S.A.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L. Parthanatos, a messenger of death. Front. Biosci. Landmark 2009, 14, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Perrin, B.; Huttenlocher, A. Calpain. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 34, 722–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Michalakis, S.; Becirovic, E.; Biel, M. Retinal cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: From pathophysiology to therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Paquet-Durand, F.; Beck, S.; Michalakis, S.; Goldmann, T.; Huber, G.; Mühlfriedel, R.; Trifunović, D.; Fischer, M.D.; Fahl, E.; Duetsch, G.; et al. A key role for cyclic nucleotide gated (CNG) channels in cGMP-related retinitis pigmentosa. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Catterall, W.A. Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a003947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shinkai-Ouchi, F.; Shindo, M.; Doi, N.; Hata, S.; Ono, Y. Calpain-2 participates in the process of calpain-1 inactivation. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baudry, M.; Bi, X. Calpain-1 and calpain-2: The yin and yang of synaptic plasticity and neurodegeneration. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Paquet-Durand, F.; Sanges, D.; McCall, J.; Silva, J.; Van Veen, T.; Marigo, V.; Ekström, P. Photoreceptor rescue and toxicity induced by different calpain inhibitors. J. Neurochem. 2010, 115, 930–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schön, C.; Paquet-Durand, F.; Michalakis, S. Cav1. 4 L-type calcium channels contribute to calpain activation in degenerating photoreceptors of rd1 mice. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chaitanya, G.V.; Alexander, J.S.; Babu, P.P. PARP-1 cleavage fragments: Signatures of cell-death proteases in neurodegeneration. Cell Commun. Signal. 2010, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Saccà, E.; Pizzutti, N.; Corazzin, M.; Lippe, G.; Piasentier, E. Assessment of calpain and caspase systems activities during ageing of two bovine muscles by degradation patterns of αII spectrin and PARP-1. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vosler, P.S.; Sun, D.; Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Kintner, D.B.; Signore, A.P.; Cao, G.; Chen, J. Calcium dysregulation induces apoptosis-inducing factor release: Cross-talk between PARP-1-and calpain-signaling pathways. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 218, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Sanyal, S.; Bal, A.K. Comparative light and electron microscopic study of retinal histogenesis in normal and rd mutant mice. Z. Für Anat. Entwickl. 1973, 142, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Belhadj, S.; Tolone, A.; Christensen, G.; Das, S.; Chen, Y.; Paquet-Durand, F. Long-Term, Serum-Free Cultivation of Organotypic Mouse Retina Explants with Intact Retinal Pigment Epithelium. JoVE 2020, 25, e61868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Belhadj, S.; Rentsch, A.; Schwede, F.; Paquet-Durand, F. Fluorescent detection of PARP activity in unfixed tissue. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ono, Y.; Saido, T.C.; Sorimachi, H. Calpain research for drug discovery: Challenges and potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 854–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lord, C.J.; Ashworth, A. PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science 2017, 355, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berkowitz, B.A.; Podolsky, R.H.; Farrell, B.; Lee, H.; Trepanier, C.; Berri, A.M.; Dernay, K.; Graffice, E.; Shafie-Khorassani, F.; Kern, T.S.; et al. D-cis-diltiazem can produce oxidative stress in healthy depolarized rods in vivo. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 2999–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hüttl, S.; Michalakis, S.; Seeliger, M.; Luo, D.G.; Acar, N.; Geiger, H.; Hudl, K.; Mader, R.; Haverkamp, S.; Moser, M.; et al. Impaired channel targeting and retinal degeneration in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunit CNGB1. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cheng, S.Y.; Wang, S.C.; Lei, M.; Wang, Z.; Xiong, K. Regulatory role of calpain in neuronal death. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Curcio, M.; Salazar, I.L.; Mele, M.; Canzoniero, L.M.; Duarte, C.B. Calpains and neuronal damage in the ischemic brain: The swiss knife in synaptic injury. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, 143, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baudry, M. Calpain-1 and calpain-2 in the brain: Dr. Jekill and Mr Hyde? Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bi, X.; Baudry, M. Calpain-1 and Calpain-2 in the Brain: New Evidence for a Critical Role of Calpain-2 in Neuronal Death. Cells 2020, 9, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Power, M.J.; Rogerson, L.E.; Schubert, T.; Berens, P.; Euler, T.; Paquet-Durand, F. Systematic spatiotemporal mapping reveals divergent cell death pathways in three mouse models of hereditary retinal degeneration. J. Comp. Neurol. 2020, 528, 1113–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Singh, R.; Brewer, M.K.; Mashburn, C.B.; Lou, D.; Bondada, V.; Graham, B.; Geddes, J.W. Calpain 5 is highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), carries dual nuclear localization signals, and is associated with nuclear promyelocytic leukemia protein bodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 19383–19394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Suzuki, S.; Murotomi, K.; Nakajima, Y.; Kawai, K.; Ohta, K.I.; Warita, K.; Miki, T.; Takeuchi, Y. Development of an artificial calcium-dependent transcription factor to detect sustained intracellular calcium elevation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Luo, Y.; Sellitti, D.F.; Suzuki, K. The Calpain Proteolytic System. Encycl. Cell Biol. 2016, 1, 670–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schön, C.; Asteriti, S.; Koch, S.; Sothilingam, V.; Garrido, M.G.; Tanimoto, N.; Herms, J.; Seeliger, M.W.; Cangiano, L.; Biel, M.; et al. Loss of HCN1 enhances disease progression in mouse models of CNG channel-linked retinitis pigmentosa and achromatopsia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Pawlyk, B.S.; Li, T.; Scimeca, M.S.; Sandberg, M.A.; Berson, E.L. Absence of photoreceptor rescue with D-cis-diltiazem in the rd mouse. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pearce-Kelling, S.E.; Aleman, T.S.; Nickle, A.; Laties, A.M.; Aguirre, G.D.; Jacobson, S.G.; Acland, G.M. Calcium channel blocker D-cis-diltiazem does not slow retinal degeneration in the PDE6B mutant rcd1 canine model of retinitis pigmentosa. Mol. Vis. 2001, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Biel, M.; Michalakis, S. Function and dysfunction of CNG channels: Insights from channelopathies and mouse models. Mol. Neurobiol. 2007, 35, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Okawa, H.; Sampath, A.P.; Laughlin, S.B.; Fain, G.L. ATP consumption by mammalian rod photoreceptors in darkness and in light. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 1917–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Ames, I.I.I. A Pharmacology, Energy requirements of CNS cells as related to their function and to their vulnerability to ischemia: A commentary based on studies on retina. Can. J. Physiol. Pharm. 1992, 70, S158–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Michalakis, S.; Shaltiel, L.; Sothilingam, V.; Koch, S.; Schludi, V.; Krause, S.; Zeitz, C.; Audo, I.; Lancelot, M.E.; Hamel, C. Mosaic synaptopathy and functional defects in Cav1. 4 heterozygous mice and human carriers of CSNB2. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 1538–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Das, S.; Popp, V.; Power, M.; Groeneveld, K.; Yan, J.; Melle, C.; Rogerson, L.; Achury, M.; Schwede, F.; Strasser, T.; et al. Redefining the role of Ca2+-permeable channels in hereditary photoreceptor degeneration using the D-and L-cis enantiomers of diltiazem. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stern, J.H.; Kaupp, U.B.; MacLeish, P.R. Control of the light-regulated current in rod photoreceptors by cyclic GMP, calcium, and l-cis-diltiazem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 1163–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Koch, K.W.; Kaupp, U.B. Cyclic GMP directly regulates a cation conductance in membranes of bovine rods by a cooperative mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 6788–6800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Greenwald, S.H.; Brown, E.E.; Scandura, M.J.; Hennessey, E.; Farmer, R.; Du, J.; Wang, Y.; Pierce, E.A. Mutant Nmnat1 leads to a retina-specific decrease of NAD+ accompanied by increased poly (ADP-ribose) in a mouse model of NMNAT1-associated retinal degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2021, 30, 644–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Olivares-Gonzalez, L.; Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara, C.; Hervas, D.; Marín, M.P.; Lahoz, A.; Millán, J.M.; Rodrigo, R. cGMP-phosphodiesterase inhibition prevents hypoxia-induced cell death activation in porcine retinal explants. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Olivares-González, L.; Velasco, S.; Millán, J.M.; Rodrigo, R. Intravitreal administration of adalimumab delays retinal degeneration in rd10 mice. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 13839–13861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sahaboglu, A.; Tanimoto, N.; Kaur, J.; Sancho-Pelluz, J.; Huber, G.; Fahl, E.; Arango-Gonzalez, B.; Zrenner, E.; Ekström, P.; Löwenheim, H. PARP1 gene knock-out increases resistance to retinal degeneration without affecting retinal function. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sahaboglu, A.; Barth, M.; Secer, E.; Del Amo, E.M.; Urtti, A.; Arsenijevic, Y.; Zrenner, E.; Paquet-Durand, F. Olaparib significantly delays photoreceptor loss in a model for hereditary retinal degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sahaboglu, A.; Miranda, M.; Canjuga, D.; Avci-Adali, M.; Savytska, N.; Secer, E.; Feria-Pliego, J.A.; Kayık, G.; Durdagi, S. Drug repurposing studies of PARP inhibitors as a new therapy for inherited retinal degeneration. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 2199–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, H.; Liu, Z.Y.; Wu, N.; Chen, Y.C.; Cheng, Q.; Wang, J. PARP inhibitor resistance: The underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bixel, K.; Hays, J.L. Olaparib in the management of ovarian cancer. Pharm. Pers. Med. 2015, 8, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Antolin, A.A.; Ameratunga, M.; Banerji, U.; Clarke, P.A.; Workman, P.; Al-Lazikani, B. The kinase polypharmacology landscape of clinical PARP inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Knezevic, C.E.; Wright, G.; Rix, L.L.R.; Kim, W.; Kuenzi, B.M.; Luo, Y.; Watters, J.M.; Koomen, J.M.; Haura, E.B.; Monteiro, A.N.; et al. Proteome-wide Profiling of Clinical PARP Inhibitors Reveals Compound-Specific Secondary Targets. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 1490–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Plana-Bonamaisó, A.; López-Begines, S.; Fernández-Justel, D.; Junza, A.; Soler-Tapia, A.; Andilla, J.; Loza-Alvarez, P.; Rosa, J.L.; Miralles, E.; Casals, I. Post-translational regulation of retinal IMPDH1 in vivo to adjust GTP synthesis to illumination conditions. eLife 2020, 9, e56418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, P.; Lockard, R.; Titus, H.; Hiblar, J.; Weller, K.; Wafai, D.; Weleber, R.G.; Duvoisin, R.M.; Morgans, C.W.; Pennesi, M.E. Suppression of cGMP-Dependent Photoreceptor Cytotoxicity With Mycophenolate Is Neuroprotective in Murine Models of Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cohen, M.S. development, Interplay between compartmentalized NAD+ synthesis and consumption: A focus on the PARP family. Genes Dev. 2020, 34, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Xie, N.; Zhang, L.; Gao, W.; Huang, C.; Huber, P.E.; Zhou, X.; Li, C.; Shen, G.; Zou, B. NAD(+) metabolism: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bertram, R.; Pedersen, M.G.; Luciani, D.S.; Sherman, A. A simplified model for mitochondrial ATP production. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 243, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Baek, S.H.; Bae, O.N.; Kim, E.K.; Yu, S.W. cells, Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction by poly (ADP-ribose) polymer: Implication for neuronal cell death. Mol. Cells 2013, 36, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Rottenberg, H.; Hoek, J.B. The Mitochondrial Permeability Transition: Nexus of Aging, Disease and Longevity. Cells 2021, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Goll, D.E.; Thompson, V.F.; Li, H.; Wei, W.; Cong, J. The calpain system. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 731–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bernardi, P.; Petronilli, V. The permeability transition pore as a mitochondrial calcium release channel: A critical appraisal. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1996, 28, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gunter, T.; Buntinas, L.; Sparagna, G.; Eliseev, R.; Gunter, K. Mitochondrial calcium transport: Mechanisms and functions. Cell Calcium 2000, 28, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Waldner, D.; Bech-Hansen, N.; Stell, W.K. Channeling vision: CaV1. 4—A critical link in retinal signal transmission. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Geistrikh, I.; Visochek, L.; Klein, R.; Miller, L.; Mittelman, L.; Shainberg, A.; Cohen-Armon, M. Ca2+-induced PARP-1 activation and ANF expression are coupled events in cardiomyocytes. Biochem. J. 2011, 438, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Zhang, F.; Xie, R.; Munoz, F.M.; Lau, S.S.; Monks, T.J. PARP-1 hyperactivation and reciprocal elevations in intracellular Ca2+ during ROS-induced nonapoptotic cell death. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 140, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Munoz, F.M.; Zhang, F.; Islas-Robles, A.; Lau, S.S.; Monks, T.J. From the cover: ROS-Induced store-operated Ca2+ entry coupled to PARP-1 hyperactivation is independent of PARG activity in necrotic cell death. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 158, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Wang, X.; Ge, P. Parthanatos in the pathogenesis of nervous system diseases. Neuroscience 2020, 449, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jiang, X.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Bai, H.; Zhang, Z. Current status and future prospects of PARP inhibitor clinical trials in ovarian cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Kamel, D.; Gray, C.; Walia, J.S.; Kumar, V. PARP inhibitor drugs in the treatment of breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers: An update of clinical trials. Curr. Drug Targets 2018, 19, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 12 00455 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on calpain activity. The calpain activity assay (blue) was performed on unfixed wt (a) and rd1 retinal cross-sections. ToPro (red) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1 retina (untr.; b) was compared to retina treated with either calpastatin (c), D-cis-diltiazem (d), Olaparib (e), or calpastatin and Olaparib combined (f). The scatter plots show the percentages of outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for calpain activity (g) in wt and rd1 retina. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). All treatments reduced the calpain activity in rd1 ONL; however, there was no added synergistic benefit from the CAST20+OLA1 combination. Untr. wt: 6 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1: 16/16; CAST20 rd1: 8/8; D100 rd1: 6/6; OLA1 rd1: 9/9; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; *** = p ≤ 0.001 and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 1. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on calpain activity. The calpain activity assay (blue) was performed on unfixed wt (a) and rd1 retinal cross-sections. ToPro (red) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1 retina (untr.; b) was compared to retina treated with either calpastatin (c), D-cis-diltiazem (d), Olaparib (e), or calpastatin and Olaparib combined (f). The scatter plots show the percentages of outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for calpain activity (g) in wt and rd1 retina. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). All treatments reduced the calpain activity in rd1 ONL; however, there was no added synergistic benefit from the CAST20+OLA1 combination. Untr. wt: 6 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1: 16/16; CAST20 rd1: 8/8; D100 rd1: 6/6; OLA1 rd1: 9/9; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; *** = p ≤ 0.001 and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g001
Biomolecules 12 00455 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on PARP activity. PARP activity assay (green) in wt and rd1 retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated wt (untr.; a) was compared to untreated rd1 retina (b) and retinae treated with either calpastatin (c), D-cis-diltiazem (d), Olaparib (e), or calpastatin and Olaparib combined (f). The scatter plots show the percentages of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for PARP activity (g) in wt and rd1 retina. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Calpastatin did not reduce the PARP activity, while D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib did. Untr. wt: 6 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1: 18/18; CAST20 rd1: 4/4; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 9/9; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, *** = p ≤ 0.001, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 2. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on PARP activity. PARP activity assay (green) in wt and rd1 retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated wt (untr.; a) was compared to untreated rd1 retina (b) and retinae treated with either calpastatin (c), D-cis-diltiazem (d), Olaparib (e), or calpastatin and Olaparib combined (f). The scatter plots show the percentages of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for PARP activity (g) in wt and rd1 retina. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Calpastatin did not reduce the PARP activity, while D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib did. Untr. wt: 6 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1: 18/18; CAST20 rd1: 4/4; D100 rd1: 10/10; OLA1 rd1: 9/9; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, *** = p ≤ 0.001, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g002
Biomolecules 12 00455 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on rd1 retinal cell viability. The TUNEL assay labeled dying cells (magenta) in wt and rd1 retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. Untreated wt (a) and rd1 control retina (untr.; b) were compared to retina treated with either 20-µM calpastatin (CAST20, c), 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, d), 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, e), or 20-µM calpastatin combined with 1-µM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1, f). Note the large numbers of dying cells in the rd1 outer nuclear layer (ONL). The scatter plot (g) shows the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the ONL. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Except for D-cis-diltiazem, all treatments decreased rd1 retinal degeneration. The combination treatment CAST20+OLA1 did not improve the therapeutic effect seen with the respective single treatments. Untr. wt: 7 explants from 4 different mice; untr. rd1: 27/27; CAST20 rd1: 8/8; D100 rd1: 16/16; OLA1 rd1: 17/17; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.01, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 3. Effects of calpastatin, D-cis-diltiazem, Olaparib, and combination treatments on rd1 retinal cell viability. The TUNEL assay labeled dying cells (magenta) in wt and rd1 retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. Untreated wt (a) and rd1 control retina (untr.; b) were compared to retina treated with either 20-µM calpastatin (CAST20, c), 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, d), 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, e), or 20-µM calpastatin combined with 1-µM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1, f). Note the large numbers of dying cells in the rd1 outer nuclear layer (ONL). The scatter plot (g) shows the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the ONL. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1 untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Except for D-cis-diltiazem, all treatments decreased rd1 retinal degeneration. The combination treatment CAST20+OLA1 did not improve the therapeutic effect seen with the respective single treatments. Untr. wt: 7 explants from 4 different mice; untr. rd1: 27/27; CAST20 rd1: 8/8; D100 rd1: 16/16; OLA1 rd1: 17/17; CAST20+OLA1 rd1: 8/8; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.01, and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g003
Biomolecules 12 00455 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on calpain activity in rd1*Cngb1−/− retina. The calpain activity assay (blue) and an immunostaining for activated calpain-2 (yellow) were performed on wt (a,b) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (untr.; c,d) was compared to retina treated with D-cis-diltiazem (e,f) or Olaparib (g,h). The scatter plots show the percentages of ONL-positive cells for calpain activity (i) and activated calpain-2 (j) in the wt and treated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina compared with the rd1*Cngb1−/− control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). In rd1*Cngb1−/−, only D-cis-diltiazem reduced the cells positive for activated calpain-2. In the calpain activity assay, untr. wt: 5 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 11/11; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6; in calpain-2 immunostaining, untr. wt: 6/3; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 17/17; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05 and ** = p ≤ 0.01. ToPro (red) and ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 4. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on calpain activity in rd1*Cngb1−/− retina. The calpain activity assay (blue) and an immunostaining for activated calpain-2 (yellow) were performed on wt (a,b) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retina. DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (untr.; c,d) was compared to retina treated with D-cis-diltiazem (e,f) or Olaparib (g,h). The scatter plots show the percentages of ONL-positive cells for calpain activity (i) and activated calpain-2 (j) in the wt and treated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina compared with the rd1*Cngb1−/− control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), and 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). In rd1*Cngb1−/−, only D-cis-diltiazem reduced the cells positive for activated calpain-2. In the calpain activity assay, untr. wt: 5 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 11/11; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6; in calpain-2 immunostaining, untr. wt: 6/3; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 17/17; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05 and ** = p ≤ 0.01. ToPro (red) and ONL = outer nuclear layer, INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g004
Biomolecules 12 00455 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on PARP activity and PAR accumulation in rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina. The PARP activity assay (green) and immunostaining for PAR (black) were performed on wt (a,b) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (c–h). DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (untr.; c,d) was compared to retina treated with D-cis-diltiazem (e,f) or Olaparib (g,h). The scatter plots show the percentages of outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for PARP activity (i) and PAR (j) in wt and treated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina compared to the rd1*Cngb1−/− control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated) and 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100) or 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). D-cis-diltiazem strongly decreased the PARP activity and PAR. In the PARP activity assay, untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 9/9; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 4/4; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6. In PAR DAB staining, untr. wt: 6/3; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 17/17; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ** = p ≤ 0.01 and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 5. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on PARP activity and PAR accumulation in rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina. The PARP activity assay (green) and immunostaining for PAR (black) were performed on wt (a,b) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (c–h). DAPI (grey) was used as nuclear counterstaining. Untreated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina (untr.; c,d) was compared to retina treated with D-cis-diltiazem (e,f) or Olaparib (g,h). The scatter plots show the percentages of outer nuclear layer (ONL) cells positive for PARP activity (i) and PAR (j) in wt and treated rd1*Cngb1−/− retina compared to the rd1*Cngb1−/− control (untr.). Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated) and 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100) or 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1). D-cis-diltiazem strongly decreased the PARP activity and PAR. In the PARP activity assay, untr. wt: 4 explants from 2 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 9/9; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 4/4; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 6/6. In PAR DAB staining, untr. wt: 6/3; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 17/17; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 10/10; error bars represent SD; ** = p ≤ 0.01 and **** = p ≤ 0.0001. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g005
Biomolecules 12 00455 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal cell viability. The TUNEL assay labeled dying cells (magenta) in wild-type (wt) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. (a) In wt retina, only a small fraction of cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were TUNEL-positive. (b) Untreated (untr.) rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina was compared to retina treated with either 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, (c) or 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, (d,e) The scatter plot shows the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Only D-cis-diltiazem alleviated the rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal degeneration. Untr. wt: 5 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 26/26; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 16/16; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 16/16; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05 and * = p ≤ 0.05. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 6. Effects of D-cis-diltiazem and Olaparib on rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal cell viability. The TUNEL assay labeled dying cells (magenta) in wild-type (wt) and rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal explant cultures. DAPI (grey) was used as a nuclear counterstain. (a) In wt retina, only a small fraction of cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were TUNEL-positive. (b) Untreated (untr.) rd1*Cngb1−/− double-mutant retina was compared to retina treated with either 100-µM D-cis-diltiazem (D100, (c) or 1-µM Olaparib (OLA1, (d,e) The scatter plot shows the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc testing performed between the control (rd1*Cngb1−/− untreated) and 20-μM calpastatin (CAST20), 100-μM D-cis-diltiazem (D100), 1-μM Olaparib (OLA1), and 20-μM calpastatin combined with 1-μM Olaparib (CAST20+OLA1). Only D-cis-diltiazem alleviated the rd1*Cngb1−/− retinal degeneration. Untr. wt: 5 explants from 3 different mice; untr. rd1*Cngb1−/−: 26/26; D100 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 16/16; OLA1 rd1*Cngb1−/−: 16/16; error bars represent SD; ns = p > 0.05 and * = p ≤ 0.05. INL = inner nuclear layer, GCL = ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g006
Biomolecules 12 00455 g007 550
Figure 7. Differential effects of experimental conditions on cGMP-dependent cell death in rd1 photoreceptors. The mutation-induced cGMP accumulation activates cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels in the outer segment, leading to Na+-and Ca2+-influx and photoreceptor depolarization. This leads to opening of voltage-gated Ca2+-channels (VGCCs) in the cell body, causing further Ca2+- influx. In the cell body, high Ca2+ levels may activate calpain if not controlled by ATP-dependent plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA). In addition, cGMP-dependent activation of protein kinase G (PKG) has been associated with histone-deacetylase (HDAC) activity, causing chromatin condensation and DNA breaks, which may trigger PARP activation. Excessive consumption of NAD+ by PARP and the production of PAR may cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to ATP shortage. Calpastatin treatment blocks calpain activation, decreasing proteolytic damage to the cell, even in the presence of CNG channel/VGCC-mediated Ca2+-influx. D-cis-diltiazem inhibits VGCCs in the cell body, reducing intracellular Ca2+-levels and calpain activity. Moreover, VGCCs could be involved in PARP activation, even though D-cis-diltiazem fails to delay rd1 rod degeneration. Olaparib blocks PARP activity, decreasing NAD+ consumption and PAR generation. This may preserve mitochondrial function and intracellular ATP levels, allowing PMCA to extrude Ca2+ and keeping calpain activity low.
Figure 7. Differential effects of experimental conditions on cGMP-dependent cell death in rd1 photoreceptors. The mutation-induced cGMP accumulation activates cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels in the outer segment, leading to Na+-and Ca2+-influx and photoreceptor depolarization. This leads to opening of voltage-gated Ca2+-channels (VGCCs) in the cell body, causing further Ca2+- influx. In the cell body, high Ca2+ levels may activate calpain if not controlled by ATP-dependent plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA). In addition, cGMP-dependent activation of protein kinase G (PKG) has been associated with histone-deacetylase (HDAC) activity, causing chromatin condensation and DNA breaks, which may trigger PARP activation. Excessive consumption of NAD+ by PARP and the production of PAR may cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to ATP shortage. Calpastatin treatment blocks calpain activation, decreasing proteolytic damage to the cell, even in the presence of CNG channel/VGCC-mediated Ca2+-influx. D-cis-diltiazem inhibits VGCCs in the cell body, reducing intracellular Ca2+-levels and calpain activity. Moreover, VGCCs could be involved in PARP activation, even though D-cis-diltiazem fails to delay rd1 rod degeneration. Olaparib blocks PARP activity, decreasing NAD+ consumption and PAR generation. This may preserve mitochondrial function and intracellular ATP levels, allowing PMCA to extrude Ca2+ and keeping calpain activity low.
Biomolecules 12 00455 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, J.; Günter, A.; Das, S.; Mühlfriedel, R.; Michalakis, S.; Jiao, K.; Seeliger, M.W.; Paquet-Durand, F. Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030455

AMA Style

Yan J, Günter A, Das S, Mühlfriedel R, Michalakis S, Jiao K, Seeliger MW, Paquet-Durand F. Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(3):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Jie, Alexander Günter, Soumyaparna Das, Regine Mühlfriedel, Stylianos Michalakis, Kangwei Jiao, Mathias W. Seeliger, and François Paquet-Durand. 2022. "Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity" Biomolecules 12, no. 3: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030455

APA Style

Yan, J., Günter, A., Das, S., Mühlfriedel, R., Michalakis, S., Jiao, K., Seeliger, M. W., & Paquet-Durand, F. (2022). Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity. Biomolecules, 12(3), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop