Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Effector Research of Magnaporthe oryzae
Previous Article in Journal
Proteome Profiling of the Dystrophic mdx Mice Diaphragm
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/biom13111649
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gibberellic Acid Inhibits Dendrobium nobile—Piriformospora Symbiosis by Regulating the Expression of Cell Wall Metabolism Genes

by
Hong Chen
1,2,
Yefei Li
1,3,
Yuying Yin
1,3,
Ji Li
1,2,
Lin Li
1,
Kunlin Wu
1,
Lin Fang
1,4,* and
Songjun Zeng
1,4,*
1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2
Department of Botany, Guangzhou Institute of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Huangzhuang South Road 6, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510540, China
3
University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Gene Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(11), 1649; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111649
Submission received: 30 August 2023 / Revised: 26 October 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 14 November 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Orchid seeds lack endosperms and depend on mycorrhizal fungi for germination and nutrition acquisition under natural conditions. Piriformospora indica is a mycorrhizal fungus that promotes seed germination and seedling development in epiphytic orchids, such as Dendrobium nobile. To understand the impact of P. indica on D. nobile seed germination, we examined endogenous hormone levels by using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. We performed transcriptomic analysis of D. nobile protocorm at two developmental stages under asymbiotic germination (AG) and symbiotic germination (SG) conditions. The result showed that the level of endogenous IAA in the SG protocorm treatments was significantly higher than that in the AG protocorm treatments. Meanwhile, GA3 was only detected in the SG protocorm stages. IAA and GA synthesis and signaling genes were upregulated in the SG protocorm stages. Exogenous GA3 application inhibited fungal colonization inside the protocorm, and a GA biosynthesis inhibitor (PAC) promoted fungal colonization. Furthermore, we found that PAC prevented fungal hyphae collapse and degeneration in the protocorm, and differentially expressed genes related to cell wall metabolism were identified between the SG and AG protocorm stages. Exogenous GA3 upregulated SRC2 and LRX4 expression, leading to decreased fungal colonization. Meanwhile, GA inhibitors upregulated EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 expression, leading to increased fungal colonization. Our findings suggest that GA regulates the expression of cell wall metabolism genes in D. nobile, thereby inhibiting the establishment of mycorrhizal symbiosis.

1. Introduction

Members of the largest flowering plant family, Orchidaceae, can form a complex symbiotic association with mycorrhizal fungi [1]. In addition to mineral nutrients, such as phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), orchid mycorrhizal fungi also supply carbohydrates for plant growth [2,3]. Orchid seed germination leads to the formation of a protocorm, a heterotrophic postembryonic structure. Fungal colonization of protocorms has three stages: a hypha enters suspensor cells of swollen embryos, pelotons form within cortical cells, and the peloton senesces and then collapses [4,5,6]. Fungal carbon (C) can be transferred from fungi to symbiotic protocorm via living or senescent hyphae. The interface between the symbionts is formed before fungal senescence, and peloton degradation also releases a significant amount of C and nitrogen in host cells [7]. The Dendrobium genus is one of the largest genera in the orchid family and has ornamental and medicinal value. Previous literature has reported that Dendrobium officinale seed germination without fungi is slower than with the mycorrhizal fungus Tulasnella sp. S6 [8]. P. indica, which is a mycorrhizal fungus with a wide range of host plants, promotes the seed germination of several species in the Dendrobium genus [9].
Plant hormones are essential for orchid seed germination, protocorm development, and mycorrhizal establishment [10]. Orchid symbiotic germination (SG) was enhanced by IAA, inhibited by gibberellic acid (GA), and suppressed by kinetin [11]. GA is a well-known class of phytohormones that can modulate seed germination and mycorrhizal establishment [10,12]. Bioactive GAs are formed from GGDP and catalyzed by a set of syntheses to produce GA12 [13]. GA12 is then converted to GA1/4 catalyzed by two dioxygenases (GA3ox and GA20ox), while another dioxygenase (GA2ox) deactivates bioactive GAs [14]. GA signaling proceeds via the degradation of the DELLA protein with the aid of the GA receptors GID1 and GID2, and the degradation of DELLA proteins activates downstream gene expression [15,16]. GAs were thought to act as a negative factor in AM symbiosis: GA-deficient pea mutant was thought to increase AM colonization and arbuscule incidence, and GAs were thought to modulate AM colonization via the DELLA proteins, which could promote arbuscule formation through the suppression of GA signaling [17,18]. In D. officinale SG, the ratio of gibberellic acids (GA3) and abscisic acid (ABA) was significantly higher than that during asymbiotic germination (AG); GA3 is a key factor connecting seed germination and mycorrhizal symbiosis, and a high concentration of exogenous GA3 inhibited fungal colonization and decreased the seed SG rate [10,19].
Plant growth and development are mediated by different plant hormones, and cell wall synthesis and remodeling are the terminals that respond to these signals and perform various specific functions. The cell wall is a dynamic extracellular matrix that actively controls growth and development, provides structure and support, and plays important roles in plant-microbe interactions [20]. Plant cell walls are crucial for orchid SG, and cell wall remodeling is essential for symbiotic interaction. Previous studies indicated that expansion is an extracellular protein that is involved in cell wall loosening and plant cell growth [21]. Expansins are believed to play important roles in seed germination and plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [22,23]. Expansins have also been identified in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots, where they play a crucial role in the accommodation process of the fungus inside the cortical cells [24]. Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases (XTHs) are cell wall proteins that can disrupt polysaccharide structure, promote cell wall elongation, and respond to stress [25]. Extensins are cell wall protein hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs) that modify the physical and chemical characteristics of the cell wall and play an important role in the interactions between plants and microorganisms, such as symbiotic association and barrier formation against pathogens [26].
The mechanisms of plant hormones that regulate SG processes remain unclear, especially the effect of GAs on the SG process. In this study, D. nobile seeds were sown under AG and SG conditions. Subsequently, seed germination physiology, cytological observations of the protocorm, and the transcriptome of the protocorm development stage were assessed, and a major endogenous hormone analysis was conducted. Furthermore, exogenous GA3 and GA inhibitors were used to study the effect of GAs on the establishment of protocorm–symbiont interactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Seed Sample Collection

Seeds of D. nobile were collected from an artificial cultivation greenhouse in the South China Botanical Garden, Guangdong province, in November 2021. The collected capsules were surface sterilized for 60 s in 70% ethanol solution, followed by 20 min in 0.1% HgCl2 solution, and then rinsed thrice times with distilled water. Sterile seeds were stored at 4 °C in 1.5 mL sterilized tubes.

2.2. Seed Germination Experiments

The mycorrhizal fungus P. indica was grown on PDA (20 g/L potato, 20 g/L glucose, and 15 g/L agar) medium for 7 days. For SG, the seeds were suspended in 0.1% agar solution, and a single drop of the seed suspension was dispensed onto 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm filter paper on the oatmeal agar plates (OMA: 4 g/L oatmeal and 8 g/L agar) in a 9 cm Petri dish. Next, 5 mm colonies of P. indica on PDA medium were placed in each OMA Petri dish (containing orchid seeds) for SG. For AG, the seeds suspension was dropped onto the 1/2 MS culture medium without fungi. The conditions used for germination were a 12/12 h light/dark cycle and a temperature of 25 °C. Stage 0 (S0), Stage 1 (S1), and Stage 2 (S2) were used to determine the extent of seed germination and development. These stages represented seeds not germinated (S0), early-stage protocorm development (S1), and late-stage protocorm development (S2).

2.3. Histology

Protocorms from the SG, including 10, 20, and 40 days after sowing, were collected and fixed for 24 h in 50% FAA (50% ethanol, 5% acetic acid, and 3.7% formaldehyde) solution. Samples were dehydrated using a gradient of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 83%, 90%, 95%, 100%); the duration of each gradient was 30 min. Next, the samples were transparentized via a gradient of xylene (30%, 50%, 70%, 100%); the duration of each gradient was 30 min. Finally, the samples were wardipped for 24 h and embedded with paraffin. The microstructural changes in the protocorm were analyzed using paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm thick) stained with 0.5% toluidine blue for 30 s. Images were captured using a LEICA DVM6 stereomicroscope.

2.4. Measurement of Phytohormones

The endogenous plant hormone content of four samples corresponded to two different germination stages (S1 and S2) of symbiotic and asymbiotic seeds, respectively, and the free-living mycelium of mycorrhizal fungus and ungerminated seeds (S0) were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS). Samples (50 mg) were collected, ground into powder, and dissolved in 1 mL of extraction buffer (methanol/formic/water acid = 15:1:4). The extract was mixed with internal standards, and the samples were dried and dissolved with 80% methanol. Then, the organic phase was injected through a membrane filter (0.22 µm) and subsequently analyzed using an HPLC–MS/MS system equipped with a Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Quattro Premier XE; Waters, MA, USA). Three biological replicates were used for each experiment.

2.5. RNA Extraction and RNA-Seq

Transcriptome analysis of four samples corresponded to two different germination stages (S1 and S2) of symbiotic and asymbiotic seeds, respectively. All collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and used for total RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the Quick RNA Isolation Kit (Huayueyang Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). RNA library construction and sequencing were performed using the HiSeq4000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and Wuhan Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Three biological replicate sequencing libraries were used for each stage, and the results were represented as the average value. The clean data of all samples were attained at 6 GB (Table S1). We constructed paired-end libraries of 350 bp inserted size, PacBio 20 kb insertion libraries, and 10 × Genomics libraries. The original transcriptomic data was deposited in the public NCBI and SRA database (accession No. PRJNA943365).
The cleaned reads of D. nobile from the SG and AG libraries were then mapped to the D. nobile genome database (Table S2). Principal component analysis (PCA) of all samples was performed during the different protocorm developmental stages. Differential expression of genes (DEGs) between samples was analyzed. Genes were considered differentially expressed if the log2 (Fold Change) ≥ 1.0 and the false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. To understand the DEGs in different stages between AG and SG, four comparison groups were designed: seeds grown under SG condition for 20 days vs. seeds grown under AG condition for 20 days (S-S1 vs. A-S1), seeds grown under SG condition for 40 days vs. seeds grown under AG condition for 40 days (S-S2 vs. A-S2), S-S1 vs. S-S2, and A-S1 vs. A-S2. KEGG pathway enrichment was performed to identify significantly enriched metabolic pathways.

2.6. Exogenous Hormone Treatment

Five-millimeter colonies of P. indica were inoculated onto an OMA medium with exogenous hormone GA3 and GAs biosynthesis inhibitor PAC; at the same time, seeds were sown onto the medium. Seeds were sown onto the OMA medium with 5 mm colonies of P. indica as the control, sown after 28 days; protocorms were used for phenotype observation and qPCR analysis. Meanwhile, protocorms were fixed for 24 h in 50% FAA solution for histology observation. The percentage of protocorm were calculated by protocorms/total seeds.

2.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from protocorm, and the first strand cDNAs were generated from equal amounts of total RNA by using a reverse transcription kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with three replicates using a Roche Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR machine with SYBR Premix ExTaq II (TaKaRa). PCRs were carried at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and then 60 °C for 15 s. The Dnactin gene was used as the internal control, and relative expression levels of genes were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method. Primer sequences are listed in Table S6.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05), as indicated in the Figure legends, and all experiments were performed on at least three independently grown biological replicates. All values represent the mean ± SD. The data on hormone content were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Duncan post hoc test was applied in the statistical analysis by using SPSS 17.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characterization of AG and SG D. nobile Seeds

Orchid seed germination usually begins with the emergence of an embryo from the testa and is followed by protocorm formation, which is a critical stage in orchid seed development. We found that D. nobile seed germination under SG conditions was faster than D. nobile seed germination under AG conditions. At 10 d, most embryos swelled and enlarged, and some embryos had emerged from the seed coat in both the SG and AG (Figure 1A,a). At 20 days, most embryos had emerged from the seed coat; 81.88% of the seeds formed the protocorm under SG conditions, and 50.65% formed the protocorm under AG conditions (Figure 1D). The sizes of the protocorms formed under SG conditions were larger than those formed under AG conditions (Figure 1B,b). At 40 days, protocorms exhibiting initiation of leaf differentiation and shoot appearance appeared under the SG and AG conditions; however, the protocorms under SG conditions were greener than those under AG (Figure 1C,c). The percentage of protocorms formed in the SG condition was significantly higher than that formed in the AG condition at 20 days, and the developmental process of protocorms in the SG condition was faster than that in the AG condition at 40 days.
Histological observations of the D. nobile germination stages in SG were performed using paraffin-embedded sectioning. After 10 days, the embryos had enlarged due to the water uptake, and P. indica did not infect the embryos (Figure 2A). After 20 days, the embryos continued to enlarge; at the apex of embryos, cells began to divide to generate a zone of meristematic cells and form protocorms, and the large and basal cells of protocorms were colonized by P. indica hyphae (Figure 2B). After 40 days, further development of the protocorms was observed with the emergence of a developing shoot pole. P. indica hyphae primarily colonized the basal part of the protocorm and formed pelotons. These pelotons subsequently collapsed and degenerated in the basal cells (Figure 2C). Most notably, P. indica colonized in the basal cells of the protocorm and was not present in the meristematic cells and developing shoot poles.

3.2. Differences in Concentrations in Endogenous Hormones or Precursors during Protocorm Development in AG and SG Conditions

We quantified types of endogenous and their precursors, ABA, GAs, 1-ACC, and IAA, at different developmental stages in the SG and AG groups. These results showed that the S0 stage (ungerminated seeds) had the highest ABA, GAs, and IAA contents, while the ABA content decreased as seed germination progressed in both SG and AG conditions (Table 1). Notably, as seed germination progressed, the IAA contents of the S1 stage (20 days after sowing) and the S2 stage (40 days after sowing) were higher in the SG group than in the AG group. In SG, the IAA content of S1 was higher than that of S2, indicating that IAA was essential for colonization. Additionally, GA3 was detected in both S1 (0.0526 ng/g·FW) and S2 (2.2754 ng/g·FW) of the SG group but was not detected in S1 and S2 of the AG group. The ungerminated seeds contained GA1 (41.34 ng/g·FW). Furthermore, ACC content increased as seed germination progressed in AG, and in SG, ACC content declined at the S1 stage but increased at the S2 stage. In free-living mycorrhizal fungus P. indica, ABA, IAA, and ACC were detected, and GAs were not detected. In free-living P. indica and protocorm under the AG condition, GA3 was not detected; however, GA3 was detected in protocorm symbiosis with P. indica.

3.3. Transcriptomic Analysis of D. nobile Protocorm Development under AG and SG Conditions

This study focused on gene expression profiling in the protocorm stages of AG and SG. Transcriptome details of each sample are presented in Table S1. The percentage of clean reads among the raw data (Q30) ranged from 93.71% to 94.79%, indicating high-quality reads for further analysis. The cleaned reads of D. nobile from the SG and AG libraries were then mapped to the D. nobile genome database with 75.80–84.35% and 84.77–88.09% of the reads in the SG and AG libraries, respectively (Table S2). A PCA of all samples was performed during the different protocorm developmental stages (Figure S1). To study the mechanism of protocorm development in AG and SG at the molecular level, we analyzed the DEGs between samples. In total, 16,276 DEGs were identified among all the libraries. The number of DEGs between S-S2 and A-S2 was the highest: 2807 downregulated genes and 3127 upregulated genes (Figure 3A). A total of 269 common DEGs were identified among four comparisons, indicating that these DEGs might be highly associated with protocorm symbiosis (Figure 3B). The most enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs between S-S1 and A-S1 were the biosynthesis of metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and plant–pathogen interactions (Figure 3C). For DEGs between S-S2 and A-S2, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, metabolic pathways, and plant hormone signal transduction were the most enriched KEGG pathways (Figure 3D), suggesting that D. nobile protocorm growth development stimulated by fungal association is involved in metabolic pathways, plant hormone signal transduction, and plant–pathogen interaction. The KEGG pathways of DEGs between S-S1 and S-S2 and between A-S1 and A-S2 suggested that D. nobile protocorm development association involves plant hormone signal transduction and metabolic pathways (Figure S2A,B).

3.4. DEGs Related to Hormone Metabolism and Signal Transduction

Twelve DEGs were involved in GA biosynthesis; all were upregulated in S-S1 and S-S2, including CPS1, KO2, KAO, four GA20ox genes, one GA3ox gene, and four GA2ox genes (Figure 4A, Table S3). We propose that mycorrhizal fungal P. indica symbiosis with D. nobile protocorm can promote the expression of GA biosynthesis genes to generate active GAs. The deactivated GA gene GA2ox was also upregulated to maintain GA homeostasis. The GA signaling-related gene GID2 and two DELLA genes were upregulated in the S-S1 and S-S2 groups (Figure 4A, Table S3). These results indicate that the mycorrhizal fungus P. indica regulates the expression of genes related to GAs synthesis and signaling pathways. We compared S-S1 with S-S2 DEGs and found that GA synthesis genes were downregulated and GA signaling genes were upregulated in S-S1, suggesting that GA signaling-related genes regulate protocorm leaf differentiation.
Auxin regulates plant growth and development, and plants maintain auxin homeostasis by regulating the synthesis, degradation, and transport of IAA [27]. IAA can be formed from tryptophan (Trp), catalyzed by flavin monooxygenase YUCCA and acylamidohydrolases AMI in Trp-dependent IAA biosynthesis pathways [28,29,30,31]. We found that six DEGs were involved in Trp-dependent IAA biosynthesis pathways: four YUCC genes and two AMI genes were upregulated in the S-S1 and S-S2 groups, respectively (Figure 4B, Table S4). Free IAA can be transported to the action site by the auxin efflux transporter PIN-formed (PIN) [32,33]. Free IAA is oxidized into 2-oxoindole-3-acetic acid (oxIAA) by the DIOXYGENASE OF AUXIN OXIDATION (DAO) enzyme [34,35]. Seven DEGs were identified: five DAO genes were upregulated, and two PIN genes were downregulated in S-S1 and S-S2, respectively (Figure 4B, Table S4). Aux/IAA, ARFs, and SAURs are involved in the auxin signaling pathway to regulate plant growth and development [36]. In S-S1 and S-S2, we found that 12 auxin-responsive DEGs, three IAA genes, and six SAURs genes were upregulated and that three ARFs genes were downregulated (Figure 4B and Table S4). These results indicate that the mycorrhizal fungal P. indica regulates the expression of genes related to IAA synthesis, degradation, and signaling pathways.

3.5. Effect of Exogenous GA3 and GA Biosynthesis Inhibitor (PAC) Treatment on Protocorm-Symbiosis Establishment

To confirm whether the GA influences the symbioses establishment between D. nobile and P. indica during SG, we performed exogenous hormone treatment experiments. Concentrations of 0.1 μM GA3 and 1 μM PAC were added exogenously in SG medium with P. indica without an exogenous hormone as a control. After 28 days of sowing, seed germination progress was slightly inhibited by 0.1 μM GA3, but seedlings reached the leaf differentiation stage. However, germination was hindered in the presence of 1 μM PAC, with seed germination arresting at the protocorm stage in comparison with the control (Figure 5A–C). Nonetheless, the percentage of protocorm formed in GA3 and PAC treatment was lower than that in the control treatment (Figure 5G). Protocorm formation was inhibited by 0.1 μM GA3 and 1 μM PAC. Additionally, there were fewer fungal peloton hyphae colonized in the protocorm in the 0.1 µM GA3 treatment (Figure 5E), and there were more fungal hyphae pelotons in the protocorm in the 1 μM PAC treatment (Figure 5F). The number of hyphae pelotons in PAC-treated protocorms was significantly higher than that in the control protocorms, and the number of hyphae pelotons in GA3-treated protocorms was lower than that in the control protocorms (Figure 5H). These findings reveal that PAC facilitated colonization, and GA3 impeded it.

3.6. DEGs Related to Cell Wall Metabolism

Thirteen DEGs related to cell wall metabolism were identified between protocorms in AG and SG, including expansin genes, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases (XTH) genes, and extensin genes. Seven expansin genes were downregulated in S-S1 and S-S2, and three XTH genes and three genes encoding the extensin proteins LRX4 and SRC2 were upregulated in S-S1 and S-S2 (Figure 6A, Table S5). Thus, P. indica colonization can regulate the expression levels of XTH, extensins, and expansin genes to modify cell wall metabolism. qPCR indicated that PAC induced EXP6, EXB16 and EXP10-2 expression and inhibited SRC2 and LRX4 expression, and GA3 induced SRC2 and LRX4 expression and inhibited EXP6, EXB16 and EXP10-2 expression (Figure 6B).

3.7. Experimental Validation of DEGs by qRT-PCR

To confirm the accuracy and reproducibility of the RNA-Seq results, we selected 12 genes related to cell wall metabolism and biosynthesis of GAs and IAA for qPCR analysis. cDNA samples were obtained from the two protocorm stages under the AG and SG conditions. The expression levels of the expansin genes EXPA6, EXB16, and EXP10 were all lower in S-S1 and S-S2, while the gene encoding XTH and extensin genes XTH2, XTH32, XTH22, LRX4, and SRC2 were significantly higher in S-S1 and S-S2. In S-S1 and S-S2, the genes DAO, GA2ox1, and GA20ox1 for IAA and GAs metabolism were upregulated, which is consistent with the RNA-Seq results (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

4.1. P. indica Promotes Seed Germination and Protocorm Development of D. nobile

Orchid seed symbiotic germination was reported to be faster than asymbiotic germination [37]. We observed that D. nobile seeds incubated with P. indica germinated faster than seeds under asymbiotic germination conditions (Figure 1). During interactions between fungi and orchid seeds, fungal hyphae grow into orchid tissues through the suspensor at the base of the seeds [37]. In orchid mycorrhiza, intracellular hyphal pelotons are produced by fungal hyphae, which are eventually digested by orchid cells [37,38]. At the early stage of D. nobile protocorm development, hyphae pelotons formed inside the basal cells; as the protocorm further developed, the hyphae pelotons collapsed and degenerated and may finally digested by the orchid (Figure 2).

4.2. P. indica Colonization Can Modify the GA and IAA Metabolism-Related Expression in D. nobile

In soybeans, inoculation with compatible rhizobia can induce GA biosynthesis gene expression, and transcriptome studies using tomato and Medicago truncatula have demonstrated that several GA biosynthesis genes were upregulated upon inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi [39,40]. The metabolites of the bacteria and/or mycorrhizal fungus can induce the level of endogenous hormones in the orchid [11]. The GA synthesis genes CPS1, KO2, KAO, four GA20ox genes, and one GA3ox gene were upregulated to promote protocorm synthesis GA3 (Figure 4A). Exogenous GA negatively affected seed germination and fungal colonization, and endogenous bioactive GA was actively converted to inactive form during seed germination [10]. Orchids have evolved such that they do not use bioactive GA as a positive regulator of seed germination; instead, orchids auto-activate the mycorrhizal symbiosis pathway through GA inactivation to accept the fungal partner immediately during seed germination [41]. Deactivation of bioactive GAs and their precursors is catalyzed by another dioxygenase, GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox), and the expression level of GA2ox is upregulated in S-S1 and S-S2 when compared with that in A-S1 and A-S2 (Figure 4), indicating that orchid through GA inactivation to accept the fungal.
During arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, IAA plays a positive role in root mycorrhizal colonization by controlling strigolactone levels [42]. Auxin signaling within host roots is required for the early stages of arbuscular mycorrhizal formation, including presymbiotic signal exchange [43,44]. When D. officinale seeds were inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus, the rate of embryo differentiation rose, and IAA production increased significantly [10]. Orchid-associated bacteria can produce IAA to enhance symbiotic germination [11]. α-naph-thaleneacetic acid (NAA) or 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) can increase the Calanthe discolor protocorm formation [45]. During seed germination development, P. indica can upregulate the IAA synthesis genes to increase the level of IAA contents in protocorms, with the aim of accelerating the development of protocorms (Table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 4).

4.3. P. indica Colonization Can Induce Cell Wall Remodeling Gene Expression

Plants need a “reprogram cycle” to adjust growth and development during a symbiotic process. The mechanism of cell wall penetration by mycorrhizal fungi involves cell wall synthesis, remodeling, and softening genes [46]. Expansins, plant cell wall loosening proteins, have been implicated in arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus (AMF) symbiosis [24,47]. For instance, the downregulation of the expansin-like gene EXPLB1 was associated with reduced AMF infection in tomatoes [48]. α-expansin NtEXPA5 was found in mycorrhizal-infected tobacco roots, suggesting the involvement of expansin in root symbiosis [49]. Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal roots showed that expansin-like genes were upregulated in epidermal cells during the formation of the pre-penetration apparatus in M. truncatula [50]. In soybeans, the expression of several β-EXP genes is associated with mycorrhizal colonization [51]. In our study, seven expansin genes were downregulated in S-S1 and S-S2, implying their involvement in the establishment of protocorm symbiosis (Figure 6). Extensins are cell wall proteins belonging to the superfamily of HRGPs, which play an important role in establishing a symbiotic relationship. In D. officinale protocorm, HRGPs accumulate in response to colonization by fungi [37]. LRX4 and SRC2, which encode extensin proteins, were upregulated in SG (Figure 6A). This suggests that P. indica colonization regulates the expression of cell wall metabolism genes, including expansins and extensins. Furthermore, GA is an upstream regulator of the cell wall remodeling process that inhibits orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis, while GA3 can upregulate SRC2 and LRX4 expression and downregulated EXP6, EXB16 and EXP10-2 expression. As the concentration of GA3 and PAC increased, the inhibition of protocorm development became more obvious (Figure 6 and Figure S3). When the concentration of GA3 increased, the expression levels of SRC2 and LRX4 increased and those of EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 decreased. As the concentration of PAC increased, the expression levels of SRC2 and LRX4 reduced and those of EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 increased (Figure 6B).

4.4. GA Disrupts the Balance between Fungal Colonization and Protocorm Development in Protocorm-Symbiont Establishment

Ferguson et al. found that the GA biosynthesis mutants of Pisum sativum develop significantly fewer nodules than their wild-type parents [52,53]; treatment with GA biosynthesis inhibitors before rhizobial inoculation hindered the lateral root-base nodule formation in the semi-aquatic legume Sesbania rostrata [40]. In AMF, exogenous GA3 suppressed arbuscule formation in pea roots, while endogenous GA levels and GA signaling influenced the formation of arbuscules in mycorrhizal pea roots [54]. Meanwhile, GA exerted no stimulatory effect on seed germination and protocorm formation in Calanthe discolor asymbiotic germination [45]. However, GA played a negative role in D. officinale symbiotic germination and inhibited fungal colonization [45]. Exogenous GA3 inhibited P. indica colonization, while the GA biosynthesis inhibitor PAC promoted P. indica colonization (Figure 5F–H). We found that fewer fungal peloton hyphae colonized the protocorm in the 0.1 µM GA3 treatment (Figure 5E), and there were more fungal hyphae and hyphae that could not form pelotons to collapse and degenerate in the protocorm in the 1 μM PAC treatment (Figure 5F). GA not only inhibits AM symbiosis but also nodulation [55]. Furthermore, GA is an upstream regulator of the cell wall remodeling process, while GA3 inhibits orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis establishment. Meanwhile, GA inhibitors promote increased fungal colonization but inhibit protocorm growth, presumably due to a reduction in the rate of pelotone degradation, thereby reducing the nutrient supply to developing protocorms (Figure 8).

5. Conclusions

Our study found that P. indica could promote D. nobile seed germination and protocorm formation. P. indica colonization is associated with the regulation of GAs and IAA synthesis and signaling gene expression. Specifically, GA inhibits fungal colonization, and GA biosynthesis inhibitors promote fungal colonization. GA can inhibit the establishment of symbiosis by regulating cell wall loosen-related gene expression, while GA biosynthesis inhibitors can promote symbiosis establishment by upregulating cell wall loosen-related gene expression. Excessive or insufficient GA disrupts the balance between fungal colonization and protocorm development in the protocorm–symbiont establishment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom13111649/s1. Figure S1: The principle component analysis (PCA) of all samples. Figure S2: The analysis of KEGG enrichment in the comparison group A-S1 vs. S-S1 and group A-S2 vs. S-S2. Figure S3: Effect of exogenous GA3 and PAC on D. nobile seeds germinate progress. A–C: morphological characters of symbiotic germination inoculated with P. indica at different treatments with GA3 and PAC. Table S1: Overview of transcriptome sequencing and de novo assembly results. Table S2: Mapping clean RNA-seq reads to the reference genome of D. nobile. Table S3: Annotated genes related to GA metabolism and signaling. Table S4: Annotated genes related to IAA metabolism and signaling. Table S5: Annotated genes related to cell wall metabolism. Table S6: Primers used for qPCR assay.

Author Contributions

H.C. performed the experiments and analyzed the transcriptome data, Y.L., Y.Y. and J.L. performed the experiments, S.Z. and L.F. conceived and supervised the project. K.W. and L.L. provided useful advice. H.C., L.F. and S.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Guangdong Research and Development Program of Key Areas (2022B1111040003), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (E11510BH01), the Guangdong Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Program (2023KJ121).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Zhihong Tian for giving mycorrhizal fungi P. indica as a gift.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Figura, T.; Tylova, E.; Jersakova, J.; Vohnik, M.; Ponert, J. Fungal symbionts may modulate nitrate inhibitory effect on orchid seed germination. Mycorrhiza 2021, 31, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cameron, D.D.; Johnson, I.; Read, D.J.; Leake, J.R. Giving and receiving: Measuring the carbon cost of mycorrhizas in the green orchid, Goodyera repens. New Phytol. 2008, 180, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fochi, V.; Chitarra, W.; Kohler, A.; Voyron, S.; Singan, V.R.; Lindquist, E.A.; Barry, K.W.; Girlanda, M.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Martin, F.; et al. Fungal and plant gene expression in the Tulasnella calospora-Serapias vomeracea symbiosis provides clues about nitrogen pathways in orchid mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghirardo, A.; Fochi, V.; Lange, B.; Witting, M.; Schnitzler, J.-P.; Perotto, S.; Balestrini, R. Metabolomic adjustments in the orchid mycorrhizal fungus Tulasnella calospora during symbiosis with Serapias vomeracea. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1939–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rasmussen, H.N. Cell-differentiation and mycorrhizal infection in Dactylorhiza-majalis (Rchb. f.) Hunt & Summerh (orchidaceae) during germination in vitro. New Phytol. 1990, 116, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  6. Uetake, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Ogoshi, A. Ultrastructural changes during the symbiotic development of Spiranthes sinensis (orchidaceae) protocorms associated with binucleate Rhizoctonia anastomosis group C. Mycol. Res. 1992, 96, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuga, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Yurimoto, H. Stable isotope cellular imaging reveals that both live and degenerating fungal pelotons transfer carbon and nitrogen to orchid protocorms. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Liu, S.S.; Kohler, A.; Yan, B.; Luo, H.M.; Chen, X.M.; Guo, S.X. iTRAQ and RNA-Seq analyses provide new insights into regulation mechanism of symbiotic germination of Dendrobium officinale seeds (Orchidaceae). J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 2174–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, X.-G.; Wu, Y.-H.; Li, N.-Q.; Gao, J.-Y. What role does the seed coat play during symbiotic seed germination in orchids: An experimental approach with Dendrobium officinale. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Yan, B.; Tang, Y.; Xing, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, D.; Guo, S. Symbiotic and asymbiotic germination of Dendrobium officinale (orchidaceae) respond differently to exogenous gibberellins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wilkinson, K.G.; Dixon, K.W.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L. Effect of IAA on symbiotic germination of an Australian orchid and its production by orchid-associated bacteria. Plant Soil 1994, 159, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liao, D.; Wang, S.; Cui, M.; Liu, J.; Chen, A.; Xu, G. Phytohormones regulate the development of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, Q.; Hedden, P.; Zhang, Q. Heterosis in rice seedlings: Its relationship to gibberellin content and expression of gibberellin metabolism and signaling genes. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1905–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ashikari, M.; Nakajima, M.; Itoh, H.; Katoh, E.; Kobayashi, M.; Chow, T.Y.; Hsing, Y.I.C.; Kitano, H.; Yamaguchi, I.; et al. GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature 2005, 437, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sasaki, A.; Itoh, H.; Gomi, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Jeong, D.H.; An, G.; Kitano, H.; Ashikari, M.; et al. Accumulation of phosphorylated repressor for gibberellin signaling in an F-box mutant. Science 2003, 299, 1896–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Floss, D.S.; Levy, J.G.; Levesque-Tremblay, V.; Pumplin, N.; Harrison, M.J. DELLA proteins regulate arbuscule formation in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E5025–E5034. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pimprikar, P.; Carbonnel, S.; Paries, M.; Katzer, K.; Klingl, V.; Bohmer, M.J.; Karl, L.; Floss, D.S.; Harrison, M.J.; Parniske, M.; et al. A CCaMK-CYCLOPS-DELLA complex activates transcriptiori of RAM1 to regulate arbuscule branching. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, T.; Song, Z.; Wang, X.J.; Xu, L.J.; Sun, Q.W.; Li, L.B. Functional insights into the roles of hormones in the Dendrobium officinale-Tulasnella sp. germinated seed symbiotic association. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barnes, W.J.; Anderson, C.T. Release, recycle, rebuild: Cell-wall remodeling, autodegradation, and sugar salvage for new wall biosynthesis during plant development. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cosgrove, D.J.; Li, L.C.; Cho, H.T.; Hoffmann-Benning, S.; Moore, R.C.; Blecker, D. The growing world of expansins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 1436–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ding, X.; Cao, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Activation of the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-8 suppresses expansin expression and promotes salicylate and jasmonate-independent basal immunity in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sampedro, J.; Cosgrove, D.J. The expansin superfamily. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Balestrini, R.; Cosgrove, D.J.; Bonfante, P. Differential location of α-expansin proteins during the accommodation of root cells to an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Planta 2005, 220, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yin, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, B.; Li, L.; Ma, G.; Wu, K.; Yang, F.; Zhu, G.; Fang, L.; Zeng, S. Exogenous GA(3) promotes flowering in Paphiopedilum callosum (Orchidaceae) through bolting and lateral flower development regulation. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Showalter, A.M.; Basu, D. Extensin and Arabinogalactan-protein biosynthesis: Glycosyltransferases, research challenges, and biosensors. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Korasick, D.A.; Enders, T.A.; Strader, L.C. Auxin biosynthesis and storage forms. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2541–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Di, D.-W.; Zhang, C.; Luo, P.; An, C.-W.; Guo, G.-Q. The biosynthesis of auxin: How many paths truly lead to IAA? Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 78, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mano, Y.; Nemoto, K.; Suzuki, M.; Seki, H.; Fujii, I.; Muranaka, T. The AMI1 gene family: Indole-3-acetamide hydrolase functions in auxin biosynthesis in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mashiguchi, K.; Tanaka, K.; Sakai, T.; Sugawara, S.; Kawaide, H.; Natsume, M.; Hanada, A.; Yaeno, T.; Shirasu, K.; Yao, H.; et al. The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18512–18517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Won, C.; Shen, X.; Mashiguchi, K.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, X.; Cheng, Y.; Kasahara, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Chory, J.; Zhao, Y. Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by tryptophan aminotransferases of arabidopsis and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18518–18523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guan, L.; Li, Y.; Huang, K.; Cheng, Z.-M.M. Auxin regulation and MdPIN expression during adventitious root initiation in apple cuttings. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Petrasek, J.; Mravec, J.; Bouchard, R.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Abas, M.; Seifertova, D.; Wisniewska, J.; Tadele, Z.; Kubes, M.; Covanova, M.; et al. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science 2006, 312, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Porco, S.; Pencik, A.; Rashed, A.; Voss, U.; Casanova-Saez, R.; Bishopp, A.; Golebiowska, A.; Bhosale, R.; Swarup, R.; Swarup, K.; et al. Dioxygenase-encoding AtDAO1 gene controls IAA oxidation and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11016–11021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Peer, W.A. Auxin homeostasis: The DAO of catabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3145–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, B.; Zeng, S.; Yin, Y.; Li, L.; Ma, G.; Wu, K.; Fang, L. Characterization of phytohormone and transcriptome profiles during protocorm-like bodies development of Paphiopedilum. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, Y.-Y.; Chen, X.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Cho, Y.-H.; Wang, A.-R.; Yeung, E.C.; Zeng, X.; Guo, S.-X.; Lee, Y.-I. Immunolocalization and changes of Hydroxyproline-Rich Glycoproteins during symbiotic germination of Dendrobium officinale. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dearnaley, J.D.W.; Cameron, D.D. Nitrogen transport in the orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis-further evidence for a mutualistic association. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hayashi, S.; Reid, D.E.; Lorenc, M.T.; Stiller, J.; Edwards, D.; Gresshoff, P.M.; Ferguson, B.J. Transient Nod factor-dependent gene expression in the nodulation-competent zone of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) roots. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lievens, S.; Goormachtig, S.; Den Herder, J.; Capoen, W.; Mathis, R.; Hedden, P.; Holsters, M. Gibberellins are involved in nodulation of Sesbania rostrata. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1366–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miura, C.; Furui, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Kanno, Y.; Honjo, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Suetsugu, K.; Yagame, T.; Seo, M.; Shigenobu, S.; et al. Orchid seed germination through auto-activation of mycorrhizal symbiosis signaling regulated by gibberellin. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Foo, E. Auxin influences strigolactones in pea mycorrhizal symbiosis. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Foo, E.; McAdam, E.L.; Weller, J.L.; Reid, J.B. Interactions between ethylene, gibberellins, and brassinosteroids in the development of rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses of pea. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2413–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hanlon, M.T.; Coenen, C. Genetic evidence for auxin involvement in arbuscular mycorrhiza initiation. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mii, K.M.M. Phytohormone pre-treatment for the enhancement of seed germination and protocorm formation by the terrestrial orchid, Calanthe discolor (Orchidaceae), in asymbiotic culture. Sci. Hortic. 1995, 63, 263–267. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar Mohanty, S.; Arthikala, M.-K.; Nanjareddy, K.; Lara, M. Plant-symbiont interactions: The functional role of expansins. Symbiosis 2018, 74, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, S.; Ren, H.; Luo, Y.; Feng, C.; Li, H. Genome-wide identification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) expansin genes and functional characterization of TaEXPB1A. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 182, 104307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dermatsev, V.; Weingarten-Baror, C.; Resnick, N.; Gadkar, V.; Wininger, S.; Kolotilin, I.; Mayzlish-Gati, E.; Zilberstein, A.; Koltai, H.; Kapulnik, Y. Microarray analysis and functional tests suggest the involvement of expansins in the early stages of symbiosis of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wisniewska, M.; Golinowski, W. Immunolocalization of α-expansin protein(NTEXPA5) in tobacco roots in the presence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae nicol. & gerd. Acta Biol. Cracoviensia Ser. Bot. 2011, 53, 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  50. Siciliano, V.; Genre, A.; Balestrini, R.; Cappellazzo, G.; deWit, P.J.G.M.; Bonfante, P. Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal roots during development of the prepenetration apparatus. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1455–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Walk, T.C.; Liao, H. Characterization of soybean beta-expansin genes and their expression responses to symbiosis, nutrient deficiency, and hormone treatment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 2805–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ferguson, B.J.; Foo, E.; Ross, J.J.; Reid, J.B. Relationship between gibberellin, ethylene and nodulation in Pisum sativum. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ferguson, B.J.; Ross, J.J.; Reid, J.B. Nodulation phenotypes of gibberellin and brassinosteroid mutants of pea. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2396–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Foo, E.; Ross, J.J.; Jones, W.T.; Reid, J.B. Plant hormones in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: An emerging role for gibberellins. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Maekawa, T.; Maekawa-Yoshikawa, M.; Takeda, N.; Imaizumi-Anraku, H.; Murooka, Y.; Hayashi, M. Gibberellin controls the nodulation signaling pathway in Lotus japonicus. Plant J. 2009, 58, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 13 01649 g001
Figure 1. Morphological characters and seed germination stages of D. nobile under symbiotic germination (SG) and asymbiotic germination (AG) conditions. (A–C): symbiotic germination on the OMA with mycorrhizal fungi P. indica, (a–c): asymbotic germination. (A,a): Ten days after sowing seeds: embryo swollen, turned light green, rupture of testa; (B,b): Twenty days after sowing seeds: the appearance of protomeristem (protocorm stage1); (C,c): Forty days after sowing seeds: leaf differentiation, shoot appearance in protocorm (protocorm stage 2); scale bar = 100 µm. (D): Effect on protocorm formation of symbiotic and asymbotic treatments t-test (two-tailed), **, p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Morphological characters and seed germination stages of D. nobile under symbiotic germination (SG) and asymbiotic germination (AG) conditions. (A–C): symbiotic germination on the OMA with mycorrhizal fungi P. indica, (a–c): asymbotic germination. (A,a): Ten days after sowing seeds: embryo swollen, turned light green, rupture of testa; (B,b): Twenty days after sowing seeds: the appearance of protomeristem (protocorm stage1); (C,c): Forty days after sowing seeds: leaf differentiation, shoot appearance in protocorm (protocorm stage 2); scale bar = 100 µm. (D): Effect on protocorm formation of symbiotic and asymbotic treatments t-test (two-tailed), **, p < 0.01.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g001
Biomolecules 13 01649 g002
Figure 2. Histology of germination D. nobile seeds under symbiotic germination (SG) condition. (A) embryo swollen, the uncolonized embryo covered by testa; (B) protocorm with the appearance of protomeristem; (C) protocorm with a developing shoot pole; scale bar = 50 µm. Black arrows: peloton hyphae; red arrows: collapsing and degenerated peloton hyphae.
Figure 2. Histology of germination D. nobile seeds under symbiotic germination (SG) condition. (A) embryo swollen, the uncolonized embryo covered by testa; (B) protocorm with the appearance of protomeristem; (C) protocorm with a developing shoot pole; scale bar = 50 µm. Black arrows: peloton hyphae; red arrows: collapsing and degenerated peloton hyphae.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g002
Biomolecules 13 01649 g003
Figure 3. Overview of DEGs analysis of samples at different stages. (A) The number of up/down-regulated DEGs in each compared group. (B) Venn diagram of the number of DEGs in each compared group. (C) The analysis of KEGG enrichment in the comparison group A-S1 vs. S-S1. (D) The analysis of KEGG enrichment analysis in the comparison group A-S2 vs. S-S2.
Figure 3. Overview of DEGs analysis of samples at different stages. (A) The number of up/down-regulated DEGs in each compared group. (B) Venn diagram of the number of DEGs in each compared group. (C) The analysis of KEGG enrichment in the comparison group A-S1 vs. S-S1. (D) The analysis of KEGG enrichment analysis in the comparison group A-S2 vs. S-S2.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g003
Biomolecules 13 01649 g004
Figure 4. Heatmap of DEGs related to GAs and IAA metabolism and signaling. (A) GAs biosynthesis and signaling, (B) IAA biosynthesis, transduction and signaling. S-S1 and S-S2: 20 and 40 days after sowing of symbiotic germination; A-S1 and A-S2: 20 and 40 days after sowing of asymbiotic germination.
Figure 4. Heatmap of DEGs related to GAs and IAA metabolism and signaling. (A) GAs biosynthesis and signaling, (B) IAA biosynthesis, transduction and signaling. S-S1 and S-S2: 20 and 40 days after sowing of symbiotic germination; A-S1 and A-S2: 20 and 40 days after sowing of asymbiotic germination.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g004
Biomolecules 13 01649 g005
Figure 5. Effect of exogenous GA3 and PAC on P. indica colonization in D. nobile protocorm. (A–C): Morphological characters of symbiotic germination inoculated with P. indica at different treatments with GA3 and PAC. (D–F): Histology observation of protocorm inoculated with P. indica at different treatments with GA3 and PAC; scale bars = 50 µm. (G): Effect on protocorm formation of GA3 and PAC treatments, five biological replicates were analyzed; t-test (two-tailed). (H): The number of hyphae peloton in protocorm at different treatments with GA3 and PAC; five biological replicates were analyzed; t-test (two-tailed), **, p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Effect of exogenous GA3 and PAC on P. indica colonization in D. nobile protocorm. (A–C): Morphological characters of symbiotic germination inoculated with P. indica at different treatments with GA3 and PAC. (D–F): Histology observation of protocorm inoculated with P. indica at different treatments with GA3 and PAC; scale bars = 50 µm. (G): Effect on protocorm formation of GA3 and PAC treatments, five biological replicates were analyzed; t-test (two-tailed). (H): The number of hyphae peloton in protocorm at different treatments with GA3 and PAC; five biological replicates were analyzed; t-test (two-tailed), **, p < 0.01.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g005
Biomolecules 13 01649 g006
Figure 6. Cell wall metabolism of D. nobile protocorms under symbiotic germination (SG) and asymbiotic germination (AG) conditions (A): the color scale bar is shown as the log10 (FPKM + 1) value in the right; the horizontal coordinates indicate the protocorm stages under AG and SG condition. SRC2 encoding leucine-rich repeat extensin-like protein, LRX4 encoding LLR extensin-like protein, EXP6 encoding expansin-A6-like, EXB16 encoding expansin-B16-like, EXP10-2 encoding expansin-A10-like. (B): Relative expression of cell wall metabolism-related genes after GA3 and PAC treatment. Three biological repeats were analyzed: t-test (two-tailed), *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Cell wall metabolism of D. nobile protocorms under symbiotic germination (SG) and asymbiotic germination (AG) conditions (A): the color scale bar is shown as the log10 (FPKM + 1) value in the right; the horizontal coordinates indicate the protocorm stages under AG and SG condition. SRC2 encoding leucine-rich repeat extensin-like protein, LRX4 encoding LLR extensin-like protein, EXP6 encoding expansin-A6-like, EXB16 encoding expansin-B16-like, EXP10-2 encoding expansin-A10-like. (B): Relative expression of cell wall metabolism-related genes after GA3 and PAC treatment. Three biological repeats were analyzed: t-test (two-tailed), *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g006
Biomolecules 13 01649 g007
Figure 7. The expression levels in AG and SG protocorm development by qPCR. The reference gene was Dnactin. The bar chart and the left y-axis represent the FPKM values. The line graph and y-axis represent the relative expression levels by qPCR. Three biological repeats were performed: t-test (two-tailed), *, p < 0.05.
Figure 7. The expression levels in AG and SG protocorm development by qPCR. The reference gene was Dnactin. The bar chart and the left y-axis represent the FPKM values. The line graph and y-axis represent the relative expression levels by qPCR. Three biological repeats were performed: t-test (two-tailed), *, p < 0.05.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g007
Biomolecules 13 01649 g008
Figure 8. Proposed working model for the role of GA3 and GA inhibitor in D. nobile–P. indica symbiosis by regulating cell wall loosen-related genes expression. GA inhibited the symbiosis establishment and protocorm growth by regulating the level of cell wall metabolism gene expression. At high GA level conditions, the extensin code genes LRX4 and SRC2 are upregulated, and the expansin code genes EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 are downregulated, leading to cell wall stiffening, resulting in the inhibition of fungi colonization. At low GA level conditions, the extensin code genes LRX4 and SRC2 are downregulated, and the expansin code genes EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 are upregulated, leading to cell wall loosening, resulting in promoting fungi territory expansion and inhibiting protocorm growth.
Figure 8. Proposed working model for the role of GA3 and GA inhibitor in D. nobile–P. indica symbiosis by regulating cell wall loosen-related genes expression. GA inhibited the symbiosis establishment and protocorm growth by regulating the level of cell wall metabolism gene expression. At high GA level conditions, the extensin code genes LRX4 and SRC2 are upregulated, and the expansin code genes EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 are downregulated, leading to cell wall stiffening, resulting in the inhibition of fungi colonization. At low GA level conditions, the extensin code genes LRX4 and SRC2 are downregulated, and the expansin code genes EXP6, EXB16, and EXP10-2 are upregulated, leading to cell wall loosening, resulting in promoting fungi territory expansion and inhibiting protocorm growth.
Biomolecules 13 01649 g008
Table 1. The level of endogenous hormones or precursor contents at different growth stages of D. nobile seeds, protocorms, and free-living P. indica.
Table 1. The level of endogenous hormones or precursor contents at different growth stages of D. nobile seeds, protocorms, and free-living P. indica.
SampleABA
(ng/g·FW)		IAA
(ng/g·FW)		GA3
(ng/g·FW)		GA1
(ng/g·FW)		ACC
(ng/g·FW)
S029.35 ± 1.94 a14.7 ± 0.49 aN/A41.34 ± 1.6263.44 ± 0.95 d
S-S11.98 ± 0.04 c14.5 ± 0.14 a0.05 ± 0.02N/A41.66 ± 0.30 e
S-S21.56 ± 0.10 c8.30 ± 0.99 b2.27 ± 2.02N/A71.57 ± 2.00 c
A-S12.25 ± 0.14 c3.59 ± 0.06 dN/AN/A85.17 ± 2.41 b
A-S25.61 ± 0.25 b3.73 ± 0.05 cdN/AN/A105.9 ± 2.24 a
P. indica0.18 ± 0.022.22 ± 0.08N/AN/A131.4 ± 2.52
Note: FW: fresh weight; S0: ungerminated seeds; S-S1 and S-S2: 20 days and 40 days after sowing of symbiotic germination; A-S1 and A-S2: 20 days and 40 days after sowing of asymbiotic germination; P. indica: free-living fungi P. indica on OMA. ABA: abscisic acids; IAA: indole-3-acetic acid; GA3 and GA1: Gibberellic A3 and A1; ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid. Different letters a–e represent the significant difference in plant hormone contents at p-value < 0.05 with S0 as the control. Three biologic repeats were performed using Duncan method analysis in SPSS 17.0 software.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Wu, K.; Fang, L.; Zeng, S. Gibberellic Acid Inhibits Dendrobium nobile—Piriformospora Symbiosis by Regulating the Expression of Cell Wall Metabolism Genes. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111649

AMA Style

Chen H, Li Y, Yin Y, Li J, Li L, Wu K, Fang L, Zeng S. Gibberellic Acid Inhibits Dendrobium nobile—Piriformospora Symbiosis by Regulating the Expression of Cell Wall Metabolism Genes. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(11):1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Hong, Yefei Li, Yuying Yin, Ji Li, Lin Li, Kunlin Wu, Lin Fang, and Songjun Zeng. 2023. "Gibberellic Acid Inhibits Dendrobium nobile—Piriformospora Symbiosis by Regulating the Expression of Cell Wall Metabolism Genes" Biomolecules 13, no. 11: 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111649

APA Style

Chen, H., Li, Y., Yin, Y., Li, J., Li, L., Wu, K., Fang, L., & Zeng, S. (2023). Gibberellic Acid Inhibits Dendrobium nobile—Piriformospora Symbiosis by Regulating the Expression of Cell Wall Metabolism Genes. Biomolecules, 13(11), 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop