Next Article in Journal
Intracerebral Hemorrhage-Associated Iron Release Leads to Pericyte-Dependent Cerebral Capillary Function Disruption
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in the Development of Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Inhibitors for Therapeutic Applications
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Interaction Between Lipoprotein(a) and Other Lipid Molecules: A Review of the Current Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Pathogenetic Links to Cardiovascular Risk

by
Vlad Alexandru Ionescu
1,2,
Gina Gheorghe
1,2,*,
Nicolae Bacalbasa
3,4 and
Camelia Cristina Diaconu
1,2,5,*
1
Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Internal Medicine Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 105402 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
5
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 050085 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(2), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020163
Submission received: 23 December 2024 / Revised: 12 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Cardiometabolic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is correlated with an increased cardiovascular risk, independent of other traditional risk factors. The mechanisms underlying this pathogenic link are complex yet remain incompletely elucidated. Among these, the most significant are visceral adiposity, low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, prothrombotic status, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and postprandial hyperlipemia, gut dysbiosis, and genetic mutations. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in patients with MASLD. These patients have an increased incidence of coronary artery disease, carotid artery disease, structural and functional cardiac abnormalities, and valvulopathies, as well as arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disorders. In this review, we present the latest data on the association between MASLD and cardiovascular risk, focusing on the pathogenic mechanisms that explain the correlation between these two pathologies. Given the high rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients with MASLD, we consider it imperative to raise awareness of the risks associated with this condition within the general population. Further research is essential to clarify the mechanisms underlying the increased cardiovascular risk linked to MASLD. This understanding may facilitate the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for these patients, as well as novel therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously referred to as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as the correlation between steatotic liver disease (SLD) and one or more cardiometabolic risk factors in the absence of alcohol consumption (Table 1) [1]. The MASLD spectrum encompasses hepatic steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1].
MASLD is the most common chronic liver disease, affecting approximately 30% of the general population and over 50% of patients with diabetes [1,2]. From 1990 to 2019, the prevalence of this disease rose by 50.4%, increasing from 25.26% between 1990 and 2006 to 38% between 2016 and 2019 [2]. Moreover, the prevalence of MAFLD exhibits significant geographical variation, with the most affected regions being Latin America (44.37%), the Middle East (36.53%), North Africa (28.63–45.22%), South Asia (33.07%), Southeast Asia (33.07%), North America (31.20%), East Asia (29.71%), Asia Pacific (28.02%), and Western Europe (25.10%) [2].
Recent data from the United States’ United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) indicate that MASLD is the second most prevalent indication for liver transplantation [3]. Furthermore, MASH is the most rapidly expanding indication for liver transplantation in Western countries [4,5,6,7].
Approximately 10–25% of patients with MASLD may develop MASH, liver cirrhosis, or HCC; nonetheless, the primary cause of mortality in these patients is cardiovascular disease [8]. Therefore, these patients exhibit an elevated risk of developing ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathies, chronic heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, or heart conduction disorders [9,10,11]. For instance, stenoses are present in at least one coronary artery in approximately 50% of patients with MASLD [9]. Based on population studies that assessed patients with MASLD from 1990 to 2019, a recent meta-analysis reported a pooled mortality rate of 12.6 per 1000 person-years for all-cause mortality, 4.1 per 1000 person-years for cardiac-specific mortality, 2.8 per 1000 person-years for extrahepatic cancer-specific mortality, and 0.92 per 1000 person-years for liver-specific mortality [2]. A significant obstacle to the effective therapeutic care of these patients is the underdiagnosis of MASLD [12]. The factors contributing to this underdiagnosis are:
  • Insufficient awareness of this condition among both patients and healthcare professionals.
  • The disease’s initial asymptomatic nature.
  • The absence of standardized diagnostic tools [12].
The annual economic burden of MASL was estimated to be approximately USD 103 billion in the United States of America (USA), EUR 27.7 billion in Germany, France, and Italy, and GBP 5.24 billion in Great Britain [9]. Furthermore, recent epidemiological data project that the costs required to care for these patients will rise to USD 1005 trillion in the USA and EUR 334 billion in Europe over the next decade [13].
The accelerated increase in the prevalence of MASLD and the high morbidity and mortality rates of these conditions underline the need for urgent strategies aimed at increasing awareness, as well as improving the diagnostic and therapeutic management of these patients. Our comprehensive narrative review presents the most recent data on MASLD and cardiometabolic risk. Consequently, we focused on presenting the mechanisms that explain the pathogenic link between the two types of conditions, while also highlighting a series of epidemiological, clinical, and paraclinical data regarding the correlation between these pathologies.

2. MASLD and Cardiovascular Diseases

Patients with MASLD have a high incidence of cardiovascular diseases, which are also the leading cause of death in this population (Figure 1) [14]. Thus, early diagnosis and proper management of this condition can significantly improve morbidity and mortality rates in these patients. The diagnosis of MASLD is based on the correlation of clinical data with laboratory and imaging investigations [15]. Patients with MASLD may exhibit mildly to moderately elevated aminotransferase levels [15]. Among these, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is most closely associated with hepatic fat accumulation and is predominantly found in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes [16]. Patients with MASLD typically have higher ALT levels than aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, with an AST/ALT ratio (De Rittis ratio) < 1 [16]. This subunitary ratio has been independently correlated with MASLD risk and can serve as a non-invasive biomarker for identifying this metabolic condition [16]. Other biological changes suggestive of MASLD include elevated serum ferritin levels or transferrin saturation (observed in 6–11% of patients) and an increase in serum alkaline phosphatase levels, which may reach 2–3 times the upper normal limit [15]. Key imaging findings in MASLD patients include increased hepatic echogenicity on ultrasound, increased fat signal on MRI, and decreased hepatic attenuation on CT [15]. The most commonly used diagnostic method for MASLD remains abdominal ultrasound, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 93% [15].
MASLD is an independent risk factor for ASCVD [12]. Both patients with MASLD and those with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) exhibit elevated coronary calcium scores (CCS) [12]. CCS is an independent predictive marker for cardiovascular events, reflecting reduced vascular compliance, extensive atherosclerotic lesions, abnormal vasomotor responses, and impaired coronary perfusion [14,17,18]. Kang et al. demonstrated in a recent study that patients with MASLD have an increased risk of coronary artery calcification, independent of other risk factors such as age, sex, smoking, or diabetes [19]. Vega et al. reported in a study including 113 patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease that 52% had MASLD [20]. A meta-analysis of 15 studies including over 10 million individuals showed increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with MASLD [21]. Another recent meta-analysis of 4725 patients with MASLD reported a direct proportional relationship between the degree of hepatic fibrosis and subclinical atherosclerosis [22]. Furthermore, patients with MASLD have a 60% higher risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke compared to those without this metabolic condition [23].
Coronary collateral circulation is an important protective mechanism for myocardial cells in the event of an occlusion in a coronary artery [24]. The development of this collateral circulation is influenced by several factors, with diabetes mellitus being a well-established condition associated with poor coronary collateral circulation [24]. However, this phenomenon has also been observed in patients with insulin resistance [25]. Arslan et al. demonstrated an association between MASLD and poor coronary collateral circulation in patients without diabetes [25]. The pathogenic mechanisms that may explain this phenomenon include the proinflammatory and pro-thrombotic states, endothelial dysfunction, and accelerated atherogenesis commonly found in patients with MASLD [24].
Current evidence supports the association of MASLD with both subclinical cardiovascular conditions (e.g., CCS, abdominal aortic calcification, increased carotid intima-media thickness [CIMT], endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness) and clinical conditions (e.g., acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery disease, and ischemic stroke) [26]. Increased CIMT is independently associated with both the degree of hepatic steatosis and subclinical atherosclerosis, as well as the risk of acute coronary syndrome or ischemic stroke [26]. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis, assessed by CIMT and CCS, in patients with MASLD, independent of other common cardiometabolic risk factors [27]. These findings were reported in both Western and Asian populations [27]. Bhatia et al. showed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that reducing the severity of hepatic steatosis correlates with the attenuation of CIMT progression, a validated and widely accepted screening tool for cardiovascular risk assessment [28]. Another study demonstrated a direct proportional relationship between the reduction in fatty liver index (FLI) and improvements in both CIMT and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) [29].
There is now clear evidence linking MASLD to a series of structural and functional cardiac abnormalities, both in the presence and absence of other features of metabolic syndrome [12]. Most studies have reported a significant association between MASLD and structural and functional alterations of the left ventricle, including left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction [30,31,32,33]. Gohil et al. recently reported a significant association between MASLD and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, emphasizing its higher prevalence among non-obese MASLD patients [33]. These findings are consistent with those of Cong et al., who observed a higher prevalence of an E/A ratio < 1 in non-obese MASLD patients in a cross-sectional study [32]. Another recent study demonstrated a direct proportional relationship between the severity of hepatic steatosis and the severity of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, even after adjusting for potential confounding factors [34]. The CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study highlighted an association between MASLD and an increased incidence of abnormal left ventricular geometry, left ventricular hypertrophy, and worsening myocardial strain, independent of traditional heart failure risk factors or changes in BMI [35]. This study also identified MASLD as a risk factor for long-term left ventricular remodeling [35]. These findings are further supported by Hung et al., who demonstrated a direct proportional relationship between MASLD severity and the incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and abnormal QTc intervals [36]. They advocate for regular electrocardiographic and echocardiographic evaluations in MASLD patients to enable the early detection of arrhythmias or left ventricular hypertrophy [36].
Aortic valve sclerosis and mitral annular calcification are identified in over 20% of adults aged 65 years and older [37]. However, patients with MASLD have a 32% higher risk of being diagnosed with aortic valve sclerosis compared to those without MASLD [38]. Mantovani et al. reported that MASLD is an independent predictor for mitral and aortic valve calcification in patients with diabetes mellitus [39]. The pathogenic mechanisms involved include oxidative stress and a proinflammatory state [40]. Oxidized dicarboxylic acids (derived from medium-chain lipid peroxides) can bind to calcium and induce calcification in smooth muscle cells [40].
Structural and functional cardiac abnormalities ultimately lead to chronic heart failure [41,42,43]. MASLD is associated with a 1.5-fold higher risk of developing heart failure, independent of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and other common cardiovascular risk factors [42]. Additionally, these patients are predisposed to progression towards heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [41]. Furthermore, a recent study reported a direct proportional relationship between MASLD severity and unfavorable outcomes in patients hospitalized for decompensated HFpEF episodes [44].
Patients with MASLD have an increased risk of developing arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disorders [45,46,47]. The most prevalent among these are atrial fibrillation, prolonged QT interval, and atrioventricular blocks [45,46,47]. A meta-analysis involving 364,919 MASLD patients reported a correlation between MASLD and an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with coexisting diabetes mellitus [48]. Markus et al. demonstrated a relationship between moderate elevations in liver enzymes and an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation [49]. The proposed pathogenic mechanisms for this association include elevated levels of proinflammatory, pro-coagulant, and pro-fibrinogenic factors, which induce structural and electrical remodeling of the atria [49]. Additionally, Mantovani suggested that hyperuricemia might play a role in the link between MASLD and atrial fibrillation [48]. Mahfouz et al. proposed that the increased thickness of the interatrial septum and the left atrial stiffness index could explain the higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation in MASLD patients [50]. There is also evidence supporting the role of epicardial and pericardial adipose tissue expansion in the development of cardiac arrhythmias in MASLD patients [51].
Regarding the relationship between MASLD and atrioventricular blocks or fascicular blocks, it has been shown to be bidirectional [8]. On the one hand, MASLD increases the risk of cardiac block approximately threefold, independent of other common risk factors. On the other hand, young patients with a newly diagnosed right bundle branch block, without other cardiac pathology, have an increased risk of also having MASLD [52,53]. Additionally, there is a direct proportional correlation between the severity of MASLD and the risk of a prolonged QTc interval in the general population, independent of coexisting diabetes mellitus [54,55,56].

3. Pathophysiology of MASLD and Cardiovascular Diseases

The pathogenic mechanisms underlying the complex relationship between MASLD and cardiovascular diseases remain incompletely elucidated. These mechanisms include visceral adiposity, low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, postprandial hyperlipidemia, intestinal dysbiosis, and genetic mutations (Figure 2) [8].

3.1. Visceral Adiposity

Obesity is a common risk factor for both MASLD and cardiovascular diseases. Recent studies indicate that the global prevalence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) in adults of normal weight varies between 3% and 30% [57,58]. Furthermore, normal-weight individuals with SLD exhibit a cardiovascular disease risk comparable to that of obese individuals with SLD [57]. Data from recent decades suggest that central obesity is more closely associated with metabolic disorders than an increased BMI [59]. Thus, individuals with central adipose tissue deposition but a normal BMI represent a highly susceptible subgroup for developing metabolic abnormalities, particularly MASLD [59].
Visceral adipose tissue functions as an endocrine organ, secreting hormones, adipokines, and cytokines that play a role in the development of insulin resistance and chronic inflammation [60]. Abdominal adiposity is associated with adiposopathy, characterized by enlarged, predominantly dysfunctional adipocytes and a hyperlipolytic state, exposing the liver to high concentrations of free fatty acids (FFA) and glycerol [59]. Numerous studies have reported that the release of FFA from visceral adipose tissue is more significant than total body fat content in the development and progression of MASLD [59].
These changes lead to several disruptions in the hepatic metabolism, such as an exacerbation of hyperinsulinemia and increased triglyceride production [61]. Additionally, hepatic fat accumulation has several pathological consequences, including the generation of cytotoxic lipid species, inflammasome activation, and oxidative stress [62,63,64].
MASLD is associated with ectopic fat deposition in other structures, such as the epicardium and pericardium [8]. Under physiological conditions, epicardial adipose tissue has important functions for the myocardium, including thermogenic, mechanical, and metabolic support [65]. Additionally, perivascular fat exhibits vasoactive properties [66]. However, excess epicardial adipose tissue leads to myocardial tissue hypertrophy, fibrosis, and reduced adiponectin synthesis because of the increased release of inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin 1-β [67]. The Framingham Heart Study identifies epicardial adipose tissue as an independent cardiovascular risk factor [68]. Furthermore, pericardial fat volume has been shown to correlate with the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and serves as an independent risk factor for major cardiovascular events [69,70]. Lipid deposition in cardiomyocytes (myocardial steatosis) contributes locally to myocardial dysfunction, while fat surrounding the renal arteries is associated with poor blood pressure control and progression to chronic kidney disease [71,72,73,74].
Visceral adipose tissue secretes numerous adipokines, including leptin, omentin, adiponectin, visfatin, resistin, and apelin (Table 2) [75]. An elevation in BMI is associated with hyperleptinemia and leptin resistance, leading to reduced energy consumption, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperlipidemia [76,77]. Additionally, visceral adipose tissue volume is correlated with serum leptin levels, which serve as a predictive marker for cardiovascular risk [78]. Visceral fat accumulation is correlated with reduced plasma levels of adiponectin, which subsequently impairs fatty acid oxidation and disrupts the body’s energy homeostasis [79,80,81,82]. Unlike other adipokines, which are abundant in both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, adiponectin is primarily produced by adipose tissue in the bone marrow [82]. Low levels of adiponectin are associated with chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity [83]. Omentin enhances insulin action without affecting basal glucose transport [84]. Other adipokines with protective effects include vaspin, which inhibits reactive oxygen species, and apelin, which promotes cholesterol efflux [85]. All these adipokines have reduced serum levels in overweight patients [84,85].

3.2. Low-Grade Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

Patients with MASLD exhibit a low-grade inflammatory syndrome, primarily explained by the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines from adipose tissue and intestinal dysbiosis characteristic of these patients [86]. A recent study demonstrated that macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1) induces a proinflammatory response through the c-Jun N-terminal Kinases (JNK) signaling pathway in mice fed a high-fat and high-cholesterol diet [87]. This response is characterized by increased production of proinflammatory and proatherogenic cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), both involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases [87]. Another study showed that IL-6 deletion attenuates left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction, highlighting the essential role of this cytokine in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [88]. IL-6 activates the Janus Kinase/signal transducers and activators of the transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling cascade and regulates the transcription of acute-phase reactants such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA), which further amplify the hepatic inflammatory response [89]. Moreover, serum levels of IL-6 and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) have been independently associated with cardiovascular disease risk [90,91,92]. Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-alpha and IL-6, correlate with the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis by promoting endothelial dysfunction, plaque instability, and endothelial wall damage [89].
A diet rich in lipids and carbohydrates alters the composition of gut microbiota, increasing lipopolysaccharide production and activating proinflammatory pathways [93]. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotic and prebiotic therapy can improve inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and liver injury in patients with MASLD by enhancing the intestinal barrier, preventing the formation of hepatotoxic metabolites, and modulating the immune system [94].
The secretion of micro ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) is altered in patients with MASLD compared to healthy individuals. The steatotic liver increases the release of hepatocyte-derived extracellular vesicles containing miRNAs with proinflammatory and proatherosclerotic roles [86]. These include miRNA-30a-3p, which promotes atherosclerosis by inhibiting ABC1-mediated cholesterol efflux, and miRNA-1, which induces endothelial inflammation by activating the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) signaling pathway [95,96].
Other pathogenic hypotheses highlight the proinflammatory role of specific macrophage populations found in the liver [97]. Elevated levels of FFAs and triglycerides lead to increased lipid oxidation, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lipotoxicity, resulting in cellular injury [98]. These processes trigger the release of cytokines and the activation of Kupffer cells, a subset of hepatic macrophages that recruit monocytes and other immune cells from the bloodstream, thereby exacerbating the inflammatory process [98]. Oxidative stress is closely linked to the pathophysiology of MASLD and cardiovascular diseases [99]. Excess fat accumulation in the liver leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased production of ROS, promoting inflammation and fibrosis [99]. This process can exacerbate insulin resistance, a hallmark of MASLD [99]. Moreover, patients with MASLD exhibit reduced levels of glutathione, an antioxidant primarily produced in the liver [100]. Decreased hepatic glutathione levels can impair the redox state not only in the liver but also in the heart and other organs [100]. Oxidative stress promotes atherosclerosis and may impair cardiovascular function, contributing to the development of hypertension, myocardial infarction, and heart failure [101]. Lee et al. demonstrated that oxidative stress correlates with a higher incidence of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [102].

3.3. Endothelial Dysfunction

Endothelial dysfunction is the initial stage of the atherosclerotic process, and plays a critical role in the progression of cardiovascular diseases [103]. It results from the interplay between oxidative stress, vascular inflammation (stimulated by lipoproteins such as apolipoprotein C3), and selective insulin resistance at the vascular level [103]. A key feature of endothelial dysfunction is the reduction in serum nitric oxide levels, a substance with vasodilatory properties [103]. This reduction leads to vasoconstriction, increased vascular resistance, and elevated blood pressure [103].
Patients with MASLD exhibit elevated levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), a natural antagonist of nitric oxide synthesis [104]. Increased ADMA levels are attributed to oxidative stress, a proinflammatory state, and enhanced methylation in the liver [105]. Additionally, these patients often present with hyperhomocysteinemia, which further reduces nitric oxide production [106]. Hyperhomocysteinemia also contributes to oxidative stress and increased platelet activation [107]. Beyond the reduction in nitric oxide levels, the heightened vasoconstriction observed in patients with MASLD can also be explained by elevated levels of endothelin-1, induced by the proinflammatory state and oxidative stress (Figure 3) [108].
The phenotypic changes induced by endothelial dysfunction include an increased expression of cell adhesion molecules, elevated chemokine secretion, increased cell permeability, oxidation of low-density lipoproteins, platelet activation, and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells [106].

3.4. Insulin Resistance

Under physiological conditions, insulin promotes glucose absorption by tissues and its conversion into glycogen, while simultaneously suppressing hepatic glucose synthesis. Insulin resistance, a central feature of MASLD, is characterized by impaired mechanisms of glucose homeostasis regulation mediated by this hormone [109].
Insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle reduces glycogen synthesis and increases de novo hepatic lipogenesis and triglyceride synthesis [110,111]. These processes lead to the development of atherogenic dyslipidemia, even in normal weight individuals [86]. Increased de novo lipogenesis results in the accumulation of diacylglycerols (intermediates in the biosynthesis of triacylglycerols) in the liver [112]. Elevated diacylglycerol levels lead to the translocation of protein kinase Cε (PKCε) to the plasma membrane, where it interacts with the kinase domain of the insulin receptor, thereby inhibiting the phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS-2) [112]. The result is a reduced insulin response, accompanied by increased plasma glucose and insulin levels [113]. Insulin also activates enzymes involved in fatty acid synthesis, further promoting de novo hepatic lipogenesis and triglyceride synthesis [114]. Under normal conditions, the liver synthesizes triglycerides from FFAs and packages them into very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles for storage or export [115]. Insulin resistance disrupts this process, leading to lipid accumulation in hepatocytes and exacerbating hepatic steatosis [115]. Additionally, lipid imbalance promotes the development of atherosclerosis, significantly increasing cardiovascular risk [115,116,117]. Conversely, chronic hyperglycemia induces oxidative stress and promotes a persistent inflammatory response [116].
The correlation between cell membrane composition and insulin resistance is a key factor in the pathogenesis of MASLD and cardiovascular diseases [118]. Alterations in the lipid composition of cell membranes, characterized by the accumulation of saturated fatty acids and cholesterol, are associated with an increased synthesis of proinflammatory factors such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), adhesion molecules, and C-reactive protein [119]. These changes contribute to cell membrane stiffness, leading to a reduction in the number of insulin receptors and their affinity for insulin [118]. Future studies are needed to identify mechanisms that could reduce cell membrane stiffness, improve cell membrane fluidity, and subsequently enhance the number of insulin receptors and their affinity for insulin.
Colantoni et al. demonstrated in a recent study that the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) tests have the highest accuracy in detecting MASLD [120]. The same authors suggested the utility of insulin resistance markers for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with MASLD [120]. A major implication of hepatic insulin resistance is its connection to vascular insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction [121].
Since MASLD is considered a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, it is closely associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [122]. A recent meta-analysis including nearly 2 million patients reported a MASLD prevalence of 65.04% among individuals with T2DM [123]. On the other hand, the presence of hepatic fibrosis is associated with a 2.95-fold increased risk of developing T2DM and is considered an independent predictor of the condition. The pathogenic mechanisms of MASLD and T2DM are complex, with insulin resistance being recognized as a central factor in the development of both diseases [122].

3.5. Dyslipidemia and Postprandial Hyperlipemia

A key feature of MASLD is the disruption of lipid metabolism homeostasis [124]. This includes:
  • Increased hepatic fatty acid uptake;
  • Suppressed fatty acid oxidation;
  • De novo lipogenesis;
  • Increased secretion of very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL);
  • Reduced secretion of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) [124].
In the liver, fatty acids undergo either oxidation or esterification to form triglycerides, which are stored or exported into the circulation as VLDL particles [125]. Hepatic steatosis occurs when the rate of triglyceride synthesis exceeds their elimination into the circulation [125]. This imbalance can result from excessive dietary intake or increased de novo lipogenesis [125].
Dyslipidemia is a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) particles can penetrate the endothelium, where they undergo oxidation and trigger inflammatory pathways essential for the development of atherosclerotic plaques [126]. Oxidized LDL-c is involved in endothelial dysfunction, foam cell formation (through macrophage absorption of LDL-c), monocyte chemotaxis, smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, and platelet activation. These processes collectively culminate in plaque instability and rupture (Figure 4) [126,127,128].
Postprandial hyperlipemia is defined as a postprandial increase in serum triglyceride levels, a process involved in the pathogenesis of postprandial atherosclerotic disease [129,130]. Elevated serum triglycerides levels reflect an increase in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGLs) such as chylomicrons and VLDL [129]. These biological changes are observed in patients with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, familial combined hyperlipidemia, or familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia [129,131,132].
Postprandial hyperlipemia is closely associated with postprandial hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance can induce or exacerbate both conditions [129]. TGLs stimulate monocyte migration and adhesion to endothelial cells [129]. They also contribute to inflammatory syndrome, platelet activation, and endothelial dysfunction by activating transcription factors like NF-kB in endothelial cells and monocytes [129]. In dysfunctional endothelial cells, the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) increases, reducing fibrinolysis and promoting a prothrombotic state [129,133]. TGLs also stimulate the formation of NAD(P)H oxidase-dependent superoxide via the activation of the lectin-like oxidized LDL-c receptor-1. This results in the oxidation of LDL-c within the endothelium, driving atherosclerosis development (Figure 5) [129].

3.6. Gut Dysbiosis

Recent research has revealed complex connections between gut dysbiosis, MASLD, and cardiovascular risk [134]. Gut dysbiosis contributes to the development and progression of MASLD through the dysregulation of the gut–liver axis, comprising systemic circulation, portal circulation, and bile ducts [134]. This leads to increased intestinal permeability and translocation of microbial metabolites to the liver, causing secondary inflammation [134].
The gut microbiota also influences bile acid composition (via the enterohepatic circulation), lipid and glucose metabolism, and energy balance [135,136]. Intestinal microorganisms convert undigested polysaccharides into monosaccharides and dietary fibers into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), both of which provide energy support for host cells [137]. SCFAs play a role in regulating energy metabolism and the immune system [137]. They also promote colonic motility, protect the intestinal mucosal barrier, regulate carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and improve the absorption of electrolytes and nutrients. At the same time, SCFAs exhibit anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities [137].
Systemic inflammation secondary to the translocation of microbial metabolites into the systemic circulation can promote endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis, thereby increasing cardiovascular risk [138]. Intestinal bacteria also convert dietary choline and L-carnitine into trimethylamine (TMA) [139]. TMA is subsequently metabolized in the liver into trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), which contributes to endothelial dysfunction by modulating the levels of vasoregulatory substances (including nitric oxide) and cellular adhesion molecules [139]. In a multicenter study, Li et al. demonstrated that elevated plasma TMAO levels in patients with acute coronary syndromes could predict 7-year mortality and the risk of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months [140].
Indoxyl sulfate, another intestinal metabolite, has been shown to exert proinflammatory and pro-oxidative effects, influencing blood pressure values [141]. Simultaneously, specific microbial profiles and intestinal metabolites, such as SCFAs, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), bile acids, choline, and TMA, have been correlated with liver disease severity and the stage of hepatic fibrosis [142].
Splanchnic circulation congestion, intestinal wall edema, and increased intestinal permeability facilitate the translocation of bacteria and their metabolites into systemic circulation, thereby exacerbating the proinflammatory state associated with cardiovascular diseases [137].
Among the specific effects of SCFAs on the cardiovascular system are the regulation of gut barrier integrity with anti-inflammatory effects, the modulation of lipid metabolism, and influence on insulin sensitivity [143,144]. For instance, butyrate and propionate can reduce blood pressure and ameliorate ischemia/reperfusion injuries, thereby decreasing the risk of coronary artery disease. Additionally, acetate may play a positive role in regulating hypertension and preventing atherosclerosis [143]. These SCFAs have been shown to have significantly lower levels in patients with MASLD, potentially contributing to the development of this condition and, subsequently, to an increased cardiovascular risk [144].

3.7. Genetic Mutations

Certain genetic mutations are associated with both MASLD and cardiovascular diseases, representing potential pathogenic components mediating both conditions [145]. The genes implicated in this pathogenic link encode the synthesis of the following biomolecules:
  • Apolipoprotein C-3 (APOC3);
  • Apolipoprotein E (APOE);
  • Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1);
  • Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT);
  • Tribbles homolog 1 protein (TRIB1 gene);
  • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha);
  • Interleukin 6 (IL-6);
  • Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3);
  • Transmembrane 6 superfamily 2 (TM6SF2);
  • Glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR) [145].
APOC3 is a key regulator of plasma triglyceride levels [146]. It reduces lipoprotein lipase activity and inhibits triglyceride hydrolysis in VLDL and chylomicrons, thereby increasing plasma triglyceride levels and cardiovascular risk [146]. The genetic variants C482T and T455C are associated with a 30% higher serum APOC3 level and a 60% higher serum triglyceride level, respectively [147]. Additionally, 38% of carriers of these genetic variants are diagnosed with MASLD [147].
APOE facilitates the clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins from the bloodstream [99]. It also influences vascular function through mechanisms such as the inflammatory response and platelet aggregation [148]. The prevalence of the APOE ε3 allele has been found to be increased in patients with MASLD [149]. Conversely, the APOE ε2 allele has a protective role against MASLD and exerts a hypolipidemic effect, being associated with lower LDL-c levels and higher HDL-c levels [150,151]. In contrast, the APOE ε4 allele has been shown to increase cardiovascular risk by elevating carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) as well as serum levels of LDL-c, lipoprotein(a), and apolipoprotein B [152,153,154].
PEMT catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidylethanolamine to phosphatidylcholine, a key component in VLDL synthesis [155]. The V175Met mutation is associated with reduced PEMT activity, an increased risk of progression to MASH, and lower levels of cardioprotective lipids such as LPC 16:0 and LPC 20:4 [156].
The genetic polymorphism of IRS-1 leads to reduced IRS-1 expression, resulting in an increased visceral fat-to-subcutaneous fat ratio, insulin resistance, hyperlipemia, and decreased adiponectin levels [153]. The final outcome is increased cardiovascular risk [153]. Additionally, Gly972Arg polymorphism is associated with impaired insulin receptor activity and increased MASLD severity [154].
TRIB1 reduces plasma triglycerides levels and is involved in maintaining the balance of phagocytosis, M2 macrophage differentiation, and inhibition of inflammatory chemotaxis [157]. The TRIB1 rs2954021 allele has been associated with elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) levels and an increased likelihood of a MASLD diagnosis [157]. The same allele has also been linked to an elevated risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke [158].
The PNPLA3 rs738409G allele encodes the PNPLA3 protein, which reduces triglyceride hydrolysis and VLDL production, thereby lowering cardiovascular risk [159]. However, the inhibition of PNPLA3 increases the risk of major cardiovascular diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction or heart failure [159].
The TM6SF2 E167K genetic variant has been associated with hepatic triglyceride content and cardiovascular risk [160]. Recent studies have highlighted the role of TM6SF2 in promoting steatosis, hepatic fibrosis, and hepatocarcinogenesis [161,162]. Surprisingly, however, the TM6SF2 E167K variant has demonstrated a cardioprotective effect, primarily attributed to lower triglyceride and LDL-c levels [163]. Additionally, MASLD patients carrying the TM6SF2 E167K variant have shown lower serum levels of CRP, a validated biomarker for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [164].
GCKR is involved in regulating glucose metabolism and de novo lipogenesis [165]. The rs1260326-T variant is associated with increased plasma levels of apolipoprotein B and a higher risk of MASLD [166]. Similarly, the rs789904-T variant is linked to hepatic steatosis and an increased cardiovascular risk because of elevated serum levels of triacylglycerols and VLDL, along with reduced HDL-c levels [166].

3.8. Prothrombotic State

The predominant vascular complications in patients with MASLD are arterial ischemic events [167]. Insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipemia play crucial roles in their development [167]. Additionally, patients with MASLD have been shown to be at a higher risk of venous thromboembolism, driven by hypercoagulability and reduced fibrinolysis [167]. The key factors linking MASLD to venous thromboembolism include elevated levels of factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and PAI-1 (Figure 6) [167].
PAI-1 levels do not seem to correlate with total body fat mass; instead, they are associated with hepatic lipid accumulation [168]. Additionally, inflammation, as evidenced by elevated CRP levels, promotes PAI-1 activity and enhances monocyte–endothelium interactions [168]. Furthermore, inflammation is associated with reduced levels of antithrombin, a natural anticoagulant [168]. Endothelial cells actively contribute to the inflammatory and procoagulant state by producing several molecules, including von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, and fibrinogen [17]. The levels of these molecules are significantly higher in patients with MASLD, serving as predictive factors for both arterial and venous thrombosis [18].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, MASLD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, independent of other traditional risk factors. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying this correlation are complex but remain incompletely elucidated. Given the high rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among these patients, future studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms leading to increased cardiovascular risk in MASLD. Such research could facilitate the development of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for these patients and the identification of new therapeutic targets. Additionally, we emphasize the need for informational campaigns aimed at raising awareness about the necessity of cardiovascular screening in patients with MASLD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.A.I. and G.G.; methodology, V.A.I. and N.B.; software, V.A.I.; validation, C.C.D.; formal analysis, V.A.I. and N.B.; investigation, G.G.; resources, V.A.I.; data curation, V.A.I.; writing—original draft preparation, V.A.I. and G.G.; writing—review and editing, C.C.D.; visualization, C.C.D.; supervision, C.C.D.; project administration, C.C.D.; funding acquisition, C.C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). J. Hepatol. 2024, 81, 492–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Younossi, Z.M.; Golabi, P.; Paik, J.; Henry, A.; Van Dongen, C.; Henry, L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): A systematic review. Hepatology 2023, 77, 1335–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Younossi, Z.M.; Stepanova, M.; Ong, J.; Trimble, G.; AlQahtani, S.; Younossi, I.; Ahmed, A.; Racila, A.; Henry, L. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 580–589.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Burra, P.; Becchetti, C.; Germani, G. NAFLD and liver transplantation: Disease burden, current management and future challenges. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Battistella, S.; D’Arcangelo, F.; Grasso, M.; Zanetto, A.; Gambato, M.; Germani, G.; Senzolo, M.; Russo, F.P.; Burra, P. Liver transplantation for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Indications and post-transplant management. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2022, 29, S286–S301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ionescu, V.A.; Diaconu, C.; Bungau, S.G.; Jinga, V.; Gheorghe, G. Current Approaches in the Allocation of Liver Transplantation. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Peltec, A.I.; Hotineanu, A.V.; Popescu, I.; Brasoveanu, V.S. Donor safety in living donor liver transplantation: Experience of two medical centres from Romania and Republic of Moldova. Arch. Balk. Med. Union 2023, 58, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ismaiel, A.; Dumitrascu, D.L. Cardiovascular Risk in Fatty Liver Disease: The Liver-Heart Axis-Literature Review. Front. Med. 2019, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Miao, L.; Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D.; Cao, Y.Y.; Zheng, M.H. Current status and future trends of the global burden of MASLD. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2024, 35, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Platek, A.E.; Szymanska, A. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease as a cardiovascular risk factor. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2023, 9, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D.; Tilg, H. MASLD: A systemic metabolic disorder with cardiovascular and malignant complications. Gut 2024, 73, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duell, P.B.; Welty, F.K.; Miller, M.; Chait, A.; Hammond, G.; Ahmad, Z.; Cohen, D.E.; Horton, J.D.; Pressman, G.S.; Toth, P.P.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2022, 42, e168–e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Younossi, Z.M.; Blissett, D.; Blissett, R.; Henry, L.; Stepanova, M.; Younossi, Y.; Racila, A.; Hunt, S.; Beckerman, R. The economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and Europe. Hepatology 2016, 64, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mehta, A.; Pandey, A.; Ayers, C.R.; Khera, A.; Sperling, L.S.; Szklo, M.; Gottesman, R.F.; Budoff, M.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Blumenthal, R.S.; et al. Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score Categories for Coronary Events Versus Strokes: Impact of Sex and Race: MESA and DHS. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, e010153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xuan, Y.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Z.; Yu, J.; Zhou, D. Elevated ALT/AST ratio as a marker for NAFLD risk and severity: Insights from a cross-sectional analysis in the United States. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1457598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pouwels, S.; Sakran, N.; Graham, Y.; Leal, A.; Pintar, T.; Yang, W.; Kassir, R.; Singhal, R.; Mahawar, K.; Ramnarain, D. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A review of pathophysiology, clinical management and effects of weight loss. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.C.; Hsu, W.C.; Wu, H.M.; Wang, J.Y.; Yang, P.Y.; Lin, I.C. Association between the Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Risk of Coronary Artery Calcification. Medicina 2021, 57, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Almoudi, M.; Sun, Z. Coronary artery calcium score: Re-evaluation of its predictive value for coronary artery disease. World J. Cardiol. 2012, 4, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kang, M.K.; Song, J.E.; Loomba, R.; Park, S.Y.; Tak, W.Y.; Kweon, Y.O.; Lee, Y.R.; Park, J.G. Comparative associations of MASLD and MAFLD with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcification. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vega, L.; Simian, D.; Gajardo, A.I.; Salinas, M.; Urra, A.; Cattaneo, M.; Pino, R.; Roblero, J.P.; Urzua, A.; Rojas, K.; et al. Coronary artery disease as a risk factor for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and liver fibrosis. Ann. Hepatol. 2024, 29, 101511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fu, C.E.; Ng, C.H.; Yong, J.N.; Chan, K.E.; Xiao, J.; Nah, B.; Bong, S.H.S.; Win, K.M.; Bwa, A.H.; Lim, W.H.; et al. A Meta-analysis on Associated Risk of Mortality in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Endocr. Pract. 2023, 29, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jamalinia, M.; Zare, F.; Lankarani, K.B. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Association between liver fibrosis and subclinical atherosclerosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 58, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bisaccia, G.; Ricci, F.; Khanji, M.Y.; Sorella, A.; Melchiorre, E.; Iannetti, G.; Galanti, K.; Mantini, C.; Pizzi, A.D.; Tana, C.; et al. Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Related to Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2023, 48, 101643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arslan, U.; Yenercag, M. Relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary heart disease. World. J. Clin. Cases 2020, 8, 4688–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arslan, U.; Kocaoğlu, I.; Balcı, M.; Duyuler, S.; Korkmaz, A. The association between impaired collateral circulation and non-alcoholic fatty liver in patients with severe coronary artery disease. J. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pais, R.; Giral, P.; Khan, J.F.; Rosenbaum, D.; Housset, C.; Poynard, T.; Ratziu, V.; LIDO Study Group. Fatty liver is an independent predictor of early carotid atherosclerosis. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wong, M.Y.Z.; Yap, J.J.L.; Sultana, R.; Cheah, M.; Goh, G.B.B.; Yeo, K.K. Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and subclinical atherosclerosis in Western and Asian cohorts: An updated meta-analysis. Open Heart 2021, 8, e001850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhatia, L.; Scorletti, E.; Curzen, N.; Clough, G.F.; Calder, P.C.; Byrne, C.D. Improvement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity is associated with a reduction in carotid intima-media thickness progression. Atherosclerosis 2016, 246, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Castellino, G.; Nikolic, D.; Magan-Fernandez, A.; Malfa, A.G.; Chianetta, R.; Patti, A.M.; Amato, A.; Montalto, G.; Toth, P.P.; Banach, M.; et al. Altilix® Supplement Containing Chlorogenic Acid and Luteolin Improved Hepatic and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome: A 6 Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Braha, A.; Timar, B.; Ivan, V.; Balica, M.M.; Daniluc, L.; Timar, R. Novel Biomarkers of Grade I Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Catena, C.; Brosolo, G.; Da Porto, A.; Donnini, D.; Bulfone, L.; Vacca, A.; Soardo, G.; Sechi, L.A. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with left ventricular changes in treatment-naive patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 1030968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cong, F.; Zhu, L.; Deng, L.; Xue, Q.; Wang, J. Correlation between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in non-obese adults: A cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023, 23, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gohil, N.V.; Tanveer, N.; Makkena, V.K.; Jaramillo, A.P.; Awosusi, B.L.; Ayyub, J.; Dabhi, K.N.; Nath, T.S. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Association with Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e43013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jung, J.Y.; Park, S.K.; Ryoo, J.H.; Oh, C.M.; Kang, J.G.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, J.M. Effect of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on left ventricular diastolic function and geometry in the Korean general population. Hepatol. Res. 2017, 47, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. VanWagner, L.B.; Wilcox, J.E.; Ning, H.; Lewis, C.E.; Carr, J.J.; Rinella, M.E.; Shah, S.J.; Lima, J.A.C.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M. Longitudinal Association of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Changes in Myocardial Structure and Function: The CARDIA Study. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2020, 9, e014279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hung, W.C.; Yu, T.H.; Wu, C.C.; Lee, T.L.; Tang, W.H.; Chen, C.C.; Lu, I.C.; Chung, F.M.; Lee, Y.J.; Hsu, C.C. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Related to Abnormal Corrected QT Interval and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Chinese Male Steelworkers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 14555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barasch, E.; Gottdiener, J.G.; Tressel, W.; Bartz, T.M.; Buzkova, P.; Massera, D.; deFilippi, C.; Biggs, M.L.; Psaty, B.M.; Kizer, J.R.; et al. The Associations of Aortic Valve Sclerosis, Aortic Annular Increased Reflectivity, and Mitral Annular Calcification with Subsequent Aortic Stenosis in Older Individuals: Findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2023, 36, 41–49.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Markus, M.R.P.; Baumeister, S.E.; Stritzke, J.; Dorr, M.; Wallaschofski, H.; Volzke, H.; Lieb, W. Hepatic steatosis is associated with aortic valve sclerosis in the general population: The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 1690–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mantovani, A.; Pernigo, M.; Bergamini, C.; Bonapace, S.; Lipari, P.; Valbusa, F.; Bertolini, L.; Zenari, L.; Pichiri, I.; Dauriz, M.; et al. Heart valve calcification in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism 2015, 64, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, R.R.; Gao, X.P.; Liao, M.Q.; Cui, Y.F.; Tan, S.X.; Zeng, F.F.; Lou, Y.M.; Wang, C.Y.; Xu, S.; Peng, X.L.; et al. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Associated with Aortic Calcification: A Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 880683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fudim, M.; Zhong, L.; Patel, K.V.; Khera, R.; Abdelmalek, M.F.; Diehl, A.M.; McGarrah, R.W.; Molinger, J.; Moylan, C.A.; Rao, V.N.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk of Heart Failure Among Medicare Beneficiaries. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e021654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mantovani, A.; Petracca, G.; Csermely, A.; Beatrice, G.; Bonapace, S.; Rossi, A.; Tilg, H.; Byrne, C.D.; Targher, G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of new-onset heart failure: An updated meta-analysis of about 11 million individuals. Gut 2023, 72, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Inciardi, R.M.; Mantovani, A.; Targher, G. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as an Emerging Risk Factor for Heart Failure. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2023, 20, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yoshihisa, A.; Sato, Y.; Yokokawa, T.; Sato, T.; Suzuki, S.; Oikawa, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Yamaki, T.; Kunii, H.; Nakazato, K.; et al. Liver fibrosis score predicts mortality in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2018, 5, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gong, H.; Liu, X.; Cheng, F. Relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiac arrhythmia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. K. Int. Med. Res. 2021, 49, 03000605211047074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Donnellan, E.; Cotter, T.G.; Wazni, O.M.; Elshazly, M.B.; Kochar, A.; Wilner, B.; Patel, D.; Kanj, M.; Hussein, A.; Baranowski, B.; et al. Impact of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on Arrhythmia Recurrence Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. JACC: Clin. Electrophysiol. 2020, 6, 1278–1287. [Google Scholar]
  47. Anstee, Q.M.; Mantovani, A.; Tilg, H.; Targher, G. Risk of cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 15, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mantovani, A.; Dauriz, M.; Sandri, D.; Bonapace, S.; Zoppini, G.; Tilg, H.; Byrne, C.D.; Targher, G. Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of atrial fibrillation in adult individuals: An updated meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 758–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Markus, M.R.; Meffert, P.J.; Baumeister, S.E.; Lieb, W.; Siewert, U.; Schipf, S.; Koch, M.; Kors, J.A.; Felix, S.B.; Dorr, M.; et al. Association between hepatic steatosis and serum liver enzyme levels with atrial fibrillation in the general population: The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Atherosclerosis 2016, 245, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mahfouz, R.A.; Gouda, M.; Galal, I.; Ghareb, M.S. Interatrial septal fat thickness and left atrial stiffness are mechanistic links between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incident atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography 2019, 36, 2490256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.J.; She, Z.G.; Lu, Z.; Cai, J.; Li, H. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Emerging Driver of Cardiac Arrhythmia. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1747–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mantovani, A.; Rigolon, R.; Pichiri, I.; Bonapace, S.; Morani, G.; Zoppini, G.; Bonora, E.; Targher, G. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with an increased risk of heart block in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Iscen, S. RBBB is associated with an increased risk of NAFLD in young healthy individuals. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 4056–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Naderi, A.; Farjam, M.; Mojarrad, S.; Abdollahi, A.; Alkamel, A.; Keshavarzian, O.; Tabrizi, R. The association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and corrected QT interval prolongation among generally healthy Iranian population: Fasa Cohort Study (FACS). Clin. Cardiol. 2023, 46, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huang, C.S.; Tseng, P.H.; Tu, C.H.; Chen, C.C.; Liao, W.C.; Lee, Y.C.; Chiu, H.M.; Lin, H.J.; Ho, Y.L.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Associated with QT Prolongation in the General Population. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015, 4, e001820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gheorghe, G.; Pantea Stoian, A.; Gaman, M.A.; Socea, B.; Neagu, T.P.; Stanescu, A.M.A.; Bratu, O.G.; Mischianu, D.L.D.; Suceveanu, A.I.; Diaconu, C.C. The benefits and risks of antioxidant treatment in liver diseases. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, X.; You, J.; Tang, J.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, M.; Zheng, S. Interaction between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and obesity on the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, L.; Liu, D.W.; Yan, H.Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhao, S.H.; Wang, B. Obesity is an independent risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Evidence from a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bansal, S.; Vachher, M.; Arora, T.; Kumar, B.; Burman, A. Visceral fat: A key mediator of NAFLD development and progression. Human. Nutr. Metab. 2023, 33, 200210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tran, A.; Gual, P. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patients. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2013, 37, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Neeland, I.J.; Ross, R.; Despres, J.P.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Shai, I.; Seidell, J.; Magni, P.; Santos, R.D.; Arsenault, B.; et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: A position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jomova, K.; Raptova, R.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Chronic diseases and aging. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 2499–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Arroyave-Ospina, J.C.; Wu, Z.; Geng, Y.; Moshage, H. Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Implications for Prevention and Therapy. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y. Mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: New insights from pathogenic mechanisms to clinically targeted therapy. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Iozzo, P. Myocardial, perivascular, and epicardial fat. Diabetes Care 2011, 34 (Suppl. S2), S371–S379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cesaro, A.; De Michele, G.; Fimiani, F.; Acerbo, V.; Scherillo, G.; Signore, G.; Rotolo, F.P.; Scialla, F.; Raucci, G.; Panico, D.; et al. Visceral adipose tissue and residual cardiovascular risk: A pathological link and new therapeutic options. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1187735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Packer, M. Epicardial adipose tissue may mediate deleterious effects of obesity and inflammation on the myocardium. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2360–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mahabadi, A.A.; Massaro, J.M.; Rosito, G.A.; Levy, D.; Murabito, J.M.; Wolf, P.A.; O’Donnell, C.J.; Fox, C.S.; Hoffmann, U. Association of pericardial fat, intrathoracic fat, and visceral abdominal fat with cardiovascular disease burden: The framingham heart study. Eur. Heart J. 2009, 30, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Guglielmi, V.; Sbraccia, P. Epicardial adipose tissue: At the heart of the obesity complications. Acta Diabetol. 2017, 54, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cheng, V.Y.; Dey, D.; Tamarappoo, B.; Nakazato, R.; Gransar, H.; Miranda-Peats, R.; Ramesh, A.; Wong, N.D.; Shaw, L.J.; Slomka, P.J.; et al. Pericardial fat burden on ECG-gated noncontrast CT in asymptomatic patients who subsequently experience adverse cardiovascular events. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 3, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McGavock, J.M.; Lingvay, I.; Zib, I.; Tillery, T.; Salas, N.; Unger, R.; Ramesh, A.; Wong, N.D.; Shaw, L.J.; Slomka, P.J.; et al. Cardiac steatosis in diabetes mellitus: A 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Circulation 2007, 116, 1170–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Foster, M.C.; Hwang, S.J.; Porter, S.A.; Massaro, J.M.; Hoffmann, U.; Fox, C.S. Fatty kidney, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease: The framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2011, 58, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaneko, K.; Mitsuno, R.; Kojima, D.; Azegami, T.; Kosugi, S.; Nakamura, T.; Hashiguchi, A.; Yamada, Y.; Jinzaki, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; et al. Renal sinus fat is associated with intrarenal hemodynamic abnormalities independent of visceral fat in patients with chronic kidney disease. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2024, 18, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fujioka, H.; Koike, T.; Imamura, T.; Kakeshita, K.; Yamazaki, H.; Kinugawa, K. Prognostic impact of renal sinus fat accumulation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2023, 27, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Qi, X.Y.; Qu, S.L.; Xiong, W.H.; Rom, O.; Chang, L.; Jiang, Z.S. Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) in atherosclerosis: A double-edged sword. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Myers, M.G.; Cowley, M.A.; Münzberg, H. Mechanisms of leptin action and leptin resistance. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2008, 70, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gheorghe, G.; Diaconu, C.C.; Mambet, C.; Bleotu, C.; Ionescu, V.A.; Diaconu, C.C. Comparative Analysis of Leptin and Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Related Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 Plasma Expression in Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis Patients. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Puurunen, V.P.; Kiviniemi, A.; Lepojarvi, S.; Piira, O.P.; Hedberg, P.; Juntila, J.; Ukkola, O.; Huikuri, H. Leptin predicts short-term major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Ann. Med. 2017, 49, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Qin, Z.; Yang, Q.; Yang, M.; Han, M.; Xiong, Y.; Liao, R.; Su, B. Serum leptin concentration can predict cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Clin. Chim. Acta 2021, 520, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kirichenki, T.V.; Markina, Y.V.; Bogatyreva, A.I.; Tolstik, T.V.; Varaeva, Y.R.; Starodubova, A.V. The role of adipokines in inflammatory mechanisms of obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Chait, A.; den Hartigh, L.J. Adipose Tissue Distribution, Inflammation and Its Metabolic Consequences, Including Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Clemente-Suarez, V.J.; Redondo-Florez, L.; Beltran-Velasco, A.I.; Martin-Rodriguez, A.; Martinez-Guardado, I.; Navarro-Jimenez, E.; Laborde-Cardenas, C.C.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. The Role of Adipokines in Health and Disease. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Schindler, M.; Pendzialek, M.; Grybel, K.J.; Seeling, T.; Gürke, J.; Fischer, B.; Navarrete Santos, A. Adiponectin Stimulates Lipid Metabolism via AMPK in Rabbit Blastocysts. Hum. Reprod. 2017, 32, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, R.Z.; Lee, M.J.; Hu, H.; Pray, J.; Wu, H.B.; Hansen, B.C.; Shuldiner, A.R.; Fried, S.K.; McLenithan, J.C.; Gong, D.-W. Identification of omentin as a novel depot-specific adipokine in human adipose tissue: Possible role in modulating insulin action. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 290, E1253–E1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jung, H.N.; Jung, C.H. The role of anti-inflammatory adipokines in cardiometabolic disordes: Moving beyond adiponectin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Minetti, E.T.; Hamburg, N.M.; Matsui, R. Drivers of cardiovascular disease in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: The threats of oxidative stress. Front. Cariovasc 2024, 11, 1469492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Govaere, O.; Petersen, S.K.; Martinez-Lopez, N.; Wouters, J.; Van Haele, M.; Mancina, R.M.; Jamialahmadi, O.; Bilkei-Gorzo, O.; Lassen, P.B.; Darlay, R.; et al. Macrophage scavenger receptor 1 mediates lipid-induced inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhao, L.; Cheng, G.; Jin, R.; Afzal, M.R.; Samanta, A.; Xuan, Y.T.; Girgis, M.; Elias, H.K.; Zhu, Y.; Davani, A.; et al. Deletion of interleukin-6 attenuates pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1918–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, H.; Sechi, L.A.; Navarese, E.P.; Casu, G.; Vidili, G. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and cardiovascular risk: A comprehensive review. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2024, 23, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Feng, Y.; Ye, D.; Wang, Z.; Pan, H.; Lu, X.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, M.; et al. The Role of Interleukin-6 Family Members in Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 818890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cederstrom, S.; Lundman, P.; Alfredsson, J.; Hagstrom, E.; Ravn-Fischer, A.; Soderberg, S.; Yndigegn, T.; Tornvall, P.; Jernberg, T. Association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and coronary atherosclerosis in a general middle-aged population. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 12171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Carrero, J.J.; Franko, M.A.; Obergfell, A.; Gabrielsen, A.; Jernberg, T. hsCRP Level and the Risk of Death or Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A Healthcare-Based Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e012638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lang, S.; Martin, A.; Zhang, X.; Farowski, F.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Vehreschild, M.J.G.T.; Krawczyk, M.; Nowag, A.; Kretzschmar, A.; Scholz, C.; et al. Combined analysis of gut microbiota, diet and PNPLA3 polymorphism in biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2021, 41, 1576–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Carpi, R.Z.; Barbalho, S.M.; Sloan, K.P.; Laurindo, L.F.; Gonzaga, H.F.; Grippa, P.C.; Zutin, T.L.M.; Girio, R.J.S.; Repetti, C.S.F.; Detregiachi, C.R.P.; et al. The effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in non-alcoholic fat liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chen, X.; Chen, S.; Pang, J.; Huang, R.; You, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, J.; Xue, H.; Ling, W. Hepatic steatosis aggravates atherosclerosis via small extracellular vesicle-mediated inhibition of cellular cholesterol efflux. J. Hepatol. 2023, 79, 1491–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jiang, F.; Chen, Q.; Wang, W.; Ling, Y.; Yan, Y.; Xia, P. Hepatocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promote endothelial inflammation and atherogenesis via microRNA-1. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tian, Y.; Ni, Y.; Zhang, T.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, C. Targeting hepatic macrophages for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease therapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 12, 1444198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Xu, G.X.; Wei, S.; Yu, C.; Zhao, S.Q.; Yang, W.J.; Feng, Y.H.; Pan, C.; Yang, K.X.; Ma, Y. Activation of Kupffer cells in NAFLD and NASH: Mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1199519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ma, Y.; Lee, G.; Heo, S.Y.; Roh, Y.S. Oxidative stress is a key modulator in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Antioxidants 2021, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Köroǧlu, E.; Canbakan, B.; Atay, K.; Hatemi, I.; Tuncer, M.; Dobrucali, A.; Sonsuz, A.; Gultepe, I.; Senturk, H. Role of oxidative stress and insulin resistance in disease severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 27, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Munzel, T.; Camici, G.G.; Maack, C.; Bonetti, N.R.; Fuster, V.; Kovacic, J.C. Impact of oxidative stress on the heart and vasculature: Part 2 of a 3-Part series. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lee, D.S.; Evans, J.C.; Robins, S.J.; Wilson, P.W.; Albano, I.; Fox, C.S.; Wang, T.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Vasan, R.S. Gamma glutamyl transferase and metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and mortality risk: The Framingham heart study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ktenopoulos, N.; Sagris, M.; Gerogianni, M.; Pamporis, K.; Apostolos, A.; Balampanis, K.; Tsioufis, K.; Toutouzas, K.; Tousoulis, D. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Bidirectional Association Based on Endothelial Dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Garbuzenko, D.V. Pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular disorders in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2022, 15, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Vairappan, B. Endothelial dysfunction in cirrhosis: Role of inflammation and oxidative stress. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 443–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Scioli, M.G.; Storti, G.; D’Amico, f.; Guzman, R.R.; Centofanti, F.; Doldo, E.; Miranda, E.M.C.; Orlandi, A. Oxidative Stress and New Pathogenetic Mechanisms in Endothelial Dysfunction: Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Francque, S.M.; van der Graaff, D.; Kwanten, W.J. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk: Pathophysiological mechanisms and implications. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 425–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Gunawardena, T.; Merinopoulos, I.; Wickramarachchi, U.; Vassiliou, V.; Eccleshall, S. Endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasoreactivity—A review of the history, physiology, diagnostic techniques, and clinical relevance. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021, 17, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Aedh, A.I.; Alshahrani, M.S.; Huneif, M.A.; Pryme, I.F.; Oruch, R. A Glimpse into Milestones of Insulin Resistance and an Updated Review of Its Management. Nutrients 2023, 15, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lee, S.H.; Park, S.Y.; Choi, C.S. Insulin Resistance: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. Diabetes Metab. J. 2022, 46, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. da Silva Rosa, S.C.; Nayak, N.; Caymo, A.M.; Gordon, J.W. Mechanisms of muscle insulin resistance and the cross-talk with liver and adipose tissue. Physiol. Rep. 2020, 8, e14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Smith, G.I.; Shankaran, M.; Yoshino, M.; Schweitzer, G.G.; Chondronikola, M.; Beals, J.W.; Okunade, A.L.; Patterson, B.W.; Nyangau, E.; Field, T.; et al. Insulin resistance drives hepatic de novo lipogenesis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Madonado-Rojas, A.C.; Zuarth-Vazguez, J.M.; Uribe, M.; Barbero-Becerra, V.J. Insulin resistance and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): Pathways of action of hypoglycemic agents. Ann. Hepatol. 2024, 29, 101182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hutchison, A.L.; Tavaglione, F.; Romeo, S.; Charlton, M. Endocrine aspects of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): Beyond insulin resistance. J. Hepatol. 2023, 79, 1524–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pal, S.C.; Mendez-Sanchez, N. Insulin resistance and adipose tissue interactions as the cornerstone of metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease pathogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2023, 29, 3999–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ormazabal, V.; Nair, S.; Elfeky, O.; Aguayo, C.; Salomon, C.; Zuniga, F.A. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, T.; Li, M.; Zeng, T.; Hu, R.; Xu, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Lin, H.; et al. Association Between Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Varies According to Glucose Tolerance Status: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 2022, 45, 1863–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Pilon, M. Revisiting the membrane-centric view of diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kotlayarov, S.; Kotlyarova, A. Involvement of Fatty Acids and Their Metabolites in the Development of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Colantoni, A.; Bucci, T.; Cocomello, N.; Angelico, F.; Ettorre, E.; Pastori, D.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Ben, M.D.; Baratta, F. Lipid-based insulin-resistance markers predict cardiovascular events in metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2024, 23, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gómez-Hernández, A.; de las Heras, N.; López-Pastor, A.R.; García-Gómez, G.; Infante-Menéndez, J.; González-López, P.; González-Illanes, T.; Lahera, V.; Benito, M.; Escribano, Ó.; et al. Severe hepatic insulin resistance induces vascular dysfunction: Improvement by liver-specific insulin receptor isoform A gene therapy in a murine diabetic model. Cells 2021, 10, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Xialong, Q.; Jie, L.; Cyrielle, C.; Gao-Jun, T.; Rohit, L. Epidemiology, screening, and co-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. Hepatology 2024, 10, 1097. [Google Scholar]
  123. Cho, E.E.L.; Ang, C.Z.; Quek, J.; Fu, C.E.; Lim, L.K.E.; Heng, Z.E.Q.; Tan, D.J.H.; Lim, W.H.; Yong, J.N.; Zeng, R.; et al. Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2023, 72, 2138–2148. [Google Scholar]
  124. Nguyen, M.; Asgharpour, A.; Dixon, D.L.; Sanyal, A.J.; Mehta, A. Emerging therapies for MASLD and their impact on plasma lipids. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2024, 17, 100638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, Z.; Ye, M.; Zhang, X.J.; Zhang, P.; Cai, J.; Li, H.; She, Z.G. Impact of NAFLD and its pharmacotherapy on lipid profile and CVD. Atherosclerosis 2022, 355, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Jiang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Nabavi, S.M.; Sahebkar, A.; Little, P.J.; Xu, S.; Weng, J.; Ge, J. Mechanisms of Oxidized LDL-Mediated Endothelial Dysfunction and Its Consequences for the Development of Atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 925923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jebari-Benslaiman, S.; Galicia-Garcia, U.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Olaetxea, J.R.; Alloza, I.; Vandenbroeck, K.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Martin, C. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Guo, J.; Du, L. An update on ox-LDL-inducing vascular smooth muscle cell-derived foam cells in atherosclerosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 12, 1481505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Yanai, H.; Adachi, H.; Hakoshima, M.; Katsuyama, H. Postprandial Hyperlipidemia: Its Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Atherogenesis, and Treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhao, Y.; Liu, L.; Yang, S.; Liu, G.; Pan, L.; Gu, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Zhao, R.; Wu, M. Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis Induced by Postprandial Lipemia. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Tomlinson, B.; Chan, P.; Lam, C.W.K. Postprandial hyperlipidemia as a risk factor in patients with type 2 diabetes. Expert. Rev. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2020, 15, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Saland, J.M.; Satlin, L.M.; Zalsos-Johnson, J.; Cremers, S.; Ginsberg, H.N. Impaired postprandial lipemic response in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016, 90, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Brodsky, S.V.; Malinowski, K.; Golightly, M.; Jesty, J.; Goligorsky, M.S. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promotes formation of endothelial microparticles with procoagulant potential. Circulation 2002, 106, 2372–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Song, Q.; Zhang, X. The role of gut-liver axis in gut microbiome dysbiosis associated NAFLD and NAFLD-HCC. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Han, H.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, M.; Melaku, M.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Everaert, N.; Yi, B.; Zhang, H. Intestinal dysbiosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Focusing on the gut-liver axis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 1689–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ramirez-Perez, O.; Cruz-Ramon, V.; Chinchilla-Lopez, P.; Mendez-Sanchez, N. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Bile Acid Metabolism. Ann. Hepatol. 2017, 16, s21–s26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Rauf, A.; Khalil, A.A.; Rahman, U.U.; Khalid, A.; Naz, S.; Shariati, M.A.; Rebezov, M.; Urtecho, E.Z.; de Albuquerque, R.D.D.G.; Anwar, S.; et al. Recent advances in the therapeutic application of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs): An updated review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 6034–6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Nesci, A.; Carnuccio, C.; Ruggieri, V.; D’Alessandro, A.; Di Giorgio, A.; Santoro, L.; Gasbarrini, A.; Santoliquido, A.; Ponziani, F.R. Gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease: Evidence on the metabolic and inflammatory background of a complex relationship. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zhen, J.; Zhou, Z.; He, M.; Han, H.X.; Lv, E.H.; Wen, P.B.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.T.; Cai, X.C.; Tian, J.Q.; et al. The gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide and cardiovascular diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1085041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Li, X.S.; Obeid, S.; Klingenberg, R.; Gencer, B.; Mach, F.; Raber, L.; Windecker, S.; Rodondi, N.; Nanchen, D.; Muller, O.; et al. Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide in acute coronary syndromes: A prognostic marker for incident cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. Eur. Heart. J. 2017, 38, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Huc, T.; Nowinski, A.; Drapala, A.; Konopelski, P.; Ufnal, M. Indole and indoxyl sulfate, gut bacteria metabolites of tryptophan, change arterial blood pressure via peripheral and central mechanisms in rats. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 130, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Fang, J.; Yu, C.H.; Li, X.J.; Yao, J.M.; Fang, Z.Y.; Yoon, S.H.; Yu, W.Y. Gut dysbiosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 997018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Hu, T.; Wu, Q.; Yao, Q.; Jiang, K.; Yu, J.; Tang, Q. Short-chain fatty acid metabolism and multiple effects on cardiovascular diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022, 81, 101706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yang, C.; Wu, J.; Yang, L.; Hu, Q.; Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Pan, D.; Zhao, Q. Altered gut microbial profile accompanied by abnormal short chain fatty acid metabolism exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Chew, N.W.S.; Chong, B.; Han Ng, C.; Kong, G.; Chin, Y.H.; Xiao, W.; Lee, M.; Dan, Y.Y.; Muthiah, M.D.; Foo, R. The genetic interactions between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular diseases. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 971484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Crosby, J.; Peloso, G.M.; Auer, P.L.; Crosslin, D.R.; Stitziel, N.O.; Lange, L.A. The Tg and Hdl Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project, N.H., Lung, and Blood Institute. Loss-of-Function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  147. Demirag, M.D.; Onen, H.I.; Karaoguz, M.Y.; Dogan, I.; Karakan, T.; Ekmekci, A.; Guz, G. Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2007, 52, 3399–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Baitsch, D.; Bock, H.H.; Engel, T.; Telgmann, R.; Müller-Tidow, C.; Varga, G.; Bot, M.; Herz, J.; Robenek, H.; von Eckardstein, A.; et al. Apolipoprotein E induces antiinflammatory phenotype in macrophages. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kahali, B.; Halligan, B.; Speliotes, E.K. Insights from genome-wide association analyses of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin. Liver Dis. 2015, 35, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Alagarsamy, J.; Jaeschke, A.; Hui, D.Y. Apolipoprotein E in Cardiometabolic and Neurological Health and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rasmussen, K.L.; Luo, J.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Tybjaerg-Hansen, A.; Frikke-Schmidt, R. APOE and vascular disease: Sequencing and genotyping in general population cohorts. Atherosclerosis 2023, 385, 117218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Jacobsen, R.; Martinussen, T.; Christiansen, L.; Jeune, B.; Andersen-Ranberg, K.; Vaupenl, J.W.; Christensen, K. Increased effect of the ApoE gene on survival at advanced age in healthy and long-lived Danes: Two nationwide cohort studies. Aging Cell 2010, 9, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kilpelainen, T.O.; Zillikens, M.C.; Stancakova, A.; Finucane, F.M.; Ried, J.S.; Langenberg, C.; Zhang, W.; Beckmann, J.S.; Luan, J.; Vandenput, L.; et al. Genetic variation near IRS1 associates with reduced adiposity and an impaired metabolic profile. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Bhat, S.P.; Guleria, R. Association of IRS1 (Gly972Arg) and IRS2 (Gly1057Asp) genes polymorphisms with OSA and NAFLD in Asian Indians. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Sun, C.; Holstein, D.J.F.; Garcia-Cubero, N.; Moulla, Y.; Stroh, C.; Dietrich, A.; Schon, M.R.; Gartner, D.; Lohmann, T.; Dressler, M.; et al. The Role of Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase (PEMT) and Its Waist-Hip-Ratio-Associated Locus rs4646404 in Obesity-Related Metabolic Traits and Liver Disease. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 24, 16850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Khera, A.V.; Emdin, C.A.; Drake, I.; Natarajan, P.; Bick, A.G.; Cook, N.R.; Chasman, D.I.; Baber, U.; Mehran, R.; Rader, D.J.; et al. Genetic risk, adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2349–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chandrasekharan, K.; Alazawi, W. Genetics of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver and Cardiovascular Disease: Implications for Therapy? Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 10, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, Q.H.; Yin, R.X.; Chen, W.X.; Cao, X.L.; Wu, J.Z. TRIB1 and TRPS1 variants, G × G and G × E interactions on serum lipid levels, the risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhang, G.; Juang, W.; He, F.; Fu, J.; Xu, X.; Luo, X.; Cao, Z. LDL-C and TC mediate the risk of PNPLA3 inhibition on cardiovascular diseases. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2024, dgae264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Luo, F.; Oldoni, f.; Das, A. TM6SF2: A Novel Genetic Player in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Cardiovascular Disease. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 6, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Dongiovanni, P.; Petta, S.; Maglio, C.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Pipitone, R.; Mozzi, E.; Motta, B.M.; Kaminska, D.; Rametta, R.; Grimaudo, S.; et al. Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 gene variant disentangles nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from cardiovascular disease. Hepatology 2015, 61, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Liu, Z.; Que, S.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, S.; Romeo, S.; Mardinoglu, A.; Valenti, L. The effect of the TM6SF2 E167K variant on liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Pirola, C.J.; Sookoian, S. The dual and opposite role of the TM6SF2-rs58542926 variant in protecting against cardiovascular disease and conferring risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatology 2015, 62, 1742–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sookoian, S.; Castaño, G.O.; Scian, R.; Mallardi, P.; Fernández Gianotti, T.; Burgueño, A.L.; Martino, J.S.; Pirola, C.J. Genetic variation in transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and histological disease severity. Hepatology 2015, 61, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zhang, Z.; Ji, G.; Li, M. Glucokinase regulatory protein: A balancing act between glucose and lipid metabolism in NAFLD. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1247611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gao, H.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, X.; Liu, Q.; Xin, Y.; Xuan, S. Association of GCKR Gene Polymorphisms with the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Coronary Artery Disease in a Chinese Northern Han Population. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2019, 7, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ciavarella, A.; Gnocchi, D.; Custodero, C.; Lenato, G.M.; Fiore, G.; Sabba, C.; Mazzocca, A. Translational insight into prothrombotic state and hypercoagulation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Thromb. Res. 2021, 198, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Alessi, M.C.; Bastelica, D.; Mavri, A.; Morange, P.; Berthet, B.; Grino, M.; Juhan-Vague, I. Plasma PAI-1 levels are more strongly related to liver steatosis than to adipose tissue accumulation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 1262–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cardiovascular disease in patients with MASLD [12].
Figure 1. Cardiovascular disease in patients with MASLD [12].
Biomolecules 15 00163 g001
Figure 2. Pathophysiology of MASLD and cardiovascular diseases.
Figure 2. Pathophysiology of MASLD and cardiovascular diseases.
Biomolecules 15 00163 g002
Figure 3. Pathogenic mechanisms implicated in the onset of endothelial dysfunction in patients with MASLD (ADMA—asymmetric dimethylarginine, NO—nitric oxide, ET-1—endothelin-1) [104,105,106,107,108].
Figure 3. Pathogenic mechanisms implicated in the onset of endothelial dysfunction in patients with MASLD (ADMA—asymmetric dimethylarginine, NO—nitric oxide, ET-1—endothelin-1) [104,105,106,107,108].
Biomolecules 15 00163 g003
Figure 4. The mechanisms by which oxidized LDL-c contribute to the instability and rupture of the atheromatous plaque.
Figure 4. The mechanisms by which oxidized LDL-c contribute to the instability and rupture of the atheromatous plaque.
Biomolecules 15 00163 g004
Figure 5. Mechanisms by which triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGLs) contribute to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Prothrombotic state through increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and induction of oxidative stress via NAD(P)H oxidase-dependent superoxide formation. 2. Migration of monocytes to endothelial cells. 3. Platelet activation.
Figure 5. Mechanisms by which triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGLs) contribute to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Prothrombotic state through increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and induction of oxidative stress via NAD(P)H oxidase-dependent superoxide formation. 2. Migration of monocytes to endothelial cells. 3. Platelet activation.
Biomolecules 15 00163 g005
Figure 6. Pathogenic mechanisms increasing the risk of arterial ischemic events and venous thromboembolism in patients with MASLD (vWF—von Willebrand factor, PAI-1—plasminogen activator inhibitor-1).
Figure 6. Pathogenic mechanisms increasing the risk of arterial ischemic events and venous thromboembolism in patients with MASLD (vWF—von Willebrand factor, PAI-1—plasminogen activator inhibitor-1).
Biomolecules 15 00163 g006
Table 1. Cardiometabolic risk factors in defining MASLD [1].
Table 1. Cardiometabolic risk factors in defining MASLD [1].
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
Overweight/Obesity
  • BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (≥23 kg/m2—Asians)
  • Waist circumference:
≥80 cm in women and ≥94 cm in men (Europeans)
≥80 cm in women and ≥90 cm in men (Chinese and South Asians)
≥90 cm in women and ≥85 cm in men (Japanese)
Prediabetes/type 2 diabetes
  • Prediabetes: HbA1c 5.7–6.4% or fasting plasma glucose 100–125 mg/dL or 2-h plasma glucose during OGTT 140–199 mg/dL.
  • Type 2 diabetes: HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or 2-h plasma glucose during OGTT ≥ 200 mg/dL.
  • Treatment for type 2 diabetes.
Plasma triglycerides
  • ≥150 mg/dL
  • Lipid-lowering treatment
HDL-cholesterol
  • ≤50 mg/dL in women and ≤39 mg/dL in men
  • Lipid-lowering treatment
Blood pressure
  • ≥130/85 mmHg
  • Treatment for hypertension
Legend: BMI—body mass index, HbA1c—glycated hemoglobin, HDL—high-density lipoprotein, OGTT—oral glucose tolerance test.
Table 2. Adipokines proven to influence cardiovascular risk and the mechanisms underlying this pathogenic link [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
Table 2. Adipokines proven to influence cardiovascular risk and the mechanisms underlying this pathogenic link [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
AdipokinesPathogenic Mechanism
LeptinHyperleptinemia and leptin resistance leads to reduced energy consumption, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperlipidemia.
AdiponectinReduced plasma levels of adiponectin impair fatty acid oxidation and disrupt the body’s energy homeostasis.
OmentinEnhances insulin action without affecting basal glucose transport.
VaspinInhibits reactive oxygen species.
ApelinPromotes cholesterol efflux.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ionescu, V.A.; Gheorghe, G.; Bacalbasa, N.; Diaconu, C.C. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Pathogenetic Links to Cardiovascular Risk. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020163

AMA Style

Ionescu VA, Gheorghe G, Bacalbasa N, Diaconu CC. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Pathogenetic Links to Cardiovascular Risk. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ionescu, Vlad Alexandru, Gina Gheorghe, Nicolae Bacalbasa, and Camelia Cristina Diaconu. 2025. "Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Pathogenetic Links to Cardiovascular Risk" Biomolecules 15, no. 2: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020163

APA Style

Ionescu, V. A., Gheorghe, G., Bacalbasa, N., & Diaconu, C. C. (2025). Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Pathogenetic Links to Cardiovascular Risk. Biomolecules, 15(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop