Next Article in Journal
Drug Delivery Systems: Study of Inclusion Complex Formation between Methylxanthines and Cyclodextrins and Their Thermodynamic and Transport Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Bioactivities of Halometabolites from Marine Actinobacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Network Contractility during Cytokinesis—From Molecular to Global Views
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Antiproliferative Effect of Aminoethyl-Chitooligosaccharide on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells

1
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau Mot City 820000, Binh Duong province, Vietnam
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
3
Department of Marine Life Science, College of Ocean Science and Technology, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 606-791, South Korea
4
NTT Hi-Tech Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2019, 9(5), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9050195
Submission received: 30 April 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 18 May 2019 / Published: 18 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactives from Marine Products)

Abstract

:
The aminoethyl–chitooligosaccharide (AE-COS) was reported to inhibit human gastric cancer cell proliferation and human fibrosarcoma cell invasion. In this study, the role of AE-COS in down-regulation of proliferation of human lung A549 cancer cells was evaluated. It was found that AE-COS was able to reduce A549 cell proliferation to (32 ± 1.3)% at a concentration of 500 µg/mL. Moreover, AE-COS treatment caused suppression on COX-2 expression in a dose-dependent manner. Notably, the role of AE-COS in induction of cell apoptosis was observed via decreasing Bcl-2 expression and increasing caspase-3 and -9 activation. Accordingly, the antiproliferative effect of AE-COS was indicated due to suppression of cell proliferation and induction of cell apoptosis, suggesting AE-COS as a promising chemotherapy agent for treatment of lung cancer.

1. Introduction

Cancers are well known for their involvement in unregulated cell growth, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [1]. Among them, lung cancer is one of the most leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [2]. The difficulty of early diagnosis as well as high potential of invasion and metastasis have resulted in the high mortality rates of lung cancer. Lung cancer originates from normal lung epithelial cells which transform into uncontrolled proliferating cells in the lung airway. Two major types of lung cancer have been classified as nonsmall cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer that facilitate the prediction and treatment strategy. Notably, the important feature of cancer cells was identified due to evading apoptosis [3]. Thus, induction of apoptosis is considered as a potential strategy for cancer treatment.
Chitin, a unique polysaccharide, consists of an N-acetylglucosamine unit and makes up the exoskeletons of crustaceans and invertebrates. The deacetylation of chitin up to 50% could lead to generation of aqueous acidic soluble form, called chitosan. Meanwhile, the hydrolysis of chitosan forms chitooligosaccharides (COS), which were evidenced to possess biodegradable, nontoxic, and non-allergenic properties and numerous biological activities [4,5]. Thus, COS has the potential for application in various fields, such as agriculture, biomedicine, food, cosmetics, and the environment [6]. Recently, numerous COS derivatives have been produced via introducing the bioactive group onto natural COS backbone to increase its biological activities as well as availability [7]. According to Rajapakse and colleagues, carboxylated chitooligosaccharides (CCOS) were synthesized by adding a carboxyl group to the amino position of pyranose unit [8]. CCOS were determined to possess inhibitory activities on MMP-9, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and ROS production [9,10]. Ngo et al. [11] synthesized gallic acid-conjugated COS (G-COS). Its biological activities were found due to antioxidant [12] and anti-allergic effects [13]. Moreover, sulfated COS (COS-S) exhibited antioxidant [14], anti-HIV [15], and collagenases 1 and 3 suppression [16]. Especially the combination of COS and the aminoethyl group gains an interest in the inhibition of human fibrosarcoma cell invasion, which may contribute to the prevention of metastatic cancer cells [17]. In this study, aminoethyl–chitooligosaccharide (AE-COS) was evaluated for its anticancer activity due to inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis in human lung A549 cancer cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

A549 cells were bought from Korea Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). AE-COS was provided by Dr. Dai Nghiep Ngo (Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam). Enzyme immunoassay reagents were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Aminoethyl–Chitooligosaccharides (AE-COS)

AE-COS (Scheme 1) was provided by Dr. Dai Nghiep Ngo (Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City). The synthesis was conducted as described by Ngo and colleagues [18]. AE-COS were characterized by a 1HNMR (JEOL JNM ECP-400 NMR spectrometer under a static magnetic field of 400 MHz, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Voyager mass spectrometer, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Herein, the hydroxyl group at C-6 was successfully replaced by the aminoethyl group on pyranose ring structure. AE-COS has a molecular weight of 800.79–4765 Da, while COS has a molecular weight of 800–3000 Da and deacetylation degree of 90%.

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

The cytotoxic effect of AE-COS on A549 cells was determined by MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) assay. A549 cells (2 × 105 cell/mL) were treated with AE-COS (100, 200, or 500 µg/mL) for 24 h before being incubated with MTT solution (1 mg/mL, final concentration) for 4 h. The supernatant was then removed, and DMSO (100 µL) was added to solubilize the formed formazan salt. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (GENios® Tecan Austria GmbH, A-5082 Grödig/Salzburg, Austria). The cell viability was shown as a percentage compared to blank. Moreover, the morphology of AE-COS-treated A549 cells was observed under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Western Blot Analysis

The protein expression level was measured by Western blot assay. Various doses of AE-COS (100, 200, or 500 µg/mL) were introduced to A549 cells for 24 h. The procedure was performed as described by Vo and Kim [19]. The protein band was visualized using LAS3000® Luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm Life Science, Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test of statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical differences among groups were assessed using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Inhibitory Effect of AE-COS on A549 Cell Proliferation

Cancer evolution and progression are involved in the unregulated cell proliferation and suppression of apoptosis [20]. Thus, the important parameter for screening anticancer agents is due to suppressing cancer cell proliferation and inducing cell apoptosis. In this assay, the inhibitory effect of AE-COS on the proliferation of human lung A549 cancer cells was investigated. The cells were treated with different concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h, and cell viability was then measured via MTT assay. The result showed that AE-COS treatment significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1A). Especially, cell viability was reduced to (32 ± 1.3)% upon treatment of 500 µg/mL of AE-COS. Moreover, the inverted microscopy method showed that morphological changes occurred in AE-COS-treated cells (Figure 1B). The cells were observed to be round-shaped, with a reduced cell size, disrupted boundaries, and irregular surfaces, indicating cell injury and death. Meanwhile, COS did not cause any change on cell viability as well as cell morphology significantly. This indicated that the grafting of the aminoethyl group onto COS enhances its inhibitory activity on cell proliferation and causes cell injury and death. Ngo et al. [18] showed that AE-COS is more effective than COS in inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Likewise, Karagozlu et al. [21] revealed that COS derivatives such as aminoethyl COS, dimethyl aminoethyl COS, and diethyl aminoethyl COS decreased cell viability and induced cell apoptosis in AGS cells.

3.2. The Suppressive Effect of AE-COS on COX-2 Expression

It was revealed that overexpression of COX-2 was detected in lung cancers. COX-2 was suggested to play a vital role in different steps of cancer progression, by increasing proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, and inducing metastasis formation [22]. Therefore, suppression of COX-2 expression may, in part, contribute to the inhibition of cancer progression. Herein, the effect of AE-COS on COX-2 protein expression was investigated in A549 cancer cells. It was found that AE-COS induced a dose-dependent suppression on COX-2 protein expression (Figure 2). The suppressive effect was clearly observed at the concentration of 500 µg/mL as compared with the blank group. Notably, the suppressive activity of AE-COS on COX-2 expression was stronger than that of COS. Indeed, several COX-2 specific inhibitors such as SC-236 and celecoxib were determined to be able to inhibit cancer cell proliferation [23,24]. Therefore, the suppression of AE-COS on COX-2 expression may be suggested to cause the inhibition of A549 cancer cell proliferation.

3.3. Effect of AE-COS on Apoptotic Signailing Molecules

It was evidenced that Bcl-2 protein overexpresses in various cancer cell types, leading to the increase in the migratory and invasive potentials of cancer cells. Bcl-2 supports cellular viability and inhibits apoptosis in numerous cancer cells via inactivating caspase-9 and caspase-3 [25,26]. Thus, the down-regulation of Bcl-2 activation is considered as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Herein, the A549 cells were treated with different concentrations of AE-COS, and the levels of caspase-9, caspase-3, and Bcl-2 expression were analyzed by Western blot. Interestingly, AE-COS caused down-regulation of Bcl-2 expression in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3). As the result, the expression levels of caspase-9 and caspase-3 were subsequently up-regulated in A549 cells after 24 h of AE-COS treatment. The down-regulation of Bcl-2 expression and the up-regulation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 by AE-COS treatment are the major effectors that may induce cell apoptosis and death as shown in Figure 1. The induction of cell apoptosis by AE-COS was observed to be more effective than that of COS at the same concentration in A549 cells. In the study of Karagozlu and colleagues, amino-derivatized COS also induced apoptosis via decreasing Bcl-2 expression in AGS cells [21]. Similarly, numerous natural products have been revealed to be potential for anticancer therapy due to inducing apoptosis in lung cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, and liver cancer [27].

4. Conclusions

Numerous agents of natural or synthetic origin are common alternatives for cancer prevention and treatment in many countries around the world. In this study, the grafting of the aminoethyl group onto COS increased its anticancer activity in human lung cancer A549 cells. The anticancer activity of AE-COS was determined due to inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell apoptosis via down-regulation of Bcl-2 and up-regulation of caspase-3 and -9. Importantly, additional evaluation of the therapeutic effects of AE-COS on lung cancer would be positive evidence for its application as chemotherapy in cancer treatment in the future.

Author Contributions

We declare that this research work was done by the authors named in this article. The study was conceived and designed by S.-K.K. The data were collected and analysed by D.H.N. and D.N.N. The manuscript was written by T.S.V. All authors read and approved the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from Marine Bioprocess Research Center of the Marine Biotechnology Program funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

Acknowledgments

This research was also supported by Nguyen Tat Thanh University and University of Science, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Ribas, V.; García-Ruiz, C.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Mitochondria, cholesterol and cancer cell metabolism. Clin. Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Molina, J.R.; Yang, P.; Cassivi, S.D.; Schild, S.E.; Adjei, A.A. Non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008, 83, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, S.W.; Roman, J. Targeting apoptotic signaling pathways in human lung cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2010, 10, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ngo, D.H.; Vo, T.S.; Ngo, D.N.; Kang, K.H.; Je, J.Y.; Pham, H.N.D.; Byun, H.G.; Kim, S.K. Biological effects of chitosan and its derivatives. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 51, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vo, T.S.; Kim, S.K. Potential anti-HIV agents from marine resources: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2871–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, S.K.; Rajapakse, N. Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 62, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lodhi, G.; Kim, Y.S.; Hwang, J.W.; Kim, S.K.; Jeon, Y.J.; Je, J.Y.; Ahn, C.B.; Moon, S.H.; Jeon, B.T.; Park, P.J. Chitooligosaccharide and its derivatives: Preparation and biological applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 654913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajapakse, N.; Kim, M.M.; Mendis, E.; Huang, R.; Kim, S.K. Carboxylated chitooligosaccharides (CCOS) inhibit MMP-9 expression in human fibrosarcoma cells via down-regulation of AP-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 1780–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, R.; Mendis, E.; Kim, S.K. Improvement of ACE inhibitory activity of chitooligosaccharides (COS) by carboxyl modification. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 3649–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rajapakse, N.; Kim, M.M.; Mendis, E.; Kim, S.K. Inhibition of free radical-mediated oxidation of cellular biomolecules by carboxylated chitooligosaccharides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ngo, D.H.; Qian, Z.J.; Ngo, D.N.; Vo, T.S.; Wijesekara, I.; Kim, S.K. Gallyl chitooligosaccharides inhibit intracellular free radical-mediated oxidation. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ngo, D.H.; Qian, Z.J.; Vo, T.S.; Ryu, B.; Ngo, D.N.; Kim, S.K. Antioxidant activity of gallate-chitooligosaccharides in mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vo, T.S.; Ngo, D.H.; Kim, S.K. Gallic acid-grafted chitooligosaccharides suppress antigen-induced allergic reactions in RBL-2H3 mast cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 47, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, S.J.; Kim, E.K.; Hwang, J.W.; Oh, H.J.; Park, P.J.; Kim, C.G. Antioxidative effects of sulfated chitooligosaccharides on oxidative injury. J. Chitin. Chitosan. Sci. 2009, 14, 192–196. [Google Scholar]
  15. Artan, M.; Karadeniz, F.; Karagozlu, M.Z.; Kim, M.M.; Kim, S.K. Anti-HIV-1 activity of low molecular weight sulfated chitooligosaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ryu, B.; Himaya, S.W.A.; Napitupulu, R.J.; Eom, T.K.; Kim, S.K. Sulfated chitooligosaccharide II (SCOS II) suppress collagen degradation in TNF-induced chondrosarcoma cells via NF-κB pathway. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 350, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hong, S.; Ngo, D.N.; Kim, M.M. Inhibitory effect of aminoethyl-chitooligosaccharides on invasion of human fibrosarcoma cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 45, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ngo, D.N.; Qian, Z.J.; Je, J.Y.; Kim, M.M.; Kim, S.K. Aminoethyl chitooligosaccharides inhibit the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme. Process. Biochem. 2008, 43, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vo, T.S.; Kim, S.K. Down-regulation of histamine-induced endothelial cell activation as potential anti-atherosclerotic activity of peptides from Spirulina maxima. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 50, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evan, G.I.; Vousden, K.H. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature 2001, 411, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karagozlu, M.Z.; Kim, J.A.; Karadeniz, F.; Kong, C.S.; Kim, S.K. Anti-proliferative effect of aminoderivatized chitooligosaccharides on AGS human gastric cancer cells. Process. Biochem. 2010, 45, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sobolewski, C.; Cerella, C.; Dicato, M.; Ghibelli, L.; Diederich, M. The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in cell proliferation and cell death in human malignancies. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 2010, 215158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Doherty, G.A.; Byrne, S.M.; Molloy, E.S.; Malhotra, V.; Austin, S.C.; Kay, E.W.; Murray, F.E.; Fitzgerald, D.J. Proneoplastic effects of PGE2 mediated by EP4 receptor in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nakanishi, Y.; Kamijo, R.; Takizawa, K.; Hatori, M.; Nagumo, M. Inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) suppressed the proliferation and differentiation of human leukaemia cell lines. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Um, H.D. Bcl-2 family proteins as regulators of cancer cell invasion and metastasis: A review focusing on mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 5193–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fiandalo, M.V.; Kyprianou, N. Caspase control: Protagonists of cancer cell apoptosis. Exp. Oncol. 2012, 34, 165–175. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, C.; Kim, B. Anti-cancer natural products and their bioactive compounds inducing ER stress-mediated apoptosis: A review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aminoethyl–chitooligosaccharides (AE-COS).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aminoethyl–chitooligosaccharides (AE-COS).
Biomolecules 09 00195 sch001
Figure 1. The inhibitory effect of AE-COS on A549 cell proliferation. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) Cell viability was assessed via the MTT method. (B) The representative images of the cells were assessed by light microscopy (magnification, × 10). Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. Different letters a–d indicate significant difference among groups (p < 0.05). Blank: No addition of AE-COS.
Figure 1. The inhibitory effect of AE-COS on A549 cell proliferation. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) Cell viability was assessed via the MTT method. (B) The representative images of the cells were assessed by light microscopy (magnification, × 10). Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. Different letters a–d indicate significant difference among groups (p < 0.05). Blank: No addition of AE-COS.
Biomolecules 09 00195 g001
Figure 2. The suppressive effect of AE-COS on COX-2 protein expression in A549 cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) The level of COX-2 protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis. The β-actin was used as internal control. Blank: No addition of AE-COS. (B) Densitometrically calculated expression level of COX-2 was given as a percentage compared to the blank group. Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. If two groups have different letters, they are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05. Blank is absent AE-COS or COS.
Figure 2. The suppressive effect of AE-COS on COX-2 protein expression in A549 cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) The level of COX-2 protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis. The β-actin was used as internal control. Blank: No addition of AE-COS. (B) Densitometrically calculated expression level of COX-2 was given as a percentage compared to the blank group. Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. If two groups have different letters, they are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05. Blank is absent AE-COS or COS.
Biomolecules 09 00195 g002
Figure 3. The effect of AE-COS on A549 cell apoptosis. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) The expression levels of apoptotic signaling molecules were determined by Western blot analysis. The β-actin was used as internal control. Blank: No addition of AE-COS. (B) Densitometrically calculated expression level of signaling molecules was given as a percentage compared to the blank group. Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. If two groups have different letters, they are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05. Blank is absent AE-COS or COS.
Figure 3. The effect of AE-COS on A549 cell apoptosis. The cells were treated with various concentrations of AE-COS for 24 h. (A) The expression levels of apoptotic signaling molecules were determined by Western blot analysis. The β-actin was used as internal control. Blank: No addition of AE-COS. (B) Densitometrically calculated expression level of signaling molecules was given as a percentage compared to the blank group. Each determination was made in triplicate, and the data were expressed as means ± SD. If two groups have different letters, they are significantly different from each other at p < 0.05. Blank is absent AE-COS or COS.
Biomolecules 09 00195 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngo, D.H.; Ngo, D.N.; Kim, S.-K.; Vo, T.S. Antiproliferative Effect of Aminoethyl-Chitooligosaccharide on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9050195

AMA Style

Ngo DH, Ngo DN, Kim S-K, Vo TS. Antiproliferative Effect of Aminoethyl-Chitooligosaccharide on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells. Biomolecules. 2019; 9(5):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9050195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngo, Dai Hung, Dai Nghiep Ngo, Se-Kwon Kim, and Thanh Sang Vo. 2019. "Antiproliferative Effect of Aminoethyl-Chitooligosaccharide on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells" Biomolecules 9, no. 5: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9050195

APA Style

Ngo, D. H., Ngo, D. N., Kim, S. -K., & Vo, T. S. (2019). Antiproliferative Effect of Aminoethyl-Chitooligosaccharide on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells. Biomolecules, 9(5), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9050195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop