Next Article in Journal
Modern Cartographic Forms of Expression: The Renaissance of Multimedia Cartography
Previous Article in Journal
Processing Laser Point Cloud in Fully Mechanized Mining Face Based on DGCNN
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sentinel 2 Time Series Analysis with 3D Feature Pyramid Network and Time Domain Class Activation Intervals for Crop Mapping

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10(7), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10070483
by Ignazio Gallo 1,*,†, Riccardo La Grassa 1,†, Nicola Landro 1,† and Mirco Boschetti 2,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10(7), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10070483
Submission received: 13 May 2021 / Revised: 7 July 2021 / Accepted: 8 July 2021 / Published: 13 July 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the paper in the field of crop monitoring, a very important field of study. Please find the comments and suggestions in attached manuscript itself.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your review, it is very helpful in improving our paper.

We improved the introduction by extending the reference and unifying this section with what was previously section 2 on related work.

We have modified the paper in all the points highlighted by the reviewer in the provided PDF.
To facilitate the track of the changes made to the manuscript, we have highlighted in blue the most significant ones. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for taking the time to review our paper, it was very useful for us.

Please see the attached file where you can find a point-by-point answer to comments made during the review.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Paper deals with important task. It has scientific novelty and great practical value.

It has a logical structure, all necessary sections. Paper is technically sound. 

Suggestions:

  1. Introduction section should be significantly extended .
  2. It would be good to add the remainder of this paper
  3. Related works section should be extended using non-iterative approaches for solving the stated task. Authors can use SGTM neural-like structure and its modification among others
  4. Authors should provide a link to open access repository with dataset used for modeling
  5. Authors should add all optimal parameters for all investigated methods
  6. Conclusion section should be extended using: 1) numerical results obtained in the paper; 2) limitations of the proposed approach; 3) prospects for the future research.
  7. Some of references are outdated. Please fix it using 3-5 years old papers in high-impact journals.

Author Response

Thank you for taking the time to review our paper, it was very useful for us.
Please see the attached file where you can find a point-by-point answer to comments made during the review.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks for taking the time to address my queries and making relevant changes to the manuscript. I may have missed it, but maybe add a sentence or two about the multi-class/multi-label distinction in the manuscript if not already done - it could be my shortcoming I was still confused until I read your cover letter.

Author Response

Thank you for taking the time to review our paper.

We have modified the paper in the introduction and in the conclusions to satisfy the suggestions. To facilitate the reading of the changes made to the manuscript, we have highlighted them in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop