Next Article in Journal
Sterols and Triterpenes from Dobera glabra Growing in Saudi Arabia and Their Cytotoxic Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Fatty Acid Derivatives Isolated from the Oil of Persea americana (Avocado) Protects against Neomycin-Induced Hair Cell Damage
Previous Article in Journal
Antinociceptive Effect of an Aqueous Extract and Essential Oil from Baccharis heterophylla
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vasorelaxant Effect of Boesenbergia rotunda and Its Active Ingredients on an Isolated Coronary Artery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/plants10010117
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand

by
Keerati Tanruean
1,
Pisit Poolprasert
1,
Nakarin Suwannarach
2,3,
Jaturong Kumla
2,3 and
Saisamorn Lumyong
2,3,4,*
1
Biology Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
2
Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok 10200, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010117
Submission received: 12 December 2020 / Revised: 1 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 8 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Isolation and Analysis of Characteristic Compounds from Herbal and Plant Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study established the DNA barcoding sequences (matK and rbcL) of three plant species identified in the tribe Clauseneae, namely Clausena excavata, C. harmandiana and Murraya koenigii. The total phenolic and total flavonoid contents, together with the biological activities of the derived essential oils and methanol extracts, were also investigated. Herein, the success of obtaining sequences of these plant using two different barcode genes matK and rbcL were 62.5% and 100%, respectively. Both regions were discriminated by around 700 base pairs and these had resemblance with those of the Clausenae materials earlier deposited in Genbank at a 99–100% degree of identity. Additionally, the use of matK DNA sequences could positively confirm the identity as monophyletic. The highest total phenolic and total flavonoid content values (p < 0.05) were observed in the methanol extract of M. koenigii at 43.50 mg GAE/g extract and 66.13 mg QE/g extract, respectively. Furthermore, anethole was detected as the dominant compound in C. excavata (86.72%) and C. harmandiana (46.09%). Moreover, anethole (26.02%) and caryophyllene (21.15%) were identified as the major phytochemical compounds of M. koenigii. In terms of the biological properties, the M. koenigii methanol extract was found to display the greatest amount of antioxidant activity (DPPH; IC50 95.54 µg/mL, ABTS value 118.12 mg GAE/g extract, FRAP value 48.15 mg GAE/g extract), and also revealed the highest α-glucosidase and antihypertensive inhibitory activities with percent inhibition values of 84.55 and 84.95. Notably, no adverse effects on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were observed with regard to all of the plant extracts. Furthermore, M. koenigii methanol extract exhibited promise against human lung cancer cells almost at 80% after 24 h and 90% over 48 h.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress and autoxidation are known to be harmful to the human body. The presence of these conditions can result from an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants present in the body, which can ultimately be damaging to the human body’s cells, proteins and DNA. This set of circumstances can lead to a range of health problems such as aging, diabetes and cancer, as well as certain cardiovascular and neurogenerative diseases [1,2,3]. To treat these disease, synthetic compounds can be used to help prevent any effects resulting from the specific mechanisms that may occur. In spite of their advantages, it has been recently reported that an overdose of chemical compounds might lead to a range of detrimental side effects and health issues including the formation of carcinogenic tissues or tumors [4]. Consequently, natural products have been recognized for their potential in the development of medicinal treatment to address many of these illnesses. In this way, the active molecules derived from plants and other natural resources have been isolated and enhanced with the intention of reducing the oxidation processes that occur in these plant substances and to development alternative and beneficial forms of treatment. The Clauseneae tribe belongs to the Rutaceae family, which is generally recognized as a citrus family of flowering plants (Angiosperms). The tribe Clauseneae is comprised of five genera, namely Micromelum, Marillia, Glycosmis, Murraya and Clausena [5]. The latter genus has been identified as a potent natural resource. It has been used in a variety of applications and is considered a traditional food source. It is now being considered for use in the field of pharmacology. Furthermore, there is a great need to discover and develop novel bioactive compounds that can be utilized for a range of medicinal purposes including for anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal and anti-malarial treatments [6,7,8]. Clausena is a relatively small genus of strongly scented evergreen trees with odd-pinnate leaves. It is comprised of around 30 species that are distributed throughout tropical Asia, South Asia and South East Asia [6,9] and are primarily found in India. In Thailand, the genus Clausena is considered an economically important group of plants with a range of potential health benefits. Specifically, C. excavata and C. harmandiana have been identified as plants within this genus that show potential in the development of natural health treatments [10,11]. Concerning the tribe Clauseneae, several species in this tribe have been acknowledged as sources of edible fruits, essential oils, herbal medicines, spices (Murraya exotica and M. kwangsiensis) and various horticultural items (Clausena anisum-olens, C. lansium and Glycosmis parviflora). Several species have also been recognized as potential sources of lumber and pharmaceutical compounds [12]. Additionally, Murraya koenigii, a popular and commonly known species, is scattered throughout different regions of the globe [13]. Recently, Balakrishnan et al. [14] speculated that M. koenigii was a beneficial source of various bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, polyphenols, terpenoids and flavonoids. Additionally, M. koenigii was also found to be capable of expressing a range of anticarcinogenic, proapoptotic, antiangiogenic, antimetastatic, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties. These properties can be further developed as antiemetic and antidiarrheal agents. They could then potentially be used to treat diseases like dysentery as a febrifuge, blood purifier, tonic and stomachic. Furthermore, M. koenigii is already being used as a flavoring agent in curries and chutneys. In some cultures, M. koenigii is being utilized in traditional systems of medicine [15].
Over the last decades, molecular technique based on DNA sequence can be applied to the systematic identification of known and unknown plants and animals. DNA barcoding, a modern method for the rapid identification of any species, is considered as a molecular and bioinformatics tool for species differentiation, identification and discovery of new species at molecular systematic level [16]. In terms of barcoding of vascular plants, it was mostly focused on markers of chloroplast genes, several markers were assessed and with time most commonly applied combinations are rbcL, matK, trnH-psbA, with a nuclear internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) established [17,18,19,20].
As mentioned above, bioactivities, namely anticarcinogenic and antioxidant have extensively addressed in the Clauseneae. Nonetheless, many aspects among these plants such as chemical profiles, some biological properties and DNA evident are still scarce and they are needed to be explored.
Nonetheless, due to a set of resembling systematics, this tribe has been labeled with a diverse range of local names at the local level, which can mislead people and result in incidences of misidentification. Furthermore, similar plant species have been utilized for numerous alternative purposes as ingredients in food or in pharmaceuticals. This present study, therefore, has aimed to confirm the obscure major taxa of Clauseneae i.e., Clausena excavata, C. harmandiana and Murraya koenigii gathered from Chiang Mai, Thailand using the DNA barcoding sequences obtained from two candidates of barcoding loci (matK and rbcL). In addition, phytochemical screening and an assessment of the biological properties of these Clauseneae plants were also carried out.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Genetic Variation Analysis

Botanically, three plant species in the Clauseneae tribe have been recognized as a type of strongly fragrant evergreen trees with a tall slender shape of approximately 10 m tall, and odd-pinnate narrow leaves positioned in around 10–15 pairs separated to slanting leaf-lets that are 3.5 to 7 cm long. All materials were morphologically confirmed by an expert botanist by using the Forest Trees of Southern Thailand [21]. It was determined that the specific collected materials labeled with voucher numbers PSRU-RUT001-PSRU-RUT002 could not be identified by species. However, voucher numbers PSRU-RUT003-PSRU-RUT004 and PSRU-RUT005-PSRU-RUT006 could be identified as Clausena excavata and C. harmandiana, respectively. The details of the morphological features of each representative Claseneae tree are presented in Figure 1.
Furthermore, their relevant molecular traits were assessed to identify all plant specimens. Herein, we have established the DNA barcoding sequences (matK and rbcL) of these three species of plants to be in the tribe Clauseneae. All obtained sequences were verified by their accession numbers (matK; MH187239- MH187243 and rbcL; MH187222- MH187229) and compared to the sequences previously deposited in Genbank using BLAST. Regarding molecular identification, genomic DNA was successfully extracted from every specimen. Two main chloroplast matK and rbcL genes were employed for the purposes of DNA barcoding. Upon PCR amplification, fragments encompassing both matK and rbcL were distinguished by approximately 700 base pairs. The success rates of PCR amplification of matK and rbcL were 62.5% and 100%, respectively. Regions of similarity between the sequences were observed via the BLAST program. It was determined that these were similar to those of the Clausenae specimens previously deposited in Genbank at a 99–100% degree of accuracy. Based on matK DNA sequences, five samples of Clauseneae (PSRU_RUT001-PSRU_RUT002, PSRU_RUT003-PSRU_RUT004 and PSRU_RUT005) were found to be closely related to Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng, Clausena excavata Burm.f. and Clausena harmandiana (Pierre) Pierre ex Guillaumin, respectively. Furthermore, eight rbcL sequences revealed a close resemblance to M. koenigii (L.) Spreng (PSRU_RUT001-PSRU_RUT002), C. excavata Burm.f. (PSRU_RUT003-PSRU_RUT004) and C. harmandiana (Pierre) Pierre ex Guillaumin (PSRU_RUT005-PSRU_RUT008). Nevertheless, some rbcL sequences were observed to be similar to the sequences previously deposited in Genbank, namely M. koenigii (99.58%, complete genome), M. paniculate (99.58%, complete genome) and Micromelum minutum (99.44%, complete genome) etc. This set of circumstances resulted in a number of difficulties with regard to establishing the correct species name. Therefore, representative specimens obtained from the matK DNA sequences [PSRU-RUT001 (MH187239), PSRU-RUT003 (MH187241) and PSRU-RUT005 (MH187243)] and a relevant outgroup were further assessed by phylogenic analysis using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The phylogenic construction revealed that each representative plant species was reciprocally monophyletic as depicted in Figure 2.
In the past decade, DNA barcoding inferred from nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence was employed for the discrimination of M. koenigii. It was suggested that the ITS sequence was an appropriate molecular marker for isolation of M. koenigii from selected plants [5]. At this time, the matK gene was determined to be more reliable when applied as a DNA barcode for the identification of the designated three plant species in the tribe Clauseneae. It was noted that the rbcL sequences were inconsistent with the basic principles of DNA barcoding because of certain drawbacks, for instance low rates of variation and amplification, poor universality of the primer, gene deletion and a potential number of other issues as has been postulated by Shivakumar et al. [17]. Although matK had a higher discriminatory power than rbcL, it was more difficult to amplify it across distantly related species [18]. In the same manner, this result conformed to those of previous studies conducted by Penjor et al. [19] who established the phylogenetic relationships of citrus plants and their relatives inferred from matK gene sequences. It was found that use of matK as a marker alone could establish the curry tree as M. koenigii. A combination of both markers, matK + rbcL, could help to discriminate between a maximum number of species. However, a number of researchers have used the integration of the DNA barcode to classify and identify species, while several different combinations of DNA barcodes have been effectively put forward for different plants [20]. To attain a maximum discrimination rate among closely related species, a combination of Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS + matK + rbcL) has been suggested by Li et al. [22].

2.2. Phytochemical Analysis of Essential Oils

The phytochemical composition of the leaves used to obtain the essential oil of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii are shown in Table 1. A GC-MS chromatogram is presented in Figure 3. Various compounds were detected by gas chromatography. Notably, C. harmandiana was acknowledged as a high-performance specimen containing compounds amounting to 93.60% followed by C. excavata 89.86% and M. koenigii 88.87%. Furthermore, anethole was the most dominant compound identified in essential oil, while C. excavata was found to contain the highest yield at 86.72% followed by C. harmandiana and M. koenigii at 46.09% and 26.02%, respectively.
As determined by the results, anethole was identified as a major phytochemical compound of C. excavata and C. harmandiana. Additionally, minor compounds were observed to be present, namely Camphene (9.61%), β-Terpinene (7.87%), D-Limonene (7.07%), β-Mycene (3.69%), γ-Terpinene (3.57%), 4-Terpinenol (3.34%) and others, of which less than 3% were found in the essential oils. Cheng et al. [23] reported that the essential oil obtained from the fresh leaves of C. excavata contained Safrole (75.85%) and Terpinolene (17.86%) as the primary components, while Trung et al. [24] discovered that β-Caryophyllene (16.7%), Spathulenol (11.9%) and Bicyclogermacrene (7.5%) were the major constituents of the C. excavata plant collected in Vietnam. On the other hand, Arbab et al. [6] revealed that α-Pinene (12.23%) and Copaene (12.40%) were the major constituents present in the essential oil of C. harmandiana. Moreover, bioactive Carbazoles and Coumarins were observed as the major constituents of C. excavata and C. harmandiana, of which these two compounds were identified as bioactive compounds [11,25,26]. According to the results of the assessment of the essential oil of M. koenigii, it was found to possess Anethole (26.02%), Caryophyllene (21.15%) and α-Pinene (12.23%) as the major components. These results are in accordance with those presented in the published report of Sukkaew et al. [27], wherein the essential oil obtained from the fresh leaves of M. koenigii collected from Surat Thani Province, Thailand, was found to contain β-Caryophyllene (21.4%), α-Selinene (10.2%) and α-Humulene (7.1%) and α-Pinene (4.4%) as its major components. However, in this study, the chemical composition of the essential oil of M. koenigii was distinctly different from that of previous studies. The composition of the essential oils of the fresh leaves of M. koenigii that was cultivated at six locations in Peninsula Malaysia and Borneo revealed that the two major volatile metabolites were identified as β-Caryophyllene (16.6–26.6%) and α-Humulene (15.2–26.7%). The volatile substances could be categorized as sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes as the major groups along with oxygenated monoterpenes and oxygenated diterpenes [28], Caryophyllene (9.5%), β-Myrcene (3.2%), α-Caryophyllene (2.8%), 4-Terpineol (2.8%), g-Terpinene (2.7%) and Allyl (methoxy) dimethylsilane (2.6%) [29]. Rao et al. [13] stated that the essential oil obtained from wild and cultivated M. koenigii leaves collected from ten Indian locations revealed different chemical compositions. For the essential oil of the wild plants, α-Pinene (55.7%) and β-Pinene (10.6%) were detected as the dominant constituents.
Furthermore, α-Pinene (13.5–35.7%) and/or β-Phellandrene (14.7–50.2%) were identified as the major components of the specimen collected from seven other locations. Additionally, (E)-Caryophyllene (26.5%–31.5%) and α-Selinene (9.5%–10.4%) were considered the principal components of the essential oils derived from the specimens collected from two locations. The chemical compositions of the essential oil of two Chemotypes of M. koenigii collected from northern India were assessed in different seasons. Chemotype A contained the major compounds of α-Pinene (34.6–41.9%), Sab-inene (26.1–36.1%), (E)-Caryophyllene (2.4–5.4%) and Terpinen-4-ol (1.5–5.3%), while chemotype B contained α-Pinene (52.7–65.3%), β-Pinene (10.7–12.9%), (E)-Caryophyllene (3.1–10.3%) and Limonene (5.1–5.7%) [30]. On the other hand, the major compounds detected in the essential oil of M. koenigii leaves collected from southern India, namely Linalool (32.83%), Elemol (7.44%), Geranyl acetate (6.18%), Myrcene (6.12%), Allo-Ocimene (5.02%), α-Terpinene (4.9%), (E)-β-Ocimene (3.68%) and Neryl acetate (3.45%), were also identified [31]. Notably, Tripathi et al. [32] established that 3-Carene (18.52%), β-Pinene (13.57%), α-Pinene (9.38%), Linalool (5.42%), α-Eudesmol (4.55%), ρ-Cymene (3.61%), γ-Terpinene (3.48%), α-Amorphene (3.38%), Allo-Ocimene (2.75%), Sabinene (2.55%), γ-Terpinene (2.48%), Linalyl acetate (2.46%), Myrcene (2.43%) and β-Eudesmol (2.16%) were the crucial constituents of the essential oil of M. koenigii collected from Uttarakhand, India. Hence, variations in the compositions of the essential oils of curry leaves were found to be dependent upon season and the specific location of collection.

2.3. Total Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Contents

The total phenolic (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) in the extracts of the leaves of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and mg quercetin equivalent (QE) per gram extract. As is shown in Table 2, TPC ranged from 7.07 to 43.50 mg GAE/g extract, of which M. koenigii in the methanol extract exhibited the highest yields amounting to 43.50 mg GAE/g extract (p < 0.05) followed by M. koenigii in essential oil, C. excavata in methanol extract, C. har-mandiana in methanol extract, C. excavata in essential oil and C. harmandiana in essen-tial oil (32.28, 22.89, 19.71, 9.70 and 7.07 mg GAE/g extract, respectively). Meanwhile, TFC ranged from 16.82 to 66.13 mg QE/g extract M. koenigii in the methanol extract and presented the highest value at 66.13 mg QE/g extract (p < 0.05) followed by M. koenigii in essential oil, C. harmandiana in methanol extract, C. excavata in methanol extract, C. excavata in essential oil, and C. harmandiana in essential oil (50.57, 39.95, 30.89, 23.91 and 16.82 mg QE/g extract, respectively). Additionally, the phenolic compounds and flavonoids that were found in the three Clauseneae extracts, along with certain other phytoconstituents, such as phenols, steroids, saponins, quinones, alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, carbohydrates, proteins and volatile oils, were found to be present in the Clauseneae plants [33].
Antioxidant activity of the essential oils and methanol extracts of three Clauseneae plants were measured by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays. In terms of establishing potential antioxidant activities, the DPPH free radical scavenging ability is usually employed as the preferred method. In this situation, the antioxidant compounds in the plant extracts donate an electron or hydrogen radical to an unstable DPPH free radical and then become a stable diamagnetic molecule [34]. In this study, the DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the three Clauseneae plant extracts were expressed as IC50 (µg/mL). The DPPH radical scavenging activities of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii in the methanol extracts and essential oils were observed and are presented in Table 3. Specifically, the IC50 values ranged from 95.54 µg/mL to 2865.26 µg/mL. Furthermore, it was revealed that M. koenigii in the methanol extract displayed the highest radical scavenging activity at 95.54 µg/mL followed by M. koenigii in essential oil (167.74 µg/mL), C. excavata in methanol extract (904.53 µg/mL), C. harmandiana in methanol extract (2037.66 µg/mL), C. excavata in essential oil (2059.29 µg/mL) and C. harmandiana in essential oil (2865.26 µg/mL). There was a strong correlation between the DPPH free radical scavenging activity in terms of the total phenolic (r = 0.810, p < 0.05) and total flavonoid (r = 0.835, p < 0.05) contents of all plant extracts. Furthermore, the antioxidant capacities of the essential oil and methanol extracts of the three Clauseneae plants were investigated through the scavenging activity of the ABTS cation free radicals. With regard to the mechanism of this assay, the antioxidant compounds donated an electron and hydrogen atom to an unstable ABTS+ cation radical, which could then convert to a stable ABTS radical form and then be used to evaluate the degree of antioxidant activity by reduction of the bluegreen ABTS+ radical. The ABTS free radical scavenging ability of various extracts of the Clauseneae plant extracts was expressed as mg GAE/g extract. The ABTS cation scavenging activity of the methanol extract of M. koenigii was found to be significantly higher than the other extracts (p < 0.05) at a value of 118.12 mg GAE/g extract, followed by the methanol extracts of C. excavata (88.65 mg GAE/g extract) and C. harmandiana (80.11 mg GAE/g extract).
Furthermore, the essential oil of all plants displayed less scavenging activity of the ABTS cation radical than the methanol extracts, with the exception of the essential oil extract of M. koenigii which possessed a degree of high ABTS cation radical that was close to that of the methanol extract of C. harmandiana (p > 0.05). Importantly, a high correlation between ABTS cation free radical scavenging activity with total phenolic (r = 0.881, p < 0.05) and total flavonoid (r = 0.880, p < 0.05) contents of all plant extracts was observed. Additionally, the antioxidant activity of Clauseneae plant extracts was investigated by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay based on the measurement of the ability of antioxidants to reduce ferric iron (Fe3+) to its ferrous (Fe2+) form. The potential antioxidant activity was then measured through its reducing ca-pacity. The FRAP values of the extracts were expressed as mg GAE/g extract. The highest FRAP value was found in the methanol extract of M. koenigii (48.15 mg GAE/g extract) (p < 0.05), while the essential oil of C. excavata displayed a minimum degree of antioxidant activity at 5.07 mg GAE/g extract. Additionally, a high correlation was observed between their FRAP values and their total phenolic (r = 0.823, p < 0.05) and total flavonoid (r = 0.875, p < 0.05) contents. It was further observed that the methanol extract of M. koenigii showed strong DPPH free radical scavenging activity, the highest degree of ABTS free radical scavenging ability, and also exhibited high reducing power. All of which indicated that the methanol extract of M. koenigii has the potential to scavenge both neutral and cation free radicals. Moreover, a significant correlation between chemical constituents and antioxidant activity suggests that the phenolic and flavonoid contents of Clauseneae plants extracts are associated with their strong antioxidant activities. In addition, the antioxidant activities of the extracts may be a result of the level of terpene contained in the extract. A previous study conducted by Ma et al. [35] revealed that the alkenes isolated from M. koenigii exhibited significant antioxidant activities using DPPH free radical scavenging assay. The study conducted by Truong et al. [36] reported that the methanol extract of Severinia buxifolia, belonging to the Rutaceae family, showed the highest extraction yield along with the highest content of phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids and terpenoids. Moreover, the methanol extract also possessed the highest degree of antioxidant activity indexed by the DPPH free radical scavenging assay and the highest in vitro anti-inflammatory activity. Similarly, Albaayit et al. [37] speculated that the extract of the methanol leaves of C. excavata displayed the highest phenolic content and antioxidant activity based on FRAP and DPPH radical scavenging activity assays. These finding support the contention that methanol is the optimal solvent for the extraction of Rutaceae plants.
The α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii in the methanol extract and essential oil are shown in Table 4. The results reveal that the percentage of inhibition of α-glucosidase inhibitory activities ranged from 24.33% to 84.55% and the methanol extract of M. koenigii displayed positive inhibitory activity at 84.55% inhibition. The antidiabetic activity of Claseneae plants has been reported, while the root ethanolic extract of C. excavata that contained dentatin and heptaphyllin exhibited high activity in term of α-glucosidase inhibitory [38]. Specifically, the extract of M. koenigii exhibited high potential in preventing diabetes [39,40].
Furthermore, the inhibition of α-glucosidase, an important enzyme that hydrolyses oligosaccharides, can reduce the risk of diabetes and obesity. Based on our results, the high potential of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity observed in the methanol extract of M. koenigii could be related to its high total phenolic and total flavonoid contents. This would be indicative of strong relative correlations of 0.792 and 0.804 (p < 0.05). These results are supported by the findings of Nagarani et al. [41], which suggested that the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of natural substances was strongly correlated with the contents of the flavonoid and phenolic compounds. Moreover, antihypertensive inhibitory activity was investigated and the percentage ranged from 31.07% to 84.95% (Table 4). The methanol extract of M. koenigii recorded the highest value at 84.95%. These results revealed a strong correlation r = 0.704 (p < 0.05) and r = 0.727 (p < 0.05) between the antihypertensive inhibitory activity of all plant extracts and their total phenolic and total flavonoid contents, respectively. Moreover, the high potential of the antihypertensive (>80%) properties of plants has been reported in various plant species such as Quercus infectoria (Fagaceae) (93.9%), Berberis integerrima (Berberidaceae) (88.2%), Crataegus microphylla (Rosaceae) (80.9%) and Onopordon acanthium (Asteraceae) (80.2%) [42].

2.4. Determination of Methanol Extract and Essential Oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii against Human Normal Cells and Human Lung Cancer Cells

Over the past decade, the number of cancer deaths worldwide has been increasing. It is a significant cause of many of the health problems experienced by humans around the world. Cancer is followed by a range of cardiovascular diseases in terms of mortality rates. Notably, the leading cause of deaths attributed to cancer is lung cancer. Therefore, the antitumor activity of the three Clauseneae plant extracts in this study were investigated. The effect of the essential oil and methanol extracts of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii by varied concentrations (0–1 µg/mL) were observed for 24 and 48 h against human normal cells using human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and human lung cancer cell (A549).
The results revealed that the essential oil and methanol extracts of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii did not have any toxic effect on PBMC at a concentration of 1 µg/mL relating to the increasing number of cell viability after being tested over 24 h and 48 h (data not shown). For A549 cells assessment, the essential oil and methanol extracts of C. excavata, C. harmandiana and M. koenigii could effectively decrease cell viability when concentrations were increased to 1 µg/mL (Figure 4). This was especially true for M. koenigii in the methanol extract, which displayed high efficacy activity against A549 cells at almost 80% after 24 h and 90% over 48 h. The study conducted by Huang et al. [43] determined that carbazole alkaloids and coumarins obtained from Clausena plants exhibited anticancer activity. Based on the finding of our study, all the Clauseneae plant extracts exhibited high activity against human lung cancer cells. This was especially true of the methanol extract of M. koenigii that displayed high potential activity against A549 cells when compared with the methanol leaves and stem extracts of Marsdenia glabra Cost. In turn, this extract displayed low inhibitory activity within a range of about 15–25% at 1000 µg/mL [44]. Moreover, the study conducted by Muthumani et al. [45] revealed that the extract of M. koenigii displayed a high degree of potential anticancer activity in experimental animal trials.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials and Chemicals

All plant samples were tentatively identified to species level by comparison with the reference materials at the herbarium of Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden, Chiang Mai, Thailand, and deposited as voucher specimens (PSRU-RUT001-008) in the collection of Faculty of Science and Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University (PSRU), Phitsanulok Province, Thailand.
Gallic acid was purchased from Merck (Germany) and folin-ciocalteu reagent was bought from BDH Chemicals Ltd. (Poole, England). The 2,2′-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) and 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ) were purchased from Fluka (Steinheim, Germany). 2, 2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) was derived from SIGMA (Oakville, ON, Canada). Intestinal acetone powder and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium and fetal bovine serum were purchased from Invitrogen Corp. (Grand Island, NY, USA). All the solvents and other chemicals were an analytical grade (A.R.).

3.2. Collection of Plant Material for Genetic Variation Analysis

3.2.1. Plant Sample Collection

The fresh leaves were individually collected from local area in Chiang Mai province, upper northern Thailand, labeled and transported in sterile plastic bags and frozen until processed for DNA extraction. The morphological details of each representative Clauseneae leaf are demonstrated as Figure 5.

3.2.2. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturers protocol. Purity and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA was performed with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. DNA was checked using 1.0% an agarose gel stained with stained with RedsafeTM.

3.2.3. PCR Amplication

We amplified and sequenced the chloroplast DNA regions (matK and rbcL) based on primers 1) matK (matK-F; 5′-TAA TTT ACG ATC AAT TCA TTC-3′ and matK-R; 5′-TCT GGA GTC TTT CTT GAG CG-3′) and 2) rbcL (rbcL-F; 5′-TCA CCA CAA ACA GAA ACT AAA GC-3′ and rbcL-R; 5′-GGC ACA AAA TAA GAA ACG ATC TC-3′). PCR was conducted in a final reaction volume of 20 μL made up of 5× PCR Enhancer, 2 μL of 10× HF Reaction Buffer, 0.4 μL of 10 mM dNTP Mix, 0.3 μL each of the forward and reverse primers (10 μmol/L), 0.3 μL of Long and High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (0.75 U) (biotechrabbit, Germany), 10.7 μL of nuclear free water and at least 20 ng of the DNA template. PCR amplification was performed using a T100TM Thermal Cycler (BioRad, USA). The thermal profile used was: 94 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 48 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 10 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were verified on 1% agarose gels stained with RedsafeTM under UV light and were then purified using GenUP PCR/Gel Cleanup Kit (Biotechrabbit, Germany). Afterwards, the purified product was direct sequenced with forward and reverse primers by Macrogen, Inc (http://www.macrogen.com).

3.2.4. Alignment of Sequences and Phylogenetic Analysis

A similarity search for each sequence was verified using BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The maximum likelihood (ML) methods from the MEGA (version 5.0) program [46] were used to create phylogenetic trees. The reliability of each branch was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications. Clade with bootstrap values of 70% was considered significantly supported [47]. The sequences of Merrillia caloxyon were used as an outgroup. All DNA sequences were finally trimmed to 718 (matK) and 713 (rbcL) base pairs. The sequences obtained after removing the primers used for PCR amplification were deposited to NCBI-Genbank BankIt (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BankIt/) under accession numbers (matK; MH187239-MH187243 and rbcL; MH187222-MH187229).

3.3. Preparation of Plant Extracts

The leaves of three plants of Clauseneae were dried at 50 °C for 72 h, grounded into small pieces and stored at room temperature. Plant materials (100 g) were individually extracted with 1000 mL of methanol (1:10) and left for 12 h at ambient temperature. The extracts were sonicated using an ultrasonicator (Crest, USA) for 30 min, filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter paper and evaporated under a vacuum at 40 °C using a rotary evaporator until dry. Dry extracts were kept at 4 °C in the dark for further study.
The essential oil was extracted from the dried leaves and stems by stream distillation with a ratio of 1:20 and partitioned with dichloromethane for 3 h. The essential oil was obtained after evaporation of the dichloromethane. After that, the essential oil was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulphate and stored at 4 °C for further analysis.
The methanol extract and essential oil of each plant species were performed in triplicate.

3.4. Phytochemical Analysis of Essential Oils

Phytochemical analysis of the essential oils was determined according to the previous research of Tanruean et al. [48]. The extracts were analyzed for their phytochemicals using a gas chromatography (GC) 6890 Agilent Technologies/MSD 5973 Hewlett Packard, equipped with a MS detector and an HP-5MS capillary column (bonded and cross-linked 5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane 30 × 0.25 µm, film thickness 0.25 µm). The injector and detector temperatures were set at 270 and 280 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was set at 80 °C and held for 2 min, and then increased at a rate 10 °C/min to 120 °C and held for 4 min. The oven temperature was then in-creased at a rate 10 °C/min to 155 °C and held for 4 min, and then increased at a rate 5 °C/min to 280 °C and held for 12.50 min. The total running time was 55 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The sample (1 µL) was injected in the splitless mode. GC-MS detection of an electron ionization system with an ionization energy measurement of 70 eV was used. Injector and MS transfer line temperatures were set at 270 and 290 °C, respectively. The components were identified based on a comparison of their relative retention times and the mass spectra with W8N08 and Wiley7n libraries data of the GC-MS system.

3.5. Determination of Total Flavonoid Contents

The total flavonoid contents were determined by the method of Kaewnarin et al. [49] with a few slight modifications. The extract (0.5 mL) was mixed with 2 mL of methanol, followed by the addition 0.15 mL of 50 g/L NaNO2. After 5 min, 0.15 mL of 100 g/L AlCl3 was added. The reaction was mixed and incubated at ambient temperature for 15 min, and the absorbance was measured at 415 nm. Quercetin solution was used as a standard for the determination [50,51,52] and the results were expressed as mg QE/g extract. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.6. Determination of Total Phenolic Contents

Total phenolic contents were estimated using the protocol of Thitilertdecha et al. [53] with slight modifications. The procedure involved of combining 0.25 mL of sample (1 mg/mL) with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.5 mL of folin-ciocalteu reagent. After 5 min, 0.5 mL of 20% (w/v) Na2CO3 was added, and the solution was incubated for 1 h at ambient temperature. Absorbance was then measured at 760 nm. Gallic acid solution was used as a standard for the determination and the results were expressed as mg GAE/g extract. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.7. Determination of Antioxidant Activities

3.7.1. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

The free radical scavenging ability was determined according to the method of Gülçin et al. [54] with slight modifications. The 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH●) solution in ethanol (0.1 mM, 1.5 mL) was mixed with 0.5 mL of different concentrations of each extract, and methanol was used as the control. The mixtures were well shaken and kept at ambient temperature for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm and gallic acid was used as the comparative standard. The percent of DPPH● discoloration of the samples was calculated according to the formula:
  • Percent inhibition = (Ao- As/Ao) × 100
  • Where Ao is the absorbance of the control (containing all reagents except the test compound), and As is the absorbance of the mixture containing the test compound. The test sample concentrations providing 50% inhibition (IC50) were calculated from the plot of inhibition percentage against extract concentration values. The radical scavenging ability was presented IC50 values. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.7.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

The ABTS•+ scavenging activity was measured according to the method of Re et al. [55] with some modification. The stock solution of ABTS cation chromophore was prepared by a reaction between a 7 mM ABTS solution (100 mL) and 2.45 mM potassium persulphate (final concentration) (100 mL) and was kept in a dark place at an ambient temperature for 16 h. The ABTS•+ solution was diluted with phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 002 at 734 nm. An aliquot of each extract (100 µL) was added to 3 mL of an ABTS•+ solution, and the resulting mixture was then incubated for 30 min at an ambient temperature prior to measuring the absorbance at 734 nm. Gallic acid was used as a reference compound, and the ABTS•+ scavenging activity was expressed as mg GAE/g extract. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.7.3. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay was determined according to the protocol of Li et al. [56] with some modifications. The FRAP reagent containing 10 mM of 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ) solution in 40 mM hydrochloric acid (20 mL), 20 mM ferric (III) chloride (20 mL) and acetate buffer (5 mL, 300 mM, pH 3.6) was pre-pared freshly prior to being used. Different concentrations of each extract (0.1 mL) was mixed with the FRAP reagent (1.5 mL) and 1.4 mL of acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6) and were then incubated at an ambient temperature for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 593 nm. Gallic acid was used as a standard and FRAP value was calculated as mg GAE/g extract. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.8. Determination of α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

α-Glucosidase (AGH) solution was prepared from rat intestinal acetone powder by partial modification of the procedure reported by Oki et al. [57]. 100 mg of intestinal acetone powder (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.; St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to 3 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, homogenized with the sonication and kept in an ice bath. After centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, the resulting supernatant was kept cold and directly subjected to inhibitory assay. The method of Adisakwattana et al. [58] was used to determine AGH inhibitory assay. The assay was defined as the percent inhibition under the assay conditions, which was calculated according to the formula:
  • Percent inhibition = (Ao − As/Ao) × 100
  • Where Ao is the absorbance of the control, and As is the absorbance of the mixture containing the test compound. The data were presented as the average of the triplicate analyses.

3.9. Determination of Antihypertensive Activity

The angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity was evaluated by the modified method of Park et al. [59]. The sample (50 µL) was mixed with 50 µL of 25 mU/mL ACE (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.; St. Louis, MO, USA) and pre-incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Then, 6 mM hippuryl-histidyl-leucine (HHL) in 50 mM Tris with 300 mM NaCl 100 µL was added and further incubated for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 200 µL of 1.0 M HCl. Hippuric acid was extracted by ethyl acetate (600 µL), followed by centrifugation at 4880 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant (200 µL) was transferred to a test tube and evaporated at 95 °C to remove the ethyl acetate. Hot distilled water (1.0 mL) was added to dissolve the hippuric acid and the absorbance was determined at 228 nm. The ACE inhibition was calculated from this equation:
  • Percent inhibition = [1 − (As/Ao)] × 100
  • Where Ao is the absorbance of the control (containing all reagents except the test compound), and As is the absorbance of the mixture containing the test compound. The results of all experiments were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

3.10. Antitumor Activity and Cell Toxicity Assay

Antitumor activity and cell toxicity assay of the extracts were determined according to the protocol of Wang et al. [60] with some modifications. Tumor cells, A549, were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) until reaching 80% con-fluence. Trypan blue exclusion method was applied to determine the cell viability. In this experiment, optimum cell viability was above 98% and concentration level was adjusted for further experimentation. Human lymphocyte cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), were obtained from healthy volunteers by venipuncture and heparin was used as an anticoagulant. The blood solution was diluted with one-fold sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and was centrifuged with Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation to separate PBMCs from the other specimens. Briefly, the diluted blood solution was overlaid in Ficoll-Hypaque solution and centrifuged at 1300 rpm, 25 °C for 30 min. The PBMC layer was collected, washed two times with sterile PBS and the redissolved PBMC pellets were treated with RPMI-1640 cell medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cell viability was determined. and the concentration level was adjusted for further experiment.
The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to investigate the cytotoxicity of the three Clauseneae plants extracts on A549 and human lymphocyte cells. Tumor cells (A549) and human lymphocyte cells were cultured in a 96-well tissue culture plate, which contained 5000 and 10,000 cells, in each well, respectively. Different concentrations of the sample solution were added to each well and they were then incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h. After that, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL of MTT in PBS, pH 7.4) was added and the specimens were further incubated at 37 °C for another 4 h. Cell medium was drained out and the formazan dye sediment was dissolved with 100 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Absorbance was measured at 540 nm and the cell viability ratio was calculated by comparing the absorbance of the wells that did not contain any sample solution.

3.11. Ethical Considerations

Concerning the cultured human cells used in this current research, approval to conduct this study was gained from the Ethics Review Committee for Research In-volving Human Research Subjects, by the human ethics committees of the Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (Study Code: AM-SEC-63EM-032).

3.12. Statistical Analysis

The results of all experiments were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance was performed by ANOVA procedure and Duncan’s multiple comparison test was used to determine any significant differences (p < 0.05) identified between treatments. The correlation (r) between the two variants was analyzed using the Pearson test. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS v.25 for windows; IBM Crop., Armonk, NY, USA).

4. Conclusions

It can be concluded that matK possesses a good DNA barcode for Clauseneae, especially with regard to the discrimination of Murraya koenigii from Clausena excavata and C. harmandiana. This is due to its ease of amplification and sequence variation. However, a combination with other DNA fragments would increase its degree of identification efficiency. Notably, the extracts obtained from Clausena excavata, C. harmandiana and Murraya koenigii were found to be effective as natural antioxidant, antidiabetic and antihypertension agents and were also found to inhibit human lung cancer cells without any side effects on human normal cells. Moreover, the methanol extract of M. koenigii exhibited the strongest degree of biological activities because it possessed the highest amount of containable phenolic compounds and flavonoids. Suggesting that the extracts of the three Clauseneae plants could be promising candidates as natural bioactive agents in various relevant fields, which the biological activities in animal models could be initially studied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.T., N.S. and S.L.; investigation, K.T., J.K., N.S. and P.P.; software, J.K., N.S. and P.P.; writing—original draft, K.T.; writing—review and editing, K.T., J.K., N.S., P.P. and S.L.; supervision, K.T. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful to Chiang Mai University and Biology Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (Study Code: AM-SEC-63EM-032, Date of Approval: December 30, 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

These cultured human cells are considered by IRB as exemptions.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Russell K. Hollis for the English proofreading of this manuscript. Special appreciation is also extended to Khanittha Punturee, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, for the technical support in the clinical laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nguyen, H.C.; Lin, K.H.; Huang, M.Y.; Yang, C.M.; Shih, T.H.; Hsiung, T.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Tsao, F.C. Antioxidant activities of the methanol extracts of various parts of Phalaenopsis orchids with white, yellow, and purple flowers. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo. Cluj Napoca. 2018, 46, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yen, G.C.; Chen, C.S.; Chang, W.T.; Wu, M.F.; Cheng, F.T.; Shiau, D.K.; Hsu, C.L. Antioxidant activity and anticancer effect of ethanolic and aqueous extracts of the roots of Ficus beecheyana and their phenolic components. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Biparva, P.; Ehsani, M.; Hadjmohammadi, M.R. Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using extraction solvents lighter than water combined with high performance liquid chromatography for determination of synthetic antioxidants in fruit juice sample. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2012, 27, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sitthitharworn, W.; Wirasathien, L.; Kampiranont, L.; Khomdej, P.; Waiyasilp, W. Identification of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng using DNA barcoding technique based on the ITS sequence. Thai J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 5, 202–205. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arbab, I.A.; Abdul, A.B.; Aspollah, M.; Abdullh, R.; Abdelwahab, S.I.; Ibrahim, M.Y.; Ali, L.Z. A review of traditional uses, phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of selected members of Clausena genus (Rutaceae). J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 5107–5118. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, J.; Li, C.J.; Du, Y.Q.; Li, L.; Sun, H.; Chen, N.H.; Zhang, D.M. Bioactive compounds from the stems of Clausena lansium. Molecules 2017, 22, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Palombo, E.A. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: Potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011, 2011, 680354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Peng, W.; Fu, X.; Li, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Shi, Z.; Shi, X.; Zhang, F.; Huo, G.; Li, B. Phytochemical study of stem and leaf of Clausena lansium. Molecules 2019, 24, 3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yenjai, C.; Sripontan, S.; Sriprajun, P.; Kittakoop, P.; Jintasirikul, A.; Tanticharoen, M.; Thebtaranonth, Y. Coumarins and carbazoles with antiplasmodial activity from Clausena harmandiana. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wongthet, N.; Sanevas, N.; Schinnerl, J.; Valant-Vetschera, K.; Bacher, M.; Vajrodaya, S. Chemodiversity of Clausena excavata (Rutaceae) and related species: Coumarins and carbazoles. Biochem. Syst. 2018, 80, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mou, F.J.; Tu, T.Y.; Chen, Y.Z.; Zhang, D.X. Phylogenetic relationship of Clauseneae (Rutaceae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA data and taxonomic implication for some major taxa. Nord. J. Bot. 2018, 36, e01552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, B.R.; Rajput, D.K.; Mallavarapu, G.R. Chemical diversity in curry leaf (Murraya koenigii) essential oils. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 989–994. [Google Scholar]
  14. Balakrishnan, R.; Vijayraja, D.; Jo, S.H.; Ganesan, P.; Su-Kim, I.; Choi, D.K. Medicinal profile, phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities of Murraya koenigii and its primary bioactive compounds. Antioxidants 2020, 24, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ajay, S.; Rahul, S.; Sumit, G.; Paras, M.; Mishra, A.; Gaurav, A. Comprehensive review: Murraya koenigii Linn. Asian J. Pharm. Life Sci. 2011, 1, 417–425. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; de Waard, J.R. Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proc. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shivakumar, V.S.; Appelhans, M.S.; Johnson, G.; Carlsen, M.; Zimmer, E.A. Analysis of whole chloroplast genomes from the genera of the Clauseneae, the curry tribe (Rutaceae, Citrus family). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 117, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hollingsworth, P.M.; Graham, S.W.; Little, D.P. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Penjor, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Uehara, M.; Ide, M.; Matsumoto, N.; Matsumoto, R.; Nagano, Y. Phylogenetic relationships of Citrus and its relatives based on matK gene sequences. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Duan, H.; Wang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhou, Y. The screening and identification of DNA barcode sequences for Rehmannia. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gardner, S.; Sidisunthorn, P.; Chayamarit, K. Rutaceae. In Forest Trees of Southern Thailand; Amarin Printing and Publishing Plc.: Bangkok, Thailand, 2018; Volume 3 (Mo-Z), pp. 1968–1969. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, D.Z.; Gao, L.M.; Li, H.T.; Wang, H.; Ge, X.J.; Liu, J.Q.; Chen, Z.D.; Zhou, S.L.; Chen, S.L.; Yang, J.B.; et al. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19641–19646. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cheng, S.S.; Chang, H.T.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, P.S.; Huang, C.G.; Chen, W.J.; Chang, S.T. Insecticidal activities of leaf and twig essential oils from Clausena excavata against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus larvae. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Trung, H.D.; Thang, T.D.; Ban, P.H.; Hoi, T.M.; Dai, D.N.; Ogunwande, I.A. Terpene constituents of the leaves of five Vietnamese species of Clausena (Rutaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Songsiang, U.; Thongthoom, T.; Zeekpudsa, P.; Kukongviriyapan, V.; Boonyarat, C.; Wangboonskul, J.; Yenjai, C. Antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity against cholangiocarcinoma of carbazoles and coumarins from Clausena harmandiana. Sci. Asi. 2012, 38, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Greger, H. Phytocarbazoles: Alkaloids with great structural diversity and pro-nounced biological activities. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 1095–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sukkaew, S.; Pripdeevech, P.; Thongpoon, C.; Machan, T.; Wongchuphan, R. Volatile constituents of Murraya koenigii fresh leaves using headspace solid phase microextraction—Gas chromatography—Mass spectrometry. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1783–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nagappana, T.; Ramasamyb, P.; Vairappana, C.S. Chemotaxonomical markers in essential oil of Murraya koenigi. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1375–1378. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chowdhury, J.U.; Bhuiyan, M.N.I.; Yusuf, M. Chemical composition of the leaf essential oils of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng and Murraya paniculata (L.) Jack. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2008, 3, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C.; Arya, V.; Chauhan, A. Aroma profiles of the curry leaf, Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. Chemotypes: Variability in north India during the year. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 36, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rajendran, M.P.; Pallaiyan, B.B.; Selvaraj, N. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant profile of essential oil from Murraya koenigii (L.) leaves. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2014, 4, 200–214. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tripathi, Y.C.; Anjum, N.; Rana, A. Chemical composition and in vitro antifungal and antioxidant activities of essential oil from Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. Leaves. Asian J. Biomed. Pharm. 2018, 8, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gupta, S.; Paarakh, P.M.; Gavani, U. Isolation of phytoconstituents from the leaves of Murraya koenigii Linn. J. Pharm Res. 2009, 2, 1313–1314. [Google Scholar]
  34. Soares, J.R.; Dins, T.C.P.; Cunha, A.P.; Almeida, L.M. Antioxidant activity of some extracts of Thymus zygis. Free Radic. Res. 1997, 26, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ma, Q.G.; Xu, K.; Sang, Z.P.; Wei, R.R.; Liu, W.M.; Su, Y.L.; Yang, J.B.; Wang, A.G.; Ji, T.F.; Li, L.J. Alkenes with antioxidative activities from Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Truong, D.H.; Nguyen, D.H.; Ta, N.T.A.; Bui, A.V.; Do, T.H.; Nguyen, H.C. Evaluation of the use of different solvents for phytochemical constituents, antioxidants, and in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of Severinia buxifolia. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 8178294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Albaayit, S.F.A.; Abba, Y.; Abdullah, R.; Abdullah, N. Evaluation of antioxidant activity and acute toxicity of Clausena excavata leaves extract. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 975450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Thant, T.M.; Aminah, N.S.; Kristanti, A.N.; Ramadhan, R.; Aung, H.T.; Takaya, Y. Antidiabetes and antioxidant agents from Clausena excavata root as medicinal plant of Myanmar. Open Chem. 2019, 17, 1339–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Arulselvan, P.; Senthilkumar, G.P.; Sathish Kumar, D.; Subramanian, S. Antidiabetic effect of Murraya koenigii leaves on streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Pharmazie 2006, 61, 874–877. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yankuzo, H.; Ahmed, Q.U.; Santosa, R.I.; Akter, S.F.U.; Talib, N.A. Beneficial effect of the leaves of Murraya koenigii L. Spreng (Rutaceae) on diabetes-induced renal damage in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 135, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagarani, G.; Abirami, A.; Siddhuraju, P. A comparative study on antioxidant potentials, inhibitory activities against key enzymes related to metabolic syndrome, and anti-inflammatory activity of leaf extract from different Momordica species. Food Sci. Hum. Well 2014, 3, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sharifi, N.; Souri, E.; Ziai, S.A.; Amin, G.; Amanlou, M. Discovery of new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors from medicinal plants to treat hypertension using an in vitro assay. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 21, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, L.; Feng, Z.L.; Wang, Y.T.; Lin, L.G. Anticancer carbazole alkaloids and coumarins from Clausena plants. A review. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2017, 15, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tanruean, K.; Suwannarach, N.; Choonpicharn, S.; Lumyong, S. Evaluation of phytochemical constituents and biological activities of leaves and stems of Marsdenia glabra Cost. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar]
  45. Muthumani, P.; Venkatraman, S.; Ramseshu, K.; Meera, R.; Devi, P.; Kameswari, B.; Eswarapriya, B. Pharmacological studies of anticancer, anti-inflammatory activities of Murraya koenigii L. Spreng in experimental animals. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2009, 1, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hillis, D.M.; Bull, J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tanruean, K.; Kaewnarin, K.; Suwannarach, N.; Lumyong, S. Comparative evaluation of phytochemicals, and antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Cuscuta reflexa grown on different hosts in northern Thailand. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kaewnarin, K.; Niamsup, H.; Shank, L.; Rakariyatham, N. Antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of some edible and medicinal plants. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2014, 41, 105–116. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kamarul Zaman, M.A.; Azzeme, A.M.; Ramle, I.K.; Normanshah, N.; Ramli, S.N.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Ahmad, S.; Abdullah, S.N.A. Induction, multiplication, and evaluation of antioxidant activity of Polyalthia bullata callus, a woody medicinal plant. Plants 2020, 9, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Radulescu, C.; Buruleanu, L.C.; Nicolescu, C.M.; Olteanu, R.L.; Bumbac, M.; Holban, G.C.; Simal-Gandara, J. Phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seeds and skin from organic and conventional vineyards. Plants 2020, 9, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Thitilertdecha, N.; Teerawutgulrag, A.; Rakariyatham, N. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Nephelium lappacium L. extracts. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 2029–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gülçın, İ.; Oktay, M.; Kıreçcı, E.; Küfrevıoǧlu, Ö.İ. Screening of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) seed extracts. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice- Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.; Guo, C.; Yang, J.; Wei, J.; Xu, J.; Cheng, S. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of pomegranate peel extract in comparison with pomegranate pulp extract. Food Chem. 2006, 96, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oki, T.; Matsui, T.; Osajima, Y. Inhibitory effect of α-glucosidase inhibitors varies according to its origin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 550–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Adisakwattana, S.; Chantarasinlapin, P.; Thammarat, H.; Yibchok-Anun, S. A series of cinnamic acid derivatives and their inhibitory activity on intestinal α-glucosidase. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, P.J.; Je, J.Y.; Kim, S.K. Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity of hetero-chitooligosaccharides prepared from partially different deacetylated chitosans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4930–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, P.; Henning, S.M.; Heber, D. Limitations of MTT and MTS-based assays for measurement of antiproliferative activity of green tea polyphenols. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 00117 g001 550
Figure 1. General morphology of plants. (A) PSRU-RUT001 (foliage of unknown plant species), (B), Clausena excavata plant (PSRU-RUT003), (C) Fruits of C. excavata, (D) flowers of C. excavata, (E) Clausena harmandiana plant (PSRU-RUT005), (F) Fruits of C. harmandiana and (G) flowers of C. harmandiana.
Figure 1. General morphology of plants. (A) PSRU-RUT001 (foliage of unknown plant species), (B), Clausena excavata plant (PSRU-RUT003), (C) Fruits of C. excavata, (D) flowers of C. excavata, (E) Clausena harmandiana plant (PSRU-RUT005), (F) Fruits of C. harmandiana and (G) flowers of C. harmandiana.
Plants 10 00117 g001
Plants 10 00117 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the matK gene of 18 sequences. Bar represents 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position. The plants from this study are presented in bold.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the matK gene of 18 sequences. Bar represents 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position. The plants from this study are presented in bold.
Plants 10 00117 g002
Plants 10 00117 g003 550
Figure 3. GC-MS Chromatogram of (A) Clausena excavata leaves in essential oil (B) Clausena harmandiana leaves in essential oil and (C) Murraya koenigii leaves in essential oil.
Figure 3. GC-MS Chromatogram of (A) Clausena excavata leaves in essential oil (B) Clausena harmandiana leaves in essential oil and (C) Murraya koenigii leaves in essential oil.
Plants 10 00117 g003
Plants 10 00117 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of the extracts of Clausena excavata (essential oil, -○-; methanol extract, -●-), Clausena harmandiana (essential oil, -□-; methanol extract, -■-) and Murraya koenigii (essential oil, -△-; methanol extract, -▲-) against human lung cancer cells (A549) at 24 h (A) and 48 h (B).
Figure 4. Effects of the extracts of Clausena excavata (essential oil, -○-; methanol extract, -●-), Clausena harmandiana (essential oil, -□-; methanol extract, -■-) and Murraya koenigii (essential oil, -△-; methanol extract, -▲-) against human lung cancer cells (A549) at 24 h (A) and 48 h (B).
Plants 10 00117 g004
Plants 10 00117 g005 550
Figure 5. Representative leaf images of three plant species in Claseneae; (A) PSRU_RUT005-006, (B) PSRU_RUT003-004 and (C) PSRU_RUT001-002.
Figure 5. Representative leaf images of three plant species in Claseneae; (A) PSRU_RUT005-006, (B) PSRU_RUT003-004 and (C) PSRU_RUT001-002.
Plants 10 00117 g005
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii leaves essential oil.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii leaves essential oil.
Rt (min) aCompound b% Composition
C. excavataC. harmandianaM. koenigii
5.617α-Pinene-1.0512.23
5.943Camphene-9.610.27
5.998Sabinene--0.05
6.685β-Terpinene-7.87-
6.703β-Pinene-0.880.46
6.9526-Methyl- 5-hepten-2-one--0.28
7.068β-Mycene-3.690.65
7.513α-Phellandrene--0.63
7.6933-Carene0.762.410.33
8.172p-Cymene-1.270.53
8.406D-Limonene -7.07-
8.342β-Phellandrene--3.67
8.456Eucalyptol-0.5-
8.616(E)-Ocimene-0.9-
8.947α-Ocimene-0.570.78
9.403γ-Terpinene-3.57-
9.705(Z)-β-Terpineol-0.4-
10.419Terpinolene0.251.380.85
10.8953,7-dimethyl-1,6-Octadien-3-ol--0.57
11.761trans-1-Methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-2-cyclohexen-1-ol-0.29-
13.9864-Terpinenol-3.340.09
14.849Estragole1.231.680.38
18.805Anethole86.7246.0926.02
21.137α-Cubebene--0.15
22.030Ylangene--0.16
22.220Copaene--0.31
22.400cis-β-Guaiene--0.16
22.925β-Elemene--0.41
23.0676,10,11,11-Tetramethyl-tricyclo[6.3.0.1(2,3)]undec-7-ene --0.23
23.598α-Gurjunene--0.70
24.202Caryophyllene-0.6721.15
24.695Zingiberene--1.29
24.817Spathulenol--1.25
24.978Eudesma-4(14),11-diene --0.55
25.434α-Caryophyllene-0.173.92
26.739β-helmiscapene--3.81
27.105γ-Elemene-0.19-
27.126α-Selinene0.34-6.10
30.285Spathulenol0.56--
30.445Caryophyllene oxide--0.85
Total89.8693.6088.87
a Retention time (in minutes). b Compounds listed in order of elution from a HP-5 MS column. “-”= not detected.
Table
Table 2. Total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Table 2. Total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Plant ExtractsPercent Yield
(%Yield)		Total Phenolic Content
(mg GAE/g Extract)		Total Flavonoid Content
(mg QE/g Extract)
C. excavata methanol extract5.52 ± 0.32a22.89 ± 0.93c30.89 ± 2.15d
C. excavata essential oil0.83 ± 0.06d9.70 ± 0.72d23.91 ± 1.98e
C. harmandiana methanol extract4.12 ± 0.19c19.71 ± 0.83c39.95 ± 0.63c
C. harmandiana essential oil0.64 ± 0.08d7.07 ± 0.73d16.82 ± 1.25f
M. koenigii methanol extract4.92 ± 0.39b43.50 ± 4.30a66.13 ± 1.69a
M. koenigii essential oil0.86 ± 0.09d36.28 ± 1.65b50.57 ± 1.11b
Average ± standard deviations from three replicates. Different letters in the same column are considered significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Antioxidant activity of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Table 3. Antioxidant activity of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Plant ExtractsAntioxidant Activity
DPPH Free Radical Scavenging (IC50, ug/mL) ABTS Cation Free Radical Scavenging (mg GAE/g extract) Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (mg GAE/g extract)
C. excavata methanol extract904.53 ± 3.23c88.65 ± 0.71b16.48 ± 0.72d
C. excavata essential oil2059.29 ± 83.13d12.27 ± 0.1.75d5.07 ± 0.17e
C. harmandiana methanol extract2037.66 ± 39.23d80.11 ± 1.01c19.07 ± 0.55c
C. harmandiana essential oil2865.26 ± 8.22e12.83 ± 1.04d5.37 ± 0.32e
M. koenigii methanol extract95.54 ± 3.46a118.12 ± 1.01a48.15 ± 1.21a
M. koenigii essential oil167.74 ± 6.97b79.52 ± 1.01c28.22 ± 0.94b
Average ± standard deviations from three replicates. Different letters in the same column are considered significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Alpha-glucosidase and antihypertensive inhibitory activity of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Table 4. Alpha-glucosidase and antihypertensive inhibitory activity of methanol extract and essential oil of Clausena excavata, Clausena harmandiana and Murraya koenigii.
Plant Extractsα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity (% Inhibition) Antihypertensive Inhibitory Activity (% Inhibition)
C. excavata methanol extract49.30 ± 1.10c47.63 ± 1.11c
C. excavata essential oil36.20 ± 1.49e38.90 ± 1.05d
C. harmandiana methanol extract41.42 ± 0.65d58.10 ± 1.75b
C. harmandiana essential oil24.33 ± 0.91f31.07 ± 1.16e
M. koenigii methanol extract84.55 ± 0.49a84.95 ± 1.24a
M. koenigii essential oil52.39 ± 1.16b39.33 ± 1.13d
Average ± standard deviations from three replicates. Different letters in the same column are considered significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanruean, K.; Poolprasert, P.; Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Lumyong, S. Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand. Plants 2021, 10, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010117

AMA Style

Tanruean K, Poolprasert P, Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Lumyong S. Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand. Plants. 2021; 10(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanruean, Keerati, Pisit Poolprasert, Nakarin Suwannarach, Jaturong Kumla, and Saisamorn Lumyong. 2021. "Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand" Plants 10, no. 1: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010117

APA Style

Tanruean, K., Poolprasert, P., Suwannarach, N., Kumla, J., & Lumyong, S. (2021). Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Extracts from Three Clauseneae Plants in Northern Thailand. Plants, 10(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop