Next Article in Journal
Application of UPLC-QTOF-MS Based Untargeted Metabolomics in Identification of Metabolites Induced in Pathogen-Infected Rice
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Cultures of Some Medicinal Plant Species (Cistus × incanus, Verbena officinalis, Scutellaria lateriflora, and Scutellaria baicalensis) as a Rich Potential Source of Antioxidants—Evaluation by CUPRAC and QUENCHER-CUPRAC Assays
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study of Morpho-Physiological Traits in Aegilops tauschii to Broaden Wheat Genetic Diversity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anacyclus pyrethrum var. pyrethrum (L.) and Anacyclus pyrethrum var. depressus (Ball) Maire: Correlation between Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents with Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Chemically Characterized Extracts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/plants10020212
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg

by
Yeimi Cecilia Vega-Ruiz
,
Corina Hayano-Kanashiro
,
Nohemí Gámez-Meza
and
Luis Angel Medina-Juárez
*
Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Universidad de Sonora, Blvd. Luis Donaldo Colosio s/n, Entre Reforma y Sahuaripa, Edificio 7G, Col. Centro, Hermosillo, Sonora C.P. 83000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(2), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020212
Submission received: 11 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 18 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Jatropha species have been shown to be an important source of secondary metabolites with different biological effects. Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg are distributed in the Northwestern region of Mexico, are adapted to extreme weather conditions and are widely used (stems, leaves, and sap) in traditional medicine. The aim of the present study was to carry out the phytochemical characterization and the evaluation of the antioxidant activity in methanolic extracts of stems and leaves from J. cinerea and J. cordata. The compounds present in the extracts of both species were characterized by ESI-IT-MS/MS and quantified by HPLC-DAD. The results showed that the stem extracts of both species are rich in phenolic acids, while the leaf extracts are rich in flavonoids. Some of the main compounds found were gallic acid, gentisic acid, 3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, vitexin, isovitexin, and catechol. Both species showed high concentrations of phenols and total flavonoids and antioxidant activity. J. cordata showed the highest antioxidant capacity and the highest concentration of phenolic compounds. Overall, both Jatropha species are a natural source of antioxidant compounds with potential biotechnological uses.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Euphorbiaceae family is considered one of the most diverse, with around 7800 species [1]. Among the genera that belong to this family is Jatropha L. This genus is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions from Africa, America, and Asia. Mexico is the diversity center and endemism of the Jatropha genus. A total of 50 of the 186 known Jatropha species are found in Mexico (even in areas with extreme temperature and humidity conditions) and 39 of them are endemic [2,3].
Jatropha species have been used for different purposes; one of them is to produce biodiesel, being the seed oil of Jatropha curcas L., the main product at an industrial level [4]. In Mexico and other countries, the Jatropha species such as Jatropha curcas L. (Peru, Ghana), Jatropha multifida L. (Cambodia, Nigeria), Jatropha gossypiifolia L. (India, Brazil), Jatropha gaumeri Greenm (México) and Jatropha elliptica M. Arg (Brazil) are used as traditional medicine. When these Jatropha species were studied, the results showed that the roots, stems, and leaves of this plant are a source of phenolic compounds and triterpenes. In addition they showed antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity [5]. Nowadays, the knowledge generated from Jatropha curcas L. studies could contribute to the global development of other Jatropha species. Therefore, it is important to perform studies that evaluate the potential of the genetic resources of all Mexican species of this genus.
There are four Jatropha species: Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg, Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg, Jatropha cardiophylla (Torr.) Muell.-Arg, and Jatropha cuneata Wiggins and Rollins, widely distributed in the most arid region of Northwestern Mexico. In addition, these four species are considered within the Priority Terrestrial Regions of the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO) [6,7].
J. cinerea, commonly known as “sangrengado”, is widely distributed along the Baja California peninsula, and the coasts of Sonora and Sinaloa, Mexico [8]. A J. cinerea shrub is characterized by its resistance to long periods of drought and its development in saline soils and growth in hot, as well as in dry and semi-dry conditions at 1500 m above sea level too; they can measure between 1 to 3 m high, they have thin stems, kidney-shaped leaves, pink flowers with tubular or globular appearance and rounded fruits. The steam bark is brown to whitish in color. It has shallow roots and appears as succulent roots above the ground. The leaves are 2 to 6 cm wide; they are more or less cordate at the base, and its fruit is 1.5 to 2.5 cm wide [6,9].
J. cordata is a perennial tree that can grow up to 10 m of height. It is distributed in the arid and semi-arid regions of Mexico and the southern United States. This plant has a taller than wide appearance, soft wood and semi-succulent. It has a well-developed main trunk and small flexible branches. A particular characteristic of J. cordata is that the stem of thin sheets emerges similar to paper, this is the reason why this it is called “papelillo”. The leaves are 2.5 to 6 cm wide, with its fruit being 1.5 to 2.0 cm wide [10,11,12].
On the other hand, ethnobotanical studies, it has been reported that Jatropha species have been used to treat diseases. The roots of J. cinerea are used by the Seri ethnic group in the state of Sonora (Mexico) to cure dysentery and the sap to treat mouth ulcers [13]. The J. cordata root is used by ethnic groups in the state of Sonora to combat toothache and the stem and leaves are used to cure gums [14].
Phytochemical studies of the genus Jatropha have increased in recent years due to the high potential of these species as natural sources of bioactive compounds. The compounds isolated from Jatropha species are phenolic acids, lignans, flavonoids, coumarins, alkaloids, and terpenes, which have shown antioxidant, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory activities [15]. However, these secondary metabolites and their biological effect have been studied just in few Jatropha species [16].
For this reason, it is important to carry out the first phytochemical study of the stem and leaves of J. cinerea and J. cordata. The information obtained in this study will be useful to highlight the importance of these endemic species in the arid region of Northwestern Mexico as a potential source of bioactive compounds.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Qualitative Analysis of Phytochemical Compounds

The compounds present in the studied fractions were flavonoids, phenols, coumarins, sterols, and tannins (Table 1). The alcoholic fractions of J. cinerea presented flavonoids, phenols, coumarins, and tannins; while the alcoholic fractions of J. cordata only presented flavonoids, phenols, and tannins. There are reports of other Jatropha species showing a high content of phenolic compounds [17,18]. On the other hand, coumarins in ethyl acetate and alcoholic fractions of J. cinerea were found. Additionally, the presence of sterols was detected in the hexane fractions.
Results of alcoholic fractions from the aerial part of J. cinerea and J. cordata are important because recent publications have reported that alcoholic extracts of these species are used for medicinal purposes [19]. Furthermore, for other species belonging to the genus Jatropha, qualitative phytochemical profiles like those presented in the methanolic extracts of the aerial part of J. cinerea and J. cordata have been reported. Phenols, flavonoids, and tannins were reported in the alcoholic extracts from Jatropha mollissima (Pohl) Baill leaves [20]. On the other hand, Jatropha curcas L. alcoholic extracts were rich in phenolic compounds [17,18].

2.2. Phenol and Flavonoid Content

J. cinerea and J. cordata leaf extracts showed a higher concentration of phenols and flavonoids than those of stems extracts. Comparing the two Jatropha species, J. cordata extracts from leaves and stems showed higher phenols and flavonoids contents (Table 2).
The content of phenolic compounds in leaves and stems from Jatropha curcas L. were lower than the values reported in this study. Jatropha curcas L. plant collected from Malaysia showed a total phenol content in leaves of 1.33 ± 0.013 mg GAE/g and 0.11 ± 0.013 mg GAE/g in stems [21]. Namulli et al. [22] also found that Jatropha curcas L. leaves and stems (collected in Malaysia) showed lower total phenols (9.29 mg GAE/g, 3.09 mg GAE/g, respectively) and flavonoids contents (0.91 mg Rutin E/g, 0.38 mg Rutin E/g, respectively), than the ones reported in the present work. On the other hand, El-Baz et al. [23] reported that leaves methanolic extract of Jatropha curcas L. from Egypt showed a lower content of total phenols (51.25 mg GAE/g) than the values obtained in the present study; being J. cinerea and J. cordata native from the most arid region of Northwestern Mexico. Recently, the total phenol content in methanolic extracts from Jatropha mollisima (Pohl) Baill leaves, an endemic species from Brazilian semiarid region, was reported with values around 245.12 mg GAE/g [20]. Maybe, different environmental conditions could influence the total phenolic content in Jatropha species, as observed in wild Jatropha mollisima (Pohl) Baill and cultivated Jatropha curcas L. There are reports showing the influence of weather and others external factors on the synthesis of these secondary metabolites [24,25]. Further, the phenolic compounds profile could vary among same species even if different factors are involved, such as genotype, phenological state of the plant and time of cultivation [26,27]. All of these factors could explain the variations found in the phenolic compounds and their concentration in leaves and stems from different Jatropha species.

2.3. Antioxidant Activity

Extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata showed antioxidant activity. However, the antioxidant activities (IC50 values) of the J. cordata leaf and stem extracts, were higher than those of the J. cinerea extracts. Phenolic compounds have the capacity to donate one or more of their additional electrons to free radicals; therefore they are excellent free radical scavengers. For example, flavonoids donate electron from their dihydroxy substituents at the 3′ and 4′ position of the B ring of their molecule, neutralizing free radicals or chelating metal ion [28].
In the present work, the antioxidant activity in both wild Jatropha species was evaluated by ABTS and DPPH, to analyze the simple electron transfer (SET) mechanism of phenolic compounds. As observed, the IC50 values of the Jatropha leaf and steam extracts were different in both radicals used. (Table 2). Physical and chemical properties of the alcoholic extracts, the solvent system and the pH used can lead to different kinetics and side reactions [29].

2.4. Identification of Phenolic Compounds by the Extract ESI-IT-MS-MS

Mass spectroscopy methodology was used to determine the different phenolic compounds, present in methanolic extracts from leaves and stems of J. cinerea and J. cordata. This methodology allows us to identify these compounds through the fragmentation of the molecules in the sample [30]. Therefore, the phenolic compounds were confirmed by comparing them with pure standards and using data from other references (Figure 1).
The phenolic compounds present in the leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata are showed in Table 3. The phytochemical compounds profile identified in the alcoholic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata is similar to that already reported for Jatropha gossypiifolia, being p-coumaric, ferulic, caffeic, gallic, vanillic, and gentisic acids, catequin, vitexin, isovitexin, luteolin and apigenin the main compounds [31,32]. Respect to flavonoids, J. cinerea and J. cordata presented quercetin and rhoifolin, which are the same compounds reported in Jatropha curcas L. [15].

2.5. HPLC-DAD Analyses of Methanolic Extracts

Several compounds belonging to the main phenolic subclasses identified by means of mass spectrometry analysis in the methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from both Jatropha species were quantified by HPLC-DAD and their concentration was expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9) and summarized in Table 4.
The quantified compounds present in leaves extracts from J. cinerea were the phenolic acids such as acids 4-hydroxybenzoic, caffeic, gallic, gentisic, p-coumaric, and the flavonoid apigenin, while in the stem extracts were 4-hydroxybenzoic, caffeic, gallic, gentisic, p-coumaric, syringic and vanillic acids, and the flavonoids found were apigenin, epicatechin, and quercetin. The compounds quantified in J. cordata leaves extracts were 4-hydroxybenzoic, caffeic, gallic, gentisic and p-coumaric acids, and flavonoids apigenin and quercetin, while in stems were 4-hydroxybenzoic, caffeic, gallic, gentisic, sinapic and vanillic acids, and the flavonoids apigenin, epicatechin, and quercetin. Data showed that the contents of each phenolic compound from the leaves and stems of J. cinerea and J. cordata were significantly different between species and plant organs.
According to the results, the phenolic compounds profile in both Jatropha species indicates that they are not uniformly distributed throughout the plant. It is suggested that some compounds are more concentrated in the roots and seeds and others in the green tissues of the aerial part (stems and leaves). This can be possible because each organ has a specialization that must fulfill according to its physiological function, which generated differences in the phenolic compounds profile [40]. For example, it was reported that leaf has the ability to synthesize phenolic metabolites as a rapid response to external stimuli such as microbial attack and light [41]. Furthermore, it is well known that the synthesis of secondary metabolites depends on the season and plant growth stage [42].
Flavonoids represented the highest concentration of phenolic compounds in stem methanolic extracts from J. cinerea and J. cordata, while leaf extracts showed the highest concentration to phenolic acids. Comparing extracts of both species, J. cordata was the species with the highest concentration of phenolic compounds, being gentisic acid, the phenolic acid with the highest concentration (864.62 µg/g), and quercetin as the most abundant flavonoid presented in the extracts, with a concentration of 573.98 µg/g. Extracts of stems and leaves from J. cinerea, also presented gentisic acid as the most abundant phenolic acid with a concentration of 634.55 µg/g; while the most abundant flavonoid was epicatechin (230.05 µg/g). In addition, these results showed a positive correlation with the antioxidant activity of the methanol extracts from leaves and stems of J. cinerea and J. cordata (Table 2).
Another important phenolic compound is the gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid), which is present in the plant kingdom and is capable of exhibiting antioxidant properties [43]. Gallic acid was present in the methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata in higher amounts than those reported in methanolic extracts for Jatropha curcas L. leaves (220 µg/g) [22].
Gentisic acid (2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid) is the phenolic acid with the highest concentration in the leaves of J. cinerea and J. cordata (Table 4). This is a diphenolic compound and a derivative of benzoic acid [44]. Gentisic acid can be found in plants such as grapes (Vitis vinifera) and citrus fruits (Citrus spp.). This compound has shown to have activity as antioxidant, anticancer, hepatoprotective, antimicrobial, and antiinflammatory. Furthermore, no strong evidence of adverse effects and toxicity of gentisic acid has been reported [45].
In the present study within flavonoids identified, the apigenin was found in greater quantity in the leaves of J. cinerea and J. cordata (Table 4). Apigenin chemical name is 4′, 5, 7, -trihydroxyflavone, is a nontoxic active biological flavonoid and it has been detected in some fruits such as grapefruit, onions, oranges, tea, chamomile, and in some seasonings [46]. It was recently reported that apigenin has the antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties and can be used as a natural product in reducing some of the symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome [47].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All reagents, solvents and chemicals standards were acquired from Sigma Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). The solvents used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses were methanol and formic acid from JT Baker (Xalostoc, Mexico State, Mexico) and Milli-Q water (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA).

3.2. Plant Material

The stems and leaves from J. cinerea and J. cordata were collected from the central area of Sonora state in arid region of northwestern Mexico (Figure 2). J. cinerea was collected from the coastal area of Hermosillo city during August 2018 (N 28°49.831′, W 111°56.672′), while J. cordata was collected from the periphery area from Hermosillo city, during September 2018 (N 29°10.994′, W 110°55.846′). For each Jatropha species, the sample were randomly collected from at least 18 individuals, taking around 150–200 g of leaves and stems. The material was kept in paper bags and was protected from light and moisture until it was dried.
The taxonomic identification of both Jatropha species was confirmed by experts in the Herbarium of the University of Sonora (Sonora, Mexico).

3.3. Preparation of Sample

The leaves and stems of both species were manually separated. The samples were dried at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) for 3 months and protected from the light and moisture. The material was grinded with a blender (Oster model 4122, Mexico City, Mexico) until powder and it was sieved at particle size of 500 µm.

3.4. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds

The phenolic compounds extraction was performed according to Molina-Quijada et al. [48]. The sample (1 g) was mixed with 10 mL of methanol:water (70:30, v/v), shaken vigorously in a vortex, and sonicated (Sonic 1510 R-DTH, Branson Ultrasonics Corporation, Danbury, CT, USA) for 30 min. Then, the mixture was centrifuged (3000× g) for 15 min at 4 °C (Centrifuge IEC CL3 IR, Thermo Electron Industries SAS, Chaâteau-Gontier, Mayenne, France). The methanolic extraction was repeated twice at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C), protecting samples from light. A total extraction volume of 20 mL was obtained for each gram of sample. The supernatants were recollected, filtered (Whatman membrane filters nylon, pore size 0.2 µm) and stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

3.5. Qualitative Analyses of Phytochemical Compounds

The phytochemical compounds present in methanolic extracts of aerial part (stems and leaves) from the two species of Jatropha were screened by qualitative assays of the secondary metabolites. The solvents of the extracts of each species were evaporated under reduced pressure at 40 °C, followed by adding consecutively the different solvents from minor to major polarity like hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, and methanol (50 mL of each solvent). Qualitative phytochemical tests for alkaloids, glycosides, coumarins, tannins, sterols, quinones, saponins, phenols, and flavonoids were carried out according to Janaki et al. [49]. The color intensity was used as a response of mentioned tests. The results were interpreted such as presence (+) and absence (−) of the phytochemical groups in the fractions.

3.6. Determination of Total Phenolic Compounds

The total phenolic content in the extracts from leaves and stems from both Jatropha species was carried out according to Ashish et al. [50]. In 96-well plates, 30 µL of extract were placed and 150 µL of diluted Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added to each well and these were incubated at room temperature for 3 min. Then 120 μL of sodium carbonate were added and they were incubated for 30 min at room temperature protected from light. Finally, the absorbances were measured at 765 nm (Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader, Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). The total phenolic compounds content was determined as gallic acid equivalents per g of sample (mg GAE/g), using the linear equation based on the calibration curve.

3.7. Determination of Total Flavonoids

The total flavonoids content in the extracts was determined by a colorimetric assay [51]. Then 2 mL of extract were mixed with 300 µL of NaNO2 (5%). After 6 min, then 300 µL of AlCl3 (10%) were added and after 1 min, 1 mL of NaOH (4%) was added. The final volume was brought up to 6 mL with deionized water. From this mixture, 300 µL of each tube was added to the 96-well plate, reading the absorbance at 510 nm (Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader, Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). A quercetin calibration curve was performed to quantify the total flavonoids contents. Results were expressed as quercetin equivalents per gram of sample (mg QE/g).

3.8. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity of the methanolic extracts of the two Jatropha species was evaluated by two techniques based on the system of transfer individual electrons (SET), which implies a unique redox reaction, being the oxidant the indicator for end point measurement [29].

3.8.1. DPPH Method Antioxidant Capacity

The DPPH radical (working solution) was prepared mixing 2.5 mg of DPPH reagent (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) with 80 mL of methanol. The absorbance of the working solution was adjusted to 0.70 ± 0.02 at 515 nm. The experiment was carried out in 96-well microplates where 20 μL of each sample was added to each well followed by the addition of 180 μL of DPPH working solution. Then, the plate was incubated in the dark during 30 min at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) [52]. Finally, the absorbance was measured in a microplate reader (Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader, Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland) at 520 nm and compared against a standard curve of Trolox. Results were expressed as percent of inhibition.

3.8.2. ABTS Method

The 2,2′-azino- bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) ABTS•+ radical cation was prepared by mixing 10 mL of 2.45 mM K2S2O8 with 38.4 mg ABTS reagent. The mix was kept under dark conditions with constant shaking during 12–16 h at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C). The ABTS•+ radical cation was mixed with methanol 70% (v/v methanol:water) until reach an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm (working solution). In a 96-well microplate, 25 µL of extracts were added to 225 µL of the previously prepared solution. Samples were incubated for 5 min at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) under darkness. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 734 nm (Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland)) [53]. Results were compared against a standard curve of Trolox and expressed as percent of inhibition.
Concentrations of 1.11 to 50 mg/mL of leaves and stems methanolic extracts from J. cinerea and J. cordata were used. For the assays, the concentration necessary for the inhibition of 50% of ABTS and DPPH radicals was calculated with a lineal regression using the software GraphPad Prism 8. Trolox was used as comparation antioxidant standard.

3.9. Identification of Phenolic Compounds by ESI-IT-MS-MS

The identification of compounds present in the leaves and stems extracts of both Jatropha species was done injecting the extracts (10 μg/mL p/v) by direct infusion to a Varian 500-MS mass spectrometer (Walnut Creek, CA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source and an ion trap mass analyzer, which were controlled by MS WorkStation software v.16 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The mass spectrometer was operated in negative mode, nitrogen as a misting gas and helium as a collision gas for accurate mass measurement at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Mass spectra were acquired in full scan mode in the range of 100–2000 m/z using a flow rate of 10 µL/min a voltage −17 KV, and capillary temperature of 350 °C. The manipulation of the extracts was carried out with protection of the light. The identification of several metabolites was performed by second order fragmentation (MS/MS). The confirmation was carried out comparing the fragmented ions with pure standards (compounds 2, 12–14 and 19; Table 3) and using data from bibliography (compounds 1, 13, 15–18, 20–22; Table 3).

3.10. HPLC-DAD Analysis of Extracts

The quantification of the phenolic compounds presents in the extracts of both Jatropha species was performed using an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system (Agilent 1260 Infinity and ChemStation Software, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled to a diode array detector (HPLC-DAD, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation of the compounds was done on a C-18 HPLC column (5 µm, 25 cm × 4 mm, SupelcosilTM LC-18, SUPELCO). The mobile phase was a gradient of solvents: A (5% formic acid) and B (methanol) to 1 mL/min flow rate [54]. The leaves and stems extracts were filtered (nylon filter, 0.22 µm) and injected in the chromatography system (20 µL of leaves and 50 µL of stems). The chromatograms were recorded at 260, 280, 320, 330, and 370 nm. The identification of compounds was done comparing the peak retention times and UV spectra of the samples against data obtained fron the commercial standards (Figure 3). The compounds were quantified using standard curves of 4-hydroxybenzoic, caffeic, gallic, gentisic, p-coumaric, sinapic, syringic and vanillic acids, and flavonoids apigenin, epicatechin, and quercetin were performed with corresponding standards (Table 4). The concentration of each compound present in the extracts of both Jatropha species were expressed as µg per g of sample (µg/g) as the mean (n = 9) ± standard deviation.

3.11. Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using the statistical software R studio, version 1.3.959-1 (StatSoft Poland, Cracow, Poland). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined by the Tukey’s test.

4. Conclusions

The determination of the chemical components carried out in methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata, showed that both species are an important source of phenolic acids and flavonoids, when compared to studies reported in other Jatropha species. Overall results showed further that the contents of each phenolic compound of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata were significantly different between species and plant organs. This can be related to the specialization that each of these organs has must fulfill, its physiological function and the relationship of the phenolics compounds with it. Additionally, the ability of the leaf to synthesize phenolic metabolites is very important because it is related to the response to external stimuli such as microbial attack and light. Furthermore, leaves of J. cordata showed the highest antioxidant activity compared with those obtained from J. cinerea. On the other hand, it is shown that the stems and leaves of J. cinerea and J. cordata may have potential as a source of bioactive compounds. Overall, this study shows the potential application of these two endemic species from the arid regions of Northwestern Mexico adapted to extreme temperature and salinity conditions. To verify the bioactive potential of the phytochemicals identified in both Jatropha species studied, the evaluation of the cytotoxicity, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity should be carried out in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.M.-J. and C.H.-K.; methodology, validation formal analysis, Y.C.V.-R., L.A.M.-J., C.H.-K. and N.G.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.M.-J. and Y.C.V.-R.; writing—review and editing, L.A.M.-J., N.G.-M., C.H.-K. and Y.C.V.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Y.C.V.-R. would like to thank the Mexican Research Council, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT-935322) for the scholarship granted. We also thank Claudia Celeste Molina-Domínguez for their technical assistance and support with analytical section and Jesús Sánchez-Escalante of the University of Sonora’s Herbarium for the identification of the two species of Jatropha (J. cinerea and J. cordata).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Webster, G.L. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1994, 81, 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Govaerts, R.; Frodin, D.G.; Radcliffe-Smith, A.; Carter, S. World Checklist and Bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (with Pandaceae); Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew Richmond, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Steinmann, V.W. Diversidad y endemismo de la familia Euphorbiaceae en México. Acta Bot. Mex. 2002, 61–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gübitz, G. Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 67, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sabandar, C.W.; Ahmat, N.; Jaafar, F.M.; Sahidin, I. Medicinal property, phytochemistry and pharmacology of several Jatropha species (Euphorbiaceae): A review. Phytochemistry 2013, 85, 7–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fresnedo-Ramírez, J.; Orozco–Ramírez, Q. Diversity and distribution of genus Jatropha in Mexico. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 60, 1087–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Córdova-Téllez, L.C.; Ramírez, E.B.; Colmenero, A.Z.; Lorca, J.A.R.; Vázquez, A.P.; Sánchez, O.M.S.; Herrera, J.M.; Sánchez, J.A.C. Diagnóstico y Plan Estratégico de Jatropha spp. En México; SNICS: Sinarefi, México, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schmid, R.; Turner, R.J.; Bowers, J.E.; Burgess, T.L. Sonoran Desert Plants: An Ecological Atlas; The University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dehgan, B.; Webster, G.L. Morphology and Infrageneric Relationships of the Genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae); University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1979; Volume 74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Popham, A.R. Developmental anatomy of seedling of Jatropha cordata. Ohio J. Sci. 1947, 47, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kane, C.W. Herbal Medicine of the American Southwest: A Guide to the Medicinal and Edible Plants of the Southwestern United States; Lincoln Town Press: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Felger, R.S.; Johnson, M.B.; Wilson, M.F. The trees of Sonora, Mexico; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  13. Felger, R.S.; Moser, M.B. Seri Indian pharmacopoeia. Econ. Bot. 1973, 28, 415–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Johnson, M.B. Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae) in Southwestern United States and Adjacent Northern Mexico; University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cavalcante, N.B.; Santos, A.D.D.C.; Almeida, J.R.G.D.S. The genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae): A review on secondary chemical metabolites and biological aspects. Chem. Interactions 2020, 318, 108976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srinivasan, N.; Palanisamy, K.; Mulpuri, S. Jatropha: Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology. In Jatropha, Challenges for a New Energy Crop; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2019; pp. 415–435. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rebecca, R.; Samuel, D.D.; Bello, Y.M.; Simeon, O.K. Qualitative Phytochemistry and Antibacterial Resistance Pattern of Leaves and Stem Bark Extracts of Jatropha curcas. Am. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 4, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oyama, M.O.; Malachi, O.I.; Oladejo, A.A. Phytochemical Screening and Antimicrobial Activity of Leaf Extract of Jatropha curcas. J. Adv. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wong-Paz, J.E.; Muñiz-Márquez, D.B.; Aguilar-Zárate, P.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Cruz, K.; Reyes-Luna, C.; Rodríguez, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Chapter 5-Extraction of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds by Alternative Technologies. In Handbook of Food Bioengineering, Ingredients Extraction by Physicochemical Methods in Food; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dias, W.; Junior, E.D.V.; Oliveira, M.D.D.A.D.; Barbosa, Y.; Silva, J.D.N.; Júnior, J.D.C.; De Almeida, P.; Martins, F. Cytogenotoxic effect, phytochemical screening and antioxidant potential of Jatropha mollissima (Pohl) Baill leaves. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 123, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Othman, A.R.; Abdullah, N.; Ahmad, S.; Ismail, I.S.; Zakaria, M.P. Elucidation of in-vitro anti-inflammatory bioactive compounds isolated from Jatropha curcas L. plant root. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Namuli, A.; Abdullah, N.; Sieo, C.; Zuhainis, S.; Oskoueian, E. Phytochemical compounds and antibacterial activity of Jatropha curcas Linn. extracts. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 3982–3990. [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Baz, F.K.; Aly, H.F.; Abd-Alla, H.I.; Saad, S.A. Bioactive flavonoid glycosides and antidiabetic activity of Jatropha curcas on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 29, 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain, S.; Choudhary, G.; Jaina, D. In vitro free radical scavenging activity of Jatropha gossgypifolia Linn. containing phenolic compounds. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 1424–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rampadarath, S.; Puchooa, D.; Mala Ranghoo-Sanmukhiya, V. A comparison of polyphenolic content, antioxidant activity and insecticidal properties of Jatropha species and wild Ricinus communis L. found in Mauritius. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, S384–S390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ali, I.B.E.H.; Bahri, R.; Chaouachi, M.; Boussaïd, M.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F. Phenolic content, antioxidant and allelopathic activities of various extracts of Thymus numidicus Poir. organs. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 62, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Verma, N.; Shukla, S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2015, 2, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Banjarnahor, S.D.; Artanti, N. Antioxidant properties of flavonoids. Med. J. Indones. 2015, 23, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tan, J.B.L.; Lim, Y.Y. Critical analysis of current methods for assessing the in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activity of plant extracts. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharmin, E.; Zafar, F. Spectroscopic Analyses: Developments and Applications; BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, Q.; Patocka, J.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K. Jatropha gossypiifolia L. and its biologically active metabolites: A mini review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 234, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Silveira, R.D.S.; Leal, G.C.; Molin, T.R.D.; Faccin, H.; Gobo, L.A.; Da Silveira, G.D.; Souza, M.T.D.S.; Lameira, O.A.; De Carvalho, L.M.; Viana, C. Determination of phenolic and triterpenic compounds in Jatropha gossypiifolia L by Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (UHPLC-MS/MS). Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khallouki, F.; Voggel, J.; Breuer, A.; Klika, K.D.; Ulrich, C.M.; Owen, R. Comparison of the major polyphenols in mature Argan fruits from two regions of Morocco. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Neves, N.D.A.; Stringheta, P.C.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Flavonols and ellagic acid derivatives in peels of different species of jabuticaba (Plinia spp.) identified by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn. Food Chem. 2018, 252, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kardel, M.; Taube, F.; Schulz, H.; Schütze, W.; Gierus, M. Different approaches to evaluate tannin content and structure of selected plant extracts-review and new aspects. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2013, 86, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hernandez-Hernandez, A.; Alarcon-Aguilar, F.; Almanza-Perez, J.; Nieto-Yañez, O.; Olivares-Sanchez, J.; Duran-Diaz, A.; Rodriguez-Monroy, M.; Canales-Martinez, M. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities, wound-healing effectiveness and chemical characterization of the latex of Jatropha neopauciflora Pax. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 204, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sánchez-Rabaneda, F.; Jáuregui, O.; Casals, I.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Izquierdo-Pulido, M.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric study of the phenolic composition of cocoa (Theobroma cacao). J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dias, A.L.D.S.; Rozet, E.; Larondelle, Y.; Hubert, P.; Rogez, H.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. Development and validation of an UHPLC-LTQ-Orbitrap MS method for non-anthocyanin flavonoids quantification in Euterpe oleracea juice. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 9235–9249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Papalia, T.; Barreca, D.; Panuccio, M.R. Assessment of Antioxidant and Cytoprotective Potential of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) Grown in Southern Italy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Carvalho, H.A.S.; Ribeiro, L.F.; Pirovani, C.P.; Gramacho, K.P.; Micheli, F. Activity of polygalacturonases from Moniliophthora perniciosa depends on fungus culture conditions and is enhanced by Theobroma cacao extracts. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 83, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Haddock, E.A.; Gupta, R.K.; Al-Shafi, S.M.K.; Haslam, E.; Magnolato, D. The metabolism of gallic acid and hexahydroxydiphenic acid in plants. Part Introduction. Naturally occurring galloyl esters. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1982, 1, 2515–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saffaryazdi, A.; Ganjeali, A.; Farhoosh, R.; Cheniany, M. Variation in phenolic compounds, α-linolenic acid and linoleic acid contents and antioxidant activity of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) during phenological growth stages. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lu, Z.; Nie, G.; Belton, P.S.; Tang, H.; Zhao, B. Structure–activity relationship analysis of antioxidant ability and neuroprotective effect of gallic acid derivatives. Neurochem. Int. 2006, 48, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Joshi, R.; Gangabhagirathi, R.; Venu, S.; Adhikari, S.; Mukherjee, T. Antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging reactions of gentisic acid: In-vitro and pulse radiolysis studies. Free Radic. Res. 2011, 46, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Abedi, F.; Razavi, B.M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. A review on gentisic acid as a plant derived phenolic acid and metabolite of aspirin: Comprehensive pharmacology, toxicology, and some pharmaceutical aspects. Phytother. Res. 2019, 34, 729–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shukla, S.; Gupta, S. Apigenin: A Promising Molecule for Cancer Prevention. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 962–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darabi, P.; Khazali, H.; Natanzi, M.M. Therapeutic potentials of the natural plant flavonoid apigenin in polycystic ovary syndrome in rat model: Via modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and antioxidant activity. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 36, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Molina-Quijada, D.M.; Medina-Juárez, L.A.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; Robles-Sánchez, R.M.; Gamez-Meza, N. Compuestos fenólicos y actividad antioxidante de cáscara de uva (Vitis viniferaL.) de mesa cultivada en el noroeste de México Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of table grape (Vitis viniferaL.) skin from northwest Mexico. CyTA J. Food 2010, 8, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Janaki, A.; Kaleena, P.K.; Elumalai, D.; Velu, K.; Babu, M.; Ravi, S.; Hemavathi, M.; Arulvasu, C. Qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analysis: In vitro studies of antioxidant and anticancer activity of Bauhinia tomentosa (L) leaf extracts. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 2403–2410. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nayak, A.; Satapathi, K.; Sahoo, S. Comparative Studies on the Phytochemistry, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Jatropha Species (J. curcas L. and J. gossypifolia L.) of Odisha. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2016, 8, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hassan, H.A.; Attia, E.Z.; Desoukey, S.Y.; Mohamed, K.M.; Kamel, M. Quantitative Analysis of Total Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Constituents of some Ficus species. J. Adv. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 2, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Elosaily, A.H.; Mahrous, E.A.; Salama, A.M.; El Zalabani, S.M. Proximate composition, phenolic content and antioxidant potential of the leaves of four Jatropha species. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 10, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Surco-Laos, F.; Campos, M.V.; Loyola, E.; Dueñas, M.; Santos, C. ACTIVIDAD ANTIOXIDANTE DE METABOLITOS DE FLAVONOIDES ORIGINADOS POR LA MICROFLORA DEL INTESTINO HUMANO. Rev. Soc. Química Perú 2016, 82, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Cantos, E.; García-Viguera, C.; De Pascual-Teresa, S.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Effect of postharvest ultraviolet irradiation on resveratrol and other phenolics of cv. Napoleon table grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 4606–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 00212 g001 550
Figure 1. Fragmented ion of two phenolic compounds found in leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata by mass spectrophotometer with electrospray in negative ionization mode and ion trap (ESI-IT-MS/MS). (A) Gallic acid. (B) Apigenin.
Figure 1. Fragmented ion of two phenolic compounds found in leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata by mass spectrophotometer with electrospray in negative ionization mode and ion trap (ESI-IT-MS/MS). (A) Gallic acid. (B) Apigenin.
Plants 10 00212 g001
Plants 10 00212 g002 550
Figure 2. Jatropha species, leaves and fruits. (A) Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg, (B) Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg.
Figure 2. Jatropha species, leaves and fruits. (A) Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg, (B) Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg.
Plants 10 00212 g002
Plants 10 00212 g003 550
Figure 3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography chromatograms of Jatropha cordata extracts (280 nm). A: Leaves extract. B. Stems extract. (1) 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, (2) Caffeic acid, (3) Gallic acid, (4) Gentisic acid, (5) p-coumaric acid, (6) Synapic acid, (8) Vanillic acid, (9) Apigenin, (10) Epicatechin, (11) Quercetin. For peaks between 30 and 40 min, considering the mass spectrophotometer information, they could correspond to sinapic acid, rutin hydrate and vitexin. However, there was no conclusive evidence for their identification when compared with the retention times of commercial standards.
Figure 3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography chromatograms of Jatropha cordata extracts (280 nm). A: Leaves extract. B. Stems extract. (1) 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, (2) Caffeic acid, (3) Gallic acid, (4) Gentisic acid, (5) p-coumaric acid, (6) Synapic acid, (8) Vanillic acid, (9) Apigenin, (10) Epicatechin, (11) Quercetin. For peaks between 30 and 40 min, considering the mass spectrophotometer information, they could correspond to sinapic acid, rutin hydrate and vitexin. However, there was no conclusive evidence for their identification when compared with the retention times of commercial standards.
Plants 10 00212 g003
Table
Table 1. Qualitative analysis of phytochemical compounds from aerial part (leaves and stems) of J. cinerea and J. cordata.
Table 1. Qualitative analysis of phytochemical compounds from aerial part (leaves and stems) of J. cinerea and J. cordata.
PhytochemicalsJ. cinereaJ. cordata
HEAEMHEAEM
Flavonoids−−++−−++
Phenols−−++−−++
Coumarins−+++−−−−
Saponins−−−−−−−−
Sterols+−−−+−−−
Tannins−−++−−++
Alkaloids−−−−−−−−
Quinones−−−−−−−−
Glycosides−−−−−−−−
(+) Present, (−) Absent. Solvents; H: hexane, AE: Ethyl acetate, E: ethanol and M: methanol.
Table
Table 2. Phenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata.
Table 2. Phenol and flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata.
J. cinereaJ. cordata
LeavesStemsLeavesStems
Total phenols (mg GAE/g)82.65 ± 1.65 *62.02 ± 2.80 *215.63 ± 3.62 *153.39 ± 2.91 *
Total flavonoids (mg QE/g)11.30 ± 0.13 *3.27 ± 0.11 *18.55 ± 0.23 *7.41 ± 0.14 *
ABTS IC50 (mg/mL)23.03 ± 2.31 *15.92 ± 0.01 *7.59 ± 1.107.18 ± 0.99
DPPH IC50 (mg/mL)14.03 ± 2.4012.50 ± 1.302.72 ± 0.46 *3.96 ± 0.39 *
Values are the mean (n = 6) ± standard deviation. * Mean values in the same line and the same species showed significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Phenolic compounds from leaves and stems of J. cinerea and J. cordata identified by ESI-IT-MS/MS.
Table 3. Phenolic compounds from leaves and stems of J. cinerea and J. cordata identified by ESI-IT-MS/MS.
CompoundsPrecursor IonFragment IonsJ. cinereaJ. cordata
[M-H]-m/zESI-MSN (m/z)LeavesStemsLeavesStems
13,4-Dihydroxy-benzoic acid [33]153109, 153, 108****
24-Hydroxy-benzoic acid °13792, 93, 136, 137****
3Caffeic acid °179135****
4Ellagic acid [34]301300.9, 229, 257****
5Gallic acid °169125****
6Gentisic acid °153109****
7p-coumaric acid °163119****
8Syringic acid °197182, 153ND*NDND
9Sinapic acid °223164, 179NDNDND*
10Tannic acid [35]17001700****
11Vanillic acid °167157, 123, 108ND*ND*
12Apigenin °269227, 150, 117****
13Catechol [36]109108, 91****
14Epicatechin °289245, 205, 179ND*ND*
15Apigenin-7-O-Rutinoside [37]577269, 577*NDNDND
16Rutin hydrate [38]609301, 151NDND**
17Isovitexin [39]431311, 341, 413****
18Pyrogalol [39]125124, 125NDNDND*
19Quercetin °301151, 179ND***
20Rhoifolin [39]577577.1, 269, 268*NDNDND
21Rutin °609301, 179,151ND***
22Vitexin [39]431311,341*ND**
° Confirmed by authentic chemical standards. ND: Not detected. * Detected.
Table
Table 4. Phenolic compounds content in methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata by HPLC-DAD (μg/g of sample).
Table 4. Phenolic compounds content in methanolic extracts of leaves and stems from J. cinerea and J. cordata by HPLC-DAD (μg/g of sample).
CompoundsJ. cinereaJ. cordata
LeavesStemsLeavesStems
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid60.34 ± 0.50 *35.97 ± 0.10 *75.74 ± 0.89 *22.09 ± 0.62 *
Caffeic acid61.27 ± 0.10 *22.19 ± 0.10 *58.75 ± 0.31 *50.49 ± 0.31 *
Gallic acid261.68 ± 0.40 *113.77 ± 0.60 *284.45 ± 1.27 *215.31 ± 1.19 *
Gentisic acid634.55 ± 1.80 *26.91 ± 0.40 *864.62 ± 5.24 *14.6 ± 0.21 *
p-coumaric acid175.27 ± 0.40 *62.98 ± 0.50 *123.91 ± 0.13 *ND
Sinapic acidNDNDND12.44 ± 0.12 *
Syringic acidND39.15 ± 0.60 *NDND
Vanillic acidND38.48 ± 0.10 *ND40.81 ± 0.80 *
Apigenin148.06 ± 1.30 *94.18 ± 1.80 *343.54 ± 2.96 *87.61 ± 1.46 *
EpicatechinND230.05 ± 4.60 *ND90.16 ± 6.79 *
QuercetinND198.52 ± 0.20 *238.12 ± 1.63 *573.98 ± 2.11 *
Values represent means (n = 9) ± standard deviation. * Mean values in the same line and the same species showed significant differences (p < 0.05). ND: No Detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vega-Ruiz, Y.C.; Hayano-Kanashiro, C.; Gámez-Meza, N.; Medina-Juárez, L.A. Determination of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg. Plants 2021, 10, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020212

AMA Style

Vega-Ruiz YC, Hayano-Kanashiro C, Gámez-Meza N, Medina-Juárez LA. Determination of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg. Plants. 2021; 10(2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vega-Ruiz, Yeimi Cecilia, Corina Hayano-Kanashiro, Nohemí Gámez-Meza, and Luis Angel Medina-Juárez. 2021. "Determination of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg" Plants 10, no. 2: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020212

APA Style

Vega-Ruiz, Y. C., Hayano-Kanashiro, C., Gámez-Meza, N., & Medina-Juárez, L. A. (2021). Determination of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Stems from Jatropha cinerea (Ortega) Müll. Arg and Jatropha cordata (Ortega) Müll. Arg. Plants, 10(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop