Next Article in Journal
Proteomic Identification and Meta-Analysis in Salvia hispanica RNA-Seq de novo Assemblies
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Foliar Silicic Acid Application on Soybean (Glycine max L.) Varieties Grown across Two Distinct Rainfall Years
Previous Article in Journal
Berry Quality and Anthocyanin Content of ‘Consort’ Black Currants Grown under Artificial Shade
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silicon in the Soil–Plant Continuum: Intricate Feedback Mechanisms within Ecosystems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/plants10040767
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress

by
Taowen Pan
1,2,3,
Jian Zhang
1,
Lanmengqi He
1,
Abdul Hafeez
1,2,3,
Chuanchuan Ning
1,2,3 and
Kunzheng Cai
1,2,3,*
1
College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Key Laboratory of Tropical Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(4), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040767
Submission received: 12 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 11 April 2021 / Published: 14 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silicon in the Soil-Plant Continuum)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Flooding is an important natural disaster limiting rice production. Silicon (Si) has been shown to have an important role in alleviating varied environmental stress. However, very few studies have investigated the effects and mechanisms of Si in alleviating flood stress in rice. In the present study, wild type rice (cv. Oochikara, WT) and Si-defective mutant (lsi1) were chosen to examine the impacts of Si application on plant growth, photosynthesis, cell structure, and antioxidant enzyme activity of rice exposed to submergence stress at tillering stage. Our results showed that Si application improved root morphological traits, and increased Si uptake and plant biomass of WT under submergence stress, but non-significantly influenced lsi1 mutant. Under submergence stress, leaf photosynthesis of WT was significantly inhibited, and Si application had no significant effects on photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration for both of WT and lsi1 mutant, but the photochemical quenching of WT was increased and the integrity of cell structure was improved. In addition, Si application significantly reduced malondialdehyde concentration and increased the activity of peroxidase and catalase in WT leaves under submergence stress. These results suggested that Si could increase rice plant resistance against submergence stress by improving root morphological traits and chloroplast ultrastructure and enhancing antioxidant defense.

1. Introduction

Rice is an important food crop; over half of the population in the world depend on rice, especially in many Asian and African countries [1]. Global climate change has increased the distribution and frequency of heavy rainfall that can negatively affect plant growth and development. If it persists for a number of days, it may lead to the plant’s death. Many crops, including rice, a semi-aquatic plant, are significantly negatively impacted by flooding, resulting in annual yield loss [2]. More than 20 million hectares of rice in Asia and over 16% of rice in the world are adversely influenced by flooding because of submergence each year [3]. The estimated annual economic loss of this year is more than US$ 600 million. Flooding and reaeration can cause plant oxidative stress, leading to the production and rapid accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4]. In addition, the production of ROS may lead to enzyme dysfunction and lipid oxidative damage, and eventually form toxic products, such as malondialdehyde (MDA) [5]. Under environmental stress, plants possess a complex antioxidant defensive system through increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) to combat harmful effects caused by ROS [4,6,7]. Generally, rice plants adapt to submergence stress through escape or quiescence strategies [8,9]. Under hypoxic conditions, escape strategies for submergence tolerance of rice are usually characterized by rapid internodal or stem elongation and leaf extension, which can be in contact with air [10]. Different environmental and hormonal factors such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GA) regulate shoot elongation during submergence stress [11]. The rapid elongation of shoot can again restore the contact between leaves and air. However, if the carbohydrate reserves are exhausted during this process, it may cause the plant to die [12]. Specific allelic variants of Sub1A confer submergence tolerance in lowland rice, an ethylene-response factor found in some rice varieties that can reduce ethylene and GA responsiveness [13], causing a quiescent growth, which is related to the ability to regenerate after desubmergence [14]. Rice with Sub1A adopts a quiescence behavior strategy, where rice plants maintain slow growth and development under flooding conditions, storing energy until the flood water recedes, and then use the stored energy for recovery and extension [15].
Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in soil. Rice is a typical Si-accumulating plant, containing large amounts of silicon that are significantly higher than other macronutrients including N, P, and K [16]. Silicon plays an important role in increasing plant resistance against varied biotic and abiotic stresses [17,18]. In the abiotic stress-induced adversity, Si is involved in the regulation of various plant metabolic processes, mainly including the production of osmotic pressure and the regulation of ROS by the antioxidant defense system [19]. Si enhances the resistance of plants to various abiotic stresses by regulating the synthesis/accumulation of plant endogenous hormones. For instance, Si enhanced the activity of polyphenoloxydases, peroxidase, and chitinases in cucumber plant roots infected by Pythium [20]. Si deposition in hulls, leaves, and culms enhances the rigidity and strength of a cell wall and reduces transpiration from cuticle, and thus improves the resistance to lodging, UV radiation, and temperature and drought stress [21]. Several researchers have studied the physiological changes and molecular regulation of rice plants exposed to submergence stress [22,23,24]. However, the role and mechanism of Si in alleviating submergence stress is seldom reported. In the present study, we have explored the role of Si in mitigating submergence stress of rice using wild type rice (cv. Oochikara) and Si-defective mutant, which has a mutation in the influx transporter (Lsi1) of Si [25]. Our hypothesis is that Si can alleviate submergence stress of rice through increasing Si uptake and enhancing plant antioxidant system of rice, but will have no effects for Si-defective mutant. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of submergence stress on plant growth as well as cytological and physiological traits of rice, which help decipher the role of Si in mitigating submergence stress.

2. Results

2.1. Plant Biomass

Plant biomass of wild type (WT) and lsi1 mutant was significantly reduced under submergence stress (Figure 1). However, exogenous Si application alleviated submergence stress and increased the growth of WT shoot. Under submergence stress, compared with no Si treatment, Si application increased the stem, leaf, and total biomass of WT by 99.8%, 80.6%, and 77.2%, respectively. However, for lsi1 mutant, Si treatment did not influence root, stem, leaf, and total biomass.

2.2. Root Morphological Traits

Submergence stress significantly inhibited root growth for both WT and lsi1 mutant, while Si application could improve root development and morphological traits of WT (Figure 2). Compared with WT, submergence stress significantly increased the average diameter of lsi1 mutant. Under submergence stress, surface area and volume of WT were increased by 47.0% and 33.6%, respectively, by adding Si (Table 1). For lsi1 mutant, Si application had non-significant effects on root morphological traits regardless of submergence treatment.

2.3. Silicon Concentration

Si concentrations in stem and leaves of WT were significantly higher than those of lsi1 mutant regardless of submergence or Si addition (Figure 3). Whatever submergence stress or not, Si application significantly increased Si concentration in the shoots of WT. Si concentrations in the stem and leaves of WT were increased by 27.6% and 39.0%, respectively, under no-submergence stress, and 44.7% and 60.8%, respectively, under submergence stress. However, Si application did not influence Si concentration in stem and leaves of lsi1 mutant, regardless of submergence stress.

2.4. Photosynthesis

Submergence stress significantly reduced Pn, Gs, and Tr of both WT and lsi1 mutant, while Si application had non-significant effects (Table 2). In addition, under normal conditions, Si addition significantly reduced the Ci of WT. However, for lsi1 mutant, submergence stress and Si application had non-significant effects on Ci.

2.5. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Si application significantly increased qP of leaves in WT regardless of submergence stress, but had non-significant effects on qP in lsi1 mutant (Table 3). In addition, submergence stress significantly increased qN of WT, while it reduced ΦPSII. Si application and submergence stress did not influence Fo, Fm, and Fv/Fm of both rice materials.

2.6. Chloroplast Ultrastructure

Ultrastructural changes in the chloroplast were observed in WT and lsi1 mutant (Figure 4). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation revealed that, under normal growth conditions, the ultrastructure of WT and lsi1 mutant was complete and clear. In addition, the proportion of chloroplasts was large, which were fusiform in shape. The thylakoids were rich, and the lamella structure was well developed and neatly arranged (Figure 4A,D). Compared with the normal condition (CK), significant changes in the ultrastructure of rice leaves were presented under submergence treatment (Figure 4B,E). Under submergence stress, there were a large number of starch grains in WT chloroplast, and partial separation between chloroplasts and cell walls (Figure 4B). The chloroplast of lsi1 mutant showed a hemispherical shape and tended to decompose. In addition, the chloroplast was completely separated from the cell wall, and the number of osmophilic particles increased greatly (Figure 4E). Si application gradually restored the appearance and structure of WT chloroplast (Figure 4C). In addition, Si application could also reduce the number of starch grains in chloroplast. However, Si application had non-significant effects on the appearance and structure of lsi1 mutant (Figure 4F).

2.7. Malondialdehyde Concentration and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

When exposed to submergence stress, MDA concentrations in the leaves of WT and lsi1 mutant were significantly increased (Table 4). Si application significantly reduced MDA concentration of WT regardless of stress, but had a non-significant effect on MDA concentration of lsi1 mutant. Compared with WT, submergence stress significantly increased POD activity of lsi1 mutant, but had a non-significant effect on SOD and CAT activity. Si application and submergence stress had non-significant effects on SOD activity in the leaves of WT and lsi1 mutant. In addition, Si application did not influence POD and CAT activity in non-submergence stressed leaves of WT and lsi1 mutant. However, under submergence stress, Si application increased POD activity and CAT activity in WT by 41.0% and 40.8%, respectively, but had a non-significant effect on lsi1 mutant.

3. Discussion

3.1. Si Application Increased Si Uptake and Improved Plant Growth under Submergence Stress

The submergence tolerance of rice is a complex trait influenced by the interaction between environmental conditions and rice genotypes [9,26]. Our results showed that submergence stress not only inhibited root growth of both WT and lsi1 mutant (Figure 2), but also reduced biomass accumulation (Figure 1). Roots play an important role in nutrient absorption under submergence stress, and are also one of the carbohydrate storage functions required for plant survival [27]. In the present study, increased average diameter may be related to the aerenchyma tissue formed in the root.
Numerous studies have reported that Si uptake ability of rice roots contributes to Si accumulation in rice shoot [25]. The present study found that Si application significantly increased shoot Si concentration and uptake of Si regardless of stress for WT, not lsi1 mutant (Figure 3), which is beneficial to plant resistance. However, submergence stress had a non-significant effect on Si uptake in WT and lsi1 mutant. Lsi1 is an encoded transporter mainly expressed in roots and has specific transport activity for silicon; it is located in the plasma membrane of cells in both the exodermis and endodermis. In addition, as an influx transporter, Lsi1 is responsible for transporting silicon from external solutions to root cells [28]. Ma et al. [29] reported that Si uptake of Si-defective mutant was significantly reduced compared with vector control plants. Therefore, knocking out the transporter gene will cause loss of Si absorption [29]. Our results showed that Si absorption of lsi1 mutant was significantly lower than that of WT, regardless of submergence or Si addition (Figure 3), which is similar to the results by Ma et al. [29], who reported that lsi1 mutant accumulated less silicon in the shoot during the growth period. Under submergence stress, plants form aerenchyma tissue in roots and leaves, which promotes the exchange of gases underwater. This not only helps to transport O2 to the root system, but also exhausts the waste gases produced by the root system, such as methane, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and so on. We found that Si application significantly increased plant biomass accumulation of WT (Figure 1), similar to the findings of Chu et al. [30] and Viciedo et al. [31]. Chu et al. [30] demonstrated that, under submergence conditions, basal application of Si significantly reduce the loss of rice biomass. Viciedo et al. [31] reported that, under ammonium toxicity, adding Si to the nutrient solution alleviated the growth reduction of radish seedlings.
In addition, our study demonstrated that Si treatment significantly increased the surface area and volume of the WT root system, which was similar to the results by Fan et al. [32] and Li et al. [33], who found that Si improved root morphological traits of rice and tomato under heavy metal and salinity stress, respectively. It is well known that Si acts as a mechanical barrier to promote root elongation and protect the stele by hardening the cell wall of endodermal tissues and stele [34,35]. Biju et al. [36] reported that the application of Si increased the Si concentration in lentil under drought stress, which may be caused by the deposition of Si in the cell wall. The deposited Si can strengthen the membrane of plant cells and change its permeability, thereby improving drought resistance.

3.2. Si Application Did Not Influence Leaf Photosynthesis under Submergence Stress

The leaf gas exchange of plants is extremely sensitive to submergence stress [37]. Under submergence stress, the photosynthetic capacity of leaf is also limited owing to the shading effect of water [38]. Our study showed that submergence stress negatively affected the photosynthesis in WT and lsi1 mutant (Table 2). In addition, several studies reported that Si application improved plant photosynthesis under drought and heavy metal stress [39,40,41]. However, in the present study, Si application had non-significant effects on leaf photosynthesis of WT under submergence stress (Table 2).
Chlorophyll fluorescence plays an important role in photosystem II (PSII) activity and changes in photosynthetic metabolism of plants under stress [42]. In addition, PSII activity is highly sensitive to floods and water-logging [37]. In the present study, submergence stress showed significant effects on the PSII activity in rice, as reflected by the decreased qP and ΦPSII, and increased qN (Table 3), indicating that submergence stress inhibited photosynthetic electron transfer, resulting in a reduction of photosynthesis, which is consistent with the results of flooding stress change of Populus simonii [43]. Studies found that Si application could improve chlorophyll fluorescence of maize plants under drought stress [44] and tomato plants under salt stress [45]. In addition, Nwugo and Huerta [46] found that the addition of Si induced a significant increase in qP of rice plants under Cd stress. It was also observed that Si application significantly increased qP in WT. Kaufman et al. [47] proposed the “window hypothesis” of Si, and believed that Si deposited in the leaf epidermal cells in the form of Si bodies could be used as a “window” to increase light-use-efficiency through accelerating light transmission to the photosynthetic mesophyll tissues. However, our results showed that Si application had a non-significant effect on ΦPSII of WT and lsi1 mutant (Table 3), and the reasons need to be further studied.

3.3. Si Addition Improved Leaf Chloroplast Structure under Submergence Stress

In higher plants and algae, the chloroplast contains a highly ordered thylakoid membrane system that provides structural properties for optimal light capture [48]. In addition, Bertamini et al. [49] reported that the structural integrity of thylakoids contributes to the conversion of light energy in chloroplast photosynthesis. In the present study, submergence stress resulted in an increase of osmophilic granules in lsi1 mutant. Si application had non-significant effect on the distribution of osmophilic granules in lsi1 mutant (Figure 4F), while reducing the number of starch grains in chloroplasts of WT and the destruction of thylakoids (Figure 4C), which helped to restore the structural integrity of chloroplasts and improve photosynthesis. Mittelheuser and Van Steveninck [50] found that, when the chloroplast membrane structure was well developed, osmium particles were absent or rarely present. In addition, Guo et al. [51] found that Si application was helpful for the recovery of chloroplast appearance and structure of rice seedlings under Cd stress. The quantities and sizes of starch grains and osmiophilic granules in the cells were radically reduced by Si [51]. Song et al. [41] and Li et al. [52] also found that Zn and Mn destroyed the ultrastructure of chloroplasts, while the addition of Si alleviated the hazardous effects of heavy metals on rice. All in all, a complete and orderly cell structure is the basis of sustaining normal functions of cells, providing appropriate conditions for different molecules and enzymes [51].

3.4. Si Addition Reduced Oxidative Damage and Enhanced the Activity of POD and CAT under Submergence Stress

When plants are under stress, the antioxidant system will produce a series of stress responses, leading to changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes [5]. In addition, in the antioxidant enzyme system, POD and CAT have a certain ability to decompose H2O2 produced under stress, and achieve the purpose of eliminating active oxygen in plants [53,54]. Our results showed that submergence stress caused oxidative damage for both materials; the concentration of MDA was increased especially for lsi1 mutant (Table 4). Huang et al. [55] also found that MDA concentration in rice leaves increased under Cd and Zn stress. Numerous studies have shown that, under stress conditions, Si application significantly reduced MDA concentration in plant organs and alleviated the damage to plants [56,57,58,59,60,61]. Our results were consistent with those studies (Table 4), indicating that Si treatment decreased membrane lipid peroxidation in rice. In addition, submergence stress significantly increased POD activity of WT leaves, and Si application could enhance its activity (Table 4). However, the CAT activity of WT was significantly reduced under submergence stress. This is because, when the submergence stress exceeded a certain intensity, the rice cannot scavenge oxygen free radicals in time and the antioxidant capacity of antioxidant enzymes was limited, resulting in decreased enzyme activity. However, under submergence stress, the activity of CAT in lsi1 mutant was not significantly reduced, possibly because non-enzymatic antioxidants such as glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (ASA) were involved in the removal of H2O2 to cope up with submergence stress. Under different stresses and intensities, the changes of antioxidant enzymes in plants are different. For example, Ma et al. [39] reported that drought stress resulted in the increase of POD activity of cucumber plants, while silicon-treated plants showed lower POD activity than that of no-silicon-treated plants. In addition, CAT activity in cucumber plants was decreased significantly with the increase of drought intensity, and CAT activity in silicon-treated plants was higher than that of no-silicon-treated plants. However, Huang et al. [55] observed that SOD activity decreased in rice leaves, while POD and CAT activity increased under heavy metals stress. In different growth stages, the addition of Si reduced the intensity of these changes caused by Cd and Zn stress. These results show that Si takes an important part in improving the self-protection mechanism of rice against submergence stress through the antioxidant enzyme system.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Planting Material and Growth Conditions

Pot experiment was conducted at the Ecological Farm of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China (113°21′ E, 23°09′ N). Wild type rice (cv. Oochikara, WT) and Si-defective mutant rice (lsi1) were used in the study. This mutant was defective in active Si uptake. So, this rice was defined as a Si-defective mutant. Seeds were soaked for 30 min in 10% hydrogen peroxide, rinsed three times with deionized water, and then placed in incubator for 2 days at 80% humidity and 25℃ temperature. After germination, seedlings were transferred to a paddy field for growth. Plastic pots (upper diameter 27.5 × lower diameter 17.5 × height 20 cm) were filled with 5 kg of soil. Each pot was planted with three holes and two seedlings (fourth-leaf stage) planted in each hole. The basic properties of soil for pot experiments were as follows: pH 5.72, organic matter 18.36 g kg−1, total N 1.16 g kg−1, total P 0.61 g kg−1, total K 9.72 g kg−1, and available Si 147.28 mg kg−1.

4.2. Experimental Design

The experiment included four treatments with three biological replicates in the study: (1) no submergence without silicon application (CK); (2) no submergence with silicon application (Si); (3) submergence without silicon application (Sub); and (4) submergence with silicon application (Si+Sub). Silicon (K2SiO3) was added before transplanting, and the concentration was 2 mmol kg−1. The effect of potassium was eliminated by adding the same amount of KCl3. In the present experiment, to fulfill nutrient requirements for normal rice growth, nitrogen (CH4N2O; 0.325 g kg−1), phosphorus (CaP2H4O8; 0.243 g kg−1), and potassium (KCl3; 0.241 g kg−1) were added and mixed in the soil thoroughly for all treatments. For those submerged treatment, rice plants, 14 days after transplantation, along with pot were placed in a bucket (upper diameter 50 × lower diameter 40 × height 62 cm) for 7 days; the submerged depth was two-thirds of the average plant height. After the submerged treatment, plant samples were collected to analyze biomass, root traits, Si content, photosynthesis traits, chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplast ultrastructure, MDA concentration, and antioxidant enzyme activity.

4.3. Determination of Biomass and Root Morphological Traits

Sampled rice plants were separated into root, stem, and leaf; initially dried at 110 °C for 30 min; and then at 65 °C till the samples attained a constant weight. Root, stem, and leaf biomass was determined using electric balance. Fresh root samples were collected to scan (using scanner Epson Expression 1600 pro, Model EU-35, Suwa, Japan), then root morphological traits including root surface area, length, diameter, and volume were analyzed by WinRHIZO Reg. 2009 (Regent Instruments, Inc., Quebec, QC, Canada).

4.4. Measurement of Si Concentration

Colorimetric molybdenum blue method was used to determine Si concentration in rice stem and leaf [62]. In short, 0.3 g samples of stems and leaves in rice were ashed at 550 °C for 3 h, then the ash was dissolved using 1.3% hydrogen fluoride, and Si concentration was determined by spectrophotometer (PGENERAL TU-1901 UV-VIS, Beijing, China) at 811 nm.

4.5. Determination of Photosynthesis

LI-6400XT photosynthetic system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) with a photon flux density of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 and a flow rate of 500 μmol s−1 was used to measure the photosynthetic index of the third fully expanded leaf, including the photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and stomatal conductance (Gs).

4.6. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements

Chlorophyll fluorometer (MINI-PAM-II, Walz, Germany) was used to measure the chlorophyll fluorescence of the third fully expanded leaf. The actinic light intensity and the saturated flash intensity were set to 190 µmol m−2 s−1 and 6000 µmol m−2 s−1, respectively. The light induction curve program was used to measure on the plants after 20 min of dark treatment. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters include Fo (minimal fluorescence), Fm (maximal fluorescence), ΦPSII (actual photochemical efficiency of PSII), Fv/Fm (maximal photochemical efficiency), qP (photochemical quenching), and qN (non-photochemical quenching). Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, qP, and qN are calculated as follows: Fv/Fm = (Fm − Fo)/Fm; ΦPSII = ΔF/Fm′ = (Fm′ − F)/Fm′; qP = (Fm′ − F)/(Fm′ − Fo′); qN = 1 − (Fm′ − Fo′)/(Fm − Fo).

4.7. Microscopic Observation of Chloroplast Structure

Fresh leaves were collected and cut into pieces (0.5 × 0.3 cm). The pieces were fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C for 8 h and rinsed four times with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 15 min each time. Then, they were fixed overnight with 1% OsO4 and rinsed four times with phosphate buffer solution (PPB) for 15 min each time. After the gradient concentration (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%), the ethanol solution was dehydrated for 15 min, and then dehydrated with 100% ethanol solution for another 15 min. The material was treated with 100% acetone twice for 15 min each time and embedded with different ratios of acetone and resin, and polymerized at 70 °C for 24 h. Finally, the embedded material was cut with a microtome (Leica, Germany) and observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Talos L120C, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.8. Determination of Malondialdehyde Concentration

MDA concentration in leaves was determined by thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction [63]. Here, 0.5 g leaf sample was extracted with 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and 0.5% TBA was added to the extract. After 20 min of boiling water bath, centrifugation was carried out. The absorbance of the sample supernatant was measured at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm at the same time.

4.9. Antioxidant Enzyme Activity Measurements

SOD activity in leaves was measured according to its ability to inhibit photochemical reduction of Nitrotetrazolium Blue chloride (NBT) [64] at 560 nm using a spectrophotometer (PGENERAL TU-1901 UV-VIS, Beijing, China). POD activity was determined by the Guaiacol method of Egley et al. [65]. The increase in absorbance of the reaction system in 5 min was measured at an absorbance of 470 nm. CAT activity was determined by the decomposition rate of H2O2 at 240 nm [66].

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as the mean ± standard error for three replicates. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and data differences among the treatments were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test (MRT) at a 0.05 probability level.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our results suggested that submergence stress had negative impacts on the growth and development of rice at tillering stage. Si application could reverse the inhibited effect of submergence stress through increasing Si uptake and accumulation and plant biomass, improving root morphological traits and chloroplast ultrastructure. In addition, Si reduced oxidase damage by enhancing the activity of POD and CAT and reducing MDA concentration, thereby alleviating the damage of submergence stress to rice. Further studies are needed to decipher the molecular mechanisms of Si-alleviated submergence stress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C.; methodology, T.P.; software, T.P.; validation, T.P. and C.N.; formal analysis, T.P. and C.N.; investigation, J.Z. and L.H.; resources, T.P. and C.N.; data curation, T.P., J.Z., and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P.; writing—review and editing, K.C. and A.H.; visualization, T.P. and A.H.; supervision, K.C.; project administration, K.C.; funding acquisition, K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870420).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jianfeng Ma of Okayama University (Japan) for providing the two rice materials, wild type (cv. Oochikara, WT) and Si-defective mutant (lsi1), in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chukwu, S.C.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ramlee, S.I.; Ismail, S.I.; Oladosu, Y.; Okporie, E.; Onyishi, G.; Utobo, E.; Ekwu, L.; Swaray, S.; et al. Marker-assisted selection and gene pyramiding for resistance to bacterial leaf blight disease of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 440–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Arolu, F.; Chukwu, S.C.; Muhammad, I.; Kareem, I.; Salisu, M.A.; Arolu, I.W. Submergence tolerance in rice: Review of mechanism, breeding and, future prospects. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Singh, S.; Mackill, D.J.; Ismail, A.M. Tolerance of longer-term partial stagnant flooding is independent of the SUB1 locus in rice. Field Crops Res. 2011, 121, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ella, E.S.; Kawano, N.; Yamauchi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Ismail, A.M. Blocking ethylene perception enhances flooding tolerance in rice seedlings. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scandalios, J.G. Oxygen stress and superoxide dismutases. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sarkar, R.K. Saccharide content and growth parameters in relation with flooding tolerance in rice. Biol. Plant. 1997, 40, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmed, S.; Nawata, E.; Hosokawa, Y.; Domae, Y.; Sakuratani, T. Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mungbean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perata, P.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Submergence tolerance in rice requires SUB1A, an ethylene-response-factor-like gene. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jackson, M.B.; Ram, P.C. Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sakagami, J.-I.; Joho, Y.; Sone, C. Complete submergence escape with shoot elongation ability by underwater photosynthesis in African rice, Oryza glaberrima Steud. Field Crops Res. 2013, 152, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vriezen, W.H.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Van Der Straeten, D. Regulation of submergence induced enhanced shoot elongation in Oryza sativa L. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sakagami, J.-I.; Kawano, N. Survival of submerged rice in a flood-prone region of West Africa. Tropics 2011, 20, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schmitz, A.J.; Folsom, J.J.; Jikamaru, Y.; Ronald, P.; Walia, H. SUB1A-mediated submergence tolerance response in rice involves differential regulation of the brassinosteroid pathway. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1060–1070. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fukao, T.; Xu, K.; Ronald, P.C.; Bailey-serres, J. A variable cluster of ethylene response factor–like genes regulates metabolic and developmental acclimation responses to submergence in rice. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2021–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Goswami, S.; Kar, R.K.; Paul, A.; Dey, N. Differential expression of Sub1A loci in rice under submergence. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 2018, 27, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, J.F.; Takahashi, E. Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  17. Debona, D.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Datnoff, L.E. Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cai, K.Z.; Gao, D.; Chen, J.N.; Luo, S.M. Probing the mechanisms of silicon-mediated pathogen resistance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Khan, M.I.R.K.; Ashfaque, F.; Chhillar, H.; Irfan, M.; Nafees, K.A. The intricacy of silicon, plant growth regulators and other signaling molecules for abiotic stress tolerance: An entrancing crosstalk between stress alleviators. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chérif, M.; Asselin, A.; Bélanger, R.R. Defense responses induced by soluble silicon in cucumber roots infected by Pythium spp. Phytopathology 1994, 84, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J. Submergence tolerance conferred by Sub1A is mediated by SLR1 and SLRL1 restriction of gibberellin responses in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16814–16819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Septiningsih, E.M.; Pamplona, A.M.; Sanchez, D.L.; Neeraja, C.N.; Vergara, G.V.; Heuer, S.; Ismail, A.M.; Mackill, D.J. Development of Submergence-tolerant rice cultivars: The Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Loreti, E.; van Veen, H.; Perata, P. Plant responses to flooding stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 33, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ma, J.F.; Tamai, K.; Ichii, M.; Wu, G.F. A rice mutant defective in Si uptake. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 2111–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Das, K.K.; Panda, D.; Sarkar, R.K.; Reddy, J.N.; Ismail, A.M. Submergence tolerance in relation to variable floodwater conditions in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 66, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ella, E.S.; Dionisio-Sese, M.L.; Ismail, A.M. Application of silica before sowing negatively affects growth and survival of rice following submergence. Philip. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Tamai, K.; Konishi, S.; Fujiwara, T.; Katsuhara, M.; Yano, M. An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature 2007, 448, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, J.F.; Tamai, K.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Konishi, S.; Katsuhara, M.; Ishiguro, M.; Murata, Y.; Yano, M. A silicon transporter in rice. Nature 2006, 440, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chu, M.J.; Liu, M.; Ding, Y.F.; Wang, S.H.; Liu, Z.H.; Tang, S.; Ding, C.Q.; Chen, L.; Li, G.H. Effect of nitrogen and silicon on rice submerged at tillering stage. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Viciedo, D.O.; Prado, R.D.M.; Toledo, R.L.; Aguilar, D.S.; Santos, L.C.N.D.S.; Hurtado, A.C.; Calzada, K.P.; Aguilar, C.B. Physiological role of silicon in radish seedlings under ammonium toxicity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5637–5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, X.Y.; Wen, X.H.; Huang, F.; Cai, Y.X.; Cai, K.Z. Effects of silicon on morphology, ultrastructure and exudates of rice root under heavy metal stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, H.L.; Zhu, Y.X.; Hu, Y.H.; Han, W.H.; Gong, H.J. Beneficial effects of silicon in alleviating salinity stress of tomato seedlings grown under sand culture. Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hattori, T.; Inanaga, S.; Tanimoto, E.; Lux, A.; Luxová, M.; Sugimoto, Y. Silicon-induced changes in viscoelastic properties of sorghum root cell walls. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lux, A.; Luxová, M.; Abe, J.; Tanimoto, E.; Hattori, T.; Inanaga, S. The dynamics of silicon deposition in the sorghum root endodermis. New Phytol. 2003, 158, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Biju, S.; Fuentes, S.; Gupta, D. Silicon improves seed germination and alleviates drought stress in lentil crops by regulating osmolytes, hydrolytic enzymes and antioxidant defense system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Panda, D.; Rao, D.N.; Sharma, S.G.; Strasser, R.J.; Sarkar, R.K. Submergence effects on rice genotypes during seedling stage: Probing of submergence driven changes of photosystem 2 by chlorophyll a fluorescence induction O-J-I-P transients. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, S.Y.; Wu, Y.S.; Chen, C.T.; Lai, M.H.; Yen, H.M.; Yang, C.Y. Physiological and molecular responses of seedlings of an upland rice (‘Tung Lu 3′) to total submergence compared to those of a submergence-tolerant lowland rice (‘FR13A’). Rice 2017, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ma, C.C.; Li, Q.F.; Gao, Y.B.; Xin, T.R. Effects of silicon application on drought resistance of cucumber plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, W.; Yao, X.Q.; Cai, K.Z.; Chen, J.N. Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, A.; Li, P.; Fan, F.L.; Li, Z.J.; Liang, Y.C. The Effect of Silicon on Photosynthesis and Expression of Its Relevant Genes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under High-Zinc Stress. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schnabel, G.; Strittmatter, G.; Noga, G. Changes in photosynthetic electron transport in potato cultivars with different field resistance after infection with Phytophthora infestans. J. Phytopathol. 1998, 146, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Du, K.B.; Xu, L.; Tu, B.K.; Shen, B.X. Influences of soil flooding on ultrastructure and photosynthetic capacity of leaves of one-year old seedlings of two poplar clones. Sci. Silv. Sin. 2010, 46, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, Q.F.; Ma, C.C.; Shang, Q.L. Effects of silicon on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzymes of maize under drought stress. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 18, 531–536. [Google Scholar]
  45. Al-aghabary, K.; Zhu, Z.J.; Shi, Q.H. Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nwugo, C.C.; Huerta, A.J. Effects of silicon nutrition on cadmium uptake, growth and photosynthesis of rice exposed to low-level cadmium. Plant Soil 2008, 311, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaufman, P.B.; Takeoka, Y.; Carlson, T.J.; Bigelow, W.C.; Jones, J.D.; Moore, P.H.; Ghosheh, N.S. Studies on silica deposition in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) using scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, neutron activation analysis and light microscopy. Phytomorphology 1979, 29, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pfannschmidt, T. Chloroplast redox signals: How photosynthesis controls its own genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bertamini, M.; Muthuchelian, K.; Nedunchezhian, N. Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) grown under field conditions. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mittelheuser, C.J.; Van Steveninck, R.F.M. The ultrastructure of wheat leaves I. Changes due to natural senescence and the effects of kinetin and ABA on detached leaves incubated in the dark. Protoplasma 1971, 73, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, L.; Chen, A.T.; He, N.; Yang, D.; Liu, M.D. Exogenous silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity in rice seedlings in relation to Cd distribution and ultrastructure changes. J. Soils Sedim. 2018, 18, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, P.; Song, A.; Li, Z.J.; Fan, F.L.; Liang, Y.C. Silicon ameliorates manganese toxicity by regulating both physiological processes and expression of genes associated with photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 2015, 354, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Breusegem, F.V. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Posmyk, M.M.; Kontek, R.; Janas, K.M. Antioxidant enzymes activity and phenolic compounds content in red cabbage seedlings exposed to copper stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huang, F.; Wen, X.H.; Cai, Y.X.; Cai, K.Z. Silicon-Mediated enhancement of heavy metal tolerance in rice at different growth stages. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Liang, Y.C. Effects of silicon on enzyme activity, and sodium, potassium and calcium concentration in barley under salt stress. Plant Soil 1999, 209, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, J.F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yao, X.Q.; Chu, J.Z.; Cai, K.Z.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.D.; Geng, W.Y. Silicon improves the tolerance of wheat seedlings to Ultraviolet-B stress. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 143, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, H.J.; Wu, J.W.; Sun, H.; Gong, H.J. Silicon improves seed germination and alleviates oxidative stress of bud seedlings in tomato under water deficit stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Parveen, A.; Liu, W.; Hussain, S.; Asghar, J.; Perveen, S.; Xiong, Y.S. Silicon priming regulates morpho-physiological growth and oxidative metabolism in maize under drought stress. Plants 2019, 8, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Abdelaal, K.A.A.; Mazrou, Y.S.S.; Hafez, Y.M. Silicon Foliar Application Mitigates Salt Stress in Sweet Pepper Plants by Enhancing Water Status, Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Fruit Yield. Plants 2020, 9, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Van der Vorm, P.D.J. Dry ashing of plant material and dissolution of the ash in HF for the colorimetric determination of silicon. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1987, 18, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bailly, C.; Benamar, A.; Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seeds as related to deterioration during accelerated aging. Physiol. Plant 1996, 97, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gong, H.J.; Zhu, X.Y.; Chen, K.M.; Wang, S.M.; Zhang, C.L. Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Egley, G.H.; Paul, R.N.; Vaughn, K.C.; Duke, S.O. Role of peroxidase in the development of water-impermeable seed coats in Sida spinosa L. Planta 1983, 157, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cakmak, I.; Marschner, H. Magnesium deficiency and high light intensity enhance activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase in bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 1222–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 10 00767 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of Si application on root (A), stem (B), leaf (C), and total biomass (D) of rice under submergence stress. Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type; DW, dry weight.
Figure 1. Effects of Si application on root (A), stem (B), leaf (C), and total biomass (D) of rice under submergence stress. Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type; DW, dry weight.
Plants 10 00767 g001
Plants 10 00767 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of Si application on phenotypic characteristics of roots under submergence stress. WT, wild type.
Figure 2. Effects of Si application on phenotypic characteristics of roots under submergence stress. WT, wild type.
Plants 10 00767 g002
Plants 10 00767 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of Si application on Si concentration in rice stem (A) and leaf (B) under submergence stress. Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type.
Figure 3. Effects of Si application on Si concentration in rice stem (A) and leaf (B) under submergence stress. Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type.
Plants 10 00767 g003
Plants 10 00767 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of Si application on chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves under submergence stress (×8500, bar = 1 μm). WT, wild type. (A–C), WT; (D–F), lsi1; (A,D), CK; (B,E), Sub; (C,F), Si + Sub. Ch, chloroplast; Cw, well wall; Tl, thylakoild lamella; Og, osmiophilic granules; Sg, starch grains.
Figure 4. Effects of Si application on chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves under submergence stress (×8500, bar = 1 μm). WT, wild type. (A–C), WT; (D–F), lsi1; (A,D), CK; (B,E), Sub; (C,F), Si + Sub. Ch, chloroplast; Cw, well wall; Tl, thylakoild lamella; Og, osmiophilic granules; Sg, starch grains.
Plants 10 00767 g004
Table
Table 1. Effects of Si application on root morphological traits of rice under submergence stress.
Table 1. Effects of Si application on root morphological traits of rice under submergence stress.
MaterialsTreatmentTotal Root Length (m)Surface Area (cm2)Volume (cm3)Average Diameter (mm)
WTCK123.5 ± 12.0 b1150.5 ± 157.4 bc9.03 ± 1.61 b0.33 ± 0.01 cd
Si175.8 ± 16.8 a1529.2 ± 228.0 a11.16 ± 0.15 a0.32 ± 0.01 cde
Sub57.0 ± 1.7 cd622.8 ± 75.1 d5.65 ± 0.37 e0.35 ± 0.02 bc
Si + Sub77.9 ± 6.1 c915.7 ± 56.3 c7.55 ± 0.89 bcd0.37 ± 0.01 b
lsi1CK118.2 ± 25.1 b1125.8 ± 198.7 bc8.85 ± 1.24 bc0.32 ± 0.01 de
Si140.4 ± 21.3 b1247.6 ± 98.8 b9.15 ± 0.68 b0.30 ± 0.02 e
Sub49.7 ± 7.0 d621.3 ± 104.6 d7.18 ± 0.55 cde0.41 ± 0.01 a
Si + Sub46.8 ± 7.8 d516.9 ± 53.4 d6.01 ± 0.98 de0.42 ± 0.02 a
Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type.
Table
Table 2. Effects of Si application on photosynthesis of rice leaves under submergence stress.
Table 2. Effects of Si application on photosynthesis of rice leaves under submergence stress.
MaterialsTreatmentPn
(μmol CO2 m−2 s−1)		Gs
(μmol H2O m−2 s−1)		Ci
(μmol CO2 mol−1)		Tr
(mmol H2O m−2 s−1)
WTCK15.49 ± 0.62 a0.53 ± 0.08 a338.24 ± 8.83 a6.23 ± 0.63 de
Si15.03 ± 0.32 a0.44 ± 0.02 ab317.35 ± 3.84 b7.35 ± 0.34 bcd
Sub12.06 ± 0.40 bc0.28 ± 0.04 d302.15 ± 9.25 bc6.33 ± 0.60 de
Si + Sub11.53 ± 1.22 c0.24 ± 0.05 d295.41 ± 9.20 c6.04 ± 0.82 e
lsi1CK13.33 ± 0.73 b0.40 ± 0.09 bc316.52 ± 10.96 b8.54 ± 0.43 a
Si12.75 ± 1.79 bc0.30 ± 0.02 cd301.33 ± 10.83 bc8.44 ± 0.69 ab
Sub11.06 ± 0.45 c0.30 ± 0.02 cd311.63 ± 8.84 bc7.83 ± 0.56 abc
Si + Sub11.55 ± 0.59 c0.25 ± 0.06 d293.43 ± 15.75 c6.95 ± 0.64 cde
Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type. Pn, photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate; Ci, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration; Gs, stomatal conductance.
Table
Table 3. Effects of Si application on chlorophyll fluorescence of rice under submergence stress.
Table 3. Effects of Si application on chlorophyll fluorescence of rice under submergence stress.
MaterialsTreatmentqPqNFoFmFv/FmΦPSII
WTCK0.533 ± 0.009 bc0.628 ± 0.050 c511.7 ± 34.6 a3363.3 ± 202.1 a0.848 ± 0.003 a0.379 ± 0.005 a
Si0.559 ± 0.012 a0.672 ± 0.027 bc501.7 ± 14.0 a3223.7 ± 28.9 a0.844 ± 0.004 a0.383 ± 0.004 a
Sub0.529 ± 0.008 c0.737 ± 0.023 a524.3 ± 14.0 a3394.3 ± 117.7 a0.845 ± 0.007 a0.345 ± 0.018 b
Si + Sub0.551 ± 0.014 ab0.731 ± 0.017 ab515.7 ± 18.6 a3261.3 ± 187.3 a0.842 ± 0.008 a0.357 ± 0.002 ab
lsi1CK0.556 ± 0.010 a0.742 ± 0.039 a496.0 ± 19.0 a3148.3 ± 66.9 a0.842 ± 0.003 a0.357 ± 0.021 ab
Si0.536 ± 0.016 bc0.750 ± 0.040 a494.3 ± 28.7 a3159.0 ± 127.0 a0.844 ± 0.004 a0.342 ± 0.017 b
Sub0.533 ± 0.005 bc0.733 ± 0.019 ab497.3 ± 12.6 a3226.3 ± 102.6 a0.846 ± 0.003 a0.348 ± 0.010 b
Si + Sub0.521 ± 0.010 c0.722 ± 0.036 ab498.0 ± 5.2 a3234.7 ± 96.2 a0.846 ± 0.005 a0.344 ± 0.021 b
Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type. qP, photochemical quenching; qN, non-photochemical quenching; Fo, minimal fluorescence; Fm, maximal fluorescence; Fv/Fm, maximal photochemical efficiency; ΦPSII, actual photochemical efficiency of PSII.
Table
Table 4. Effects of Si application on malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and antioxidant enzyme activity of rice under submergence stress.
Table 4. Effects of Si application on malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and antioxidant enzyme activity of rice under submergence stress.
MaterialsTreatmentMDA Concentration
(nmol g−1 FW)		SOD Activity
(U g−1 FW)		POD Activity
(U min−1 g−1 FW)		CAT Activity
(U min−1 g−1 FW)
WTCK20.0 ± 1.3 d22.2 ± 0.2 a999.3 ± 176.5 c1502.2 ± 233.3 ab
Si15.1 ± 1.1 e22.1 ± 0.7 a1129.6 ± 246.1 c1751.1 ± 188.7 a
Sub27.8 ± 1.4 b20.2 ± 2.3 a1638.5 ± 231.3 b1017.8 ± 244.4 d
Si + Sub24.6 ± 1.2 c20.7 ± 2.0 a2311.0 ± 406.7 a1432.9 ± 60.0 abc
lsi1CK17.6 ± 0.9 d22.2 ± 0.4 a938.5 ± 147.6 c1126.7 ± 54.6 cd
Si19.4 ± 1.2 d22.6 ± 0.3 a1046.7 ± 72.8 c1047.8 ± 180.3 d
Sub32.2 ± 2.5 a20.8 ± 1.9 a2417.8 ± 220.3 a1048.9 ± 274.0 d
Si + Sub32.7 ± 0.8 a22.1 ± 0.2 a2434.1 ± 76.3 a1180.0 ± 30.6 bcd
Values are expressed as mean ± SE from three replicates (n = 3). The different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among all treatments (p < 0.05). WT, wild type. SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase. FW, fresh weight.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, T.; Zhang, J.; He, L.; Hafeez, A.; Ning, C.; Cai, K. Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040767

AMA Style

Pan T, Zhang J, He L, Hafeez A, Ning C, Cai K. Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress. Plants. 2021; 10(4):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Taowen, Jian Zhang, Lanmengqi He, Abdul Hafeez, Chuanchuan Ning, and Kunzheng Cai. 2021. "Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress" Plants 10, no. 4: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040767

APA Style

Pan, T., Zhang, J., He, L., Hafeez, A., Ning, C., & Cai, K. (2021). Silicon Enhances Plant Resistance of Rice against Submergence Stress. Plants, 10(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop