Next Article in Journal
Screening for Higher Grain Yield and Biomass among Sixty Bread Wheat Genotypes Grown under Elevated CO2 and High-Temperature Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Roles of γ Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Gated Channels in Plant Stress Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
RNAi Suppression of LEAFY Gives Stable Floral Sterility, and Reduced Growth Rate and Leaf Size, in Field-Grown Poplars
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/plants10081595
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Jute Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Approaches

by
Khussboo Rahman
,
Naznin Ahmed
,
Md. Rakib Hossain Raihan
,
Farzana Nowroz
,
Faria Jannat
,
Mira Rahman
and
Mirza Hasanuzzaman
*
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(8), 1595; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595
Submission received: 2 July 2021 / Revised: 30 July 2021 / Accepted: 1 August 2021 / Published: 3 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Physiological Basis of Abiotic Stress Tolerance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Jute (Corchorus spp.) belongs to the Malvaceae family, and there are two species of jute, C. capsularis and C. olitorious. It is the second-largest natural bast fiber in the world according to production, which has diverse uses not only as a fiber but also as multiple industrial materials. Because of climate change, plants experience various stressors such as salt, drought, heat, cold, metal/metalloid toxicity, and flooding. Although jute is particularly adapted to grow in hot and humid climates, it is grown under a wide variety of climatic conditions and is relatively tolerant to some environmental adversities. However, abiotic stress often restricts its growth, yield, and quality significantly. Abiotic stress negatively affects the metabolic activities, growth, physiology, and fiber yield of jute. One of the major consequences of abiotic stress on the jute plant is the generation of reactive oxygen species, which lead to oxidative stress that damages its cellular organelles and biomolecules. However, jute’s responses to abiotic stress mainly depend on the plant’s age and type and duration of stress. Therefore, understanding the abiotic stress responses and the tolerance mechanism would help plant biologists and agronomists in developing climate-smart jute varieties and suitable cultivation packages for adverse environmental conditions. In this review, we summarized the best possible recent literature on the plant abiotic stress factors and their influence on jute plants. We described the possible approaches for stress tolerance mechanisms based on the available literature.

1. Introduction

Global climatic change disturbs ecological fitness and induces several abiotic stresses, which are considered as the significant constraints for crop productivity, namely, drought, waterlogging/flooding, salinity, extreme temperature (high and low), toxic metals/metalloids, etc. [1]. Abiotic stress can hamper different morpho-physiological and biochemical features of plants, which leads to a considerable decrease in plant growth and productivity.
Jute is the second most important fiber crop in the world in terms of cultivation and usage [2]. Jute belongs to the Malvaceae family, and Corchorus capsularis and C. olitorious are the two commercial species of jute. Jute is the longest, cheapest, and one of the strongest vegetable fibers that is extracted from stem bark. In the Indian sub-continent, jute is considered as an important cash crop and has multipurpose usages like food, fibers, fuel, industrial materials, soil enrichment, etc. Jute fiber is 100% biodegradable and eco-friendly [3]. Worldwide, at least 20 countries produce jute, and Bangladesh and West Bengal of India produce approximately 85% of the world’s jute production [4]. In the era of climate change, because of unfavorable climatic conditions, jute yield and quality is gradually decreasing. Temperature and rainfall are the most dominating components for jute production. In recent years, a fluctuation in temperature and rainfall has been seen, and as a result the production of jute is decreasing [5]. Salt stress negatively affects jute growth and physiological parameters, which subsequently reduces yield quality [6]. Drought reduces germination as well as seedling characteristics, which has a caused 20 to 30% loss of fiber yield and decreased fiber quality [7,8]. Though jute is tolerant to waterlogging at the mature stage, at the seedling stage, it become more susceptible towards waterlogging [9,10]. Other stresses like toxic metals/metalloids, heat, and high light also have a negative effect on jute growth and physiology [2,11]. Under stressful conditions, the excess generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced oxidative damage in jute can be scavenged by a large number of ROS detoxifying antioxidant enzymes [12,13].
To mitigate the negative effect of abiotic stress, as well as to maintain sustainable production, different conceivable approaches can be taken. Agronomic practices like the adjustment of sowing time, nutrient management, organic matter management, tillage, proper irrigation, well-drainage, and the use of tolerant varieties help to ameliorate the negative effects of abiotic stress. The application of different types of biostimulants can be considered a fruitful strategy to increase the tolerance capacity of plants against conditions of stress [14,15]. Recently, several genetic and molecular approaches have been used to develop the stress tolerance of jute. The genome sequence of jute has also been revealed, which created a new avenue for molecular breeding [16].
To increase yields and improve fiber quality, plant biologists should know the actual plant responses under various forms of abiotic stress. Besides, the development and dissemination of stress-tolerant varieties should be introduced to improve jute production. Though abiotic stress substantially hampers growth, physiology, and productivity, a few studies have been conducted on the abiotic stress responses of jute. However, there are hardly any comprehensive reviews that describe the multiple abiotic stress responses and forms of tolerance. This review describes the morpho-physiological responses of jute under abiotic stress and feasible approaches to enhance abiotic stress tolerance.

2. Jute Responses to Abiotic Stress

Abiotic stress can hamper different morpho-physiological and biochemical features of jute plants, which leads to a considerable decrease in plant growth and productivity (Table 1). However, the effects of abiotic stress depend on the type of stressor, the duration and extent of stress, the crop species, the growth stage, and other environmental factors.

2.1. Morphophysiological Responses of Jute under Different Abiotic Stress

2.1.1. Salinity

Salinity is considered as the vital environmental stress, which significantly reduced germination, plant vigor, and crop yield [40]. About 20% of irrigated land and 6% of world land is covered with salinity [41]. El Moukhtari et al. [42] stated that by creating osmotic stress, ionic imbalance and toxicity salt stress severely affect plant physiology and metabolism.
Jute showed dynamic responses under salt stress. No germination took place above 160 mM when nine varieties of C. olitorius were exposed in different doses of NaCl (100, 160, 240, and 300 mM), whereas a decline in the rate of germination at 100 and 160 mM was observed in a dose-dependent manner [20]. Among nine varieties, they recorded maximum reduction of germination (38%) in the S-19 variety and a minimum (18%) in JRO-128 at 160 mM NaCl-induced salt stress over the control. The highest and lowest salt tolerance indices were found in S-19 (77%) and JRO-128 (30%), respectively at 160 mM NaCl, which indicates the susceptibility and tolerance of S-19 and JRO-128 under salt stress. Shoot and root length reduced with the increase in NaCl levels. In another experiment, Naik et al. [6] exposed five C. capsularis genotypes in different levels of NaCl (100, 150, 200, and 250 mM NaCl) and the observed highest reduction in shoot length (50%), root length (40%), number of leaves (>70%), and RWC (39%) in the JRC-517 variety at 250 mM NaCl. A contrasting association was also observed between photosynthetic pigments and the salt level, which provoked a reduction in Chl pigments. The highest Pro and protein content were observed in JRC-532, which expressed plants’ salt tolerance characteristics. Similar results were also found in five mutants of C. olitorius where growth and yield parameters decreased at 4 and 6 dS m−1 salinity [18]. In our recent study, we exposed 15-d-old C. olitorius (cv. O-9897) seedlings at different levels (200 and 400 mM NaCl) of salt stress and observed a reduction in growth parameters in both treatments in a dose-dependent manner at 25 days after sowing compared to the control (Figure 1).
Ghosh et al. [19] demonstrated a reduction in shoot length, root length, and RWC of C. olitorius (cv. O-9897) by 39, 30, and 9% at 100 mM NaCl and 59, 60, and 21% at 200 mM NaCl, respectively, over the control. However, Chl content (SPAD value) increased by 5% at 100 mM NaCl but reduced by 13% at 200 mM NaCl over the control. Tareq et al. [22] also exposed five varieties of C. capsularis at 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl and observed a reduction in growth (plant height and branches plant−1) and yield parameters (number of seed capsule−1, seed yield plant−1, and 1000-seed weight) with the extent of salt stress. They also observed an increase in false seed content with the increased level of salt stress. Yakoub et al. [23] measured that gs, Pn, and Tr of C. olitorius decreased by 86, 75, and 75%, respectively, at 175 mM NaCl over the control. The leaf area and yield parameters, i.e., the number of pods plant−1, the lengths of pods (cm), and the number of seeds pod−1 were also decreased with the extent of salt stress, and the seed yield reduced by 37% at 175 mM NaCl, corresponding to the control. On the contrary, soluble sugar and Pro content increased by 4- and 16-fold at 175 mM NaCl-induced salt stress. Under 100 mM Na2SO4-induced salt stress, shoot and root length, leaf area, and root and shoot DW decreased by 17, 28, 18, 30 and 26%, respectively, corresponding to the control [24]. Photosynthetic pigment levels (Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoid) also decreased by 18, 30, and 15%, respectively. They also recorded a reduction in free amino acid content (27%), soluble sugar (22%), glycine betaine (GB, 13%), Pro (55%), and proteins (5%) at 100 mM Na2SO4-induced salt stress. In case of secondary metabolites, phenolic compound levels increased by 6%, and tannin content decreased by 1.3%. However, no sharp changes were observed in the case of saponin content at 100 mM Na2SO4-induced salt stress.

2.1.2. Drought

Water is one of the most important factors for crop growth and productivity in the absence of which morphological and physiological processes and the yield development of plants reduced drastically. In a water deficit condition, about 40–60% crop yield can be reduced [43].
To find out the most critical stage of C. olitorius plants regarding water susceptibility, Ayodele and Fawusi [44] imposed drought stress (−6.0 bar) on plants at four different physiological stages (mid-vegetative, flowering, pod formation, and pod filling). Though moisture deficit stress decreased growth and yield in every stage of the plants, because of the highest yield reduction (64%), they marked the flowering stage as the most critical stage, followed by the pod filling stage (47%). Shiwachi et al. [25] exposed two varieties of C. olitorious (Yaya and Moroheiya) at three different soil moisture conditions (FC, >75%; light moisture stress, 60–50%; and acute moisture stress, 40–30%) and found that in both varieties plant height reduced in acute and light moisture stress conditions compared to the FC. Plant height reduction in cv. Moroheiya at light and acute moisture stress conditions was recorded as 12% and 23%, respectively, and in cv. Yaya it was 19% and 26%, respectively, compared to the field capacity water level. In both varieties, the highest reduction in leaf number, branches, and leaf area were recorded in the acute moisture stress condition. Similar results were also found by Ewetola and Fasanmi [27] in C. olitorius plants where at four different moisture levels (100, 75, 50, and 25% FC), they recorded the highest plant height, stem girth, and leaf area at 75% FC and the lowest at 25% FC, corresponding to the control. At 75% FC, a five-fold increase in biomass yield was observed compared to the control. Yakoub et al. [28] also exposed C. olitorius plant at three different water regimes (100, 60, and 40% FC) where the highest reduction in plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area (reduced by 52, 41, and 67%, respectively) were observed at 40% FC. They also observed a reduction in Chl a, Chl b, and RWC content with the intensity of moisture stress. To cope with the moisture deficit stress, the plant increased the amount of osmolytes, due to which Pro and soluble sugar content increased by eight- and four-fold at 40% FC, respectively, compared to the control. Similar trends were also observed when C. olitorius plants were exposed to three different water regimes (30, 60, and 100% ETc) where plant height and leaf number sharply increased from the 30% crop water requirement ETc to 60 and 100% ETc [29]. They also stated that because of the reduction in the water regime the drought condition imposed on plants reduced the Chl content index and the yield of the plant. Fasinmirin and Olyufao [26] also grew C. olitorius plants in drought conditions by maintaining three irrigation levels (100, 75, and 50% pan evaporation (EP)) and observed reductions in plant height, leaf area, and leaf number plant−1 by 7, 10, and 6%, respectively, at 75% EP and 40, 25, and 30%, respectively, at 50% EP over the control. They also recorded 19 and 50% reductions in biomass yield at 75 and 50% EP, respectively, over 100% EP. At a constant drought (8–10% soil moisture) condition, C. capsularis plants (cv. CVL-1) failed to complete their life cycle, survived up to 90 d only, and reduced plant height and base diameter by 50 and 42%, respectively, over the control [9,10]. Yumnam et al. [7] exposed C. olitorius seedlings in PEG-6000-induced simulated drought stress (−2.0, −3.0, and −4.0 bar) and found maximum reduction in seedling vigor, shoot length, shoot FW, root length, and FW at severe drought stress (−4.0 bar). However, the responses were greatly varied in different genotypes [7].

2.1.3. Waterlogging

Waterlogging is considered one of the main constraints for sustainable agriculture. Waterlogging creates hypoxia in soils, which leads plants towards growth reduction, leaf senescence, reduction in leaf area, stomatal closure etc. [45]. Because of the generation of ROS, plants face oxidative damage at waterlogged conditions. ROS also damages membrane integrity, minimizes the efficiency of PS-II, and causes a significant decrease in Pn [46]. Waterlogging may reduce yields by up to 50% in different crops [47].
Prodhan et al. [9] imposed different levels of standing water on four genotypes of C. capsularis (cvs. D-154 and CVL-1) and C. olitorious (cvs. O-4 and R-26) and found a severe reduction in plant height by 45, 39, 59, and 61% in CVL-1, D-154, O-4, and R-26 genotypes, respectively, when a 5-cm standing water level was imposed on 30-d-old crop. However, when a 30-cm standing water level was imposed at the mature stage (90-d-old), plant height reduction was much less (3, 3, 9, and 12%) than the previous one. In another experiment, Prodhan et al. [10] demonstrated a similar trend of reduction in stem base diameter at different water regimes, which varied in different genotypes. When the 30-d-old plants were exposed to 5 cm of standing water stem diameters in D-154, CVL-1, O-4, and R-26 genotypes were decreased by 37, 30, 40, and 36%, respectively. However, at the mature stage, this reduction was 0.6, 3, 9, and 8% even at the 30-cm standing water level. This indicates the waterlogging tolerance of jute at mature stages. In another study, Changdee et al. [31] grew C. olitorius plants in five different durations of waterlogging (45, 60, 75, 90, and 105 d) and observed a reduction in growth and yield parameters with the increase in waterlogging duration. At 105 d of waterlogging, severe reductions in plant height (53%), stem diameter (36%), leaf area (73%), tap root length (71%), and yield (75%) were recorded over the control. However, adventitious root formation was increased with the increased duration of waterlogging.
Changdee et al. [48] observed aerenchyma cell formation in waterlogged C. olitorius plants, which is considered as the key survival factor of plant under waterlogged condition. They also noticed a Casparian band and lignified cell wall in root cells, which prevents root rupture and oxygen loses from aerenchyma. This study is considered as the first report regarding anatomical changes in C. olitorius root at waterlogged conditions. Parvin et al. [32] also observed aerenchyma formation in C. capsularis plants at a waterlogged condition (2 cm of standing water). They also noticed a decrease in the size of epidermal cells and an increase in the size of pith.

2.1.4. Metal/Metalloid Toxicity

The Earth’s crust contains varying levels of different metals/metalloids. Among these, some are essential for plant cells, viz., Cu, iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and Zn at supra-optimum concentrations, whereas some are harmful, viz., silver (Ag), aluminum (Al), As, Cd, chromium (Cr), cesium (Cs), mercury (Hg), led (Pb), strontium (Sr), and uranium (U), even at low concentrations [49]. Toxic metals/metalloids negatively affect plant morphophysiology and metabolism and finally decrease yield [50]. Plants try to cope with metal/metalloid stress through different defense strategies, viz., exclusion, compartmentalization, complexation, chelation, etc. [51]. Because of the effective defense mechanism and hyperaccumulation of heavy metals, jute is considered as a good candidate for phytoremediation in metal-contaminated soil [52,53]. However, it becomes susceptible at higher concentrations of toxic metals to reduced plant growth, fiber yield, and quality [34,38].
Nizam et al. [33] exposed C. capsularis plants at different Cd levels (1, 5, and 10 mg L−1) and observed zero emergence of seeds at 10 mg L−1 Cd. At 5 mg L−1 Cd, survivability % and shoot and root length reduced by 50, 92, and 25%, respectively, in cv. CVE-3 and 35, 73, and 41%, respectively, in cv. BJC-7370 corresponding to the control. Similar results were also recorded by Hassan et al. [34] where C. olitorius plants were exposed to different levels of Cd (1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1). In our recent study, we sowed C. olitorius seed in Cd-contaminated (0.5 mM CdCl2) growth medium and recorded a reduction in shoot length and survivability in Cd exposure seedlings at 15 days after sowing compared to the control (Figure 2).
In another experiment, Nizam et al. [54] observed a decreasing trend in growth parameters of cvs. BJC-7370 and CVE-3, exposed in Pb-contaminated soil. Islam et al. [55] found that, in C. olitorius plants, only higher doses of Cr (200–400 mg kg−1 soil) reduced crop growth, and no negative effect was observed at a low level of Cr (100 mg kg−1 soil). However, both low and high doses of As (200 and 400 mg kg−1 soil) were negatively correlated with growth parameters of C. olitorius plants. A combination of a low level of Cr and As (50 mg kg−1) slightly alleviated the crop growth and photosynthetic pigments. However, at a high dose, it became toxic to the plant. They also stated that As is more corrosive compared to Cr for C. olitorius plants. The germination percentage of C. capsularis (cv. Da An Qing Pi) reduced at different levels of Cu (2, 5, 10, 30, and 50 µmol L−1) where the maximum reduction (50%) occurred at 50 µmol L−1 Cu. Seedling height, FW, and DW were also reduced by 52, 36, and 63%, respectively, over the control [36]. Similar results were also found by Saleem et al. [37] in C. capsularis plant at 50 µmol L−1 Cu. In another study, Saleem et al. [56] demonstrated that with highly Cu-contaminated soil (natural soil and Cu-contaminated soil ratio 0:1), plant height, shoot FW, shoot DW, and the total Chl content of C. capsularis was reduced by 23, 43, 41, and 45%, respectively, over the control. Photosynthesis pigments and chloroplast ultrastructure were also altered by Cu stress and reduced gs, Pn, Ci, and Tr by 88, 56, 13, and 59%, respectively, corresponding to the control. Parveen et al. [39] also observed a sharp reduction in Tr, Pn, gs, and Ci at 50 μM (40, 41, 46 and 13%) and 100 μM (58, 67, 77 and 20%) Cu, respectively over the control.

2.1.5. High Light

Light plays a key role in the plant life cycle. As jute is light-sensitive, it showed different responses at a different wave lengths of light. Saleem et al. [2] demonstrated that different red lights (red, dark red, and mixed dark red light) increased plant height, root length, and root/shoot FW and DW compared to white light (control), but blue light and orange light showed negative correlations with these parameters. However, blue and orange light increased the stem diameter by 86 and 84%, respectively, and the root diameter by 83 and 84%, respectively, over the control. They also noticed an increase in total Chl content by 74, 76, and 79% and carotenoid content by 67, 70, and 61% at red, dark red, and mixed dark red light, respectively, corresponding to the control.

2.2. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense of Jute under Different Abiotic Stresses

One of the obvious consequences of abiotic stress is the excess generation of ROS, which causes oxidative stress. In many plant studies it was observed that ROS metabolism was significantly hampered because of various abiotic stresses (Table 1). Ma et al. [17] tested C. capsularis (Huang No.1 and 9511) and C. olitorius (Mengyuan and 07–21) genotypes under two different levels of salt (70 and 140 mM NaCl) and observed increased lipid peroxidation (MDA content). At 100 mM Na2SO4-induced salt stress, MDA content was increased by 110%, which indicated the oxidative stress in plants [24]. It also decreased the activity of GR and increased the activities of CAT, GST, and SOD. At 100 mM Na2SO4-induced salt stress, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and glutathione (GSH) were decreased but ascorbate (AsA) content was increased compared to the control.
At 4 d of the water deficit condition, H2O2 content increased by 142 and 236% in C. capsularis and C. olitorius, respectively [57]. Plants also showed a sharp increase in MDA content, which indicates the membrane instability in the plant cell. The activities of SOD and CAT also decreased in the water deficit condition. In another experiment, similar results were also recorded by Chowdhury and Choudhuri [58] in C. capsularis and C. olitorius plants at 2 d of the water deficit condition.
In C. olitorius plants, Islam et al. [55] observed a sharp increase in MDA content due to As stress compared to Cr stress. However, a combination of low levels of As and Cr stress (50 mg kg−1) decreased the MDA content, which indicated less oxidative damage. Saleem et al. [37] also reported that the maximum content of MDA and H2O2 and the activities of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX were observed at the Shang Huo Ma genotype exposed in Cu-contaminated (50 µmol L−1) media. Similarly, with the increasing levels of Cu (50 and 100 μM), MDA content increased by 108 and 228%, respectively, in C. capsularis over the control [39]. In another experiment, Saleem et al. [59] observed a higher MDA content in C. capsularis at 100 μM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O), which also increased the activities of POD and SOD.
Oxidative stress was induced by blue light and orange light in C. capsularis plants and increased MDA (83 and 90%, respectively) content compared to the control [2]. They also increased the activities of SOD (86 and 84%) and POD (83 and 82%) in stressed plants.

3. Jute Quality under Abiotic Stress

The quality of jute fiber has great importance for industrial use, which could be deteriorated under different abiotic stress conditions like metals/metalloids, waterlogging, salinity, etc. Though several articles have been published related to morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of jute, only a few reports have discussed the fiber quality under stressed conditions [30,60,61]. Abiotic stress is responsible for the reduction in reed length, fiber color, the fiber elongation rate, and fiber breaking strength, and ultimately it reduces the marketability of the fibers [6,8].
Ghorai et al. [60] imposed waterlogging stress on three cultivars of jute (C. olitorius cv. JRO-524; C. capsularis cvs. Hybrid-C and JRC-212) and found that reed length (length of fiber) was reduced by 19–24% under different water heads (0, 4–5, 8–10, 10–15, 16–20, 18–25, and 22–30 cm) compared to the control (40 cm raised bed). Along with this, the basal region of jute plants become hard and dark-colored because of the waterlogging condition, which caused a reduction in fiber quality.
Key determinants of fiber quality parameters, e.g., reed length, fiber strength, fiber color, and the number of fiber layers in a fiber strand, were adversely affected by the waterlogging stress of C. olitorius (cv. JRO-524). Both reed length and fiber strength were reduced by 11−43% and 12−55%, respectively, under different water heads (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 cm) compared to the control (well-drained condition). Under waterlogging, fiber layers become thinner in the fiber strand, which ultimately affects the fiber strength. A higher reduction of fiber layers per fiber strand was observed at the 30 cm waterlogged condition compared to the control. Furthermore, because of waterlogging stress, hard barky bottoms were observed, which also deteriorated the quality of fibers [30].
Under water deficit stress (WDS), fiber strength was significantly higher in tolerant genotypes of C. olitorius (OIN 631, OIN 632, and OIN 633) compared to the control. In contrast, a reduction of fiber strength was observed in susceptible genotypes (OIN 694, OIN 873, and OIN 875) under WDS. It was also noticed that fiber fineness was reduced in tolerant genotypes, but, in cases of susceptible genotypes, it was increased prominently when it was subjected to the water deficit condition [8].
Upon exposure to salinity stress (0, 100, 150, and 250 mM NaCl), K+ was decreased significantly in the leaves and shoots of all tested cultivars of C. capsularis (JRC-698, JBC-5, JRC-532, JRC-321, and JRC-517) compared to the control. Decreasing K+ ion in plants reduced the fiber quality, as K content is considered as a vital quality element for fiber [6].
Saleem et al. [61] conducted an experiment with two varieties of C. capsularis (cvs. Hong Tie Gu Xuan and Gu Ba Chang Jia) that were cultivated in highly Cu-contaminated soil (2221 mg kg−1) and incorporated with different doses of P, viz., 30, 60, and 120 kg ha−1, which significantly affected both fiber yield and quality. Fiber quality parameters like fiber diameter, fiber breaking strength, and the fiber elongation rate, were reduced under highly Cu-contaminated soil. When P was applied at the rate of 60 kg ha−1, fiber diameter (43 μM), fiber breaking strength (3.9 cN), and the fiber elongation rate (40%) were highest in cv. Hong Tie Gu Xuan. However, quality parameters were reduced at 120 kg ha−1 P.

4. Contrasting Abiotic Stress Responses of C. capsularis and C. olitorius

C. capsularis and C. olitorius are two commercial species of jute, which act differently at different abiotic stresses. They showed different tolerance mechanisms when exposed to abiotic stresses.
Chaudhury and Choudhuri [62] exposed C. capsularis (JRC-212) and C. olitorius (JRO-632) at 200 mM NaCl-induced salt stress where RWC and Pn, decreased by 6 and 83% in JRC-212 and 23 and 95% in JRO-632. Higher accumulation of Na+ and Cl− were recorded at C. olitorius, which indicates the salt susceptibility of C. olitorius plants. Ma et al. [17] observed higher MDA content in Mengyuan and 07–21 (C. olitorius) over Huang No.1 and 9511 (C. capsularis) genotypes. The activities of CAT and SOD also decreased in Mengyuan and 07–21, which indicated the higher salt tolerance of C. capsularis over C. olitorius.
Prodhan et al. [9] demonstrated that when 30-d-old seedlings were exposed at constant drought condition (8–10% moisture) C. capsularis cv. CVL-1 survived only 90 d but C. olitorius cv. O-4 could survive up to 120 d and complete their life cycle. Reduction in plant height was more severe in CVL-1 (50%) compared to O-4 (38%) at 90-d-old seedlings. A similar trend was also observed in the case of stem diameter of both varieties [10].
Prodhan et al. [9] exposed four genotypes of C. capsularis (cv. D-154 and cv. CVL-1) and C. olitorius (cvs. O-4 and R-26) at a 5-cm standing water level and observed severe reduction of plant height in C. olitorius (59 and 61%) compared to C. capsularis (45 and 39%). The stem diameter of C. olitorius was greatly reduced at different water levels compared to C. capsularis.
Several studies [39,52,56,63] have proven that both species of jute have good phytoremediation capacity and can mitigate metal/metalloid toxicity. However, in the case of Cd stress, C. olitorius plants were able to establish at 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Cd [63], but C. capsularis (cvs. BJSC-7370 and CVE-3) failed to germinate at 10 mg L−1 Cd [34], which proves the susceptibility of C. capsularis to Cd stress.
We have illustrated the relative tolerance of C. capsularis and C. olitorius to major abiotic stress based on the known literature and our preliminary studies (Figure 3). As fewer studies have been found regarding the specific stress tolerance of these two species, it is hard to specify the comparison among two jute species. Further studies should be conducted to specify the different stress tolerance species of jute. This can be a promising phenomenon to create a further scope of the investigation at the molecular level to tailor stress tolerance parameters of C. capsularis and C. olitorius.

5. Approaches in Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Jute

Environmental stress greatly hampered jute plant growth and physiology. Implementation of different agronomic management practices through the application of different kinds of nutrients, phytohormones, nano-particles, plant extracts, chelates, etc. improved plant growth conditions (Table 2) and can be a helpful tool to alleviate the negative effect of abiotic stress.

5.1. Fertilizer Management

Plant nutrients play a vital role in many morphological and physiological processes in the plant. They also help to meet up high crop yield even at different stress conditions. The requisite amount of fertilizer helps to mitigate stress, though the excess amount may induce toxicity in plants. Fertilizer management can be a promising phenomenon in introducing abiotic stress tolerance in jute. The application of different doses of P (30, 60, and 120 kg ha−1 P) in Cu-contaminated soil improved the growth condition and reduced oxidative stress in C. capsularis, which ultimately improved yield and yield quality [61].

5.2. Early Sowing

By altering the sowing time of the crop, farmers can avoid stress conditions in some cases. Though jute is waterlogging tolerant at the mature stage, at the vegetative stage they cannot withstand waterlogging up to 30-d-old [67]. Early sowing can be an effective approach to avoid waterlogging caused by heavy rainfall.

5.3. Application of Phytohormones

Phytohormones are termed as a chemical messenger, which plays a crucial role in regulating the growth, physiology, and biochemical responses of plants at abiotic stress [68]. Although abscisic acid (ABA) inhibited plant growth at a higher concentration, at a lower concentration (0.01 mM), foliar application of ABA helped to mitigate drought stress in both C. capsularis and C. olitorius [58]. Another phytohormone, viz., KN can be used to mitigate the effect of NaCl-induced salt stress in both C. capsularis and C. olitorius species [62]. Metal uptake is also reduced by phytohormones, viz., GA in Cu-contaminated soil and improved growth parameters and reduced oxidative damage in plants [66].

5.4. Seed Priming

Plant growth and productivity are negatively hampered by abiotic stress, which can be alleviated by seed priming. Pretreatment of seeds with calcium chloride (CaCl2) increased structural integrity of cell wall and improved antioxidant defense of C. capsularis at the water deficit condition [65]. Seed priming with 10% parsley extracts helps to improve morpho-physiological responses of C. olitorius at Na2SO4-induced salt stress [24].

5.5. Stress-Tolerant Varieties

Yield losses due to abiotic stress can be effectively reduced by introducing stress-tolerant varieties. In Bangladesh, the Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI) had released salt-tolerant cvs. BJRI Deshi Pat-8 and BJRI Deshi Pat-10 are moderately salinity-tolerant and can be introduced in saline-prone areas of the southern coastal districts of Bangladesh.

6. Genetic Approaches in Enhancing Jute Tolerance to Abiotic Stress

Enhancement of stress tolerance in jute through the conventional breeding program is greatly challenging because of the incomplete and narrow gene pool of jute. In jute-producing countries, a conventional breeding program was followed to develop jute variety for higher fiber yields. To produce quality jute fiber under different forms of abiotic stress, improved transgenic jute plants should be developed by modifying the jute genome sequence through approaching convenient techniques.
With the increased study of the salt-stress tolerance of jute, it has become a potential candidate for growing under saline soil. According to Islam et al. [69], ROS-scavenging enzymes were up-regulated under saline conditions (150 mM NaCl) in jute plant (C. olitorius cv. O-72) through transfer DNA (T-DNA) technology using Escherichia coli (K-12) katE gene, which pulled the transgenic plant to the reproductive stage by improving the salt tolerance capacity over the control. This might be a feasible option to develop the breeding program. In another experiment, Ma et al. [70] reported that through expressing a gene encoding a stress-responsive protein complex, jute seedlings were adapted to salt stress (160 mM NaCl, 4 d) by changing signal transduction, reducing oxidative stress, conserving energy, enhancing cellular metabolism, and altering root structure.
To explore the possible salt-stress-responsible gene, Yang et al. [71] reported that, along with different transcription factors, a smaller amount of differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) were implicated in different metabolic traits that enhanced stress tolerance in jute, such as the ABA signaling pathway, plant hormone signal transduction, and metabolism of cystine/methionine, and these were mainly noticeable in the root tissue of salt-tolerant genotypes. Similarly, another three relevant pathways enriched in root, namely, Ca2+- and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways and oxidative phosphorylation pathways, were identified by Yang et al. [72], which were involved in the mechanism of salt stress tolerance in two jute species (C. capsularis and C. olitorius).
Yang et al. [73] subsequently constructed a high-throughput quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, which consisted of 4839 markers on seven linkage groups (LG) that ranged from LG1–7 for improving salt-stress tolerance at the germination stage. Among these, three highly and thirteen slightly effective QTLs were found on four LGs under two salt stress treatments (140 and 160 mM NaCl), which were mainly implicated in salt tolerance. The major QTL, qJST-1, was identified under both salt stress treatments, which was observed with the highest phenotypic variation in germinated seeds (12 and 20%). This approach can be used in improving germination under salt stress in jute.
Sawarkar et al. [74] studied sixty C. olitorius genotypes to isolate drought-tolerant as well as maximum-fiber-yielding lines and screened out fifteen lines with promoted early maturity and increased plant height, stem diameter, fiber weight, and thickness. Seed pre-treatment with several primers, such as CaCl2, CaNP, and β- aminobutyric acid, also improved the drought stress tolerance through expressing transcripts of jute (JEC 1–18), which were involved in the up-regulation of Pro, CAT, and POD and the down-regulation of Pro oxidase [65]. Yang et al. [75] conducted a comparative study between C. olitorius (drought-tolerant) and C. capsularis (drought-sensitive) species and observed that tolerant species were enriched with higher DEGs compared to sensitive ones. Yang et al. [75] also introduced the contribution of the two most important pathways in drought-stress tolerance in C. olitorius and C. capsularis, viz., phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and the peroxisome pathway. Several TFs, namely, no apical meristem (NAM), Arabidopsis transcription activation factor, and cup-shaped cotyledon 2 occupied the C. capsularis NAC1 (CcNAC1) gene and were expressed under drought stress (20% PEG) to mitigate the negative effect by speeding the early maturity of C. capsularis [76]. Additionally, Zhang et al. [77] found that regulation of NAM-2-like genes can be significantly involved in drought tolerance in C. capsularis.
Niu et al. [78] evaluated the expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UBC) and chaperon protein under PEG-induced (20%) drought stress, while, upon exposure to salt stress (200 mM NaCl), an Ras-related small GTP-binding nuclear protein was detected as the most stable candidate gene to study the survival capacity of jute under these stresses. Along with UBC, elongation factor alpha (EF1α) can be used as a reference gene to mitigate low temperature stress in C. olitorius [79].
Additionally, the positive involvement of Ca-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) was established by Ahmed et al. [80], and they found the contribution of CoCDPK6, 11, and 12 genes (in C. olitorius) and CcCDPK8, 10, and 18 genes (in C. capsularis) in both salt and drought stress tolerance and quality improvement in fiber yield.
To develop transgenic jute plants, RNA interference technology can also be adopted. To investigate the participation of microRNA (miRNAs) and the related target genes to metal stress tolerance, Hauqe et al. [81] found that up-regulation of miR319 and a gene ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport played a fundamental role as a metal transporter and increased As (250 µM NaAsO2) stress tolerance in jute (C. olitorius cv. O-9897). In addition, Hauqe et al. [81] reported jute as a metal accumulator because of the down-regulation of two miRNAs, i.e., miR159 and miR167, and their marked genes ABC and auxin responsive factor 8 (ARF8) in response to Mn (25 mM KMnO4) and Cr (25 mM K2Cr2O7), and they improved the remedial capacity of C. olitorius against Mn and Cr.
By following the particle bombardment method, Bhattacharyya et al. [82] transferred a bialaphos-tolerant gene into C. capsularis cv. JRC-321 to obtain a herbicide-tolerant transgenic jute plant. It might be a great opportunity to introduce stress-related targeted genes into the Corchorus species by in vitro approaches.
In Bangladesh, recently whole genome sequences of both the cultivated species, viz., C. capsularis and C. olitorius, were discovered, which might facilitate the progress of improved breeding technologies [16]. Stress-tolerant jute cultivars can be invented by increasing the studies at the gene level under different abiotic stresses. Thus, transgenic approaches might be a successful measure to increase quality fiber production and improve abiotic stress tolerance in jute.

7. Conclusions

Understanding plant abiotic stress responses of crop plants is a complex task as the plant acts differently under various abiotic stresses, and it also depends on the levels and duration of the stresses. Unlike many other crops, the response of jute to abiotic stress is very complex, and such responses are dependent on the plant’s age, species, and genotype. Therefore, the stress tolerance mechanism of jute is multidimensional, and understanding the gene regulation, signaling cascade, and adaptive mechanism is an important task for plant physiologists, breeders, and molecular biologists. In some Asian countries like Bangladesh, jute is the main fiber crop and is often called the “golden fiber.” Therefore, revealing the natural secret of jute and exploiting its genetic basis would result in suitable jute varieties tolerant to abiotic stress. Although there are some tolerant varieties developed by researchers, these are not sufficiently tolerant. Researchers have unrevealed the jute genome in the last decade, and there is scope for further molecular advancement towards tolerant jute varieties. Approaches in enhancing the antioxidant defense in plants would be another area of research that can mitigate oxidative stress in jute plants. Manipulating agronomic practices can also contribute to adapting the abiotic stresses. Therefore, integrating plant physiology, agronomy, and plant breeding should be practiced to gain sustainable development in jute production in the era of climate change. Unfortunately, there is still lack of studies regarding jute responses and tolerance to extreme temperature, which would be a topic of further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.R., N.A., M.R.H.R., F.N., F.J., M.R.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; visualization, M.H.; supervision, M.H. All authors have collected the literature and written the manuscript draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the Ministry of Science and Technology Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for their funding for research through the special allocation fund for Science and Information & Communication Technology (Grant No. BS-188).

Data Availability Statement

All relevant information is present in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Research System (SAURES) for providing support for our research. We acknowledge Md. Mahbubul Islam, the former Chief Scientific Officer of Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, for his valuable suggestions and for providing some literature.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saleem, M.H.; Rehman, M.; Zahid, M.; Imran, M.; Xiang, W.; Liu, L. Morphological changes and antioxidative capacity of jute (Corchorus capsularis, Malvaceae) under different color light-emitting diodes. Braz. J. Bot. 2019, 42, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Islam, M.M. Advanced Production Technology and Processing of Jute. In Agronomic Crops, Volume-1: Production Technologies; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 387–440. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kumari, K.; Singh, P.K.; Kumari, S.; Singh, K.M. Dynamics of Jute Export in India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 3769–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, A.K. The potential of jute crop for mitigation of greenhouse gas emission in the changing climatic scenario. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 13, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Naik, M.R.; Barman, D.; Maruthi, R.T.; Babu, V.R.; Mandal, U.K.; Kundu, D.K. Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon morpho-physiological attributes in white jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). J. Environ. Biol. 2019, 40, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yumnam, S.; Sawarkar, A.; Mukherjee, S. Response to water stress on some seedling characters of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). J. Crop Weed 2017, 13, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dhar, P.; Ojha, D.; Kar, C.S.; Mitra, J. Differential response of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius) submitted to water deficit stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prodhan, A.K.M.A.; Rahman, M.L.; Haque, M.A. Effect of water stresses on growth attributes in jute I. plant height. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2001, 4, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Prodhan, A.K.M.A.; Rahman, M.L.; Haque, M.A. Effect of water stresses on growth attributes in jute II. plant based diameter. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2001, 4, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Larnyo, A.; Atitsogbui, P.J. Effect of temperature treatments on seed germination and seedling growth of jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius). Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotech. 2020, 5, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Tognetti, V.B.; Vandepoele, K.; Gollery, M.; Shulaev, V.; Van Breusegem, F. ROS signaling: The new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Del Buono, D.; Regni, L.; Del Pino, A.M.; Bartucca, M.L.; Palmerini, C.A.; Proietti, P. Effects of megafol on the olive cultivar ‘Arbequina’ grown under severe saline stress in terms of physiological traits, oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and cytosolic Ca2+. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 603576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wani, S.H.; Kumar, V.; Shriram, V.; Sah, S.K. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop J. 2016, 4, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ribba, T.; Garrido-Vargas, F.; O’Brien, J.A. Auxin-mediated responses under salt stress: From developmental regulation to biotechnological applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 3843–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Islam, M.S.; Saito, J.A.; Emdad, E.M.; Ahmed, B.; Islam, M.M.; Halim, A.; Hossen, Q.M.M.; Hossain, M.Z.; Ahmed, R.; Hossain, M.S.; et al. Comparative genomics of two jute species and insight into fibre biogenesis. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 16223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ma, H.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z.; Yu, T.; Jia, Y.; Gu, H.; Wang, X.; Ma, H. Screening of salinity tolerant jute (Corchorus capsularis & C. olitorious) genotypes via phenotypic and physiology assisted procedures. Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 2655–2660. [Google Scholar]
  18. Islam, M.T.; Begum, M.B.; Islam, M.O. Screening of jute mutants for salinity tolerance. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2011, 6, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghosh, R.K.; Phumichai, T.; Sreewongchai, T.; Nakasathien, S.; Phumichai, C. Evaluation of salt tolerance of jute (Corchorus spp.) genotypes in hydroponics using physiological parameters. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2013, 12, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naik, M.R.; Barman, D.; Maruthi, R.T.; Mandal, U.K.; Kundu, D.K. Screening of tossa jute (Corchorus olitrius L.) varieties against salt stress. Ecoscan 2015, 9, 815–819. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bhuyan, M.I.; Hassan, K.M.M.; Lipi, N.J.; Uddin, M.R.; Islam, M.M.; Ferdous, M.; Antor, N.H.; Das, P. Screening of jute and kenaf varieties for salinity tolerance. Int. J. Adv. Geosci. 2018, 6, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tareq, M.Z.; Hossen, B.; Biswas, S.K.; Hoque, A.B.M.Z.; Hasan, M.M. Yield and quality of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) vegetable seed as affected by salinity environment. J. Agroecol. Nat. Res. Manag. 2018, 5, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yakoub, A.R.B.; Tlahig, S.; Ferchichi, A. Germination, growth, photosynthesis, and osmotic adjustment of tossa jute (Corchorus olitrius L.) seeds under saline irrigation. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saad-Allah, K.M.; Nessem, A.A. Parsley extract improves physio-biochemical traits and the activity of the defense system in mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) under Na2SO4 salinity. Gesunde Pflanz 2020, 72, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shiwachi, H.; Komoda, M.; Koshio, K.; Takahashi, H. Effect of soil moisture stress on the growth of Corchorus olitorius L. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2009, 4, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fasinmirin, J.T.; Olufayo, A.A. Yield and water use efficiency of jute mallow Corchorus olitorius under varying soil water management strategies. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ewetola, E.A.; Fasanmi, T.F. Growth responses of Okra (Albemoschus esculentus) and Jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius) to water stress and non-water stress conditions. Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 2015, 59, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yakoub, A.R.B.; Benabderrahim, M.A.; Ferchichi, A. Physiological and agromorphological responses of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) to drought stress. J. Plant Physiol. Pathol. 2016, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maseko, I.; Mabhaudhi, T.; Tesfay, S.; Araya, H.T.; Fezzehazion, M.; Plooy, C.P.D. African leafy vegetables: A review of status, production and utilization in South Africa. Sustainability 2020, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ghorai, A.K.; Bhattacharjee, A.K.; Saha, S.; Rao, P.V.; Bandopadhyay, A.K. Impact of waterlogging on yield and quality of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius). Indian J. Agron. 2005, 50, 320–323. [Google Scholar]
  31. Changdee, T.; Polthanee, A.; Akkasaeng, C.; Morita, S. Effect of different waterlogging regimes on growth, some yield and roots development parameters in three fiber crops (Hibiscus cannabinus L., Hibiscus sabdariffa L. and Corchorus olitorius L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 2009, 8, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Parvin, D.; Rashid, P.; Karmoker, J. Anatomical responses of jute (Corchorus capsularis L. cv. D-154) to waterlogging. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 27, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nizam, M.U.; Zaman, M.W.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain, M.M. Cadmium remediation potentials of jute, kenaf and mesta at early growing stage. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2015, 9, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hassan, M.S.; Dagari, M.S.; Babayo, A.U. Effect of citric acid on cadmium ion uptake and stress response of hydroponically grown jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius). J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol. 2016, 6, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nizam, M.U.; Zaman, M.W.; Rahman, M.M.; Kim, J.E. Phytoremediation potential of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), mesta (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and jute (Corchorus capsularies L.) in arsenic-contaminated soil. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2016, 35, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Saleem, M.H.; Ahmad, S.; Urooj, S.; Rehaman, M.; Liu, L.; Saeed, F.; Kasana, R.A. Screening of different varieties of jute seedling under copper stress. Ann. Agric. Crop Sci. 2019, 4, 1043. [Google Scholar]
  37. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Seleiman, M.F.; Rizwan, M.; Rehman, M.; Akram, N.A.; Liu, L.; Alotaibi, M.; Al-Ashkar, I.; Mubushar, M. Assessing the correlations between different traits in copper-sensitive and copper-resistant varieties of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). Plants 2019, 8, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Kamran, M.; Iqbal, N.; Azeem, M.; Javed, M.T.; Ali, Q.; Haider, M.Z.; Irshad, S.; Rizwan, M.; et al. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) mitigates the toxic effect of excessive copper concentrations on growth, gaseous exchange and chloroplast ultrastructure of Corchorus capsularis L. and improves copper accumulation capabilities. Plants 2020, 9, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Parveen, A.; Salemm, M.H.; Kamran, M.; Haidar, M.Z.; Chen, J.-T.; Malik, Z.; Rana, M.S.; Hassan, A.; Hur, G.; Javed, M.T.; et al. Effect of citric acid on growth, ecophysiology, chloroplast ultrastructure, and phytoremediation potential of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) seedlings exposed to copper stress. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Oku, H.; Nahar, K.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Mahmud, J.A.; Baluska, F.; Fujita, M. Nitric oxide-induced salt stress tolerance in plants: ROS metabolism, signaling, and molecular interactions. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 12, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Z.; Li, J.-L.; Liu, L.-N.; Xie, Q.; Sui, N. Photosynthetic regulation under salt stress and salt-tolerance mechanism of sweet sorghum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El Moukhtari, A.; Cabassa-Hourton, C.; Farissi, M.; Savouré, A. How does proline treatment promote salt stress tolerance during crop plant development? Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Raza, M.A.S.; Shahid, A.M.; Saleem, M.F.; Khan, I.H.; Ahmad, S.; Ali, M.; Iqbal, R. Effects and management strategies to mitigate drought stress in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Zemdirb. Agric. 2017, 104, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ayodele, V.I.; Fawusi, M.O.A. Studies on drought susceptibility of Corchorus olitorius L. II. Effects of moisture stress at different physiological stages on vegetative growth and seed yield of C. olitorius cv. ‘Oniyaya’. Biotronics 1990, 19, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zeng, R.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Cao, J.; Li, X.; Xu, X.; Xia, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhang, L. Effect of waterlogging stress on dry matter accumulation, photosynthesis characteristics, yield, and yield components in three different ecotypes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tian, L.; Li, J.; Bi, W.; Zuo, S.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Sun, L. Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 218, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhushan, D.; Pandey, A.; Choudhary, M.K.; Datta, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, N. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in chickpea extracellular matrix during dehydration stress. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2007, 6, 1868–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Changdee, T.; Morita, S.; Abe, J.; Ito, K.; Tajima, R.; Polthanee, A. Root anatomical responses to waterlogging at seedling stage of three cordage fibre crops. Plant Prod. Sci. 2008, 11, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Anjum, N.A.; Singh, H.P.; Khan, M.I.R.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Negi, A.; Batish, D.R.; Khan, N.A.; Duarte, A.C.; Pereira, E.; et al. Too much is bad–an appraisal of phytotoxicity of elevated plant-beneficial heavy metal ions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3361–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Amari, T.; Ghnaya, T.; Abdelly, C. Nickel, cadmium and lead phytotoxicity and potential of halophytic plants in heavy metal extraction. South Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ashraf, S.; Ali, Q.; Zahir, Z.A.; Ashraf, S.; Asghar, H.N. Phytoremediation: Environmentally sustainable way for reclamation of heavy metal polluted soils. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 174, 714–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abubakari, M.; Moomin, A.; Nyarko, G.; Dawuda, M.M. Heavy metals concentrations and risk assessment of roselle and jute mallow cultivated with three compost types. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2017, 62, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rizwan, M.; Irshad, S.; Shafiq, F.; Iqbal, M.; Alharbi, B.M.; Alnusaire, T.S.; et al. Jute: A potential candidate for phytoremediation of metals—A review. Plants 2020, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nizam, M.U.; Zaman, M.W.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.S.; Islam, M.S. Phytoremediation potentiality of lead from contaminated soils by fibrous crop varieties. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2016, 2, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Islam, M.K.; Khanam, M.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Waghmode, T.R.; Alam, I.; Huh, M.R. Interactive effects of arsenic and chromium stresses on mineral and metal uptake in jute (‘Corchorus olitorius L.). Plant Omics J. 2015, 8, 220–231. [Google Scholar]
  56. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Irshad, S.; Hussaan, M.; Rizwan, M.; Rana, M.S.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Parvaiz, A. Copper uptake and accumulation, ultra-structural alteration, and bast fibre yield and quality of fibrous jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) plants grown under two different soils of China. Plants 2020, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Chowdhury, S.R.; Choudhuri, M.A. Hydrogen peroxide metabolism as in index of water stress tolerance in jute. Physiol. Plant 1985, 65, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chowdhury, S.R.; Choudhuri, M.A. Effects of CaCl2 and ABA on changes in H2O2, metabolism in two jute species under water deficit stress. J. Plant Physiol. 1989, 135, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saleem, M.H.; Fahad, S.; Khan, S.U.; Ahmar, S.; Khan, M.H.U.; Rehman, M.; Maqbool, Z.; Liu, L. Morpho-physiological traits, gaseous exchange attributes, and phytoremediation potential of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) grown in different concentrations of copper-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ghorai, A.K.; Bhattacharjee, A.K.; Saha, S.; Rao, P.V. Effect of waterlogging and drainage on yield and quality of jute (Corchorus olitorius and Corchorus capsularis). J. Water Manag. 2003, 11, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  61. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.; Rana, M.S.; Rizwan, M.; Kamran, M.; Imran, M.; Riaz, M.; Soliman, M.H.; Elkelish, A.; et al. Influence of phosphorus on copper phytoextraction via modulating cellular organelles in two jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) varieties grown in a copper mining soil of Hubei Province, China. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chaudhuri, K.; Choudhuri, M.A. Effects of short-term NaCl stress on water relations and gas exchange of two jute species. Biol. Plant 1997, 40, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nizam, M.U.; Zaman, M.W.; Rahman, M.M. Lead toxicity tolerance of jute, kenaf and mesta at germination phase. Bangladesh J. Seed Sci. Technol. 2014, 18, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  64. Das, A.; Ray, R.; Mandal, N.; Chakrabarti, K. An analysis of transcripts and enzyme profiles in drought stressed jute (Corchorus capsularis) and rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings treated with CaCl2, hydroxyapatite nano-particle and β-amino butyric acid. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 79, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Saleem, M.H.; Fahad, S.; Adnan, M.; Ali, M.; Rana, M.S.; Kamran, M.; Ali, Q.; Hashem, I.A.; Bhantana, P.; Ali, M.; et al. Foliar application of gibberellic acid endorsed phytoextraction of copper and alleviates oxidative stress in jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) plant grown in highly copper-contaminated soil of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 37121–37133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Saleem, M.H.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.; Rizwan, M.; Kamran, M.; Mohamed, I.A.A.; Khan, Z.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Alharby, H.F.; Hakeem, K.R.; et al. Individual and combined application of EDTA and citric acid assisted phytoextraction of copper using jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) seedlings. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 19, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bhattacharyya, A.C.; Palit, P.K. Effect of Waterlogging on Jute Growth and Yield; Jute Agriculture Research Institute: Calcutta, India, 1984; p. 70. [Google Scholar]
  68. Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M.; Soliman, M.H. Abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: Role of phytohormones. In Abiotic Stress in Plants; Intech Open: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Islam, M.S.; Azam, M.S.; Sharmin, S.; Sajib, A.A.; Alam, M.M.; Reza, M.S.; Ahmed, R.; Khan, H. Improved salt tolerance of jute plants expressing the katE gene from Escherichia coli. Turk. J. Biol. 2013, 37, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ma, H.; Yang, R.; Song, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Ren, C.; Ma, H.; Zafar, S.; Ashraf, M.Y. Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in jute (Corchorus capsularis & olitorius L.) seedling roots. Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 385–396. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yang, Z.; Lu, R.; Dai, Z.; Yan, A.; Tang, Q.; Cheng, C.; Xu, Y.; Yang, W.; Su, J. Salt-stress response mechanisms using de Novo transcriptome sequencing of salt-tolerant and sensitive Corchorus spp. genotypes. Genes 2017, 8, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Yang, Z.; Yan, A.; Lu, R.; Dai, Z.; Tang, Q.; Cheng, C.; Xu, Y.; Su, J. De novo transcriptome sequencing of two cultivated jute species under salinity stress. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Dai, Z.; Xie, D.; Tang, Q.; Cheng, C.; Xu, Y.; Liu, C.; Deng, C.; Chen, J.; et al. Construction of a high-resolution genetic map and identification of quantitative trait loci for salt tolerance in jute (Corchous spp.). BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Sawarkar, A.G.; Yumnam, S.; Patil, S.G.; Mukherjee, S. Genetic divergence of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) for fibre yield and its related component characters under moisture stress condition. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2015, 28, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, Z.; Dai, Z.; Lu, R.; Wu, B.; Tang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Cheng, C.; Su, J. Transcriptome analysis of two species of jute in response to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zhang, G.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C.; Li, D.; Wu, Y.; Deng, J.; Shan, S.; Qi, J. Overexpression of CcNAC1 gene promotes early flowering and enhances drought tolerance of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). Protoplasma 2021, 258, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, G.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, D.; Deng, J.; Shan, S.; Qi, J. Comparative transcriptome sequencing analysis and functional identification of a NAM-2-like gene in jute (Corchorus capsularis L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Niu, X.; Qi, J.; Zhang, G.; Xu, J.; Tao, A.; Fang, P.; Su, J. Selection of reliable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR gene expression analysis in Jute (Corchorus capsularis) under stress treatments. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Ferdous, A.S.; Islam, M.T.; Alam, S.S.; Khan, H. Identification of stable reference genes for quantitative PCR in jute under different experimental conditions: An essential assessment for gene expression analysis. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2015, 9, 646–655. [Google Scholar]
  80. Ahmed, B.; Alam, M.; Hasan, F.; Emdad, E.M.; Islam, S.; Rahman, N. Jute CDPK genes and their role in stress tolerance and fiber development: A genome-wide bioinformatic investigation of Corchorus capsularis and C. olitorius. Plant Gene 2020, 24, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hauqe, S.; Ferdous, A.S.; Sarker, S.K.; Islam, M.T.; Hossain, K.; Khan, H. Identification and expression profiling of microRNAs and their corresponding targets related to phytoremediation of heavy metals in jute (Corchorus olitorius var. O-9897). Bioresour. Comm. 2016, 2, 152–157. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bhattacharyya, J.; Chakraborty, A.; Roy, S.; Pradhan, S.; Mitra, J.; Chakraborty, M.; Manna, A.; Sikdar, N.; Chakraborty, S.; Sen, S.K. Genetic transformation of cultivated jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) by particle bombardment using apical meristem tissue and development of stable transgenic plant. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2015, 121, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 01595 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of different levels of salt stress on C. olitorius plants; C—control, S1—200 mM NaCl, and S2—400 mM NaCl.
Figure 1. Effect of different levels of salt stress on C. olitorius plants; C—control, S1—200 mM NaCl, and S2—400 mM NaCl.
Plants 10 01595 g001
Plants 10 01595 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological changes of C. olitorius cv. O-9897 seedlings exposed in 0.5 mM CdCl2 for 15 days (Cd).
Figure 2. Morphological changes of C. olitorius cv. O-9897 seedlings exposed in 0.5 mM CdCl2 for 15 days (Cd).
Plants 10 01595 g002
Plants 10 01595 g003 550
Figure 3. Hypothetical comparison matrix of the relative tolerance of C. capsularis and C. olitorius to major abiotic stresses. This a general trend based on the various published literature and preliminary studies. The actual tolerance varies with the stress levels and genotypes.
Figure 3. Hypothetical comparison matrix of the relative tolerance of C. capsularis and C. olitorius to major abiotic stresses. This a general trend based on the various published literature and preliminary studies. The actual tolerance varies with the stress levels and genotypes.
Plants 10 01595 g003
Table
Table 1. Jute (C. capsularis and C. olitorius) responses to different abiotic stresses.
Table 1. Jute (C. capsularis and C. olitorius) responses to different abiotic stresses.
SpeciesStress LevelEffectsReferences
Salt stress
C. olitorius,
C. capsularis		140 mM NaClIncreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content and peroxidase (POD) activity.
Inhibited catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities.		[17]
C. olitorius4 and 6 ds m−1 NaClReduced plant height, number of leaves plant−1, root/shoot length, and dry weight (DW).
Decreased stem diameter and fiber yield.		[18]
C. olitorius
(cv. O-9897)		200 mM NaClReduced shoot length (59%), root length (60%), relative water content (RWC; 21%), and the SPAD value (13%).[19]
C. olitorius160 mM NaClReduced germination, shoot and root length, fresh weight (FW), and DW.[20]
C. capsularis (cv. CVL-1)100 mM NaClDecreased germination (75%), plant height (74%), number of leaves (65%), and DW (73%).[21]
C. capsularis200 mM NaClInhibited germination, plant height and branches plant−1, number of seed capsule−1, seed yield plant−1, and 1000-seed weight.
Increased false seed content.		[22]
C. capsularis (cv. JRC-517)250 mM NaClReduced shoot length (50%), root length (40%), number of leaves (>70%), and RWC (39%).
Decreased K+, chlorophyll (Chl) a and Chl b content
Increased Na+ content.		[6]
C. olitorius175 mM NaClReduced germination (60%), number of ramifications (57%), leaf area (69%), FW (40%), number of pods plant−1 (49%), and number of seeds pod−1 (37%).
Decreased net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) by 75, 86, and 75%, respectively.
Increased Pro and soluble sugars by 16- and 4-fold.		[23]
C. olitorius100 mM Na2SO4Reduced shoot and root length, leaf area, and root and shoot DW by 17, 28, 18, 30, and 26%, respectively.
Decreased Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoid content by 18, 30, and 15%, respectively.
Reduced free amino acids (27%), soluble sugar (22%), proteins (5%), and tannin content (1.3%).
Increased phenolic compounds by 6%.
Increased MDA (110%) and proline (Pro) (55%).
Inhibited the activities of CAT, glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and SOD.
Reduced glutathione reductase (GR) activity.		[24]
Drought stress
C. capsularis, C. olitorius8–10% soil moistureReduced plant height (35–50%).[9]
C. capsularis, C. olitorius8–10% soil moistureDecreased base diameter (16–42%).[10]
C. olitorius (cvs. Yaya, Moroheiya)Acute moisture stress (40–30%), light moisture stress (60–50%)Inhibited plant height, number of nodes on stem, and node length.
Decreased leaf area, root DW, and fiber yield.		[25]
C. olitorius50% pan evaporation (EP) Reduced plant height (40%), leaf number plant−1 (30%), leaf area (25%), and yield (50%).[26]
C. olitorius25% field capacity (FC)Decreased plant height, leaf area, leaf number plant−1, and stem girth.
Reduced yield by 80%.		[27]
C. olitorius40% FCReduced plant height (52%), stem diameter (41%), and leaf area (67%).
Increased Pro and soluble sugar content by 8- and 4-fold.		[28]
C. olitoriusPolyethylene glycol (PEG-6000)
(−2.0, −3.0, and −4.0 bar)		Decreased shoot and root length, FW, and DW.[7]
C. olitorius (cvs. OIN 694, OIN 873, OIN 875)Water deficit, 10 dDecreased plant height, root length, and stem diameter.
Decreased RWC, photosynthetic carbon assimilation, Pn, and Tr.
Deteriorated fiber strength and fineness.
Increased Pro and flavonoid contents.
Reduced polyphenols contents.		[8]
C. olitorius30% crop water requirement (ETc)Reduced plant height (23%) and leaf number (34%).
Decreased Chl content index and yield.		[29]
Waterlogging stress
C. capsularis, C. olitorius5 cm standing water imposed on 30-d-old seedlingsReduced plant height (39–61%).[9]
C. capsularis, C. olitorius5 cm standing water imposed on 30-d-old seedlingsDecreased base diameter (30–40%).[10]
C. olitorius5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 cm standing waterReduced plant height, tap root DW, and basal diameter.
Decreased stomatal resistance, Pn, and Tr.
Decreased fiber yield by 20–60%.
Inhibited fiber length (11–43%) and fiber strength (12–55%).		[30]
C. olitoriusWaterlogging, 105 dDecreased plant height (53%), shoot DW (87%), stem diameter (36%), leaf area (73%), tap root length (71%), and yield (75%).
Increased adventitious root formation.
Developed aerenchyma tissue in adventitious root. 		[31]
C. capsularis2 cm standing waterInduced aerenchyma formation.
Increased pith size.
Reduced xylem vessels.
Decreased epidermal cell size.		[32]
Metal/metalloid stress
C. capsularis (cv. CVE-3)5 mg L−1 cadmium (Cd)Decreased survivability (92%), shoot length (92%), and root length (25%).
Reduced shoot and root DW.		[33]
C. olitorius1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 CdReduced root and shoot FW.
Alleviated Pro content. 		[34]
C. capsularis (cv. BJC-7370)98.25 mg kg−1 arsenic (As)Reduced germination (19%), survivability (9%), and stem girth (53%).
Inhibited plant height and dry biomass production.		[35]
C. capsularis (cv. Da An Qing Pi)50 µM copper (Cu) (CuSO4.5H2O) Inhibited germination (50%), plant height (52%), shoot. FW (36%), and DW (63%).
Increased POD (46%) and SOD (29%) activities.		[36]
C. capsularis (cv. Shang Huo Ma)50 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)Reduced germination, plant height, total Chl content, shoot FW, and DW.
Increased MDA and H2O2 content.
Decreased CAT and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities.		[37]
C. capsularis100 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)Decreased plant height (52%), FW (22%), DW (35%), and stem diameter (25%).
Inhibited, Pn, Tr, intercellular CO2 (Ci), and gs content
Increased MDA (475%) and Pro content (446%).
Increased POD and SOD activities.		[38]
C. capsularis100 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)Decreased plant height (37%), FW (20%), DW (35%), and stem diameter (33%).
Reduced Tr, Pn, gs, and Ci by 58, 67, 77, and 20%, respectively.
Increased MDA (229%) content and SOD (476%) and POD (107%) activities.		[39]
Table
Table 2. List of different protectants and their protective roles in enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in jute.
Table 2. List of different protectants and their protective roles in enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in jute.
SpeciesStress LevelProtectantsProtective EffectsReferences
C. olitorius, C. capsularis160 and 200 mM NaCl0.09 mM kinetin (KN), 4 mM glutamic acid, 5 mM calcium nitrate Higher Pn, Tr, and water use efficiency.[62]
C. olitorius1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Cd5 mM citric acid (CA)Higher shoot and root biomass.
Reduced Cd uptake. 		[34]
C. capsularisDrought stress (24 h)CaCl2 nanoparticle (CaNP), and β- aminobutyric acid
(20 µg ml−1)		Higher Pro content.
Increased CAT and POD activities.		[64]
C. capsularis100 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)3 mM ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid (EDTA)Increased plant height (9%), FW (6%), DW (11%), and stem diameter (7%).
Higher Pn, Tr, Ci, and gs by 8, 13, 14, and 27%.
Increased total Chl content by 21%.
Reduced MDA and Pro content.
Decreased POD and SOD activities.		[38]
C. capsularisCu (2221 mg kg−1 soil)30, 60, and 120 kg ha−1 PIncreased plant height and shoot FW and DW.
Reduced MDA and Pro content.
Higher fiber yield and improved quality.		[61]
C. capsularisCu-contaminated soil (2221 mg kg−1)100 mg L−1 gibberellic acids (GA)Increased plant height and shoot FW and DW by 31, 31, and 36%, respectively.
Improved Pn, Tr, Ci, and gs.
Reduced MDA (51%), H2O2 (54%), and electrolyte leakage (EL; 39%).
Increased CAT (25%), POD (40%), SOD (54%), and APX (28%) activities.		[65]
C. capsularis80 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)3 mM EDTA + 3 mM citric acid (CA)Increased plant height (55%), stem diameter (24%), and shoot FW (36%) and DW (31%).
Higher Pn, Tr, Ci, and gs by 55, 170, 20, and 175%, respectively.
Reduced MDA (37%), H2O2 (28%), and EL (43%).
Increased CAT (63%), POD (68%), SOD (142%), and APX (48%) activities.		[66]
C. capsularis100 µM Cu (CuSO4.5H2O)2 mM CAIncreased plant height (40%), stem diameter (18%), and shoot FW (41%) and DW (33%).
Increased Pn (50%), Tr (59%), and gs (20%) content.
Reduced MDA (27%) and Pro (11%) content.		[39]
C. olitorius100 mM Na2SO410% parsley extracts (pretreatment)Increased shoot height, root length, and leaf area by 16, 10, and 19%, respectively.
Higher Chl a and Chl b content.
Decreased MDA, Pro, tannins, and GB content.		[24]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahman, K.; Ahmed, N.; Raihan, M.R.H.; Nowroz, F.; Jannat, F.; Rahman, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Jute Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Approaches. Plants 2021, 10, 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595

AMA Style

Rahman K, Ahmed N, Raihan MRH, Nowroz F, Jannat F, Rahman M, Hasanuzzaman M. Jute Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Approaches. Plants. 2021; 10(8):1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahman, Khussboo, Naznin Ahmed, Md. Rakib Hossain Raihan, Farzana Nowroz, Faria Jannat, Mira Rahman, and Mirza Hasanuzzaman. 2021. "Jute Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Approaches" Plants 10, no. 8: 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595

APA Style

Rahman, K., Ahmed, N., Raihan, M. R. H., Nowroz, F., Jannat, F., Rahman, M., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2021). Jute Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Approaches. Plants, 10(8), 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop