Next Article in Journal
Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Stripe Rust in Six Spring Wheat Populations by Modeling Genotype by Environment Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Bioactive Extracts from Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods Biorefinery as a Source of Ingredients for High-Value Industries
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Nanoparticles of Proanthocyanidins from Uncaria tomentosa Leaves: QTOF-ESI MS Characterization, Antioxidant Activity and Immune Cellular Response
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 13
10.3390/plants11131738
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Content of Certain Groups of Phenolic Compounds and the Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Halophyte Parts of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. at Different Levels of Soil Salinization

by
Artem Pungin
*,
Lidia Lartseva
,
Violetta Loskutnikova
,
Vladislav Shakhov
,
Olesya Krol
,
Elena Popova
,
Andrey Kolomiets
,
Nadezhda Nikolaeva
and
Aleksandra Volodina
Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Universitetskaya Str. 2, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(13), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131738
Submission received: 29 May 2022 / Revised: 25 June 2022 / Accepted: 28 June 2022 / Published: 30 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Ecophysiology and Economical Potential of the Halophytes and Gypsophytes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Halophyte plants are known for their resistance to harsh environmental conditions associated with excess salts in their habitats. Their resistance to salinization is due, among other things, to their high ability to detoxify free radicals, owing to the relatively high content of antioxidants. On the coast of the Baltic Sea and in the lagoons, there are several rare halophyte species included in the Red Book of the Kaliningrad Region (Russia) and the Baltic region, such as Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. The aim of the research was to study the accumulation of certain groups of phenolic compounds in different parts of S. marina and G. maritima plants under conditions of weak and strong soil salinity, as well as to analyze the antioxidant, antibacterial, and fungicidal activity of extracts of the studied plant species. The present study showed an increase in total phenolic content in the roots and shoots of S. marina, and the shoots of G. maritima, in response to increased soil salinity. At the same time, the total content of flavonoids in all the studied parts of the two plant species remained unchanged. However, the content of individual flavonoids (hesperetin, epicatechin, apigenin derivative, luteolin derivative) in S. marina increased, for G. maritima there was a tendency to reduce the content of flavonoids in roots and shoots with an increase in soil salinity. There was an increase in the total content of hydroxycinnamic acids in the roots of Glaux maritima, as well as an increase in the content of protocatechuic acid in the roots and shoots of Spergularia marina. A positive relationship was established between the antioxidant activity of S. marina root extracts and the total content of phenolic compounds, as well as G. maritima shoots extracts and the total content of phenolic compounds. Extracts of S. marina showed no antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, and weak fungicidal activity of stem extracts and inflorescences grown on soils, with high levels of salinities, was detected against Candida albicans. The extracts of roots and shoots from G. maritima showed weak antimicrobial and fungicidal activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

It is known that many of the natural biologically active substances used in medicine are products of the secondary metabolism of plants, which have various beneficial effects on human health [1]. The therapeutic effect of biologically active substances such as phenolic compounds is possible due to their antioxidant activity [2]. Antioxidants play a significant role in protecting the cell from reactive oxygen species and free radicals [3]. Excess free radicals in the cell cause oxidative stress, which leads to premature aging, the development of diabetes, cardiovascular and neurological diseases, and cancer [4,5]. Plants have effective antioxidant mechanisms that protect them from the toxic effect of free radicals, which are formed in large quantities in plant cells due to physiological and biochemical features [6].
Glycophyte plants are not adapted to salt stress, which leads to various adverse changes, including the excessive formation of free radicals [7,8]. Halophytes, by contrast, are known for their resistance to harsh environmental conditions associated with excess salts in their habitats [7,8]. Their resistance to such environmental conditions is due, among other things, to their high ability to detoxify free radicals, which is possible due to the relatively high content of antioxidants, including compounds of polyphenolic nature [9]. It has been shown that the total amount of polyphenols in halophytes is twice as high in glycophytes, and the extracts from halophytes have a high ability to remove free radicals of DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and reduce the activity of Fe3+ compared to glycophytes, which may indicate the important role of polyphenols in reducing the harmful effects of free radicals in halophyte species [10,11].
On the coast of the Baltic Sea and in the lagoons, there are several rare halophyte species listed in the Red Book of the Kaliningrad Region [12] and the Baltic region [13]. Two rare halophyte species are of particular interest: Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. From a global perspective, these plants is considered a least-concern species [14,15].
S. marina, an annual herbaceous plant of the Caryophyllaceae family, grows in Europe, North Africa, Asia, Australia, and North America [16]. As a mandatory halophyte, this species grows on soils with variable but usually high salinity. It is found in marine and inland salt marshes, and can inhabit roadsides on which salt has been used to melt ice [16].
G. maritima is a perennial herbaceous plant belonging to the Primulaceae family. This species is also known as Lysimachia maritima (L.) [17,18]. The species is circumpolar in the northern hemisphere and grows in Europe, Central Asia, and North America. It prefers to grow in very humid, salty places, which can also be flooded periodically, usually in coastal habitats [19,20].
The biological activity and chemical composition of secondary metabolites of S. marina remain poorly studied. In the study of several species of the genus Spergularia, the therapeutic effects and properties of extracts were revealed: hypoglycemic, diuretic, hypotensive, antibacterial, antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cholesterol-lowering properties [21,22]. It is known that S. marina is used in the food industry in South Korea for the development of functional food products and as a supplement—a substitute for salt [23,24,25]. S. marina has been found to have such properties as reduced insulin resistance [26,27], antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory [28,29,30], antimicrobial [31], and antiadipogenic effects [27], as well as the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation [28] and an inhibitory effect on cancer cells [32]. Vasodilatory and diuretic effects of extracts have been noted, which represents the prospect of S. marina-based preparations as calcium channel antagonists with antihypertensive effects [33].
The biological activity and chemical composition of secondary metabolites of G. maritima have not yet been determined [34,35]. Species of the Lysimachia genus are used in traditional medicine in East Asia to treat digestive disorders, stop bleeding, and sterilize wounds [36]. Extracts of these plants are known to contain polyphenols [37] and saponins [38]. It has been shown that extracts of species of the Lysimachia genus have antioxidant [39,40,41], anthelmintic [42], antimicrobial [43], and endothelioprotective effects [41], and they can improve the vasodilating function of the endothelium [44], inhibit lipogenesis processes [36], and exhibit therapeutic effects on neurodegenerative diseases [45].
As can be seen, the studied plants have a high biotechnological and therapeutic potential, but the chemical composition of secondary metabolites remains poorly studied. Moreover, it is not known how the growing conditions, in particular the level of soil salinization, affect the qualitative and quantitative composition of secondary metabolites. Based on this, the purpose of this work was to study the accumulation of certain groups of phenolic compounds in different parts of Spergularia marina and Glaux maritima plants under conditions of weak and strong soil salinity, as well as to analyze the antioxidant, antibacterial, and fungicidal activity of extracts of the studied plant species.

2. Results

2.1. Soil Analysis

A soil chemistry analysis was performed; the mean and standard deviation of pH, electrical conductivity, soluble salt residue, soluble cations, and anions in the soil are shown in Table 1. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the soil used for the studied plants was generally alkaline (pH = 7.56–7.74). The electrical conductivity, dry residue, chloride, sulfate, sodium, potassium, and calcium contents were high in the soil at the elevated areas of S. marina and G. maritima (upper level of the salt marsh), while in the soil in the relief depressions (lower level of the salt marsh), the values were significantly lower.
It is known that soil salinization gradually increases with height, reaching a maximum just above the average sea level [46,47]. This can be explained by the fact that the evaporation periods (occurring when the area is not flooded) are longer at higher altitudes than in lowlands, and thus the salts in the surface soils can be very concentrated. In higher ground areas, above mean sea level, soil salinity tends to decrease due to the increasingly rare solonchak flooding and the consequent decrease in salt intake.
According to the agronomic classification of soil salinization based on electrical conductivity [48], the soil on the upper level of S. marina and G. maritima can be characterized as saline soils, and in turn, the soil in the lower level is non-saline. However, a relatively high content of chlorides and sodium was found in the terrain downgrades, indicating the presence of salinization.
According to another classification, which is based on the assessment of the dry residue of salts readily soluble in water [49], the soil in the upper level is characterized as highly saline, and in the lower level as slightly saline. Further in this work, the authors will adhere to this classification when assessing the total content of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids, and when evaluating the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and fungicidal activity of extracts of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization.

2.2. Total Phenolic Compounds Content

The total content of phenolic compounds in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization was found (Figure 1). For S. marina, the highest content of phenolic compounds was found in plant roots (5.9 ± 0.6 mg GAE g−1 DW) growing on soils with a high level of salinity. Low total phenolic content (TPC) was observed in S. marina shoots (1.5 ± 0.1 mg GAE g−1 DW) under low salinity conditions. The total content of phenolic compounds in roots and shoots significantly increases with an increase in soil salinity.
In G. maritima, high total content of phenolic compounds was found in the roots (13.9 ± 1.4 mg GAE g−1 DW) under conditions of strong soil salinity, but there were no significant differences with such content under conditions of weak soil salinity (t-test, p > 0.05). However, differences in the total content of phenolic compounds in G. maritima shoots with an increase in soil salinity were found from 8.2 ± 1.4 mg GAE g−1 DW with a low level of salinity to 13.0 ± 0.5 mg GAE g−1 DW under conditions of strong soil salinity.

2.3. Total Flavonoids Content

The analysis of the total content of S. marina flavonoids showed that the maximum content of flavonoids was in inflorescences (3.9 ± 2.1 mg RE g−1 DW), and the minimum was in the roots (0.4 ± 0.1 mg RE g−1 DW). In S. marina shoots, under conditions of strong soil salinity, the total content of flavonoids was 2.7 ± 0.9 mg RE g−1 DW. However, the authors did not find differences in the content of flavonoids in the roots, shoots, and inflorescences of S. marina growing in conditions of weak and strong soil salinization (Figure 2).
In turn, for G. maritima, growing at different levels of soil salinization, no differences in the content of flavonoids in roots and shoots were found. Concurrently, the highest content of flavonoids was found in the shoots of plants under conditions of weak soil salinization (18.8 ± 4.0 mg RE g−1 DW), and the lowest was found in the roots of plants with strong soil salinization (0.2 ± 0.1 mg RE g−1 DW).

2.4. Total Hydroxycinnamic Acids Content

The content of hydroxycinnamic acids in various parts of S. marina could not be determined, due to the low content of these substances, which is below the sensitivity threshold of the method used.
The results of the study of the accumulation of hydroxycinnamic acids in various parts of G. maritima are presented in Figure 3. The analysis showed that the accumulation of hydroxycinnamic acids in Glaux roots depended on the level of soil salinity; a higher content was observed at a high level of salinity (1.0 ± 0.1 mg CAE g−1 DW). In the shoots of G. maritima, the content of hydroxycinnamic acids was more than twice as high as that of roots, while no dependence of the content on the level of soil salinity was observed.

2.5. Content of Individual Phenolic Compounds

The content of flavonoids and phenolic acids in different parts of the studied plants S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization was found (Table 2). Various parts of S. marina contained flavonoids such as catechin, hesperetin, epicatechin, apigenin derivative, luteolin derivative, and tricin derivative. Among the phenolic acids, protocatechuic acid and trace amounts of other derivatives of hydroxycinnamic acid (chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, and rosmarinic acid) were found. It should be noted that with an increase in soil salinity, an increase in the content of hesperetin, epicatechin, and apigenin derivatives was found in the roots and shoots of S. marina, as well as luteolin derivatives in the shoots and inflorescences (Appendix A, Figure A1). In turn, with an increase in soil salinity in the roots of S. marina, the content of protocatechuic acid increased, whereas, in the shoots, it decreased.
Flavonoids, such as hyperoside, isoquercitrin, astragalin, and trace amounts of catechin and rutin, as well as other derivatives of quercetin and kaempferol, were found in the shoots of G. maritima. Among the phenolic acids, protocatechuic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and traces of chlorogenic acids were detected. In general, for G. maritima, there was a tendency to reduce the content of flavonoids in roots and shoots with an increase in soil salinity (Appendix A, Figure A2).

2.6. Antioxidant Activity

In this study, the evaluation of antioxidant activity was conducted with assaying DPPH and ascorbic acid as a standard using a method related to the ability of antioxidants to bind radicals.
The extracts of S. marina roots had relatively high antioxidant activity under conditions of strong soil salinity (21.9 ± 3.6 mg TE g−1 DW), in comparison with a weak level of salinity (15.5 ± 0.6 mg TE g−1 DW). The antioxidant activity of stem and inflorescence extracts was 3–5 times lower compared to extracts from S. marina roots, and also did not depend on salinity conditions (Figure 4).
In turn, extracts of roots and shoots of G. maritima are characterized by high antioxidant activity. Extracts of plant shoots growing under conditions of strong soil salinization have slightly higher activity compared to a weak level of salinization (20.3 ± 3.6 and 16.9 ± 3.0 mg TE g−1 DW, respectively). At the same time, no statistically significant variation in antioxidant activity (t-test, p > 0.05), as measured by the DPPH method, was observed for roots and shoots in relation to the level of soil salinity.

2.7. Correlation between Phenolic Compounds Content and Antioxidant Activity

The diversity of compounds with different antioxidant mechanisms present in plants affects the antioxidant activity of their extracts. Antioxidant activity depends on the content of different classes of phytocomponents in the samples. Typically, phenolic compounds have a significant effect on the total antioxidant activity of extracts [50,51].
The correlation analysis conducted within the study showed a positive relationship between the content of different groups of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of extracts of different parts of S. marina (Table 3). The correlation analysis confirmed a positive relationship between the antioxidant activity of S. marina root extracts and the total content of phenolic compounds (r = 0.909, p ≤ 0.01), protocatechuic acid (r = 0.859, p ≤ 0.01), and individual flavonoids (r = 0.754–0.893, p ≤ 0.05). However, the results relating to total flavonoid content (TFC) did not show significant correlations with both antioxidant activity and individual flavonoid content in all parts of S. marina studied.
The correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship between the antioxidant activity of G. maritima shoot extracts and the total content of phenolic compounds (r = 0.700, p ≤ 0.05), and the total content of hydroxycinnamic acids (r = 0.691, p ≤ 0.05). However, there is a negative correlation of AOA (DPPH) with the content of individual flavonoids—the derivatives of kaempferol (r = −0.681–−0.714, p ≤ 0.05) and protocatechuic acid (r = −0.678, p ≤ 0.05) (Table 4). The correlation analysis revealed no significant (p > 0.05) relationship between the content of different groups of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of G. maritima root extracts.

2.8. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity

The antibacterial and fungicidal activities of extracts from different parts of S. marina and G. maritima, which grow on soils with different levels of salinization, were studied with regard to the representative of Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, the representative of Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis, and the saprotrophic yeast-like fungus Candida albicans. The results of the study are presented in Table 5. Taking into account the results presented in the table, it can be seen that the S. marina extracts did not show antibacterial activity. Only very weak fungicidal activity of shoots and inflorescences of S. marina was detected on soils with a high level of salinity.
Extracts from G. maritima shoots, however, exhibited some antibacterial effect, with minor activity against E. coli; the root extract, a 2 mg disk−1, hardly inhibited the colony growth of B. subtilis. Extracts from shoots and roots of G. maritima also exhibited a weak inhibitory effect on Candida albicans.
However, the standard antibiotic kanamycin (50 µg disk−1) that was used showed significant antibacterial and fungicidal activity against all the tested microorganisms (Table 5).

3. Discussion

3.1. Variation in Phenolic Compounds Content, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Fungicidal Activity

There is now growing interest in halophytes due to their high bioactive content (primary and secondary metabolites), such as polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, sterols, essential oils, polysaccharides, glycosides, and phenolic compounds. These biologically active substances possess potent antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumor activity and, thereby, are key compounds for the prevention of various diseases [10]. Consequently, some halophytes have traditionally been used for medical and nutritional purposes. A promising area of research is the optimization of cultivation methods that maximize the yield of high-quality and functional plant products of wild plant populations and cultural species that are rich in target bioactive compounds, including the potential application of salinity as an effective method for increasing the content of secondary metabolites in plants, especially those of phenolic nature. From this standpoint, rare halophytic species of S. marina and G. maritima, which biological activity and secondary metabolites content has not been studied enough, are promising for use in the food and medical industries [23,24,25].
The results obtained in the present study supplement the knowledge about the qualitative composition of phenolic compounds in S. marina and the antioxidant activity of extracts. It was found that extracts of different parts of S. marina contained flavonoids (catechin, hesperetin, epicatechin, apigenin derivatives, luteolin derivatives, and tricin derivatives), as well as phenolic acids (protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, and rosmarinic acid).
In another study [52,53], phenyl lipid alkaloid and several phenolic compounds were identified from S. marina. These compounds were identified as 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, N-hexacosanoylanthranilic acid, tryptophan, 4 hydroxybenzyol glucopyranoside, luteolin 6-C-β-D-glucopyranoside 8-C-β-D-(2-O-feruloyl)glucopyranoside, luteolin 6-C-β-D-(2-O-feruloyl)glucopyranoside 8-C-β-D-glucopyranoside, apigenin 6-C-β-D-glucopyranoside 8-C-β-D-(2-O-feruloyl)glucopyranoside, and apigenin 6-C-β-D-(2-O-feruloyl)glucopyranoside 8-C-β-D-glucopyranoside. The identified compounds can partially contribute to the antioxidant activity of S. marina. Thus, it was noted that compounds containing flavone 6,8-C-diglucoside and ferulic acid exhibited high antioxidant activity, as well as compounds containing luteolin and apigenin. Iranian researchers have shown [54] that S. marina contains relatively large amounts of phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins in seeds, in the above-ground parts of the plant, and in the entire plant. The authors found that the number of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins was directly related to antioxidant activity. In another phytochemical study of S. marina, seven compounds were isolated from various plant extracts [31]. From the chloroform extract, β-sitosterol glycoside and tricin were isolated; in turn, dihydroferulic acid, vanillic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, uracil, and 8-hydroxy cuminoic acid were isolated from the ethyl acetate extract. Among the known compounds, in the authors’ opinion, tricin deserves special attention. Tricin is described to have specific biological properties, such as antiviral and anti-inflammatory action; antihistamine effects; and antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-tuberculosis activities, which make this compound superior to other flavonoids and polyphenols in terms of agricultural, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical value [55,56]. One of the most known features of tricin is its potential anti-tumor activity. However, the tricin content of S. marina is relatively low and is 0.398 mg/100 g wet weight [56].
Multiple drug resistance, including antibiotic resistance, has become a serious problem in pharmacotherapy as the number of infectious diseases caused by bacteria has increased. Special attention is paid to searching for new drugs that can be capable of solving this problem. Among the promising sources for searching for new medicinal compounds, one can identify secondary metabolites of plants belonging to different chemical classes [57].
In the present study, the antibacterial and fungicidal activity of extracts (10% DMSO) from different parts of S. marina against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Candida albicans was studied. Extracts showed no antibacterial activity, and weak fungicidal activity of extracts of shoots and inflorescences grown in soils with a high level of salinity was revealed against C. albicans. Similar results were obtained when studying the antimicrobial activity of the S. marina methanolic extract [54] with the disc diffusion method on eight bacterial species, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and the fungus Candida albicans, where no inhibition zone was detected. In another study, the results of screening antibacterial and antifungal activity for different fractions showed [31] that all of the extracts and isolates of S. marina that were tested did not show antibacterial activity against Gram-negative E. coli and P. aeruginosa. However, the volatile fraction of S. marina petroleum ether extract had only antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis. Extracts (petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate, n-butanol) were active against all the Gram-positive bacteria, with the exception of n-butanol, which was not active against Staphylococcus aureus. The only n-butanol extract was active against Candida albicans. The authors also tested the compounds isolated from the extracts (tricin, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 8-hydroxy cuminoic acid) to compare their results with the activity of the extracts. Experiments have shown that the extracts were more active than the individual compounds. Tricin and p-hydroxybenzoic acid were active against Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus luteus, and Candida albicans. In turn, 8-Hydroxy cuminoic acid was active only against Candida albicans. Thus, the available data allow us to conclude that various groups of phenolic compounds in S. marina extracts can be active against the Gram-positive bacteria studied in this work, as well as against the yeast-like fungus Candida albicans.
The study discussed in this article showed that G. maritima contains flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids, and the extracts of roots and shoots have high antioxidant activity, as well as weak antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and fungicidal activity against Candida albicans. German researchers conducted screening tests the extracts G. maritima for the content of alkaloids, saponins, and phenolic compounds—namely, flavonoids and tannins [34]. The ethanolic extracts of G. maritima do not show the presence of saponins, flavonoids, and alkaloids. Ethanolic extracts of the above-ground parts of 28 plant species, including G. maritima, were screened by the same authors for activity against seven fungal, three yeast, five algae, and six bacterial species [35]. No activity was detected against all organisms tested for G. maritima. It is well known [58,59] that there are large differences in the chemical composition of different organs of the same plant. In addition, the chemical composition varies in plants from different geographical locations, climates, and soil conditions, which can explain the results obtained in this study and in the studies under discussion [34,35].

3.2. Effect of Soil Salinity on Phenolic Compounds Content

The present study showed an increase in TPC in the roots and shoots of S. marina, and in the shoots of G. maritima, in response to increased soil salinity. At the same time, the total content of flavonoids in all the studied parts of the two plant species remained unchanged. However, the content of individual flavonoids (hesperetin, epicatechin, apigenin derivatives, luteolin derivatives) in S. marina increased, for G. maritima, there was a tendency to reduce the content of flavonoids in roots and shoots with an increase in soil salinity. There was an increase in the total content of hydroxycinnamic acids in the roots of Glaux maritima, as well as an increase in the content of Protocatechuic acid in the roots and shoots of Spergularia marina. A positive relationship was established between the total content of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of S. marina root extracts, as well as G. maritima shoots extracts.
In the present study, it is shown that the roots of S. marina and G. maritima are characterized by a high content of phenolic compounds and have a high antioxidant activity, which is most likely determined by their function. Plant roots use polyphenols to adapt to the rhizosphere, where communities of rhizospheric and root endospheric bacteria reside [60] and mycorrhizal symbiosis with fungi is formed [61,62], which is very important for the adaptation of halophytes to the coastal environment. For instance, flavonoids have beneficial impact on symbiosis, stimulating the spore germination, the development of hyphae, and the colonization of roots. Mycorrhiza increases the influx of assimilates to the roots [63].
Generally, halophytes are complex matrices containing a large variety of phenols [64]. However, the ability of plants to accumulate phenolic compounds in response to salinization depends on various factors, such as plant genotype, its ontogenetic state, organ-specific factors, and the intensity and duration of salinization. For example, treatment with 250 mM sodium chloride of Aegiceras corniculatum (L.) Blanco (a shrub that grows in moist soil in estuaries and river banks, often on the coastal edge of the mangrove zone) more than doubled the polyphenol content compared to control plants [65]. A study of salinity on the accumulation of biologically active compounds in the Crithmum maritimum L. halophyte revealed a significant accumulation of chlorogenic acid in leaves with increased salinity [66]. In another experiment [67], in a study of the effect of increased salinity on the total content of phenols, phenolic acids, antioxidant activity, and other compounds in Brassica napus var oleifera seedlings, it was shown that moderate salinization (25–50 mM NaCl) caused the greatest relative increase in the concentration of phenols. Salinization (50–100 mM NaCl) produced a markedly higher uptake of free DPPH forms from both early and late seedlings [67]. In turn, salinization did not have effects on the content of phenolic acids in seedlings. The authors identified a significant positive linear correlation between phenol content and antioxidant activity (r = 0.95) [67]. A study of Cynara cardunculus L. seedlings confirmed the importance of phenolic substances in the resistance of plants to stress conditions by showing that salt stress induced the synthesis of these molecules in proportion to the increase in the concentration of NaCl (0, 60, and 120 mM) [50]. As with total phenols, the trend of antioxidant activity (DPPH) was directly proportional to the salt concentration, demonstrating that the increase in polyphenols corresponds to greater antioxidant activity.
However, the accumulation of phenolic compounds in plants under salt stress is also associated with plant species, so in some plant species, phenolic compounds do not accumulate or vice versa, and a decrease in content is observed [68]. For example, the stress of salinity led to a decrease in the content of flavonoids and phenolic acids in broccoli leaves (B. oleracea var. italica of the Marathon variety), with flavonoid losses being higher [69]. A study of the effect of salinity on total phenol content in Salvia macrosiphon Boiss. showed a decrease in total phenol content in the leaves with an increase in the concentration of sodium chloride [70].
It can also be assumed that the accumulation of polyphenols in plants S. marina and G. maritima plays the role of protective metabolites in salinization. The phenolic composition of plants is one of the factors of plant adaptive variability in their adaptation to environmental conditions, including salinity. Salinization is known to cause oxidative stress due to the high production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in altered plant metabolism. Plants produce a large number of secondary metabolites to remove or detoxify ROS [68]. In response to salt stress, the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway is stimulated, leading to the production of various phenolic compounds with strong antioxidant potential. Phenolic compounds help to neutralize harmful ROS in plants under salt stress [71]. Transcriptional regulation is an important tool to modulate flavonoid biosynthesis. Salt stress is associated with specific gene expression and synthesis of secondary metabolites to eliminate the negative effects of ROS [71,72]. For example, the VvbHLH1 gene from grape has been shown to be involved in enhanced flavonoid production in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., regulating the biosynthesis pathway genes and conferring salt tolerance to plants [73]. In Nicotiana tabacum L., overexpression of NtCHS1 gene plays an important role in flavonoid biosynthesis and in increasing salt tolerance [74]. In the halophytic plant Aeluropus littoralis (Gouan) Parl. expression of the CWPRX gene increased the content of phenolic acids in the leaf cell wall (ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, and sinapic acid) [75].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area and Plant Material

The collection of plants S. marina and G. maritima was carried out on 17 July 2021, on the Vistula Spit (Kaliningrad region), on the shore of the Vistula Gulf, on a periodically flooded meadow (salt marsh) characterized by herbaceous halophytic vegetation, where there grows, in addition to the studied species, Trifolium fragiferum L., Triglochin maritima L., Tripolium pannonicum (Jacq.) Dobrocz., and Centaurium littorale (Turner) Gilmour. Plants of S. marina favor disturbed areas and are often found on soil covered with water. G. maritima grows not only on the lower parts of the coast, together with species of the genus Juncus L., but also on the coastal bar as a dominant and codominant. The salt marsh is flooded with the waters of the bay (average salinity 3.5 psu) and more salty waters of the Baltic Sea (7.3 psu) during the period of surge winds (north and northwest direction) [76]. The water level, dropping during the storm periods, is on average about 0.5–0.7 m. On the investigated site, two levels can be conditionally distinguished, where the studied plant species grow [77]. The lower level is a shallow lowering of the topography, more often flooded, in which water accumulates after flooding (puddles form). The upper level of the salt marsh is somewhat elevated relative to the lower one, after flooding the water is not retained in these areas (Figure 5).
All experimental S. marina plants were harvested in the flowering phase and G. maritima plants in the vegetation phase. From each place of growth (lower and upper level of salt marsh), about 10–15 individuals of each species were collected from five test sites. The roots, shoots, and inflorescences of native plants of S. marina and only the roots and shoots of G. maritima were used as objects of study. In the laboratory, the plants were washed and dried at 60 °C to constant weight. The dried plants were milled to a particle size passing through a 1 mm mesh screen. Samples were placed in paper bags and stored in dark conditions at room temperature until further analysis.

4.2. Soil Analysis

Within each growing area of S. marina and G. maritima, soil samples were taken at a depth of 0–20 cm and combined into two samples for the upper and lower layers of the salt marsh, respectively. Soil samples were dried at room temperature, sieved through a 2 mm mesh sieve, and stored until further analysis.
A series of analyses including electric conductivity and pH in saturated aqueous soil extract (1:2.5) were performed to investigate soil salinity in the area under study, but soluble cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+) and anions (HCO3−, Cl−, SO42−) were determined in a 1:5 water extraction. These analyses were performed using a multi-channel ionomer analyzer/conductometer ANION 7051. To determine the mass fraction of the dry residue, a gravimetric method was used based on the evaporation of the aliquot part of the filtered aqueous extract of the soil, and the drying of the resulting residue at a temperature of 105 °C followed by weighing [78].

4.3. Extract Preparation

The phenolic compounds were extracted with a 70% ethanol solution from crushed dry plant material of S. marina and G. maritima. A 0.2 g sample of plant material was ground in a mortar, placed in a 50 mL round bottom flask, and then poured into 30 mL of 70% ethanol. The flask was heated in a water bath and boiled for 30 min, then filtered through a paper filter into a volumetric flask. The extraction procedure was repeated three times. The resulting filtrates were combined, and the total volume was adjusted to 50 mL with a 70% ethanol solution.

4.4. The determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

To determine the total content of phenolic compounds, the research team used the spectrophotometric method using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent [59,79]. In total, 100 mL of sample, 300 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 3 mL of sodium carbonate, and 3 mL of distilled water were added to 10 mL tubes and stirred. Distilled water was used as a control. After 20 min, the optical density of the solutions was determined at a wavelength of 720 nm on a UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). Gallic acid was used as the calibration standard. The total phenolic compound (TPC) content was estimated from the calibration curve and expressed in mg gallic acid equivalents per gram dry weight (Appendix B, Table A1).

4.5. The Determination of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

To determine the total content of flavonoids, a spectrophotometric method was used, based on the complexation reaction with aluminum chloride with the addition of a 10% acetic acid solution. In 10 mL tubes, 1 mL of extract, 2 mL of a 2% solution of aluminum chloride in 95% ethanol, and 1 drop of dilute acetic acid were added, and then the solution volume was adjusted to 10 mL with 95% ethanol. A reference solution was also prepared for each extract, namely, without the addition of a 2% aluminum chloride solution. After 30 min, the absorbance of the solutions was measured on a UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) at 410 nm [80]. Rutin was used as the calibration standard. TFC was expressed in mg of rutin equivalents per gram of dry weight (Appendix B, Table A1).

4.6. The Determination of Total Content of Hydroxycinnamic Acids (THA)

The research team used the spectrophotometric method using the Arno reagent to determine the total hydroxycinnamic acid content [51,81]. Then, 1 mLof vegetable extract, 2 mL of 0.5 M HCl, 2 mL of Arno reagent, and 2 mL of 8.5% NaOH were added to 10 mL tubes. The solution volume was adjusted to 10 mL with distilled water. For each extract, a reference solution was prepared separately without the addition of the Arno reagent. The absorbance of the solutions was measured on a UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) at 505 nm. Chlorogenic acid was used as the calibration standard. The total hydroxycinnamic acids (THA) content was estimated from the calibration curve and expressed in mg chlorogenic acid equivalents per gram dry weight (Appendix B, Table A1).

4.7. The Determination of Individual Phenolic Compounds

Individual phenolic compounds were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) [51]. In preparation for HPLC, the extracts were filtered and dried. The resulting dry matter was then dissolved in a 10% methanol solution. The new extract was centrifuged (4500× g) for 15 min; the supernatant was filtered through a syringe filter (0.22 µm). The separation was performed on a Shimadzu LC-20 Prominence chromatograph with a Shimadzu SPD20MA diode array detector and an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (C18 250 × 4.6 mm2, 5 µm). The mobile phase included a solvent mixture of water/trifluoroacetic acid 99.9/0.1 (solvent A) and acetonitrile (B). Gradient mode was used for separation: 0 min—95% A, 5% B; 3 min—88% A, 12% B; 46 min—75% A, 25% B; 49.5 min—10% A, 90% B; 52 min—10% A, 90% B; 52.7 min—95% A, 5% B; 59 min—95% A, 5% B. We used a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1, column temperature of 40 °C, and sample volume of 10 μL. Detection was carried out in the wavelength range of 180–900 nm.
Compounds of interest were identified by comparing their peak retention times and UV spectra to those of chromatographically pure samples. Chromatograms were processed using the LabSolutions software. Quantitative analysis of flavonoids was carried out according to calibration curves plotted in the concentration range of 5–100 μg/mL. The following Sigma-Aldrich standards (Sigma-Aldrich Rus, Moscow, Russia) were used: catechin, hyperoside, quercetin 3-o-rutinoside, quercetin 3-β-d-glucoside, kaempferol 3-o-glucoside, hesperetin, epicatechin, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, rosmarinic acid, apigenin 7-o-glucoside, apigenin 7-o-glucuronide, and luteolin 7-o-glucoside.

4.8. The Determination of Antioxidant Activity (AOA)

Antioxidant activity was determined by DPPH: 2.85 mL of DPPH solution was added to 100, 150, and 250 µL of extract. The volume was adjusted to 3.10 mL with ethyl alcohol. A mixture containing DPPH solution and 70% ethanol was used as the reference solution. The solutions were left for 60 min in a dark place. Absorbance reduction was measured at 515 nm on a UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) after 60 min of incubation of the reaction mixture at room temperature in the dark [82]. Ascorbic acid was used to build the calibration curve. Antioxidant activity was expressed in mg ascorbic acid equivalents per gram dry weight (Appendix B, Table A1).

4.9. Determination of Antimicrobial and Fungicidal Activity

The antibacterial and fungicidal activity of plant extracts was assessed by disc diffusion analysis [83]. The extracts of the plant species tested were filtered and dried, and the resulting dry matter was dissolved in a 10% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution. To study the antimicrobial activity of the extracts, a Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis (B-9865) and a Gram-negative Escherichia coli (DH5α) were selected, and a yeast-like fungus Candida albicans (Y-3108) was selected to study the fungicidal activity.
Sterile paper disks of filter paper with a diameter of 6 mm were impregnated with extracts in a concentration of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg of extract per disk. Discs containing 50 µg of kanamycin were used as positive controls. Discs impregnated with 20 µL of 10% DMSO were used as a negative control.
The Mueller–Hinton medium was used for the analysis [84]. A 90 mm diameter petri dish was filled with 25 mL of culture medium. After solidifying the agar, 100 μL of a suspension of microorganisms, with a density of 0.5 McFarland, was inoculated onto the surface and then evenly distributed using a sterile Drigalsky spatula. The inoculated petri dishes were coated with sterile tweezers with extract disks and control disks and pressed for uniform contact with the medium. Petri dishes were incubated in a thermostat at 37 °C for 12 h. To establish antibacterial activity, the inhibition zone were measured in millimeters around the disc (diameter). The test was repeated three times to ensure reliability.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 23 was used for the statistical processing of the data obtained. To test statistical hypotheses and assess the significance of differences, the t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used. Statistical results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlations of the quantitative features.

5. Conclusions

The present study showed that the studied halophytes Spergularia marina and Glaux maritima are characterized by a relatively high content of phenolic compounds, the total content of flavonoids, and high antioxidant activity, which is associated with the presence of phenolic compounds, individual flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids in plants. The present results showed that the content of the studied substances was associated with soil salinization. Extracts of S. marina showed no antibacterial activity, while the weak fungicidal activity of extracts of shoots and inflorescences, grown on soils with a high level of salinity, was detected against Candida albicans. Extracts of roots and shoots of G. maritima have weak antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, and fungicidal activity against Candida albicans. Further experimental research is recommended to assess the effect of salinity on the content of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the studied halophytes. This includes the possible use of salinity as an effective method to increase the content of secondary metabolites in the studied plants for obtaining high-quality and functional plant products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.; methodology, A.P. and O.K.; validation, A.P., A.K. and V.S.; investigation, L.L., V.L., O.K., E.P., A.K., N.N. and A.V.; resources, A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.; writing—review and editing, A.P., O.K. and A.V.; visualization, A.P.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 21-74-00035, https://rscf.ru/project/21-74-00035/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Plants 11 01738 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Chromatographic profile of the phenolic acids and flavonoids at 254 nm for different parts of the Spergularia marina: roots in slight (a) and strong (b) soil salinity, shoots in slight (c) and strong (d) soil salinity, inflorescence in slight (e) and strong (f) soil salinity. 1—3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 2—catechin; 3—chlorogenic acid; 4—luteolin derivative; 5—epicatechin; 6–12—apigenin derivative; 13, 14—tricin derivative; 15—chicoric acid; 16—tricin derivative; 17—rosmarinic acid; 18—hesperetin; NI—not identified.
Figure A1. Chromatographic profile of the phenolic acids and flavonoids at 254 nm for different parts of the Spergularia marina: roots in slight (a) and strong (b) soil salinity, shoots in slight (c) and strong (d) soil salinity, inflorescence in slight (e) and strong (f) soil salinity. 1—3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 2—catechin; 3—chlorogenic acid; 4—luteolin derivative; 5—epicatechin; 6–12—apigenin derivative; 13, 14—tricin derivative; 15—chicoric acid; 16—tricin derivative; 17—rosmarinic acid; 18—hesperetin; NI—not identified.
Plants 11 01738 g0a1
Plants 11 01738 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Chromatographic profile of the phenolic acids and flavonoids at 254 nm for different parts of the Glaux maritima: roots in slight (a) and strong (b) soil salinity, shoots in slight (c) and strong (d) soil salinity. 1—3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 2—catechin; 3—chlorogenic acid; 4—quercetin derivative; 5—kaempferol derivative; 6—ferulic acid; 7, 8—kaempferol derivative; 9—quercetin derivative; 10—quercetin 3-β-d-glucoside; 11, 12, 13—quercetin derivative; 14—p-coumaric acid; 15, 16—quercetin derivative; 17—hyperoside; 18—quercetin 3-O-rutinoside; 19—kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; NI—not identified.
Figure A2. Chromatographic profile of the phenolic acids and flavonoids at 254 nm for different parts of the Glaux maritima: roots in slight (a) and strong (b) soil salinity, shoots in slight (c) and strong (d) soil salinity. 1—3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 2—catechin; 3—chlorogenic acid; 4—quercetin derivative; 5—kaempferol derivative; 6—ferulic acid; 7, 8—kaempferol derivative; 9—quercetin derivative; 10—quercetin 3-β-d-glucoside; 11, 12, 13—quercetin derivative; 14—p-coumaric acid; 15, 16—quercetin derivative; 17—hyperoside; 18—quercetin 3-O-rutinoside; 19—kaempferol 3-O-glucoside; NI—not identified.
Plants 11 01738 g0a2

Appendix B

Table
Table A1. Calibration curves of the equation of phenolic compound standards.
Table A1. Calibration curves of the equation of phenolic compound standards.
MethodStandardRange,
mg mL−1		EquationR2
TPCGallic acid0.02–0.30y = 1.221x + 0.0110.994
TFCRutin0.025–0.500y = 1.879x + 0.0040.999
THAChlorogenic acid0.01–0.30y = 2.264x + 0.0040.999
AOA (DPPH)Ascorbic acid0–0.34y = −0.624x + 0.7000.999

References

  1. Cragg, G.M.; Newman, D.J. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 3670–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Salehi, B.; Azzini, E.; Zucca, P.; Varoni, E.M.; Kumar, N.V.A.; Dini, L.; Panzarini, E.; Rajkovic, J.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Peluso, I.; et al. Plant-Derived Bioactives and Oxidative Stress-Related Disorders: A Key Trend towards Healthy Aging and Longevity Promotion. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zehiroglu, C.; Ozturk Sarikaya, S.B. The importance of antioxidants and place in today’s scientific and technological studies. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4757–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lobo, V.; Patil, A.; Phatak, A.; Chandra, N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yang, S.; Lian, G. ROS and diseases: Role in metabolism and energy supply. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 467, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasote, D.M.; Katyare, S.S.; Hegde, M.V.; Bae, H. Significance of Antioxidant Potential of Plants and its Relevance to Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity Tolerance in Halophytes. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soundararajan, P.; Manivannan, A.; Jeong, B.R. Different Antioxidant Defense Systems in Halophytes and Glycophytes to Overcome Salinity Stress. In Sabkha Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ozgur, R.; Uzilday, B.; Sekmen, A.H.; Turkan, I.; Ozgur, R.; Uzilday, B.; Sekmen, A.H.; Turkan, I. Reactive oxygen species regulation and antioxidant defence in halophytes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ksouri, R.; Ksouri, W.M.; Jallali, I.; Debez, A.; Magné, C.; Hiroko, I.; Abdelly, C. Medicinal halophytes: Potent source of health promoting biomolecules with medical, nutraceutical and food applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ksouri, R.; Smaoui, A.; Isoda, H.; Abdelly, C. Utilization of Halophyte Species as New Sources of Bioactive Substances. J. Arid L. Stud. 2012, 1, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gubareva, I.Y. Spergularia salina J. at C. Presl. In The Red Data Book of the Kaliningrad Region; Dedkov, V.P., Grishanov, G.V., Eds.; Immanuel Kant University: Kaliningrad, Russia, 2010; p. 141. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ingeloeg, T.; Andersson, R.; Tjernberg, M. (Eds.) Red Data Book of the Baltic Region. Part 1: Lists of Threatened Vascular Plants and Vertebrates; Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Uppsala in co-Operation with Institute of Biology: Riga, Latvia, 1993; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
  14. GBIF. Lysimachia maritima (L.) Galasso, Banfi & Soldano in GBIF Secretariat. In GBIF Backbone Taxonomy; Checklist Dataset; GBIF: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. GBIF. Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. in GBIF Secretariat. In GBIF Backbone Taxonomy; Checklist Dataset; GBIF: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pliszko, A. A new record of Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae) from southern Poland. Acta Musei Silesiae. Sci. Nat. 2017, 66, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Banfi, E.; Galasso, G.; Soldano, A. Notes on systematics and taxonomy for the Italian vascular flora 1. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Milano 2005, 146, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hao, G.; Yuan, Y.M.; Hu, C.M.; Ge, X.J.; Zhao, N.X. Molecular phylogeny of Lysimachia (Myrsinaceae) based on chloroplast trnL–F and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 31, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rozema, J.; Buizer, D.A.G.; Fabritius, H.E. Population Dynamics of Glaux maritima and Ecophysiological Adaptations to Salinity and Inundation. Oikos 1978, 30, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alegro, A.; Šegota, V.; Koletic, N.; Vukovic, N.; Vilovic, T.; Rimac, A. Glaux maritima L. (Primulaceae), a new plant species in SE Europe. Acta Bot. Croat. 2019, 78, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vinholes, J.; Grosso, C.; Andrade, P.B.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Valentão, P.; De Pinho, P.G.; Ferreres, F. In vitro studies to assess the antidiabetic, anti-cholinesterase and antioxidant potential of Spergularia rubra. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tegin, I.; Canpolat, G.; Fidan, M. The Antioxidant Capacity, Total Phenolic Content and Phenolic Compounds of Plantago coronopus L. subsp. coronopus in Naturally Distributed in Akdoǧmuş-Siirt. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), Ankara, Turkey, 19–21 October 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, J.-J.; Jung, H.-O. Changes in Physicochemical Properties of Spergularia marina Griseb by Blanching. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2012, 19, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Son, H.-K.; Kong, H.-M.; Cha, S.-S.; Choi, Y.-J.; Lee, J.-J. Quality characteristics of cookies added with Spergularia marina Griseb powder. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2015, 22, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chang, H.; Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Sim, K.H. Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of Noodles added with Spergularia marina L. Griseb Powder. J. East Asian Soc. Diet. Life 2017, 27, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cho, J.Y.; Huang, Z.; Park, S.Y.; Park, K.H.; Pai, T.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, H.R.; Ham, K.S. The Effects of Several Halophytes on Insulin Resistance in Otsuka Long-evans Tokushima Fatty Rats. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 46, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Park, Y.H.; Lee, J.J.; Son, H.K.; Kim, B.H.; Byun, J.; Ha, J.H. Antiobesity Effects of Extract from Spergularia marina Griseb in Adipocytes and High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Nutrients 2020, 12, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Karadeniz, F.; Kim, J.-A.; Ahn, B.-N.; Kim, M.; Kong, C.-S. Anti-adipogenic and Pro-osteoblastogenic Activities of Spergularia marina Extract. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 19, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kong, C.S. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of the Solvent-Partitioned Fractions from Spergularia marina in LPS-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 19, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Miri, A.; Shahraki, E.; Tabrizian, K.; Bilimleri Dergisi, F.; Mïrï, A.; Shahrakï, E.; Tabrïzïan, K.; Oudï, S. Anti-Nociceptive and Antiinflammatory Effects of the Hydroalcoholic Extract of the Spergularia marina (L). Griseb in Male Mice. Cumhur. Univ. Fac. Sci. Sci. J. 2015, 36, 1732–1738. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gamal El-Dien, O.; Shawky, E.; Aly, A.H.; Abdallah, R.M.; Abdel-Salam, N.A. Phytochemical and Biological Investigation of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. Growing in Egypt. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2014, 20, 152–159. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Yang, Y.; Seo, Y.; Ju, J. Changes in Antioxidant and Cancer Cell Growth Inhibitory Activities of Spergularia marina Griseb Extract according to Different Cooking Methods. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2017, 33, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ismail, C.A.; Baraka, A.M.; Abdallah, R.M.; El-Dien, O.G.; Mostafa, D.K. Spergularia marina: A potential source of a novel calcium channel blocker with antihypertensive and diuretic activities. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lellau, T.F.; Liebezeit, G. Alkaloids, saponins and phenolic compounds in salt marsh plants from the Lower Saxonian Wadden Sea. Senckenbergiana Marit. 2001, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lellau, T.F.; Liebezeit, G. Activity of ethanolic extracts of salt marsh plants from the Lower Saxonian Wadden Sea Coast against microorganisms. Senckenbergiana Marit. 2003, 32, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Jhin, C.; Shin, J.M.; Kim, M.; Ahn, H.R.; Yoo, G.; Son, Y.J.; Jung, S.H.; Nho, C.W. Reduction of Hepatic Lipogenesis by Loliolide and Pinoresinol from Lysimachia vulgaris via Degrading Liver X Receptors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12419–12427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tóth, A.; Riethmüller, E.; Alberti, Á.; Végh, K.; Kéry, Á. Comparative phytochemical screening of phenoloids in Lysimachia species. Eur. Chem. Bull 2012, 1, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  38. Podolak, I.; Koczurkiewicz, P.; Galanty, A.; Michalik, M. Cytotoxic triterpene saponins from the underground parts of six Lysimachia L. species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 47, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, H.; Hao, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.; Li, J. Antioxidant activities of extracts and fractions from Lysimachia foenum-graecum Hance. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Toth, A.; Toth, G.; Kery, A. Polyphenol Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Three Lysimachia Species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wu, N.; Ke, Z.; Wu, S.; Yang, X.; Chen, Q.; Huang, S.; Liu, C. Evaluation of the antioxidant and endothelial protective effects of Lysimachia christinae Hance (Jin Qian Cao) extract fractions. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Challam, M.; Roy, B.; Tandon, V. Effect of Lysimachia ramosa (Primulaceae) on helminth parasites: Motility, mortality and scanning electron microscopic observations on surface topography. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Csepregi, R.; Temesfői, V.; Das, S.; Alberti, Á.; Tóth, C.A.; Herczeg, R.; Papp, N.; Kőszegi, T. Cytotoxic, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant Properties and Effects on Cell Migration of Phenolic Compounds of Selected Transylvanian Medicinal Plants. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, F.X.; Liu, X.F.; Ke, Z.Q.; Wu, N.H.; Chen, H.G.; Liu, C. The Effects of Lysimachia christinae Hance Extract Fractions on Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation. Pharmacology 2019, 104, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Özgen, U.; Şener, S.Ö.; Šmejkal, K.; Vaclavik, J.; Şenol Deniz, F.S.; Erdoğan Orhan, İ.; Svajdlenka, E.; Gören, A.C.; Žemlička, M. Cholinesterase and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Potential and Antioxidant Capacity of Lysimachia verticillaris L. and Isolation of the Major Compounds. Turkish J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 17, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Adam, P. Saltmarsh Ecology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  47. Silvestri, S.; Defina, A.; Marani, M. Tidal regime, salinity and salt marsh plant zonation. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2005, 62, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Richards, L. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; LWW: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  49. Manzhina, S.A. On the issue of chemical mechanism and soil salinity degree determination: Russian and foreign practices. L. Reclam. Hydraul. Eng. 2021, 11, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pappalardo, H.D.; Toscano, V.; Puglia, G.D.; Genovese, C.; Raccuia, S.A. Cynara cardunculus L. as a Multipurpose Crop for Plant Secondary Metabolites Production in Marginal Stressed Lands. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Feduraev, P.; Skrypnik, L.; Nebreeva, S.; Dzhobadze, G.; Vatagina, A.; Kalinina, E.; Pungin, A.; Maslennikov, P.; Riabova, A.; Krol, O.; et al. Variability of Phenolic Compound Accumulation and Antioxidant Activity in Wild Plants of Some Rumex Species (Polygonaceae). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jakimiuk, K.; Wink, M.; Tomczyk, M. Flavonoids of the Caryophyllaceae. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 179–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cho, J.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, Y.G.; Jeong, H.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Ham, K.S.; Moon, J.H. A phenyl lipid alkaloid and flavone C-diglucosides from Spergularia marina. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kraa, O.; Ghodbane, H.; Saadi, R.; Ayad, M.; Becherif, M.; Bahri, M.; Aboubou, A. Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb extract. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2016, 8, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Zhou, J.M.; Ibrahim, R.K. Tricin—A potential multifunctional nutraceutical. Phytochem. Rev. 2009, 9, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. El-Dien, O.G.; Shawky, E.; Aly, A.H.; Abdallah, R.M.; Abdel-Salam, N.A. A Validated High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (Hptlc) Method for the Quantitative Determination of Tricin in Two Spergularia Species. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2013, 4, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Khameneh, B.; Iranshahy, M.; Soheili, V.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S. Review on plant antimicrobials: A mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. El-Amier, Y.A.; Soufan, W.; Almutairi, K.F.; Zaghloul, N.S.; Abd-Elgawad, A.M. Proximate Composition, Bioactive Compounds, and Antioxidant Potential of Wild Halophytes Grown in Coastal Salt Marsh Habitats. Molecules 2021, 27, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chepel, V.; Lisun, V.; Skrypnik, L. Changes in the Content of Some Groups of Phenolic Compounds and Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Parts of Heather (Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull) at Different Growth Stages. Plants 2020, 9, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Yamamoto, K.; Shiwa, Y.; Ishige, T.; Sakamoto, H.; Tanaka, K.; Uchino, M.; Tanaka, N.; Oguri, S.; Saitoh, H.; Tsushima, S. Bacterial diversity associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux maritima and Salicornia europaea. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Druva-Lūsīte, I.; Karlsons, A.; Osvalde, A.; Ņečajeva, J.; Ievinsh, G. Photosynthetic performance and mycorrhizal symbiosis of a coastal marsh plant, Glaux maritima, in conditions of fluctuating soil salinity. Acta Univ. Latv. 2014, 745, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sonjak, S.; Udovič, M.; Wraber, T.; Likar, M.; Regvar, M. Diversity of halophytes and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising their roots in an abandoned and sustained part of Sečovlje salterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Munakata, R.; Larbat, R.; Duriot, L.; Olry, A.; Gavira, C.; Mignard, B.; Bourgaud, F. Polyphenols from Plant Roots. Recent Adv. Polyphen. Res. 2019, 6, 207–236. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lopes, M.; Sanches-Silva, A.; Castilho, M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Ramos, F. Halophytes as source of bioactive phenolic compounds and their potential applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B.; Sanada, Y.; Mohanty, P. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquat. Bot. 2004, 80, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Castillo, J.M.; Mancilla-Leytón, J.M.; Martins-Noguerol, R.; Moreira, X.; Moreno-Pérez, A.J.; Muñoz-Vallés, S.; Pedroche, J.J.; Figueroa, M.E.; García-González, A.; Salas, J.J.; et al. Interactive effects between salinity and nutrient deficiency on biomass production and bio-active compounds accumulation in the halophyte Crithmum maritimum. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 301, 111136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Falcinelli, B.; Sileoni, V.; Marconi, O.; Perretti, G.; Quinet, M.; Lutts, S.; Benincasa, P. Germination under Moderate Salinity Increases Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity in Rapeseed (Brassica napus var oleifera Del.) Sprouts. Molecules 2017, 22, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Yang, L.; Wen, K.S.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, Y.X.; Wei, F.; Wang, Q. Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules 2018, 23, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. López-Berenguer, C.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.D.C.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M.; García-Viguera, C. Growing Hardier Crops for Better Health: Salinity Tolerance and the Nutritional Value of Broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Valifard, M.; Mohsenzadeh, S.; Kholdebarin, B. Salinity effects on phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Salvia macrosiphon. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2017, 41, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Role of Polyphenols in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Saha, B.; Chowardhara, B.; Awasthi, J.P.; Panda, S.K.; Panigrahi, K.C.S. Salinity Stress and Plant Secondary Metabolite Enhancement: An Overview. In Biotechnological Approaches to Enhance Plant Secondary Metabolites; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, F.; Zhu, H.; Chen, D.; Li, Z.; Peng, R.; Yao, Q. A Grape BHLH Transcription Factor Gene, VvbHLH1, Increases the Accumulation of Flavonoids and Enhances Salt and Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 125, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chen, S.; Wu, F.; Li, Y.; Qian, Y.; Pan, X.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Fu, C.; Lin, H.; et al. NTMYB4 and NTCHS1 Are Critical Factors in the Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis and Are Involved in Salinity Responsiveness. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Haghighi, L.; Majd, A.; Nematzadeh, G.; Shokri, M.; Kelij, S.; Irian, S. Salt-induced changes in cell wall peroxidase (CWPRX) and phenolic content of “Aeluropus littoralis” (willd) parl. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 296–300. [Google Scholar]
  76. Chubarenko, B.; Margoński, P. The Vistula Lagoon. Ecol. Stud. 2008, 197, 167–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Packham, J.R.; Willis, A.J. Ecology of Dunes, Salt Marsh and Shingle; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  78. ISO 11465; Soil Quality–Determination of Dry Matter and Water Content on a Mass Basis-Gravimetric Method. ISO-International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
  79. Padhi, E.M.T.; Liu, R.; Hernandez, M.; Tsao, R.; Ramdath, D.D. Total polyphenol content, carotenoid, tocopherol and fatty acid composition of commonly consumed Canadian pulses and their contribution to antioxidant activity. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 38, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. FS.2.5.0033.15 Artemisiae absinthii herba. In State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation, 14th ed.; Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: Moscow, Russia, 2018; Volume 4, pp. 6343–6350.
  81. Štefan, M.B.; Vuković Rodríguez, J.; Blažeković, B.; Kindl, M.; Vladimir-Knežević, S. Total Hydroxycinnamic Acids Assay: Prevalidation and Application on Lamiaceae Species. Food Anal. Methods 2013, 7, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Skrypnik, L.; Grigorev, N.; Michailov, D.; Antipina, M.; Danilova, M.; Pungin, A. Comparative study on radical scavenging activity and phenolic compounds content in water bark extracts of alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Klančnik, A.; Piskernik, S.; Jeršek, B.; Možina, S.S. Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antibacterial activity of plant extracts. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mueller, J.H.; Hinton, J. A Protein-Free Medium for Primary Isolation of the Gonococcus and Meningococcus. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016, 48, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 01738 g001 550
Figure 1. The total content of phenolic compounds in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. The total content of phenolic compounds in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Plants 11 01738 g001
Plants 11 01738 g002 550
Figure 2. The total content of flavonoids in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. The total content of flavonoids in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Plants 11 01738 g002
Plants 11 01738 g003 550
Figure 3. Total hydroxycinnamic acids in roots (a) and shoots (b) of G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Total hydroxycinnamic acids in roots (a) and shoots (b) of G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Plants 11 01738 g003
Plants 11 01738 g004 550
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity (DPPH) of extracts from different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity (DPPH) of extracts from different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different levels of soil salinity (t-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Plants 11 01738 g004
Plants 11 01738 g005 550
Figure 5. Map showing the growth sites of S. marina and G. maritima.
Figure 5. Map showing the growth sites of S. marina and G. maritima.
Plants 11 01738 g005
Table
Table 1. The results of the chemical analysis of soil of two habitats of the studied plant species.
Table 1. The results of the chemical analysis of soil of two habitats of the studied plant species.
Place of GrowthEC, dSm−1pH Dry Residue, %Content of Soluble Cations and Anions, cmolc kg−1
Cl−Na+K+Ca2+SO42−HCO3−
Lower level of
salt marsh		1.38 ± 0.02 b*7.74 ± 0.02 a0.50 ± 0.05 b6.9 ± 0.2 b4.3 ± 0.1 b0.16 ± 0.01 b0.50 ± 0.04 b0.45 ± 0.08 b0.61 ± 0.06 a
Upper level of
salt marsh		4.02 ± 0.23 a7.56 ± 0.10 b1.42 ± 0.45 a16.5 ± 6.2 a9.1 ± 2.6 a0.25 ± 0.04 a3.00 ± 0.30 a0.67 ± 0.13 a0.64 ± 0.10 a
* Different letters indicate significant differences between levels of soil salinity (Mann–Whitney U-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Content of flavonoids and phenolic acids in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization.
Table 2. Content of flavonoids and phenolic acids in different parts of the studied plants of S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization.
Content of Individual Phenolic Compounds, µg g−1
S. marinaG. maritima
Plant PartsRootsShootsInflorescenceRootsShoots
Soil SalinitySlightStrongSlightStrongSlightStrongSlightStrongSlightStrong
CompoundsFlavonoids
Catechin190.1 ± 9.7 a**244.6 ± 47.4 a+ ***++++++-
Hyperoside--------97.5 ± 10.9-
Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside (rutin)--------+-
Quercetin 3-β-d-glucoside (isoquercitrin)------52.2 ± 9.4 a47.1 ± 5.6 a1711.0 ± 323.4 a587.5 ± 42.6 b
Quercetin derivative *------273.9 ± 2.4 a165.4 ± 8.0 b5203.5 ± 1809.3 a2294.0 ± 240.4 b
Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (astragalin)--------88.2 ± 22.9 a55.6 ± 6.0 b
Kaempferol derivative------108.2 ± 14.4 b151.6 ± 17.0 a4248.0 ± 622.1 a2522.3 ± 329.2 b
Hesperetin32.9 ± 1.1 b51.9 ± 10.5 a48.9 ± 10.4 b71.9 ± 10.1 a111.0 ± 11.1 a100.6 ± 23.1 a----
Epicatechin742.8 ± 42.4 b1012.6 ± 50.4 a+77.1 ± 27.2++----
Tricin derivative++++++----
Apigenin derivative311.3 ± 43.1 b410.7 ± 9.0 a1593.9 ± 327.6 b2170.9 ± 205.2 a2911.7 ± 176.9 a3541.4 ± 1340.4 a----
Luteolin derivative---102.9 ± 40.4-61.8 ± 19.9----
Phenolic acids
3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid
(protocatechuic acid)		35.9 ± 1.7 b52.4 ± 8.3 a 31.4 ± 1.8 a24.6 ± 2.6 b27.1 ± 4.2 a21.4 ± 3.9 a21.7 ± 1.1 a19.6 ± 1.9 a46.8 ± 12.8 a38.6 ± 2.0 a
p-Coumaric acid--------16.9 ± 3.2 a21.7 ± 6.3 a
Ferulic acid------+++16.1 ± 3.9
Chlorogenic acid-+----++++
Chicoric acid+-++++----
Rosmarinic acid+-++++----
* The compounds identified by UV spectra and quantified by standard, with the same aglycon, are indicated in italics. ** Different letters indicate significant differences between levels of soil salinity (Mann–Whitney U-test, p ≤ 0.05). *** The sign “+” denotes trace amounts of compounds.
Table
Table 3. Correlation matrix with the Pearson coefficient values for phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of S. marina.
Table 3. Correlation matrix with the Pearson coefficient values for phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of S. marina.
Roots
VariablesAOA (DPPH) 1TPCTFCProtocatechuic AcidHesperetinEpicatechinApigenin DerivativeCatechin
AOA (DPPH)10.909 **−0.334 ns0.859 **0.883 **0.876 **0.754 *0.893 **
TPC 1−0.189 ns0.797 **0.837 **0.870 **0.800 **0.753 *
TFC 1−0.470 ns−0.418 ns−0.454 ns−0.403 ns−0.406 ns
Protocatechuic acid 10.987 **0.936 **0.776 **0.935 **
Hesperetin 10.909 **0.757 *0.954 **
Epicatechin 10.851 **0.818 **
Apigenin derivative 10.663 *
Catechin 1
Shoots
AOA (DPPH)10.492 ns0.050 ns−0.452 ns0.216 ns0.015 ns0.097 ns-
TPC 10.552 ns−0.846 **0.720 *−0.873 ns0.669 *-
TFC 1−0.450 ns0.672 *−0.996 ns0.594 ns-
Protocatechuic acid 1−0.768 **0.978 ns−0.768 **-
Hesperetin 1−0.997 ns0.914 **-
Epicatechin 1−0.996 ns-
Apigenin derivative 1-
Inflorescence
AOA (DPPH)10.054 ns0.288 ns−0.558 ns−0.702 *-−0.082 ns-
TPC 10.064 ns−0.557 ns−0.346 ns-0.208 ns-
TFC 10.281 ns0.099 ns-−0.302 ns-
Protocatechuic acid 10.778 *-−0.517 ns-
Hesperetin 1-−0.122 ns-
Epicatechin 1--
Apigenin derivative 1-
1 AOA (DPPH), antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay; TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; ** Correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.01; * correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.05; ns, correlation is not significant (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Correlation matrix with the Pearson coefficient values for phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of G. maritima.
Table 4. Correlation matrix with the Pearson coefficient values for phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of G. maritima.
Roots
VariablesAOA (DPPH) 1TPCTFCTHAIsoquercitrinQuercetin DerivativeKaempferol DerivativeAstra
Galin		Proto
Catechuic Acid		p-Coumaric Acid
AOA (DPPH)10.389 ns0.504 ns0.237 ns−0.389 ns0.025 ns0.310 ns-−0.146 ns-
TPC 1−0.127 ns0.419 ns−0.231 ns−0.237 ns0.397 ns-−0.474 ns-
TFC 1−0.255 ns−0.622 ns0.415 ns−0.350 ns-−0.099 ns-
THA 1−0.396 ns−0.889 **0.791 **-−0.604 ns-
Isoquercitrin 10.289 ns−0.152 ns-0.812 **-
Quercetin derivative 1−0.853 **-0.536 ns-
Kaempferol derivative 1-−0.348 ns-
Protocatechuic acid -1-
Shoots
AOA (DPPH)10.700 *0.199 ns0.691 *−0.521 ns−0.263 ns−0.681 *−0.714 *−0.678 *−0.185 ns
TPC 1−0.201 ns0.486 ns−0.871 **−0.607 ns−0.934 **−0.842 **−0.676 *0.303 ns
TFC 10.577 ns0.585 ns0.784 **0.271 ns0.105 ns−0.270 ns−0.516 ns
Isoquercitrin 10.904 **0.903 **0.839 **0.495 ns−0.498 ns
Quercetin derivative 10.668 *0.657 *0.136 ns−0.607 ns
Kaempferol derivative 10.861 **0.702 *−0.391 ns
Astragalin 10.768 **−0.286 ns
Protocatechuic acid 10.092 ns
p-Coumaric acid 1
1 AOA (DPPH), antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay; TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; THA, total hydroxycinnamic acids; ** Correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.01; * correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.05; ns, correlation is not significant (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Antibacterial and fungicidal activity of extracts from different parts of the studied plants S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization (the inhibition zones include the diameter of the disk—6 mm).
Table 5. Antibacterial and fungicidal activity of extracts from different parts of the studied plants S. marina and G. maritima at different levels of soil salinization (the inhibition zones include the diameter of the disk—6 mm).
ArtPlant PartsSoil SalinityDiameter of Zone of Inhibition, mm
E. coli
Kanamycin10% DMSOExtract Concentration, mg Disk−1
50 µg Disk−120 µL Disk−10.250.501.002.00
S. marinaRootsSlight29.8 ± 0.2 a*-----
Strong26.9 ± 1.0 b-----
ShootsSlight27.7 ± 2.9 a-----
Strong29.0 ± 0.4 a-----
InflorescenceSlight29.3 ± 0.7 a-----
Strong28.7 ± 0.7 b-----
G. maritimaRootsSlight30.4 ± 1.9 a-----
Strong29.2 ± 1.6 a-----
ShootsSlight29.4 ± 0.9 a-----
Strong29.9 ± 2.5 a---7.9 ± 0.49.5 ± 0.4
B. subtilis
S. marinaRootsSlight24.6 ± 1.7 a-----
Strong24.6 ± 0.3 a-----
ShootsSlight26.5 ± 1.9 a-----
Strong25.3 ± 0.2 a-----
InflorescenceSlight26.7 ± 0.6 a-----
Strong26.0 ± 0.6 b-----
G. maritimaRootsSlight26.1 ± 1.4 a----7.0 ± 0.2
Strong26.0 ± 1.4 a-----
ShootsSlight24.8 ± 0.6 b-----
Strong27.6 ± 0.7 a-----
C. albicans
S. marinaRootsSlight27.8 ± 0.4 a-----
Strong27.7 ± 0.6 a-----
ShootsSlight29.1 ± 2.0 a-----
Strong29.3 ± 0.7 a---6.4 ± 0.17.3 ± 0.8
InflorescenceSlight28.4 ± 0.3 a-----
Strong28.4 ± 1.1 a----6.4 ± 0.1
G. maritimaRootsSlight27.8 ± 0.8 a---6.8 ± 0.1 a7.5 ± 0.3 a
Strong29.2 ± 3.2 a---6.7 ± 0.1 a7.0 ± 0.1 b
ShootsSlight28.3 ± 0.7 a---6.5 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.1 a
Strong29.8 ± 1.0 a----6.5 ± 0.1 a
«-»—no inhibition zone was observed. * Different letters indicate significant differences between levels of soil salinity (Mann–Whitney U-test, p ≤ 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pungin, A.; Lartseva, L.; Loskutnikova, V.; Shakhov, V.; Krol, O.; Popova, E.; Kolomiets, A.; Nikolaeva, N.; Volodina, A. The Content of Certain Groups of Phenolic Compounds and the Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Halophyte Parts of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. at Different Levels of Soil Salinization. Plants 2022, 11, 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131738

AMA Style

Pungin A, Lartseva L, Loskutnikova V, Shakhov V, Krol O, Popova E, Kolomiets A, Nikolaeva N, Volodina A. The Content of Certain Groups of Phenolic Compounds and the Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Halophyte Parts of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. at Different Levels of Soil Salinization. Plants. 2022; 11(13):1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pungin, Artem, Lidia Lartseva, Violetta Loskutnikova, Vladislav Shakhov, Olesya Krol, Elena Popova, Andrey Kolomiets, Nadezhda Nikolaeva, and Aleksandra Volodina. 2022. "The Content of Certain Groups of Phenolic Compounds and the Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Halophyte Parts of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. at Different Levels of Soil Salinization" Plants 11, no. 13: 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131738

APA Style

Pungin, A., Lartseva, L., Loskutnikova, V., Shakhov, V., Krol, O., Popova, E., Kolomiets, A., Nikolaeva, N., & Volodina, A. (2022). The Content of Certain Groups of Phenolic Compounds and the Biological Activity of Extracts of Various Halophyte Parts of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. at Different Levels of Soil Salinization. Plants, 11(13), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop