Next Article in Journal
Effects of Polyploidization on Morphology, Photosynthetic Parameters and Sucrose Metabolism in Lily
Previous Article in Journal
Lime Rate in Clayey Soils Influences Chemical Fertility and Sugarcane Yield
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima

1
Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China
2
Qingyuan Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning, Lishui 323800, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
4
Lanxi City Nursery of Zhejiang Provence, Lanxi 321100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2111; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162111
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 31 July 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 14 August 2022

Abstract

:
Chestnut (Castanea spp., Fagaceae family) is an economically and ecologically valuable species. The main goals of chestnut production vary among species and countries and depend on the ecological characteristics of orchards, agronomic management, and the architecture of chestnut trees. Here, we review recent research on chestnut trees, including the effects of fungal diseases (Cryphonectria parasitica and Phytophthora cinnamomi) and insect pests (Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu), molecular markers for breeding, ecological effects, endophytic fungi, and extracts with human health benefits. We also review research on chestnut in the food science field, technological improvements, the soil and fertilizer used for chestnut production, and the postharvest biology of chestnut. We noted differences in the factors affecting chestnut production among regions, including China, the Americas, and Europe, especially in the causal agents of disease and pests. For example, there is a major difference in the resistance of chestnut to C. parasitica in Asian, European, and American countries. Our review provides new insights into the integrated disease and pest management of chestnut trees in China. We hope that this review will foster collaboration among regions and help to clarify differences in the direction of breeding efforts among countries.

1. Introduction

Chestnut (Castanea spp., Fagaceae family) is an economically important tree in the wood processing industry that occurs in Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Americas [1,2,3]. There are four most important and cultivated chestnut varieties: C. molissima (Chinese chestnut) and C. crenata (Japanese chestnut) are distributed in Asia; C. sativa is distributed in continental Europe (European chestnut); and Castanea dentata is distributed in North America (American chestnut) [4]. Chestnuts are a source of nuts and industrial raw materials, including wood, that can be used as firewood, as well as to build timber and barrels for winemaking (Figure 1). In recent years, extracts from chestnut shells (e.g., tannins, polyphenols, and polysaccharides), female flower, and spring buds have been applied in the medical, pharmaceutical, and healthcare fields [5,6,7,8] (Figure 1). Discarded chestnut shells, inner shells, burs, and leaves have been re-utilized as biomass and catalyst material [9,10]. The important economic and environmental roles of chestnut underlie its high value to ecosystems and agroforestry systems [11,12,13,14] (Figure 1).
Chestnut plantations in Europe and North America are vulnerable to diseases caused by Cryphonectria parasitica and Phytophthora cinnamomi and damage from pests, such as Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) [15,16,17,18,19]. Diseases and pests pose a major threat to the production of chestnut plantations and related ecological systems (Figure 2). Nevertheless, global chestnut production has continually increased over the past 15 years, and this global increase is mainly driven by increases in chestnut production in China, which contributes nearly 90% of the world’s chestnut production [20]. Increases in chestnut production in China have largely been driven by government policies, scientific fertilization and planting technology, the development of new varieties and agricultural tools, and increases in the skills of farmers.
From 2019 to 2022, we conducted surveys of the planting technology, species of pests and disease, soil nutrients, and fertilization conditions of Chinese chestnut in Zhejiang and Hubei Provinces, and this survey was supported by the Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry. Our survey revealed that the main focus of current research on chestnut varies among Asian, American, and European countries. Although blight and ink diseases are widespread in China and Japan, chestnut is naturally resistant to the agents causing these diseases, and this has prevented chestnut populations from becoming extirpated. However, American and European chestnuts do not possess natural resistance to the agents causing these diseases, and this has resulted in the complete extirpation of chestnut populations when nursery stocks were introduced to the Americas and Europe from China and Japan in the late 1800s [20]. Chestnut gall wasp is the main perennial pest of chestnut trees in Europe and the Americas; however, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) is the main pest species that currently affects chestnut trees in Hubei Province, China (data not shown). In some chestnut orchards in Hubei Province and Zhejiang Province, the chestnut trees are either fertilized by chemical and organic fertilizers or not fertilized. In Europe (Italy), the organic matter content is increased through the addition of sheep and cattle; alternatively, chestnut trees are fertilized with 10–15 tons/ha/year manure [3]. Breeders in America and Europe have focused on the use of molecular markers to detect resistant genes against fungal pathogens, and the quality of the nuts of chestnut trees has been a main focus of research on chestnut in China. These differences in the focus of research on a global scale require consideration for ensuring the health of nursery stocks in different regions. As the production and global importance of chestnut trees in China are growing, more academic collaboration among regions is needed to solve the problems associated with chestnut production.

2. Main Pathogens and Insect Pests and Their Monitoring

2.1. Disease and Pest Species

Chestnut blight is caused by C. parasitica, which is a fungus that specifically infects stem tissue and eventually kills the tree. It has become the most economically significant disease of chestnut trees and has resulted in major yield reductions in North America and Europe. The adverse effects of blight fungus disease occur in the last growth ring next to the vascular cambium, where symptoms of deterioration can be observed [21]. The leaves of European chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) have the lowest photosynthetic capacity but the highest antioxidant enzyme activities in response to blight fungus disease when compared to other chestnut species [16].
The fungus P. cinnamomi is another pathogen that causes ink disease and poses a threat to the health of chestnut forests. P. cambivora, P. citricola, and P. cactorum are the main Phytophthora species that cause ink disease in chestnut trees, but P. cambivora is the most aggressive to Castanea sativa [22]. The Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) and Japanese chestnut (Castanea crenata) are innately resistant to P. cinnamomi, an oomycete that causes ink disease. However, European chestnut has little to no disease resistance to this pathogen; consequently, this pathogen can induce substantial losses in European chestnut forests, orchards, and nurseries. Significant changes to the proteome, the accumulation of proline, and an increase in the content of salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate, and sugars mediate the defense response to infection by P. cinnamomi [17]. Up-regulation of the expression of the plant susceptibility genes pmr4 and dmr6 negatively regulates the SA pathway, and negative regulation of the expression of defense genes increases susceptibility to infection by C. parasitica and P. cinnamomi [18].
Chestnut rot can have a significant negative effect on the quality and yield of chestnut products. Fungal isolates causing brown rot are homologous with Gnomoniopsis sp., Gnomoniopsis Castanea, and Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi, and brown rot disease outbreaks can also appear following several periods of drought [22]. Gnomoniopsis Castaneae was first reported in Greece; it is the causal agent of nut rot and can reduce yields by approximately 20~30% [23].
The Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (D. kuriphilus, Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) is one of the most economically significant pests of chestnut, and it can severely reduce yields of nuts and timber [15,24]. Losses as high as 80% have been observed when the number of galls of D. kuriphilus exceeds six per 50-cm twig [14,25]. The development of resistant chestnut trees is an effective approach for reducing the number of pest eggs and the number of larvae that complete development, including the number and size of the galls of D. kuriphilus [26]. Biological control via the parasitoid Torymus sinensis is an effective approach for controlling D. kuriphilus in Portugal, and a mathematical model has shown that this biological control approach is efficient in small and homogeneous orchards [27].

2.2. Disease and Pest Monitoring

Comprehensive measures have been taken to reduce the spread of chestnut disease caused by different pathogens to ensure the health of forests and ecological security. Due to the high economic and ecological value of chestnuts, significant efforts have been made to combat pathogens over the past century. Recently, genomics approaches have been used to identify defense-related genes in C. parasitica. Construction of a linkage map and identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to P. cinnamomi of backcross families derived from crosses of American chestnuts with Chinese chestnuts have shown that their hybrid progeny has a few dominant QTL and possess quantitatively inherited partial resistance via multiple small-effect QTL [28]. A set of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) among European, American, Japanese, and Chinese chestnut species revealed a high interspecific transferability rate of EST-SSRs that facilitates the evolution of resistance to P. cinnamomi [29]. Transcriptome analysis has revealed that differentially expressed genes between canker and healthy stem tissue are involved in cell wall biosynthesis, reactive oxygen species, and hormones [30]. Recovery is slower in the marron genotype when injected with the hypovirulent strain of C. parasitica compared with normal chestnut trees, which indicates that the recovery from blight disease is genotype-dependent [31]. Biological agents might be a valuable approach for resisting pathogens. For example, Brevibacterium frigoritolerans DSM8801T and Arthrobacter parietis LMG 22281T are effective against both C. parasitica and P. cinnamomi in vitro [14]. Research has also shown that subsequent generations of ink-diseased chestnut trees show enhanced tolerance to P. cinnamomi, which might stem from the fact that the invasive pathogen induces resistance to pathogen stress [18]. Various approaches, including genetic engineering and conventional breeding, have been used to mitigate the negative effects of disease and insects. The reintroduction of resistant species is another efficient way to promote the recovery of forests in American and European countries [32].

2.3. Control of Diseases and Pests

To control the aforementioned diseases and pests, fruit growers in China have typically used chemical insecticides and fungicides because they are cheap and efficient. For example, mist sprays with insecticides and fungicides used in the ‘Resource Nursery of Chinese chestnut’ (Lanxi City, Zhejiang Provence, China) are highly effective for controlling damage caused by pathogens and pests. Previous studies over the past five years have revealed that the combination of Dithane M-45® (80% WP, Dow AgroSciences®, Indiana, United States), Score® (10% WG, Difenoconazole, Syngenta, Basel, Switzerland), and Cabrio® (250 g/L EC, BASF®, Ludwigshafen, Germany) is the most effective for controlling infection by P. cinnamomi and C. parasitica. The combination of LORSBAN® (Chlorpyrifos, 45% EC, Dow AgroSciences®, Indiana, United States) and MEOTHRIN® (Fenpropathrin, 20% EC, Sumitomo Chemical(Shanghai) Co., LTD., Shanghai, China) is the most effective for controlling infection by D. kuriphilus, D. punctiferalis, and other lepidopteran pests.
Chemical control treatments also have several shortcomings, such as the high costs of applying them on larger trees, the killing of beneficial insects (e.g., Torymus sinensis), and environmental pollution. The only alternative to chemical, physical, and biological measures is the breeding of new genotypes with resistance to pathogens, which can decrease and weaken the pest population [25].

3. Iatrical Benefits and Any Other Functions

Glucan extracted from Castanea mollissima fruit and its selenylation modification derivative have strong antiproliferative effects and could potentially be used as an antitumor drug [33]. Castanol B (1), a new phenol from a water-soluble extract of shells of Castanea mollissima, suppresses the growth of hepatoma cells and induces cell apoptosis by reducing the levels of TLR4, IKKβ, and NF-κB [34]. CMP90 is a new water-soluble polysaccharide isolated from Castanea mollissima Blume that inhibits the proliferation of HL-60 cells and the growth of S180 solid tumors [8]. Selenium nanoparticles decorated with 1,6-α-D-glucan (isolated from the fruits of Castanea mollissima Blume) have an anti-proliferative effect on HeLa cells in vitro by inducing apoptosis and S phase arrest [32]. All extracts from the chestnut shell, inner shell, bur, and leaves exhibit antioxidant activity and inhibit the growth of all Gram-positive and two Gram-negative bacteria [35]. Ellagic acid and chestanin extracted from the burs of Castanea sativa Miller inhibit the growth of Alternaria alternata and Fusarium solani by inhibiting mycelial growth and spore germination [36]. It is also reported that chestnut male flower has both excellent antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [37,38] (Figure 1). Portuguese delicacy “pastel de nata” with added extracts of Castanea sativa male flower had higher activity of reducing agents and radical scavengers two days after baking [39]. The leaf extract of Castanea sativa Mill. reduces the level of malondialdehyde when human sperm samples are treated with H2O2 [40] and lowers serum cholesterol levels in mice [41]. A new report also showed that 30 g resistant starch had a significant protective role against non-colorectal cancers for patients, and chestnut is rich in resistant starch [42] (Figure 1). Extracts obtained from chestnut are hypoglycemic and show antioxidant activity, and this mitigates the negative effects of diabetes on the liver [43].
Bioactive compounds extracted from chestnut shells and bur, such as polyphenols, minerals, lignin, and vitamins, are widely used in the food and medicine industries. Polyphenols extracted from chestnut are considered to be beneficial bioactive compounds in food production and preservation [44,45]. C. mollissima kernel is rich in vitamin C and vitamin E, which are beneficial in humans’ daily diet in reducing the diseases of scurvy and cancer [14,46]. Various macroelements (such as K, P, Ca, and Mg) and microelements (such as Zn, Fe, and Cu) are contained in chestnut kernel, which are beneficial minerals to maintain health [47,48].

4. Industrial Production and Technology

4.1. Chestnut Products

Instead of burning waste chestnut shell, many studies have subjected them to biorefinery processes. The use of 5% (w/v) activated charcoal can yield 70.3% (w/v) phenolic compounds, and the phenol radical scavenging activity is higher in the first activated charcoal eluate than in crude chestnut shell hydrolyzate [9]. Castanea mollissima shell can be used in various reactions (e.g., propane dehydrogenation), and it shows high catalytic performance and is low in cost [49]. In vitro digestion has shown that the total phenol content and antioxidant activity are higher in the outer/inner skin of digested chestnut than in undigested chestnut, and this could be used as a source of raw materials for antioxidant-rich active substances [5].

4.2. Improvements in Industrial Technologies

High amounts of tannins are present in chestnut wood and bark, and these tannins are widely used in the wood, culinary, and medicinal industries; they are also used as a fuel, as an additive in animal fodder, and for tanning leather [6,37]. Experiments of the hydrothermal hydrolysis of sweet chestnut tannins have revealed that 250 °C for 30 min are the optimal conditions for maximizing the content of total tannins and phenols [6]. Optimized choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents can be used to extract and recover ellagic acid from waste chestnut shells [7]. The content of flavonoids and tannins from male chestnut flowers is maximized when the following optimal conditions of ultrasonic-assisted extraction are used: 24 ± 3 min, 259 ± 16 W, and 51 ± 7% ethanol [50].

5. Food Science

5.1. Beneficial Extractions from Chestnut

The glycemic index is negatively correlated with the relative crystallinity, which indicates that the starch crystalline structure has a retardant effect on digestibility [51]. Various factors, such as the drying temperature and the order of long-range, short-range, and other molecular compounds in chestnut, affect the digestibility of starch [52]. Animals fed with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, a tannin-rich extract from chestnut, promote pig fattening by increasing the body weight, average daily weight gain, and the feed-to-gain ratio of pigs [53]. The addition of chestnut to the diet increases the intramuscular fat content of the biceps femoris muscle of pigs compared with commercial feed; a diet with chestnut also alters the content of some volatile compounds [54]. The organic acid composition is affected by hot air convective drying treatment, and the effect depends on the chestnut variety [55]. Soy protein isolate films containing chestnut bur extract might provide an effective packaging and preservation method given that antioxidant activity is increased in films with chestnut bur extract [56]. A blend of chestnut and wheat flour or rice flour can be used to generate a high-quality paste [57].
According to different authors, C. mollissima bur and inner shell are remarkable sources of bioactive ingredients. C. mollissima bur is rich in phenolic acids, flavonoids, and total tannin [58,59]. C. mollissima inner shell contains multiple polyphenolic components, which have a beneficial health care function to the human body [60]. Chestnut shells are optimized for alkaline delignification to co-produce ligin and bio-ethanol [61]. Flavonoids procyanidin B3, quercetin-3-O-glycoside, and steroidal sapogenins extracted from C. mollissima shells are natural resource pigments, which are natural additives in production in the food industry [62].

5.2. Postharvest Biology and Technology

The postharvest quality of chestnut has been a major focus of research in recent years. Chestnuts treated by high-pressure processing (400, 500, and 600 MPa for 5 min at 20 °C) have prolonged storage times, fewer molds and insect larvae, and nuts with higher quality [63]. Chestnuts coated with chitosan have lower abundances of microorganisms under refrigeration (0 °C, 90% HR) after 6 months compared with control chestnuts [64]. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with thymol coating reduce the decline in the soluble sugar and starch content of chestnut and inhibit the growth of mold and yeast [65].

6. Soil, Fertilizer, and Endophytic Fungi

6.1. Soil and Fertilizer Conditions

The optimal soil conditions for chestnut are deep, soft, and original volcanic soil rich in phosphorus, potassium, and organic matter [66]. The content of most macronutrients (e.g., total nitrogen, available phosphorus, potassium, and calcium) in chestnut leaves and orchards is low, which indicates that chestnut trees could benefit from fertilization [67]. Nine- and ten-year-old chestnut trees are largest when they are fertilized with suitable amounts of N, P, and K fertilizer [68]. The vertical distribution of plant nutrients under a balanced fertilization regime (N2:P1:K2) is affected by soil type (e.g., loam, clay loam, and sandy loam) [69]. Different levels of N and P application increase the content of some elements, such as N and Cu, but decrease the content of other elements (e.g., Fe and Mn under N application, and K, Ca, and Mg under P application) in the leaves of chestnut [70]. The N concentration in chestnut leaves and the average nut yield are higher under lime application plus a compound NPK fertilizer than lime plus phosphorus fertilizer and unfertilized control orchards [71]. Potassium silicate application increases the accumulation of phytoliths in the leaf, cell wall, and xylem and enhances the tolerance of plants to high temperature by increasing the efficiency of photosystem II and the content of photosynthetic pigments [72]. Regardless of the sampling period, the concentration of boron in leaves is the factor most strongly correlated with chestnut productivity, and leaves are the most useful tissue for the early diagnosis of boron deficiency during the bloom period [73]. The conversion of native forest to Chinese chestnut plantations increases the total nitrogen stock but decreases carbon storage in soil following intensive management [74].

6.2. Endophytic Fungi of Chestnut Trees

Trees can obtain their nutrients through mycorrhizae and nutrient recycling. The fitness and productivity of chestnuts are affected by different types of fungi, and ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) affect both the roots and above-ground parts of plants [75,76,77]. The symbionts of EMF and chestnut contribute to the strength of the roots, including their ability to deeply penetrate the soil, which enhances the growth of chestnut trees. Various planting methods have been used to increase the growth and survival of EMF to promote EMF root colonization and the restoration of chestnuts [78,79]. The EMF species Scleroderma spp., Laccaria spp., and Cenococcum geophilum can disperse and colonize new habitats rapidly, including young chestnut trees [80], and Amanita, Boletus, Cantharellus, Cortinarius, Lactarius, Russula, and Tricholoma are dominant in mature trees [81]. Chestnut blight induces decreases in the rate of photosynthesis, EMF colonization, and species diversity, and blight does not have an effect on the parent trees or neighboring five-month-old seedlings, which are more tolerant of reductions in the content of photosynthate [82]. The success of EMF colonization differs among chestnut tree species infected with P. cinnamomi and healthy ones, and EMF have more extrametrical hyphae in healthy trees than in infected trees [83]. The decrease in mycorrhizal root tip density and ECM species richness might explain the defoliation caused by Swiss needle cast disease [84]. Thus, EMF can be used to enhance the survival of chestnut when chestnut trees are reintroduced to regions vulnerable to blight outbreaks.

7. Genetic Research with SSRs

SSR-based analyses are used to characterize the genetic diversity and genetic structure of plant populations, as well as patterns of kinship, all of which have conservation benefits [85,86,87]. Trees from southeastern France, Corsica, and other regions show differentiation in 10 SSRs [88]. A total of 17 polymorphic microsatellite primers have been shown to be effective for the cross-species amplification of several Fagaceae members, including Japanese and European chestnut and interspecific hybrids of Chinese and Japanese chestnut [89]. An analysis of 16 SSRs has revealed two genotypes: the major genotype ‘Marroni’ and another genotype observed in different varieties of Italian chestnuts [90]. An analysis of 10 SSR loci and 20 morphological characteristics of 68 chestnut plants in the Piedmont of Italy revealed 36 different genotypes, and four gene pools were shown to contribute to the formation of the population according to analysis of the genetic structure of germplasm [91]. Seven of the SSR markers selected from 146 unique fingerprints were core markers for rapidly distinguishing different accessions of Chinese chestnut resources [92]. Twelve new SSR markers were developed for the identification of 216 chestnut accessions, and 21 synonym groups and 189 different genotypes were identified [88]. A total of 272 chestnut individuals were genotyped with 24 SSR markers, and analysis of five outlier loci showed that they were significantly associated with environmental variables [32].
Genetic diversity significantly differed within and among populations of chestnut in southern Spain, but this pattern was not observed using neutral microsatellite markers [93]. Three species of Chinese chestnut represent a single monophyletic clade according to a phylogeny of Castanea based on chloroplast trnT-L-F sequence data, and the North American and European species were sister groups [94]. A total of 52 accessions of Swiss chestnut cultivars were separated into groups of different genotypes by clustering analysis with random amplified polymorphic DNA, amplified fragment length polymorphism DNA, and inter-simple sequence repeats [95]. Microsatellite markers and various analysis methods were used to obtain a single overall gene pool with a diverse admixture of genotypes, and the genotypes in Britain and Ireland differed from those in other areas in Europe [96]. An analysis of the genetic differences in four chestnut populations in the western Balkans and northern Italy using 21 microsatellite markers revealed an introgression zone in the northern Balkans that might be established through gene flow from the above regions [97]. FIR059 exhibited three private alleles for drought-susceptible individuals and two private alleles for drought-tolerant individuals according to an analysis with eight EST-SSR markers; these could thus provide candidate markers for predicting the drought tolerance of C. sativa trees [98]. The genotypes of chestnut seeds vary, but the mass of fruit might be an important target of selection [99].

8. Ecological Environment of Chestnut Orchards

The ecological features of chestnuts are manifold and include soil conditions, temperature, and altitude; natural and anthropogenic factors are also important, as well as whether management is traditional or intensive [2,66,100,101,102]. Compared with infested chestnut seeds, non-infested and mast seeds are cached more by rodents, which promotes seed germination and forest regeneration [103]. C. sativa is an invasive alien species on the Canary Islands that many have suggested should not be completely eradicated given that they are reservoirs of lichen biodiversity [11]. Study of the American chestnut in the southwestern portion of its historical range has revealed that a suitable habitat is present at higher elevations and in regions with higher forest canopy cover [104]. Claudia Mattioni et al. (2017) identified three main gene pools of sweet chestnut and a significant genetic barrier among populations, and this provided new insights into the biogeographic history, geographic locations of different gene pools, and priority areas possessing high genetic diversity in Europe [105]. A 30-year study has shown that the spread of chestnut in northeastern Turkey is mostly driven by temperature and total precipitation [106]. The phenology, morphometric parameters, ripening time, and average yield of different genotypes of sweet chestnut can vary among locations [107]. Compared with other co-occurring tree species, sweet chestnut has a lower survival probability because of its low shade tolerance, poor competitiveness, preference for dry conditions, and summer temperatures [12]. Latitudinal variation among populations is associated with variation in phenology and the xerothermic index; the phenology of chestnut trees in central and southern Mediterranean populations was earlier than that of the northern populations, and drought plays a key role in this pattern [108].

9. China Has Abundant Chestnut Germplasm Resources

Asian chestnut varieties, including Chinese and Japanese chestnut, are considered important resources of genotypes resistant to P. cinnamomi, C. parasitica, and the chestnut gall wasp [30,109,110]. However, few breeders have focused on breeding varieties resistant to these pathogens in China. This is one of the causes of the differences in research on pest control and breeding among Asian and European/American countries. For example, a priority in current research in the Americas, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand is to acquire new varieties with resistance to pathogens, elite genotypes, and tolerance of a wide range of environmental conditions because of the high risk of damage by disease and insects. However, in China, the focus has been on improving the quality of nuts or their use as a source of useful secondary metabolisms. Dichocrocis punctiferalis GUENEE (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) is the most harmful pest of ‘Wukeli’, and this pest has been studied in 15 chestnut orchards from four villages in ‘Luotian’ County (Huanggang City, Hubei Province, China) in 2021 (Figure 3) (data not shown).
Many orchards that have been abandoned due to attacks by pests and disease in American countries are being re-established, and there is a major focus on selecting resistant varieties or hybrids [109,110,111]. China has the most abundant and suitable chestnut resources to support this initiative.

10. Conclusions

A diversified strategy based on careful consideration of the different chestnut cultivation regions is needed to increase chestnut production and improve the marketing of chestnut products. The main measures that could be taken include helping farmers with afforestation efforts, strategically planting chestnut orchards, and implementing scientifically based agronomic and chemical/biological measures to combat diseases and pests to increase the productivity and quality of wood and nuts.

Author Contributions

Y.W. wrote the manuscript; C.L. and X.J. created the figures; Z.F., Y.X. and B.G. edited the manuscript and organized the references; J.L., J.F. and Q.W. critically reviewed and corrected the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFD1000700) and Zhejiang Science and Technology Major Program on Agricultural New Variety Breeding (2021C02070-4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguín, O.; Rial, C.; Piñón, P.; Sainz, M.J.; Mansilla, J.P.; Salinero, C. First report of Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi causing chestnut brown rot on nuts and burrs of sweet chestnut in Spain. Plant Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pereira-Lorenzo, S.; Ballester, A.; Corredoira, E.; Vieitez, A.M.; Agnanostakis, S.; Costa, R.; Bounous, G.; Botta, R.; Beccaro, G.L.; Kubisiak, T.L.; et al. Chestnut. In Fruit Breeding. Handbook of Plant Breeding; Badenes, M., Byrne, D., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 8, pp. 729–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rosario, N.; Gabriele, L.B.; Agnieszka, S.; Chiara, C.; Claudio, D. Endophytic Fungi and Ecological Fitness of Chestnuts. Plants 2021, 10, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Vasconcelos, M.D.C.B.M.; Bennett, R.N.; Rosa, E.A.S.; Cardoso, J.V.F. Primary and Secondary Metabolite Composition of Kernels from Three Cultivars of Portuguese Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) at Different Stages of Industrial Transformation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 559, 3508–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fen, T.; Xie, C.Y.; Li, H.N.; Lei, S.C.; Li, J.; Huang, X.W.; Yang, F. Effect of in vitro digestion on chestnut outer-skin and inner-skin bioaccessibility: The relationship between biotransformation and antioxidant activity of polyphenols by metabolomics. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130277. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanja, G.; Željko, K.; Mojca, Š. Hydrothermal hydrolysis of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) tannins. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2019, 84, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, H.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, S.H.; Li, S.H.; Zhou, G.Q.; Wang, S.X.; Zhang, J.C. Extraction, selenylation modification and antitumor activity of the glucan from Castanea mollissima Blume. Glycoconj. J. 2017, 34, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, X.D.; Feng, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.N.; Ji, H.Y.; Yu, S.S.; Liu, A.J.; Yu, J. A novel polysaccharide from Castanea mollissima Blume: Preparation, characteristics and antitumor activities in vitro and in vivo. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morana, M.; Squillaci, G.; Paixão, S.M.; Alves, L.; Cara, F.L.; Moura, P. Development of an Energy Biorefinery Model for Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) Shells. Energies 2017, 10, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zha, J.J.; Fan, B.; He, J.R.; He, C.Y.; Ma, C.L. Valorization of Biomass to Furfural by Chestnut Shell-based Solid Acid in Methyl Isobutyl Ketone-Water-Sodium Chloride System. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2022, 194, 2021–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. González-Montelongo, C.; Pérez-Vargas, I. Is an invasive alien tree able to sustain a similar lichen diversity as the native forest? The case of the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and the laurel forest in Macaronesia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2021, 488, 119009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Conedera, M.; Krebs, P.; Gehring, E.; Wunder, J.; Hülsmann, L.; Abegg, M.; Maringer, J. How future-proof is Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in a global change context? Forest Ecol. Manag. 2021, 494, 119320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paletto, A.; Focacci, M.; De Meo, I. Farmers’ opinions on chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) supply chain development strategies: A case study in Central Italy. Forest Syst. 2018, 27, eSC02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, S.; Wang, L.T.; Fu, Y.J.; Jiang, J.C. Bioactive constituents, nutritional benefits and woody food applications of Castanea mollissima: A comprehensive review. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Battisti, A.; Benvegnù, I.; Colombari, B.; Haack, R.A. Invasion by the chestnut gall wasp in Italy causes significant yield loss in Castanea sativa nut production. Agr. Forest Entomol. 2014, 16, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kovács, G.E.; SzÕke, L.; Tóth, B.; Kovács, B.; Bojtor, C.; Illés, Á.; Jr, L.R.; Moloi, M.J.; Radócz, L. The Physiological and Biochemical Responses of European Chestnut (Castanea sativa L.) to Blight Fungus (Cryphonectria parasitica (Murill) Barr). Plants 2021, 10, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saiz-Fernández, I.; Milenković, I.; Berka, M.; Černý, M.; Tomšovský, M.; Brzobohatý, B.; Kerchev, P. Integrated Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiling of Phytophthora cinnamomi Attack on Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa) Reveals Distinct Molecular Reprogramming Proximal to the Infection Site and Away from It. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pavese, V.; Moglia, A.; Gonthier, P.; Marinoni, D.T.; Cavalet-Giorsa, E.; Botta, R. Identification of Susceptibility Genes in Castanea sativa and Their Transcription Dynamics following Pathogen Infection. Plants 2021, 10, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Camisón, Á.; Martín, M.Á.; Oliva, J.; Elfstrand, M.; Solla, A. Increased tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in offspring of ink-diseased chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller) trees. Ann. Forest Sci. 2019, 76, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anagnostakis, S.L. Chestnut blight: The classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 1987, 79, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gündüz, G.; Akyuz, M.; Aydemir, D.; Yaman, B.; Asik, N.; Bulbul, A.S.; Allahverdiyev, S. Investigation on Some Physical, Morphological Properties And Raman Spectroscopy of Chestnut Blight Infected Castanea sativa Mill. Wood. Cerne. 2016, 22, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maresi, G.; Longa, C.M.O.; Turchetti, T. Brown rot on nuts of Castanea sativa Mill: An emerging disease and its causal agent. iForest 2013, 6, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tziros, G.T. First report of nut rot caused by Gnomoniopsis castaneae on Castanea sativa in Greece. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Labbate, L.; McCullough, D.G. Phenology, Density and Parasitism of Asian Chestnut Gall Wasp (Dryocosmus kuriphilus) (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Recently Invaded Chestnut (Castanea spp.) Orchards in Michigan. Environ. Entomol 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vollmeier, R.; Osterc, G.; Luthar, Z. Preservation of sweet chestnut genetic resources (Castanea sativa Mill.) against attack by chestnut gall wasp (Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu, 1951). Acta Agric. Slov. 2018, 111, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nugnes, F.; Gualtieri, L.; Bonsignore, C.P.; Parillo, R.; Annarumma, R.; Griffo, R.; Bernardo, U. Resistance of a Local Ecotype of Castanea sativa to Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Southern Italy. Forests-Basel 2018, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balsa, C.; Bento, A.; Paparella, F. Biological control of the Asian chestnut gall wasp in Portugal: Insights from a mathematical model. PLoS ONE 2016, 7, e0254193. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhebentyayeva, T.; Sisco, P.H.; Georgi, L.L.; Jeffers, S.N.; Perkins, M.T.; James, J.B.; Hebard, F.V.; Saski, C.; Nelson, C.D.; Abbott, A.G. Dissecting Resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in Interspecific Hybrid Chestnut Crosses Using Sequence-Based Genotyping and QTL Mapping. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1594–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santos, C.; Zhebentyayeva, T.; Serrazina, S.; Nelson, C.D.; Costa, R. Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers for mapping reaction to Phytophthora cinnamomi in Castanea spp. Sci. Hortic.-Amst. 2015, 194, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barakat, A.; Staton, M.; Cheng, C.H.; Park, J.; Yassin, N.B.M.; Ficklin, S.; Yeh, C.C.; Hebard, F.; Baier, K.; Powell, W.; et al. Chestnut resistance to the blight disease: Insights from transcriptome analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ježić, M.; Krstin, L.; Poljak, I.; Liber, Z.; Idžojtić, M.; Jelić, M.; Meštrović, J.; Zebec, M.; Ćurković-Perica, M. Castanea sativa: Genotype-dependent recovery from chestnut blight. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2014, 10, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Müller, M.; Nelson, C.D.; Gailing, O. Analysis of Environment-Marker Associations in American Chestnut. Forests 2018, 9, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, H.Y.; Liu, D.D.; Xue, C.H. Synthesis and cytotoxicity of selenium nanoparticles stabilized by α-D-glucan from Castanea mollissima Blume. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, F.; Yao, X.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.J.; Jin, Y.; Xie, H.F.; Liu, Y.C.; Yang, Y.F.; Zheng, X.W. One New Phenolic Compound from Castanea mollissima Shells and its Suppression of HepatomaCell Proliferation and Inflammation by Inhibiting NF-κB Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 466. [Google Scholar]
  35. Silva, V.; Falco, V.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Silva, A.; Capita, R.; Alonso-Calleja, C.; Amaral, J.S.; Igrejas, G.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; et al. Evaluation of the Phenolic Profile of Castanea sativa Mill. By-Products and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity against Multiresistant Bacteria. Antioxidants-Basel 2020, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mencherini, T.; Sansone, F.; Auriemma, G.; Gazzerro, P.; Puca, R.V.; Iandoli, R.; Aquino, R.P. Development, Characterization, and Clinical Investigation of a New Topical Emulsion System Containing a Castanea sativa Spiny Burs Active Extract. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1634. [Google Scholar]
  37. Carocho, M.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Barros, L.; Bento, A.; Cámara, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Traditional pastry with chestnut flowers as natural ingredients: An approach of the effects on nutritional value and chemical composition. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 44, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carocho, M.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chestnut flowers as functionalizing agents to enhance the antioxidant properties of highly appreciated traditional pastry. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 2989–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Caleja, C.; Barros, C.; Barros, J.C.M.; Soković, M.; Calhelha, R.C.; Bento, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Castanea sativa male flower extracts as an alternative additive in the Portuguese pastry delicacy “pastel de nata”. Food Funct. 2022, 11, 2208–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Biagi, M.; Noto, D.; Corsini, M.; Baini, G.; Cerretani, D.; Cappellucci, G.; Moretti, E. Antioxidant Effect of the Castanea sativa Mill. Leaf Extract on Oxidative Stress Induced upon Human Spermatozoa. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodrigues, P.; Ferreira, T.; Nascimento-Gonçalves, E.; Seixas, F.; Costa, R.M.G.; Martins, T.; Neuparth, M.J.; Pires, M.J.; Lanzarin, G.; Félix, L.; et al. Dietary Supplementation with Chestnut (Castanea sativa) Reduces Abdominal Adiposity in FVB/n Mice: A Preliminary Study. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mathers, J.C.; Elliott, F.; Macrae, F.; Mecklin, J.-P.; Möslein, G.; McRonald, F.E.; Bertario, L.; Evans, D.G.; Gerdes, A.-M.; Ho, J.W.; et al. Cancer Prevention with Resistant Starch in Lynch Syndrome Patients in the CAPP2-Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial: Planned 10-Year Follow-up. Cancer Prev. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mihailović, M.; Uskoković, A.; Jovanović, J.A.; Grdović, N.; Dinić, S.; Poznanović, G.; Franić, A.; Đorđević, M.; Vidaković, M. Treatment of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with Castanea sativa and Lactarius deterrimus extracts decreases liver damage by initiating activation of the Akt prosurvival kinase. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2020, 72, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pinto, D.; Braga, N.; Silva, A.M.; Costa, P.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Rodrigues, F. Chapter 6-Chestnut. In Valorization of Fruit Processing Byproducts; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pinto, D.; Vieira, E.F.; Peixoto, A.F.; Freire, C.; Freitas, V.; Costa, P.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Rodrigues, F. Optimizing the extraction of phenolic antioxidants from chestnut shells by subcritical water extraction using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2020, 334, 127521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Q.; Shi, X.; Zhao, Q.; Cui, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Xu, F. Effect of cooking methods on nutritional quality and volatile compounds of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume). Food Chem. 2016, 201, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Vasconcelos, M.D.C.B.M.; Nunes, F.; Viguera, C.G.; Bennett, R.N.; Rosa, E.A.S.; Ferrira-Cardoso, J.V. Industrial processing effects on chestnut fruits (Castanea sativa Mill.) 3. Minerals, free sugars, carotenoids and antioxidant vitamins. Int. J. Food Sci. Techn. 2010, 45, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bao, X.L.Y. Determination of six mineral elements in chestnut in Chengde by atomic absorption spectrometry. China Food Nutr. 2015, 21, 62–63. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hu, Z.P.; Zhao, H.; Chen, C.; Yuan, Z.Y. Castanea mollissima shell-derived porous carbons as metal-free catalysts for highly efficient dehydrogenation of propane to propylene. Catal. Today 2018, 316, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alaya, I.; Pereira, E.; Dias, M.I.; Pinela, J.; Calhelha, R.C.; Soković, M.; Kostić, M.; Prieto, M.A.; Essid, F.; Caleja, C.; et al. Development of a Natural Preservative from Chestnut Flowers: Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Optimization and Functionality Assessment. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hao, H.N.; Bao, W.J.; Wu, Y.W.; Ouyang, J. Relationship between physicochemical characteristics and in vitro digestibility of chestnut (Castanea mollissima) starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, Z.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wu, Y.W.; Ouyang, J. The role of drying methods in determining the in vitro digestibility of starch in whole chestnut flour. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 153, 112583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Durjava, M.K.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of DSP® (Na2EDTA, tannin-rich extract of Castanea sativa, thyme oil and origanum oil) for pigs for fattening. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6163. [Google Scholar]
  54. Echegaray, N.; Pateiro, M.; Zhang, W.G.; Domínguez, R.; Campagnol, P.C.B.; Carballo, J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Influence of the Inclusion of Chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller) in the Finishing Diet and Cooking Technique on the Physicochemical Parameters and Volatile Profile of Biceps femoris Muscle. Foods 2020, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Delgado, T.; Ramalhosa, E.; Pereira, J.A.; Casal, S. Organic acid profile of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) as affected by hot air convective drying. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, H.X.; Hu, D.Y.; Ma, Q.Y.; Wang, L.J. Physical and antioxidant properties of flexible soy protein isolate films by incorporating chestnut (Castanea mollissima) bur extracts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 71, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, S.Y.; Reddy, C.K.; Du, B.; Xu, B.J. Pasting, thermal, and functional properties of wheat flour and rice flour formulated with chestnut flour. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2021, 26, 100290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dong, S.; Li, H.; Gasco, L.; Xiong, Y.; Guo, K.J.; Zoccarato, I. Antioxidative activity of the polyphenols from the involucres of Castanea mollissima Blume and their mitigating effects on heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. An, J.Y.; Wang, L.T.; Lv, M.J.; Wang, J.D.; Cai, Z.H.; Wang, Y.Q.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Q.; Fu, Y.J. An efficiency strategy for extraction and recovery of ellagic acid from waste chestnut shell and its biological activity evaluation. Microchem. J. 2020, 160, 105616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, L.; Gao, H.Y.; Baba, M.; Okada, Y.; Okuyama, T.; Wu, L.J.; Zhan, L.B. Extracts and compounds with anti-diabetic complications and anti-cancer activity from Castanea mollissina Blume (Chinese chestnut). BMC Complem Altern Med. 2014, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morales, A.; Gullón, B.; Dávila, I.; Eibes, G.; Labidi, J.; Gullón, P. Optimization of alkaline pretreatment for the co-production of biopolymer lignin and bioethanol from chestnut shells following a biorefinery approach. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 124, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. You, T.T.; Zhou, S.K.; Wen, J.L.; Ma, C.; Xu, F. Chemical Composition, Properties, and Antimicrobial Activity of the Water-Soluble Pigments from Castanea mollissima Shells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1936–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pino-Hernández, E.; Pinto, C.A.; Abrunhosa, L.; Teixeira, J.A.; Saraiva, J.A. Hydrothermal and high-pressure processing of chestnuts-Dependence on the storage conditions. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2022, 185, 111773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fernandes, L.; Pereira, E.L.; Fidalgo, M.C.; Gomes, A.; Ramalhosa, E. Physicochemical properties and microbial control of chestnuts (Castanea sativa) coated with whey protein isolate, chitosan and alginate during storage. Sci. Hortic.-Amst. 2020, 263, 109105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guo, X.H.; Chu, L.J.; Gu, T.T.; Purohit, S.; Kou, L.P.; Zhang, B. Long-term quality retention and decay inhibition of chestnut using thymol loaded chitosan nanoparticle. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bounous, G.; Marinoni, D.T. Chestnut: Botany, horticulture, and utilization. Hort. Rev. 2005, 31, 291–347. [Google Scholar]
  67. Toprak, S. The macro and micro nutrition status of Anatolian chestnut in Inegol (Bursa-Turkey). Eurasian J. For. Sci. 2019, 7, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ribeiro, S.L.; Fonseca, T.F.; Pires, A.L. Influence of fertilization on growth of young chestnut trees (Castanea sativa Mill.) managed for wood production. Cerne 2019, 25, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Toprak, S. Balanced Basic Fertilization in Sweet Chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.): Vertical Distribution of Plant Nutrients in Different Soil Textures. Alinteri J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Toprak, S.; Ateş, Ö.; Yalçin, G.; Taşpinar, K. How Does N: P: K Fertilizer Applications in Different Levels Affect The Nutrition of Anatolian Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.)? Int. J. Anatolia Agric. Eng. 2021, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodrigues, M.A.; Raimundo, S.; Pereira, A.; Arrobas, M. Large Chestnut Trees (Castanea sativa) Respond Poorly to Liming and Fertilizer Application. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 2020, 20, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carneiro-Carvalho, A.; Anjos, R.; Aires, A.; Marques, T.; Pinto, T.; Gomes-Laranjo, J. Ecophysiological study of the impact of SiK® fertilization on Castanea sativa Mill. seedling tolerance to high temperature. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Portela, E.M.A.C.; Louzada, J.L.P. Early diagnosis of boron deficiency in chestnut. J. Plant Nutr. 2012, 35, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, Y.F.; Zhang, J.J.; Chang, S.X.; Jiang, P.K.; Zhou, G.M.; Shen, Z.M.; Wu, J.S.; Lin, L.; Wang, Z.S.; Shen, M.C. Converting native shrub forests to Chinese chestnut plantations and subsequent intensive management affected soil C and N pools. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 312, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aryal, P.; Meiners, S.J.; Carlsward, B.S. Ectomycorrhizae determine chestnut seedling growth and drought response. Agrofor. Syst. 2021, 95, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, H.Y.; Quan, W.X.; Liu, H.Y.; Ding, G.J. Effects of Suillus luteus and S. bovinus on the physiological response and nutrient absorption of Pinus massoniana seedlings under phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil. 2022, 471, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Querejeta, J.I.; Schlaeppi, K.; López-García, Á.; Ondoño, S.; Prieto, I.; Heijden, M.G.A.; Alguacil, M.M. Lower relative abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi under a warmer and drier climate is linked to enhanced soil organic matter decomposition. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bauman, J.M.; Keiffer, C.H.; Hiremath, S.; McCarthy, B.C. Soil preparation methods promoting ectomycorrhizal colonization and American chestnut (Castanea dentata) establishment in coal mine restoration. J. App. Ecol. 2013, 50, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bauman, J.M.; Adamson, J.; Brisbin, R.; Cline, E.T.; Keiffer, C.H. Soil metals and ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with American chestnut hybrids as reclamation trees on formerly coal mined land. Int. J. Agron. 2017, 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Twieg, B.D.; Durall, D.M.; Simard, S.W. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Martins, A.; Marques, G.; Borges, O.; Portela, E.; Lousada, J.; Raimundo, F.; Madeira, M. Management of chestnut plantations for a multifunctional land use under Mediterranean conditions: Effects on productivity and sustainability. Agrofor. Syst. 2011, 81, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bauman, J.M.; Francino, S.; Santas, A. Interactions between ectomycorrhizal fungi and chestnut blight (Cryphonectria parasitica) on American chestnut (Castanea dentata) used in coal mine restoration. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 104–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Maarten, B.J. Dissertation. Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill) Mycorrhzas: The Composition of Their Communities over a Wide Geographical Range in Europe; University of Wales: Bangor, ME, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  84. Luoma, D.L.; Eberhart, J.L. Relationships between Swiss needle cast and ectomycorrhizal fungus diversity. Mycorrhiza 2014, 4, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tautz, D. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 6463–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nishio, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Terakami, S.; Sawamura, Y.; Takada, N.; Saito, T. Genetic diversity of Japanese chestnut cultivars assessed by SSR markers. Breeding Sci. 2011, 61, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jiang, X.B.; Tang, D.; Gong, B.C. Genetic diversity and association analysis of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume) cultivars based on SSR markers. Braz. J. Bot. 2017, 40, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bouffartigue, C.; Debille, S.; Fabreguettes, O.; Cabrer, A.R.; Pereira-Lorenzo, S.; Flutre, T.; Harvengt, L. Two main genetic clusters with high admixture between forest and cultivated chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in France. Ann. Forest Sci. 2020, 77, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Inoue, E.; Ning, L.; Hara, H. Development of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Chinese Chestnut and Their Characterization in Diverse Chestnut Cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2009, 134, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alessandri, S.; Krznar, M.; Ajolfi, D.; Cabrer, A.M.R.; Pereira-Lorenzo, S.; Dondini, L. Genetic Diversity of Castanea sativa Mill. Accessions from the T uscan-Emilian Apennines and Emilia Romagna Region (Italy). Agronomy-Basel 2020, 10, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Marinoni, D.T.; Akkak, A.; Beltramo, C.; Guaraldo, P.; Boccacci, P.; Bounous, G.; Ferrara, A.M.; Ebone, A.; Viotto, E.; Botta, R. Genetic and morphological characterization of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) germplasm in Piedmont (north-western Italy). Tree Genet. Genomes. 2013, 9, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nie, X.H.; Wang, Z.H.; Liu, N.W.; Song, L.; Yan, B.Q.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, K.F.; Zhao, Y.L.; Chen, X.; et al. Fingerprinting 146 Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume) accessions and selecting a core collection using SSR markers. J. Integ. Agr. 2021, 20, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cuestas, M.I.; Mattioni, C.M.; Martín, L.M.; Vargas-Osuna, E.; Cherubini, M.; Martín, M.A. Functional genetic diversity of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) populations from southern Spain. For. Syst. 2017, 26, eSC06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lang, P.; Dane, F.; Kubisiak, T.L. Phylogeny of Castanea (Fagaceae) based on chloroplast trnT-L-F sequence data. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2006, 2, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abdelhamid, S.; Omri, A.; Araouiki, A.; Sghair, A. Molecular Characterization of Swiss Chestnut Cultivars (Castanea Sativa Mill.) Using RAPD, AFLP and ISSR Markers. Int. J. Adv. Res. Bot. 2016, 2, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jarman, R.; Mattioni, C.; Russell, K.; Chambers, F.M.; Bartlett, D.; Martin, M.A.; Cherubini, M.; Villani, F.; Webb, J. DNA analysis of Castanea sativa (sweet chestnut) in Britain and Ireland: Elucidating European origins and genepool diversity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Skender, A.; Kurtović, M.; Pojskić, N.; Stroil, B.K.; Hadžiabulić, S.; Gaši, F. Genetic Structure and Diversity of European chestnut (Castanea sativa mill.) Populations in Western Balkans: On a Crossroad between East and West. Genetika-Belgrade 2017, 49, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Alcaide, F.; Solla, A.; Mattioni, C.; Castellana, S.; Martín, M.Á. Adaptive diversity and drought tolerance in Castanea sativa assessed through EST-SSR genic markers. Forestry 2019, 92, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Grygorieva, O.; Klymenko, S.; Teslyuk, M. Variability of Morphological Parameters and Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds of Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa mill.) genotypes fruits. Plant Introd. 2018, 2, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mota, M.; Marques, T.; Pinto, T.; Raimundo, F.; Borges, A.; Caço, J.; Gomes-Laranjo, J. Relating plant and soil water content to encourage smart watering in chestnut trees. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 203, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Warmund, M.R. Nutrient status and fruiting response of young Chinese chestnut trees following application of nitrogen. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 2018, 72, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
  102. Mellano, M.G.; Beccaro, G.L.; Donno, D.; Marinoni, T.D.; Boccacci, P.; Canterino, S.; Cerutti, A.K.; Bounous, G. Castanea spp. Biodiversity conservation: Collection and characterization of the genetic diversity of an endangered species. Gen. Res. Crop Evol. 2012, 59, 1727–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Han, N.; Feng, T.; Hou, X.; An, X.N.; Chang, G. Effects of mast seeding and insect infestation on predation and dispersal of Castanea mollissima nuts by rodents in the Qinling Mountains of China. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2021, 499, 119630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Laport, R.G.; Brookover, Z.S.; Christman, B.D.; Ng, J.; Philley, K.; Craddock, J.H. Environmental niche and demographic modeling of American chestnut near its southwestern range limit. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mattioni, C.; Martin, M.A.; Chiocchini, F.; Cherubini, M.; Gaudet, M.; Pollegioni, P.; Velichkov, I.; Jarman, R.; Chambers, F.M.; Damian, V.L.; et al. Landscape genetics structure of European sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill): Indications for conservation priorities. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2017, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Usta, A.; Yılmaz, M. Spatio-temporal change of anatolian chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) forests under climate change, NORTHEASTERN TURKEY. Environ.Eng. Manag. J. 2020, 19, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar]
  107. Odalović, A.; Prenkić, R.; Dubak, D.; Jovančević, M.; Čizmović, M.; Radunović, M. Effect of ecological conditions on expression of biopomological characteristics of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in natural populations of montenegro. Genetika-Basel 2013, 45, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Míguez-Soto, B.; Fernández-Cruz, J.; Fernández-López, J. Mediterranean and Northern Iberian gene pools of wild Castanea sativa Mill. are two differentiated ecotypes originated under natural divergent selection. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sevarika, M.; Stacconi, V.R.; Romani, R. Fine Morphology of Antennal and Ovipositor Sensory Structures of the Gall Chestnut Wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus. Insects 2021, 12, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bounous, G. Perspectives and future of the chestnut industry in Europe and all over the world. In: Proceedings of the second European congress on chestnut. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1043, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dini, F.; Sartor, C.; Botta, R. Detection of a hypersensitive reaction in the chestnut hybrid ‘Bouche de Betizac’ infested by Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2012, 60, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the processing and utilization of the wood, leaves, and nuts of chestnut trees. Castanea mollissima Bl. is a multi-value species with high ecological value that is widely used in the food, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and industrial raw material industries.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the processing and utilization of the wood, leaves, and nuts of chestnut trees. Castanea mollissima Bl. is a multi-value species with high ecological value that is widely used in the food, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and industrial raw material industries.
Plants 11 02111 g001
Figure 2. Main diseases and pests of chestnut. Characteristics of chestnut stem after Cryphonectria parasitica infection (AF). The bark and phloem of chestnut trees can be severely damaged by Cryphonectria parasitica; however, the xylem can remain fully intact and functional, and the trees can remain alive (AD). However, the xylem can be severely damaged after infection, and the trees can die (E,F). Leaf galls induced by Dryocosmus kuriphilus on a chestnut tree (G,H); larvae (I-S1,S2) and adults (I-S3,S4) of Dryocosmus kuriphilus. Three different development forms of Dryocosmus kuriphilus appear simultaneously on the same chestnut tree in May. The photos were taken in a private orchard in Qingyuan County, Lishui City, Zhejaing Province, China.
Figure 2. Main diseases and pests of chestnut. Characteristics of chestnut stem after Cryphonectria parasitica infection (AF). The bark and phloem of chestnut trees can be severely damaged by Cryphonectria parasitica; however, the xylem can remain fully intact and functional, and the trees can remain alive (AD). However, the xylem can be severely damaged after infection, and the trees can die (E,F). Leaf galls induced by Dryocosmus kuriphilus on a chestnut tree (G,H); larvae (I-S1,S2) and adults (I-S3,S4) of Dryocosmus kuriphilus. Three different development forms of Dryocosmus kuriphilus appear simultaneously on the same chestnut tree in May. The photos were taken in a private orchard in Qingyuan County, Lishui City, Zhejaing Province, China.
Plants 11 02111 g002
Figure 3. Dichocrocis punctiferalis GUENEE is the main insect pest of Chinese chestnut in Luotian County, Hubei Province, China. Chestnuts attacked by D. punctiferalis (A), and different stages of the life cycle of D. punctiferalis: larva (B), pupa (C), and adult (D). Photos were taken in a private orchard in Luotian County, Huanggang City, Hubei Province, China in 2021.
Figure 3. Dichocrocis punctiferalis GUENEE is the main insect pest of Chinese chestnut in Luotian County, Hubei Province, China. Chestnuts attacked by D. punctiferalis (A), and different stages of the life cycle of D. punctiferalis: larva (B), pupa (C), and adult (D). Photos were taken in a private orchard in Luotian County, Huanggang City, Hubei Province, China in 2021.
Plants 11 02111 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Fang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Gong, B.; Jiang, X.; Lai, J.; Fan, J. A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima. Plants 2022, 11, 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162111

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu C, Fang Z, Wu Q, Xu Y, Gong B, Jiang X, Lai J, Fan J. A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yanpeng, Cuiyu Liu, Zhou Fang, Qiang Wu, Yang Xu, Bangchu Gong, Xibing Jiang, Junsheng Lai, and Jingen Fan. 2022. "A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima" Plants 11, no. 16: 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162111

APA Style

Wang, Y., Liu, C., Fang, Z., Wu, Q., Xu, Y., Gong, B., Jiang, X., Lai, J., & Fan, J. (2022). A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima. Plants, 11(16), 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop