Next Article in Journal
Anthracnose Disease Control and Postharvest Quality of Hass Avocado Stored in Biobased PLA/PBAT/Pine Essential Oil/Chitosan Active Packaging Nets
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytotoxic Metabolites Produced by Fungi Involved in Grapevine Trunk Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Morphological Differentiation of Spirit Producing Agave angustifolia Traditional Landraces Cultivated in Jalisco, Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Studies on the In Vitro Interactions Between the Secondary Metabolites Produced by Esca-Associated Fungi and Enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains

by
Leonardo Scarano
1,2,
Francesco Mazzone
2,
Francesco Mannerucci
1,
Margherita D’Amico
2,
Giovanni Luigi Bruno
1,* and
Antonio Domenico Marsico
2
1
Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via G. Amendola, 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics—Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology (CREA-VE), Via Casamassima, 148, 70010 Turi, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(17), 2277; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172277
Submission received: 30 July 2022 / Revised: 24 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022

Abstract

:
Esca-affected vines alter the carbohydrate metabolism, xylem transport of water and photosynthesis and show regular grapes (but berries do not reach maturity), and phenolic compounds are reduced in concentration, oxidate and polymerizate. Pullulan and a mixture of scytalone and isosclerone (9:1; w/w), secondary metabolites produced in vitro and in planta by Phaeoacremonium minimum (syn. P. aleophilum) and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, were assayed against the strains Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007 in microvinifications with synthetic grape must. The presence of pullulan and pentaketides mix affects the growth and metabolism of the tested Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Assays at 100 and 1000 µg mL−1 inhibited the growth of both strains, while no effects were recorded when evaluated at 1 and 5 µg mL−1. In comparison with the controls, pullulan and the scytalone/isosclerone mixture at 10 µg mL−1 had a growth reduction, a lower alcohol yield, reduced the concentration of tartaric acid and malic acid; and slowed down the production of lactic acid, acetic acid and total polyphenol content of the tested S. cerevisiae strains. These metabolites could be applied as an alternative to the sulfite addition in the early stages of vinification to support the action of selected Saccharomyces. Appealing is the subtractive action of pullulan against tartaric acid. Further data are needed to confirm and validate the enological performance in freshly pressed grape juice.

1. Introduction

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivation and winemaking production are negatively affected by the impacts of pathogens and pests on vines, which compromise their annual growth cycle, lifetime and organoleptic qualities of grapes and wine. Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are the most destructive diseases of a vineyard, causing cankers, dieback and the eventual death of vines. The presence of a consortium of fungi participates in GTDs. Species of Botryosphaeria, Diplodia, Dothiorella, Granulodiplodia, Lasiodiplodia, Neofusicoccum, Phaeobotryosphaeria, Spencermartinsia, Phaeomoniella, Cadophora, Phaeoacremonium, Fomitiporia, Fomitiporella, Fuscoporia, Inocutis, Phellinus, Porodaedalea, Stereum, Eutypa, Eutypella, Cryptosphaeria, Cryptovalsa, Diatrype, Diatrypella, Pleurostomophora and Diaporthe are isolated from grapevine wood affected by GTDs. Fungi in the Diaporthales order are implicated in Esca and other GTDs, such as the Eutypa dieback [1,2,3,4,5].
The disease usually called “Esca” is one of the longest recognized and most complex and destructive GTDs [2]. In particular, the worldwide cost for the replacement of dead vines is roughly estimated to be more than 1.0 billion euros per year [3].
Esca is now considered a complex of different diseases overlapping in the same vine or developing at different ages of the vine’s life span. Esca complex includes white rot (which is at the origin of the name Esca) and three vascular syndromes: brown wood streaking of grapevine cuttings, Petri disease and grapevine leaf stripe disease (GLSD, previously named “young esca”). GLSD affects young and old vines, which show wood streaking and discoloration. The association between GLSD and white rot was described as “Esca proper”. The vines affected by Esca complex, white rot and Esca proper can show apoplectic symptoms. Brown wood streaking, Petri disease and GLSD are grouped as phaeotracheomycosis complex [2,6,7,8]. Symptoms on leaves start with chlorotic areas becoming necrotic and conferring a “tiger striped” appearance. On berries, dark purple spots on the epidermis can be observed [9,10]. The manifestation of leaf and berry symptoms and apoplexy may fluctuate from year to year [1,2,4,6,7,8,9].
Members of the basidiomycetous genus Fomitiporia (F. mediterranea M. Fisch. mainly in Europe and the Mediterranean area) cause white rot [11,12]. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (W. Gams, Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Mugnai) Crous & W. Gams, Phaeoacremonium minimum (Tul. & C. Tul.) Gramaje, L. Mostert & Crous (syn. Phaeoacremonium aleophilum W. Gams, Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Mugnai) and other Phaeoacremonium ssp. are the etiological agents of brown wood streaking, Petri disease and GLSD [1,7].
So far, no curative methods are available. Different strategies are applied to limit the occurrence of GTDs, both in nurseries and fields [2]. Most promising is the application of biocontrol agents. Strains of Pythium oligandrum Drechsler, bacteria of the genus Paenibacillus and mycoparasite fungi of the genus Trichoderma spp. (including Trichoderma atroviride P. Karst., Trichoderma asperellum Samuels, Lieckf. & Nirenberg and Trichoderma gamsii Samuels & Druzhin.), are applied against GTDs, including Esca [2,10,13], still with innovative, ecofriendly hybrid nanomaterials [13].
No pathogens have been isolated from the leaves or berries of infected plants. Leaf “tiger stripe” and berry symptoms are linked to cultivar susceptibility, vine age, the microorganisms involved, pedoclimatic conditions and other physiological factors [6,7,8]. Reaction products of the diseased wood, stress metabolites, oxygen radicals, polyphenol compound changes, phytotoxic metabolites excreted by Esca-associated fungi, or a combination of these, originating in the discolored woody tissues of affected trunks and branches contribute to the deterioration/necrosis in the wood and leaves symptoms development [2,4,5,6,8,10,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Glycerophospholipids and polyphenol compounds, principally stilbenoids could play a role to limit in planta Esca pathogens development [10]. Macro- and micronutrients play a role in Esca complex symptom progression [22,23,24].
P. minimum and P. chlamydospora produce different secondary metabolites in vitro: naphthalenone pentaketides, exopolysaccharides and polypeptides. Among naphthalenone pentaketides, from liquid culture of P. minimum were isolated scytalone, isosclerone (Figure 1), cis-4-hydroxy-scytalone, 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphtalene (1,3,8-THN), 2,4,8-trihydroxytetralone (2,4,8-THT), 3,4,8-trihydroxytetralone (3,4,8-THT), flavioline, 2-hydroxyjuglone (2-HJ) and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde. From liquid cultures of P. chlamydospora, scytalone, isosclerone, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, tyrosol, 1-O-methylemodine, 3-hydroxy-5-decanolide, (S)-4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid and 4-hydroxy-3-(3-methyl-2-butenyloxy)-benzoic acid have been yielded. The exopolysaccharides include the α-glucan pullulan (Figure 1) [14,15,25,26,27,28,29]. The structures of the polypeptides have not yet been determined [15,29].
The biological activity of metabolites secreted by P. minimum and P. chlamydospora was evaluated against grapevine leaves, calli and protoplasts and towards Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts [14,15,25,26,27,28]. Assayed on detached leaves of cvs Italia, Sangiovese and Matilde, aqueous solutions of scytalone (50 µg mL−1) produce light green to chlorotic, round to irregular, interveinal or marginal spots, which eventually coalesce or diffuse to large areas. Similarly, isosclerone (100 µg mL−1 in water) origins yellowish spots, slowly becoming coalescent and necrotic, followed by distortion and withering of the lamina [25,26]. Pullulan (50 µg mL−1) causes the collapse of marginal and interveinal tissue, which desiccates and becomes dry [27].
Polypeptides secreted by P. chlamydospora and P minimum stimulate anthocyanins production on grapevine leaves. Applied to grapevine cells in culture, these polypeptides have modified proton fluxes, depolarized the cell membrane, inhibited the transport of sucrose and glutamine and, lastly, caused the death of the cells [15,29].
Variations in glutathione/ascorbate pools, PR-proteins, phenolic compounds, phytoalexins, carbohydrate metabolism, xylem water transport and photosynthesis are observed in Esca complex-affected vines [4,8,10,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Climatic conditions also influence vine physiology, pathogens aggressiveness, their interaction, tiger stripes and apoplexy expression [37,38].
Vines with Esca complex show regular bunches with grapes that do not reach maturity, loss of grape quality and yield, variations in the concentration of flavonoids, anthocyanins, phenolic compounds and their polymerization [17,22,39]. Trans-resveratrol concentration increases in wood with symptoms of brown streaks, in the berries of vines infected with P. minimum and P. chlamydospora [14,17,28] and in Trebbiano d’Abruzzo wines obtained from Esca complex diseased grapevine [22,39].
Laccases produced by F. mediterranea could oxidize proanthocyanidins and anthocyanins, contributing to the reduction of phenolic compounds concentration in wines obtained from Esca complex diseased vines [40]. Anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins, present in the grape skins and seeds, are phenolic compounds involved in the quality of red wine. Anthocyanins are responsible for the color of red wine [41], while proanthocyanidins include different phenolic compounds comprised of flavan-3-ol monomer subunits and confer astringent and bitter properties [42] and play a role in long-term color stability [43,44]. In addition, musts obtained from Esca complex diseased vines show a reduction in sugars (up to 4%) with an increase in total acidity and assimilable nitrogen contents associated with a delayed ripening of berries and reduced photosynthesis [36,39,40].
In winemaking production, pure cultures of selected strains of yeast, sourced in the house or supplied from specific producing companies, are commonly used as starter cultures. The current study aimed to characterize the incidence of exopolysaccharide pullulan and the two pentaketides produced by P. minimum and P. chlamydospora on growth and enological parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Desm.) Meyen strains of enological interest using a synthetic must as substrate.

2. Results

2.1. Pullulan and Pentaketides Production, Extraction and Purification

Pc25 and Pm33 grown in CzMM as stationary liquid cultures revealed differences in growth rate, final pH and secondary metabolites production (Table 1).

2.2. Pullulan and Pentaketides Mix Interaction with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Strains

On synthetic must (Figure 2), strain Byosal HS1 reached 4.1 × 109 CFU mL−1, while 3.8 × 109 CFU mL−1 were counted for IOC 18-2007. Increasing concentrations of pullulan or pentaketides mix reduced the growth and viability of the two isolates until complete inhibition at 100 and 1000 µg mL−1.
Based on the results of growth experiments, the concentration of 10 µg mL−1 was selected to verify the effects of for both pullulan and pentaketides on the enological performance of Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007 (Table 2).
The pH, from the initial 3.4, was reduced in all the cultures considered (Table 2).
Utilized sugars (Table 2) were reduced in the presence of pentaketides mix. Pullulan did not affect sugar utilization from both tested strains.
The presence of pullulan and pentaketides mix reduced the percentage of ethanol produced (Table 2).
The ethanol yield (Table 2) was not significantly different from the two strains grown in the controls. Compared to control, strain IOC 18-2007 showed an insignificant higher overall when grown with pentaketides mix.
The presence of pullulan reduced total acidity (Table 2).
The volatile acidity (Table 2) was related to the substrate and the strain considered. Byosal HS1 grown in the presence of pullulan produced the lowest volatile acidity.
The initial content of tartaric acid (5 g L−1) was reduced especially in the media containing pullulan (Table 2).
Both strains utilized more than 50% of the malic acid present in the synthetic must (Table 2).
Lactic acid was produced by both strains (Table 2). Pullulan allowed the lower accumulation.
In the media performed as control fermented by strain Byosal HS1, the concentrations in total polyphenols were almost two times those of strain IOC 18-2007. The presence of pullulan and pentaketides mix almost halved the content of these substances in fermentations conducted with the Byosal HS1 strain in comparison with the control (Table 2).
Pullulan and pentaketides mix lowered the fermentation vigour of both S. cerevisiae strains (Table 2).

3. Discussion

The alcoholic fermentation of grape must is a biological process allowing the transformation of grape juice into wine. During fermentation, sugars contained in the must, by the action of yeast’s enzymes, are transformed into ethanol, carbon dioxide and a series of by-products that will compose the aromatic and gustatory qualities of the wine. Spontaneous alcoholic fermentation is initiated by a complex yeast community comprising the enological microbiome of berries (e.g., species of Torulopsis, Cryptococcus, Candida, Rhodotorula, Hanseniaspora, Kloeckera, Metschnikowia and Pichia). These yeasts are involved during the first 3–4 days, after which they die off, due to the rapid depletion of nutrients and oxygen, and the toxicity of the accumulation of ethanol and other metabolites [45,46]. Thereafter, Saccharomyces species, principally S. cerevisiae, dominate and complete the fermentation process. S. cerevisiae performed aerobic respiration of sugars to obtain CO2, H2O, ATP and, consequently, pyruvic acid, glycerol and other biochemical intermediates. As sugar degradation progresses and the oxygen concentration decreases, Saccharomyces cells activate their anaerobic metabolism useful to transform sugars into alcohol, CO2, glycerol, acetaldehyde, acetic acid (responsible for volatile acidity), ethyl acetate and other alcohols that determine the taste qualities of the wine [47]. To prevent the risk of sluggish or stuck fermentations and quality deterioration, selected indigenous or commercially available S. cerevisiae strains with excellent enological characteristics are added as starter cultures to drive the transformation of the musts to wines of high quality and stability.
During winemaking production, the fermentative activity of yeasts is influenced by the quality of the musts and by the presence of molecules produced by the activities of microorganisms associated with the berry, grape stalk, leaves and wood of the grape. Botrytis cinerea Pers. (teleomorph Botryotinia fuckeliana (de Bary) Whetzel), the causal agent of gray mold rots in wine and table grape vineyards, produce “botryticine” substances, heat-stable glycoproteins with molecular weights between 10 and 50,000 Da. These glycoproteins are accumulated in the berries and the must. Botryticine slows down fermentation kinetics and increases acetic acid and glycerol concentrations [48,49,50]. Microvinifications conducted with musts from vines affected by the Esca complex show qualitative differences compared to musts derived from noninfected vines [38,40].
In this study, the effects of the exopolysaccharide pullulan and two naphthalenone pentaketides, such as scytalone and isosclerone, on the growth and enological performances of two commercial strains of S. cerevisiae were evaluated in synthetic must. Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007, are universal and well-known commercial strains of S. cerevisiae suitable for the fermentation of all kinds of grape juice. These strains cope well under low pH and temperature in the range of 8–30 °C, utilize the sugar in the must without the production of undesirable compounds, such as acetaldehyde, and are resistant to ethanol and sulfur dioxide (https://www.enartis.com; https://ioc.eu.com, accessed on 29 July 2022).
Esca complex is associated with extensive wood necrosis in the trunk and branches through the development of pathogenic fungi [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The cultivar, pruning methods, climate conditions, nutritional status and vine physiology interfere with fungal colonization of the wood, lead to symptom expression on leaves and berries and made it difficult to individualize the diseased plants in the vineyard [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,14,22,23,24,30,31,32,33].
Pullulan, scytalone and isosclerone are phytotoxic secondary metabolites produced by P. minimum and P. chlamydospora the two most diffuse etiological agents of brown wood streaking, Petri disease and GLSD [25,26,27,51]. These three metabolites are found in wood, bleeding xylem sap and leaves of vines with symptoms of brown streaking associated with the Esca complex fungal pathogens [14,28,51]. Rachis, skin and pulp of ‘Italia’ vines naturally infected with P. chlamydospora, and P. minimum accumulated pullulan, scytalone and isosclerone [14]. Therefore, if these metabolites are present in berries of wine grapes, could be potentially found in the grape juice and must.
When bio-assayed, these secondary metabolites showed different degrees of phytotoxicity and are associated with fungal lifestyles [15,25,26,51]. Scytalone and isosclerone are also involved in the melanin biosynthesis pathway of P. chlamydospora, P. minimum, Verticillium dahliae Kleb., Berkeleyomyces basicola (Berk. & Broome) W.J. Nel, Z.W. de Beer, T.A. Duong & M.J. Wingf. (syn. Thielaviopsis basicola Berk. & Broome) Ferraris) and Pyricularia oryzae Cavara [26]. Pullulan is nontoxic, nonirritating, nonionic, blood compatible, biodegradable, nonmutagenic, nonimmunogenic and noncarcinogenic substance [52]. Moreover, pullulan can be used as an adhesive, it forms fibers and oxygen-impermeable films [53].
To avoid the presence of naturally compromise grape juice [39,40,48,50], including the presence of pullulan, scytalone and isosclerone in the berries, our experiments were conducted with synthetic must. Grape must composition moreover changes with the grape variety, ripeness stage, terroir characteristics, climate and viticultural factors [50]. In laboratory experiments, the use of natural grape must, to study yeast in enological variations, allows the best conditions [50]. However, data standardization and validation make it necessary to use synthetic must with defined composition [54,55].
Pullulan, scytalone and isosclerone are phytotoxins, or fungal secondary metabolites that exert toxicity against plants. Phytotoxins interfere with plant metabolisms, inhibit enzymatic activities, affect membrane integrity, disrupt mitochondrial functions, suppress defense responses and have an important role in the disease development. Some are phytotoxic only to the host plant susceptible to the pathogen (host-selective toxins); others exhibit general toxicities to both host and nonhost plants (non-host-selective toxins). Host- and non-host-selective toxins show distinct modes of action, target site and pathological role [15,56,57]. Phytotoxins also have unique and intriguing biological and chemical properties. For example, phytotoxic secondary metabolites produced by fungal plant pathogens have pharmaceutical potential as anticancer agents [58,59], potential use as agricultural pesticides, herbicides or antimicrobials [60].
Here we demonstrate toxic effects of these substances against other fungal species (S. cerevisiae).
The data obtained in the microvinifications conducted in this study shows that pullulan and the pentaketides mix (scytalone and isosclerone in a 9:1 w/w ratio) influence the growth and metabolism of the two tested S. cerevisiae strains.
Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007, responded differently in the growth tests according to their metabolic activity. Overall, biomass formation was correlated with the duration of the lag phase and the exponential growth rate was correlated with the fermentation time that characterizes the considered strain. At the end of the experiments performed in the control flasks with synthetic must alone, Byosal HS1 showed a growth rate greater than 6.1% of strain IOC 18-2007. Regarding the presence of pullulan and the pentaketides mix in the media, no effects were recorded when evaluated at 1 and 5 µg mL−1. Assayed at 100 and 1000 µg mL−1 these substances inhibit, while at 10 µg mL−1 significantly reduce the growth rate both S. cerevisiae strains evaluated.
Based on these data, the concentration of 10 µg mL−1 for both pullulan and pentaketides mix, was selected to perform microfermentations suitable to verify the effects on the enological performance of both S. cerevisiae strains.
At the end of the microvinification differences were recorded in the enological behaviour of the two strains assessed as a function of the media (control, with pullulan and with pentaketides mix) considered.
In control media, no differences were recorded in ethanol production between the two strains. The presence of pullulan reduced the ethanol production in both strains, while the scytalone–isosclerone mix significantly reduced ethanol production only with the Byosal HS1 strain. It is evident that sugar metabolism has not been directed towards the production of ethanol via fermentation but has been used in other pathways. With high glucose concentrations in the substrate (over 9 g·L−1), S. cerevisiae metabolizes sugars only by fermentation, as there is repression (Crabtree effect) in the synthesis of mitochondrial enzymes and consequent degeneration of these organelles or with high glycerol presence [48,61,62]. The data of the microfermentations conducted in this study allow us to hypothesize that pentaketides and pullulan have “shifted” the transformation of sugars in glycerol–pyruvic fermentation. From the glycerol–pyruvic pathway, S. cerevisiae regenerates NAD+, produces ethanol, glycerol (as a protector against high osmotic pressures), succinic acid, acetic acid, diacetyl, acetoin, 2,3-butanediol, ethanal (also called acetaldehyde), higher alcohols and two types of esters: the acetates of higher alcohols and the esters of fatty acids. The acetates of higher alcohols give off different odors, such as glue (ethyl acetate), banana (isoamyl acetate) or rose (phenyl ethanol acetate). The esters of fatty acids give off a fruity aroma [63,64]. Because of this shift, a reduction in ethanol yield was recorded in the microfermentations of strain Byosal HS1 conducted with the presence of pullulan and pentaketides mix. Less sensitive to these fungal secondary metabolites was the strain IOC 18-2007.
In all the microvinification, the initial pH was adjusted to 3.4 with NaOH [55]. At the end of fermentations, a reduction in the pH was recorded. In general, the pH of the wine is between 2.8 and 3.8, while in the fermentations conducted here it also reaches values of 2.4. Wine acidity conditions freshness, tartness and crisp taste.
While pH measures the concentration of H+ ions and is a ripeness indicator and it influences the sensory properties of wine [65], total acidity considers all the acids in wine, both fixed organic and volatile acids and titratable acidity reflects the acidity assessed by titration with a strong base to a fixed pH of 8.2. The predominant acids that generally occur in the grape and are present in must and wine are tartaric and malic acid, while citric, acetic, succinic and lactic acids will be produced during fermentation [66].
Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007 grown in the presence of pullulan reduce the concentration of tartaric acid. S. cerevisiae is considered unable to use tartaric acid [46]. The decrease in this compound recorded in our experiments could be due to a chemical–physical effect associated with pullulan presence that could react with tartaric acid and lower its solubility [53]. Tartaric acid precipitates in all wines at the end of fermentation, when as potassium salt, it becomes insoluble in alcohol. This is not a problem for wine consumers. From the fermentation vats to the bottle decanting, filtration, clarification and stabilization steps bring wine stability and warrant the absence of precipitates [50]. In this study, the wines were analyzed at the end of fermentation and were not stabilized. Of modest importance is the reduction in tartaric acid noted for the two isolates in the control theses and in the presence of pentaketides mix which could be due to spontaneous precipitation.
Of particular interest is the reduction in malic acid recorded in microfermentations conducted in the presence of pullulan. Predominantly, the Gram-positive bacterial species Oenococcus oeni (Garvie) Dicks completes the malolactic fermentation by the conversion of malic acid into lactic acid, while this possibility is reduced in the malo-ethanolic pathway conducted by S. cerevisiae [67].
Lactic acid is a by-product of fermentation obtained by reducing pyruvic acid by the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase. In microvinifications with pullulan, both strains slowed down the production of this organic acid compared to the controls and the presence of pentaketides mix. This is probably associated with a reduction in the activity of the enzymes involved in this metabolic pathway.
Acetic acid is the main component of volatile acidity. The concentration of this organic acid during alcoholic fermentation varied with yeast species and strains, the composition of the must and physical factors [68,69]. Acetic acid production by S. cerevisiae occurs during the fermentation of the first 50–100 g·L−1 of sugar, then decreases and increases slightly at the end of fermentation [70]. Anaerobiosis, low pH (<3.1) and high pH (>4.0), certain amino acid or vitamin deficiencies in the must, also favoring the production of acetic acid by S. cerevisiae. In this study, the two strains used produce different amounts of acetic acid. The minor concertation of this organic acid was recorded for the Byosal HS1 strain in the synthetic media containing pullulan. This exopolysaccharide may have reduced the metabolism that leads to the production of acetic acid, or vice versa intensified its degradation.
The fermentation vigour, the speed at which yeast starts the fermentation, is expressed as grams of CO2 produced during the first 2–3 days after fermentation [71]. Higher values of fermentation vigour indicate greater weight loss due to the amount of CO2 produced and released by the Müller trap. Compared to the controls, the presence of pullulan and pentaketides mix reduced fermentation vigour in both tested strains. Values of fermentation vigour recorded from other commercial and indigenous S. cerevisiae starter strains are in the range of 3.30–4.47 [72]. The presence of pullulan, and especially pentaketides mix, reduce the fermentation vigour, indicating a low adaptation ability to the growth conditions.
A separate discussion deserves the content in total polyphenols. In wine, especially red wine, phenolic compounds contribute to its sensory, antioxidant and pharmacological characteristics. Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites present in grapes and wine that can be formed and transformed during the winemaking process.
In microorganisms, the pentose phosphate pathway plays a key role in the synthesis of aromatic acids: crucial components for protein biosynthesis and precursors of phenolic compounds, vitamins and cofactors. S. cerevisiae utilizes DAHP synthase (EC 4.1.2.15) to synthesize the aromatic ring from glucose [66]. Under the control conditions, the strain IOC 18-2007 produces low polyphenols than Byosal HS1. Compared to control, strain Byosal HS1 shows a reduction of 41,8 and 44,4% when grown on synthetic must amended with pullulan and pentaketides mix, respectively. Regarding strain IOC 18-2007, the presence of pullulan reduced polyphenols concentration (about 5%), while the pentaketides mix induce a low (4.5%) increment. These variations could be related to 1) the production of enzymes that hydrolyze anthocyanins; 2) the release of polysaccharides capable of binding polyphenols; 3) the adsorption of anthocyanins on the yeast wall [73,74,75].
Finally, we would like to point out a drawback of this study in the light of the interpretation and generalization of the obtained results. Because of the small number of repetitions and the use of synthetic must alone, the results should be treated with caution. Further tests are needed to verify the universality of the obtained findings, with a wider range of S. cerevisiae indigenous or commercially available isolates, species of enological interest (e.g., species of Torulopsis, Cryptococcus, Candida, Rhodotorula, Hanseniaspora, Kloeckera, Metschnikowia, Pichia and other components of berry’s microbiome) and well characterized natural must. However, data collected in this study point out the attention on the possible enological effects associated with the presence of scytalone, isosclerone and pullulan.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains

Two commercial strains of S. cerevisiae [Byosal HS1 (Esseco s.r.l.—Divisione Enartis San Martino, Trecate NO, Italy) and IOC 18-2007 (Institut OEnologique de Champagne, Epernay Cedex, France)] were selected on the bases of their well-known enological properties. Both strains produce high-quality wines, work at low pH, in the range of 8–30 °C, are resistant to sulfur dioxide and tolerate over 15% of alcohol (https://www.enartis.com; https://ioc.eu.com, accessed on 29 July 2022).
Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-were rehydrated and kept as stock cultures at 4 °C on Yeast Peptone Dextrose Agar (YPDA: 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 2% Technical agar N° 3 from Oxoid Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific—Microbiology, Hampshire, UK) for short-term storage. Fresh cultures of each yeast were grown in YPD broth (pH 6.5) at 25 ± 1 °C, for 24 h in orbital agitation (120 rpm). Cells were collected by centrifugation (Thermo Scientific SL8R centrifuge; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 3500 g for 15 min, resuspended in YPD broth added with 25% (v/v) glycerol and stored at −80 °C before use.
Stock cultures of P. chlamydospora strain Pc25 and P. minimum strain Pm33, isolated from Esca-affected grapevines cv Sangiovese in Valenzano (Bari, Italy), were stored on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) slant tubes at 4 °C and routinely grown on PDA at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark.

4.2. Production, Extraction and Purification of Secondary Metabolites

Pc25 and Pm33 were grown in stationary liquid cultures in 1 L Roux flasks containing 150 mL Oxoid Czapek Dox Medium Modified (CzMM) with 0.1% Oxoid yeast extract and 0.1% Oxoid malt extract, pH 5.7 at 25 ± 1 °C for 28 days in the dark. At harvest, the mycelial mat was removed by filtration on Miracloth (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA) and the filtrate was centrifuged (Thermo Scientific SL8R centrifuge) at 8 000× g, 4 ± 1 °C for 20 min [25,27]. The mycelial mat was drained on filter paper, weighed to record fresh weight and dried at 70 ± 2 °C for 48 h to measure mycelial dry weight.
For pentaketides extractions, culture filtrates (3 liters per strain) were brought to pH 4 with 1N HCl and extracted 4 times with ethyl acetate (1.5 liters each). The combined organic extracts were dried on anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporated under reduced pressure. Separation was performed on preparative TLC [25]. Each TLC band was scraped off, dissolved in methanol and analyzed with a Prominence Shimadzu liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with DGU-20A online degassing unit, CBM-20A system controller, LC-20A solvent delivery unit, CTO-20A column oven, SPD-20A UV-VIS detector settled at 280 nm and a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) Nova-Pak C18 (150 × 3.9 mm i.d., 4 mm particle diameter) analytical column, following a previous procedure [14]. To avoid the loss of considerable amounts of scytalone and isosclerone, these two metabolites were tested together using the mixture in the ratio of 9:1 (w/w; scytalone/isosclerone) as a combination of Pm33 and Pc25 productions (scytalone 23.0 + 13.0 mg L−1 and isosclerone 1.5 + 2.5 mg L−1).
For pullulan extractions, culture filtrates (3 liters per strain) were treated with two volumes of cold absolute ethanol [27]. Each precipitate was filtered through Whatman GFC filters, dried, lyophilized, washed three times with 10 mL of cold methanol and weighed. HPLC analyses were performed on a Prominence Shimadzu liquid chromatograph equipped with a Waters differential refractometer (model 410), and a 1000 Å Nucleogel GFC (300 × 7.7 mm i.d., Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) column [27].

4.3. Pullulan and Pentaketides Mix Interaction with S. Cerevisiae Strains

Fermentations were conducted by inoculating the selected species in synthetic grape juice medium according to the OIV-OENO Resolution 370-2012 [76] using analytical grade chemicals purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (a part of Merck Corporation, Burlington, MA, USA). D-glucose and D-fructose (115 g L−1 each) were used as carbon sources. The available nitrogen was provided by 100 mg L−1 (NH4)2HPO4 and by a mixture of 19 amino acids (89 mg L−1 aspartic acid, 126 mg L−1 glutamic acid, 26 mg L−1 alanine, 188 mg L−1 arginine, 39 mg L−1 asparagine, 126 mg L−1 proline, 39 mg L−1 phenylalanine, 14 mg L−1 glycine, 51 mg L−1 glutamine, 51 mg L−1 isoleucine, 39 mg L−1 histidine, 76 mg L−1 leucine, 63 mg L−1 lysine, 39 mg L−1 methionine, 101 mg L−1 serine, 6.00 mg L−1 tyrosine, 89 mg L−1 threonine, 51 mg L−1 valine, 26 mg L−1 tryptophan). Salts solution contained 1.14 g L−1 K2HPO4, 1.23 g L−1 MgSO4∙7H2O, 0.44 g L−1 CaCl2∙2H2O, 198.2 µg L−1 MnCl2∙4H2O, 135.5 µg L−1 ZnCl2, 13.6 µg L−1 CuCl2, 32.0 µg L−1 FeCl2, 5.7 µg L−1 H3BO3, 29.1 µg L−1 Co(NO)3∙6H2O, 24.2 µg L−1 NaMoO4∙2H2O, 10.8 µg L−1 KIO3. Organic acids (5.00 g L−1 potassium tartrate, 0.20 g L−1 citric acid, 3.00 g L−1 L-malic acid), vitamins (20 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 0.40 mg L−1 pyridoxine hydrochloride, 0.40 mg L−1 nicotinic acid, 0.20 mg L−1 calcium pantothenate, 0.10 mg L−1 thiamine hydrochloride, 0.04 mg L−1 p-aminobenzoic acid, 0.04 mg L−1 riboflavin, 0.03 mg L−1 biotin, 0.04 mg L−1 folic acid), 10 mg L−1 ergosterol and 0.5 mL L−1 tween 80 were also added. The pH was adjusted to 3.4 using NaOH [57]. Concentrated solutions of each compound were prepared, filtered through 0.22 µm nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore filter, type GSWP) and added in adequate amounts before S. cerevisiae inoculations.

4.3.1. Effects on Growth

Pullulan and pentaketides mix (scytalone/isosclerone 9:1/w/w) solutions were tested at 1, 5, 10, 100 and 1000 µg mL−1 of synthetic must. Yeast inoculation was standardized at 4 × 104 cells mL−1 starting concentration. All fermentations were conducted in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with a cotton cap at 20 ± 1 °C under 12 rpm of orbital shaking in a GFL 3020 shaker (Helago, Kladská, CZ) for 18 days. Yeast cultures grown on synthetic must without pullulan and pentaketides mix were used as control.
Yeast growth and viability were determined every 3 days by counting colony-forming units (CFU) after decimal dilution with YPD broth on YPDA solid medium.
All experiments were performed at least two times, each with three replicates.

4.3.2. Effects on Enological Parameters

Based on the results obtained during the previous experiments, the concentration of 10 µg mL−1 for both pullulan and pentaketides mix was selected to perform new microfermentations suitable to verify the effects on the enological performance of both S. cerevisiae strains.
Microfermentations were achieved in 100 mL of synthetic must in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks using 1 × 106 CFU mL−1 of each S. cerevisiae strain as starting concentration at 20 °C with 12 rpm orbital shaking for 18 days.
Sugars, tartaric, malic, lactic and acetic acid and a total polyphenol concentration at the end of fermentation, were ascertained with a Hyperlab wine analyzer (Stereoglass S.r.l. San Martino in Campo, Perugia, Italy).
The pH of the wine was measured using a Basic 20 pH-meter with a glass XS Foodtrode Electrode.
The total titratable acidity was measured by titrating each wine sample against 0.1 M NaOH using Bromothymol blue as the indicator and expressed as g L−1 of tartaric acid.
The ethanol content was determined using a Gibertini Digital Distilling Unit (Gibertini Elettronica s.r.l., Novate Milanese, Milano, Italy) following the OIV-MA-AS312-01B method [77].
Ethanol yield was calculated as the ratio between ethanol concentration (g L−1) and sugar consumed (g L−1).
The fermentation vigour was investigated according to the OIV-OENO Resolution, 370-2012 [76] in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks sealed with a Müller trap, containing 100 mL of synthetic must alone or amended with pullulan or pentaketides mix at 10 µg mL−1. Before inoculation, yeasts were grown for 24 h in a YEPD medium to obtain the mother culture. Flasks, inoculated with 1 × 106 CFU mL−1, were incubated at 20°C, under 12 rpm orbital shaking, for 48 h. The fermentation vigour was expressed as grams of CO2 (calculated as 2.5 ×·Δ weight) evolved by 100 mL of substrate [71].

4.4. Statistical Analysis

For each analyzed parameter, the mean and the standard deviation (sd) were calculated. Data were preliminarily subjected to Shapiro–Wilk’s test and Levene’s test to verify the normality of the distribution and the homoscedasticity of variances, respectively. Subsequently, the variance analysis (ANOVA) with a 95% confidence level and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) were performed. All statistical tests were conducted using SAS software version 9.0 for Windows.

5. Conclusions

In the awareness that in field conditions the effective concentrations of pullulan and naphthalenone pentaketides (scytalone and isosclerone) used in this study, have reduced chances of being reached in the berries and must, it seems reasonable to consider the results commented here in the light of their possible enological effects. Negative is the reduction in total acidity that would bring undesirable effects on the quality of wines, especially white ones. A reduction in the vitality of the yeast population could affect the organoleptic characteristics of the wine. Positive is the reduction of the alcohol content, following the trends of the market that requires wines that are not excessively alcoholic. Pullulan could be applied at the end of fermentation to reduce the concentration of tartaric acid and tartaric instabilities and improve the appearance of the wine. Further data are needed to confirm and validate the enological performance in freshly pressed grape juice. It would be interesting to evaluate the effects of pullulan, scytalone and isosclerone on the yeasts present in the grapes (e.g., Candida zemplinina Sipiczki, Candida stellata (Kroemer & Krumbholz) S.A. Mey. & Yarrow, Metschnikowia pulcherrima Pitt & M.W. Mill., Kloeckera apiculata (Reess) Janke, Pichia spp.) to reduce the use of antimicrobial products such as sulfites and candidate, especially the pullulan, as a possible food additive for enological use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and G.L.B.; methodology, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M. (Francesco Mazzone), M.D. and A.D.M.; investigation, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M. (Francesco Mazzone), M.D. and A.D.M.; resources, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M (Francesco Mazzone)., M.D. and A.D.M.; data curation, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M (Francesco Mazzone)., M.D. and A.D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M (Francesco Mazzone)., M.D. and A.D.M.; writing—review and editing, G.L.B., L.S., F.M. (Francesco Mannerucci), F.M. (Francesco Mazzone), M.D. and A.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kenfaoui, J.; Radouane, N.; Mennani, M.; Tahiri, A.; El Ghadraoui, L.; Belabess, Z.; Fontaine, F.; El Hamss, H.; Amiri, S.; Lahlali, R.; et al. A panoramic view on Grapevine Trunk Diseases threats: Case of Eutypa dieback, Botryosphaeria dieback, and Esca disease. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mondello, V.; Songy, A.; Battiston, E.; Pinto, C.; Coppin, C.; Trotel-Aziz, P.; Clément, C.; Mugnai, L.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1189–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hofstetter, V.; Buyck, B.; Croll, D.; Viret, O.; Couloux, A.; Gindro, K. What if esca disease of grapevine were not a fungal disease? Fungal Divers. 2012, 54, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bruno, G.L.; Ippolito, M.P.; Mannerucci, F.; Bragazzi, L.; Tommasi, F. Physiological responses of ‘Italia’ grapevines infected with Esca pathogens. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perez-Gonzalez, G.; Sebestyen, D.; Petit, E.; Jellison, J.; Mugnai, L.; Gelhaye, E.; Lee, N.; Farine, S.; Bertsch, C.; Goodell, B. Oxygen Radical-Generating Metabolites Secreted by Eutypa and Esca Fungal Consortia: Understanding the Mechanisms Behind Grapevine Wood Deterioration and Pathogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 921961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Graniti, A.; Surico, G.; Mugnai, L. Esca of grapevine: A disease complex or a complex of diseases? Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Surico, G. Towards a redefinition of the diseases within the esca complex of grapevine. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2009, 48, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bertsch, C.; Ramírez-Suero, M.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Larignon, P.; Chong, J.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Spagnolo, A.; Clément, C.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: Complex and still poorly understood. Plant Pathol. 2012, 62, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mugnai, L.; Graniti, A.; Surico, G. Esca (Black Measles) and brown wood-streaking: Two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Dis. 1999, 83, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chervin, J.; Romeo-Oliván, A.; Fournier, S.; Puech-Pages, V.; Dumas, B.; Jacques, A.; Marti, G. Modification of Early Response of Vitis vinifera to Pathogens Relating to Esca Disease and Biocontrol Agent Vintec® Revealed by Untargeted Metabolomics on Woody Tissues. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 835463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fischer, M. A new wood-decaying basidomycete species associated with esca of grapevine: Fomitiporia mediterranea (Hymenochaetales). Mycol. Prog. 2002, 1, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fischer, M. Biodiversity and geographic distribution of basidiomycetes causing esca-associated white rot in grapevine: A worldwide perspective. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spasova, M.; Manolova, N.; Rashkov, I.; Naydenov, M. Eco-Friendly Hybrid PLLA/Chitosan/Trichoderma asperellum Nanomaterials as Biocontrol Dressings against Esca Disease in Grapevines. Polymers 2022, 14, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L.; Graniti, A. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L.: IV. Diffusion through the xylem of metabolites produced by two tracheiphilous fungi in the woody tissue of grapevine leads to esca-like symptoms on leaves and berries. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 71, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andolfi, A.; Mugnai, L.; Luque, J.; Surico, G.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A. Phytotoxins produced by fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases. Toxins 2011, 3, 1569–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lecomte, P.; Darrieutort, G.; Liminana, J.M.; Comont, G.; Muruamendiaraz, A.; Legorburu, F.-J.; Choueiri, E.; Jreijiri, F.; El Amil, R.; Fermaud, M. New insights into esca of grapevine: The development of foliar symptoms and their association with xylem discoloration. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amalfitano, C.; Evidente, A.; Surico, G.; Tegli, S.; Bertelli, E.; Mugnai, L. Phenols and stilbene polyphenols in the wood of esca-diseased grapevines. Phytopathol. Mediter. 2000, 39, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
  18. Amalfitano, C.; Agrelli, D.; Arrigo, A.; Mugnai, L.; Surico, G.; Evidente, A. Stilbene Polyphenols in the brown red wood of Vitis vinifera cv. sangiovese affected by “Esca Proper”. Phytopathol. Mediter. 2011, 50, S224–S235. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lima, M.R.M.; Felgueiras, M.L.; Cunha, A.; Chicau, G.; Ferreres, F.; Dias, A.C.P. Differential phenolic production in leaves of Vitis vinifera cv. alvarinho affected with esca disease. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 112, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lima, M.R.M.; Machado, A.F.; Gubler, W.D. Metabolomic study of chardonnay grapevines double stressed with esca-associated fungi and drought. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lima, M.R.M.; Felgueiras, M.L.; Graca, G.; Rodrigues, J.E.A.; Barros, A.; Gil, A.M.; Dias, A.C. NMR metabolomics of Esca disease-affected Vitis vinifera cv. Alvarinho leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4033–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Calzarano, F.; Amalfitano, C.; Seghetti, L.; Cozzolino, V. Nutritional status of vines affected with esca proper. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2009, 48, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Calzarano, F.; Di Marco, S.; D’agostino, V.; Schiff, S.; Mugnai, L. Grapevine leaf stripe disease symptoms (esca complex) are reduced by a nutrients and seaweed mixture. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2014, 53, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Calzarano, F.; Di Marco, S. Further evidence that calcium, magnesium and seaweed mixtures reduce grapevine leaf stripe symptoms and increase grape yield. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Evidente, A.; Sparapano, L.; Andolfi, A.; Bruno, G. Two naphthalenone pentaketides isolated from liquid cultures of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, a fungus associated with esca disease syndrome. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fkyerat, C.; Dubin, G.-M.; Tabacchi, R. Phytotoxins from fungi of esca of grapevine. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L.: I. Characterization of secondary metabolites in culture media and host responses to the pathogens in calli. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 69, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L.: II. Characterization of biomolecules in xylem sap and leaves of healthy and diseased vines. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 69, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luini, E.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Rousseau, L.; Roblin, G.; Berjeaud, J. Inhibitory effects of polypeptides secreted by the grapevine pathogens Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum on plant cell activities. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 74, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Petit, A.N.; Vaillant, N.; Boulay, M.; Clement, C.; Fontaine, F. Alteration of photosynthesis in grapevines affected by esca. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 1060–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Magnin-Robert, M.; Letousey, P.; Spagnolo, A.; Rabenoelina, F.; Jacquens, L.; Mercier, L.; Clément, C.; Fontaine, F. Leaf strip of esca induces alteration of photosynthesis and defence reactions in presymptomatic leaves. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 856–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Valtaud, C.; Thibault, F.; Larignon, P.; Berstch, C.; Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Bourbouloux, A. Systemic damage in leaf metabolism caused by esca infection in grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2011, 17, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fontaine, F.; Pinto, C.; Vallet, J.; Clément, C.; Gomes, A.C.; Spagnolo, A. The effects of grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) on vine physiology. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 144, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Calzarano, F.; D’Agostino, V.; Pepe, A.; Osti, F.; Della Pelle, F.; De Rosso, M.; Flamini, R.; Di Marco, S. Patterns of phytoalexins in the grapevine leaf stripe disease (esca complex)/grapevine pathosystem. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2016, 55, 410–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Calzarano, F.; Osti, F.; D’Agostino, V.; Pepe, A.; Di Marco, S. Mixture of calcium, magnesium and seaweed affects leaf phytoalexin contents and grape ripening on vines with grapevine leaf stripe disease. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2017, 56, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Calzarano, F.; Osti, F.; D’Agostino, V.; Pepe, A.; Della Pelle, F.; De Rosso, M.; Flamini, R.; Di Marco, S. Levels of phytoalexins in vine leaves with different degrees of grapevine leaf stripe disease symptoms (Esca complex of diseases). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2017, 56, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fischer, M.; Peighami Ashnaei, S. Grapevine, esca complex, and environment: The disease triangle. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2019, 58, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Songy, A.; Fernandez, O.; Clément, C.; Larignon, P.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases under thermal and water stresses. Planta 2019, 249, 1655–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Calzarano, F.; Seghetti, L.; Del Carlo, M.; Cichelli, A. Effect of esca on the quality of berries, musts and wines. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2004, 43, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lorrain, B.; Ky, I.; Pasquier, G.; Jourdes, M.; Guerin Dubrana, L.; Gény, L.; Rey, P.; Donèche, B.; Teissedre, P.-L. Effect of Esca disease on the phenolic and sensory attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes, musts and wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheynier, V.; Dueñas-Paton, M.; Salas, E.; Maury, C.; Souquet, J.-M.; Sarni-Manchado, P.; Fulcrand, H. Structure and Properties of Wine Pigments and Tannins. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006, 57, 298–305. [Google Scholar]
  42. Peleg, H.; Gacon, K.; Schlich, P.; Noble, A.C. Bitterness and astringency of flavan-3-ol monomers, dimers and trimers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Somers, T.C. The polymeric nature of wine pigments. Phytochemistry 1971, 10, 2175–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vivar-Quintana, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Francia-Aricha, E.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C. Formation of anthocyanin-derived pigments in experimental red wines. Food Sci Technol Int. 1999, 5, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Regueiro, L.A.; Costas, C.L.; Rubio, J.E.L. Influence of viticultural and enological practices on the development of yeast populations during winemaking. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1993, 44, 405–408. [Google Scholar]
  46. Martini, A.; Vaughan-Martini, A. Grape Must Fermentation: Past and Present. In Yeast Technology; Spencer, J.F.T., Spencer D., M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990; pp. 105–123. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fleet, G.H. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 86, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ribéreau-Gayon, J.; Peynaud, E.; Lafourcade, S. The formation of fermentation inhibitory substances by Botrytis cinerea. C. R. Acad. Sci. D Nat. 1952, 234, 478–480. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ribéreau-Gayon, P.; Lafon-Lafourcade, S.; Dubourdieu, D.; Lucmaret, V.; Larue, F. Métabolisme de Saccharomyces cerevisiae dans les moûts de raisins parasites par Botrytis cinerea. Inhibition de la fermentation; formation d’acide acetique et de glycerol. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D Nat. 1979, 289, 441–444. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ribereau-Gayon, P.; Dubourdieu, D.; Donèche, B.; Lonvaud, A. The Chemistry of Wine. In Handbook of Enology, the Microbiology of Wine and Vinifications; Ribereau-Gayon, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2006; pp. 1–228. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sparapano, L.; Bruno, G.; Graniti, A. Effects on plants of metabolites produced in culture by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum, P. aleophilum and Fomitiporia punctata. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kimoto, T.; Shibuya, T.; Shiobara, S. Safety studies of a novel starch, pullulan: Chronic toxicity in rats and bacterial mutagenicity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1997, 35, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Leathers, T.D. Pullulan. In Biopolymers. Polysaccharides II: Polysaccharides from Eukariotes; Vandamme, E.J., De Baets, S., Steinbüchel, A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; Volume 6, pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rossouw, D.; Jolly, N.; Jacobson, D.; Bauer, F.F. The effect of scale on gene expression: Commercial versus laboratory wine fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012, 4, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Viana, T.; Loureiro-Dias, M.C. Prista Efficient fermentation of an improved synthetic grape must by enological and laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express 2014, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Graniti, A. Phytotoxins and their involvement in plant diseases. Experientia 1991, 47, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pontes, J.G.M.; Fernandes, L.S.; Dos Santos, R.V.; Tasic, L.; Fill, T.P. Virulence Factors in the Phytopathogen–Host Interactions: An Overview. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7555–7570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mathieu, V.; Superchi, S.; Masi, M.; Scafato, P.; Kornienko, A.; Evidente, A. In Vitro Effects of Fungal Phytotoxins on Cancer Cell Viability: First Insight into Structure Activity Relationship of a Potent Metabolite of Cochliobolus australiensis Radicinin. Toxins 2022, 14, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yuan, S.; Gopal, J.V.; Ren, S.; Chen, L.; Liu, L.; Gao, Z. Anticancer fungal natural products: Mechanisms of action and biosynthesis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 202, 112502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, D.; Xue, M.; Shen, Z.; Jia, X.; Hou, X.; Lai, D.; Zhou, L. Phytotoxic Secondary Metabolites from Fungi. Toxins 2021, 13, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Belinchón, M.M.; Gancedo, J.M. Glucose controls multiple processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through diverse combinations of signaling pathways. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gancedo, J.M. The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 673–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zamora, F. Biochemistry of Alcoholic Fermentation. In Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry; Moreno-Arribas, M.V., Polo, M.C., Eds.; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  64. Del Mónaco, S.; Barda, N.; Rubio, N.; Caballero, A. Selection and characterization of a Patagonian Pichia kudriavzevii for wine deacidification. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Godden, P.; Wilkes, E.; Johnson, D. Trends in the composition of Australian wine 1984–2014. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2015, 21, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zoecklin, B.W.; Fugelsang, K.C.; Gump, B.H.; Nury, F.S. Hydrogen Ion (pH) and Fixed Acids. In Wine Analysis and Production; Zoecklin, B.W., Fugelsang, K.C., Gump, B.H., Nury, F.S., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 76–88. [Google Scholar]
  67. Redzepovic, S.; Orlic, S.; Majdak, A.; Kozina, B.; Volschenk, H.; Viljoen-Bloom, M. Differential malic acid degradation by selected strains of Saccharomyces during alcoholic fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 83, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shimazu, Y.; Watanabe, M. Effects of yeast strains and environmental conditions on formation of organic acid in must during fermentation. J. Ferment. Technol. 1981, 59, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  69. Delfini, C.; Costa, A. Effects of the grape must lees and insoluble materials on the alcoholic fermentation rate and on the production of acetic acid, pyruvic acid and acetaldehyde. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1993, 44, 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  70. Vasserot, Y.; Mornet, F.; Jeandet, P. Acetic acid removal by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation in enological conditions. Metabolic consequences. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vigentini, I.; Barrera Cardenas, S.; Valdetara, F.; Faccincani, M.; Panont, C.A.; Picozzi, C.; Foschino, R. Use of native yeast strains for in-bottle fermentation to face the uniformity in sparkling wine production. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Agarbati, A.; Canonico, L.; Ciani, M.; Comitini, F. Fitness of Selected Indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for White Piceno DOC Wines Production. Fermentation 2018, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chrzanowski, G. Saccharomyces Cerevisiae-An Interesting Producer of Bioactive Plant Polyphenolic Metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mazza, G.; Fukumoto, L.; Delaquis, P.; Girard, B.; Ewert, B. Anthocyanins, phenolics, and color of Cabernet Franc, Merlot, and Pinot noir wines from British Columbia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4009–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Caridi, A.; Cufari, A.; Ramondino, D. Isolation and clonal pre-selection of enological Saccharomyces. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. OIV. OIV-OENO Resolution, 370-2012. Guidelines for the Characterization of Wine Yeasts of the Genus Saccharomyces Isolated from Vitivinicultural Environments. Available online: https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/1429/oiv-oeno-370-2012-en.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2021).
  77. OIV. OIV-OENO Resolution, 377-2009. Alcoholic Strength by Volume. Available online: https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/5158/oiv-ma-as312-01a.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2021).
Figure 1. Structure formulae of scytalone (A), isosclerone (B) and pullulan (C).
Figure 1. Structure formulae of scytalone (A), isosclerone (B) and pullulan (C).
Plants 11 02277 g001
Figure 2. Growth curves of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains Byosal HS1 (—) and IOC 18-2007 (---) growth on synthetic must containing 0 (△), 1 (■), 5 (▲), 10 (◆), 100 (•) or 1000 (□) µg mL−1 of pullulan or pentaketides mix (scytalone/isosclerone; 9:1/w/w) during 18 days of fermentation (20 ± 1 °C, 12 rpm orbital shaking, in the dark). Values are the means of 2 experiments with 3 replicates ± sd. The vertical bars show the LSD value (p = 0.05). CFU = colony-forming units.
Figure 2. Growth curves of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains Byosal HS1 (—) and IOC 18-2007 (---) growth on synthetic must containing 0 (△), 1 (■), 5 (▲), 10 (◆), 100 (•) or 1000 (□) µg mL−1 of pullulan or pentaketides mix (scytalone/isosclerone; 9:1/w/w) during 18 days of fermentation (20 ± 1 °C, 12 rpm orbital shaking, in the dark). Values are the means of 2 experiments with 3 replicates ± sd. The vertical bars show the LSD value (p = 0.05). CFU = colony-forming units.
Plants 11 02277 g002
Table 1. Biomass, recorded as fresh and dry weight, final pH values and yield of secondary metabolites produced by Phaeoacremonium minimum (Pm33) and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (Pc25) grown 28 days on Czapek modified medium at 25 ± 2 °C in the dark 1.
Table 1. Biomass, recorded as fresh and dry weight, final pH values and yield of secondary metabolites produced by Phaeoacremonium minimum (Pm33) and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (Pc25) grown 28 days on Czapek modified medium at 25 ± 2 °C in the dark 1.
ParametersPm33Pc25
Biomass fresh weight (mg L−1)15.3 ± 0.1237.5 ± 0.37
Biomass dry weight (mg L−1)4.2 ± 0.026.8 ± 0.04
Final pH3.9 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.2
Ethyl acetate extracts (mg L−1)183.0 ± 12191.0 ± 10
Scytalone (mg L−1)23.0 ± 213.0 ± 1
Isosclerone (mg L−1)1.5 ± 0.32.5 ± 0.6
Ethanol precipitate (g L−1)6.5 ± 0.27.2 ± 0.5
Pullulan (mg L−1)430.83 ± 92982.4 ± 0.3
1 Values are the means of 2 experiments with 10 replicates ± sd.
Table 2. Enological performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007 grown on synthetic must (Con) and synthetic must amended with 10 µg mL−1 of pullulan (Pul) or pentaketides mix (scytalone/isosclerone; 9:1/w/w; P-Mx) 1.
Table 2. Enological performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains Byosal HS1 and IOC 18-2007 grown on synthetic must (Con) and synthetic must amended with 10 µg mL−1 of pullulan (Pul) or pentaketides mix (scytalone/isosclerone; 9:1/w/w; P-Mx) 1.
ParametersByosal HS1IOC 18-2007
ConPulP-MixConPulP-Mix
pH2.40 ± 0.1 a2.44 ± 0.1 a2.44 ± 0.1 a2.40 ± 0.1 a2.86 ± 0.1 b2.40 ± 0.1 a
Residual sugar (g L −1)0.1 ± 0.01 a0.4 ± 0.01 a14.79 ± 0.04 b0.29 ± 0.02 a0.12 ± 0.01 a35.31 ± 0.05 c
Utilized sugar (g L −1)229.93 ± 0.01 a229.61 ± 0.1 a215.21 ± 0.4 b229.71 ± 0.2 a229.92 ± 0.1 a194.69 ± 0.2 c
Ethanol (%)7.5 ± 0.1 a4.1 ± 0.1 c2.44 ± 0.1 d7.3 ± 0.1 a5.7 ± 0.1 b6.9 ± 0.1 a
Ethanol yield 20.32 ± 0.02 a0.17 ± 0.02 c0.11 ± 0.02 c0.31 ± 0.02 a0.24 ± 0.02 a0.35 ± 0.02 a
Titratable acidity (g L −1)10.27 ± 0.1 a6.6 ± 0.1 b9.82 ± 0.1 a10.05 ± 0.1 a7.5 ± 0.1 b9.75 ± 0.1 a
Acetic acid (volatile acidity) (g L −1)0.51 ± 0.01 a0.25 ± 0.02 c0.53 ± 0.02 a0.43 ± 0.02 b0.40 ± 0.01 b0.45 ± 0.01 b
Tartaric acid (g L −1)4.14 ± 0.07 a3.08 ± 0.02 b4.29 ± 0.03 a4.27 ± 0.03 a3.25 ± 0.01 b4.29 ± 0.08 a
L-malic acid (g L −1)1.46 ± 0.07 a0.95 ± 0.02 c1.43 ± 0.01 a1.45 ± 0.02 a1.05 ± 0.02 b1.51 ± 0.03 a
Lactic acid (g L −1)0.05 ± 0.02 a0.01 ± 0.001 b0.05 ± 0.001 a0.06 ± 0.001 a0.02 ± 0.001 b0.06 ± 0.001 a
Total polyphenols (mg L −1)464.04 ± 5.2 a269.88 ± 3.1 b257.91 ± 3.6 d261.75 ± 3.2 b248.88 ± 3.5 c273.63 ± 3.7 b
Fermentation vigour 33.17 ± 0.01 a0.35 ± 0.07 c0.01 ± 0.001 d3.16 ± 0.001 a1.35 ± 0.01 b0.09 ± 0.001 d
1 Values are mean ± sd. Data with different superscript letters within each row are significantly different (Fisher’s Least Significant Difference test; p = 0.05). 2 Expressed as g of ethanol produced per g of sugar consumed. 3 Evaluated at day 3 of fermentation as g of CO2 evolved by 100 mL of the substrate.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scarano, L.; Mazzone, F.; Mannerucci, F.; D’Amico, M.; Bruno, G.L.; Marsico, A.D. Preliminary Studies on the In Vitro Interactions Between the Secondary Metabolites Produced by Esca-Associated Fungi and Enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Plants 2022, 11, 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172277

AMA Style

Scarano L, Mazzone F, Mannerucci F, D’Amico M, Bruno GL, Marsico AD. Preliminary Studies on the In Vitro Interactions Between the Secondary Metabolites Produced by Esca-Associated Fungi and Enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Plants. 2022; 11(17):2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scarano, Leonardo, Francesco Mazzone, Francesco Mannerucci, Margherita D’Amico, Giovanni Luigi Bruno, and Antonio Domenico Marsico. 2022. "Preliminary Studies on the In Vitro Interactions Between the Secondary Metabolites Produced by Esca-Associated Fungi and Enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains" Plants 11, no. 17: 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172277

APA Style

Scarano, L., Mazzone, F., Mannerucci, F., D’Amico, M., Bruno, G. L., & Marsico, A. D. (2022). Preliminary Studies on the In Vitro Interactions Between the Secondary Metabolites Produced by Esca-Associated Fungi and Enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Plants, 11(17), 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop