Next Article in Journal
Seaweed Extracts as an Effective Gateway in the Search for Novel Antibiofilm Agents against Staphylococcus aureus
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomics Using the Enriched Arabidopsis Shoot Apex Reveals Developmental Priming Genes Involved in Plastic Plant Growth under Salt Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Computational and Experimental Studies of Anabasine Encapsulation by Beta-Cyclodextrin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Yield Components and Desirable Eating Quality of Two Wheat Genotypes Using Si and NanoSi Particles under Heat Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 17
10.3390/plants11172284
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 Gene (AvPR-1) with Induced Expression in Oat (Avena sativa L.) during Abiotic and Hormonal Stresses

by
Khalid A. AlHudaib
1,2,*,
Naimah Asid Alanazi
3,
Mouna Ghorbel
3,
Sherif Mohamed El-Ganainy
1,2 and
Faiçal Brini
4
1
Department of Arid Land Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2
Pests and Plant Diseases Unit, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Hail, P.O. Box 2440, Ha’il City 81451, Saudi Arabia
4
Laboratory of Biotechnology and Plant Improvement, Center of Biotechnology of Sfax, University of Sfax, P.O. Box 1177, Sfax 3018, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(17), 2284; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172284
Submission received: 6 August 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses Volume II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) plays crucial roles in regulating plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. This study aimed to isolate and characterize the first PR-1 (AvPR-1) gene in oat (Avena sativa L.). AvPR-1 presented conserved signal peptide motifs and core amino acid composition in the functional protein domains as the protein sequence of AvPR-1 presented 98.28%, 97.7%, and 95.4% identity with known PR1 proteins isolated from Triticum aestivum PRB1-2-like, Triticum dicoccoides PRB1-2-like, and Aegilops tauschii subsp. tauschii, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis showed that the AvPR-1 protein belongs to the CAP superfamily (PF00188). Secondary and 3D structure analyses of the AvPR-1 protein were also conducted, confirming sequence conservation of PR-1 among studied species. The AvPR-1 protein harbors a calmodulin-binding domain located in its C-terminal part as previously shown for its wheat homolog TdPR1.2. Moreover, gene expression analysis showed that AvPR-1 was induced in response to many abiotic and hormonal stresses especially in leaves after treatment for 48 h. This is the first study exhibiting the expression profiles of the AvPR-1 gene under different stresses in oat.

1. Introduction

Plants have developed different mechanisms to protect themselves from surrounding threats. These stimuli activate an array of defense mechanisms such as synthesis of antimicrobial molecules, hypersensitive response (HR), and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins [1]. The PR proteins are thermostable and protease-resistant components which have a relatively low molecular weight of ~5–43 kDa. Moreover, the PR genes are expressed in all plant organs. Interestingly, they constitute about 5–10% of the total proteins in leaves [2,3]. PR-1 proteins are rapidly activated upon plant exposure to different biotic and abiotic stresses and form about 2% of soluble proteins in cells after infection [4]. PR genes are implicated in plant response to pathogen attack [5], wounding, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid [6,7], and ethylene [8], suggesting that PR proteins are involved in plant adaptation to different environmental stresses. Those proteins have antiparasitic activities (fungi, bacteria, viruses, insects, and nematodes) [9,10]. PR proteins are also involved in plant maturation, flowering, and plant/seed/floral development as well as leaf senescence [11].
PR proteins have been classified into 17 different families based on their main properties [12,13]. The PR-1 protein family contains the most studied proteins, known as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), but their mode of action is still not well understood [12]. Depending on their isoelectric point, those proteins could be defined as acidic or alkaline. PR-1 proteins are generally secreted and accumulated in the extracellular/apoplastic space due to the presence of an N-terminal secretion peptide in their sequence, but many proteins could be also found in vacuoles [9]. Several PR-1 proteins have been isolated and characterized in monocot and dicot plant species such as tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; [14], tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; [15]), durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum; [7]), garlic (Allium sativum L.; [4]), and banana (Musa spp.; [16]). All known PR-1 proteins have a conserved cysteine-rich secretory protein, antigen-5, and pathogenesis-related-1 (CAP) domain. This domain typically folds into four α-helices and four β-sheets stabilized by disulfide bonds. Such unique structures are indispensable for their biological roles in response to different biotic and abiotic stresses [17,18,19]. In Allium sativum L., three different PR genes (PR1, PR3, and PR5 genes) are positive marks for garlic resistance to F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae [10]. Furthermore, it has been shown that garlic infection with different pathogenic fungi of the genus Fusarium induced the expression of different pathogen-related protein genes such as AsPR1 (AsPR1c, d, g, k) and AsPR2 (AsPR2b, AsPR5a, c) in roots and AsPR4 (AsPR4a(c), b) and AsPR2c in stems and cloves of both resistant and sensitive cultivars [4]. In sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids), 19 different PR-1 proteins were identified that respond to a wide range of stresses such as infection with Acidovorax avenae subsp. Avenae (Aaa), as well as other different abiotic stresses such as NaCl, PEG6000, and SA treatments [20]. In Arabidopsis, it has been shown that an ELF18-INDUCED LONG NONCODING RNA 1 (ELENA1) acts as a positive regulator of immune responsive genes during their transcription [21]. Moreover, ELENA1 is associated with mediator subunit 19a (MED19a) to enhance enrichment of the complex on the PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 (PR1) promoter, whereas FIBRILLARIN 2 (FIB2) is negative transcriptional regulator of many immune responsive genes, such as PR1. ELENA1 can dissociate the FIB2/MED19a complex. Thus, it releases FIB2 transcriptional regulator from the PR1 promoter and enhances PR1 expression [21]. SlPR-1, a tomato PR-1 protein, was induced after plant treatment with SA and infection with Meloidogyne incognita nematode [6]. In tomato, plant infection with Alternaria solani induced the expression of a pathogenesis-related protein-like protein gene (known as BG124298). This gene was upregulated 5.57-fold and 1.63-fold in a resistant and a susceptible genotype, respectively [22]. PR-1 genes also have crucial roles in response to abiotic stresses. In Triticum aestivum, it has been demonstrated that plant treatment with glycerol induced the expression of different genes such as pathogenesis-related (PR) genes (PR-1, PR-3, PR-10) and peroxidase [23]. In addition, TaPR-1-1 gene expression was induced by osmotic stresses, freezing, and salinity. Interestingly, overexpression of TaPR-1-1 positively regulated plant tolerance to those stresses in yeast and Arabidopsis [24]. Despite the extensive work on PR-1 proteins, little is known about their regulation. In Arabidopsis, it has been demonstrated that PR-1 promoter interacts with AtWRKY50 via its C-terminal part. AtWRKY50 is considered as the most effective WRKY activator of PR1 gene expression [25]. This interaction occurs simultaneously in presence of TGA2 or TGA5, and AtWRKY stimulates this binding [25]. The same result was also found in tobacco [26] and banana [27]. More recently, it has been demonstrated that durum wheat TdPR1.2 physically interacts in vitro with CaM/Ca2+ complex. This interaction enhances the catalytic activity of TdPR1.2, which is further enhanced in presence of Mn2+ cations [7]. Moreover, TdPR1.2 confers abiotic stress tolerance (salt, osmotic, and heavy metal stress) to E. coli [28].
Avena sativa plants are found all over the word. Those cereals are rich in health-promoting substances and can be used as animal feed, forage, and food [29,30]. Furthermore, oat is more resistant to salty soils compared to other cereals. Avena sativa is an important crop for improving plant adaptability to salty alkali soils [31]. Many studies investigated gas exchange [32], oxidative stress [33,34], and ions [32,33,34,35,36] of oat plants subjected to salt stress. Recently, it has been shown that application of exogenous Ca2+ can alleviate salt stress applied to oat grown in salty mediums [31] by conserving the stability and functions of the plasma membrane in cells [37]. Although an important number of gene families are implicated in the resistance and defense of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses, PR-1 genes have not been revealed in oat plants, and their biological functions remain largely unknown. In the present study, we isolated and characterized a novel PR-1 gene from oat (Avena sativa) and studied its tissue expression patterns in response to different abiotic and hormonal stresses. Our results provide new insights into the function of the A. sativa PR-1 gene, which can be used in breeding programs to increase the resistance to different abiotic stresses in cultivated Avena spp.

2. Results

2.1. AvPR1 Sequence Analysis

Sequence analysis of the AvPR-1 gene (GenBank OP132412) revealed an ORF length of 525 bp. Expasy tools analysis showed that the corresponding protein presented a size of 174 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 18.89 kDa and an isoelectrical point (pI) of 9.19 (Table 1). The aliphatic index (AI) was 63.45. This index reflects the relative number of hydrophobic residues. Finally, the GRAVY index of AvPR-1 was negative (−0.288), which means that AvPR-1 is predicted to be a hydrophobic protein [4]. All studied PR-1 proteins have a negative GRAVY index, which means that all those proteins are hydrophobic (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, different PR1 proteins isolated so far have a similar length (161–179 aa) and a predicted Mw of 17–19 kDa. The novel PR-1 protein is a basic protein as shown for many other PR-1 proteins isolated from other different species [7,15,16].
Next, analyses of the AvPR1 amino acid sequence were performed using the NCBI server. The result showed that AvPR1 belonged to the cysteine-rich secretory proteins, antigen-5 and pathogen-related protein-1 (CAP) superfamily; Figure 1a. AvPR1 protein contains a putative conserved SCP_PR-1-like domain (cd05381) of 135 aa (from aa 29 to aa 164 (pfam00188)). AvPR-1 harbors a caveolin-binding domain (CMB; 108–113; Figure 1b). CBM represents the putative sterol-binding domain identified in pathogen-related yeast 1 (PRY1) proteins [17]. Moreover, CAP-derived peptide (CAPE) with conserved residues was identified (154–160; Figure 1b) [38]. Such domains were previously identified in many PR-1 proteins from different species such as pepper, banana, soybean, and tomato [1,15,39,40].
The Signal P-5.0 database revealed the presence of a cleavage site between positions 24 and 25. In addition, signal peptide is found in the AvPR-1 structure. This site is the 8 aa Signal Peptide found in the N-terminal part of the AvPR-1 protein (positions 1–8; Figure 1b and Figure 2). Sequence analysis of the different studied proteins shown that those signatures are conserved among PR-1 proteins (Figure 2). Using the PONDR database, analysis showed a second site in the C-terminal part of AvPR-1 (173–174; Figure 2). The C-terminal locates signal peptides of basic PR-1 proteins, controlling protein transport into vacuoles [41] and is constitutively expressed by stress signals [1]. The same results were also found in TdPR1.2 [28]. The presence of the transmembrane region in the AvPR-1 sequence was also investigated using the PDONR database (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?TMHMM-2.0). The AvPR-1 sequence harbors a transmembrane region in the N-terminal part of the protein (6–24 aa, Figure 1b, Supplementary Figure S1). Overall, our results are coherent with some previously reported findings for other species [20,39,42]. A conserved calmodulin binding domain was mapped in the AvPR-1 structure using the calmodulin target database (data not shown). This domain is located at the C-terminal part of the protein. A similar domain was recently identified in the TdPR1.2 protein that can interact with calmodulins in a calcium-dependent manner [7].

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of AvPR-1

Different PR1 protein sequences isolated from different plant species were obtained from NCBI. Sequence analysis of those proteins using Cluster Omega revealed that those proteins are highly conserved and present an important sequence homology (Figure 2). The deduced protein sequence of AvPR1 shared a high similarity with other PR-1 proteins, ranging from 98.28% identity with bread wheat (Triticum aestivum PRB1-2-like, GenBank accession number XP_044433901.1) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum TdPR1.2 (GenBank accession no. MK570869.1) PR-1 proteins to 97.7% and 95.4% identity with PR1 proteins isolated from Triticum dicoccoides PRB1-2-like and Aegilops tauschii subsp. tauschii (GenBank: XP_020170282.1), respectively.
Moreover, phylogenetic tree analysis was performed using the same database through the neighbor-joining method. This resulted in five major clusters, viz. I, II, III, IV and V. As expected, PR1 proteins isolated from dicotyledonous plants were clustered into one group (group I, Figure 3a), whereas proteins isolated from monocotyledons were clustered into four groups. The second group is formed by proteins isolated from Phoenix dactylifera and Musa acuminate. The majority of proteins were clustered into group III, whereas AvPR1 protein was clustered with barley and Aegilops taushii proteins (cluster IV), suggesting an evolutionary conservation of those species and that oat protein may share a common ancestor with those proteins and could perform the same functions. In addition, the last group was formed by proteins isolated from three wheat plants (Figure 3a).
To create LOGO motifs of the AvPR-1 protein, MEME was run on the sequence database. The LOGO representations of the protein are shown in Figure 3b. Analysis showed 10 conserved domains in PR-1 protein sequences. Those motifs are conserved among studied species (Figure 3b, Supplementary Figure S2). As shown in Supplementary Figure S2, five domains (blue, red, green, cyan, and orange) are much conserved among studied PR-1 proteins. The SGDLSG motif (yellow) is found only in PR-1 isolated from dicotyledonous plants used in this work and absent in all monocotyledonous plants. The MNFTNYSRFLIVF motif (pink) was found only in four dicotyledonous plants.
Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification (PTM) controlling crucial cellular processes, such as signaling, transport, and nutrient uptake [43]. Thus, the number of putative phosphorylated sites was also investigated using the Notphos 3.1 server. AvPR-1 presented 12 putative phosphorylated residues (S3, S4, S7, S24, T28, T49, Y61, S86, S89, S98, S130, and T131, Supplementary Figure S3). Such a result may prove that AvPR-1 is phosphorylated in cells in response to different stress conditions. Finally, the GPS-SNO predictor was also used to predict the putative nitrosylation residues in the PR-1 structure. Analysis shows that the AvPR-1 sequence harbors six different nitrosylation sites (C69, C113, C119, C135, C140, C150). Those residues are crucial for protein post-translational modifications [44].

2.3. Gene Ontology and KEGG Annotation

Gene ontology (GO) was carried out based on biological process, molecular function, and cellular component terms for the AvPR-1 protein using the PANNZER2 online server (Supplementary Figure S4). The AvPR-1 protein regulates two biological processes (GO:0006952 defense response and GO:0009607 response to biotic stimulus) and two cellular components (GO:0005576: Extracellular region and GO:0016021: Integral component of membrane). A KEGG orthology analysis of AvPR-1 revealed that oat PR-1 gene was mapped to the MAPK signaling pathway (04016), plant hormone signal transduction (04075), and to the plant–pathogen interaction (04626). Such findings were also cited for other PR-1 proteins such as P. nigrum [1]. Based on the gene ontology enrichment data, the oat PR-1 protein function suggests that the PR-1 gene has an important role in plant defense against different abiotic stress treatments.

2.4. Interaction Network of AvPR-1 Protein

The interaction network of the AvPR-1 protein from oat was constructed based on the interaction relationship of the homologous PR-1 proteins from Triticum aestivum (Figure 4). The interaction network analysis showed that the AvPR-1 protein interacted with the Glyco_18 domain-containing protein, which belongs to the glycosyl hydrolase 18 family, a Bet_v_1 domain-containing protein (uncharacterized protein) and a Pex2_Pex12 domain-containing protein (uncharacterized protein). Glycoside hydrolase family 18 (GH18) belongs to the chitinase subfamily. It catalyzes the degradation of β-1,4 glycosidic bonds in amino polysaccharides and possesses different functions. GH18 chitinases are implicated in many physiological processes, such as nutrition uptake and regulation of the immune response [45].

2.5. Predicted Secondary and 3D Structures of the AvPR-1 Protein

The secondary structure analyses of AvPR-1 were performed using the SOPMA online server (Figure 5a, Table 2). AvPR-1 has 55 α-helices, 8 β-turns, 81 random coils, and 30 extended strands (Table 2).
The same result was observed in TdPR1.2 and TaPR-1 proteins (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S4). The predicted 3D structures of AvPR1 protein and other studied proteins were generated online using the Phyre2 server (Figure 5b). The 3D structure of the AvPR-1 protein is conserved, especially regarding the α–β–α sandwich structure that is characteristic of PR-1 proteins (Figure 5b) [42].

2.6. Differential Expression of AvPR-1 Gene under Various Stress Conditions

To investigate the possible biological functions of the AvPR-1 gene, we assessed the expression patterns of AvPR-1 genes in oat under various abiotic stress conditions using qRT-PCR (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
In response to salt stress (150 mM NaCl), AvPR-1 was significantly upregulated (Figure 6a). The same result was observed when plants were subjected to mannitol and PEG stresses (Figure 6b,c). When heat stress was applied to oat plants (42 °C for 30 min), there was a significant increase in AvPR-1 expression level in roots and shoots, suggesting that this protein could have a putative protective role in controlling oat heat tolerance (Figure 6d).
The hormonal response of the AvPR-1 gene was investigated by treating plants with salycilic acid (SA), indole acetic acid (IAA), jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA). As shown in Figure 7, AvPR-1 was upregulated in response to all hormones used in this work. Overall, those results demonstrate that AvPR-1 is implicated in plant response to many abiotic and hormonal stresses.

3. Discussion

Cereals have a key role in fulfilling the world’s food demand [24]. They are exposed to variable stresses during their life cycle [24], and this is especially the case for the common oat Avena sativa. Thus, a crucial role of PR-1 genes is necessary for the pathogenesis-related metabolic pathways. PR-1 genes have various intricate growth/developmental mechanisms. They also help plants to cope with an important number of environmental stresses. PR-1 genes are among the proteins that show a high level of transcription in response to biotic and abiotic stress applications. These proteins have a crucial role in plant defense against biotic stresses as they thicken the cell wall to block the apoplastic spread of pathogens [46]. Furthermore, PR proteins are crucial components in cells that enhance plant response to an important number of abiotic stresses such as light, salt, low temperature, and drought [9,42,47]. Thus, those genes are used to generate transgenic plants that have an enhanced tolerant to different pathogens such as oomycetes [48], bacteria [49], and fungi [50], as well as abiotic stresses.
The PR-1 gene family has been identified and characterized in many plant species. The number of PR-1 family members differs depending on the species. For example, 13 genes were identified in tomato [15], 19 in Saccharum spontaneum [20], and 23 genes in wheat and rice [51,52]. Despite their importance in plants, little is known about the PR-1 genes in monocotyledons, especially in oat. In the current study, the first PR-1 gene was identified in oat. AvPR-1 presents a negative GRAVY score, which is common for hydrophilic proteins. The AvPR-1 protein possess the CAP signature, the CBM domain is involved in sterol binding [17], and the CAPE is involved in plant immune signaling [38]. In general, the ability of the PR-1 proteins to bind sterols is correlated with their antimicrobial activity against the sterol auxotroph, a major plant pathogen known as the Phytophthora species [53]. CAPE-1 is well conserved among the monocots and dicotyledonous plants. The consensus motif PxGNxxxxxPY is found in AvPR-1. Sequence analysis of AvPR-1 structure revealed the presence of a calmodulin-binding domain in the C-terminal part of the protein. Such a domain was also identified in durum wheat TdPR1.2 [7]. Calmodulins (CaMs) are ubiquitous Ca2+ bonding proteins highly conserved in eukaryotes that decode the Ca2+ signaling pathways in plants. After plant exposure to stress, the intracellular Ca2+ concentration increases. This variation in Ca2+ level is perceived by CaMs (and other calcium sensors) leading to the formation of active Ca2+/CaM complexes able to interact with a variety of target proteins (phosphatases, kinases, catalases, PR-1s) [7,54,55,56].
The presence of these motifs strongly suggests that AvPR-1 responds to different biotic stresses [38,40,42,57]. In this study, AvPR1 was upregulated in leaf and root tissues of a Saudi oat cultivar subjected to NaCl (150 mM) and PEG (10% PEG 6000) treatments as previously shown in other studies such as in Zea mays (ZmPR-1; [55,58]), banana [16], tomato (13 SlPR-1 genes; [15]), Vitis vinifera (VvPR-1; [59]), and rice (OsPR1a; [19]). Moreover, ScPR-1 was upregulated in leaf tissues of Saccharum spontaneum after salt and PEG stresses but downregulated in stem (MT11–610 cultivar) after PEG treatment and root tissues (ROC22 and MT11–610 cultivars) after NaCl treatment [20], suggesting that this gene could have a dual role depending on the tissue expression in the plant. Many studies have described the effect of heat stress on plant [60,61].
It was described in the literature that the SA and JA signaling pathways are stimulated after biotrophic/hemibiotrophic (under the control of SA) and necrotrophic (under the control of JA) pathogen infection [9]. Thus, we investigated the effect of SA and JA application on AvPR-1 gene expression in oat. Our results showed that AvPR-1 was upregulated after application of those phytohormones in roots and shoots of oat.
Other different PR-1 proteins were reported to be upregulated after plant treatment with SA and JA [15,24]. In banana, MaPR1-1 was upregulated after plant treatment with SA and JA stresses due to the presence of cis-elements and binding sites for transcription factors [27]. Thus, identification of stress-responsive elements involved in up/downregulation of PR-1 will help in understanding plants’ resistance mechanisms toward various stresses. These findings strongly suggest that the AvPR-1 gene plays a crucial role in plant defense against environmental stresses. It has been suggested that PR-1 genes can serve as molecular markers associated with resistance to different biotic and abiotic stresses [1,4,9]. Thus, our findings could be useful for breeding programs aimed at increasing the resistance of oat crops to salt, drought, and hormonal stresses as well as plant infection with pathogens. This could be achieved by, for example, generating an oat crop that overexpress the AvPR-1 gene, which may protect against surrounding environmental threats. In addition, besides PR-1 genes, plant defense against environmental stresses is associated with some other PR genes from other families such as chitinases and endo-1,3-_-glucanases, TLPs, and PR-10.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Stress Treatments

In this work, seeds of Saudi oat (Avena sativa L.) were kindly given from a private field in Ha’il, Saudi Arabia. Before incubation, around 45 seeds were sterilized in each box containing 30 mlof 0.6% NaClO solution for 15 min, then washed five times with 50 mL sterile water. For each treatment, 45 seeds were placed in each Petri dish (11 cm long, 2.5 cm high and 11 cm wide) in the presence of a sponge and filter paper placed below to maintain moisture at 25 ± 2 °C. Seeds were then transferred to a greenhouse at 24 ± 2 °C, with photosynthetically active radiation of 280 μmol m−2 s−1, a 16 h photoperiod, and 60 ± 10% relative humidity. After 10 days, seeds were subjected to stresses. In this study, nine treatments were used including the control (distilled water), 150 mM NaCl, 10% PEG, 200 mM mannitol, 5 mM of each phytohormone (SA, JA, IAA and ABA), and heat (42 °C). Each treatment was replicated three times. Finally, shoots were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

4.2. Isolation of the cDNA AvPR1.2

Total RNA was isolated from Avena sativa plants subjected to 5 mM SA for 24 hours using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Next, the remaining genomic DNA was removed using RNase-free DNase. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Sequence alignment of different full sequences of PR1 genes was performed. Primers corresponding to 5′ and 3′ UTR regions were designed and used to amplify AvPR1. After cloning and sequencing of the fragment, the AvPR1 full-length cDNA was amplified using two specific primers AvPR1_Fr (5′-ATGGCA TCT TCC AAG AGC AG -3′) and AvPR1_Rv (5′-TCA AGGGTG AGG ACG CGA A-3′), designed based on Triticum turgidum subsp. durum; TdPR1.2 sequence (MK570869.1). PCR products were purified from agarose gel, cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector, sequenced using an ABI PRISM automated sequencer, and then published (GenBank OP132412).

4.3. Sequence Analysis of AvPR1

The predicted protein was characterized using the ProtParam server (http://web.expasy.org/protparam; accessed on 1 May 2022) [62] to investigate MW, pI, AI, and GRAVY. The conserved domains, sites, and motifs were analyzed using NCBI-CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd; accessed on 1 May 2022). Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree analysis were conducted with Cluster Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/services/web/toolresult.ebi?jobId=clustalo-I20220527-204434-0929-25108385-p2m&analysis=phylotree). The signal peptide cleavage sites (SignalP 5.0; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/; accessed on 27 May 2022) were also used to detect the presence of putative signal peptides in the AvPR-1 protein [63].
The AvPR1 sequence-predicted phosphorylation sites of the AvPR-1 protein were identified using the NetPhos 3.1 server (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetPhos-3.1) [64]. The conserved motifs of the AvPR-1 protein were identified using the Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) server v5.1.1 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) [64]. For MEME searches, the “any number of repeats” mode was used, with a search limit of 10 motifs. All other parameters were left at their default values.
The trans-membrane helix was identified using the TMHMM database (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?TMHMM-2.0). Predicted disordered regions (DRs) were identified using the Predictor of Natural Disordered Regions (PONDR) server (http://www.pondr.com/). The physiological role of AvPR-1 was revealed by Pannzer2 (http://ekhidna2.biocenter.helsinki.fi/sanspanz/). The subcellular localization of the AvPR-1 protein was predicted by the WoLF PSORT II online software (https://www.genscript. com/wolf-psort.html?src=leftbar). The presence of a putative calmodulin-binding domain was revealed by the calmodulin target database (http://calcium.uhnres.utoronto.ca/ctdb/no_flash.htm).

4.4. Secondary and Tertiary Structure Analyses

Secondary structure analyses were performed using the SOPMA server (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_sopma.html) [65]. Predicted 3D structure analyses were generated using the Protein Homology/analogY Recognition Engine v2 (Phyre2) server (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) [66].

4.5. Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis

Gene ontology (GO) was used to obtain information about the AvPR-1 gene involvement, including biological processes, cellular components, and molecular function using the PANNZER2 web server (http://ekhidna2.biocenter.helsinki.fi/sanspanz/).

4.6. Interaction Network of AvPR-1 Proteins

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) was studied using STRING v11.0 for PR-1 using Triticum aestivum as reference [67]. The minimum required interaction score parameters were set at the medium confidence level.

4.7. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from individual roots and leaves (0.5 g of each tissue) using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Extracted RNA was then purified from genomic DNA (RNase free DNase set; QIAGEN), qualified by gel electrophoresis, and used for first-strand cDNA synthesis (GoScript Reverse Transcription System; Promega, Madison, USA) with an oligo-dT primer. PCR reactions were achieved in a 10 μL final volume tube in the presence of 3 μL cDNA (obtained from 40 ng of DNase-treated RNA), 0.5 μL of each primer of the AvPR-1 gene (AvPR_Fw and AvPR_Rv at 10 μM), 5 μL 2 × SYBR Green I master mix and 1 μL of RNase-free water (Sigma). The reaction consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles composed of 10 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, then a melting curve (5 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 65 °C, and 5 min with the temperature increasing from 65 to 97 °C). Three biological repetitions were performed for each experimental condition, with three technical repetitions for each sample. Melting curve analysis at the end of cycling was used to verify whether there was single amplification. At the end of the reaction, the threshold cycle (CT) values of the triplicate PCRs were averaged and used for transcript quantification. The relative expression ratio of the TdPR1.2 gene was calculated by using the comparative CT method with the actin gene designed from the T. aestivum genome (actin Av_Fw: 5′-TCC CTC AGC ACA TTC CAG CAGAT-3 and actin Av_Rv: 5′-AAC GAT TCC TGG ACC TGC CTC ATC-3′) as an internal expression standard [68]. The relative expression level was calculated from triplicate measurements based on the 2-DDCT, where DDCT = (CT, target gene−CT, actin) stressed—(CT, target gene−CT, actin) control. Relative expression ratios from three independent experiments (three biological repetitions) are reported.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as mean ± S.E. The results were compared statistically by using Student’s t test, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.01.

5. Conclusions

Pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) is the most produced protein during plant response toward many environmental stresses. Moreover, PR-1 genes play a crucial role in plant growth and maturation. However, the PR-1 gene family in oat has not been previously studied. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the first isolated PR-1 gene from oat (Avena sativa), including gene structure, phylogenetic relationship, motifs, and gene expression profiles against different stresses. The structural analysis of AvPR-1 revealed similar binding pockets in the predicted 3D structures of other different PR-1 proteins. Expression analysis of AvPR-1 showed a positive correlation, and the identified candidate PR-1 gene must be further functionally validated for its biological significance and molecular mechanisms. It could be also a hopeful candidate for selecting multiple stress tolerant oat varieties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11172284/s1, Figure S1: Identification of signal peptides in AvPR-1 sequence using PONDR (Predictor of Natural Disor-dered Regions) server (http://www.pondr.com/) database. Figure S2: Conserved motifs identified from AvPR-1 protein and its homologs in plants. Figure S3: Identification of putative phosphory-lation sites as revealed by NetPhos database. Figure S4: Identification of the biological role of AvPR-1 as revealed bythe PANNZER2 online server.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization K.A.A., N.A.A., M.G., S.M.E.-G. and F.B.; methodology, K.A.A., N.A.A., M.G. and S.M.E.-G.; formal analysis N.A.A., and M.G. software, M.G. investigation, K.A.A., N.A.A., M.G., S.M.E.-G. and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.A. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, N.A.A., M.G., S.M.E.-G. and F.B.; supervision, K.A.A. and F.B.; funding acquisition, K.A.A.; project administration, K.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deputyship for Research at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, through project number AN000455.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

We the authors extend our appreciation to the Deputyship for Research at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through project number AN000455.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kattupalli, D.; Srinivasan, A.; Soniya, E.V. A Genome-Wide Analysis of Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 (PR-1) Genes from Piper nigrum Reveals Its Critical Role during Phytophthora capsici Infection. Genes 2021, 12, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Loon, L.C.; Pierpont, W.S.; Boller, T.; Conejero, V. Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1994, 12, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Okushima, Y.; Koizumi, N.; Kusano, T.; Sano, H. 2000 Secreted proteins of tobacco cultured BY2 cells: Identification of a new member of pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 42, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Anisimova, O.K.; Shchennikova, A.V.; Kochieva, E.Z.; Filyushin, M.A. Pathogenesis-Related Genes of PR1,PR2, PR4 and PR5 Families Are Involved in the Response to Fusarium Infection in Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Punja, Z.K. Genetic engineering of plants to enhance resistance to fungal pathogens—A review of progress and future prospects. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2001, 23, 216–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bozbuga, R. Expressions of Pathogenesis related 1 (PR1) Gene in Solanumlycopersicum and Influence of Salicylic Acid Exposures on Host-Meloidogyne incognita Interactions. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 494, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ghorbel, M.; Zribi, I.; Missaoui, K.; Drira-Fakhfekh, M.; Brini, F. Differential regulation of the durum wheat Pathogenesis-related protein (PR1) by Calmodulin TdCaM1.3 protein. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Campos, M.A.; Rosa, D.D.; Teixeira, J.E.C.; Targon, M.L.P.; Souza, A.A.; Paiva, L.V.; Stach-Machado, D.R.; Machado, M.A. PR gene families of citrus: Their organ specific-biotic and abiotic inducible expression profiles based on ESTs approach. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2007, 30, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zribi, I.; Ghorbel, M.; Brini, F. Pathogenesis related proteins (PRs): From cellular mechanisms to plant defense. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2021, 22, 396–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chand, S.K.; Nanda, S.; Mishra, R.; Joshi, R.K. Multiple garlic (Allium sativum L.) microRNAs regulate the immunity against the basal rot fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae. Plant Sci. 2017, 257, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cooper, B.; Clarke, J.D.; Budworth, P.; Kreps, J.; Hutchison, D.; Park, S.; Guimil, S.; Dunn, M.; Luginbühl, P.; Ellero, C.; et al. A network of rice genes associated with stress response and seed development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4945–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sels, J.; Mathys, J.; De Coninck, B.M.; Cammue, B.P.; De Bolle, M.F. Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: A focus on PR peptides. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, T.P. Current overview of allergens of plant pathogenesis related protein families. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 543195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Loon, L.C.; van Kammen, A. Polyacrylamide disc electrophoresis of the solubleleaf proteins from Nicotianatabacum var. “Samsun” and “Samsun NN”. II. Changesin protein constitution after infection with tobacco mosaic virus. Virology 1970, 40, 190–211. [Google Scholar]
  15. Akbudak, M.A.; Yildiz, S.; Filiz, E. Pathogenesis related protein-1 (PR-1) genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): Bioinformatics analyses and expression profiles in response to drought stress. Genomics 2020, 112, 4089–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Anuradha, C.; Chandrasekar, A.; Backiyarani, S.; Thangavelu, R.; Giribabu, S.; Uma, S. Genome-wide analysis of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) gene family from Musa spp. and its role in defense response during stresses. Gene 2022, 821, 146334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choudhary, V.; Darwiche, R.; Gfeller, D.; Zoete, V.; Michielin, O.; Schneiter, R. The caveolin-binding motif of the pathogen-related yeast protein Pry1, a member of the CAP protein superfamily, is required for in vivo export of cholesteryl acetate. J. Lipid Res. 2014, 55, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Seo, P.J.; Lee, A.-K.; Xiang, F.; Park, C.-M. Molecular and Functional Profiling of Arabidopsis Pathogenesis-Related Genes: Insights into Their Roles in Salt Response of Seed Germination. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 20, 49334–49344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kothari, K.S.; Dansana, P.K.; Giri, J.; Tyagi, A.K. Rice Stress Associated Protein 1 (OsSAP1) Interacts with Aminotransferase (OsAMTR1) and Pathogenesis-Related 1a Protein (OsSCP) and Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, N.; Zhou, J.-R.; Rott, P.C.; Li, J.; Fu, H.-Y.; Huang, M.-T.; Zhang, H.-L.; Gao, S.-J. ScPR1 plays a positive role in the regulation of resistance to diverse stresses in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) and Arabidopsis thaliana. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 180, 114736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seo, J.S.; Diloknawarit, P.; Park, B.S.; Chua, N.H. Elf18-induced long noncoding rna 1 evicts fibrillarin from mediator subunit to enhance pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1) expression. New Phytologist. 2019, 221, 2067–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Upadhyay, P.; Rai, A.; Kumar, R.; Singh, M.; Sinha, B. Differential expression of pathogenesis related protein genes in tomato during inoculation with A. solani. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, Y.; Qiu, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhuansun, X.; Fahima, T.; Xie, C. Glycerol-induced powdery mildew resistance in wheat by regulating plant fatty acid metabolism, plant hormones crosstalk, and pathogenesis-related genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Mao, X.; Wang, R.; Li, A.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, J.; Jing, R. Identification of wheat stress-responding genes and TaPR-1-1 function by screening a cDNA yeast libraryprepared following abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 141. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hussain, R.M.; Sheikh, A.H.; Haider, I.; Quareshy, M.; Linthorst, H.J. Arabidopsis WRKY50 and TGA transcription factors synergistically activate expression of PR1. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Verk, M.C.; Pappaioannou, D.; Neeleman, L.; Bol, J.F.; Linthorst, H.J. A novel WRKY transcription factor is required for induction of PR-1a gene expression by salicylic acid and bacterial elicitors. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1983–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, Y.; Kuang, J.F.; Wang, F.Y.; Chen, L.; Hong, K.Q.; Xiao, Y.Y.; Chen, J.Y. Molecular characterization of PR and WRKY genes during SA-and MeJA-induced resistance against Colletotrichum musae in banana fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 79, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ghorbel, M.; Zribi, I.; Haddaji, N.; Besbes, M.; Bouali, N.; Brini, F. The Wheat Pathogenesis Related Protein (TdPR1. 2) Ensures Contrasting Behaviors to E. coli Transformant Cells under Stress Conditions. Adv. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gutierrez-Gonzalez, J.J.; Garvin, D.F. Subgenome-specific assembly of vitamin E biosynthesis genes and expression patterns during seed development provide insight into the evolution of oat genome. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 2147–2157. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bekele, W.A.; Wight, C.P.; Chao, S.; Howarth, C.J.; Tinker, N.A. Haplotype-based genotyping-by-sequencing in oat genome research. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Dingxuan, Q.; Shi, M. Calcium amendment for improved germination, plant growth, and leaf photosynthetic electron transport in oat (Avena sativa) under NaCl stress. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, G.Q.; Ma, B.L.; Ren, C.Z. Growth, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Swapnil, S.; Iti, G.M.; Sharad, T. Klebsiella sp. confers enhanced tolerance to salinity and plant growth promotionin oat seedlings (Avena sativa L.). Microbiol. Res. 2018, 206, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, H.S.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zeng, X.Y.; Nie, C.R. Toxic effects of potassium chlorate on peanut growth. Chin. J. Plan. Ecol. 2006, 30, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Talwar, H.S.; Kumari, A.; Surwenshi, A.; Seetharama, N. Sodium: Potassium ratio in foliage as an indicatorof tolerance to chloride-dominant soil salinity in oat (Avena sativa L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci. B 2011, 81, 481–484. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu, B.; Hu, Y.; Huo, P.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z. Transcriptome analysis of hexaploidhulless oat inresponse to salinity stress. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evans, N.H.; McAinsh, M.R.; Hetherington, A.M. Calcium oscillations in higher plants. Curr.Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.L.; Lee, C.Y.; Cheng, K.T.; Chang, W.H.; Huang, R.N.; Nam, H.G.; Chen, Y.R. Quantitative peptidomics study reveals thata wound-induced peptide from PR-1 regulates immune signaling in tomato. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4135–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Almeida-Silva, F.; Venancio, T.M. Pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) genes in soybean: Genome-wide identification, structural analysis and expression profiling under multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. Genes 2022, 809, 146013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lincoln, J.E.; Sanchez, J.P.; Zumstein, K.; Gilchrist, D.G. Plant and animal PR1 family members inhibit programmed cell death and suppress bacterial pathogens in plant tissues. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 2111–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ali, S.; Ganai, B.A.; Kamili, A.N.; Bhat, A.A.; Mir, Z.A.; Bhat, J.A.; Tyagi, A.; Islam, S.T.; Mushtaq, M.; Yadav, P.; et al. Pathogenesis-related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 212, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Breen, S.; Williams, S.J.; Outram, M.; Kobe, B.; Solomon, P.S. Emerging insights into the functions of pathogenesis-related protein 1. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arsova, B.; Schulze, W.X. Current status of the plant phosphorylation site database PhosPhAt and its use as a resource for molecular plant physiology. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xue, Y.; Liu, Z.; Gao, X.; Jin, C.; Wen, L.; Yao, X.; Ren, J. GPS-SNO: Computational predictionof protein S-nitrosylation sites with a modified GPSalgorithm. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, X.B.; Dang, Y.R.; Liu, S.S.; Huang, K.X.; Qin, Q.L.; Chen, X.L.; Li, P.Y. Identification and Characterization of Three Chitinases with Potential in Direct Conversion of Crystalline Chitin into N, N′-diacetylchitobiose. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 3–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.-E.; Li, D.-W.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Zhao, Q.; He, Y.-M.; Gong, Z.-H. Defence responses of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) infected with incompatible and compatible strains of Phytophthoracapsici. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 136, 625–638. [Google Scholar]
  47. Joshi, V.; Joshi, N.; AmderVyas, A.; Jadhav, S.K. Pathogenesis-related proteins: Role in plant defense. In Biocontrol Agents and Secondary Metabolites; Jogaiah, S., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 573–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarowar, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, E.N.; Kim, K.D.; Hwang, B.K.; Islam, R.; Shin, J.S. Overexpression of a pepper basic pathogenesis-related protein 1 gene in tobacco plants enhances resistance to heavy metal and pathogen stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shin, S.H.; Pak, J.-H.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, H.J.; Oh, J.S.; Choi, H.K.; Jung, H.W.; Chung, Y.S. An acidic pathogenesis-related1 gene of Oryzagrandiglumis is involved in disease resistance response against bacterial infection. Plant Pathol. J. 2014, 30, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kiba, A.; Nishihara, M.; Nakatsuka, T.; Yamamura, S. Pathogenesis-related protein 1 homologue is an antifungal protein in Wasabia japonica leaves and confers resistance to Botrytis cinerea in transgenic tobacco. Plant Biotechnol. 2007, 24, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lu, S.; Friesen, T.L.; Faris, J.D. Molecular characterization and genomic mapping of the pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) gene family in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2011, 285, 485–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Q.; Xue, Q. Computational identification of novel PR-1-type genes in Oryza sativa. J. Genet. 2011, 85, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gamir, J.; Darwiche, R.; Hof, P.V.; Choudhary, V.; Stumpe, M.; Schneiter, R.; Mauch, F. The sterol-binding activity of pathogenesis-related protein 1 reveals the mode of action of an antimicrobial protein. Plant J. 2017, 89, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. DeFalco, T.A.; Bender, K.W.; Snedden, W.A. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signaling. Biochem. J. 2009, 425, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghorbel, M.; Feki, K.; Tounsi, S.; Haddaji, N.; Hanin, M.; Brini, F. The Activity of the Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L.) Catalase 1 (TdCAT1) Is Modulated by Calmodulin. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghorbel, M.; Zaidi, I.; Robe, E.; Ranty, B.; Mazars, C.; Galaud, J.-P.; Hanin, M. The activity of the wheat MAP kinase phosphatase 1 is regulated by manganese and by calmodulin. Biochimie 2015, 108, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, S.; Faris, J.; Sherwood, R.; Friesen, T.L.; Edwards, M.C. A dimeric PR-1-type pathogenesis-related protein interacts with ToxA and potentially mediates ToxA-induced necrosis in sensitive wheat. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 15, 650–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shi, F.M. Cloning and Function Study of Pathogenesis-Related Protein Genes ZmPR-1 and ZmPR-4. Ph.D. Thesis, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hou, L.X.; Gao, C.; Che, Y.M.; Zhao, F.G.; Liu, X. Gene cloning and expression analysis of pathogenesis-related protein 1 in Vitis vinifera L. Plant Physiol. J. 2012, 48, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jiao, Z.; Xu, W.; Nong, Q.; Zhang, M.; Jian, S.; Lu, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Xia, K. An Integrative Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Red Pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) Seedlings in Response to Heat Stress. Genes. 2021, 12, 1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xi, Y.; Han, X.; Zhang, Z.; Joshi, J.; Borza, T.; Aqa, M.M.; Zhang, B.; Yuan, H.; Wang-Pruski, G. Exogenous phosphite application alleviates the adverse effects of heat stress and improves thermotolerance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server, The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
  63. Armenteros, J.J.A.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Sønderby, C.K.; Petersen, T.N.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; Heijne, G.; von Nielsen, H. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deepneural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Blom, N.; Sicheritz-Ponten, T.; Gupta, R.; Gammeltoft, S.; Brunak, S. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the aminoacid sequence. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1633–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Geourjon, C.; Deleage, G. SOPMA: Significant improvement in protein secondarystructure prediction by c prediction from alignments and joint prediction. Bioinformatics 1995, 11, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kelley, L.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.; Wass, M.; Sternberg, M. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real Time Quantitative PCR and the 22DDCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02284 g001 550
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analysis of AvPR-1 structure. (a) Analysis of AvPR-1 proteins using the NCBI server showed that AvPR-1 belongs to the CAP superfamily. (b) Conserved domains of the AvPR-1 protein. The predicted AvPR-1 protein contained a conserved motif at residues 29–164 aa that belonged to the CAP-superfamily. Two peptide signals were also identified in the N-(1–25) and C-(164–174) terminal parts with the presence of a transmembrane domain. AvPR-1 also contains a cleavage site at position 25.
Figure 1. Bioinformatic analysis of AvPR-1 structure. (a) Analysis of AvPR-1 proteins using the NCBI server showed that AvPR-1 belongs to the CAP superfamily. (b) Conserved domains of the AvPR-1 protein. The predicted AvPR-1 protein contained a conserved motif at residues 29–164 aa that belonged to the CAP-superfamily. Two peptide signals were also identified in the N-(1–25) and C-(164–174) terminal parts with the presence of a transmembrane domain. AvPR-1 also contains a cleavage site at position 25.
Plants 11 02284 g001
Plants 11 02284 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of different PR-1 proteins identified in oat (GenBank OP132412), Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (MK570869.1), Triticum aestivum (XP_044433901.1), Aegilop stauschii subsp. tauschii (XP_020170282.1), Triticum urartu (EMS45472.1), Phoenix dactylifera (XP_008796972.2), Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare (BAK01044.1), Triticum dicoccoides (XP_037463373.1), Panicum hallii (XP_025795067.1), Oryza brachyantha (XP_006661674.1), Zea mays (XP_008657154.1), Eutrema japonicum (BAF03626.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010467245.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_179068.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006409652.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006299028.1), Brassica napus (XP_013733404.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002465112.1), Setaria italica (XP_004983398.1), Musa acuminata (ABK41053.2), and Oryza sativa Japonica Group (XP_015613013.1). The blue rectangle indicates the signal peptide, the PF00188 domain structure is highlighted with a red line, caveolin-binding motif (CBM) is highlighted in orange, and the CAP-derived peptide (CAPE) with conserved residues is highlighted in green.
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of different PR-1 proteins identified in oat (GenBank OP132412), Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (MK570869.1), Triticum aestivum (XP_044433901.1), Aegilop stauschii subsp. tauschii (XP_020170282.1), Triticum urartu (EMS45472.1), Phoenix dactylifera (XP_008796972.2), Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare (BAK01044.1), Triticum dicoccoides (XP_037463373.1), Panicum hallii (XP_025795067.1), Oryza brachyantha (XP_006661674.1), Zea mays (XP_008657154.1), Eutrema japonicum (BAF03626.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010467245.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_179068.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006409652.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006299028.1), Brassica napus (XP_013733404.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002465112.1), Setaria italica (XP_004983398.1), Musa acuminata (ABK41053.2), and Oryza sativa Japonica Group (XP_015613013.1). The blue rectangle indicates the signal peptide, the PF00188 domain structure is highlighted with a red line, caveolin-binding motif (CBM) is highlighted in orange, and the CAP-derived peptide (CAPE) with conserved residues is highlighted in green.
Plants 11 02284 g002
Plants 11 02284 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Phylogenetic analysis of 21 different pathogen-related proteins oat (GenBank OP132412), Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (MK570869.1), Triticum aestivum (XP_044433901.1), Aegilops tauschii subsp. tauschii (XP_020170282.1), Triticum urartu (EMS45472.1), Phoenix dactylifera (XP_008796972.2), Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare (BAK01044.1), Triticum dicoccoides (XP_037463373.1), Panicum hallii (XP_025795067.1), Oryza brachyantha (XP_006661674.1), Zea mays (XP_008657154.1), Eutrema japonicum (BAF03626.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010467245.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_179068.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006409652.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006299028.1), Brassica napus (XP_013733404.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002465112.1), Setaria italica (XP_004983398.1), Musa acuminata (ABK41053.2), Oryza sativa Japonica Group (XP_015613013.1) using the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree for the PR1 query, generated using the Cluster Omega program. (b) LOGO presentation of conserved segments in PR-1 proteins in plants. Amino acids are grouped by color according to their physiochemical properties. The height of the amino acids corresponds to their conservation at that position.
Figure 3. (a) Phylogenetic analysis of 21 different pathogen-related proteins oat (GenBank OP132412), Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (MK570869.1), Triticum aestivum (XP_044433901.1), Aegilops tauschii subsp. tauschii (XP_020170282.1), Triticum urartu (EMS45472.1), Phoenix dactylifera (XP_008796972.2), Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare (BAK01044.1), Triticum dicoccoides (XP_037463373.1), Panicum hallii (XP_025795067.1), Oryza brachyantha (XP_006661674.1), Zea mays (XP_008657154.1), Eutrema japonicum (BAF03626.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010467245.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_179068.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006409652.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006299028.1), Brassica napus (XP_013733404.1), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002465112.1), Setaria italica (XP_004983398.1), Musa acuminata (ABK41053.2), Oryza sativa Japonica Group (XP_015613013.1) using the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree for the PR1 query, generated using the Cluster Omega program. (b) LOGO presentation of conserved segments in PR-1 proteins in plants. Amino acids are grouped by color according to their physiochemical properties. The height of the amino acids corresponds to their conservation at that position.
Plants 11 02284 g003
Plants 11 02284 g004 550
Figure 4. Protein–protein interaction network of AvPR-1 protein.
Figure 4. Protein–protein interaction network of AvPR-1 protein.
Plants 11 02284 g004
Plants 11 02284 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) 2D structure presentation of AvPR-1 as revealed by the SOPMA server. The alpha helixes are presented in blue, the extended strands are presented in red, the beta turns are presented in green, and the random coils are presented in yellow. (b) 3D structure of different PR-1 proteins used in this work as revealed by the PHYRE2 database (1.1 AvPR-1; 1.2 HvPR-1; 1.3 TdPR1.2; 1.4 TaPR1; TcPR1.2; AetPR1; PhPR1-like, TuPR1; EjPR-1; ObPRB1-2-like; SbPR1; SbPR1; ZmPRB1-2; SiPR1; MaPR1; EsPR1; CsPR1; AtPR1; OsPR1; PdPR1).
Figure 5. (a) 2D structure presentation of AvPR-1 as revealed by the SOPMA server. The alpha helixes are presented in blue, the extended strands are presented in red, the beta turns are presented in green, and the random coils are presented in yellow. (b) 3D structure of different PR-1 proteins used in this work as revealed by the PHYRE2 database (1.1 AvPR-1; 1.2 HvPR-1; 1.3 TdPR1.2; 1.4 TaPR1; TcPR1.2; AetPR1; PhPR1-like, TuPR1; EjPR-1; ObPRB1-2-like; SbPR1; SbPR1; ZmPRB1-2; SiPR1; MaPR1; EsPR1; CsPR1; AtPR1; OsPR1; PdPR1).
Plants 11 02284 g005
Plants 11 02284 g006 550
Figure 6. qRT-PCR expression analysis of AvPR-1 gene under different abiotic stresses (a) salt, (b) mannitol, (c) PEG 10%, and (d) heat. The red bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under standard conditions, and the blue bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under stressed conditions. (***) indicates value significantly different from the control. Statistical significance was assessed by applying the student t-test at p < 0.01.
Figure 6. qRT-PCR expression analysis of AvPR-1 gene under different abiotic stresses (a) salt, (b) mannitol, (c) PEG 10%, and (d) heat. The red bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under standard conditions, and the blue bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under stressed conditions. (***) indicates value significantly different from the control. Statistical significance was assessed by applying the student t-test at p < 0.01.
Plants 11 02284 g006
Plants 11 02284 g007 550
Figure 7. qRT-PCR expression analysis of AvPR-1 gene under different hormonal stresses (a) Salycilic acid (SA) (b) Jasmonic acid (JA) (c) abscisic acid (ABA), and (d) IAA. The red bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under standard conditions, and the blue bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under stressed conditions. (***) indicates value significantly different from the control. Statistical significance was assessed by applying the student t-test at p < 0.01.
Figure 7. qRT-PCR expression analysis of AvPR-1 gene under different hormonal stresses (a) Salycilic acid (SA) (b) Jasmonic acid (JA) (c) abscisic acid (ABA), and (d) IAA. The red bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under standard conditions, and the blue bars represent the expression level of the AvPR-1 gene under stressed conditions. (***) indicates value significantly different from the control. Statistical significance was assessed by applying the student t-test at p < 0.01.
Plants 11 02284 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison between different isolated PR-1 from plants using ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/; accessed on 1 May 2022).
Table 1. Comparison between different isolated PR-1 from plants using ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/; accessed on 1 May 2022).
Protein MWNumber of aaNumber of
Negatively Charged Residues		Number of
Positively Charged Residues		Grand Average of Hydropathicity (GRAVY)Aliphatic
Index		PI
AvPR118.891741218−0.28863.459.19
TdPR118,836.121741217−0.23865.119.02
TcPR1.218,850.151741217−0.23765.119.02
AetPR118,658.971721218−0.27366.409.17
HvPR118,969.981721219−0.33363.029.32
PhPR1-like18,898.311741520−0.19070.809.00
TuPR118,330.671671021−0.36267.199.86
EjPR-117,668.021611016−0.26881.749.1
ObPRB1-2-like18,458.881721120−0.18265.999.51
SbPR119,094.561791420−0.15266.159.10
BnPR-117,771.981621016−0.31578.279.02
ZmPRB1-219,156.671791321−0.18968.389.50
SiPR119,045.541761221−0.16471.149.0
MaPR117,308.30162811−0.20466.368.49
EsPR117,706.921611516−0.32281.747.58
PdPR117,470.431621111−0.18266.366.93
CsPR117,697.91161814−0.26873.859.08
AtPR117,676.941611016−0.28873.859.08
OsPR118,743.061761218−0.22766.659.10
Table
Table 2. Secondary structure analysis of AvPR-1 and other plant PR-1 using SOPMA program.
Table 2. Secondary structure analysis of AvPR-1 and other plant PR-1 using SOPMA program.
Proteinα-HelicesExtended StrandsRandom Coilsβ-Turns
AvPR-15588130
TdPR1.25588130
HvPR16887026
PhPR16686931
ObPR16477526
SbPR16478127
DoPR14787231
PvPR166107228
ZmPR168107131
SiPR16687131
MaPR15577030
AsPR16187126
PdPR15796927
CsPR15596831
TaPR15588130
AtsPR16887125
OsPR16088226
ClPR15867228
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AlHudaib, K.A.; Alanazi, N.A.; Ghorbel, M.; El-Ganainy, S.M.; Brini, F. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 Gene (AvPR-1) with Induced Expression in Oat (Avena sativa L.) during Abiotic and Hormonal Stresses. Plants 2022, 11, 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172284

AMA Style

AlHudaib KA, Alanazi NA, Ghorbel M, El-Ganainy SM, Brini F. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 Gene (AvPR-1) with Induced Expression in Oat (Avena sativa L.) during Abiotic and Hormonal Stresses. Plants. 2022; 11(17):2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172284

Chicago/Turabian Style

AlHudaib, Khalid A., Naimah Asid Alanazi, Mouna Ghorbel, Sherif Mohamed El-Ganainy, and Faiçal Brini. 2022. "Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 Gene (AvPR-1) with Induced Expression in Oat (Avena sativa L.) during Abiotic and Hormonal Stresses" Plants 11, no. 17: 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172284

APA Style

AlHudaib, K. A., Alanazi, N. A., Ghorbel, M., El-Ganainy, S. M., & Brini, F. (2022). Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenesis-Related Protein-1 Gene (AvPR-1) with Induced Expression in Oat (Avena sativa L.) during Abiotic and Hormonal Stresses. Plants, 11(17), 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop