Next Article in Journal
Genetic Evaluation of In Vitro Micropropagated and Regenerated Plants of Cannabis sativa L. Using SSR Molecular Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation and Functional Characterization of Soybean BES1/BZR1 Homolog 3-Like 1 (GmBEH3L1) Associated with Dehydration Sensitivity and Brassinosteroid Signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distinct Mechanisms of Endomembrane Reorganization Determine Dissimilar Transport Pathways in Plant RNA Viruses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/plants11192568
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2) Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Disease Resistance in Rice

by
Ruirui Jiang
,
Shichen Zhou
,
Xiaowen Da
,
Tao Chen
,
Jiming Xu
,
Peng Yan
and
Xiaorong Mo
*
State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(19), 2568; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192568
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biology of Plant–Pathogen Interactions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lesion mimic mutants (LMMs) are great materials for studying programmed cell death and immune mechanisms in plants. Various mechanisms are involved in the phenotypes of different LMMs, but few studies have explored the mechanisms linking deubiquitination and LMMs in rice (Oryza sativa). Here, we identified a rice LMM, rust spots rice (rsr1), resulting from the mutation of a single recessive gene. This LMM has spontaneous reddish-brown spots on its leaves, and displays enhanced resistance to both fungal leaf blast (caused by Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacterial blight (caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae). Map-based cloning showed that the mutated gene in rsr1 encodes a Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2). The mutation of OsUBP2 was shown to result in reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, chloroplast structural defects, and programmed cell death, while the overexpression of OsUBP2 weakened rice resistance to leaf blast. OsUBP2 is therefore a negative regulator of immune processes and ROS production. OsUBP2 has deubiquitinating enzyme activity in vitro, and the enzyme active site includes a cysteine at the 234th residue. The ubiquitinated proteomics data of rsr1 and WT provide some possible target protein candidates for OsUBP2.

1. Introduction

Lesion mimic mutants (LMMs) exhibit constitutive cell death in the absence of exogenous pathogens, similar to the HR when pathogens invade plants, and most LMMs showed increased resistance to pathogens compared to WT [1,2]. LMMs have been reported in a variety of plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana [3], maize (Zea mays) [4], and rice [5,6,7]. Studying the genes responsible for the LMMs is important for the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of disease resistance in plants. Researchers have cloned multiple LMM genes in rice using forward and reverse genetic methods. Spotted Leaf 35 (SPL35) encodes a protein containing a CUE (coupling of ubiquitin conjugation to endoplasmic reticulum [ER] degradation) structural domain. The spl35 mutant exhibits reduced chlorophyll, increased H2O2, upregulated expression of defense-related marker genes, and enhanced resistance to rice fungal and bacterial pathogens [3]. Both SPL11-interacting Protein 6 (Spin6) RNA interference (RNAi) lines and T-DNA insertion mutants resulted in PCD, ROS accumulation, and the increased expression of genes related to the defense response [8]. Early Lesion Leaf 1 (ELL1) encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, which localizes to the ER. In the ell mutants, the chlorophyll content was decreased, the chloroplasts were degraded, and the photosynthetic protein content was decreased, suggesting that ELL may be involved in chloroplast development [9].
Plants have evolved a two-layered immune system to protect themselves from pathogens. The first layer of the immune system is known as the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immune (PTI) response, in which pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) located on the cell membrane recognize PAMPs and activate a series of immune defense responses to defend against pathogen invasion [10]. During the co-evolution of host–microbe interactions, pathogens have evolved a class of effectors that can be secreted into plant cells. Those effectors inhibit the plant immune response by attacking the PTI signaling pathway, enabling the survival of the pathogen in the plant. Meanwhile, plants have evolved a class of resistance (R) proteins that directly or indirectly monitor pathogen effectors and activate a stronger immune response, effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [11]. ETI is an accelerated and amplified PTI response, usually associated with cell death at the site of infection, known as the hypersensitive response (HR) [12].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive reduced forms of oxygen molecules, including superoxide anion (O2–), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (·OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2). Plant ROS production largely takes place in the chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes, and is dependent on several classes of enzymes, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, peroxidase, and oxidase [13,14,15]. While ROS plays important roles in various processes, high levels of ROS can be highly damaging to cells; therefore, plants use enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) to scavenge excess ROS and maintain homeostasis [16].
ROS plays an important role in both PTI and ETI [10]. In rice, PRRs activate various immune responses by sensing PAMPs, including the rapid and intense production of ROS by OsRbohB and other ROS-producing components, to trigger PTI in rice. In the second layer of defense, plant intracellular immune receptors directly or indirectly recognize specific pathogen effectors to induce ETI. In this case, rice activates a series of signaling pathways leading to the HR, which involves a ROS burst, callus deposition, the induced expression of pathogen-related genes, and programmed cell death (PCD) [17,18,19].
The posttranslational modifications of proteins play key regulatory roles in most cellular signaling events. Ubiquitination is a typical posttranslational modification found in eukaryotes [20]. The ubiquitin proteasome pathway has been reported to be involved in the formation of LMMs in rice. A multi-unit RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL), consisting of Cullin3 (CUL3), RING-box protein 1 (RBX1), and BTB proteins, was shown to be involved in the plant immune response [21]. The cul3a mutants develop reddish-brown lesions on leaves at 60 days post-sowing (dps) under greenhouse conditions or at 45 dps under field conditions. Spotted Leaf-11 SPL11 encodes a ubiquitin ligase, and the spl11 mutant displays iron rust spots in the late tillering stage through to maturity. The spl11 mutant was shown to have lost the ability to regulate NADPH oxidase activity, resulting in the accumulation of ROS [22,23].
Deubiquitination is the opposite of ubiquitination. Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) dissociate ubiquitin from ubiquitin–protein conjugates [24], and some plant DUBs have been shown to be involved in immune response processes. The UBIQUITIN-SPECIFIC PROTEASEs (UBPs) AtUBP12 and AtUBP13 are functionally redundant, and are both able to hydrolyze the K48-linked ubiquitin chain. The RNAi mutants of AtUBP12 and AtUBP13 displayed an enhanced resistance to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 [25]. The deubiquitinase PICI1 (PigmR-interacting and chitin-induced proteins) is an immune hub of PTI and ETI in rice. PICI1 deubiquitinates and stabilizes methionine synthase, activating methionine-mediated immunity mainly through the biosynthesis of methionine. PICI1 is targeted for degradation by blast fungal effectors, including AvrPi9, to inhibit PTI [26]. A deubiquitinating enzyme OsLMP1 (Lesion Mimic Phenotype 1) regulates immune responses in rice through the epigenetic modification of H2B histones [27]. The mutation of OsLMP1 resulted in lesions on the leaves and an enhanced resistance to rice bacterial blight (caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [Xoo] PXO99). These mutants had elevated levels of histone H2B ubiquitination and histone H3-K4me2/3 methylation, which directly activated the salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis genes OsPAL6 (Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase Genet 6) and OsPAL7 (Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase Genet 7) to improve plant disease resistance [27].
In the present study, we identified a rice LMM, rust spots rice (rsr1), the leaves of which develop reddish-brown rust spots. The underlying mutant gene encodes a functional DUB, OsUBP2/OsLMP1. OsUBP2 was located at the same locus as OsLMP1. The mutation of OsUBP2 led to ROS accumulation, chloroplast structural defects, and PCD, with the Osubp2 mutant displaying an enhanced resistance to both leaf blast (caused by Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacterial blight (caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae). Overexpressing OsUBP2 weakened the resistance to rice blast. This study established that OsUBP2 functions as a negative regulator of immunity and ROS accumulation in rice.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Identification of the rsr1 Mutant

The rice rsr1 mutant was identified in a population of M2 mutant lines of the rice cultivar Nipponbare mutagenized by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) treatment. Compared with the wild type (WT), the rsr1 mutant developed reddish-brown lesions on the leaves at the four-leaf stage. The lesions spread from the tip of the leaf to the base, starting with the older leaves. At the seedling stage, lesions could only be observed on the leaf tips (Figure 1A,B), but were distributed over the entire leaf at the heading stage (Figure 1C,D). To verify whether the formation of lesions in the rsr1 mutant is light-dependent, the middle sections of the leaves were covered with aluminum foil for seven days. No lesions formed in the shaded parts (Figure 1E), indicating that lesion formation in rsr1 is light-dependent.
To determine the disease resistance of the rsr1 mutant, both rsr1 and the WT were inoculated with M. oryzae (Magnaporthe oryzae) isolate RB22 and the bacterial blight Xoo (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) isolate P6 during the nutritional growth stage. rsr1 showed strong resistance to both M. oryzae and Xoo (Figure 1F–I). The expression of genes related to disease resistance, including OsPBZ1, OsAOS2, OsPR1a, and OsPR1b, were significantly upregulated in rsr1 compared with the WT, as determined using qRT-PCR (Figure 1J).

2.2. RSR1 Encodes OsUBP2, a Predicted Deubiquitinating Enzyme

To clone the RSR1 gene, we crossed rsr1 with Kasalath, and the F1 generation was selfed to obtain the F2 generation population. All of the F1 plants showed a WT phenotype with no lesion spots. By contrast, the F2 generation population showed segregation of traits, with a WT: mutant phenotype ratio of approximately 3:1 (Supplemental Table S1), indicating that the rsr1 mutant phenotype is controlled by a single recessive gene. We designed 240 pairs of SSR primers based on the SSR polymorphisms between Nipponbare and Kasalath. Initially, using 25 homozygous recessive F2 individuals, OsRSR1 was mapped onto chromosome 9 between the SSR markers RM107 and RM6174 (Figure 2A,B). We then developed a series of markers (17.7 MB, 19.4 MB, and 19.7 MB; for details, see Supplemental Table S2) between the SSR markers RM107 and RM6174 and carried out further mapping analyses. In 25 F2 mutant progenies, we observed 6, 0, and 1 recombination events between the rsr1 locus and 17.7 MB, 19.4 MB, and 19.7 MB, respectively (Figure 3A). Using an F2 population derived from a cross between Nipponbare and rsr1 for MUTMAP sequencing, a base deletion (C; 1157 bp from the start codon of the coding sequence [CDS]) was identified in the first exon of gene Os09g0505100 (Figure 2C,D). This mutation causes an open reading frame (ORF) shift in Os09g0505100 and results in the truncation of the protein (Supplemental Figure S1). Evolutionary tree and sequence alignment analyses revealed that Os09g0505100 is closely related to AtUBP2 in Arabidopsis (Supplemental Figure S2); therefore, in this article, the gene is named OsUBP2 and the rsr1 mutant is renamed Osubp2.
To confirm whether the rsr1 phenotype was caused by the mutation of OsUBP2, we constructed a complementation plasmid, which included the coding frame of OsUBP2 with the 3000-bp upstream sequence, and transformed it into the Osubp2 mutant. The transgenic plants were named pOsUBP2, and their phenotype was consistent with that of the WT (Figure 2E). No lesion spots appeared on the leaves (Figure 2F), and the disease resistance of pOsUBP2 to Xoo did not differ from that of the WT (Figure 2G,H). We also knocked down the OsUBP2 gene in the Nipponbare background using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing technology and obtained an OsUBP2-KO mutant with a large deletion in OsUBP2. The OsUBP2-KO mutant was phenotypically identical to the Osubp2 mutant (Supplemental Figure S3).

2.3. OsUBP2 Is a Functional Deubiquitination Enzyme

OsUBP2 contains two domains, a ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase (UCH) and a zinc-finger in the ubiquitin-hydrolases (zf-UBP) domain. UCH possesses two conserved catalytic motifs, the Cys- and His-boxes (Supplemental Figure S4). Within these boxes are positionally conserved Cys and His residues within the active site [28]. To confirm whether OsUBP2 has deubiquitinating enzyme activity, GST-OsUBP2, GST-OsUBP2C234S (carrying a mutation of cysteine to serine at position 234), or GST were co-transformed with His-UBQ1 (ubiquitin extension protein) and His-UBQ10 (hexameric polyubiquitin) into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Immunoblot analysis indicated that only GST-OsUBP2 could cleave ubiquitin molecules (Figure 3A,B). To investigate whether the phenotype of Osubp2 results from the absence of its kinase activity, pOsUBP2C234S (p represents the promoter of OsUBP2) transgenic plants were generated in the Osubp2 background. Unlike pOsUBP2, pOsUBP2C234S could not recover the lesion phenotype of Osubp2 (Figure 3C). The Osubp2 protein contained a shift at amino acid 844 and prematurely terminated, resulting in the complete deletion of the His-box (Supplemental Figure S4). These findings show that the His-box and the cysteine residue at position 234 in the Cys-box are essential for OsUBP2 to function normally; and that OsUBP2 is a functional deubiquitinating enzyme.

2.4. Mutation of OsUBP2 Causes ROS Accumulation

To detect the accumulation of ROS in the Osubp2 mutant, various histochemical staining methods were used. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining showed an accumulation of H2O2 in the Osubp2 mutant; nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining showed the accumulation of O2– in the Osubp2 mutant (Figure 4A). In addition, the leaves of the WT and Osubp2 plants were immersed in solutions containing 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) to observe ROS accumulation and redox homeostasis. The oxidation state fluorescence signal of the probe was observed in the Osubp2 mutant, but not in the WT (Figure 4C). To further explore the excessive ROS accumulation in Osubp2 leaves, we measured the concentrations of H2O2 and the lipid oxidation product malondialdehyde (MDA), revealing both were significantly higher in Osubp2 than in the WT (Figure 4B).
In order to explore whether the accumulation of ROS in Osubp2 is caused by a defective ROS-scavenging mechanism, the enzymatic activities related to ROS scavenging were analyzed in the Osubp2 mutant and the WT. The activities of peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) were all increased in Osubp2 (Figure 4E), suggesting that the accumulation of ROS in this mutant is not due to defects in the ROS-scavenging mechanism.

2.5. Mutation of OsUBP2 Led to Abnormal Chloroplasts and Cell Death

To characterize Osubp2-mediated apoptosis, a TUNEL assay was used to detect cell death in Osubp2 and WT leaves. No positive TUNEL signal was detected in the WT; however, a strong green TUNEL signal was detected in the nuclei of Osubp2 cells (Figure 5A), indicating intense DNA damage and likely cell death. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe the chloroplast ultrastructure of Osubp2 and WT leaves. Compared with the WT, the chloroplasts in Osubp2 contained far fewer starch granules and some irregular protrusions (indicated by a red arrow in Figure 5B), which might be degraded thylakoid structure. Both the TUNEL assay and TEM sections were performed on leaves taken from WT and Osubp2 at 30 dps, when the lesions first appeared on the leaves of Osubp2. The section of the Osubp2 leaf was taken from a region with no lesion spots. Additionally, the chlorophyll contents of the Osubp2 and WT leaves were measured. The chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll contents of Osubp2 were significantly lower than those of the WT, whether in regions with or without lesion spots, but there was no difference in the carotene contents of the two genotypes (Figure 5C). Overall, the mutation of OsUBP2 caused chloroplast morphological defects and cell death.

2.6. Overexpression of OsUBP2 Weakens Resistance to Rice Blast

In order to further reveal the function of OsUBP2 against bacterial blight, OsUBP2 was overexpressed using a ubiquitin promoter. Two transgenic lines overexpressing OsUBP2 were obtained, named OVER-9 and OVER-11. A qRT-PCR analysis revealed a 25-fold and 30-fold increase in the expression of OsUBP2 in OVER-11 and OVER-9, respectively, compared with the WT (Figure 6D). Interestingly, the expression of the pathogen-related gene OsPR1b was significantly lower in OVER-9 and OVER-11 when compared with WT (Figure 6D). The leaf morphology of the overexpression lines was identical to the WT, and no lesion spots developed (Figure 6A). The overexpression lines and the WT were then inoculated with M. oryzae at the heading stage to observe their disease resistance 7 days post inoculation (dpi). The lesion lengths of OVER-9 and OVER-11 were longer than those of the WT (Figure 6B,C), indicating that the overexpression of OsUBP2 decreased resistance to rice blast.

2.7. Expression Pattern of OsUBP2

To identify the expression pattern of OsUBP2, we used qRT-PCRs to test its relative expression levels in different tissues and organs in the WT, revealing that it was more highly expressed in the leaf and leaf sheath than the other tissues (Figure 7A). To further investigate the expression pattern of OsUBP2, transgenic plants harboring a β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene driven by the OsUBP2 promoter (the 3-kb sequence upstream of the start codon) were produced. GUS staining showed that OsUBP2 was expressed in the leaf, root, panicle, and ligule bases (Figure 7B). To determine the subcellular localization of OsUBP2, plasmids of UBP2-fused GFP or GFP alone (as a control) were co-expressed in rice protoplasts with mCherry driven by the 35S promoter. OsUBP2 was found to be localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure 7C). We also transiently expressed p35S::OsUBP2-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana, the OsUBP2-GFP fusion protein was localized in both cytoplasm and nucleus, as indicated by the overlap between GFP signals and red signals from the nucleus marker (H2B-mcherry) (Supplemental Figure S5).

2.8. Ubiquitinated Proteomics Analysis of the Osubp2 and WT Plants

To find target protein candidates, label-free quantitative proteomics was used to compare the protein ubiquitination levels between Osubp2 and the WT. A total of 394 reliable ubiquitination sites (localization probability ≥ 0.75) were identified in Osubp2, while 720 reliable ubiquitination sites were identified in the WT. Proteins with expression differences greater than 1.5-fold between the two genotypes and p-value < 0.05 were considered to be significantly differentially ubiquitinated loci. The clustering of the proteins with significantly different ubiquitin levels for Osubp2 and WT is shown in Figure 8A. Thirty ubiquitination modification sites were significantly elevated and sixteen ubiquitination modification sites were significantly decreased in the Osubp2 mutant compared with WT. The 26 proteins with elevated levels of ubiquitination sites in Osubp2 could be considered candidate target proteins for OsUBP2.

3. Discussion

There are four main mechanisms by which LMMs are generated. First, the pathogen-associated genes may be mutated or overexpressed, disrupting the immune signaling pathways and initiating the HR [29]. This unsuppressed HR could lead to massive cell death and lesion mimic spots. The ssi4 gain-of-function mutant in Arabidopsis contains an amino acid substitution in the NBS structural domain of the TIR-NBS-LRR protein SSI4, This mutation constitutively activates the immune system, resulting in the significant upregulation of the disease-related genes and subsequent PCD following SA accumulation [30]. Similar to SSI4, NLS1 in rice encodes a typical CC-NB-LRR protein. The mutation of an amino acid in a non-conserved region near the GLPL motif of the NB structural domain leads to the constitutive activation of defense responses in the nls1 mutant, including the excessive accumulation of H2O2 and SA, and the upregulation of disease-related gene expression. The nls1 mutant develops necrotic spots on its leaf sheaths and displays an enhanced resistance to bacterial pathogens [31].
Another mechanism underlying the LMM phenotype is uncontrolled PCD. OsLSD1 in rice plays a negative regulatory role in regulating PCD, while OsLSD1-antisense transgenic plants exhibit a LMM phenotype, with upregulated PR-1 expression and an accelerated allergic response when inoculated with a non-virulent rice blast fungus [32]. A third mechanism underlying LMMs is metabolic pathway disorder, which can lead to the accumulation of intermediate metabolites or the blocked biosynthesis of some key enzymes in the metabolic process, thus causing the emergence of the LMM phenotype. Examples include the formation of the maize les22 mutant [33], the Arabidopsis rug1 mutant [34], and rlin1 in rice [7]. Fourth, temperature and light can affect the occurrence of the LMM phenotype. High-temperature stress inhibits normal cellular processes and leads to abnormal plant growth and development. In the LMMs spl7 [35] and les1 [36] in rice, the lesion spots were enhanced at higher temperatures. The formation of spots was reported to be light-dependent in several LMMs in rice, with less damage found on leaves covered with aluminum foil, and fewer or no spots formed on covered areas of leaves compared with the uncovered areas [35,37].

3.1. Mutation of OsUBP2 Promotes ROS Accumulation and Cell Death

Plants need light for photosynthesis; however, too much light energy can cause significant cell damage. These symptoms were observed on several LMMs, such as lsd1 [38], mips1 [39], and cat2 [40]. The phenotypes of these LMMs are light-dependent, suggesting that chloroplast activity acts as a signal that may trigger cell death through the accumulation of ROS. Lesion formation in Osubp2 was also light-dependent (Figure 1E), and abnormal chloroplast morphology (Figure 5B) with decreased chlorophyll content (Figure 5C) was also observed. Histochemical staining experiments and H2O2 content detection demonstrated that Osubp2 accumulated excessive levels of ROS in its leaves (Figure 4A–C). APX, SOD, POD, and CAT play important roles in the ROS-scavenging process [13], and the activities of all four were increased in Osubp2 (Figure 4D), suggesting that the accumulation of ROS in this mutant was not the result of a defect in the ROS-removal mechanism. ROS also plays complex roles as secondary messengers in the signaling pathway of gene-regulated cellular suicide, PCD [41]. A positive TUNEL signal was detected in the Osubp2 mutant (Figure 5A), providing further verification that the accumulation of ROS in Osubp2 leaves caused cell death. These results suggest that mutations in OsUBP2 lead to defective chloroplast function, the accumulation of ROS, and cell death. OsUBP2 plays a key role in ROS production and PCD, deepening our understanding of the relationship between these two processes in plants.

3.2. Loss of OsUBP2 Deubiquitinating Enzyme Activity Leads to the Osubp2 Phenotype

The Osubp2 mutant forms reddish-brown rust spots on the leaves in a light-dependent manner (Figure 1A–E). The expression of pOsUBP2 could fully rescue the Osubp2 mutant phenotype (Figure 2E–H). OsUBP2 is a functional deubiquitinating enzyme that can hydrolyze ubiquitinated precursors AtUBQ1 and AtUBQ10 in vitro; however, this function was lost when the cysteine at position 234 in Cys-box was mutated to serine (Figure 3A,B). pOsUBP2C234S could not recover the phenotype of Osubp2 (Figure 3C). The Oslmp1 mutant was previously reported to have truncated OsUBP2 at amino acid 868, also resulting in the deletion of the His-box and a lack of deubiquitinating enzyme activity in vitro [27]. These findings show that the His-box and the cysteine residue at position 234 in the Cys-box are essential for OsUBP2 to function normally. Deubiquitination is the antagonistic process of ubiquitination, in which DUBs dissociate ubiquitin from ubiquitin–protein conjugations [20,42]. Here, we showed that the levels of ubiquitin-linked proteins, especially K48-linked proteins, were higher in Osubp2 than in the WT, which was even more aggravated after Xoo inoculation (Figure 3D). These results suggest that OsUBP2-mediated protein deubiquitination is involved in the rice immune response to Xoo, as well as normal rice growth and development more generally.
Our results provide important evidence about the function of OsUBP2 in rice immunity. During the course of this study, Sun et al. 2022 independently characterized Osubp2/Oslmp1 mutant alleles. OsUBP2/OsLMP1 was shown to epigenetically modify the SA biosynthesis pathway genes by deubiquitinating H2B, thereby regulating the immune response in rice [27]. They attempted to verify the interaction of OsUBP2/OsLMP1 with the H2B variant, but the results did not verify their interaction; therefore, they proposed that OsLMP1 and H2B might be connected through a new regulatory link [27]. Notably, H2B is a universal component of a nucleosome, and, thus, the specificity of changes in H2B ubiquitination only at SA biosynthetic pathway genes in the mutants further suggests that H2B might not be a direct target of OsUBP2. Moreover, in our study, OsUBP2 was not mainly localized in the nucleus, as previously reported; rather, our results showed a similar amount of OsUBP2 also existed in the cytoplasm (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure S4), suggesting that OsUBP2 may also function in the deubiquitination of cytoplasmic proteins. It will be of great interest to determine the precise biochemical nature and direct targets of OsUBP2 in the immune pathway, which thus far remains uncertain. Our ubiquitinated proteomics data supply possible target protein candidates, providing some clues for the further elucidation of the function of OsUBP2 and immunity mechanisms in rice.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Condition

The EMS-mutated mutant library was generated using the Japonica rice Nipponbare. The Indica rice Kasalath was used to construct the genetic population for map-based cloning. Phenotypic characterization of the wild-type and mutant plants was performed in a growth chamber at 30 °C/22 °C (day/night) and 60% to 70% humidity, with bulb type light at a photon density of 300 μmolm–2 s–1 and a photoperiod of 14 h. The nutrient solution for hydroponics was Kimura nutrient solution described previously [43].

4.2. Map-Based Cloning

For map-based cloning, the Osubp2 mutant crossed with Kasalath to produce the F1 generation, and the F1 generation was self-pollinated to obtain the F2 generation population. Twenty-five plants with the lesion phenotype were selected from the F2 population for primary localization. OsUBP2 was initially identified on chromosome 9 using SSR markers. The Osubp2 mutant crossed with Nipponbare to generate F2 populations for MUTMAP sequencing. DNA was extracted from F2 populations, and genome resequencing was performed with a mean coverage of 30 times using an Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer.

4.3. Construction of Vectors and Generation of Transgenic Plants

To verify that the mutation of OsUBP2 was responsible for lesion formation in the Osubp2 mutant, the pOsUBP2 complementation construct was generated with the full-length OsUBP2 sequence and the 3000-bp sequence upstream of OsUBP2. pOsUBP2 was ligated into binary vector pBI101.3. Compared to the pOsUBP2 vector, pOsUBP2C234S has a mutation that induces a change at the 234 amino acid residue from cysteine to serine in the resulting protein. The point mutation in OsUBP2 was introduced using overlap extension PCR. To generate OsUBP2-KO mutants, two specific targets in OsUBP2 were selected to construct the CRISPR-Cas9 vector. The sequences were ligated into the pYLCRISPR/gRNA vector, followed by a ligation into the pYLCRISPR/Cas9-MH vector as described previously [44].
To construct an overexpression vector for OsUBP2, the CDS of OsUBP2 was amplified from Nipponbare cDNA and ligated into the PTCK303-Flag vector driven by the UBIQUITIN promoter and the pCAMBIA1300-sGFP vector driven by the 35S promoter.
To construct the pOsUBP2::OsUBP-GUS vector, the 3000-bp promoter sequence upstream of OsUBP2 was amplified from Nipponbare genomic DNA and the CDS sequence of OsUBP2 was amplified from Nipponbare cDNA. Overlap extension PCR was used to link the promoter sequence and the CDS sequence of OsUBP2 and the product was ligated into the pBI101.3-GUS (β-glucuronidase) vector.
To perform deubiquitination experiments in vitro, GST-OsUBP2, GST-OsUBP2C234S, His-UBQ1, and His-UBQ10 vectors were constructed. The CDS of OsUBP2 was amplified from Nipponbare cDNA and ligated into the pGEX-4T vector. The CDSs of UBQ1 and UBQ10 were amplified from Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) cDNA and ligated into the PET28a vector.
All constructs were transformed into mature seed-induced callus via Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105–mediated transformation, as described previously [45].

4.4. Measurement of Chlorophyll Content

Methods for the quantification of plant chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids have been described previously [46]. Briefly, leaf samples were cut into pieces, ground, soaked in 80% acetone and incubated in the dark until the leaves were completely decolored. The optical density of the sample solution was measured at 645, 470 and 663 nm using a spectrophotometer. Three biological replicates were measured for each sample.

4.5. Histochemical Staining

To quantify hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anions, the inverted second leaves of 30-day-old rice seedlings were immersed in 0.1% DAB solution (pH = 3.8) and 0.1% NBT solution (pH = 7.8) in the dark for 48 h, respectively. The leaves were then transferred to 95% ethanol until they completely were decolored. H2O2 was also detected using a 10 μm 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (H2DCFDA) probe. The leaves were washed twice with 1×PBS after ten minutes of staining and analyzed using 485 ± 10 nm/535 ± 10 nm excitation/emission as described before [47].

4.6. In Vitro Deubiquitination Assay

GST-OsUBP2/OsUBP2 and His-UBQ1/His-UBQ10 were co-transformed into E. coli strain BL21. The E. coli cells were grown to OD600 = 0.8, cooled on ice for 30 min, and induced with IPTG at a final concentration of 0.5 mM. The cultures were further incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, and lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE with anti-GST and anti-ubiquitin antibodies.

4.7. Inoculation of Pathogens

Rice was inoculated with bacterial blight using the leaf-cutting method. The concentration of Xoo was adjusted to OD600 = 0.6 with sterile water, and the bacterial solution was sprayed on the rice seedlings with the leaf tips removed. The inoculation method for rice blast was described previously [3]. In brief, M. oryzae spores were collected in sterile water containing 0.05% Tween-20, the concentration was adjusted to 1 × 105 spores per mL, and 10 μL was added to holes created by pricking the surface of rice leaves with a needle. Disease spot length was measured 7 days post inoculation (dpi).

4.8. Subcellular Localization

OsUBP2-GFP or GFP (as the control) driven by 35S promoter were co-transfected into rice protoplasts with 35s-mCherry. We also transiently expressed p35S::OsUBP2-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana, constructs p35S::OsUBP2-GFP, p35S::GFP and p35S::H2B-mcherry were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 cells. Suspension cultures carrying p35S::OsUBP2-GFP or p35S::GFP and p35S::H2B-mcherry were co-infiltrated into 5-week-old N. benthamiana leaves. Fluorescence signals were detected using a LSM710 confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss), as described previously [48].

4.9. TUNEL Assay

Wild-type and Osubp2 mutant leaves were embedded in paraffin and cut into thin slices. The slices were decolorized in xylene and then labeled using the TUNEL kit (C1088) from Beyotime.

4.10. Gene Expression Analysis

The total RNA of rice leaves was extracted with the TaKaRa MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction Kit. cDNA was synthesized with the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser using 2 μg RNA in a volume of 20 μL. qRT-PCRs were performed using TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (TaKaRa) on a LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR system (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative expression levels were normalized to the reference gene OsACTIN1.

4.11. Proteomics Analysis

Total protein of the above-ground fraction was extracted from wild-type and Osubp2 mutants at 21 days post-sowing (dps), and the protein was sent to SHANGHAI BIOPROTILE for label-free ubiquitinated proteomics analysis. The mass spectrometry database search software was MaxQuant 1.6.0.16, and the protein database was UniProt-Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (Rice)-148902-20200615.fasta.

4.12. Measurement of Various Antioxidant Indexes

The kits for the determination of H2O2 and MDA content, and kits for measuring POD, CAT, APX, and SOD enzyme activities were purchased from the Bioengineering Research Institute of Nanjing Jiancheng. All experiments were conducted according to the instructions, and measured 30 days after rice sowing.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11192568/s1, Figure S1: Protein sequence alignment of RSR1 and rsr1; Figure S2: Phylogenetic tree of OsUBP2 homologous proteins in rice and Arabidopsis; Figure S3: The phenotype of OsUBP2-KO plant; Figure S4: The conserved structural domains and catalytic motifs of UBP2 protein; Figure S5: Subcellular localization of OsUBP2. Table S1: F2 generation segregation ratio after crossing the rsr1 mutant with Kasalath.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.J. and X.M.; methodology, R.J.; software, J.X. and P.Y.; validation, R.J. and X.M.; formal analysis, R.J.; investigation, R.J., S.Z., X.D., T.C., J.X. and P.Y.; resources, R.J., S.Z. and X.M.; data curation, R.J.; writing—original draft preparation, R.J.; writing—review and editing, R.J.; visualization, R.J.; supervision, X.M.; project administration, X.M.; funding acquisition, X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (grant no. LZ21C020002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Weihua Mao from the Center of Analysis and Measurement at Zhejiang University for sequencing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhai, K.; Liang, D.; Li, H.; Jiao, F.; Yan, B.; Liu, J.; Lei, Z.; Huang, L.; Gong, X.; Wang, X.; et al. NLRs guard metabolism to coordinate pattern- and effector-triggered immunity. Nature 2021, 601, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lorrain, S. Lesion mimic mutants: Keys for deciphering cell death and defense pathways in plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kang, S.G.; Lee, K.E.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P.; Matin, M.N. Rice lesion mimic mutants (lmm): The current understanding of genetic mutations in the failure of ros scavenging during lesion formation. Plants 2021, 10, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ma, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Meng, L.; Jing, R.; Wang, F.; Wang, S.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, L.; et al. Disruption of gene spl35, encoding a novel cue domain-containing protein, leads to cell death and enhanced disease response in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1679–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Johal, G.S.; Hulbert, S.H.; Briggs, S.P. Disease Lesion Mimics of Maize: A model for cell death in plants. Bioessays 1995, 17, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fekih, R.; Tamiru, M.; Kanzaki, H.; Abe, A.; Yoshida, K.; Kanzaki, E.; Saitoh, H.; Takagi, H.; Natsume, S.; Undan, J.R.; et al. The Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Lesion mimic resembling, which encodes an aaa-type ATPase, is implicated in defense response. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2014, 290, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, C.; Liu, L.; Tang, J.; Lin, A.; Zhang, F.; Fang, J.; Zhang, G.; Chu, C. RLIN1, encoding a putative coproporphyrinogen iii oxidase, is involved in lesion initiation in rice. J. Genet. Genom. 2011, 38, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, S.-H.; Lim, J.-H.; Kim, S.-S.; Cho, S.-H.; Yoo, S.-C.; Koh, H.-J.; Sakuraba, Y.; Paek, N.-C. Mutation of spotted leaf3(spl3) impairs abscisic acid-responsive signalling and delays leaf senescence in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 7045–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, J.; Park, C.H.; He, F.; Nagano, M.; Wang, M.; Bellizzi, M.; Zhang, K.; Zeng, X.; Liu, W.; Ning, Y.; et al. The rhogap spin6 associates with spl11 and osrac1 and negatively regulates programmed cell death and innate immunity in rice. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, Y.; van Wersch, R.; Zhang, Y. Convergent and divergent signaling in pamp-triggered immunity and effector-triggered immunity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chisholm, S.T.; Coaker, G.; Day, B.; Staskawicz, B.J. Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jones, J.D.G.; Dangl, J.L. The Plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shapiguzov, A.; Vainonen, J.P.; Wrzaczek, M.; Kangasjärvi, J. ROS-talk-how the apoplast, the chloroplast, and the nucleus get the message through. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mittler, R. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Camejo, D.; Guzmán-Cedeño, Á.; Moreno, A. Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant–pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kou, Y.; Qiu, J.; Tao, Z. Every Coin Has Two Sides: Reactive oxygen species during rice–magnaporthe oryzae interaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jwa, N.-S.; Hwang, B.K. Convergent evolution of pathogen effectors toward reactive oxygen species signaling networks in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mhamdi, A.; Breusegem, F.V. Reactive oxygen species in plant development. Development 2018, 15, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive Oxygen Species: Metabolism, Oxidative Stress, and Signal Transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cui, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, S.; Ruan, B.; Xu, Q.; Yu, X.; Zhou, T.; Liu, H.; Zeng, D.; et al. Disruption of early lesion leaf 1, encoding a cytochrome p450 monooxygenase, induces ros accumulation and cell death in rice. Plant J. 2020, 105, 942–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, H.; Zhao, J.; Cai, J.; Patil, S.B. Ubiquitin-specific proteases function in plant development and stress responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gao, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhan, X.; Deng, C.; Cheng, S.; Cao, L. OsCUL3a-associated molecular switches have functions in cell metabolism, cell death, and disease resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5471–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shirsekar, G.S.; Vega-Sanchez, M.E.; Bordeos, A.; Baraoidan, M.; Swisshelm, A.; Fan, J.; Park, C.H.; Leung, H.; Wang, G.-L. Identification and characterization of suppressor mutants of spl11-mediated cell death in rice. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yin, Z.; Chen, J.; Zeng, L.; Goh, M.; Leung, H.; Khush, G.S.; Wang, G.-L. Characterizing rice lesion mimic mutants and identifying a mutant with broad-spectrum resistance to rice blast and bacterial blight. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chung, C.H.; Baek, S.H. Deubiquitinating enzymes: Their diversity and emerging roles. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 266, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ewan, R.; Pangestuti, R.; Thornber, S.; Craig, A.; Carr, C.; O’Donnell, L.; Zhang, C.; Sadanandom, A. Deubiquitinating Enzymes AtUBP12 and AtUBP13 and their tobacco homologue ntubp12 are negative regulators of plant immunity. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, J.; Song, W.; Chang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, T.; Zhang, Z. OsLMP1, encoding a deubiquitinase, regulates the immune response in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 814465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, N.; Doelling, J.H.; Falbel, T.; Durski, A.; Vierstra, R. The Ubiquitin-specific protease family from Arabidopsis. atubp1 and 2 are required for the resistance to the amino acid analog canavanine. Plant Physiol. 2000, 4, 1828–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mittler, R.; Pozo, O.D.; Meisel, L.; Lam, E. Pathogen-induced programmed cell death in plants, a possible defense mechanism. Dev. Genet. 1997, 21, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shirano, Y.; Kachroo, P.; Shah, J.; Klessig, D.F. A gain-of-function mutation in an arabidopsis toll interleukin1 receptor–nucleotide binding site–leucine-rich repeat type r gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3149–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, B.; Li, F.; Fang, J.; Chu, C. Semi-dominant mutations in the CC-NB-LRR-Type R gene, nls1, lead to constitutive activation of defense responses in rice. Plant J. 2011, 66, 996–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, L.; Pei, Z.; Tian, Y.; He, C. OsLSD1, a rice zinc finger protein, regulates programmed cell death and callus differentiation. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hu, G.; Yalpani, N.; Briggs, S.P.; Johal, G.S. A porphyrin pathway impairment is responsible for the phenotype of a dominant disease lesion mimic mutant of maize. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Quesada, V.; Sarmiento-Mañús, R.; González-Bayón, R.; Hricová, A.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L. Porphobilinogen deaminase deficiency alters vegetative and reproductive development and causes lesions in arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yamanouchi, U.; Yano, M.; Lin, H.; Ashikari, M.; Yamada, K. A Rice spotted leaf gene, spl7, encodes a heat stress transcription factor protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Belarus-Agrar. Ser. 2002, 99, 7530–7535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xia, S.; Liu, H.; Cui, Y.; Yu, H.; Rao, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zeng, D.; Hu, J.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Z.; et al. UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase enhances rice survival at high temperature. New Phytol. 2021, 233, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, C.; Ren, C.; Zhi, T.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F.; Peng, W.; Xie, D. Disruption of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase causes spontaneous cell death under short-day conditions in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1956–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mateo, A.; Mühlenbock, P.; Rustérucci, C.; Chang, C.C.-C.; Miszalski, Z.; Karpinska, B.; Parker, J.E.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Karpinski, S. Lesion simulating disease 1 is required for acclimation to conditions that promote excess excitation energy. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2818–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meng, P.H.; Raynaud, C.; Tcherkez, G.; Blanchet, S.; Massoud, K.; Domenichini, S.; Henry, Y.; Soubigou-Taconnat, L.; Lelarge-Trouverie, C.; Saindrenan, P.; et al. Crosstalks between myo-inositol metabolism, programmed cell death and basal immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Queval, G.; Issakidis-Bourguet, E.; Hoeberichts, F.A.; Vandorpe, M.; Gakière, B.; Vanacker, H.; Miginiac-Maslow, M.; Breusegem, F.V.; Noctor, G. Conditional oxidative stress responses in the arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength-dependent gene expression, and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of h2o2-induced cell death. Plant J. 2007, 52, 640–657. [Google Scholar]
  41. Williams, B.; Dickman, M. Plant programmed cell death: Can’t live with it; can’t live without it. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; He, H.; Ma, L.; Deng, X.W. Functional characterization of the arabidopsis ubiquitin-specific protease gene family reveals specific role and redundancy of intdidual members in development. Plant J. 2008, 55, 844–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, X.; Shi, J.; Hao, X.; Liu, H.; Shi, J.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, M.; Wu, P.; Mao, C. OsORC3 is required for lateral root development in rice. Plant J. 2013, 74, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shao, Y.; Zhou, H.-Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lin, J.; Jiang, X.; He, Q.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; et al. OsSPL3, an sbp-domain protein, regulates crown root development in rice. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1257–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Toki, S.; Hara, N.; Ono, K.; Onodera, H.; Tagiri, A.; Oka, S.; Tanaka, H. Early infection of scutellum tissue with agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant J. 2006, 47, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wellburn, A.R. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 144, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Leshem, Y.; Melamed-Book, N.; Cagnac, O.; Ronen, G.; Nishri, Y.; Solomon, M.; Cohen, G.; Levine, A. Suppression of arabidopsis vesicle-snare expression inhibited fusion of h2o2-containing vesicle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Belarus-Agrar. Ser. 2006, 103, 18008–18013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lv, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Shi, J.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Mao, C.; Yi, K.; et al. SPX4 negatively regulates phosphate signaling and homeostasis through its interaction with phr2 in rice. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1586–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 11 02568 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of the rsr1 mutant. (A) Wild-type (WT) and rsr1 mutant plants at the seedling stage. Bar = 2 cm. (B) Leaves of WT and rsr1 mutant plants at the seedling stage. Bar = 2 cm. (C) Wild-type (WT) and rsr1 mutant plants at the heading stage. Bar = 2 cm. (D) Leaves of WT and rsr1 mutant plants at the heading stage. (E) The phenotype of rsr1 mutant leaf blades after shading with foil for 7 days. (F) Punch inoculation of rsr1 mutant and WT plants with the compatible M. Oryzae isolate RB22. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (G) Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n= 12). (H) Leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants were inoculated with compatible Xoo isolate P6. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (I) Lesion length on the leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n = 17). (J) Relative expression levels of defense response genes between rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 30 days post-sowing (dps) using the qRT-PCR assay. Data were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene OsACTIN. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the WT and rsr1 mutant by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of the rsr1 mutant. (A) Wild-type (WT) and rsr1 mutant plants at the seedling stage. Bar = 2 cm. (B) Leaves of WT and rsr1 mutant plants at the seedling stage. Bar = 2 cm. (C) Wild-type (WT) and rsr1 mutant plants at the heading stage. Bar = 2 cm. (D) Leaves of WT and rsr1 mutant plants at the heading stage. (E) The phenotype of rsr1 mutant leaf blades after shading with foil for 7 days. (F) Punch inoculation of rsr1 mutant and WT plants with the compatible M. Oryzae isolate RB22. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (G) Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n= 12). (H) Leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants were inoculated with compatible Xoo isolate P6. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (I) Lesion length on the leaves of rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n = 17). (J) Relative expression levels of defense response genes between rsr1 mutant and WT plants at 30 days post-sowing (dps) using the qRT-PCR assay. Data were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene OsACTIN. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the WT and rsr1 mutant by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Plants 11 02568 g001
Plants 11 02568 g002 550
Figure 2. Map-based cloning of OsRSR1. (A) OsRSR1 was initially mapped on chromosome 9 between simple sequence repeat markers RM107 and RM614. (B) The OsRSR1 locus was fine-mapped to a 2-Mb genomic region between 17.7 Mb and 19.7 Mb. The numbers under the linkage map represent the number of recombinants, n = 25. (C) Structure of OsRSR1 gene and mutation site. The line represents the intron; black boxes represent the exons; white boxes represent 3′UTR (left) and 5′UTR (right); the blue box represents the mutation site. (D) The sequence of the mutation site in WT and rsr1 mutant, the rsr1 mutant missing a base C compared with WT cased frameshift mutation. (E) The phenotype of 2-month-old WT, Osubp2 mutant and pOsUBP2 T2 plants. T2: T2 generation of the pOsUBP2 transgenic plants (after selfing). (F) Leaves (second from the top) of pOsUBP2 T2 plants and Osubp2 mutant at 60 days post-sowing (dps). (G) Leaves of WT and pOsUBP2 T2 plants were inoculated with compatible Xoo isolate P6. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (H) Lesion length on the leaves of WT and complement pOsUBP2 T2 plants at 7 dpi shown in (G). Error bars represent + SD (n = 9).
Figure 2. Map-based cloning of OsRSR1. (A) OsRSR1 was initially mapped on chromosome 9 between simple sequence repeat markers RM107 and RM614. (B) The OsRSR1 locus was fine-mapped to a 2-Mb genomic region between 17.7 Mb and 19.7 Mb. The numbers under the linkage map represent the number of recombinants, n = 25. (C) Structure of OsRSR1 gene and mutation site. The line represents the intron; black boxes represent the exons; white boxes represent 3′UTR (left) and 5′UTR (right); the blue box represents the mutation site. (D) The sequence of the mutation site in WT and rsr1 mutant, the rsr1 mutant missing a base C compared with WT cased frameshift mutation. (E) The phenotype of 2-month-old WT, Osubp2 mutant and pOsUBP2 T2 plants. T2: T2 generation of the pOsUBP2 transgenic plants (after selfing). (F) Leaves (second from the top) of pOsUBP2 T2 plants and Osubp2 mutant at 60 days post-sowing (dps). (G) Leaves of WT and pOsUBP2 T2 plants were inoculated with compatible Xoo isolate P6. Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (H) Lesion length on the leaves of WT and complement pOsUBP2 T2 plants at 7 dpi shown in (G). Error bars represent + SD (n = 9).
Plants 11 02568 g002
Plants 11 02568 g003 550
Figure 3. Characterization of OsUBP2 protein. (A,B) show the DUB enzyme activity of OsUBP2 and OsUBP2C234S protein in vivo, detected by the degradation of the substrate AtUBQ1 in (A) and AtUBQ10 in (B) into small fragments. IB, Immunoblot; Ub, ubiquitin. (C) Leaves of Osubp2 and POsUBP2C234S transgenic T1 plants in Osubp2 background at the heading stage. (D) The ubiquitin conjugates in WT and Osubp2 mutant before and after Xoo isolate P6 inoculation. Total protein extracts from seedlings before or after Xoo infection were analyzed using anti-ubiquitin (Ub), anti-K48-linked (K48) or anti-K63-linked (K63) ubiquitin chain antibodies. CBB, Coomassie blue staining, hpi: hours post-inoculation.
Figure 3. Characterization of OsUBP2 protein. (A,B) show the DUB enzyme activity of OsUBP2 and OsUBP2C234S protein in vivo, detected by the degradation of the substrate AtUBQ1 in (A) and AtUBQ10 in (B) into small fragments. IB, Immunoblot; Ub, ubiquitin. (C) Leaves of Osubp2 and POsUBP2C234S transgenic T1 plants in Osubp2 background at the heading stage. (D) The ubiquitin conjugates in WT and Osubp2 mutant before and after Xoo isolate P6 inoculation. Total protein extracts from seedlings before or after Xoo infection were analyzed using anti-ubiquitin (Ub), anti-K48-linked (K48) or anti-K63-linked (K63) ubiquitin chain antibodies. CBB, Coomassie blue staining, hpi: hours post-inoculation.
Plants 11 02568 g003
Plants 11 02568 g004 550
Figure 4. Mutation of OsUBP2 led to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. (A) 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining of the wild type (WT) and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 days post-sowing (dps). Scale Bar = 2 cm. (B) The content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps, mgprot: protein per milligram. (C) Microscopic analysis of leaves of the WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps, incubated with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DAFDA). Red, chlorophyll; green, oxidized H2DCFDA. Scale Bar = 200 μm. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel. (D) The peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) enzyme activity in WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate significant difference between Osubp2 mutant and WT by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Mutation of OsUBP2 led to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. (A) 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining of the wild type (WT) and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 days post-sowing (dps). Scale Bar = 2 cm. (B) The content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps, mgprot: protein per milligram. (C) Microscopic analysis of leaves of the WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps, incubated with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DAFDA). Red, chlorophyll; green, oxidized H2DCFDA. Scale Bar = 200 μm. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel. (D) The peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) enzyme activity in WT and Osubp2 mutant leaves at 30 dps. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate significant difference between Osubp2 mutant and WT by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Plants 11 02568 g004
Plants 11 02568 g005 550
Figure 5. Mutation of OsUBP2 led to DNA damage and abnormal chloroplast morphology. (A) TUNEL assay in WT leaves and Osubp2 mutant leaves, red signal indicates PI (Propidium iodide) staining; green represents TUNEL-positive signals. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel, Scale Bar = 50 μm. (B) Chloroplast ultrastructure in WT (up) and Osubp2 mutant (below). Thy: thylakoid; CM, chloroplast membrane; SG, starch granule; OG, osmiophilic globules; IP, irregular protrusions; Scale Bar = 1 μm. (C) Chlorophyll content in the flag leaves of WT and Osubp2 mutant plants at 30 days post-sowing (dps). chla: chlorophyll a; chlb: chlorophyll b; car: carotene; Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate significant difference between the Osubp2 and WT by Student’s t-test, *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Mutation of OsUBP2 led to DNA damage and abnormal chloroplast morphology. (A) TUNEL assay in WT leaves and Osubp2 mutant leaves, red signal indicates PI (Propidium iodide) staining; green represents TUNEL-positive signals. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel, Scale Bar = 50 μm. (B) Chloroplast ultrastructure in WT (up) and Osubp2 mutant (below). Thy: thylakoid; CM, chloroplast membrane; SG, starch granule; OG, osmiophilic globules; IP, irregular protrusions; Scale Bar = 1 μm. (C) Chlorophyll content in the flag leaves of WT and Osubp2 mutant plants at 30 days post-sowing (dps). chla: chlorophyll a; chlb: chlorophyll b; car: carotene; Error bars represent + SD (n = 3 independent pools of leaves, three plants per pool). Asterisks indicate significant difference between the Osubp2 and WT by Student’s t-test, *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Plants 11 02568 g005
Plants 11 02568 g006 550
Figure 6. Disease resistance phenotype of OsUBP2 overexpression plants. (A) Leaves of WT and OsUBP2 overexpression plants at the heading stage. Bar = 2 cm. (B) Punch inoculation of OsUBP2 overexpression plants and WT plants with the compatible M. Oryzae isolate RB22, Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (C) Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of OsUBP2 overexpression plants and WT plants shown in (B) at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n = 9). (D) Relative expression levels of OsUBP2 and OsPR1b in two overexpression lines. Data were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene OsACTIN. Error bars represent +SD (n = 6 independent pools of leaves, two plants per pool). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the OsUBP2 overexpression and WT plants by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 6. Disease resistance phenotype of OsUBP2 overexpression plants. (A) Leaves of WT and OsUBP2 overexpression plants at the heading stage. Bar = 2 cm. (B) Punch inoculation of OsUBP2 overexpression plants and WT plants with the compatible M. Oryzae isolate RB22, Leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Scale Bar = 2 cm. (C) Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of OsUBP2 overexpression plants and WT plants shown in (B) at 7 dpi. Error bars represent + SD (n = 9). (D) Relative expression levels of OsUBP2 and OsPR1b in two overexpression lines. Data were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene OsACTIN. Error bars represent +SD (n = 6 independent pools of leaves, two plants per pool). Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the OsUBP2 overexpression and WT plants by Student’s t-test: **** p < 0.0001.
Plants 11 02568 g006
Plants 11 02568 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression pattern and subcellular location of OsUBP2. (A) Relative expression level of OsUBP2 in various organs at different growth stages. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3). (B) β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining of pOsUBP2::GUS transgenic plants. Scale Bar = 2 cm in Leaf, Root and Ligule Base; Scale Bar = 0.2 cm in Panicle. (C) Subcellular localization of the OsUBP2 protein. Scale Bar = 20 μm. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel.
Figure 7. Expression pattern and subcellular location of OsUBP2. (A) Relative expression level of OsUBP2 in various organs at different growth stages. Error bars represent + SD (n = 3). (B) β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining of pOsUBP2::GUS transgenic plants. Scale Bar = 2 cm in Leaf, Root and Ligule Base; Scale Bar = 0.2 cm in Panicle. (C) Subcellular localization of the OsUBP2 protein. Scale Bar = 20 μm. White: white light channel; Merged: image color merged channel.
Plants 11 02568 g007
Plants 11 02568 g008 550
Figure 8. Proteomics analysis of the Osubp2 and WT plants. Clustering result of modified sites with significant differences between the Osubp2 and WT. WT−1 and WT-2, Osubp2−1, Osubp−2 represent two replicates. Annotation on the right side contains group (protein ID + modification site) gene name and the annotation of the gene. The information of protein ID, gene name, and the annotation of the gene was from UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/ (accessed on 20 August 2022)). Red represents higher ubiquitination modification, and blue, lower ubiquitination modification.
Figure 8. Proteomics analysis of the Osubp2 and WT plants. Clustering result of modified sites with significant differences between the Osubp2 and WT. WT−1 and WT-2, Osubp2−1, Osubp−2 represent two replicates. Annotation on the right side contains group (protein ID + modification site) gene name and the annotation of the gene. The information of protein ID, gene name, and the annotation of the gene was from UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/ (accessed on 20 August 2022)). Red represents higher ubiquitination modification, and blue, lower ubiquitination modification.
Plants 11 02568 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, R.; Zhou, S.; Da, X.; Chen, T.; Xu, J.; Yan, P.; Mo, X. Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2) Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Disease Resistance in Rice. Plants 2022, 11, 2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192568

AMA Style

Jiang R, Zhou S, Da X, Chen T, Xu J, Yan P, Mo X. Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2) Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Disease Resistance in Rice. Plants. 2022; 11(19):2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Ruirui, Shichen Zhou, Xiaowen Da, Tao Chen, Jiming Xu, Peng Yan, and Xiaorong Mo. 2022. "Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2) Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Disease Resistance in Rice" Plants 11, no. 19: 2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192568

APA Style

Jiang, R., Zhou, S., Da, X., Chen, T., Xu, J., Yan, P., & Mo, X. (2022). Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 2 (OsUBP2) Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Disease Resistance in Rice. Plants, 11(19), 2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop