Next Article in Journal
From a Lose–Lose to a Win–Win Situation: User-Friendly Biomass Models for Acacia longifolia to Aid Research, Management and Valorisation
Next Article in Special Issue
Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase GmPAL1.1 Promotes Seed Vigor under High-Temperature and -Humidity Stress and Enhances Seed Germination under Salt and Drought Stress in Transgenic Arabidopsis
Previous Article in Journal
Photosynthesis, Phytohormone Signaling and Sugar Catabolism in the Culm Sheaths of Phyllostachys edulis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exogenous Spermidine Promotes Germination of Aged Sorghum Seeds by Mediating Sugar Metabolism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health

1
MARA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center, No. 2901 Beidi Road, Shanghai 201106, China
3
College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
4
Hubei Key Laboratory of Nutritional Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(21), 2864; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864
Submission received: 11 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 23 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Seed Development, Germination and Vigor)

Abstract

:
Seed germination and stand establishment are the first steps of crop growth and development. However, low seed vigor, improper seedbed preparation, unfavorable climate, and the occurrence of pests and diseases reduces the germination rate and seedling quality, resulting in insufficient crop populations and undesirable plant growth. Seed coating is an effective method that is being developed and applied in modern agriculture. It has many functions, such as improving seed vigor, promoting seedling growth, and reducing the occurrence of pests and diseases. Yet, during seed coating procedures, several factors, such as difficulty in biodegradation of coating materials and hindrance in the application of chemical ingredients to seeds, force us to explore reliable and efficient coating formulations. Biochar, as a novel material, may be expected to enhance seed germination and seedling establishment, simultaneously ensuring agricultural sustainability, environment, and food safety. Recently, biochar-based seed coating has gained much interest due to biochar possessing high porosity and water holding capacity, as well as wealthy nutrients, and has been proven to be a beneficial agent in seed coating formulations. This review presents an extensive overview on the history, methods, and coating agents of seed coating. Additionally, biochar, as a promising seed coating agent, is also synthesized on its physico-chemical properties. Combining seed coating with biochar, we discussed in detail the agricultural applications of biochar-based seed coating, such as the promotion of seed germination and stand establishment, the improvement of plant growth and nutrition, suitable carriers for microbial inoculants, and increase in herbicide selectivity. Therefore, this paper could be a good source of information on the current advance and future perspectives of biochar-based seed coating for modern agriculture.

1. Introduction

Farmers have long pursued crop seeds with high vigor to guarantee increased and uniform germination post-sowing, along with successful plant establishment, which contributes to achieving higher yield [1]. Yet, the undesirable properties of initial seeds, i.e., hardness, low seed vigor, and seed aging [2], result in erratic germination and poor stand establishment. Additionally, there are many external factors for seedling suboptimal germination and mortality, including improper farming operations (unsuitable sowing depth, uneven soil, the excessive use of fertilizers in the seedbed) and a wide range of environmental stresses (drought, chill) and biological stresses (weed infestation, animal and insect damage) [3]. It is difficult to change and regulate environmental conditions in a large area. Therefore, the judicious application of seed treatments may provide a promising attempt to improve seed vigor, seedling stand, and stress resistance.
In the past few years, seed enhancement technologies, including seed priming and seed coating, have been employed to boost seed performance by suffering from specific conditions and regimes [4,5]. Seed enhancements are most effective when they are goal-oriented and plant-specific to assure optimal seedling establishment and promote production under changing climatic environments [4]. Recent studies reported that seed enhancement techniques produced a healthy crop stand and, additionally, improved the growth and physio-morphological traits of the plant [6]. The application of seed priming is relatively common among different seed treatment technologies. Seed priming, known as the earliest seed treatment technique, refers to on-farm seed priming whereby seeds are controlled and hydrated in either water or water solution with additives or through contact with a solid carrier in order to start the germination while preventing radicle emergence [7]. Seed priming resulted in synchronized emergence, and uniform stand establishment due to a decline in the lag time to imbibition and a better repair of metabolic segments and osmotic adjustment [8,9]. Nevertheless, seed priming is facing many challenges, such as product conservation, viability losses during storage, and difficulties in upscaling management [2,10]. Moreover, this makes the process time-consuming and cumbersome when priming large quantities of seeds that require subsequent drying.
Seed enhancements via seed coating may overcome these issues. Seed coating technology has been considered a promising approach to alleviate the pressure of agricultural activities and combat abiotic and biotic stresses. Seed coating is a reliable technique to apply external materials in close proximity to germinating seeds, which ultimately increases seed quality and yield via improving seed placement and performance [11]. Some of these exogenous materials include the application of nutrients, plant growth regulators, and microorganisms [12], which positively influence seed germination, emergence, and early seedling growth [4]. Likewise, the utilization of non-active or active materials into seeds during seed coating alters the original shape and size of seeds, thereby enhancing a build-up in seed weight, which facilitates seed handling and sowing. Recently, a biomaterial based on silk and trehalose has been mixed with rhizobacterial through a seed coating approach, which boosted seed germination and mitigated soil salinity [3]. The seed coating technique has been used as an efficient tool for raising plant establishment and the development of wheat under water deficit conditions [13].
In recent years, biochar research has received increasing attention due to the unique structure and characteristics of biochar. Biochar derived from biomass through the pyrolysis process is usually employed as a soil amendment [14]. Previously, considerable studies reported that biochar application helps to improve soil properties, increase crop productivity, and enhance carbon sequestration [15,16]. However, the handling of biochar faces one of the major barriers of the use process due to its low energy density and bulk density, along with expensive transporting and storing costs Additionally, the wide utilization of biochar results in the generation of dust, which could lead to product loss and harm the health of workers. It is potentially possible to resolve the above-mentioned difficulties by biochar modification, such as biochar-based seed coating technology. Coating techniques have strong potential toward increasing the value of biochar, as well as its economic viability owing to the high mass and energy density of coatings and their convenient storage. Additionally, it is able to minimize dust generation via the enlargement of particle sizes, which conduces to the environment and human health. Here, the currently published studies on seed coating techniques and the properties and roles of biochar are extensively reviewed. Moreover, by combining seed coating with biochar, we particularly focus on the agricultural applications of biochar-based seed coating. New research opportunities and future prospects are also highlighted.

2. The Development and Classification of Seed Coating Technology

2.1. The Development of Seed Coating Technology

Seed coating technology is an ancient practice with previous evidence of its utilization being traced back to as far as 2000 years ago by the ancient Chinese, who used mud-coated rice seeds to maintain their dominance in flooded fields (Figure 1) [17]. The first seed patent was filed in 1868 to improve cotton seed for planting by coating a mixture of a glutinous material and gypsum [18], which was the earliest scientific literature on seed coating. Seed coating was first commercially produced for cereal seeds in the 1930s by a British seed company. During the mid-20th century, Jeffs [19] reviewed numerous seed coating techniques that were developed for enhancing agricultural production. The extensive commercial application of seed coating started in the 1960s to increase precision sowing for the greenhouse transplant industry in Europe [20], followed shortly by the United States’ agricultural sector in the 1970s after implementing stricter legal requirements in the horticulture industry [20,21]. Seed coating technologies continually increased from the 1970s to the 1990s, as reviewed by Scott [22], Taylor and Harman [23], and Hill [21].
Since the 21st century, more overviews concentrate on seed enhancements and seed coating equipment by Halmer [24], Pedrini [1,25], and Afzal [26]. In 2018, the world seed market achieved an estimated value of 41.6 billion USD due to the increase in scientific and agricultural prowess [27]. Currently, this technology has proven to be so effective that almost exclusively field crops and horticultural crop seeds are performed, whose market is estimated to reach 18 billion USD each year [28]. With the rapid spread and development of seed coating techniques in developing countries, the global market for materials alone (binders, fillers, and other additives) that are utilized in seed coating was 1.8 billion USD in 2019, which is predicted to rise to almost 3.0 billion USD by 2025 [26,29].

2.2. Definition of Modern Seed Coating

Previously, many scientists have proposed a definition of seed coating. Porter [30] suggested that seed coating is used for the application of biostimulants, nutrients, and other products that alleviate biotic and abiotic stresses encountered after sowing. Scott [22] defined seed coating as the application of needed materials to the seed surface that affect the seed or soil at the seed–soil interface. Kaufman [20] proposed that seed coating is the process of applying exogenous materials to the surface of the natural seed coat, which is used for the physical modification of seed or the delivery of active ingredients. However, modern seed coating has a new and broad interpretation. Modern seed coating technology refers to a reliable and efficient technique to apply external materials to cover the natural seed coat, resulting in forming a thinner or thicker layer on the surface. The aims of modern seed coating include achievement in uniform seed dimensions, improvement in seed quality, such as seed vigor and viability, the stimulation of seed germination and seedling growth, and promotion to crop yield via improving seed placement and performance, as well as increase to stress tolerance.

2.3. Classification of Seed Coating Methods

Seed coating methods are generally categorized as dependent on the shape, size, weight, and sorting properties of the coated seeds [1,25,31]. Even though the terminology adopted in the literature regarding the type of seed coating is not consistent, the methods most used and reported are seed dressing, film coating, encrusting, pelleting, and extruded pelleting [32,33].

2.3.1. Seed Dressing

Seed dressing is the most commonly adopted method for active coating ingredients with low dosages onto the surface of seeds [34]. The primary seed coating equipment for seed dressing is a rotary coater (Figure 2), which comprises a metal cylinder with a concave disc, along with two spinning base discs. The concave disk at the bottom drives the seed mass to move steadily along the walls of the cylinder when rotating, while the smaller rotating one attached to the drum lid and suspended in the middle of the drum, allows the atomization and projection of liquid/slurry coating to the spinning seed mass. In villages, low-cost containers, such as earthen pots and buckets, can also be used for seed dressing by the farmers. This method can be used to apply a wide range of active materials, particularly chemical plant protectants. The rate of liquid chemical materials applied to seeds ranges from 0.05 to 1% of seed weight (Figure 3). Finishing powders or fluency powders are utilized shortly after the liquid coating to consume excess liquids, resulting in loading higher dosages of chemical seed dressing, especially modern pesticides [35].

2.3.2. Film Coating

Film coating is known as a current method of encapsulating seeds with a thin layer of active materials, which comprises a mixture of polymers, pigments, plasticizers, and colorants [36]. The most popular seed coating apparatus is a rotary coater and fluidized bed but the former is used much more in commercial practice than the latter. Prior to application onto seeds, film coating polymers (liquid adhesive) are formulated to disperse or dissolve active components. This method produced nearly 90% application recovery [23], along with slight modification of the seed size, shape, and weight [24]. Generally, the increase of loading rates in seed weight is between 2 and 5% (Figure 3). To elevate loading from 5 to 8%, dry finishing powders can be added to the rotary coater or utilized with the dry powder applicator, a coating device where a rotating stainless steel brush sifts a powder material through a metering screen (Figure 2). Additionally, film coating promotes seed flowability during seed treating and sowing operations while eliminating the production of dust-off. Therefore, film coating has been obtained in use as a seed coating technique in the seed industry, in particular certain high-value vegetable species and other important crop seeds due to the excellent delivery of protectants on valuable seeds. When compared with other seed coating types, the significant advantages of film coating are the reduction of loss in the active ingredients throughout seed handling and transportation [35], as well as the prompter release of active components from the seed.

2.3.3. Encrusting

Encrusting is another method of covering seeds that includes applying liquids and solid materials to create a completely coated seed with the shape of the initial seed maintained [37]. The two most ordinary encrusting machines to generate encrusted seeds are the rotary coater or rotating pan (Figure 2). As the earliest seed encrusting machine, the rotating pan is popularly composed of an inclined round pan driven by a rotating motorized pivot (Figure 2), where seeds are put in the pan on a slow spinning motion and then materials are gradually added to improve encrusted product size [38], followed by size sorting with sifters and then drying [24].
This procedure results in a smoother surface and a more uniform shape and promotes the weight and size of seeds, which can be utilized both in the field and in the greenhouse, thereby exploiting seed planting productivity [39]. Generally, the weight increase or build-up increase after the coating is more than film coating and ranges from 8–500% (Figure 3). Moreover, before packaging and storage, the freshly encrusted seeds need to be dried back to their original seed moisture content due to the addition of substantial amounts of water during the coating. This approach is commonly used on plants that gain benefit from seed singulation but do not require thinning during the post-emergence [40].

2.3.4. Pelleting

Pelleting is the technique with liquids and inert materials (such as diatomaceous earth, talc, and bentonite) applied to the seed surface, enabling a greater weight increase, and is thus regarded as a continuation of encrusting operation [26]. Therefore, this process is also carried out using a rotating pan or rotary coater (Figure 2). Nonetheless, pelleting usually modifies seed morphology into a larger and spherical shape that is difficult to discriminate from the original seed shape [24]. Pelleting contributes to precise metering and improving plantability with mechanical planting equipment by increasing the percent weight up to 500–5000% (Figure 3). It facilitates making planting easy and accurate for small-seeded or irregular-shaped horticultural crops, including lettuce [41] and tomato [42].
Various forms, i.e., liquids and dry powders, serve as a binder. The mixture of dry powders and filler materials is to form a coating blend, with only water functioning as a solvent during the pelleting procedure [43]. It is crucial to select the appropriate liquids and fillers to make sure that pelleted seeds germinate without the constraints of the pellet matrix [37]. Similar to the encrusting process, the freshly pelleted seeds must be dried before packing and storing. In comparison with other coating methods, pelleting requires more time and expertise due to the extensive application of liquids, active ingredients, and solid powders. Additionally, the integrity of pelleting relies on the materials utilized (e.g., fillers and binders) and suitable techniques [23]. Unfortunately, manufacturers keep materials and methods of pelleting as closely guarded secrets, hampering the progress of pelleting technology [32].

2.3.5. Extruded Pelleting

Extruded pelleting is the approach of seed coating with the addition of seeds and a relatively large amount of materials to produce pellets of various shapes and sizes, usually cylindrical [25]. This method aims to promote seed germination and seedling growth for small-seeded species through the dough mixture of seed and a host of materials [44]. Extruded pelleting requires specialized application machinery, that is, an extruder (Figure 2), which is similar to an industrial pasta machine that makes pasta in the food industry [25,45]. This apparatus consists of tubing, auger, dies, and cutter with a rotary wire. The process is that seed and materials (liquids and solids) are thoroughly mixed to produce a “friable” dough, which could efficiently flow through the auger. As the dough is compacted against the wall of the machine, seed dough material is extruded through a round die and then cut by a rotary wire cutter. All previously described coating methods avoid doubles or agglomerates (one coated propagule contains two or more seeds), while extruded pelleting incorporates multiple seeds into a single delivery unit. Furthermore, the build-up increase in seed weight is beyond 500% (Figure 3) due to the application of sufficient materials.
Depending on site environments and plants, supporting additives incorporated into the dough mixture contain water-sensitive binders, hydrophilic clay fillers, super absorbent polymers, plant growth regulators, and fertilizers [45]. As compared with standard seed coating techniques, extruded pelleting allows for several times more materials to be added to the seed surface. Likewise, precise placement with one or multiple seeds can be accomplished after the extrusion, which is conducive to the reduction of seed waste and control of the desired seed density per extruded pellet [33].

3. Seed Coating Agents

A broad range of materials in the process of seed coating are used as seed coating agents. According to materials function, these materials can be generally broken down into three primary categories: binders, fillers, and active ingredients [1]. Binders and fillers are used to provide for the thermal, physical, and mechanical characteristics of coated seeds, while active ingredients target the protection and increment of seed germination and seeding development [25]. It is worth noting that fillers and binders should be compatible with active components and not pose threats to the ability of seeds to germinate and grow.

3.1. Binders

Binders, functioning as adhesives, adhere to the seed and provide structural support and retention for active compounds. Seed dressing and film coating usually require a binder, which commonly refers to natural or synthetic polymers, for instance, methyl cellulose [46], carboxymethyl cellulose [47], polyvinyl alcohol [48], and gum arabic [49]. Apart from the polymer, certain organic binders in the fine powder form are mixed with the small particle fillers to produce a sticky coating powder when water is applied. They are usually delivered in aqueous solution form during or toward the end of the coating process to stick the exogenous materials to seeds and lower the amount of dusting off in the final product [1]. Moreover, the application of various layers with the binder during the different stages of coated seeds could offer a physical buffer to avoid direct contact between the active chemicals and the seed or other active layers. Additionally, the quantity of adhesive materials employed alters the mechanical properties of encrusted coatings, for instance, compressive strength, integrity, and disintegration time after water immersion [50].

3.2. Fillers

Fillers are popularly bulking inert materials and allow for physical modification, which is commonly used in the process of encrusting and pelleting. They are applied as either a single component or a combination of various components, and the most commonly used are bentonite [42], lime [51], diatomaceous earth [52], and talc [53]. These fillers are normally mineral materials that are mined from the earth with minimal alteration apart from crushing to gain a small particle size used in seed coating. In addition to physical structure support, chemically inactive fillers can separate the seed from the active substances (i.e., fungicides, insecticides, herbicides), accordingly protecting seeds against phytotoxic chemicals. The choice and optimum of the proper fillers rely on successful seed pelleting, which does not interfere with seed germination [41]. Furthermore, other features, such as cost, availability, safety, origin and environmental influences, should also be taken into account when selecting the most appropriate filler materials [54].

3.3. Active Ingredients

The objective of a wider range of active ingredients incorporated into seed coatings is to improve seed survival, increase resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses, aid in germination and growth, and promote ultimate yield [31]. The role of active substances for protection or enhancement is dependent on the mode of their action [37]. The most commonly reported active components in coating agents include protectants, nutrients, growth stimulants, microbial inoculants, soil adjuvants, and markers [36,55]. A summary of some of the most common active ingredients used in seed coating agents and their form, source, advantages, and disadvantages is presented in Table 1.
Seed coating protectants are the most broadly applied group of ingredients for controlling predation and infection by pathogens and pests at the time of sowing. Fungicides, pesticides, nematicides, bactericides, and herbicides are classified as protectants [31]. Nutrient amendments in coatings mainly focus on the delivery of polymer micronutrients, for example, copper, manganese, and zinc [36], which are used to compensate for soil deficiencies in these trace elements. The combination of growth stimulants properties and their application through seed coating has the pronounced potential for enhancing plant performance [63]. There are various categories of growth stimulants, such as plant-derived proteins [43,64], protein hydrolysates and amino acids [50,76], carbohydrate derivatives [59], and herbal extracts [77]. There is increased interest and demand based on nutrient and growth stimulant seed treatments [1]. Coating the seeds is considered a convenient and efficient tool for introducing beneficial microorganisms into the soil and consequently the rhizosphere of plant tissues [78]. There are three major types of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) that are regarded as beneficial for plant nutrition: plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and rhizobia. Additionally, external environmental stresses may occur post-sowing due to drought, chilling, and heat, and the selection of seed treatments with natural and chemically synthesized may be exploited in the seed coating to mitigate these stresses.
However, the majority of existing chemical materials have a neutral or even detrimental effect on seed vigor, germination, and plant establishment [79] and are harmful to the environment [57], along with difficulties in biodegradation [80]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore innovative seed coating materials that are environmentally friendly. Biochar, as a novel material, may be expected to enhance seed germination and stand establishment, simultaneously ensuring agricultural sustainability, environment, and food safety. Due to the unique properties of biochar, i.e., high porosity and water holding capacity, the elevated contents of organic carbon and nutrients, it is proven to be a beneficial agent in seed coating formulations to increase germination and survivability [81].

3.4. Biochar

Biochar is an environmentally persistent organic matter with rich carbon, which is prepared under anaerobic conditions by the pyrolysis of biomass [82]. Due to the large variability in the production feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions, biochar could possess broadly various physical and chemical properties (Figure 4). The most significant chemical difference between biochar and other organic matter is the much higher proportion of condensed aromatic structures and aromatic carbon, which is the key reason for the high stability of biochar. In terms of the components of biochar elements, the organic ingredients contain carbon majorly, whereas the inorganic portion could be composed of diverse micro- and macroelements, such as inorganic carbonates, potassium, sodium, magnesium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, etc. Biochar is generally characterized by the large specific surface area, porous structure, high citation exchange capacity, and surface functional groups [83], which have direct links to the adsorption capacity of biochar.
Due to the above-mentioned properties of biochar, it can be used not only as a renewable fuel but also as an additive to improve soil quality. Furthermore, biochar displays great prospects for retaining soil fertility and promoting a circular economy in agriculture as a result of its higher biodegradable property. Recently, researchers are keen to utilize the biochar for its multifunctional role in agriculture (soil remediation [84], crop productivity [85]), ecosystem (carbon sequestration [86], wastewater management [87]), and energy (catalyst for biodiesel production [84]). The large-scale application of biochar is increasingly used for soil amelioration agents. Biochar amendment has substantial outcomes on the physical and physicochemical properties of soil, which directly induces soil nutrient dynamics and affects plant growth. The porous shape and high surface of biochar alter the soil’s physical nature by producing inter pores between soil and biochar particles, triggering a promotion in the total specific surface area of soil, accordingly increasing the porosity and aeration of the soil as well as water holding capacity. Biochar has numerous nutrients, organic matter, and ash content that can help in promoting soil organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, and soil pH for optimum plant growth [88]. In addition to affecting soil nature, biochar also stimulates the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms and mycorrhizal fungi [89]. Biochar particles have a high surface area and porous structure which promotes the colonization of microbes and improve soil microbial processes by increasing soil pH in acidic soils [90]. The addition of biochar induces changes in soil physical structure, altering gas transport and hydrodynamics, which facilitate the living behavior of soil biota [89]. These structural and functional transformations in soil properties under biochar addition can also significantly influence soil enzyme activities. Thus, biochar is a prospective material used for the improvement of soil quality and the simulation of soil microorganisms.
In recent years, based on the strong adsorption, water retention and organic nutrition characteristics of biochar, the usage of biochar with a dual role in active components and solid materials to coat crop seeds has obtained successful research progress and outcomes. A previous patent of biochar-based seed coating has revealed the coating method that mixing the seeds with starch or a suitable binder solution in a rotary tumbler and then adding the biochar material to the seed/binder mixture to achieve the desired thickness of seed coating [91]. Notably, this invention emphasized the necessity of biochar pretreatment in order to (i) improve the ideal properties like nutrient and moisture retention, (ii) remove harmful impurities from material pores, (iii) eliminate variations in properties due to derivation from various biomass materials, and (iv) load the appropriate active ingredients on the biochar particles. Another later study on biochar-based seed coating in combination with PGPM reported enhanced seedling growth when soluble phosphorus was applied, which could be interpreted that the water-holding characteristics of biochar may be a more pronounced factor in the observed plant growth promotion compared with the phosphorus solubilization effect from the inoculated bacteria [92]. Compared with regular pelleted seeds, biochar pelleting might improve the cost in the seed coating procedures due to the high production cost of biochar [93]. However, the incorporation of biochar usage in the seed coating helps efficient use of waste for a circular agriculture economy. Therefore, biochar-based seed coating is not only an exciting advancement in seed enhancement technology but also provides a novel approach to the recycling of organic waste.

4. Applications of Biochar-Based Seed Coating

Based on recent successful research in applying biochar seed coating techniques, the studies summarized in Table 2, report all recently available publications, including peer-reviewed literature and dissertations, which were searched on Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com). Search terms included: “seed coat*”, “seed encrust*”, “seed pellet*”, “seed enhanc* techn*”, “seed enhanc* treat*”, “seed treat*”, “biochar”, and “activated carbon”. We included only papers that tested outcomes of seed coating with biochar or activated carbon and excluded reviews. The final dataset consisted of 25 articles where the publication dates ranged from 2014 to 2022 (Table 2).
Overall, seed coating with biochar has been successfully delivered to a diverse range of species of seeds, including both native and non-native species. The most investigated plant species concerning biochar coating were restoration species (twelve studies), such as Bluebunch wheatgrass and Wyoming big sagebrush, followed by legume species (eight studies), such as soybean and chickpea. The least studied species were vegetable (three studies) and cereal species (two studies). Likewise, the literature on biochar coating methods contained a higher number of studies focused on extruded pelleting (eight studies), followed by pelleting (six studies) and film coating (four studies). The outcomes of most studies we found, for instance germination, growth, protection, and yield, were commonly positive. Nine of the twenty-five instances focused on protection, with eight instances focused on germination, followed by four instances each between growth and yield. Recently, seed coating with biochar has received substantial attention for its ability to confer benefits to plant productivity and microbial inoculants. As the seed coating material, biochar is a desirous and cost-effective carbonaceous agent.

4.1. Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment Promotion

Seed coating with biochar or activated carbon as the main active ingredient has been considered an important input in promoting seed germination and seedling establishment [45,102,103]. In a recent patent, Dong and coworkers [113] disclosed a method to develop safe and green seed coatings through novel seed coating formulation (e.g., biochar, sodium alginate, ethylene glycol, and bentonite) in lieu of traditional seed coating containing pesticides (such as carbofuran and carbendazim). The patent mentioned that biochar coating with 5–10% ratio displayed higher germination potential, root length, and root biomass accumulation than uncoated corn seeds. Madsen et al. [45] evaluated the effect of the incorporation of seed and biochar within an extruded pellet on Wyoming big sagebrush seedling emergence over a range of seedling depths. They found that pellets at all planting depths increased seedling emergence between 2.3 to 10.0 fold in the silt–loam soil. To screen proper binders for biochar-based seed coating, nine potential binders (such as methylcellulose, sodium hydroxide, starch, biobinder, etc.) were used to examine the effects of biochar-based coating on the plant germination and radicle extension of four species of crops and trees. The results indicated that biobinder and starch in the process of biochar coating performed optimally for the emergence and early seedling growth due to their ability to provide the structural support and retention of active materials, which can even expand the survival time of coating active components [103]. Also using the starch as a binder in the biochar-based coating formulations, Parvin et al. [94] found that seed coating with biochar (200 g/kg of seed) exhibited the highest germination rate, shoot length, and root length in comparison with untreated seeds of black gram. Similarly, Elamparithi et al. [102] reported that biochar coating in combination with organic materials recorded higher germination and seedling development compared with uncoated brinjal seeds. A recent study revealed that seed coating with a suitable ratio of markedly biochar-enhanced rice emergence and seedling stand [79]. This promotion in stand establishment can be due to the enhancement of water availability and rich nutrients around the seed, which is induced by biochar functioning, i.e., porous structure (Figure 5).

4.2. Plant Growth Enhancement

Biochar-based seed coating could be used to promote plant growth and production. Biochar addition can alter the soil conditions to affect plant growth positively, negatively, or neutrally. It has been proven that seed coating with biochar could be very effective at enhancing plant growth in many field crops [79]. For example, seed coating with biochar originating from corn stalk significantly increased plant height, leaf area, and leaf fresh weight in maize plants by 26.4%, 48.9%, and 19.8%, respectively, compared with non-seed coating [114]. In addition, Zhang [115] conducted pot and field trials to determine the impact of biochar coating on rapeseed growth and production. The author observed that coating treatment greatly improved crop height, leaf number, and dry biomass weight under both growth conditions, which eventually boosted rapeseed output. Recently, a study evaluated the efficacy of biochar derived from rice straw via seed coating on water-saving and drought-resistance rice [79]. Rice seeds coated with various proportions of biochar were sown in the growth chamber and open field to identify the appropriate ratio of biochar, and the effect of biochar coating on crop growth and yield under a dry direct-seeded system. Growth chamber trials conducted on rice seeds showed pronouncedly improved seedling growth when the content of biochar was 20% in the seed coating formulation. Moreover, biochar-coated rice was conducive to increasing the development of seedling roots [79]. Early and vigorous crop stands frequently capture more moisture and nutrient resources due to a greater root system and possess higher tiller numbers and larger leaf areas with enhanced photosynthetic products to maximize yields.

4.3. Suitable Carrier for Microbial Inoculants

Microbial seed coating is defined as a precise and efficient technology in which PGPM, e.g., PGPB, rhizobia, and AMF, are applied to the surface of plant seeds with the assistance of the binder and filler functioning as a carrier to promote plant growth and production and resistance to abiotic or biotic stress [31,36]. Biochar could be a suitable and promising alternative carrier for microbial inoculants. The high porosity of biochar may hold soil water and elevate aeration, which may offer a favorable habitat for bacterial proliferation [116,117]. Additionally, biochar rich in organic carbon and nutrients can serve as a carbon source that aids in the survival of microbial strains as a food source [101].
Generally, an inoculant formulation with seed coating is typically comprised of PGPM inoculants, suitable carriers, and multiple additives [36,118]. It has been extensively reported that biochar-based seed coating as a carrier could help maintain the viability and abundance of beneficial microorganisms [81,101,119]. For instance, Glodowska et al. [92] first proposed that biochar could function as a suitable carrier for P. libanensis, a phosphorus solubilizing bacteria, to generate inoculated seed coatings of corn. This suggested that biochar might be an alternative to peat moss, a non-renewable resource, and a standard carrier of inoculum. Thereafter, another study of theirs found the survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, a nitrogen-fixing bacteria, was extremely influenced by the physical and chemical characteristics of biochar [100]. Moreover, biochar-based coating with microbial inoculum allowed for the sustainment of a high bacterial population for long periods (9 months), thereby boosting the efficient nodulation of soybean and biological nitrogen fixation. Similarly, a pot experiment on the evaluation of the Rizobia inoculant carriers was conducted by Ghazi [97], who also observed a higher population of microbial inoculants 6 months after inoculation with biochar as a carrier substrate. Moreover, biochar produced from rice straw was found to ameliorate the antimicrobial effect of seed diffusate for kidney bean.
The effectiveness of biochar as a carrier on microorganisms survival varied with biochar feedstocks. Egamberdieva et al. [101] investigated the survival of Bradyrhizobium sp. in hydrochar from maize silage and biochar from wood, revealing that hydrochar sustained a higher population in comparison with biochar from wood. Meanwhile, another study reported that four types of biochar, two from hardwood feedstock and two from softwood, were tested for bacterial survival via seed coating. The findings indicated that pyrovac biochar from softwood and dynamotive biochar from hardwood was the most appropriate carrier due to the retention of a higher rate of bacterial survival [100]. Biochar prepared through the slow pyrolysis of agricultural wastes, such as leguminous plants and leafy vegetables, greatly enhanced the viability of two PGPM, Bacillus sp. strain A30, and Burkholderia sp. strain L2 [81]. Biochar-based formulations showed sustainment of the viable numbers of bacterial cells up to 180 days of storage, while seed germination trials observed a pronounced increase in the germination of coated seeds in comparison with uncoated controls. Notably, the properties of biochar, for instance, pyrolysis temperature, pH, degree of oxidation, and granulate size also influence microbial survival and colonization [119].

4.3.1. Biochar-Based Microbial Inoculants and Crop Growth

Previous studies indicated that microbial seed coating with biochar as a carrier could promote crop growth and output [36]. Tripti et al. [81] investigated the potential of bioformulations containing mixtures of biochar originated from agriculture waste and fly ash (a byproduct of the coal burning process) containing PGPM to coat tomato seeds. Biochar-based formulations with Burkholderia sp. strain L2 improved shoot growth (an increase of 61%, 73%, and 46% in maximum length, fresh biomass, and dry biomass, respectively), root growth (an increase of 114%, 141%, and 99% in maximum length, fresh biomass, and dry biomass, respectively), and yield (an increase of 225% in fruit yield), respectively, compared to uncoated controls. Similar observations were recorded by Camara-Williams [99], where seed pelleting with groundnut husk biochar increased mean nodule numbers and nodule fresh and dry weight of soybean under the pot experiments and field experiments.
Biochar-based seed coating with PGPM can be particularly pertinent in low-input and organic agricultural systems due to its potential to reduce the inputs of agrochemicals and improve crop productivity. Rocha et al. [95] showed that a biochar-based seed coating was a successful tool to inoculate the AMF isolates and rhizobacteria that results in significant increases in shoot biomass (76%), the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively), and grain yield (56%) in cowpea under no fertilization field conditions. By using a similar coating material and formulation, Rocha et al. [96] investigated the influence of biochar-based seed coating on chickpea production under greenhouse and field conditions. They observed that biochar coating with multiple AMF isolates displayed higher shoot biomass (14%) and seed individual weight (21%) under greenhouse conditions and increased pod (160%), seed numbers (148%), and grain yield (140%) in the natural fields without receiving fertilizers.

4.3.2. Biochar-Based Microbial Inoculants and Crop Nutrition

In addition to the enhancement of plant growth, biochar-based seed coating with microbes is a promising and practical approach for improving the nutritional value of various crops [119]. For example, Egamberdieva et al. [101] evaluated the response of lupin to the biochar-based inocula of Bradyrhizobium sp. in pot experiments under irrigated and drought conditions. They found that biochar-based coating produced plant nutrient concentration increments of 39%, 31%, 34%, and 21% for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg), respectively, compared to the control under water deficit. Similar results were reported by Glodowska et al. [92], where biochar coating with P. libanensis promoted chlorophyll content and N uptake of corn shoots when soluble P was applied. In the subsequent study, Glodowska et al. [100] observed a significant increase in N (90%), carbon (C, 8%), and N/C (100%) of soybean plants in the biochar seed coating with Bradyrhizobium japonicum under N-free nutrient solution. Such improvements could be attributed that biochar protects functional microbes living against environmental stresses by providing a favorable microenvironment [116,117]. The underlying mechanisms by which biochar-based seed coating enhances plant growth and nutrient uptake mainly include moisture absorption and retention, nutrient provision and mobilization, beneficial microorganisms recruitment, and herbicide adsorption to protect the native species (Figure 5).

4.4. Herbicide Selectivity Increase

There are limited cost-effective strategies for successfully restoring native species in areas where exotic species are dominant. This is because non-native species commonly outcompete native species, which is reflected in the higher plant, seed bank densities, and growth rates of non-native species [12]. These invasive species are therefore removed or controlled as part of ecological restoration to avoid further unfavorable outcomes, for instance reducing the survival of native species [120], modifying vegetation structure [121], and altering soil nutrients [122]. It has been widely proposed that seed coating containing biochar or activated carbon to provide herbicide protection could facilitate controlling invasive species and achieve successful restoration, since coating treatments are applied simultaneously with herbicide application [104,108,112]. The herbicide protection pods (HPPs) technology was developed by Madsen et al. [108], designed to combine the protective ability of activated carbon banding with the selectivity of seed coating. This method is anticipated to provide sufficient coverage of activated carbon for the seeded species to neutralize herbicide adsorption while minimizing herbicide protection to weed species. For example, Elymus elymoides (bottlebrush squirreltail) and Agropyron fragile (Siberian wheatgrass) seeds incorporated into biochar extruded pellets displayed greater density than the control seedlings (bare seed) when sites were treated with imazapic (a herbicide), which effectively controlled exotic annual weeds [112]. Similarly, bluebunch wheatgrass seeds based on biochar coating successfully grew in a laboratory environment treated with pre-emergent herbicide, where the herbicide effectively controlled invasive annual grasses [106]. Recently, Terry et al. [105] evaluated two approaches, namely biochar coating and furrow, simultaneously with an imazapic application to control annual grasses. They found that combining biochar coating and furrow treatment mitigated harmful herbicide effects on seedling emergence, plant densities, and growth. The results showed that coating seeds with biochar could assist native species to achieve a similar establishment as a non-herbicide seeding with a lower abundance of exotic grasses when in combination with agronomical practices. Remarkably, more studies are required to investigate these techniques on other plant species, soil types, and climatic conditions before they are large-scale applied in the restoration. After all, some species are more susceptible to pre-emergent herbicide [123], causing the loss of seedling vigor due to inadequate protection from seed coatings and deep furrows.

5. Future Prospects

Extensive reports showed that biochar-based seed coating contributed to the improvement of stand establishment and plant production due to the distinct physiological and biochemical properties of biochar. Nevertheless, not all studies show that biochar seed coating could stimulate seed germination. Xavier et al. [98] and James [18] observed that seed coating with biochar had no effect on the seed and seedling performance compared to uncoated seeds. Despite some uncertainty, it is worthy to further evaluate the effectiveness of biochar seed coating on different plant species under various environments concerning biochar types [54]. For instance, some local initiatives (e.g., “biochar seedballs” in Kenya) are assessing the impacts of this approach on trees and grass species, aiming to rehabilitate degraded land damaged by human activity [124]. Below we present key and unresolved points that future researchers on biochar-based seed coating should strive to focus on:
(1) Further research is required to affirm the utility of biochar-based coating with a focus on biochar pretreatment to eliminate harmful substances. Most of the existing literature maintains a commonly favorable outlook on the application of biochar via seed coating on multiple aspects. However, a study was performed by Williams et al. [125], who found that biochar-based seed coating had either a neutral or negative effect on seed germination and plant establishment for all plant species. The authors hypothesize that some volatile organic compounds in biochar may negatively affect seed germination. Likewise, previous studies have raised concerns about the toxic substances (carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and harmful free radicals) present in biochar. Zhang et al. [126] explored the impact of biochar nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth of three plants, including rice, tomato, and reed, indicating that the risk of biochar nanoparticles toxicity was determined by the biochar feedstock. Despite this, biochar nanoparticles are the promising agents of seed priming for future research.
(2) Future research on biochar-based seed coating could be developed on the novel and efficient seed coating formulation by the varying biochar feedstocks, coating ingredients, and coating techniques. The efficiency of biochar-based seed coating depends on the types, properties, and preparation methods of biochar. For example, most biochar were commonly alkaline, and high alkalinity (pH > 9) may have adverse influences on crop emergence, particularly at higher biochar ratios (>30%) [79]. Thus, more studies comparing various biochar origins with different crops should be further explored. Moreover, more clarity regarding the ingredients and methodological details of seed coating with biochar is required.
(3) So far, biochar-based seed coatings have been mainly designed for the ecosystem restoration of native plant species, such as Bluebunch wheatgrass and Wyoming big sagebrush. More attention should be paid to other agricultural species (i.e., fruit/vegetable, oil crops, and fiber crops) in biochar-based seed coating, particularly for sustainable farming. The optimum and development of biochar-based seed coating for a wide range of crops could transform agricultural production systems to be more sustainable. Aerial seeding may be an effective way to restore ecosystems owing to rapid seed delivery over large areas [54]. Yet, biochar-based coating combined with aerial seeding (i.e., unmanned aerial vehicles) has rarely been used for ecological restoration. Additionally, the scarcity of studies reported on the roles of biochar-based seed coating in ameliorating abiotic stresses (such as salinity, chill, and heat) of plants. So, the effects of biochar-based seed coating on seed germination, plant growth, and stress resistance under various growth conditions should be conducted. Future research on the economic assessment for the production of biochar-based seed coating is also included.
(4). On the other hand, with the application of biochar via seed coating, the interaction mechanisms of plant–microbe–soil become of great importance and are promising lines of study for promoting the efficiency of biochar-based seed coating in the field. Although biochar may offer a favorable habitat for bacterial proliferation, the effects of biochar-based seed coating on the microbial abundance in the rhizosphere are still unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavior of rhizosphere microbes recruited by biochar in the seed coating under different environmental conditions by the soil microbiome. The metagenomic of soil microorganisms approach will provide new avenues to address the issues of biochar-based seed coating, along with bringing novelty in revealing the interacting mechanisms of plant–microbe–soil.

6. Conclusions

Erratic germination and plant establishment led to the loss of crop production due to adverse environmental and biological factors. Seed coating has the potential to be an efficient and cost-effective approach for alleviation of stresses, promotion of crop yield, and provision of desirable merits to the seeds via the application of external materials. Yet, the current materials of seed coating are still facing limitations. Some coating agents were hard to biodegradation, which causes damage to the environment. On the other hand, the chemical components in the seed coating had toxicity to seeds, reducing the seed vigor or hampering seed germination. Recently, biochar-based seed coating has gained much interest due to biochar-possessing high porosity and water holding capacity, as well as wealthy nutrients, and has been proven to be a beneficial agent in seed coating formulations. Previous studies showed that biochar-based seed coating was not only able to improve the emergence and growth of the seedling but also increase plant production and nutrition. Additionally, biochar via seed coating was extensively applied to the delivery of PGPM and the ecological restoration of native species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.H., J.B. and L.L.; Methodology: Q.Y., Z.Q., J.L., T.L. and K.Z. (Kunmiao Zhu); Formal analysis and investigation: K.Z. (Kangkang Zhang) and Z.K.; Writing—original draft preparation: K.Z. (Kangkang Zhang) and Z.K.; Writing—review and editing: L.H. and J.B.; Funding acquisition: J.B.; Resources: L.H. and J.B.; Supervision: L.H., J.B. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Excellent Team Project of the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences [Hunong Kezhuo (2022) 001] for funding this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pedrini, S.; Merritt, D.J.; Stevens, J.; Dixon, K. Seed Coating: Science or Marketing Spin? Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, W.; He, A.; Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. The Effect of Storage Condition and Duration on the Deterioration of Primed Rice Seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zvinavashe, A.T.; Lim, E.; Sun, H.; Marelli, B. A bioinspired approach to engineer seed microenvironment to boost germination and mitigate soil salinity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 25555–25561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Halmer, P. Seed Technology and Seed Enhancement. Acta Hortic. 2008, 771, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taylor, A.; Allen, P.; Bennett, M.; Bradford, K.; Burris, J.; Misra, M. Seed enhancements. Seed Sci. Res. 1998, 8, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anilkumar, L.; Malarkodi, K.P. Combined seed enhancement techniques involving seed priming and coating for improvised anatomical potential and vigour of okra seeds (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). J. Phytol. 2019, 11, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farooq, M.; Usman, M.; Nadeem, F.; Rehman, H.U.; Wahid, A.; Basra, S.M.A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Seed priming in field crops: Potential benefits, adoption and challenges. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ullah, A.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Ahmad, R.; Wakeel, A. Zinc seed priming improves stand establishment, tissue zinc concentration and early seedling growth of chickpea. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2019, 29, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar]
  9. Farooq, M.; Basra, S.; Hafeez, K. Seed invigoration by osmohardening in coarse and fine rice. Seed Sci. Technol. 2006, 34, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mhada, M.; Zvinavashe, A.T.; Hazzoumi, Z.; Zeroual, Y.; Marelli, B.; Kouisni, L. Bioformulation of Silk-Based Coating to Preserve and Deliver Rhizobium tropici to Phaseolus vulgaris Under Saline Environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adak, T.; Kumar, J.; Shakil, N.A.; Pandey, S. Role of nano-range amphiphilic polymers in seed quality enhancement of soybean and imidacloprid retention capacity on seed coatings. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4351–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Madsen, M.D.; Davies, K.W.; Boyd, C.S.; Kerby, J.D.; Svejcar, T.J. Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2016, 24, S77–S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Yin, H.; Wang, W.-X.; Zhao, X.-M.; Du, Y.-G. Alginate oligosaccharides enhanced Triticum aestivum L. tolerance to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 62, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rasool, B.; Mahmood Ur, R.; Zubair, M.; Khan, M.A.; Ramzani, P.M.A.; Dradrach, A.; Turan, V.; Iqbal, M.; Khan, S.A.; Tauqeer, H.M.; et al. Synergetic Efficacy of Amending Pb-Polluted Soil with P-Loaded Jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana) Twigs Biochar and Foliar Chitosan Application for Reducing Pb Distribution in Moringa Leaf Extract and Improving Its Anti-cancer Potential. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tauqeer, H.M.; Turan, V.; Farhad, M.; Iqbal, M. Sustainable agriculture and plant production by virtue of biochar in the era of climate change. In Managing Plant Production Under Changing Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 21–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tauqeer, H.M.; Basharat, Z.; Adnan Ramzani, P.M.; Farhad, M.; Lewińska, K.; Turan, V.; Karczewska, A.; Khan, S.A.; Faran, G.-e.; Iqbal, M. Aspergillus niger-mediated release of phosphates from fish bone char reduces Pb phytoavailability in Pb-acid batteries polluted soil, and accumulation in fenugreek. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 313, 120064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vanangamudi, K.N. Seed Hardening, Pelleting and Coating: Principles and Practices; Satish Serial Publishing House: Delhi, India, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. James, M.S. Effects of Biochar-Based Seed Coatings on Seed Germination and Seedling Vigor of California Brome (Bromus carinatus L.) and Blue Wildrye (Elymus glaucus L.). Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeffs, K.A. Seed Treatment, 2nd ed.; The British Crop Protection Council (BCPC) Publication: Surrey, UK, 1986; p. 332. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaufman, G. Seed coating: A tool for stand establishment; a stimulus to seed quality. HortTechnol. 1991, 1, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hill, H. Recent developments in seed technology. J. New Seeds 1999, 1, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Scott, J.M. Seed coatings and treatments and their effects on plant establishment. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; Volume 42, pp. 43–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor, A.; Harman, G. Concepts and technologies of selected seed treatments. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1990, 28, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Halmer, P. Commercial seed treatment technology. In Seed Technology and Its Biological Basis; Sheffield Academic Press: Sheffield, UK, 2000; pp. 257–286. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pedrini, S.; Balestrazzi, A.; Madsen, M.D.; Bhalsing, K.; Hardegree, S.P.; Dixon, K.W.; Kildisheva, O.A. Seed enhancement: Getting seeds restoration-ready. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S266–S275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Afzal, I.; Javed, T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Modern Seed Technology: Seed Coating Delivery Systems for Enhancing Seed and Crop Performance. Agriculture 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sohail, M.; Pirzada, T.; Opperman, C.H.; Khan, S.A. Recent advances in seed coating technologies: Transitioning toward sustainable agriculture. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 6052–6085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Menz, M.H.; Dixon, K.W.; Hobbs, R.J. Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 2013, 339, 526–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Seed Coating Market by Additive (Polymers, Colorants, Pellets, Minerals/Pumice, Active Ingredients), Process (Film Coating, Encrusting, Pelleting), Active Ingredient (Protectants and Phytoactive Promoters), Crop Type, Region—Global Forecast to 2025. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/seed-coating-materials-market-149045530.html (accessed on 14 February 2022).
  30. Porter, F.; Scott, J. Seed coating methods and Purposes: A status report. In Proceedings of the Short Course for Seedsmen; Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station: Prairie, MS, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sharma, K.; Singh, U.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, L. Seed treatments for sustainable agriculture-A review. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2015, 7, 521–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Brown, V.S.; Erickson, T.E.; Merritt, D.J.; Madsen, M.D.; Hobbs, R.J.; Ritchie, A.L. A global review of seed enhancement technology use to inform improved applications in restoration. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kimmelshue, C.; Goggi, A.S.; Cademartiri, R. The use of biological seed coatings based on bacteriophages and polymers against Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis in maize seeds. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kavusi, E.; Shahi Khalaf Ansar, B.; Dehghanian, Z.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; Nobaharan, K.; Ma, Y.; Glick, B.R. Delivery of Beneficial Microbes via Seed Coating for Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production: A Critical Review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, Y. Seed coating with beneficial microorganisms for precision agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Taylor, A.G. Seed storage, germination, quality and enhancements. In The Physiology of Vegetable Crops, 2nd ed.; Wien, H.C., Stutzel, H., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2020; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  38. Scott, J.; Blair, G.; Andrews, A. The mechanics of coating seeds in a small rotating drum. Seed Sci. Technol. 1997, 25, 281–292. [Google Scholar]
  39. Szemruch, C.; Ferrari, L. Encrusting offers protection against phytotoxic chemicals and maintains the physiological quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oliveira, R.S.; Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H. Seed coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an ecotechnologicalapproach for sustainable agricultural production of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2016, 79, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Kangsopa, J.; Hynes, R.K.; Siri, B. Lettuce seeds pelleting: A new bilayer matrix for lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Javed, T.; Afzal, I. Impact of seed pelleting on germination potential, seedling growth and storage of tomato seed. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1273, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.S.; Netravali, A.N.; Taylor, A.G. A Seed Coating Delivery System for Bio-Based Biostimulants to Enhance Plant Growth. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Madsen, M.; Svejcar, T. Development and application of “Seed Pillow” Technology for Overcoming the Limiting Factors Controlling Rangeland Reseeding Success. U.S. Patent US9,326,451 B, 3 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. Madsen, M.D.; Hulet, A.; Phillips, K.; Staley, J.L.; Davies, K.W.; Svejcar, T.J. Extruded seed pellets: A novel approach for enhancing sagebrush seedling emergence. Nativ. Plants J. 2016, 17, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lopisso, D.T.; Kühlmann, V.; Siebold, M. Potential of soil-derived fungal biocontrol agents applied as a soil amendment and a seed coating to control Verticillium wilt of sugar beet. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 1019–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, J.; Deng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Cobb, A.B.; Zhang, Z. Molybdate in rhizobial seed-coat formulations improves the production and nodulation of alfalfa. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ryu, C.-M.; Kim, J.; Choi, O.; Kim, S.H.; Park, C.S. Improvement of biological control capacity of Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 by seed pelleting on sesame. Biol. Control 2006, 39, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Singh, A.; Jain, A.; Sarma, B.K.; Upadhyay, R.S.; Singh, H.B. Rhizosphere competent microbial consortium mediates rapid changes in phenolic profiles in chickpea during Sclerotium rolfsii infection. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qiu, Y.; Amirkhani, M.; Mayton, H.; Chen, Z.; Taylor, A.G. Biostimulant Seed Coating Treatments to Improve Cover Crop Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy 2020, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gault, R.; Brockwell, J. Studies of seed pelleting as an aid to legume inoculation. 5. Effects of incorporation of molybdenum compounds in the seed pellet on inoculant survival, seedling nodulation and plant growth of lucerne and subterranean clover. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1980, 20, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sikhao, P.; Taylor, A.G.; Marino, E.T.; Catranis, C.M.; Siri, B. Development of seed agglomeration technology using lettuce and tomato as model vegetable crop seeds. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 184, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Berninger, T.; Mitter, B.; Preininger, C. The smaller, the better? The size effect of alginate beads carrying plant growth-promoting bacteria for seed coating. J. Microencapsul. 2016, 33, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pedrini, S.; Merritt, D.; Dixon, K. Smart seed for automated forest restoration. In Automated Forest Restoration: Could Robots Revive Rain Forests? Elliott, S., Gale, G., Robertson, M., Eds.; FORRU-CMU: Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2020; pp. 112–129. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nikita, G. Seed Coating with Beneficial Microbes for Precision Farming. Int. J. Mod. Agric. 2021, 10, 813–818. [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith, R.G.; Atwood, L.W.; Morris, M.B.; Mortensen, D.A.; Koide, R.T. Evidence for indirect effects of pesticide seed treatments on weed seed banks in maize and soybean. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 216, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rundlöf, M.; Andersson, G.K.S.; Bommarco, R.; Fries, I.; Hederström, V.; Herbertsson, L.; Jonsson, O.; Klatt, B.K.; Pedersen, T.R.; Yourstone, J.; et al. Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature 2015, 521, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alburaki, M.; Boutin, S.; Mercier, P.-L.; Loublier, Y.; Chagnon, M.; Derome, N. Neonicotinoid-coated Zea mays seeds indirectly affect honeybee performance and pathogen susceptibility in field trials. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125790. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ziani, K.; Ursúa, B.; Maté, J.I. Application of bioactive coatings based on chitosan for artichoke seed protection. Crop. Prot. 2010, 29, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Kontturi, M.; Peltonen, J. Phosphorus Seed Coating Enhancement on Early Growth and Yield Components in Oat. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Siddique, K.H. Micronutrient application through seed treatments: A review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mašauskas, V.; Mašauskienė, A.; Repšienė, R.; Skuodienė, R.; Brazienė, Z.; Peltonen, J. Phosphorus seed coating as starter fertilization for spring malting barley. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Plant Soil Sci. 2008, 58, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Madsen, M.D.; Fidanza, M.A.; Barney, N.S.; Kostka, S.J.; Badrakh, T.; McMillan, M.F. Low-dose application of nonionic alkyl terminated block copolymer surfactant enhances turfgrass seed germination and plant growth. HortTechnology 2016, 26, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Amirkhani, M.; Netravali, A.N.; Huang, W.; Taylor, A.G. Investigation of soy protein–based biostimulant seed coating for broccoli seedling and plant growth enhancement. HortScience 2016, 51, 1121–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gorim, L.; Asch, F. Effects of composition and share of seed coatings on the mobilization efficiency of cereal seeds during germination. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2012, 198, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guan, Y.; Li, Z.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; Song, W.; Hu, J. “On-Off” Thermoresponsive Coating Agent Containing Salicylic Acid Applied to Maize Seeds for Chilling Tolerance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ma, Y.; Rajkumar, M.; Zhang, C.; Freitas, H. Beneficial role of bacterial endophytes in heavy metal phytoremediation. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 174, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Honglu, X.; Guomei, X. Suspension Property of Gemini Surfactant in Seed Coating Agent. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2008, 29, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Akhter, J.; Mahmood, K.; Malik, K.; Mardan, A.; Ahmad, M.; Iqbal, M. Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gorim, L.; Asch, F. Seed Coating Increases Seed Moisture Uptake and Restricts Embryonic Oxygen Availability in Germinating Cereal Seeds. Biology 2017, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Stahl, J.D.; Cameron, M.D.; Haselbach, J.; Aust, S.D. Biodegradation of superabsorbent polymers in soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2000, 7, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; He, F.; Guan, Y.; Zhu, S.; Hu, J. A novel anti-counterfeiting method: Application and decomposition of RB for broad bean seeds (Vicia faba L.). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 61, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guan, Y.; Wang, J.; Tian, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, S.; Hu, J. The Novel Approach to Enhance Seed Security: Dual Anti-Counterfeiting Methods Applied on Tobacco Pelleted Seeds. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Almeida, A.d.; Couto, H.T.Z.d.; Almeida, Á.F.d. Are camouflaged seeds less attacked by wild birds? Sci. Agric. 2010, 67, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sikhao, P.; Teerapornchaisit, P.; Taylor, A.; Siri, B. Seed coating with riboflavin, a natural fluorescent compound, for authentication of cucumber seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2014, 42, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wilson, H.T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Evaluation of Gelatin as a Biostimulant Seed Treatment to Improve Plant Performance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ben-Jabeur, M.; Kthiri, Z.; Harbaoui, K.; Belguesmi, K.; Serret, M.D.; Araus, J.L.; Hamada, W. Seed coating with thyme essential oil or Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN strain: Conferring Septoria leaf blotch resistance and promotion of yield and grain isotopic composition in wheat. Agronomy 2019, 9, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Bennett, A.J.; Mead, A.; Whipps, J.M. Performance of carrot and onion seed primed with beneficial microorganisms in glasshouse and field trials. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Zhang, K.; Khan, Z.; Liu, J.; Luo, T.; Zhu, K.; Hu, L.; Bi, J.; Luo, L. Germination and Growth Performance of Water-Saving and Drought-Resistant Rice Enhanced by Seed Treatment with Wood Vinegar and Biochar under Dry Direct-Seeded System. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zeng, D.; Shi, Y. Preparation and application of a novel environmentally friendly organic seed coating for rice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 2181–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tripti; Kumar, A.; Usmani, Z.; Kumar, V.; Anshumali. Biochar and flyash inoculated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria act as potential biofertilizer for luxuriant growth and yield of tomato plant. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 190, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khan, Z.; Zhang, K.; Khan, M.N.; Fahad, S.; Xu, Z.; Hu, L. Coupling of Biochar with Nitrogen Supplements Improve Soil Fertility, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Rapeseed Growth. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Khan, Z.; Fan, X.; Khan, M.N.; Khan, M.A.; Zhang, K.; Fu, Y.; Shen, H. The toxicity of heavy metals and plant signaling facilitated by biochar application: Implications for stress mitigation and crop production. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Khan, Z.; Khan, M.N.; Zhang, K.; Luo, T.; Zhu, K.; Hu, L. The application of biochar alleviated the adverse effects of drought on the growth, physiology, yield and quality of rapeseed through regulation of soil status and nutrients availability. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 171, 113878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Al-Wabel, M.I.; Hussain, Q.; Usman, A.R.A.; Ahmad, M.; Abduljabbar, A.; Sallam, A.S.; Ok, Y.S. Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: A review. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2124–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zou, W.; He, F.; Hu, X.; Tsang, D.C.; Ok, Y.S.; Gao, B. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: A critical review. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khan, Z.; Khan, M.N.; Luo, T.; Zhang, K.; Zhu, K.; Rana, M.S.; Hu, L.; Jiang, Y. Compensation of high nitrogen toxicity and nitrogen deficiency with biochar amendment through enhancement of soil fertility and nitrogen use efficiency promoted rice growth and yield. GCB Bioenergy 2021, 13, 1765–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lehmann, J.; Rillig, M.C.; Thies, J.; Masiello, C.A.; Hockaday, W.C.; Crowley, D. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1812–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gul, S.; Whalen, J.K.; Thomas, B.W.; Sachdeva, V.; Deng, H. Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: Mechanisms and future directions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 206, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Traxler, V.; Kim, H.S.; Malyala, R.; Thompson, T.A.; Buege, B.; Jarand, M.L. Biochar Coated Seeds. U.S. Patent 10,550,044 B2, 4 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
  92. Głodowska, M.; Husk, B.; Schwinghamer, T.; Smith, D. Biochar is a growth-promoting alternative to peat moss for the inoculation of corn with a pseudomonad. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Meyer, S.; Glaser, B.; Quicker, P. Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: A literature review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 9473–9483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Parvin Banu, A.; Sujatha, K.; Geetha, R.; Kannan, P. Biochar coating and its effect on seed quality and biochemical parameters in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) var. VBN 11. Pharma Innov. 2022, 11, 2836–2840. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rocha, I.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Pereira, G.; Ma, Y.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low-input agricultural system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rocha, I.; Duarte, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Látr, A.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed Coating with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Improved Field Production of Chickpea. Agronomy 2019, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ghazi, A.A. Potential for biochar as an alternate carrier to peat moss for the preparation of Rhizobia bio inoculum. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2017, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xavier, P.B.; Vieira, H.D.; Guimarães, C.P. Physiological potential of stylosanthes cv. Campo Grande seeds coated with different materials. J. Seed Sci. 2015, 37, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Camara-Williams, I. Effect of Seed Pelleting and Biochar on Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.). Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  100. Głodowska, M.; Schwinghamer, T.; Husk, B.; Smith, D. Biochar Based Inoculants Improve Soybean Growth and Nodulation. Agric. Sci. 2017, 08, 1048–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Egamberdieva, D.; Reckling, M.; Wirth, S. Biochar-based Bradyrhizobium inoculum improves growth of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) under drought stress. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 78, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Elamparithi, R.; Sujatha, K.; Menaka, C.; Senthil, K. Impact of organic Seaweed pelleting on seed quality and biochemical parameters in brinjal seeds. Pharma Innov. 2021, 10, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar]
  103. Chen, Z. Effects of Biochar-Based Seed Coating Binders on Seed Germination and Radicle Extension. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  104. Davies, K.; Madsen, M.; Hulet, A. Using activated carbon to limit herbicide effects to seeded bunchgrass when revegetating annual grass-invaded rangelands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 70, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Terry, T.J.; Madsen, M.D.; Gill, R.A.; Anderson, V.J.; St. Clair, S.B. Selective herbicide control: Using furrows and carbon seed coatings to establish a native bunchgrass while reducing cheatgrass cover. Restor. Ecol. 2021, 29, e13351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Holfus, C.M.; Rios, R.C.; Boyd, C.S.; Mata-González, R. Preemergent Herbicide Protection Seed Coating: A Promising New Restoration Tool. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 76, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Taylor, J.B.; Cass, K.L.; Armond, D.N.; Madsen, M.D.; Pearson, D.E.; St. Clair, S.B. Deterring rodent seed-predation using seed-coating technologies. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Madsen, M.D.; Davies, K.W.; Mummey, D.L.; Svejcar, T.J. Improving restoration of exotic annual grass-invaded rangelands through activated carbon seed enhancement technologies. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 67, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Clenet, D.R.; Davies, K.W.; Johnson, D.D.; Kerby, J.D. Native seeds incorporated into activated carbon pods applied concurrently with indaziflam: A new strategy for restoring annual-invaded communities? Restor. Ecol. 2019, 27, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Baughman, O.W.; Griffen, J.; Kerby, J.; Davies, K.W.; Clenet, D.; Boyd, C. Herbicide protection pod technology for native plant restoration: One size may not fit all. Restor. Ecol. 2021, 29, e13351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Brown, V.S.; Ritchie, A.L.; Stevens, J.C.; Harris, R.J.; Madsen, M.D.; Erickson, T.E. Protecting direct seeded grasses from herbicide application: Can new extruded pellet formulations be used in restoring natural plant communities? Restor. Ecol. 2019, 27, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Davies, K. Incorporating seeds in activated carbon pellets limits herbicide effects to seeded bunchgrasses when controlling exotic annuals. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 71, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dong, J.; Fu, P.; Pan, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, J. A Crop Seed Coating Agent Prepared by Using Agricultural Waste New Biomass Charcoal And Its Preparation Method. CN Patent 103053244B, 10 December 2014. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  114. Dong, J. Preparation of Biochar-Wood Vinegar Derived Seed Coating and Its Effect on Maize Seedling Growth. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhang, C. Effects of Seed Priming and Pelletization on Seed Germination and Plant Growth and Development of Rapeseed. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  116. Pietikäinen, J.; Kiikkilä, O.; Fritze, H. Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 2000, 89, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Khan, Z.; Zhang, K.; Khan, M.N.; Bi, J.; Zhu, K.; Luo, L.; Hu, L. How Biochar Affects Nitrogen Assimilation and Dynamics by Interacting Soil and Plant Enzymatic Activities: Quantitative Assessment of 2 Years Potted Study in a Rapeseed-Soil System. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 853449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Deaker, R.; Roughley, R.J.; Kennedy, I.R. Legume seed inoculation technology—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 1275–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Egamberdieva, D.; Hua, M.; Reckling, M.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Potential effects of biochar-based microbial inoculants in agriculture. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 1, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Stanbury, K.E.; Stevens, J.C.; Ritchie, A.L. Legacy issues in post-pine (Pinus pinaster) restoration environments: Weeds compromise seedling growth and function more than edaphic factors. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 1694–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R.; Dogra, K.S.; Kaur, S.; Kohli, R.K.; Negi, A. Negative effect of litter of invasive weed Lantana camara on structure and composition of vegetation in the lower Siwalik Hills, northern India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 3379–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Fisher, J.L.; Veneklaas, E.J.; Lambers, H.; Loneragan, W.A. Enhanced soil and leaf nutrient status of a Western Australian Banksia woodland community invaded by Ehrharta calycina and Pelargonium capitatum. Plant Soil 2006, 284, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kyser, G.B.; Wilson, R.G.; Zhang, J.; Ditomaso, J.M. Herbicide-Assisted Restoration of Great Basin Sagebrush Steppe Infested With Medusahead and Downy Brome. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 66, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kenya, S. Seedballs Kenya. Available online: https://www.seedballskenya.com/seedballs (accessed on 10 September 2022).
  125. Williams, M.I.; Dumroese, R.K.; Page-Dumroese, D.S.; Hardegree, S.P. Can biochar be used as a seed coating to improve native plant germination and growth in arid conditions? J. Arid Environ. 2015, 125, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, K.; Wang, Y.; Mao, J.; Chen, B. Effects of biochar nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Timeline of the history of seed coating technology.
Figure 1. Timeline of the history of seed coating technology.
Plants 11 02864 g001
Figure 2. The four main coating equipment and five types of related seed coating. SS: stainless steel.
Figure 2. The four main coating equipment and five types of related seed coating. SS: stainless steel.
Plants 11 02864 g002
Figure 3. Percent weight increases after five major methods of seed coating. The red for seed dressing and film coating is the application of the finishing powder during the coating process. The percent weight increase is shown on a log scale to aid comparison between methods.
Figure 3. Percent weight increases after five major methods of seed coating. The red for seed dressing and film coating is the application of the finishing powder during the coating process. The percent weight increase is shown on a log scale to aid comparison between methods.
Plants 11 02864 g003
Figure 4. Properties of biochar and associated benefits.
Figure 4. Properties of biochar and associated benefits.
Plants 11 02864 g004
Figure 5. Mechanisms of biochar-based seed coating to promote plant growth.
Figure 5. Mechanisms of biochar-based seed coating to promote plant growth.
Plants 11 02864 g005
Table 1. Review of active ingredients in the seed coating agents.
Table 1. Review of active ingredients in the seed coating agents.
Types of Active IngredientsActive IngredientsIngredient FormIngredient SourceIngredient BenefitsIngredient FlawsReferences
ProtectantsFungicides, insecticides, nematicides, bactericides, predator deterrents, herbicidesVariableSynthetic chemicalsProtect seed; promote germination and growthEcosystem contamination[56,57,58,59]
NutrientsMacronutrients: P, K; micronutrients: boron, copper, manganese, zincSolidSynthetic chemicals; mineralImprove growth and yield; alleviate trace elements deficiency in soilReduction in germination and emergence caused by nutrients[22,60,61,62]
Growth stimulantsPhytohormone: salicylic acid, gibberellic acid, auxin; protein hydrolysates: soy flourSolidSynthetic chemicals; natural products or derivativesStimulate germination, improve growth, development, and stress resistanceSometimes delay germination and hamper root growth[63,64,65,66]
Microbial inoculantsArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant growth-promoting bacteria and rhizobiaSolidNatural productsPromote growth, yield and nutrition; increase abiotic and biotic tolerancePoor survival of the inoculant; the insufficient amount of microbial inoculant for small seeds[22,31,35,36,67]
Soil adjuvantsSoil hydrophilic materials or hydro absorbers: hydrogels; soil surfactantSolidSynthetic chemicalsAccelerate or delay germination through influencing water absorptionEnvironment risk due to the difficulty of degradation; sometimes unaffected germination or seedling growth[1,65,68,69,70,71]
MarkersFluorescent dyes and magnetic powderSolidSynthetic chemicalsImprove the traceability of seed batches; limit the predation of seed by birdsInconvenient application; requires sophisticated detection equipment[72,73,74,75]
Table 2. Studies on the application of seed coating with biochar published in peer-reviewed studies and dissertations.
Table 2. Studies on the application of seed coating with biochar published in peer-reviewed studies and dissertations.
SpeciesBiochar SourcesCoating MaterialsActive IngredientsCoating EquipmentCoating TypeMain FindingsReference
RiceRice strawBiochar, talc, attapulgiteBiocharRotary coaterPelletingBiochar seed coating improved the emergence rate and seedling growth both under laboratory study and field study.[79]
CornHardwood and softwoodBiochar, peat moss, P. Libanensis, guar gumP. LibanensisNdFilm coating Biochar-based seed coating with inoculants enhanced germination speed and corn growth without increasing the phosphorous content of the plants.[92]
Black gramGreen waste of Prosopsis plantBiochar, starchBiocharNdNdBiochar coating @ 200 g/kg of seed performed well and increased the seedling growth, vigor and biochemical parameters.[94]
CowpeaNdPseudomonas libanensis TR1, Rhizophagus irregularis, biochar, gum arabicPseudomonas libanensis TR1, Rhizophagus irregularisRotating panSeed dressingSeed coating with PGPR and multiple AM fungal isolates increased shoot dry weight (76%), grain yield (56%) and grain lipid (25%).[95]
ChickpeaNdR. Irregularis inoculum, biochar, gum arabicMultiple Rhizophagus irregularis isolatesRotating panSeed dressingPlants inoculated with multiple isolates in the greenhouse displayed higher shoot dry weight (14%) and seed individual weight (21%), while in the field increased pod (160%), seed number (148%), and grain yield (140%).[96]
Kidney beanRice strawPeat moss, vermiculite, biocharRhizobium phaseoliNdNdThe biochar-based carrier inoculant gave the highest nodule dry weight, plant dry weight, plant height.[97]
Stylosanthes cv. Campo GrandeACDolomitic limestone, sand, polyvinyl acetate, AC, calcium silicateCalcium silicateRotating panPelletingCoating with calcium silicate and polyvinyl acetate was outstanding for germination speed index and fresh and dry matter of shoot and root.[98]
SoybeanSaw dust, groundnut husk, rice husk and rice strawBiochar, rock phosphate, calcium carbonate, rhizobium inoculantsBiocharNdPelletingSeed pelleting with biochar improved mean nodule number, nodule fresh weight and nodule dry weight in pot and field experiments.[99]
SoybeanHardwood and softwoodBiochar, peat moss, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, guar gumBradyrhizobium japonicumNdFilm coating Biochar solid inoculant positively affected plant growth metrics, root characteristics, and the chemical composition of plants supplied with N-free nutrient solution.[100]
LupinMaize silage, maize and woodHydrochar, pyrolysis biochar, Bradyrhizobium sp. (BR) inoculantsBradyrhizobium sp.NdFilm coatingHTC-based BR Inoculants significantly enhanced plant growth, N and P uptake, and lupin nodulation under drought conditions than BR strain inoculation.[101]
BrinjalNdSargassum sp., Kappaphycus sp., azophos, biochar, talc powderBiocharNdPelletingSeed pelleting recorded higher seed quality and biochemical parameters.[102]
Radish, lettuce, coreopsis, white birchNdPectin, DTL 35% (lignin), methylcellulose, sodium hydroxide, starch, biobinder, biocoatBiocharNdFilm coatingSeed coating with bio-based compounds and starch binder performed best for seed germination, radicle extension, and non-phytotoxicity.[103]
TomatoAgricultural wastesFlyash, biochar, Burkholderia sp., Bacillus megateriumBurkholderia sp., Bacillus megateriumNdNdThe biochar based bioformulation using Burkholderia sp. Tremendously enhanced the productivity of tomatoes and soil fertility. A mixture of biochar and flyash inoculated with Burkholderia sp. Showed noteworthy results for the growth parameters and yield of tomato.[81]
Crested wheatgrassACAC, Ca Bentonite, worm castings, compost, super absorbent powder, super absorbent fine granulesACExtruderExtruded pelletingHPPs increased the abundance of crested wheatgrass (300%) compared with bare seeds.[104]
Bluebunch wheatgrassACAC, polyvinyl alcoholACRotary coaterExtruded pelletingCombining carbon coatings and furrow treatments mitigated harmful herbicide effects on seedling emergence, plant densities, and growth.[105]
Bluebunch wheatgrassACAC, compost, worm castings, bentonite clay, polyvinyl alcoholACRotary coaterPelletingThe AC-based coating produced 307% higher emergence, 235% higher seedling height, and 87% higher biomass than uncoated seeds with herbicide application, respectively.[106]
Bluebunch wheatgrassACBentonite clay, polyvinyl alcohol, host pepper, cayenne pepper, anthraquinone, methyl-nonyl-ketone, pine needle essential oil, bergamot essential oil, neem oil, AC, beta cyclodextrinACRotary coaterEncrustingSeeds coating with ghost pepper, neem oil, and AC reduced rodent seed-predation by 47–50% than control.[107]
Bluebunch wheatgrass, downy bromeACAC, diatomaceous earth, polyvinyl alcoholACExtruderExtruded pelletingCoating with AC was 4.8-, 3.8-, and 19.0-fold higher than untreated seeds in density, height, and biomass, respectively, at the higher levels of herbicide application.[108]
Wyoming big sagebrushWestern juniper treeCalcium bentonite, biochar, worm castings, compost, super-absorbent polymer, starch, surfactant, cytokinin, gibberellic acid, indole butyric acidNdExtruderExtruded pelletingExtruded pellets improved seedling emergence between 2.3- to 10.0-fold in the silt–loam soil.[45]
Wyoming big sagebrush, bluebunch wheatgrassACCa bentonite, AC, worm castings, compostACExtruderExtruded pelletingHPPs protected seeded species at low, mid, and high rates of the preemergent herbicide, and had a greater abundance and size of plants compared to bare seeds.[109]
Wyoming big sagebrush, sandberg bluegrassACBentonite clay, AC, compost, worm casting fines, fungicideACExtruderExtruded pelletingThe smaller HPPs produced about two-fold higher final emergence and higher aboveground biomass than larger pellets and maintained protection from herbicide toxicity.[110]
Lolium rigidum, annual ryegrassACAC, bentonite, diatomaceous earth, sand, starch, water-holding crystalsACExtruderExtruded pelletingExtruded pellet formulation increased seedling tolerance to pre-emergent herbicide with mortality reduced from 96% in non-pelleted seeds to 22% in pellets containing AC.[111]
Bottlebrush squirreltail, Siberian wheatgrassACCa Bentonite, AC, worm castings, compost, superabsorbent powder, super absorbent fine granulesACExtruderExtruded pelletingThese two bunchgrasses had greater density and growth (height, leaf length, number of stems, and leaves) when incorporated into AC pellets compared with bare seeds.[112]
California brome, blue WildryeBeetle-killed pine treesBiochar, CaCO3, hydrophilic polymers, micronutrients, GA3BiocharNdNdSeed coating showed equal or slightly higher germination over the untreated control.[18]
Mountain brome, prairie junegrass, Wyeth’s buckwheat, western yarrowBeetle-killed ponderosa, lodgepole pineBiochar, polyvinyl alcoholBiocharRotating panPelletingBiochar seed coatings had either a neutral or negative effect on germination and growth under different temperature and moisture conditions, and slightly improved mountain brome root weight and prairie junegrass cover in the field.[107]
Notes: Nd, not described; AC, activated carbon; HTC, hydrochar from maize silage; HPPs, herbicide protection pods containing AC.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Khan, Z.; Yu, Q.; Qu, Z.; Liu, J.; Luo, T.; Zhu, K.; Bi, J.; Hu, L.; Luo, L. Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health. Plants 2022, 11, 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864

AMA Style

Zhang K, Khan Z, Yu Q, Qu Z, Liu J, Luo T, Zhu K, Bi J, Hu L, Luo L. Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health. Plants. 2022; 11(21):2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kangkang, Zaid Khan, Qing Yu, Zhaojie Qu, Jiahuan Liu, Tao Luo, Kunmiao Zhu, Junguo Bi, Liyong Hu, and Lijun Luo. 2022. "Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health" Plants 11, no. 21: 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864

APA Style

Zhang, K., Khan, Z., Yu, Q., Qu, Z., Liu, J., Luo, T., Zhu, K., Bi, J., Hu, L., & Luo, L. (2022). Biochar Coating Is a Sustainable and Economical Approach to Promote Seed Coating Technology, Seed Germination, Plant Performance, and Soil Health. Plants, 11(21), 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop