Next Article in Journal
Floral Characterization of Pomegranate Genotypes to Improve Hybridization Efficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
10th Anniversary of Plants—Recent Advances and Further Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Development of SNP Markers for Original Analysis and Germplasm Identification in Camellia sinensis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cucumber mosaic virus Is Unable to Self-Assemble in Tobacco Plants When Transmitted by Seed
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/plants12010164
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological Features and Conservation of Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae): A Narrow Endemic Species of Sicily

by
Saverio Sciandrello
1,*,
Salvatore Cambria
1,
Gianpietro Giusso del Galdo
1,
Pietro Minissale
1,
Marta Puglisi
1,
Gianmarco Tavilla
1,* and
Valeria Tomaselli
2
1
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via A. Longo 19, 95125 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Environment, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010164
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Plants—Recent Advances and Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The conservation actions of endangered plant species require a clear knowledge of their habitats. Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae) is a rare endemic plant species occurring on shady cliffs in the southern-eastern part of Sicily. In the last century, the extreme anthropogenic alterations of Hyblaean plateau have caused the continuous and unrestrained fragmentation of natural habitats and consequently the reduction and disappearance of some plant species. A total of 52 vegetation plots, of which 34 are unpublished, were analyzed in order to characterize the floristic composition of the U. rupestris community. All the relevés were classified using classification and ordination methods. The species is mainly linked to shady and wet rock habitats, and only secondarily colonizes the undergrowth shrubs. According to IUCN criteria, we propose a new risk status for this species and the establishment of a new habitat (92/43CEE) for correct long-term conservation. Finally, a new association, Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris, which falls within the Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii alliance (Adiantetea capilli-veneris class), was described. This study can provide useful information for the management and conservation of U. rupestris.

1. Introduction

Defining effective plant conservation strategies has become a crucial issue in the Mediterranean area due to strong human pressure on the natural landscape, which has led to the loss of habitats and some endemic plant species [1,2]. Sicily is one of the most important centers of plant diversity in the Mediterranean region, with many habitats included in Annex I of the Habitat Directive [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The importance of the vascular flora of Sicily lies not only in the total number of taxa (2763 species according to Bartolucci et al. [10]), but also in the considerable number of endemic species (400 species according to Peruzzi et al. [11]). In particular, the south-eastern sector of the island (Hyblaean territory), despite relatively low altitudes, hosts an extraordinary floristic richness and several plant communities, as well as many habitat types [12,13,14]. This high biological variety is due to the great geological, geomorphological, and bioclimatic complexity of the Hyblaean territory. In this area, several rare and narrow endemic species grow, such as Zelkova sicula Di Pasq., Garfì & Quézel, Trachelium caeruleum L. subsp. lanceolatum (Guss.) Arcang., Anthemis pignattiorum Guarino, Raimondo & Domina, Limonium syracusanum Brullo, L. pachynense Brullo, L. pavonianum Brullo, Ferulago nodosa (L.) Boiss. subsp. geniculata (Guss.) Troìa & Raimondo, Myosotis tineoi C.Brullo & Brullo, Epipactis hyblaea Brullo & Zimmitti, and Solenopsis laurentia (L.) C.Presl. subsp. hyblaea Brullo et al. [15,16,17]. In the list of endemic species of the Hyblean territory, there is also Urtica rupestris, which shows some affinities (morifolia-clade) with U. morifolia Poir. (Macaronesian Islands) and a strong similarity with U. fragilis J.Thiébaut (Syria, SE Turkey, Lebanon) [18]. Urtica rupestris, exclusive to the southern-eastern part of Sicily, is an Urticaceae woody nettle species that grows on the shady cliffs of the Hyblaean district. It was listed in the Red Book of Italian flora [19,20] as a vulnerable species (VU). The aim of our research was to study the scattered surviving U. rupestris population, in particular, analyzing the floristic composition, identifying the ecological requirements, and re-evaluating the conservation status at a regional level. Moreover, we propose the establishment of a new habitat type according to the European Directive 92/43CEE in order to achieve long-term conservation of the species.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Description of the Species (Based on our Specimens Collected in Monello and Palombara Localities)

Based on our morphological investigations of Urtica rupestris, we report below an updated and more detailed description of the species than those available in the literature.
Urtica rupestris Guss., Cat. Pl. Hort. Boccadifalco: 83(–84). 1821. Type (lectotype designated by Corsi et al. [21]: 218) “Militello di Val di Noto nel vallone detto il Carcarone. Ad rupes vulcanicas in umbrosis vallibus, Aprili. Majo”. (Herb. Guss. NAP).
The species is an erect, perennial, rhizomatous herb 0.3–0.8(−1.0 m) that is woody at the base and forms a perennial root with many unbranched stems. The plants are mostly dioecious and sometimes monoecious. The plant has a very sparse cover of erect stinging hairs that are 0.9–1.2 mm long, with a pluricellular straight base and a ca. 1/3–1/2 of the overall length of the seta. It is subglabrous with scattered, simple trichomes that are 0.1–0.4 mm long. The leaf lamina are 50–100 × 30–50 Mm ovate-acuminate, cuneate, or truncate at the base. The surface is poorly pubescent with short simple trichomes that are 0.1–0.5 mm long and has very few stinging hairs. The margins are coarsely and regularly serrate, with 8–9 teeth on each side. These teeth are 5–7 mm long and are usually undivided. The leaves are opposite and are deciduous with an apex acute to acuminate. The stipules are free (4 per node) and 3–4 mm long. The petioles are 25–45 mm long. The leaves are thin, dark green, and shiny on the upper side and lighter green on the lower leaf page. The racemes are unisexual. The plant has staminate flowers with tepals that are 0.6–0.8 mm long and pistillate flowers with tepals that are 1–1.2 mm long, which are sparsely pubescent. The female inflorescence is 8–18 mm long and is shorter than the subtending petiole, patent, or pendent in fruit. The male inflorescence is 20–40 mm long and is erecto-patent. The female flowers have subglabrous perianth segments. The mature fruit has tepals of 1.2–1.3 mm long and are achenes ovoid, wrinkled, and 1.2–1.3 × 0.8–0.9 mm.
Chromosome number: 2n = 26 according to Corsi et al. [21].

2.2. Ecological Data and Habitat Analysis

Urtica rupestris is a hemicryptophyte scapose, is rhizomatous, and flowers between April and June. It grows on shady cliffs exclusively in the Hyblaean district (south-eastern Sicily), mainly on carbonate rocks and sporadically on volcanic outcrops (Figure 1), although the specimens used to describe the plant species were collected on the volcanic substrates of Calcarone valley near Militello (Type: Militello di Val di Noto nel vallone detto il Carcarone. Ad rupes vulcanicas in umbrosis vallibus, Aprili. Majo) [21]. The species thrives within valleys that mainly comprise evergreen woodlands dominated by Quercus ilex L., of fluvial tectonic origin, with steep slopes. They are locally named “Cave”. It is a member of the highly specialized shady rupicolous community that is rich in bryophytes and pteridophytes and grows in the water dripping crevices of calcareous rocks. It only secondarily colonizes the Rubus ulmifolius shrubs (Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris Brullo, Minissale, Scelsi, and Spampinato 1993), and in the presence of rock outcrops, also the Quercus ilex woods (Ostryo-Quercetum ilicis Lapraz 1975, Doronico-Quercetum ilicis Barbagallo, Brullo, & Fagotto 1979, Pistacio-Quercetum ilicis Brullo & Marcenò 1985), as well as the rare Laurus nobilis communities of the Hedero helicis-Lauretum nobilis Bueno & Prieto 1991 [22]. Considering the high phytogeographic value of U. rupestris and the remarkable naturalistic value of its habitat, as well as its vulnerability, we propose the inclusion of this habitat with the name “Shady wet cliffs (Adiantetea capilli-veneris)”, as a new habitat type in Annex I of the Habitat Directive. This shady and wet habitat, with high edaphic humidity, includes the dripping cliffs/walls of the Mediterranean areas that are characterized by chomophytic and chasmophytic vegetation (edaphohygrophylous) related to the Adiantetea capilli-veneris class. In the Mediterranean area, this class includes one order and three alliances [23]. In particular, the alliance Adiantion capilli-veneris groups plant communities dominated by Adiantum capillus-veneris L., which are particularly rich in bryophytes that grow on siliceous or calcareous dripping cliffs. The second one, Pinguiculion longifoliae, includes a relict herb-rich chomophytic vegetation of shaded and water-splashed habitats that are dominated by Pinguicula L. sp. pl., whereas the Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendri groups the fern-rich communities of damp walls and narrow and shady ravines. This shady, wet, and rocky habitat type is characterized by the occurrence of many ferns (Adiantum capillus-veneris, Struthiopteris spicant (L.) Weiss, Pteris vittata L., Pteris cretica L., Osmunda regalis L., Asplenium scolopendrium L. subsp. scolopendrium, and Woodwardia radicans (L.) Sm.), bryophytes (Eucladium verticillatum (Brid.) Bruch & Schimp., Didymodon tophaceus (Brid.) Lisa, Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort., Conocephalum conicum (L.) Dumort., and Palustriella commutata (Hedw.) Ochyra), and vascular plants (Urtica rupestris, Cymbalaria pubescens (C.Presl) Cufod., Hypericum hircinum L. subsp. hircinum, Hypericum androsaemum L., and Samolus valerandi L., etc.). As such, this vegetation type is typically found under the Mediterranean macrobioclimate, and occasionally under the sub-Mediterranean variant of the temperate macrobioclimate [24,25]. In Italy, it has been observed in the southern part of the peninsula and in the main islands, as well as in the coastal and sub-coastal areas of the central-northern part of the country [26,27,28,29,30]. These fern-rich plant communities, on thicker and water-rich soils, often come into catenal contact with the phytocoenoses that are dominated by bryophytes of the Cratoneurion commutati alliance, including in the Habitat 7220* “Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratoneurion)”. The need for a specific habitat type concerning shady dripping cliffs with communities dominated by bryophytes and pteridophytes that belong to the Adiantetea capilli-veneris class (shady dripping cliffs with Woodwardia radicans and other large ferns) has already been highlighted by Spampinato [31], as well as recently by Guarino et al. [32] and Sciandrello et al. [33]. This proposed Mediterranean dripping cliff habitat includes sciaphilous-hygrophilous communities, in which the density of pteridophytes and bryophytes is high, and rare or endangered ferns of remarkable phytogeographic interest, such as Woodwardia radicans, Osmunda regalis, Pteris vittata, Pteris cretica, and Asplenium scolopendrium subsp. scolopendrium.

2.3. Phytosociological Insights

The cluster and ordination analysis of all the relevés (52 rel. × 72 sp.) carried out in the Hyblaean territory showed two main groups (Table S1, Appendix A, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The first group (cluster A) includes the shady rupicolous vegetation of the Adiantetea capilli-veneris class (20rel. × 46sp.), whereas the second (cluster B) group (32rel. × 56sp.) includes the thermophilous scrub vegetation of the Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris (Pruno spinosae-Rubion ulmifolii alliance, Crataego-Prunetea class). In this last association, U. rupestris, together with Scutellaria rubicunda Hornem., was indicated by Brullo et al. [34] as a characteristic species for the Hyblaean territory [35]. It is a nemoral and sciaphilous association characterized by species belonging to the Rhamno-Prunetea class, such as Rubus ulmifolius Schott, Smilax aspera L., Clematis cirrhosa L., C. vitalba L., and Crataegus monogyna Jacq. This phytocoenosis is essentially localized in the thermo-mesophilious woods of the Doronico-Quercetum ilicis, Ostryo-Quercetum ilicis, and Pistacio-Quercetum ilicis. Most species of this phytocoenosis belong to the Mediterranean element (45%), with the dominant life form corresponding to phanerophytes/nanophanerophytes (34%) and hemicryptophytes (31%).
Cluster A includes perennial vegetation growing mainly on dripping vertical limestone cliffs and shady ravines, which are humid for most of the year, in the shade of wooded formations that are dominated by Quercus ilex within the Hyblaean caves. The structure of the community is determined by U. rupestris, together with several hygrophilous species of bryophytes and pteridophytes, such as Pellia endiviifolia, Thamnobryum alopecurum (Hedw.) Gangulee, Asplenium scolopendrium subsp. scolopendrium, Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott, and Adiantum capillus-veneris, Asplenium sagittatum (DC.) Bange. Moreover, this vegetation is enriched with several lianose species, such as Hedera helix L., Rubia peregrina L. Dioscorea communis (L.) Caddick & Wilkin, Clematis vitalba, and Aristolochia sempervirens L. Due to its ecological features, U. rupestris has been proposed as a characteristic species of a new association named Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris ass. nova hoc loco (* holotypus: Table 1, Rel. 10) within the Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii alliance (Adiantetea capilli-veneris class, Appendix B). From a chorological and structural viewpoint, this vegetation highlights the relevance of this species with a Mediterranean distribution (29%), with hemicryptophytes (53%) being the dominant life forms. This new association shows floristic-ecological affinities with Thamnobryo alopecuri-Phyllitidetum scolopendrium Brullo, Privitera & Puglisi 1993, which have been described for southern Italy and Sicily [27]. Furthermore, it shows edaphic-ecological characteristics similar to Conocephalo conici-Woodwardietum radicantis Brullo, Lo Giudice, & Privitera 1989, Adianto capilli veneris-Pteridetum vittatae Brullo, Lo Giudice & Privitera 1989, Adianto capilli veneris-Osmundetum regalis Brullo, Lo Giudice & Privitera 1989. These chasmo-comophytic associations are rich in bryophytes and pteridophytes of shady/humid cliffs, which were described for the Peloritani Mountains in the north-eastern sector of Sicily [26]. From a bioclimatic point view, the Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris falls within the upper Thermomediterranean and lower Mesomediterranean belts with lower dry and upper ombrotypes [36].

2.4. Distribution and Conservation Status

Our investigations confirmed 13 sites with U. rupestris (Figure 4): 1. Vallone Carcarone—Militello (1 plot); 2. Torrente Belluzza—Villasmundo (1 plot, SAC-ITA090024); 3. Cava Sorciaro, Cava Mostringiano—Monti Climiti (3 plots, SAC-ITA090020); 4. Grotta Palombara—Siracusa (1 plot, SAC-ITA090012); 5. Grotta Monello—Siracusa (1 plot, SAC-ITA090011; 1 plot out of the SAC); 6. Vallone Caradonna—Canicattini Bagni (1 plot); 7. Cava Grande del Cassibile e Cava di Baulì, Manghisi (2 plots, SAC-ITA090007; 2 plots out of the SAC); 9. Cava del Prainito, Rosolini (1 plot, SAC-ITA080012); 10. Cava Grande, Valle dell’Anapo e Bibinello—Buscemi, Cassaro, Ferla, Palazzolo Acreide, Sortino (5 plots, SAC-ITA090009); 11. Sant’Andrea, Valle Cupa—Buccheri (1 plot, SAC-ITA090015); 12. Cava Rosolini (La Rosa A., Aprile. 2016) (1 plot); 13. Cava Brucoli (Alicata I., 6.11.2016) (1 plot). The species was no longer found in two of the sites: first in Syracuse “scendendo dal Belvedere a oriente verso il mare” (Lojacono 1904) and second in “Pantani Capo Passero” (Lopriore 1900). In total, U. rupestris falls within 22 cells (2 × 2 km) and eight special areas of conservation (SAC), and outside of four Natura 2000 sites. The area hosting the largest number of individuals was the N2000 “Valle del Fiume Anapo, Cavagrande del Calcinara, Cugni di Sortino” (ITA090009) site. Currently, almost all U. rupestris sites are located in the Syracuse province, with the exception of the locus classicus, which falls within the Catania territory, and one in the Ragusa province. Despite the many records of the distribution of the species, U. rupestris is threatened by many factors that, over time, have altered and reduced its natural habitat. Urtica rupestris was listed in the Red Book of Italian plants [37] as lower risk (LR), which was subsequently reconsidered by Brullo et al. [13] as a vulnerable species (VU), and, more recently, has been classified as a vulnerable species [19,20]. Our accurate field surveys allowed us to have a deeper knowledge of the distribution and conservation status of U. rupestris. Considering our current assessments and observations in the field, the species is currently recorded in 22 cells in the Hyblaean territory. According to the reference grid for Italy [38] and the GeoCAT tool, based on the IUCN criterion B, we propose a new status for this species, which should be considered endangered (EN) B2ab (ii, iii). In fact, we assessed this using the GeoCAT web tool, and calculated an EOO area equal to 1880 km2 and an AOO equal to 104 km2. This decline in the original population, because of habitat loss and fragmentation, suggests that this species could be classified as endangered (EN).

3. Materials and Methods

Data in the literature regarding the distribution of this species were reviewed [39,40,41,42,43], and specimens of herbaria of Catania (CAT) and Palermo (PA) were also examined. Based on these starting data, all the sites in which U. rupestris has been reported were visited. In addition, other sites that were potentially suitable for the species were investigated. In order to analyze the floristic composition of the U. rupestris plant community in the Hyblaean territory, several field activities were carried out in the years between 2015 and 2020. A total of 52 relevés were collected, of which 34 were unpublished and 18 from bibliographic data [34,44,45]. The floristic composition and cover of the species in each plot were determined using the standard phytosociological method [46]. All the phytosociological relevés were processed using classification and ordination methods. The numerical analysis was performed using the software package “PCORD” 6.08 and R software. A multivariate analysis (linkage method: Ward’s, distance measure: Bray–Curtis) was applied. Clustering was performed using the R package “pvclust” [47]. Pvclust computes p-values for each cluster’s uncertainty using bootstrap resampling. The bootstrap sample size was set to 1000. Detrended correspondence analyses (DCA) were utilized in order to develop a hypothesis about the vegetation/environmental interactions and to establish geographic patterns in the scatter-gram [48]. The DCA takes into account different quantitative data, such as the vegetation coverage (%),number of species (N. sp.), altitude (m a.s.l.), and slope (◦). Quantum GIS software version 3.6 and GPS Garmin Montana were used to geolocalize the surveyed population. For the risk assessment at the regional scale (Sicily), we followed the IUCN protocol and the most recent guidelines for its application [49]. In particular, we applied the IUCN criterion B for estimating the trends in the Area of Occupancy (AOO) using the 2 × 2 km grid for the Italian territory proposed by Gargano [38]. On the other hand, in order to obtain an accurate assessment, we also calculated the Area of Occupancy (AOO, km2) and Extent of Occurrence (EOO) using the Geo-CAT web tool (Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool) programme [50], which performs a rapid geospatial analysis of species in a simple way.
The identification of vascular plants was carried out according to Pignatti et al. [51,52,53,54], and the nomenclature follows the Portal to the Flora of Italy (http://dryades.units.it/floritaly/ accessed on 15 October 2022) [55], whereas the nomenclature of bryophytes is in accordance with Cortini Pedrotti [56,57]. The syntaxonomical nomenclature follows Mucina et al. [58]. The bioclimatic units refer to Bazan et al. [36].

Study Area

The study area, located in the southeast of Sicily, is represented by the Hyblaean plateau which belongs to the African plate. It comprises of a crust of continental types different from that of the rest of Sicily [59], whereas, from a geophysicist standpoint, it is characterized by a strong gravimetric and magnetic anomaly (Bouguer anomalies) chiefly due to its composition. Outcropping successions in the Hyblaean plateau consist mostly of carbonate and carbonate-marly sediments ranging from Lower Cretaceous to Pleistocene, where basic volcanics of considerable power [60] are intercalated. One of the most typical landscapes of the Hyblaean area is the “Cave”, which are valleys of fluvial-tectonic origin, with a cross-section very similar to a V with steep slopes. Water courses flowing in the “Cave” usually have temporary arrangements or a permanent regime. Furthermore, the Hyblean territory is characterized by the presence of very important coastal wetlands [61,62,63,64], as well as several rocky pools and temporary ponds that host very specialized vascular flora [65,66,67,68,69]. Blasi et al. [70] identified six important plant areas (IPAs) for the Hyblaean territory, which are essential for the conservation of plant biodiversity. Furthermore, the Hyblaean territory is affected by 43 special areas of conservation (SAC), and 9 regional protected areas. According to the bioclimatic classification proposed by Rivas-Martínez [71,72], the area under study is referred to as the Mediterranean pluviseasonal oceanic bioclimate, with thermotypes ranging from low thermomediterranean to supramediterranean, and ombrotypes from semiarid to lower humid.

4. Conclusions

The ecological and phytosociological analyses carried out on U. rupestris in the Sicilian territory pointed out the biogeographical importance of this rupicolous species and of the shady dripping cliff habitat that deserves to be included in Annex I of the 93/42 EEC Directive. The re-assessment of the conservation status of this species (EN) highlights the urgent need to primarily preserve the habitats of the “Hyblaean Cave”, which hosts U. rupestris and several other restricted endemic species, such as Zelkova sicula, Trachelium caeruleum subsp. lanceolatum, Anthemis pignattiorum, Limonium pachynense, L. pavonianum, Epipactis hyblaea, etc. Therefore, the outcomes of this research can be included in future conservation and management strategies for this rare endemic taxon.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12010164/s1, Table S1: Phytosociological relevés; Scheme S1: Old records and Specimina visa of U. rupestris.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; methodology, S.S. and G.T.; investigation, S.S., S.C., G.T., V.T., G.G.d.G., P.M. and M.P.; data curation, S.S. and G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S. and G.T.; writing—review and editing, S.S., S.C., G.T., V.T., G.G.d.G., P.M. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the research programme (PIA.CE.RI. 2020–2022 Line 2 cod. 22722132149 and Line 3 Starting Grant Progetto HAB-VEG cod. 22722132172) funded by the University of Catania, and by Convention with PIM within the project MedIsWet funded by the MAVA Foundation.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Localities and Dates of Relevés (Table 1)

Rel. 1, Cava Grande del Cassibile, 6.05.2014 (Minissale & Sciandrello); Rel. 2–4, Cava Grande del Cassibile, 09.06.2014 (Minissale & Sciandrello); Rel. 5, 07.04.2015, Villasmundo, Belluzza (Sciandrello); Rel. 6–15, Cava Bibinello, Palazzolo Acreide, 30.03.2021 (Cambria, Minissale, Sciandrello); Rel. 16–17, Pantalica (Minissale et al. 2007); Rel. 18–19, Pantalica (Brullo et al. 1993).

Appendix B. Syntaxonomical Scheme

  • Adiantetea capilli-veneris Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl., Roussine & Negre 1952
  • Adiantetalia capilli-veneris Br.-Bl. ex Horvatic 1934
  • Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendri Ubaldi ex Ubaldi & Biondi in Biondi, Allegrezza, Casavecchia, Galdenzi, Gasparri, Pesaresi, Vagge & Blasi 2014
  • Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris ass. nova hoc loco
  • Crataego-Prunetea spinosae R.Tx. 1962
  • Pyro spinosae-Rubetalia ulmifolii Biondi, Blasi & Casavecchia in Biondi et al. 2014
  • Pruno spinosae-Rubion ulmifolii O. Bolòs 1954
  • Scutellario rubicundae-Urticetum rupestris Brullo, Minissale, Scelsi & Spamp. 1993.

References

  1. Schröter, D.; Cramer, W.; Leemans, R.; Prentice, I.C.; Araújo, M.B.; Arnell, N.W.; Bondeau, A.; Bugmann, H.; Carter, T.R.; Gracia, C.A.; et al. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 2005, 310, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tomaselli, V.; Tenerelli, P.; Sciandrello, S. Mapping and quantifying habitat fragmentation in small coastal areas: A case study of three protected wetlands in Apulia (Italy). Environ. Monitor. Assessm. 2012, 184, 693–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Médail, F.; Quézel, P. Hot-spots analysis for conservation of plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1997, 84, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Médail, F.; Quézel, P. Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting global conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13, 1510–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sciandrello, S.; Guarino, R.; Minissale, P.; Spampinato, G. The endemic vascular flora of Peloritani Mountains (NE Sicily): Plant functional traits and phytogeographical relationships in the most isolated and fragmentary micro-plate of the Alpine orogeny. Plant Biosyst. 2015, 149, 838–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sciandrello, S.; Cambria, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Guarino, R.; Minissale, P.; Pasta, S.; Tavilla, G.; Cristaudo, A. Floristic and Vegetation Changes on a Small Mediterranean Island over the Last Century. Plants 2021, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sciandrello, S.; Minissale, P.; Giusso del Galdo, G. Vascular plant species diversity of Mt. Etna (Sicily): Endemicity, insularity and spatial patterns along the altitudinal gradient of the highest active volcano in Europe. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brullo, S.; Cambria, S.; Crisafulli, A.; Tavilla, G.; Sciandrello, S. Taxonomic remarks on the Centaurea aeolica (Asteraceae) species complex. Phytotaxa 2021, 483, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tavilla, G.; Angiolini, C.; Bagella, S.; Bonini, F.; Cambria, S.; Caria, M.C.; Esposito, A.; Fanfarillo, E.; Ferri, V.; Fiaschi, T.; et al. New national and regional Annex I Habitat records: From #37 to #44. Plant Sociol. 2022, 59, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bartolucci, F.; Peruzzi, L.; Galasso, G.; Albano, A.; Alessandrini, A.; Ardenghi, N.M.G.; Astuti, G.; Bacchetta, G.; Ballelli, S.; Banfi, E.; et al. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 179–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peruzzi, L.; Conti, F.; Bartolucci, F. An inventory of vascular plants endemic to Italy. Phytotaxa 2014, 168, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brullo, S.; Grillo, M.; Guglielmo, A. Considerazioni fitogeografiche sulla flora iblea. Boll. Acc. Sci. Nat. 1998, 29, 45–111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brullo, C.; Minissale, P.; Sciandrello, S.; Spampinato, G. Phytogeographic survey on the endemic vascular flora of the Hyblaean territory (SE Sicily-Italy). Acta Bot. Gall. 2011, 158, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pavone, P.; Spampinato, G.; Tomaselli, V.; Sciandrello, S.; Ronsisvalle, F. Map of the habitats of the EEC Directive 92/43 in the biotopes of the Syracuse province (eastern Sicily). Fitosociologia 2007, 44, 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  15. Garfì, G.; Carimi, F.; Pasta, S.; Rühl, J.; Trigila, S. Additional insights on the ecology of the relic tree Zelkova sicula Di Pasquale, Garfì & Quézel (Ulmaceae) after the finding of a new population. Flora 2011, 206, 407–417. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guarino, R.; Raimondo, F.M.; Domina, G. A new species of Anthemis sect. Hiorthia (Asteraceae) from SE Sicily. Plant Biosyst. 2013, 147, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Brullo, S.; Brullo, C.; Sciandrello, S.; Tavilla, G.; Cambria, S.; Tomaselli, V.; Ilardi, V.; Giusso Del Galdo, G.; Minissale, P. The Plant Communities of the Class Isoëto-Nanojuncetea in Sicily. Plants 2022, 11, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grosse-Veldmann, B.; Nürk, N.M.; Smissen, R.; Breitwieser, I.; Quandt, D.; Weigend, M. Pulling the sting out of nettle systematics—A comprehensive phylogeny of the genus Urtica L. (Urticaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 102, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rossi, G.; Orsenigo, S.; Gargano, D.; Montagnani, C.; Peruzzi, L.; Fenu, G.; Abeli, T.; Alessandrini, A.; Astuti, G.; Bacchetta, G.; et al. Lista Rossa Della Flora Italiana. 2 Endemiti e Altre Specie Minacciate; Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, 2020; Available online: https://http://www.iucn.it/pdf/LISTAROSSAvol-2-FLORAITALIANA.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  20. Orsenigo, S.; Fenu, G.; Gargano, D.; Montagnani, C.; Abeli, T.; Alessandrini, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Bartolucci, F.; Carta, A.; Castello, M.; et al. Red list of threatened vascular plants in Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2021, 155, 310–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Corsi, G.; Garbari, F.; Maffei, F. Il genere Urtica L. (Urticaceae) in Italia. Revisione biosistematica. Webbia 1999, 53, 193–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brullo, S.; Costanzo, E.; Tomaselli, V. Étude phytosociologique sur les formations à Laurus nobilis L. dans le Monts Iblei (Sicile sud-orientale). Phytocoenologia 2001, 31, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foucault, B. Contribution au prodrome des végétations de France: Les Adiantetea capilli-veneris Braun-Blanq. ex Braun-Blanq., Roussine & Nègre 1952. Acta Bot. Gall. 2015, 162, 375–403. [Google Scholar]
  24. Biondi, E.; Blasi, C.; Allegrezza, M.; Anzellotti, I.; Azzella, M.M.; Carli, E.; Casavecchia, S.; Copiz, R.; Del Vico, E.; Facioni, L.; et al. Plant communities of Italy: The Vegetation Prodrome. Plant Biosyst. 2014, 148, 728–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Biondi, E.; Allegrezza, M.; Casavecchia, S.; Galdenzi, D.; Gasparri, R.; Pesaresi, S.; Vagge, I.; Blasi, C. New and validated syntaxa for the checklist of Italian vegetation. Plant Biosyst. 2014, 148, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brullo, S.; Lo Giudice, R.; Privitera, M. La classe Adiantetea in Sicilia. Arch. Bot. Ital. 1989, 65, 81–99. [Google Scholar]
  27. Brullo, S.; Privitera, P.; Puglisi, M. Thamnobryo alopecuri-Phyllitidetum scolopendrium nuova associazione centro-mediterranea della classe Adiantetea. Arch. Bot. Ital. 1993, 68, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Brullo, S.; Scelsi, F.; Spampinato, G. La Vegetazione dell’Aspromonte. Studio Fitosociologico; Laruffa Editore: Reggio Calabria, Italy, 2001; pp. 525–774. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cortini Pedrotti, C. Associations de la classe Adiantetea dans quelques grottes de la gorge de Frasassi. Guide-Itinéraire. Excursion Internationale de Phytosociologie en Italie centrale (2-11 juillet 1982). Univ. Di Camerino 1982, 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  30. Puglisi, M. Homalio lusitanicae-Adiantetum, nuova associazione della classe Adiantetea Br.-Bl. 1947. Boll. Acc. Gioenia Sci. Nat. 1994, 27, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Spampinato, G. Rupi Stillicidiose Mediterranee dell’Adiantion: Nuovo habitat proposto per l’inserimento nell’allegato i della Direttiva (92/43CEE). In Specie e Habitat di Interesse Comunitario in Italia: Distribuzione, Stato di Conservazione e Trend; Genovesi, P., Angelini, P., Bianchi, E., Dupré, E., Ercole, S., Giacanelli, V., Ronchi, F., Stoch, F., Eds.; Serie Rapporti, 194/201; ISPRA: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 276–279. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guarino, R.; Pasta, S.; Bazan, G.; Crisafulli, A.; Caldarella, O.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Silvestre Gristina, A.; Ilardi, V.; La Mantia, A.; Marcenò, C.; et al. Relevant habitats neglected by the Directive 92/43 EEC: The contribution of Vegetation Science for their reappraisal in Sicily. Plant Sociol. 2021, 58, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sciandrello, S.; Cambria, S.; Crisafulli, A.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Minissale, P.; Musarella, C.M.; Puglisi, M.; Tavilla, G.; Tomaselli, V.; Spampinato, G. A new habitat of the shady wet cliffs (Adiantetea capilli-veneris) of the Mediterranean region. In Proceedings of the 54th SISV Congress, Twenty years in the third millennium with Vegetation Science, Online, 28–29 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Brullo, S.; Minissale, P.; Scelsi, F.; Spampinato, G. Note fitosociologiche miscellanee sul territorio ibleo (Sicilia sud-orientale). Boll. Accad. Gienia Sci. Nat. 1993, 26, 19–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bartolo, G.; Brullo, S.; Fichera, G.; Scelsi, F. Osservazioni fitosociologiche sulla vegetazione a Urtica rupestris Guss. del territorio ibleo (Sicilia sudorientale). Giorn. Bot. Ital. 1989, 123, 90. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bazan, G.; Marino, P.; Guarino, R.; Domina, G.; Schicchi, R. Bioclimatology and vegetation series in Sicily: A geostatistical approach. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2015, 52, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Conti, F.; Manzi, A.; Pedrotti, F. Liste rosse Regionali delle Piante d’Italia; WWF Italia, Società Botanica Italiana: Camerino, Italy, 1997; pp. 1–139. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gargano, D. Proposta metodologica. Verso la realizzazione di nuove Liste Rosse della flora d’Italia: Una griglia standard per la misura dell’Area of Occupancy (AOO). Inf. Bot. Ital. 2011, 43, 455–456. [Google Scholar]
  39. Giardina, G.; Raimondo, F.M.; Spadaro, V. A catalogue of plants growing in Sicily. Bocconea 2007, 20, 5–582. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gussone, J. Catalogus Plantarum Quae Observantur in Regio Horto ser. Fr. Borbonii Principis Juventutis in Boccadifalco prope Panormum; Typis Angeli Trani: Neapoli, Greece, 1821; pp. 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gussone, J. Florae Siculae Synopsis 2 (2); Ex Typis Tramater: Neapoli, Greece, 1845; pp. 525–774. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lopriore, C. Studi Comparativi Sulla Flora Lacustre Della Sicilia; Tip. Sicula di Monaco & Mollica: Catania, Italy, 1900; pp. 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lojacono Pojero, M. Flora Sicula o Descrizione Delle Piante Vascolari Spontanee o Indigenate in Sicilia; Tipo-Litografia Salvatore Bizzarri: Palermo, Italy, 1904; Volume 2, pp. 1–428. [Google Scholar]
  44. Minissale, P.; Sciandrello, S.; Spampinato, G. Analisi della biodiversità vegetale e relativa cartografia della Riserva Naturale Orientata “Pantalica, Valle dell’Anapo e Torrente Cava Grande” (Sicilia sudorientale). Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 2007, 18, 241–303. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zimmitti, A.; Ronsisvalle, F.B.F.; Ronsisvalle, G.A. Aree di interesse naturalistico per la rete ecologica dei M.ti Iblei (Sicilia sud-orientale): Il territorio dei Monti Climiti. Quad. Bot. Amb. Appl. 2007, 8, 319–342. [Google Scholar]
  46. Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd ed.; Springer: Wien, Austria, 1964; pp. 1–330. [Google Scholar]
  47. Suzuki, R.; Shimodaira, H. Pvclust: An R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1540–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hill, M.O.; Gauch, H.G. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 1980, 42, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  50. Bachman, S.; Moat, J.; Hill, A.W.; Torre, J.; Scott, B. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 2011, 150, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Volume 1: Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale. In Flora d’Italia: In 4 Volumi, 2nd ed.; Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media srl: Milano, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Volume 2: Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale. In Flora d’Italia: In 4 Volumi, 2nd ed.; Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media srl: Milano, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Volume 3: Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale. In Flora d’Italia: In 4 Volumi, 2nd ed.; Edagricole-Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media srl: Milano, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Volume 4: Flora d’Italia & Flora Digitale. In Flora d’Italia: In 4 Volumi, 2nd ed.; Edagricole Edizioni Agricole di New Business Media srl: Milano, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  55. Martellos, S.; Bartolucci, F.; Conti, F.; Galasso, G.; Moro, A.; Pennesi, R.; Peruzzi, L.; Pittao, E.; Nimis, P.L. FlorItaly—The portal to the Flora of Italy. PhytoKeys 2020, 156, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cortini Pedrotti, C. Flora dei Muschi d’Italia. Sphagnopsida, Andreaeopsida, Bryopsida (I Parte); Antonio Delfino Editore: Rome, Italy, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cortini Pedrotti, C. Flora dei Muschi d’Italia. Bryopsida (II Parte); Antonio Delfino Editore: Rome, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mucina, L.; Bültmann, H.; Dierßen, K.; Theurillat, J.-P.; Raus, T.; Carni, A.; Šumberová, K.; Willner, W.; Dengler, J.; García, R.G.; et al. Vegetation of Europe: Hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2016, 19, 3–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ben Avraham, Z.; Grasso, M. Collisional zone segmentation in Sicily and surrounding areas in the Central Mediterranean. Ann. Tecton. 1990, 4, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bianchi, F.; Carbone, S.; Grasso, M.; Invernizzi, G.; Lentini, F.; Longaretti, G.; Merlini, G.; Mostardini, F. Sicilia orientale: Profilo geologico Nebrodi-Iblei. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 1989, 38, 429–445. [Google Scholar]
  61. Minissale, P.; Santo, A.; Sciandrello, S. The coastal vegetation of the SCI “Capo Murro di Porco, Penisola della Maddalena e Grotta Pellegrino” (Siracusa). Fitosociologia 2011, 48, 77–98. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sciandrello, S.; Guglielmo, A.; Spampinato, G. Spatial patterns and floristic composition of plant communities in coastal salt marshes of south-eastern Sicily (Italy). Acta Bot. Gall. 2014, 161, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sciandrello, S.; Musarella, C.M.; Puglisi, M.; Spampinato, G.; Tomaselli, V.; Minissale, P. Updated and new insights on the coastal halophilous vegetation of southeastern Sicily (Italy). Plant Sociol. 2019, 56, 81–98. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sciandrello, S. Coastal saltmarsh vegetation in Sicily (Italy): Phytosociological insights and plant diversity. Plant Biosyst. 2020, 154, 860–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Minissale, P.; Molina, J.A.; Sciandrello, S. Pilularia minuta Durieu (Marsileaceae) discovered in south-eastern-Sicily: New insights on its ecology, distribution and conservation status. Bot. Lett. 2017, 164, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Minissale, P.; Sciandrello, S. Ecological features affect patterns of plant communities in Mediterranean temporary rock pools. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Minissale, P.; Trigilia, A.; Brogna, F.; Sciandrello, S. Plants and vegetation in the archaeological park of Neapolis of Siracusa (Sicily–Italy). A management effort but also an opportunity for a better enjoyment of the site. Conserv. Manag. Archeol. 2015, 17, 340–369. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sciandrello, S.; Privitera, M.; Puglisi, M.; Minissale, P. Plant communities diversity and spatial patterns in volcanic temporary pond of Sicily (S-Italy). Biologia 2016, 71, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brullo, S.; Brullo, C.; Tavilla, G.; Cambria, S.; Minissale, P.; Sciandrello, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Siracusa, G.; Del Guacchio, E. About the occurrence of Elatine macropoda and E. gussonei (Elatinaceae) in Sicily and lectotypification of their names. Acta Bot. Croat. 2022, 81, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Blasi, C.; Marignani, M.; Copiz, R.; Fipaldini, M.; Bonacquisti, S.; Del Vico, E.; Rosati, L.; Zavattero, L. Important plant areas in Italy: From data to mapping. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rivas Martínez, S. Bases para una nueva clasificacion bioclimatica de la tierra. Folia Bot. Matritensis 1993, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rivas-Martínez, S. Bioclimatic Map of Europe: Bioclimates, Scale 1:16 Mill; Cartographic Service; University of León: León, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
Plants 12 00164 g001 550
Figure 1. Some views of Urtica rupestris. (A) On a limestone cliff; (B) Female inflorescence; (C) Urtica rupestris with Asplenium scolopendrium from Cava Bibbinello (Syracuse); (D) Undergrowth plant from Anapo valley (Syracuse); (E) Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris from Cava Bibbinello (Syracuse); (F) Male inflorescence.
Figure 1. Some views of Urtica rupestris. (A) On a limestone cliff; (B) Female inflorescence; (C) Urtica rupestris with Asplenium scolopendrium from Cava Bibbinello (Syracuse); (D) Undergrowth plant from Anapo valley (Syracuse); (E) Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris from Cava Bibbinello (Syracuse); (F) Male inflorescence.
Plants 12 00164 g001
Plants 12 00164 g002 550
Figure 2. Dendrogram resulting from the cluster analysis (Cophenetic correlation = 0.808) of the surveyed plant communities: (A). Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris; (B). Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris. Approximately unbiased (AU—values printed in red) and bootstrap probability (BP—values printed in green) p-values are shown next to the nodes.
Figure 2. Dendrogram resulting from the cluster analysis (Cophenetic correlation = 0.808) of the surveyed plant communities: (A). Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris; (B). Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris. Approximately unbiased (AU—values printed in red) and bootstrap probability (BP—values printed in green) p-values are shown next to the nodes.
Plants 12 00164 g002
Plants 12 00164 g003 550
Figure 3. Ordination scatter diagram (DCA). Total variance (‘inertia’) in the species data: 2.1536. The r 2 value of axis 1 is (Eig = 0.44982) and the r 2 value of axis 2 is (Eig = 0.15224). Plant communities: 1. Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris; 2. Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris.
Figure 3. Ordination scatter diagram (DCA). Total variance (‘inertia’) in the species data: 2.1536. The r 2 value of axis 1 is (Eig = 0.44982) and the r 2 value of axis 2 is (Eig = 0.15224). Plant communities: 1. Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris; 2. Scutellario-Urticetum rupestris.
Plants 12 00164 g003
Plants 12 00164 g004 550
Figure 4. Geographical distribution of Urtica rupestris in Sicily. Black dot, current distribution; black cross, no longer recorded; yellow polygons, Special Areas Conservation.
Figure 4. Geographical distribution of Urtica rupestris in Sicily. Black dot, current distribution; black cross, no longer recorded; yellow polygons, Special Areas Conservation.
Plants 12 00164 g004
Table
Table 1. Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris ass. nova hoc loco. Phytosociological relevés of the plant community investigated. The symbol * display the holotypus.
Table 1. Urtico rupestris-Adiantetum capilli-veneris ass. nova hoc loco. Phytosociological relevés of the plant community investigated. The symbol * display the holotypus.
Cluster number12345141516171819202122232435364950
Relevé number12345678910 *11121314151617181920
Area (mq)161616161616161616161616161616163636
Coverage (%)8580859535909085859595909090908010010080100
AspectNNNNNNN-NENE-NE--------Presence
Slope (◦)45353035859080807590902070808070806080100
Altitude341345351355140461461460465465465465465465465464320320320320
ChorotypeLife formFloristic richness2014181610202022161915162222202110121011
Char. Ass
End. Sic.HUrtica rupestris Guss.3224134234333123335320
Char. Polysticho setiferi-Phyllitidion scolopendrii & Adiantetea capilli-veneris
Circumbor.HAsplenium scolopendrium L. subsp. scolopendrium2211.++232332333.21218
Subtrop.GAdiantum capillus-veneris L.121++2+2111221+1+...17
Southern-temp. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dum. 1+1+.+1++11+1+11....15
Temperate Thamnobryum alopecurum (Hedw.) Gangulee1111.1211+112111....15
Steno-Medit.-Merid.HAsplenium sagittatum (DC.) Bange..................+.1
Other species
NW-Medit.HLamium flexuosum Ten.1232.+12++21123112.218
Steno-Medit.-Occ.HAcanthus mollis L.+++++121++..++1+12+218
Subatl.PHedera helix L.+11+1211+21+....432316
Euri-Medit.GDioscorea communis (L.) Caddick & Wilkin1.1+1......1+++++22213
Steno-Medit.PRubia peregrina L.+....+1++1++++++....12
Paleotemp.HBrachypodium sylvaticum (Huds.) P. Beauv.1+1+.+++.+..++1+....12
Temperate Plagiomnium affine (Blandow ex Funck) T.J.Kop......++++11+++11....11
Eurasiat.HFicaria verna Huds. subsp. verna.....+1+++1+1+++....11
Euri-Medit.NPRubus ulmifolius Schott..11.+11....+1++..2.10
Subcosmop.TGeranium robertianum L.1111........+++++1..10
Endem. Sic.ChCymbalaria pubescens (C. Presl) Cufod.2..+112++1.......+1.10
Medit-Atl. Scorpiurium circinatum (Brid.) M. Fleisch. & Loeske.....111++++.1.+....9
Steno-Medit.NPHypericum hircinum L. +.+..+.1..++121.....9
Europ.-Caucas.PSambucus nigra L........1+++1+++.....8
Steno-Medit.GArum italicum Mill.......+++1++...+....7
Steno-Medit.TParietaria lusitanica L.1111............1+..6
Steno-Medit.GUmbilicus horizontalis (Guss.) DC......11+.+++........6
Europ.PClematis vitalba L.....1+++.+.....+....6
SubcosmopGDryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schot+..+.11.....+.......5
Endem. Ital.HScutellaria rubicunda Hornem.............++..++.+5
PonticaHAnthriscus nemorosa (M. Bieb.) Spreng.++++...........1....5
Steno-Medit.HMelissa officinalis subsp. altissima (Sm.) Arcang.1.11.+1.............5
Euri-Medit.ChRuscus aculeatus L.........++...++.....4
Steno-Medit.HViola alba subsp. dehnhardtii (Ten.) W. Becker............++++....4
Steno-Medit.HCarex distachya Desf........+....+++.....4
Eurasiat.HCarex pendula Huds.++1.................3
Paleotemp.HEupatorium cannabinum L. subsp. cannabinum............++.+....3
Eurasiat.TGalium aparine L.................+1.+3
Medit-Atl. Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort. ex Lindb.1+1.................3
Euri-Medit.TGeranium purpureum Vill...................1+2
Subtrop.HAsplenium onopteris L.....+..+............2
Circumbor.HChelidonium majus L..................+.+2
Steno-Medit.-Occ.GAllium subhirsutum L.....+...............1
Medit.-Turan.PFicus carica L.....+...............1
Euri-Medit.HParietaria judaica L....................+1
Euri-Medit.H Polypodium cambricum L................+....1
Circumbor.GPolystichum setiferum (Forssk.) T. Moore ex Woyn...................+.1
Subcosmop.HPotentilla reptans L.............+.......1
Subcosmop.HUrtica dioica L...............1.....1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sciandrello, S.; Cambria, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Minissale, P.; Puglisi, M.; Tavilla, G.; Tomaselli, V. Ecological Features and Conservation of Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae): A Narrow Endemic Species of Sicily. Plants 2023, 12, 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010164

AMA Style

Sciandrello S, Cambria S, Giusso del Galdo G, Minissale P, Puglisi M, Tavilla G, Tomaselli V. Ecological Features and Conservation of Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae): A Narrow Endemic Species of Sicily. Plants. 2023; 12(1):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sciandrello, Saverio, Salvatore Cambria, Gianpietro Giusso del Galdo, Pietro Minissale, Marta Puglisi, Gianmarco Tavilla, and Valeria Tomaselli. 2023. "Ecological Features and Conservation of Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae): A Narrow Endemic Species of Sicily" Plants 12, no. 1: 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010164

APA Style

Sciandrello, S., Cambria, S., Giusso del Galdo, G., Minissale, P., Puglisi, M., Tavilla, G., & Tomaselli, V. (2023). Ecological Features and Conservation of Urtica rupestris Guss. (Urticaceae): A Narrow Endemic Species of Sicily. Plants, 12(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop