Next Article in Journal
Developing Functional Relationships between Soil Moisture Content and Corn Early-Season Physiology, Growth, and Development
Next Article in Special Issue
The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Elevated CO2 Concentrations on the Growth of Various Microalgae Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 13
10.3390/plants12132469
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants

by
Wenli Sun
1,*,†,
Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian
1,†,
Spyridon A. Petropoulos
2 and
Nazanin Shahrajabian
3
1
Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece
3
Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 81595-158, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(13), 2469; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 27 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Biostimulants in Sustainable Horticulture and Agriculture: Development, Function, and Applications)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chitosan is illustrated in research as a stimulant of plant tolerance and resistance that promotes natural defense mechanisms against biotic and abiotic stressors, and its use may lessen the amount of agrochemicals utilized in agriculture. Recent literature reports indicate the high efficacy of soil or foliar usage of chitin and chitosan in the promotion of plant growth and the induction of secondary metabolites biosynthesis in various species, such as Artemisia annua, Curcuma longa, Dracocephalum kotschyi, Catharanthus roseus, Fragaria × ananassa, Ginkgo biloba, Iberis amara, Isatis tinctoria, Melissa officinalis, Mentha piperita, Ocimum basilicum, Origanum vulgare ssp. Hirtum, Psammosilene tunicoides, Salvia officinalis, Satureja isophylla, Stevia rebaudiana, and Sylibum marianum, among others. This work focuses on the outstanding scientific contributions to the field of the production and quality of aromatic and medicinal plants, based on the different functions of chitosan and chitin in sustainable crop production. The application of chitosan can lead to increased medicinal plant production and protects plants against harmful microorganisms. The effectiveness of chitin and chitosan is also due to the low concentration required, low cost, and environmental safety. On the basis of showing such considerable characteristics, there is increasing attention on the application of chitin and chitosan biopolymers in horticulture and agriculture productions.

1. Introduction

Chitin is a linear cationic heteropolymer consisting of β-(1-4)-linked 2-acetamde-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose (N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, GlcNAc) and randomly distributed units of 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose (D-glucosamine, GlcN) [1]. Chitin can be converted to chitosan by both biological and chemical or enzymatic procedures [1]. Chitin is generally available as a structural factor in the exoskeletons of an extensive range of eukaryotic organisms, such as insects; in the cell walls of fungi; in crustaceans, such as crabs, shrimps, and lobsters; and it is the second most plentiful biopolymer on the planet, alongside cellulose [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. As a natural amino polysaccharide, it indicates different practical applications, owing to its functional characteristics [9,10]. Both chitooligosaccharides and chitosan are obtained from the depolymerization and deacetylation of chitin, respectively [11,12]. Chitin exists naturally in three polymorphic structures: α-, β-, and γ-chitin [13]. A-chitin has anti-parallel chains, whereas β-chitin has parallel chains forming monoclinic crystals with intramolecular H-bonds and intermolecular H-bonds [14]. Li et al. [15] reported that a chitin/cellulose nanofiber complex (CCNFC), which was extracted from the spent mushroom substrate, indicated significant plant growth promotion activity and plant disease resistance activity. It has been reported that chitin-based nanofibers (CNFs) were outstanding in decreasing pathogenic fungal spread in pepper [16,17]. Parada et al. [18] noted that chitin nanofiber may cause a decrease in the number of spots caused by Alternaria brassicicola and the size of lesions induced by Colletotrichum fructicola, while it can promote disease resistance in strawberry and cabbage plants. Chitin and chitosan are derived from different sources: (1) aquatic: crabs (Chionoecetes opilio, Podophthalmus vigil, Paralithodes camtschaticus, Carcinus mediterraneus), water lobster, prawn, krill (Anax imperator, Daphnia longispina, Notonecta glauca, Hydrophilus piceus, Asellus aquaticus, Agabus bipustulatus), and squid pens; (2) terrestrial: spiders (Geolycosa vultuosa, Hogna radiata, Nephila edulis), scorpions (Mesobuthus gibbosus), beetles (Bombyx mori, Holotrichia parallela, Leptinotarsa decemlineata), cockroaches, and brachiopods; and (3) microorganisms.
Chitosan and its oligosaccharides may increase photosynthesis by increasing the activities of different enzymes of nitrogen and carbon metabolism, as well as dark and light responses of photosynthetic apparatus. They also have an important function in photosynthetic machinery stimulation by modulating principal photochemistry; they can also manage the restraints of stomata, escalate the carbon fixation effectiveness in dark reactions, and improve the synthesis of metabolites. Chitosan and its oligosaccharides may also promote the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and the activity of enzymes [19]. Chitosan derivatives have superior antifungal activity compared to chitosan [20]. Chitosan can be used for different purposes based on the specificity of its physicochemical properties [21,22], as well as its biodegradability [23] and biocompatibility [24,25,26]. The potential utilization of chitosan and its derivatives include their use as antimicrobial and antioxidant agents, a drug delivery system, gene therapy, food technology, bio-nanotechnology, regenerative technology, effluent treatments, and electrolytes, as well as in various industries, including paper manufacturing, cosmetics, as absorption enhancers, photography, wood industries, environmental protection, agriculture, obesity treatment, catalyst research, immune therapy, as permeation enhancers, energy production, and in the immobilization of cells. Chitosan leads to various defensive genes in plants, such as genes related to pathogenesis, namely, chitinase and glucanase [27]. It may also trigger several enzymes in the reactive oxygen species scavenging system, such as superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase [27,28,29,30]. Chitosan also leads to the accumulation of auxin in the apex of roots, thus promoting root elongation [31]. Moreover, chitosan and its oligosaccharides act as the suited ligand for the initiation of accessible receptors and, therefore, elicit different signaling pathways in the plant, namely, GPCR and PLC/PK, MAPK, H2O2 burst, and the promotion of transcription parameters, thus generating plant responses to environmental stimuli [32]. Chitosan and its oligosaccharides also show antimicrobial properties and can be used as biopesticides, preventing the proliferation of pathogens and improving crop quality and yield [32,33,34,35]. For example, chitosan has innate antibacterial characteristics that prevent the development of fungi and germs [36]; its nanoparticles were utilized to control the release of citronella essential oil for use against cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) [37]. Moreover, it can noticeably decrease plant oxidative stress and improve crop yield [38,39], while root exposure to chitosan increased both antioxidant and defense enzyme activity [38]. Chitosan can decrease plant diseases via two major procedures: direct antimicrobial function against pathogens, or through the induction of plant defense reactions [39,40,41,42,43]. The effects of chitosan on plant defense mechanisms are connected to its application method and dose [44]. The potential applications of chitosan as eco-friendly tools in agricultural production are shown in Figure 1.
Oligochitosan, obtained from chitosan, is a potential plant immunity regulator [45,46]. It has shown an extensive range of biological applications, including as a plant growth stimulator, antimicrobial agent, and feed additive, among others [47,48]. Oligochitosan can activate a plant’s innate immunity via signal transduction, signal perception, and the oligochitosan response to proteins and genes, thus leading to accumulation of defense-related secondary metabolites [49,50]. It can elicit different defense responses, including the scavenging of reactive oxygen species, the synthesis of jasmonate, the increase of cell walls’ lignification, the production of phytoalexins, and the accumulation of defense-related proteinases inhibitors, as well as the induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and salicylic acid [51,52,53,54]. Zhang et al. [55] reported that oligochitosan could decrease black spots on tomato fruits, while Deng et al. [56] suggested that a preharvest application of oligochitosan can be an important substitute to conventional control practices for the prevention of post-harvest anthracnose in navel oranges. Oligochitosan showed a significant impact on controlling fruit brown rot; it could boost antioxidant and defense-related enzymes activities, accelerate the corresponding gene transcript expression, and also delay fruit senescence and softening [57]. Oligochitosan remarkably activated phenylpropanoid pathway metabolism and induced defense responses against green and blue mold in citrus fruit [58,59]. Wang et al. [60] proposed that primary metabolites induced by oligochitosan behave as the source of energy and signaling or as substrate molecules that have indirect or direct roles in defense reactions against Geotrichum candidum, also known as sour rot, in citrus fruit.
Relevant literature was obtained using the keywords “Biostimulants”, “Chitin”, “Chitosan”, “Oligochitosan”, “Medicinal plants”, “Aromatic plants”, “Natural products”, “Biotic stress”, and “Abiotic stress” from scientific literature databases, such as “Web of Science”, “SciFinder”, “PubMed”, and “Elsevier”. The current review gives a literature overview with regards to the impacts of chitosan, chitin, and its derivatives on medicinal and aromatic plants, focusing on their noticeable functions in modern sustainable production. We also highlight the major restrictions and illustrate the future possibilities of applications of this form of biostimulant.

2. The Effects of Biostimulants on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

A plant biostimulant is defined as any substance or microorganism used on plants that may lead to increased nutrition efficiency and improvement of abiotic stress tolerance and crop quality traits. Biostimulants consist of algae or plant extracts, mushrooms, amino acids, humic substances, microorganisms, biomolecules, natural ingredients, and metabolites of fermentation, among others [61,62,63,64]. Utilization of Moringa leaf extract led to greater growth, lower weed infestation, and an increased final yield of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) [65,66], while the application of salicylic increased the content of different metabolite components in leaves [67] and improved the values of shoot fresh weight, plant height, and dry weight of basil seedlings under water shortage treatments [68]. The combination of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum lipoferum significantly enhanced the fresh and dry yield of coriander [69], while foliar spraying of a biostimulant (Asahi SL or Goemar Goto Arysta Life Science) induced the photochemical effectiveness of photosystem II, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate, but decreased the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration [70]; moreover, it promoted the total phenolic compounds’ concentration, L-ascorbic acid, and the total antioxidant activity of coriander seedlings [70]. The utilization of different biostimulants as a seed treatment during germination boosted the germination percentage of garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) [71]. Humic acids increased the bulb yield and clover and bulb diameter of garlic (Allium sativum L.) [72], and demonstrated a positive effect on the mineral nutrition content [73]. Bacillus subtilis and humic acids boosted the level of protein and minerals and increased the antioxidant activities of garlic [74]. Salicylic acid improved the secondary metabolites in a callus culture of Iranian sodab (Ruta graveolens L.) [75]. The application of salicylic acid led to a significant decrease of the toxic impact of mercury on the growth and final yield of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) [76], while seed priming with Pseudomonas spp. accelerated the germination and inoculation of seedlings and positively influenced lemon balm growth [77]. Potassium silicate (K2SiO3) application increased the pigments, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, ascorbic acid, valine, protein, Ca, Mg, and K content and the uptake of P, K, and N of horseradish tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) [78]. Some other biostimulants, such as benzoic acid, phenylalanine, N-benzoyl glycine, glycine, and serine, significantly improved the taxol accumulation in a callus of Japanese yew [79]. The application of humic acids containing L-ascorbic acid and thiamine, both alone (ROOTS) and together with fertilizer (ROOT PLUS), increased the production of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) plants; it also induced earlier flowering [80]. For the same species, bioactive amino acid constituents, namely Kadostim and Humiforte, promoted the total flavonoids and carbohydrate constituents of leaves, P, K, and N [81]. The application of Radifarm® boosted the nutrient status of French marigold (Tagetes erecta and Tagetes patula L.) plants and flowering [82]. The utilization of chitosan reduced the adverse effects of salt stress, and stimulated the enzyme activities and antioxidants of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.) [83]. Salicylic acid decreased the osmotic adjustment under drought stress, increased the antioxidant compounds’ content in seeds, and boosted the vegetative growth and yield of milk thistle by escalating the relative water content in regions under the influence of a water shortage [84]. Trichoderma ovalisporum (NFCCI2689) and T. harzianum (NFCCI 2241) improved the menthol content and oil yield of mint (Mentha arvensis L.) [85], while the application of CRADLETM, MobilizerTM, and Nanozim NXTTM biostimulants promoted metabolic and physiological responses, such as the leaf water potential, gas exchange, proline accumulation, and relative water content of stressed seedlings of mint [86]. The application of ethanol and humic acids improved the photosynthetic pigments and yield potential of Moldavian dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) [87]. The application of salicylic acid stimulated the oil components of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) compared to control plants, particularly menthol, menthone, methyl acetate, and 1,8-cineole [88]. Applications of chitosan, citric acid, and humic acid on the same species boosted the stem and leaves dry weight [89,90]. A combined application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with chitosan positively affected the secondary metabolites and dry herbal weight of peppermint [91,92]. Moreover, Pseudomonas sp. P17 strain was used as a potential plant growth promoter for better plant growth and higher nutrient uptake in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) [93]. A chitosan and salicylic acid application stimulated the production of amarogentin, mangiferin, and swertiamarin from shoot cultures of swertia (Swertia paniculata Wallich), which have significant bioactive properties that render them very important in the pharmaceutical industries [94].

3. Practical Usage of Chitosan on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

The multiple functions of chitosan’s chemically and naturally synthesized components could act as potent elicitors and biostimulants and change the physicochemical status of medicinal crops [95,96,97]. They participate in the activation of defensive genes via the overexpression of pathogenesis-related genes; they may also provide photoprotection by increasing secondary metabolite biosynthesis. They play an important function in oxidative damage reversal by managing hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide signaling. They also stimulate activity at the cellular level of antioxidant enzymes, such as peroxidase, dismutase superoxide, and catalase; retain ion homeostasis; improve the photosynthesis rate by interacting with abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure; improve plant vigor and environmental stress tolerance; and generally improve crop performance [98,99,100]. Aristolochic acid I (AA I) is one of the substituted 1-phaenanthrene carboxylic acids usually discovered in Asarum and Aristolochia plants, and chitosan-changed carbon microcoils were used as suitable adsorbents for the selective extraction of aristolochic acid I from Aristolochiaceae plants [101]. Psammosilene tunicoides W. C. Wu et C. Y. Wu, a monotypic species of Caryophyllaceae that is endemic to China, has been used as folk medicine for centuries, and it is one of the major ingredients in the traditional Chinese medicine “Yunnan Baiyao”. According to the literature, hairy roots of the species elicited with 200 mg L−1 of chitosan increased the total saponin content by 4.55-fold [102]. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) indicated that the yields of gypsogenin, quillaic acid, and gypsogenin-3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside were significantly escalated after a chitosan application [102]. Furthermore, exogenous chitosan usage significantly triggered the reactive oxygen species (ROS), scavenging enzyme activities, and nitric oxide (NO) content in the hairy roots of Psammosilene tunicoides [102].
In basil seedlings, the level of rosmarinic acid (RA) increased after the application of 100 mg/L of chitosan lactate [103]. The mixture of common chili (Capsicum annuum) fruit extracts and chitosan can be effective against pathogenic bacteria, especially against Staphylococcus aureus, which is a Gram-positive, spherically shaped bacterium [104]. A chitosan application increased the content of the EO components, the positive impacts of chitosan utilization under drought stress conditions [105]. The usage of water-soluble carboxymethyl chitosan-grafted daphnetin nanoparticles (DA@CMCS-NPs) improved the activities of defense enzymes in tobacco, and effectively inhibited the development of tobacco bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) [106]. The effects of chitosan on different medicinal and aromatic plants are shown in Table 1.

4. Activities and Applications of Oligochitosan

Chitooligosaccharides or oligochitosan are plant elicitors that have similar impacts to chitosan on herbs and plants against biotic stress [136]. Moreover, oligochitosan, with a higher degree of polymerization, indicated a stronger elicitation impact via the overexpression of defensive genes [137]. Oligochitosan may promote protection against pathogens through the activation of salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonic acid/ethylene (JA/ET)-dependent pathways; boost growth by escalating gibberellin, auxin, photosynthesis content, and N and C assimilation; induce protection against abiotic stress via the abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent pathway; and increase the synthesis of secondary metabolites with medicinal and antipathogenic activities [138]. The application of chitosan oligosaccharide at both 60 g L−1 and 120 g L−1 levels increased fennel growth and yield, while it increased estragole and reduced the anethole content, thus demonstrating adverse effects on the essential oil quality of fennel [139]. Liu et al. [140] reported that oligochitosan sprayed at 5 g/L noticeably inhibited rhizome rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum, and also decreased weight loss; however, it did not influence the amount of soluble solids or titratable acidity of the rhizomes of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). The potential of oligochitosan to decrease rot in stored rhizomes could be related to their ability to induce defense responses in ginger [140]. Li et al. [141] also indicated that oligochitosan caused the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial dysfunction, metacaspase activation, and Ca2+ homeostasis dysregulation, together with hallmarks of apoptosis consisting of DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine externalization, and nuclear condensation to control pathogens in Ceratocystis fimbriata. Lu et al. [142] observed that oligochitosan led to tobacco resistance to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) by the Ca2+ signaling pathway. Ahmad et al. [143] indicated that a foliar spray of irradiated chitosan (80 mgL−1) significantly increased the physiology and growth of peppermint. On the basis of LC-MS analysis, the chitosan oligosaccharide application slightly increased artemisinin production in the leaves, while the impacts of chitosan oligosaccharide and salicylic acid on artemisinin production varied, indicating that these elicitors may not be an appropriate method for increasing the artemisinin yield or that the regulation takes longer to be effective in sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua L.) [144].

5. The Application of Chitin as Biostimulant

Chitin can induce both a local immune reaction and a systemic disease resistance when provided as a supplement in soils [145]. The most important chitin derivatives are chitosan, alkyl chitin, N and O sulfated chitin, dibutyryl chitin, carboxymethyl chitin (CMCH), chito-oligosaccharides (COS), chitin nanofibers (CNF), chitin nano-whiskers (CNW), chitin nanoparticles (CNP), chitin nanocomposites (CNC), and chitin hydrogels (CHG). Unlike chitosan, the application of chitin had no remarkable effects on defense mechanisms, such as enzymatic activities, gene expression levels, hormone quantities, and root secreted proteins of medicinal cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) [146,147,148,149]. Cretoiu et al. [150] added chitinous matter obtained from shrimps to the soil’s top layer to assess the suppressiveness of the oil toward Verticillium dahliae, as well as against plant pathogenic nematodes. They reported a change in both structures and an abundance of soil microbial communities, both total soil fungi and bacteria; they also found that the structures and abundance of soil actinobacteria and the Oxalobacteraceae were influenced by chitin. Liopa-Tsakalidi et al. [151] reported that a chitin application in the peat substrate did not influence the weight and length of lemon balm. Chitin influenced the tarragon leaves, leading to an increase of the total chlorophyll content [151]. The seed germination percentage of chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium L.) was improved in the substrate with 1% and 2% chitin and 200, 500, and 1000 ppm GA3 compared to the control treatments (H2O) [152]. With the increasing rate of chitin and GA3, the seed germination of the chervil was decreased (Liopa-Tsakalidi and Barouchas, 2011). In the combinations of 1% chitin + 80 mM NaCl, 1% chitin + 120 NaCl, 120 NaCl + GA3, 2% chitin + 180 NaCl, and 200 GA3 +180 NaCl, germination was boosted and the Timson index of germination velocity was greater than the corresponding velocity in H2O [152]. Kanawi et al. [153] found that the percentage of germination of basil seeds increased with the increasing concentration of chitin, while the percentage of inhibition of pathogenic fungi also escalated with the rise of the concentration of chitin. The application of chitin/nano-TiO2 and chitin/nano-SiO2 resulted in a notable increase of the preservation of seed quality of Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) [154].

6. Conclusions—Future Remarks

Biostimulants are known and described as molecules of biological origin with positive effects on the growth and development of different crops, increasing resistance to both biotic and abiotic stress parameters and improving crop quality and yield. The most important biostimulant impacts on crops are improved stress tolerance, the production of deeper roots, increased cation exchange, accelerated crop establishment, improved seed germination rates, reduced leaching, increased nutrient uptake, detoxification of heavy metals, increased stomata opening and plant transpiration, improved drought tolerance, increased natural plant toxins, repelling of pests, stimulation of immune system of plants, and improved yields and crop performance. The accurate application of chitin may show a beneficial function in the growth, development, and bioactive phytoconstituents accumulation of medicinal plants, which, in turn, could upscale the possibility of industrial exploitation of medicinal plants in the most sustainable way possible. Chitosan is the principal tool in the agricultural field because it is biocompatible, nontoxic, and biodegradable, and also has adsorption capabilities, since it can absorb different heavy metals, insecticides from water or pollutants, soil, and pesticides. Chitosan can be formed in several ways, as nanoparticles, nanomaterials, and nanocomposites, which are appropriate for plant protection, while its characteristics can be improved by combining it with other substances. The importance of chitosan in the formation of photosynthetic metabolites and pigments; the absorption of elements; assimilation; and the expression of genes as micro-, macro-, and nano-structures and in the form of composites or pure components with metal elements; and, lastly, the qualitative and quantitative performance of different medicinal plants and crops influenced by chitosan components has been investigated thus far. Chitosan and chitosan-based nanoparticles have shown promising findings in medicinal plants as fertilizers, plant disease control and insecticidal agents, soil-conditioning agents, ripening retardants, and fruit and seed coatings. These components are able to increase the assimilation of secondary metabolites through the stimulation of biochemical modification, defensive responses, and the biosynthesis of phytoalexins. Using chitosan as a foliar spray significantly increased plant growth; ions; chlorophyll; antioxidant capacity; and phytopharmaceutical components, such as anthocyanins, total soluble phenols and flavonoids, and alkaloids; it also reduced the number of oxidative biomarkers. Biocompatible and biodegradable chitosan and chitosan-based nanomaterials are becoming important in agriculture because of their unique characteristics, such as eliciting, biostimulating, antimicrobial activity, and stimulation of plant growth and tolerance to environmental stresses. Currently, these substances are not being commonly utilized in agriculture, as the procedures of their biological activity in plants and action against pathogenic microorganisms have not been completely elucidated to date. Chitosan successfully increases the physiological functions of plants; additionally, chitosan treatment modulates various genes, especially through the activation of plant defense signaling pathways. Furthermore, it is useful in decreasing fertilizer losses because of its coating ability, which is essential in maintaining control of environmental pollution. Chitin and its derivatives are highly recognized as growth stimulants, plant growth regulators, and elicitors for the production of secondary metabolites. In summary, despite the open challenges, molecules of chitosan and chitin have been proven practical in different aspects of plant biology, from the increase in crop yield to the protection against attacks from pathogens. Hence, more research is needed to survey and fine tune the application of chitosan and chitin to the root zone to prevent soil-borne diseases and to decrease the overuse of synthetic fertilizers in medicinal and aromatic crops in the future.

Author Contributions

W.S., writing—original draft preparation; M.H.S., writing—original draft preparation and editing; S.A.P., writing and editing; N.S., writing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (research grant 2019YFA0904700). This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (Grant No. M21026). This research was also supported by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program for Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (project code: T2EDK-05281). The article processing charges (APC) were also covered by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program for Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation under the call RE-SEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (project code: T2EDK-05281).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chakravarty, J.; Edwards, T.A. Innovation from waste with biomass-derived chitin and chitosan as green and sustainable polymer: A review. Energy Nexus 2022, 8, 100149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joseph, S.M.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Paranthaman, R.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. A review on source-specific chemistry, functionality, and applications of chitin and chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shahrajabian, M.H. Medicinal herbs with anti-inflammatory activities for natural and organic healing. Curr. Org. Chem. 2021, 25, 2885–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Biostimulants application: A low input cropping management tool for sustainable faring of vegetables. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Al Shaqsi, N.H.K.; Al Hoqani, H.A.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Al Sibani, M.A. Optimization of the demineralization process for the extraction of chitin from Omani Portunidae segnis. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020, 23, 100779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liao, J.; Wang, Y.; Hou, B.; Zhang, J.; Huang, H. Nano-chitin reinforced agarose hydrogels: Effects of nano-chitin addition and acidic gas-phase coagulation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 313, 120902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hou, F.; He, L.; Ma, X.; Wang, D.; Ding, T.; Ye, X.; Liu, D. Ultrasound enhanced the binding ability of chitinase onto chitin: From an AFM insight. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 67, 105117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vaikuntapu, P.R.; Rambabu, S.; Madhuprakash, J.; Podile, A.R. A new chitinase-D from a plant growth promoting Serratia marcescens GPS5 for enzymatic conversion of chitin. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 220, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kertmen, A.; Ehrlich, H. Patentology of chitinous biomaterials. Part I: Chitin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 282, 119102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, J.; Lv, X.; Ma, M.; Oh, D.-H.; Jiang, Z.; Fu, X. Chitin and chitin-based biomaterials: A review of advances in processing and food applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 299, 120142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Curto, M.A.; Butassi, E.; Ribas, J.C.; Svetaz, L.A.; Cortes, J.C.G. Natural products targeting the synthesis of β(1,3)-D-glucan and chitin of the fungal cell wall. Existing drugs and recent findings. Phytomedicine 2021, 88, 153556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Ezhilarasi, P.N.; Kondamareddy, K.K.; Rajan, D.K.; Sathishkumar, P.; Rajarajeswaran, J.; Conterno, L. Green and eco-friendly approaches for the extraction of chitin and chitosan: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 287, 119349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sultan, R.; Reghunadhan, A.; Sambhudevan, S. A new era of chitin synthesis and dissolution using deep eutectic solvents-comparison with ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 380, 121794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, S.K. Solubility of lignin and chitin in ionic liquids and their biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, J.; Liu, R.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Lyu, L.; Shi, Z.; Man, Y.B.; Wu, F. Selenium uptake and accumulation in winter wheat as affected by level of phosphate application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 433, 128762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aiman, U.; Nisar, N.; Tsuzuki, T.; Lowe, A.; Rossiter, J.T.; Javaid, A.; Powell, G.; Waseem, R.; Al-Mijalli, S.H.; Iqbal, M. Chitin nanofibers trigger membrane bound defense signaling and induce elicitor activity in plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 178, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, R.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, M.; Sharma, I.; Shara, P.; Kamboj, P.; Saini, A.; Voraha, R.; Sharma, A.K.; Upadhyay, T.K.; et al. Chitin, chitinases and chitin derivatives in biopharmaceutical, agricultural and environmental perspective. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 9985–10005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parada, R.Y.; Egusa, M.; Aklog, Y.F.; Miura, C.; Ifuku, S.; Kaminaka, H. Optimization of nanofibrillation degree of chitin for induction of plant disease resistance: Elicitor activity and systemic resistance induced by chitin nanofiber in cabbage and strawberry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118 Pt B, 2185–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alamdari, S.; Mirzaee, O.; Jahroodi, F.N.; Tafreshi, M.J.; Ghamsari, M.S.; Shik, S.S.; Ara, M.H.M.; Lee, K.-Y.; Park, H.-H. Green synthesis of multifunctional ZnO/chitosan nanocomposite film using wild Mentha pulegium extract for packaging applications. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 34, 102349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, L.; Zhang, J.; Tan, W.; Wang, G.; Li, Q.; Dong, F.; Guo, Z. Antifungal activity of double Schiff bases of chitosan derivatives bearing active halogeno-benzenes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 179, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Desti, A.; Kavetsou, E.; Kostopoulou, I.; Pitterou, I.; Pontillo, A.R.N.; Tzani, A.; Christodoulou, P.; Siliachli, A.; Zoumpoulakis, P. Nanosystems for the encapsulation of natural products: The case of chitosan biopolymer as a matrix. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wahba, M.I. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of chitosan. J. Biomater. Sci. Poly. Ed. 2020, 31, 30–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Landrischina, A.; Rosen, J.; Friedman, A.J. Biodegradable chitosan nanoparticles in drug delivery for infectious disease. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Islam, N.; Dmour, I.; Taha, M.O. Degradability of chitosan micro/nanoparticles for pulmonary drug delivery. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shahrajaian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Soleymani, A.; Cheng, Q. Traditional herbal medicines to overcome stress, anxiety and improve mental health in outbreaks of human coronaviruses. Phytother. Res. 2020, 35, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Exploring Artemisia annua L., artemisinin and its derivatives, from traditional Chinese wonder medicinal science. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2020, 48, 1719–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pichyangkura, R.; Chadchawan, S. Biostimulant activity of chitosan in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hemmati, F.; Salehi, R.; Ghotaslou, R.; Kafil, H.S.; Hasani, A.; Gholizadeh, P.; Rezaee, M.A. The assessment of antibiofilm activity of chitosan-zinc oxide-gentamicin nanocomposite on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 2248–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. The importance of flavonoids and phytochemicals of medicinal plants with antiviral activities. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2022, 19, 293–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Foliar application of nutrients on medicinal and aromatic plants, the sustainable approaches for higher and better production. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Suarez-Fernandez, M.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Lopez-Moya, F.; Arnao, M.B.; Cabrera-Escribano, F.; Nueda, M.J.; Gunse, B.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Chitosan induces plant hormones and defenses in tomato root exudates. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 572087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ahmad, B.; Khan, M.M.A.; Jahan, A.; Shabbir, A.; Jaleel, H. Increased production of valuable secondary products in plants by leaf applied radiation-processed polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Do, N.H.N.; Truong, Q.T.; Le, P.K.; Ha, A.C. Recent developments in chitosan hydrogels carrying natural bioactive compounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 294, 119726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Roshni, A.; Thambidurai, S. Enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of ZnO with rice field crab chitosan and Plectranthus amboinicus extract. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 291, 126739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sultan, M.; Abdelhakim, A.A.; Nassar, M.; Hassan, Y.R. Active packaging of chitosan film modified with basil oil encapsulated in silica nanoparticles as an alternate for plastic packaging materials. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kabiriyel, J.; Jeyanthi, R.; Jayakumar, K.; Amalraj, A.; Arjun, P.; Shanmugarathinam, S.; Vignesh, G.; Raja Mohan, C. Green synthesis of carboxyl methyl chitosan based curcumin nanoparticles and its biological activity: Influence of size and conductivity. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023, 5, 100260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ibrahim, S.S.; Abou-Elseoud, W.S.; Elbehery, H.H.; Hassan, M.L. Chitosan-cellulose nanoencapsulation systems for enhancing the insecticidal activity of citronella essential oil against the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 184, 115089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Balusamy, S.R.; Rahimi, S.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Sunderraj, S.; Shanmugam, R.; Thangavelu, L.; Mijakovic, I.; Perumalsamy, H. Chitosan, chitosan nanoparticles and modified chitosan biomaterials, a potential tool to combat salinity stress in plants. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 284, 119189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ji, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, F.; Fan, N.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, Z. Meta-analysis of chitosan-mediated effects on plant defense against oxidative stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851 Pt 1, 158212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khairy, A.M.; Tohamy, M.R.A.; Zayed, M.A.; Mahmoud, S.F.; El-Tahan, A.M.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Mesiha, P.K. Eco-friendly application of nano-chitosan for controlling potato and tomato bacterial wilt. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2199–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Du, M.; Yi, Y.; Yin, Y.; Cai, Z.; Cai, W.; Li, J.; He, G.; Zhang, J. Bacterial-triggered photodynamic nano-system based on hematoporphyrin-modified chitosan for sustainable plant disease control. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 191, 112035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riseh, R.S.; Hassanisaadi, M.; Vatankhah, M.; Babaki, S.A.; Barka, E.A. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to manage plant diseases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 220, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sathiyabama, M.; Gandhi, M.; Indhumathi, M. Suppression of dry root rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler in chickpea plants by application of thiamine loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 173 Pt B, 105893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, Z.; Wang, L.; Qin, Y.; Li, P. Activity of chitin/chitosan/chitosan oligosaccharide against plant pathogenic nematodes and potential modes of application in agriculture: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 306, 120592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, X.; She, X.; Du, Y.; Liang, X. Induction of antiviral resistance and stimulary effect by oligochitosan in tobacco. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2007, 87, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yin, H.; Zhao, X.; Du, Y. Oligochitosan: A plant diseases vaccine—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, R.; Zuo, P.; Zhang, M.; Meng, D.; Wang, B.; Zhen, T. Transglutaminase induced oligochitosan glycosylation of ferritin as a novel nanocarrier for food bioactive molecules. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, T.; Chang, Y.H. Structural, physicochemical, and in vitro release properties of hydrogel beads produced by oligochitosan and de-esterified pectin from yuzu (Citrus junos) peel as a quercetin delivery system for colon target. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yin, H.; Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Du, Y.; Ma, X. cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression in Brassica napus treated with oligochitosan elicitor. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Svirshchevskaya, E.V.; Alekseeva, L.G.; Reshetov, P.D.; Phomicheva, N.N.; Parphenyuk, S.A.; Ilyina, A.V.; Zueva, V.S.; Lopatin, S.A.; Levov, A.N.; Varlamov, V.P. Mucoadjuvant properties of lipo- and glycoconjugated derivatives of oligochitosans. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 2030–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, J.; Zhao, L.; Yu, Q. Receptor-mediated stimulatory effect of oligochitosan in macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 317, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Han, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yu, Z.; Yu, Q. Role of mannose receptor in oligochitosan-mediated stimulation of macrophage function. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2005, 5, 1533–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, Y.; Yin, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Du, Y.; Li, F. Oligochitosan induced Brassica napus L. production of NO and H2O2 and their physiological function. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, H.; Zhao, X.; Bai, X.; Du, Y. Involvement of N-mediated defense in oligochitosan inducing resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, S581–S582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Han, Z.; Huang, W.; Gu, X.; Li, B.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, H. Pichia caribbica combined with oligochitosan controlling black spot of tomatoes and the regulation on ROS metabolism of the fruits. Biol. Control 2022, 176, 105109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Deng, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, K. Pre-harvest spray of oligochitosan induced the resistance of harvested navel oranges to anthracnose during ambient temperature storage. Crop. Prot. 2015, 70, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, Z.; Yang, L.; Yan, H.; Kennedy, J.F.; Meng, X. Chitosan and oligochitosan enhance the resistance of peach fruit to brown rot. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, Y.; Ma, J.; Xie, J.; Deng, L.; Yao, X.; Zeng, K. Transcriptomic and biochemical analysis of highlighted induction of phenylpropanoid pathway metabolism of citrus fruit in response to salicylic acid, Pichia membranaefaciens and oligochitosan. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 142, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, L.-Y.; Zhang, J.-L.; Bassett, C.L.; Meng, X.-H. Difference between chitosan and oligochitosan in growth of Monilinia fructicola and control of brown rot in peach fruit. LWT-Food. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, W.; Deng, L.; Yao, S.; Zeng, K. Primary metabolites analysis of induced citrus fruit disease resistance upon treatment with oligochitosan, salicylic acid and Pichia membranaefaciens. Biol. Control 2020, 148, 104289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Sustainable agriculture systems in vegetable producing using chitin and chitosan as plant biostimulants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Sustainable approaches to boost yield and chemical constituents of aromatic and medicinal plants by application of biostimulants. Recent Adv. Food Nutr. Agric. 2022, 13, 72–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Using bacteria and fungi as plant biostimulants for sustainable agricultural production systems. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2022, 16, 206–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Sun, W. Survey of the influences of microbial biostimulants on horticultural crops: Case studies and successful paradigms. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Prabhu, M.; Kumar, A.R.; Rajamani, L. Influence of different organic substances on growth and herb yield of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.). Indian J. Agric. Res. 2010, 44, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kwiatkowski, C.A.; Juszczak, J. The response of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) to the application of growth stimulators and forecrops. Acta Agrobot. 2012, 64, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Elhindi, K.M.; Al-Amri, S.M.; Abdel-Salam, E.M.; Al-Suhaibani, N.A. Effectiveness of salicylic acid in mitigating salt-induced adverse effects on different physico-biochemical attributes in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Damalas, C.A. Improving drought tolerance in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) with salicylic acid. Sci. Hortic 2019, 246, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shirkhodaei, M.; Darzi, M.T.; Haj Seyed Hadi, M.R. Influence of vermicompost and biostimulant on the growth and biomass of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 2014, 2, 706–714. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pokluda, R.; Sekara, A.; Jezdinsky, A.; Kalisz, A.; Neugebauerova, J.; Grabowska, A. The physiological status and stress biomarker concentration of Coriandrum sativum L. plants subjected to chilling are modified by biostimulant application. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2016, 32, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lisjak, M.; Tomic, O.; Spoljarevic, M.; Teklic, T.; Stanisavljevic, A.; Balas, J. Garden cress germinability and seedling vigour after treatment with plant extracts. Poljoprivreda (Osijek) 2015, 21, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Abdel-Razz, H.S.; El-Sharkaw, G.A. Effect of biofertilizer and humic acid applications on growth, yield, quality and storability of two garlic (Allium sativum L.) cultivars. Asian J. Crop Sci. 2012, 5, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Manas, D.; Soumya, G.; Kheyali, S. Effect of humic acid application on accumulation of mineral nutrition and pungency in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Int. J. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Res. 2014, 5, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Jedrszczyk, E.; Kopec, A.; Bucki, P.; Ambroszczyk, A.M.; Skowera, B. The enhancing effect of plants growth biostimulants in garlic cultivation on the chemical composition and level of bioactive compounds in the garlic leaves, stems and bulbs. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2018, 47, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sharifi, Y.; Nematzadeh, G.A.; Ghasemi, O.V.; Tavabe, G.T.S.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A. Effect of salicyic acid on phenols and flavonoids content in callus culture of Iranian sodab (Ruta graveolens): A threatened medicinal plant of North of Iran. Tabari Biomed. Stud. Res. J. 2019, 1, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Safari, F.; Akramian, M.; Salehi-Arjmand, H.; Khadivi, A. Physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying salicylic acid-mitigated mercury toxicity in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 183, 109542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hatami, M.; Khanizadeh, P.; Bovand, F.; Aghaee, A. Silicon nanoparticle-mediated seed priming and Pseudomonas spp. Inoculation augment growth, physiology and antioxidant metabolic status in Melissa officinalis L. plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Moustafa, H.E.B.; Ahmed, S.S.; Shahin, S.M. Effect of foliar spray with potassium silicate on growth and active constituents of horseradish armiractetra (Moringa oleifera Lam.) plants grown in some soils of Egypt. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2018, 7, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fett-Neto, A.G.; Melanson, S.J.; Nicholson, S.A.; Pennington, J.J.; DiCosmo, F. Improved taxol yield by aromatic carboxylic acid and amino acid feeding to cell cultures of Taxus cuspidata. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 44, 967–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Russo, R.; Poincelot, R.P.; Berlyn, G.P. The use of a commercial organic biostimulant for improved production of marigold cultivars. J. Home. Consumer. Horticultr. 1993, 1, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rafiee, H.; Mehrafarin, A.; Qaderi, A.; Kalate Jari, S.; Naghdi Badi, H. Phytochemical, agronomical and morphological responses of pot Marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) to foliar application of bio-stimulators (Bioactive amino acid compounds). Faslnamahi Giyahan-I Daruyi 2013, 12, 48–61. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zeljkovic, S.; Paradikovic, N.; Vinkovic, T.; Tkalec, M.; Maksimovic, I.; Haramija, J. Nutrient status, growth and proline concentration of French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) as affected by biostimulant treatment. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 2324–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Safikhan, S.; Khoshbakht, K.; Chaichi, M.R.; Amini, A.; Motesharezadeh, B. Role of chitosan on the growth, physiological parameters and enzymatic activity of milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.) in a pot experiment. J. Appl. Red. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 10, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Estaji, A.; Niknam, F. Foliar salicylic acid spraying effect on growth, seed oil content, and physiology of drought-stressed Silybum marianum L. plant. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 234, 106116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ratnakumari, R.; Nagamani, A.; Sarojini, C.K.; Adinarayana, G. Effect of Trichoderma species on yield of Mentha arvensis L. Int. J. Adv. Res. (Indore) 2014, 2, 864–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Elansary, H.O.; Mahmoud, E.A.; El-Ansary, D.O.; Mattar, M.A. Effects of water stress and modern biostimulants on growth and quality characteristics of mint. Agronomy 2020, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Samadimatin, A.; Hani, A. Effect of ethanol and humic acid foliar spraying on morphological traits, photosynthetic pigments, and quality and quantity of essential oil content of Dracocephalum moldavica L. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 8, 2299–2306. [Google Scholar]
  88. Saharkhiz, M.J.; Goudarzi, T. Folliar application of salicylic acid changes essential oil content and chemical compositions of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2014, 17, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Santoro, M.V.; Capperllari, L.R.; Giordano, W.; Banchio, E. Plant growth-promoting effects of native Pseudomonas strains on Mentha piperita (peppermint): An in vitro study. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 1218–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shahabivan, S.; Padash, A.; Aghaee, A.; Nasiri, Y.; Fathi Rezaei, P. Plant biostimulants (Funnerliformis mosseae and humic substances) rather than chemical fertilizer improved biochemical responses in peppermint. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 8, 2333–2344. [Google Scholar]
  91. Caruso, G.; De Pacale, S.; Cozzolino, R.; Giordano, M.; El-Nakhel, C.; Cuciniello, A.; Cenvinzo, V.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Protein hydrolysate or plant extract-based biostimulants enhanced yield and quality performances of greenhouse perennial wall rocket growth in different seasons. Plants 2019, 8, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Goudarzian, A.; Pirbalouti, A.G.; Hossaynzadeh, M. Menthol balance of menthol/menthone, and essential oil contents of Mentha piperita L. under foliar-applied chitosan and inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Praveen Kumar, G.; Desai, S.; Reddu, G.; Leo Daniel Amalraj, E.; Rasul, A.; Mir Hassan Ahmed, S.K. Seed bacterization with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Enhances nutrient uptake and growth of Cajanus cajan L. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2015, 46, 652–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kaur, P.; Gupta, R.C.; Dey, A.; Malik, T.; Pandey, D.K. Optimization of salicylic acid and chitosan treatment for bitter secoiridoid and xanthone glycosides production in shoot cultures of Swertia paniculata using response surface methodology an artificial neural network. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Bektas, N.; Senel, B.; Yenilmez, E.; Ozatik, O.; Arslan, R. Evaluation of wound healing effect of chitosan-based gel formulation containing vitexin. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kaboudi, Z.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Nourbakhsh, H.; Soltanzadeh, M. Nanoencapsulation of Chavir (Ferulago angulata) essential oil in chitosan carrier: Investigating physicochemical, morphological, thermal, antimicrobial and release profile of obtained nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 123963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yin, W.; Yan, R.; Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Sang, S.; McClements, D.J.; Chen, L.; Long, J.; Jiao, A.; Wang, J.; et al. Preparation of robust, water-resistant, antibacterial, and antioxidant chitosan-based films by incorporation of cinnamaldehyde-tannin acid-zinc acetate nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2023, 419, 136004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yadav, N.; Mudgal, D.; Anand, R.; Jindal, S.; Mishra, V. Recent development in nanoencapsulation and delivery of natural bioactives through chitosan scaffolds for various biological applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 220, 537–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mujtaba, M.; Ali, Q.; Yilmaz, B.A.; Kurubas, M.S.; Ustun, H.; Erkan, M.; Kaya, M.; Cicek, M.; Oner, E.T. Understanding the effects of chitosan, chia mucilage, levan based composite coatings on the shelf life of sweet cherry. Food Chem. 2023, 416, 135816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Das, S.; Chaudhari, A.K.; Singh, V.K.; Dwivedy, A.K.; Dubey, N.K. Chitosan based encapsulation of Valeriana officinalis essential oil as edible coating for inhibiting of fungi and aflatoxin B1 contamination, nutritional quality improvement, and shelf life extension of Citrus sinensis fruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shu, H.; Ge, Y.-H.; Xu, X.-Y.; Guo, P.-Q.; Luo, Z.-M.; Du, W.; Chang, C.; Liu, R.-L.; Fu, Q. Hybrid-type carbon microcoil-chitosan composite for selective extraction of aristolochic acid I from Aristolochiaceae medicinal plants. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1561, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Qiu, H.; Su, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. Chitosan elicitation of saponin accumulation in Psammosilene tunicoides hairy roots by modulating antioxidant activity oxide production and differential gene expression. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Dresler, S.; Rubinowska, K.; Matraszek-Gawron, R. Eliciting effect of foliar application of chitosan lactate on the phytochemical properties of Ocimum basilicum L. and Melissa officinalis L. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Aldayel, M.F. The synergistic effect of capsicum aqueous extract (Capsicum annuum) and chitosan against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khodadadi, F.; Ahmadi, F.S.; Talebi, M.; Moshtaghi, N.; Matkowski, A.; Szumny, A.; Rahimmalek, M. Essential oil composition, physiological and morphological in Salvia abrotanoides and S. yangii under drought stress and chitosan treatments. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 187 Pt B, 115429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Luo, B.; Dai, Y.; Wei, Z.; Li, S.; He, R.; et al. Molecular mechanism of plant elicitor daphnetin-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles against Ralstonia solanacearum by activating plant system resistance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 241, 124580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mathew, R.; Sankar, P.D. Effect of methyl jasmonate and chitosan on growth characteristics of Ocimum basilicum L., Ocimum santum L. and Ocimum gratissimum L. cell suspension cultures. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 4759–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pirbalouti, A.G.; Malekpoor, F.; Salimi, A.; Golparvar, A. Exogenous application of chitosan on biochemical and physiological characteristics, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of two species of basil (Ocimum ciliatum and Ocimum basilicum) under reduced irrigation. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 217, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sheikhalipour, M.; Mohammadi, S.A.; Esmaielpour, B.; Spanos, A.; Mahmoudi, R.; Mahdavinia, G.R.; Milani, M.H.; Kahnamoei, A.; Nouraein, M.; Antoniou, C.; et al. Seedling nanopriming with selenium-chitosan nanoparticles mitigates the adverse effects of salt stress by inducing multiple defence pathways in bitter melon plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Limpanavech, P.; Chaiyasuta, S.; Vongpromek, R.; Pichyangkura, R.; Khunwasi, C.; Chadchawan, S.; Lotrakul, P.; Bunjongrat, R.; Chaidee, A.; Bangyeekhun, T. Chitosan effects on floral production, gene expression, and anatomical changes in the Dendrobium orchid. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kahromi, S.; Khara, J. Chitosan stimulates secondary metabolites production and nutrient uptake in medicinal plant Dracocephalum kotschyi. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 101, 3898–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Razavizadeh, R.; Adabavazeh, F. In vitro application of chitosan effects on essential oil content and physiological characteristics of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. J. Plant Process. Funct. 2019, 9, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  113. Dar, T.A.; Uddin, M.; Khan, M.M.; Ali, A.; Mir, S.R.; Varshney, L. Effect of Co-60 gamma irradiated chitosan and phosphorus fertilizer on growth, yield and trigonelline content of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Angouti, F.; Nourafcan, H.; Saeedi Sar, S.; Asadi, A.; Ebrahimi, R. The effect of different levels of chitosan and salicylic acid on morphological traits of the medicinal plant Galega (Galega officinalis L.). J. Crop. Improv. 2022, 24, 1341–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Abdul-Hafeez, E.Y.; Ibrahim, O.H.M. Effects of chitosan and BABA foliar application on flowering and chemical characteristics of German chamomile Bode-gold. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 139, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Varghese, L.; Thomas, G. Chitosan triggers tolerance to Pythium myriotylum infection in ginger (Zingiber officinale) by modulating multiple defense signaling pathways. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 125, 101983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Samany, S.M.A.; Pirbalouti, A.G.; Malekpoor, F. Phytochemical and morpho-physiological changes of hyssop in response to chitosan-spraying under different levels of irrigation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Govindaraju, S.; Arulselvi, P.I. Effect of cytokinin combined elicitors (L-phenylalanine, salicylic acid and chitosan) on in vitro propagation, secondary metabolites and molecular characterization of medicinal herb- Coleus aromaticus Benth (L.). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Elguea-Culebras, G.O.D.; Bourbon, A.; Costa, M.J.; Munoz-Tebar, N.; Carmona, M.; Molina, A.; Sanchez-Vioque, R.; Berruga, M.I.; Vicente, A.A. Optimization of a chitosan solution as potential carrier for the incorporation of Santolina chamaecyparissus L. solid by product in an edible vegetal coating on Manchego cheese. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Coskun, Y.; Duran, R.E.; Ozgul, Z.; Yavuz, N.; Turkmen, K. Chitosan improves plant regeneration in callus culture of a medicinal herb Melissa officinalis L. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 208, S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fooladi vanda, G.; Shabani, L.; Razavizadeh, R. Chitosan enhances rosmarinic acid production in shoot cultures of Melissa officinalis L. through the induction of methyl jasmonate. Bot. Stud. 2019, 60, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Zubair, M.; Ramzani, P.M.A.; Rasool, B.; Khan, M.A.; ur-Rahman, M.; Akhtar, I.; Turan, V.; Tauqeer, H.M.; Farhad, M.; Khan, S.A.; et al. Efficacy of chitosan-coated textile waste biochar applied to Cd-polluted soil for reducing Cd mobility in soil and its distribution in moringa (Moringa oleifera L.). J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 284, 112047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Giglou, M.T.; Giglou, R.H.; Esmaeilpour, B.; Azarmi, R.; Padash, A.; Falakian, M.; Sliwka, J.; Gohari, G.; Lajayer, H.M. A new method in mitigation of drought stress by chitosan-coated iron oxide nanoparticles and growth stimulant in peppermint. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 187 Pt A, 115286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mirheidari, F.; Hatami, M.; Ghorbanpour, M. GA3 and chitosan nano-fiber on physio-morphological characteristics and metabolite contents in roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 145, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Alizadeh, A.; Moghaddam, M.; Asgharzade, A.; Sourestani, M.M. Phytochemical and physiological response of Satureja hortensis L. to different irrigation regimes and chitosan application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 112990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gohari, G.; Farhadi, H.; Panahirad, S.; Zareei, E.; Labib, P.; Jafari, H.; Mahdavinia, G.; Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Ioannou, A.; Kulak, M.; et al. Mitigating of salinity impact in spearmint plants through the application of engineered chitosan-melatonin nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 893–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tocci, N.; Ferrari, F.; Santamaria, A.R.; Valletta, A.; Rovardi, I.; Pasqua, G. Chitosan enhances xanthone production in Hypericum perforatum subsp. angustifolium cell cultures. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sayed, T.E.; Ahmed, E.-S.S. Elicitation promoability with gamma irradiation, chitosan and yeast to perform sustainable and inclusive development for Marjoram under organic agriculture. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Kamalipourazad, M.; Sharifi, M.; Maivan, H.Z.; Behmanesh, M.; Chashimi, N.A. Induction of aromatic amino acids and phenylpropanoid compounds in Scrophularia striata Boiss. cell culture in response to chitosan-induced oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bistgani, Z.E.; Siadat, S.A.; Bakhshandeh, A.; Pirbalouti, A.G.; Hashemi, M. Interactive effects of drought stress and chitosan application on physiological characteristics and essential oil yield of Thymus daenensis Celak. Crop. J. 2017, 5, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Momeni, M.; Pirbalouti, A.G.; Mousavi, A.; Naghdi Badi, H. Effect of foliar applications of salicylic acid and chitosan on the essential oil of Thymbra spicata L. under different soil moisture conditions. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1142–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dowom, S.A.; Karimian, Z.; Dehnavi, M.M.; Samiei, L. Chitosan nanoparticles improve physiological and biochemical responses of Salvia abrotanoides (Kar.) under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sathiyabama, M.; Bernstein, N.; Anusuya, S. Chitosan elicitation for increased curcumin production and stimulation of defence response in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 89, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Silva, E.A.D.; Paula, A.C.C.F.F.D.; Silva, V.N.B.; Alvarenga, A.A.D.; Bertolucci, S.K.V. Biostimulating effect of chitosan and acetic acid on the growth and profile of the essential oil of Mentha arvensis L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 171, 113987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Heidari, J.; Amooaghaie, R.; Kiani, S. Impact of chitosan on nickel bioavailability in soil, the accumulation and tolerance of nickel in Calendula triptrocarpa. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Darvill, A.; Augur, C.; Bergmann, C.; Carlson, R.W.; Cheong, J.-J.; Eberhard, S.; Hahn, M.G.; Lo, V.-M.; Marfa, V.; Meyer, B.; et al. Oligosaccharins-oligosaccharides that regulate growth, development and defence responses in plants. Glycobiology 1992, 2, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zhang, B.; Ramonell, K.; Somerville, S.; Stacey, G. Characterization of early, chitin-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Moenne, A.; Gonzalez, A. Chitosan-, alginate- carrageenan-derived oligosaccharides stimulate defense against biotic and abiotic stresses, and growth in plants: A historical perspective. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 503, 108298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. El-Serafy, R.S.; El-Sheshtawy, A.-N.; Dahab, A.A.; Al-Ashkar, I. Can yeast extract and chitosan-oligosaccharide improve fruit yield and modify the pharmaceutical active ingredients of organic fennel? Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 173, 114130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, Y.; Wisniewski, M.; Kennedy, J.F.; Jiang, Y.; Tang, J.; Liu, J. Chitosan and oligochitosan enhance ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) resistance to rhizome rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum in storage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, X.; Li, Z.; Qin, S.; Xing, K. Novel antifungal mechanism of oligochitosan by triggering apoptosis through a metacaspase-dependent mitochondrial pathway in Ceratocystis fimbriata. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Lu, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W.; Yin, H.; Xu, J.; Bai, X.; Du, Y. Inhibition effect on tobacco mosaic virus and regulation effect on calreticulin of oligochitosan in tobacco by induced Ca2+ influx. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ahmad, B.; Dar, T.A.; Khan, M.M.A.; Ahmad, A.; Rinklebe, J.; Chen, Y.; Ahmad, P. Oligochitosan fortifies antioxidative and photosynthetic metabolism and enhances secondary metabolite accumulation in arsenic-stressed peppermint. Front. Plant. Sci. 2022, 13, 987746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yin, H.; Kjaer, A.; Frette, X.C.; Du, Y.; Christensen, L.P.; Jensen, M.; Grevsen, K. Chitosan oligosaccharide and salicylic acid up-regulate gene expression differently in relation to the biosynthesis of artemisinin in Artemisia annua L. Process. Biochem. 2012, 47, 1559–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Takagi, M.; Hotamori, K.; Naito, K.; Matsukawa, S.; Egusa, M.; Nishizawa, Y.; Kanno, Y.; Seo, M.; Ifuku, S.; Mine, A.; et al. Chitin-induced systemic disease resistance in rice requires both OsCERK1 and OsCEBiP and is mediated via perturbation of cell-wall biogenesis in leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1064628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Suwanchaikasen, P.; Nie, S.; Idnurm, A.; Selby-Pham, J.; Walker, R.; Boughton, B.A. Effects of chitin and chitosan on root growth, biochemical defense response and exudate proteome of Cannabis sativa. Plant Environ. Interact. 2023, 4, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Barberry (Berberis vulgaris), a medicinal fruit and food with traditional and modern pharmaceutical uses. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Natural dietary and medicinal plants with anti-obesity therapeutics activities for treatment and prevention of obesity during lock down and in post-Covid-19 era. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Lin, M. Research progress of fermented functional foods and protein factory-microbial fermentation technology. Fermentation 2022, 8, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cretoiu, M.S.; Korthals, G.W.; Visser, J.H.M.; Elsas, D.V. Chitin amendment increases soil suppessiveness toward plan pathogens and modulates the actinobacterial and oxalobacteraceal communities in an experimental agricultural field. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5291–5301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Liopa-Tsakalidi, A.; Chalikiopoulos, D.; Papasavvas, A. Effect of chitin on growth and chlorophyll content of two medicinal plants. J. Med. Plant. Res. 2010, 4, 499–508. [Google Scholar]
  152. Liopa-Tsakalidi, A.; Barouchas, P.E. Salinity, chitin and GA3 effects on seed germination of chervil (Anthriscus cerefolium). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 973–978. [Google Scholar]
  153. Kanawi, M.A.; Haydar, M.A.; Radhi, W.N. Effect of chitin and chitosan in improvement of plant growth and anti-fungal activity. Egypt. J. Bot. 2021, 61, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Tian, L.; Shi, S.; Ma, L.; Zhou, X.; Luo, S.; Zhang, J.; Lu, B.; Tian, C. The effect of Glomus intraradices on the physiological properties of Panax ginseng and on rhizospheric microbial diversity. J. Ginseng. Res. 2019, 43, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 02469 g001 550
Figure 1. Utilization of chitosan and its derivatives in crop production.
Figure 1. Utilization of chitosan and its derivatives in crop production.
Plants 12 02469 g001
Table
Table 1. The effects of chitosan on medicinal and aromatic plants.
Table 1. The effects of chitosan on medicinal and aromatic plants.
PlantScientific NamePlant FamilyKey PointReferences
BasilOcimum basilicum;
Ocimum ciliatum		LamiaceaeVarious amounts of chitosan had considerable impacts on the antioxidant activity and total phenol content of the extracts of two species. [107,108]
Chitosan could be a promising material used to reduce the adverse impacts of water stress on the growth factors of basil seedlings. [108]
Bitter melonMomordica charantia L. CucurbitaceaeAn application of chitosan and their conjugated forms as nanoparticles (Se-CS NPs) improved the biochemical and morphophysiological characteristics of bitter melon plants under moderate and severe salinity stress condition. [109]
Exogenous utilization of Se-CS NPs leads to the expression of multiple defense- and secondary metabolism-related transcripts in bitter melon plants. [109]
Dendrobium orchidsDendrobiumOrchidaceaeChitosan showed the ability to improve floral production of the Dendrobium. [110]
It also stimulated the number of vascular bundles in both young and old leaves.[110]
DragonheadDracocephalum kotschyi BoissLamiaceaeIt was an effectual elicitor for increasing rosmarinic acid and quercetin content. [111]
Chitosan increased the content of apigenin noticeably. [111]
A chitosan spray had a significant influence on the principle essential oil components, such as p-cymene and thymol. [112]
FenugreekTrigonella foenum-graecum L. LeguminosaeThe activity of nitrate reductase and the contents of photosynthetic pigments and carbonic anhydrase enzymes were significantly increased after an application of Co-60 gamma-irradiated chitosan. [113]
Co-60 gamma-irradiated chitosan significantly boosted the total alkaloid content, seed yield, and trigonelline constituent. [113]
GalegaGalega officinalis L. LeguminosaeAn application of chitosan had a more optimal impact on the morphological characteristics. [114]
German chamomileMatricaria recutita L. AsteraceaeIts foliar spray in the flowering stage increased the chamomile flower number and weight per plant. [115]
Its usage at the rate of 40 ppm is suggested for German chamomile cultivation. [115]
GingerZingiber officinale L.ZingiberaceaeIts application induced the HR marker gene HSR203J in ginger and inhibited the expression of cell death markers AIF2, HIN1, and AIF1. [116]
Chitosan has the potential to prime standing ginger plants against soft rot disease and facilitate appropriate sustainable management of ginger soft rot (Pythium myriotylum). [116]
HyssopHyssopus officinalis L. LamiaceaeThe results show that spraying chitosan at 2.5 g/L significantly increased the measurements of the canopy diameter, inflorescence height, plant height, numbers of auxiliary and flowering branches, dry herbal weight, and the components of photosynthesis pigments under various levels of irrigation frequencies. [117]
The maximum values of the volatile oil yield were related to the chitosan-spraying in a reduced irrigation condition. [117]
Chitosan had noticeable effects on the percentage of (cis- and trans-) pinocamphone, as the predominant components of hyssop volatile oil, under a reduced irrigation condition. [117]
Indian borage (Indian mint)Coleus aromaticus Benth (L.)LamiaceaeA mixture of Chitosan and cytokinin showed a positive impact on multiple shoot induction than cytokinin alone. [118]
Its application also increased the percentage of alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, saponins, tannins, and total phenolic content. [118]
Lavender-cottonSantolina chamaecyparissus L. AsteraceaeIts application improved antifungal capacities and increased some physical characteristics. [119]
Lemon balmMelissa officinalis L. LamiaceaeIt increased plant regeneration in a callus culture of a medicinal herb. [120]
Its consumption consists of the trigger of defense-related enzymes; stimulated expression of rosmarinic acid synthase (RAS) genes and tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT); and stimulation of methyl jasmonate biosynthesis. [121]
Milk thistleSilybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. AsteraceaeSignificant reduction of the negative impact of salinity and increased plant growth and improved physiological characteristics occurred after its application. [83]
Its usage at 0.01% increased the chlorophyll and total chlorophyll content. [83]
Its application promoted the enzymatic activity and reduced H2O2 components in the leaves. [83]
Chitosan may protect plants from salt stress damage by regulation of the intracellular ion component and through increasing the capability of antioxidant enzyme activities. [83]
MoringaMoringa oleifera L. MoringaceaeChitosan improved the plant growth parameters: root length, root fresh weight, shoot length, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and contents of chlorophyll-b and chlorophyll-a. [122]
PeppermintMentha piperita L. LamiaceaeUnder drought stress, the usage of chitosan-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe-CTs NPS) increased essential oils production in the mint plant. [123]
Under foliar spray of chitosan, the maximum constituents of the essential oil yield, menthol, and the balance of menthol/menthone of the essential oil from peppermint were achieved from the peppermint plants. [92]
RoselleHibiscus sabdariffa L. MalvaceaeChitosan nanofiber (CNF) treatments affected the plant growth regulators’ impact on most of the traits evaluated. [124]
It could be applied for enhancement of the number of calyxes, plant height, total chlorophyll, β-carotene, antioxidant activity, and flavonoids.[124]
SavorySatureja hortensis L. LamiaceaeUnder severe water stress, its application improved the total soluble sugar, antioxidant activity, total phenolic and proline contents, and essential oil content of the seedlings. [125]
Under water stress conditions, it may have positive influences on the essential oil quality and quantity, osmotic adjustment, antioxidant activity, and growth of summer savory. [125]
SpearmintMentha spicata L. LamiaceaeChitosan–melatonin nanoparticles could be used as an innovative protective agent to reduce the impact of salinity in spearmint plants. [126]
St. John’s wortHypericum perforatum L. ClusiaceaeIt showed a significant rise in xanthone production and a simultaneous decline in flavonoid production. [127]
Chitosan also led to the production of 1,7-dihydroxyxanthone (euxanthone). [127]
Sweet marjoram Majorana hortensis Moench LamiaceaeIts application improved the marjoram biomass and secondary metabolites’ assimilation.[128]
Tashenehdari Scrophularia striata Boiss.Scrophulariaceae The increase in amino acid content and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity was related to rises in the phenolic components after application of chitosan treatments.[129]
Chitosan, by up-regulating the PAL gene, increases the production of the phenylpropanoid content. [129]
ThymeThymus daenensis Celak LamiaceaeUnder the mild stress, the maximum essential oil yield was related to the utilization of 400 μL−1 chitosan. [130]
Mediterranean thymeThymbra spicata L. LamiaceaeThe carvacrol level in the essential oil escalated in the plants after application of chitosan. [131]
The spray of chitosan could reduce the harmful impacts of water shortage on the oil yield and the carvacrol percentage. [131]
Russian sage Salvia abrotanoides (Kar.) Sytsma LamiaceaeA chitosan foliar application can increase drought tolerance. [132]
The leaves showed significant antioxidant enzyme activity under drought stress using chitosan nanoparticles. [132]
TurmericCurcuma longa L. ZingiberaceaeIts application improved the production of curcumin. [133]
The chitosan could boost the activity or protease inhibitor in rhizomes and leaves. [133]
Wild mint Mentha arvensis L. LamiaceaeThe 0.125% content of chitosan provides a higher accumulation of roots, shoots, and total dry weight.
The maximum menthol content is obtained after application of 0.06% chitosan. 		[134]
Winged-fruited marigold Calendula tripterocarpa Rupr. AsteraceaeThe chitosan application also increased the growth parameters, carotenoids, and levels of chlorophyll a, b under both Ni stress and normal conditions. [135]
Chitosan decreased the level of malondialdehyde and the activities of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the shoot and roots under Ni stress. [135]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Shahrajabian, N. Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants. Plants 2023, 12, 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469

AMA Style

Sun W, Shahrajabian MH, Petropoulos SA, Shahrajabian N. Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants. Plants. 2023; 12(13):2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Wenli, Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian, Spyridon A. Petropoulos, and Nazanin Shahrajabian. 2023. "Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants" Plants 12, no. 13: 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469

APA Style

Sun, W., Shahrajabian, M. H., Petropoulos, S. A., & Shahrajabian, N. (2023). Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants. Plants, 12(13), 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop