Next Article in Journal
Leaf–Root–Soil Stoichiometric Characteristics in Different Shrub Ages of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus 
Next Article in Special Issue
Multifarious Characterization and Efficacy of Three Phosphate-Solubilizing Aspergillus Species as Biostimulants in Improving Root Induction of Cassava and Sugarcane Stem Cuttings
Previous Article in Journal
Linum usitatissimum AccD Enhances Seed Fatty Acid Accumulation and Tolerance to Environmental Stresses during Seed Germination in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Production by Using Chitosan and Chitin-Based Biostimulants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture

by
Wenli Sun
*,† and
Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian
Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(17), 3101; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173101
Submission received: 28 July 2023 / Revised: 16 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023

Abstract

:
Biostimulant application can be considered an effective, practical, and sustainable nutritional crop supplementation and may lessen the environmental problems related to excessive fertilization. Biostimulants provide beneficial properties to plants by increasing plant metabolism, which promotes crop yield and improves the quality of crops; protecting plants against environmental stresses such as water shortage, soil salinization, and exposure to sub-optimal growth temperatures; and promoting plant growth via higher nutrient uptake. Other important benefits include promoting soil enzymatic and microbial activities, changing the architecture of roots, increasing the solubility and mobility of micronutrients, and enhancing the fertility of the soil, predominantly by nurturing the development of complementary soil microbes. Biostimulants are classified as microbial, such as arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF), plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), non-pathogenic fungi, protozoa, and nematodes, or non-microbial, such as seaweed extract, phosphite, humic acid, other inorganic salts, chitin and chitosan derivatives, protein hydrolysates and free amino acids, and complex organic materials. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are among the most prominent microbial biostimulants and have an important role in cultivating better, healthier, and more functional foods in sustainable agriculture. AMF assist plant nutrient and water acquisition; enhance plant stress tolerance against salinity, drought, and heavy metals; and reduce soil erosion. AMF are proven to be a sustainable and environmentally friendly source of crop supplements. The current manuscript gives many examples of the potential of biostimulants for the production of different crops. However, further studies are needed to better understand the effectiveness of different biostimulants in sustainable agriculture. The review focuses on how AMF application can overcome nutrient limitations typical of organic systems by improving nutrient availability, uptake, and assimilation, consequently reducing the gap between organic and conventional yields. The aim of this literature review is to survey the impacts of AMF by presenting case studies and successful paradigms in different crops as well as introducing the main mechanisms of action of the different biostimulant products.

1. Introduction

Biostimulant application is known as an eco-friendly and novel farming practice and is relevant to two otherwise contrasting concepts, namely crop sustainability and intensification [1]. Biostimulant products already form a significant part of the global farming industry, indicating increasing trends over the years and in the future [2]. There are various reports regarding their positive impacts on crops, especially under biotic and abiotic stress conditions, and significant research is continuously conducted to find and/or produce new biostimulatory products, as well as to show the mechanisms of action behind the observed impacts. However, the variance in the composition of biostimulant products, as well as the lack of ordinary application protocols for the different products, may create inconsistencies between the observed results and complicate attempts to reveal the actual mechanisms behind the biostimulatory impacts, which may include physiological procedures, hormonal regulation, and morphological alterations. Biostimulants’ beneficial activities include the improvement of nutrient uptake, the induction of root growth, and the production of phytohormones; osmotic adjustment through the synthesis of organic osmolytes has also been confirmed. Biostimulants can also be applied to decrease the application of mineral inorganic fertilizer and are considered environmentally friendly tools with no significant negative impacts on fruit quality or total yield. Humic acids, fulvic acid, protein seaweed extracts, hydrolysates, N-containing compounds, botanicals, seaweed extracts, chitosan and other related biopolymers, beneficial bacteria and fungi, and inorganic compounds are the major categories of plant biostimulants. Modern crop production has to cope with abiotic and biotic stressors such as soil and irrigation water salinity, extreme and untimely weather phenomena, water limitations, infections from pathogens, and pests, which severely influence crop performance and the quality of the final products [3,4,5]. The most important advantages of biostimulants include improved profits, stimulated plant reactions, decreased operating costs, reduced application of fertilizers, improved root protection from soil pathogens, and enhanced drought tolerance; moreover, they repel pests, accelerate root establishment, boost fertilization, enhance stress tolerance, ameliorate fertilization, alleviate leaching, detoxify heavy metals and chemicals, and improve stomata opening and plant transpiration [3,4,5,6]. Biostimulatory compounds may also have positive effects on soil biology and are recognized as a good technique for recovering semi-arid areas and degraded ecosystems [6,7,8]. However, the variable composition of raw materials applied for the production of biostimulant products makes the task of revealing the mechanisms of action more difficult, and long-term research and standardization processes are needed [9]. Different sources of chitin and chitosan in nature are crustaceans (lobster, shrimp, king crab), fungi (Mucor rouxii, Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus niger, Lactarius vellereus), insects (ladybug, wax worm, silk worm, butterfly), and mollusks (shell oysters, squid pen). Crustacean shells are the most notable chitin source, and chitin recovery involves three steps consisting of demineralization, deproteination, and the elimination of pigments and lipids [10,11,12]. Microbial proteases such as Lactobacillus sp., Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Serrati marcescens, etc., are the most significant strains applied in chitin and chitosan production [10].
Biostimulants containing organic substances, humic acids, amino acids, algae extracts, and carbon and boron increased plant growth, yield, and shelf life of onion bulbs [13], and the application of diluted honey extract (DHE) improved photosynthetic parameters, antioxidant activity, biomass production, and yield [14]. The use of seaweed extracts, vermicompost, and a mixture of animal waste increased yield and bulb traits [15]. Foliar application of vermicompost leachate, smoke-water, Ecklonia maxima extracts, and indole-3-butyric acid on seedlings of mustard greens grown in soils from goldmines boosted phytoremediation activities through the accumulation of heavy metals [16]. Foliar application of Kelpak SL and Asahi SL increased the nutritional value and improved the storage life of carrots [17], while root and foliar application of protein hydrolysates in lettuce plants grown under salinity conditions mitigated oxidative stress and increased glucosinolate and osmolyte content [18,19]. In intensive cropping sectors such as horticulture and floriculture, biostimulants can also boost nutrient use efficiency, partly substitute chemical fertilizer inputs, and ameliorate the quality and yield of crops [20,21]. Biostimulants based on microorganisms are a subgroup of the heterogeneous family of biostimulants, related to a microorganism (or mix of microorganisms) that can stimulate biochemical and physiological processes that benefit the nutrient efficiency, nutrient uptake, abiotic stress tolerance, crop quality, and/or yield of plants [22], which can moderately mitigate the damaging effects of intensive agriculture [23,24,25]. The most common microorganisms included in this group of biostimulatory products are the non-pathogenic and non-toxigenic bacteria of Azotobacter spp., Rhizobium spp., and Azospirillum spp., as well as different mycorrhizal fungi [24]. Mycorrhizas are a symbiotic association between fungi and plant roots and are present in several forms according to the fungal taxonomy and the host plant. Two important parameters that influence the distribution of these forms are the climatic and soil conditions and the host plant distribution [26,27] (Hart and Reader, 2002; Yang et al., 2012), and mycorrhiza can significantly boost the efficiency of mineral absorption, falling into two major categories: endotrophic and ectotrophic [28]. The main types of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are related to the sub-phylum Glomeromycotina of the phylum Mucoromycota [29], and four orders of AMF, namely Glomerales, Paraglomerales, Archaeosporales, and Diversisporales, have been recognized in this sub-phylum, which contains 25 genera [30,31]. The protective mechanisms are credited to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted alleviation of oxidative stress, rapid water uptake and nutrient absorption, and changes in the transcript levels of genes involved in signaling pathways or stress response [32,33,34], and the effectiveness of AMF is usually influenced by environmental variables and soil conditions [35]. Considering the numerous literature reports in the past decade related to microbial biostimulants and their impacts on different crops, this review aims to present the most up-to-date key results of microbial biostimulant practical applications on crops and the new tools available to unravel the mechanisms behind the observed impacts. In the present review, all relevant reports in the English language were collected. The literature search was performed by using the keywords of plant biostimulants, microbial biostimulants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, mycorrhizal fungi, and sustainable agriculture in the main indexing systems, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Google Scholar search engine, as well as the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science, from July 2000 to July 2023.

2. Biostimulant Categories

Biostimulants are classified into two distinct groups based on their origin; one category includes products that have biological origins in pathogens or plants, and the second group consists of products that do not have biological origins [36,37,38]. Another classification approach divides biostimulant products into microbial biostimulants, which are obtained from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant-growth-promoting bacteria, and non-microbial biostimulants, which include plant micro-algae extracts, humic substances, and biopolymers such as chitosan [39,40,41,42,43]. Different compounds with bioactive properties can be used as biostimulants to boost plant growth and development under normal and stress conditions [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Salicylic acid is economical and quick in action, environmentally sound, and it also links with other elicitors to boost the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [53,54,55]. Humic acid can increase plant growth, retain water, enrich nutrients, and suppress disease [56,57]. Fulvic acids are used in sustainable horticulture and can change plant primary and secondary metabolism and increase nutrient uptake, root growth, and crop tolerance to environmental stresses [58,59]. Protein hydrolysate biostimulants, mostly produced by chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis of plant- and animal-derived proteins, are based on a mixture of soluble amino acids and peptides and can increase the yield and quality of products as well as improve the nutrient uptake and abiotic stress tolerance of plants [60,61,62,63]. They are largely prepared from brown seaweeds, such as Ecklonia maxima, Ascophyllum nodosum, and Macrocystis pyrifera, and they include promoting hormones or trace elements such as Zn, Fe, Mn, and Cu [64,65]. Humic-like substances such as fulvic and humic acids may also show biostimulatory activity, since several reports have suggested improved crop performance attributed mainly to auxin- and cytokinin-like impacts; they are obtained from organic matter decomposition and metabolic products of soil microbes, and they have roles in plant growth via the improvement of soil physical–chemical properties and the boosted availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere [66,67,68]. The actual mechanisms of action seem to be the result of synergy between the several bioactive components in raw materials, although the impacts may change depending on the crop, soil type, and soil microbes present in the rhizosphere [69,70,71,72]. The most important impacts of chitin and its derivatives’ applications are that they stimulate and protect seed germination, stimulate stress resistance, mitigate negative impacts of abiotic stress, induce plant growth and development, improve soil properties and prevent nutrient leaching, improve the shelf-life of crops, chelate heavy metals, increase crop yield and quality, and protect against pests and pathogens, e.g., bacteria, viruses, fungi, insects, and nematodes [73,74,75]. Amino acids are the best candidates to boost stress tolerance through osmo-protection, ROS scavenging, metal chelation, and nutrient availability [76], which can notably impact the synthesis and stimulation of some enzymes and gene expression [77,78,79]. They can also be applied as signal molecules, like for inducing stomatal closure, as sensors of the nutrient contents of cells, or as regulators for inducing their own catabolism. Amino acids can manage the procedure of protein synthesis, strengthening plant growth, photosynthesis, and yield formation. They can increase nutrient assimilation, use, and translocation, as well as increase the quality of constituents [79]. Amino acids are well-known biostimulants due to their positive effects on yield and plant growth, and can mitigate injuries from abiotic stresses [80,81]. Amino acids also have a significant role in ammonium fixation and C4 metabolism and in the biosynthesis of different components, including isoflavonoids, flavonoids, cutin, aurones, sporopollenin, stilbenes, proanthocyanidins, suberin, lignins, catechins, phenylpropenes, lignans, acylated polyamines, and other different alkaloid derivatives. The largest and most diverse group of secondary metabolites in plants is phenols, which have good antioxidant effects and are involved in the regulation of photosynthesis, physiological activities, oxidation reduction procedures, and plant breathing [82]. Phenolic acids and their derivatives are coumarins, stilbenes, quinones, lignans, flavonoids, curcuminoids, and tannins, which have meaningful roles in plant development, especially in pigment and lignin biosynthesis, and of course, they have a significant role in protecting plants from stress [83].
Protein hydrolysate biostimulants, mostly produced by enzymatic and chemical hydrolysis of plant-derived and animal proteins, are based on a mixture of peptides and soluble amino acids, and can increase the quality and yield of products as well as the uptake and abiotic stress tolerance of plants [84]. Glomus, the largest and most common genus in the phylum Glomeromycota, forms symbiotic relationships with plant roots [85,86], which can boost the drought tolerance of the host plant, mediated by proteins with chaperone-like activity [87]. Trichoderma fungi have important functions in nature as plant growth promoters and antagonists of phytopathogenic fungi [88], and as rhizosphere inhabitants, they contribute to interactions with microorganisms, soil, arthropods, and plants at multiple trophic levels [89], and can be used as biocontrol and biopesticide agents [90]. Members of the genus Trichoderma are also used in different industry branches, like in the production of biofuel, antibiotics, and enzymes [91]. The main Trichoderma–plant interactions include their impacts on plant morphology, plant physiology, nutrient absorption and solubilization, disease resistance, yield improvement, and abiotic stress tolerance [92]. Trichoderma reesei is a genus of filamentous fungi and a superior cellulose source for industrial uses, and it can produce proteins, including different enzymes, cellulases, hemicellulases, and hydrophobins [93,94]. The endophytic fungus Heteroconium chaetospira can also penetrate through the outer epidermal cells of its host, pass into the inner cortex, and grow all over the cortical cells, consisting of those of the root tip region, without causing apparent pathogenic symptoms [95], and it can provide even more nitrogen to the plant than mineralizing plant-available organic nitrogen [96]. Arthrobacter species, which are Gram-positive chemoorganotrophs and obligate aerobes, are commonly identified among soil bacteria [97], being dominant aerobic bacteria under the class of families Micrococcaceae and Actinobacteria [98], and nutritional versatility is the principal feature of arthrobacters [99]. Acinetobacter spp. are Gram-negative coccobacilli that are aerobic, non-motile, and oxidative negative, with no glucose fermentation ability; they can be found in different environments [100] and can fix nitrogen, solubilize minerals, produce siderophores, and act as plant endophytes or epiphytes, which can help hosts in detaching pollutants and tolerating environmental stresses [101]. Moreover, the plant-growth-promoting traits of Actinobacteria entail phosphate solubilization, IAA, and siderophores [102]. They can also promote higher phosphorus content and plant growth and increase radical scavenging, plant phenolic components, and antioxidant activity [103]. Other important bacteria are Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Ochrobactrum spp., Bacilus spp., and Rhodococcus spp. [104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113]. Figure 1 shows different classifications of plant biostimulants.

3. Microbial Biostimulants

There are two kinds of microbial inoculants: biopesticides and biofertilizers. Biofertilizers are categorized under biostimulants [114,115]. They are also known as bioinoculants, which consist of living organisms and promote plant growth via a variety of procedures, such as increasing biomass and root growth, supplying nutrients, and increasing the capacity of nutrient uptake when applied to plants, seeds, or soil [116]. Microbial biostimulants have numerous positive functions associated with the solubilization, uptake, primary and secondary metabolism, and translocation of macro- and micro-nutrients, which induce phytochemical accumulation, the development of robust root systems for foraging surrounding soil, and the improvement of photosynthetic activity to promote growth, increase nutrient use efficiency, and stimulate antioxidant defense systems to decrease the oxidative stress burden [117]. Recently, biostimulants related to living microorganisms have attracted the attention of both academics and industry professionals for the simple reason that the growth and development of a plant can be increased more easily in the field [118,119]. These microbes are effective enzyme producers and are potential alternatives to formulating beneficial microbial consortia that can be used in tandem with gelatin to increase biostimulant activity [120]. Microorganisms acting as biostimulants mostly belong to beneficial fungi groups consisting of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and free-living bacteria [116,121,122]. Many parameters are responsible for the development of microbial inoculants as biofertilizers, such as the variety of plants [123,124] and the compatibility with different types of soil, chemical fertilizers, and environmental conditions [123,124]. The activity of microbial inoculants is mainly affected by root exudates (extracellular secretions by plants) and they also act as a substrate for the formation of biologically active substances [125]. AMF play a significant role in stimulating plant growth via different mechanisms: (i) increasing the uptake of water, as AMF boost the surface area of the root so that the plant can easily take up water; (ii) modifications of root architecture; (iv) availability of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, under nutrient-deficient conditions; (v) alterations in enzymatic and physiological activities, especially for plants that are active in antioxidative responses; and (vi) induction of ABA plant hormones, which are mostly involved in stress conditions [126,127]. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are selected as a carbon source for abundant microbial primary degraders [128].

4. Mechanisms of Microbial Biostimulant Action

Various notable protective mechanisms in the utilization of microbial biostimulants under different stresses are osmolite production, phytohormone level modulation, increased antioxidant activity, and secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) under water stress such as flooding and drought [129,130,131]; phytohormone level modulation, emission of volatile organic components, ice nucleation activity antagonism, delay of senescence, and osmo and thermal protection under thermal stress such as freezing and extreme heat [132,133,134,135]; increased soil exploration and mineral nutrient solubilization under nutrient stress [136,137]; and induced system resistance, direct antagonism with pathogens, and phytohormone level modulation under biotic stress [138,139,140,141,142]. Bozhinova [143] reported that the application of the microbial inoculant Europlus® and the protein hydrolysate (PH) Trainer® increased the yield of tobacco by 5.5% and 6.7%, respectively, in comparison with untreated plants. Bozhinova [143] also noted that the application of the microbial inoculant Europlus boosted N, P, and K concentrations in leaves, and the concentrations of Ca, Mn, Zn, and Cu were slightly higher than the control treatment when the microbial inoculant Europlus was applied, and concluded that the use of microbial biostimulants in sustainable tobacco farming was effective in boosting the yield of oriental tobacco and the quality of cured leaves. AMF can increase dry weight, photosynthesis, and seed fresh yield of Glycine max under drought stress [144]. Under drought stress, Gigaspora decipiens and Glomus mosseae can boost the chlorophyll content and growth of Triticum aestivum, and Rhizophagus intraradices can improve levels of Mg, Zn, Cu, and F in grains of Triticum durum [145,146]. Under drought stress, Rhizophagus intraradices can increase N, P, and K uptake in Zea mays [147]; Funneliformis geosporus BEG11 can increase water use efficiency in Fragaria ananassa [148]; Glomus deserticola can improve the level of proline and the number of leaves in Antirrhinum majus [149]; and Gigaspora gregaria can increase mineral levels and decrease the level of proline in Vigna subterranea [150]. Amid water shortage, Paraglomus occultum can increase the rate of water absorption and the length of the hypha in Poncirus trifoliata [151]; Rhizophagus irregularis can increase the conductivity of stomata and dry matter of shoot in Digitaria eriantha [152]; and Glomus species can improve the osmotic potential adjustment in Ipomoea batatas [153] and increase water uptake and phenolic, metabolite, and glutathione levels in Saccharum arundinaceum [154]. Under salinity stress, Rhizophagus irregularis can increase the fresh weight of shoots and roots and the number of leaves of Solanum lycopersicum [155], Claroideoglomus etunicatum can increase the conductivity of stomata and the level of soluble sugars in Aleurites moluccanus [156], and Claroideoglomus etunicatum can boost the dry mass of shoots and roots as well as the conductivity of stomata in Aeluropus littoralis [156]. Under cold stress, Rhizophagus irregularis and Funneliformis mosseae can increase photochemical reactions, decrease the damage in the membrane, and activate the antioxidant defense system in Solanum melongena [157]. Rhizophagus irregularis can improve the plant photosynthetic efficiency of Solanum lycopersicum under heat stress [158]. AMF containing Rhizoglomus irregulare and Funnerliformis mosseae can significantly influence the growth, productivity, and nutraceutical and nutritional quality of tomato cultivars, as AMF increase the biosynthesis and nutrient uptake of notable molecules involved in cellular pH and oxidative stress [159]. Six single strains (Acaulospora laevis, Acaulospora scrobiculata, Gigaspora gigantea, Entrophospora colombiana, Glomus manihotis, and Scutellospora heterogama) and a mixture of AMF (Glomuss mosseae, Glomus manihotis, and Glomus gigantea) recultured with Chloris gayana increased survival, improved tolerance against stress, and boosted the nutritional status, relative water content, photosynthetic rate, and the contents of P, N, Mg, and Fe in Vitis vinifera cv. Pusa Navrang [160]. Rhizophagus irregularis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Funneliformis mosseae application lead to an increase in APX and GPX enzyme activities, an enhancement of plant growth parameters, the alleviation of water deficit damage, a decrease in H2O2 and lipid peroxidation, and an improvement of drought tolerance in Cupressus arizonica Green [161]. The utilization of Glomus mosseae, Rhizobium leguminosarum, and Arthrobacter protophormiae induced a decrease in proline content and lipid peroxidation, an improvement of plant weight, an enhancement of nutrient uptake, an increase in pigment content, and the alleviation of salt stress of Pisum sativum under salt stress [162]. The application of Acaulospora sp., Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Rhizobium sp., and Burkholderia sp. led to an improvement in the absorption of chemical fertilizers and an increase in the wood yield of Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum under salt stress [163]. Bacillus megaterium, Rhizophagus irregularis, and Frateuria aurantia induced an enhancement of nutrient uptake responses, an improvement of low-mobility nutrient uptake such as Zn and Ca, an enhancement of total microbial biomass and microbial metabolism, an increase in plant growth, and an increase in gluten quality of Triticum aestivum L. under salt stress [164]. Miceli et al. [165] reported that the application of microbial biostimulants altered seedling growth and responses to different stresses and had a growth-promoting impact on the unstressed seedlings, increasing dry and fresh biomass accumulation, leaf area, and leaf number, being an appropriate option for improving the salinity tolerance of seedlings, particularly under salinity stress.

5. Case Studies and Practical Application of Microbial Biostimulants

There are two types of mechanisms of action of microbial biostimulants. For direct mechanisms, it has been reported that microbes are active in the synthesis of components that can boost the adsorption of nutrients, while indirect mechanisms refer to siderophore production, zinc solubilization, phosphorus solubilization, indole acetic acid biosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme production, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide production, biological nitrogen fixation, and phytohormone production [166,167]. Microbial biostimulants can alleviate the adverse effects of environmental stresses by producing hormone-like stimulants with positive impacts on plant growth and final yield [168]. Molecular processes that have roles in the interactions of plants and microorganisms which may lead to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites are the protective impacts of microbial biostimulants on plants against different stressors [169]. The production of protective molecules is obtained via the shikimate pathway which may consist of the enzyme phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) for the production of phenylpropanoids after microbial eliciting [170], which may have significant effects to adjust the pressure from external factors, called induced systemic resistance (ISR) [171]. The main mechanisms targeted by microorganisms according to various biostimulants can target shoot targets such as stomatal regulation and xylem hydraulic conductance, and root targets such as root zone water availability, root ethylene and auxin levels via ROS scavenging, membrane stability, and osmoprotection [172]. Biostimulants can influence plant phenotype, cellular level, and molecular level. The impact on plant phenotype consists of improved shoot and root growth, improved flowering, higher yield parameters, higher leaf number and vigor, better abiotic stress tolerance, better fruit nutritional quality, increased relative water content, increased stomatal conductance, and higher nutrient acquisition uptake and transportation. The effects at the cellular level include increased antioxidant activity, improved primary and secondary metabolisms, increased chlorophyll content, and higher photosynthetic rates, and those at the molecular level entail increased gene expression of SOD, CAT, APX, nutrient transporters, and stress-related genes [173]. Microbial biostimulants can alleviate abiotic stress, balance plant hormone levels, regulate indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), regulate cytokinins, regulate gibberellins, regulate abscisic acid, produce ACC deaminase, facilitate nutrient availability, modify root biomass and morphology, induce antioxidant enzyme syntheses in crops, accumulate osmolytes in crops, induce gene resistance to drought and salt stress, improve crop organic and inorganic pollutant toxicity tolerance, mediate increased nutrient availability (N, P, K, Fe, and Zn), improve crop cold tolerance, increase crop heat tolerance, and boost crop waterlogging tolerance [174,175,176,177,178,179]. It has been reported that microbial-based biostimulants boosted plant yield, Cu and Ca, and isochlorogenic acid components, and the influence of biostimulants on the functional and nutritional quality of lettuce was mainly independent of water availability [180]. Microbial biostimulants can significantly improve carbohydrate, protein, sugar, K, Ca, Mn, Zn, and Fe content in chickpea seeds and plants, and the microbiome analysis indicated a positive correlation with soil health and yield [181]. Mrid et al. [182] reported that microbial-based biostimulants can positively influence cropping systems via numerous mechanisms and can increase nutrient uptake and use efficiencies, suppress phytopathogens infection, boost root system development, reduce heavy metal toxicity, and improve crop growth and yield. Natural biostimulants can increase tolerance against abiotic stresses in agricultural and horticultural crops [183,184] and increase crop productivity under environmental stress [185,186]. Alfonzetti et al. [187] showed the potency of microbial biostimulants to positively influence native plant emergence and growth, but the exact impacts are linked to the plant species, type of amendment, and the characteristics of the planting site soil. Microbial biostimulants can increase ornamental plant growth during production and increase crop performance under abiotic stress, and appropriate microbes can also produce secondary metabolites like volatile organic components to improve plant growth. Aside from the direct impacts on molecular procedures, the effects of microbial biostimulants are related to morphological alterations such as changes in root morphology after inoculation with AMF and the increase in root surface, which can both increase the uptake of nutrients and water, thus helping plants cope with the negative impacts of stressors [188]. It has also been reported that the inoculation of water-stressed plants with Penicillium sp., Phoma glomerata, Glomus intraradices, Exophiala sp., and Paecilomyces formosus may lead to greater soil exploration by roots or fungal hyphae with meaningful improved root conductivity [189,190].

6. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)

AMF, favorable microorganisms extensively distributed in nature, can establish a symbiotic relationship with most terrestrial herbs. AMF belong to 11 families, 25 genera, and nearly 250 species [191]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is the widespread mutualistic relationship between fungi and plants and plays an important role in nutrient exchange, ecosystem sustainability, the enhancement of plant stress resistance, and the development of host plants [192,193,194,195,196]. AMF increase the C allocation of the host plant below ground, which can form a microbial community composition [197]. AMF belong to the phylum Mucoromycota and subphylum Glomeromycotina. AMF are available in our natural environment and are helpful in several ways; they play an important role in increasing plant nutrition acquisition, improving plant tolerance and resistance to stresses, and increasing soil fertility and structure, and have several beneficial applications in agriculture [198,199,200]. Symbiosis can increase host plant nutrition because plants can absorb nutrients not only through mycorrhizal pathways but also through their own pathways. Besides that, AMF can also influence nutrient availability by altering soil physicochemical characteristics, microbial communities, and nutrient cycling [201,202,203]. AMF have notable effects on herbaceous plant element stoichiometry, such as plant C:N:P stoichiometry, which depends on plant and fungal functional group identities and soil nutrient availability [204].
AMF promoted the utilization and accumulation of Ca in apple rootstock (Malus robusta) by adjusting the expression levels of genes associated with these pathways. GO and KEGG pathway analysis showed that gene expression changes in different critical gene families, such as auxin response (MdGH3, MdAux/IAAs, and MdSAUR), TCA cycles (MdCS, MdMDH, and MdACO), phosphate transporters (MdPHT1;1, MdPHT1;10, and MdPHT1;3), and Ca2+ signal transduction pathways (MdCa2+/ATPase, MdTPC1, MdCML, and MdCDPK), showing that apple stimulates the expression of genes related to auxin synthesis, organic acid secretion, and calcium transporters and channels, thus promoting the growth of apple root and improving the secretion of organic acids, which may lead to an increase in calcium effectiveness in soil [205]. Uptake of ZnO nanoparticles in barley was increased by AMF, possibly related to the mutualistic connection between the root and the fungi, which promotes water absorption because of the more efficient property of the rhizosphere [206]. The combination of humic substance and AMF remarkably increased plant biomass [207]. The impacts of Rhizobium and AMF inoculation were investigated on the growth and yield of Lablab purpureus, Vigna unguiculata, and Mucuna pruriens, and in comparison to single inoculation and uninoculated forages, the dual inoculation with AMF and Rhizobia improved the growth and biomass yield of forage legumes, and dual inoculation could be an optimal alternative in attempts to decrease the overreliance of chemical fertilizers on forage production [208]. The effects of mycorrhizal association on plant and root ecosystems are presented in Figure 2.
When AMF are inoculated in a plant, they increase the plant’s tolerance against different stresses such as heavy metals, drought, and high temperatures. AMF form spores and hyphae in the rhizosphere, while inside the root tissues, they shape arbuscular, vesicles, and hyphae to improve the accessibility of plant roots to large soil surface areas by hyphal network knowledge with roots of plants, therefore increasing growth in the plant [209]. AMF synergistically improve plant P nutrition, and feedstock origin determines P accessibility and, as a consequence, mycorrhizal performance [210]. AMF inoculation may lead to the promotion of leaf chlorophyll content, shoot height, leaf photochemical efficiency, RWC, turf quality, and root and shoot biomass, as well as enhanced melatonin (MT) content through the upregulation of the MT biosynthesis genes and the reduction in the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), electrolyte leakage (EL), chlorophyll catabolic genes (CCGs), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and senescence-associated genes (SAGs) to decrease heat stress in perennial ryegrass [211]. AMF inoculation increased gibberellin (GA), internal MT, and cytokinin (CTK) levels while reducing ABA levels in heat-stressed plants; moreover, the MT biosynthesis genes (LpASMT1, LpTDC1, LpCOMT1, LpTDC2, and LpASMT3), the abscisic acid (ABA) catabolic gene, the CTK biosynthesis genes, the GA biosynthesis genes, and the associated signal transduction response transcription factors (TFs) (type-B ARRs) showed increased levels, whereas the expression of the GA to ABA exerted decreased levels after MT application and AMF inoculation in heat-stressed plants [211]. AMF can increase earlier flowering of plants, promote fruit and flower production, prolong the total duration of flowering, and increase seed yield, showing potential in promoting seedling growth and seed germination [212].
AMF increased the plant height, root weight, root length, and stem weight of lettuce, and the functional composition profiles showed that several functions were increased, including cell motility and environmental adaptation, and AMF had a significant influence on the lettuce endophytic bacterial network community and structure function [213]. AMF with high Cu components provided adaptive mechanisms for the plant growth and survival of grapevine rootstock; in greenhouse conditions, stomatal conductance and transpiration improved with Cu additions, influencing plant growth [214]. AMF could inhibit the uptake of Hg, particularly methyl-Hg in grains of rice, as it may lead to Hg transfer in the non-edible parts of rice, such as the leaf and stem, and promote the growth indexes and micro-indexes of rice, and it can be a practical remediation technology for soil heavy metal pollution [215]. AMF also responds to Cd stress in kenaf; inoculation with AMF could be applied to kenaf to enhance the removal of Cd from soil in mining areas by phytoremediation, as AMF can adjust the expression levels of key kenaf genes, such as Hc.AKR, Hc.GH3.1, and Hc.PHR1, thus playing an important role in enhancing kenaf’s Cd tolerance [216].
Micro-proton-induced X-ray emission was utilized to determine element localization and indicated that AMF improved the nutrient uptake by wetland plants (Iris pseudacorus) and suppressed Cr translocation from roots to shoots, which showed that the interaction between plants and AMF could significantly improve the immobilization of high Cr concentrations in semi-aquatic habitats [217]. AMF inoculation and/or legume intercropping uphold the stability of microbial networks by weakening taxonomic interactions and improving modularity under drought events; overall, AMF inoculation causes Medicago sativa to need water during a drought event, which worsens soil water deficit and thus may increase interspecific water competition between Medicago sativa and Broussonetia papyrifera. The results of one experiment revealed that in the roots of tomato plants colonized by AMF, there was a meaningful mutual relationship between the insects feeding on the plant and the fungal species (Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae, R. irregularis, and Glomus iranicus) [218].
AM fungi (Glomus spp.) play a role in upregulating plant growth and nutrition status in Fe-ore tailings in technosols of host plants like sorghum, providing the basis for the involvement of AM fungi in the eco-engineered pedogenesis of iron ore tailings [219]. In the ethanolic extracts of leaves of Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell.) Brenan, seedlings had more saponins and flavanols and showed significant antioxidant activity when inoculated with AMF (Gigaspora albida and Acaulospora longula) [220,221]. AMF significantly improved the biomass and nutrient levels of Iris tectorum and reduced the constituents of Cr in soils; furthermore, it can boost the abundance of functional genes related to nutrient cycling (N, P) in rhizosphere microbial communities, increase the abundance of functional genes associated with heavy metal resistance and transporters in the rhizosphere microbial community, and increase the complexity and stability of the rhizosphere microbial community [222]. AMF reduce the plant uptake and bioavailability of Cd and As, and the reduction in As and Cd accumulations induced by AMF depends on the plant family [223]. It has also been reported that AMF–Glomus versiforme (Gv) symbiosis significantly increased P uptake, plant growth, and photosynthesis in upland rice, and Gv inoculation decreased the expression of Nramp5, thus reducing Cd absorption, transfer, and accumulation in upland rice and enhancing the activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxide (POD) in Gv-inoculated upland rice [224]. Glomeraceae and Paraglomeraceae are the dominant fungi affecting the available P content. Expanding Glomeraceae and Paraglomeraceae and applying them to Eucalyptus plantations may increase soil P availability, and the structure of the AMF community may be a sensitive indicator of the quality of soil-available P in Eucalyptus plantations [225]. AMF reduced the toxicity risk of Pb by accumulating Pb in fungal structures, and both flooding and Pb stress reduced the AMF diversity but not the abundance [226].
Inoculation with indigenous AMF such as Glomus sp. and Paraglomus sp. boosted the biomass of plants and promoted root growth under replanting conditions, and it can also induce the activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase and increase the resistance of apple rootstock by upregulating root reactive oxygen species levels and the antioxidant system under replanting conditions [227]. It is suggested that mycorrhizal fungi can reduce the detrimental impacts of salt stress on Ligustrum vicaryi plants, and the mediation of Ca2+, Zn2+, N, Mg2+, and soluble protein components could be the basic mechanism underlying salt tolerance in mycorrhizal plants [228]. AMF and root hairs are functionally redundant in maize, and AMF had a greater effect on microbial structure than root hairs, as well as a greater role in microbial P mineralization than root hairs of maize [229]. Activities of 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase (4CL), chalcone isomerase (CHI), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and expression levels of PtPAL1 and Pt4CL were induced by Funneliformis mosseae inoculation under water stress, and AMF plants showed higher scavenging activity of hydroxyl radical and superoxide (O2) by root flavonoid extracts under water stress, together with lower levels of O2 and hydrogen peroxide and the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation in comparison with non-AMF plants, as well as increased flavonoid synthesis of trifoliate orange for reducing oxidative damage under water stress [230]. The single inoculation of Claroideoglomus etunicatum and Rhizophagus clarus promoted the accumulation of nitrogen in the aerial part of cowpea cultivars, and plants inoculated with C. etunicatum had similar or superior responses to plants fertilized with NPK or P [231]. Wheat inoculated with Glomus intraradices had maximum wheat yield and growth, which mechanically resulted from a higher rhizosphere colonization level, photosynthetic rate, and water use efficiency under drought stress [232].
Fungal inoculations partly improved fruit quality and mineral element components, depending on the fungi species, while the cultured mycorrhiza-like fungus Piriformospora indica relatively replaced AMF in citrus plants [233]. Inoculation with AMF provided good dry weight gain in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), and notably contributed to high essential oil yield [234]. The mixed AMF inoculation in chamomile cultivation promoted both plant productivity and the quality of flower heads, especially regarding the component of phenolic compounds [235]. AMF inoculation had a positive effect on the yield of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) [236], while the combined implementation of biochar with AMF improved the colonization potential of AMF and significantly increased the photosynthetic potential of Tamarindus indica by increasing the contents of chlorophyll and carotenoids [237]. Different species of filamentous endophytic fungi, such as Trichoderma, are capable of controlling the pathogens Xylella fastidiosa and Pseudomonas savastanoi via the production and release of secondary metabolites; they are also effective against Oomycetes sp. and Colletotrichum sp. [238]. The combined application of GA3 (Gibberellic acid) and AMF (Rhizophagus irregularis) decreased growth impairment under salinity conditions by upregulating the hormonal balance of plants. The utilization of AMF was able to increase the productivity of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) plants under salinity conditions, and mycorrhizal inoculation significantly promoted water use efficiency and chlorophyll content under salinity stress [239]. AMF formation significantly boosted the high temperature tolerance of lettuce, a finding that could be related to the PSII system’s protection from damage under high temperatures [240]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that mycorrhizal symbiosis decreased the Na+ and Cl content and improved the relative water content (RWC), the total fresh and dry weight, and the photosynthetic activity of olive plants [241]. Mango (Mangifera indica L.) root stocks reacted to AMF inoculation in the nursery and also in the field with improved nutrient uptake, plant growth, and yield [242].
Rouphael et al. [243] concluded that the improvement in the biomass of crops after the application of two beneficial fungi, namely arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma koningii TK7, could be connected to the modulation of the multilayer phytohormone interaction network, as well as a potential improvement in nitrogen use effectiveness via the glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GS-GOCAT) system. Hashem et al. [244] reported that the negative effects of salt stress in cucumber were ameliorated by AMF inoculation, which improved the activity of antioxidant enzymes that scavenged ROS and protected plant tissues from dehydration stress, including ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase, and enhanced plant biomass and the synthesis of proline, pigments, and glycine betaine. Shekoofeh et al. [245] reported that AMF inoculation protected Ocimum basilicum plants from salinity stress by promoting water use efficiency, and increased chlorophyll synthesis and mineral uptake. Other examples of modes of action of AMF include the increased antioxidant activity and the accumulation of osmolytes [246], the adjusting of proline biosynthesis [246,247], and the accumulation of K, Ca, and Mg, which increased chlorophyll production and promoted the activity of enzymes [248,249]. Regarding the mitigating impacts of AMF against salinity stress, Estrada et al. [250] concluded that AMF inoculation restricted both uptake and accumulation of Na by adjusting the expression levels of SOS1, AKT2, and SKOR genes in roots, which allowed them to retain the homeostasis of Na+ and K+. The recent findings in omics science have also helped show that microbial biostimulants’ application involves great alterations in secondary and primary metabolites such as amino acids, phenolic acids, lipids, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) intermediates, as well as alterations in protective mechanisms against stress that involve redox homeostasis, the stabilization of cell membranes, osmoregulation, the production of energy via amino acid degradation, and the increased expression of stress-related genes [150,251]. Qiu et al. [252] reported that the mitigation impacts of AMF increased with increasing AMF root colonization rate, and the mitigation impacts of AMF reduced with increasing soil P and N availability. Hu et al. [253] found that the symbiotic relationship between plant roots and AMF could affect the translocation and accumulation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in plants, and that substrate type can affect the function.
The application of humic substances and AMF treatment led to a reduction in carvone content compared to treatment with humic substances alone, and it was suggested that AMF inoculation combined with a high P rate promoted essential oil content, whereas AMF inoculation combined with a high P rate and humic substance addition decreased the carvone content in Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E.Br. [254]. AMF can shorten the litter nutrient cycle, which is of great significance for the absorption, storage, and utilization of plant nutrients in the Songnen grassland ecosystem [255]. It has been reported that mycorrhizal colonization increased apple drought tolerance by improving gas exchange capacity, promoting chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, increasing scavenging of reactive oxygen species, creating a greater osmotic adjustment capacity, and using mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signals for interactions between AMF and their apple plant hosts [256]. Wang et al. [257] showed that AMF increased soil N2O emissions from legume systems by increasing P acquisition for biological N2 fixation, suggesting that AMF benefit crop production for higher yield and fewer N2O emissions in legume systems. The AMF Gigaspora margarita KKU-BH-01 can effectively increase the growth and aid eucalyptus seedlings to survive leaf blight disease (Cylindrocladium quinqueseptatum), as AMF induced plant chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase enzymes, resulting in improved disease resistance in plants [258]. Mycorrhizal oregano and mint plants had higher dry weight and essential oils, and the Glomus etunicatum strains were more effective than the Glomus lamellosum strain, and mycorrhizal oregano plants had higher dry weight than mycorrhizal mint plants [259]. Lam and Lai [260] reported that AMF treatment increased water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk.) growth and reduced the accumulation of Ni but not Cd. Glomus mosseae and Glomus deserticola increased shoot length, dry weight, chlorophyll quantity, and total N, P, and K components in Eucalyptus globulus shoots [261]. Gheisari Zardak et al. [262] concluded that the application of AMF could be important in the cultivation of medicinal plants under semi-arid and arid conditions. The most important impacts of AMF on different plants are shown in Table 1.

7. Modes of Action of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)

AMF inoculation changed the biochemical procedures of lemongrass with a subsequent effect on growth and increased the suppression of Fusarium root rot under greenhouse conditions; additionally, essential oils (EOs) from mycorrhizal lemongrass frequently inhibited Fusarium Solani Fs4 development, notably more than the non-inoculated counterpart [389]. AMF can form a symbiosis with most vegetable plants, including the main crops from diverse families, such as Apiaceae (e.g., carrot), Amaryllidaceae (e.g., onion, garlic, leek), Cucurbitaceae (cucumber), Asteraceae (e.g., lettuce), Fabaceae (e.g., pea and bean), and Solanaceae (e.g., bell pepper, tomato) [390]. The most significant beneficial impacts of AMF are the boosted capture of mineral elements such as calcium, phosphorus, copper, zinc, sulfur, and iron, and the increased resistance to various types of abiotic and biotic stress [391,392]. In one experiment, it was reported that the α-diversity of AMF and diazotrophs communities, N-related enzymes, and sediment nutrition constituents were the principle parameters driving the biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) process in mangrove ecosystems [393]. The synchronous utilization of chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) and AMF promoted the levels of carotenoids, polyphenols, and tocopherols in the roots, thus increasing antioxidant capacity (33%); therefore, CSNPs can be used as effective biofertilization tools to increase plant growth and fitness, exemplified by the improvement in the health-promoting components in wheat [394]. In the presence of AMF inoculation strains Rhizophagus irregularis and Funneliformis mosseae, phosphorous components in the leaves of tomato plants were increased under both watering regimes, and even under limited watering conditions, Ca, K, Zn, Mg, and Mn were increased to levels similar to those of non-stressed plants [395]. AMF increased nutrient uptake, particularly phosphorus and other less mobile elements, mostly by increasing the absorptive surface of hyphal exploration in the rhizosphere, and acted as soil reclamation and biocontrol agents for contaminated or polluted soil [396]. Sarkar et al. [397] reported the probability of using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on symbiotic Miscanthus plants in phytoremediation and growing them in Zn-deficient soils. AMF improved plant growth under toxic trace element (TE) stress. The function of AMF in regulating heavy metal transport is concentration-dependent, and the transport direction of Cd and Zn in plants regulated by AMF changes with TE. AMF increased the absorption of Zn by growth dilution and Cd by biological enrichment, and the interaction between Cd and Zn was affected by AMF and other components [398].
Mycorrhizal fungi respond to metal contamination in different ways. Funneliformis mosseae in pepper can promote the dry mass production photosynthesis rate under Cu stress [399], Glomus versiforme and Rhizophagus intraradices can increase P nutrition and antioxidant activity of Lotus japonica under Cd stress [400], Rhizophagus intraradices can accumulate Cr in roots and decrease its translocation towards shoots of Brachiaria mutica under Cr stress, Rhizophagus irregularis may immobilize Cu and Pb in soil for the cultivation of willows [401], Rhizophagus intraradices can regulate As transporter in root epidermis cells and decrease its uptake in pea seedlings [402], and Claroideoglomus and Rhizophagus spp. can decrease Cd accumulation in wheat grains [403]. Funneliformis mosseae is a famous mycorrhiza among different AMF species for its symbiosis with the roots of various plant species, and it may facilitate the exchange of nutrients via the expansion of roots through the outer membrane of the mycelia and by boosting root development [404]. Some of the most important examples of mycorrhizal fungi mitigating soil nutrient deficiencies are Rhizophagus irregularis reducing soil nutrient deficiencies of P and Zn in Medicago truncatula by increasing MtZIP5 and MtPT4 gene induction [405], Rhizophagus irregularis boosting root absorption area and soil P availability in maize, Rhizophagus irregularis modifying the ZIP transporter response in barley and boosting grain Zn bioavailability [406], Funneliformis mosseae promoting the uptake of nutrients such as Mn, Mg, Zn, Fe, Ca, S, N, P, and K in cucumber [407], and Rhizophagus irregularis stimulating MtZIP6 gene expression and boosting the root absorption area in Medicago truncatula [406]. Various biochemical and physical mechanisms have been reported to play important roles in the enhancement of common bean plant stress resistance by AMF inoculation against Rhizoctonia solani or Rhizoctonia root rot disease, namely improved plant growth, increased plant nutrition, cytoplasmic granulation, improved cell wall thickening, and the accumulation of some antimicrobial components such as defense-related enzymes and phenolic substances [408]. Li et al. [409] reported that AMF promoted the accumulation of Cd in the roots of wheat but significantly decreased the amount of Cd in the grains and shoots. Moreover, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rates, chlorophyll content, transpiration rates, and the accumulation of carbohydrates under Cd stress were elevated by AMF symbiosis. Proteomic analysis showed that AMF led to the expression of two enzymes that have significant functions in the chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway, namely Mg-protoporphyrin IX chelates and coproporphyrinogen oxide; increased the expression of two proteins related to CO2 assimilation, namely malic enzyme and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase; and boosted the expression of S-adenosylmethionine synthase. Under salinity stress, glomus mosseae can increase total proline and phenol content, leaf area, and root and shoot dry weights and lengths in Triticum aestivum [410]; Funneliformis mosseae can increase nutrient uptake, the photosynthetic rate, and the stand establishment rate of Cucumis sativus [411]; and Rhizobium irregularis and Funneliformis mosseae can increase plant biomass and decrease oxidative burst by strengthening the antioxidant enzymatic activities of Cajanus cajan [412]. Yu et al. [413] reported that AMF have ecological functions in decreasing Cd loss, with positive effects on maize growth because of leaching from polluted soil, as the AMF changed Cd migration by boosting the contents of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP), exudates, and root morphology. Selvaraj et al. [414] observed that Glomus intraradices can improve both nutrient use efficiency and increase the defense response against herbivorous insects (Spodoptera litura) in blackgram. AMF symbiosis reduces temperature stress in host plants by improving the osmotic adjustment [415], increasing the photochemistry of PSII and the photosynthetic rate [416], increasing the uptake of nutrients [417], improving reproductive capacity, and enhancing antioxidant activity [418,419]. Farghaly et al. [420] reported that AMF inoculation can decrease the adverse impacts of alkalinity stress on wheat plants by decreasing Na concentration and pH and improving the availability of P and the productivity of wheat yield.

8. Practical Application of Microbial Biostimulants on Crops

Culture-dependent approaches have allowed the isolation of various bacteria taxa from the mycorrhizosphere of Glomus margarita, Glomus versiforme, Rhizobium irregular, Rhizobium clarus, and Funneliformis mosseae [421,422,423]. Microbial inoculants in horticulture and agriculture systems have different effects; for example, Pseudomonas putida can increase iron uptake in rice, and Pseudomonas fluorescens can improve grain yield, plant height, and biomass in rice, sweet potato, and rapeseed [424,425,426]. The Streptomyces strain shows positive effects on the plant growth of tomato and rice [427,428]. Improved dry shoot weight and a significant increase in leaf length were reported after the application of Azospirillum brasilense Sp245, and Aeromonas spp. increased the root area of rice [429]. Comamonas acidovorans and Bacillus subtilis have significantly improved plant growth and increased cytokinin constituents in shoots and roots [430,431]. Bacillus licheniformis application increased fresh weight, enhanced cell division, and raised the chlorophyll content in cucumber [432], and Azospirillum lipoferum improved the root hair density of maize seedlings [433]. Azospirillum lipoferum increased tolerance to salinity stress in wheat [434], and Pseudomonas putida application led to increased shoot and root biomass and water content of white clover [435]. The utilization of Alternaria sp. stimulated drought tolerance in wheat [436,437]. It has also been reported that Azoarcus sp. increased plant nitrogen nutrition and root growth and reduced nutrient deficiency in wheat [438], and Azorhizobium sp. boosted plant nitrogen nutrition and root growth and alleviated nutrient deficiency [438]. Rhizobium meliloti improved plant growth, nitrogen use efficiency, and the quality of pods of peanuts [439,440], and Rhizobium leguminosarum boosted growth and yield performance under drought stress in soybean seedlings [441]. Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii increase root and shoot length, chlorophyll content, and root and leaf number [442]. Application of Bacillus halotolerans, Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis RG2, and Enterobacter hormaechei increased germination, growth, and yield; induced better drought resistance; and improved uptake of P, N, and Zn [443]. Rhizoglomus irregulare Aoufous consortium enhanced growth traits and physiological characteristics that have functions in the absorption of N and P content, increased protein and sugar content, reduced MDA and H2O2, alleviated soil pH, and increased the electrical conductivity, organic matter, and total organic carbon of date palm under drought conditions [444]. Glomus spp. increased root fresh weigh, root length, shoot height, shoot fresh weight, and germination index and improved the root basal diameter, dry biomass, and seedling length of date palm under heavy metal stress conditions [445]. AMF also can interact with PGPR [446,447]; for example, a positive and significant synergistic interaction has been reported between Bacillus subtilis and AMF regarding nitrate, nitrate reductase, and nitrogenase properties and the components of phenols, lipids, fiber, and osmoprotectants such as proline, betaine, and glycine [448]. Zamljen et al. [449] reported that microbial biostimulants added to the nutrient solution showed better results in the volatile content as well as primary metabolism and yield of basil. Anton-Herrero et al. [450] concluded that the origin and composition of microbial biostimulants determine their physiological impacts on pepper plants. Microbial biostimulants increased lipophilic antioxidants and yield and reduced sugars in cherry tomato cultivars [451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463].

9. Conclusions and Future Remarks

Biostimulants are sustainable and eco-friendly products that may promote metabolic and enzymatic processes in plants to enhance their yield, productivity, and crop quality and increase resistance to abiotic stresses. Biostimulants contain substances or products containing special formulations, natural components, or microorganisms that can naturally improve plant growth. The most important categories of biostimulants are humic and fulvic acid, fungi, bacteria, amino-acid-containing products, hormone-containing products, etc. Biostimulants are not only considered important alternatives to mineral fertilizers, but are also distinguished in organic farming systems under sustainable crop production management. Increased shoot and root growth, better root growth potential, improved resistance to stressors, and reduced nitrogen fertilizer inputs are some of the most noteworthy effects of biostimulant application in sustainable agriculture systems.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are widespread root colonization fungi associated with the roots of higher plants. The current multiplication methods of mycorrhizal species under root organ culture (ROC) have become efficient alternatives for the cultivation of specific secondary metabolite compounds. Several kinds of studies have shown that AMF lead to significant changes in the quality and quantity of secondary metabolites that originate from medicinal and aromatic plants of economic interest. AMF can only be grown in the presence of host plants and are extensively used in agriculture and horticulture, especially Rhizophagus (formerly known as Glomus) intraradices and Funneliformis (formerly known as Glomus) mosseae. AMF make a positive contribution to growth, yield, stress tolerance, pathogen protection, and the maintenance of agricultural ecosystem sustainability. The increased activities of secondary metabolite production and antioxidant defense system enzymes related to plant defense have been extensively reported in mycorrhizal plants.
In conclusion, AMF play a key role in plant nutrition and performance due to their capacity to improve plant mineral uptake. AMF, like other microbial biostimulants, can increase the sustainability of agricultural and horticultural production systems as well as improve the quality and quantity of food for the ever-growing world population. Moreover, studying the molecular mechanisms behind the observed activities will help to reveal the physiological and plant metabolism pathways involved in these processes and provide farmers with tailor-made products suitable for various conditions. However, further studies are needed to improve the reproducibility of the positive effects and to standardize the production processes from the lab to an industrial scale. This review article concludes that inoculation with specific arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can increase the concentration of secondary metabolites in plants. However, future studies are needed to increase the reproducibility of the positive impacts, and more in-depth research is needed to identify the influence of interactions between AMF and biostimulants for promoting plants’ physiological characteristics.

Author Contributions

W.S., writing—original draft preparation; M.H.S., writing—original draft preparation and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0904700). This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (Grant No. M21026).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic potential of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants-natural health products for human health. Molecules 2023, 28, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Shahrajabian, N. Developing sustainable agriculture systems in medicinal and aromatic plant production by using chitosan and chitin-based biostimulants. Plants 2023, 12, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q.; Sun, W. The effects of amino acids, phenols and protein hydrolysates as biostimulants on sustainable crop production and alleviated stress. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2022, 16, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Sun, W. Survey of the influences of microbial biostimulants on horticultural crops: Case studies and successful paradigms. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Five important seeds in traditional medicine, and pharmacological benefits. Seeds 2023, 2, 290–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karapouloutidou, S.; Gasparatos, D. Effects of biostimulant and organic amendment on soil properties and nutrient status of Lactuca sativa in a Calcareous saline-sodic soil. Agriculture 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tejada, M.; Benitez, C.; Gomez, I.; Parrado, J. Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2011, 49, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yakhin, O.I.; Lubyanov, A.A.; Yakhin, I.A.; Brown, P.H. Biostimulants in plants science: A global perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Philibert, T.; Lee, B.H.; Fabien, N. Current status and new perspectives on chitin and chitosan as functional biopolymers. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 1314–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meramo-Hurtado, S.I.; Gonzalez-Delgado, A.D. Application of techno-economic and sensitivity analyses as decision-making tools for assessing emerging large-scale technologies for production of chitosan-based adsorbents. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 17601–17610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Koleska, I.; Hasanagic, D.; Todorovic, V.; Murtic, S.; Klokic, I.; Paradikovic, N.; Kukavica, B. Biostimulants prevents yield loss and reduces oxidative damage in tomato plants grown on reduced NPK nutrition. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shehata, S.A.; AbdelGawad, K.F.; Elmogy, M. Quality and shelf-life of onion bulbs influenced by biostimulants. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 23, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Semida, W.M.; El-Mageed, T.A.A.; Hemida, K.; Rady, M.M. Natural bee-honey based biostimulants confer salt tolerance in onion via modulation of the antioxidant defense system. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anbarasi, D.; Haripriya, K. Response of aggregatum onion (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum Don.) to organic inputs, biofertilizer and biostimulants. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 759–762. [Google Scholar]
  16. Arthur, G.D.; Aremua, A.O.; Kulkarni, M.G.; Okem, A.; Stirk, W.A.; Davies, T.C.; Van Staden, J. Can the use of natural biostimulants be a potential means of phytoremediating contaminated soils from goldmines in South Africa? Int. J. Phytoremediation 2015, 18, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wszelaczynska, E.; Szczepanek, M.; Poberezny, J.; Kazula, M.J. Effect of biostimulant application and long-term storage on the nutritional value of carrot. Hortic. Bras. 2019, 37, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Halpern, M.; Bar-Tal, A.; Ofek, M.; Minz, D.; Muller, T.; Yermiyahu, U. The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Adv. Agron. 2015, 130, 141–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lucini, L.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Canaguier, R.; Kumar, P.; Colla, G. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline condition. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 182, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petropoulos, S.A.; Fernandes, A.; Plexida, S.; Chrysargyris, A.; Tzortzakis, N.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Biostimulants application alleviates water stress effects on yield and chemical composition of greenhouse green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Sustainable agriculture systems in vegetable production using chitin and chitosan as plant biostimulants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Joly, P.; Calteau, A.; Wauquier, A.; Dumas, R.; Beuvin, M.; Vallenet, D.; Crovadore, J.; Cochard, B.; Lefort, F.; Berthon, J.-Y. From strain characterization to field authorization: Highlights on Bacillus velezensis strain B2 beneficial properties for plants and its activities on phytopathogenic fungi. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tomas, M.S.J.; Carrasco, M.G.; Lobo, C.B.; Alessandrello, M.J.; Sanchez, L.; Ferrero, M.A. PAH removal simultaneous and sequential inoculation of Pseudomonas monteilii P26 and Gordonia sp. H19 in the presence of biostimulants. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 144, 104752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barros-Rodriguez, A.; Rangseekawe, P.; Lasudee, K.; Pathom-aree, W.; Manzanera, M. Regulatory risks associated with bacteria as biostimulants and biofertilizers in the frame of the European Regulation (EU) 2019/1009. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mickan, B.S.; Alsharmani, A.R.; Solaiman, Z.M.; Leopold, M.; Abbott, L.K. Plant-dependent soil bacterial responses following amendment with a multispecies microbial biostimulant compared to rock mineral and chemical fertilizers. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 550169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hart, M.M.; Reader, R.J. Taxonomic basis for varition in the colonizatio strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. N. Phytol. 2002, 153, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, H.; Zang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, J.; Chen, X. Selectivity by host plants affects the distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal funi: Evidence from ITS rDNA sequence metadata. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cruz, C.; Vishwakarma, K.; Kumar, D.; Varma, A. (Eds.) Soil Nitrogen Ecology; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Spatafora, J.W.; Chang, Y.; Benny, G.L.; Lazarus, K.; Smith, M.E.; Berbee, M.L.; Bonito, G.; Corradi, N.; Grigoriev, I.; Gryganskyi, A.; et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 2016, 108, 1028–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Redecker, D.; Schussler, A.; Stockinger, H.; Sturmer, S.L.; Morton, J.B.; Walker, C. An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, B.; Gao, T.; Zhang, D.; Fing, K.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Functions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 303, 111219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cui, X.; Jia, B.; Diao, F.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, F.Y.; Guo, W. Transcriptomic analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrilotriacetic acid on Suaeda salsa tolerance to combined stress of cadmium and salt. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 160, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sales, L.R.; Silva, A.O.; Sales, F.R.; Rodrigues, T.L.; Barbosa, M.V.; Santos, J.V.D.; Kemmelmeier, K.; Siqueira, J.O.; Carneiro, M.A.C. On farm inoculation of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves efficiency in increasing sugarcane productivity in the field. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, W.; Liu, G.; Ma, L.; Xue, S. Secondary vegetation succession on the Loess Plateau altered the interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 530, 120744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paymaneh, Z.; Sarcheshmehpour, M.; Mohammadi, H.; Hesni, M.A. Vermicompost and/or compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are conducive to improving the growth of pistachio seedlings to drought stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 182, 104717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rafiee, H.; Badi, H.N.; Mehrafarin, A.; Qaderi, A.; Zarinpanjeh, N.; Sekara, A.; Zand, E. Application of plant biostimulants as new approach to improve the biological responses of medicinal plants—A critical review. J. Med. Plants. 2016, 15, 6–39. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bosi, S.; Negri, L.; Accorsi, M.; Baffoni, L.; Gaggia, F.; Gioia, D.D.; Dinelli, G.; Marotti, I. Biostimulants for sustainable management of sport turfgrass. Plants 2023, 12, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vasconsuelo, A.; Boland, R. Molecular aspects of the early stages of elicitation of secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahemad, M.; Kibret, M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2014, 26, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perez-Montano, F.; Alias-Villegas, C.; Bellogin, R.; del Cerro, P.; Espuny, M.; Jimenez-Guerrero, I.; Lopez-Baena, F.; Ollero, F.; Cubo, T. Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: From microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De Vries, F.T.; Griffiths, R.I.; Knight, C.G.; Nicolitch, O.; Williams, A. Harnessing rhizosphere microbiomes for drought-resilient crop production. Science 2020, 368, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Toward a sustainable agriculture through plant biostimulants: From experimental data to practical applications. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Askari-Khorasgani, O.; Hatterman-Valenti, H.; Pardo, F.B.F.; Pessarakli, M. Plant and symbiont metabolic regulation and biostimulants application improve symbiotic performance and cold acclimation. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2151–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Massa, D.; Lenzi, A.; Montoneri, E.; Ginepro, M.; Prisa, D.; Burchi, G. Plant response to biowaste soluble hydrolysates in hibiscus grown under limiting nutrient availability. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 41, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kloepper, J.W.; Ryu, C.-M.; Zhang, S. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Glick, R.B. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruzzi, M.; Aroca, R. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Editorial: Biostimulants in Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, C. The importance of flavonoids and phytochemicals of medicinal plants with antiviral activities. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2022, 19, 293–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nazir, A.; Shafiq, M.; Bareen, F. Fungal biostimulant-driven phytoextraction of heavy metals from tannery solid waste contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremed. 2021, 24, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. The golden spice for life: Turmeric with the pharmacological benefits of curcuminoids components, including curcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, and demethoxycurcumin. Curr. Org. Synth. 2023, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ali, B. Salicylic acid: An efficient elicitor of secondary metabolite production in plants. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 101884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eraslan, F.; Inal, A.; Gunes, A.; Alpaslan, M. Impact of exogenous salicylic acid on the growth, antioxidant activity and physiology of carrot plants subjected to combined salinity and boron toxicity. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 113, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lefevere, H.; Bauters, L.; Gheysen, G. Salicylic acid biosynthesis in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Guo, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, S. Humic substances developed during organic waste composting: Formation mechanisms, structural properties, and agronomic functions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiang, Y.; Kang, F.; Xiang, Y.; Jiao, Y. Effects of humic acid-modified magnetic Fe3O4/MgAl-layered double hydroxide on the plant growth, soil enzyme activity, and metal availability. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 182, 109424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Canellas, L.P.; Olivares, F.L.; Aguiar, N.O.; Jones, D.L.; Nebbioso, A.; Mazzeri, P.; Piccolo, A. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ouni, Y.; Ghnaya, T.; Montemurro, F.; Abdelly, C.; Lakhdar, A. The role of humic substances in mitigating the harmful effects of soil salinity and improve plant productivity. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2014, 8, 353–374. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bah, C.S.F.; Bekhit, A.E.D.A.; Carne, A.; McConnell, M.A. Production of bioactive peptide hydrolysates from deer, sheep, and pig plasma using plant and fungal protease preparations. Food Chem. 2015, 176, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Colla, G.; Nardi, S.; Cardarelli, M.; Ertani, A.; Lucini, L.; Canaguier, R.; Rouphael, Y. Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Lin, M. Research progress of fermented functional foods and protein factory-microbial fermentation technology. Fermentation 2022, 8, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Battacharyya, D.; Babgohari, M.Z.; Rathor, P.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gupta, V.; Kumar, M.; Brahmbhatt, H.; Reddy, C.; Seth, A.; Jha, B. Simultaneous determination of different endogenetic plant growth regulators in common green seaweeds using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 1259–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sivasankari, S.; Venkatesalu, V.; Anantharaj, M.; Chandrasekaran, M. Effect of seaweed extract on the growth and biochemical constituents of Vigna sinensis. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pizzeghello, D.; Francioso, O.; Ertani, A.; Muscolo, A.; Nardi, S. Isopentenyladenosine and cytokinin-like activity of different humic substances. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 129, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Puglisi, I.; Barone, V.; Sidella, S.; Coppa, M.; Broccanello, C.; Gennari, M.; Baglieri, A. Biostimulant activity of humic-like substances from agro-industrial waste on Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda. Eur. J. Phycol. 2018, 53, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vujinovic, T.; Zanin, L.; Venuti, S.; Contin, M.; Ceccon, P.; Tomasi, N.; Pinton, R.; Cesco, S.; De Nobili, M. Biostimulant action of dissolved humic substances from a conventionally and an organically managed soil on nitrate acquisition in maize plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Olaetxea, M.; De Hita, D.; Garcia, C.A.; Fuentes, M.; Baigorri, R.; Mora, V.; Garnica, M.; Urrutia, O.; Erro, J.; Zamarreno, A.M.; et al. Hypothetical framework integrating the main mechanisms involved in the promoting action of rhizospheric humic substances on plant root- and shoot- growth. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 123, 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Conselvan, G.B.; Fuentes, D.; Merchant, A.; Peggion, C.; Francioso, O.; Carletti, P. Effects of humic substances and indole-3-acetic acid on Arabidopsis sugar and amino acid metabolic profile. Plant Soil 2018, 426, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Garcia, A.C.; Olaetxea, M.; Santos, L.A.; Mora, V.; Baigorri, R.; Fuentes, M.; Zamarreno, A.M.; Berbara, R.L.; Garcia-Mina, J.M. Involvement of hormone- and ROS- signaling pathways in the beneficial action of humic substances on plants growing under normal and stressing conditions. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3747501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jindo, K.; Martim, S.A.; Navarro, E.C.; Perez-Alfocea, F.; Hernandez, T.; Garcia, C.; Aguiar, N.O.; Canellas, L.P. Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant Soil 2012, 353, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goni, O.; Quille, P.; O’Connell, S. Production of chitosan oligosaccharides for inclusion in a plant biostimulant. Pure Appl. Chem. 2016, 88, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, C.; Mou, B. Chitosan as soil amendment affects lettuce growth, photochemical efficiency, and gas exchange. HortTechnology 2018, 28, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Survey on medicinal plants and herbs in traditional Iranian medicine with anti-oxidant, anti-viral, anti-microbial, and anti-inflammation properties. Lett. Drud Des. Discov. 2023, 20, 1707–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oosten, M.J.V.; Pepe, O.; Pascale, S.D.; Silletti, S.; Maggio, A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rai, V.K. Role of amino acids in plant responses to stresses. Biol. Plant. 2002, 45, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Sustainable approaches to boost yield and chemical constituents of aromatic and medicinal plants by application of biostimulants. Recent Adv. Food Nutr. Agric. 2022, 13, 72–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Mechanism of action of collagen and epidermal growth factor: A review on theory and research methods. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2023, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Popko, M.; Michalak, I.; Wilk, R.; Gramza, M.; Chojnacka, K.; Gorecki, H. Effect of the new plant growth biostimulants based on amino acids on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Molecules 2018, 23, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sadak, S.H.; Abdelhamid, M.T.; Schmidhalter, U. Effect of foliar application of amino acids on plant yield and physiological parameters in bean plants irrigated with seawater. Acta. Biol. Colomb. 2015, 20, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ozyigit, I.I.; Kahraman, M.V.; Ercan, O. Relation between explants age, total phenol and regeneration response in tissue cultured cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Schaafsma, G. Safety of protein hydrolysates, fractions thereof and bioactive peptides in human nutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Albertsen, A.; Ravnskov, S.; Green, H.; Jensen, D.F.; Larsen, J. Interactions between the external mycelium of the Mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus intraradices and other soil microorganisms as affected by organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 1008–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Scervino, J.M.; Ponce, M.A.; Erra-Bassells, R.; Vierheilig, H.; Ocampo, J.A.; Godeas, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of tomato by Gigaspora and Glomus species in the presence of root flavonoids. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Porcel, R.; Aroca, R.; Cano, C.; Bago, A.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. A gene from the Arbuscular mycorrhical fungus Glomus intraradices encoding a binding protein is up-regulated by drought stress in some mycorrhizal plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Schubert, M.; Mourad, S.; Fink, S.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R. Ecophysiological responses of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride (T-15603.1) to combined environmental parameters. Biol. Control 2005, 49, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reiter, B.; Sessitsch, A. Bacterial endophytes of the wildflower Crocus albiflorus analyzed by characterization of isolates and by a cultivation-independent approach. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Niznansky, L.; Varecka, L.; Kyrstofova, S. Disruption of GABA shunt affects Trichoderma atroviride response to nutritional and environmental stimuli. Acta Chim. Solv. 2016, 9, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Blaszczyk, L.; Siwulski, M.; Sobieralski, K.; Lisiecka, J.; Jedryczka, M. Trichoderma spp.—Application and prospects for use in organic farming and industry. J. Plant. Prot. Res. 2014, 54, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wuczkowski, M.; Druzhinina, I.; Gherbawy, Y.; Klug, B.; Prillinger, H.; Kubicek, C.P. Species pattern and genetic diversity of trichoderma in a mid-European, primeval floodplain-forest. Microbiol. Res. 2003, 158, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Katenkamp, U.; Jacob, H.-E.; Kerns, G.; Dalchow, E. Hybridization of Trichoderma reesei protoplasts by electrofusion. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1989, 22, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Keshavarz, B.; Khalesi, M. Trichoderma reesi, a superior cellulose source for industrial applications. Biofuels 2016, 7, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hashiba, T.; Narisawa, K. The development and endophytic nature of the fungus Heteroconium chaetrospira. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 252, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ohki, T.; Yonezawa, M.; Hashiba, T.; Masuya, H.; Usuki, F.; Narisawa, K.; Narisawa, K. Colonization process of the root endophytic fungus Heteroconium chaetospira in roots of Chinese cabbage. Mycoscience 2002, 43, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Orlandini, V.; Maida, I.; Fondi, M.; Perrin, E.; Papaleo, M.C.; Bosi, E.; Pascale, D.D.; Tutino, M.L.; Michaud, L.; Giudice, A.L.; et al. Genomic analysis of three sponge-associated Arthrobacter antarcitic strains, inhibiting the growth of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria by synthesizing volatile organic compounds. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mukhia, S.; Khatri, A.; Acharya, V.; Kumar, R. Comparative genomics and molecular adaptational analysis of Arthrobacter from Sikkim Himalaya provided insights into its survivability under multiple high-altitude stress. Genomics 2021, 113, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cacciari, I.; Lippi, D. Arthrobacters: Successful arid soil bacteria: A review. Arid. Soil. Res. Rehabil. 1987, 1, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, H.-G.; Liu, W.-S.; Zhu, M.; Li, X.-X. Research and analysis of 74 bloodstream infection cases of Acinetobacter baumannii and drug resistance. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 1782–1786. [Google Scholar]
  101. Khaksar, G.; Treesubsuntorn, C.; Thiravetyan, P. Impact of endophytic colonization patterns on Zamioculcas amiifolia stress response and in regulating ROS, tryptophan and IAA levels under airbone formaldehyde and formaldehyde-contaminated soil conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 114, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lin, H.-R.; Shu, H.-Y.; Lin, G.-H. Biological roles of indole-3-acetic acid in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 216, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Joe, M.M.; Devaraj, S.; Benson, A.; Sa, T. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing endophytic bacteria from Phyllanthus amarus schum & thonn: Evaluation of plant growth promotion an antioxidant activity under salt stress. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2016, 3, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abraham, J.; Silambarasan, S. Biodegradation of carbendazim by Rhodococcus erythropolis and its plant growth-promoting traits. Biol. Environ. 2018, 118, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hashem, A.; Tabassum, B.; Fathi Abd Allah, E. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Anise (Pimpinella anisum L.), a dominant spice and traditional medicinal herb for both food and medicinal purposes. Cogent Biol. 2019, 5, 1673688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Natural dietary and medicinal plants with anti-obesity therapeutics activities for treatment and prevention of obesity during lock down and in post-COVID-19 era. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Fenugreek cultivation with emphasis on historical aspects and its uses in traditional medicine and modern pharmaceutical science. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Nitrogen fixation and diazotrophs—A review. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 26, 2834–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Traditional herbal medicine for the prevention and treatment of Cold and Flu in the autumn of 2020, overlapped with COVID-19. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20951431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Soleymani, A.; Cheng, Q. Traditional herbal medicines to overcome stress, anxiety and improve mental health in outbreaks of human coronaviruses. Phytother. Res. 2020, 35, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Francis, P.B.; Earnest, L.D.; Bryant, K. Maize growth and yield response to a biostimulant amendment. J. Crop Improv. 2016, 6, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Marmitt, D.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Plant species used in Brazil and Asia regions with toxic properties. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4703–4726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bashan, Y.; Holguin, G. Proposal for division of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria into two classification: Biocontrol-PGPB (Plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tejada, M.; Rodriguez-Morgado, B.; Gomez, I.; Parrado, J. Degradation of chlorpyrifos using different biostimulants/biofertilizers: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 84, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 2003, 255, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Younes, N.A.; Anik, T.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Wardany, A.A.; Dawood, M.F.A.; Tran, L.-S.P.; Latef, A.A.H.A.; Mostofa, M.G. Effects of microbial biostimulants (Trichoderma album and Bacillus megaterium) on growth, quality attributes, and yield of onion under field conditions. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jacobs-Hoffman, I.; Hills, P.N. Effects of the commercial biostimulant BC204 on the rhizosphere microbial community of Solanum lycopersicum L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 143, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mandal, S.; Anand, U.; Lopez-Bucio, J.; Radha; Kumar, M.; Lal, M.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Dey, A. Biostimulants and environmental stress mitigation in crops: A novel and emerging approach for agricultural sustainability under climate change. Environ. Res. 2023, 233, 116357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Costa, O.Y.A.; Pijl, A.; Houbraken, J.; va Lith, W.; Kuramae, E.E. Soil substrate source drives the microbes involved in the degradation of gelatin used as a biostimulant. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 189, 104906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Berg, G. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: Perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Doss, I.C.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Microbial enhancement of crop resource use efficiency. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Dalmastri, C.; Chiarini, L.; Cantale, C.; Bevivino, A.; Tabacchioni, S. Soil type and maize cultivar affect the genetic diversity of maize root-associated Burkholderia cepacia populations. Microb. Ecol. 1999, 38, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Remans, R.; Beebe, S.; Blair, M.; Manrique, G.; Tovar, E.; Rao, I.; Vanderleyden, J. Physiological and genetic analysis of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil 2008, 302, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Khalid, A.; Arshad, M.; Zahir, Z.A. Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 96, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Querejeta, J.I.; Barea, J.M.; Allen, M.F.; Caravaca, F.; Roldan, A. Differential response of ẟ13C and water use efficiency to arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in two arid land woody plant species. Oecologia 2003, 135, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Botti, A.; Musmeci, E.; Negroni, A.; Capuozzo, R.; Fava, F.; Biagi, E.; Zanaroli, G. Site-specific response of sediment microbial community to supplementation of polyhydroxyalkanoates as biostimulants for PCB reductive dechlorination. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 898, 165485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lindow, S.E.; Brandl, M.T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lim, J.H.; Kim, S.D. Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. Plant Pathol. J. 2013, 29, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Saia, S.; Colla, G.; Raimondi, G.; Di Stasio, E.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Vitaglione, P.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. An endophytic fungi-based biostimulant modulated lettuce yield, physiological and functional quality responses to both moderate and severe water limitation. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Selvakumar, G.; Bisht, S.C.; Bisht, J.K.; Kundu, S.; Gupta, H.S. Characterization of a psychrotolerant plant growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain PGERs17 (MTCC 9000) isolated from North Western Indian Himalayas. Ann. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ali, S.Z.; Sandhya, V.; Grover, M.; Kishore, N.; Rao, L.V.; Venkateswarlu, B. Pseudomonas sp. strain AKM-P6 enhances tolerance of sorghum seedlings to elevated temperatures. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2009, 46, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Theocharis, A.; Bordiex, S.; Fernandez, O.; Paquis, S.; Dhondt-Cordelier, S.; Baillieul, F.; Clement, C.; Barka, E.A. Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN primes Vitis vinifera L. and confers a better tolerance to low nonfreezing temperatures. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tiryaki, D.; Aydin, I.; Atici, P. Psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from the lead apoplast of cold-adapted wild plants improve the cold resistance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under low temperature. Cyrobiology 2019, 86, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bhalerao, R.P.; Eklof, J.; Ljung, K.; Marchant, A.; Bennett, M.; Sandberg, G. Shoot-derived auxin is essential for early lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2002, 29, 32–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Romano, I.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O. Effectiveness of plant beneficial microbes: Overview of the methodological approaches for the assessment of root colonization and persistence. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mangman, J.S.; Deaker, R.; Rogers, G. Optimal plant growth-promoting concentration of Azospirillum brasilense inoculated to cucumber, lettuce, and tomato seeds varies between bacterial strains. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 62, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. He, Y.; Pantigoso, H.A.; Wu, Z.; Vivanco, J.M. Co-inoculation of Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas putida at different development stages acts as a biostimulant to promote growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of tomato. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pellegrino, M.; Spera, D.; Ercole, C.; del Gallo, M. Allium cepa L. seed inoculation with a consortium of plant growth-promoting bacteria: Effects on plant growth and development and soil fertility status and microbial community. Proceedings 2020, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kumar, P.; Erturk, V.S.; Almusawa, H. Mathematical structure of mosaic disease using microbial biostimulants via Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. Results Phys. 2021, 24, 104186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Tanveer, Y.; Jahangir, S.; Shah, Z.A.; Yasmin, H.; Nosheen, A.; Hassan, M.N.; Illyas, N.; Bajguz, A.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Ahmad, P. Zinc oxide nanoparticles mediated biostimulant impact on cadmium detoxification and in silico analysis of zinc oxide-cadmium networks in Zea mays L. regulome. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bozhinova, R. Yield and chemical composition of oriental tobacco as affected by biostimulant application. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 29, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  144. Pavithra, D.; Yapa, N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances drought stress tolerance of plants. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 7, 49–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Goicoechea, N.; Antolin, M.C. Increased nutritional value in food crops. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Goicoechea, N.; Bettoni, M.M.; Fuertes-Mendizabal, T.; Gonzalez-Murua, C.; Aranjuelo, I.; Goicoechea, N.; Bettoni, M.M.; Fuertes-Mendizabal, T.; Gonzalez-Murua, C.; Aranjuelo, I. Durum wheat quality traits affected by mycorrhizal inoculation, water availability and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhao, R.; Guo, W.; Bi, M.; Guo, J.; Wang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the growth, nutrient uptake and water status of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in two types of coal mine spoils under drought stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 88, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Boyer, L.R.; Brain, P.; Xu, X.M.; Jeffries, P. Inoculation of drought-stressed strawberry with a mixed inoculum of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Effects on population dynamics of fungal species in roots and consequential plant tolerance to water deficiency. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Asrar, A.-W.A.; Elhindi, K.M. Alleviation of drought stress of marigold (Tagetes erecta) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J. Bio. Sci. 2011, 18, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tsoata, E.; Njock, S.R.; Youmbi, E.; Nwaga, D. Early effects of water stress on some biochemical and mineral parameters of mycorrhizal Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc. (Fabaceae) cultivated in cameroon. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res. 2015, 7, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhang, F.; He, J.D.; Ni, Q.D.; Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N. Enhancement of drought tolerance in trifoliate orange by mycorrhiza: Changes in root sucrose and proline metabolism. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2018, 46, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pedranzani, H.; Rodriguez-Rivera, M.; Gutierrez, M.; Porcel, R.; Hause, B.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates physiology and performance of Digitaria eriantha plants subjected to abiotic stresses by modulating antioxidant and jasmonate levels. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Yooyongwech, S.; Samphumphuang, T.; Tisarum, R.; Theerawitaya, C.; Cha-Um, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved water deficit tolerance in two different sweet potato genotypes involves osmotic adjustments via soluble sugar and free proline. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 198, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mirshad, P.P.; Puthur, J.T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal association enhances drought tolerance potential of promising bioenergy grass (Saccharum arundinaceum Retz.). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Khalloufi, M.; Martinez-Andujar, C.; Lachaal, M.; Karray-Bouraoui, N.; Perez-Alfocea, F.; Albacete, A. The interaction between foliar GA3 application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improves growth in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modifying the hormonal balance. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 214, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hajiboland, R.; Dashtebani, F.; Aliasgharzad, N. Physiological responses of halophytic C4 grass Aeluropus littoralis to salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization. Photosynthetica 2015, 53, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pasbani, B.; Salimi, A.; Aliasgharzad, N.; Hajiboland, R. Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigates cold stress through improvement of antioxidant defense and accumulation of protecting molecules in eggplants. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Calvo-Polanco, M.; Sanchez-Romera, B.; Aroca, R.; Asins, M.J.; Declerck, S.; Dodd, I.C.; Martinez-Andujar, C.; Albacete, A.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Exploring the use of recombinant inbreed lines in combination with beneficial microbial inoculants (AM Fungus and PGPR) to improve drought stress tolerance in tomato. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 131, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Carillo, P.; Kyratzis, A.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Fusco, G.M.; Corrado, G.; Rouphael, Y. Biostimulatory action of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhances productivity, functional and sensory quality in Piennolo del Vesuvio cherry tomato landraces. Agronomy 2020, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Krishna, H.; Singh, S.K.; Sharma, R.R.; Khawale, R.N.; Grover, M.; Patel, V.B. Biochemical changes in microporpagated grape (Vitis vinifera L.) plantlets due to arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation during ex vitro acclimatization. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 106, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Aalipour, H.; Nikbakht, A.; Etemadi, N.; Rejali, F.; Soleimani, M. Biochemical response and interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria during establishment and stimulating growth of Arizona cypress (Cupressus arizonica G.) under drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 108923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Barnawal, D.; Bharti, M.; Maji, D.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Kalra, A. ACC deaminase-containing Arthrobacter protophormiae induces NaCl stress tolerance thtough reduced ACC oxidase activity and ethylene production resulting in improved nodulation and mycorrhization in Pisum sativum. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 884–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Cely, M.V.T.; Siviero, M.A.; Emiliano, J.; Spago, F.R.; Freiras, V.F.; Barazetti, A.R.; Goya, E.T.; Lamberti, G.D.S.; Dos Santos, I.M.O.; De Oliveira, A.G.; et al. Inoculation of Schizolobium parahyba with mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases wood yield under field conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Dal Cortivo, C.; Barion, G.; Visioli, G.; Mattarozzi, M.; Mosca, G.; Vamerali, T. Increased root growth and nitrogen accumulation in common wheat following PGPR inoculation: Assessment of plant-microbe interactions by ESEM. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 247, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Miceli, A.; Moncada, A.; Vetrano, F. Use of microbial biostimulants to increase the salinity tolerance of vegetable transplants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kumar, M.; Poonam; Ahmad, S.; Singh, R. Plant growth promoting microbes: Diverse roles for sustainable and ecofriendly agriculture. Energy Nexus 2022, 7, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kumari, M.; Swarupa, P.; Kesari, K.K.; Kumar, A. Microbial inoculants as plant biostimulants: A review on risk status. Life 2023, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Joshi, M.; Parewa, H.P.; Joshi, S.; Sharma, J.K.; Shukla, U.N.; Paliwal, A.; Gupta, V. Chapter 5—Use of Microbial Biostimulants in Organic Farming. In Advances in Organic Farming; Meena, V.S., Meena, S.K., Srinivasarao, C., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 59–73. [Google Scholar]
  169. Ganugi, P.; Martinelli, E.; Lucini, L. Microbial biostimulants as a sustainable approach to improve the functional quality in plant-based foods: A review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mansoor, S.; Sharma, V.; Mir, M.A.; Mir, J.I.; Nabi, S.U.; Ahmed, N.; Alkahtani, J.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Masoodi, K.Z. Quantification of polyphenolic compounds and relative gene expression studies of phenylpropanoid pathway in apple (Malus domestica Borkh) in response to Venturia inaequalis infection. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3397–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Heil, M.; Bostock, R. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the content of induced plant defences. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. The importance of rhizobium, agrobacterium, bradyrhizobium, herbaspirillum, sinorhizobium in sustainable agricultural production. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2021, 49, 12183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q.; Sun, W. Using bacteria and fungi as plant biostimulants for sustainable agricultural systems. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2020, 17, 206–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Behera, B.; Supraja, K.V.; Paramasivan, B. Integrated microalgal biorefinery for the production and application of biostimulants in circular bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 339, 125588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Mian, G.; Belfiore, N.; Musetti, R.; Tomasi, D.; Cantone, P.; Lovat, L.; Lupinelli, S.; Iacumin, L.; Celotti, E.; Golinelli, F. Effect of a triacontanol-rich biostimulant on the ripening dynamic and wine must technological parameters in Vitis vinifera cv. Ribolla Gialla. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 188, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Su, H.; Kuang, X.; Ren, Y.; Luo, L. Biostimulants promote biodegraation of n-hexadecane by Raoultella planticola: Generation of lipopeptide biosurfactants. J. Environ. Chem. Engin. 2022, 10, 108382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Etesami, H.; Jeong, B.R.; Glick, B.R. Potential use of Bacillus spp. as an effective biostimulant against abiotic stresses in crops—A review. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2023, 5, 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hao, J.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. Metabolomics reveals the molecular mechanism of sewage sludge-derived nutrients and biostimulants stimulating resistance enhancement and the redistribution of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in pakchoi cabbage. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 891, 164330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Tolisano, C.; Del Buono, D. Biobased: Biostimulants and biogenic nanoparticles enter the scene. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Saia, S.; Corrado, G.; Vitaglione, P.; Colla, G.; Bonini, P.; Giordano, M.; Stasio, E.D.; Raimondi, G.; Sacchi, R.; Rouphael, Y. An endophytic fungi-based biostimulant modulates volatile and non-volatile secondary metabolites and yield of greenhouse basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) through variable mechanisms dependent on salinity stress level. Pathogens 2021, 10, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mukherjee, A.; Singh, S.; Gaurav, A.K.; Chouhan, G.K.; Jaiswal, D.K.; Pereiro, A.P.D.A.; Passari, A.K.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M.; Verma, J.P. Harnessing of phytomicrobiome for developing potential biostimulant consortium for enhancing the productivity of chickpea and soil health under sustainable agriculture. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 836, 155550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Mrid, R.B.; Benmrid, B.; Hafsa, J.; Boukcim, H.; Sobeh, M.; Yasri, A. Secondary metabolites as biostimulant and bioprotectant agents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kaushal, P.; Ali, N.; Saini, S.; Pati, P.K.; Pati, A.M. Physiological and molecular insight of microbial biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1041413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Zulfiqar, F.; Casadesus, A.; Brockman, H.; Munne-Bosch, S. An overview of plant-based natural biostimulants for sustainable horticulture with a particular focus on moringa leaf extracts. Plant Sci. 2020, 295, 110194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Buono, D.D. Can biostimulants be used to mitigate the effect of anthropogenic climate change on agriculture? It is time to respond. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Mattarozzi, M.; Di Zinno, J.; Montanini, B.; Manfredi, M.; Marengo, E.; Fornasier, F.; Ferrarini, A.; Careri, M.; Visioli, G. Biostimulants applied to maize seeds modulate the enzymatic activity and metaproteome of the rhizosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 148, 103480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Alfonzetti, M.; Doleac, S.; Mills, C.H.; Gallagher, R.V.; Tetu, S. Characterizing effects of microbial biostimulants and whole-soil inoculums for native plant revegetation. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Lephatsi, M.; Nephali, L.; Meyer, V.; Piater, L.A.; Buthelezi, N.; Dubery, I.A.; Opperman, H.; Brand, M.; Huyser, J.; Tugizimana, F. Molecular mechanisms associated with microbial biostimulant-mediated growth enhancement, priming and drought stress tolerance in maize plants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Aroca, R.; Rosa, P.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under drought, cold or salinity stresses? N. Phytol. 2007, 173, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Khan, A.L.; Hussain, J.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Lee, I.J. Endophytic fungi: Resource for gibberellins and crop abiotic stress resistance. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Shubler, A.; Schwarzott, D.; Walker, C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Biostimulants application: A low input cropping management tool for sustainable farming of vegetables. Biomolecues 2021, 11, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. The effectiveness of rhizobium bacteria on soil fertility and sustainable crop production under cover and catch crops management and green manuring. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2022, 50, 12560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Cheng, Q. Archaea, bacteria and termite, nitrogen fixation and sustainable plants production. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2021, 49, 12172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. Potential roles of longan as a natural remedy with tremendous nutraceutical values. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2023, 19, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lanfranco, L.; Bonfante, P. Lessons from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal genomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 75, 102357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Huang, H.; Liu, S.; Du, Y.; Tang, J.; Hu, L.; Chen, X. Carbon allocation mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alters the soil microbial community under various phosphorus levels. Fungal Ecol. 2023, 62, 101227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chen, E.C.H.; Morin, E.; Beaudet, D.; Noel, J.; Yildirir, G.; Ndikumana, S.; Charron, P.; St-Onge, C.; Giorgi, J.; Kruger, M.; et al. High intraspecific genome diversity in the model arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiont Rhizophagus irregularis. N. Phytol. 2018, 220, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Tester, M.; Smith, S.E.; Smith, F.A. The phenomenon of nonmycorrhizal plants. Can. J. Bot. 1987, 65, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 299–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Kan, Z.-R.; Wei, Q.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J.; Qi, J.; Li, F.-M.; Yang, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate earthworm-induced N2O emissions from upland soil in a rice-rotated wheat farming system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 189, 104981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Ng, A.; Wilson, B.A.L.; Frew, A. Belowground crop responses to root herbivory are associated with the community structure of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 185, 104797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zheng, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Cao, M.; Wu, F.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Jiang, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decrease soil ammonium availability and nitrous oxide emissions under nitrogen input. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 333, 109385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Yang, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, J.; Bai, H.; Shen, Y. How arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi drives herbaceous plants’ C: N: P stoichiometry? A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 862, 160807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Fu, W.; Yan, M.; Zhao, L.; Zeng, X.; Cai, B.; Qu, S.; Wang, S. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase calcium uptake in Malus robusta. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321, 112295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Kimura, T.; Ueno, M.; Petchsang, N.; Nishiyama, K. Barley uptake of ZnO nanoparticles enhanced by asrbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Implications for biomarker systems. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 386, 122496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Zhao, Y.; Naeth, M.A. Soil amendment with a humic substance and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance coal mine reclamation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Mpongwana, S.; Manyevere, A.; Mupangwa, J.; Mpendulo, C.T.; Mashamaite, C.V. Optimizing biomass yield of three herbaceous forage legumes through dual inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobia. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 159, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Khaliq, A.; Perveen, S.; Alamer, K.H.; Zia Ul Haq, M.; Rafique, Z.; Alsudays, I.M.; Althobaiti, A.T.; Saleh, M.A.; Hussain, S.; Attia, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis to enhance plant-soil interaction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Figueira-Galan, D.; Heupel, S.; Duelli, G.; Morgano, M.T.; Stapf, D.; Requena, N. Exploring the synergistic effects of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on phosphorus acquisition in tomato plants by using gene expression analyses. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 884, 163506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Wei, H.; He, W.; Kuang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W.; Tang, M.; Chen, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and melatonin synergistically suppress heat-induced leaf senescence involves in abscisic acidm gibberellin, and cytokinin-mediated pathways in perennial ryegrass. Enviorn. Experim. Bot. 2023, 213, 105436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Du, Y.; Zhang, D.; Tang, Z. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on the growth and reproduction of cherry tomato can be persistent to the next generation. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2022, 112, 103429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Han, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Xiao, Q.; Li, Z.; Geng, X.; Lin, K.; Huang, T.; Li, X.; et al. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on endophytic bacteria of lettuce. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 126, 102036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Betancur-Agudelo, M.; Meyer, E.; Lovato, P.E. Increased copper concentrations in soil affect indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and physiology of grapevine plantlets. Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Li, X.; Zhou, M.; Shi, F.; Meng, B.; Liu, J.; Mi, Y.; Dong, C.; Su, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on mercury accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): From enriches isotope tracing perspective. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 255, 114776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Pan, J.; Cao, S.; Xu, G.; Rehman, M.; Li, X.; Luo, D.; Wang, C.; Fang, W.; Xiao, H.; Liao, C.; et al. Comprehensive analysis reveals the underlying mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in kenaf cadmium stress alleviation. Chemosphere 2023, 314, 137566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Chen, Z.; Hu, B.; Hu, S.; Vogel-Mikus, K.; Pongrac, P.; Vymazal, J. Immobilization of chromium enhanced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in semi-aquatic habitats with biochar addition. J. Hazard. Mat. 2022, 439, 129562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Shafiei, F.; Shahidi-Noghabi, S.; Sedaghati, E. The impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on tomato plant resistance against Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in greenhouse conditions. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2022, 25, 101971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Li, Z.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yi, Q.; Hall, M.; Saha, N.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Huang, L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate plant mineral nutrient uptake and partitioning in iron ore tailings undergoing eco-engingeered pedogenesis. Pedosphere 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Falcao, E.L.; Muniz, B.C.; Filh, C.J.A.B.; Kapoor, R.; da Silva, F.S.B. Soil microbial respiration and pH modulated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence the biosynthesis of health-promoting compounds in Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell.) Brenan. Rhizosphere 2023, 26, 100685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Qin, Z.; Peng, Y.; Yang, G.; Feng, G.; Christie, P.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Gai, J. Relationship between phosphorus uptake via indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and crop response: A 32P-labeling study. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 180, 104624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Zhao, W.; Chen, Z.; Yang, X.; Sheng, L.; Mao, H.; Zhu, S. Metagenomics reveal arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi altering functional gene expression of rhizosphere microbial community to enhance Iris tectorum’s resistance to Cr stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 164970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Tan, Q.; Guo, Q.; Wei, R.; Zhu, G.; Du, C.; Hu, H. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on bioaccumulation and bioavailability of As and Cd: A meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Zhu, Q.; Xu, P.; Lei, L.; Jing, Y. Transcriptome analysis reveals decreased accumulation and toxicity of Cd in upland rice inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 177, 104501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Liu, S.; Lu, X.; Yang, G.; He, C.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L.; et al. Variation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in the rhizosphere soil of Eucalyptus plantations based on different stand ages and its effect on phosphorus fractionation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 189, 104908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Lv, Y.; Liu, J.; Fan, Z.; Fang, M.; Xu, Z.; Ban, Y. The function and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in ecological floating beds used for remediation of Pb contaminated wastewater. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 872, 162233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Wang, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Mao, Z.; Yin, C. Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance resistance of apple rootstock M9T337 to apple replant disease. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 116, 101717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Qiu, Y.-J.; Zhang, N.-L.; Zhang, L.-L.; Zhang, X.-L.; Wu, A.-P.; Huang, J.-Y.; Yu, S.-Q.; Wang, Y.-H. Mediation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and biochemical parameters of Ligustrum vicaryi in response to salinity. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 112, 101522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Zhou, J.; Zhang, L.; Feng, G.; George, T.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have a greater role than root hairs of maize for priming the rhizosphere microbial community and enhancing rhizosphere organic P mineralization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 171, 108713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Liu, X.-Q.; Cheng, S.; Aroca, R.; Zou, Y.-N.; Wu, Q.-S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce flavonoid synthesis for mitigating oxidative damage of trifoliate orange under water stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 204, 105089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Oliveira, E.P.D.; Soares, P.P.D.S.; Santos, G.L.; Coutrim, R.L.; Assis, F.G.D.V.D.; Miguesl, D.L.; Leal, P.L. Single inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promotes superior or similar effects on cowpea growth compared to co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Naseer, M.; Zhu, Y.; Li, F.-M.; Yang, Y.-M.; Wang, S.; Xiong, Y.-C. Nano-enabled improvements of growth and colonization rate in wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 295, 118724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Cheng, X.-F.; Xie, M.-M.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.-Y.; Liu, C.-Y.; Wu, Q.-S.; Kuca, K. Effects of field inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic fungi on fruit quality and soil properties of Newhall navel orange. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 170, 104308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Alves de Assis, R.M.; Carneiro, J.J.; Medeiros, A.P.R.; Carvalho, A.A.D.; Honorato, A.D.C.; Carneiro, M.A.C.; Bertolucci, S.K.V.; Pinto, J.E.B.P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic manure enhance growth and accumulation of citral, total phenols, and flavonoids in Melissa officinalis L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 112981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Baczek, K.B.; Wisniewska, M.; Przybyl, J.L.; Kosakowska, O.; Weglarz, Z. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) organic cultivation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Chen, K.; Kleijn, D.; Scheper, J.; Fijen, T.P.M. Additive and synergistic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, insect pollination and nutrient availability in a perennial fruit crop. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 325, 107742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Ndiate, N.I.; Qun, C.L.; Nkoh, J.N. Importance of soil amendments with biochar and/or Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi to mitigate aluminum toxicity in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) on an acidic soil: A greenhouse study. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Poveda, J.; Baptista, P. Filamentous fungi as biocontrol agents in olive (Olea europaea L.) diseases: Mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi. Crop Prot. 2021, 146, 105672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Elhindi, K.M.; El-Din, A.S.; Elgorban, A.M. The impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating salt-induced adverse effects in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Yan, Z.; Ma, T.; Guo, S.; Liu, R.; Li, M. Leaf anatomy, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of lettuce as influenced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under high temperature stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 280, 109933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Hassena, A.B.; Zouari, M.; Trabelsi, L.; Decou, R.; Amar, F.B.; Chaari, A.; Sousa, N.; Labrousse, P.; Khabou, W.; Zouari, N. Potential effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating the salinity of treated wastewater in young olive plants (Olea europaea L. cv. Chetoui). Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 245, 106635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Mohandas, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi benefit mango (Mangifera indica L.) plant growth in the field. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 143, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Rouphael, Y.; Lucini, L.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Colla, G.; Bonini, P.; Cardarelli, M. Metabolomic responses of maize shoots and roots elicited by combinatorial seed treatments with microbial and non-microbial biostimulants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Hashem, A.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Al-Arjani, A.-B.F.; Aldehaish, H.A.; Egamberdieva, D.; Allah, E.F.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1102–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Shekoofeh, E.; Sepideh, H.; Roya, R. Role of mycorrhizal fungi and salicylic acid in salinity tolerance of Ocimum basilicum resistance to salinity. J. Biotech. 2012, 11, 2223–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Qun, H.Z.; Zing, H.C.; Bin, Z.Z.; Rong, Z.Z.; Song, W.H. Changes of antioxidative enzymes and cell membrane osmosis in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizae under NaCL stress. Coll. Surf. B Bioint. 2007, 59, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Iqbal, N.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A. Nitrogen availability regulates proline and ethylene production and alleviates salinity stress in mustard (Brassica juncea). J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 178, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Mo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Zheng, J.; Liu, C.; Li, H.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, C.; Zhang, X. Regulation of plant growth, photosynthesis, antioxidation and osmosis by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in watermelon seedlings under well-watered and drought conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Parre, E.; Ghars, M.A.; Leprince, A.S.; Thiery, L.; Lefebvre, D.; Bordenave, M.; Richard, L.; Mazars, C.; Abdelly, C.; Savoure, A. Calcium signaling via phospholipase C is essential for proline accumulation upon ionic but not nonionic hyperosmotic stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Estrada, B.; Aroca, R.; Maathuis, F.J.M.; Barea, J.M.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi native from a Mediterranean saline area enhance maize tolerance to salinity through improved ion homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1771–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Nephali, L.; Moodley, V.; Piater, L.; Steenkamp, P.; Buthelezi, N.; Dubery, I.; Burgess, K.; Huyser, J.; Tugizimana, F. A metabolomic landscape of mize plants treated with a microbial biostimulant under well-watered and drought conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 676632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Qiu, Q.; Bender, S.F.; Mgelwa, A.S.; Hu, Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate soil nitrogen and phsophorus losses: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Hu, B.; Hu, S.; Vymazal, J.; Chen, Z. Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for pharmaceuticals and personal care productions removal in constructed wetlands with different substrate. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 339, 130760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Lermen, C.; Cruz, R.M.S.D.; Pinc, M.M.; Zardeto, G.; Lorencete, M.D.S.; Schwengber, R.P.; Dias-Arieira, C.R.; Alberton, O. Essential oil of bushy lippia inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under different levels of humic substances and phosphorus. Rhizosphere 2023, 25, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Mei, L.; Zhang, P.; Cui, G.; Yang, X.; Zhang, T.; Guo, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote litter decomposition and alleviate nutrient limitations of soil microbes under warming and nitrogen application. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 171, 104318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Huang, D.; Ma, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Jing, G.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced drought resistance in apple by regulating genes in the MAPK pathway. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 149, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Dobbie, S.; Zhang, X.; Deng, A.; Qian, H.; Zhang, W. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on crop growth and soil N2O emissions in the legume system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 322, 107641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Karagiannidis, N.; Thomidis, T.; Lazari, D.; Panou-Filotheou, E.; Karagiannidou, C. Effect of three Greek arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in improving the growth, nutrient concentration, and production of essential oils of oregano and mint plants. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Klinsukon, C.; Ekprasert, J.; Boonlue, S. Using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Gigaspora margarita) as a growth promoter and biocontrol of leaf blight disease in eucalyptus seedlings caused by Cylindrocladium quinqueseptatum. Rhizosphere 2021, 20, 100450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Lam, C.-M.; Lai, H.-Y. Effect of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and blanching on the bioaccessibility of heavy metals in water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Arriagada, C.A.; Herrera, M.A.; Ocampo, J.A. Beneficial effect of saprobe and arbuscular mycorhizal fungi on growth of Eucalyptus globulus co-cultured with Glycine max in soil contaminated with heavy metals. J. Environ. Manag. 2007, 84, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Gheisari Zardak, S.; Dehnavi, M.M.; Salehi, A.; Ghlamhoseini, M. Effects of using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to alleviate drought stress on the physiological traits and essential oil yield of fennel. Rhizosphere 2018, 6, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Goicoechea, N.; Baslam, M.; Erice, G.; Irigoyen, J.J. Increased photosynthetic acclimation in alfalfa associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and cultivated in greenhouse under elevated CO2. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1774–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Xu, P.; Liang, L.-Z.; Dong, X.-Y.; Xu, J.; Jiang, P.-K.; Shen, R.-F. Response of soil phosphorus required for maximum growth of Asparagus officinalis L. to inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pedosphere 2014, 24, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Zhang, X.; Han, C.; Gao, H.; Cao, Y. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) reveals the molecular mechanism for growth with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 141, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tang, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter carbohydrate distribution and amino acid accumulation in Medicago truncatula uncer lead stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 171, 103950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Gyuricza, V.; Declerck, S.; Boulois, H.D.D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decrease radiocesium accumulation in Medicago truncatula. J. Environ. Radioact. 2010, 101, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Li, X.; Kang, X.; Zou, J.; Yin, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, A.; Ma, X. Allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote Salix viminalis L.—Mediated phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons characterized by increasing the release of organic acids and enzymes in soils. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 249, 114461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Mohammed, A.E.; Alotaibi, M.O.; Elobeid, M. Interactive influence of elevated CO2 and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on sucrose and coumarin metabolism in Ammi majus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 185, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Darakeh, S.A.S.S.; Weisany, W.; Tahir, N.A.-R.; Schenk, P.M. Physiological and biochemical responses of black cumin to vermicompost and plant biostimulants: Arbuscular mycorrhizal and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 188, 115557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Wang, L.; Jia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, C.-Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Cao, K.; Zhang, N. Effects of elevated CO2 on arbusular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Robinia pseudoacacia L. grown in cadmium-contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Aggangan, N.S.; Cortes, A.D.; Reaño, C.E. Growth response of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) plant as affected by bamboo biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sterilized and unsterilized soil. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 101347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Outamamat, E.; Dounas, H.; Aziz, F.; Barguaz, A.; Duponnois, R.; Ouahmane, L. The first use of morphologically isolated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi single-species from Moroccan ecosystems to improve growth, nutrients uptake and photosynthesis in Ceratonia siliqua seedlings under nursery conditions. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2121–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Zhang, T.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Tian, C.; Guo, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve plant growth of Ricinus communis by altering photosynthetic properties and increasing pigments under drought and salt stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 117, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Pellegrino, E.; Bedini, S. Corrigendum to ”Enhancing ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture: Biofertilization and biofortification of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi“. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 314–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Kaba, J.S.; Abunyewa, A.A.; Kugbe, J.; Kwashie, G.K.S.; Ansah, E.O.; Andoh, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and potassium fertilizer as plant biostimulants and alternative research for enhancing plants adaptation to drought stress: Opportunities for enhancing drought tolerance in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Sustain. Environ. 2021, 7, 1963927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Ganugi, P.; Pathan, S.I.; Zhang, L.; Arfaioli, P.; Benedettelli, S.; Masoni, A.; Pietramellara, G.; Lucini, L. The pivotal role of cultivar affinity to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in determining mycorrhizal responsiveness to water deficit. Phytochemistry 2022, 203, 113381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Metwally, R.A.; Abdelhameed, R.E. Synergistic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and physiology salt-stressed Trigonella foenum-graecum plants. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Caruso, T.; Mafrica, R.; Bruno, M.; Vescio, R.; Sorgona, A. Root architectural traits of rooted cuttings of two fig cultivars: Treatments with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi formulation. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 283, 110083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Shen, W.; Feng, Z.; Song, H.; Jin, D.; Fu, Y.; Cheng, F. Effects of solid waste-based soil conditioner and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on crop productivity and heavy metal distribution in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 313, 114974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Liu, N.; Shao, C.; Sun, H.; Liu, Z.; Guan, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biofertilizer improves American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) growth under the continuous cropping regime. Geoderma 2020, 363, 114155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D. Bioremediation of adverse impact of cadmium toxicity on Cassia italica Mill by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Fokom, R.; Adamou, S.; Essono, D.; Ngwasiri, D.P.; Eke, P.; Mofor, C.T.; Tchoumbougnang, F.; Fekam, B.F.; Zollo, P.H.A.; Nwaga, D.; et al. Growth, essential oil content, chemical composition and antioxidant properties of lemongrass as affected by harvest period and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in field conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 138, 111477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Cozzolino, V.; Meo, V.D.; Piccolo, A. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi applications on maize production and soil phosphorus availability. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 129, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Birhane, E.; Bongers, F.; Damtew, A.; Tesfay, A.; Norgrove, L.; Kuyper, T.W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve nutrient status of Commiphora myrrha seedlings under drought. J. Arid Environ. 2023, 209, 104877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. El-Nashar, Y.I.; Hassan, B.A.; Aboelsaadat, E.M. Response of Nemesia (Nemesia × hybridus) plants to different irrigation water sources and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 243, 106416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Ostadi, A.; Javanmard, A.; Amani Machiani, M.; Sadeghpour, A.; Maggi, F.; Nouraein, M.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Hano, C.; Lorenzo, J.M. Co-application of TiO2 nanoparticles and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves essential oil quality and quality of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) in drought stress conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Saleh, A.M.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Hassan, A.R.; Habeeb, T.H.; Yehia, R.S.; El-gawad, H. Global metabolic changes induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in oregano plants grown under ambient and elevated levels of atmospheric CO2. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Chen, D.; Saeed, M.; Ali, M.N.H.A.; Raheel, M.; Ashraf, W.; Hassan, Z.; Hassan, M.Z.; Farooq, U.; Hakim, M.F.; Rao, M.J.; et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi combined application reveals enhanced soil fertility and rice production. Agronomy 2023, 13, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Wen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Meng, J. Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stimulate rice root growth strategy and soil nutrient availability. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2022, 113, 103448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Bao, X.; Wang, Y.; Olsson, P.A. Arbuscular mycorrhiza under water-carbon-phosphorus exchange between rice and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under different flooding regimes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 129, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Liu, M.; Che, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, L.; Xiao, Y. Rice straw bioachr and phosphorus inputs have more positive effects on the yield and nutrient uptake of Lolium multiflorum than arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in acidic Cd-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2019, 235, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Lahbouki, S.; Ben-Laouane, R.; Anli, M.; Boutasknit, A.; Ait-Rahou, Y.; Ait-El-Mokhtar, M.; El Gabardi, S.; Douira, A.; Wahbi, S.; Outzourhit, A.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or organic amendment enhance the tolerance of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) under drought stress. J. Arid Environ. 2022, 199, 104703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Minggui, G.; Ming, T.; Qiaoming, Z.; Xinxin, F. Effects of climatic and edaphic factors on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of Hippophae rhamnoides in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecol. Sinica. 2012, 32, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Abdelhalim, T.S.; Tia, N.A.J.; Elkhatim, K.A.; Othman, M.H.; Joergensen, R.G.; Almaiman, S.A.; Hassan, A.B. Exploring the potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for improving health-promoting phytochemicals in sorghum. Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Dantas, L.V.D.A.; Silva, E.N.; Silva, D.K.A.D.; Beckmann-Cavalcante, M.Z.; Yano-Melo, A.M. Impact of long-term application of paclobutrazol in communities of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and their efficiency in the development of Helianthus annuus L. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 191, 105029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Langeroodi, A.R.S.; Mancinelli, R.; Radicetti, E. Contribution of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to sustainable cultivation of sunflower under semi-arid environment. Field Crops Res. 2021, 273, 108292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Paskovic, I.; Soldo, B.; Ban, S.G.; Radic, T.; Lukic, M.; Urlic, B.; Mimica, M.; Bubola, K.B.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; et al. Fruit quality and volatile compound composition of processing tomato as affected by fertilisation practices and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi application. Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Duan, J.; Tian, H.; Drijber, R.A.; Gao, Y. Systemic and local regulation of phosphate and nitrogen transporter genes by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Jerbi, M.; Labidi, S.; Bahri, B.A.; Laruelle, F.; Tisserant, B.; Jeddi, F.B.; Sahraoui, A.L.-H. Soil properties and climate affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil microbial communities in Mediterranean rainfed cereal cropping systems. Pedobiologia 2021, 87–88, 150748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Colla, G. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating the adverse effects of acidity and aluminium toxicity in zucchini squash. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 188, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Qin, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, Q.; Niu, Y.; Ren, A.; Gao, Y. Effects of simultaneous infections of endophytic fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of their shared host grass Achnatherum sibiricum under varying N and P supply. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Gao, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ding, X.; Zhang, C.; Feng, X. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae) and elevated air temperature on Cd migration in the rhizosphere soil of alfalfa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 248, 114342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Borj, M.A.; Etesami, H.; Alikhani, H.A. Silicon improves the effect of phosphate solubilizing bacterium and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on phosphorus concentration of salinity-stressed alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Gao, T.; Liu, X.; Shan, L.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Dopamine and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act synergistically to promote apple growth under salt stress. Environ. Experim. Bot. 2020, 178, 104159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Tyerman, S.D.; Cavagnaro, T.R. The dual benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soil zinc deficiency and toxicity: Linking plant physiology and gene expression. Plant Soil. 2017, 420, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Wiesel, L.; Dubchak, S.; Turnau, K.; Broadley, M.R.; White, P.J. Caesium inhibits the colonization of Medicago truncatula by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 141, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Wu, F.; Wu, S.; Cao, Z.; Lin, X.; Wong, M.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence the accumulation and partitioning of Cd and P in bashfulgrass (Mimosa pudica L.) grown on a moderately Cd-contaminated soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 73, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Yadav, V.K.; Jha, R.K.; Kaushik, P.; Altalayan, H.; Balawi, T.A.; Alam, P. Traversing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens for carrot production under salinity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 4217–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Sarr, P.S.; Sugiyama, A.; Begoude, A.D.B.; Yazaki, K.; Araki, S.; Nawata, E. Diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) croplands in Cameroon as revealed by Illumina MiSeq. Rhizosphere 2019, 10, 100147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Straker, C.J.; Hilditch, A.J.; Rey, M.E.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Sehoane, E.; Mogni, V.; Pagani, A.; Gil-Cardeza, M.L. Taxonomical and functional analysis of four arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi populations obtained from a Ricinus communis rhizospheric Cr(VI) polluted soil. Environ. Adv. 2023, 11, 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Gil-Cardeza, M.L.; Muller, D.R.; Amaya-Martin, S.M.; Viassolo, R.; Gomez, E. Differential responses to high soil chromium of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities isolated from Cr-polluted and non-polluted rhizospheres of Ricinus communis. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Zhao, Z.; Chen, L.; Xiao, Y. The combined use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, biochar and nitrogen fertilizer is most beneficial to cultivate Cichorium intybus L. in Cd-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 217, 112154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Boonlue, S.; Surapat, W.; Pukahuta, C.; Suwanarit, P.; Suwanarit, A.; Morinaga, T. Diversity and efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils from organic chili (Capsicum frutescens) farms. Mycoscience 2012, 53, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Xiao, X.; Chen, J.; Liao, X.; Yan, Q.; Liang, G.; Liu, J.; Wang, D.; Guan, R. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi established by two inoculation methods improve growth and droughts resistance of Cinnamomum Migao seedlings differently. Biology 2022, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Merlin, E.; Melato, E.; Lourenco, E.L.B.; Jacomassi, E.; Gasparotto Junior, A.; Sete da Cruz, R.M.; Otenio, J.K.; Da Silva, C.; Alberton, O. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus addition increase coarse mint (Plectranthus amboinicus Lour.) plant growth and essential oil content. Rhizosphere 2020, 15, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Razakatiana, A.T.E.; Trap, J.; Baohanta, R.H.; Raherimandimby, M.; Le Roux, C.; Duponnois, R.; Ramanankierana, H.; Becquer, T. Benefits of dual inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia on Phaseolus vulgaris planted in a low-fertility tropical soil. Pedobiologia 2020, 83, 150685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Azizi, S.; Kouchaksaraei, M.T.; Hadian, J.; Nosrat Abad, A.R.; Sanavi, S.A.M.M.; Ammer, C.; Bader, M.K.-F. Dual inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boost drought resistance and essential oil yield of common myrtle. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Kavadia, A.; Omirou, M.; Fasoula, D.A.; Louka, F.; Ehaliotis, C.; Ioannides, I.M. Co-inoculations with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alters mycorrhizal composition and lead to synergistic growth effects in cowpea that are fungal combination-dependent. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 167, 104013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Ogunkunle, C.O.; El-Imam, A.M.A.; Bassey, E.; Vishwakarma, V.; Fatoba, P.O. Co-application of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nano-TiO2 reduced Cd uptake and oxidative stress in pre-flowering cowpea plants. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Chen, S.; Jin, W.; Liu, A.; Zhang, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, F.; Lin, X.; He, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase growth and secondary metabolism in cucumber subjected to low temperatures stress. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 160, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Li, Y.; Chen, Y.-L.; Li, M.; Lin, X.-G.; Liu, R.-J. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities on soil quality and the growth of cucumber seedlings in a greenhouse soil of continuously planting cucumber. Pedosphere 2012, 22, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Hu, J.-L.; Lin, X.-G.; Wang, J.-H.; Shen, W.-S.; Wu, S.; Peng, S.-P.; Mao, T.-T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation enhances suppression of cucumber Fusarium wilt in greenhouse soils. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Hilali, R.E.; Symanczik, S.; Kinany, S.E.; Oehl, F.; Ouahmane, L.; Bouamri, R. Cultivation, identification, and application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with date palm plants in Draa-Tafilalet oasis. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Jaiti, F.; Meddich, A.; El-Hadrami, I. Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the protection of date palm (Phoenic dactylifera L.) against bayound disease. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 71, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Kinany, S.E.; Achbani, E.; Faggroud, M.; Ouahmane, L.; El-Hilali, R.; Haggoud, A.; Bouamri, R. Effect of organic fertilizer and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of micropropagated date plam cv. Feggouss. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2019, 18, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Kuang, Y.; Cui, H.; Fu, L.; Sun, W. Metabolic changes of active components of important medicinal plants on the basis of traditional Chinese medicine under different environmental stress. Curr. Org. Chem. 2023, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Di Miceli, G.; Vultaggio, L.; Sabatino, L.; De Pasquale, C.; La Bella, S.; Consentino, B.B. Synergistic effect of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on eggplant grown in open fields: A two-year study. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Sharma, M.; Saini, I.; Kaushik, P.; Aldawsari, M.M.; Balawi, T.; Alam, P. Mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens application reduces root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) infestation in eggplant. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3685–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Alipour, A.; Rahimi, M.M.; Hosseini, S.M.A.; Bahrani, A. Mycorrhizal fungi and growth-promoting bacteria improves fennel essential oil yield under water stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Nogales, A.; Rottier, E.; Campos, C.; Victorino, G.; Costa, J.M.; Coito, J.L.; Pereira, H.S.; Viegas, W.; Lopes, C. The effects of field inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through rye donor plants on grapevine performance and soil properties. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 313, 107369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Sun, S.; Fan, X.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, H.; Song, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence the uptake of cadmium in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Chemosphere 2023, 330, 138728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Gaveliene, V.; Socik, B.; Jankovska-Bortkevic, E.; Jurkoniene, S. Plant microbial biostimulants as a promising tool to enhance the productivity and quality of carrot root crops. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Souza, B.C.D.; Cruz, R.M.S.D.; Lourenco, E.L.B.; Pinc, M.M.; Dalmagro, M.; Silva, C.D.; Nunes, M.G.L.F.; Souza, S.G.H.D.; Alberton, O. Inoculation of lemongrass with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria alters plants growth and essential oil production. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Silva, A.M.M.; Jones, D.L.; Chadwick, D.R.; Qi, X.; Cotta, S.R.; Araujo, V.L.V.P.; Matteoli, F.P.; Lacerda-Junior, G.V.; Pereira, A.P.A.; Fernandes-Junior, P.I.; et al. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate 33P uptake in maize plants under water stress? Microbiol. Res. 2023, 271, 127350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Yang, Y.-M.; Naseer, M.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, S.-G.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.-Z.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Wang, W.; Tao, H.-Y.; et al. Dual effects of nZVI on maize growth and water use are positively mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi via rhizosphere interactions. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 308, 119661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Celebi, S.Z.; Demir, S.; Celebi, R.; Durak, E.D.; Yilmaz, I.H. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) applications on the silage maize (Zea mays L.) yield in different irrigation regimes. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2010, 46, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Sun, C.; Guo, Q.; Zeeshan, M.; Milham, P.; Qin, S.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Lai, H.; Huang, J. Dual RNA and 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing reveal arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated mitigation of selenate stress in Zea mays L. and reshaping of soil microbiota. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 247, 114217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Olowe, O.M.; Olawuyi, O.J.; Sobowale, A.A.; Odebode, A.C. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as biocontrol agents against Fusarium verticillioides causing ear rot of Zea mays L. (Maize). Curr. Plant Biol. 2018, 15, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Liu, L.-Z.; Gong, Z.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Li, P.-J. Growth, cadmium accumulation and physiology of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) as affected by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Asrar, A.A.; Abdel-Fattah, G.M.; Elhindi, K.M. Improving growth, flower yield, and water relations of snapdragon (Antirhinum majus L.) plants grown under well-watered and water-stress conditions using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Photosynthetica 2021, 50, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Alizadeh, S.; Gharagoz, S.F.; Pourakbar, L.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Jamalomidi, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate salinity stress and alter phenolic compounds of Moldavian balm. Rhizosphere 2021, 19, 100417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Lu, N.; Zhou, X.; Cui, M.; Yu, M.; Zhou, J.; Qin, Y.; Li, Y. Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promotes the growth of Morus alba L. seedlings under greenhouse conditions. Forests 2015, 6, 734–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Aganchich, B.; Wahbi, S.; Yaakoubi, A.; El-Aououad, H.; Bota, J. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on growth and physiology performance of olive trees under regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 148, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Tekaya, M.; Dabbaghi, O.; Guesmi, A.; Attia, F.; Chehab, H.; Khezami, L.; Algathami, F.K.; Hamadi, N.B.; Hammadi, M.; Prinsen, E.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizas modulate carbohydrate, phenolic compounds and hormonal metabolism to enhance water deficit tolerance of olive trees (Olea europaea). Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 274, 107947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Khabou, W.; Hajji, B.; Zouari, M.; Rigane, H.; Abdallah, F.B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve growth and mineral uptake of olive tree under gypsum substrate. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Metwally, R.A.; Soliman, S.A.; Latef, A.A.H.A.; Abdelhameed, R.E. The individual and interactive role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma viride on growth, protein content, amino acids fractionation, and phosphatases enzyme activities of onion plants amended with fish waste. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 214, 112072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Pankaj, U.; Kurmi, A.; Lothe, N.B.; Verma, R.K. Influence of the seedlings emergence and initial growth of palmarosa (Cymbopogon martinii (Roxb.) Wats. var. Motia Burk) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil salinity conditions. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 24, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Hernandez-Montiel, L.G.; Rueda-Puente, E.O.; Cordoba-Matson, M.V.; Holguin-Pena, J.R.; Zulueta-Rodriguez, R. Mutualistic interaction of rhizobacteria with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and its antagonistic effect on Fusarium oxysporum in Carica papaya seedlings. Crop Prot. 2013, 47, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Xu, F.-J.; Zhang, A.-Y.; Yu, Y.-Y.; Sun, K.; Tang, M.-J.; Zhang, W.; Xie, X.-G.; Dai, C.C. Soil legacy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita: The potassium-sequestering glomalin improves peanut (Arachis hypogaea) drought resistance and pod yield. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 249, 126774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Sensoy, S.; Demir, S.; Turkmen, O.; Erdinc, C.; Savur, O.B. Responses of some different pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes to inoculation with two different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 113, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Sharif, M.; Claassen, N. Action mechanisms of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phosphorus uptake by Capsicum annuum L. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Singh, N.V.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, A.K.; Meshram, D.T.; Suroshe, S.S.; Mishra, D.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) induced hardening of micropropagated pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) plantlets. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 136, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Rahimi, S.; Baninasab, B.; Talebi, M.; Gholami, M.; Zarei, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improves iron deficiency in quince via alterations in host root phenolic compounds and expression of genes. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 285, 110165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Medina, C.; Mutis, A.; Bardehle, L.; Hormazabal, E.; Borie, F.; Aguilera, P.; Ortega, F.; Quiroz, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance monoterpene production in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.): A potential tool for pest control. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 981–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  357. Wang, P.; Shu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.J.; Liu, J.F.; Xia, R.X. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in red tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco) rootstock rhizospheric soils from hillside citrus orchards. Pedobiologia 2013, 56, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, S.; Cao, R. Rhizosphere interactions between earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase nutrient availability and plant growth in the desertification soils. Soil Tillag. Res. 2019, 186, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Li, H.; Chen, X.W.; Wong, M.H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduced the ratios of inorganic/organic arsenic in rice grains. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Li, H.; Luo, N.; Zhang, L.J.; Zhao, H.M.; Li, Y.W.; Cai, Q.Y.; Wong, M.H.; Mo, C.H. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect cadmium uptake kinetics, subcellular distribution and chemical forms in rice? Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Baki, M.Z.I.; Suzuki, K.; Takahashi, K.; Chowdhury, S.A.; Asiloglu, R.; Harada, N. Molecular genetic characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with upland rice in Bangladesh. Rhizosphere 2021, 18, 100357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Silva, H.F.O.D.; Tavares, O.C.H.; Silva, L.D.S.D.; Zonta, E.; Silva, E.M.R.D.; Saggin Junior, O.J.; Nobre, C.P.; Berbara, R.L.L.; Garcia, A.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and humic substances increased the salinity tolerance of rice plants. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 44, 102472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Beyene, B.B.; Tuji, F.A. Inoculation of rose (Rosa rubigniosa L., eglantine or the briar rose) flower root stocks with consortia of endophytic bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves its establishment and success rate under greenhouse conditions. Rhizoshphere 2023, 26, 100698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Han, Y.; Zveushe, O.K.; Dong, F.; Ling, Q.; Chen, Y.; Sajid, S.; Zhou, L.; Dios, V.R.D. Unraveling the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on cadmium uptake and detoxification mechanisms in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  365. Liu, C.; Dai, Z.; Cui, M.; Lu, W.; Sun, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate boron toxicity in Puccinellia tenuiflora under the combined stresses of salt and drought. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Caser, M.; Demasi, S.; Victorino, I.M.M.; Donno, D.; Faccio, A.; Lumini, E.; Bianciotto, V.; Scariot, V. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulate the crop performance and metabolic profile in saffron in soilless cultivation. Agronomy 2019, 9, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Wang, S.; Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Gong, W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter the response of growth and nutrient uptake of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to O3. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Hadian-Deljou, M.; Esna-Ashari, M.; Mirzaie-asl, A. Alleviation of salt stress and expression of stress-responsive gene through the symbiosis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with sour orange seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 268, 109373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Sun, X.-G.; Tang, M. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on root traits and root volatile organic compound emissions of Sorghum bicolor. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 88, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Nakmee, P.S.; Techapinyawat, S.; Ngamprasit, S. Comparative potentials of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve nutrient uptake and biomass of Sorghum bicolor Linn. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2016, 50, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Chandra, P.; Singh, A.; Prajapat, K.; Rai, A.K.; Yadav, R.K. Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve growth, biomass yield, and phosphorus nutrition of sorghum in saline and sodic soils of the semi-arid region. Environ. Experim. Bot. 2022, 201, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Crossay, T.; Cavaloc, Y.; Majorel, C.; Redecker, D.; Medevielle, V.; Amir, H. Combinations of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve fitness and metal tolerance of sorghum in ultramafic soil. Rhizosphere 2020, 14, 100204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Thiub, M.; Ewusi-Mensah, N.; Sarkodie-Addo, J.; Adjei-Gyapong, T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances phosphorus use efficiency and soybean productivity on a Haplic Acrisol. Soil Till. Res. 2019, 192, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Barazetti, A.R.; Simionato, A.S.; Navarro, M.O.P.; Santos, I.M.O.D.; Modolon, F.; Andreata, M.F.D.L.; Liuti, G.; Cely, M.V.T.; Chryssafidis, A.L.; Dealis, M.L.; et al. Formulations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum applied to soybean and corn plant under controlled and field conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 142, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Chiomento, J.L.T.; Nardi, F.S.D.; Filippi, D.; Trentin, T.D.S.; Dornelles, A.G.; Fornari, M.; Nienow, A.A.; Calvete, E.O. Morpho-horticultural performance of strawberry cultivated on substrate with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 282, 110053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Moradtalab, N.; Hajoboland, R.; Aliasgharzad, N.; Hartmann, T.E.; Neumann, G. Silicon and the association with an arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus clarus) mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on strawberry. Agronomy 2019, 9, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Wei, Z.; Sixi, Z.; Xiuqing, Y.; Guodong, X.; Baichun, W.; Baojing, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter rhizosphere bacterial community characteristics to improve Cr tolerance of Acorus calamus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 253, 114652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Xiao, L.; Lai, S.; Chen, M.; Long, X.; Fun, X.; Yang, H. Effects of grass cultivation on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community in a tangerine orchard. Rhizosphere 2022, 24, 100583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Hua, J.; Lin, X.; Yin, R.; Jiang, Q.; Shao, Y. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on arsenic accumulation by tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1214–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Ziane, H.; Hamza, N.; Meddad-Hamza, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and fertilization rates optimize tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growth and yield in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2021, 20, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Arpanahi, A.A.; Feizian, M.; Mehdipourian, G.; Khojasteh, D.N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improve essential oil and physiological parameters and nutritional values of Thymus daenensis Celak and Thymus vulgaris L. under normal and drought stress conditions. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2020, 100, 103217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Li, J.-F.; He, X.-H.; Li, H.; Zheng, W.-J.; Liu, J.-F.; Wang, M.-Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase growth and phenolics synthesis in Poncirus trifoliata under iron deficiency. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 183, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Amanifar, S.; Toghranegar, Z. The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal for improving tolerance of Valeriana officinalis L. and enhancing valerenic acid accumulation under salinity stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 147, 112234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Li, J.; Awasthi, M.K.; Xing, W.; Liu, R.; Bao, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase the bioavailability and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) uptake of selenium in soil. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 150, 112383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  385. Li, J.; Liu, R.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Lyu, L.; Shi, Z.; Man, Y.B.; Wu, F. Selenium uptake and accumulation in winter wheat as affected by level of phosphate application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Hazard. Mat. 2022, 433, 128762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  386. Ma, X.; Luo, W.; Li, J.; Wu, F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase both concentrations and bioavailability of Zn in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain on Zn-spiked soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 135, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Tchabi, A.; Coyne, D.; Hountondji, F.; Lawouin, L.; Wiemken, A.; Oehl, F. Efficacy of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for promoting white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) growth in West Africa. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W. The important nutritional benefits and wonderful health benefits of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). Nat. Prod. J. 2023, 13, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Eke, P.; Adamou, S.; Fokom, R.; Nya, V.D.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Wakam, L.N.; Nwaga, D.; Boyom, F.F. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter antifungal potential of lemongrass essential oil against Fusarium solani, causing root rot in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Heliyon 2020, 6, e05737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Baum, C.; El-Tohamy, W.; Gruda, N. Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 187, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Siddiky, M.R.; Schaller, J.; Caruso, T.; Rillig, M.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and collembola non-additively increase soil aggregation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 47, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  392. Kara, Z.; Arslan, D.; Guller, M.; Guler, S. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and application of micronized calcite to olive plant: Effects on some biochemical constituents of olive fruit and oil. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 185, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Yu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Su, L.; Yan, K.; Li, B.; He, Y.; Zhan, F. Effect of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on maize growth and cadmium migration in a sand column. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  394. Saleh, A.M.; El-Soud, W.M.A.; Alotaibi, M.O.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Mohammed, A.E.; AbdElgawad, H. Chitosan nanoparticles support the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi on growth and sugar metabolism of wheat crop. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 235, 123806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  395. Leventis, G.; Tsiknia, M.; Feka, M.; Ladikou, E.V.; Papadakis, I.E.; Chatzipavlidis, I.; Papadopoulou, K.; Ehaliotis, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance growth of tomato under normal and drought conditions, via different water regulation mechanisms. Rhizosphere 2021, 19, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Tekaya, M.; Dahmen, S.; Mansour, M.B.; Ferhout, H.; Chehab, H.; Hammami, M.; Attia, F.; Mechri, B. Foliar application of fertilizers and biostimulant has a strong impact on the olive (Olea europaea) rhizosphere microbial community profile and the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Rhizosphere 2021, 19, 100402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  397. Sarkar, A.; Asaeda, T.; Wang, Q.; Kaneko, Y.; Rashid, M.H. Response of Miscanthus saccharidlorus to zinc stress mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Flora 2017, 234, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  398. You, Y.; Wang, L.; Ju, C.; Wang, G.; Ma, F.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and toxic element uptake of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud under zinc/cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  399. Ruscitti, M.; Arango, M.; Beltrano, J. Improvement of copper stress tolerance in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) by inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2017, 29, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  400. Jiang, Q.Y.; Zhuo, F.; Long, S.H.; Zhao, H.D.; Yang, D.J.; Ye, Z.H.; Li, S.S.; Jing, Y.X. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce Cd uptake and alleviate Cd toxicity of Lonicera japonica grown in Cd-added soils? Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Dagher, D.J.; Pitre, F.E.; Hijri, M. Ectomycorrhizal fungi inoculation of sphaerosporella brunnea significantly increased stem biomass of Salix miyabeana and decreased lead, tin, and zinc, soil concentrations during the phytoremediation of an industrial landfill. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  402. Alam, M.Z.; Hoque, M.A.; Ahammed, G.J.; Carpenter-Boggs, L. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, biochar, selenium, silica gel, and sulfur on arsenic uptake and biomass growth in Pisum sativum L. Emerg. Contam. 2020, 6, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  403. Baghaie, A.H.; Aghili, F.; Jafarinia, R. Soil-indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and zeolite addition to soil synergistically increase grain yield and reduce cadmium uptake of bread wheat (through improved nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and immobilization of Cd in roots). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 30794–30807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  404. Sbrana, C.; Avio, L.; Giovannetti, M. Beneficial mycorrhizal symbionts affecting the production of health-promoting phytochemicals. Electrophoresis 2014, 35, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  405. Nguyen, T.D.; Cavagnaro, T.R.; Watts-Williams, D.J. The effects of soil phosphorus and zinc availability on plant responses to mycorrhizal fungi: A physiological and molecular assessment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  406. Watts-Williams, S.J.; Cavagnaro, T.R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain zinc concentration and modify the expression of root ZIP transporter genes in a modern barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Chen, S.; Zhao, H.; Zou, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhao, P.; Wang, M.; et al. Combined inoculation with multiple arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves growth, nutrient uptake and photosynthesis in cucumber seedlings. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  408. Abdel-Fttah, G.M.; El-Haddad, S.A.; Hafez, E.E.; Rashad, Y.M. Induction of defense responses in common bean plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 166, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  409. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Wu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Teng, H.; Wei, D.; Yuan, Z.; Yuan, Z. Physiological and proteomic analyses reveal the important role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on enhancing photosynthesis in wheat under cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 261, 115105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  410. Tofighi, C.; Khavari-Nejad, R.A.; Najafi, F.; Razavi, K.; Rejali, F. Brassinosteroid (BR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi alleviate salinity in wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  411. Sallaku, G.; Sanden, H.; Babaj, I.; Kaciu, S.; Balliu, A.; Rewad, B. Specific nutrient absorption rates of transplanted cucumber seedlings are highly related to RGR and influenced by grafting method, AMF inoculation and salinity. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 243, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  412. Pandey, R.; Garg, N. High effectiveness of Rhizophagus irregularis is linked to superior modulation of antioxidant defence mechanisms in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. genotypes grown under salinity stress. Mycorrhiza 2017, 27, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  413. Yu, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, C.; Peng, Y.; Yu, X.; Gu, H.; Zheng, X.; Wang, C.; Xiao, F.; Shu, L.; et al. Co-symbiosis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and diazotrophs promote biological nitrogen fixation in mangrove ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 108382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  414. Selvaraj, A.; Thangavel, K.; Uthandi, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus intraradices) and diazotrophic bacterium (Rhizobium BMBS) primed defense in blackgram against herbivorous insect (Spodoptera litura) infestation. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 231, 126355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  415. Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1743–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  416. Habibzadeh, Y.; Pirzad, A.; Zardashti, M.R.; Jalilian, J.; Eini, O. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on seed and protein yield under water deficit stress in mungbean. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  417. Barzana, G.; Aroca, R.; Bienert, G.P.; Chaumont, F.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. New insights into the regulation of aquporins by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in maize plants under drought stress and possible implications for plant performance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  418. Jumrani, K.; Bhatia, V.S.; Kataria, S.; Alamri, S.A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Rastogi, A. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate the adverse effects of high temperature in soybean. Plants 2022, 11, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  419. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; Liu, W.; Ye, X.F.; Zai, H.F.; Zhao, L.J. Alleviation of salt stress in citrus seedlings inoculated with mycorrhiza: Changes in leaf antioxidant defense systems. Plant Soil Environ. 2010, 56, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  420. Farghaly, F.A.; Nafady, N.A.; Abdel-Wahab, D.A. The efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhiza in increasing tolerance of Triticum aestivum L. to alkaline stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  421. Mayo, K.; Davis, R.E.; Motta, J. Stimulation of germination spores of Glomus versiforme by spore-associated bacteria. Mycologia 1986, 78, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  422. Xavier, L. Response of lentil under controlled conditions to co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia varying in efficacy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  423. Cruz, A.F.; Horii, S.; Ochiai, S.; Yasuda, A.; Ishii, T. Isolation and analysis of bacteria associated with spores of Gigaspora margarita. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  424. Hasani, H.; Aminpanah, H. Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculation on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different levels of phosphorus fertilizer. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 48, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
  425. Lally, R.D.; Galbally, P.; Moreira, A.S.; Spink, J.; Ryan, D.; Germaine, K.J.; Dowling, D.N. Application of endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescens and a bacterial consortium to Brassica napus can increase plant height and biomass under greenhouse and field conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  426. Santana-Fernandez, A.; Beovides-Garcia, Y.; Simo-Gonzalez, J.E.; Perez-Penaranda, M.C.; Lopez-Torres, J.; Rayas-Cabrera, A.; Santos-Pino, A.; Basail-Perez, M. Effect of a Pseudomonas fluorescens-based biofertilizer on sweet potato yield components. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2021, 9, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  427. Rungin, S.; Indananda, C.; Suttiviriya, P.; Kruasuwan, W.; Jaemsaeng, R.; Thamchaipenet, A. Plant growth enhancing effects by a siderophore-producing endophytic streptomycete isolated from a Thai jasmine rice plant (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 102, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  428. Verma, V.C.; Singh, S.K.; Prakash, S. Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachat indica. A. Juss. J. Basic Microbiol. 2011, 51, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  429. Mehnaz, S.; Mirza, M.S.; Haurat, J.; Bally, R.; Normand, P.; Bano, A.; Malik, K.A. Isolation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis of the beneficial bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice. Can. J. Microbiol. 2001, 472, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  430. Arkhipova, T.N.; Veselov, S.U.; Melentiev, A.I.; Martynenko, E.V.; Kudoyarova, G.R. Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant Soil 2005, 272, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  431. Barazani, O.; Friedman, J. Is IAA the major root growth factor secreted from plant-growth-mediating bacteria? J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  432. Hussain, A.; Hasnain, S. Cytokinin production by some bacteria: Its impacts on cell division in cucumber cotyledons. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 3, 704–712. [Google Scholar]
  433. Fulchieri, M.; Lucangeli, C.; Bottini, R. Inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum affects growth and gibberellin status of corn seedling roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 1993, 34, 1305–1309. [Google Scholar]
  434. Bacilio, M.; Rodriguez, H.; Moreno, M.; Hernandez, J.P.; Bashan, Y. Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by a gfp-tagged Azospirillum liopferum. Biol. Fert. Soils 2004, 40, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  435. Marulanda, A.; Barea, J.-M.; Azcon, R. Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: Mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  436. Bae, H.; Sicher, R.C.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, S.-H.; Strem, M.D.; Melnick, R.L.; Bailey, B.A. The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3279–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  437. Singh, L.P.; Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Unraveling the role of fungal symbionts in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  438. Dal Cortivo, C.; Ferrari, M.; Visioli, G.; Lauro, M.; Fornasier, F.; Barion, G.; Panozzo, A.; Vamerali, T. Effects of seed-applied biofertilizers on rhizosphere biodiversity and growth common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the field. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  439. Das, K.; Prasanna, R.; Saxena, A.K. Rhizobia: A potential biocontrol agent for soilborne fungal pathogens. Folia Microbiol. 2017, 62, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  440. Mondal, M.; Skalicky, M.; Garai, S.; Hossain, A.; Sarkar, S.; Banerjee, H.; Kundu, R.; Brestic, M.; Barutcular, C.; Erman, M. Supplementing nitrogen in combination with rhizobium inoculation and soil mulch in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production system: Part II. Effect on phenology, growth, yield attributes, pod quality, profitability and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  441. Igiehon, N.O.; Babalola, O.O.; Aremua, B.R. Genomic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobia capable of enhancing soybean germination under drought stress. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Jain, D.; Sharma, J.; Kaur, G.; Bhojiya, A.A.; Chauhan, S.; Sharma, V.; Suman, A.; Mohanty, S.R.; Maharjan, E. Phenetic and molecular diversity of nitrogen fixation plant growth promoting Azotobacter isolated from semiarid regions of India. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6686283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Fahsi, N.; Mahdi, I.; Mesfioui, A.; Biskri, L.; Allaoui, A. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from the jujube (Ziziphus lotus) plant enhance wheat growth, Zn uptake, and heavy metal tolerance. Agriculture 2021, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  444. Anli, M.; Baslam, M.; Tahiri, A.; Raklami, A.; Symanczik, S.; Boutasknit, A.; Ait-El-Mokhtar, M.; Ben-Laouane, R.; Toubali, S.; Ait Rahou, Y.; et al. Biofertilizers as strategies to improve photosynthetic apparatus, growth, and drought stress tolerance in date palm. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 516818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  445. Ghadbane, M.; Medjekal, S.; Benderradji, L.; Belhadj, H.; Daoud, H. Assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi status and rhizobium on date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivated in a Pb contaminated soil. In Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions, 2nd ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  446. Karthikeyan, B.; Abitha, B.; Henry, A.J.; Sa, T.; Joe, M.M. Interaction of rhizobacteria with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and their role in stress abetment in agriculture. In Fungal Biology; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 117–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  447. Vafadar, F.; Amooaghaie, R.; Otroshy, M. Effect of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on plant growth, stevioside, NPK, and chlorophyll content of Stevia rebaudiana. J. Plant. Interact. 2013, 9, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  448. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Shah, M.A. Induction of osmoregulation and modulation of salt stress in Acacia gerrardii Benth. by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus subtilis (BERA 71). Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6294098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  449. Zamljen, T.; Medic, A.; Veberic, R.; Hudina, M.; Grohar, M.C.; Slatnar, A. Influence of hydrolyzed animal protein-based biostimulant on primary, soluble and volatile secondary metabolism of Genovese and Greek-type basil grown under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 319, 112178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  450. Anton-Herrero, R.; Garcia-Delgado, C.; Anton-Herrero, G.; Mayans, B.; Delgado-Moreno, L.; Eymar, E. Design of a hydroponic test to evaluate the biostimulant potential of new organic and organomineral products. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  451. Distefano, M.; Steingass, C.B.; Leonardi, C.; Giuffrida, F.; Schweiggert, R.; Mauro, R.P. Effects of a plant-derived biostimulant application on quality and functional traits of greenhouse cherry tomato cultivars. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  452. Ahammed, G.J.; Shamsy, R.; Liu, A.; Chen, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-induced tolerance to chromium stress in plants. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 327, 121597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Bagu, H.M.M.K.; Hassan, E.A.; Nafady, N.A.; Dawood, M.F.A. Efficacy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic strain Epicoccum nigrum ASU11 as biocontrol agents against blackleg disease of potato caused by bacterial strain Pectobacterium carotovora subsp. Biol. Control. 2019, 134, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  454. Juila, D.; Ghosh, S. Aspects, problems and utilization of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) application as bio-fertilizer in sustainable agriculture. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  455. Larimer, A.L.; Clay, K.; Bever, J.D. Synergism and context dependency of interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia with a prairie legume. Ecology 2014, 95, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  456. Liao, X.; Zhao, J.; Xu, L.; Tang, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, J.; Xiao, D.; Hu, P.; Nie, Y.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase the interspecific competition between two forage plant species and stabilize the soil microbial network during a drought event: Evidence from the field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 185, 104805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  457. Lin, Y.; Jones, M.L. Evaluating the growth-promoting effects of microbial biostimulants on greenhouse floriculture crops. HortScience 2022, 57, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  458. Lu, X.; Koide, R.T. The effects of mycorrhizal infection on components of plant growth and reproduction. N. Phytol. 1994, 128, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  459. Pan, J.; Huang, C.-H.; Peng, F.; Wang, T.; Liao, J.; Ma, S.-X.; You, Q.-G.; Xue, X. Synergistic combination of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria modulates morpho-physiological characteristics and soil structure in Nitraria tangutorum bobr. under saline soil conditions. Res. Cold Arid Reg. 2022, 14, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  460. Sanjuan, J.; Napoles, M.C.; Perez-Mendoza, D.; Lorite, M.J.; Rodriguez-Navarro, D.N. Microbials for agriculture: Why do they call them biostimulants when they mean probiotics? Microorganisms 2023, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  461. Ven, A.; Verlinden, M.S.; Verbruggen, E.; Vicca, S. Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 2215–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  462. Xavier, L.J.C.; Germida, J.J. Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  463. Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuca, K. Unravelling the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating the oxidative burst of plants under drought stress. Plant Biol. 2021, 23 (Suppl. S1), 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Different classifications of plant biostimulants.
Figure 1. Different classifications of plant biostimulants.
Plants 12 03101 g001
Figure 2. The influences of mycorrhizal association on root and plant ecosystem.
Figure 2. The influences of mycorrhizal association on root and plant ecosystem.
Plants 12 03101 g002
Table 1. The most important effects of AMF on plants.
Table 1. The most important effects of AMF on plants.
TypePlantPlant FamilyEffectsReference
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation may increase photosynthetic rates and the content of sugars in leaves. [263]
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.)AsparagaceaeAMF improved P efficiency via increased P uptake and optimal growth by adding AMF to suitable P fertilization. [264]
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.)AsparagaceaeAMF inoculation can enhance adaptation to salinity stress. [265]
Barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation may alleviate Pb toxicity by improving the transport of sucrose from shoot to root, increasing the cleaving sucrose in roots, and increasing minor amino acid accumulation. [266]
Barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.)FabaceaeAMF in combination with K can play an important role in reducing radiocesium uptake and its subsequent translocation to plant shoots. [267]
Basket willow (Salix viminalis L.)SalicaceaeWillow AMF promoted the dissipation of soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
Willow AMF increased the content of organic acids beneficial to metabolizing PAHs.
[268]
Bishop’s flower (Ammi majus)ApiaceaeIts application can induce the accumulation of phyto-molecules, coumarin, which might increase its medicinal and pharmacological applications. [269]
Black cumin (Nigella sativa Linn.)RanunculaceaeColonization can increase relative water content (RWC), Chl b content, and micronutrient uptake. [270]
Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.)Fabaceae AMF associated with black locusts may be useful to be used for improving the phytoremediation of Cd under elevated CO2 (ECO2).[271]
Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.)MalvaceaeIt can improve the overall growth and can positively increase the yield of cacao plants in acidic soils.[272]
Carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.)FabaceaeThe used AMF inocula stimulated significantly the height of carob tree as well as the aerial dry weight.[273]
Castor bean (Ricinus communis L.)EuphorbiaceaeAMF could protect castor bean against drought and salt stress by improving leaf exchanges and photosynthetic capacity and altering concentrations of metabolites. [274]
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation increased the final yield of chickpea. [275]
Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.)MalvaceaeAMF application improved the physical (cell wall turgor, root growth) and biochemical (proline, polyamines, enzymatic) characteristics of cocoa seedlings to reduce water stress. [276]
Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum (Desf.))Gramineae AMF can decrease water deficiency in cultivars, resulting in the up- and downregulation of many amino acids, phenylpropanoids, lipids, alkaloids, and hormones. [277]
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation was effective in improving the tolerance of fenugreek to salinity. [278]
Fig (Ficus carica L.)MoraceaeFig was positively responsiveness to mycorrhizal inoculation, and the AMF induced different root architecture models. [279]
Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) PoaceaeAMF application can decrease heavy metal phytoavailability and post-harvest transfer risks. [280]
Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.)AraliaceaeAMF inoculation can promote plant uptake of N and P by suppressing soil-borne pathogens. [281]
Italian senna (Cassia italica Mill.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation increased the chlorophyll, protein, proline, and phenol content and lipid peroxidation. [282]
Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus)GramineaeAMF inoculation modified lemongrass metabolism with consequences on the essential oil component, composition, and antioxidant properties during growth. [283]
Maize (Zea mays L.)GramineaeInoculation with AMF affects plant P constituent with or without P fertilizers addition.
Inoculation may improve P availability in P-unamended and -amended soil.
[284]
Myrrh (Commiphora myrrha) BurseraceaeMycorrhizal seedlings had higher biomass than non-mycorrhizal seedlings.
Mycorrhizal seedlings had higher nutrient concentrations than non-mycorrhizal seedlings.
[285]
Nemesia (Nemesia × hybridus) ScrophulariaceaeAMF inoculation can improve flower yield and growth quality of nemesia.
AMF can increase the response of the plant to irrigation with treated wastewater and reduce the cost associated with using other water sources.
[286]
Nitre-bush (Nitraria tangutorum Bobr.)ZygophyllaceaeThe combination of AMF and PGPR significantly increased mycorrhizal colonization, promoted biomass accumulation, boosted morphological development, and improved photosynthetic performance, stomatal adjustment ability, and the exchange of water and gas. [287]
Oregano (Origanum vulgare)LamiaceaeThe synchronous application of AMF and atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) promoted the accumulation of the majority of the detected sugars, amino acids, organic acids, phenolic acids, unsaturated fatty acids, and flavonoids.
Both AMF and eCO2 treatments significantly promoted the growth and photosynthesis of oregano plants.
Both AMF and eCO2 acted synergistically in improving the antioxidant capacity and anti-lipid peroxidation activity of oregano.
[288]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)GramineaeAMF could inhibit the uptake of Hg, particularly methyl-Hg in grains of rice.
AMF caused Hg transfer in the non-edible parts of rice, such as leaf and stem.
AMF improved the growth index and micro-indexes of rice.
[289]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)GramineaeThe biochar combined with AMF improved soil nutrient availability and root growth strategy, and then promoted the nutrient absorption capacity of rice. [290]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)GramineaeAMF may have a significant function in wetlands. [291]
Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) GramineaeAMF had a positive influence on the plant shoot biomass and the contents of P, N, Ca, K, and Mg in plants. [292]
Prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica)CactaceaeAMF promoted physiological and biochemical factors, and led to a decline in malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).[293]
Seaberry (Hippophae rhamnoides)ElaeagnaceaeAMF had a positive influence on the final yield. [294]
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)GramineaeThe total phenolic, carotenoid, flavonoid, and tannin concentrations were significantly higher in AMF–sorghum grain for all cultivars.
The total phenolic, carotenoid, flavonoid, and tannin concentrations were significantly higher in AMF–sorghum grain for all cultivars.
[295]
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)AsteraceaeAMF community has greater efficiency in promoting sunflower development and mycorrhizal colonization. [296]
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)AsteraceaeThe combination of AMF and biochar increased antioxidant enzyme activity, nutrient content, osmoprotectants, and relative water content. [297]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)SolanaceaeAMF application has a significant influence on manganese, total nitrogen, and hydrophilic phenol components in the fruit. [298]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)GeramineaeAMF mitigated earthworm-induced N2O emissions from upland soil in a rice-rotated wheat farming system. [299,300]
Zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)CucurbitaceaeInoculation may lead to better nutritional status of P, N, K, Mg, Ca, Zn, B, and Fe and low Al accumulation. [301]
Glomus mosseae, Glomus etunicatumAchnatherum (Achnatherum sibricium L.)GramineaeSimultaneous infections of both fungi significantly increased total phenolic concentrations. [302]
Glomus mosseaeAlfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)FabaceaeIt significantly enhanced Cd uptake by the roots of alfalfa under ET.
It has no significant effect on iron-regulated transport 1 (IRT1) and natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 (NRAMP1) gene expression.
[303]
Claroideoglomus etunicatumAlfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)FabaceaeThe AMF alone or in combination with Si can alleviate salinity stress in alfalfa. [304]
Funneliformis mosseaeApple (Malus domestica Borkh.)RosaceaeThe synergistic effect of dopamine and AMF improved apple salt resistance, and overexpression of MdTYDC promoted AMF symbiosis. [305]
Rhizophagus irregularisBarley (Hordeum vulgare L.)GramineaeThe inoculation resulted in improved grain and straw Zn concentrations, especially at low soil Zn concentrations.
AMF may be more appropriate for improving the quality of barley grain in terms of Zn concentrations, rather than improving yield.
[306]
Rhizophagus intraradicesBarrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.)FabaceaeMycorrhizal colonization had little effect on root or shoot cesium (Cs) concentrations. [307]
Glomus caledonium, Glomus versiformeBashfulgrass (Mimosa pudica L.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation significantly increased root mycorrhizal colonization rates and soil acid phosphate activities. [308]
Glomus mosseae, Gigaspora giganteaCarrot (Daucus carota L.)ApiaceaeAMF inoculation can lead to successful carrot production under salinity stress. [309]
Glomus sinuosum, Paraglomus occultumCassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)EuphorbiaceaeIt can improve the final yield of cassava.[310]
Gloms rubiforme, Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus etunicatum, Glomus rubiforme, Acaulospora tuberculataCassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)EuphorbiaceaeThe inoculation had positive effects on cassava. [311]
Rhizophagus irregularis, Paraglomus sp.Castor bean (Ricinus communis L.)EuphorbiaceaeShoot Cr concentration doubled in non-AMF versus AMF plants; the content was similar.
AMF vesicle percentage negatively correlated with Cr root concentration.
[312,313]
Glomus tortuosumChicory (Cichorium intybus L.)AsteraceaeAMF, biochar, and N fertilizer application enhanced biomass.[314]
Glomus tortuosumChicory (Cichorium intybus L.)AsteraceaeAMF and biochar application increased nutrient absorption and reduced Cd absorption. [314]
Glomus clarumChili (Capsicum frutescens)SolanaceaeThe inoculation increased the growth, flowering, and fruit production, and also increased the P uptake significantly. [315]
Glomus etunicatum, Funneliformis mosseaeCinnamomum (Cinnamomum migao)LauraceaeIt markedly upregulated antioxidant enzyme activities and osmotic adjustment substances. [316]
Rhizophagus clarusCoarse Mint (Mentha arvensis)Lamiaceae Inoculation of coarse mint with AMF Rhizophagus clarus and a high dose of P boosted plant growth and the essential oil yield, and it increased carvacrol content.[317]
Acaulospora sp., Glomus sp. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)FabaceaeThe positive impact of co-infection by AMF and rhizobia on plant growth and the total N content of the plants was reported, along with a synergistic influence on the total P content, the number of nodules, and the mycorrhizal rate of the plants. [318]
Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularisCommon myrtle (Myrtus communis) MyrtaceaeAMF boosted myrtle drought resistance through enhanced water and nutrient supply and stimulation of antioxidant defense. [319]
Dominikia disticha, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Rhizophagus irregularisCowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)FabaceaeInoculation with all AMF led to high aboveground biomass production and accumulation of N as well as increased P content in plants. [320]
Glomus Spp.Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)FabaceaeThe activity of AMF in alleviating Cd stress in pre-flowering cowpea has been proven. [321]
Funneliformis mosseaeCucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)CucurbitaceaeThe enhanced secondary metabolism and integrated transcriptional regulation might play a crucial role in AMF-mediated alleviation of chilling stress in plants. [322]
Glomus etunicatum, Glomus mosseae, Glomus versiforme, Glomus margaritaCucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)CucurbitaceaeAMF communities increased plant growth, soluble sugar content, chlorophyll content, and root activity. [323]
Glomus spp., Acaulospora spp. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)CucurbitaceaeThe AMF consortium could inhibit Fusarium wilt of cucumber, and, consequently, showed promising results as a biological control factor in greenhouse agro-ecosystems. [324]
Pervetustus simplex, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Albahypha drummondii, Septoglomus xanthium, Funneliformis mosseae, and Rhizoglomus irregulareDate palm
(Phoenix dactylifera L.)
ArecaceaeShoot length and stem diameter were significantly higher in treatments augmented with compost and AMF.[325]
Glomus monosporus, Glomus deserticola, Glomus clarumDate palm
(Phoenix dactylifera L.)
ArecaceaeAll fungi significantly stimulated shoot height and biomass and increased the number of leaves per plant. [326]
Glomus iranicumDate palm
(Phoenix dactylifera L.)
ArecaceaeIt showed increased biomass production, chlorophyll, and mineral nutrient content. [327]
Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Rhizoglomus irregulare, Diversispora versiformisEggplant
(Solanum melongena L.)
SolanaceaeThe inoculation is an effective strategy for alleviating cold stress.[328]
Rhizoglomus irregulareEggplant
(Solanum melongena L.)
SolanaceaeAMF improved fruit quality by reducing glycoalkaloid concentration and fruit browning potential. [329]
Gigaspora gigantean, Glomus mosseaeEggplant
(Solanum melongena L.)
SolanaceaeTwo mycorrhiza fungi affected plant growth indirectly, and in some situations, they reduced the inputs of chemical pesticides in eggplant.[330]
Glomus mosseaeFennel (Foeniculum vulgare)ApiaceaeThe mycorrhiza and growth-promoting bacteria (Azospirillum) resulted in the highest yields, total carotenoids, and chlorophyll in fennel plants subjected to water deficit stress. [331]
Funneliformis mosseaeGrapevines (Vitis vinifera)VitaceaeThe introduction of F. mosseae through donor plants is a suitable field inoculation method for grapevines and can help them to better withstand heat waves. [332]
Rhizophagus irregularisHemp (Cannabis sativa L.)CannabaceaeAMF increased the heavy metal tolerance of hemp, and they changed Cd chemical forms by changing the composition of low molecular weight organic acids, which in turn affected soil Cd bioavailability. [333]
Rhizophagus intraradicesHoly Basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.)LamiaceaeThe inoculation increased the productivity of holy basil and boosted the quality of the final products.[334]
Rhizophagus clarus, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Azospirillum brasilenseLemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf) GraminaeaeIt is concluded that inoculating lemongrass with AMF enhances plant growth and development and modifies the content and essential oil composition. [335]
Rhizophagus clarusMaize (Zea mays L.)GraminaeaeA combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. [336]
Funneliformis mosseaeMaize (Zea mays L.)GraminaeaeAMF massively improved biomass.[337]
Glomus intraradicesMaize (Zea mays L.)GraminaeaeAfter inoculation, there was an increase in leaf and stem ratios but a decrease in ear ratios. [338]
Funneliformis mosseae, Claroideoglomus etunicatumMaize (Zea mays L.)GraminaeaeThe inoculation increased bacterial diversity, decreased the relative abundances of selenobacteria related to plant Se absorption, and improved bacterial network complexity in selenium (Se)(VI)-stressed soils. [339]
Glomus clarum, Glomus deserticolaMaize (Zea mays L.)Graminaeae30 g of G. clarum and G. deserticola had biocontrol potential against Fusarium verticillioides. [340]
Glomus intraradices, Glomus constrictum, Glomus mosseaeMarigold (Tagetes erecta L.)AsteraceaeIt can improve the capability of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging and reduce Cd concentration in plants to alleviate Cd stress in marigolds. [341]
Glomus constrictum Trappe Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)AsteraceaeAMF affected the host plant positively in growth, pigments, phosphorous content, and flower quality, and thus alleviated the stress imposed by water deficiency. [342]
Funneliformis mosseae, Claroideoglomus etunicatumMoldavian balm (Moldavian dragonhead) (Dracocephalum moldavica L.)LamiaceaeInoculation may increase growth parameters and salinity tolerance under all salinity levels. [343]
Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradicesMulberry (Morus alba L.)MoraceaeAMF species colonization increased P and N contents of seedlings. [344]
Glomus deserticola, Gigaspora margaritaOlive
(Olea europaea L.)
OleaceaeMycorrhizal symbiosis decreased Na+ and Cl content and improved RWC, dry and fresh weight, and photosynthetic activity.[345]
Rhizophagus irregularisOlive
(Olea europaea L.)
OleaceaeThe inoculation exhibited better performance under drought, especially under partial root-zone drying (PRD) treatment.[345]
Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM 197,198Olive
(Olea europaea L.)
OleaceaeIts colonization with olive roots significantly reduced the deleterious effect of water deficit stress by upregulating the primary and secondary metabolism and preserving a high stem water potential level in olive plants.[346]
Glomus intraradicesOlive
(Olea europaea L.)
OleaceaeThe mycorrhizal inoculation played an important part in the attenuation of the impacts of sulfates contained in gypsum substrate on olive trees.[347]
Funneliformis mosseae, Funneliformis constrictum, Gigaspora margarita, and Rhizophagus irregularisOnion
(Allium cepa L.)
AmryllidaceaeApplication of AMF and Trichoderma viride to onion plants assisted their growth in nutrient-deficient soils amended with fish waste.[348]
Rhizophagus intraradicesPalmarosa (Cymbopogon maritinii (Roxb.) Wats. Var. Motia BurkGramineaeIt may influence palmarosa seedling emergence and growth under salinity conditions, and it is useful for health and significant seedling emergence.[349]
Glomus intraradices, Glomus mosseae, Glomus etunicatumPapaya (Carica papaya L.)CaricaceaeRhizobacteria and AMF acting together formed a mutualistic relationship that enhanced disease control against Fusarium oxysporum and stimulated growth in papaya. [350]
Gigaspora margaritaPeanut (Arachis hypogaea)AnacardiaceaeThe inoculation significantly enhanced leaf K accumulation, drought resistance, and pod yield under drought stress. [351]
Glomus intraradices, Gigaspora margaritaPepper (Capsicum annuum L.)SolanaceaeInoculated plants had greater dry weight compared to non-inoculated plants.
The inoculation can increase P absorbance and P uptake.
[352,353]
Glomus mosseae, Acaulospora laevis, Glomus manihotis, and a mixed AMF strainPomegranate (Punica granatum L.)PunicaceaeGrowth, physiological, and biochemical activities were effectively improved by bio-hardening.[354]
Funneliformis mossae, Rhizophagus intraradicesQuince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.)RosaceaeInoculation with AMF led to significant enhancements in shoot and root dry weight and leaf chlorophyll content.[355]
Genera Scutellospora, Acaulospora, and GlomusRed clover (Trifolium pratense L.)FabaceaeAfter inoculation, significant increases in monoterpenes such as myrcene, (-)-β-pinene, and linalool were observed.
[356]
Glomus aggregatum, Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus intraradicesRed tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco)RutaceaeAMF had a positive effect on red tangerine. [357]
Claroideoglomus etunicatumRedtip (Photinia fraseri Dress)RosaceaeAMF had an impact on plant height and hyphal length density. [358]
Rhizophagus intraradicesRice (Oryza sativa L.)GramineaeIt significantly reduced total As and inorganic As components in rice grains. [359,360]
Acaulospora mellea; Glomus formosanum; Rhizoglomus clarum; Glomus spp. Rice (Oryza sativa L.)GramineaeIt stimulated plant growth, improved root morphological characteristics, and increased P accumulation in rice plants under salt stress conditions. [361,362]
Glomus sp1Rose (Rosa rubiginosa L.)RosaceaeThe highest percentage of rose root stock establishment increment was achieved with the application of Glomus sp1.[363]
Glomus etunicatum, Glomus mosseaeRyegrass (Lolium perenne) GramineaeAMF-inoculated plants showed lower Cd toxicity, despite the increase in Cd uptake. [364]
Funneliformis mosseae, Claroideoglomus etunicatumSalt grass (Puccinellia tenuiflora)GramineaeIt is able to alleviate boron (B) toxicity by improving biomass and reducing tissue B concentrations.
It can help plants tolerate the combined stresses of salt and drought.
[365]
Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseaeSaffron (Crocus sativus L.)IridaceaeThe mixture of both species increased the spice yield, quality, antioxidant activity, and bioactive compound contents. [366]
Glomus mosseaeSnap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)FabaceaeAMF increased the concentrations of P, N, Mg, and Ca in roots and shoots.
It can be concluded that it may reduce the detrimental impacts of increasing O3 on host plants by improving plant nutrition and growth.
[367]
Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradices, Glomus hoiSour orange (Citrus aurantium L.)RutaceaeUnder salt stress, mycorrhizal-inoculated plants had higher chlorophyll content, higher growth, lower electrolyte leakage, better water status, greater gas exchange capacity, higher malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide content, higher osmolyte accumulation, and better antioxidant defense systems. [368]
Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradicesSorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)GramineaeAMF can change the profile of VOCs emitted by roots as well as root morphology.
AMF can positively affect the morphological traits of the host roots, total root length, and specific root length of mycorrhizal plants.
[369]
Glomus sp. 1, Glomus sp. 2, Glomus sp. 3, Glomus aggregatum, Glomus fasciculatum, Acaulospora longula, Glomus occultum, Acaulospora scrobiculata, Acaulospora spinosa, Scutellospora sp. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)GramineaeAMF application improved P and K uptake in shoots.[370]
Funneliformis mosseae; Funneliformis geosporumSorghum GramineaePlant height and fresh and dry biomass of AMF-inoculated plants were greater in normal soil, followed by sodic and saline soils. [371]
Acaulospora saccata, Acaulospora fragilissima, Scutellospora ovalis, Rhizophagus neocaledonicus, Claroideoglomus etunicatum nc, Pervetustus simplex ncSorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)GramineaeInoculum of combined AMF isolates is appropriate to obtain higher yields and less contaminated biomass of forage sorghum in ultramafic environments. [372]
Glomus mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularisSoybean (Glycine max L.)FabaceaeThe inoculation can enhance P uptake and soybean productivity. [373]
Rhizophagus clarusSoybean (Glycine max L.)FabaceaeAMF inoculation positively influenced grain yield, shoot dry weight, and P and N content in leaves. [374]
Cetraspora pellucida, Claroideoglomus etunicatumStrawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
RosaceaePlants grown with 9% biochar and inoculated with C. etunicatum showed a more profuse root system.[375]
Rhizophagus clarusStrawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)
RosaceaeAMF significantly enhanced plant biomass production by boosting photosynthesis rate, antioxidant enzyme defense, water content and use efficiency, and the nutritional status of Zn, in particular. [376]
Rhizophagus intraradicesSweet flag (Acorus calamus)AcoraceaeUnder Cr stress, AMF promoted nutrient uptake by A. calamus and increased soil carbon input.
AMF significantly increased the synergy between the dominant strains.
[377]
Rhizophagus fasciculatus, Rhizophagus aggregatus, Rhizophagus irregularisTangerine orchard (Citrus reticulata L.)RutaceaeInoculation had a positive effect on the final yield.[378]
Glomus versiformeTobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)SolanaceaeAMF can protect tobacco against As uptake, and it can play an important role in food quality and safety. [379]
Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Claroideoglomus claroideum, Glomus microaggregatum, Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae, Funneliformis geosporumTomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)SolanaceaeMycorrhizal inoculation significantly boosted root colonization levels, height, root dry biomass, total yield, shoot dry biomass, and number of fruits. [380]
Funneliformis Mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradicesThyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)LamiaceaeTheir inoculation increased essential oil production in both Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus daenensis under water stress conditions. [381]
Glomus versiformeTrifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) RutaceaeMycorrhization significantly increased gallic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, and phlorizin acid. [382]
Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseaeValerian (Valeriana officinalis L.)CaprifoliaceaeThey considerably improved root proline and total soluble sugars and total phenolics in roots and shoots versus untreated valerian plants.[383]
Funneliformis mosseae, Glomus versiformeWheat (Triticum aestivum L.)GraminaeInoculation with AMF could increase Se bioavailability in the rhizosphere. [384]
Funneliformis mosseae, Glomus versiformeWheat (Triticum aestivum L.)GraminaeAMF combined with 48.76 mgkg−1 P applied in soil can not only achieve high grain yield, but also fully exploit the biological potential of Se uptake in wheat.[385]
Funneliformis mosseae BGC HEB02, Rhizophagus intraradices BGC HEB07DWheat (Triticum aestivum L.)GraminaeZn in wheat grain can be significantly increased by inoculation with AMF, indicating the potential of AMF to cope with Zn deficiency. [386]
Glomus mosseae, Glomus hoi, Glomus etunicatum, Acaulospora scrobiculata, Acaulospora spinosaWhite yam (Dioscorea rotundata)Dioscoreaceae AMF can increase yam tuber growth.[387]
Funneliformis mosseae, Laroideoglomus etunicatum, Rhizophagus intraradicesWillow (Salix viminalis)SalicaceaeOrganic acids including arachidonic acid, octadecanedioic acid, α-linolenic acid, 10,12,14-octadecarachidonic acid, and 5-methoxysalicylic acid were significantly increased under AMF inoculation treatment.
AMF inoculation also increased the levels of polyphenol oxidase and dehydrogenase.
[388]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture. Plants 2023, 12, 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173101

AMA Style

Sun W, Shahrajabian MH. The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture. Plants. 2023; 12(17):3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Wenli, and Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian. 2023. "The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture" Plants 12, no. 17: 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173101

APA Style

Sun, W., & Shahrajabian, M. H. (2023). The Application of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Microbial Biostimulant, Sustainable Approaches in Modern Agriculture. Plants, 12(17), 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop