Next Article in Journal
Epigenetic Control of Plant Response to Heavy Metals
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Profiling and Antioxidant and Anti-Amyloid Capacities of Salvia fruticosa Extracts from Greece
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/plants12183194
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Reactive Oxygen Species in Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure: The Potential Roles of NPR1

by
Xin-Cheng Li
1,*,†,
Claire Chang
1,† and
Zhen-Ming Pei
2
1
East Chapel Hill High School, 500 Weaver Dairy Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
2
Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(18), 3194; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183194
Submission received: 8 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 7 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stomatal closure is a vital, adaptive mechanism that plants utilize to minimize water loss and withstand drought conditions. We will briefly review the pathway triggered by drought that governs stomatal closure, with specific focuses on salicylic acid (SA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS). We propose that the non-expressor of PR Gene 1 (NPR1), a protein that protects plants during pathogen infections, also responds to SA during drought to sustain ROS levels and prevent ROS-induced cell death. We will examine the evidence underpinning this hypothesis and discuss potential strategies for its practical implementation.

1. Introduction

Drought stress is a major abiotic constraint that adversely affects plant growth, development, and crop productivity worldwide. To withstand water scarcity, plants have evolved various physiological and molecular mechanisms to regulate water loss and maintain cellular homeostasis [1]. Among these mechanisms, stomatal closure plays a pivotal role in reducing transpiration water loss through the regulation of gas exchange [2]. Stomata, microscopic pores on leaf surfaces, are controlled by a complex signaling pathway that integrates environmental cues [3] and internal hormonal signals such as salicylic acid (SA) [4]. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the stomatal closure pathway in response to drought stress, focusing on the underlying molecular and physiological processes that involve reactive oxygen species (ROS), antioxidants, and SA.

2. ROS Responses in Plants

One of the unavoidable results of drought stress is increased ROS production in plants [5]. ROS are highly reactive molecules that are formed as byproducts of the metabolism of oxygen. There are many different types of ROS, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide (O2−·), and the hydroxyl radical (HO•). Each type of ROS reacts within cells differently; superoxide usually reacts with other molecules to form secondary oxidants [6], hydroxyl radicals can damage DNA [7], hydrogen peroxide mainly reacts with cysteine residues of proteins [8], and singlet oxygen can react with both proteins [9] and DNA [10].
In plants, ROS can be generated through multiple different pathways. Under physiological conditions in chloroplasts, the splitting of water at Photosystem II (PSII) during the light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis can form superoxide and singlet oxygen [11]. Superoxide is also formed by Complex I and Complex III in the mitochondrial electron transport chain during the formation of ubisemiquinone [12]. From superoxide, hydrogen peroxide can be formed via superoxide dismutase (SOD) [13]. Under stress conditions, ROS can be synthesized by cell wall peroxidases and NADPH oxidase [14].
ROS can function as secondary messenger molecules during signal transduction processes [15]. In such instances, hydrogen peroxide oxidizes target proteins at their cysteine residues, leading to alterations in protein structure and function [16]. One intrinsic limitation of ROS, however, is that, due to their high reactivity, in high concentrations, ROS can cause irreversible cell damage or even cell death. In the presence of biotic and abiotic stressors, ROS increases the permeability of mitochondria, leading to the release of cytochrome C (Cyt C) to the cytosol. The loss of Cyt C subsequently impairs the functionality of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, exacerbating the buildup of ROS. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of ROS accumulation, thereby intensifying the positive feedback loop triggering programmed cell death (PCD) [17]. To prevent ROS-induced cell death, ROS are regulated by antioxidants, which include chemicals such as flavonoids [18] and carotenoids [19], and proteins such as catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) [20]. These antioxidants neutralize ROS by transferring electrons, often eventually converting ROS into water [21].

3. ROS and Hormone Crosstalk in Stomatal Closure

ROS are directly implicated in the process of drought-induced stomatal closure [22]. This intricate process, which occurs within guard cells, is regulated by various plant hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA) and salicylic acid (SA) [3]. When confronted with drought stress, plants generate ABA in their roots [23,24,25], where drought-induced turgor loss is detected, and transmit the ABA signal to leaves through the xylem. ABA is derived from a C40 carotenoid precursor, which is cleaved into the intermediate xanthoxin and then converted into ABA. ABA binds to its receptor PYR/PYL [26] and induces the recruitment and inhibition of PP2Cs [27], a group of phosphatases that dephosphorylate and deactivate the protein kinase OST1 [28]. The inhibition of PP2Cs leaves OST1 phosphorylated, enabling it to phosphorylate Ser120 of SLAC1 anion channels. However, the phosphorylation of Ser120 alone is not sufficient to activate SLAC1 [29]. At this juncture, ROS comes into play. Besides directly phosphorylating SLAC1, OST1 phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RBOHF [30], which subsequently produces superoxide that is converted by superoxide dismutase (SOD) into hydrogen peroxide [31]. Hydrogen peroxide then activates calcium channels on the plasma membrane of guard cells [32] through the oxidation of extracellular cysteine residues on HPCA1 kinase, leading to autophosphorylation and the subsequent activation of the calcium channels, causing calcium influx [33]. The increased calcium induces calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) to phosphorylate Ser59 of SLAC1. Only when both serines, Ser120 and Ser 59, are phosphorylated does SLAC1 initiate anion efflux from the cell [34,35]. The efflux of anions from the guard cell creates a concentration gradient, compelling water to exit the cell to restore equilibrium, thus causing a decrease in cell volume and leading to stomatal closure [36]. While most of these studies were conducted in Arabidopsis thaliana, in rice, hydrogen peroxide production also experiences a dramatic increase upon ABA induction. Following the calcium influx induced by ABA, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (DMI3) phosphorylates Ser191 of RBOHB, leading to superoxide production. The superoxide flux then activates channels permitting Ca2+ to flow into the cytosol. This Ca2+ influx, in turn, further induces OsDMI3-mediated phosphorylation, which further intensifies superoxide production during the ABA response, creating a positive feedback loop [37,38].
ABA is not the sole hormone to induce ROS production during stomata closure. Under drought conditions, jasmonic acid (JA) assumes the form of JA-isoleucine (JA-Ile), which relocates to the nucleus and activates the coronatine insensitive 1 (COI1) protein within the Skp1p–cullin–F-box protein (SCF) E3 ligase complex, as well as a range of transcription factors [39]. Under physiological conditions, these transcription factors are sequestered from DNA by jasmonate-zim-domain (JAZ) proteins. Upon JA-Ile engagement, the JAZ proteins are degraded by SCF-COI1 and the 26S proteasome. This liberates transcription factors and activates an array of genes responsible for the JA response [40]. In Hevea brasiliensis, the presence of JA leads to the upregulation of the transcription of RBOHF, aiding in the generation of ROS [41].
Similarly, SA, another hormone, also contributes to drought-induced stomatal closure through the activation of ROS generating enzymes (Figure 1). Drought stress prompts the heightened expression of isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1), a gene essential for SA biosynthesis [42,43]. The accumulation of SA has been observed to both augment drought tolerance [44,45] and induce stomatal closure [46,47]. Specifically, SA contributes to stomatal closure by fostering ROS accumulation [46]. During stomatal closure, SA induces SHAM-sensitive peroxidases to produce superoxide. The proposed mechanism is that SA reduces Compound I and II of peroxidase, forming SA free radical species that react with oxygen gas to create superoxide and SA+ [48,49]. The resulting superoxide is converted into hydrogen peroxide via SOD [22,46,49]. Simultaneously, SA inhibits the antioxidant catalase, further increasing ROS levels [50,51]. The ROS generated by SA integrates into the ABA-induced stomatal closure pathway, activating calcium channels and instigating calcium influx [36].
While both SA and JA have been demonstrated to induce ROS production in response to various stress conditions, intriguingly, their interplay does not exhibit synergy; rather, it displays antagonism. Particularly under pathogen-induced stress, JA prompts the transcription factor MYC2 to directly bind to the promoters of multiple NAC transcription factors, thereby activating their transcription. These NAC transcription factors subsequently restrain the expression of ICS1, a key enzyme in SA biosynthesis [52]. Some proteins such as UGT76B1 (Table 1) have also been shown to decrease SA response while increasing JA response. Conversely, SA triggers the upregulation of ROXY19/GRX480, which impedes the TGA transcription factors from facilitating the expression of JA response genes [53]. The biological subtlety from this complex crosstalk remains elusive, particularly in the context of drought stress.
While it is recognized that SA competitively inhibits antioxidant catalase-2 (CAT2) as an antagonist [50], numerous other antioxidants, such as GPX, are known to be regulated by SA during stomatal closure with elusive mechanisms. Another unsolved puzzle is how guard cells avoid cell death under high ROS levels induced by SA and ABA. However, potential clues to these questions can be found in the known roles of SA in managing other stress responses.

4. SA Is a Key Modulator in General Stress Response

SA is a phenolic compound naturally present in plants. SA biosynthesis is tightly regulated and can proceed via several different pathways, with the phenylpropanoid and isochorismate pathways being the most prevalent [80]. In the phenylpropanoid pathway, the amino acid phenylalanine is converted into SA by phenylalanine ammonia lyase, while in the isochorismate pathway, isochorismate synthase converts chorismate into isochorismate which then acts as a precursor to SA [81]. SA serves as a key signaling molecule within various physiological and pathological processes and is primarily known for its role in regulating defensive mechanisms in plant abiotic stress response pathways and pathogen immunity [82].
During a pathogen attack, the plant initiates a series of signaling events that lead to an increase in SA levels. A primary consequence of this SA accumulation is the activation of defense-related genes. SA acts as a ligand for NPR1 (Non-expressor of Pathogenesis-Related Genes 1), leading to the activation of downstream defense genes. These genes produce various antimicrobial compounds, including pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins that bind to pathogens and inhibit their growth [83].
In response to pathogen invasion, particularly as effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in plants, apoptosis can be activated in cells neighboring the infection site to isolate the pathogen. However, if left unregulated, ETI-associated apoptosis can spread, leading to excessive levels of programmed cell death (PCD). SA-induced NPR1 can counteract potential spread by conjugating to form salicylic-acid-induced NPR1 condensates (SINCs) within the cytoplasm. This condensate assembles the NPR1-associated proteins with Cullin 3 E3 ligase complex, which marks PCD proteins such as EDS1 and WRKYs for ubiquitination and subsequent protein degradation, thereby promoting cell survival [84]. This mechanism of promoting cell survival is not exclusive to pathogen stress; both SA and NPR1 are required to support cell survival under other stressors, including heat, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. This suggests that SA and NPR1 play pivotal roles in coordinating stress response and cell survival.

5. NPR1 May Coordinate Comprehensive Protection during Drought Stress

The formation of SA-induced NPR1 condensates may also be essential for stomatal closure and cell survival during drought stress. It has, indeed, been noted that NPR1 expression increases in response to drought, and this increase has been implicated in promoting ROS generation and stomatal closure [42,85]. Upon SA increase, NPR1-activated gene expression includes ACS2/6/11, enzymes for ethylene precursor synthesis. Ethylene, in turn, promotes ROS production by activating ATRBOHD, an NADPH oxidase. The disruption of ethylene production through the mutation of ethylene biosynthesis genes inhibits SA-induced stomatal closure, suggesting that ethylene-induced ROS production is necessary for this process [85].
Furthermore, our literature review revealed that, during pathogen stress, NPR1 condensates triggered by SA also incorporate various proteins that potentially contribute to sustaining ROS responses. In the proteomics data published in an article by Dong and colleagues, which studies NPR1’s response against pathogens [84], we identified six proteins directly involved in ROS scavenging, an additional five proteins participating in antioxidant biosynthesis, and seven proteins that assist other antioxidants in ROS scavenging (Table 1). Among these proteins are Glutathione Peroxidase 8 (GPX8), which has been shown to have decreased expression during drought [56], and selenoprotein, the absence of which has been linked to increased drought tolerance [57]. Given these proteins’ unilateral roles in ROS scavenging, their degradation by NPR1 would lead to an accumulation of ROS, thereby inducing stomatal closure and enhancing drought tolerance.
Notablt, during pathogen infection, GSTU19—a member of the GST family—is detected within NPR1-associated complexes, implying potential degradation. GSTU19 is well-known for its role in catalyzing the degradation of ROS, primarily hydrogen peroxide [86]. Such degradation of GSTU19 could result in increased ROS levels. Yet, under drought conditions, studies have observed an upregulation of GSTU19 at both the mRNA and protein levels in Manihot esculenta [87]. This raises two plausible scenarios: (1) NPR1 may not target or degrade GSTU19 during a drought response; or (2) even if NPR1 condensate degrades GSTU19 during drought, the degradation might not be robust enough to offset its amplified expression. Currently, the exact dynamics remain unclear. The regulation of GSTU19 underscores the nuanced control of ROS during drought responses.
Taking this together, we hypothesize that, in stomatal closure, SA induces NPR1 to form condensates with antioxidant proteins and precursors and tag them for degradation via the 26S proteasome. Along with the other functions of SA during stomatal closure, such as the activation of ROS-generating proteins, the inhibition of ROS-degrading proteins may be crucial in maintaining cellular ROS at an elevated level, and therefore sustain the stomatal closure. Meanwhile, SA will also induce NPR1 to form condensates to degrade multiple key cell death proteins, preventing guard cells from programmed death under the constant ROS stress (Figure 2).

6. Perspectives

Research indicates that NPR1 is essential for cell survival during drought stress. Enhancing the expression of NPR1 in plants might be a potential strategy to boost plant resistance to drought. However, the perpetual overexpression of NPR1 has been associated, in some cases, with decreased plant growth and vitality [88]. To circumvent these fitness costs, in a 2017 study Xu et al. utilized upstream open reading frames (uORFs) to suppress the translation of NPR1 under normal conditions. Their findings showed that these genetically modified plants could grow normally while also exhibiting enhanced pathogen resistance due to the stress-induced overexpression of NPR1 [89]. Utilizing the same molecular biology maneuver could be an effective approach to improve drought resistance. Future experiments are needed to determine whether overexpressing NPR1 can prevent plants from death in drought, and whether drought stress is able to overcome uORF inhibition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.-C.L. and C.C.; writing, X.-C.L. and C.C.; discussion, editing and finalization, Z.-M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data discussed in this review are shown in previously published studies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xinnian Dong and Dong Labs at Duke University for their inspiration. We would also like to thank Jinlong Wang and Raul Zavaliev for helping us with understanding the background information behind NPR1 immunity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought Stress Impacts on Plants and Different Approaches to Alleviate Its Adverse Effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hepworth, C.; Doheny-Adams, T.; Hunt, L.; Cameron, D.D.; Gray, J.E. Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. Open or close the gate—Stomata action under the control of phytohormones in drought stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prodhan, M.Y.; Munemasa, S.; Nahar, M.N.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Guard Cell Salicylic Acid Signaling Is Integrated into Abscisic Acid Signaling via the Ca(2+)/CPK-Dependent Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cruz de Carvalho, M.H. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hayyan, M.; Hashim, M.A.; AlNashef, I.M. Superoxide Ion: Generation and Chemical Implications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 3029–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kitchin, K.T.; Ahmad, S. Oxidative stress as a possible mode of action for arsenic carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 137, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cerny, M.; Habanova, H.; Berka, M.; Luklova, M.; Brzobohaty, B. Hydrogen Peroxide: Its Role in Plant Biology and Crosstalk with Signalling Networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jensen, R.L.; Arnbjerg, J.; Ogilby, P.R. Reaction of singlet oxygen with tryptophan in proteins: A pronounced effect of the local environment on the reaction rate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9820–9826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Agnez-Lima, L.F.; Melo, J.T.; Silva, A.E.; Oliveira, A.H.; Timoteo, A.R.; Lima-Bessa, K.M.; Martinez, G.R.; Medeiros, M.H.; Di Mascio, P.; Galhardo, R.S.; et al. DNA damage by singlet oxygen and cellular protective mechanisms. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2012, 751, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asada, K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Drose, S.; Brandt, U. Molecular mechanisms of superoxide production by the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 748, 145–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kliebenstein, D.J.; Monde, R.A.; Last, R.L. Superoxide dismutase in Arabidopsis: An eclectic enzyme family with disparate regulation and protein localization. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tripathy, B.C.; Oelmuller, R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ye, C.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, D.; Lu, J.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhuang, C.; Li, J. Initiation and Execution of Programmed Cell Death and Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fini, A.; Brunetti, C.; Di Ferdinando, M.; Ferrini, F.; Tattini, M. Stress-induced flavonoid biosynthesis and the antioxidant machinery of plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 709–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Young, A.J.; Lowe, G.L. Carotenoids-Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matamoros, M.A.; Dalton, D.A.; Ramos, J.; Clemente, M.R.; Rubio, M.C.; Becana, M. Biochemistry and molecular biology of antioxidants in the rhizobia-legume symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Defense in Plants under Abiotic Stress: Revisiting the Crucial Role of a Universal Defense Regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sierla, M.; Waszczak, C.; Vahisalu, T.; Kangasjarvi, J. Reactive Oxygen Species in the Regulation of Stomatal Movements. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Griffiths, A.; Parry, A.D.; Jones, H.G.; Tomos, A.D. Abscisic acid and turgor pressure regulation in tomato roots. J. Plant Physiol. 1996, 149, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuromori, T.; Seo, M.; Shinozaki, K. ABA Transport and Plant Water Stress Responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wilkinson, S.; Davies, W.J. ABA-based chemical signalling: The co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dittrich, M.; Mueller, H.M.; Bauer, H.; Peirats-Llobet, M.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Geilfus, C.M.; Carpentier, S.C.; Al Rasheid, K.A.S.; Kollist, H.; Merilo, E.; et al. The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.; et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vlad, F.; Rubio, S.; Rodrigues, A.; Sirichandra, C.; Belin, C.; Robert, N.; Leung, J.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Lauriere, C.; Merlot, S. Protein phosphatases 2C regulate the activation of the Snf1-related kinase OST1 by abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3170–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geiger, D.; Scherzer, S.; Mumm, P.; Stange, A.; Marten, I.; Bauer, H.; Ache, P.; Matschi, S.; Liese, A.; Al-Rasheid, K.A.; et al. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21425–21430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sirichandra, C.; Gu, D.; Hu, H.C.; Davanture, M.; Lee, S.; Djaoui, M.; Valot, B.; Zivy, M.; Leung, J.; Merlot, S.; et al. Phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis AtrbohF NADPH oxidase by OST1 protein kinase. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 2982–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, J.P.; Koster, P.; Drerup, M.M.; Scholz, M.; Li, S.; Edel, K.H.; Hashimoto, K.; Kuchitsu, K.; Hippler, M.; Kudla, J. Fine-tuning of RBOHF activity is achieved by differential phosphorylation and Ca2+ binding. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1935–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pei, Z.M.; Murata, Y.; Benning, G.; Thomine, S.; Klusener, B.; Allen, G.J.; Grill, E.; Schroeder, J.I. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature 2000, 406, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, F.; Chi, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Xie, L.; Huang, F.; Wan, D.; Ni, J.; Yuan, F.; Wu, X.; et al. Hydrogen peroxide sensor HPCA1 is an LRR receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Nature 2020, 578, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brandt, B.; Munemasa, S.; Wang, C.; Nguyen, D.; Yong, T.; Yang, P.G.; Poretsky, E.; Belknap, T.F.; Waadt, R.; Aleman, F.; et al. Calcium specificity signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis guard cells. Elife 2015, 4, e03599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brandt, B.; Brodsky, D.E.; Xue, S.; Negi, J.; Iba, K.; Kangasjarvi, J.; Ghassemian, M.; Stephan, A.B.; Hu, H.; Schroeder, J.I. Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10593–10598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saito, S.; Uozumi, N. Guard Cell Membrane Anion Transport Systems and Their Regulatory Components: An Elaborate Mechanism Controlling Stress-Induced Stomatal Closure. Plants 2019, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Q.; Shen, T.; Ni, L.; Chen, C.; Jiang, J.; Cui, Z.; Wang, S.; Xu, F.; Yan, R.; Jiang, M. Phosphorylation of OsRbohB by the protein kinase OsDMI3 promotes H2O2 production to potentiate ABA responses in rice. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 882–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Torres, M.-Á.; Berlanga, D.J. OsDMI3, a Ca2+/calmodulin kinase, integrates and amplifies H2O2 and Ca2+ signaling in ABA-mediated responses. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 968–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kazan, K.; Manners, J.M. MYC2: The master in action. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Mostafa, S.; Zeng, W.; Jin, B. Function and Mechanism of Jasmonic Acid in Plant Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zou, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X. Insights into genes encoding respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs) in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 128, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Park, S.-H.; Lee, B.-R.; La, V.H.; Mamun, M.A.; Bae, D.-W.; Kim, T.-H. Drought Intensity-Responsive Salicylic Acid and Abscisic Acid Crosstalk with the Sugar Signaling and Metabolic Pathway in Brassica napus. Plants 2021, 10, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wildermuth, M.C.; Dewdney, J.; Wu, G.; Ausubel, F.M. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 2001, 414, 562–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Miura, K.; Okamoto, H.; Okuma, E.; Shiba, H.; Kamada, H.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Murata, Y. SIZ1 deficiency causes reduced stomatal aperture and enhanced drought tolerance via controlling salicylic acid-induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 73, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Okuma, E.; Nozawa, R.; Murata, Y.; Miura, K. Accumulation of endogenous salicylic acid confers drought tolerance to Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e28085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khokon, A.R.; Okuma, E.; Hossain, M.A.; Munemasa, S.; Uraji, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Murata, Y. Involvement of extracellular oxidative burst in salicylic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mori, I.C.; Pinontoan, R.; Kawano, T.; Muto, S. Involvement of superoxide generation in salicylic acid-induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kawano, T.; Furuichi, T.; Muto, S. Controlled salicylic acid levels and corresponding signaling mechanisms in plants. Plant Biotechnol. 2004, 21, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kawano, T.; Muto, S. Mechanism of peroxidase actions for salicylic acid-induced generation of active oxygen species and an increase in cytosolic calcium in tobacco cell suspension culture. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 685–693. [Google Scholar]
  50. Durner, J.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic acid is a modulator of tobacco and mammalian catalases. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 28492–28501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Durner, J.; Klessig, D.F. Inhibition of ascorbate peroxidase by salicylic acid and 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid, two inducers of plant defense responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11312–11316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zheng, X.Y.; Spivey, N.W.; Zeng, W.; Liu, P.P.; Fu, Z.Q.; Klessig, D.F.; He, S.Y.; Dong, X. Coronatine promotes Pseudomonas syringae virulence in plants by activating a signaling cascade that inhibits salicylic acid accumulation. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 11, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zander, M.; Chen, S.; Imkampe, J.; Thurow, C.; Gatz, C. Repression of the Arabidopsis thaliana Jasmonic Acid/Ethylene-Induced Defense Pathway by TGA-Interacting Glutaredoxins Depends on Their C-Terminal ALWL Motif. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dong, W.; Wang, M.; Xu, F.; Quan, T.; Peng, K.; Xiao, L.; Xia, G. Wheat Oxophytodienoate Reductase Gene TaOPR1 Confers Salinity Tolerance via Enhancement of Abscisic Acid Signaling and Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marchitti, S.A.; Brocker, C.; Stagos, D.; Vasiliou, V. Non-P450 aldehyde oxidizing enzymes: The aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008, 4, 697–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bela, K.; Horváth, E.; Gallé, Á.; Szabados, L.; Tari, I.; Csiszár, J. Plant glutathione peroxidases: Emerging role of the antioxidant enzymes in plant development and stress responses. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 176, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fichman, Y.; Koncz, Z.; Reznik, N.; Miller, G.; Szabados, L.; Kramer, K.; Nakagami, H.; Fromm, H.; Koncz, C.; Zilberstein, A. SELENOPROTEIN O is a chloroplast protein involved in ROS scavenging and its absence increases dehydration tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Labunskyy, V.M.; Hatfield, D.L.; Gladyshev, V.N. Selenoproteins: Molecular pathways and physiological roles. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 739–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nakane, S.; Wakamatsu, T.; Masui, R.; Kuramitsu, S.; Fukui, K. In vivo, in vitro, and x-ray crystallographic analyses suggest the involvement of an uncharacterized triose-phosphate isomerase (TIM) barrel protein in protection against oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41636–41646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ahsan, M.K.; Lekli, I.; Ray, D.; Yodoi, J.; Das, D.K. Redox regulation of cell survival by the thioredoxin superfamily: An implication of redox gene therapy in the heart. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2741–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Catarino, M.D.; Alves-Silva, J.M.; Pereira, O.R.; Cardoso, S.M. Antioxidant capacities of flavones and benefits in oxidative-stress related diseases. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Falcone Ferreyra, M.L.; Emiliani, J.; Rodriguez, E.J.; Campos-Bermudez, V.A.; Grotewold, E.; Casati, P. The Identification of Maize and Arabidopsis Type I FLAVONE SYNTHASEs Links Flavones with Hormones and Biotic Interactions. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1090–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lepesheva, G.I.; Waterman, M.R. Sterol 14alpha-demethylase cytochrome P450 (CYP51), a P450 in all biological kingdoms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1770, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yoshida, Y.; Niki, E. Antioxidant effects of phytosterol and its components. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2003, 49, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pose, D.; Castanedo, I.; Borsani, O.; Nieto, B.; Rosado, A.; Taconnat, L.; Ferrer, A.; Dolan, L.; Valpuesta, V.; Botella, M.A. Identification of the Arabidopsis dry2/sqe1-5 mutant reveals a central role for sterols in drought tolerance and regulation of reactive oxygen species. Plant J. 2009, 59, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Widhalm, J.R.; Ducluzeau, A.L.; Buller, N.E.; Elowsky, C.G.; Olsen, L.J.; Basset, G.J. Phylloquinone (vitamin K(1)) biosynthesis in plants: Two peroxisomal thioesterases of Lactobacillales origin hydrolyze 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoyl-CoA. Plant J. 2012, 71, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vervoort, L.M.; Ronden, J.E.; Thijssen, H.H. The potent antioxidant activity of the vitamin K cycle in microsomal lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997, 54, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taviano, M.F.; Melchini, A.; Filocamo, A.; Costa, C.; Catania, S.; Raciti, R.; Saha, S.; Needs, P.; Bisignano, G.G.; Miceli, N. Contribution of the Glucosinolate Fraction to the Overall Antioxidant Potential, Cytoprotection against Oxidative Insult and Antimicrobial Activity of Eruca sativa Mill. Leaves Extract. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2017, 13, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bak, S.; Tax, F.E.; Feldmann, K.A.; Galbraith, D.W.; Feyereisen, R. CYP83B1, a cytochrome P450 at the metabolic branch point in auxin and indole glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Melicher, P.; Dvorak, P.; Samaj, J.; Takac, T. Protein-protein interactions in plant antioxidant defense. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1035573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Groden, D.; Beck, E. H2O2 destruction by ascorbate-dependent systems from chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1979, 546, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ozyigit, I.I.; Filiz, E.; Vatansever, R.; Kurtoglu, K.Y.; Koc, I.; Öztürk, M.X.; Anjum, N.A. Identification and Comparative Analysis of H2O2-Scavenging Enzymes (Ascorbate Peroxidase and Glutathione Peroxidase) in Selected Plants Employing Bioinformatics Approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Behr, M.; Neutelings, G.; El Jaziri, M.; Baucher, M. You Want it Sweeter: How Glycosylation Affects Plant Response to Oxidative Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 571399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Valero, E.; Macia, H.; De la Fuente, I.M.; Hernandez, J.A.; Gonzalez-Sanchez, M.I.; Garcia-Carmona, F. Modeling the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in chloroplasts under light/dark conditions. BMC Syst. Biol. 2016, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jin, L.; Li, D.; Alesi, G.N.; Fan, J.; Kang, H.B.; Lu, Z.; Boggon, T.J.; Jin, P.; Yi, H.; Wright, E.R.; et al. Glutamate dehydrogenase 1 signals through antioxidant glutathione peroxidase 1 to regulate redox homeostasis and tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2015, 27, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Chang, N.; Nan, W.; Wang, S.; Ruan, M.; Sun, L.; Li, S.; Bi, Y. Cytosolic Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Is Involved in Seed Germination and Root Growth Under Salinity in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dal Santo, S.; Stampfl, H.; Krasensky, J.; Kempa, S.; Gibon, Y.; Petutschnig, E.; Rozhon, W.; Heuck, A.; Clausen, T.; Jonak, C. Stress-induced GSK3 regulates the redox stress response by phosphorylating glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3380–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Marreiro, D.D.; Cruz, K.J.; Morais, J.B.; Beserra, J.B.; Severo, J.S.; de Oliveira, A.R. Zinc and Oxidative Stress: Current Mechanisms. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. von Saint Paul, V.; Zhang, W.; Kanawati, B.; Geist, B.; Faus-Kessler, T.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Schaffner, A.R. The Arabidopsis glucosyltransferase UGT76B1 conjugates isoleucic acid and modulates plant defense and senescence. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 4124–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Biosynthesis and Regulation of Salicylic Acid and N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid in Plant Immunity. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lefevere, H.; Bauters, L.; Gheysen, G. Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kinkema, M.; Fan, W.; Dong, X. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2339–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, W.; Withers, J.; Li, H.; Zwack, P.J.; Rusnac, D.V.; Shi, H.; Liu, L.; Yan, S.; Hinds, T.R.; Guttman, M.; et al. Structural basis of salicylic acid perception by Arabidopsis NPR proteins. Nature 2020, 586, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zavaliev, R.; Mohan, R.; Chen, T.; Dong, X. Formation of NPR1 Condensates Promotes Cell Survival during the Plant Immune Response. Cell 2020, 182, 1093–1108.e1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, H.Q.; Sun, L.P.; Wang, L.X.; Fang, X.W.; Li, Z.Q.; Zhang, F.F.; Hu, X.; Qi, C.; He, J.M. Ethylene mediates salicylic-acid-induced stomatal closure by controlling reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2020, 294, 110464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Horváth, E.; Bela, K.; Kulman, K.; Faragó, N.; Riyazuddin, R.; Gallé, Á.; Puskás, L.G.; Csiszár, J. Glutathione Transferases are Involved in Salicylic Acid-Induced Transcriptional Reprogramming. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 4497–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ding, Z.; Fu, L.; Tie, W.; Yan, Y.; Wu, C.; Hu, W.; Zhang, J. Extensive Post-Transcriptional Regulation Revealed by Transcriptomic and Proteomic Integrative Analysis in Cassava under Drought. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3521–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fitzgerald, H.A.; Chern, M.-S.; Navarre, R.; Ronald, P.C. Overexpression of (At)NPR1 in Rice Leads to a BTH- and Environment-Induced Lesion-Mimic/Cell Death Phenotype. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xu, G.; Yuan, M.; Ai, C.; Liu, L.; Zhuang, E.; Karapetyan, S.; Wang, S.; Dong, X. uORF-mediated translation allows engineered plant disease resistance without fitness costs. Nature 2017, 545, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 03194 g001
Figure 1. Current working model of stomatal closure.
Figure 1. Current working model of stomatal closure.
Plants 12 03194 g001
Plants 12 03194 g002
Figure 2. NPR1, a potential crucial regulator of stomatal closure.
Figure 2. NPR1, a potential crucial regulator of stomatal closure.
Plants 12 03194 g002
Table 1. ROS-related proteins identified in NPR1 condensates [51].
Table 1. ROS-related proteins identified in NPR1 condensates [51].
Protein Discovered in NPR1 Condensate Proteomics Study [51]Explanation of Protein Functionp-Value in Discovery
Direct ROS scavengersOPR1Neutralizes ROS [54]0.000052
ALDH7B4Involved in detoxification and is involved in reducing oxidative stress [55]0.005
GPX8Converts H2O2 to H2O [56]0.007
Selenoprotein family proteinInvolved in breaking down H2O2 to H2O [57,58]0.04
Aldolase-type TIM barrel family proteinProtects against H2O2, suggests that they may be involved in scavenging H2O2 [59]0.042
Thioredoxin superfamily proteinScavenges ROS [60]0.044
Positive regulators of ROS scavenger biosynthesisDMR6Has flavone synthase activity. Flavones directly decrease the amount of ROS [61,62]0.000025
CYP51Involved in sterol biosynthesis. Sterol can serve as an ROS scavenger [63,64]0.006
SQE3Required for sterol biosynthesis. Sterols can serve as ROS scavengers [65]0.014
Thioesterase superfamily proteinVitamin K biosynthesis requires thioesterases. The Vitamin K cycle has antioxidant activity [66,67]0.031
ATR4, CYP83B1, RED1, RNT1, SUR2, cytochrome P450, family 83, subfamily B, polypeptide 1Involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis. Glucosinolate decreases ROS levels [68,69]0.046
Proteins facilitating ROS neutralizationGRF6ANKR2A-APX3 complex is a protein complex that degrades H2O2, and GRF6 is found to interact with the complex during antioxidant defense [70,71]0.002
GSTU19Interacts with the protein GPX when GPX breaks down ROS [72]0.002
UGT73B2Glycosylates quercetin, which is a flavonoid that reduces H2O2 to H2O [73]0.003
ATMDAR2Involved in the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, which serves to break down H2O2 to H2O [74]0.012
GDH1GPX is a protein that converts H2O2 to H2O. GPX requires GDH1 to function [75]0.016
G6PD6Reduces ROS under redox stress by supplying NADPH [76,77]0.035
Zim-17 type zinc finger proteinEssential for facilitating zinc binding. Zinc acts as a cofactor for reducing ROS [78]0.04
Hormone crosstalkUDP-Glycosyltransfersae superfamily protein (UGT76B1)Reduces SA response and promotes JA response [79]0.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.-C.; Chang, C.; Pei, Z.-M. Reactive Oxygen Species in Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure: The Potential Roles of NPR1. Plants 2023, 12, 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183194

AMA Style

Li X-C, Chang C, Pei Z-M. Reactive Oxygen Species in Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure: The Potential Roles of NPR1. Plants. 2023; 12(18):3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xin-Cheng, Claire Chang, and Zhen-Ming Pei. 2023. "Reactive Oxygen Species in Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure: The Potential Roles of NPR1" Plants 12, no. 18: 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183194

APA Style

Li, X. -C., Chang, C., & Pei, Z. -M. (2023). Reactive Oxygen Species in Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure: The Potential Roles of NPR1. Plants, 12(18), 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop