Next Article in Journal
Distribution Patterns of Gymnosperm Species along Elevations on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: Effects of Climatic Seasonality, Energy–Water, and Physical Tolerance Variables
Next Article in Special Issue
Artificial Vegetation for Sand Stabilization May Impact Sand Lake Dynamics in Dune Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of ZF-HD Gene Family in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Ecological Restoration and Climate Change on Herbaceous and Arboreal Phenology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relict Plants Are Better Able to Adapt to Climate Change: Evidence from Desert Shrub Communities

School of Architecture, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(23), 4065; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234065
Submission received: 17 October 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 4 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological Processes and Sandy Plant Adaptations to Climate Change)

Abstract

:
Shrubs are the main dominant plants in arid desert systems and play an important role in maintaining the biodiversity, ecosystem services and stability of desert ecosystems. Studies have shown that the survival of a large number of shrub species in desert areas under the influence of climate change is significantly threatened, with different species showing different response strategies. To test the tolerance of different shrub species to climate change, this study selected 10 dominant shrub species (ancient relict shrub species and regional endemic shrub species) in the Alashan desert area as the research object. Based on a field survey of species distribution, a species distribution model was developed to simulate the suitable distribution area of shrub species under current conditions and under future climate change scenarios. The distribution changes of ancient relict and regional endemic shrub species under the climate change scenarios were tested, and the tolerance of the two types of shrub to climate change was analyzed. The results showed that under different climate change scenarios, except for Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, the total suitable area of four out of the five relict plants was relatively stable, the potential distribution area of Tetraena mongolica increased, and the future distribution pattern was basically consistent with the current distribution. However, the suitable area of typical desert plants was unstable under different climate change scenarios. Except for Kalidium foliatum, the suitable distribution areas of four out of the five shrubs showed different degrees of reduction, and the distribution location showed significant migration. Based on the research results, climate change will lead to the reduction and displacement of the distribution area of typical desert shrubs, while relict shrubs will be less affected by climate change. This is because, compared to desert species, relict plants have a longer evolutionary history and have developed a wider range of adaptations after experiencing dramatic environmental changes. This study provides a scientific basis for actively responding to the impacts of climate change on desert ecosystems.

1. Introduction

The impact of climate change on species survival and biodiversity is increasing [1,2,3,4]. The sixth report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states that continued greenhouse gas emissions will lead to a further increase in global temperature. Among the scenarios and model paths considered, the best estimate of global temperature rise is 1.5 ℃ in the near future (2021–2040), and an increase in global temperature rise will lead to multiple hazards [5]. Studies have shown that the risk of extinction will increase with global warming [6,7]. Climate change has an important impact on the distribution of plants, especially endangered species, and the intensification of global climate change poses a serious threat to the maintenance of biodiversity. For example, Parmesan [8] found that climate change increases the risk of extinction for polar and alpine species. Meng et al. [9] found that climate change has a direct impact on the range of the endangered species Disanthus endemic in East Asia. Wu et al. [10] found that the spatial distribution pattern of six desert plants, such as Anabasis brevifolia, Haloxylon ammodendron, Ephedra przewalskii and Ceratoides latens, changed with climate change. The study by Wan et al. [11] showed that climate change will shift the range of the endangered plant Taxus cuspidata. Tao et al. [12] found that the range of the endangered plant Pinus kwangtungensis in southern China tends to shift northward with climate change. Therefore, studying the response of different species to climate change and predicting changes in the potential distribution of species under climate change scenarios are crucial for the conservation and utilization of endangered plants [13].
Different species have different response strategies and adaptabilities to climate change. In the process of long-term adaptation to harsh habitats, relict plants have formed different adaptation mechanisms and survival strategies. For example, the study of Qin et al. showed that the distribution area of the relict plant Potaninia mongolica will increase in the future under the climate change scenario, and precipitation was the main limiting factor dictating its distribution [14]. The study of Tsuga longibracteata by Tan et al. showed that the precipitation in the driest month was the dominant climatic factor affecting its distribution, and its future distribution pattern did not change significantly under the influence of climate change, showing the ‘refuge in situ’ characteristic [15]. A study of Cathaya argyrophylla by Ran et al. found that the potential distribution area of this species will expand in the future [16]. Zhao et al. found that precipitation was the dominant factor controlling the distribution of Gymnocarpos przewalskii, and the suitable distribution area of this species increased under different climate change scenarios [17]. A study of the relict plant Liriodendron chinense by Zhai et al. found that the wettest season rainfall, driest season rainfall, and monthly mean temperature difference between day and night were the main limiting factors affecting its distribution [18]. The geometric center of its suitable distribution area remained unchanged under the influence of climate change. The tolerance of relict plants to climate change is strong, the suitable distribution area simulated under different climate scenarios fluctuates little or increases, and temperature is not the main distribution-limiting factor.
At present, studies on Tertiary relict plants mainly focus on community structure, population maintenance mechanism, population genetics and genetic geography, but less on plant origin and evolutionary history. Shang et al. [19] investigated six species of relict plants, i.e., Cyclocarya paliurus, Nyssa sinensis, Liquidambar acalycina, Liquidambar formosana, Emmenopterys henryi and Euptelea pleiospermum, and analyzed their population structure and regeneration strategies. Tang et al. and He et al. investigated Metasequoia glyptostroboides [20], Ginkgo biloba [21], Liriodendron chinense [22], Tetracentron sinense [23,24] and Taiwania cryptomerioides [25] distributed in China, and the results showed that the unstable habitat disturbed to a certain extent was beneficial to the population maintenance of Tertiary relict plants and occupied the greatest dominance. Compared with typical desert plants, the relict plants have a longer evolutionary history. Therefore, we speculate that the relict plants have developed different survival strategies in the process of tolerating harsh habitats for a long time and have evolved a wider range of adaptations after undergoing dramatic environmental changes, which may be more vital than we thought [26].
The Alashan desert area is located in the Eurasian hinterland, far from the ocean, which is a typical mid-temperate arid area [27]. The East Alashan–West Erdos region is one of the most concentrated distribution areas of endemic plants and psammophytes in the northwestern arid region of China [28,29], where there are many Tertiary relict plants that have existed since the Early Tertiary in the northern hemisphere [30,31]. From the early Oligocene, due to the cold climate, a large number of plants distributed in the middle and high latitudes and around the north gradually retreated to the low latitudes [32], and during the Late Tertiary to Quaternary, they retreated southward to the three major glacial refugia of East Asia, North America, and Southwest Europe [30,33,34]. The special ecological background of Alashan desert makes it the preferable area of the plant endemic phenomenon in arid and semi-arid areas of China, and it is the distribution gathering place of endemic plant genera in Inner Mongolia Plateau and Central Asia (eastern Central Asia) [35]. Its plant composition is dominated by xerophytes, super-xerophytes and semi-shrubs, and there are few perennial herbs and legumes. The dominant shrubs are Chenopodiaceae, Rosaceae, Leguminosae and Compositae, forming a unique vegetation landscape in the desert [27]. The ecological environment in this region is harsh, and the area suitable for human production and living is only 6%, with drought and water scarcity and sparse vegetation [36]. It has experienced many frequent climate change events [37,38,39], intense climate change events [40,41,42] and high temperature events. The extreme minimum temperature was −34.4 °C (Norrigong, 24 January 2008), and the extreme maximum temperature was 44.5 °C (Guaizi Lake, 28 July 2020). The coldest month is January, with an average temperature ranging from −10.9 to −7.5 °C, and the warmest month is July, with an average temperature ranging from 23.8 to 28.4 °C. The average annual precipitation is 39.3~224.2 mm [43]. According to the data of Alashan Meteorological Observatory, from 1962 to 2021, the annual average number of sandstorm days was 10.7. The natural ecosystem in this region has limited adaptability and is more vulnerable to serious or even irreversible damage [36]. Based on this, this study selected the dominant shrub species in the Alashan desert area as the research object, simulated the potential distribution areas of relict shrub species and typical desert shrub species under different climate change scenarios, and compared and analyzed the adaptability of the two types of shrubs to climate change to test the hypothesis that relict plants can better adapt to climate change.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Species Distribution Survey

The study area is located in the eastern part of the temperate arid desert subregion of the Hexi Corridor–Alashan Plateau in China. To facilitate mapping, Alashan City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, is used as the main study area (Figure 1). Alashan is bordered by Gansu Province to the west, Bayannur City to the northeast and Wuhai City to the southeast. Alashanzuoqi county is located in the southeast of Alashan, Alashanyouqi county is located in the center of Alashan, and Ejinaqi county is located in the northwest of Alashan, which is also the westernmost tip of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The total area of the region is 270,000 km2, of which the desert area is 63,700 km2 [43].
The study area is located in the hinterland of the Asian continent, which has a typical continental climate. It is dry and rainless, windy and sandy, cold in winter and hot in summer. The climate characteristics of the four seasons are distinct, and the temperature difference between day and night is large. Affected by the southeast monsoon, the rainy season is mostly concentrated in July, August and September; the precipitation decreases from the southeast to the northwest and evaporation decreases from southeast to northwest [43]. In the northern part of the study area, westerly winds prevail, and in the south, southeasterly winds prevail.
Due to the unique climatic and geomorphological conditions in the Alashan desert area, a large number of rare and endangered species are present. There are 913 species of wild plants and 6 wild shrub nature reserves in the study area [44]. The main protected species include endangered shrubs Tetraena mongolica, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, Amygdalus mongolica and Sarcozygium xanthoxylon. In this study, 10 dominant shrub species were selected for research, as shown in Table 1.
Nitraria tangutorum is a deciduous dwarf shrub. Zhang et al. [45] considered that Nitraria first appeared between the Cretaceous and the Early Paleocene and hypothesized an Early Paleogene (65 Mya) origin of Nitraria based on molecular data. Amber Woutersen et al. [46] found the oldest fossil pollen grain of Nitraria, at least 53 Myr old, and dated it to the Paleogene based on its characteristics. Reaumuria songarica is an ultra-xerophyte with strong stress resistance [47]. According to paleomagnetic measurements and fossil evidence, it underwent the desertification of Asia that began at least 22 million years ago [48]. Tetraena mongolica is an ancient Mediterranean relict plant from 140 million years ago [28,49]. Sarcozygium xanthoxylon is a succulent xerophytic deciduous shrub [50]. Bellstedt et al. [51] found that Asian Zygophyllum and T. mongolica originated independently in Africa and may be of Eocene and Miocene age, respectively. Wu et al. [52] showed that Asian Zygophyllum originated in the early Oligocene (30.39 Ma, HPD%: 21.53–39.81 Ma) and indicated that Asian Zygophyllum differentiated in the early Miocene (19.56 Ma, 95% HPD: 11.25–28.78 Ma). Ammopiptanthus mongolicus is an evergreen broad-leaved leguminous shrub [53]. According to the historical data [54], Liu et al. [55] concluded that Ammopiptanthus is one of the species of Trib. Podalyrieal evolved to adapt to different habitats at the end of the Miocene–Eocene. Amygdalus mongolica is a xerophytic deciduous shrub. Zhao [56] showed that A. mongolica often grew along the surface with good hydrothermal conditions, forming a “green corridor” in the desert area. Halocnemum strobilaceum is a component of the Mediterranean–Central Asian flora [57], and the H. strobilaceum community is the most widespread plant community in the halophytic desert [58]. Kalidium foliatum community is another widespread halophyte community, and its habitat is similar to that of H. strobilaceum community, but its salt tolerance is less [58]. Convolvulus tragacanthoides is a desert salt–alkaline plant, and it is found on all continents except circumpolar areas [59,60,61]. Artemisia ordosica is a major indicator plant of desert grassland desertification in the northern and northwestern temperate regions of China [62].
The desert area was divided into 30 × 30 km grids, the position of shrub species in the grid was investigated and the species distribution map was drawn for the construction of a species distribution model. At the same time, the spatial point pattern of shrubs in different shrub communities was investigated for the analysis of the relationship among shrub species.
Table 1. Overview of shrub species.
Table 1. Overview of shrub species.
FamilySpeciesHabitat and DistributionEcological Traits
relict plantsZygophyllaceaeSarcozygium xanthoxylonDeserts, steppe deserts and desertified grassland areasDrought resistance
NitrariaceaeNitraria tangutorumDesert and semidesert lake basin sandsSalt-tolerant, sand fixation
TamaricaceaeReaumuria songaricaDeserts and desert steppe zonesDrought resistance, salt tolerance, sand collection
ZygophyllaceaeTetraena mongolicaSteppe desert, Yellow River terrace, steppe desert areaDrought tolerance
LeguminosaeAmmopiptanthus mongolicusSandy and gravelly textures in desert areasSuper xerophytic structure,
strong stress resistance
typical desert plantsRosaceaeAmygdalus mongolicaGobi Desert Region in Central AsiaDrought tolerance,
cold hardiness
ChenopodiaceaeKalidium foliatumWet, fluffy saline soils of deserts, desert steppes and grasslands in EurasiaSalt tolerance
CompositaeArtemisia ordosicaSandy areas of steppe, desert steppe to steppe desertsWind erosion resistance, sand burial resistance
ChenopodiaceaeHalocnemum strobilaceumSouthern Europe, Western and Northern Asia and Northern AfricaSalt tolerance
ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulus tragacanthoidesDry slopes in semidesert areas and mountain basinsDrought resistance
Relict plants are plants with a long origin, many related groups are extinct, relatively isolated, and slow evolution. Typical desert plants are plants that can survive in desert conditions. According to the “Flora of China”, this study refers to Zygophyllum and Sarcozygium as Zygophyllum. The above sources are [63,64,65,66,67,68].

2.2. Data Analysis

2.2.1. Species Distribution Model

(1)
Abiotic factors
Nonbiological factors are mainly divided into soil attribute factors, bioclimatic factors and topographic factors. Soil attribute data were derived from the World Soil Database (http://www.fao.org/, accessed on 9 September 2022). Bioclimatic data were derived from the WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/, accessed on 23 September 2022) data website, and 19 bioclimatic variables covered by the data were used as biometeorological factors. Topographic data were obtained from the WorldClim website using SRTM DEM digital elevation data to generate bioclimatic data. Nonbiological data were resampled, unified with species distribution data, and converted into ASC files for model construction. The nonbiological factors selected are detailed in Table 2.
(2)
Biological factors.
In addition to the influence of environmental factors, species growth is also affected by the distribution of other species. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the interaction between species and obtain the species types that affect the distribution of the species to be predicted. The spatial point pattern analysis method was used in this study. Based on the data of shrub species distribution points in different communities, the R package spatstat was used to calculate Ripley’s K(12) function [69]. Based on 100 Monte Carlo simulations, the confidence interval was calculated, and the relationship between different shrub species was analyzed. The analysis results are shown in Figure 2.
The Maxent model was used to simulate and predict the potential distribution area of shrub species in the Alashan desert under different climate change scenarios. Seventy percent of the training samples were randomly selected, and thirty percent of the distribution data were selected as the prediction samples [70,71,72]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used as the measurement method of model simulation accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) enclosed by the ROC curve and abscissa was used as the evaluation index. The AUC values were all greater than 0.9, indicating that the model had good fit.

2.2.2. Climate Change Scenario

The setting of climate change scenarios is an important basis for the analysis of the potential impacts of future climate change. The climate change data were set as proposed in the CMIP6 model in the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC (AR6) [73,74]. Based on the CMIP5 climate change scenario, the Shared Socio-economic Path (SSP) was added as the climate change scenario. SSP refers to the scenario model of global climate change without the influence of relevant climate policies [75]. The set of SSP climate scenarios includes SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585.
The SSP126 scenario predicts the future under the green growth paradigm [76], which represents an environmentally friendly sustainable development scenario and low greenhouse gas emissions, with the radiative forcing reaching 2.6 W·m−2 in 2100 [77], the total amount of agricultural land being greatly reduced and the forest area increasing [78,79]. SSP245 is a low stability scenario, which represents the intermediate scenario of social and economic development and a medium level of greenhouse gas emissions, with the radiative forcing reaching 4.5 W·m−2 before 2100 and not exceeding this value [80]. SSP370 represents the regional competitive development path of the medium–high forcing scenario, which represents the strong expansion of global cropland and pastureland, which increase by 40% and 7%, respectively, from 2010 to 2100, leading to large-scale deforestation, and the radiative forcing would reach 7.0 W·m−2 in 2100 [80]. In the SSP585 scenario, fossil fuel use is projected to double global food demand and greenhouse gas emissions are projected to triple during this century [80], with radiative forcing reaching 8.5 W·m−2 in 2100 [77].
Climate change scenarios were obtained from WorldClim. WorldClim provided the 20-year averages of bioclimatic data under the SSP126, SSP245, SSP370 and SSP585 global climate change scenarios from 2041 to 2060 (2050s) [75,81,82,83]. The climate change scenario data were resampled and unified with species distribution data and converted into ASC files for model construction.

3. Results

3.1. Shrub Species Distribution

Based on the species data from the field investigation, a distribution point map of shrub species in the Alashan desert area was drawn (Figure 3).
The range of distribution points of different species is quite different, but most of them are concentrated in the southeast of the study area, which is related to the characteristics of the species themselves. In the field investigation, it was found that the relict species N. tangutorum was concentrated on flat terrain with more sediment content but was distributed throughout the whole Alashan desert area. S. xanthoxylon was concentrated in the area with more sediment content, and it was distributed in a relatively flat terrain. R. songarica was mainly distributed in the valley area [84], in the eastern part of the Alashan desert area and in the southeastern part of the study area. T. mongolica, as an endangered protected species, had few habitats and few individuals [85], and was distributed on a small-scale in the western, eastern and northern regions of the Alashan desert. A. mongolicus was distributed in the eastern part of Alashan desert area. This shrub had a small range, which was found in barren hills and rocky Gobi besides sandy gravel soil [53].
The typical desert plant A. mongolica was mainly distributed in high mountains and steep rock walls and was sporadically distributed in the eastern part of the Alashan desert with high aggregation intensity [86]. K. foliatum was concentrated in saline–alkali land and was distributed within a small range in the west, east and north of the Alashan desert area. A. ordosica was distributed more commonly along rivers and within a small range in the southeast, west and north of the Alashan desert area. The distribution range of H. strobilaceum was small, mainly in the eastern part of the Alashan desert area; C. tragacanthoides was distributed in the east and south of the Alashan desert.

3.2. Prediction of Shrub Species Distribution under Different Climate Change Scenarios

The Maxent model was used to simulate and predict the suitable distribution area of shrub species in the current Alashan desert area, as shown in Figure 4.
The suitable distribution area of species predicted via simulation basically covered the effective distribution points of all species obtained from the investigation, indicating that the suitable distribution area of each species simulated under the current climatic conditions was basically consistent with its actual distribution range.
The results showed that relict plants were mainly distributed in the southeast of the study area, and there was also a small distribution in the north–central part of the study area. The specific distribution of each species was as follows:
(1)
The potential distribution areas of the relict plants N. tangutorum, S. xanthoxylon and R. songarica were mainly in the southeastern part of the study area, among which N. tangutorum had a higher probability of distribution in the eastern part of the study area. The overall suitable area of the S. xanthoxylon was biased toward the middle of the study area; the suitable distribution area of R. songarica in the southern part of the study area was large, and it was similar to the suitable area of S. xanthoxylon, which was related to the interaction between the species.
(2)
The endangered relict plant T. mongolica was mainly distributed in the east and north of the study area, and the distribution probability in the north was low.
(3)
The endangered relict plant A. mongolicus was mainly distributed in the central and eastern parts of the study area, and the distribution probability in the central part was low.
Typical desert plants were widely distributed in the eastern part of the study area. The specific distribution of each species was as follows:
(1)
The typical desert plant A. mongolica was concentrated in the eastern part of the study area, and very few areas showed a high probability distribution.
(2)
H. strobilaceum and K. foliatum were distributed in the southeastern part of the study area, and the distribution area was scattered.
(3)
The suitable distribution area of A. ordosica was large, and it was often distributed in the eastern boundary of the study area.
(4)
The suitable distribution area of C. tragacanthoides was located in the southeast of the study area, and the distribution probability was high in the south.
The Maxent model was used to simulate and predict the suitable distribution areas of shrub species in the Alashan desert under four climate change scenarios in the coming years until 2050. The results are shown in Figure 5.
Under different climate change scenarios, the suitable distribution areas of relict plants were basically consistent with the current distribution forms of all species, mainly concentrated in the southeast of the study area. The distribution of each species was as follows:
(1)
The suitable distribution areas of the relict plants S. xanthoxylon, N. tangutorum and R. songarica under the four climate change scenarios were all concentrated in the southeastern part of the study area, which was consistent with the current distribution pattern of each species, but there was a trend toward a shift to the southern part of the study area.
(2)
The suitable distribution area of the relict plant T. mongolica was located in the north and east of the study area, and the suitable area in the north was facing the risk of contraction.
(3)
The suitable area of the relict plant A. mongolicus was located in the middle and east of the study area. The distribution probability in the middle was low, and the distribution patterns under the four climate scenarios were basically the same.
Under different climate change scenarios, the suitable distribution areas of typical desert plants had changed greatly. The distribution of each species was as follows:
(1)
The suitable distribution area of A. mongolica, a typical desert plant, changed significantly under the four climate change scenarios. The suitable distribution areas under the SSP126, SSP370 and SSP585 climate change scenarios were located in the northern and eastern parts of the study area. The distribution area in the northern part of the study area disappeared under the SSP245 climate change scenario.
(2)
The suitable distribution areas of H. strobilaceum and K. foliatum were located in the southeastern part of the study area.
(3)
The probability of distribution of C. tragacanthoides in the eastern part of the study area was higher.
(4)
The suitable distribution area of A. ordosica was located in the middle and south of the study area.

3.3. Differences in Tolerance of Different Shrub Species to Climate Change

Based on the prediction map of the suitable distribution area of 10 shrub species under four climate change scenarios generated using the Maxent model above, the proportion of area change of relict plants (Table 3 and Figure 6) and typical desert plants (Table 4 and Figure 7) was calculated.
The results showed that there were differences in the suitable distribution area changes of endangered relict shrub species and typical desert shrub species under different future climate scenarios: (1) Among the relict plants, except for A. mongolicus, the suitable area of most plants was relatively stable. The suitable area of A. mongolicus always decreased, and the decrease rate was stable at approximately 13%. The species for which the suitable distribution area always increased were R. songarica and T. mongolica. The average increase in the suitable distribution area of R. songarica was approximately 4.5%, and the change range was small. The increase in the suitable distribution area of T. mongolica under the four climate scenarios was 6–19%. The total suitable distribution areas of R. songarica, S. xanthoxylon and N. tangutorum did not change much. (2) The suitable area of typical desert plants was unstable. Except for K. foliatum, the suitable distribution area of most species showed a decreasing trend to varying degrees. The suitable area of K. foliatum always increased, and its total area was the largest under the SSP585 climate change scenario, reaching 10,227 km2, and the smallest was under the SSP245 climate change scenario at 9956 km2. The suitable area of C. tragacanthoides always decreased, and the decrease ranged from 2% to 17%. The total distribution area of H. strobilaceum was similar under the four climate change scenarios, and it was slightly larger than 7454 km2 under the SSP370 climate change scenario and slightly smaller than 7054 km2 under the SSP126 climate change scenario. The change in the different distribution probability areas of the species was offset, resulting in little change in the total suitable area. The total suitable areas of A. mongolica and A. ordosica changed greatly under the different climate change scenarios. The total suitable area for A. mongolica under all climate scenarios except for the SSP370 scenario, under which a small increase was observed, and the change ratio ranged from 1% to 10%. The total suitable distribution area of A. ordosica was 29,650 km2 under the SSP585 climate change scenario and 32,172 km2 under the SSP370 climate change scenario. Compared with the current suitable area, there was great uncertainty in the area increases and decreases.

4. Discussion

4.1. Climate Change Is Not the Main Limiting Factor for the Distribution of Relict Plants

Among the nonbiological factors examined in this study, the soil attribute factor is one of the main factors limiting plant growth, and the biometeorological factor is the main factor limiting the establishment and development of species niches, especially at medium and large scales [87]. The main factor affecting plant growth in desert areas is water, and soil moisture is the main source of water for plant growth. In the dry season, water deficit is prone to occur. To adapt to arid environments, vegetation will form a spatial pattern.
In this study, the potential distribution areas of 10 shrubs reflected well the close relationship between geographical distribution and environment, but the environmental factors limiting the distribution of relict plants and typical desert plants were different. (1) The response of the two groups of plants to different soil properties was different: relict plants such as S. xanthoxylon, N. tangutorum and T. mongolica were concentrated in areas with high sand content, species such as K. foliatum were concentrated in saline–alkali land and species such as A. ordosica were more frequently distributed along rivers. (2) The distribution of shrub species was restricted by topographic factors, and the factors of elevation, slope and aspect had great influence on shrub species. Relict plants such as S. xanthoxylon and N. tangutorum were mainly distributed in relatively flat terrain, the typical desert plant A. mongolica was mainly distributed in hilltop areas with larger slopes and K. foliatum was mainly distributed in valley areas.
The distribution of plant populations is usually the result of the interaction of ecological and historical geographical factors. There are a large number of relict plants in the study area, which have adapted to arid environments in the long-term ecological evolution process. The suitable distribution area of the relict plant A. mongolicus predicted by the model was partly located on the eastern edge of the Ulan Buh desert, and a small part was distributed along the northern part of the Helan Mountains. The simulation results confirmed that the places where A. mongolicus occurred were areas with good water and heat conditions in the local environment, and it could not tolerate excessively harsh arid environmental conditions [88]. This was related to its physiological and ecological characteristics and explained why it does not conform to the hypothesis that “relict plants can better adapt to climate change”. Among the typical desert plants, except for A. ordosica, the suitable distribution areas of other shrubs were mainly concentrated in the southeastern part of the study area because this area had the most suitable combination of water and heat conditions compared with other desert areas. Typical desert plants are generally significantly affected by temperature and precipitation, and temperature is not the main limiting factor for the distribution of relict plants.

4.2. There Is a General Positive Correlation between Relict Shrub Species

The suitable distribution areas of some relict shrub species were very similar. The analysis showed the following relationships among these species: (1) Although there was no correlation between species, the response of the species to the environment was similar. For example, S. xanthoxylon and N. tangutorum were concentrated in sandy land and relatively flat terrain, so these species were distributed at the edge of the desert. (2) There were interactions between species. The interspecific relationship between S. xanthoxylon and R. songarica showed a significant positive correlation, and the suitable areas of the two plants in the eastern part of the study area were similar. Interspecific relationships have an important influence on environmental adaptation. The above situation showed that the suitable distribution area of the species was affected not only by the environment but also by the interspecific relationship.

4.3. Relict Shrub Species Have Developed Rich Ecological Strategies in Their Long Evolutionary History

Except for A. mongolicus and T. mongolica, the distributions of the remaining species under different future climate change scenarios were consistent with the current suitable distribution area, and the distribution range showed no considerable change. As super-xerophytic shrubs in desert areas, A. mongolicus and T. mongolica have a strong ability to adapt to arid environments. Due to the influence of extreme climate, the plant community structure was singular, the ecosystem was unstable, and the habitat suitability of the community decreased. A. mongolicus has a limited geographical distribution and isolated taxonomic status [89]. To maintain the integrity of leaf structure and leaf function in harsh environments, its foliar nutrient demand is higher than that of other plants, resulting in other relict plant populations having stronger environmental adaptability than A. mongolicus under different climate change scenarios. The distribution of T. mongolica was characterized by a long and narrow gap, and temperature had a significant influence this species. A previous study showed that during the growth of T. mongolica, the harsher the environment, the stronger the reproductive capacity [90], which also explains why the suitable area of T. mongolica always increased. The results of this study showed that the suitable range of T. mongolica has a tendency to migrate to high latitudes to meet its growth needs under human intervention.
Relict plants and typical desert plants have different strategies to adapt to the environment. Most relict plants, such as S. xanthoxylon, N. tangutorum and R. songarica, are important constructive species in desert areas. During the long evolutionary process, these species have interacted with habitats and gradually developed many internal physiological and external morphological adaptation strategies to promote their growth and development, which is conducive to the survival and expansion of these species in desert areas. The physiological metabolic rates of the photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration of most relict plants are lower than those of typical desert plants under the same conditions. This is the result of the long-term evolution of adaptation strategies to arid climates and environments. Gao et al. [91] found that the branches of Nitraria were often specialized as thorns to reduce the transpiration area, and Tetraena formed fleshy short rod-shaped leaves. The leaves of Zygophyllum were not only fleshy, but the whole plant was often laid flat on the ground to prevent water transpiration and strong light burns. The leaves of Nitraria were grayish white, which had a certain reflective effect on strong sunlight. The cuticle on the leaf surface of Zygophyllum was thick or slightly leathery and shiny to prevent the mesophyll cells from being burned. To make efficient use of water, the leaves of Zygophyllum and Tetraena were apparently fleshy, and the spongy tissue cells of the mesophyll specialized as large water-storing parenchyma cells that stored a lot of water. Compared with other genera, the transport tissue of Zygophyllum was more developed and the transport efficiency was higher. Meng et al. [92] found that the adaptation of shrubs such as A. mongolicus and R. songarica to the environment was mainly as follows: the leaves were membranous leaves, fleshy leaves and acupuncture leaves. The fruits were mainly dried fruits. The water ecotype was mainly xerophyte, and the water use efficiency of seeds was diverse.
However, while adapting to the growth environment of arid areas, relict plants also show the problems of slow growth and difficult recovery after being destroyed. For example, the relict plant T. mongolica is often in an unfavorable competitive position in the community after entering the adult stage, and it tends to give way to other strong xerophytic shrubs such as S. xanthoxylon and N. tangutorum. Field observations showed that the patches formed after landscape fragmentation were gradually occupied by the close relatives of N. tangutorum and T. mongolica. A. mongolica, a typical desert plant, is a dominant species in the Alashan desert area. Its interspecific competition is weak, the endocarp is hard and thick and mature seeds cannot be sowed far, so it presents an aggregated distribution pattern. A. mongolica generally cannot form a large desert community and can only be distributed in mountains and valleys to form a local fragment community. This fragmentated distribution is likely to affect the genetic diversity and evolutionary potential of A. mongolica, resulting in the disappearance of its suitable area in the northern part of the study area in the simulation results.
After decades of evolution, relict plants have strong environmental adaptability, are less affected by climate change and have a small range of suitable distribution areas. However, the study found that the optimal distribution area of endangered relict plant populations such as T. mongolica and A. mongolicus was increasingly narrow. It is speculated that island isolation may occur in the future, and problems such as difficulty in gene exchange and heritability decline may occur. These plants generally lack the ability to regenerate naturally and coupled with the vulnerability of the distribution environment and the intensification of climate change, there is a problem of limited regeneration [85,93,94,95].
This study is based on the niche of relict plants captured in the field survey, which has certain limitations, and some speculations were not confirmed. In the future, we will strengthen research on the functional characteristics of these shrub species and learn more about the environmental adaptation and ecological strategies of these relict plants. When analyzing the driving factors of plant population distribution, environmental variables should be fully considered to further explore the influence of abiotic factors on plant population distribution patterns. Due to the limitation of experimental conditions, it is difficult to confirm the existence of allelopathy among species. In the future, distinguishing differentiation and interspecific competition through controlled laboratory experiments will help to better understand the ecological adaptation mechanism of plants.
The protection and rational utilization of relict plant resources play a very important role in the ecological protection and improvement of desert areas. It is recommended that nature reserve planning and biodiversity conservation should take into account the adaptation of plants to climate change.

Author Contributions

Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.Z.; data curation, M.Z., M.J. and S.G.; investigation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO: 31901170; NO: 32260279), the Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Projects (NO: 2022ZY0137), the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation (NO: 2019MS03082) and the Inner Mongolia University of Technology Foundation (NO: BS201941; NO: YHX202108).

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their comments, which helped us improve the quality of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhat, I.A.; Fayaz, M.; Rafiq, S.; Guleria, K.; Qadir, J.; Wani, T.A.; Kaloo, Z.A. Predicting potential distribution and range dynamics of Aquilegia fragrans under climate change: Insights from ensemble species distribution modelling. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, Y.F.; Wang, S.H.; Feng, J.W.; Ge, J.P.; Wang, T.M. Free-ranging livestock changes the acoustic properties of summer soundscapes in a Northeast Asian temperate forest. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 283, 110123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fausett, S.R.; Sandjak, A.; Billard, B.; Braendle, C. Higher-order epistasis shapes natural variation in germ stem cell niche activity. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Varol, T.; Cetin, M.; Ozel, H.B.; Sevik, H.; Zeren Cetin, I. The Effects of Climate Change Scenarios on Carpinus betulus and Carpinus orientalis in Europe. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report—Climate Change 2023 [EB/OL]. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 26 May 2023).
  6. Urban, M.C. Climate change. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 2015, 348, 571–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Canturk, U.; Kulaç, S. The effects of climate change scenarios on Tilia ssp. in Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37, 637–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, Y.H.; Xu, X.; Jiang, X.L.; Xu, G.B. Potential distribution modeling and analysis of Disanthus Maxim. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 2816–2825. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, J.G.; Lü, J.J.; Zhou, Q.F. Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Distribution of Six Desert Plants in China. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2010, 45, 723–738. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wan, J.Z.; Wang, C.J.; Han, S.J.; Yu, J.H. The Planning of Priority Protection Area for Taxus cuspidata under Climate Change. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 2014, 45, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tao, C.; Li, X.X.; Wang, Q.C.; Cui, G.F. Relationships between Geographical Distribution of Endangered Pinus kwangtungensis and Climate in China. Plant Sci. J. 2012, 30, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shen, Y.F.; Tu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhong, W.P.; Xia, H.; Hao, Z.Y.; Zhang, C.G.; Li, H.G. Predicting the impact of climate change on the distribution of two relict Liriodendron species by coupling the MaxEnt model and actual physiological indicators in relation to stress tolerance. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 322, 116024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qin, Y.Y.; Lu, K.; Du, Z.Y.; Shi, J.G.; Chai, G.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, K.Y.; Duan, Y.Z. Potential changes in the geographical distribution of the relict plant Polaninia mongolica Maxim. in China under climate change scenarios. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2022, 42, 4473–4484. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, A.P.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.; Wu, X.G.; Sun, X.M.; Xiong, Q.L.; Pan, K.W. The suitable distribution area of Tsuga longibracteata revealed by a climate and spatial constraint model under future climate change scenarios. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 8934–8945. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ran, Q.; Wei, H.Y.; Zhao, Z.F.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Liu, J.; Gu, W. Impact of climate change on the potential distribution and habitat fragmentation of the relict plant Cathaya argyrophylla Chun et Kuang. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 2481–2493. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao, Z.F.; Wei, H.Y.; Guo, Y.L.; Luan, W.F.; Zhao, Z.B. Impact of climate change on the suitable habitat distribution of Gymnocarpos przewalskii, a relict plant. Desert China 2020, 40, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhai, X.Y.; Shen, Y.F.; Zhu, S.H.; Tu, Z.H.; Zhang, C.G.; Li, H.G. Potential Impacts of Climate Change in Future on the Geographical Distributions of Relic Liriodendron chinense. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2021, 29, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shang, K.K.; Chen, B.; Da, L.J. Population structure and regeneration strategy of relict deciduous broadleaved trees on Mount Tianmu, Zhejiang Province, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 361–368. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tang, C.Q.; Yang, Y.; Ohsawa, M.; Momohara, A.; Hara, M.; Cheng, S.; Fan, S. Population structure of relict Metasequoia glyptostroboides and its habitat fragmentation and degradation in south-central China. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, C.Q.; Yang, Y.; Ohsawa, M.; Yi, S.R.; Momohara, A.; Su, W.H.; Wang, H.C.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Peng, M.C.; Wu, Z.L. Evidence for the persistence of wild Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgoaceae) populations in the Dalou Mountains, southwestern China. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 1408–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, C.Q.; Yang, Y.; Ohsawa, M.; Momohara, A.; Mu, J.; Robertson, K. Survival of a tertiary relict species, Liriodendron chinense (Magnoliaceae), in southern China, with special reference to village Fengshui forest. Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 2112–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tang, C.Q.; Peng, M.C.; He, L.Y.; Ohsawa, M.; Wang, C.Y.; Xie, T.H.; Li, W.S.; Li, J.P.; Zhang, H.Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Population persistence of a Tertiary relict tree Tetracentron sinense on the Ailao Mountains, Yunnan, China. J. Plant Res. 2013, 126, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, C.Q.; Ohsawa, M. Tertiary relic deciduous forests on a humid subtropical mountain, Mt. Emei, Sichuan, China. Folia Geobot. 2002, 37, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, L.Y.; Tang, C.Q.; Wu, Z.L.; Wang, H.C.; Ohsawa, M.; Yan, K. Forest structure and regeneration of the Tertiary relict Taiwania cryptomerioides in the Gaoligong Mountains, Yunnan, southwestern China. Phytocoenologia 2015, 45, 135–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. González, G.; Begoña, M. Life history and population size variability in a relict plant. Different routes towards long-term persistence. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, Z.Y.; Yan, S.Y.; Qin, Y.; Zou, L.N. The characters of shrubby diversity of Alxa arid desert region. Joumal Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2009, 23, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhi, Y.B.; Li, J.M.; Wang, Z.L.; Han, X.; Zhang, H.L.; Su, Z.A.; Yu, Y.H.; Jia, X.T.; Bai, Z.Q. Pollen morphology of eight major sand plants and their historical significance in west ordos, Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Micropalaeontol. Sin. 2010, 27, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu, Z.Y.; Ma, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.L.; Zhao, Y.Z. Endemic plants and floristic characteristics in Alashan-ordos biodiversity center. Arid. Zone Resour. Environ. 1999, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tiffney, B.H. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: Its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. J. Arnold Arbor. 1985, 66, 243–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tiffney, B.H. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 1985, 66, 73–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wolfe, J.A. Tertiary climatic fluctuations and methods of analysis of Tertiary floras. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1971, 9, 27–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tiffney, B.H.; Manchester, S.R. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the Northern Hemisphere Tertiary. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2001, 162, S3–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Milne, R.I.; Abbott, R.J. The origin and evolution of Tertiary relict floras. Adv. Bot. Res. 2002, 38, 281–314. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, T.; Wang, W.; An, H.J.; Zhang, H.D.; Wu, J.L. Relevant Analysis on Changed Population Spot and Priority Protection Order of the Peculiar Endangered Plants in Eastern Alasham-western Erdos. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2005, 19, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang, Z.Y. Monitoring and Assessment of Ecological Environment in Alxa League under the Background of Climate Change. J. Agric. Catastrophology 2023, 13, 105–107. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, F.; Zhu, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, Q.; Jin, L.; Wünemann, B. Abrupt Holocene changes of the Asian monsoon at millennial- and centennial-scales: Evidence from lake sediment document in Minqin Basin, NW China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2001, 46, 1942–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, H.C.; Ma, Y.Z.; Li, J.J.; Wüennemann, B. A preliminary study on the Paleocene paleoclimatic change in the southern margin of Tengger Desert. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1998, 43, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, H.C.; Ma, Y.Z.; Wünnemann, B.; Pachur, H.J. A Holocene climatic record from arid northwestern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2000, 162, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. You, L.; Shen, J.G.; Pei, H. Climate change in Inner Mongolia in the last 50 years and the trend in the next 10–20 years. Inn. Mong. Meteorol. 2002, 4, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Y.X.; Li, J.B.; Ma, W.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y. Preliminary analysis and mutation test of air temperature in Alashan League area. Inn. Mong. Sci. Econ. 2017, 06, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, D.M.; Yang, Z.Y. Characterisation of changes in extreme cold weather events in Alashan League. Mod. Agric. 2017, 96–97. [Google Scholar]
  43. Alashan League Administration. About Alashan—Geography and Environment [EB/OL]. Available online: http://www.als.gov.cn/col/col3386/index.html#dlhj2022a (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  44. Alashan League Administration. Alashan Facts—Natural Resources [EB/OL]. Available online: http://www.als.gov.cn/col/col3386/index.html#mzzj2022b (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  45. Zhang, M.L.; Temirbayeva, K.; Sanderson, S.C.; Chen, X. Young dispersal of xerophil Nitraria lineages in intercontinental disjunctions of the Old World. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Woutersen, A.; Jardine, P.E.; Silvestro, D.; Bogotá-Angel, R.G.; Zhang, H.-X.; Meijer, N.; Bouchal, J.; Barbolini, N.; Dupont-Nivet, G.; Koutsodendris, A.; et al. The evolutionary history of the Central Asian steppe-desert taxon Nitraria (Nitrariaceae) as revealed by integration of fossil pollen morphology and molecular data. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2023, 202, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, H.Y.; Tan, H.J.; Zhang, Z.S.; Jia, X.H.; Zhang, J.G.; Fan, H.W. Physiological Response and Adjustment Mechanism of Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina to Extreme Environment. J. Desert Res. 2012, 32, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  48. Guo, Z.T.; Ruddiman, W.F.; Hao, Q.Z.; Wu, H.B.; Qiao, Y.S.; Zhu, R.X.; Peng, S.Z.; Wei, J.J.; Yuan, B.Y.; Liu, T.S. Onset of Asian desertification by 22 Myr ago inferred from loess deposits in China. Nature 2002, 416, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dong, X.J.; Zhang, X.S. Some observations of the adaptations of sandy shrubs to the arid environment in the Mu Us Sandland: Leaf water relations and anatomic features. J. Arid. Environ. 2001, 48, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, X.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, C. The research of the breeding characters of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum. Pratacult. Sci. 2006, 23, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bellstedt, D.U.; Galley, C.; Pirie, M.D.; Linder, H.P. The migration of paleotropical arid flora: Zygophylloideae as an example. Syst. Bot. 2012, 37, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, S.D.; Lin, L.; Li, H.L.; Yu, S.X.; Zhang, L.J.; Wang, W. Evolution of Asian Interior Arid-Zone Biota: Evidence from the Diversification of Asian Zygophyllum (Zygophyllaceae). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shen, X.X.; Chai, M.W.; Xiang, J.; Li, R.L.; Qiu, G.Y. Survival strategies of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus and Zygophyllum xanthoxylon in saline and drought environments, northwest China. Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhengyi, W. China Vegetation; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu, Y.H.; Wang, S.M.; Wang, H.S. A Study on the chromosomal geography of Ammopiptanthus Genus. Geogr. Res. 1996, 15, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhao, Y.Z. Study on Floristic Geographical Distribution of Amygdalus mongolica. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. NeiMonggol (Nat. Sci.) 1995, 26, 713–715. [Google Scholar]
  57. Xinjiang Comprehensive Investigation Team of China Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Vegetation and Its Utilization in Xinjiang; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang, H.S. Distribution of main halophyte communities in Xinjiang and their relationship with soil and groundwater. Plant Ecol. Geophys. Ser. 1964, 2, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
  59. Staples, G.W. Revision of Asiatic Poraneae (Convolvulaceae)—Cordisepalum, Dinetus, Duperreya, Porana, Poranopsis and Tridynamia. Blumea-Biodivers. Evol. Biogeogr. Plants 2006, 51, 403–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Staples, G.W.; Austin, D.F. Revision of neotropical Calucobolus and Porana (Convolvulaceae). Edinb. J. Bot. 2009, 66, 133–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Staples, G.W.; Noltie, H.J. Proposal to conserve the name Hewittia against Shuttereia Choisy (Convolvulaceae). Taxon 2007, 56, 262. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang, D.K.; Wang, J.H.; Ma, Q.L.; Liu, H.J. Summary of Artemisia ordosica studies. Pratacultural Sci. 2007, 24, 34–35. [Google Scholar]
  63. Inner Mongolia Flora Editorial Committee. Inner Mongolia Flora; Inner Mongolia People ‘s Publishing House: Hohhot, China, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  64. Department of Ecological Environment, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Natural Ecological Protection and Management-Rare and Endangered Plant List of Inner Mongolia [EB/OL]. Available online: https://sthjt.nmg.gov.cn/stbh2021/zrstbhgl/202108/t20210829_1850525.html (accessed on 19 May 2023).
  65. National Environmental Protection Administration, Chinese Academy of Sciences. China Rare and Endangered Plant List; Science Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, S.; Xie, H. Red List of Chinese Species; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  67. Liguo, F. China Plant Red Book; Science Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kong, L.S.; Ma, M.H. The bioecological characteristics of Halocnemum strobilaceum and its community on the border of oasis in Hutubi, Xinjiang. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1995, 15, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ripley, B.D. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J. Appl. Probab. 1976, 13, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, G.; Xie, C.; Wei, L.; Gao, Z.; Yang, H.; Jim, C. Predicting Suitable Habitats for China’s Endangered Plant Handeliodendron bodinieri (H. Lév.) Rehder. Diversity 2023, 15, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xie, S.; Si, H.; Sun, H.; Zhao, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Niu, J.; Wang, Z. Predicting the Potential Distribution of the Endangered Plant Eucommia ulmoides in China under the Background of Climate Change. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dong, P.B.; Wang, L.Y.; Wang, L.J.; Jia, Y.; Li, Z.H.; Bai, G.; Zhao, R.M.; Liang, W.; Wang, H.Y.; Guo, F.X.; et al. Distributional Response of the Rare and Endangered Tree Species Abies chensiensis to Climate Change in East Asia. Biology 2022, 11, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pollock, L.J.; Tingley, R.; Morris, W.K.; Golding, N.; O’Hara, R.B.; Parris, K.M.; Vesk, P.A.; McCarthy, M.A. Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM). Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J.A. Generalized Linear Models; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Vuuren, D.P.; Stehfest, E.; Gernaat, D.E.; Doelman, J.C.; van den Berg, M.; Harmsen, M.; de Boer, H.S.; Bouwman, L.F.; Diaoglou, V.; Edelenbosch, O.Y. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 42, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fan, M.E.; Wang, P.Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gang, C.C.; Ma, F.L. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Global Grassland and Net Primary Productivity under Different Future Climate Scenarios. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2023, 1–14. Available online: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3362.S.20231101.1428.014.html (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  78. Doelman, J.C.; Stehfest, E.; Tabeau, A.; van Meijl, H.; Lassaletta, L.; Gernaat DE, H.J.; Hermans, K.; Harmsen, M.; Diaoglou, V.; Biemans, H.; et al. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 48, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Popp, A.; Calvin, K.; Fujimori, S.; Havlik, P.; Humpenöder, F.; Stehfest, E.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Dietrich, J.P.; Doelmann, J.C.; Gusti, M.; et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 42, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hurtt, G.C.; Chini, L.; Sahajpal, R.; Frolking, S.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Calvin, K.; Doelman, J.C.; Fisk, J.; Fujimori, S.; Klein Goldewijk, K.; et al. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 2020, 13, 5425–5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Warton, D.I.; Blanchet, F.G.; O’Hara, R.B.; Ovaskainen, O.; Taskinen, S.; Walker, S.C.; Hui, F.K. So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30, 766–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zurell, D.; Pollock, L.J.; Thuiller, W. Do joint species distribution models reliably detect interspecific interactions from co-occurrence data in homogenous environments? Ecography 2018, 41, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chib, S.; Greenberg, E. Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models. Biometrika 1998, 85, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shi, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhao, P.; Yin, H.; Zhao, X.; Xiao, H.; Li, X.; Chen, G.; Ma, X.F. Transcriptomic analysis of a tertiary relict plant, extreme xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica to identify genes related to drought adaptation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cheng, J.; Kao, H.X.; Dong, S.B. Population genetic structure and gene flow of rare and endangered Tetraena mongolica Maxim. revealed by reduced representation sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ivanov Leonid, A.; Migalina Svetlana, V.; Ronzhina Dina, A.; Tumurjav Shinekhuu Gundsambuu Tserenkhand Bazha Sergey, N.; Ivanova Larissa, A. Altitude-dependent variation in leaf structure and pigment content provides the performance of a relict shrub in mountains of Mongolia. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2022, 181, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pearson, R.G.; Dawson, T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Inner Mongolia Ningxia Comprehensive Expedition Team, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Inner Mongolia Vegetation; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liguo, F. Chinese Plants; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  90. Xu, Q.; Liu, S.R.; Zang, R.G.; Guo, Q.S.; Hao, Y.G. The characteristics of reproductive ecology of endemic species Tetraena mongolica population in China. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2001, 37, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  91. Gao, Q.; Yan, L.; Feng, Z.Q. The adjust diversity of the envronment dversity on the leaf structrue of 13 species of Zypophyllacdae. J. Inn. Mong. Agric. Univ. 2008, 29, 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  92. Meng, H.; Siqingaowa NaRen, H.; Gao, R.H. Adaptation diversity of Alashan desert shrub in inner mongolia. J. Inn. Mong. Agric. Univ. 2011, 32, 277–281. [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhi, Y.B.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.S.; An, S.Q.; Wang, Z.L.; Li, H.L.; Su, Z.A.; Wang, Q. The endangered characteristics and mechanism of the endemic relict shrub Tetraena mongolica Maxim. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2008, 28, 0767–0776. [Google Scholar]
  94. Jiang, S.; Luo, M.X.; Gao, R.H.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.Z.; Li, Y.J.; Liao, P.C. Isolation-by-environment as a driver of genetic differentiation among populations of the only broad-leaved evergreen shrub Ammopiptanthus mongolicus in Asian temperate deserts. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 12008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, Y.Z.; Luo, M.X.; Pang, L.D.; Gao, R.H.; Chang, J.T.; Liao, P.C. Parallel adaptation prompted core-periphery divergence of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 956374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of the study area (the yellow area represents a sandy desert with almost no vegetation. The topography data adopted SRTM DEM digital elevation data obtained from the WorldClim website. The precipitation data were derived from https://www.worldclim.org/, accessed on 23 September 2022, which was version 2.1 of WorldClim, released in 2020).
Figure 1. Overview of the study area (the yellow area represents a sandy desert with almost no vegetation. The topography data adopted SRTM DEM digital elevation data obtained from the WorldClim website. The precipitation data were derived from https://www.worldclim.org/, accessed on 23 September 2022, which was version 2.1 of WorldClim, released in 2020).
Plants 12 04065 g001
Figure 2. Interspecies relationship diagram. Legend: SX, Sarcozygium xanthoxylon; NT, Nitraria tangutorum; RS, Reaumuria songarica; AM, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus; TM, Tetraena mongolica; CT, Convolvulus tragacanthoides; Amo, Amygdalus mongolica; KF, Kalidium foliatum; HS, Halocnemum strobilaceum; AO, Artemisia ordosica. Green indicates a positive correlation, orange indicates a negative correlation and gray indicates a nonsignificant correlation.
Figure 2. Interspecies relationship diagram. Legend: SX, Sarcozygium xanthoxylon; NT, Nitraria tangutorum; RS, Reaumuria songarica; AM, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus; TM, Tetraena mongolica; CT, Convolvulus tragacanthoides; Amo, Amygdalus mongolica; KF, Kalidium foliatum; HS, Halocnemum strobilaceum; AO, Artemisia ordosica. Green indicates a positive correlation, orange indicates a negative correlation and gray indicates a nonsignificant correlation.
Plants 12 04065 g002
Figure 3. Distribution points of shrub species.
Figure 3. Distribution points of shrub species.
Plants 12 04065 g003
Figure 4. Probability plot of the suitable distribution of shrub species.
Figure 4. Probability plot of the suitable distribution of shrub species.
Plants 12 04065 g004
Figure 5. Probability plot of the suitability distribution of 10 shrub species under different climate change scenarios.
Figure 5. Probability plot of the suitability distribution of 10 shrub species under different climate change scenarios.
Plants 12 04065 g005aPlants 12 04065 g005b
Figure 6. The change in suitable range for relict plants compared to the current climate. The “−” is the percentage reduction in range.
Figure 6. The change in suitable range for relict plants compared to the current climate. The “−” is the percentage reduction in range.
Plants 12 04065 g006
Figure 7. Change in suitable range for typical desert plants compared to current climate. The “−” is the percentage reduction in range.
Figure 7. Change in suitable range for typical desert plants compared to current climate. The “−” is the percentage reduction in range.
Plants 12 04065 g007
Table 2. Description of abiotic factors.
Table 2. Description of abiotic factors.
Soil Property FactorsTopographic FactorsBiometeorological Factors
Silt concentrationSlopeAverage annual temperatureAverage temperature of the warmest quarter
Silt contentAspect of slopeDaily difference in mean temperatureAverage temperature of the coldest quarter
Clay contentAltitudeIsothermalityAnnual rainfall
Organic carbon content Coefficient of seasonal variation of temperaturePrecipitation in the wettest month
PH Maximum temperature in the hottest monthPrecipitation in the driest month
Carbonate or lime content Minimum temperature in the coldest monthSeasonal variations in precipitation
Sulfate content Annual difference in temperaturePrecipitation in the driest quarter
Average temperature of the wettest quarterWettest quarter precipitation
Average temperature of the driest quarterWarmest quarter precipitation
Coldest quarter precipitation
Table 3. Suitable areas for relict plants under current and four future climate scenarios.
Table 3. Suitable areas for relict plants under current and four future climate scenarios.
SpeciesCurrent Area
(km2)
Area under SSP126 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP245 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP370 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP585 Scenario (km2)
SX16,34317,28316,13016,66516,878
NT14,76014,81614,94715,21714,366
RS17,98618,84319,11318,69918,598
AM21,55421,27620,06422,41021,145
TM18,85319,23718,80218,20718,608
Table 4. Suitable areas of typical desert plants under current and four future climate scenarios.
Table 4. Suitable areas of typical desert plants under current and four future climate scenarios.
SpeciesCurrent Area
(km2)
Area under SSP126 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP245 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP370 Scenario (km2)Area under SSP585 Scenario (km2)
CT12,31111,48012,03811,55210,161
Amo12,85711,55512,42313,02512,470
KF964910,023995610,14310,227
HS74537054736674547249
AO30,01430,74830,68632,17229,650
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, M.; Jie, M.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y. Relict Plants Are Better Able to Adapt to Climate Change: Evidence from Desert Shrub Communities. Plants 2023, 12, 4065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234065

AMA Style

Lu Y, Zhang B, Zhang M, Jie M, Guo S, Wang Y. Relict Plants Are Better Able to Adapt to Climate Change: Evidence from Desert Shrub Communities. Plants. 2023; 12(23):4065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Ying, Boran Zhang, Min Zhang, Meiyu Jie, Siqi Guo, and Yange Wang. 2023. "Relict Plants Are Better Able to Adapt to Climate Change: Evidence from Desert Shrub Communities" Plants 12, no. 23: 4065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234065

APA Style

Lu, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Jie, M., Guo, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Relict Plants Are Better Able to Adapt to Climate Change: Evidence from Desert Shrub Communities. Plants, 12(23), 4065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop