Next Article in Journal
Mechanistic Insights on Salicylic Acid Mediated Enhancement of Photosystem II Function in Oregano Seedlings Subjected to Moderate Drought Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Reference Organism to Study Algal–Microbial Interactions: Why Can’t They Be Friends?
Previous Article in Journal
Friends in Arms: Flavonoids and the Auxin/Cytokinin Balance in Terrestrialization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbial Intervention: An Approach to Combat the Postharvest Pathogens of Fruits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhibition of Autophagy Increases Cell Death in HeLa Cells through Usnic Acid Isolated from Lichens

1
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
2
Division of Microbiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
3
Centre of Advanced study in Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(3), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030519
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Microbe Interactions 2022)

Abstract

:
The Western Ghats, India, is a hotspot for lichen diversity. However, the pharmacological importance of lichen-associated metabolites remains untapped. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of lichens of this region. For this, sixteen macrolichens were collected and identified from two locations in the Western Ghats. The acetone extract of Usnea cornuta (UC2A) showed significant cytotoxicity towards multiple human cancer cell lines. Interestingly, co-treatment with chloroquine (CQ), an autophagy inhibitor, increased the cytotoxic potential of the UC2A extract. A gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) study revealed usnic acid (UA), atraric acid and barbatic acid as the dominant cytotoxic compounds in the UC2A extract. Further, UA was purified and identified from the UC2A extract and evaluated for cytotoxicity in HeLa cells. The monodansyl cadaverine and mitotracker red double staining revealed the autophagy-inducing activities of UA, and the inhibition of autophagy was confirmed via CQ treatment. Autophagy inhibition increased the cytotoxicity of UA by 12–16% in a concentration-dependent manner. It also increased lipid peroxidation, ROS levels and mitochondrial depolarization and decreased glutathione availability. A decrease in zeta potential and a 40% increase in caspase 3/7 activity were also noted after CQ treatment of UA-treated cells. Thus, cytotoxicity of UA can be increased by inhibiting autophagy.

1. Introduction

One of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity for women worldwide, particularly in India, is human cervical cancer [1]. It is the fourth most commonly reported cancer among women in the world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), with current measures for the treatment of cervical carcinoma, the number of deaths could increase by half in the coming years [2]. With increasing resistance to the current drugs available against cervical carcinoma, natural products have gained momentum, owing to the rich diversity of secondary metabolites produced by the vast array of flora and fauna, many of which are still unexplored [3,4].
Lichens comprise the symbiotic association between mycobiont(s) and photobiont(s), which can thrive in any climatic conditions. Their synergistic growth and survival have resulted in the production of numerous secondary metabolites, many of which are novel [5,6]. Many lichens have been used in Chinese and Indian traditional practices, due to their cytotoxic, antibacterial, antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory potential [7,8]. The Indian subcontinent harbors a rich diversity of lichens with more than 2450 species, especially in Himalayan and Western Ghats regions [9], and it has been estimated that it covers around 45% of the total lichen diversity of the country [10], though the pharmacological importance of the lichens residing in this region remains neglected.
The Western Ghats region is particularly rich in macrolichens including Usnea, Parmelia and Cladonia sp. [11]. Usnic acid (UA) is a unique metabolite reported in various lichen species or some genera, especially belonging to family Parmeliaceae. Previous published report showed numerous biological activities of usnic acid [12,13,14]. Generally, in lichens, usnic acid is present in the two enantiomeric forms, (−)-usnic acid and (+)-usnic acid, which protects the lichen from UV radiation. However, (+)-usnic acid (UA) is well known for inducing cytotoxic activities at low concentrations by inducing apoptotic cell death in human breast cancer, human cervical carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma [13].
Autophagy is one of the cell death mechanisms whereby the existing cellular materials are delivered to lysosomes for the generation of energy via the degradation of intracellular protein and organelles [15]. Many natural products use autophagy as a mechanism to either protect the cells or destroy them. In terms of cancer death regulation, it shows inhibitory effects on tumor cell growth [16]. Many natural products, including berberine, curcumin, honokiol and ursolic acid, are known to induce tumor-suppressing autophagy via JNK, LC3- II/III, mTOR, MAPK, CD 147 and ROS dependent pathways [17]. On the other hand, the inhibition of autophagy by certain natural products, such as artemisinin, paclitaxel and resveratrol, increases the apoptosis-mediated cell death by modulating Wnt/β-catenin, LC3- III and caspase 3 pathways [18]. Recent studies have shown the apoptosis- and autophagy-inducing activities of UA in hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric carcinoma, though their cell-death inducing or preventing roles are still not deciphered [19,20,21]. Chen et al. [19] found that autophagy induction and JNK activation prevent apoptosis in hepatic cell carcinoma mediated by UA, although the precise balance between cell death and cell survival induced by UA remains to be determined.
This study, for the first time, reports the isolation of UA from lichens of the Western Ghats and its cytotoxic potential against human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells. Further, the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis in cell death induction mediated by UA in HeLa cells was also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Isolation and Characterization of Lichens for Cytotoxic Activities

In total, 16 macrolichens were isolated and identified from the two locations of the Western Ghats, India, in which the majority of the species belonged to the Parmeliaceae family (Table S1). In total, 14 lichens (87.5%) were corticolous, while the remaining lichens were saxicolous. Out of 16 lichens, four belonged to Parmelia sp. and two belonged to Usnea, Collema and Cladonia sp. respectively. Similar diversity of macrolichens was obtained by Balaji and Hariharan [11] from the Bolampatti II Forest Range (Siruvani Hills), Western Ghats. The Western Ghats, India is among the eight hotspots of biodiversity worldwide, which host a diverse range of lichens, though their pharmaceutical importance is not discovered yet.
The acetone extracts of UC2, PA3, CF6 and CF13 showed good cytotoxicity towards HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines, with UC2 showing the highest cytotoxicity towards HeLa cells (IC50, 38.2 ± 1.25 µg/mL) (Figure 1A,B; Table 1). The hexane extracts of CF6, CM8, LS14 and HP15 exhibited moderate cytotoxicity towards HeLa and MCF-7 cells in comparison to that with the acetone extract (Figure 1C,D; Table 1). The results clearly demonstrated the presence of both polar and non-polar cytotoxic compounds in the screened lichen extracts. Though the polar nature of cytotoxic compounds was present in most of the screened lichens, non-polar extracts of CF6, CM8, LS14 and HP15 also need to be screened further for the isolation of non-polar active ingredients.
Further, to assess the role of autophagy in the cytotoxicity of the lichen crude extracts, the selected lichen extracts were added with chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor. A decrease in the IC50 of the acetone extract of UC2 and LS14 extracts was observed after the addition of CQ (Figure 2; Table 2). Similarly, the hexane extract of LS14 exhibited a decrease in its IC50 value from 41.1 ± 3 to 34 ± 1 µg/mL and 53.7 ± 5 to 47.4 ± 4 µg/mL with HeLa and MCF-7 cells, respectively (Table 2). The highest cytotoxicity was observed with the acetone extract of UC2 against the HeLa cell line after the addition of CQ (IC50, 26.01 ± 1 µg/mL). Many of the lichen extracts are known to induce cell death in cancer cells via apoptosis, though the interplay of autophagy in the modulation of cell death has not been deciphered [22,23]. Usnea intermedia and Usnea barbata extracts demonstrated significant cytotoxicity toward cancer cells by inducing apoptosis [24,25]. Zugic et al. [26] have reported autophagy induction in B16 mouse melanoma and C6 rat glioma using a CO2 supercritical extract of Old Man’s Beard (Usnea barbata),though the death-inducing or suppressing role of autophagy remains undeciphered [26].

2.2. Chemical Composition of UC2A

To determine the cytotoxic metabolites present in UC2A, GCMS was carried out. A total of 29 secondary metabolites matched the hits in the database. The analysis revealed the presence of depsides, phenols and alkaloids in the UC2A extract (Table 3). +(−) Usnic acid, benzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethyl-, methyl ester (atraric acid) and benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-((2-hydroxy-4-methoxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoyl)oxy)-3,6-dimethyl- (barbatic acid)-methyl ester detected in the GCMS are some of the known cytotoxic secondary metabolites unique to the lichens (Figure S2). The +(−) usnic acid present in abundance (13.3%) in UC2A is known to induce cytotoxicity in multiple cancer cell lines [14]. Atraric acid isolated from lichens, including Physcia and Parmelia sp., has shown cytotoxic potential against HepG2, A549 and HL-60 cells [27]. Barbatic acid is also a unique metabolite of Usnea sp. that can induce cancer cell death [24]. The UC2A extract also showed the presence of octadecanoic and hexadecanoic acid. Interestingly, a vinca alkaloid derivative, apovincamine, was detected in small quantities in the extract of UC2A (0.016%), which has previously shown cytotoxic activities against B16 mouse melanoma cells [28].

2.3. Purification and Identification of UA from UC2A Extract

The results of the KCP spot test of UC2 and GCMS analysis of the UC2A extract revealed the presence of UA as a prominent cytotoxic secondary metabolite in the extract; hence, the studies were further carried out for the purification of UA from the UC2A extract.

2.3.1. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

After optimization of the solvent systems, the best resolution was observed with the solvent system (toluene:acetic acid, 9:1) for the UC2A extract, when visualized under UV 254 nm. The Rf value of the standard UA band and the corresponding band of UC2A extract was found to be 0.82 (Figure 3A-inset). Interestingly, US5 isolated from the other Usnea sp. also showed a faint band with an Rf value of 0.82. Further, preparative TLC was carried out to obtain a higher quantity of the desired band from the UC2A extract. The obtained yellow colored powder was weighed and dissolved in acetone for further characterization.

2.3.2. GCMS

The GC analyses of the eluted spot indicated a single peak at a retention time 24.06 min (Figure 3A). The MS of the compound indicated abundant fragments of 233, 260 and 344 m/z (Figure 3B). The NIST database produced a matching hit with ~99 % probability with (+)-usnic acid. This MS of usnic acid (Figure 3C) also indicated abundant fragments of 233, 260 and 344 m/z, thus confirming the identity of the TLC-eluted spot.

2.3.3. FTIR

The spectrum of FTIR spectroscopy of the UC2A extract (Figure 3D) matched with the peaks that have been reported earlier after FTIR spectroscopy of UA [29,30]. A wide low-intensity peak was observed at 3427 cm−1 indicating the stretching vibrations of phenol OH groups of UA. The C-H stretching vibration of the UA aromatic part was noted at 2934 cm−1, while C=O stretching of the strong carbonyl non-chelated aromatic ketone was observed at 1693 cm−1. A band at 1544 cm−1 indicated the conjugated chelated carbonyl, which was also reported by Karabacak et al. [30] in a UA spectrograph. The band at 1453 cm−1 corresponded to the C-H bending of alkane, while the band at 971 cm−1 depicted the C=C bending of alkene in UA. The presence of a phenolic group in UA was confirmed based on the O-H bending of alcohol at 1361 cm−1, while the C-O stretching of alcohol was observed at 1050, 1126 and 1194 cm−1. The C=O deformation vibration of the aromatic structure in UA was confirmed based on a high-intensity band at 823 cm−1.

2.4. Usnic Acid (UA) Isolated from UC2A Extract Shows Concentration-Dependent Cytotoxicity against Cancer Cell Lines

After isolation, identification and structural elucidation of UA from the UC2A extract, the cytotoxic activities were evaluated against the cancer cell lines MCF7, A-549 and HeLa (Figure 4A).The results showed concentration-dependent cell death in all three cancer cell lines with UA treatment. The lowest IC50 was observed with the HeLa cell line (48.65 µM), followed by that with A-549 (84.21 µM) and MCF7 (89.09 µM) cells. Earlier research has shown the UA induces cytotoxicity in HeLa cells with IC50 values ranging from 48.5 to 199.2 μM after 72 h of incubation [5,14].
Chloroquine treatment inhibits autophagy by decreasing the degradation of autophagosomes and decreases mitochondrial membrane potential. Autophagy is often linked with apoptosis, although the latter is the most common cell death pathway invoked by anticancer compounds. Autophagy, being a pro-survival cell strategy, diminishes the cytotoxic effect of the treatment. Hence, blocking autophagy using CQ, an autophagic flux blocker, can enhance the apoptotic effect of anticancer drugs [31,32].
The cells were treated with UA followed by CQ and visualized via confocal microscopy (Figure 5A,B). The MDC staining of HeLa cells treated with UA IC50 + CQ resulted in the accumulation of autophagosomes, as indicated by the presence of blue puncta and elevated blue fluorescence intensity. However, treatment with UA (IC50) alone demonstrated the absence of blue fluorescence reflecting the autophagosome degradation via the lysosomal pathway. No blue puncta were observed in control cells and CQ-treated cells. As seen in the histogram (Figure 5B), a massive increase in blue fluorescence intensity was recorded when cells were co-treated with UA and CQ [31]. MitoxRed staining indicated a massive MMP disruption in response to UA (IC50) + CQ in comparison to that with UA (IC50) in HeLa cells. As seen in the histogram (Figure 5B), compared to that in the control and CQ-treated cells, the red fluorescence decreased drastically when treated with UA and further when co-treated with CQ. This causes severe energy disruptions in the cells and further elevates apoptosis as compared to that with UA alone treatment. UA-induced autophagy has also been observed in HePG2 and SNU-449 (HBV(+) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines [19,20]. Further, the HeLa cells were treated with the phagophore fusion inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) for the inhibition of autophagy. Autophagy inactivation has been associated with decreased JNK activity and increased UA-induced cytotoxicity in HePG2 cells [19]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to apoptosis and autophagy. Since, autophagy is a pro-survival mechanism, it protects mitochondrial function. However, blocking autophagy elevates the apoptotic effect of anticancer drugs and also induces MMP loss [31]. The interplay between apoptosis and autophagy decides the final fate for the turnover or the destruction of the cellular structures, including cancer cells [33].

2.5. Inhibition of Autophagy Increases the Cytotoxicity of UA against HeLa Cells

After confirming the autophagy-inducing activities of UA and its inhibition mediated by CQ, the role of UA-induced autophagy in cytotoxicity against HeLa cells was investigated. The MTT and resazurin assays were carried out with the UA-treated HeLa cells in the presence and absence of CQ. A significant increase in cell death was observed after the inhibition of autophagy mediated by CQ treatment (Figure 4B,C). The IC50 value decreased from 48.65 to 29.1 µM based on the MTT assay carried out on UA-treated cells with CQ treatment, while a 17% decrease in the IC50 value of UA was observed in UA-treated HeLa cells after autophagy inhibition during the resazurin assay. The data were cross-verified via PI live/dead flow cytometric assays. An increase of 25–49% cell death was observed after autophagy inhibition in UA-treated HeLa cells (Figure 6A,B). UA is known to induce autophagy, but the regulation of cytotoxicity mediated by autophagy has not been studied in detail. Yurdacan et al. [20] in their studies observed the role of UA as a therapeutic compound against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, though they also emphasized further studies on the death-preventive or promoting roles of UA-induced autophagy in cancer cell lines. Many natural products have shown the apoptosis-suppressing role of autophagy mediated by regulating ROS generation and interfering with signaling pathways [34]. Though the interplay of ROS and autophagy is complex, studies have supported the link between decreased ROS and pre-tumoral autophagy, suggesting the important role of autophagy inhibitors in increased cancer cell death [35].

2.6. Autophagy Inhibition Increases ROS Generation and Changes the Membrane Potential of UA-Treated Hela Cells

ROS-triggered modulation of redox homeostasis and programmed cell death is a well-known phenomenon in cancer cell death [36]. Modulating the balance between autophagy and redox signaling pathways is the key to the outcome of cancer cells [37]. DCHFDA flow cytometry staining was performed to evaluate the role of autophagy inhibition in ROS generation in UA-treated HeLa cells. It was observed that UA treatment increased the ROS generation in HeLa cells by 6–13-fold. Further, CQ treatment resulted in a significant increase in ROS production in UA-treated HeLa cells (Figure 7A). The ROS production increased 28.75-fold with CQ treatment in comparison to the 13.28-fold increase in 50 µM UA-treated HeLa cells (Figure 7B).
Lipid peroxidation and the reduced glutathione level (GSH) in cancer cells are also major determinants of cancer cell fate. GSH depletion and increased lipid peroxidation are hallmarks of cancer cell death [38,39]. After CQ treatment, the lipid peroxidation increased to 44.84–64.66% in comparison to that in UA-treated HeLa cells without CQ treatment (Figure 8A). The GSH level in CQ treated cells was 23.2–40% lower than that in UA-treated HeLa cells without CQ (Figure 8B).
Taken together, the data suggest that autophagy inhibition plays a significant role in increased ROS generation and dysregulation of the redox machinery in UA-treated HeLa cells. The influence of ROS in shaping the cancer microenvironment and the progression of programmed cell death is crucial [40]. The inhibition of autophagy can result in the disruption of redox homeostasis via the accumulation of ROS and upregulation of apoptosis-inducing pathways.
CQ treatment in UA-treated HeLa cells also altered the zeta potential of cells. Zeta potential is generally used for colloidal systems to explore their stability and study the surface charges, though its use in biological systems is untapped [41]. The inhibition of autophagy mediated by CQ resulted in a further decrease in the zeta potential from −23.17 ± 1.33 mV to −29.78 ± 3 in 50 µM UA-treated HeLa cells. The control cells had a zeta potential of −19.08 ± 0.81 (Table S2). A shift in the zeta potential towards the more negative side may indicate the exposure of negatively charged phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine, to the outer membrane, which occurs during apoptosis. Kazantsev et al. [42] correlated a similar decrease in the zeta potential of neuro-2a tumor cells with cytotoxicity after their exposure to alumina nanoparticles.

2.7. Autophagy Inhibition Increases Apoptosis in UA-treated HeLa Cells by Increasing Caspase 3/7 Activity

The caspase 3/7 activity in HeLa cells increased by 0.42- and 0.79-fold after treatment with 25 and 50 µM UA, respectively. The activation of the caspase 3/7 pathway is a pre-apoptotic event that initiates a cascade of reactions for the apoptotic death of cancer cells [43]. The results confirmed the apoptosis-inducing potential of UA in A ROS-dependent manner. Further, the activity of caspase 3/7 was increased by 50–78% in UA-treated HeLa cells when treated with CQ in comparison to that in UA-treated HeLa cells without CQ (Figure 8C). The results indicated that the inhibition of autophagy can increase the cytotoxicity of UA in an apoptosis-dependent manner in HeLa cells. Caspase activation is the ultimate hallmark of apoptosis. Anticancer compounds target autophagy and apoptosis. Although this interplay is extremely complex, several studies have demonstrated the pivotal role of autophagy blockers in enhancing cancer chemotherapy outcomes [44]. Bhattacharjee et al. [45] reported the cytotoxic effect of ormeloxifene in ovarian cancer cells. The cytotoxicity of the compound was characterized by caspase-dependent apoptosis, MMP loss and ROS generation. All of these effects were immensely elevated when co-treatment with an autophagic inhibitor was performed. Since cancer cells can grow in a hypoxic, limited nutrition environment, they are especially capable of utilizing an autophagic survival strategy. Hence, the autophagy–apoptosis concept has been widely researched to suppress autophagy and elevate apoptosis [41,44,46].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection and Identification of Lichens

The lichen samples were collected from Kodaikanal (10.2381° N, 77.4892° E), Tamilnadu, India surrounded by Palani Hill Forests and Munnar (10.0889° N, 77.0595° E), Kerela, India, the two locations known for the lichen diversity and richness of fauna (Supporting Figure S1A,B). Samples were collected in paper bags in March, 2019, and transported to the Department of Biochemistry, at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, under aseptic conditions. The collected lichen thalli were washed with sterile water and air-dried for one week to remove the moisture [12]. The obtained samples were identified using their morphology and the results of a color test using K (5% Ca(OH)2), C (aq. Ca(OCl)2.), and PD (C6H4(NH2)2).

3.2. Cell Line and Culture Conditions

The cell lines of human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), human breast cancer (MCF-7) and human lung cancer (A-549) were collected from the collection center of the National Centre for Cell Sciences, Pune, India. The cells were grown in complete DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (cDMEM), antibiotics (100 mg/L penicillin, 250 mg/L streptomycin) and 2 mM glutamine in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C, with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity [47].

3.3. Preparation of the Lichen Extracts and Screening of the Extracts for Their Cytotoxic Activities in HeLa and MCF Cell Lines

The 10 g of air-dried lichen thalli was ground uniformly to yield a powder form. The dried powder was sequentially extracted with hexane and acetone for non-polar and polar active ingredient extraction. Briefly, the dried powders were soaked in 200 mL of hexane and kept on the rotary shaker for 48 h. Thereafter, the filtrate was again soaked in 200 mL of acetone and kept on the rotary shaker for 48 h. Further, both the non-polar (hexane) and polar (acetone) extracts were obtained by evaporating the organic solvents in a rotary evaporator until the organic solvent was evaporated.
Both the extracts were screened to evaluate their cytotoxic potential using HeLa cells and human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) via MTT assays following standard protocols [48]. In brief, the respective cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a 104 cells/well seeding density and incubated for 24 h in cell culture conditions. Thereafter the cells were exposed to hexane and acetone extracts of lichens (50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) for 24 h., after which the MTT assay was performed by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 595 nm on a multiplate reader instrument (Tecan Infinite M200 Pro microplate reader). Paclitaxel (100 nm) served as positive control.

3.4. Screening of Selected Extracts for their Cytotoxic Potential in the Presence of Autophagy Inhibitors

The lichen extracts showing cytotoxic potential were further checked for the interference of autophagy [49]. Briefly, the cells were incubated with lichen extracts (25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) for 24 h with 80 µM of chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor. After the incubation, an MTT assay was carried out as described earlier. Paclitaxel served as positive control. The IC50 values with or without treatment with chloroquine were calculated to infer autophagy in the cell death induction mediated by lichen extracts.

3.5. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (GCMS) Studies for Detection of Cytotoxic Metabolites in Lichen Extracts

To screen the cytotoxic metabolites present in the extracts, GCMS studies were carried out. The lichen extract that showed potential to increase cytotoxicity after autophagy inhibition (UC2A) was subjected to GCMS analysis using the previously described instruments and protocols [47,50]. The compounds spotted in GC/MS were further identified by performing a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database search.

3.6. Purification and Identification of UA from U. cornuta Acetone Extract (UC2A)

3.6.1. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

Based upon the earlier evidence of KC test and GCMS results, TLC of the UC2A extract was carried out using silica gel 60 GF254 TLC sheets (Merck, India), 20 × 20, with a 0.25 mm thickness and the optimized solvent system (toluene:acetic Acid, 9:1). For this, 1 μg/mL of standard + (−) usnic acid was simultaneously run on the same silica gel sheet. Further, the TLC sheet was visualized with UV 254 nm light, and the Rf values were noted for each spot. The bands with the same Rf value as the standard UA were scrapped, dissolved in acetone, and dried in a speed vacuum for further use.

3.6.2. GCMS and FTIR Analysis

GCMS was used to identify the TLC band and to analyze its mass fragmentation pattern using a mass spectral database search of the NIST, as described earlier. The hit with the highest score was used to elucidate the structure [51].
The functional groups were observed via FTIR analyses (Perkin Elmer, US), and the spectra were observed at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the region of 4000–400 cm−1 [51].

3.7. Confirmation of Autophagy Inhibition and Change in Mitochondrial Potential using Mitotracker Red (MitoxRed) and Monodansyl Cadaverine (MDC) Staining

MitoxRed and MDC double staining was performed for the control and the UA-treated HeLa cells with or without CQ, which has been used to analyze the formation of acidic vacuoles [32,49]. Briefly, cells at a seeding density of 1 × 105 cells/mL were grown for 24 h and treated with UA (25, 50 µM) with or without CQ. After incubation, the cells were washed thrice and stained with 100 nM MitoxRed and 50 μM MDC at 37 °C in the dark for 30 min. The stained cells were visualized immediately using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FLUOVIEW FV3000 confocal microscope). The relative intensities of different treatments were plotted further using ImageJ software [52].

3.8. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of UA in Human Cancer Cell Lines and Effect of Autophagy Inhibition on the Cytotoxic Effect of UA on HeLa Cells

The cytotoxicity of UA (5–500 µM) isolated and purified from the UC2A extract was checked using HeLa, MCF-7 and A-549 cells after 24 h of incubation by performing MTT assays, as described earlier. Based on the data, IC50 values of UA for each cell line were calculated.
The maximum cytotoxicity of UA was obtained with HeLa cells. Therefore, further studies were performed only using HeLa cells. The cytotoxicity of UA (25, 50, 100 µM for 24 h) in the presence of an autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine (80 µM), was checked via MTT assays, as described earlier, and the IC50 values were calculated in the presence and absence of chloroquine.
Further, to check the enhancement in UA-induced cell death mediated by the inhibition of autophagy, a resazurin reduction test was performed. Briefly, HeLa cells (1 × 104 cells/mL) were cultured in 96-well plates for 24 h. Thereafter, the cells were treated with UA (25, 50, 100 µM) in the presence and absence of chloroquine (CQ) for 24 h.
After 24 h, 20 μL resazurin (0.01%) was added, and the cells were further incubated at 37 °C in dark. After 3 h, the intensity of the fluorescence was measured using a multiplate reader by focusing the excitation and emission wavelengths at 544 nm and 590 nm, respectively. The cytotoxicity was measured by comparing the UA treated cells with the untreated control, based on which the IC50 values were calculated [32].

3.9. PI Live/Dead Assay

To assess the changes of in the surface induced by UA, a PI live/Dead assay was performed [22,25]. Before analysis, HeLa cells (3 × 105 cells/mL) were treated with UA (25, 50 µM) with or without CQ for 24 h. The live and dead cells were measured via FACS (Cytoflex, Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using CytExpert 2.0 software [43].

3.10. Dichloro-Dihydro-Fluorescein Diacetate (DCFH-DA) Assay

The DCFH-DA assay was used to evaluate the effect of autophagy inhibition on the oxidative stress or generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HeLa cells induced by UA [47]. HeLa cells were administered UA (25, 50 µM) treatment for 24 h either with or without the 80 M CQ treatment. After 15 min of dark incubation at 37 °C, new 10 M DCFH-DA was added to the culture medium, which was then trypsinized, and the cells were harvested. CytExpert 2.0 software (California, USA) was used to quantify and analyze the ROS levels using FACS (Cytoflex). Hela cells were used as the test subjects, while cells treated with 0.1% DMSO served as the positive and negative controls, respectively.

3.11. Lipid Peroxidation and Reduced Glutathione (GSH) Assay

To further assess the impact of autophagy on the redox machinery of UA-treated HeLa cells (25, 50 µM) with or without CQ, the extent of lipid peroxidation and depletion of glutathione were assessed [14].
For the lipid peroxidation assay, control and treated HeLa cell lysis was performed with tris-EDTA buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail. Further, the TBA-reacting substances (TBARS) were calculated as nanomoles of TBARS/mg protein. The Bradford method followed to measure the protein content of HeLa cells.
To measure the concentration of GSH in lysates of HeLa cells, the cells were treated with 0.1 mM DTNB, 12 mM NADPH and 50 U/L GR. However the generation of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB) was measured at 412 nm as n moles/mg of protein.

3.12. Surface Potential of the Cells

To check the effect of autophagy inhibition on the cell surface potential in UA-treated cells, the zeta (ξ) potential was measured via dynamic light scattering (ZetaPALS, Brookhaven Instruments, USA) [14,41,47]. Briefly, the UA-treated HeLa cells (25, 50 µM) with or without treatment with CQ were trypsinized, harvested, and suspended in 1 mL of HEPES buffer after 24 h of incubation. The instrument calculated the zeta (ξ) potential based on the electrophoretic mobility of the cells constructed based on the Smoluchowski equation as follows:
v = (εE/η) ξ,
where v = electrophoretic velocity, η = viscosity, ε = electrical permittivity of the electrolytic solution and E shows the electric field.

3.13. Caspase 3/7 Assay for Confirmation of Apoptosis in the Presence of an Autophagy Inhibitor

For measuring the caspase 3/7 activation after UA treatment (25, 50 µM) in HeLa cells for 24 h in the presence of an autophagy inhibitor, the Glomax caspase 3/7 assay (Promega, India) was performed [43].

3.14. Statistical Analysis

In this study, each experiment was run in triplicate. The quantitative variables were displayed as histograms and expressed as the mean ± S.D using SPSS 16.0 analysis. Statistical significance was considered at a p-value ≤ 0.05. [51].

4. Conclusions

This study provides insight into the vast cytotoxic potential of lichen extracts isolated from the Western Ghats, India, which can be explored further to hunt for potent compounds from nature’s Pandora box. The study also demonstrated that the inhibition of autophagy in UA-treated HeLa cells increases the cytotoxic potential of UA. The combinatorial application of UA and autophagy inhibitors can be an interesting perspective that needs to be exploited in the search for new cytotoxic agents.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12030519/s1, Figure S1: Sampling locations of lichens in Munnar and Kodaikanal, India, Figure S2: Structure of barbatic acid and atraric acid, Table S1: Diversity and distribution pattern of lichens isolated from the Western Ghats, India, Table S2: Zeta potential of usnic acid (UA) treated HeLa cells in the presence and absence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) after 24 h of treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., S.K. and C.J.; Formal analysis, M.K. and S.K.; Investigation, M.K. and S.K.; Methodology, M.K., S.K., S.K.S. and A.K.; Supervision, C.J.; Visualization, M.K., S.K., A.K. and C.J.; Writing—review & editing, M.K., S.K., S.K.S., A.K. and C.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, New Delhi (Ref. no. BT/PR/14569).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Spectroscopy Analytical Test Facility, FACS facility of Division of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. The authors also thank Muralidhar Nayak from the IISc spectroscopy facility for his contribution to GCMS analysis. The authors also thank the Micro Nano Characterization Facility, Centre for Nano Science and Engineering (CeNSE), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India, for zeta potential analysis. This study was supported by a grant from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, New Delhi (Ref. no. BT/PR/14569). M.K. thanks CSIR for a Senior Research Associateship and S.K. thanks UGC for her Senior Research Fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mishra, R. An epidemiological study of cervical and breast screening in India: District-level analysis. BMC Women’s Health 2020, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, M.M.; Ma, R.H.; Ni, Z.J.; Thakur, K.; Cespedes-Acuña, C.L.; Jiang, L.; Wei, Z.J. Apigenin 7-O-glucoside promotes cell apoptosis through the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway and inhibits cell migration in cervical cancer Hela cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 146, 111843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Assad, B.M.; Savi, D.C.; Biscaia, S.M.; Mayrhofer, B.F.; Iantas, J.; Mews, M.; de Oliveira, J.C.; Trindade, E.S.; Glienke, C. Endophytic actinobacteria of Hymenachne amplexicaulis from the Brazilian Pantanal wetland produce compounds with antibacterial and antitumor activities. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 248, 126768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Homero, U.; Tortella, G.; Sandoval, E.; Cuozzo, S.A. Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) produced by Streptomyces sp. biofilms: Chemical composition and anticancer properties. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 253, 126877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Felczykowska, A.; Pastuszak-Skrzypczak, A.; Pawlik, A.; Bogucka, K.; Herman-Antosiewicz, A.; Guzow-Krzemińska, B. Antibacterial and anticancer activities of acetone extracts from in vitro cultured lichen-forming fungi. BMC Comp. Alt. Med. 2017, 17, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hei, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tan, N.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, X.; Hu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Qi, J.; Gao, J.M. Antimicrobial activity and biosynthetic potential of cultivable actinomycetes associated with Lichen symbiosis from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 244, 126652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kosanić, M.; Manojlović, N.; Janković, S.; Stanojković, T.; Ranković, B. Evernia prunastri and Pseudoevernia furfuraceae lichens and their major metabolites as antioxidant, antimicrobial and anticancer agents. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lagarde, A.; Jargeat, P.; Roy, M.; Girardot, M.; Imbert, C.; Millot, M.; Mambu, L. Fungal communities associated with Evernia prunastri, Ramalina fastigiata and Pleurosticta acetabulum: Three epiphytic lichens potentially active against Candida biofilms. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 211, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Upreti, D.K.; Divakar, P.K.; Nayaka, S. Commercial and ethnic use of lichens in India. Econ. Bot. 2005, 59, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nayaka, S.; Upreti, D.K. Status of lichen diversity in Western Ghats, India. Sahyadri E-News West. Ghats Biodiverstity Inf. Syst. 2005, 16, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  11. Balaji, P.; Hariharan, G.N. Diversity of Macrolichens in Bolampatti II Forest Range (Siruvani Hills), Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 124020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aravind, S.R.; Sreelekha, T.T.; Kumar, B.D.; Kumar, S.N.; Mohandas, C. Characterization of three depside compounds from a Western Ghat lichen Parmelia erumpens Kurok with special reference to antimicrobial and anticancer activity. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 34632–34643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Machado, N.M.; de Rezende, A.A.A.; Nepomuceno, J.C.; Tavares, D.C.; Cunha, W.R.; Spanó, M.A. Evaluation of mutagenic, recombinogenic and carcinogenic potential of (+)-usnic acid in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kumari, M.; Kamat, S.; Jayabaskaran, C. Usnic acid induced changes in biomolecules and their association with apoptosis in squamous carcinoma (A-431) cells: A flow cytometry, FTIR and DLS spectroscopic study. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 274, 121098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tompkins, K.D.; Thorburn, A. Focus: Death: Regulation of apoptosis by autophagy to enhance cancer therapy. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2019, 92, 707. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. White, E.; DiPaola, R.S. The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5308–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, N.; Feng, Y. Elaborating the role of natural products-induced autophagy in cancer treatment: Achievements and artifacts in the state of the art. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 934207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Deng, S.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Kumar, A.P.; Yap, C.T.; Sethi, G.; Bishayee, A. Targeting autophagy using natural compounds for cancer prevention and therapy. Cancer 2019, 125, 1228–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, S.; Dobrovolsky, V.N.; Liu, F.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mei, N.; Guo, L. The role of autophagy in usnic acid-induced toxicity in hepatic cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 142, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yurdacan, B.; Egeli, U.; Eskiler, G.G.; Eryilmaz, I.; Cecener, G.; Tunca, B. The role of usnic acid-induced apoptosis and autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum. Experiment. Toxicol. 2019, 38, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Geng, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, B.; Zhang, C.; Tu, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Gao, H.; Qin, G.; Pan, W. Usnic acid induces cycle arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy in gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Solárová, Z.; Liskova, A.; Samec, M.; Kubatka, P.; Büsselberg, D.; Solár, P. Anticancer potential of lichens’ secondary metabolites. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dar, T.U.H.; Dar, S.A.; Islam, S.U.; Mangral, Z.A.; Dar, R.; Singh, B.P.; Verma, P.; Haque, S. May. Lichens as a repository of bioactive compounds: An open window for green therapy against diverse cancers. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 36, 1120–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Popovici, V.; Bucur, L.A.; Schröder, V.; Gherghel, D.; Mihai, C.T.; Caraiane, A.; Badea, F.C.; Vochița, G.; Badea, V. Evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of the Usnea barbata (L.) FH Wigg dry extract. Molecules 2020, 25, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ozturk, S.; Erkisa, M.; Oran, S.; Ulukaya, E.; Celikler, S.; Ari, F. Lichens exerts an anti-proliferative effect on human breast and lung cancer cells through induction of apoptosis. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 44, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zugic, A.; Jeremic, I.; Isakovic, A.; Arsic, I.; Savic, S.; Tadic, V. Evaluation of anticancer and antioxidant activity of a commercially available CO2 supercritical extract of old man’s beard (Usnea barbata). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nugraha, A.S.; Laksono, T.A.; Firli, L.N.; Putri, C.P.Z.S.; Pratoko, D.K.; Zulfikar, Z.; Untari, L.F.; Wongso, H.; Lambert, J.M.; Dillon, C.T.; et al. Anti-Cancer Evaluation of Depsides Isolated from Indonesian Folious Lichens: Physcia millegrana, Parmelia dilatata and Parmelia aurulenta. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Apovincamine#section=Biological-Test-Result (accessed on 14 January 2023).
  29. Nikolić, V.; Stanković, M.; Nikolić, L.; Nikolić, G.; Ilić-Stojanović, S.; Popsavin, M.; Zlatković, S.; Kundaković, T. Inclusion complexes with cyclodextrin and usnic acid. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2013, 76, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karabacak, R.B.; Tay, T.; Kıvanç, M. Preparation of novel antimicrobial polymer colloids based on (+)-usnic acid and poly (vinylbenzyl chloride). React. Funct. Polym. 2014, 83, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, A.; He, W.; Shi, H.; Huang, X.; Ji, G. Natural compound oblongifolin C inhibits autophagic flux, and induces apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in human cholangiocarcinoma QBC939 cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 3179–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kamat, S.; Kumari, M.; Jayabaskaran, C. Visualizing the anti-cancer effects of chrysin nanoparticles by flow cytometry, microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In Colloidal Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications XVII; SPIE BiOS: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2022; Volume 11977, pp. 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marino, G.; Niso-Santano, M.; Baehrecke, E.H.; Kroemer, G. Self-consumption: The interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Xie, Q.; Chen, Y.; Tan, H.; Liu, B.; Zheng, L.L.; Mu, Y. Targeting autophagy with natural compounds in cancer: A renewed perspective from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 748149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Poillet-Perez, L.; Despouy, G.; Delage-Mourroux, R.; Boyer-Guittaut, M. Interplay between ROS and autophagy in cancer cells, from tumor initiation to cancer therapy. Redox Biol. 2015, 4, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Perillo, B.; Di Donato, M.; Pezone, A.; Di Zazzo, E.; Giovannelli, P.; Galasso, G.; Castoria, G.; Migliaccio, A. ROS in cancer therapy: The bright side of the moon. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yun, H.R.; Jo, Y.H.; Kim, J.; Shin, Y.; Kim, S.S.; Choi, T.G. Roles of autophagy in oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ortega, A.L.; Mena, S.; Estrela, J.M. Glutathione in cancer cell death. Cancers 2011, 3, 1285–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Clemente, S.M.; Martínez-Costa, O.H.; Monsalve, M.; Samhan-Arias, A.K. Targeting lipid peroxidation for cancer treatment. Molecules 2020, 25, 5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aggarwal, V.; Tuli, H.S.; Varol, A.; Thakral, F.; Yerer, M.B.; Sak, K.; Varol, M.; Jain, A.; Khan, M.; Sethi, G. Role of reactive oxygen species in cancer progression: Molecular mechanisms and recent advancements. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.; Portney, N.G.; Cui, D.; Budak, G.; Ozbay, E.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C.S. Zeta potential: A surface electrical characteristic to probe the interaction of nanoparticles with normal and cancer human breast epithelial cells. Biomed. Microdevices 2008, 10, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kazantsev, S.O.; Fomenko, A.N.; Korovin, M.S. Zeta potential change of neuro-2a tumor cells after exposure to alumina nanoparticles. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 1760, p. 020025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taritla, S.; Kumari, M.; Kamat, S.; Bhat, S.G.; Jayabaskaran, C. Optimization of PhysicoChemical Parameters for Production of Cytotoxic Secondary Metabolites and Apoptosis Induction Activities in the Culture Extract of a Marine Algal–Derived Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus sp. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 542891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rahman, M.; Hannan, M.A.; Dash, R.; Rahman, M.D.; Islam, R.; Uddin, M.J.; Sohag, A.A.M.; Rhim, H. Phytochemicals as a complement to cancer chemotherapy: Pharmacological modulation of autophagy-apoptosis pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhattacharjee, A.; Hasanain, M.; Kathuria, M.; Singh, A.; Datta, D.; Sarkar, J.; Mitra, K. Ormeloxifene-induced unfolded protein response contributes to autophagy-associated apoptosis via disruption of Akt/mTOR and activation of JNK. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hung, J.Y.; Hsu, Y.L.; Li, C.T.; Ko, Y.C.; Ni, W.C.; Huang, M.S.; Kuo, P.L. 6-Shogaol, an active constituent of dietary ginger, induces autophagy by inhibiting the AKT/mTOR pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9809–9816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kumari, M.; Taritla, S.; Sharma, A.; Jayabaskaran, C. Antiproliferative and antioxidative bioactive compounds in extracts of marine-derived endophytic fungus Talaromyces purpureogenus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Kamat, S.; Kumari, M.; Taritla, S.; Jayabaskaran, C. Endophytic fungi of marine alga from Konkan coast, India—A rich source of bioactive material. Front. Marine Sci. 2020, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Patra, S.; Panda, P.K.; Naik, P.P.; Panigrahi, D.P.; Praharaj, P.P.; Bhol, C.S.; Mahapatra, K.K.; Padhi, P.; Jena, M.; Patil, S.; et al. Terminalia bellirica extract induces anticancer activity through modulation of apoptosis and autophagy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 136, 111073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sajna, K.V.; Kamat, S.; Jayabaskaran, C. Antiproliferative role of secondary metabolites from Aspergillus unguis AG 1.1 (G) isolated from marine macroalgae Enteromorpha sp. by inducing intracellular ROS production and mitochondrial membrane potential loss leading to apoptosis. Front. Marine Sci. 2020, 7, 543523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kamat, S.; Kumari, M.; Sajna, K.V.; Jayabaskaran, C. Endophytic fungus, Chaetomium globosum, associated with marine green alga, a new source of Chrysin. Scient. Rep. 2020, 10, 18726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, J.; Chen, C.; Xu, T.; Yan, M.; Xue, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhong, T.; Wang, Z.; Meng, X.; et al. Pseudolaric acid B activates autophagy in MCF 7 human breast cancer cells to prevent cell death. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity of lichen extracts observed via MTT assays after 24 h of treatment; (A) acetone extract against HeLa cells; (B) acetone extract against MCF-7 cells; (C) hexane extract against HeLa cells; (D) hexane extract against MCF-7 cells.
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity of lichen extracts observed via MTT assays after 24 h of treatment; (A) acetone extract against HeLa cells; (B) acetone extract against MCF-7 cells; (C) hexane extract against HeLa cells; (D) hexane extract against MCF-7 cells.
Plants 12 00519 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of selected lichen extracts in the presence of an autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine (CQ), observed via MTT assays after 24 h of treatment; (A) selected lichen acetone extract against HeLa cells (+/−CQ); (B) selected lichen acetone extract against MCF-7 cells (+/−CQ); (C) selected lichen hexane extract against HeLa cells (+/−CQ); (D) selected lichen hexane extract against MCF-7 cells (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of selected lichen extracts in the presence of an autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine (CQ), observed via MTT assays after 24 h of treatment; (A) selected lichen acetone extract against HeLa cells (+/−CQ); (B) selected lichen acetone extract against MCF-7 cells (+/−CQ); (C) selected lichen hexane extract against HeLa cells (+/−CQ); (D) selected lichen hexane extract against MCF-7 cells (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.
Plants 12 00519 g002
Figure 3. Purification and characterization of usnic acid from Usnea cornuta acetone extract (UC2A). (A) Inset: TLC analysis of UC2A and the purified compound, usnic acid, with Rf = 0.82. Full TIC scan of purified compound, usnic acid, via GCMS at a retention time of 24.06 min. (B) +EI scan of peak at 24.06 min of usnic acid in UC2A and (C) usnic acid in the NIST database; both fragmentation patterns matched, indicating that the TLC-eluted compound was usnic acid. (D) FTIR spectrum of usnic acid from UC2A indicating the presence of functional groups.
Figure 3. Purification and characterization of usnic acid from Usnea cornuta acetone extract (UC2A). (A) Inset: TLC analysis of UC2A and the purified compound, usnic acid, with Rf = 0.82. Full TIC scan of purified compound, usnic acid, via GCMS at a retention time of 24.06 min. (B) +EI scan of peak at 24.06 min of usnic acid in UC2A and (C) usnic acid in the NIST database; both fragmentation patterns matched, indicating that the TLC-eluted compound was usnic acid. (D) FTIR spectrum of usnic acid from UC2A indicating the presence of functional groups.
Plants 12 00519 g003
Figure 4. Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of usnic acid against cancer cell lines after 24 h of treatment. (A) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid against MCF-7, A-549 and HeLa cancer cell lines. (B) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via an MTT assay. (C) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via a resazurin assay. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of usnic acid against cancer cell lines after 24 h of treatment. (A) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid against MCF-7, A-549 and HeLa cancer cell lines. (B) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via an MTT assay. (C) Cytotoxicity of usnic acid in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via a resazurin assay. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Plants 12 00519 g004
Figure 5. Confocal microscopy of UA-treated HeLa cells. (A) Evaluation of autophagy and MMP loss mediated by UA with or without CQ after 24 h of treatment. The cells were dual stained with MDC and MitoxRed and visualized via confocal microscopy. (B) Quantification of fluorescence intensities of stained HeLa cells using ImageJ software. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. Confocal microscopy of UA-treated HeLa cells. (A) Evaluation of autophagy and MMP loss mediated by UA with or without CQ after 24 h of treatment. The cells were dual stained with MDC and MitoxRed and visualized via confocal microscopy. (B) Quantification of fluorescence intensities of stained HeLa cells using ImageJ software. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Plants 12 00519 g005
Figure 6. Cytotoxic effect of usnic acid (UA) against HeLa cells in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via PI live/dead FACS analysis after 24 h of treatment. (A) FACS plot of UA-treated (+/−CQ) HeLa cells. (B) Bar graph representing PI-positive cells after UA treatment (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05. The blur color represents PI negative cells, whereas purple color represents PI positive cells.
Figure 6. Cytotoxic effect of usnic acid (UA) against HeLa cells in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via PI live/dead FACS analysis after 24 h of treatment. (A) FACS plot of UA-treated (+/−CQ) HeLa cells. (B) Bar graph representing PI-positive cells after UA treatment (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05. The blur color represents PI negative cells, whereas purple color represents PI positive cells.
Plants 12 00519 g006
Figure 7. Effect of UA on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in HeLa cells in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via DCFHDA FACS analysis after 24 h of treatment. (A) FACS plot of UA-treated (+/−CQ) HeLa cells. (B) The bar graph shows the fold-change in ROS production after UA treatment (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05. The blue color represents ROS generating cells, while red color represents healthy cells which are not producing ROS.
Figure 7. Effect of UA on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in HeLa cells in the presence of chloroquine (+/−CQ) via DCFHDA FACS analysis after 24 h of treatment. (A) FACS plot of UA-treated (+/−CQ) HeLa cells. (B) The bar graph shows the fold-change in ROS production after UA treatment (+/−CQ). Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05. The blue color represents ROS generating cells, while red color represents healthy cells which are not producing ROS.
Plants 12 00519 g007
Figure 8. Effect of UA on HeLa cells in the presence or absence of chloroquine after 24 h of treatment; (A) increase in lipid peroxidation; (B) depletion of reduced glutathione (GSH); (C) caspase 3/7 activity. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 8. Effect of UA on HeLa cells in the presence or absence of chloroquine after 24 h of treatment; (A) increase in lipid peroxidation; (B) depletion of reduced glutathione (GSH); (C) caspase 3/7 activity. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Plants 12 00519 g008
Table 1. Cytotoxicity (IC50) of lichen acetone and hexane extracts against HeLa and MCF-7 cells after 24 h of treatment. PS: Parmelia sulcata, UC: Usnea cornuta, PA: Parmelia andinum, PP: Parmotrema perlatum, US: Usnea sp., CF: Collema flaccidum, HP: Hypogymnia physodes, CM: Cladonia macilenta, HI: Heterodermia indica, CM: Cladonia macilenta, PS12 :Parmelia sp. 12, LS: Leptogium sp., PS16: Physcia sp.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity (IC50) of lichen acetone and hexane extracts against HeLa and MCF-7 cells after 24 h of treatment. PS: Parmelia sulcata, UC: Usnea cornuta, PA: Parmelia andinum, PP: Parmotrema perlatum, US: Usnea sp., CF: Collema flaccidum, HP: Hypogymnia physodes, CM: Cladonia macilenta, HI: Heterodermia indica, CM: Cladonia macilenta, PS12 :Parmelia sp. 12, LS: Leptogium sp., PS16: Physcia sp.
S. NoLichen ExtractAcetone Extract
IC50 (µg/mL)
Hexane Extract
IC50 (µg/mL)
HeLaMCF7HeLaMCF7
1.PS199.28 ± 398.80 ± 8>200174.8 ± 6
2.UC238.2 ± 1.2541.7 ± 296.8 ± 11167.2 ± 7
3.PA379.12 ± 893.5 ± 5>200170.3 ± 8
4.PP476.87 ± 4>200>200189.3 ± 9
5.US573.2 ± 6115.02 ± 6>200183.09 ± 5
6.CF675.31 ± 169.77 ± 979.05 ± 871.4 ± 8
7.HP775.45 ± 771.51 ± 11191 ± 2>200
8.CM8158.40 ± 13>20069.03 ± 770.04 ± 4
9.HI9188.28 ± 17>200>200>200
10.CM10173.03 ± 16188.28 ± 19175.7 ± 13189.1 ± 14
11.PS11179.75 ± 11>200186.3 ± 16>200
12.PS12115.22 ± 13>20086.4 ± 782.8 ± 9
13.CF1353.76 ± 563.8 ± 8123.1 ± 9>200
14.LS14169.35 ± 965.2 ± 241.1 ± 353.7 ± 5
15.HP1589.22 ± 5>20059.09 ± 558.3 ± 4
16.PS1671.88 ± 4111.06 ± 7111.9 ± 666.2 ± 7
Table 2. (A) Cytotoxicity of selected lichen acetone extracts (IC50) against HeLa and MCF-7 cells in the presence and absence of the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) after 24 h of treatment. (B) Cytotoxicity of selected lichen hexane extracts (IC50) against HeLa and MCF-7 cells in the presence and absence of the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) after 24 h of treatment.
Table 2. (A) Cytotoxicity of selected lichen acetone extracts (IC50) against HeLa and MCF-7 cells in the presence and absence of the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) after 24 h of treatment. (B) Cytotoxicity of selected lichen hexane extracts (IC50) against HeLa and MCF-7 cells in the presence and absence of the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) after 24 h of treatment.
(A)
S. NoLichen ExtractAcetone Extract
HeLaMCF-7
−CQ+CQ−CQ+CQ
1.UC238.2 ± 1.2526.01 ± 141.7 ± 237.1 ± 2
2.PA379.12 ± 878.09 ± 693.5 ± 592.9 ± 7
3.CF675.31 ± 177.56 ± 969.77 ± 972.7 ± 8
4.CF1353.76 ± 546.9 ± 663.8 ± 867.4 ± 9
(B)
S. NoLichen ExtractHexane Extract
HeLaMCF-7
−CQ+CQ−CQ+CQ
1.CF679.05 ± 872.3 ± 871.4 ± 866.6 ± 8
2.CM869.03 ± 762.8 ± 770.04 ± 466.9 ± 6
3.LS1441.1 ± 334.03 ± 153.7 ± 547.4 ± 4
4.HP1559.09 ± 558.9 ± 458.3 ± 459 ± 2
Table 3. GCMS analysis of Usnea cornuta acetone extract (UC2A) for detection of lichen compounds.
Table 3. GCMS analysis of Usnea cornuta acetone extract (UC2A) for detection of lichen compounds.
S. NoName of the CompoundChemical FormulaRetention Time (Rt)AreaRelative % Peak Area
11,2-Benzenediol, o-(2,3,4-trifluorobenzoyl)-o’-(2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyryl)-C17H6F10O48.75865,8300.07
2Pentasiloxane, dodecamethyl-C12H36O4Si58.80275,5620.08
33,6,9-Trioxa-2,10-disilaundecane, 2,2,10,10-tetramethyl-C10H26O3Si210.315471,0480.5
4Hexane, 3,3-dimethylC8H1810.74945,5910.04
51,2,3-TrimethyldiaziridineC4H10N210.74941,1700.04
6Glycerol, tris(trimethylsilyl) etherC12H32O3Si311.0981,216,8311.3
73-Penten-2-one, 5,5,5-trimethoxy-, (Z)-C8H14O413.4325,3750.02
8Benzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethyl-, methyl esterC10H12O414.0688,253,4668.8
9Trimethyl(2,6 ditert.-butylphenoxy)silaneC17H30OSi16.362790,6180.84
10Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-((2-hydroxy-4-methoxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoyl) oxy)-3,6-dimethyl-, methyl esterC19H20O717.189,126,5189.7
11Pentane, 1-(1-ethoxyethoxy)-C9H20O218.14913,4490.01
12L-(-)-Arabitol, pentakis(trimethylsilyl) etherC20H52O5Si519.5655,036,4885.3
132-Deoxy ribose O,O’,O’’-tris(trimethylsilyl)-C14H34O4Si319.725,745,3066.14
14DL-Glyceraldehyde, tris(trimethylsilyl) etherC12H30O3Si319.7343,791,2424.05
15meso-Erythritol, tetrakis(trimethylsilyl) etherC16H42O4Si419.96420,462,41621.8
16L-(-)-Arabitol, pentakis(trimethylsilyl) etherC20H52O5Si520.125,937,6546.35
17Adonitol, pentakis(trimethylsilyl) etherC20H52O5Si520.17411,992,66912.8
18D-Ribo-Hexitol, 3-deoxy-1,2,4,5,6-pentakis-O-(trimethylsilyl)-C21H54O5Si522.039470,2300.5
19Anhydro 5-hydroxy-3-piperonyl-1,2,3,4-oxatriazolium hydroxideC9H7N3O422.58424,3730.02
209,10-Anthracenedione, 2-methyl-1,6-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-C21H26O4Si223.515240,3650.25
21Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl-C10H15N23.69839,7000.04
22(+)-Usnic acidC18H16O724.35810,990,72211.7
23Hexadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl esterC19H40O2Si24.8421,843,2001.97
24ApovincamineC21H24N2O227.261,3860.001
25Octadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl esterC21H44O2Si27.696679,6310.72
26Hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]propyl esterC25H54O4Si232.355740,0450.79
271,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) esterC24H38O434.058218,5190.23
28Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]propyl esterC27H58O4Si234.6095,103,9115.46
291-(Bromomethyl)-2,3-bis(4,5-dimethoxy-2-methylphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-4,5-dimethoxy-7-methyl-1H-indeneC31H37BrO641.23111,1080.011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumari, M.; Kamat, S.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Jayabaskaran, C. Inhibition of Autophagy Increases Cell Death in HeLa Cells through Usnic Acid Isolated from Lichens. Plants 2023, 12, 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030519

AMA Style

Kumari M, Kamat S, Singh SK, Kumar A, Jayabaskaran C. Inhibition of Autophagy Increases Cell Death in HeLa Cells through Usnic Acid Isolated from Lichens. Plants. 2023; 12(3):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumari, Madhuree, Siya Kamat, Sandeep Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar, and C. Jayabaskaran. 2023. "Inhibition of Autophagy Increases Cell Death in HeLa Cells through Usnic Acid Isolated from Lichens" Plants 12, no. 3: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030519

APA Style

Kumari, M., Kamat, S., Singh, S. K., Kumar, A., & Jayabaskaran, C. (2023). Inhibition of Autophagy Increases Cell Death in HeLa Cells through Usnic Acid Isolated from Lichens. Plants, 12(3), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop