Next Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of Fusarium Species Causing Watermelon Fruit Rot in Northern Thailand
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Characterization of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Non-Nodulating Mutants Altered in Rhizobial Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Drought and Heat Stress on Mineral Content, Antioxidant Activity and Bioactive Compound Accumulation in Four African Amaranthus Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Co-Inoculating Saccharomyces spp. with Bradyrhizobium japonicum on Atmospheric Nitrogen Fixation in Soybeans (Glycine max (L.))
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Contribution of Biofertilizers to Pulse Crops: From Single-Strain Inoculants to New Technologies Based on Microbiomes Strategies

by
Gustavo Ribeiro Xavier
1,
Ederson da Conceição Jesus
1,
Anelise Dias
2,
Marcia Reed Rodrigues Coelho
1,
Yulimar Castro Molina
3 and
Norma Gouvêa Rumjanek
1,*
1
Embrapa Agrobiologia, Rodovia BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica 23897-970, RJ, Brazil
2
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Instituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, UFRRJ, Rodovia BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica 23890-000, RJ, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-graduação em Microbiologia Agrícola, Universidade Federal de Lavras, UFLA, Trevo Rotatório Professor Edmir Sá Santos, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040954
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interactions between Plants and Soil Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
Pulses provide distinct health benefits due to their low fat content and high protein and fiber contents. Their grain production reaches approximately 93,210 × 103 tons per year. Pulses benefit from the symbiosis with atmospheric N2-fixing bacteria, which increases productivity and reduces the need for N fertilizers, thus contributing to mitigation of environmental impact mitigation. Additionally, the root region harbors a rich microbial community with multiple traits related to plant growth promotion, such as nutrient increase and tolerance enhancement to abiotic or biotic stresses. We reviewed the eight most common pulses accounting for almost 90% of world production: common beans, chickpeas, peas, cowpeas, mung beans, lentils, broad beans, and pigeon peas. We focused on updated information considering both single-rhizobial inoculation and co-inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. We found approximately 80 microbial taxa with PGPR traits, mainly Bacillus sp., B. subtilis, Pseudomonas sp., P. fluorescens, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and that contributed to improve plant growth and yield under different conditions. In addition, new data on root, nodule, rhizosphere, and seed microbiomes point to strategies that can be used to design new generations of biofertilizers, highlighting the importance of microorganisms for productive pulse systems.

1. Introduction

The global challenge of feeding an 8 billion people population, which should reach 9.7 billion by 2050 [1], represents a planetary dilemma. Food supply depends on agricultural aptitude and soil management under the threat of climate change, germplasm production (animal, plants, and microorganisms), and geopolitical aspects among other aspects. Furthermore, food supply needs to be achieved in a complex environment where the increase in purchasing power has led to changes in the consumption pattern, favoring the consumption of animal protein, the inclusion of traditional and indigenous peoples and their cultures, and the commitment to world peace should be a permanent goal.
Pulses comprise a group of crops that are consumed as dry beans, rich in protein and fiber, which play an essential role in human nutrition, thus representing a valuable global food security resource [2]. Moreover, they perform critical biological functions such as anti-stress [3], anti-inflammatory [4], antioxidant, and liver protection [5]. Due to their related nutritional and healthy qualities, pulses are an alternative solution for reducing hidden hunger, frequently found in impoverished populations around the world who have a limited access to animal protein, vitamins, and minerals supplements [6]. Increasing the offer of plant-based protein, especially for the low-income populations, is a key to improving the quality of the diet at an affordable price. To further encourage vegetable consumption, actions based on plant-based proteins have gained prominence through technological innovation, aiming to approximate the flavors and textures of products developed from plants to animal-based food, expanding opportunities for consumption, and consequently stimulating production scaling and the adoption of new technologies to production systems [7,8]. In addition to being a significant contribution to eradication of hunger, pulses may improve human health and reduce soil degradation. Regarding these characteristics, they are an associated component towards the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [9].
Among several vegetables that are classified as pulses, the temperate legumes chickpeas, peas, broad beans, and lentils, and the tropical legumes beans, cowpeas, mung beans, and pigeon peas are the subject of this review. The total pulse production from 2018 to 2020 accounted for approximately 93,210 × 103 tons per year, while the eight pulses listed above represent approximately 88% of the total (Table 1) [10].
Most pulses are especially suitable for production in arid or subtropical areas since they grow in soils with low natural fertility and are capable of tolerating drought, salinity, and thermal stresses. In part, this ability to thrive in low-fertility soils is given by biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) carried out by rhizobia that inhabit the root nodules of these legumes (Figure 1), as well as the association with other plant BNF activity by microsymbionts inhabitant of pulse nodules-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). In this text, PGPR includes both bacteria and fungi living in roots, nodules, and the rhizosphere. The interest in the nodule microsymbionts, and other PGPR, has steadily increased in recent years.
There is a wide literature related to PGPR activity and the associative models between host plant and microorganisms elaborated through anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology mechanisms [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The interaction between the host plant and the microsymbiont may produce symbioses with different levels of efficiency, so research has been intensely concerned with recognizing and selecting the best symbioses and associations to increase the percentage of fixed N. Pulses may also be responsive to PGPR aiming to increase yields and nutrients either under edaphic and climatic conditions recommended for each crop or under climatic stress conditions.
This work aims to review the most common strategies that have been carried out to optimize biological processes for the eight most produced pulses worldwide through a systematic analysis using the Web of Science database, mainly during the 2018–2023 period. The selected studies range from classic assays with isolated strains, through multiple functional inoculants, to knowledge acquired from microbiome approaches. The emphasis was placed on biological functions such as BNF, nutrient solubilizers, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, and the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and siderophores, related to non-stressed or stressed environments (salinity, thermal, and drought). In this review, a close look has been placed on the current scenario of the microbial species that are being tested in different assays, with the aim of understanding the predominant groups, which show potential for the development of future technologies that could contribute to the increase in pulse productivity.

2. Microsymbionts Inhabitants of Pulse Nodules

Microsymbionts are microbial endophytes that inhabit the interior of plant tissues without causing any damage to the host plant. A group of microsymbionts that inhabit legume nodules characterizes a symbiosis capable of fixing N2 from the air [18,19]. BNF activity is mediated by an intense exchange of molecular signals, including flavonoids and bacterial lipooligosacharides, leading to nodule formation.

2.1. Rhizobium Leguminosarum Symbiovar Viciae (Rlv) Strains: The Main Microsymbiont for Peas, Lentils, and Broad Beans

Peas, broad beans, and lentils are nodulated by a wide variety of soil Rhizobium leguminosarum symbiovar viciae (Rlv) strains, although other rhizobial species can also promote the formation of nodules in these crops [23,24]. According to host specificity, R. leguminosarum comprises two other symbiovars, trifolii and phaseoli [25]. Due to the large diversity of bacterial strains, Rlv is described as a “species complex” (Rlc), which includes 18 distinct genospecies and seven unique strains [26]. Five of the genospecies include type strains of Rhizobium laguerreae, Rhizobium sophorae, Rhizobium ruizarguesonis, Rhizobium indicum, and R. leguminosarum itself. More recently, the nodulation of pea by Sphingomonas sediminicola has been reported, describing the first example of nodulation of legumes with this genus [24].
The soil type and the variety of pea significantly influence the efficiency of native rhizobia, nodulation, shoot and root biomass production, and accumulation of shoot nitrogen [27]. Boivin et al. [23] claimed that competitive rhizobia are not necessarily the most efficient at fixing atmospheric nitrogen, which can often result in a crop yield reduction. They concluded that competitiveness was associated with specific regions of the nod locus without a relationship to variations in the core genome. Furthermore, Boivin et al. [23] co-inoculated a collection of 32 Rlv strains in three genotypes of each host species: peas, broad beans, and lentils. From the results, they estimated the Early Partner Choice (EPC) strain for the Fabeae tribe hosts, also known as tribe Vicieae. Most of the tested Rlv strains induced nodules in all the Fabeae hosts, but their behavior is distinct when they are co-inoculated. For that reason, when it comes to inoculation of Rlv strain, it is common to repeat the inoculation at every new planting to guarantee adequate crop yields [27,28].
Climate variability and farming management practices with a heavy reliance on fertilizers and herbicides can result in a reduction in soil carbon, fertility, and pH, and not rarely, can contribute to an increase in the incidence of plant disease. In legume production areas where rhizobial contribution to BNF is at risk, a solution was sought based on the selection of Rlv strains by superior symbiotic performance and saprophytic competence [29]. A large rhizobial collection obtained from acid soils was the source for fourteen strains with a superior BNF capacity, higher than 78% nitrogen derived from the atmosphere, and twenty-two strains that showed a high soil survival capacity into the next season [30]. From this collection, the authors performed a selection regarding both traits in comparison to commercial strains, which achieved only 3% of nodule colonization; they found an elite strain, WSM4643, characterized by its better survival ability, which may represent a potential inoculant for peas in dry soil agricultural areas.
Mendoza-Suárez et al. [31] used reporter plasmids to differentiate rhizobial nodulation competitiveness from BNF effectiveness in individual nodules by using green fluorescent protein (GFP) and barcode strain identification (plasmid ID). After monitoring 84 Rlv strains, a super-competitive and highly efficient strain for peas was found. Furthermore, the method has shown that nodules colonized by multiple strains were quite common, including one nodule with six different strains. Standardization of the technique may provide a quick way to characterize nodule-forming rhizobia from agricultural systems, helping to improve the benefits of biofertilizers.
Phylogenetic characterization of a bacterial collection isolated from broad beans and lentils cultivated in ten different sites in Ethiopia identified nine genospecies of Rlv, suggesting the presence of a diverse rhizobial population associated with the Viciae tribe [32]. The genospecies distribution was mainly due to environmental variables rather than to the host legume species. Alternatively, in China, broad bean rhizobia belong to different Rhizobium species, such as R. anhuiense, R. fabae, R. vallis, R. sophorae, Agrobacterium radiobacter, and four strains related to Rhizobium and Agrobacterium [33]. Analysis of the plant growth promotion and symbiotic genes (nifH and nodC, respectively) revealed the presence of a locally adapted diversity of broad bean rhizobia.
Indigenous rhizobial population isolated from broad bean nodules from different regions of Tunisia showed tolerance to salinity and pH variation, in addition to BNF and phosphate (P) solubilization activities [34]. Another rhizobial collection from broad beans isolated from cultivated lands in Egypt also consisted of salinity stress-tolerant strains and P solubilizers [35]. Some strains, even under salt stress, showed growth-promoting characteristics and may have the potential to be used as a biofertilizer for areas presenting abiotic stresses.
A two-year field experiment with broad beans was conducted in Tunisia, where crop cultivation is declining due to strongly acid soil (pH 5.1) and a low available P content [36]. Inoculation with an indigenous strain showed the highest yield, 3137 kg ha−1, compared to the uninoculated control, representing an increase of almost 40%. Another two-year multilocation experiment using six indigenous rhizobial strains as inoculants and three varieties of faba beans resulted in an increase in nodulation and shoot and root dry weight [37]. The results were greatly influenced by the interaction between the three factors: location, strain, and variety [37]. The results obtained by Lishan et al. [38] showed that at 50 cm spacing between rows, the inoculation of broad beans increased grain yield more than twice compared to the control without inoculation, achieving 2540 kg ha−1.
In Morocco, nodules from lentil accessions were a source of fourteen Rhizobium strains [39]. Phylogenetic analysis grouped them into three rhizobial species, R. laguerreae, R. leguminosarum, and Mesorhizobium huakuii, represented by just one strain. One of the varieties showed the best association with ten strains, leading the authors to conclude that the lentil genotypes largely ruled both rhizobial genetic diversity and symbiotic efficiency.
In semi-arid areas, lentil seeds were inoculated with rhizobial strains obtained from nodules of two cultivars of peas and lentils growing in sub-humid and semi-arid regions [40]. The results showed that lentil inoculation with the strains from sub-humid areas were more effective in promoting plant development under conditions of environmental stress.
In a field experiment carried out in Saskatoon, Canada, for two consecutive years, lentil inoculation with a commercial granular rhizobial formulation, Nodulator (strain P2) showed results similar to N fertilizer application (50 kg ha−1), and for the uninoculated control, around a 20% increase in yield was observed [41].

2.2. Rhizobium spp. Strains: The Main Microsymbionts for Common Beans

The common bean nodulates preferentially with the genus Rhizobium, in contrast to what has been observed for other species of Phaseolus that nodulate preferentially with Bradyrhizobium [42]. This observation has been made mainly with culture-dependent methods. More recently, Bender et al. [43], using metabarcoding, observed that Rhizobium dominated in the nodules of uninoculated common beans in the field, supporting the preference of the crop for this genus.
The common bean is known for its promiscuity, which according to Shamseldin and Velázquez [42] is attributed to its ability to nodulate with different symbiovars, including phaseoli and tropici, gallicum, giardinii, and mediterranense. Two major symbiovars, phaseoli and tropici, were first found in the Americas. R. etli, which, together with R. leguminosarum and R. phaseoli, constitutes a major phylogenetic clade within the genus, is the main symbiont in diversification centers [44]. Rhizobium tropici and related species are adapted to acid soils and are found in Brazil, Colombia, Chile, and Argentina. The other symbiovars were first found in Europe, Africa, and Asia [42]. Although dominant under some conditions, these symbiovars are shared between different locations, indicating the exchange of rhizobial diversity and the exchange of genetic material through horizontal gene transfer.
In addition to nodulating with different Rhizobium symbiovars, common bean nodulates with a wide range of rhizobial genera and species, including alpha- and beta-rhizobia. Among these are Ensifer spp., Pararhizobium spp., Bradyrhizobium spp., Cupriavidus spp., and Paraburkholderia spp. [42,45,46]. However, the interaction with these species occurs at different effectiveness levels. An effective symbiosis is usually established with Rhizobium, Ensifer, and Pararhizobium [42]. Bradyrhizobium spp. can induce nodulation, but the nodules are usually not colonized effectively, with strains remaining in the intercellular space and not entering cells to form an effective symbiosis [47]. However, at least one effective symbiosis has already been reported [48]. Beta-rhizobia, such as Paraburkholderia and Cupriavidus, can also nodulate the common bean, usually with a low N2-fixing capacity, although some effective strains have been identified [49,50].
Confirming this information, most of the rhizobial inoculants tested in the recent literature belong to the genus Rhizobium, such as R. etli [51], R. leguminosarum [52], and R. tropici [51,53,54,55]. However, inoculation did not always result in a positive response, and in some cases, productivity decreased [54]. For example, Thilakarathna et al. [54] observed a yield variability between −60 and 300% in common beans inoculated with R. tropici USDA 9030 and indigenous strains, with an average increase of 140 and 43% in 2015 and 2016 in a humid site (Kaski), and 93 and 8% in 2015 and 2016 in a dry site (Dhading). The evaluation of 39 on-farm trials, inoculation had a success ratio of 2:1 and was especially successful with the introduced USDA 9030 strain.
Productivity varied between countries, with some producing hundreds of kg [35], while others a few thousand kg per ha [51,53,55,56,57]. For example, Oliveira et al. [51] obtained 1975 kg ha−1 with the inoculation of R. tropici, which was comparable to the control with 80 kg N ha−1. This variation is probably due to local conditions and variations in plant genetic material and the technological levels. For example, in Brazil, experiments were conducted with liming and fertilization and with a high plant density in relatively moderate reliefs, while in Nepal, plants are cultivated in small areas and tutored with a trellis [54].

2.3. Mesorhizobium spp.: The Main Microsymbiont for Chickpeas

Turkey and Ethiopia, respectively, are recognized as the primary and secondary centers of chickpea diversity [58]. Turkish landraces spread over the eastern and western Mediterranean and to areas close to Central and Middle Asia, Iran, and Afghanistan. Consequently, they have much higher phenotypic diversity compared to Ethiopian landraces, characterized by a low degree of variability.
Chickpea nodulation is restricted to a few species of microsymbionts, the most common being Mesorhizobium ciceri and Mesorhizobium mediterraneum [59]. Both macro and micropartners show a certain degree of specificity toward each other, and it is not common for Mesorhizobium strains to form cross-nodulation with other legume species. The presence of compatible rhizobial populations is essential for efficient BNF activity, which was not the case at the time of chickpea introduction in western Canada in the early 1990s [60]. The indigenous rhizobial population could not establish symbiosis with the legume species; therefore, nodulation did not occur. In Australia, where all agricultural legumes and their rhizobial associates are exotic, a similar picture was observed when the legume was introduced into the country [61]. These authors showed evidence for horizontal transfer of a mobile gene cluster from the CC1192 inoculant strain of M. ciceri to the native Australian rhizobial population. This transfer modified the BNF efficiency of the native population and represented a pivotal contributor to increasing genetic diversity in the resident rhizobial population.
Despite technological improvements such as synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, conventional breeding, and new approaches based on molecular techniques, global chickpea grain productivity is still at the same level as 50 years ago, between 0.5 and 1 tons ha−1 [62]. Low efficiency indigenous rhizobial populations, extreme weather conditions, low fertility soils, pathogens, etc., are some factors that severely impact the benefits of BNF to chickpea grain production. Biofertilizers composed of highly efficient nodulating strains are being developed in many parts of the world to maximize atmospheric nitrogen input into farming systems [61].
In India, M. ciceri is prevalent among chickpea nodule isolates collected at semiarid or subhumid alkaline field sites as determined by a concatenated sequence analysis of six loci [63]. As expected, the isolates did not show cross-nodulation with four other pulses (P. vulgaris, P. sativum, L. culinaris, and V. mungo). In the major soil areas of Myanmar, chickpea nodulating rhizobia are most closely related to Mesorhizobium gobiense, Mesorhizobium muleiense, Mesorhizobium silamurunense, Mesorhizobium tamadayense, and Mesorhizobium temperatum [64]. Around two-thirds of the strains were close to M. gobiense, which also represents a common Indian strain CA-181 already mentioned by Singh et al. [63]. In Ethiopia, the secondary center of chickpea diversity, a phylogenetic analysis inferred from the entire genome sequences of 81 rhizobial strains isolated from chickpea nodules harvested from low pH soils showed the presence of eight species of Mesorhizobium, as well as a novel species. Mesorhizobium plurifarium and Mesorhizobium loti represented the two major genomic groups widely spread throughout the sites [65].
Species other than Mesorhizobium spp. may also contribute to chickpea nodulation, including Rhizobium pusense and Paraburkholderia kururiensis, isolated from alluvial soils, and Rhizobium sp., R. tropici, Rhizobium multihospitium, and Mesorhizobium sp. from different regions of India [62,66].

2.4. Bradyrhizobium spp.: The Main Microsymbiont for Cowpeas, Mung Beans, and Pigeon Peas

Cowpea, mung bean and pigeon pea are tropical vegetables considered promiscuous because they are nodulated by different microsymbionts. Strains of the genus Bradyrhizobium are the most common, but, depending on the species, the nodules are formed by different species of fast-growing nodulating bacteria.

2.4.1. Cowpeas

Cowpea is considered a promiscuous legume [67]. In this crop, BNF occurs mainly with Bradyrhizobium species. However, strains from other genera can be a source of efficient strains for the development of inoculants for this crop [68]. Studies on cowpea inoculation from the last five years are almost restricted to Africa and Brazil. In Brazil, cowpea is an important crop for the Semiarid region and drylands [69]. The Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA) regulates strains that can be used as commercial inoculants. Concerning cowpea, four strains are recommended: BR 3267 identified as Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense [70]; BR 3262 identified as Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi [70]; UFLA 03–84 identified as Bradyrhizobium viridifuturi [71]; and INPA 3-11B identified as Bradyrhizobium elkanii [72]. Inoculation with these strains may significantly increase BNF contributions from 36 to 75 kg N ha−1 [69,73,74]. In Venezuela, Artigas Ramirez et al. [75] found that rhizobia nodulating cowpea are mainly fast growing, including the genera Rhizobium and Ensifer, and the β-rhizobia genera Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia, although Bradyrhizobium has also been found. In this study, a Rhizobium sp. strain showed high symbiotic performance and could be suitable as a novel inoculant for V. unguiculata and V. radiata. They also found the presence of nitrogen fixation genes from B. elkanii in Paraburkholderia, suggesting the existence of horizontal gene transfer of symbiotic islands between these species [75]. In a pot experiment, Gyogluu et al. [76] found that B. elkanii strains isolated from soybeans in Mozambique were unable to nodulate cowpea, whereas Bradyrhizobium sp. strain CB756, a commercial cowpea inoculant strain, was originally isolated from Macrotyloma africanum nodules in Zimbabwe [77]. In South Africa, cowpea was nodulated mainly by Bradyrhizobium strains, and the legume effectively fixed more than 60% of its total N from the atmosphere in all soil treatments, indicating that V. unguiculata may adapt to nutrient-poor ecosystems by establishing a symbiotic interaction with soil native rhizobia [78]. Endophytic, non-rhizobial bacteria such as Paenibacillus and Bacillus were also isolated. Mbah et al. [79] pointed out the possibly low competitiveness for nodule occupancy by introduced strains, which were highly divergent from native strains obtained from cowpea root or due to their inability to adapt to new environmental conditions in South Africa. Five Bradyrhizobium strains isolated in Ethiopia inoculated on five cowpea varieties improved the growth, biomass accumulation, and nodulation performance of the cowpea varieties tested, suggesting that the Bradyrhizobium isolates studied can be used to improve cowpea production [80]. Still in Ethiopia, a field experiment showed a significant improvement in seed yield (21%), pod number (16%), and weight of 100 seeds (13%) compared to control in cowpea varieties at three sites and two crop seasons due to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium strain CP-24 [81].
Quite a few studies focused on studying the natural diversity of cowpea microsymbionts in the last five years [82]. Grönemeyer and Reinhold-Hurek [68] showed a high diversity of Bradyrhizobium species in sub-Saharan Africa nodulating cowpea, which appears to be as yet underestimated, and regional strains may be a source to develop adapted inoculants for pulses. Degefu et al. [83], suggest that Ethiopian soils are a hotspot for rhizobial diversity. In Kenya, Nyaga and Njeru [84] demonstrated the existence of effective native rhizobia isolates (R. tropici, Mesorhizobium sp., and R. pusense) in small-holder cowpea farms that improve nodulation, dry shoot weight, and yield. In eastern Kenya, Muindi et al. [85] isolated two native rhizobia (assigned as Paraburkholderia phenoliruptrix and Rhizobium mesosinicum) with significantly high symbiotic efficiency recorded at 82.5 and 72.8%, respectively, compared to the commercial strain Bradyrhizobium sp. USDA 3456 (67.78%). In Senegal, Fatick, Le Quere et al. [86] showed the dominance of Bradyrhizobium vignae as a primary symbiont of cowpea.

2.4.2. Mung Beans

Bradyrhizobium is the predominant mung bean symbiont in Brazilian agricultural sites, and among the species, B. yuanmingense promotes the greatest increase in shoot biomass [87]. B. yuanmingense is also one of the species inhabiting mung bean nodules in Pakistan [88]. This genus has been demonstrated as promoting significant increases in nodulation and root and shoot biomass, and strains of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum superclade were shown to be better growth promoters than strains of the B. elkanii superclade [89]. Bradyrhizobium has also been found nodulating mung beans in Ethiopia, which can be considered as a hotspot for rhizobia diversity [83]. In this country, Bradyrhizobium inoculation associated with P fertilization increased BNF and N yields in a low-input area, and it may be an alternative to increase grain yield in small-holder farmers. However, this genus is not dominant in all cases. For example, a co-dominance between Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer was observed in Pakistan, while in the rhizosphere they represent only a small fraction associated with the phyla Proteobacteria [90].
In Brazilian tropical soils, mung bean nodulation with native rhizobia is lower in the sampled areas of the Cerrado, the Brazilian savannah, compared to the Atlantic Forest [87]. On the other hand, in Australia, the Bradyrhizobium strain CB1015 from India is recommended for inoculation of mung beans [91], but it is rarely detected in agricultural areas, including inoculated sites [92]. The authors suggest that indigenous strains may be more competitive than the inoculant strain in some environments. In fact, they found that some wild bradyrhizobia capable of forming nodules in mung beans may be as effective as commercial inoculum.
Cross-nodulation with different Bradyrhizobium strains has also been observed. Three out of four Bradyrhizobium strains used in Brazil as a commercial inoculant for cowpea, B. viridifuturi, B. yuanmingense, and B. elkanii, successfully nodulate mung bean, but not B. pachyrhizi [93]. These results indicate the existence of some level of incompatibility between strains of the Bradyrhizobium genus in relation to the colonization of mung bean nodule colonization. A type III secretion system (T3SS) is responsible for the interaction between mung bean and Bradyrhizobium strains through T3SS mutations that determine cultivar specificities and nodulation properties. The USDA 61 strain of B. elkanii is not compatible with mung bean and soybean due to the presence of a functional T3SS. As a result, it does not nodulate with either plant [94]. In addition to T3SS, an innB gene may also restrict nodulation and control symbiosis with Vigna species. In contrast, Piromyou et al. [95] evaluating four Bradyrhizobium strains that share a common origin based on similarities in T3SS, found that the bradyrhizobial strain SUTN9-2 showed the best interaction with mung bean, due to its specific T3SS.
Furthermore, several other genera can be isolated from mung bean nodules, such as Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Ensifer, Leifsonia, Bacillus, Agrobacterium, Mycolicibacterium, and Kaistia [87]. Leifsonia, Bacillus, Agrobacterium, Mycolicibacterium, and Kaistia are non-rhizobial bacteria and can be considered as nodule endophytes. Hakim et al. [88] found, in addition to Bradyrhizobium strains, the fast-grower species Ensifer aridi and Ensifer meliloti, as well as R. pusense, all capable of establishing effective symbiosis with mung bean [88].
Inoculation of mung beans with rhizobial strains that have PGPR traits may result in greater symbiotic efficiency. IAA production and P solubilization ability are present in three rhizobial isolates from mung bean nodules [96]. The isolate assigned to B. elkanii showed the best PGPR characteristics and, as a result, had the highest nodulation and shoot biomass under axenic conditions. A strain of R. pusense, an endophytic bacteria isolated from mung bean roots, has several PGPR traits: siderophore, IAA, and ammonia production; and ACC deaminase and P solubilization activities [97]. Additionally, proteins and transporters related to stress tolerance are also present. In a pot experiment, this strain promoted a substantial increase in nodulation and shoot biomass. In another study, a rhizobial strain that is capable of producing bacteriocin was co-inoculated with the recommended rhizobial strain and resulted in significant increases in nodulation, root and shoot biomasses, chlorophyll and leghemoglobin content, and grain yield, among other factors, compared to inoculation with single-rhizobial inoculation [98]. There is an increase in nodular occupation by the bacteriocin-producing strain, which may be a strategy for the development of promising biofertilizers.

2.4.3. Pigeon Peas

Nodulation in pigeon pea roots is often poor, and understanding of symbiotic efficiency is still limited. It is crucial to study the pigeon pea microsymbiont to maximize the contribution of BNF to increase plant growth and grain productivity. The main factor influencing the native population capable of forming root nodules with pigeon peas, according to Chalasani et al. [99], is the crop area, followed by the plant developmental stage and soil type. In their study, plant genotypes play a small role, while for Bopape et al. [100], data from the analysis of forty soil samples showed a differential N fixation ability among them, which is mainly dependent on the host plant genotype.
Pigeon peas are nodulated by a wide range of rhizobia comprising Bradyrhizobium and fast-growing rhizobia. It is highly tolerant to drought, although the yields tend to reduce under these conditions. BNF through inoculation with elite strains characterized by effective symbiotic traits is a strategy to improve crop yield. Nineteen strains isolated from different soil types in India and selected from nodulation and productivity data were submitted to complete genome sequencing [101]. Jorrin et al. [101] found that these strains belong to Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer, and B. yuanmingense was the most common species. In terms of productivity, strains of B. yuanmingense and one strain of Ensifer alkalisoli were the best available resources for inoculant development. However, nodules from pigeon pea, chickpea, and sweet pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) growing in Bangladesh were mostly colonized by a Rhizobium sp., which promoted increased nodulation and shoot dry weight in the three species, also being a potential inoculant for pigeon peas.
Two classical strains used for soybean inoculation were tested in pigeon pea: a fast-growing strain, Ensifer fredii (USDA 191), and a slow-growing strain, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (USDA110), in addition to the respective T3SS mutants [102]. All inoculants produced Fix+ nodules, except USDA 110, which did not have rhizobia or leghemoglobin in its interior. Furthermore, nodulation assays with the USDA 110 strain T3SS mutant showed high competitiveness, together with the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Despite promising results, more studies are needed.

3. PGPR Benefits: Nutrition Enhancement and Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses

Research on PGPR is abundant, which reflects the interest and the importance that microorganisms have for plant development. These microorganisms establish themselves in the rhizosphere, root, and shoot where they act through multiple mechanisms. Among them are: (1) the production of plant growth regulators; (2) increased root absorption (formation of adventitious roots and absorbent hairs, membrane transporters, stimulus to the proton pump); (3) availability of nutrients in the soil solution (solubilization of potassium and phosphate rocks, production of organic acids, production of siderophores, exopolysaccharides, and hydrolytic enzymes—proteases, pectinases, lipases, and chitinases and phytases); (4) mitigation of the effects of abiotic stresses (production of ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharides, and stimulus to the accumulation of antioxidant enzymes—catalase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase, and of non-enzymatic antioxidant metabolites—glutathione and ascorbic acid). Growth promotion also occurs indirectly through the relationships of hyperparasitism, antagonism, competition, and the induction of resistance in plants to phytopathogens. Research on PGPR is abundant, which reflects the interest and the importance that microorganisms have for plant development [103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110].
In this section, assays with approximately 160 microorganisms focused on pulse growth promotion were described, totaling 81 taxa. Most of these studies consist of selecting microorganisms capable of producing specific applications in plants by improving various nutritional aspects and increasing tolerance to climatic stresses. The results point to an increase in chlorophyll levels, nutrients such as N, P, K, Ca, Mg, K, S, proteins, and sugars in plant tissues; leaf area; shoot and root biomass; grain yield, grain weight, number of pods per plant, and harvest index; and reduction in plant disease incidence. The translation of these results into technologies applied to agricultural production systems aims to increase productivity and replace or reduce the use of soluble chemical fertilizers. In addition, a greater number of studies related to the culture of common beans, chickpeas, peas, broad beans, cowpea, and mung bean were found.
Table 2 shows the seven most common taxa used in studies as PGPR. Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp., including B. subtilis and P. fluorescens, have been tested in the eight leguminous pulses. A broader look at the interaction of microorganisms with pulses suggests, on the one hand, potential promising groups for the development of biotechnological applications and, on the other, little-studied groups that perhaps deserve greater attention.

3.1. Temperate Pulses

3.1.1. Chickpeas

Co-inoculation of Mesorhizobium with PGPR has been considered as a promising strategy for chickpea inoculation. A consortium of a Mesorhizobium strain used in India with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas argentinensis isolated from the rhizosphere and roots of wild chickpeas improved symbiotic traits, soil quality, and grain yield compared to the single Mesorhizobium inoculant [128]. The authors consider the consortium to be a potential biofertilizer for promoting sustainable agriculture. Co-inoculation of actinobacterial endophytes isolated from chickpea roots with M. ciceri increased total plant N and approximately 30% of shoot biomass [155,156]. Exudates from chickpea roots colonized by actinobacteria stimulate nodulation-related biological processes and may help improve chickpea production under field conditions.
Phosphate (P) and zinc (Zn) solubilizers are important PGPR traits essential to increase BNF, plant growth, and yield. A P-solubilizing microbial consortium that included strains of Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Chryseobacterium sp., and Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated from a lab-scale bioreactor [113]. The consortium significantly improved growth and reduces fertilizers by 50–100% in both chickpea and mung bean. Two P- and Zn-solubilizing bacterial strains of the Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera isolated from the rhizospheric soil of a chickpea production area promoted an increase of approximately 17% in grain yield [111]. In areas with a low rhizobium population, the addition of Mesorhizobium to the P- and Zn-solubilizing strains was necessary. A Zn-solubilizing strain of Pseudomonas protegens, which also possess P solubilization and ACC deaminase activities, promoted an approximately 40% increase in shoot length compared to control plants [157].
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were also successfully used as a biofertilizer for chickpea. Under field conditions, multiple AMF isolates applied by seed coating stimulate mycorrhizal root colonization and increase grain yield by 140% compared to a single AMF isolate [144]. Comparing AMF symbiosis with non-AM fungal endophytes, Bazghaleh et al. [158] showed that the former increased chickpea biomass, while the latter had a neutral effect. The effect is cultivar-dependent, and co-inoculation of AMF and non-AM fungal endophytes may show different responses.
Chickpea in arid and semi-arid environments is frequently affected by harsh environmental stresses such as heat, drought, and salinity, which limit its growth and productivity, and are aggravated by climate change. Enriching microbial colonization can help alleviate stressful conditions. Small noncoding regulatory RNA molecules, the microRNAs, are modulated by bacteria during various environmental stresses. Pseudomonas putida promotes a variable expression pattern of individual microRNAs and their target genes in a tolerant chickpea genotype exposed to drought and salt stress [159]. The authors concluded that specific miRNA-mediated perception and response mechanisms operate under these stresses. ACC deaminase activity may improve tolerance in salinity and drought situations. Azotobacter chroococcum, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and Bacillus pumilus, all of them with a high level of ACC-deaminase activity, endured different pH, temperature, and NaCl concentrations [137]. The consortium with the four strains exerted a positive impact on the growth of chickpea plants under normal conditions compared to uninoculated plants.
Regarding salinity stress, chickpea seed inoculation with rhizobium improves mineral uptake, reduces electrolyte leakage, which directly influences photosynthesis, and increases yield attributes in salt-treated plants [160]. A consortium composed of Bacillus safensis, Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Staphylococcus xylosus increases the total fresh weight of chickpea under salinity stress by 54% in a field experiment, compared to the control under normal conditions [161].
Chickpea co-inoculation of M. ciceri and P. fluorescens significantly improved the fresh and dry weight of leaves, roots, and shoots under drought stress conditions, although it did not alter the nodulation parameters [129]. Laranjeira et al. [112] inoculated chickpea seeds with bacteria (Mesorhizobium sp., Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp.) and AMF (Rhizophagus irregularis, Funneliformis geosporum, and Claroideoglomus claroideum). Under field conditions, irrigated only during reproductive stages, they observed the highest cumulative grain yield (18,157 kg ha−1), resulting in an increase of 16% and 237% over fully irrigated inoculated plants and non-inoculated plants under rainfed conditions, respectively.

3.1.2. Peas

Pea is one of the first domesticated crops, and it contributes to sustainable agriculture by playing important agronomic, economic, and environmental roles [27]. It is an alternative cover crop in semi-arid regions, capable of generating an economic return due to grain production [27]. The co-inoculation between PGPR and the Rlv strain has shown some promising results in pea. Mamontova et al. [145] observed that the co-inoculation of pea line K-8274 with Rlv and AMF strains resulted in a significant and stable increase in shoot and seed biomass compared to line K-3358. K-8274 showed a high efficiency of interaction with soil microorganisms (EIBSM) in comparison to a low-EIBSM line K-3358. Although, the molecular mechanisms behind this effect are not fully understood, the responsive line, K-8274, exhibited prolongation of seed maturation by up-regulation of proteins associated to cellular respiration and protein biosynthesis, and down-regulation of proteins during late-embryogenesis, while the low-EIBSM line K-3358 displayed lower levels of the proteins related to cell metabolism. The authors suggested that EIBSM trait should be considered in pulse breeding programs. In a soil-filled pot experiment, co-inoculation of pea seeds with Rlv and AMF strains followed three inoculation schedules and resulted in an increase of approximately 30% in seed yield compared to the control inoculated with the Rlv strain only [147]. In addition, co-inoculation increased ascorbic acid, protein, and carbohydrate contents in the seeds, while no significant differences occurred between pre-sowing or post-emergence applications.
To evaluate the response of biofertilizers in an agroforestry system, Shukla et al. [152] co-inoculated several legumes in the spring and winter with specific rhizobial strains for each pulse, a PSB strain, and two AMF species, Acaulospora scrobiculata and R. irregularis, common to all crops. Grain yields, rhizobial nodulation, and AMF colonization were lower in the shade compared to plants growing in full sunlight. Consortium inoculations were effective in peas, chickpeas, lentils, and mung beans, among other crops, under both light conditions, suggesting that their use in agroforestry systems may at least partially overcome the adverse effect of shading typical of this type of system [152].
In a three-year field experiment, two consortia formed by a Rlv strain and either a (1) P-mobilizing strain, Lelliottia nimipressuralis, and Paenibacillus polymyxa carrying phytopathogen antagonistic properties, or (2) a phototrophic N2-fixing strain of Nostoc linckia significantly increased pea seed yield [162]. The three years average results compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment were heavily influenced by the climatic conditions. The yields range from around 2.1 to 3.5 tons ha−1, the former observed under low soil, low air humidity, and low rainfall, but the positive results derived from the inoculation of the consortia were independent of the climate conditions.
PGPR strains may also be used as a biofertilizer for pea cultivation. Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Sanguibacter inulinus isolated from the rhizospheres of rapeseed, winter pea, and faba bean showed a high proportion of P solubilization, but the abilities of PSB strains isolated from rapeseed were significantly higher than those isolated from winter pea and faba bean [114]. The authors emphasized the influence of the plant on its microbiome to fit P demand.
Pea plants are highly sensitive to salinity stress, which can be minimized by inoculation with different microorganisms. Acinetobacter bereziniae, Enterobacter ludwigii, and Alcaligenes faecalis strains possess various PGPR traits (IAA, siderophore, and exopolysaccharide production, P, Zn, and K solubilization, and ACC deaminase activity); they are salt-tolerant and can mitigate salinity stress [163]. The three of them enhanced the growth parameters of pea seedlings by improving antioxidant enzyme activity associated with salt stress alleviation, but A. faecalis showed the best performance. Furthermore, in field trials, the authors observed that inoculation increased pea growth and grain yield in the presence of NaCl stress (100 mM). The Bacillus marisflavi and Bacillus cereus strains selected for their potent ACC-deaminase activity were able to mitigate symptoms and increase plant biomass and levels of antioxidant enzymes, among other parameters, when inoculated in pea plants under NaCl stress [124]. Other Bacillus strains, B. subtilis, B. safensis, and B. cereus selected for their PGPR traits (IAA, P solubilization, siderophore, and ammonia production) were further evaluated on pea seedlings under 1% NaCl stress [138]. In addition to improving plant growth parameters, inoculation also increases antioxidant enzyme activities, preventing oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS).
Inoculation with a strain of halotolerant Kocuria rhizophila, a Gram-positive bacterium that belongs to the order Actinomycetales, also improved growth and oxidative enzyme activities in pea plants subjected to saline stress. The authors point out that the response was defined by a fine interaction between K. rhizophila and pea genotypes modulated through the antioxidant system [164].
A consortium inoculation with strains from different families of AMF, Rhizophagus fasciculatus, and Gigaspora sp. benefits pea production under salinity stress by reducing adverse effects through the improvement of the antioxidant system [146]. The AMF consortium exhibits a better response compared to a single AMF inoculation. The authors considered that incompatibility between symbionts might explain the difference between AMF treatments [165].
In addition to salinity stress, bacteria containing ACC-deaminase may also mitigate drought stress in peas. Inoculation with Rlv, which generally has ACC deaminase activity, may enhance shoot biomass, nodulation, and BNF activity of pea plants subjected to water-deficit stress [166]. A consortium composed of three strains of rhizobacteria producing ACC-deaminase, Ochrobactrum pseudogrignonense, Pseudomonas, and B. subtilis significantly increases the percentage of seed germination, the lengths of the roots and shoots, and the dry weight of inoculated plants exposed to drought stress [115].
Most of the authors suggested that these strains may be used to mitigate abiotic stress, contributing to the maintenance of plant health and to sustainable crop development.

3.1.3. Lentils

Field experiments under rainfed and irrigated conditions were carried out in Iran with lentils inoculated with Azotobacter, a soil N2-fixing bacteria, and Glomus intraradices, an AMF species [167]. Respectively, yield and seed protein were 6.5 and 20.5% higher under rainfed conditions and 21.9 and 28.2% under irrigated conditions compared to the control. The highest seed yields, 649.03 kg ha−1, and seed protein, 159.77 kg ha−1, were produced under supplemental irrigation and inoculation with AMF and Azotobacter.
Lentil biofertilization with R. leguminosarum and/or P. fluorescens was evaluated at different levels of P [168]. The application of 40 kg P2O5 resulted in maximum uptake of N, P, and K. Using similar treatments, Singh et al. [169] observed that lentil co-inoculation with Rhizobium and P. fluorescens promoted significantly higher grain yield after receiving 20 kg P2O5 ha−1 than after receiving 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 without biofertilizer.
The agroforestry system is an alternative for managing multiple crops, with natural competition for plants for nutrients, water, and light, as mentioned by Shukla et al. [152] in the previous section.
Sixty-three rhizobacteria isolated from lentils were obtained from nine soils in the Mediterranean area [116]. Ten selected strains were identified as Pseudomonas spp. One of them, close to Pseudomonas umsongensis, increased early nodulation by 85% when co-inoculated with rhizobium compared to single-rhizobial inoculation. This strain showed higher ACC-deaminase activity and IAA production. No statistical differences were found (p < 0.05)].
The use of an N2-fixing Rhizobium with P-mobilizing microorganisms (Priestia megaterium and P. polymyxa) increased lentil yield [170]. An additional increase of approximately 8% in grain yield was obtained when a seaweed extract biostimulant was also applied.
Besides Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus, Enterobacter, and Bacillus are commonly used as plant growth-promoting agents and can be of potential interest for agricultural applications under climate stress conditions. Their combination with rhizobia has shown synergistic growth and nodulation outcomes. An irrigation assay was conducted at 30 and 50% levels to assess the maximum water-retaining soil capacity. Lentil co-inoculation with Rhizobium and PGPR under sufficient watering conditions (50%), showed a significant increase in shoot dry weight for several strain combinations: R. laguerreae and Enterobacter aerogenes, R. laguerreae and Bacillus sp., R. laguerreae and Bacillus sp. as well as the single inoculation of E. aerogenes, compared to the nitrogen fertilizer control [125]. Shoot dry weight decreased under water stress (30%) compared to normal watering treatment. Generally, all consortium combinations increased shoot biomass compared to single inoculations and the fertilized control, except the consortium composed of R. laguerreae and Bacillus.
Growth and yield can be significantly improved by co-application of ACC-deaminase-producing rhizobacteria (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Lysinibacillus fusiform) and caffeic acid under drought stress [171]. However, the effect of B. amyloliquefaciens was more prominent than L. fusiform for most of the growth attributes of lentils when caffeic acid was added under drought stress. Caffeic acid is converted to ferulic acid under drought stress through the O-methyltransferase enzyme. Both ferulic acid and caffeic acid are accumulated in the leaves during drought stress conditions. These antioxidants attach to the leaf cell wall and protect the photosynthetic apparatus from high-energy radiations by absorbing them into mesophyll cells [172]. Caffeic acid and its derivatives are important in enhancing nitrogen fixation, and carbohydrates and protein content in nodules [173].
Cytokinins are another important group of growth regulators responsible for cell division, nutrient allocation, and photosynthetic performance. A Methylobacterium oryza cepa was selected based on its high cytokinin production and its tolerance to water stress tested by in vitro exposure of lentils to PEG6000 [174]. The presence of Methylobacterium significantly improved the performance of lentils exposed to drought by: a. stimulating the initial growth of shoots and roots; b. increasing photosynthetic rates for well-irrigated and water-stressed conditions; c. improving the harvest index by seven times for well-watered lentils and four times for drought-stressed plants.

3.1.4. Broad Beans

In a field experiment for two consecutive years, broad beans co-inoculated with rhizobia and P. fluorescens at 109 CFU ml−1 extended the period to reach the maximum leaf area and increased grain yield and dry shoot biomass [130]. The environmental conditions influenced the results. Co-inoculation gave the best results in the first year, while in the second year, when unfavorable conditions were found, a single inoculation with Pseudomonas was the best treatment. Rhizobial inoculation can promote N exudation to the rhizosphere, promoting an increase in PGPR populations, which also contributes to stimulate nodulation and root growth [36].
In a greenhouse, broad bean was inoculated with an A. chroococcum isolate capable of producing several hydrolytic enzymes. Inoculation showed higher and lower values for shoot and root biomasses, compared to the uninoculated control and NPK fertilization treatment, respectively [142]. A. chroococcum inoculation may be an alternative capable of replacing, at least partially, mineral fertilization by increasing the efficiency of the fertilizer and reducing costs.
Co-inoculation of broad beans with Rhizobium sp. isolated from nodules of faba beans and Rahnella aquatilis or Pseudomonas brassicacearum, both isolated from the rhizosphere of broad beans, significantly increased shoot and pod biomass and P content, in addition to increasing root phosphatase-phytase activities [175]. In a field experiment in Morocco, PGPR strains isolated from the broad bean rhizosphere (R. aquatilis and Acinetobacter pittii) and an E. meliloti strain were inoculated as a single strain or in a mixture on broad bean and Triticum durum (wheat) plants [176]. Shoot and root dry weight more than doubled compared to the uninoculated control whether single-rhizobial strain or its mixture with PGPR were used. The results suggest that the growth stimulus was mainly due to BNF. The authors concluded that the best responses to inoculation, associated with increased growth and nutrient absorption, occurred with the mixture of PGPR and when V. faba was intercropped with T. durum. The introduced PGPR strains can probably establish and colonize the rhizosphere of both species, promoting growth in single cultivation and with a synergistic effect in intercropping.
The inoculation of broad bean with AMF reveals promising results that have been motivating the execution of several studies. Rakiami et al. [177] inoculated broad beans under field conditions cultivated in a calcareous soil with pH 7 in Morocco with a tripartite biofertilizer composed of two PGPR strains Acinetobacter sp. and R. aquatilis, two strains of E. meliloti, and the AMF species, Glomus sp., Sclerocystis sp., and Acaulospora sp. Increases in shoot and root biomasses, pod weight and number, and shoot content of N, P, Ca, K, Na, sugars, and proteins were shown. Rhizobium inoculation was sufficient to improve the N content, while mycorrhizal fungi expanded the frequency of root mycorrhization (>90%). However, broad bean inoculation with rhizobia, R. laguerreae, and AMF (R. irregularis, F. geosporum, and C. claroideum) does not show a uniform response in terms of increases in nodulation and BNF levels [153]. The number of nodules decreased and single-rhizobial inoculation stimulated the mycorrhizal colonization rate. Sanchez-Navarro et al. [154] cultivated broad beans in a semi-arid area in Spain with a complex mixture of microorganisms, made up of R. leguminosarum, Burkholderia cenocepacia, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, and the AMF species R. irregularis, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, C. claroideum, and Funneliformis mosseae. The authors found that single inoculation with R. leguminosarum led to an increase in seed N and protein content, although it did not increase BNF. AMF inoculation increased N levels in seeds, shoots, and roots, probably due to efficiency of nutrient use.
In addition to the availability of P in the soil, micronutrients can improve the effect of broad bean inoculation with AMF. El-Mansy et al. [148] reported the beneficial effect of Fe foliar fertilization (400–500 ppm) in a two-year field experiment in arid regions of Egypt, where reduced Fe availability is common due to alkaline pH. The addition of Fe addition increased AMF colonization, the native and inoculated number of AMF spores, and the number of active nodule number. The synergistic effect between AMF inoculation and Fe addition produced a 100% increase in crop yield. In contrast, the combined effect of the application of Zn through soil (5 mg kg−1 soil) and AMF inoculation in broad beans cultivated in sterilized and non-sterilized soil in a greenhouse showed that Zn fertilization did not influence mycorrhizal colonization, while increases in both dry shoot biomass and nutrient concentrations in tissues of inoculated plants were observed, regardless of mineral fertilization [149].
Ensifer saheli, an endophytic isolate from the nodules of a tree legume from the Aswan Desert in Egypt, was able to reduce the light irradiance stress in broad bean seedlings in a greenhouse experiment. The strain, in addition to fixing N, produces hydrolytic enzymes and IAA, promoted greater efficiency of water use, reduced stomatal conductance, and increased chlorophyll and protein content, length, and root and shoot biomasses [178].
Under drought stress, the co-inoculation of Rlv and P. putida shows the best results compared to isolated strains, such as increased root and shoot parameters, seed production, and water use efficiency [179]. The authors suggested that the ACC deaminase enzyme produced by Pseudomonas reduced the ACC, precursor of ethylene in plants, and stimulated greater absorption of nutrients and induced the formation of absorptive roots.
A single inoculation or a co-inoculation with halotolerant B. subtilis and Bacillus thurigiensis, both isolated from halophytic plants in Egypt, mitigated the effect of salt stress by promoting the growth of shoots and roots, and increasing the absorption of minerals such as N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and K [139]. Broad bean inoculation with R. leguminosarum combined with nonnodulating exopolysaccharide-producing strains such as Paenibacillus mucilaginosus and E. meliloti improved the plant’s tolerance to salt stress, suggesting a direct or indirect effect on plant response. Indirectly, growth promotion was related to the modulation of soil microbiota adhered to the roots.
Three strains of Pseudomonas isolated from saline soils and vineyards in Algeria were selected for their ability to grow in culture medium with sodium chloride (7%), produce indole acetic acid, and siderophore pyoverdine [180]. Broad bean inoculation significantly increased fresh biomass production in the presence or absence of salt stress in a greenhouse experiment.

3.2. Tropical Pulses

3.2.1. Common Beans

The recent literature cites the co-inoculation of common beans with rhizobia and several other bacteria, such as Azospirillum, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Cyanobacteria, and Burkholderia, among others [133,181,182,183,184]. A classic example is the co-inoculation with Rhizobium and Azospirillum, which has been reported to increase yields with return rates between 90% and 114% in commercial farming [181]. De Carvalho et al. [185] found that co-inoculation of R. tropici with Azospirillum baldaniorum or B. elkanii 29w contributed to early nodulation and biomass accumulation in common beans. Additionally, in a field experiment, Leite et al. [55] observed that the co-inoculation of R. tropici with B. diazoefficiens CPAC 7 contributed to an increase of approximately 20% in yield compared to the single inoculation of R. tropici, with a yield greater than 3000 kg ha−1. Finally, Pastor-Bueis et al. [143] evaluated the efficacy of the inoculant based on the elite strain R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli LCS0306 (R), looking for the optimal combination with P. brassicacearum subsp. neoaurantiaca (P) and A. chroococcum. The consortium between Rhizobium and Pseudomonas increased the contribution of N2 fixation by 51.7 kg ha−1 (87 %) and the yield by 1337 kg ha−1 (59%) compared to the control without inoculation and without fertilization.
The success of co-inoculation may be due to a complex combination of several factors, such as the ability of the non-rhizobial strain to colonize the interior of the nodule, located in a separate niche, which is the case of Pseudomonas, thus enabling action as a PGPR without competition with its rhizobial partner. Several bacterial genera such as Pantoea, Klebsiella, Rhizobium, Enterobacter, and Bacillus have been reported as nodule endophytes, either by culture-dependent and independent methods [43,126]. Additionally, other diazotrophic bacteria, such as Azospirillum, establish less direct relationships with the host plant but are also capable of supplying, at least partially, the plant’s N demands [186,187]. In the case of the co-inoculation reported by Leite et al. [55], the Bradyrhizobium strains induce ineffective nodulation when singly inoculated. However, a synergistic effect is obtained when they are co-inoculated with R. tropici. The mechanisms behind this interaction remain to be unveiled.
Regarding P absorption, the association between mycorrhizal fungi and the common bean represents a viable alternative. BNF is an energy-demanding process, and adequate provision of P to legumes contributes to improving the efficiency of the symbiosis. AMF are the key in this regard, since they help plants absorb nutrients, especially P, in addition to contributing to water and improving resistance to environmental stress [188]. In common beans, Razakatiana et al. [189] evaluated the effects of inoculation of AMF isolates identified as Acaulospora sp. and Glomus sp. together with a group of ten Rhizobium strains, reporting a synergistic effect of double inoculation on plant P content, nodulation, mycorrhization rate, and acid phosphatase activity. The plant’s P content, which was 0.85 g kg−1 without inoculation, increased to 1.57 g kg−1 with double inoculation, corresponding to an amount three times higher of P accumulated in the plant biomass. Likewise, the mycorrhization rate also increased, 30–63% for inoculation with mycorrhiza only, and 80–95% for inoculation with mycorrhiza and rhizobia; that is, an increase of 28–216%.
Microbial inoculants can also help mitigate the effects of biotic and abiotic stresses, such as salinity and temperature [190]. This is relevant since the common bean is sensitive to high and low temperatures as well as to thermal and saline stress. Bacillus spp. were demonstrated to enhance several parameters under osmotic and thermal stresses either alone or when co-inoculated with other microbes such as Pseudomonas and AMF. Inoculation with this genus improved seed germination and plant growth and reduced oxidative osmotic stress, and the effects were strain-dependent [117]. Benefits were also observed when B. subtilis was combined with P. fluorescens and silicon, contributing to bean growth, yield, and biochemical parameters, such as catalase and superoxide dismutase activities [132]. In another experiment, the co-inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens and AMF benefited the photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance, and yield of common beans under water stress. Finally, de Lima et al. [140] observed that non-inoculated plants showed lower growth when exposed to high temperature (35 °C against 25 °C in the control) compared to plants inoculated with B. subtilis, which increased shoot biomass (40%), shoot:root ratio (30%), and number of leaves (25%) in plants subjected to thermal stress during the reproductive phase. Similarly, bacteria can also help plants cope with the stress caused by low temperature. Psychrotolerant bacteria, among them four species of Pseudomonas and one Brevibacterium frigoritolerans, decreased freezing injury, ice nucleating activity, lipid peroxidation, and stimulated antioxidant enzyme activity, contributing to cold tolerance of inoculated common beans [191].
According to Talaat et al. [192] the application of effective microorganisms (EM) showed protective roles against stress and a mechanism of protection of the photosynthetic apparatus of bean plants was found. They helped maintain photosynthetic pigments, improved PS I and PS II activities, improved gas exchange parameters, regulated chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics, and induced Rubisco activities.

3.2.2. Cowpeas

PGPR may help legume–rhizobia symbiosis and improve cowpea productivity. Jayakumar et al. [120] inoculated Pseudomonas spp. in cowpea seeds and saw a significant increase in growth parameters such as shoot length, root length, and root numbers in inoculated plants compared to the control. Valdez-Nunez et al. [193] isolated bacterial strains from healthy cowpea root nodules capable of solubilizing tricalcium phosphate, producing siderophores, and with antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum. Regarding this, the co-inoculation of efficient Bradyrhizobium strains [194], with Azospirillum brasilense [194,195,196,197], AMF [78,150], Trichoderma [198,199] and P-solubilizing fungi [200] may help cowpea plants absorb more nutrients from soil and increase grain yield.
Through culture-independent molecular methods, Le Quere et al. [86] accessed the diversity of bradyrhizobial populations in association with cowpea nodules in Senegal and found that Bradyrhizobium vignae was the dominant symbiont. Puozaa et al. [201] detected the presence of highly diverse bradyrhizobia (i.e., B. vignae, B. elkanii, B. iriomotense, B. pachyrhizi, and B. yuanmingense) and also unidentified bradyrhizobia in acid soils from Ghana and South Africa. Mukhtar et al. [118] evaluated the diversity of DNA isolated from cowpea nodules in Pakistan and the dominant bacterial genus in the nodule microbiomes was the α-proteobacterial genus Bradyrhizobium, but other proteobacterial genera, some distinct from rhizobia such as Acidiphilium and Pseudomonas, were also detected. Bacterial isolates from cowpea nodules from the same soils were identified and often shown to be PGPR, namely Mesorhizobium, Ensifer, Bradyrhizobium, Paenibacillus, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and the actinobacteria Frankia sp., Streptomyces galilaeus, and Streptomyces griseoaurantiacus. Some isolates also showed plant growth-promoting traits such as nitrogen fixation, P solubilization, and siderophore and HCN production. Antifungal activity and extracellular enzymes such as cellulase, lipase, chitinase, amylase, and protease were also detected. Stress-tolerant bacteria may also improve cowpea growth under salinity stress conditions [119]. Abiala and Sahoo [202] found that Bacillus filamentosus (C8) and Bacillus aryabhattai (C29) were able to protect cowpea under NaCl-induced salinity stress, probably due to stabilized membrane and enhanced proline content.

3.2.3. Mung Beans

Yousefi et al. [203] evaluated leaf area index and radiation use efficiency in mung beans in six fertilization treatments: (1) free-living N2-fixing bacteria, (2) P-solubilizing bacteria, (3) K-solubilizing bacteria, (4) a mixture of N2-fixing, P-solubilizing and K-solubilizing bacteria, (5) nitrogen fertilizer, and (6) control (without biological or chemical fertilizers). Tripartite inoculation was the best treatment considering the parameters evaluated.
Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Acinetobacter isolated from mung bean rhizosphere produced under in vitro conditions IAA (from 45.66 to 111.94 µg mL−1) and siderophore, in addition to possessing P solubilizing (from 952.91 to 1341.24 µg mL−1) and catalase activities [122].
Bilal et al. [121] investigated the effect of Pseudomonas spp., a PSB, as inoculant for mung bean varieties, and reveal a significant improvement in grain yield of 882.23 kg ha−1, similar to 70 kg ha−1 of P fertilization, greater than the control. Other parameters such as root and shoot dry weight, root and shoot length, weight of 1000 grains, and harvest index also improve with Pseudomonas inoculation.
Mung bean inoculation with strains of P. aeruginosa or B. subtilis, both isolated from the rhizospheric soil of healthy mung bean plants, promoted an increase in shoot and root length and fresh and dry weight compared to the uninoculated control [141]. Additionally, inoculated plants showed a significant increase in leaf surface area and chlorophyll content compared to control. A high degree of colonization by the isolates was confirmed by the formation of dense microcolonies on the root surface according to a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
A strain of Burkholderia arboris isolated from soil samples dominated by Pinus roxburghii was shown to be effective when inoculated in mung bean seeds in a pot experiment [204]. The strain was characterized by the solubilization activities of K and Zn and the ability to produce siderophore.
A total of 25 non-rhizobial endophytic bacteria were isolated from the root nodules of cowpea, soybean, and mung bean [127]. Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Acinetobacter were genera present in mung bean nodules, which exhibit some characteristics related to plant growth promotion, such as Zn and P solubilization activities and auxin production.
Under N-limited conditions, the shoot and root biomass of mung bean, cowpea, and soybean were significantly enhanced by the biofertilizer consisting of three strains (B. japonicum, B. elkanii, and Streptomyces griseoflavus) compared to the uninoculated control [205]. The application of biofertilizer also improved nodulation and nitrogen fixation in the three leguminous crops. Regarding grain yield, the authors recommend that the biofertilizer can be useful for both soybean and mung bean production.
Inoculation of mung beans with a consortium consisting of N2-fixing bacteria, P-solubilizing bacteria, and AMF promoted a 23.3% increase in grain yield compared to the uninoculated control [206]. In another study, inoculation with AMF improved the BNF efficiency of a Bradyrhizobium sp. strain, leading to improved nodulation, biomass, seed yield, and plant nutrition [151]. AMF inoculation combined with nutrient rich compost was also evaluated as a mung bean inoculant by Wahid et al. [207]. The treatment promoted an improvement in chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations and shoot and root biomass and length compared to the control.
Streptomyces thermocarboxydus isolated from spores of F. mosseae, an AMF from the family Glomeraceae, showed the highest IAA and siderophore production and P-solubilization activity. The inoculation of mung beans with S. thermocarboxydus resulted in a significant increase in the length of the root and the total length (shoot and root), and the fresh weight as a consequence of IAA production, relative to the control [208].
Under salinity stress, inoculation of mung bean with PGPR and salt-tolerant bacteria resulted in an increase in growth, biomass, and physiology parameters, even at 2 and 10% salinity levels. Furthermore, the inoculated mung bean showed an increase in the uptake of N and P under saline conditions, mobilizing Na+ ions from root to shoot to reduce the toxicity presented by the ion [209].
Depending on the geographical region, nearly 40–100% of the losses in mung bean yield are due to various environmental stresses [210]. Drought stress is one of the most important factors that significantly affects agricultural land and reduces the production of various crops. Ahmed et al. [211] induced drought stress by adding a chemical PEG-6000 and evaluated the mitigation potential of a drought-tolerant bacterial consortium of Enterobacter sp. and Leclercia adecarboxylata recovered from rhizospheric soil, which produced significant amounts of plant growth-promoting bioactive compounds and colonized the roots of mung bean plants. According to the authors, these strains not only increase water and nutrient absorption, but also improve stomatal conductance, helping buffer the detrimental effects of drought.
The mixed inoculation of F. mosseae and P. fluorescens effectively alleviates the harmful effects of water stress. An enzyme assay suggested that the co-inoculation of F. mosseae and P. fluorescens was also effective in increasing the antioxidant defense system such as catalase, glutathione—and glutathione reductase [134]. These antioxidative enzymes are the most important components in the reactive oxygen species scavenging system [212,213].

3.2.4. Pigeon Peas

In India, pigeon peas cultivated in acid soils, which received an inoculant consisting of Rhizobium strains and P-solubilizing bacteria, in addition to limestone application and a reduced dose of N (75%), showed an increase in nutrient absorption and the highest grain yield [214]. Economic analyzes were in line with the highest net return value and the best cost–benefit ratio. In sandy soil, tripartite inoculation of broad beans with A. chroococcum, P. megaterium, and P. fluorescens increases the rhizospheric abundance of N fixers and nitrifiers compared to control and mineral fertilizer application [136]. Furthermore, tripartite inoculation promoted the availability of rhizospheric N and P by 1.17 and 1.03, respectively, compared to the uninoculated control, while inoculation did not differ from the recommended dose of mineral fertilizer.
Broad bean inoculation with a consortium of A. chroococcum, P. megaterium, and Pseudomonas sp. was evaluated to reveal the synergistic mechanism among the three bacterial species [123]. The consortium promoted an increase in shoot and root length, and fresh and dry weigh compared to the inoculation of a single bacterium or two-membered consortium.
Sulfur deficiency negatively affects BNF in legumes, which depend on this element for the formation of sulfur amino acids and proteins. Strains characterized as sulfur oxidizing bacteria (SOB) convert elemental sulfur (S0) to sulfates (S+6), which occurs concomitantly with the reduction in the pH of the culture medium. Stenotrophomonas spp. strains stimulate the overexpression of sulfate transport genes in roots and sox genes in the rhizosphere of pigeon pea and act synergistically, increasing both absorption and translocation of sulfur from the roots to the aerial part of plants [215,216]. The inoculated plants showed an increase in N, P, and K uptake compared to the uninoculated control.
Broad bean inoculation with a consortium of P-solubilizing bacteria associated with Rhizobium increased the yield in a multilocus experiment during two consecutive years in India [217]. The grain yield was 50% higher when the bacterial inoculant was combined with the recommended dose of fertilizer and vermicompost (2 tons ha−1), compared to the control without fertilization, while the consortium inoculation increased grain yield by 17% compared to the uninoculated control.
Drought stress can be mitigated by inoculating pigeon pea seeds with PGPR (B. aryabhattai and Bacillus spp.) in a pot experiment containing soil at 50% and 25% of field capacity [218]. B. aryabhattai (IAA+) was more effective in promoting plant growth under stress than in soil at field capacity. Plants inoculated with B. aryabhattai showed a relative water content, 26.3% higher than the control. Different regulatory strategies were detected such as root biomass and relative water content (RWC) increase, and level reduction in osmolytes, proline, glycine-betaine, and antioxidants. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that bacterial inoculation positively regulated gene expression in response to water shortage and negatively regulated proline gene expression.
Bacteria promote plant growth by reducing ethylene levels in plants growing under stress conditions due to the production of the enzyme ACC deaminase which converts ethylene into ammonia and α-ketobutyrate, reducing ethylene tissue levels [219]. In pigeon pea, the ACC deaminase activity of Enterobacter indigenous mitigates salinity stress under controlled and field conditions, in a loamy soil, which was corroborated by using cobalt chloride, an inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis.

4. Microbiomes Associated with Pulses

Plants live in close association with microbial communities that perform functions related to nutrition and protection against biotic and abiotic stresses [220]. Plant microbiomes are spread across plant tissues and organs; among the best known are the rhizosphere, nodule, root, and seed microbiomes. As interest grows in these populations and the benefits they bring to plants, the number of studies addressing this subject is increasing, aiming to understand the diversity and functionality of microbiomes, while at the same time seeking ways to use this knowledge to design new strategies to support plant development.

4.1. Nodule Microbiome

N2-fixing bacteria are major components of nodule microbiomes, where they co-exist with other PGPRs. Analysis of nodule microbiomes may point to new N2-fixing strains, as well as other bacterial species that may act together to increase BNF activity. There is no consensus so far on the role of non-rhizobial bacteria present inside the nodules, although they have a high percentage of PGPR traits. As these communities are studied, the information can be used to develop promising biofertilizers composed of combinations of bacterial strains capable of providing a greater response potential than those with only a single N2-fixing strain.
For example, data from metagenome analysis showed that Bradyrhizobium is predominant in mung bean and cowpea nodules regardless of the plant genotype or the history of the cultivation area [87,221]. The prevalence of this genus has previously been reported for three areas of mung bean production in Pakistan; however, Ensifer, a fast-growing rhizobium, represented a relative abundance of 99% in all rhizobial sequences in a sample collected from a desert region [222]. In Favero et al. [87], the genus Pseudomonas was the most abundant non-rhizobial bacteria (NRB) in mung bean observed in nodules from one cultivar, while Hakim et al. [222] showed Acinetobacter as the most abundant NRB, followed by Microbacterium and Pseudomonas. In cowpea, the bacterial groups Microbacterium, Chitinophagales, Rhizobiaceae, and Acetobacteraceae were present in the nodule microbiome, which was also influenced by the plant genotype. In contrast, the low and high rates of Cr-rich composted tannery sludge added to the soil did not affect the microbiome composition [221]. The presence of Pseudomonas in different nodule microbiomes is worth noting since species of this genus have several PGPR and biocontrol properties. When studying microbial communities in Lotus burttii nodules, Crosbie et al. [220] discovered that a representative of Pseudomonas was present in healthier plants and that it co-colonized nodules infected by an effective strain of Mesorhizobium, but not with an ineffective Rhizobium strain. Additionally, co-inoculation with the Pseudomonas strain decreased nodulation with the ineffective Rhizobium rather than the effective Mesorhizobium.
In a recent study, the nodule and root microbiomes of soybeans and common beans were evaluated to compare the microbial colonization of plants inoculated with elite rhizobial strains and their co-inoculation with A. brasilense [43]. The nodules of the inoculated soybean showed a high abundance of the Bradyrhizobium strain, compared to the bean nodules. Co-inoculation slightly reduced the abundance of Bradyrhizobium in soybean nodules, while it did not change the percentage of bean nodules. For both crops, co-inoculation promoted a significant increase in rhizobial abundance in the roots. In beans, BNF is generally limited, and the authors suggested that it may be due to reduced rhizobial colonization. In broad beans, inoculation with Rlv resulted in an increase in seed N content and grain protein without an increase in BNF compared to the non-inoculated control [154]. Regardless of inoculation or not with a selected strain (Rhizobium, Burkholderia, or AMF) as a single inoculant or in co-inoculation, Rhizobium was the dominant genus in the nodule microbiome, suggesting that this genus was already present in the soil. NRB belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Devosia, Agrobacterium, and Rhodococcus were also found. The inoculated treatment with a 20% reduction in the fertilizer dose did not decrease grain production, corresponding to an environmentally friendly alternative.

4.2. Root and Rhizosphere Microbiome

Several studies with root and rhizosphere microbiomes were performed with different pulses. These microbiomes are known to influence plant growth and productivity. Unlike the nodule microbiome, they can provide an evaluation of the impact caused by the production system and enable the selection of indicators related to the sustainability of agroecosystems. A new species-specific and highly polymorphic 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer barcode was designed to estimate the diversity of bradyrhizobial populations associated with the nodulated roots of cowpea and peanut plants in Senegal [86]. B. vignae is the dominant symbiont in the region. The use of barcoding also showed that the introduction of inoculants could modify the structure of bacterial populations. The difference found between the cowpea and peanut microbiomes confirms the influence of plant species on Bradyrhizobium genotypes.
For several plant species, including the common bean, Soldan et al. [223] propose that the rhizosphere microbiome may have been affected in modern cultivars compared to their wild ancestors. The effects of the characteristics of domesticated plants resulting from direct and indirect selection on the assembly of the host microbiome can lead to species loss, species gain, or species replacement, with the endophyte microbiota varying more among plant organs than among bean varieties [196,224]. Perez-Jaramillo et al. [225] showed that wild common bean relatives were enriched in bacterial taxa of the phylum Bacteroidetes, relative to modern relatives that were enriched in Actinobacteria. This change in composition was associated with plant genotypic traits as well as root phenotypic traits, showing a significant effect between common bean genotype and the associated microbial diversity.
Lv et al. [226] evaluated the structure and complexity of different root and nodule endophytes recruited during the life cycle. The Rhizobium genus was prevalent during all stages of development, being the highest relative abundance observed during flowering. The highest complexity was achieved at the seedling roots, which progressively decreased as the plant matured, whereas nodule complexity is also quite high during flowering. The relative abundance of Pseudomonas gradually increases during the life cycle, whereas that of Bacteroides decreases. From the dynamics established between endophytes, the authors consider that it is possible to propose the design of a synthetic community that can be used to promote activities to implement plant development, such as BNF and resistance to disease.
R. irregularis, used as an AMF inoculant in both phases of a rotation system composed of canola and pulses (pea or lentil), as the preceding crops, and corn and flax, as the main crops, resulted in the enrichment of the root microbiome with Rhizobium in the presence of pulses, which tends to be related to higher yields and the highest uptake of N and P in the main crops [227]. Microbiome studies can bring to light new information about complex systems involving several plant species that may be affected to a certain extent by patterns and dynamics established by microbial communities. The percentage of intercropping overyielding due to the soil microbial community was estimated [228]. In wheat and broad beans or corn and broad beans intercrops, the microbial legacy contributed with an increase of 28 to 51%. In intercropping, an increase in fungal diversity is generally observed compared to monocultures. Broad bean, in contrast to wheat and corn, benefits from cultivation with another crop. Wheat and corn intercropping did not show significant overyielding. The authors conclude that the dynamics established by both beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms are important in designing sustainable agricultural systems, usually based on the intercropping of legumes and cereals.
The rhizosphere microbiome may be a useful indicator of soil fertility and agroecosystem sustainability. During a long-term experiment maintained for at least eight years, the bacterial communities from the pea rhizosphere and the bulk soil were analyzed [229]. Rhizospheric bacterial diversity was higher compared to bulk soil, although different tillage and residue management treatments did not promote significant differences, suggesting that the key driver for alpha diversity levels should be the rhizosphere effect. The rhizosphere is characterized by a high abundance of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Nitrobacter, Enterobacter, and Sphingomonas. Conservation agriculture management predicts the maintenance of crop productivity, and, in this sense, the rhizospheric microbiome can be a highly sensitive indicator capable of anticipating changes in the sustainability status. When comparing the rhizosphere microbial communities of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rapeseed (Brassica napus), and pea, Wyszkowska et al. [230] demonstrated that wheat promoted the most beneficial effect on bacterial development and enzyme activities, indicated by the ecophysiological diversity index (EP, based on bacteria and actinobacteria counts) and the abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTU). The authors highlight that this index can be used as an indicator of soil fertility indicator.
Rhizospheric soil samples from cowpea growing in a semiarid region of Pakistan were used as inoculant in controlled experiments subjected to saline stress conditions. Shoot length, plant biomass, and root nodules were higher when inoculated with two of the four soil samples collected [118]. The soil microbiome showed an overall pattern at the phylum level, being dominated by Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while the Bradyrhizobiaceae family is prevalent in the nodule microbiome of controlled experiments. The genera Bosea, Afipia, Rhodopseudomonas, and Oligotropha are also present. The authors suggested that the positive results obtained might be due to the presence of PGPR, which is a promising way to develop a cowpea inoculant with the aim of increasing tolerance under salinity stress.
In the rhizospheric community of cowpea grown after maize, a constant increase was observed in the fila Proteobacteria, Armatimonadetes, WPS-2, and OP11 between flowering and senescence [231]. There was a predominance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Network analysis showed that during the senescence phase, the rhizospheric community was the most complex, closely followed by the nodule microbiome during flowering. Keystone genera were identified, citing, among others, Bacillus for corn and cowpea and Microlunatus for cowpea related to P metabolism. These keystone genera are indicative of species that can contribute to the stabilization of microbial communities, which may have biotechnological applications.
Root architecture and exudation modified by plant domestication may have led to new microbial associations in the rhizosphere [232]. According to Medina-Paz et al. [233] the common bean recruits specific taxa from the surrounding soil within its native area and in a domestication area. Using 16S rRNA amplicon gene sequencing for paired evaluations of rhizosphere and endosphere communities at three ontogenetic stages in common beans, they found that the rhizosphere bacterial community was dominated by six phyla: Proteobacteria (41%), Bacteroidetes (14%), Actinobacteria (13%), Gemmatimonadetes (6%), Chloroflexi (4%), and Acidobacteria (3.5%). The dominant genera were Candidatus Nitrososphaera (11.5%), Flavisolibacter (3%), Steroidobacter (3%), Kaistobacter (2%), Agrobacterium (1%), and Rubrobacter (1%). In the endosphere, more than 99% of the sequences were annotated as Proteobacteria and most belonged to the genera Agrobacterium and Rhizobium (representing 30% each) followed by Ochrobactrum (less than 1%). Regarding the vegetative stage, the single out annotated as Chryseobacterium in the endosphere increased strongly and the abundance of rhizosphere OTUs annotated as Rhizobium and Aeromonas exhibited a 40-fold increase from the vegetative to the flowering stage.

4.3. Seed Microbiome

Seeds are colonized by microorganisms that can be transferred to the next generation, and contribute to their development, plant health, adaptation, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and productivity. As we understand how seed microbiomes are organized, transferred, and preserved, we are better able to use this information in breeding programs to include the benefits of microbial communities in the development of new cultivars. In this sense, the seed microbiome is the first inoculum to colonize a germinating seed and may be responsible for initiating the microbiome assembly. When vertical transmission occurs directly to dormant seeds, it is possible to have a better estimate of the seed’s native population, reducing the influence of selection mechanisms that occur after the onset of germination [234].
The vertical transmission of seed bacterial communities across two generations of seven lentil genotypes cultivated in two different soil types has been investigated [234]. Although the seed microbiome differed significantly between soils, the genera Cutibacterium, Methylobacterium, Sphingomonas, Streptococcus, and Tepidimonas are transmitted and preserved in lentil genotypes. Despite the effect of soil, the occurrence of vertical transmission suggests the role of the seed microbiome in the adaptation and establishment of plant species.
Chartrel et al. [235] characterized pea seed microbiomes from different countries (France, Sweden, and Canada). While the bacterial core microbiome represents 31% of the relative abundance, the fungus core microbiome is around 82%, indicating that the variability is much higher in bacterial than in fungal communities. Additionally, the seed microbiome has a unique dominant microbial signature in each country. Crop, genotype, and field environmental conditions drive the seed microbiome, as demonstrated in wheat, canola, and lentil agricultural crops over two generations [236]. The interaction of genotype lines and generations explained the largest source of variation for both wheat and lentil microbial communities, corresponding to approximately 40 and 60% variance for bacteria and fungi, respectively. The core microbiome determined for each crop suggests that to some extent the host is responsible for selecting specific microorganisms, although the influence of environmental conditions must not be neglected.
The composition and structures of seedborne bacteria can vary between wild and domesticated species. For example, this variation has been observed for wild C. judaicum and domesticated C. arietinum from different geographic locations [237]. Diversity values were higher among domesticated genotypes compared to the wild genotypes. Bacillus spp. and Sphingomonas spp. dominated in the wild species, whereas Burkholderia dominated the domesticated species. The seed microbiome of wild species may provide clues for reconstructing the microbiomes of modern crops.
The effect of abiotic conditions (mild drought, half of baseline nutrition) on the structure of the bean seed microbiome for bacterial/archaeal communities was high compared to control, while for fungal communities the influence was limited [238]. No substantial changes in diversity were observed. The results shed light on the mechanisms capable of driving changes in the microbiome of plants under stress.

5. Conclusions

This review shows a broad research effort during the last five years aimed at selecting microsymbionts and plant growth-promoting microorganisms associated with nutritional aspects and tolerance to climate stress for pulses. The classical work for selecting rhizobial strains continues, and it has started to be integrated to the new field of microbiome studies, looking to study their interaction with the complex microbiota present in the rhizosphere. Still, microbiome studies in pulses are limited and deserve more attention due to their potential to contribute with new technologies, such as the design of synthetic microbial communities through the identification of keystone species responsible for structuring complex and generally more stable microbial networks. Other possible contributions are the use of microbiomes to mitigate climate change scenarios, and their integration into breeding programs.
Also, nodule endophytes have gained greater attention as a source of new microorganisms to improve the contribution of BNF. Approximately 65 PGPR taxa have been tested in the selected studies, the most common being Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., P. fluorescens, B. subtilis, and A. chroococcum. Regarding arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, a group that has received increasing attention, 13 taxa are listed, citing AMF sp. and R. irregularis as the most prevalent.
Strategies based on microorganisms for inoculation either as isolated strains or in multiple functional inoculants can increase the opportunities for implementing the use of biofertilizers in pulses. There is a consensus that, so far, there is not a clear picture capable of explaining the behavior of microbial communities associated with plants. However, establishing response patterns against biotic and abiotic factors will be essential to determine their functioning. These responses are urgent and necessary, especially if they are adaptable to the edaphoclimatic conditions of each region in the face of climate change scenarios, as to guarantee increased grain productivity and reducing the dependence on fertilizers, such as N, or increasing their use efficiency, such as in the case of P and K.
In recent years, a large amount of information has been generated in studies such as those discussed in this text. An attempt to see the various aspects related to the subject comprehensively can facilitate our understanding and contribute to future research focused on advancing the technological maturity level to promote the adoption of technologies capable of increasing grain productivity and protein supply capable, and at the same time, reflecting the economic, social, and environmental impact on pulse production systems worldwide.
The creation of a distribution program for pulses, seeds, and biofertilizers, especially in countries with limited food security, may be a critical and constructive approach capable of motivating fund managers, public or private.

Author Contributions

G.R.X., E.d.C.J., A.D., M.R.R.C., Y.C.M. and N.G.R. were responsible for the bibliographic search, the selection of relevant articles, and the writing of the preliminary manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) and the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ); the Post-Graduation Program in Agricultural Microbiology from Federal University of Lavras (UFLA); project E-26/202.683/2018 and E-26/202.546/2019 financed by the Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support in the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ); the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)—Financing Code 001; and the Research Productivity Fellowships from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq 310275/2021-0 and 311796/2019-2).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this review.

Acknowledgments

Y.C.M. gratefully acknowledges a Ph.D. fellowship from CAPES; GRX and ECJ acknowledge FAPERJ for providing them with the grants “Cientista do Nosso Estado” and “Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado”, respectively, and CNPq for their Research Productivity Fellowships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nations, U. World Population to Reach 8 Billion on 15 November 2022. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/desa/world-population-reach-8-billion-15-november-2022 (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  2. Rawal, V.; Navarro, D.K. The Global Economy of Pulses; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2019; Volume 174. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yeap, S.K.; Beh, B.K.; Ali, N.M.; Mohd Yusof, H.; Ho, W.Y.; Koh, S.P.; Alitheen, N.B.; Long, K. In VivoAntistress and Antioxidant Effects of Fermented and Germinated Mung Bean. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 694842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ali, N.M.; Mohd Yusof, H.; Yeap, S.-K.; Ho, W.-Y.; Beh, B.-K.; Long, K.; Koh, S.-P.; Abdullah, M.P.; Alitheen, N.B. Anti-Inflammatory and Antinociceptive Activities of Untreated, Germinated, and Fermented Mung Bean Aqueous Extract. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 350507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ali, N.M.; Mohd Yusof, H.; Long, K.; Yeap, S.K.; Ho, W.Y.; Beh, B.K.; Koh, S.P.; Abdullah, M.P.; Alitheen, N.B. Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Effect of Aqueous Extract of Germinated and Fermented Mung Bean on Ethanol-Mediated Liver Damage. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 693613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gödecke, T.; Stein, A.J.; Qaim, M. The global burden of chronic and hidden hunger: Trends and determinants. Glob. Food Secur. 2018, 17, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mistry, K.; Sardar, S.D.; Alim, H.; Patel, N.; Thakur, M.; Jabbarova, D.; Ali, A. Plant Based Proteins: Sustainable Alternatives. Plant Sci. Today 2022, 9, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alcorta, A.; Porta, A.; Tárrega, A.; Alvarez, M.D.; Vaquero, M.P. Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations. Foods 2021, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calles, T.; Del Castello, R.; Baratelli, M.; Xipsiti, M.; Navarro, D.K. International Year of Pulses: Final Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 17 December 2022).
  11. Torabian, S.; Farhangi-Abriz, S.; Denton, M.D. Do tillage systems influence nitrogen fixation in legumes? A review. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 185, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bellenger, J.P.; Darnajoux, R.; Zhang, X.; Kraepiel, A.M.L. Biological nitrogen fixation by alternative nitrogenases in terrestrial ecosystems: A review. Biogeochemistry 2020, 149, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palmero, F.; Fernandez, J.A.; Garcia, F.O.; Haro, R.J.; Prasad, P.V.; Salvagiotti, F.; Ciampitti, I.A. A quantitative review into the contributions of biological nitrogen fixation to agricultural systems by grain legumes. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 136, 126514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oleńska, E.; Małek, W.; Wójcik, M.; Swiecicka, I.; Thijs, S.; Vangronsveld, J. Beneficial features of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and health in challenging conditions: A methodical review. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 743, 140682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choudhury, D.; Tarafdar, S.; Dutta, S. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and their eco-friendly strategies for plant growth regulation: A review. Plant Sci. Today 2022, 9, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, A.; Ding, Z.; Ishaq, M.; Khan, I.; Ahmed, A.A.; Khan, A.Q.; Guo, X. Applications of beneficial plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and mycorrhizae in rhizosphere and plant growth: A review. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2020, 13, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goswami, M.; Deka, S. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—Alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review. Pedosphere 2020, 30, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hyder, S.; Rizvi, Z.F.; los Santos-Villalobos, S.D.; Santoyo, G.; Gondal, A.; Khalid, N.; Fatima, S.N.; Nadeem, M.; Rafique, K.; Rani, A. Applications of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for increasing crop production and resilience. J. Plant Nutr. 2023, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, A.; Behera, I.; Langthasa, M.; PrakashNaroju, S. Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on alleviating salinity stress in plants: A review. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Daniel, A.I.; Fadaka, A.O.; Gokul, A.; Bakare, O.O.; Aina, O.; Fisher, S.; Burt, A.F.; Mavumengwana, V.; Keyster, M.; Klein, A. Biofertilizer: The Future of Food Security and Food Safety. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhowmik, S.N.; Das, A. Biofertilizers: A Sustainable Approach for Pulse Production. In Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management; Meena, R.S., Das, A., Yadav, G.S., Lal, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 445–485. [Google Scholar]
  22. Htwe, A.Z.; Moh, S.M.; Moe, K.; Yamakawa, T. Biofertiliser Production for Agronomic Application and Evaluation of Its Symbiotic Effectiveness in Soybeans. Agronomy 2019, 9, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Boivin, S.; Ait Lahmidi, N.; Sherlock, D.; Bonhomme, M.; Dijon, D.; Heulin-Gotty, K.; Le-Queré, A.; Pervent, M.; Tauzin, M.; Carlsson, G.; et al. Host-specific competitiveness to form nodules in Rhizobium leguminosarumsymbiovarviciae. N. Phytol. 2020, 226, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mazoyon, C.; Hirel, B.; Pecourt, A.; Catterou, M.; Gutierrez, L.; Sarazin, V.; Dubois, F.; Duclercq, J. Sphingomonas sediminicola Is an Endosymbiotic Bacterium Able to Induce the Formation of Root Nodules in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and to Enhance Plant Biomass Production. Microiorganisms 2023, 11, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tong, W.; Li, X.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, E.T.; Chen, W.; Tao, S.; Wei, G. Genomic insight into the taxonomy of Rhizobium genospecies that nodulate Phaseolus vulgaris. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 41, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Young, J.P.W.; Moeskjær, S.; Afonin, A.; Rahi, P.; Maluk, M.; James, E.K.; Cavassim, M.I.A.; Rashid, M.H.; Aserse, A.A.; Perry, B.J.; et al. Defining the Rhizobium leguminosarum Species Complex. Genes 2021, 12, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hachana, A.; Hemissi, I.; Souissi, A.; L’Taief, B.; Abdi, N.; Bouraoui, M.; Al-Qthanin, R.N.; Arfaoui, H.; Sifi, B. Patterns for Pea-Rhizobium symbiosis efficiency response to pedological and varietal variations in Tunisia. Rhizosphere 2021, 17, 100304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stepanovic, S.V.; Burr, C.; Peterson, J.A.; Rudnick, D.; Creech, C.F.; Werle, R. Field Pea Response to Seeding Rate, Depth, and Inoculant in West-Central Nebraska. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 1412–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yates, R.J.; Steel, E.J.; Poole, C.M.; Harrison, R.J.; Edwards, T.J.; Hackney, B.F.; Stagg, G.R.; Howieson, J.G. Optimizing the growth of forage and grain legumes on low pH soils through the application of superior Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae strains. Grass Forage Sci. 2021, 76, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yates, R.J.; Harrison, R.J.; Loi, A.; Steel, E.J.; Edwards, T.J.; Nutt, B.J.; Porqueddu, C.; Gresta, F.; Howieson, J.G. Sourcing Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae strains from Mediterranean centres of origin to optimize nitrogen fixation in forage legumes grown on acid soils. Grass Forage Sci. 2021, 76, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mendoza-Suárez, M.A.; Geddes, B.A.; Sánchez-Cañizares, C.; Ramírez-González, R.H.; Kirchhelle, C.; Jorrin, B.; Poole, P.S. Optimizing Rhizobium- legume symbioses by simultaneous measurement of rhizobial competitiveness and N 2 fixation in nodules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 9822–9831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Asfaw, B.; Aserse, A.A.; Asefa, F.; Yli-Halla, M.; Lindstrom, K. Genetically diverse lentil- and faba bean-nodulating rhizobia are present in soils across Central and Southern Ethiopia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.X.; Zou, L.; Penttinen, P.; Chen, Q.; Li, Q.Q.; Wang, C.Q.; Xu, K.W. Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Nodulating Rhizobia in Panxi, China, Are Diverse at Species, Plant Growth Promoting Ability, and Symbiosis Related Gene Levels. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. L’Taief, B.; Smari, S.; Abdi, N.; Sifi, B. Biochemical and Physiological Characterization of Rhizobia Nodulating Vicia faba L. Genotypes. Comptes Rendus L’Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2019, 72, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rabab, I.R.; Omar, M.N.A.; Clara, A.R.; Enas, A.S.; Abdel-Fattah, M.; Zahran, H.H. Characterization and Evaluation of Rhizobium Isolates from Vicia Faba for Some Plant Growth Promoting Traits. Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 2971–2982. [Google Scholar]
  36. Alemayehu, D.; Dechassa, N. Inoculating Faba Bean Seed with Rhizobium Bacteria Increases the Yield of the Crop and Saves Farmers from the Cost of Applying Phosphorus Fertilizer. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2022, 16, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Allito, B.B.; Ewusi-Mensah, N.; Logah, V.; Hunegnaw, D.K. Legume-rhizobium specificity effect on nodulation, biomass production and partitioning of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lishan, T.; Alemu, W.; Wondimu, W.; Mekonnen, G. Effects of Bio-Fertiliser and Inter-Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Faba Bean (Vicia Faba L.) in South Western Ethiopia. Trop. Agric. 2022, 99, 196–208. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sijilmassi, B.; Filali-Maltouf, A.; Boulahyaoui, H.; Kricha, A.; Boubekri, K.; Udupa, S.; Kumar, S.; Amri, A. Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Symbiotic Efficiency of Selected Rhizobia Strains Nodulating Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Plants 2021, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Riah, N.; de Lajudie, P.; Béna, G.; Heulin, K.; Djekoun, A. Variability in symbiotic efficiency with respect to the growth of pea and lentil inoculated with various rhizobial genotypes originating from sub-humid and semi-arid regions of eastern Algeria. Symbiosis 2021, 85, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bueckert, R.; Zakeri, H.; Pritchard, J.; Lafond, G. First versus last born: Flowers, pods, and yield formation in no-tillage lentil. Crop. Sci. 2020, 60, 1634–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shamseldin, A.; Velázquez, E. The promiscuity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Common bean) for nodulation with rhizobia: A review. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bender, F.R.; Alves, L.C.; da Silva, J.F.M.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Pauli, G.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Microbiome of Nodules and Roots of Soybean and Common Bean: Searching for Differences Associated with Contrasting Performances in Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aguilar, O.M.; Collavino, M.M.; Mancini, U. Nodulation competitiveness and diversification of symbiosis genes in common beans from the American centers of domestication. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Costa, B.H.G.; de Resende, M.L.V.; Monteiro, A.C.A.; Júnior, P.M.R.; Botelho, D.M.D.S.; da Silva, B.M. Potassium phosphites in the protection of common bean plants against anthracnose and biochemical defence responses. J. Phytopathol. 2018, 166, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moura, F.T.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Helene, L.C.F.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. So many rhizobial partners, so little nitrogen fixed: The intriguing symbiotic promiscuity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Symbiosis 2022, 86, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jesus, E.D.C.; Leite, R.D.A.; Bastos, R.D.A.; Aragão, O.O.D.S.; Araújo, A.P. Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium stimulates the symbiosis efficiency of Rhizobium with common bean. Plant Soil 2018, 425, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tong, W.; Li, X.; Wang, E.; Cao, Y.; Chen, W.; Tao, S.; Wei, G. Genomic insight into the origins and evolution of symbiosis genes in Phaseolus vulgaris microsymbionts. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Da Silva, K.; Florentino, L.A.; da Silva, K.B.; de Brandt, E.; Vandamme, P.; de Souza Moreira, F.M. Cupriavidus necator isolates are able to fix nitrogen in symbiosis with different legume species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 35, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dall’Agnol, R.F.; Bournaud, C.; De Faria, S.M.; Béna, G.; Moulin, L.; Hungria, M. Genetic diversity of symbiotic Paraburkholderia species isolated from nodules of Mimosa pudica (L.) and Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) grown in soils of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlântica). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Oliveira, D.P.; Pereira, T.D.A.; Rufini, M.; Martins, F.A.D.; Junior, C.L.D.S.; Baptista, M.V.B.D.G.; da Silva, J.S.; de Oliveira, P.C.; Aragão, O.O.D.S.; de Andrade, M.J.B.; et al. Liquid Inoculation with Rhizobia in the Planting Furrow of Common Bean under No-Till Is Feasible under Different Soil and Climatic Conditions. Crop. Sci. 2019, 59, 2178–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Massa, N.; Cesaro, P.; Todeschini, V.; Capraro, J.; Scarafoni, A.; Cantamessa, S.; Copetta, A.; Anastasia, F.; Gamalero, E.; Lingua, G.; et al. Selected autochthonous rhizobia, applied in combination with AM fungi, improve seed quality of common bean cultivated in reduced fertilization condition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 148, 103507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Oliveira, D.P.; Soares, B.L.; Ferreira, P.A.A.; Passos, T.R.; de Andrade, M.J.B.; Ferreira, D.F.; Moreira, F.M.D.S. Selection of elite Rhizobium strains by biometric techniques for inoculation in common bean. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 3244–3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Thilakarathna, M.S.; Chapagain, T.; Ghimire, B.; Pudasaini, R.; Tamang, B.B.; Gurung, K.; Choi, K.; Rai, L.; Magar, S.; Bk, B.; et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Rhizobium Inoculants and Micronutrients as Technologies for Nepalese Common Bean Smallholder Farmers in the Real-World Context of Highly Variable Hillside Environments and Indigenous Farming Practices. Agriculture 2019, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. De Almeida Leite, R.; Martins, L.C.; Ferreira, L.V.d.S.F.; Barbosa, E.S.; Alves, B.J.R.; Zilli, J.E.; Araújo, A.P.; Jesus, E.D.C. Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium promotes growth and yield of common beans. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 172, 104356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Oliveira, D.P.; Soares, B.L.; Martins, F.A.D.; Franceschini, L.A.; Cardillo, B.E.D.S.; Rufini, M.; De Morais, A.R.; Moreira, F.M.D.S.; De Andrade, M.J.B. Viability of liquid medium-inoculation of Rhizobium etli in planting furrows with common bean. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2018, 53, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Raji, S.G.; Tzanakakis, V.; Dörsch, P. Bradyrhizobial inoculation and P application effects on haricot and mung beans in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Plant Soil 2019, 442, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vishnyakova, M.A.; Burlyaeva, M.O.; Bulyntsev, S.V.; Seferova, I.V.; Plekhanova, E.S.; Nuzhdin, S.V. Chickpea landraces from centers of the crop origin: Diversity and differences. Selskokhozyaistvennaya Biol. 2017, 52, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gaur, Y.D.; Sen, A.N. Cross inoculation group specificity in Cicer-Rhizobium symbiosis. N. Phytol. 1979, 83, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kyei-Boahen, S.; Slinkard, A.E.; Walley, F.L. Isotopic fractionation during N2 fixation by chickpea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hill, Y.; Colombi, E.; Bonello, E.; Haskett, T.; Ramsay, J.; O’hara, G.; Terpolilli, J. Evolution of Diverse Effective N 2 -Fixing Microsymbionts of Cicer arietinum following Horizontal Transfer of the Mesorhizobium ciceri CC1192 Symbiosis Integrative and Conjugative Element. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02558-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Srinivas, V.; Vemula, A.; Samineni, S.; Rathore, A. Influence of diazotrophic bacteria on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth promotion and yield traits in five cultivars of chickpea. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Singh, R.P.; Manchanda, G.; Yang, Y.; Singh, D.; Srivastava, A.K.; Dubey, R.C.; Zhang, C. Deciphering the Factors for Nodulation and Symbiosis of Mesorhizobium Associated with Cicer arietinum in Northwest India. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zaw, M.; Rathjen, J.R.; Zhou, Y.; Ryder, M.H.; Denton, M.D. Rhizobial diversity is associated with inoculation history at a two-continent scale. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2022, 98, fiac0440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Muleta, A.; Tesfaye, K.; Assefa, F.; Greenlon, A.; Riely, B.K.; Carrasquilla-Garcia, N.; Gai, Y.; Haileslassie, T.; Cook, D.R. Genomic diversity and distribution of Mesorhizobium nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from low pH soils of Ethiopia. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 45, 126279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mir, M.I.; Kumar, B.K.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Vadlamudi, S.; Hameeda, B. Characterization of rhizobia isolated from leguminous plants and their impact on the growth of ICCV 2 variety of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Heliyon 2021, 7, e08321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bala, A.; Giller, K.E. Symbiotic specificity of tropical tree rhizobia for host legumes. N. Phytol. 2001, 149, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Grönemeyer, J.L.; Reinhold-Hurek, B. Diversity of Bradyrhizobia in Subsahara Africa: A Rich Resource. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Martins, L.M.V.; Xavier, G.R.; Rangel, F.W.; Ribeiro, J.R.A.; Neves, M.C.P.; Morgado, L.B.; Rumjanek, N.G. Contribution of biological nitrogen fixation to cowpea: A strategy for improving grain yield in the semi-arid region of Brazil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2003, 38, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Leite, J.; Passos, S.R.; Simões-Araújo, J.L.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Xavier, G.R.; Zilli, J. Genomic identification and characterization of the elite strains Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense BR 3267 and Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi BR 3262 recommended for cowpea inoculation in Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Martins da Costa, E.; Soares de Carvalho, T.; Azarias Guimarães, A.; Ribas Leão, A.C.; Magalhães Cruz, L.; de Baura, V.A.; Lebbe, L.; Willems, A.; de Souza Moreira, F.M. Classification of the inoculant strain of cowpea UFLA03-84 and of other strains from soils of the Amazon region as Bradyrhizobium viridifuturi (symbiovar tropici). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guimarães, A.A.; Florentino, L.A.; Almeida, K.A.; Lebbe, L.; Silva, K.B.; Willems, A.; Moreira, F.M.D.S. High diversity of Bradyrhizobium strains isolated from several legume species and land uses in Brazilian tropical ecosystems. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Da Silva Júnior, E.B.; Favero, V.O.; Xavier, G.R.; Boddey, R.M.; Zilli, J.E. Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Souza, A.C.D.M.; Lira, T.P.; DA Costa, A.F.; Fracetto, F.J.C.; Fracetto, G.G.M.; Junior, M.A.L. Biological Nitrogen Fixation Stability of Cowpea Cultivars with Tropical Semi-Arid Rhizobial Strains. Rev. Caatinga 2021, 34, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ramírez, M.D.A.; España, M.; Lewandowska, S.; Yuan, K.; Okazaki, S.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Yokoyama, T. Phylogenetic Analysis of Symbiotic Bacteria Associated with Two Vigna Species under Different Agro-Ecological Conditions in Venezuela. Microbes Environ. 2020, 35, ME19120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gyogluu, C.; Mohammed, M.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Kyei-Boahen, S.; Dakora, F.D. Assessing host range, symbiotic effectiveness, and photosynthetic rates induced by native soybean rhizobia isolated from Mozambican and South African soils. Symbiosis 2017, 75, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Blumenthal, M.J.; Staples, I.B. Origin, Evaluation and Use of Macrotyloma as Forage—A Review. Trop. Grassl. Aust. 1993, 27, 16–29. [Google Scholar]
  78. Makaure, B.T.; Aremu, A.O.; Magadlela, A. Soil Nutritional Status Drives the Co-occurrence of Nodular Bacterial Species and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Modulating Plant Nutrition and Growth of Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp) in Grassland and Savanna Ecosystems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mbah, G.C.; Mohammed, M.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Dakora, F.D. Phylogenetic Relationship, Symbiotic Effectiveness, and Biochemical Traits of Native Rhizobial Symbionts of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in South African Soil. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 2235–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ayalew, T.; Yoseph, T. Symbiotic effectiveness of inoculation with Bradyrhizobium isolates on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) varieties. Cogent Food Agric. 2020, 6, 1845495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ayalew, T.; Yoseph, T.; Petra, H.; Cadisch, G. Yield response of field-grown cowpea varieties to Bradyrhizobium inoculation. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 3258–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pule-Meulenberg, F. Root-Nodule Bacteria of Legumes Growing in Semi-Arid African Soils and Other Areas of the World. In Bacterial Diversity in Sustainable Agriculture; Sustainable Development and Biodiversity; Maheshwari, D.K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 101–130. [Google Scholar]
  83. Degefu, T.; Wolde-Meskel, E.; Rasche, F. Genetic diversity and symbiotic effectiveness of Bradyrhizobium strains nodulating selected annual grain legumes growing in Ethiopia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nyaga, J.W.; Njeru, E.M. Potential of Native Rhizobia to Improve Cowpea Growth and Production in Semiarid Regions of Kenya. Front. Agron. 2020, 2, 606293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Muindi, M.M.; Muthini, M.; Njeru, E.M.; Maingi, J. Symbiotic efficiency and genetic characterization of rhizobia and non rhizobial endophytes associated with cowpea grown in semi-arid tropics of Kenya. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Le Quéré, A.; Diop, S.; Dehaene, N.; Niang, D.; Rego, F.D.; Fall, S.; Neyra, M.; Karsova-Wade, T. Development of an Illumina-based analysis method to study bradyrhizobial population structure—Case study on nitrogen-fixing rhizobia associating with cowpea or peanut. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 6943–6957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Favero, V.O.; de Carvalho, R.H.; Leite, A.B.C.; de Freitas, K.M.; Zilli, J.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Urquiaga, S. Characterization and nodulation capacity of native bacteria isolated from mung bean nodules used as a trap plant in Brazilian tropical soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 167, 104041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hakim, S.; Imran, A.; Mirza, M.S. Phylogenetic diversity analysis reveals Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense and Ensifer aridi as major symbionts of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) in Pakistan. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Favero, V.O.; de Carvalho, R.H.; Leite, A.B.C.; dos Santos, D.M.T.; de Freitas, K.M.; Boddey, R.M.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Urquiaga, S. Bradyrhizobium strains from Brazilian tropical soils promote increases in nodulation, growth and nitrogen fixation in mung bean. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 175, 104461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hakim, S.; Mirza, B.S.; Zaheer, A.; Mclean, J.E.; Imran, A.; Yasmin, S.; Sajjad Mirza, M. Retrieved 16S rRNA and nifH sequences reveal co-dominance of Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer (Sinorhizobium) strains in field-collected root nodules of the promiscuous host Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Bullard, G.K.; Roughley, R.J.; Pulsford, D.J. The legume inoculant industry and inoculant quality control in Australia: 1953–2003. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Christopher, M.; Macdonald, B.; Yeates, S.; Ziegler, D.; Seymour, N. Wild bradyrhizobia that occur in the Burdekin region of Queensland are as effective as commercial inoculum for mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.)) and black gram (Vigna mungo (L.)) in fixing nitrogen and dry matter production. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 124, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Favero, V.O.; de Carvalho, R.H.; Leite, A.B.C.; dos Santos, D.M.T.; de Freitas, K.M.; Zilli, J.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Urquiaga, S. Cross-Inoculation of Elite Commercial Bradyrhizobium Strains from Cowpea and Soybean in Mung Bean and Comparison with Mung Bean Isolates. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 4356–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nguyen, H.P.; Ratu, S.T.N.; Yasuda, M.; Göttfert, M.; Okazaki, S. InnB, a Novel Type III Effector of Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61, Controls Symbiosis with Vigna Species. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Piromyou, P.; Songwattana, P.; Teamtisong, K.; Tittabutr, P.; Boonkerd, N.; Tantasawat, P.A.; Giraud, E.; Göttfert, M.; Teaumroong, N. Mutualistic co-evolution of T3SSs during the establishment of symbiotic relationships between Vigna radiata and Bradyrhizobia. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e00781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Dechjiraratthanasiri, C.; Santasup, C.; Boonmee, P.; Inthasan, J. Identification and characterization of native rhizobia from three mungbean varieties. Malays. J. Microbiol. 2021, 17, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chaudhary, T.; Gera, R.; Shukla, P. Deciphering the Potential of Rhizobium pusense MB-17a, a Plant Growth-Promoting Root Endophyte, and Functional Annotation of the Genes Involved in the Metabolic Pathway. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 8, 617034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Maan, P.; Garcha, S.; Sharma, S.; Walia, G. Nodule Occupancy Behaviour of Bacteriocinogenic Rhizobium spp. in Mungbean (Vigna radiata). Legume Res. Int. J. 2021, 44, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chalasani, D.; Basu, A.; Pullabhotla, S.V.; Jorrin, B.; Neal, A.L.; Poole, P.S.; Podile, A.R.; Tkacz, A. Poor Competitiveness of Bradyrhizobium in Pigeon Pea Root Colonization in Indian Soils. Mbio 2021, 12, e0042321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bopape, F.L.; Gwata, E.T.; Hassen, A.I.; Zhou, M.M. Symbiotic efficiency of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth) with different sources of nitrogen. Plant Genet. Resour. Charact. Util. 2021, 19, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jorrin, B.; Maluk, M.; Atoliya, N.; Kumar, S.C.; Chalasani, D.; Tkacz, A.; Singh, P.; Basu, A.; Pullabhotla, S.V.; Kumar, M.; et al. Genomic Diversity of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) Endosymbionts in India and Selection of Potential Strains for Use as Agricultural Inoculants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 680981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Alaswad, A.A.; Oehrle, N.W.; Krishnan, H.B. Classical Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) Symbionts, Sinorhizobium fredii USDA191 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110, Reveal Contrasting Symbiotic Phenotype on Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Mohanty, P.; Singh, P.K.; Chakraborty, D.; Mishra, S.; Pattnaik, R. Insight Into the Role of PGPR in Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 667150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Santoyo, G.; Urtis-Flores, C.A.; Loeza-Lara, P.D.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C.; Glick, B.R. Rhizosphere Colonization Determinants by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Biology 2021, 10, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vocciante, M.; Grifoni, M.; Fusini, D.; Petruzzelli, G.; Franchi, E. The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Basílio, F.; Dias, T.; Santana, M.M.; Melo, J.; Carvalho, L.; Correia, P.; Cruz, C. Multiple modes of action are needed to unlock soil phosphorus fractions unavailable for plants: The example of bacteria- and fungi-based biofertilizers. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 178, 104550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Timofeeva, A.; Galyamova, M.; Sedykh, S. Prospects for Using Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms as Natural Fertilizers in Agriculture. Plants 2022, 11, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Keswani, C.; Singh, S.P.; Cueto, L.; García-Estrada, C.; Mezaache-Aichour, S.; Glare, T.R.; Borriss, R.; Singh, S.P.; Blázquez, M.A.; Sansinenea, E. Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8549–8565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mukherjee, R.; Sen, S. Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF) in Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Int. J. Adv. Life Sci. Res. 2021, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mekonnen, H.; Kibret, M. The roles of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable vegetable production in Ethiopia. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2021, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zaheer, A.; Malik, A.; Sher, A.; Qaisrani, M.M.; Mehmood, A.; Khan, S.U.; Ashraf, M.; Mirza, Z.; Karim, S.; Rasool, M. Isolation, characterization, and effect of phosphate-zinc-solubilizing bacterial strains on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Laranjeira, S.; Fernandes-Silva, A.; Reis, S.; Torcato, C.; Raimundo, F.; Ferreira, L.; Carnide, V.; Marques, G. Inoculation of plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve chickpea performance under water deficit conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 164, 103927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jha, V.; Purohit, H.; Dafale, N.A. Designing an Efficient Consortium for Improved Crop Productivity using Phosphate Stress Adapted Bacteria with Multiple Growth-Promoting Attributes. Geomicrobiol. J. 2022, 39, 925–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Amy, C.; Avice, J.-C.; Laval, K.; Bressan, M. Are native phosphate-solubilizing bacteria a relevant alternative to mineral fertilizations for crops? Part II: PSB inoculation enables a halving of P input and improves the microbial community in the rapeseed rhizosphere. Rhizosphere 2022, 21, 100480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Saikia, J.; Sarma, R.K.; Dhandia, R.; Yadav, A.; Bharali, R.; Gupta, V.K.; Saikia, R. Alleviation of drought stress in pulse crops with ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria isolated from acidic soil of Northeast India. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sepúlveda-Caamaño, M.; Gerding, M.; Vargas, M.; Moya-Elizondo, E.; Oyarzúa, P.; Campos, J. Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) growth promoting rhizobacteria and their effect on nodulation in coinoculation with rhizobia. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018, 64, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lastochkina, O.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Garshina, D.; Garipova, S.; Pusenkova, L.; Allagulova, C.; Fedorova, K.; Baymiev, A.; Koryakov, I.; Sobhani, M. Seed priming with endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain-specifically improves growth of Phaseolus vulgaris plants under normal and salinity conditions and exerts anti-stress effect through induced lignin deposition in roots and decreased oxidative and osmotic damages. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 263, 153462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mukhtar, S.; Hirsch, A.M.; Khan, N.; Malik, K.A.; Humm, E.A.; Pellegrini, M.; Shi, B.; Briscoe, L.; Huntemann, M.; Clum, A.; et al. Impact of Soil Salinity on the Cowpea Nodule-Microbiome and the Isolation of Halotolerant PGPR Strains to Promote Plant Growth under Salinity Stress. Phytobiomes J. 2020, 4, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Akhtar, S.S.; Andersen, M.N.; Naveed, M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Liu, F. Interactive effect of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes on ameliorating salinity stress in maize. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015, 42, 770–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jayakumar, A.; Perinchery, A.; Jaffer, F.M.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Differential modulation of phytoelemental composition by selected Pseudomonas spp. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bilal, S.; Hazafa, A.; Ashraf, I.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Ramzan, A.; Qamar, N.; Sher, F.; Naeem, M. Comparative Effect of Inoculation of Phosphorus-Solubilizing Bacteria and Phosphorus as Sustainable Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.). Plants 2021, 10, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kumari, P.; Meena, M.; Upadhyay, R. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from the rhizosphere of Vigna radiata (mung bean). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Srivastava, S.; Sharma, S. Metabolomic insight into the synergistic mechanism of action of a bacterial consortium in plant growth promotion. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2022, 134, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gupta, A.; Bano, A.; Rai, S.; Kumar, M.; Ali, J.; Sharma, S.; Pathak, N. ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance salinity stress tolerance in Pisum sativum. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Taha, K.; El Attar, I.; Hnini, M.; Raif, A.; Béna, G.; Aurag, J.; Berraho, E.B. Beneficial effect of Rhizobium laguerreae co-inoculated with native Bacillus sp. and Enterobacter aerogenes on lentil growth under drought stress. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kawaka, F.; Makonde, H.; Dida, M.; Opala, P.; Ombori, O.; Maingi, J.; Muoma, J. Genetic diversity of symbiotic bacteria nodulating common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Kenya. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bakhtiyarifar, M.; Enayatizamir, N.; Khanlou, K.M. Biochemical and molecular investigation of non-rhizobial endophytic bacteria as potential biofertilisers. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Nagpal, S.; Sharma, P.; Sirari, A.; Kumawat, K.; Wati, L.; Gupta, S.; Mandahal, K.S. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as model legume for decoding the co-existence of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Mesorhizobium sp. as bio-fertilizer under diverse agro-climatic zones. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 247, 126720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Abdela, A.A.; Barka, G.D.; Degefu, T. Co-inoculation effect of Mesorhizobium ciceri and Pseudomonas fluorescens on physiological and biochemical responses of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during drought stress. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2020, 25, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vahdatpour, F.; Aroiee, H.; Hemmati, K.; Kamkar, B.; Sheikh, F. Leaf Area Index, Dry Matter Accumulation and Allocation Trends in Vicia Faba L. Affected by Inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2021, 23, 903–914. [Google Scholar]
  131. Singh, A.; Permar, V.; Tomar, B.S.; Praveen, S. Effect of Temperature on Symptoms Expression and Viral RNA Accumulation in Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Infected Vigna unguiculata. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, e1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kumar, V.; Kumar, P.; Khan, A. Optimization of PGPR and silicon fertilization using response surface methodology for enhanced growth, yield and biochemical parameters of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under saline stress. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nascimento, F.X.; Tavares, M.J.; Franck, J.; Ali, S.; Glick, B.R.; Rossi, M.J. ACC deaminase plays a major role in Pseudomonas fluorescens YsS6 ability to promote the nodulation of Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria rhizobial strains. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Salehi, M.; Faramarzi, A.; Mohebalipour, N.; Farboodi, M.; Ajalli, J. Effects of glomus mosseae and pseudomonas fluorescens on eco-physiological traits and antioxidant production of mung bean under drought condition. Turk. J. Field Crops 2020, 25, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ahmad, M.; Naseer, I.; Hussain, A.; Mumtaz, M.Z.; Mustafa, A.; Hilger, T.H.; Zahir, Z.A.; Minggang, X. Appraising Endophyte–Plant Symbiosis for Improved Growth, Nodulation, Nitrogen Fixation and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Experimental Investigation with Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy 2019, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Sharma, M.P.; Grover, M.; Chourasiya, D.; Bharti, A.; Agnihotri, R.; Maheshwari, H.S.; Pareek, A.; Buyer, J.S.; Sharma, S.K.; Schütz, L.; et al. Deciphering the Role of Trehalose in Tripartite Symbiosis Among Rhizobia, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, and Legumes for Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 509919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pandey, S.; Gupta, S.; Ramawat, N. Unravelling the potential of microbes isolated from rhizospheric soil of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as plant growth promoter. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gupta, A.; Rai, S.; Bano, A.; Khanam, A.; Sharma, S.; Pathak, N. Comparative Evaluation of Different Salt-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Isolates in Mitigating the Induced Adverse Effect of Salinity in Pisum sativum. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 13141–13154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mahgoub, H.A.M.; Fouda, A.; Eid, A.M.; Ewais, E.E.-D.; Hassan, S.E.-D. Biotechnological application of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria isolated from halophytic plants to ameliorate salinity tolerance of Vicia faba L. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 15, 819–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. De Lima, B.C.; Bonifacio, A.; Neto, F.D.A.; de Araujo, F.F.; Araujo, A.S.F. Bacillus subtilis rhizobacteria ameliorate heat stress in the common bean. Rhizosphere 2022, 21, 100472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kumari, P.; Meena, M.; Gupta, P.; Dubey, M.K.; Nath, G.; Upadhyay, R. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their biopriming for growth promotion in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Alsalim, H.A. Assessment of Azotobacter Chroococcum’s Ability to Produce Hydrolytic Enzymes and Enhance Growth of Vicia Faba. Baghdad Sci. J. 2019, 16, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Pastor-Bueis, R.; Jiménez-Gómez, A.; Barquero, M.; Mateos, P.F.; González-Andrés, F. Yield response of common bean to co-inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas endophytes and microscopic evidence of different colonised spaces inside the nodule. Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 122, 126187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rocha, I.; Duarte, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Látr, A.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed Coating with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Improved Field Production of Chickpea. Agronomy 2019, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Mamontova, T.; Afonin, A.M.; Ihling, C.; Soboleva, A.; Lukasheva, E.; Sulima, A.S.; Shtark, O.Y.; Akhtemova, G.A.; Povydysh, M.N.; Sinz, A.; et al. Profiling of Seed Proteome in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines Characterized with High and Low Responsivity to Combined Inoculation with Nodule Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Molecules 2019, 24, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Parihar, M.; Rakshit, A.; Rana, K.; Meena, R.P.; Joshi, D.C. A consortium of arbuscular mycorrizal fungi improves nutrient uptake, biochemical response, nodulation and growth of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) under salt stress. Rhizosphere 2020, 15, 100235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ibrahim, H.M.; El-Sawah, A.M. The Mode of Integration Between Azotobacter and Rhizobium Affect Plant Growth, Yield, and Physiological Responses of Pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 1238–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. El-Mansy, A.B.; Mahmoud, M.; Mansour, M. Synergistic effects of inoculating AMF and foliar iron fertilizer on growth and yield of broad bean under North Sinai conditions. Catrina Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 23, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Akpinar, C.; Ortas, I.; Demirbas, A. The Effects of Different ZN Doses and Mycorrhizae Application on Horse Bean Growth and Nutrient Uptake under Sterile and Non Sterile Soil Conditions. Sci. Pap. Ser. A Agron. 2018, 61, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  150. Pereira, S.; Singh, S.; Oliveira, R.; Ferreira, L.; RoSa, E.; Marques, G. Co-inoculation with rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi increases yield and crude protein content of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) under drought stress. Landbauforsch. J. Sustain. Org. Agric. Syst. 2020, 70, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gough, E.C.; Owen, K.J.; Zwart, R.S.; Thompson, J.P. The role of nutrients underlying interactions among root-nodule bacteria (Bradyrhizobium sp.), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Funneliformis mosseae) and root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus thornei) in nitrogen fixation and growth of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Plant Soil 2022, 472, 421–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Shukla, A.; Kumar, A.; Chaturvedi, O.P.; Nagori, T.; Kumar, N.; Gupta, A. Efficacy of rhizobial and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to ameliorate shade response on six pulse crops. Agrofor. Syst. 2018, 92, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pereira, S.; Mucha, Â.; Gonçalves, B.; Bacelar, E.; Látr, A.; Ferreira, H.; Oliveira, I.; Rosa, E.; Marques, G. Improvement of some growth and yield parameters of faba bean (Vicia faba) by inoculation with Rhizobium laguerreae and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sánchez-Navarro, V.; Zornoza, R.; Faz, Á.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Ros, M.; Pascual, J.A.; Fernández, J.A. Inoculation with Different Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Affects Grain Protein Content and Nodule Bacterial Communities of a Fava Bean Crop. Agronomy 2020, 10, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Vo, Q.A.T.; Ballard, R.A.; Barnett, S.J.; Franco, C.M.M. Isolation and characterisation of endophytic actinobacteria and their effect on the growth and nodulation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Plant Soil 2021, 466, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Xu, T.; Vo, Q.A.T.; Barnett, S.J.; Ballard, R.A.; Zhu, Y.; Franco, C.M.M. Revealing the underlying mechanisms mediated by endophytic actinobacteria to enhance the rhizobia—chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) symbiosis. Plant Soil 2022, 474, 299–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yasmin, R.; Hussain, S.; Rasool, M.H.; Siddique, M.H.; Muzammil, S. Isolation, Characterization of Zn Solubilizing Bacterium (Pseudomonas protegens RY2) and its Contribution in Growth of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Deciphered by Improved Growth Parameters and Zn Content. Dose-Response 2021, 19, 15593258211036792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Bazghaleh, N.; Hamel, C.; Gan, Y.; Tar’An, B.; Knight, J.D. Genotypic variation in the response of chickpea to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Jatan, R.; Chauhan, P.S.; Lata, C. Pseudomonas putida modulates the expression of miRNAs and their target genes in response to drought and salt stresses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Genomics 2019, 111, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Mushtaq, Z.; Faizan, S.; Gulzar, B.; Hakeem, K.R. Inoculation of Rhizobium Alleviates Salinity Stress through Modulation of Growth Characteristics, Physiological and Biochemical Attributes, Stomatal Activities and Antioxidant Defence in Cicer arietinum L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 2148–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Nagaraju, Y.; Mahadevaswamy; Naik, N.M.; Gowdar, S.B.; Narayanarao, K.; Satyanarayanarao, K. ACC Deaminase-Positive Halophilic Bacterial Isolates with Multiple Plant Growth-Promoting Traits Improve the Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Under Salinity Stress. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 681007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Didovich, S.; Ptashnik, O.; Pashtetskiy, V. IOP Effectiveness of Polyfunctional Microbial Preparations in Growing Pisum Sativum L. in the South of Russia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 624, p. 012064. [Google Scholar]
  163. Sapre, S.; Gontia-Mishra, I.; Tiwari, S. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Ameliorates Salinity Stress in Pea (Pisum sativum). J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Khan, A.A.; Wang, T.; Hussain, T.; Ali, F.; Shi, F.; Latef, A.A.H.A.; Ali, O.M.; Hayat, K.; Mehmood, S.; Zainab, N.; et al. Halotolerant-Koccuria rhizophila (14asp)-Induced Amendment of Salt Stress in Pea Plants by Limiting Na+ Uptake and Elevating Production of Antioxidants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Parihar, M.; Rakshit, A.; Rana, K.; Tiwari, G.; Jatav, S.S. The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation in Mitigating Salt Stress of Pea (Pisum Sativum L.). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 1545–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Belimov, A.A.; Zinovkina, N.Y.; Safronova, V.I.; Litvinsky, V.A.; Nosikov, V.V.; Zavalin, A.A.; Tikhonovich, I.A. Rhizobial ACC deaminase contributes to efficient symbiosis with pea (Pisum sativum L.) under single and combined cadmium and water deficit stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 167, 103859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Amirnia, R.; Ghiyasi, M.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Rahimi, A.; Damalas, C.A.; Heydarzadeh, S. Nitrogen-Fixing Soil Bacteria Plus Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve Seed Yield and Quality Traits of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Singh, N.; Singh, G.; Gupta, R. Nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency as influenced by application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Rhizobium, and phosphorus in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). Agrochimica 2019, 63, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Singh, N.; Singh, G.; Aggarwal, N.; Khanna, V. Yield enhancement and phosphorus economy in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) with integrated use of phosphorus, Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Prysiazhniuk, O.I.; Slobodianiuk, S.V.; Topchii, O.V.; Sukhova, H.I.; Karpuk, L.M.; Kryvenko, A.I.; Svystunova, I.V.; Pavlichenko, A.A. Peculiarities of the lentil productivity formation under the use of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-mobilizing microorganisms. Bull. Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2020, 4, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zafar-Ul-Hye, M.; Akbar, M.N.; Iftikhar, Y.; Abbas, M.; Zahid, A.; Fahad, S.; Datta, R.; Ali, M.; Elgorban, A.M.; Ansari, M.J.; et al. Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Caffeic Acid Alleviated Drought Stress in Lentil Plants. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Riaz, U.; Kharal, M.A.; Murtaza, G.; Zaman, Q.U.; Javaid, S.; Malik, H.A.; Aziz, H.; Abbas, Z. Prospective Roles and Mechanisms of Caffeic Acid in Counter Plant Stress: A Mini Review. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 2018, 32, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Toussaint, J.-P.; Smith, F.A.; Smith, S.E. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can induce the production of phytochemicals in sweet basil irrespective of phosphorus nutrition. Mycorrhiza 2007, 17, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jorge, G.L.; Kisiala, A.; Morrison, E.; Aoki, M.; Nogueira, A.P.O.; Emery, R.N. Endosymbiotic Methylobacterium oryzae mitigates the impact of limited water availability in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) by increasing plant cytokinin levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Bechtaoui, N.; Raklami, A.; Benidire, L.; Tahiri, A.-I.; Göttfert, M.; Oufdou, K. Effects of PGPR Co-inoculation on Growth, Phosphorus Nutrition and Phosphatase/Phytase Activities of Faba Bean under Different Phosphorus Availability Conditions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Bechtaoui, N.; Raklami, A.; Tahiri, A.-I.; Benidire, L.; El Alaoui, A.; Meddich, A.; Göttfert, M.; Oufdou, K. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their benefits on growth and phosphate nutrition of faba bean and wheat. Biol. Open 2019, 8, bio043968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Raklami, A.; Bechtaoui, N.; Tahiri, A.-I.; Anli, M.; Meddich, A.; Oufdou, K. Use of Rhizobacteria and Mycorrhizae Consortium in the Open Field as a Strategy for Improving Crop Nutrition, Productivity and Soil Fertility. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Radwan, U.; Hezayen, F.; Nabil, S. A Gram-negative bacterium, Sinorhizobium saheli S-1T promotes Vicia faba growth under irradiance stress. Catrina Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 24, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mansour, E.; Mahgoub, H.A.; Mahgoub, S.A.; El-Sobky, E.-S.E.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.; Kamara, M.M.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Desoky, E.-S.M. Enhancement of drought tolerance in diverse Vicia faba cultivars by inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under newly reclaimed soil conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Idder, B.; Djibaoui, R.; Yssaad, H.A.R.; Djoudi, A. Role of some rhizospheric Pseudomonas on the growth and physiology of broad bean (Vicia faba) under salt stress conditions. Acta Agrobot. 2019, 72, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. De Brito Ferreira, E.P.; da Silva, O.F.; Wander, A.E. Economics of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in irrigated common bean in commercial and family farming. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2020, 55, 01532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Gabre, V.V.; Venancio, W.S.; Moraes, B.A.; Furmam, F.D.G.; Galvão, C.W.; Gonçalves, D.R.P.; Etto, R.M. Multiple Effect of Different Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms on Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Crop. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2020, 63, e20190493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Mortinho, E.S.; Jalal, A.; Oliveira, C.E.D.S.; Fernandes, G.C.; Pereira, N.C.M.; Rosa, P.A.L.; Nascimento, V.D.; de Sá, M.E.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Co-Inoculations with Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in the Common Bean to Increase Efficiency of NPK Fertilization. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Horácio, E.H.; Zucareli, C.; Gavilanes, F.Z.; Yunes, J.S.; dos Santos Sanzovo, A.W.; Andrade, D.S. Co-inoculation of rhizobia, azospirilla and cyanobacteria for increasing common bean production. Londrina 2020, 41, 2015–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. De Carvalho, R.H.; Jesus, E.D.C.; Favero, V.O.; Straliotto, R.; Araújo, A.P. The Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium Increases the Early Nodulation and Development of Common Beans. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Filipini, L.D.; Pilatti, F.K.; Meyer, E.; Ventura, B.S.; Lourenzi, C.R.; Lovato, P.E. Application of Azospirillum on seeds and leaves, associated with Rhizobium inoculation, increases growth and yield of common bean. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Steiner, F.; Ferreira, H.C.P.; Zuffo, A.M. Can co-inoculation of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense increase common bean nodulation and grain yield? Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2019, 40, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Genre, A.; Lanfranco, L.; Perotto, S.; Bonfante, P. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Razakatiana, A.; Trap, J.; Baohanta, R.; Raherimandimby, M.; Le Roux, C.; Duponnois, R.; Ramanankierana, H.; Becquer, T. Benefits of dual inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia on Phaseolus vulgaris planted in a low-fertility tropical soil. Pedobiologia 2020, 83, 150685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Garcia, C.L.; Dattamudi, S.; Chanda, S.; Jayachandran, K. Effect of Salinity Stress and Microbial Inoculations on Glomalin Production and Plant Growth Parameters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Agronomy 2019, 9, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Tiryaki, D.; Aydın, İ.; Atıcı, Ö. Psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from the leaf apoplast of cold-adapted wild plants improve the cold resistance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under low temperature. Cryobiology 2019, 86, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Talaat, N.B. Effective microorganisms: An innovative tool for inducing common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) salt-tolerance by regulating photosynthetic rate and endogenous phytohormones production. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Valdez-Nuñez, R.A.; Castro-Tuanama, R.; Castellano-Hinojosa, A.; Bedmar, E.J.; Ríos-Ruiz, W.F. PGPR Characterization of Non-Nodulating Bacterial Endophytes from Root Nodules of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Microb. Probiotics Agric. Syst. Adv. Agron. Use 2019, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Nascimento, E.; Souza, A.R.D.; Nascimento, R.D.; da Silva, A.A.; Bezerra, C.V.D.C.; Lima, R.F.D.; Guimarães, R.F.B.; Batista, M.C. Co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense in cowpea under salt stress. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2023, 27, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Galindo, F.S.; Teixeira Filho, M.; Silva, E.C.D.; Buzetti, S.; Fernandes, G.C.; Rodrigues, W.L. Technical and economic viability of cowpea co-inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. and nitrogen doses. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2020, 24, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Galindo, F.S.; Pagliari, P.H.; da Silva, E.C.; Silva, V.M.; Fernandes, G.C.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Céu, E.G.O.; de Lima, B.H.; Jalal, A.; Muraoka, T.; et al. Co-Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium sp. Enhances Nitrogen Uptake and Yield in Field-Grown Cowpea and Did Not Change N-Fertilizer Recovery. Plants 2022, 11, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Da Silva, K.C.; Lima, I.M.D.O.; Cabral, R.D.C.; Zuffo, A.M.; Steiner, F. Cowpea and Mungbean Response to Co-Inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum and Molybdenum Application in Sandy Soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2022, 54, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Dos Santos, G.R.; Reis, H.B.; Rotili, E.A.; Mourão, D.D.S.C.; De Farias, D.I.O.A.; Pereira, T.A.; Ferreira, T.P.D.S.; Junior, A.F.C. Inoculation of Rhizobium associated with Trichoderma asperellum on the development and yield of cowpea. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Agrar. Agrar 2020, 15, e8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mendes, J.B.S.; Neto, V.P.D.C.; de Sousa, C.D.A.; Filho, M.R.D.C.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Bonifacio, A. Trichoderma and bradyrhizobia act synergistically and enhance the growth rate, biomass and photosynthetic pigments of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) grown in controlled conditions. Symbiosis 2020, 80, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Gudiño–Gomezjurado, M.E.; Leite, R.D.A.; de Carvalho, T.S.; Pfenning, L.H.; Moreira, F.M.D.S. Phosphate–solubilizing fungi co–inoculated with Bradyrhizobium promote cowpea growth under varying N and P fertilization conditions. Sci. Agric. 2022, 79, e20210061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Puozaa, D.K.; Jaiswal, S.K.; Dakora, F.D. Phylogeny and distribution of Bradyrhizobium symbionts nodulating cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) and their association with the physicochemical properties of acidic African soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 42, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Abiala, M.A.; Sahoo, L. Bacillus aryabhattai enhanced proline content, stabilized membrane and improved growth of cowpea under NaCl-induced salinity stress. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1520–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Yousefi, A.; Mirzaeitalarposhti, R.; Nabati, J.; Soufizadeh, S. Evaluation radiation use efficiency and growth indicators on two mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under the influence of biological fertilizers. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 44, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Singh, T.B.; Sahai, V.; Goyal, D.; Prasad, M.; Yadav, A.; Shrivastav, P.; Ali, A.; Dantu, P.K. Identification, Characterization and Evaluation of Multifaceted Traits of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria from Soil for Sustainable Approach to Agriculture. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 3633–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Htwe, A.Z.; Moh, S.M.; Soe, K.M.; Moe, K.; Yamakawa, T. Effects of Biofertilizer Produced from Bradyrhizobium and Streptomyces griseoflavus on Plant Growth, Nodulation, Nitrogen Fixation, Nutrient Uptake, and Seed Yield of Mung Bean, Cowpea, and Soybean. Agronomy 2019, 9, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Singh, Y.V.; Naragund, R.; Jaiswal, P.; Bana, R.S.; Choudhary, A.K. Influence of Crop Establishment Practices and Microbial Inoculants on Nodulation of Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata) and Soil Quality Parameters. Legum. Res. Int. J. 2020, 45, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Wahid, F.; Sharif, M.; Fahad, S.; Adnan, M.; Khan, I.A.; Aksoy, E.; Ali, A.; Sultan, T.; Alam, M.; Saeed, M.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and phosphorus uptake of mung bean plants fertilized with composted rock phosphate fed dung in alkaline soil environment. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 1760–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Lasudee, K.; Tokuyama, S.; Lumyong, S.; Pathom-Aree, W. Actinobacteria Associated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Funneliformis mosseae Spores, Taxonomic Characterization and Their Beneficial Traits to Plants: Evidence Obtained from Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) and Thai Jasmine Rice (Oryza sativa). Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Desai, S.; Mistry, J.; Shah, F.; Chandwani, S.; Amaresan, N.; Supriya, N.R. Salt-tolerant bacteria enhance the growth of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) and uptake of nutrients, and mobilize sodium ions under salt stress condition. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2023, 25, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Sharma, K.D. Impact of Different Rhizobial Strains on Physiological Responses and Seed Yield of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under Field Conditions. Legume Res. Int. J. 2021, 44, 679–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Ahmed, B.; Shahid, M.; Syed, A.; Rajput, V.D.; Elgorban, A.M.; Minkina, T.; Bahkali, A.H.; Lee, J. Drought Tolerant Enterobacter sp./Leclercia adecarboxylata Secretes Indole-3-acetic Acid and Other Biomolecules and Enhances the Biological Attributes of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek in Water Deficit Conditions. Biology 2021, 10, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 249–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Rasool, S.; Ahmad, A.; Siddiqi, T.O.; Ahmad, P. Changes in growth, lipid peroxidation and some key antioxidant enzymes in chickpea genotypes under salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1039–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Phonglosa, A.; Dalei, B.B.; Ray, K.; Pattanayak, S.K. Integrated nutrient management improves productivity, profitability and quality of rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.) in an alfisol of Eastern India. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 46, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Malviya, D.; Varma, A.; Singh, U.B.; Singh, S.; Singh, H.V.; Saxena, A.K. Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria from Coal Mine Enhance Sulfur Nutrition in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 932402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Malviya, D.; Varma, A.; Singh, U.B.; Singh, S.; Saxena, A.K. Unraveling the mechanism of sulfur nutrition in pigeonpea inoculated with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 927702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, P. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in changing climatic condition of Bihar. Legume Res. Int. J. 2020, 43, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Devi, N.S.A.; Kumutha, K.; Anandham, R.; Krishnamoorthy, R. Induction of moisture stress tolerance by Bacillus and Paenibacillus in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan. L). 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Anand, G.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Shrivas, V.L.; Dubey, S.; Sharma, S. ACC deaminase positive Enterobacter-mediated mitigation of salinity stress, and plant growth promotion of Cajanus cajan: A lab to field study. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 1547–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Crosbie, D.B.; Mahmoudi, M.; Radl, V.; Brachmann, A.; Schloter, M.; Kemen, E.; Marín, M. Microbiome profiling reveals that Pseudomonas antagonises parasitic nodule colonisation of cheater rhizobia in Lotus. N. Phytol. 2022, 234, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Rocha, I.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Pereira, G.; Ma, Y.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low-input agricultural system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Hakim, S.; Mirza, B.S.; Imran, A.; Zaheer, A.; Yasmin, S.; Mubeen, F.; Mclean, J.E.; Mirza, M.S. Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tag shows disparity in rhizobial and non-rhizobial diversity associated with root nodules of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) growing in different habitats in Pakistan. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 231, 126356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Soldan, R.; Fusi, M.; Cardinale, M.; Daffonchio, D.; Preston, G.M. The effect of plant domestication on host control of the microbiota. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Stopnisek, N.; Shade, A. Persistent microbiome members in the common bean rhizosphere: An integrated analysis of space, time, and plant genotype. ISME J. 2021, 15, 2708–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Pérez-Jaramillo, J.E.; De Hollander, M.; Ramírez, C.A.; Mendes, R.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Carrión, V.J. Deciphering rhizosphere microbiome assembly of wild and modern common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in native and agricultural soils from Colombia. Microbiome 2019, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Lv, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Hao, J.; Li, L.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Community structure and associated networks of endophytic bacteria in pea roots throughout plant life cycle. Plant Soil 2021, 468, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Li, Y.; Laterrière, M.; Lay, C.-Y.; Klabi, R.; Masse, J.; St-Arnaud, M.; Yergeau, É.; Lupwayi, N.Z.; Gan, Y.; Hamel, C. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation and crop sequence on root-associated microbiome, crop productivity and nutrient uptake in wheat-based and flax-based cropping systems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 168, 104136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Wang, G.; Bei, S.; Li, J.; Bao, X.; Zhang, J.; Schultz, P.A.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.; Bever, J.D.; et al. Soil microbial legacy drives crop diversity advantage: Linking ecological plant–soil feedback with agricultural intercropping. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Chaudhari, D.; Rangappa, K.; Das, A.; Layek, J.; Basavaraj, S.; Kandpal, B.K.; Shouche, Y.; Rahi, P. Pea (Pisum sativum l.) Plant Shapes Its Rhizosphere Microbiome for Nutrient Uptake and Stress Amelioration in Acidic Soils of the North-East Region of India. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Wyszkowska, J.; Borowik, A.; Olszewski, J.; Kucharski, J. Soil Bacterial Community and Soil Enzyme Activity Depending on the Cultivation of Triticum aestivum, Brassica napus, and Pisum sativum ssp. arvense. Diversity 2019, 11, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. De Araujo, A.S.F.; Miranda, A.R.L.; Sousa, R.S.; Mendes, L.W.; Antunes, J.E.L.; Oliveira, L.M.D.S.; de Araujo, F.F.; Melo, V.M.M.; Figueiredo, M.D.V.B. Bacterial community associated with rhizosphere of maize and cowpea in a subsequent cultivation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 143, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Martínez-Romero, E.; Aguirre-Noyola, J.L.; Taco-Taype, N.; Martínez-Romero, J.; Zuñiga-Dávila, D. Plant microbiota modified by plant domestication. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 43, 126106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Medina-Paz, F.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Heil, M. All Set before Flowering: A 16S Gene Amplicon-Based Analysis of the Root Microbiome Recruited by Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Its Centre of Domestication. Plants 2022, 11, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Morales Moreira, Z.P.; Helgason, B.L.; Germida, J.J. Assembly and potential transmission of the Lens culinaris seed microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2021, 97, fiab166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Chartrel, V.; Dugat-Bony, E.; Sarthou, A.-S.; Huchette, S.; Bonnarme, P.; Irlinger, F. The microbial community associated with pea seeds (Pisum sativum) of different geographical origins. Plant Soil 2021, 462, 405–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Morales Moreira, Z.P.; Helgason, B.L.; Germida, J.J. Crop, genotype, and field environmental conditions shape bacterial and fungal seed epiphytic microbiomes. Can. J. Microbiol. 2021, 67, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Lalzar, M.; Zeevi, A.; Frenkel, O.; Gamliel, A.; Abbo, S.; Kruh, L.I. Seed-Derived Microbial Community of Wild Cicer Seedlings: Composition and Augmentation to Domesticated Cicer. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0278521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Bintarti, A.F.; Kearns, P.J.; Sulesky-Grieb, A.; Shade, A. Abiotic Treatment to Common Bean Plants Results in an Altered Endophytic Seed Microbiome. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0021021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Nodulated root of Phaseolus vulgaris. Credits: Ederson da Conceição Jesus.
Figure 1. Nodulated root of Phaseolus vulgaris. Credits: Ederson da Conceição Jesus.
Plants 12 00954 g001
Table 1. Annual grain production of eight pulse legumes: beans, chickpeas, peas, cowpeas, mung beans, lentils, broad beans, and pigeon peas according to the FAOSTAT code. Data are averages for the period 2018 to 2020. Countries responsible for at least 80% of total production are shown.
Table 1. Annual grain production of eight pulse legumes: beans, chickpeas, peas, cowpeas, mung beans, lentils, broad beans, and pigeon peas according to the FAOSTAT code. Data are averages for the period 2018 to 2020. Countries responsible for at least 80% of total production are shown.
FAO CodePulsesGrain Production
(103 Tons)
Number of Producing CountriesMain Producing Countries
176Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris); mung beans (Vigna radiata) *27,038103India (20.9%), Brazil (10.9%), Myanmar (10.8%), China (4.9%), United Republic of Tanzania (4.4%), United States (4.4%), Mexico (3.9%), Kenya (2.9%), Uganda (2.7%), Argentina (2.1%), Ethiopia (2.0%), Burundi (1.8%), Rwanda (1.7%), Cameroon (1.5%), Mozambique (1.4%), Canada (1.4%), Angola (1.3%), Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1.2%)
191Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)15,40246India (70%), Turkey (4.1%), Myanmar (3.3%), Australia (3.2%), Russian Federation (3.1%)
187Peas (Pisum sativum)14,01595Canada (29.5%), Russia Federation (17.6%), China (10.5%), United States (6.5%), India (6.2%), France (4.6%), Ukraine (4.3%), Ethiopia (2.7%)
195Cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)857835Nigeria (41.5%), Niger (28.8%), Burkina Faso (7.8%), Kenya (2.6%)
201Lentils (Lens culinaris)629742Canada (39.4%), India (21.3%), Australia (7.6%), Turkey (5.7%), United States (5.1%), Nepal (4.0%)
181Broad beans (Vicia faba)553164China (31.8%), Ethiopia (18.8%), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (9.1%), Australia (5.8%), Germany (3.3%), Lithuania (3.0%), Sudan (3%), France (2.8%), Italy (2.3%)
197Pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan)491724India (77.9%, Malawi (8.6%), Myanmar (7.1%)
* Classification of pulses according to FAO: common bean and mung bean production share the same FAO code and are accounted together with lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus), tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius), adzuki bean (Vigna angularis), mungo bean (Vigna mungo), rice bean (Vigna umbellate), and moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia).
Table 2. Main microbial taxa described in interactions with pulses selected for their PGPR characteristics.
Table 2. Main microbial taxa described in interactions with pulses selected for their PGPR characteristics.
Pulses (References)
BacteriaPseudomonaschickpea [111,112,113]; pea [114,115]; lentil [116]; common bean [117]; cowpea [118,119,120]; mung bean [121,122]; pigeon pea [123]
Bacilluschickpea [111]; pea [114,124]; lentil [125]; cowpea [119]; common bean [43,117,126]; mung bean [122,127]
Pseudomonas fluorescenschickpea [128,129]; broad bean [130]; lentil [63,131]; common bean [132,133]; mung bean [134,135]; pigeon pea [136]
Bacillus subtilischickpea [137]; pea [115,138]; broad bean [139]; common bean [132,140]; mung bean [135,141].
Azotobacter chroococcumchickpea [137]; broad bean [142]; common bean [143]; pigeon pea [123,136]
AMFAMFchickpea [144]; pea [145,146,147]; broad bean [148,149]; cowpea [78,150]; mung bean [151]
Rhizophagus irregularisChickpea [112]; pea [152]; broad bean [153,154]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xavier, G.R.; Jesus, E.d.C.; Dias, A.; Coelho, M.R.R.; Molina, Y.C.; Rumjanek, N.G. Contribution of Biofertilizers to Pulse Crops: From Single-Strain Inoculants to New Technologies Based on Microbiomes Strategies. Plants 2023, 12, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040954

AMA Style

Xavier GR, Jesus EdC, Dias A, Coelho MRR, Molina YC, Rumjanek NG. Contribution of Biofertilizers to Pulse Crops: From Single-Strain Inoculants to New Technologies Based on Microbiomes Strategies. Plants. 2023; 12(4):954. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xavier, Gustavo Ribeiro, Ederson da Conceição Jesus, Anelise Dias, Marcia Reed Rodrigues Coelho, Yulimar Castro Molina, and Norma Gouvêa Rumjanek. 2023. "Contribution of Biofertilizers to Pulse Crops: From Single-Strain Inoculants to New Technologies Based on Microbiomes Strategies" Plants 12, no. 4: 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040954

APA Style

Xavier, G. R., Jesus, E. d. C., Dias, A., Coelho, M. R. R., Molina, Y. C., & Rumjanek, N. G. (2023). Contribution of Biofertilizers to Pulse Crops: From Single-Strain Inoculants to New Technologies Based on Microbiomes Strategies. Plants, 12(4), 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop