Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Qualitative and Bioactive Compounds of Whole and Refined Flours in Durum Wheat Grains with Different Year of Release and Yield Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Arnica montana Planta Tota versus Flower Extracts: Analytical, In Vitro and In Vivo Mouse Paw Oedema Model Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Promising Bioregulators for Higher Water Productivity and Oil Quality of Chia under Deficit Irrigation in Semiarid Regions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Variability of Free Asparagine Content in the Grain of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Cultivated in Italy to Reduce Acrylamide-Forming Potential

1
National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology (IBBA), via E. Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
SIS Società Italiana Sementi, Via Mirandola 5, 40068 San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(6), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061349
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 14 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023

Abstract

:
Acrylamide, a suspected human carcinogen, is generated during food processing at high temperatures in the Maillard reaction, which involves reducing sugars and free asparagine. In wheat derivatives, free asparagine represents a key factor in acrylamide formation. Free asparagine levels in the grain of different wheat genotypes has been investigated in recent studies, but little is known about elite varieties that are cultivated in Italy. Here, we analysed the accumulation of free asparagine in a total of 54 bread wheat cultivars that are relevant for the Italian market. Six field trials in three Italian locations over two years were considered. Wholemeal flours obtained from harvested seeds were analysed using an enzymatic method. Free asparagine content ranged from 0.99 to 2.82 mmol/kg dry matter in the first year, and from 0.55 to 2.84 mmol/kg dry matter in the second year. Considering the 18 genotypes that were present in all the field trials, we evaluated possible environment and genetic influences for this trait. Some cultivars seemed to be highly affected by environment, whereas others showed a relative stability in free asparagine content across years and locations. Finally, we identified two varieties showing the highest free asparagine levels in our analysis, representing potential useful materials for genotype x environment interaction studies. Two other varieties, which were characterized by low amounts of free asparagine in the considered samples, may be useful for the food industry and for future breeding programs aimed to reduce acrylamide-forming potential in bread wheat.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum spp. L.) is one of the world’s most important crops, contributing an estimated 18.6% to global daily calorie intake and 19.8% to global daily protein intake in 2018 (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 7 January 2023)). The world currently produces around 770 mmt of wheat annually [1]. A key reason for the importance of wheat as a staple crop is its ability to be used as the main ingredient in a plethora of products, such as breads, noodles, couscous, and pasta. In Southern Europe, about 5 million hectares were used for wheat cultivation in 2021, with a production of about 22 million tonnes. In 2020, in the same geographic area, per capita consumption of wheat was estimated at about 115 kg (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed on 7 January 2023)). In Italy, wheat represents an important part of the national cereal market with more than 7 million tonnes produced in 2021, as shown also by a 3.3% increase in production compared to the average of the last 5 years (https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DashboardCereals/CerealsProduction.html (accessed on 6 December 2022)).
Wheat breeding is principally aimed to elevate yield potential with stability, reduce the requirements for water, fertilizers, and other inputs without affecting productivity, increase the ability of wheat to grow on marginal lands, and protect wheat production from emerging threats of climate change [2]. Today, one of the objectives of wheat breeding is the improvement of its nutritional quality and health value [3,4]. A major issue related to food production that can be faced through specific breeding programs is the reduction of acrylamide, which is generated in a wide range of foods, including wheat derivatives [5,6]. Acrylamide (C3H5NO) is a white, odourless, water-soluble molecule and is rapidly absorbed through the skin and from the gastro-intestinal tract. Once metabolised, it produces glycidamide (C3H5NO2), which forms adducts with DNA both in vitro and in vivo in human and animal tissues [7]. Acrylamide is classed in group 2a as a probable carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [8]. Acrylamide is generated by Maillard cascade reactions during high-temperature processing of foods (frying, baking, roasting, toasting) [9,10,11,12]. These reactions involve free reducing sugars, such as glucose, fructose, and maltose, and free asparagine (fAsn), which gives the carbon skeleton. The fAsn concentration has been identified as the main determinant of acrylamide-forming potential in wheat and other cereals [12,13,14]. For this reason, a major recommendation in the food industry to reduce acrylamide levels cereal-based products is the use of grain with low fAsn content [15]. Free amino acids generally account for about 5% or less of the total nitrogen content of wheat grain, with fAsn accounting for 10% or less of the total [16]. Consequently, this amino acid was of little scientific interest until the demonstration that it is a precursor of acrylamide during cooking. Only in recent years has an increasing number of studies aimed to compare the level of fAsn in the seeds of different wheat genotypes and to identify the factors influencing this trait. Variability in fAsn accumulation in the grain is high among wheat genotypes [15,17,18,19]. It is well demonstrated that this trait is highly influenced by environmental factors, such as abiotic and biotic stresses [16], sulphur or nitrogen availability [11,13,20,21,22,23,24], and poor disease control [21,25]. Nevertheless, the accumulation of fAsn in wheat seed is a specific trait showing good heritability [26,27]. In addition, genotype versus environmental (GxE) effects influence fAsn content in wheat seeds [13,15,18,28,29]. Thus, both breeding and genetics may play an important role in selecting and developing cultivars accumulating low and stable fAsn levels across different growing environments, and then to mitigate the acrylamide risk in wheat products.
Most of the studies about fAsn in wheat grain have been related to bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes that are principally cultivated in the U.S., the UK, Canada, and Australia [15,18]. These studies underlined that many differences in fAsn concentration were due to the growing environment and crop management, although some cultivars may be considered as low asparagine accumulating genotypes for the involvement of genetic factors. Contrastingly, there is little information on fAsn concentration in bread wheat varieties cultivated in Italy. To our knowledge, only Corol and collaborators [18] included in their study two bread wheat varieties cultivated and commercialized in Italy (i.e., Blasco and Palesio), both classified as low fAsn genotypes. Considering the importance of bread wheat in the Italian agricultural system and food industry, the aim of this study was to perform a preliminary evaluation of fAsn content in the grain of selected elite varieties of bread wheat, relevant for the Italian market, to set the base of a characterization of this genetic material in terms of acrylamide-forming potential. We considered a total of 54 genotypes, that are widely cultivated in Italy, and three growing locations over two years to evaluate possible influences of both environmental and genetic factors. Hence, our analysis allowed for the identification of cultivars showing relatively low and stable fAsn levels. These genotypes may be used in future breeding programs aimed to mitigate the acrylamide risk in wheat derivatives.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Free Asparagine Quantification in Six Field Trials Over Two Years

Field trials of selected bread wheat elite varieties relevant for the Italian market were performed over two years (2018–2019 and 2019–2020) at three locations across Southern, Central, and Northern Italy (Foggia, Grosseto, Voghera, respectively). There were 54 varieties altogether over the two trial seasons: 36 genotypes in 2018–2019 and 36 genotypes in 2019–2020, with 18 varieties being present in both. The genotypes are listed in Table 1, grouped according to the Italian bread wheat classification based on chemical and rheological properties [30,31]. Bread wheat is unique for the production of leavened food, bread and biscuits in particular. The classification of different genotypes relies on several physical, chemical, and rheological characteristics. Worldwide, various classification systems are principally based on objective evaluations of gluten proteins. In Italy, bread wheat is classified into five categories, depending on its end use [31]. The specific classes are: (i) FF = improver wheat (“Frumento di Forza”in Italian), varieties suitable for manufacturing highly leavened products with a very resistant gluten network; (ii) FPS = superior bread making wheat (“Frumento Panificabile Superiore”), varieties with consistent milling and baking performance; (iii) FP = ordinary bread making wheat (“Frumento Panificabile”), varieties with bread-making potential but not suited to all grists; (iv) FB = wheat for biscuits (“Frumento da Biscotto”), soft varieties used for biscuits, breakfast cereals, cakes, and similar products. The variety list for 2018–2019 comprised six FF varieties, five FPS varieties, twenty FP varieties, and five FB varieties (Table 1). The variety list for 2019–2020 comprised six FF varieties, nine FPS varieties, eighteen FP varieties, and three FB varieties (Table 1).
A recent study underlined that there are no significant differences in free asparagine levels among different classes related to rheological characteristics [15]. Nevertheless, it may be useful to indicate the classification of the analysed genotypes to help farmers and the food industry in decision making.
Wholemeal flour was produced from the grain harvested from the six field trials. The flour was then analysed for fAsn concentration; the results are reported in Table S1. The fAsn content in the considered samples ranged from 0.99 to 2.82 mmol/kg dry matter (d.m.) for 2018/2019 and from 0.55 to 2.84 mmol/kg d.m. for 2019/2020.
Considering the first year of field trials (2018–2019, Figure 1), Giambologna, classified as FF, showed the lowest amount of fAsn, reaching 0.99 mmol/kg d.m. in the Foggia field trial, whereas RGT_Montecarlo, classified as FPS, showed the highest amount of fAsn reaching 2.82 mmol/kg d.m. (Table S1) in the Voghera field trial.
Some cultivars displayed fAsn amounts lower than 1.5 mmol/kg in the three field trials, i.e., Giambologna (classified as FF), Blasco (classified as FPS), Ascott, LG_Absalon, Sothys_CS, SY_Cicerone (all classified as FP), and the two FB genotypes Oregrain and Santorin. On the other hand, the two FPS genotypes Lancillotto and RGT_Montecarlo, as well as the FB variety Cosmic, showed fAsn amounts higher than 2 mmol/kg in the three field trials.
In the second year of field trials (2019–2020, Figure 2), KWS_Coli, a FP variety, showed the lowest amount of fAsn, reaching 0.55 mmol/kg d.m. in the Grosseto field trial, whereas the FPS cultivar SY_Starlord showed the highest amount of fAsn, reaching 2.84 mmol/kg d.m. (Table S1) in the Voghera field trial.
Some cultivars displayed fAsn amounts lower than 1.5 mmol/kg in the three field trials: the three FF varieties Aiace_VST, Bologna, and Giorgione, the FPS genotype Solindo_CS, and six FP varieties (i.e., Antigua, KWS_Coli, KWS_Lazuli, LG_Arnova, Poker_VST, and SY_Cicerone). No bread wheat variety showed fAsn amounts higher than 2 mmol/kg in the three field trials of the second year. Compared to the first year of field trials, the data of the second year seemed to display a general lower amount of fAsn. In particular, the Grosseto field trial presented very low levels of fAsn, with most of the bread wheat varieties showing a range of fAsn amounts between 0.5 to 1 mmol/kg.
Overall, our results were comparable with data obtained in previous works [13,32,33], where fAsn levels ranged between 0.68 and 4.77 mmol/kg d.m. when plants were grown in optimal conditions and treated against pathogens infections. As expected, a variability among the considered genotypes was observed. Although the reported data were preliminary and needed to be confirmed by further evaluations, our analysis suggested that both the environment and genetics may affect fAsn accumulation in the grain of the 54 considered varieties. As reported above, 18 genotypes were sown in both growing seasons during 2018/2019 and 2019/2020. We then focused on the data related to these 18 genotypes to evaluate the possible effect played by the environment and/or by the genotype on fAsn accumulation in the considered bread wheat panel.

2.2. Evaluation of the Influence of Growing Environments on Free Asparagine Accumulation

To evaluate a possible influence of the environment, the measurements of fAsn content were compared among the six field trials, considering the data related to each genotype as a whole (Figure 3).
In the two field trials in Foggia, the median values of fAsn levels in the 18 genotypes were very similar: 1.48 and 1.47 mmol/kg d.m. for the first and the second year, respectively. Similarly, grain harvested in Voghera showed similar median values of fAsn levels in the 18 genotypes between the two field trials: 1.75 and 1.55 mmol/kg d.m. for the first and the second year, respectively. Overall, the Foggia and the Voghera samples showed comparable levels of fAsn. Differently, the genotypes grown in Grosseto in the second year accumulated a lower amount fAsn (median value 0.95 mmol/kg d.m.) compared to those grown in the previous year in the same location (median value 1.81 mmol/kg d.m.). This data is consistent with the previous observation related to the 36 genotypes of the second year (Figure 2), where the Grosseto field trial presented very low levels of fAsn. Interestingly, the samples derived from the field trial in Grosseto in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 showed the highest and the lowest levels of fAsn content, respectively, compared to those measured in the six field trials considered here. The large effect of crop management and other environmental factors, both alone and interacting with genetic factors (G × E), has a reasonable impact in fAsn accumulation [12]. It has been well demonstrated how differences in growth location and/or growth year may influence fAsn accumulation due to environmental conditions [19,34,35]. Many authors have shown how differences in sulphur or nitrogen availability strongly affect fAsn accumulation [11,13,15,20,21,22,23,24]. In our case, the considered field trials were conducted in the frame of an Italian network of experimental fields (i.e., the Italian “National Network of Common Wheat Variety Comparison”; in Italian “Rete Nazionale di Confronto Varietale del Frumento Tenero”). This network shared similar agricultural practices among field trials, including protocols for fertilization. For this reason, nitrogen and sulphur supply resulted in similar results among the field trials (Table S2) and probably did not influence the low fAsn level observed in the 2019–2020 Grosseto field trial. The observed differences in fAsn accumulation in this field trial, when compared to the previous year and to the other locations of Foggia and Voghera, were probably due to environmental factors, such as rainfall and soil water availability, or specific climatic conditions, which highly affected the fAsn accumulation in wheat seeds. This data is in agreement with a previous analysis, which reported that the level of precipitation and temperature during grain development (between heading and harvest) had the greatest effect on fAsn concentration in mature grain [18].

2.3. Evaluation of the Influence of Genetic Factors on Free Asparagine Accumulation

To preliminary characterize a possible effect played by the genotype in fAsn accumulation of the selected bread wheat panel, we compared the fAsn content of the 18 common genotypes considering all of the six measurements (three locations for two years; Figure 4).
The box plots in Figure 4 show a high variability in fAsn content among years and locations for some genotypes. In particular, RGT_Montecarlo and Lancillotto showed the highest variability by accumulating fAsn with differences between maximum and minimum values of about 4.06 and 3.64 times, respectively. Other genotypes appeared more stable in terms of fAsn content across year and locations. LG_Arnova and LG_Ascona showed the lowest variability in the amount of fAsn, with differences between maximum and minimum values of about 1.44 and 1.63 times, respectively.
Considering the observed levels of fAsn in each genotype in the analysed field trials, SY_Cicerone showed a relatively low and stable amount of fAsn, ranging from 0.63 to 1.42 mmol/kg d.m. (median value 1.21 mmol/kg d.m.). Similarly, the genotype Sothys_CS showed a fAsn content ranging from 1.02 to 1.98 mmol/kg d.m. (median value 1.26 mmol/kg d.m.). If these data could be confirmed in further analyses, these varieties may be utilised to mitigate the acrylamide risk in wheat products and to develop low fAsn accumulator genotypes in future breeding programs. On the other hand, Stromboli showed relatively high fAsn levels, ranging between 1.39 and 2.45 mmol/kg d.m. (median value 2.19 mmol/kg d.m.). RGT_Montecarlo fAsn values were highly variable between different trials, but reached the highest amount of fAsn (2.82 mmol/kg d.m.) of the entire panel and showed a median value (2.07 mmol/kg d.m.) comparable to Stromboli.
The variability in fAsn accumulation among genotypes has been well reported in the literature [13,15,17,20,27,33,35]. Despite the documented effect of environmental factors, the accumulation of fAsn in wheat seeds is a specific trait showing good heritability [15,26,27]. To date, crop management strategies, including ensuring sufficient sulphur in the soil during cultivation [23] and avoiding pathogen infection [21,25], are the most common strategies to reduce fAsn concentrations. Nevertheless, a further crucial point to control fAsn content in wheat seeds is the identification and utilization of wheat genotypes with a strong genetic component in this trait [5]. A recent study highlighted that a natural deletion of a key gene encoding the asparagine synthetase of class 2 of the B genome (TaASN-B2) can reduce the amount of fAsn in wheat grain [36]. The presence and absence of this gene was investigated in a panel of common wheat varieties, showing that free asparagine concentrations in field-produced grain were, on average, lower in varieties lacking TaASN-B2 [36]. In this regard, some breeding programs are already ongoing to reduce the amount of fAsn in wholemeal and refined flour by modulating the expression of key genes, such as ASN genes, that are involved in its synthesis inside the kernel.
Previous studies were able to identify specific bread wheat genotypes that were considered low fAsn accumulators and confirmed that selection for low asparagine content is possible [19,21,27,28]. Hence, the analysis of fAsn accumulation in several wheat genotypes sown in different locations may be crucial to identify stable genotypes, as well as specific genetic traits associated with fAsn accumulation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Field Trials

This study was conducted on 54 bread wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) that were included in the Italian “National Network of Common Wheat Variety Comparison” (In Italian: “Rete Nazionale di Confronto Varietale del Frumento Tenero”) coordinated by the Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA). The field trials were conducted in three Italian locations (Foggia, Grosseto, and Voghera) for two crop years (2018/2019 and 2019/2020). Geographical coordinates and sowing and harvesting dates are reported in Table 2 for the six field trials.
The applied fertilization inputs are reported in Table S2. Weather data were collected throughout the field trials for each location (Table S3).

3.2. Flour Deproteination

Whole-grain samples were ground through a 0.5 mm grid diameter mesh using a laboratory mill (Cyclotec CT293, FOSS, Hilleroed, Denmark) to obtain a homogeneous powder. Wholemeal flour (5 g) was added to 15 mL of 1 M perchloric acid and shaken for 30 min at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged at 5300 RCF for 3 min at 4 °C to produce a clear extract. Clear supernatant was brought to pH 8 by adding 2 M KOH and adjusted to 50 mL in a graduated cylinder. The samples were refrigerated in an iced bath for 30 min. Samples were then centrifuged at 5300 RCF for 30 min at 4 °C. Clear supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter and 2 mL was transferred into a 2 mL tube and stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis.

3.3. Free Asparagine Quantification

The quantification of fAsn levels in deproteinated wholemeal flour samples was conducted according to Lecart and co-workers [32] with slight modifications, using a K-ASNAM L-Asparagine/L-Glutamine/Ammonia kit (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland).
This kit foresees the use of three enzymatic reactions.
L-glutamine + H2O → L-glutamate + NH+4
NH+4 + 2-oxoglutarate + NADPH → L-glutamate + NADP+ + H2O
L-asparagine + H2O → L-aspartate + NH+4
Practically, 200 µL of the deproteinated sample was collected and mixed with 100 µL of the pH 4.9 buffer (offered in the K-ASNAM kit) and 10 µL of glutaminase (reaction 1). After a 5 min time lapse at room temperature, 150 µL of the second buffer at pH 8.0 was added together with 100 µL of NADPH and 600 µL of distilled water. After a delay of 10 min at room temperature, 10 µL of glutamate dehydrogenase was added (reaction 2). Subsequently, both the ammonium ions of the sample and those generated by the first reaction react with 2-oxoglutarate and NADPH. The absorbance at 340 nm was then measured to measure the conversion of NADPH to NADP+. After measurement, 10 µL of asparaginase was added (reaction 3). In this step, asparagine is hydrolysed to aspartate and ammonium ions by the action of asparaginase. This reaction liberates ammonium ions, which enter the second reaction and lead to an additional fall in absorbance at 340 nm, which is stoichiometric with the concentration of asparagine in the sample. The absorbance was recorded using a Jasco V-630 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). The concentration of fAsn in the sample was calculated as reported by the manufacturer.
To check the repeatability of the quantification protocol, the same deproteinated whole-grain sample of wheat (cv Palesio) was routinely added to each quantification procedure and measured as the control. All the fAsn measurements of this control sample are reported in Table S4. The variability among these measurements was estimated at about 0.41 mmol/kg and considered as the intrinsic error of the quantification method. The average value of Palesio was 1.48 ± 0.10 mmol/kg.

4. Conclusions

To our knowledge, this work reports the first comprehensive analysis related to fAsn accumulation in seeds of bread wheat elite varieties relevant for the Italian market. Although these data need to be validated in further field trials, this analysis represents a starting point for the characterization of this genetic material. The food industry requires varieties that can be relied upon to produce grain with low fAsn amounts over a range of environments and harvest years [15,37]. Despite the environmental role in fAsn accumulation, we identified specific bread wheat varieties that showed good stability among years and locations in terms of fAsn concentration. Our data also suggested that the varieties SY_Cicerone and Sothys_CS, with low amounts of fAsn in the grain and a low influence from the environment, may be useful for the food industry to mitigate the acrylamide risk in wheat derivatives. In contrast, Stromboli and RGT_Montecarlo, which showed high fAsn levels in our analysis, may be useful for studying the GxE interaction in this trait. In conclusion, these materials can be useful for further studies to dissect the mechanisms involved in fAsn accumulation in wheat seeds, as well as for studies aimed to reduce the acrylamide-forming potential of wheat varieties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12061349/s1, Table S1. Measurement of fAsn content in the grain of bread wheat genotypes from the six field trials. The 18 varieties that have been analysed in all the field trials are written in bold. Standard deviation of technical replicates is shown. N.a.: not available. Table S2. Fertilizers input dates and composition. Table S3. Weather data for location and agronomic year. Table S4. Measurements of fAsn content in standard samples of the cultivar Palesio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B.; Formal Analysis, A.T., R.P., M.Z. and F.S.; Data Curation, E.B. and A.T.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.B. and A.T.; Writing—Review and Editing, all authors; Supervision and Project Administration, E.B.; Funding Acquisition, A.C., S.R., S.M. and D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the ROP of the Lombardy Region ERDF 2014–2020—Axis I “Strengthen technological research, development and innovation”—Action 1.b.1.3 “Support for co-operative R&D activities to develop new sustainable technologies, products and services”—Call Hub.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Patrizia Vaccino, Antonio Troccoli and Pasquale De Vita from CREA, and Paola Viola from APSOV Sementi for providing wheat grains and information about “Rete Nazionale di Confronto Varietale del Frumento Tenero”. Part of the research was carried out in the framework of the national program for “Departments of Excellence 2023-27” of MUR (Italian Minister of University and Research) at DAFNE, University of Tuscia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kiszonas, A.M.; Morris, C.F. Wheat breeding for quality: A historical review. Cereal Chem. 2018, 95, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rasheed, A.; Xia, X. From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 767–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gaikwad, K.B.; Rani, S.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, V.; Babu, P.H.; Bainsla, N.K.; Yadav, R. Enhancing the Nutritional Quality of Major Food Crops Through Conventional and Genomics-Assisted Breeding. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 533453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loskutov, I.G.; Khlestkina, E.K. Wheat, barley, and oat breeding for health benefit components in grain. Plants 2021, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oddy, J.; Raffan, S.; Wilkinson, M.D.; Elmore, J.S.; Halford, N.G. Understanding the Relationships between Free Asparagine in Grain and Other Traits to Breed Low-Asparagine Wheat. Plants 2022, 11, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tareke, E.; Rydberg, P.; Karlsson, P.; Eriksson, S.; Törnqvist, M. Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated foodstuffs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4998–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Scientific Opinion on acrylamide in food. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Some industrial chemicals. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; World Health Organization: Rome, Italy, 1994; Volume 60, pp. 1–568. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mottram, D.S.; Wedzicha, B.L.; Dodson, A.T. Food chemistry: Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction. Nature 2002, 419, 448–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stadler, R.H.; Blank, I.; Varga, N.; Robert, F.; Hau, J.; Guy, P.A.; Robert, M.C.; Riediker, S. Food chemistry: Acrylamide from Maillard reaction products. Nature 2002, 419, 449–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Granvogl, M.; Wieser, H.; Koehler, P.; Von Tucher, S.; Schieberle, P. Influence of sulfur fertilization on the amounts of free amino acids in wheat. Correlation with baking properties as well as with 3-aminopropionamide and acrylamide generation during baking. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4271–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raffan, S.; Halford, N.G. Acrylamide in food: Progress in and prospects for genetic and agronomic solutions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 175, 259–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Curtis, T.Y.; Muttucumaru, N.; Shewry, P.R.; Parry, M.A.J.; Powers, S.J.; Elmore, J.S.; Mottram, D.S.; Hook, S.; Halford, N.G. Effects of genotype and environment on free amino acid levels in wheat grain: Implications for acrylamide formation during processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halford, N.G.; Muttucumaru, N.; Curtis, T.Y.; Parry, M.A.J. Genetic and agronomic approaches to decreasing acrylamide precursors in crop plants. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Curtis, T.Y.; Powers, S.J.; Wang, R.; Halford, N.G. Effects of variety, year of cultivation and sulphur supply on the accumulation of free asparagine in the grain of commercial wheat varieties. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lea, P.J.; Sodek, L.; Parry, M.A.J.; Shewry, P.R.; Halford, N.G. Asparagine in plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 150, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Claus, A.; Schreiter, P.; Weber, A.; Graeff, S.; Herrmann, W.; Claupein, W.; Schieber, A.; Carle, R. Influence of agronomic factors and extraction rate on the acrylamide contents in yeast-leavened breads. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8968–8976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Corol, D.I.; Ravel, C.; Rakszegi, M.; Charmet, G.; Bedo, Z.; Beale, M.H.; Shewry, P.R.; Ward, J.L. 1H-NMR screening for the high-throughput determination of genotype and environmental effects on the content of asparagine in wheat grain. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Navrotskyi, S.; Baenziger, P.S.; Regassa, T.; Guttieri, M.J.; Rose, D.J. Variation in asparagine concentration in Nebraska wheat. Cereal Chem. 2018, 95, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Curtis, T.Y.; Postles, J.; Halford, N.G. Reducing the potential for processing contaminant formation in cereal products. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Martinek, P.; Klem, K.; Váňová, M.; Bartáčková, V.; Večerková, L.; Bucher, P.; Hajšlová, J. Effects of nitrogen nutrition, fungicide treatment and wheat genotype on free asparagine and reducing sugars content as precursors of acrylamide formation in bread. Plant Soil Environ. 2009, 55, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Muttucumaru, N.; Halford, N.G.; Elmore, J.S.; Dodson, A.T.; Parry, M.; Shewry, P.R.; Mottram, D.S. Formation of high levels of acrylamide during the processing of flour derived from sulfate-deprived wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8951–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Raffan, S.; Oddy, J.; Halford, N.G. The sulphur response in wheat grain and its implications for acrylamide formation and food safety. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wilson, T.L.; Guttieri, M.J.; Nelson, N.O.; Fritz, A.; Tilley, M. Nitrogen and sulfur effects on hard winter wheat quality and asparagine concentration. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Curtis, T.Y.; Powers, S.J.; Halford, N.G. Effects of Fungicide Treatment on Free Amino Acid Concentration and Acrylamide-Forming Potential in Wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 9689–9696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Emebiri, L.C. Genetic variation and possible SNP markers for breeding wheat with low-grain asparagine, the major precursor for acrylamide formation in heat-processed products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1422–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rapp, M.; Schwadorf, K.; Leiser, W.L.; Würschum, T.; Longin, C.F.H. Assessing the variation and genetic architecture of asparagine content in wheat: What can plant breeding contribute to a reduction in the acrylamide precursor? Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 2427–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Malunga, L.N.; Ames, N.; Khorshidi, A.S.; Thandapilly, S.J.; Yan, W.; Dyck, A.; Waterer, J.; Malcolmson, L.; Cuthbert, R.; Sopiwnyk, E.; et al. Association of asparagine concentration in wheat with cultivar, location, fertilizer, and their interaction. Food Chem. 2021, 344, 128630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Postles, J.; Powers, S.J.; Elmore, J.S.; Mottram, D.S.; Halford, N.G. Effects of variety and nutrient availability on the acrylamide-forming potential of rye grain. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 57, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cocchi, M.; Corbellini, M.; Foca, G.; Lucisano, M.; Pagani, M.A.; Tassi, L.; Ulrici, A. Classification of bread wheat flours in different quality categories by a wavelet-based feature selection/classification algorithm on NIR spectra. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 544, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Foca, G.; Ulrici, A.; Corbellini, M.; Pagani, M.A.; Lucisano, M.; Franchini, G.C.; Tassi, L. Reproducibility of the Italian ISQ method for quality classification of bread wheats: An evaluation by expert assessors. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lecart, B.; Jacquet, N.; Anseeuw, L.; Renier, M.; Njeumen, P.; Bodson, B.; Vanderschuren, H.; Richel, A. Nonconventional enzymatic method to determine free asparagine level in whole-grain wheat. Food Chem. 2018, 251, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Žilić, S.; Dodig, D.; Basić, Z.; Vančetović, J.; Titan, P.; Đurić, N.; Tolimir, N. Free asparagine and sugars profile of cereal species: The potential of cereals for acrylamide formation in foods. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2017, 34, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ohm, J.B.; Mergoum, M.; Simsek, S. Variation of free asparagine concentration and association withquality parameters for hard red spring wheat grown in North Dakota. Cereal Chem. 2017, 94, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xie, Y.; Malunga, L.N.; Ames, N.P.; Waterer, J.; Khorshidi, A.S.; Scanlon, M.G. Effects of growing environment, genotype, and commercial fertilization levels on free asparagine concentration in Western Canadian wheat. Cereal Chem. 2021, 98, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oddy, J.; Alarcón-Reverte, R.; Wilkinson, M.; Ravet, K.; Raffan, S.; Minter, A.; Mead, A.; Elmore, J.S.; de Almeida, I.M.; Cryer, N.C.; et al. Reduced free asparagine in wheat grain resulting from a natural deletion of TaASN-B2: Investigating and exploiting diversity in the asparagine synthetase gene family to improve wheat quality. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Žilić, S.; Aktağ, I.G.; Dodig, D.; Filipović, M.; Gökmen, V. Acrylamide formation in biscuits made of different wholegrain flours depending on their free asparagine content and baking conditions. Food Res. Int. 2020, 132, 109109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Concentration of fAsn in the grain of 36 bread wheat varieties grown in 2018–2019 in the three locations Foggia, Grosseto, and Voghera. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Figure 1. Concentration of fAsn in the grain of 36 bread wheat varieties grown in 2018–2019 in the three locations Foggia, Grosseto, and Voghera. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Plants 12 01349 g001
Figure 2. Concentration of fAsn in the grain of 36 bread wheat varieties grown in 2019–2020 in the three locations Foggia, Grosseto, and Voghera. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Figure 2. Concentration of fAsn in the grain of 36 bread wheat varieties grown in 2019–2020 in the three locations Foggia, Grosseto, and Voghera. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Plants 12 01349 g002
Figure 3. Box plots of fAsn measurements in the six considered field trials, considering the data from the 18 genotypes common to the six field trials.
Figure 3. Box plots of fAsn measurements in the six considered field trials, considering the data from the 18 genotypes common to the six field trials.
Plants 12 01349 g003
Figure 4. Box plots of fAsn measurements from the 18 genotypes present in the six field trials.
Figure 4. Box plots of fAsn measurements from the 18 genotypes present in the six field trials.
Plants 12 01349 g004
Table 1. List of the 54 analysed varieties used in the six field trails. The varieties are grouped according to the Italian bread wheat classification, which is based on specific rheologic and analytical parameters [31]. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Table 1. List of the 54 analysed varieties used in the six field trails. The varieties are grouped according to the Italian bread wheat classification, which is based on specific rheologic and analytical parameters [31]. FF: improver wheat; FPS: superior bread making wheat; FP: ordinary bread making wheat; FB: wheat for biscuits.
Italian Bread Wheat
Classification
Genotype NameField Trials
FFAiace_VST2019–2020
Bingo_VST2019–2020
Bolognaboth years
Giambologna2018–2019
Giorgioneboth years
Izalco_CS2019–2020
Metropolis2018–2019
Nestore2018–2019
Rebeldeboth years
FPSAlbagran2019–2020
Berta2019–2020
Blasco2018–2019
Lancillottoboth years
Pinturicchio2019–2020
RGT_Algoritmo2018–2019
RGT_Montecarloboth years
RGT_Vivendo2019–2020
Solindo_CS2019–2020
SY_Starlord2019–2020
SY_Ural2019–2020
Teorema2018–2019
FPAmburgo2018–2019
Angelico2018–2019
Antiguaboth years
Artù_SNboth years
Ascott2018–2019
Ausonio2018–2019
Brunelleschi2018–2019
Cabiria2019–2020
Somtuoso_CSboth years
Filon2019–2020
Ginger2019–2020
Guercinoboth years
KWS_Coli2019–2020
KWS_Lazulli2019–2020
LG_Absalon2018–2019
LG_Arnovaboth years
LG_Asconaboth years
LG_Ayrton2018–2019
Poker_VST2019–2020
Porticcioboth years
PR22R582018–2019
Sofolk2018–2019
Solehioboth years
Sothys_CSboth years
Stromboliboth years
SY_Capitano2019–2020
SY_Ciceroneboth years
FBAvilaboth years
Bramanteboth years
Canaletto2019–2020
Cosmic2018–2019
Oregrain2018–2019
Santorin2018–2019
Table 2. Geographical coordinates and sowing and harvesting dates related to all locations and agronomic seasons.
Table 2. Geographical coordinates and sowing and harvesting dates related to all locations and agronomic seasons.
YearLocationField
Coordinates
Sowing DateHarvesting Date
2018/2019Foggia41°27′45.26” N, 15°30′11.06” E6 December 201818 June 2019
2019/2020Foggia41°27′46.03” N, 15°30′10.02” E9 December 201911 June 2020
2018/2019Grosseto42°57′14.332” N, 11°5′45.956” E3 January 20192 July 2019
2019/2020Grosseto42°57′26.557” N, 11°5′47.68” E5 January 202024 June 2020
2018/2019Voghera45°1′44.83” N, 9°1′19.189” E25 October 201820 July 2019
2019/2020Voghera45°1′0.3” N, 8°59′44.822” E9 December 201912 July 2020
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tafuri, A.; Zuccaro, M.; Ravaglia, S.; Pirona, R.; Masci, S.; Sestili, F.; Lafiandra, D.; Ceriotti, A.; Baldoni, E. Exploring Variability of Free Asparagine Content in the Grain of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Cultivated in Italy to Reduce Acrylamide-Forming Potential. Plants 2023, 12, 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061349

AMA Style

Tafuri A, Zuccaro M, Ravaglia S, Pirona R, Masci S, Sestili F, Lafiandra D, Ceriotti A, Baldoni E. Exploring Variability of Free Asparagine Content in the Grain of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Cultivated in Italy to Reduce Acrylamide-Forming Potential. Plants. 2023; 12(6):1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tafuri, Andrea, Melania Zuccaro, Stefano Ravaglia, Raul Pirona, Stefania Masci, Francesco Sestili, Domenico Lafiandra, Aldo Ceriotti, and Elena Baldoni. 2023. "Exploring Variability of Free Asparagine Content in the Grain of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Cultivated in Italy to Reduce Acrylamide-Forming Potential" Plants 12, no. 6: 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061349

APA Style

Tafuri, A., Zuccaro, M., Ravaglia, S., Pirona, R., Masci, S., Sestili, F., Lafiandra, D., Ceriotti, A., & Baldoni, E. (2023). Exploring Variability of Free Asparagine Content in the Grain of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Cultivated in Italy to Reduce Acrylamide-Forming Potential. Plants, 12(6), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop