Next Article in Journal
Authentication and Quality Control of the Brazilian Traditional Herb ‘Carquejas’ (Baccharis Species) Using Morpho-Anatomy and Microscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Brassinosteroids Alleviate Salt Stress by Enhancing Sugar and Glycine Betaine in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Milk Substitute Based on Pea, Bean and Sunflower Seeds with Natural Bioactive Stabilisers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Mani et al. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886

1
School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Hwy, North Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
2
Institute of Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Bruce Hwy, North Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(21), 3031; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213031
Submission received: 7 February 2024 / Accepted: 4 March 2024 / Published: 30 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Bioactive Compounds and Prospects for Their Use in Beverages)
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. Part of the information in the figure was cut off. The corrected Figure 2 appears below.
There was a mistake in Figure 12 as published. The image of one of the plant samples (A—Podocarpus elatus) was incorrect. The corrected Figure 12 appears below.
The values of TPC and FRAP in the text pertaining to KPF were incorrect as per Table 1. A correction has been made to the fifth sentence of abstract and fourth sentence of conclusion section. The correction is as follows: “The highest values were found in the KPF which were 20,847 ± 2322 mg GAE/100 g TPC and 100,494 ± 9487 mg TXE/100 g antioxidant capacity”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Mani, J.; Johnson, J.; Hosking, H.; Hoyos, B.E.; Walsh, K.B.; Neilsen, P.; Naiker, M. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Percentage cell viability of cell lines treated with plant extracts at 500 µg/mL concentration. One-way ANOVA test indicated a significant difference (p-value < 0.05) in cytotoxicity between the different plant extracts for the same cell line, denoted by different letters on the respective bars. Negative control: cells without treatment; positive control: cells treated with 50 µg/mL cisplatin (chemotherapy drug).
Figure 2. Percentage cell viability of cell lines treated with plant extracts at 500 µg/mL concentration. One-way ANOVA test indicated a significant difference (p-value < 0.05) in cytotoxicity between the different plant extracts for the same cell line, denoted by different letters on the respective bars. Negative control: cells without treatment; positive control: cells treated with 50 µg/mL cisplatin (chemotherapy drug).
Plants 13 03031 g002
Figure 12. (A) Podocarpus elatus (Illawarra plum), (B) Pleiogynium timoriense (Burdekin plum), (C) Terminalia ferdinandiana (Kakadu plum), (D) Cupaniopsis anacardioides (Tuckeroo) and (E) Pittosporum angustifolium (Gumbi gumbi).
Figure 12. (A) Podocarpus elatus (Illawarra plum), (B) Pleiogynium timoriense (Burdekin plum), (C) Terminalia ferdinandiana (Kakadu plum), (D) Cupaniopsis anacardioides (Tuckeroo) and (E) Pittosporum angustifolium (Gumbi gumbi).
Plants 13 03031 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mani, J.; Johnson, J.; Hosking, H.; Hoyos, B.E.; Walsh, K.B.; Neilsen, P.; Naiker, M. Correction: Mani et al. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886. Plants 2024, 13, 3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213031

AMA Style

Mani J, Johnson J, Hosking H, Hoyos BE, Walsh KB, Neilsen P, Naiker M. Correction: Mani et al. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886. Plants. 2024; 13(21):3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mani, Janice, Joel Johnson, Holly Hosking, Beatriz E. Hoyos, Kerry B. Walsh, Paul Neilsen, and Mani Naiker. 2024. "Correction: Mani et al. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886" Plants 13, no. 21: 3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213031

APA Style

Mani, J., Johnson, J., Hosking, H., Hoyos, B. E., Walsh, K. B., Neilsen, P., & Naiker, M. (2024). Correction: Mani et al. Bioassay Guided Fractionation Protocol for Determining Novel Active Compounds in Selected Australian Flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886. Plants, 13(21), 3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop