Next Article in Journal
Reframing Climate Change Resilience: An Intersectional Perspective of Ethnicity and Gender from Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Viticultural Manipulation and New Technologies to Address Environmental Challenges Caused by Climate Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temporal Changes in Minimum and Maximum Temperatures at Selected Locations of Southern Africa

1
Faculty of Erath and Environmental Sciences, Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Marondera P.O. Box 35, Zimbabwe
2
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Mount Pleasant, Harare P.O. Box MP 163, Zimbabwe
3
Centre for Water and Sanitation Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
4
International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA) c/o ICIPE, Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
5
Divisão de Agricultura, Instituto Superior Politécnico de Manica, Campus de Matsinho, Chimoio P.O. Box 417, Mozambique
6
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Chitedze Research Station, Lilongwe P.O. Box 1096, Malawi
7
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
8
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 2003, Ethiopia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Climate 2023, 11(4), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040084
Submission received: 9 March 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023

Abstract

:
Agriculture is threatened by ever increasing temperatures and this trend is predicted to continue for the near and distant future. The negative impact of rising temperatures on agri-food systems is also compounded by the erratic and highly variable rainfall in most parts of southern Africa. Minimum and maximum temperatures’ variability and trend analysis were undertaken using daily time series data derived from 23 meteorological stations spread across Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe. The modified Mann–Kendall and Theil–Sen slope models were used to assess temperature trends and their magnitudes. Temperature varied with location and minimum temperature was more variable than maximum temperature. Semi-arid regions had higher variation in minimum temperature compared to humid and coastal environments. The results showed an upward trend in minimum (0.01–0.83 °C over a 33–38 year period) and maximum (0.01–0.09 °C over a 38–57 year period) temperatures at 9 and15 locations, respectively. A downward trend in minimum temperature (0.03–0.20 °C over 38–41 years) occurred in South Africa at two locations and Dedza (Malawi), while a non-significant decline in maximum temperature (0.01 °C over 54 years) occurred at one location in coastal dry sub-humid Mozambique. The results confirm the increase in temperature over 33–79 years, and highlight the importance of including temperature when designing climate change adaption and mitigation strategies in southern Africa and similar environments.

1. Introduction

1.1. Temperature Trends

Agriculture is a key economic sector in southern Africa and is under threat from climate variability and change. Consequently, close to one third of the rural population in southern Africa is at risk of food shortages and loss of livelihood [1,2,3] due to climate variability and change. In Africa, decadal temperature increases of 0.32 °C were observed before 2010 [4], while Ref. [5] reported a significant increase in air temperature between 1979 and 2010. Temperature trend analyses conducted between 2004 and 2017 have indicated temperature increases of 0.2 °C in South Africa between 1960 and 2003 [6] and 0.16 °C per decade in semi-arid parts of Zimbabwe between 1967 and 2015 [7]. In South Africa, temperature variability of 0.18 °C in winter and 0.09 °C in summer were observed for the period 1950–1999 under semi-arid conditions using a decade time step [8]. Globally, there has been a general increase in night and daytime temperatures [9], and [10] reports increases of 1.1 °C from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019. Specifically, there has been a decrease in cold days and nights in most parts of southern Africa [11]. In southern Africa, air temperature is projected to increase over the coming decades [6] with the projected changes varying from no change to 3.5 °C by 2050 [12]. Globally, mean annual temperature has increased by 0.85 °C since 1880 [13], while general increases in the night and daytime temperatures have also been observed [4].

1.2. Impact of Day and Night Time Temperatures

Maximum temperatures during crop growth and development have a significant impact on the final yield outcomes [14]. Temperature interaction with other weather elements and their impacts on crop yield also needs more exploration [15]. Temperatures beyond the threshold for major food security cereals and legumes are detrimental, particularly during the pollination and grain filling growth stages [16,17]. Daytime temperatures of >35 °C often limit growth and the overall productivity of cereals and legumes that require optimum temperatures of 25 to 33 °C [14,16,17]. Temperatures above optimum levels for cereals and legumes may shorten the duration of grain filling, resulting in low crop yields [15]. Ref. [18] observed a notable negative correlation between daytime maximum temperature during grain filling and yields of maize (Zea may L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr). High temperatures (>35 °C) at the pollination stage of maize plants reduce pollen viability, which negatively impacts kernel set resulting in reduced yields [19]. A daytime temperature of >25 °C reduces the growth rate and pod formation of legumes such as cowpea, common bean, soybean and groundnut [20]. For pigeon pea, a decrease in night temperatures affects pod set [21], resulting in low yields. Drought has a critical and negative impact on grape yields at the farm scale and this can be attributed to high temperatures during summer and winter [22]. Agronomic management practices that reduce crop exposure to high temperature are, therefore, critical to complement genetic improvements targeted at dealing with heat stress [15].
High daytime temperature promotes more soil evaporation, which could lead to increased soil water deficits [23]. This introduces stress in crop plants under rainfed cropping systems, particularly during sensitive growth stages such as flowering. Soil water losses of 1.5–4 mm per day can occur from bare soil in the sub-humid and semi-arid environments of southern Africa [23]. There is evidence that climate-change-induced temperature and soil moisture changes can result in varying effects on the diversity, distribution and abundance of soil microfauna, most of the effects being negative [24]. Soil microbial activity which is critical for organic matter build-up and nutrient cycling might be reduced due to increased soil temperature [25,26]. This in turn has negative impacts on plant growth conditions. At a watershed level, extreme daytime temperature drives rapid depletion of soil moisture through an increase in evapotranspiration and augmenting water supplies through rainwater harvesting is paramount for agricultural systems in dry areas [27]. Water losses of up to 40% due to evaporation can occur from large water bodies during periods of extreme daytime temperature [28,29] and this will continue to have negative impacts on irrigated agriculture and livestock water supply.
Minimum temperatures are also critical for crop growth and development [30]. In southern Africa, projected trends indicate an increase in minimum temperatures, with notable variation depending on location [8,12]. Minimum temperatures are projected to increase more rapidly than maximum temperatures in the United States of America [31]. The southern Africa region is one of the hotspots for the projected general warming, characterized by increase in average day and night temperatures [32]. This will in turn affect production of field and horticultural crops, as well as fruits, in the different agro-ecological regions of southern Africa. High nighttime temperatures can be more detrimental than daytime temperature, especially on temperate crops. Respiration rate increases with increase in nighttime temperatures and this results in rapid depletion of stored sugars in the plants, thus reducing the final crop yield [15,33]. An increase in minimum temperatures will influence horticultural crops negatively or positively depending on species but will be detrimental to fruit production [16,34]. In field crops, increasing minimum temperatures potentially promote early senescence, which in turn shortens the grain filling period, resulting in low yields [16]. In fruit production, chilling hours required to trigger flowering might not be met in the face of increasing nighttime temperatures [35,36], while in both fruit and vegetables increasing temperatures result in high vulnerabilities during reproductive stages and, an increase in insect pest attacks and disease prevalence [36].
Daytime temperature extremes reduce livestock productivity, quality of livestock and shelf-life of products [37]. Under heat stress and water temperatures above 21 °C, animals take less feed and water [37]. This reduces growth and the overall productivity of the animal. With increasing daytime temperatures new adaptation and mitigation strategies for livestock management need to be formulated in southern Africa. Prioritizing climate smart livestock production technologies is imperative in the face of a changing climate [38]. Livestock management strategies should include diseases and pest prevention practices, in addition to the provision of adequate feed during the dry season. Inclusion of forage crops in the cropping systems, as well as integration of agroforestry into farming systems, could be key in tackling livestock production challenges induced by climate change and variability [39]. Similarly, in aquaculture fish are facing changing climate dangers due to the alterations in their habitats [36].
Temperatures in southern Africa are already conducive for emerging crop pests such as the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith)), and further increases in temperature will worsen pest and disease management on smallholder farms [40]. In livestock systems, high temperatures promote increased infestation of pests such as ticks [41]. Studies conducted by [42,43] revealed that increased ambient temperature promotes the proliferation of storage pests in traditional granaries used on smallholder farms, resulting in high grain losses.

1.3. Purpose of Study

Household food security is under threat in the coming decades due to ongoing global warming. This threat is higher in southern Africa’s rainfed agricultural systems. Therefore, generating timely information on all key elements of the weather that drive productivity of rainfed farming in the region is critical to improve decision making and agricultural risk management at farm, landscape, regional and national levels. This is also important to fine tune extension messages, research agendas and agriculture policy making. Nevertheless, more emphasis has been placed on analysing rainfall patterns and their impact on agriculture particularly for rainfed systems [44,45,46]. However, temperature is emerging as an important weather element that needs to be considered when designing adaptation and mitigation strategies against climate change [14]. Therefore, more research is needed to build a clear understanding of how minimum and maximum temperatures have changed over the years in Southern Africa. This will aid targeted research design to critically understand/assess the impacts of temperature dynamics on crop growth and farm productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa.
This study was guided by the following research questions: (i) How did minimum and maximum temperatures vary between 1947 and 2019 in southern Africa? (ii) What have the minimum and maximum temperature trends been between 1947 and 2019? (iii) What are the magnitudes of changes in minimum and maximum temperature between 1947 and 2019, at the selected locations in southern Africa? The specific objectives were to (i) assess the degree of minimum and maximum temperature variation, (ii) analyse the trends in minimum and maximum temperatures, (iii) evaluate the magnitude of change in minimum and maximum temperatures between 1947 and 2019 in selected locations of southern Africa and (iv) explore some of the implications of the temperature changes for agriculture and water resource management in southern Africa.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of Study Sites

Measured temperature data from 23 meteorological stations located in regions of contrasting climate regimes in Malawi, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa were used for this study (Figure 1). The geographical characteristics of the sites are summarized in Table 1. Based on agro-ecological characteristics (rainfall, temperature and altitude), the selected locations in Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe were placed into arid, semi-arid, sub-humid, dry sub-humid, coastal dry sub-humid and coastal regions (Table 1). Malawi experiences a sub-tropical climate with a minimum temperature averaging 17–22 °C in semi-arid lowlands, and 6–17 °C in the sub-humid highlands. The maximum temperature averages 27–32 °C in semi-arid lowlands and 23–30 °C in sub-humid highlands [47]. Mozambique experiences tropical to sub-tropical climatic patterns. Generally, temperatures are warmer along the Indian Ocean coast than further inland. Minimum and maximum temperatures average 16–24 °C and 26–32 °C, respectively, along the coast. Further inland, minimum and maximum temperatures average 12–20 °C and 22–36 °C, respectively [48,49]. South Africa experiences a wider range of climatic regimes than the other three countries used in this study, due to multiple different agro-ecologies. These climate patterns include arid, semi-arid, sub-tropical and Mediterranean. Minimum and maximum temperatures in coastal areas average 10–19 °C and 18–24 °C, respectively. Under arid to semi-arid conditions, minimum and maximum temperatures average 3–22 °C and 20–34 °C, respectively. Under Mediterranean conditions, minimum and maximum temperatures average 7–16 °C and 18–27 °C [50]. Climatic patterns of Zimbabwe are close to those experienced in Malawi and inland Mozambique. Semi-arid parts of Zimbabwe experience minimum temperatures of 6–23 °C and maximum temperatures of 26–35 °C on average. Highland areas experience a minimum of 7–16 °C and maximum of 13–29 °C [45,51].

2.2. Data Source and Quality

Daily minimum and maximum temperatures data were derived from 23 meteorological stations located in four countries and spread across different agro-ecological regions of Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe. The choice of these meteorological stations was based on the availability of long-term records of daily minimum and maximum temperature data, and completeness of the data sets. The length of available daily minimum and maximum temperature data varied from country to country and station to station. Meteorological stations with at least 20 years of measured temperature data were considered for the analyses as such length can produce a credible statistical analysis output. The temperature data were checked for quality using the RHtestV3 package in RClimDex 1.1 program [52] and the process involved identifying missing data, outliers and errors in the data set. The quality checks on the temperature time series data focused on identifying duplicate data and outliers, as well as spatial and temporal inconsistencies in the data sets from the different locations. Furthermore, the boxplots were used to display a clear summary of the maximum and minimum temperature time series data as they can expose the existence of extreme events (outliers) and handle large data easily.

2.3. Analyses of Minimum and Maximum Temperatures

2.3.1. Homogeneity Test

The Mann–Whitney–Pettitt test is a non-parametric test, and it was applied in this study in order to handle abrupt changes in the mean of the distribution of temperature changes. This test allows the detection of a single shift at an unknown point in time. Minimum and maximum temperature data for each meteorological station were subjected to a test for homogeneity using the Mann–Whitney–Pettitt test [53] at a 5% significance level. The null hypothesis (H0—homogenous) assumes uniform trends, whilst the alternative hypotheses (Ha—heterogenous) assumes that the trends were composed of diverse parts.

2.3.2. Modified Mann–Kendall (MMK) Test

Previous observations of weather elements such as temperature influence time series data, and when the data is not random, the power of the non-parametric Mann–Kendall test is also highly influenced by serially correlated data. The Modified Mann–Kendall (MMK) test is a variance correction approach which addresses the issue of serial correlation in trend analysis. Data are initially detrended and the effective sample size is calculated using the ranks of significant serial correlation coefficients which are then used to correct the inflated (or deflated) variance of the test statistic. In this study, the MMK test was conducted in R (version 4.2.2) [54] using the modified MK package (version 1.6) as follows:
MMKh (X1, …, n, ci = 0.95) where mmkh is the command to compute the modified Mann–Kendall test, X is the station, 1…, n is the number of stations for both minimum and maximum temperatures. The test results give corrected Zc, the Z statistic after variance correction; a new p-value after variance correction; N/N*, the effective sample size; the original Z, the original Mann–Kendall Z statistic; old p-value, the original Mann–Kendall p-value; Tau, Mann–Kendall’s Tau; Sen’s Slope, Sen’s slope; old variance, the old variance before variance correction; and new variance, the variance after correction (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).
To illustrate the spatial changes in minimum and maximum temperatures over time, maps were drawn representing the districts where the meteorological stations are located. The maps were drawn focusing mainly on the 1980–2004 period which was common at most locations.

2.3.3. Theil–Sen Slope Estimator

The Theil–Sen slope test was performed to examine the magnitude of the slope for minimum and maximum temperature changes. Given a set of pairs of years in a data series in this study, the slopes between all pairs of years were calculated. The Theil–Sen estimate of the slope is the median of all these slopes. The Theil–Sen estimator procedure was selected for this study because it gives accurate confidence intervals even with data that are not normally distributed, and it can handle outliers. The test was performed in R version 4.2.2 using the Trend package [54]. The test computes slope using Theil–Sen’s method which calculates a set of linear slopes followed by a median of the slopes as follows:
dk = (Xj − Xi)/(j − i)
for (1 ≤ i < j ≤ n), where d is the slope, X denotes the variable, and i and j are indices. As a result, the Theil–Sen slope (bSen) is given by
bSen = med(dk)
where “med” is the empirical median function.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics of Minimum and Maximum Temperatures

Descriptive statistical analyses performed on the minimum and maximum temperatures across the different locations in the four countries are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3. In Malawi, maximum temperature ranged from 22 °C to 43 °C in the lowland semi-arid Chitala location. In mid- and high-altitude locations, maximum temperature ranged from 11.9 °C to 41.4 °C. The minimum temperature ranged from 0.9 °C to 29 °C over the study period. The smallest and largest minimum temperature ranges were recorded at dry sub-humid Golomoti (18.7 °C) and Chitedze (7.80 °C), respectively. In Mozambique, maximum temperature ranged from 2.1 °C to 43.9 °C, and the smallest range was recorded in Cabo Delgado (Pemba), along the northern Mozambique costal channel. Minimum temperature ranged between 1.5 °C and 29.6 °C with the smallest range also being experienced in the northern Mozambique costal line in Cabo Delgado province (Table 3). Maximum temperature ranged from −0.1 °C to 47.8 °C in South Africa with the semi-arid Vryburg location having the largest temperature range. Minimum temperature ranged from −13 °C at humid sub-tropical Bethlehem to 30.7 °C at semi-arid Vryburg. As observed with maximum temperature, the largest minimum temperature range was also recorded at semi-arid Vryburg. In Zimbabwe, the maximum temperature ranged from 2.6 to 42.4 °C with semi-arid West Nicholson having the largest range of minimum temperature (39 °C). Minimum temperature ranged from −4.6 to 26.3 °C and West Nicholson experienced the highest temperature (29.2 °C).
The relatively higher standard deviation (up to 7.65 °C) of daily minimum temperature confirms higher variation in minimum than maximum temperature at most of the locations (Table 2 and Table 3). In Malawi, a higher variation in minimum temperature was observed at four of the five locations with a standard deviation of at least 3 °C. Chitala experienced higher variation in minimum temperature than maximum temperature. The high-altitude upland Dedza location experienced more variations in maximum than minimum temperature over the study period. In Mozambique, minimum temperature exhibited higher variation than maximum temperature at all locations. The lowest minimum and maximum temperature variation were experienced in Central Mozambique’s costal Quelimane location in Zambezia. However, the combined highest minimum and maximum temperature variation in Mozambique was recorded in Chimoio, a central Mozambique mid-altitude zone. Overall, the highest variation in maximum temperature was recorded in Chimoio and Rotanda, both in central Mozambique mid- and high-altitude inland regions. Six of the nine locations experienced higher variation in minimum than the maximum temperature in South Africa. The highest variation (10.8 °C) in minimum temperature was observed at the semi-arid Upington location in western South Africa. The highest variation in maximum temperature was experienced at the Polokwane location in the Limpopo province. As observed in the other countries, the minimum temperature varied more than the maximum temperature at the locations in Zimbabwe. Sub-humid Harare had the highest variation in minimum temperature and the lowest variation in maximum temperature in Zimbabwe (Table 2 and Table 3).

3.2. Trends in Maximum and Minimum Temperatures

The upward or downward direction, or lack of trends in maximum and minimum temperatures were location specific and also varied from country to country. In Malawi, three and four of the five locations, experienced significant upward trends in both maximum and minimum temperatures, respectively (Figure 2, Table 4). In contrast, Dedza experienced a significant decreasing trend in minimum temperature. In Mozambique, Chimoio and Sussundenga experienced increasing minimum temperature trends (Figure 3, Table 4) between 1951 and 2015. The inland locations registered the highest trend increase in minimum temperature. Maximum temperature increased significantly in the Zambezia coastal line (Quelimane) between 1951 and 2008. In South Africa, trends were location specific and three locations (Bethlehem, Nelspruit, Polokwane) experienced significant increase in minimum temperature (Figure 4, Table 4). Two locations from arid and semi-arid sub-tropics (Kimberley, Upington) exhibited decreasing trends in minimum temperature. Eight of the nine locations in South Africa experienced an upward trend in maximum temperature (Table 4). In Zimbabwe, West Nicholson experienced an increase in minimum temperature while the high-altitude sub-humid Harare experienced no change in both minimum and maximum temperatures between 1961 and 2001 (Figure 5). Three locations in Zimbabwe (Marondera, Masvingo, West Nicholson) experienced a significant increase in maximum temperature.
Based on the Theil–Sen slope estimator, 15 out of the 23 locations exhibited significantly increasing maximum temperature (Table 4). Maximum temperature increased by 0.01–0.09 °C over a 34–79 year period across the 15 locations. Overall, locations in South Africa experienced a higher increase in maximum temperature compared to stations from other countries. Nine locations experienced a significant increase in minimum temperature, ranging from 0.01 °C at Sussundenga and Nelspruit to 0.83 °C at Chitedze over a 33–38 year period. At semi-arid locations, a significant increase in maximum temperature (0.03–0.09 °C over 30–40 years) was detected at four of the five locations while a significant increase (0.02 °C over 38–40 years) in minimum temperature was experienced at two locations. In the humid and sub-humid locations, a significant increase in maximum temperature of 0.01–0.09 °C occurred at 8 of the 16 locations over a 38–57 year period. Four locations experienced an upward but insignificant trend, while one location had a significant downward trend in the humid and sub-humid agro-ecologies of southern Africa over the same period.
In Malawi, trends detected at Chitala and Chitedze were not significant for both maximum and minimum temperatures (Table 4). Only Dedza experienced a significant decrease in minimum temperature. The Pemba station in the northern Mozambique coastal province of Cabo Delgado experienced a decrease in maximum temperature over 54 years, although this change was not significant. Overall, South African locations had higher magnitudes of minimum temperature increase compared with locations in the other three countries. For minimum temperature, seven locations had positive but insignificant trends, while five had negative trends that were also not statistically significant. Six and three locations experienced insignificant positive and negative maximum temperature trends, respectively. Six locations experienced no change in minimum temperature between 1951 and 2018. Six locations also experienced no change in maximum temperature between 1947 and 2013 (Table 4).
In Malawi, two districts hosting the meteorological stations warmed between 1980 and 2004 based on maximum temperature (Figure 6). Based on minimum temperature, three districts warmed while Salima experienced cooling and warming cycles. In Mozambique, warming was more pronounced in the coastal districts (Pemba and Quelimane) with Pemba consistently warming based on both maximum and minimum temperatures (Figure 7). Inland districts (Chimoio and Sussundenga) experienced warming and cooling cycles between 1980 and 2004. Maximum temperature shows that Pietermaritzburg, Polokwane and Vryburg warmed between 1980 and 2004 (Figure 8). Based on minimum temperature, five locations experienced warming and cooling cycles in South Africa. In Zimbabwe, the Gwanda and Marondera districts experienced cooling and warming cycles based on maximum temperature, while all districts experienced warming and cooling based on minimum temperature (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

4.1. Temperature Variations and Trends

Changes in minimum and maximum temperatures occurred in different locations of southern Africa between 1947 and 2019. The patterns detected suggested the occurrence of peaks and troughs in temperature, highlighting the presence of extreme events over the years at all the locations. These temperature variations over time and scales are driven by various processes which include atmospheric and oceanic conditions (e.g., sea surface temperatures), land cover changes and locally based processes around a given location [55,56]. In this study, minimum temperature was more variable than maximum temperature at most locations. The results demonstrate that nighttime temperature increased more rapidly and it is more sensitive to warming than maximum temperatures because of the thinner boundary layer just above the ground [57]. Elsewhere, Ref. [58] used prediction models to assess temperature variations in the tropics and their results indicated higher variation in minimum than maximum temperatures. The highest variations in minimum temperatures were at the arid Upington and semi-arid Vryburg locations, and this introduces another challenge to such environments which already experience high daytime temperature and low and highly variable rainfall. Local conditions influencing minimum and maximum temperatures over time include location altitude, topography, land cover and atmospheric circulations [59]. This could explain the variations between locations observed in our results. Some locations experienced decreasing trends in both minimum and maximum temperatures, and this can be attributed to decadal variations in temperature at the same location, and a pattern which has previously been reported in other retrospective climate analyses studies in sub-Saharan Africa [5,60]. With the increasing minimum and maximum temperatures, inclusion of temperature when developing climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies and innovations in agricultural systems is imperative, particularly for regions identified as climate change hotspots such as southern Africa [61,62,63].
Increasing maximum temperatures in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has been attributed to several factors including changes in sea surface temperatures (SSTs), reduced land cover due to deforestation, reduced evapotranspiration due to declining vegetative cover and greenhouse gas accumulation in the troposphere [5,64]. South Africa experienced a higher magnitude of maximum temperature increases than all the other countries used in the study. This could be due to the country being located between two oceans, the Atlantic and Indian, which control air movements and atmospheric circulations differently compared with other countries [65]. Additionally, the warming in South Africa (particularly daytime) is apparently enhanced by decreases in cloudiness, precipitation and soil moisture, which may be ultimately related to a southward shift in the extratropical storm track [10]. When both minimum and maximum temperature increased at some locations of southern Africa, the magnitude of maximum temperature increase was greater than that of minimum temperature. The interaction of atmospheric and SSTs from both oceans increases the complexity of identifying the drivers of such phenomena [66]. Identification of the current drivers of minimum and maximum temperature in addition to solar radiation at the local level is paramount for a better understanding of current trends and the designing of more robust and appropriate adaptation and mitigation measures for agricultural systems. Some locations experienced insignificant decreases in maximum temperature. The contrasting trends of increasing and decreasing temperature at some locations suggest that generalizing temperature trends across locations in the same region is inappropriate; therefore, adaptation and mitigation strategies should be tailored to specific localities. Additionally, the use of current trends complemented by future climate change projections is therefore important for designing adaptation and mitigation strategies in southern Africa. Additionally, coupling measured/observed and downscaled time series climate data could be ideal for future studies in order to achieve a more robust assessment of current temperature trends in future. This will unravel the decades or years that have experienced significant upward temperature changes. A study by [67] revealed more warming during June–August and September–November periods before the year 2000. Recent warming on the African continent has also been associated with the El Niño phenomenon [5] and its increased frequency of occurrence has impacted negatively on water resources and agriculture. The decrease in maximum temperature at Pemba, but not at Quelimane before 1980, confirms the spatial variations in changes taking place even when locations have the same general conditions.

4.2. Implications for Agriculture and Water Resource Management

Southern Africa is projected as a climate change hotspot for temperature increases and drying as is reported in some of the recent studies [61,68]. With the ongoing climate variation and change as also evidenced by temperature increases in this study, temperature increases will likely impact negatively and to varying degrees on different components of the agri-food systems as well as water and other natural resources in Southern Africa. Therefore, it is paramount to develop resilient agri-food systems in the region for the future. The changes in temperature in the study have proven to be mostly location specific and varying between locations. This is also confirmed in the 2018 IPCC Special Report on global warming [68]. Blanket interventions to reduce the impact of changing temperatures across the different agricultural sectors may, therefore, not be effective because components of the agricultural systems will be affected differently. There is a need for agro-ecology specific coping and adaptation options to improve the efficiency of adaption strategies [69].

4.2.1. Crop Production and Grain Storage

Both minimum and maximum temperatures can negatively influence crop production. An increase in minimum temperature promotes losses in the stored sugars in plants and negatively impacts the final crop yield [15,33]. With regards to the main food security cereals (maize, wheat, rice), increased minimum temperature can affect the critical grain yield determination stages leading to low yield [16,70]. Warming during the night will negatively affect fruit production and some horticultural crops [16,34]. Some fruit tree species require adequate chilling hours for flowering to commence and this requirement might not be met in the face of increasing minimum temperatures, which are usually experienced during the night [35,36]. Increasing maximum temperatures will introduce heat stress to the field and horticultural crops which were developed to deal with mainly drought, salinity and inherently low soil fertility stresses. The current risks presented by fall armyworm and locusts, as well as diseases such as maize leaf necrosis, are likely to be worsened by the general warming taking place in southern Africa. A study by [43] indicated that ambient temperature coupled with humidity significantly influences the effectiveness of grain storage technologies. With the increasing night and daytime temperature, grain damage is set to increase, especially in the traditional storage structures used by smallholder farmers in southern Africa. This will potentially lead to consequences of high storage loses and costs as well as low profitability.

4.2.2. Livestock Production

There are predictions of higher risks of undernutrition in communities that depend on dryland agriculture and livestock in southern Africa due to increased temperatures [68]. A 2013 review on climate change and livestock concluded that livestock production in Africa and southern Africa is vulnerable and at high risk of being severely affected by climate change [70]. Air temperature affects the productivity of ruminants and monogastric farm animals. The productivity of goats, sheep and cattle is drastically reduced by high daytime temperature as the animals undergo a body cooling process. Under heat stress animals take less feed and less water if the water temperature is above 21 °C [71]. This results in reduced growth and the overall productivity of the animal. In addition, sweating due to high ambient temperature promotes loss of body fluids from the animal and this upsets the overall functioning of the body. High daytime temperature and heat waves are more detrimental to large-bodied farm animals such as cattle, and farmers need to diversify livestock species in the face of the general warming being experienced and projected to increase in southern Africa, Africa and globally. Cattle exposed to long hours of heat stress reportedly produce beef of poor quality and shorter shelf-life, while milk yield and quality also decrease in dairy farming systems. In livestock systems, high temperature also promotes increased infestation of pests such as ticks [41]. Temperature increases are also likely to have negative impacts on the availability of livestock forage. Rangelands in the arid tropics have been projected to undergo a reduction in the length of growing period by more than 20% between 2000 and 2050 [72]. Even in cultivated pastures, there are likely to be challenges as a result of the increased demand for irrigation water due to high evapotranspiration rates.

4.2.3. Aquatic Animal and Plant Production

Aquatic life will be adversely affected by rising temperatures in the coming decades [36]. Warm water due to increasing temperature will hold less dissolved oxygen for aquatic animal species and less carbon dioxide for plant species [73]. In addition, high water temperatures might render some dissolved compounds poisonous to some aquatic animal and plant species [74]. Aquatic species tolerant to warm water will thrive, while those that are intolerant will become extinct. In the process, beneficial animals and plants will be lost due to the warming of the aquatic habitat. An increase in water temperatures might also promote higher growth rates of some animal and plant species [75], which will in turn increase demand for dissolved nutrients, oxygen and carbon dioxide. The supply of these resources might not meet the demand, leading to low productivity or even the death of some species. Consequently, food chains will be affected and altered in the aquatic habitat. For example, zooplanktons might grow faster than their food supply derived from phytoplanktons, triggering detrimental changes to the food web in the aquatic habitat [76].

4.2.4. Agricultural Water

The general warming of southern Africa and the rest of the world threatens reliable agricultural water supply. High temperatures and low precipitation are likely to result in the reduction of water availability for rainfed agriculture [32]. The challenge posed by increasing temperatures is being compounded by erratic rainfall [77], which has become highly variable between seasons and spatially in southern Africa and the rest of SSA. Climate models project decreases in annual precipitation for southern Africa to be by as much as 20% by the 2080s, and this will result in reduced water availability and crop yields [78]. High daytime temperature and evaporation coupled with erratic rainfall results in reduced surface water storage. It is projected that agricultural water supply will dwindle in semi-arid and sub-humid highland areas of southern Africa [79]. This will in turn affect crop productivity in irrigated systems and yields are projected to decline [80]. Integration of water harvesting techniques and soil moisture conservation with other climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies is critical on both small- and largescale farms in southern Africa. At the field level, soil moisture supply to crops is threatened by high evaporation due to increased daytime temperature and lack of soil cover [81]. At the watershed level, high soil evaporation due to high temperature and low land cover alters runoff patterns which are critical for the refilling of rivers and dams. Prevailing daytime temperature in southern Africa is already driving potential evapotranspiration rates of 5–10 mm day−1 in semi-arid and 3–4 mm day−1 in sub-humid highlands [81]. Catchment management strategies that facilitate river and groundwater recharge are, therefore, imperative for the future of sustainable irrigation systems.

5. Conclusions

Minimum and maximum temperatures were highly variable between 1947 and 2019 at some coastal, arid, semi-arid and sub-humid parts of southern Africa. Minimum temperature was more variable than maximum temperature under the ecological conditions of selected locations used in this study. The variation in minimum temperatures was higher under semi-arid conditions than in humid and coastal environments. Both minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly at most of the locations between 1940 and 2019. Significant minimum temperature increases of 0.01–0.83 °C over a 33–38 year period occurred at nine locations of the southern African countries used in the study. Similarly, significant maximum temperature increases of 0.01–0.09 °C over a 38–57 year period at 15 locations also occurred at the same time. A significant decrease in minimum temperatures (0.03–0.20 °C over 38–41 years) occurred at two locations in South Africa and Dedza in Malawi, while a non-significant decline in maximum temperature (0.01 °C over 54 years) occurred at Pemba along the coast of the Indian Ocean.
There is evidence from various studies that southern Africa is vulnerable and at high risk of being severely affected by climate change due to temperature increase, and there are indications that the consequences for agriculture and food security are negative. Many of the studies are, however, part of global predictions with few studies looking at localized implications of temperature increase. The results of this study highlight the importance of including local temperature variations when designing climate change and variability adaption and mitigation strategies under the different agro-ecological conditions of southern Africa and similar environments. Future studies could focus on coupling measured/observed and downscaled time series climate data in order to achieve a more robust assessment of current and future temperature trends.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cli11040084/s1, Table S1: Minimum Temperature Results of the original and modified tests. Table S2: Maximum Temperature results of the original and modified tests.

Author Contributions

W.M. and L.C.—conceptualization, data analysis and developing the first draft. B.N., S.M., N.N., E.M., A.N., M.M., I.N. and F.L. edited the full draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates foundation grant: INV-005431.

Data Availability Statement

Data are only available upon request to authors. Code available upon request to authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contribution of meteorological stations from Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe for generating temperature data that was used for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haile, M. Weather patterns, food security and humanitarian response in sub-Saharan Africa. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 2169–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Masunungure, C.; Shackleton, S.E. Exploring long-term livelihood and landscape change in two semi-arid sites in Southern Africa: Drivers and consequences for social–ecological vulnerability. Land 2018, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Osbahr, H.; Twyman, C.; Adger, W.N.; Thomas, D. Evaluating Successful Livelihood Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change in Southern Africa. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niang, I.; Ruppel, O.C.; Abdrabo, M.A.; Essel, A.; Lennard, C.; Padgham, J.; Urquhart, P. Africa. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Contributions of the Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Barros, V.R., Field, C.B., Dokken, D.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1199–1266. [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins, J.M. Temperature variability over Africa. J. Clim. 2011, 24, 3649–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kruger, A.C.; Shongwe, S. Temperature trends in South Africa: 1960-2003. Int. J. Clim. 2004, 24, 1929–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sibanda, S.; Grab, S.W.; Ahmed, F. Spatio-temporal temperature trends and extreme hydro-climatic events in southern Zimbabwe. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 2017, 100, 210–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tshiala, F.M.; Olwoch, J.M.; Engelbrecht, F.A. Analysis of temperature trends over Limpopo Province, South Africa. J. Geogr. Geol. 2011, 3, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hansen, J.; Ruedy, R.; Sato, M.; Lo, K. Global Surface Temperature Change. Rev. Geophys. 2021, 48, RG4004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. IPCC. Working Group 1, Sixth Assessment Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  11. Kruger, A.C.; Sekele, S.S. Trends in extreme temperature indices in South Africa: 1962–2009. Int. J. Clim. 2013, 33, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daron, J. Regional climate messages for Southern Africa, Scientific report from the CARIAA Adaptation at Scale in Semi-Arid Regions (ASSAR) Project. 2014. Available online: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  13. Davis-Reddy, C.L.; Vincent, K. Climate Risk and Vulnerability: A Handbook for Southern Africa, 2nd ed.; CSIR: Pretoria, South Africa, 2017; 44p, Available online: http://opus.sanbi.org (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  14. Zaidi, P.H.; Zaman-Allah, M.; Trachsel, S.; Seetharam, K.; Cairns, J.E.; Vinayan, M.T. Phenotyping for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in MaizeF. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hatfield, J.L.; Boote, K.J.; Kimball, B.A.; Ziska, L.H.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Ort, D.; Thomson, A.M.; Wolfe, D. Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hatfield, J.L.; Walthall, C.L. Meeting global food needs: Realizing the potential via genetics × Environment × management interactions. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mishra, V.; Cherkauer, K.A. Retrospective droughts in the crop growing season: Implications to corn and soybean yield in the Midwestern United States. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 1030–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schoper, J.B.; Lambert, R.J.; Vasilas, B.L. Pollen viability, pollen shedding, and combining ability for tassel heat tolerance in maize. Crop. Sci. 1987, 27, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gross, Y.; Kigel, J. Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crop. Res. 1994, 36, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siambi, M. An Assessment of Diagnostic Tools for Improved Soil and Crop Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 1997; 141p. Available online: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/fa476fdc-354e-480f-9f0e-94c5eb08c9ed/content (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  22. Araujo, J.A.; Abiodun, B.J.; Crespo, O. Impacts of drought on grape yields in Western Cape, South Africa. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2016, 123, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Blight, G. Measuring evaporation from soil surfaces for environmental and geotechnical purposes. Water SA 2002, 28, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sylvain, Z.A.; Wall, D.H. Linking soil biodiversity and vegetation: Implications for a changing planet. Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murungu, F.S.; Chiduza, C.; Muchaonyerwa, P.; Mnkeni, P.N.S. Decomposition, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization from winter-grown cover crop residues and suitability for a smallholder farming system in South Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2011, 89, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adetunji, A.T.; Ncube, B.; Mulidzi, R.; Lewu, F.B. Management impact and benefit of cover crops on soil quality: A review. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 204, 104717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Irshad, M.; Inoue, M.; Ashraf, M.; Al-Busaidi, A. The management options of water for the development of agriculture in dry areas. J. Appl. Sci. 2007, 7, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Craig, I.P. Loss of Storage Water Due to Evaporation—A Literature Review; NCEA Publication: Queensland, Australia, 2005; 75p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Maestre-Valero, J.F.; Martínez-Granados, D.; Martínez-Alvarez, V.; Calatrava, J. Socio-Economic Impact of Evaporation Losses from Reservoirs Under Past, Current and Future Water Availability Scenarios in the Semi-Arid Segura Basin. Water Resour. Manag. 2013, 27, 1411–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lafitte, H.R. Identifying Production Problems in Tropical Maize: A Field Guide; Cimmyt: Mexico City, Mexico, 1994; Available online: https://repository.cimmyt.org/handle/10883/726 (accessed on 20 June 2021).
  31. Knowles, N.; Dettinger, M.D.; Cayan, D.R. Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the Western United States. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 4545–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Maure, G.A.; Pinto, I.; Ndebele-Murisa, M.R.; Muthige, M.; Lennard, C.; Nikulin, G.; Dosio, A.; Meque, A.O. The southern African climate under 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming as simulated by CORDEX regional climate models. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 065002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shah, F.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L.; Shah, T.; Chen, C.; Wang, K. Impact of high-temperature stress on rice plant and its traits related to tolerance. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Luedeling, E.; Zhang, M.; Girvetz, E.H. Climatic changes lead to declining winter chill for fruit and nut trees in California during 1950–2099. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fadón, E.; Fernandez, E.; Behn, H.; Luedeling, E. A conceptual framework for winter dormancy in deciduous trees. Agronomy 2020, 10, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tripathi, A.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.; Kumar, N.; Singh, G. Paradigms of climate change impacts on some major food sources of the world: A review on current knowledge and future prospects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 216, 356–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Paper, I. Climate Change and Wetlands: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation. Environ. Manage. 2002, 16, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shikuku, K.M.; Valdivia, R.O.; Paul, B.K.; Mwongera, C.; Winowiecki, L.; Läderach, P.; Herrero, M.; Silvestri, S. Prioritizing climate-smart livestock technologies in rural Tanzania: A minimum data approach. Agric. Syst. 2017, 151, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mupangwa, W.; Thierfelder, C. Intensification of conservation agriculture systems for increased livestock feed and maize production in Zimbabwe. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2013, 12, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prasanna Huesing, E.J.; Eddy, R. Fall Armyworm in Africa: A Guide for Integrated Pest Management, 1st ed.; CIMMYT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2018; Available online: https://repository.cimmyt.org/handle/10883/19204 (accessed on 13 April 2021).
  41. O’Hara, J.E.; UsUpensky, I.; Bostanian, N.J.; Capinera, J.L.; Chapman, R.; Barfield, C.S.; Swisher, M.E.; Heppner, J.; Fitzgerald, T.D.; Scheffrahn, R.H.; et al. Tick Paralysis. In Encyclopedia of Entomology; Capinera, J.L., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 3773–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baoua, I.B.; Bakoye, O.; Amadou, L.; Murdock, L.L.; Baributsa, D. Performance of PICS bags under extreme conditions in the sahel zone of Niger. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2018, 76, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Odjo, S.; Burgueño, J.; Rivers, A.; Verhulst, N. Hermetic storage technologies reduce maize pest damage in smallholder farming systems in Mexico. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 88, 101664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mamombe, V.; Kim, W.; Choi, Y.-S. Rainfall variability over Zimbabwe and its relation to large-scale atmosphere-ocean processes. Int. J. Clim. 2017, 37, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mkuhlani, S.; Mupangwa, W.; Nyagumbo, I. Maize yields in varying rainfall regimes and cropping systems across Southern Africa: A modelling assessment. In University Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation; Leal Filho, W., Leal-Arcas, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 203–228. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicholson, S.E.; Klotter, D.; Chavula, G. A detailed rainfall climatology for Malawi, Southern Africa. Int. J. Clim. 2014, 34, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vincent, K.; Dougill, A.J.; Mkwambisi, D.D.; Cull, T.; Stringer, L.C. Analysis of Existing Weather and Climate Information for Malawi; University of Leeds: Leeds, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Talacuece, M.A.D.; Justino, F.B.; Rodrigues, R.D.; Flores, M.E.P.; Nascimento, J.G.; Santos, E.A. Modeling of Soybean under Present and Future Climates in Mozambique. Climate 2016, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Uamusse, M.M.; Tussupova, K.; Persson, K.M. Climate change effects on hydropower in Mozambique. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kruger, A.; Nxumalo, M. Historical rainfall trends in South Africa: 1921–2015. Water SA 2017, 43, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nyagumbo, I.; Mkuhlani, S.; Mupangwa, W.; Rodriguez, D. Planting date and yield benefits from conservation agriculture practices across Southern Africa. Agric. Syst. 2017, 150, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.L.; Chen, H.; Wu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Pu, Q. New Techniques for the Detection and Adjustment of Shifts in Daily Precipitation Data Series. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim. 2010, 49, 2416–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ayadi, S.; Ghorbel, S.Z. Relevance of the Mann Whitney Wilcoxon test in the survival analysis of newly established companies in Tunisia (Case of the sfax region). J. Glob. Entrep. Res. 2018, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pohlert, T. Trend: Non-Parametric Trend Tests and Change-Point Detection, R Package Version 0.0.1. 2015. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274014742_trend_Non-Parametric_Trend_Tests_and_Change-Point_Detection_R_package_version_001 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  55. Klutse, N.A.B.; Sylla, M.B.; Diallo, I.; Sarr, A.; Dosio, A.; Diedhiou, A.; Kamga, A.; Lamptey, B.; Ali, A.; Gbobaniyi, E.O.; et al. Daily characteristics of West African monsoon rainfall in CORDEX regional climate models. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2016, 123, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Daron, J.; Burgin, L.; Janes, T.; Jones, R.G.; Jack, C.; Jack, C. Climate process chains: Examples from southern Africa. Int. J. Clim. 2019, 39, 4784–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Davy, R.; Esau, I. Differences in the efficacy of climate forcings explained by variations in atmospheric boundary layer depth. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Anderegg, W.R.L.; Hicke, J.A.; Fisher, R.A.; Allen, C.D.; Aukema, J.; Bentz, B.; Hood, S.; Lichstein, J.W.; Macalady, A.K.; McDowell, N.; et al. Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Abera, W.; Tamene, L.; Tibebe, D.; Adimassu, Z.; Kassa, H.; Hailu, H.; Mekonnen, K.; Desta, G.; Sommer, R.; Verchot, L. Characterizing and evaluating the impacts of national land restoration initiatives on ecosystem services in Ethiopia. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hughes, W.S.; Balling, R.C. Urban influences on south african temperature trends. Int. J. Clim. 1996, 16, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Engelbrecht, F.; Adegoke, J.; Bopape, M.-J.; Naidoo, M.; Garland, R.; Thatcher, M.; McGregor, J.; Katzfey, J.; Werner, M.; Ichoku, C.; et al. Projections of rapidly rising surface temperatures over Africa under low mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 085004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jury, M.R. Climate trends across South Africa since 1980. Water SA 2018, 44, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jury, M.R. Ethiopian Highlands Crop-Climate Prediction: 1979–2009. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim. 2013, 52, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Klopper, E.; Landman, W.A.; Van Heerden, J. The predictability of seasonal maximum temperature in South Africa. Int. J. Clim. 1998, 18, 741–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Van der Walt, A.J.; Fitchett, J.M. Exploring extreme warm temperature trends in South Africa: 1960–2016. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2021, 143, 1341–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bigg, G.R.; Jickells, T.D.; Liss, P.S.; Osborn, T. The role of the oceans in climate. Int. J. Clim. 2003, 23, 1127–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hulme, M.; Doherty, R.; Ngara, T.; New, M.; Lister, D. African climate change: 1900–2100. Clim. Res. 2001, 17, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Jacob, D.; Taylor, M.; Bindi, M.; Brown, S.; Camilloni, I.; Diedhiou, A.; Djalante, R.; Ebi, K.; Engelbrecht, F.; et al. Chapter 3: Impacts of 1.5 °C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. In Global Warming of 1.5 °C—An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Preindustrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways; IPCC Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 175–311. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch›site (accessed on 20 October 2022).
  69. Vervoort, J.M.; Thornton, P.K.; Kristjanson, P.; Förch, W.; Ericksen, P.J.; Kok, K.; Ingram, J.S.; Herrero, M.; Palazzo, A.; Helfgott, A.E.; et al. Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rust, J.M.; Rust, T. Climate change and livestock production: A review with emphasis on Africa. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 43, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Phillips, L. Beat the Heat! How to Care for Livestock in Extreme Weather. 2020. Available online: https://www.farmersweekly.co.za (accessed on 30 October 2021).
  72. Herrero, M.; Addison, J.; Bedelian, C.; Carabine, E.; Havlik, P.; Henderson, B.; Van De Steeg, S.J.; Thornton, P. Climate change and pastoralism: Impacts, consequences and adaptation. Rev. Sci. Tech. L’oie 2016, 35, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Somero, G.N.; Beers, J.M.; Chan, F.; Hill, T.M.; Klinger, T.; Litvin, S.Y. What Changes in the Carbonate System, Oxygen, and Temperature Portend for the Northeastern Pacific Ocean: A Physiological Perspective. Bioscience 2016, 66, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Dallas, H. The Effect of Water Temperature on Aquatic Organisms: A Review of Knowledge and Methods for Assessing Biotic Responses to Temperature. Report to the Water Research Commission. WRC Report No. KV 213/09. 2009, p. 120. Available online: https://www.wrc.org.za (accessed on 20 October 2022).
  75. Zhang, P.; Grutters, B.M.C.; Van Leeuwen, C.; Xu, J.; Petruzzella, A.; Berg, R.V.D.; Bakker, E. Effects of Rising Temperature on the Growth, Stoichiometry, and Palatability of Aquatic Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Biello, D. How Will Warmer Oceans Affect Sea Life? Scientific American, 25 August 2009. Available online: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-will-warmer-oceans-affect-sea-life/ (accessed on 13 November 2022).
  77. Mupangwa, W.; Makanza, R.; Chipindu, L.; Moeletsi, M.; Mkuhlani, S.; Liben, F.; Nyagumbo, I.; Mutenje, M. Temporal rainfall trend analysis in different agro-ecological regions of southern Africa. Water SA 2021, 47, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Conway, D.; van Garderen, E.A.; Deryng, D.; Dorling, S.; Krueger, T.; Landman, W.; Lankford, B.; Lebek, K.; Osborn, T.; Ringler, C.; et al. Climate and southern Africa’s water–energy–food nexus. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Nhemachena, C.; Nhamo, L.; Matchaya, G.; Nhemachena, C.R.; Muchara, B.; Karuaihe, S.T.; Mpandeli, S. Climate Change Impacts on Water and Agriculture Sectors in Southern Africa: Threats and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Water 2020, 12, 2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kusangaya, S.; Warburton, M.L.; van Garderen, E.A.; Jewitt, G.P.W. Impacts of climate change on water resources in southern Africa: A review. Phys. Chem. Earth 2014, 67–69, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Twomlow, S.J.; Steyn, J.T.; Du Preez, C.C.; Peterson, G.A.; Unger, P.W.; Payne, W.A. Dryland Farming in Southern Africa. In Dry Land Agriculture; American Society of Agronomy; Crop Science Society of America; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2006; pp. 93–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maps of part of southern Africa showing average minimum and maximum temperatures of the meteorological stations used in the study.
Figure 1. Maps of part of southern Africa showing average minimum and maximum temperatures of the meteorological stations used in the study.
Climate 11 00084 g001
Figure 2. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at five locations in Malawi over varying periods between 1947 and 2019.
Figure 2. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at five locations in Malawi over varying periods between 1947 and 2019.
Climate 11 00084 g002
Figure 3. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at five locations in Mozambique over varying periods between 1951 and 2014.
Figure 3. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at five locations in Mozambique over varying periods between 1951 and 2014.
Climate 11 00084 g003
Figure 4. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at nine locations in South Africa over varying periods between 1960 and 2016.
Figure 4. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at nine locations in South Africa over varying periods between 1960 and 2016.
Climate 11 00084 g004
Figure 5. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at four locations in Zimbabwe over varying periods between 1951 and 2001.
Figure 5. Minimum and maximum temperature trends at four locations in Zimbabwe over varying periods between 1951 and 2001.
Climate 11 00084 g005
Figure 6. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Malawi.
Figure 6. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Malawi.
Climate 11 00084 g006
Figure 7. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Mozambique.
Figure 7. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Mozambique.
Climate 11 00084 g007
Figure 8. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals at the meteorological stations in South Africa.
Figure 8. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals at the meteorological stations in South Africa.
Climate 11 00084 g008
Figure 9. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Zimbabwe.
Figure 9. Temperature changes at 5-year intervals in the districts where meteorological stations are located in Zimbabwe.
Climate 11 00084 g009
Table 1. Location-related information of the meteorological stations and time period of the temperature data sets used in the study in the four southern African countries.
Table 1. Location-related information of the meteorological stations and time period of the temperature data sets used in the study in the four southern African countries.
CountryLocationDistrictLatitude
(o)
Longitude
(o)
Altitude (m)Agro-EcologyPeriodYears
MalawiChitalaSalima−13.6834.25606Semi-arid1947–199952
ChitedzeLilongwe−13.9833.641100Dry sub-humid1980–201333
DedzaDedza−14.3234.251632Dry sub-humid1958–199941
GolomotiDedza−14.4434.60578Dry sub-humid1985–201934
KandeuNtcheu−14.4434.59916Dry sub-humid1979–201940
MozambiqueChimoioChimoio−19.2533.43693Sub-humid1951–201564
PembaPemba−12.5940.5270Coastal, dry sub-humid1951–200554
QuelimaneQuelimane−17.8636.875Coastal, dry sub-humid1951–200857
RotandaSussundenga−19.5032.921020Moist sub-humid1991–201322
SussundengaSussundenga−19.3333.24550Sub-humid1969–200536
South AfricaBethlehemThabo Mofutsanyane−28.1628.291631Humid Sub-tropical 1940–201979
KimberleyFrances Baard−28.7724.761198Semi-arid 1980–201838
LevubuVhembe−23.0830.28706Humid Sub-tropical 1980–200424
NelspruitEhlanzeni−25.4530.96660Humid Sub-tropical 1980–201838
PietermaritzburguMgungundlovu−29.6730.40775Humid Sub-tropical 1980–201838
PolokwaneCapricorn−23.8230.17749Semi-arid 1980–201838
StellenboschCape Winelands−33.9318.85116Humid Sub-tropical 1980–201838
UpingtonZF Mgcawu−28.4021.27836Arid 1980–201838
VryburgDr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati−26.4720.62879Semi-arid 1980–201838
ZimbabweHarareHarare−17.7231.021475Sub-humid1961–200140
MaronderaMarondera−18.9331.541658Sub-humid1951–200049
MasvingoMasvingo−19.8330.771064Dry sub-humid1951–200150
West NicholsonGwanda−21.0629.36864Semi-arid1961–200140
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for maximum temperatures measured at each of the meteorological stations in the four countries.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for maximum temperatures measured at each of the meteorological stations in the four countries.
LocationNMeanSDMinMaxRangeSkewnessKurtosis
Chitala19,15031.012.9622.043.021.00.440.29
Chitedze12,22827.153.0015.741.425.70.320.79
Dedza15,11322.992.7811.930.318.4−0.400.07
Golomoti12,56927.653.1618.438.119.70.46−0.27
Kandeu14,76127.583.2015.538.122.50.35−0.23
Chimoio23,49526.814.022.140.638.5−0.482.08
Pemba20,08929.771.6918.737.518.8−0.14−0.02
Quelimane21,18530.23.0619.743.924.20.160.00
Rotanda818727.453.952.842.139.30.030.57
Sussundenga13,14927.723.5914.241.026.8−0.030.02
Bethlehem14,24522.565.12−0.136.336.4−0.31−0.29
Kimberley14,24526.856.266.743.136.4−0.29−0.58
Levubu888726.364.488.441.933.5−0.150.09
Nelspruit14,24527.34.579.542.633.1−0.14−0.21
Pietermaritzburg14,24524.345.317.041.934.90.02−0.24
Polokwane14,24527.164.8511.343.332.0−0.09−0.32
Stellenbosch14,24523.745.839.543.133.60.18−0.67
Upington14,24529.236.657.545.237.7−0.35−0.59
Vryburg14,24530.536.556.847.841.0−0.37−0.48
Harare14,33425.243.332.635.432.8−0.330.18
Marondera17,96025.63.559.439.129.7−0.170.28
Masvingo18,44726.334.639.239.129.9−0.31−0.16
West Nicholson14,42928.635.23.442.439.0−0.26−0.28
Table 3. Descriptive statistics for minimum temperatures measured at each of the meteorological stations in the four different countries.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics for minimum temperatures measured at each of the meteorological stations in the four different countries.
LocationNMeanSDMinMaxRangeSkewnessKurtosis
Chitala19,15015.033.824.029.025.00.37−0.19
Chitedze12,22814.563.730.928.727.8−0.45−0.88
Dedza15,11313.332.970.922.121.2−0.64−0.19
Golomoti12,56918.063.397.9726.718.7−0.38−0.95
Kandeu14,76117.343.802.8926.723.8−0.47−0.44
Chimoio23,49516.243.422.125.923.8−0.36−0.69
Pemba20,08921.62.341228.716.7−0.49−0.43
Quelimane21,18520.153.468.329.621.3−0.4−0.86
Rotanda818715.353.692.324.822.5−0.44−0.61
Sussundenga13,14915.54.171.525.023.5−0.48−0.62
Bethlehem14,2456.816.33−1320.233.2−0.37−1.03
Kimberley14,2459.876.63−7.926.434.3−0.27−0.99
Levubu888715.323.710.025.825.8−0.28−0.41
Nelspruit14,24513.715.07−10.824.935.7−0.43−0.86
Pietermaritzburg14,24513.063.93−2.625.428.0−0.27−0.49
Polokwane14,24514.464.380.623.923.3−0.36−0.76
Stellenbosch14,24511.363.871.023.622.60.02−0.50
Upington14,24511.487.03−6.529.636.1−0.17−0.94
Vryburg14,24511.777.65−9.030.739.7−0.25−1.02
Harare14,33611.724.42−2.121.423.5−0.5−0.85
Marondera17,96012.224.23−4.623.728.3−0.47−0.75
Masvingo18,44712.45.12−4.623.728.3−0.47−0.82
West Nicholson14,42913.235.8−2.926.329.2−0.43−0.89
Table 4. Sen slope of minimum and maximum temperature trends at meteorological stations in each country.
Table 4. Sen slope of minimum and maximum temperature trends at meteorological stations in each country.
CountryLocationMinimumMaximumPeriod
Sen’s Slopep-ValueSen’s Slopep-Value
MalawiChitala0.070.550.000.501947–1999
Chitedze0.830.00 ***0.020.081980–2013
Dedza−0.200.01 ***0.000.881958–1999
Golomoti0.550.00 ***0.030.01 ***1985–2019
Kandeu0.660.00 ***0.010.121979–2019
MozambiqueChimoio0.020.00 ***0.010.111951–2015
Pemba−0.010.71−0.010.161951–2005
Quelimane0.000.480.010.03 ***1951–2008
Rotanda0.000.430.000.931991–2013
Sussundenga0.010.00 ***0.000.511969–2005
South AfricaBethlehem0.020.00 ***0.040.04 ***1940–2019
Kimberley−0.030.00 ***0.040.00 ***1980–2018
Levubu0.000.640.000.111980–2004
Nelspruit0.010.02 ***0.040.00 ***1980–2018
Pietermaritzburg0.000.840.040.00 ***1980–2018
Polokwane0.020.00 ***0.090.03 ***1980–2018
Stellenbosch0.030.070.070.00 ***1980–2018
Upington−0.080.01 ***0.060.00 ***1980–2018
Vryburg0.020.130.080.00 ***1980–2018
ZimbabweHarare0.000.740.000.861961–2001
Marondera0.010.340.020.03 ***1951–2000
Masvingo0.000.760.010.02 ***1951–2001
West Nicholson0.020.03 ***0.030.00 ***1961–2001
*** = significant at <0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mupangwa, W.; Chipindu, L.; Ncube, B.; Mkuhlani, S.; Nhantumbo, N.; Masvaya, E.; Ngwira, A.; Moeletsi, M.; Nyagumbo, I.; Liben, F. Temporal Changes in Minimum and Maximum Temperatures at Selected Locations of Southern Africa. Climate 2023, 11, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040084

AMA Style

Mupangwa W, Chipindu L, Ncube B, Mkuhlani S, Nhantumbo N, Masvaya E, Ngwira A, Moeletsi M, Nyagumbo I, Liben F. Temporal Changes in Minimum and Maximum Temperatures at Selected Locations of Southern Africa. Climate. 2023; 11(4):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mupangwa, Walter, Lovemore Chipindu, Bongani Ncube, Siyabusa Mkuhlani, Nascimento Nhantumbo, Esther Masvaya, Amos Ngwira, Mokhele Moeletsi, Isaiah Nyagumbo, and Feyera Liben. 2023. "Temporal Changes in Minimum and Maximum Temperatures at Selected Locations of Southern Africa" Climate 11, no. 4: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040084

APA Style

Mupangwa, W., Chipindu, L., Ncube, B., Mkuhlani, S., Nhantumbo, N., Masvaya, E., Ngwira, A., Moeletsi, M., Nyagumbo, I., & Liben, F. (2023). Temporal Changes in Minimum and Maximum Temperatures at Selected Locations of Southern Africa. Climate, 11(4), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11040084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop