1. Introduction
The quantitative and qualitative state of water resources of a watershed are formed by a variety of drivers that interact in a complex and often indirect way [
1]. Climate elements (precipitation; relative humidity; wind speed and direction; solar radiation and temperature that also controls evaporation/evapotranspiration and snow melt and their temporal and spatial distribution) and the biogeophysical characteristics of a catchment (topography, land—vegetation cover, geological structure, soil coverage) are fundamental determinants of regional hydrology [
2,
3]. The conceptual model describing the interactions among the abovementioned drivers is the hydrological cycle that links the exchange, storage and movement of water among the biosphere, atmosphere, cryosphere, lithosphere, anthroposphere, and hydrosphere [
4], while the quantification of the relationships among the components of the hydrological cycle at a given location constitutes the water balance [
5].
All characteristics of the catchment (climate elements and biogeophysical characteristics) are factors that can be largely affected by anthropogenic activities and pressures [
3]. Humanly imposed climate change due to increased emissions of greenhouse gases and dust from anthropogenically-disturbed soils [
6], is expected to significantly increase freshwater-related risks such as modification of the hydrological regime, floods and droughts, and to affect water cycle components [
7,
8]. Climate change is projected to reduce renewable surface water and groundwater resources significantly in most dry subtropical regions and is likely to increase the frequency of meteorological droughts (less rainfall) and agricultural droughts (less soil moisture) in presently dry regions. Additionally, projections imply variations in the frequency of floods and negative impacts on freshwater ecosystems by changing streamflow and water quality [
4,
7]. Regarding anthropogenic interventions in catchment’s physical characteristics (for example alteration of the land surface soil moisture, albedo and roughness [
9]), land cover changes due to livestock grazing, agriculture, timber harvest, deforestation, and urbanization can reduce retention of water in watersheds and lead to an increase of the size and frequency of floods and to the reduction of baseflow levels [
10]. Dam constructions and diversion, canalization, snagging and dredging of rivers, streams and drainage ditches, and groundwater overexploitation, disrupt the dynamic equilibrium between the movement of water and sediment that exists in rivers [
10]. Based on recent studies, direct human impacts on the terrestrial water cycle are in some large river basins of the same order of magnitude, or even larger than climate change [
11,
12]. Especially land cover change alters annual global runoff to a similar or greater extent than other major drivers [
13], while land use change contribution in regional runoff values in tropical regions is larger than that of climate change [
14], especially in the case of smaller catchments [
15].
Worldwide studies support the impacts of land cover changes, mainly deforestation and urbanization, on the hydrometeorological factors, leading primary to river discharge increase [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23] and generally to an increase of eco-environmental vulnerability of the watersheds [
24,
25]. In Greece, studies confirm the impact of land cover change and deforestation in river discharge. For example, a study conducted in Pinios river basin proved that expanding the agricultural land over forest by 20%, a mean monthly increase in the river discharge of up to 3%, can be observed from October to April and a respective reduction from May to September, reaching a maximum of 6% in July [
26]. Moreover, human interference in streams crossing urban or suburban areas raise the vulnerability to flash floods. For example, the hydrometeorological analysis of a fatal flash flood event which occurred on 15 November 2017 in the suburban area of Mandra, western Attica, Greece resulting in extensive damages and 24 fatalities, showcased heavy storm-induced run-off water in combination with human pressures on streams as the reason for the flood [
27].
Regarding the impact of land cover change to evapotranspiration, it has been reported that mean annual evapotranspiration can be up to 39% lower in agricultural ecosystems than in natural ecosystems in Brazil [
20]. A recent study concerning the whole of China showed that the average annual land surface evapotranspiration decreased at a rate of −0.6 mm/yr from 2001 to 2013, attributed partly to land use and land cover changes of forests to other land types [
28]. In Greece, a study in a small catchment showed that 16% increase of agricultural land against wetland and forest area led to a 6% increase of evapotranspiration and 10% increase of the water deficit in the soil [
29].
Given the uncertainty of future land cover changes due to socio-economic driving forces and local development policies applied, a scenario-based modeling framework can be beneficial in supporting the analysis of potential land cover changes, so as to mitigate potentially negative future impacts on a basin’s water resources. In order to investigate the effect of anthropogenic land cover changes to the hydrological cycle components and the main hydrometeorological factors of a regional agricultural watershed in Central Greece (Spercheios river basin) of great ecological value, three (3) land cover case studies were adopted, based on the land cover distribution documented in the following years: in 1960 (hereafter LC1960; baseline), in 1990 (hereafter LC1990; mid-period), and in 2018 (hereafter LC2018; current state). The modeling tool used was the physically-based hydrological model (MIKE SHE), while the high-resolution gridded observational daily meteorological dataset of Europe named E-OBS [
27] from the EU-FP6 project UERRA [
30] and the Copernicus Climate Change Service [
31] was also employed to drive the model. Since the E-OBS gridded dataset had not been used before in similar studies in Greece, the statistical evaluation of its efficiency was considered to be obligatory before performing any further analysis. Finally, statistical tests and trend analysis were performed on the simulated time series of each land cover case study examined.
The main objective of the present study was the better understanding of the system’s response and the basin’s water resources to possible future land cover changes, while the main research questions intended to be addressed are: (a) which are the interrelationships among land cover and the main hydrometeorological factors’ (precipitation, air temperature, discharge, and actual evapotranspiration) variations, (b) how land cover changes affect the trend magnitude of the main hydrometeorological factors, and (c) which are the hydrometeorological-related hazards associated with land cover changes in the study area?
4. Discussion
Anthropogenic land cover changes and interventions on catchment’s characteristics can be leading factors affecting the hydrological cycle components and, in some cases, the impacts can be of the same order of magnitude, or even larger than those attributed to climatic variabilities [
11,
12]. In order to investigate the effects of land cover changes on the main hydrometeorological factors of a regional river basin in Central Greece, a physically-based hydrological model (MIKE SHE) and gridded observational meteorological data (Copernicus Climate Change Service E-OBS) were employed, and three land cover case studies were adopted.
Before the simulations, the reliability of the E-OBS dataset including precipitation and daily temperature (average, minimum and maximum) was evaluated by comparing against time-series of in-situ observations from meteorological stations at the basin. Based on the results, E-OBS dataset systematically underestimated precipitation in Spercheios river basin for the entire period of evaluation. This may be attributed to issues arising in the comparison of in-situ measurements with area-averaged estimates [
68], such as the identification of the most representative grid-point for each meteorological station, the insufficient density of the weather stations network in Spercheios river basin or possible uncertainties concerning the accuracy of observational measurements [
69]. Moreover, the coarse horizontal resolution of E-OBS prevented to accurately describe the influence of topography on precipitation and to adequately resolve the atmospheric mesoscale processes; 10–15 km grid spacing of meteorological variables generally improves the realism of the results but does not necessarily significantly improve the objectively scored accuracy of the forecasts [
70]. Additionally, the coarse network of Greek meteorological stations used in the E-OBS development that are not evenly distributed and do not cover higher altitude sufficiently, eventually does not allow the accurate representation of area-averaged estimates. More specifically, the spatially-averaged annual precipitation calculated at the present study for the period 1960/61–2004/05 was 542.5 mm, which is close to the mean annual precipitation of Lamia meteorological station (585.5 mm for the period 1970–2000 [
71]). In other studies, the spatially-averaged annual precipitation of Spercheios river basin was estimated to be 836 mm for the period 2008/09–2010/11 (precipitation estimated based on Thiessen polygons method [
72]) and 1,077 mm for the wet hydrological years 2013/14–2014/15 [
73] (simulated precipitation provided by Poseidon Monitoring, Forecasting and Information System [
74]) [
75], while for the period 1949/50–1989/90, the spatially-averaged annual precipitation for Spercheios river basin was estimated to be 904.6 mm [
76]. Nevertheless, the main scope of the present study was the trend analysis of the time-series of the main hydrometeorological factors and, therefore, these discrepancies were considered to be acceptable, since no other meteorological data except from the low-altitude Lamia meteorological station (Hellenic National Meteorological Service, WMO 16675) were available for the entire simulation period (1960/61–2004/05).
As far as the results of hydrological simulations are concerned, average annual actual evapotranspiration and river discharge were the main parameters of the hydrological cycle which were analyzed in this study. First, the average annual actual evapotranspiration at Spercheios river basin was −5.3% and −2.5% decrease in LC1990 and LC2018 respectively, in comparison to LC1960. These variations can be attributed to the presence of the larger areas covered by vegetation (forest and pastures) in LC1960 (70% in comparison to 66% in LC1990 and LC2018), and especially to the larger extent of areas classified as pastures that also include shrubs, transitional woodland—shrub areas or areas with dense vegetation (38% in LC1960), that led to increased actual evapotranspiration. The higher value of actual evapotranspiration in LC2018 in comparison to LC1990 can be attributed to the increased forested land (34% in LC2018 in comparison to 30% in LC1990). The simulations also presented high spatial differences in average annual actual evapotranspiration. Land cover in 1960 was characterized by a more inhomogeneous pattern than in 1990 and in 2018 due to the increased distribution patterns of areas covered by forests, agricultural land and pastures in 1960 which have different effects on evaporation and transpiration. Moreover, mean annual actual evapotranspiration was almost the same at areas covered by artificial surfaces over time, for example Lamia city, but presents variations where land cover changed. The transition from pastures to agricultural land or forest increased evapotranspiration, while the inverse transition had the opposite effects for the entire simulation period which means that land cover effects can locally outflank the impact of climatic variability.
Second, average annual river discharge to Maliakos Gulf was +11.8% and +5.9% increased in LC1990 and LC2018 respectively, in comparison to LC1960. This can partially be attributed to the contribution of the baseflow to river, that ranged from 16.7% in LC1960, through 19.2% in LC1990, to 18.1% in LC2018, following the same pattern. Additionally, the high forested land covering the area of Spercheios river watershed in the case of LC1960 (31%) combined with the lowest irrigation demands during the same period and led to the smallest river discharge. Although in 1990 the forested land slightly decreased (30%), the irrigation demand was almost double, leading to higher exploitation of underground waters, offering residual water in the rivers’ flow and leading eventually to the highest river discharge. Finally, the increase of forested areas in 2018 (34%) and the additional high irrigation demand in 2018 led to the small decrease of river discharge.
Regarding trend analysis, the effect of land cover change on the trend magnitude was evident. Concerning precipitation and river discharge, the trend change points identified were almost identical. Additionally, the trend change points of actual evapotranspiration identified coincide with those of precipitation, verifying the fact that precipitation is a major factor affecting actual evapotranspiration in dry areas, in contrast to wet areas that evapotranspiration is energy-limited (radiation and air temperature) (for example [
77,
78,
79]). On the contrary, the trend change points of actual evapotranspiration and air temperature were not the same, indicating that actual evapotranspiration is affected in a more complicated way and also by other factors except air temperature as expected, such as land cover and water availability. This was also evident during the trend magnitude analysis of each trend period, where the effect of land cover was noticeable. More specifically, in the case of LC1960, where mean annual actual evapotranspiration was the highest in comparison to the other land cover cases examined, and forested land and pastures (that also include natural grasslands, sclerophyllous vegetation, transitional woodland-shrub, moors and heathland and sparsely vegetated areas) consisted of 70% of the total watershed area, the trend magnitude of each trend period examined was higher. Additionally, highly vegetated watersheds showed smaller tolerance to changes of hydrometeorological factors regarding actual evapotranspiration. On the contrary, the small trend magnitude of river discharge in LC1960 in comparison to LC1990 and LC2018 indicated that in the case of a highly vegetated river basin, the response of the system to changes of hydrometeorological factors regarding river discharge was milder. It is an important finding because land cover of LC1960 could play a relaxing role on the consequences of extreme weather phenomena, either droughts or floods, which will possibly increase in the future.
It should be noted that some uncertainties arise due to the fact that during the present study precipitation and air temperature were considered to be unaffected by land coverage. This is a weakness of the present methodological approach since the current version of the hydrological model MIKE SHE does not provide the option of a two-way dynamically coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling. The use of an uncoupled system can lead to overprediction of the change in evapotranspiration caused by land cover use changes in comparison to the use of a coupled model results [
80].
5. Conclusions
In this study, the physically-based hydrological model MIKE SHE and Copernicus Climate Change Service E-OBS gridded meteorological dataset were used to analyze the effects of anthropogenic land cover changes to the hydrological cycle components of the regional watershed of Spercheios river in central Greece. Three case studies based on the land cover of the years 1960, 1990, and 2018 were investigated.
The analysis of simulation results showed that phenomena like deforestation reduced mean annual actual evapotranspiration while increasing mean annual river discharge. The increase of irrigated agricultural land and irrigation demand also increased discharge as revealed by the results of the case study based on the latest land cover of 2018. Even though irrigation often reduces overland water resources, the exploitation of underground waters can increase river discharge.
Moreover, the climatic variabilities primarily in precipitation and secondarily in temperature influenced annual actual evapotranspiration and annual river discharge. Nevertheless, the response of various watershed areas on land cover changes was shown to be more significant, hiding the effects of climatic variabilities. Land cover changed among the case studies, and thus, locally exceeded the impact of climatic variabilities as indicated by the reduced interannual variabilities of differences in annual actual evapotranspiration. The inhomogeneity of land cover as well as the reduction of vegetated areas were highlighted as the main reasons for this effect.
Remarkably, an in-depth trend analysis unveiled the effect of land cover on increasing the vulnerability on extreme climatic variabilities causing intense hydrometeorological events, either droughts or floods. This means that the resilience of the watershed to extreme weather and climatic phenomena was higher in cases of increased vegetated area, since the response of river discharge in changes of hydrometeorological factors and precipitation was milder in cases of land cover dominated by forested land. This finding highlights the fact that the natural systems under stress mainly due to land cover changes and anthropogenic interventions are likely to have more rapid and acute reactions to climatic variabilities.
Understating the complex interactions among multiple stressors—land degradation and hydrometeorological hazards—can contribute to the development and implementation of successful Integrated Water Resources Management plans. Given the high level of uncertainty of climate change projections and related impacts on water resources, the effects of climatic variabilities on freshwater resources cannot be quantified in a deterministic way; decision-making should be rather based on possible future freshwater hazards and risks. Under this scope, the quantitative assessment of land cover effects presented in this study can be a basis for adaptation and mitigation to climate change and human interventions.