Next Article in Journal
A Non-Contact AI-Based Approach to Multi-Failure Detection in Avionic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Human Behavior in Space Exploration Missions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physical Modeling and Simulation of Reusable Rockets for GNC Verification and Validation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Guidance, Navigation, and Control for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond

German Aerospace Center, Robert Hooke Str. 7, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Aerospace 2024, 11(10), 863; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11100863
Submission received: 18 October 2024 / Accepted: 18 October 2024 / Published: 21 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GNC for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond)

1. Introduction

The interdisciplinary field known as Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) has been one of the key contributors to the tremendous advancements in space exploration since the inception of the Mercury and Apollo programs. These advancements have revolutionized science, communications, and, ultimately, the lives of billions of people. With the increasing complexity and frequency of missions—at the time of writing, only a few hours have passed since SpaceX successfully captured its Starship’s Super Heavy reusable booster using the Mechazilla’s chopsticks system) [1]—the pursuit of more efficient, sustainable solutions, and even more ambitious programs, continues to shape the future of space exploration.
As we look ahead, innovative GNC solutions will play a critical role in shaping the course for the next phase of space exploration and exploitation; see, for instance, recent examples of proposed solutions for reusable systems [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], for the study of maneuvering in cis-lunar space [9,10], as well as for deep-space missions [11,12]. Efforts are also ongoing in the improvement of advanced simulation environments [13,14] as well as in the use of state-of-the-art machine-learning-based solutions [15,16,17]. In the same spirit, this editorial highlights contributions in Guidance, Control, and Navigation across various mission types, including those to the Moon, Mars, and even deep space. One particular contribution focuses on reusable rocket applications, with the implicit assumption that the knowledge gained in this area can be applied to other celestial bodies as well.
In the following section, a more detailed description of the individual contributions to this Special Issue is provided, followed by a comprehensive list of the papers included in this Issue. Finally, the editorial concludes with some brief remarks.

2. An Overview of the Contributions to This Special Issue

Stefano Farì et al. [18] delved into the complexity of GNC validation and verification techniques, based on the use of a dedicated multi-body Modelica-based library. They focused on the application of these advanced multi-body techniques to the validation of the behavior of GNC systems for reusable systems and, more precisely, in the context of the CALLISTO rocket demonstrator [19]. Using numerical results, they demonstrated how to apply the techniques to complex subsystems such as Thrust-Vector Control and Leg unfolding mechanisms.
D’Ambrosio’s and Furfaro’s [20] work focuses on the use of a particular class of Physics-Informed Neural Networks, that is, Pontryagin Neural Networks (or PONNs) in Spacecraft Guidance. Specifically, the contribution shows the capability of the proposed machine learning technique not only to provide feasible solutions to two challenging problems, namely, an Earth–Mars transfer problem and a Mars Landing scenario, but to learn the optimal policy, by leveraging the Extreme Theory of Functional Connections [21].
Ref. [22], by Critchley-Marrows et al., explores the interoperability of Earth-independent navigation architectures for Moon missions, to enhance reliability and develop safer and more resilient missions. In particular, authors focus their attention on the use of elliptical frozen orbits around the Moon, with performance in terms of position accuracy that can reach the order of 100 m in the cases assessed in the study.
The work by Sabatini and Palmerini [23] investigates the problem of concurrently estimating both the absolute position expressed in a lunar inertial reference frame and the relative position between two systems, for instance, an orbiter and a lander, or two spacecraft in formation, by using a single-stage Kalman filter, and performed an assessment of such a solution with respect to more traditional cascaded Kalman filter implementations.
Machine learning is once more leveraged in [24] by Bacu et al. to classify asteroids by using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, in the context of space awareness activities, which, to date, do not yet fully exploit the benefits of artificial intelligence-based solutions. The work relies on state-of-the-art image classifiers and exploits the capability of learning transfer among networks.
In [25], by Li et al., a trajectory planning strategy for rovers is developed. The solution treats non-convex obstacles by decomposing them in convex substructures to come up with a safe convex corridor construction method. A corresponding nonlinear programming problem formulation then computes the corresponding solutions, which are compared with more traditional approaches.
Malgarini et al. [26] propose to exploit pulsar signals to obtain navigation solutions for deep-space missions performed by CubeSats. The techniques to detect, process, and exploit the corresponding pulsar signals onboard are simulated, showing the feasibility of the idea for deep-space autonomous navigation in the context of miniaturized systems with limited computational capabilities.
Finally, Ref. [27], by Santoro et al., studies the problem of inserting a spacecraft into a repeating-ground-track highly elliptical Martian orbit. This is done at the end of the interplanetary transfer by using low-thrust nonlinear feedback control, with the stability of the approach proven by leveraging Lyapounov stability theory. The strategy proves efficient and, since no reference trajectory information must be provided a priori, also shows a high degree of autonomy.

3. Concluding Remarks

The contributions to this Special Issue of Aerospace address various aspects and challenges in developing GNC solutions for missions to the Moon, Mars, and deep space. These studies present potential pathways for transforming new concepts and technologies into operational capabilities, helping to shape the future of space exploration. Many of the insights offered by these contributions suggest promising directions for further research, which will play a critical role in advancing the field in the coming decade, and we hope that readers will find the ideas, methodologies, and results presented in these contributions both helpful and inspiring, encouraging them to join the journey to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. space.com. SpaceX Catches Giant Starship Booster with ’Chopsticks’ on Historic Flight 5 Rocket Launch and Landing. Available online: https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-flight-5-launch-super-heavy-booster-catch-success-video (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  2. Gettatelli, F.; Benedikter, B.; Zavoli, A.; Pizzurro, S.; Cavallini, E. Convex Optimization of Ascent and Powered Descent of a Reusable Launch Vehicle. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, Harbor, MD, USA, 23–27 January 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guadagnini, J.; De Zaiacomo, G.; Lavagna, M. Mission Performance Assessment of the Recovery and Vertical Landing of a Reusable Launch Vehicle. Aerospace 2023, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spada, F.; Sagliano, M.; Topputo, F. Direct–Indirect Hybrid Strategy for Optimal Powered Descent and Landing. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2023, 60, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sagliano, M.; Hernández, J.A.M.; Farì, S.; Heidecker, A.; Schlotterer, M.; Woicke, S.; Seelbinder, D.; Krummen, S.; Dumont, E. Unified-Loop Structured H-Infinity Control for Aerodynamic Steering of Reusable Rockets. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 2023, 46, 815–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sagliano, M.; Lu, P.; Johnson, B.; Seelbinder, D.; Theil, S. Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Aero-Propulsive Entry Trajectory Optimization. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sagliano, M.; Heidecker, A.; Farì, S.; Jose Alfredo, M.H.; Schlotterer, M.; Woicke, S.; Seelbinder, D.; Dumont, E. Powered Atmospheric Landing Guidance for Reusable Rockets: The CALLISTO studies. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Robbiani, T.; Sagliano, M.; Topputo, F.; Seywald, H. Fast Desensitized Optimal Control for Rocket Powered Descent and Landing. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Federici, L.; Scorsoglio, A.; Zavoli, A.; Furfaro, R. Autonomous Guidance Between Quasiperiodic Orbits in Cislunar Space via Deep Reinforcement Learning. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2023, 60, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bowerfind, S.; Taheri, E. Rapid Approximation of Low-Thrust Spacecraft Reachable Sets within Complex Two-Body and Cislunar Dynamics. Aerospace 2024, 11, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hofmann, C.; Topputo, F. Rapid Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization in Deep Space Based on Convex Programming. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 2021, 44, 1379–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, S. Low-Energy Endgame Trajectory Design for Callisto Orbiter. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2024, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simplício, P.; Marcos, A.; Bennani, S. Reusable Launchers: Development of a Coupled Flight Mechanics, Guidance, and Control Benchmark. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2020, 57, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Oliveira, A.; Lavagna, M. Development of a Controlled Dynamics Simulator for Reusable Launcher Descent and Precise Landing. Aerospace 2023, 10, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schiassi, E.; D’Ambrosio, A.; Drozd, K.; Curti, F.; Furfaro, R. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit Transfers. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2022, 59, 834–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, H. Powered Landing Control of Reusable Rockets Based on Softmax Double DDPG. Aerospace 2023, 10, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Federici, L.; Furfaro, R. Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Transformer Networks for Space Guidance Applications. In Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum 2024, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farì, S.; Sagliano, M.; Macés Hernández, J.A.; Schneider, A.; Heidecker, A.; Schlotterer, M.; Woicke, S. Physical Modeling and Simulation of Reusable Rockets for GNC Verification and Validation. Aerospace 2024, 11, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guédron, S.; Ishimoto, S.; Dumont, E.; Tatiossian, P.; Chavagnac, C.; Desmariaux, J.; Monchaux, D.; Frenoy, O.; Moreno, E.C.; Deremaux, C.; et al. CALLISTO DEMONSTRATOR: Focus on system aspects. In Proceedings of the 71th International Astronautical Congress, Dubai, UAE, 25–29 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. D’Ambrosio, A.; Furfaro, R. Learning Fuel-Optimal Trajectories for Space Applications via Pontryagin Neural Networks. Aerospace 2024, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mortari, D. The Theory of Connections: Connecting Points. Mathematics 2017, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Critchley-Marrows, J.J.R.; Wu, X.; Kawabata, Y.; Nakasuka, S. Autonomous and Earth-Independent Orbit Determination for a Lunar Navigation Satellite System. Aerospace 2024, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabatini, M.; Palmerini, G.B. Filtering Strategies for Relative Navigation in Lunar Scenarios Using LCNS. Aerospace 2024, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bacu, V.; Nandra, C.; Sabou, A.; Stefanut, T.; Gorgan, D. Assessment of Asteroid Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Aerospace 2023, 10, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Y.; Liang, S.; Gao, J.; Chen, Z.; Qiao, S.; Yin, Z. Trajectory Optimization for the Nonholonomic Space Rover in Cluttered Environments Using Safe Convex Corridors. Aerospace 2023, 10, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malgarini, A.; Franzese, V.; Topputo, F. Application of Pulsar-Based Navigation for Deep-Space CubeSats. Aerospace 2023, 10, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santoro, R.; Pustorino, M.; Pontani, M. Low-Thrust Transfer to Quasi-Synchronous Martian Elliptic Orbit via Nonlinear Feedback Control. Aerospace 2023, 10, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sagliano, M. Guidance, Navigation, and Control for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond. Aerospace 2024, 11, 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11100863

AMA Style

Sagliano M. Guidance, Navigation, and Control for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond. Aerospace. 2024; 11(10):863. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11100863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sagliano, Marco. 2024. "Guidance, Navigation, and Control for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond" Aerospace 11, no. 10: 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11100863

APA Style

Sagliano, M. (2024). Guidance, Navigation, and Control for the Moon, Mars, and Beyond. Aerospace, 11(10), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11100863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop