Next Article in Journal
Task Engagement as Personalization Feedback for Socially-Assistive Robots and Cognitive Training
Next Article in Special Issue
Nematic Liquid Crystal Composite Materials for DC and RF Switching
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
In-Situ Contact Surface Characterization in a MEMS Ohmic Switch under Low Current Switching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Performance Comparison of Phase Change Materials and Metal-Insulator Transition Materials for Direct Current and Radio Frequency Switching Applications

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2018, 6(2), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020048
Submission received: 29 March 2018 / Revised: 25 April 2018 / Accepted: 1 May 2018 / Published: 4 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microswitching Technologies)

Abstract

:
Advanced understanding of the physics makes phase change materials (PCM) and metal-insulator transition (MIT) materials great candidates for direct current (DC) and radio frequency (RF) switching applications. In the literature, germanium telluride (GeTe), a PCM, and vanadium dioxide (VO2), an MIT material have been widely investigated for DC and RF switching applications due to their remarkable contrast in their OFF/ON state resistivity values. In this review, innovations in design, fabrication, and characterization associated with these PCM and MIT material-based RF switches, have been highlighted and critically reviewed from the early stage to the most recent works. We initially report on the growth of PCM and MIT materials and then discuss their DC characteristics. Afterwards, novel design approaches and notable fabrication processes; utilized to improve switching performance; are discussed and reviewed. Finally, a brief vis-á-vis comparison of resistivity, insertion loss, isolation loss, power consumption, RF power handling capability, switching speed, and reliability is provided to compare their performance to radio frequency microelectromechanical systems (RF MEMS) switches; which helps to demonstrate the current state-of-the-art, as well as insight into their potential in future applications.

1. Introduction

Wireless communication systems require complex radio frequency (RF) front end modules to enable reconfigurable and multiband operations as RF mobile technology shifts from 4G to 5G technologies. These complex RF modules require RF switching technologies with low insertion loss, high linearity, high isolation, and high reliability [1]. In current cellular telecommunication systems, solid state RF switching devices are ubiquitous and used primarily because of their high reliability and ultra-fast switching speed. However, high nonlinearity, high power consumption, and low power handling capability associated with these devices pave the way for radio frequency microelectromechanical systems (RF MEMS) switches in commercial use [2]. Cut-off frequency (FCO = 1 2 π R o n C o f f which is commonly known as the figure of merit (FOM) for RF switches) [2] for RF MEMS switches are several orders of magnitude higher than solid state devices. Metal-insulator transition (MIT) and phase change materials (PCM)-based RF switches show FOM values in the middle of these devices as shown in Figure 1, with excellent RF performance which cannot be achieved using MEMS or solid-state switches individually. Taking this into account, recently vanadium dioxide (VO2) among metal-insulator transition (MIT) materials and germanium telluride (GeTe) among PCM draw attention as potential RF switching materials due to their unique properties when transitioned from insulator to metal (amorphous to crystal for PCM) or vice versa at room temperature along with high OFF/ON resistivity ratio. RF switching devices based on these materials demonstrate low insertion loss, high cut-off frequency, fast switching speed, and promising broadband characteristics (compared to RF MEMS switches of the same size). These attributes make these devices promising candidates for future RF circuitry and also satellite applications. In addition, devices that are based on these innovative materials offer complementary metal oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatibility and simplified, low cost fabrication processes [3,4,5].
However, the power handling capability of VO2-based devices are relatively low compared to RF MEMS devices. In addition, high power consumption is also a bottleneck for VO2 devices as continuous direct current (DC) power is required during the ON state while PCM-based devices provide a latching ON state where continuous DC power is not required. Lifetime and reliability are still open questions for both types of devices before they can become a commercially viable solution. Moreover, there are many unexplored issues, as well as room for improvements in material growth processes, tuning intrinsic properties, switching mechanisms, and design optimizations when used as a high-performance RF switch.
In this work, we review the experimental studies of VO2 and GeTe-based RF switches. Initially, we describe the phase transition mechanisms and DC switching characteristic that is common to both devices. An understanding of DC switching behavior is necessary to achieve and evaluate RF performance metrics such as insertion loss, speed, and isolation. Afterwards, device architectures and fabrication methods of the reported works are briefly summarized as these have direct impact on both DC and RF characteristics. We then detail the RF characterizations of the devices demonstrated by various research groups to date. Low insertion loss (less than ~1 dB), high signal attenuation with flat wide band response are desired for an acceptable RF switch, applicable in current switching technologies.
We summarize and make a brief vis-a-vis comparison of RF performance parameters between these devices. This will facilitate further study and improve future RF switching devices and present an insight to harness the full potential of these devices for being used in commercial RF applications.

2. Review on GeTe and VO2 based RF Switches

2.1. Review on GeTe

Over the last few decades, phase change materials (PCM) have been extensively used in data storage applications due to their large resistivity contrast between crystalline and amorphous states. Phase changing property of the material was first exploited in 1968 for random access memory applications. In 1978 [6], Burroughs Corporation demonstrated the laser induced switching on Te81Ge15Sb2S2 but did not able to commercialize due to its slow crystallization and limited cyclability issues. Then in 1987 [7], Yamada et al. brought the breakthrough in optical storage technology by exploring the pseudo-binary alloys (GeTe and Sb2Te3) with short crystallization time, improved cyclability and a very high optical contrast. Figure 2 is a ternary phase diagram showing the different possible alloys and the year of discovery and commercialization of PCM in optical storage technology. Since then doped Sb2Te3 was the prime carrier of all the developments in optical storage technology (from CD to Blue ray disc).
Apart from the optical storage applications, a large contrast in resistivity values between amorphous and crystalline states along with the ability to switch reversibly and repeatedly make the PCM a potential candidate for radio-frequency (RF) switching applications. Phase change materials from GexSbyTez (GST) alloys did not draw much attention for RF switching applications because of their poor thermal stability in an amorphous state and void formation in the crystal structure. However, GeTe, one of the stoichiometric compositions of GST, is mostly investigated for RF switching applications due to its better thermal stability in amorphous state, fast reversible phase transition and high contrast in resistivity ratio. As phase transition nature of these PCM dictates the RF performance, a detailed understanding of this mechanism is critical to optimize RF performance for future telecommunication applications.

2.1.1. Phase Transition Mechanism and DC Characteristics

Most of the PCM possess two states namely amorphous and crystalline states at room temperature. The transition between these two states is accomplished through thermal actuation method which includes specific pattern of heating and cooling process [8]. An illustration on phase transition mechanism is depicted in Figure 3.
The phase transition characteristics can be explained through the amorphization and crystallization process [9,10]. In the amorphization process, the material is heated up beyond its melting temperature (TM) first and then a rapid quenching process is involved to convert it into the amorphous state. On the other hand, crystallization process is obtained through heating up the material up to its crystallization temperature (TC) followed by slow quenching process so that the nucleation and crystalline growth are enabled. The thermal actuation methods for the phase transition can be obtained through direct heating as well as through indirect heating. In direct heating, phase transition mechanism is obtained through the Joule heating approach whereas in the indirect heating, a separate layer of dielectric material is added in switching structure to transfer the heat into the PCM. Nonetheless, the thermal actuation method should be implemented with minimal impact on surrounding dielectrics and electrode materials.
In the works of [10,11,12], it has been reported and confirmed that the contrast in resistivity ratio value of a thin film GeTe varies from ~four to six orders of magnitudes over a very narrow temperature window (~175 °C to 225 °C) upon heating. It has also been reported that the order of magnitude may vary with the film quality, GeTe compositions and nucleation site formation [13]. This distinguishable crystalline and amorphous phase transition in GeTe material is due to their distorted cubic crystal structure with resonant bonding behavior and most of the optical and electrical properties have been explained on the light of this theory in literature [8,9,10]. The crystal structure of GeTe is formed by Ge and Te atoms arranged in a rhombohedrally distorted rock salt-type structure that forms a face-centered cubic (FCC) sub lattice at room temperature.
Along with the high OFF/ON resistivity ratio; phase transformation time, crystallization temperature, phase transformation reproducibility, and geometry of the devices are the key parameters for PCM to be used suitably in RF applications [14]. Crystallization time refers to the time required for the atoms to be arranged in a most favorable long-range order and should be as short as possible for high-speed mobile and random memory applications. To keep the GeTe in amorphous state, crystallization temperature should be in the range of 150 °C to 200 °C, and to be compatible with Joule heating at a low voltage, the melting temperature should be in the range of 500 °C to 1000 °C.

2.1.2. GeTe Growth Process

The performance of the GeTe based RF switching devices primarily depends on the quality of the deposited film on top of the substrate. The process parameters that influence the film properties include seed layer structure, precursor composition, deposition temperature, pressure, gas flow rates, precursor bubbling temperatures and the substrates. In the literature [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], DC sputtering, RF sputtering, Inductively-coupled plasma assisted sputtering, E-beam evaporation, Sol-gel coating, Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (APCVD), Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD), Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD), and Ion Beam Deposition methods have been exploited to deposit the thin film of PCM by different research groups. However, the deposition methods only related to the thin film GeTe are briefly discussed and reviewed in the following paragraphs.
In [15], they formed the active GeTe layer of their RF switch through sputtering process using a Lab 18 Modular Thin Film Deposition System. Good reproducibility, high rates, good scalability and good uniformity were the main reasons for adopting this process. In addition, this method facilitates to deposit film of variable compositions with the use of alloy targets or co-sputtering. However, this method is not effective for the technology which requires vias and trenches due to its lack of conformity and directionality. In [16], collimated sputtering or ionized vapor method has been proposed and exploited to overcome these issues.
In [17], pulsed laser deposition technique has been employed to deposit the GeTe thin film. In this method, high quality films can be grown in a very short time. Various composition as well as stoichiometric transfer of a target material is possible. This method includes a simple vacuum system and is completely decoupled from the laser beam source. In addition to these, it enables precise control of the growth rate. However, in [18] the authors point out that this method has some issues with “splashing” or the particulates deposition on the films due to the sub-surface boiling, expulsion of the liquid layer by shockwave recoil pressure and exfoliation. Narrow angular distribution of the ablated species due to the adiabatic expansion of laser, produced plasma plume and the pitting on the target surface.
Authors in [19,20,21,22], have utilized the Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) method to deposit the GeTe thin film. This is a very conformal deposition technique. It requires lower substrate temperature and compatible with complementary metal oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology. However, requirements of special precursor materials and safety issues e.g., toxic, pyrophoric, or corrosive properties, prevented the method to be widely used in the RF switch fabrication.

2.1.3. Device Fabrication and RF Characteristics

In this section of the paper, we discuss notable device architectures, thermal actuation methods, material selections for heating and isolation, fabrication methods and their associated RF performance, from the early stage to present time. Any recent relevant publications not mentioned in this paper do not decline their contribution to this field.
One of the early novel research on PCM based indirectly heated RF switch using a standard 180 nm CMOS technology was reported in [23]. In their device architecture, Ge2Sb2Te5 (germanium-antimony-telluride) via structure with diameters approximately 200–280 nm was exploited as switching element. Indirect thermal actuation part was implemented by doped tantalum nitride (TaN). To protect material diffusion into the switching structure, titanium nitride (TiN) was used. The authors report that their device exhibited stable and repetitive phase transition up to 100 switching cycles along with an OFF/ON resistance ratio of approximately 400. Although the authors demonstrated a proof of concept device; the high ON resistance (approximately 6 KΩ) due to material’s high crystalline state resistivity and low reliability limited further investigation into switching applications.
In [24], Bain et al. employed germanium antimony (Ge50Sb50) material composition as switching for the realization of a three-terminal probe reconfigurable RF switch. They designed their novel prototype device using a parallel array of sub-vias; to achieve the reduced size vias along with the optimal current for heating. They did DC magnetron sputtering to deposit Ge50Sb50 (thickness ~100 nm), copper (Cu) (thickness ~500 nm) and titanium-tungsten (thickness ~20 nm); lift-off to pattern copper (Cu) and reactive ion etching (RIE) to open vias in the structure respectively. The 20 nm layer of TiW was used as an adhesion, as well as a passivation layer at bottom and top, respectively. They found their device was stable up to 70 phase transitions with the ON resistance approximately 50 Ω. Even though the dynamic range and optimized heating current level of their novel switch structure is satisfactory for some RF applications but still this high ON resistance of the device, restricts the device structure and material compositions, to be widely used in RF applications as insertion loss is directly related to it. Moreover, the patterning of 500 nm vias was implemented through E-beam lithography which adds extra cost with process complexity.
Later in [25], Bain et al. designed and fabricated their RF switch using GeTe material. In this device, they deposited a 100 nm thick layer of GeTe via with the diameter of 1 micrometer. Authors tuned the resistance of the GeTe via and achieved the high dynamic range through the controlling of deposition conditions. It has been reported that the OFF state resistivity can be reduced at higher sputtering power. They used a 500 nm layer of copper (Cu) metal for the top and bottom electrodes instead of TiW, to minimize the electrode resistance. A silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer was patterned by etching to define the electrode area. They have observed that their device is able to exhibit 180 Ω ON resistance and a large dynamic range approximately 7 × 103 due to the lower crystalline state resistivity of GeTe. In addition, they have modeled a relation between ON state resistance and RESET current and reported that the lower reset current can be achieved by choosing a material with lower melting point and a structure with better thermal isolation. Although their device showed improved performance in terms of ON resistance and dynamic range with the new material composition, however, still the reliability, switching speed and insertion loss were not up to the level of the existing switching technology. Since then enormous efforts have been put to improve the material composition quality together with device architecture optimization.
Shim et al. proposed a two terminal directly heated RF Ohmic switch as shown in Figure 4 using Ge50Te50 in [26]. They fabricated their switching architecture on a passivated Si substrate. They have patterned all the metal connections using a lift-off technique and then deposited the Ge50Te50 and oxide layer with sputtering and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), respectively. They exploited the same two terminals structure for RF signal transmission as well as for thermal actuation. A single layer of Ge50Te50 via switching structure has been attempted at the beginning of the work but due to its poor performance in terms of ON resistance and dynamic range, an alternative structure with multiple Ge50Te50 vias has been proposed. This structure serves the purpose of both having a reduced size Ge50Te50 via for better isolation and larger effective area of the device for fast switching speed. Authors have reported that the multiple GeTe via structure is able to exhibit the ON resistance approximately 0.6 Ω, insertion loss 0.66 dB at 10 GHz, isolation 21 dB at 10 GHz, third order intercept point >27 dBm, dynamic range approximately 105 and switching speed approximately 20 µs. This novel work showed that the multiple Ge50Te50 via structure is quite functional for switching applications; however, it increases the OFF state capacitance and switching power. Moreover, the reliability and simultaneous action of RF signal transmission and thermal actuation using the same two terminals are also big challenges for this sort of device architecture. Because a switching device is required to have a low resistive path for signal transmission and high resistance path for thermal actuation which is quite difficult to have simultaneously.
In [27], to deal with the problems of two terminal device architecture, a novel four terminal indirectly heated inline GeTe based switching structure has been proposed as shown in Figure 5. In their device, a layer of 75 nm amorphous GeTe material was deposited through sputtering and a 120 nm thin film resistor (TFR) made of NiCrSi was patterned through lift off techniques to thermally actuate this GeTe structure. A 30 nm PECVD deposited electrically insulated barrier of silicon nitride (Si3N4) material was used to get the better thermal control in phase transition. It has been reported that the device is able to perform ON resistance approximately 4.5 Ω, insertion loss <0.5 dB at 18 GHz, isolation <9 dB, third order intercept point >55 dBm, dynamic range approximately 105 and figure of merit approximately 1 THz for 1500 life cycle.
Later in Reference [28], the authors optimized the deposition parameters, length (0.9 μm to 2.5 μm) and widths (10 μm to 30 μm) of the GeTe film, and the TFR widths (0.5 μm to 2.5 μm). It has been demonstrated that the ON resistance approximately 1.2 Ω, insertion loss <0.3 dB at 18 GHz, isolation <13 dB, dynamic range approximately 105 third order intercept point >55 dBm and figure of merit approximately 7.3 THz for 10,000 life cycles can easily be achieved with the same architecture with optimized process parameters. In this work, even though this four-terminal indirect heating scheme is able to avoid the isolation problem between DC and RF signal paths, but it is still an unexplored area in determining the effectiveness of heat transfer from the TFR to PCM in indirect manner. Moreover, an independent heating creates a local cold spot at the RF/PCM layer which results an increased-ON resistance and power consumptions. To achieve this increased power requirement, higher current is required to flow at RF/PCM layer which also may reduce the reliability of the device.
In the work [29], Wang et al. presents a four terminal directly heated GeTe based switching structure. A 4 µm by 4 µs witching structure has been fabricated on a Si substrate passivated by aluminum nitride (AlN). In device structure as shown in Figure 6, authors used AlN because of its high thermal conductivity and low loss tangent at higher frequency range. The thermal actuation mechanism was implemented through sputtered titanium nitride (TiN). Titanium nitride (TiN) is a metal like ceramic material which exhibits higher resistivity and good thermal stability at high temperature operation. Moreover, to isolate the RF signal electrodes and heater electrodes, GeTe was deposited twice. This novel switching structure demonstrates ON resistance approximately 5 Ω, insertion loss <0.6 dB at 20 GHz, isolation approximately 20 dB at 20 GHz, OFF/ON resistance ratio approximately 104, third order intercept point >33 at 2 GHz dBm and figure of merit approximately 3.7 THz. Although this device structure offers higher power handling capability with low ON resistance, however, the requirements for fine lithography and alignment between layers add complicacy in the fabrication process than other contemporary structures.
In [30], authors optimized their previous [27] device structure and fabrication process to improve the device performance. In their new structure, a vertically connected 250 nm GeTe layer is deposited through sputtering. Two RF electrodes were separated by 0.6 µm and on the both sides of GeTe via, a 0.5 µm thick gold (Au) layer with thin titanium (Ti) layers was deposited as diffusion layer barrier. They reported that the new structure exhibits ON resistance approximately 3.9 Ω, insertion loss <0.5 dB at 20 GHz, isolation >18 dB at 20 GHz, dynamic range approximately 104, third order intercept point >30 dBm and figure of merit approximately 4 THz. While optimization of the device structure only improves the RF characteristics, still the reliability is required to improve to outperform the other commercial RF switches.
In [31], Moon et al. realized a RF switch through both shunt and series structures using GeTe. They devised their structure in a lateral Field effect transistor (FET) configuration instead of mostly used via structure to reduce parasitic loss in the device. They reported that their switches able to demonstrate ON resistance approximately 0.3 Ω, insertion loss <0.1 dB at 40 GHz, isolation approximately 30 dB at 40 GHz, third order intercept point >50 dBm, power handling capability approximately 3–10 W, and contrast in resistance approximately 105. Later in Reference [32], the authors fabricated a RF switch with an embedded refractory microheater in series configuration. In this work, they characterize the switching structure with two different widths; 50 µm and 150 µm. They reported the switching structure with channel length of 50 nm demonstrates ON resistance approximately 2.4 Ω, insertion loss 0.25 dB at 20 GHz, isolation 24 dB at 20 GHz, power handling capability approximately 2.8 W, and FOM 11 THz. Moreover, for the first time, authors tested their switching structure for spectral regrowth under Wideband code division multiple Access (W-CDMA) signals and abled to demonstrate harmonic power suppression >90 dBc at 35 dBm.
Ghalem et al. [33] developed a four terminal indirectly heated RF switch by an array of GeTe structure. They deposited 100 nm thick layer of Si3N4 through PECVD as a dielectric layer to serve the purpose of electrical isolation as well as thermal coupling. A layer of molybdenum (Mo) with thickness approximately 200 nm was deposited by DC Magnetron sputtering; for being used as microheater; to perform thermal actuation. The active GeTe layer was deposited by pulse laser deposition (PLD) method followed by successive patterning of metal contact layers through E-beam evaporation. Initially, authors fabricated a single cell of GeTe switch and able to show ON resistance approximately 36 Ω, insertion loss <3 dB, isolation approximately 22 dB at 24 GHz. Due to poor performance, they modified their switching structure with the array of 8 GeTe cell. They reported their multiple GeTe cell units able to exhibit ON resistance approximately 7 Ω, insertion loss approximately 0.8 dB and isolation approximately 25 dB at 5 GHz. Although, their novel multiple cell structure demonstrates promising RF performance, the structure requires high switching power and increases the OFF-state capacitances as well.
In this work [34], authors have realized their switching structure through a GeTe layer with the dimension approximately 300 nm (thickness) by 250 nm (width). They deposited their device active layer through co-pulverized technique which was patterned by RIE technique. Afterwards, a metal layer of Al with thickness of 400 nm was patterned on top of the 500 nm oxide layer. They used aluminum instead of gold (Au) to maintain the fabrication compatibility with back end of line (BEOL) technology. The passivation of the device surface was implemented by a 100 nm nitride layer through PECVD method. Their switching device exhibits ON resistance approximately 1.7 Ω, insertion loss <0.2 dB, isolation >18 dB at 40 GHz and dynamic range approximately 1.8 × 104. However, the authors did not report the power handling capability, third order intercept point and most importantly reliability of their switch.

2.2. Review on VO2

Transitional metal oxides get considerable interest in electronics and other engineering applications over few decades. These materials show metal insulator transition (MIT) triggered by external stimuli [35,36,37]. Among all the other MIT materials, VO2 draws most interest because of its unique property of metal insulator transition, which bring sharp change in electronic and optical properties at room temperature, whereas the other material shows phase change far below and above room temperature [35,38,39]. Intense study is still going on to understand the underlying physical mechanism responsible for phase transition. It is evident in [38,40,41,42] that of both peril transition (structural) and mot transition (electronic) are responsible for phase transition. VO2 changes from semiconductor (bandgap approximately 1 eV) [43] to monoclinic crystal structure to metal with rutile tetragonal structure as temperature increases above 68 °C.

2.2.1. Phase Transition Mechanism and DC Characteristics

Metal insulator transition in VO2 can be triggered in various ways, for example, by thermal heating, electric field accompanied with joule heating, pressure, optical excitation etc. [35,38,44,45] Typical transition characteristics is shown below in Figure 7.
Thermally driven phase transition shows best resistivity contrast ( ρ O F F / ρ O N ) on the order of 103 to 105 depending on the quality (crystallinity and sociometry of the film), there is hysteresis in the characteristics with width of 1–5 °C [35,38]. It takes approximately 50~100 ns for the transition to occur. In insulating state, VO2 has resistivity in the order of 100 (one) whereas in metallic state it is on the order of 10−4 [38].
On the other hand, electrically driven phase transition is much faster and typically in the order of few nanoseconds. However, in this case the OFF/ON resistivity contrast is one or two orders of magnitude lower (from 102 to 103) [46]. There are several works have been done on two terminals and three terminal devices. In two terminal devices, as applied voltage increases VO2 goes from high resistive state to low resistive metallic states. It is demonstrated that only joule heating cannot make such a fast transition, both electric field in the order of 104 to 105 V/cm [47] and joule heating drives the phase transitions. In this case filamentary conduction may occurs (percolation mechanism) through the VO2 material, which suppress full volume switching leads to lower resistivity contrast [48]. To protect the device from overheating current compliance (limits the current in on state) external series resistances are needed. In micron scale, DC characteristic show S-type IV curve, which corresponds to negative differential resistance (NDR). Several steps jump in current may occur before a sharp big jump, due to partial transitions [49]. The voltage (typically several volts for micron scale devices) needs to make the transition depends on various factors such as geometry of the device, ambient temperature, thermal conductivity of the substrate etc. As temperature increases transition voltage decreases. The hysteresis width, resistivity contrast and switching speeds depend on the quality of the materials (stoichiometry and crystalline quality). Transient response of VO2 devices show voltage or current induced self-oscillation which is attributed to parasitic capacitance etc. Amplitude and frequency of this oscillation depend on various factors, such as applied voltage, temperature etc.

2.2.2. Growth and Fabrications

Growth of homogeneous and high quality VO2 is a challenge as it contains various valence state which leads to various oxides phases, namely VO, V2O3, VO2, V2O5 etc. with varying V/O ratios [50]. So, very subtle growth parameter optimization is needed. Within a narrow window of growth parameters stoichiometric VO2 growth with good crystallinity is possible. Various growth techniques such as magnetron sputtering, pulse laser deposition (PLD), CVD, sol-gel, electron beam evaporation etc. [39,48,50,51] have been used for thin films growth of VO2. Thin film has been deposited on various substrates to achieve varying quality of films and suitable for various applications such as glass, Si, SiO2/Si, sapphire, transparent conductive substrate like indium tin oxide, GaN, flexible substrate like polyethylene terephthalate (PET), muscovite etc. [39]. Crystallinity and lattice mismatch of the substrate affect the quality of film which directly affect the resistivity contrast. For example, VO2 grown on C-cut sapphire have good crystalline quality with resistivity contrast in the order of three to four as sapphire has good lattice match with VO2 [51]. On the other hand, resistivity ratio for a film grown on Si or SiO2/Si substrate shows poor crystalline quality which is attributed to the amorphous nature of the substrate [52]. Resistivity contrast of the film also varies with deposition technique and on film thickness and choice of substrates [53,54]. VO2 film grown on C-cut sapphire by PLD shows resistivity contrast higher than 103 with film thickness as low as 20 nm [55]. This is why PLD is very popular technique for growing VO2 film. Interfacial strain and doping of VO2 with Al, W etc. also alter the properties (electronic, optical and transition temperature, hysteresis width, sharpness of transition etc.) of VO2 film, which give additional degrees of freedom to engineer the material properties suitable for specific applications.

2.2.3. Device Fabrication and RF Characteristics

Vanadium dioxide-based RF devices get considerable attention only for a decade, although there are handful of work in early 1990s [56,57]. The first reported work on VO2 based RF switches is done by Sovero et al. [56]. They demonstrated VO2 based RF switches on Si3N4/GaAs (Gallium arsenide) substrate triggered by on chip heater with 30 mW of power. They achieved fast (switching time 30 ns) and broadband RF response with insertion loss less than 1 dB and attenuation of more than 12 dB up to 40 GHz. However, interest on VO2 based device did not grow much as it needed on chip integrated heater for thermal triggering. Recently, interest on VO2-based devices has drawn attention as fast electrically driven phase transitions are demonstrated by various research groups [38,58]. Taking this into account, Dragoman et al. [59] simulated a VO2 based series type Co-Planer Waveguide (CPW) device. Their simulation shows that 2 µm thick VO2 patch in silicon (Si) substrate shows more than 100 dB modulation in transmission up to 10 GHz. A typical VO2 based RF switching structure is shown in Figure 8.

Thermally Triggered RF Switches

For VO2 based RF switches, thermally triggered device came earlier than electrically triggered device. Easy implementation, easy testing and high OFF/ON resistivity ratio contrast motivated researcher to work on thermally triggered switches. Blondy et al. developed a VO2 RF microwave switches on C-cut Sapphire and SiO2/Si substrate with thermal activation/triggering using an external heater [60]. They found average isolation of 30–40 dB in the spectral range of 500 MHz to 35 GHz with insertion loss of 0.8–3 dB. Both Shunt and Series configurations are investigated with active switching material length of 1000 µm and 500 µm. A VO2 film of 200 nm has been deposited by PLD from high purity grade (99.95%) vanadium (V) metal targets. They obtained pure VO2 stabilized phase without any posttreatment. As there is relatively low lattice mismatch (4.5%) between VO2 monoclinic phase and sapphire (c-Al2O3), so this substrate is preferred to deposit mono-oriented VO2 thin films [61]. Indeed, they found monoclinic VO2 on Sapphire Substrates. They found three orders of magnitude change in resistance by thermal activation. On the other hand, film deposited on 1 µm SiO2/500 µm silicon (Si)substrate are found to be orthorhombic structure as in this case the substrate is amorphous. This time resistance contrast ( R O F F / R O N ) occurring on MIT is only 102. CPWs are made by thermal evaporation of ~200 nm gold (Au) with signal line width of 100 μm. After VO2 deposition they thickens the gold (Au) line of CPW to 800 nm to minimize propagation loss. Insertion for VO2 for shunt type device (Length = 1000 μm) introduce a low loss of only ~0.8 dB when it is in semiconducting states (at 300 K). When temperature overpasses transition temperature (>341 K) VO2 film become metallic and signal shorted to ground. Signal attenuated more than 25 dB up to 12 GHz. From 13 to 35 GHz input signal isolation or attenuation loss is higher than 35 dB. The average attenuation in the spectral range of 500 MHz to 35 GHz is 37 dB. They have done the same measurement on series (length = 500 µm) type devices. This device works in opposite way. When the temperature is above transition temperature (e.g., 400 K) VO2 is in metallic states and RF signal passes through the signal line with an insertion loss of ~2.5 dB. At room temperature, it is in an insulating state and blocks the RF signal, with an average attenuation/isolation of 40 dB in the same spectral range. It is clearly evident that series type device has better in terms of signal isolation. In case of SiO2/Si substrate the average isolation loss in the same spectral range is −24 dB (shunt) and −25 dB (series). And insertion loss/transmission loss in approximately 3 dB for both cases. Devices fabricated on SiO2/Si has little poor performance, as VO2 film has poor quality with resistance contrast of one order of magnitude lower than film deposited of C-cut sapphire. Another important thing worth mentioning is that the series type device outperforms shunt type device in terms of isolation characteristics. The same group has done another work on shunt device with same growth and fabrication technique but a modification in the device structure. This time two 250 nm VO2 film patches fill the gap between signal and ground lines of the CPW structure instead of one continuous patch [60]. VO2 shows three orders of magnitude in resistivity contrast. For 450 µm patches, they get insertion loss less than 0.7 dB and attenuation more than 32 dB (average attenuation in ~40) in the spectral range of 100 MHz to 40 GHz, which is better than their previous work with twice the length [60]. They also conclude that VO2 length affects both insertion loss and attenuation (more affected), both increases with increasing length.
Very high bandwidth can be achieved by VO2 devices. Hillman et al. use series type configuration but with inverted microstrip lines [62]. Their RF sputtered 600 nm VO2 film shows sharp thermally triggered transition with OFF/ON (RON ~1 Ω, and ROFF = 20 KΩ) contrast of more than 103. To switch the device to the on state (switching speed 2 µs), the on chip integrated heater needs 20 mW of power. They remarkably demonstrated high broadband operation up to 110 GHz with insertion loss less than 0.5 dB and isolation approaching 15 dB (up to 50 GHz it is 0.2 dB and 21.5 dB, respectively). The device shows low off state capacitance which corresponds to cutoff frequency of ~40 THz. Furthermore, they developed a parametric switching model with varying the channel length and width. The model predicts that low insertion loss <1 dB with isolation of more than 12 dB can be fabricated up to 220 GHz by utilizing their existing device process.
To implement thermally triggered VO2 switch in practical RF system, on chip integrated heater is needed. Hillman et al. [62] demonstrated inverted microstrip line type device with integrated heater. Pan et al. [63] implemented CPW series type RF device with an integrated heater as shown in Figure 9, the same time of the device was demonstrated earlier with an external heater [60]. Pt heater is fabricated on top of VO2 CPW structure with silicon dioxide (SiO2) as isolation layer. They compared the RF performance between devices with and without integrated heater. VO2 layer was deposited using PLD technique of thickness of 350 nm and RF characterization was done up to 15 GHz. Device without SiO2 and Pt heaters shows insertion loss less than 4 dB and isolation greater than 30 dB, whereas after integration the Pt heater the insertion and isolation reach 5 dB and 20 dB respectively. It shows that in the latter case device performance worsen, 10 dB degradation in isolation and 6 dB degradation in return loss. For devices without a heater, Ron = 13 Ω and Coff is 5.8 pF which corresponds to a cut off frequency of 2.1 THz. It is evident that incorporating of SiO2 layer degrades device performance although they did not find any structural changes in VO2 layer on XRD measurement. However, earlier growth of VO2 on silicon (Si)or SiO2/Si substrate shows that silicide forms in the interface, that degrade the quality of VO2 films itself. Here SiO2 layer is deposited with physically enhanced CVD at 300 °C. Other low temperature passivation layer instead of SiO2 may help to improve the performance of the devices.
Imperfect crystal quality (amorphous, polycrystalline, stoichiometric) suppress the performance VO2 based devices. On the other hand, during MIT single crystalline bulk or epitaxial VO2 has suffered from fracture and degradation of their property due to huge elastic stress, in addition to transition temperature shift bellow room temperature [64,65,66]. Lee et al. [67] recently demonstrated thermally triggered RF switches using PLD grown VO2 thin film (300 nm) on TiO2 (001) substrate with SnO2 buffer layer as shown in Figure 10. SnO2 has large (~4.2%) lattice mismatch with VO2 which lead to large and abrupt strain relaxation in the interface, this suppress the lattice-stain-induced lowering, broadening of thermally triggered metal-insulator transition (T-MIT) and cracking during MIT [66,68,69] They achieve crack free film with homogeneous bulk like lattice with sharp electrically triggered MIT (E-MIT) with OFF/ON contrast of 104 [53]. They analyzed their CPW shunt type (normally on) device in the frequency range of 45 MHz to 40 GHz and found that device property remains unchanged over 103 repeated thermal cycle with isolation more than 15 dB for entire spectral range and insertion loss les that 3 dB up to 24.2 GHz. They found a sharp transition in insertion loss at 60 and 66 °C during cooling and heating respectively (within <3 °C up to 24.2 GHz) with a low insertion loss of −1.36 dB and isolation of 17.56 dB at 12.03 GHz, respectively. Which indicates low power consumptions as hysteresis loop gap is only 6 °C. The measured average group delay is 2.49 ps—this small group delay indicates low phase distortion of the signal over a broad spectral range, suitable for ku-band RF switches. At ku band frequencies (12, 15, 18 GHz) with input power 1 µW to 2 mW devices shows linear RF power characteristics. Optimizing the design before fabrication by advanced design system (ADS) and extracting the lumped parameter model they found the cut off frequency as 18.9 THz (Ron = 1.2 Ω and Coff = 7 fF) which is higher than that of typical p-i-n diodes, FET switches, and PCM switches.

Electrically Triggered RF Switches

Electrical switching (E-MIT) in VO2 is much faster [38,58,60,70] and comparatively easier to implement, as no additional heating element is needed. Electrical switching is occurred by joule heating coupled with carrier injection [53]. Crunteanu et al. [71] first demonstrated electrically controlled VO2 based RF-switches. They analyzed CPW series type device in both voltage and current controlled mode. This work present methodical investigation of the reliably and lifetime of the RF device, which was rarely done before. Previous work reported that after only approximately 100 thermal cycles amorphous VO2 [72,73] faces rapid degradation in material properties. Ko and Ramanathan [67] suggested that polycrystalline VO2 thin films prevent microcrack formation and also suppress oxygen diffusion to oxygen deficient regions from VO2 clusters, as happens in amorphous film. VO2 thin film were deposited using reactive PLD and they found five orders of magnitude change in resistivity by thermally induced MIT for 200 nm thin film. They examined I–V characteristics in both voltage and current controlled mode. Hysteresis for V-mode is higher than that of I-mode, which indicate more joule heating. For 10-µm long devices they found isolation of more than 15 dB in the spectral range of 100 MHz to 25 GHz and insertion loss of 3 dB with bias voltage of 20 V. Finally, they investigated the change in properties during cyclic activation VO2 devices in N2 atmosphere. They modulated 10 GHz RF signal (~20 dB difference transmission between ON and OFF state) with triangular pulses, and activation/triggering voltage of the device VACT-ON as performance parameter. After 16.25 million activation cycles, VACT-ON voltage suddenly drops to zero indicating device failure. In case of current controlled device 10 mA amplitude triggering pulse is used with 1 kHz frequency and activation current IACT-ON as a performance parameter. This device can perform more than 260 million cycles without any visible degradation. Overall current controlled device has lifetime 16 times longer than voltage-controlled device. As shown in the I–V measurement, hysteresis is far more pronounced in V-mode operation, which indicate more joule heating in metallic state (current above 45 mA). Whereas in I-mode hysteresis is narrower, which indicate less resistive heating, as VO2 become metallic at currents above 5 mA only. So, there is less thermal and low dielectric stress due to electric fields. But there is current induced self-oscillation in I-mode with depends on amplitude of the activation signal, heat accumulation and value of external series resistance. The amplitude of the oscillation changes in reliability test. This kind of oscillation was previously observed in voltage controlled VO2 switches [70,74].
The speed of RF-switching by E-MIT is similar to the switching of speed of E-MIT itself, which is on the order of few nanoseconds [75,76]. Ha et al. [49] worked on the switching speed of a CPW series VO2 device, as shown in Figure 11, with respect to RF switching applications. In their device, they grew VO2 film of 120 nm thickness by RF magnetron sputtering with device dimension width = 25 µm and length = 5–15 µm. The change in electrically driven MIT was ~103 (full volume switching) which is of same order of thermally driven MIT, which is notably larger than most literature reports with similar film thickness and metrology [60,71,75,77]. The transient response was examined along with the 2.3 GHz RF signal with 100 mA compliance current. After several small currents jump a large jump was observed at 3 V (t = 21.4 μs) corresponding to full volume switching, followed by some damped oscillation which is attributed to the capacitive effects with coexisting metallic and insulating phases. The rise time is ~5 µm (time between abrupt jump and steady sate values, which is switching time from an RF device perspective), whereas the large abrupt jump takes only ~14 ns, it is of the same order as quoted on literature as dc transient switching time [75,76,78]. They also found RF-signal insertion loss is a function of bias current. At bias current of 70 to 80 mA, insertion loss is ~2.95 dB up to 13 GHz whereas isolation is measured as more than 25 dB up to 13 GHz. They also investigate effect of RF-power on the on state and find that RF input power further drives the VO2 into more mellitic states, which suggest that RF triggering of MIT may also possible. For further development of RF device, they simulate the RF-response using both lumped element and 3D electromagnetic model. In lumped signal model, VO2 is modeled as parallel RC circuit which has current dependent resistance arises from MIT and capacitance arises from dielectric nature of VO2 and proximity coupling of two signal lines. Using resistance and capacitance values as fitting parameters, they found that Ron (on state resistance) equals to 42 Ω and ROFF equals to 51 KΩ and extracted capacitance is ~0.006 pF. They suggested that optimization of device geometry to 75 µm by 10 µm to reduce the on resistance, can effectively short the capacitance, can reduce insertion loss to 1 dB with broad band flatness up to 40 GHz in on state. As device length increases parasitic capacitance decreases, so isolation will increase with longer device. Their simulation shows a 3.2 dB increases in isolation when channel length increases from 5 to 15 µm, which agrees with measured data.
Most of the VO2 based device RF devices are grown by PLD or sputtering [49]. However, film grown by these deposition techniques have varying degree of crystallinity and non-uniform strain distribution. Which leads to poor OFF/ON resistivity contrast and increases substrate capacitance. Datta et al. demonstrate a wafer scale [79] VO2 based device using metal-organic molecular beam epitaxy (MOMBE) grown epi film (35 nm thickness) with thermally triggered resistivity ratio 104. The signal line of this CPW series type device consists of 24 parallel channels of 1 µm width (effective width 24 µm) and 100 nm length as shown in Figure 12. For electrically triggered device at elevated temperature (340 K), in off state (bias current 0 mA) the device has flat response till 10 GHz with isolation ~35 dB. On the other hand, in on state (DC bias current 25 mA, Applied Voltage >~1.1 V) device has flat response till 50 GHz with insertion loss of ~0.55 dB. The switch has COFF of 41.6 fF/mm and RON of 0.146 Ω-mm (6 Ω) with results to an intrinsic FCO of 26.5 THz. On the other hand, the cut off frequency for a thermally driven (Toff = 298 and Ton = 358 K/85 °C) device is evaluated to be 44 THz. The device shows excellent linearity with input power swept from 1 µW to 15 mW, in the on state 1 dB compression point is better than 12 dBm. The switching delay is found to be less than 25 ns. They also test the reliability of the device by applying 100 kHz pulse of amplitude 2 V with 20% duty cycle, only minimal degradation occurred after 680 M cycle and breakdown or device failure never occurred.

3. Performance Benchmarking of GeTe and VO2

This section primarily provides one to one comparisons on RF performance parameters associated with these two RF switches at two representative frequencies; 10 GHz and 20 GHz; as existing 4G technology band covers 2–8 GHz and next generation 5G technology extends beyond 26 GHz. Device active length directly affects insertion loss of the switch and it increases with device length if all the other material and design parameters are kept same.
Figure 13 and Figure 14 depict the progress in insertion loss and isolation associated with GeTe and VO2 based RF switches over the years. Still there is no linear improvement of performance metrics over the year as shown in the figures. This is because different groups used different design parameters and actuation methods. This motivates us to investigate the correlation between RF performance metrics with respect to design parameters (lengths and volumes).
Figure 15 and Figure 16 show insertion losses associated with each of the switching element’s lengths and volumes based on the reported values at the frequency of 10 GHz and 20 GHz. While shunt type VO2 devices show lower insertion loss (less than ~1 dB), series type CPW devices show insertion loss above ~3 dB. On the other hand, GeTe are mostly series type, which have demonstrated insertion loss lower than ~1 dB. Moreover, their insertion losses decrease up to 0.2 dB as the device active lengths decrease as shown in the inlet of the Figure 15. It is evident that for series type switches with CPW configuration, insertion loss in GeTe based devices are lower than that of VO2 based devices. This might be attributed to the lower resistivity of GeTe compared to VO2.
We also compared the reported isolation between GeTe and VO2 devices at the same two representative frequency. Figure 17 and Figure 18 depicts that the isolation of VO2 device extends from 17.5 to 40 dB, whereas GeTe shows isolation approximately 12 dB to 30 dB at 10 GHz. At smaller length, VO2 shows better signal isolation than GeTe, as the off state capacitance of VO2 is lower than GeTe [79]. However, the lower OFF state capacitance of VO2 arises due to its, lower dielectric constant.
VO2 has very sharp and fast metal-insulator transition at the nanosecond scale [49], whereas GeTe transition is relatively slow, in the range of µs. In addition, GeTe requires longer activation pulse to convert the phase from amorphous to crystalline, but the reverse transition needs much faster. So, the overall speed depends of the crystallization time of the material, which on the order of 10’s of µs. Figure 19a shows the relation between switching time and volume of the active part of the device. It’s obvious that devices with smaller volumes switch faster as less material must be transitioned. This is also evident by the reported data as depicted the Figure 19a. The figure of merit, (FCO = 1 2 π R o n C o f f ) is an important parameter for RF applications. It can also be defined as the cut-off frequency of the device which dictates the upper limit of operation frequency of a RF switch. The reported cut-off frequency for VO2 based devices range from 2 to 40 THz, whereas GeTe shows in the range of 1 THz to 17 THz. Most of the reported work reveals that VO2 has got the trends to have higher cut-off frequency (lower values of R o n C o f f ). This is also evident from Figure 19b.
Reliability is one of the important parameters for a RF switch to be commercialized which has not been well addressed yet and is still an open question for the both categories of devices. Only few works have been reported in the literature. For GeTe devices maximum reported life cycles is ~10,000 [27]. Crunteanu et al. demonstrated methodical reliability analysis for VO2 devices [78]. Their device sustained up to 260 million cycles without any degradations. Recently Madan et al. showed their reliability of the device up to 680 million cycles with no breakdown. Although VO2 has better reliability, but still extensive analysis is needed to establish the reliability.
In addition to scattering parameters, speed and reliability; linearity, power consumptions and power handling capability are also important performance metrics for a RF switch. Linearity is one of the important parameters to evaluate phase and frequency distortions. It is reported that GeTe based switches show good linear characteristics which is evident from its reported third order power intercept values (varies ~27 dBm to 55 dBm) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Ha reported that at high bias current, VO2 also shows very good linear response till 27 dBm power [49]. The average group delay is found to be 2.9 ps up to 40 GHz as reported by Lee [67] which indicates broadband stability of VO2 switches. Madan demonstrates that output third order intercept is of >44 dBm [79]. Based on these reported values, it can be said that the both types of devices have similar linear characteristics. Maximum reported power handling capability of GeTe is ~3 W and for VO2 it is 0.5 W. In terms of power consumption, VO2 consumes 10’s of mW of continuous power [32,62], whereas as GeTe is a bi-stable device, it only consumes power during transitions. Table 1 presents the best reported values for each RF performance parameter for GeTe, VO2 and conventional MEMS RF switches irrespective of growth process, design, device geometry and fabrication.

4. Discussion

Both VO2 and GeTe exhibit promising RF properties in terms of fast switching speed and high isolation over broad frequency range compared to conventional MEMS switches. These devices also have much higher cut-off frequency and linearity compared to solid state switches. Low cost, simple fabrication and easy integration with standard CMOS processes make these materials very appealing to the RF community although reliability, power handling capability, power consumptions have not yet been well addressed.
The reliability of GeTe based switches mostly depend on the thermal breakdown of heating materials and reliable phase transitions of GeTe layer. Thermal breakdown in heating materials occurs due to the stress generated by current/voltage pulse whereas the phase transition in GeTe film fails due to material fatigue and oxidation and impurity introduction. Hence, the proper selection of heating materials for thermal actuation and patterning of a quality GeTe film as an active layer are of paramount in importance for designing a robust and reliable GeTe based RF switch. In GeTe based switches, two types of thermal actuation mechanisms; direct and indirect heating are utilized [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. In direct heating mechanism, it is found that device shows better linearity and power handling capability compared to its counterpart, however, it still requires external RF choke or impedance matching circuit to effectively deliver the power into the device which ultimately increases the device size. On the other hand, greater isolation between DC and RF signal and simpler fabrication process make the indirect heating schemes most attractive thermal actuation method to the research community nowadays. But here care must be taken in choosing the heating materials as they must have high temperature thermal stability and greater heat coupling capability to GeTe film. In the literature, silicon-chromium (SiCr), nickel-silicon-chromium (NiSiCr), titanium-nitride(TiN), tungsten (W), titanium tungsten (Ti-W), and so forth, have been reported [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] as commonly used heating materials. Apart from this fact, the patterning of a quality GeTe film is also big concern for a process engineer. Based on the literature, lift-off and plasma dry etching are widely used processes for patterning GeTe films. Although the lift off process is somewhat easier than plasma dry etching, however poor GeTe film adhesion with other materials make it rather difficult to successfully process. On the other hand, plasma dry etching is cleaner and residue free than lift-off technique but removal of photoresist after GeTe patterning makes the process more delicate and complicated than lift-off. Moreover, stress induced surface defects, cracking, poor crystallization should also be taken care of at the time of patterning. In conclusion, it can be said that to revolutionize the GeTe based RF switching technology for real industry applications, intensive research works are required in terms of material quality of GeTe, device structures and fabrication processes. As the formation of exact crystalline structure is still a big conundrum, knowing the precise atomic structure and formation process of crystalline materials are still unknown. In terms of device structure, most of the works were based on a via structure, however laterally connected heating structure and vertically connected GeTe via, top heater configuration with indirect heating are yet to be explored. In addition, optimization in phase transition temperature and phase transition speed through the introduction of doping elements, impurities and defects have not been explored yet. Obviously, more examinations to resolve the above issues will further advance the ongoing development of phase-change RF switching technology.
Device geometry for VO2 device are usually larger than GeTe device. So, there are lots of room for miniaturization for VO2 based devices, which will improve some of the performance parameter, specially switching speed and insertion loss. With careful design and fabrication technique one can minimize parasitic with will bring over all better performance Most of the RF devices demonstrated so far are CPW structure. Using other alternative structures like inverted microstrip line may give superior performance as Hillman et al. [65] demonstrated ultra-low loss switch with insertion loss 0.15 dB and cuff-off frequency of 40 THz. However, these may bring additional fabrication complexity. Pan et al. [66] implemented SiO2 as a passivation layer for an integrated heater, which degraded RF performance. An alternative may be to use a low temperature passivation layer to get better results. Most of the electrically triggered VO2 devices are driven by joule heating. Three terminal FET type RF devices have not yet been demonstrated and may have faster switching speeds since joule heating is not required [73]. Introducing doping and interfacial strain changes the resistivity contrast, transition temperature and/or transition electric field [84,85]. Even near room temperature transition is possible by engineering the interfacial strain [85]. In this way, low power switching can be achieved. In addition to that playing with these parameters may improve overall RF performance. RF power itself make can trigger the MIT in VO2. Only a few works have been demonstrated in this area [86,87,88]. Sieu D. Ha implemented RF triggered CPW switches [86] at 10 GHz and found ~21 dB drop in transmission with ~25 dBm power (less than 0.5 W).

5. Conclusions

This review summarizes the progress in GeTe and VO2 based RF switches over the past decade. It provides insight into the relative advantages and disadvantages of both type of the devices for DC and RF applications. The essential design aspects associated with the DC and RF characteristics of these switches have been reviewed and discussed. From the reported works, it is clear that the GeTe based RF switches have lower insertion loss and low power consumption than VO2 based devices. On the contrary, VO2 switches outperform GeTe in terms of speed and reliability. There are myriad of materials and/or material compositions which exhibit phase change and metal insulator transition properties with varying degrees of OFF/ON resistivity contrast. Intrinsic fast switching capabilities associated with MIT materials and latching (bi-stability) properties associated with PCM may facilitate transformative RF application with new functionality and superior performance. Still there is plenty of room for improvements of switching speed, scattering parameters, reliability in both categories of devices. Optimization in growth, design, and fabrication will leverage in harnessing the full potentials of these materials with respect to the conventional MEMS and solid states switches. At this early stage, it is difficult to determine which material is best suited for future RF applications with the limited number of demonstrated works.

Author Contributions

Protap Mahanta compiled and edited the phase change materials (PCM) portion of the manuscript. M.M. compiled and edited the metal insulator transition (MIT) materials portion of the manuscript. R.A.C., Jr. conceived the original research idea, mentored the graduate student project, and edited the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dushyant Tomer for his technical assistance and administrative support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, M.; Lin, F.; Rais-Zadeh, M. Need a Change? Try GeTe: A Reconfigurable Filter Using Germanium Telluride Phase Change RF Switches. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2016, 17, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rais-Zadeh, M.; Wang, M. Advanced reconfigurable RF/microwave electronics. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 15–18 January 2017; pp. 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ha, S.D.; Zhou, Y.; Duwel, A.E.; White, D.W.; Ramanathan, S. Quick switch: Strongly correlated electronic phase transition systems for cutting-edge microwave devices. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2014, 15, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, M.; Rais-Zadeh, M. Development and evaluation of germanium telluride phase change material based ohmic switches for RF applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2016, 27, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borodulin, P.; El-Hinnawy, N.; Padilla, C.R.; Ezis, A.; King, M.R.; Johnson, D.R.; Nichols, D.T.; Young, R.M. Recent advances in fabrication and characterization of GeTe-based phase-change RF switches and MMICs. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International InMicrowave Symposium (IMS), Honololu, HI, USA, 4–9 June 2017; pp. 285–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yamada, N.; Ohno, E.; Akahira, N.; Nishiuchi, K.I.; Nagata, K.I.; Takao, M. High speed overwritable phase change optical disk material. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 26, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raoux, S.; Wełnic, W.; Ielmini, D. Phase change materials and their application to nonvolatile memories. Chem. Rev. 2009, 110, 240–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Raoux, S. Phase change materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2009, 39, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Siegrist, T.; Merkelbach, P.; Wuttig, M. Phase change materials: Challenges on the path to a universal storage device. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2012, 3, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tomer, D.; Coutu, R.A. A Phase Change Material for Reconfigurable Circuit Applications. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Champlain, J.G.; Ruppalt, L.B.; Guyette, A.C.; El-Hinnawy, N.; Borodulin, P.; Jones, E.; Young, R.M.; Nichols, D. Examination of the temperature dependent electronic behavior of GeTe for switching applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 244501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raoux, S.; Muñoz, B.; Cheng, H.Y.; Jordan-Sweet, J.L. Phase transitions in Ge–Te phase change materials studied by time-resolved x-ray diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 143118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raoux, S.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Muñoz, B.; Jordan-Sweet, J.L. Crystallization characteristics of Ge-Sb and Ge-Te phase change materials. Proc. EPCOS 2009, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Choi, Y.F. Phase-change materials: Trends and prospects. In ECI Workshop; Lehigh University: Bethlehem, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, M. Phase Change Material Based Ohmic Switches for Reconfigurable RF Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rossnagel, S.M. Directional and ionized physical vapor deposition for microelectronics applications. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1998, 16, 2585–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, X. Phase Transformations and Switching of Chalcogenide Phase-change Material Films Prepared by Pulsed Laser Deposition. Available online: http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/22476/Dissertation_Sun_final%20version.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2018).
  18. Chrisey, D.B.; Hubler, G.K. (Eds.) Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films; J. Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, R.Y.; Kim, H.G.; Yoon, S.G. Structural properties of Ge2Sb2Te5 thin films by metal organic chemical vapor deposition for phase change memory applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 102107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, R.Y.; Kim, H.G.; Yoon, S.G. Characterization of Ge1−x Tex Chalcogenide Thin Films Deposited by MOCVD for Phase Change Memory Applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, D137–D140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, P.S.; Hunks, W.J.; Stender, M.; Chen, T.; Stauf, G.T.; Xu, C.; Roeder, J.F. CVD of amorphous GeTe thin films. MRS Online Proc. Libr. Arch. 2008, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, J.I.; Park, H.; Cho, S.L.; Park, Y.L.; Bae, B.J.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.S.; An, H.G.; Bae, J.S.; Ahn, D.H.; et al. Highly scalable phase change memory with CVD GeSbTe for sub 50 nm generation. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, Kyoto, Japan, 12–14 June 2007; pp. 102–103. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, K.N.; Krusin-Elbaum, L.; Newns, D.M.; Elmegreen, B.G.; Cheek, R.; Rana, N.; Young, A.M.; Koester, S.J.; Lam, C. Programmable via using indirectly heated phase-change switch for reconfigurable logic applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2008, 29, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lo, H.; Chua, E.; Huang, J.C.; Tan, C.C.; Wen, C.Y.; Zhao, R.; Shi, L.; Chong, C.T.; Paramesh, J.; Schlesinger, T.E.; et al. Three-terminal probe reconfigurable phase-change material switches. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2010, 57, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chua, E.K.; Shi, L.P.; Zhao, R.; Lim, K.G.; Chong, T.C.; Schlesinger, T.E.; Bain, J.A. Low resistance, high dynamic range reconfigurable phase change switch for radio frequency applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 183506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shim, Y.; Hummel, G.; Rais-Zadeh, M. RF switches using phase change materials. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 26th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Taipei, Taiwan, 20–24 January 2013; pp. 237–240. [Google Scholar]
  27. El-Hinnawy, N.; Borodulin, P.; Wagner, B.; King, M.R.; Mason, J.S.; Jones, E.B.; McLaughlin, S.; Veliadis, V.; Snook, M.; Sherwin, M.E.; et al. A four-terminal, inline, chalcogenide phase-change RF switch using an independent resistive heater for thermal actuation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 1313–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Hinnawy, N.; Borodulin, P.; Wagner, B.P.; King, M.R.; Mason, J.S.; Jones, E.B.; Veliadis, V.; Howell, R.S.; Young, R.M.; Lee, M.J. A 7.3 THz cut-off frequency, inline, chalcogenide phase-change RF switch using an independent resistive heater for thermal actuation. In Proceedings of the Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium (CSICS), Monterey, CA, USA, 13–16 October 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, M.; Shim, Y.; Rais-Zadeh, M. A low-loss directly heated two-port RF phase change switch. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, M.; Rais-Zadeh, M. Directly heated four-terminal phase change switches. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2014 IEEE MTT-S International 2014, Tampa, FL, USA, 1–6 June 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moon, J.S.; Seo, H.C.; Le, D. Development toward high-power sub-1-ohm DC-67 GHz RF switches using phase change materials for reconfigurable RF front-end. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2014 IEEE MTT-S International 2014, Tampa, FL, USA, 1–6 June 2014; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  32. Moon, J.S.; Seo, H.C.; Le, D.; Fung, H.; Schmitz, A.; Oh, T.; Kim, S.; Son, K.A.; Zehnder, D.; Yang, B. 11 THz figure-of-merit phase-change RF switches for reconfigurable wireless front-ends. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2015 IEEE MTT-S International 2015, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17–22 May 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghalem, A.; Hariri, A.; Guines, C.; Passerieux, D.; Huitema, L.; Blondy, P.; Crunteanu, A. Arrays of GeTe electrically activated RF switches. In Proceedings of the Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Serie, Pavia, Italy, 20–22 September 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Léon, A.; Saint-Patrice, D.; Castellani, N.; Navarro, G.; Puyal, V.; Reig, B.; Podevin, F.; Ferrari, P.; Perret, E. In-depth characterization of the structural phase change of Germanium Telluride for RF switches. In Proceedings of the Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series, Pavia, Italy, 20–22 September 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Morin, F.J. Oxides which show a metal-to-insulator transition at the Neel temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1959, 3, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goodenough, J.B. Anomalous properties of the vanadium oxides. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1971, 1, 101–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tokura, Y. Correlated-electron physics in transition-metal oxides. Phys. Today 2003, 56, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stefanovich, G.; Pergament, A.; Stefanovich, D. Electrical switching and Mott transition in VO2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 8837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Z.; Ko, C.; Ramanathan, S. Oxide electronics utilizing ultrafast metal-insulator transitions. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011, 41, 337–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cavalleri, A.; Dekorsy, T.; Chong, H.H.; Kieffer, J.C.; Schoenlein, R.W. Evidence for a structurally-driven insulator-to-metal transition in VO2: A view from the ultrafast timescale. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 161102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qazilbash, M.M.; Brehm, M.; Chae, B.G.; Ho, P.C.; Andreev, G.O.; Kim, B.J.; Yun, S.J.; Balatsky, A.V.; Maple, M.B.; Keilmann, F.; et al. Mott transition in VO2 revealed by infrared spectroscopy and nano-imaging. Science 2007, 318, 1750–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qazilbash, M.M.; Tripathi, A.; Schafgans, A.A.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, H.T.; Cai, Z.; Holt, M.V.; Maser, J.M.; Keilmann, F.; Shpyrko, O.G.; et al. Nanoscale imaging of the electronic and structural transitions in vanadium dioxide. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 165108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Martens, K.; Radu, I.P.; Mertens, S.; Shi, X.; Nyns, L.; Cosemans, S.; Favia, P.; Bender, H.; Conard, T.; Schaekers, M.; et al. The VO2 interface, the metal-insulator transition tunnel junction, and the metal-insulator transition switch On-Off resistance. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 124501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cavalleri, A.; Tóth, C.; Siders, C.W.; Squier, J.A.; Ráksi, F.; Forget, P.; Kieffer, J.C. Femtosecond structural dynamics in VO2 during an ultrafast solid-solid phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 237401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kikuzuki, T.; Lippmaa, M. Characterizing a strain-driven phase transition in VO2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 132107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gupta, A.; Aggarwal, R.; Gupta, P.; Dutta, T.; Narayan, R.J.; Narayan, J. Semiconductor to metal transition characteristics of VO2 thin films grown epitaxially on Si (001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 111915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, B.; Zimmers, A.; Aubin, H.; Ghosh, R.; Liu, Y.; Lopez, R. Electric-field-driven phase transition in vanadium dioxide. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 241410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Duchene, J.; Terraillon, M.; Pailly, P.; Adam, G. Filamentary Conduction in VO2 Coplanar Thin-Film Devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1971, 19, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ha, S.D.; Zhou, Y.; Fisher, C.J.; Ramanathan, S.; Treadway, J.P. Electrical switching dynamics and broadband microwave characteristics of VO2 radio frequency devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 184501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sahana, M.B.; Subbanna, G.N.; Shivashankar, S.A. Phase transformation and semiconductor-metal transition in thin films of VO2 deposited by low-pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 6495–6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ruzmetov, D.; Zawilski, K.T.; Narayanamurti, V.; Ramanathan, S. Structure-functional property relationships in rf-sputtered vanadium dioxide thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 113715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Narayan, J.; Bhosle, V.M. Phase transition and critical issues in structure-property correlations of vanadium oxide. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 103524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, H.T.; Zhang, L.; Mukherjee, D.; Zheng, Y.X.; Haislmaier, R.C.; Alem, N.; Engel-Herbert, R. Wafer-scale growth of VO2 thin films using a combinatorial approach. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, H.; Chisholm, M.F.; Yang, T.H.; Pennycook, S.J.; Narayan, J. Role of interfacial transition layers in VO2/Al2O3 heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 073515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeong, J.; Aetukuri, N.; Graf, T.; Schladt, T.D.; Samant, M.G.; Parkin, S.S. Suppression of metal-insulator transition in VO2 by electric field–induced oxygen vacancy formation. Science 2013, 339, 1402–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sovero, E.; Deakin, D.; Higgins, J.A.; DeNatale, J.F.; Pittman, S. Fast thin film vanadium dioxide microwave switches. In Proceedings of the Gallium Arsenide Integrated Circuit (GaAs IC) Symposium on Technical Digest, New Orleans, LA, USA, 7–10 October 1990; pp. 101–103. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hood, P.J.; DeNatale, J.F. Millimeter-wave dielectric properties of epitaxial vanadium dioxide thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, H.T.; Chae, B.G.; Youn, D.H.; Maeng, S.L.; Kim, G.; Kang, K.Y.; Lim, Y.S. Mechanism and observation of Mott transition in VO2-based two-and three-terminal devices. New J. Phys. 2004, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dragoman, M.; Cismaru, A.; Hartnagel, H.; Plana, R. Reversible metal-semiconductor transitions for microwave switching applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 073503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dumas-Bouchiat, F.; Champeaux, C.; Catherinot, A.; Crunteanu, A.; Blondy, P. rf-microwave switches based on reversible semiconductor-metal transition of VO2 thin films synthesized by pulsed-laser deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 223505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Garry, G.; Durand, O.; Lordereau, A. Structural, electrical and optical properties of pulsed laser deposited VO2 thin films on R-and C-sapphire planes. Thin Solid Films 2004, 453, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hillman, C.; Stupar, P.A.; Hacker, J.B.; Griffith, Z.; Field, M.; Rodwell, M. An ultra-low loss millimeter-wave solid state switch technology based on the metal-insulator-transition of vanadium dioxide. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2014 IEEE MTT-S International 2014, Tampa, FL, USA, 1–6 June 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pan, K.; Wang, W.; Shin, E.; Freeman, K.; Subramanyam, G. Vanadium oxide thin-film variable resistor-based RF switches. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 2959–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barker, A.S., Jr.; Verleur, H.W.; Guggenheim, H.J. Infrared optical properties of vanadium dioxide above and below the transition temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1966, 17, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maurer, D.; Leue, A. Investigation of transition metal oxides by ultrasonic microscopy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 370, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aetukuri, N.B.; Gray, A.X.; Drouard, M.; Cossale, M.; Gao, L.; Reid, A.H.; Kukreja, R.; Ohldag, H.; Jenkins, C.A.; Arenholz, E.; et al. Control of the metal–insulator transition in vanadium dioxide by modifying orbital occupancy. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, J.; Lee, D.; Cho, S.J.; Seo, J.H.; Liu, D.; Eom, C.B.; Ma, Z. Epitaxial VO2 thin film-based radio-frequency switches with thermal activation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 063110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, D.; Lee, J.; Song, K.; Xue, F.; Choi, S.Y.; Ma, Y.; Podkaminer, J.; Liu, D.; Liu, S.C.; Chung, B.; et al. Sharpened VO2 phase transition via controlled release of epitaxial strain. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5614–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Quackenbush, N.F.; Paik, H.; Wahila, M.J.; Sallis, S.; Holtz, M.E.; Huang, X.; Ganose, A.; Morgan, B.J.; Scanlon, D.O.; Gu, Y.; et al. Stability of the M2 phase of vanadium dioxide induced by coherent epitaxial strain. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 085105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, H.T.; Kim, B.J.; Choi, S.; Chae, B.G.; Lee, Y.W.; Driscoll, T.; Qazilbash, M.M.; Basov, D.N. Electrical oscillations induced by the metal-insulator transition in VO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 023702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Crunteanu, A.; Givernaud, J.; Leroy, J.; Mardivirin, D.; Champeaux, C.; Orlianges, J.C.; Catherinot, A.; Blondy, P. Voltage-and current-activated metal–insulator transition in VO2-based electrical switches: A lifetime operation analysis. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2010, 11, 065002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Guzman, G.; Beteille, F.; Morineau, R.; Livage, J. Electrical switching in VO2 sol–gel films. J. Mater. Chem. 1996, 6, 505–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ilinski, A.; Silva-Andrade, F.; Shadrin, E.; Klimov, V. Variations in optical reflectivity in the semiconductor–metal phase transition of vanadium dioxide. J. Non-crystalline Solids 2004, 338, 266–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sakai, J. High-efficiency voltage oscillation in VO2 planer-type junctions with infinite negative differential resistance. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 103708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Leroy, J.; Crunteanu, A.; Bessaudou, A.; Cosset, F.; Champeaux, C.; Orlianges, J.C. High-speed metal-insulator transition in vanadium dioxide films induced by an electrical pulsed voltage over nano-gap electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 213507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Ko, C.; Yang, Z.; Mouli, C.; Ramanathan, S. Voltage-triggered ultrafast phase transition in vanadium dioxide switches. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ko, C.; Ramanathan, S. Observation of electric field-assisted phase transition in thin film vanadium oxide in a metal-oxide-semiconductor device geometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 252101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chae, B.G.; Kim, H.T.; Youn, D.H.; Kang, K.Y. Abrupt metal–insulator transition observed in VO2 thin films induced by a switching voltage pulse. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2005, 369, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Madan, H.; Zhang, H.T.; Jerry, M.; Mukherjee, D.; Alem, N.; Engel-Herbert, R.; Datta, S. 26.5 Terahertz electrically triggered RF switch on epitaxial VO2-on-Sapphire (VOS) wafer. In Proceedings of the Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2015 IEEE International 2015, Washington, DC, USA, 7–9 December 2015; pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  80. Basu, A.; Adams, G.G.; McGruer, N.E. A review of micro-contact physics, materials, and failure mechanisms in direct-contact RF MEMS switches. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2016, 26, 104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Basu, A. An Experimental Investigation of Hot Switching Contact Damage in RF MEMS Switches. Ph.D. Thesis, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  82. Patel, C.D.; Rebeiz, G.M. A high power (>5 W) temperature stable RF MEMS metal-contact switch with orthogonal anchors and force-enhancing stoppers. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT), 2011 IEEE MTT-S International 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA, 5–10 June 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  83. Chan, R.; Lesnick, R.; Becher, D.; Feng, M. Low-actuation voltage RF MEMS shunt switch with cold switching lifetime of seven billion cycles. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2003, 12, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Burkhardt, W.; Christmann, T.; Meyer, B.K.; Niessner, W.; Schalch, D.; Scharmann, A. W-and F-doped VO2 films studied by photoelectron spectrometry. Thin Solid Films 1999, 345, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Muraoka, Y.; Hiroi, Z. Metal–insulator transition of VO2 thin films grown on TiO2 (001) and (110) substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ha, S.D.; Zhou, Y.; Fisher, C.J.; Ramanathan, S.; Treadway, J.P. Abrupt Insertion Loss Drop by RF-Triggering of the Phase Transition in VO2 CPW Switches. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2014, 24, 575–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Givernaud, J.; Crunteanu, A.; Orlianges, J.C.; Pothier, A.; Champeaux, C.; Catherinot, A.; Blondy, P. Microwave power limiting devices based on the semiconductor–metal transition in vanadium–dioxide thin films. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2010, 58, 2352–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Givernaud, J.; Crunteanu, A.; Pothier, A.; Champeaux, C.; Catherinot, A.; Blondy, P. CPW self-resetting power limiting devices based on microwave power induced semiconductor-metal transition in vanadium dioxide. In Proceedings of the Microwave Symposium Digest, 2009. MTT’09. IEEE MTT-S International 2009, Boston, MA, USA, 7–12 June 2009; pp. 109–112. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison of figures of merit (FOM) of various radio frequency (RF) switching technologies.
Figure 1. Comparison of figures of merit (FOM) of various radio frequency (RF) switching technologies.
Technologies 06 00048 g001
Figure 2. Ternary phase diagram showing the different possible alloys and the year of discovery and commercialization of phase change materials (PCM) in optical storage technology.
Figure 2. Ternary phase diagram showing the different possible alloys and the year of discovery and commercialization of phase change materials (PCM) in optical storage technology.
Technologies 06 00048 g002
Figure 3. Illustration of the phase transition mechanisms associated with germanium telluride (GeTe) materials. (a) Required current pulses and resulting temperature profiles for phase change; (b) Crystal structure during phase change.
Figure 3. Illustration of the phase transition mechanisms associated with germanium telluride (GeTe) materials. (a) Required current pulses and resulting temperature profiles for phase change; (b) Crystal structure during phase change.
Technologies 06 00048 g003
Figure 4. Device layout for a two terminal directly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Figure 4. Device layout for a two terminal directly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Technologies 06 00048 g004
Figure 5. Device layout for a four terminal indirectly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Figure 5. Device layout for a four terminal indirectly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Technologies 06 00048 g005
Figure 6. Device layout for a four terminal directly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Figure 6. Device layout for a four terminal directly heated GeTe based RF switch.
Technologies 06 00048 g006
Figure 7. Typical metal-insulator transition characteristic for metal-insulator transition (MIT) materials (i.e., Vanadium Dioxide).
Figure 7. Typical metal-insulator transition characteristic for metal-insulator transition (MIT) materials (i.e., Vanadium Dioxide).
Technologies 06 00048 g007
Figure 8. A generic VO2 Based Co-Planer Waveguide (CPW) RF Switches (a) Series Type (b) Shunt Type.
Figure 8. A generic VO2 Based Co-Planer Waveguide (CPW) RF Switches (a) Series Type (b) Shunt Type.
Technologies 06 00048 g008
Figure 9. CPW series type devices with integrated heater and silicon dioxide (SiO2) as passivation layer.
Figure 9. CPW series type devices with integrated heater and silicon dioxide (SiO2) as passivation layer.
Technologies 06 00048 g009
Figure 10. Schematic of epitaxial VO2 based RF switches grown on SnO2/TiO2 (001) substrate.
Figure 10. Schematic of epitaxial VO2 based RF switches grown on SnO2/TiO2 (001) substrate.
Technologies 06 00048 g010
Figure 11. Cross-sectional view of Electrically triggered VO2 based RF switches.
Figure 11. Cross-sectional view of Electrically triggered VO2 based RF switches.
Technologies 06 00048 g011
Figure 12. Signal line of CPW switches consist of 24 parallel structure.
Figure 12. Signal line of CPW switches consist of 24 parallel structure.
Technologies 06 00048 g012
Figure 13. Progress in insertion loss associated with GeTe and VO2 based switches over the years. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz.
Figure 13. Progress in insertion loss associated with GeTe and VO2 based switches over the years. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz.
Technologies 06 00048 g013
Figure 14. Progress in isolation associated with GeTe and VO2 based switches over the years. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Figure 14. Progress in isolation associated with GeTe and VO2 based switches over the years. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Technologies 06 00048 g014
Figure 15. Insertion losses associated with each reported device active lengths. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz.
Figure 15. Insertion losses associated with each reported device active lengths. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz.
Technologies 06 00048 g015
Figure 16. Insertion losses associated with each reported active volume of the device. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz
Figure 16. Insertion losses associated with each reported active volume of the device. (a) Insertion loss at 10 GHz; (b) Insertion loss at 20 GHz
Technologies 06 00048 g016
Figure 17. Isolation losses associated with each reported length of the device. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Figure 17. Isolation losses associated with each reported length of the device. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Technologies 06 00048 g017
Figure 18. Isolation associated with each reported volume of the device. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Figure 18. Isolation associated with each reported volume of the device. (a) Isolation at 10 GHz; (b) Isolation at 20 GHz.
Technologies 06 00048 g018
Figure 19. (a) Switching time associated with reported volume of the devices; (b) OFF capacitance vs. ON resistance.
Figure 19. (a) Switching time associated with reported volume of the devices; (b) OFF capacitance vs. ON resistance.
Technologies 06 00048 g019
Table 1. Reported best values for each RF performance parameter irrespective of growth process, design, device geometry and fabrication.
Table 1. Reported best values for each RF performance parameter irrespective of growth process, design, device geometry and fabrication.
Performance ParametersGeTeVO2MEMS
Favorable Growth ProcessSputtering/PLDPLD/SputteringStandard MEMS process
ON Resistance (Ω)0.6 [25] (series)1 (shunt)
6 (Series) [67,79]
<1 [80]
COFF (fF)5.4 [33]6 [47]2–10 [80]
Figures of Merit (FOM) (THz)17 [33]18 [67]10–20 [81]
Insertion Loss (dB)0.1 [30]0.7 [61]0.2 [82]
Isolation (dB)30 [30]40 [67]25 [83]
Switching Speed20 μs [25]25 ns [79]25 μs [83]
Reliability10,000 [27]260 M [47]
Power Handling Capability3 W [30]2 W [47]5 W [82]
Length800 nm–5 µm [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]100 nm–500 µm [47,61,67,79]150 µm [83]
OFF/ON Resistance Ratio~103–106 [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]~103–105 [47,61,67,79]Extremely High

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahanta, P.; Munna, M.; Coutu, R.A., Jr. Performance Comparison of Phase Change Materials and Metal-Insulator Transition Materials for Direct Current and Radio Frequency Switching Applications. Technologies 2018, 6, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020048

AMA Style

Mahanta P, Munna M, Coutu RA Jr. Performance Comparison of Phase Change Materials and Metal-Insulator Transition Materials for Direct Current and Radio Frequency Switching Applications. Technologies. 2018; 6(2):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahanta, Protap, Mohiuddin Munna, and Ronald A. Coutu, Jr. 2018. "Performance Comparison of Phase Change Materials and Metal-Insulator Transition Materials for Direct Current and Radio Frequency Switching Applications" Technologies 6, no. 2: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020048

APA Style

Mahanta, P., Munna, M., & Coutu, R. A., Jr. (2018). Performance Comparison of Phase Change Materials and Metal-Insulator Transition Materials for Direct Current and Radio Frequency Switching Applications. Technologies, 6(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop