Undergraduate Research Program to Recycle Composite Waste
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Previous Research Efforts by Undergraduate Research Programs
1.2. Brief Overview on Waste Treatment
1.3. Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer
- (i)
- Manufacturing composites from nonrenewable resources burden resources and waste management raise environmental concerns as they contribute to land and water pollution.
- (ii)
- Legal constraints on manufactures for disposing of the EoL waste on their own. Automobiles discarded after 2015 are required to be 85 percent recyclable, for example, limiting legitimate CFRP landfilling. The European Union has enacted tight regulations in this region. [30].
- (iii)
- Composites have insufficient economic feasibility, manufacturing electricity consumption (up to 165 kWh/kg) and the cost of the materials (up to £40 a kilogram) [26]. This calls for prompt measures for the re-entry of the materials into the market, thereby converting expensive waste disposal into cost-effective recycling of reusable materials and creating overall better sustainability.
- (iv)
- Most landfill sites are getting filled up, and dumping waste is getting expensive; tthe cost of legally ejecting CFRP from a landfill may be as low as 0.20 £/kg [31].
- (i)
- Mechanical recycling: composites are decomposed by employing crushing, shredding, milling, or similar mechanical processes. The composite shreds are segregated viz. powder (resin-enriched) and fibers (fiber-enriched), which are then used as reinforcements in the construction industry for optimizing integrity and strength of the structures (i.e., asphalt fillers, cement minerals, etc.) [32].
- (ii)
- Fiber Reclamation
2. Methodology
2.1. Safety Is a Priority
2.2. Material Handling
2.3. Constraints
2.4. Method
2.5. Material Testing
3. Experimentation
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (i)
- Design and fabrication of apparatus for prompt handling and storage of CFRP shreds under constant pressure.
- (ii)
- Optimum storage compartments for CFRP powder to prevent contamination.
- (iii)
- Design multicave molds to multiply sample production.
- (iv)
- Produce variable quality sample by providing different temperature and pressure conditions. The shreds can also be powdered to check to obtain better quality samples too.
- (v)
- Understand and comply with safety regulations related to process prepreg waste.
- (vi)
- Use engineering standardizations related to testing of the material.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pickering, S.J. Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials—Current status. Compos. Part A 2006, 37, 1206–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carberry, W. Airplane recycling efforts benefit Boeing operators. Boeing AERO Mag. QRT 2008, 4, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
- Buntrock, R.E. Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science: The transformation from student to scientist. Choice 2008, 46, 532. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, W.; Alnajjar, F.; Zaneldin, E.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Munkhjargal Gochoo, M.; Khalid, S. Implementing FDM 3D printing strategies using natural fibers to produce biomass composite. Materials 2020, 13, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taraban, R.; Blanton, R.L. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lopatto, D.; Tobias, S. Council on Undergraduate Research (U.S.), Research Corporation for Science Advancement. In Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning, 1st ed.; Council on Undergraduate Research: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Bridger, A.R.; Ford, R.M. Undergraduate student research engagement through the open laboratory model. New Dir. High. Educ. 2019, 185, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chris, C.; McKay, T.; Mazzeo, A.; Morris, J.; Prigodich, C.; De Groot, R. Cross-Discipline perceptions of the undergraduate research experience. J. High. Educ. 2011, 82, 92–113. [Google Scholar]
- Elaine, S.; Hunter, A.B.; Laursen, S.L.; DeAntoni, T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Sci. Educ. 2004, 88, 493–534. [Google Scholar]
- Marcus, F.; Webber, K.; Kleiber, P.B. How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students? CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2011, 10, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
- Webber, K.L.; Laird, T.F.N.; BrckaLorenz, A.M. Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research. Res. High. Educ. 2012, 54, 227–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffioen, M.E. The influence of undergraduate students’ research attitudes on their intentions for research usage in their future professional practice. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2018, 56, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, X.D.; Grineski, S.E.; Collins, T.W. Faculty motivation to mentor students through undergraduate research programs: A study of enabling and constraining factors. Res. High. Educ. 2016, 58, 520–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wolf, L.W. Undergraduate research as engaged student learning. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2018, 2018, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanucci, J.K. Publish with undergraduates or perish? Strategies for preserving faculty time in undergraduate research supervision at large universities and liberal arts colleges. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cooper, K.M.; Gin, L.E.; Akeeh, B.; Clark, C.E.; Hunter, J.S.; Roderick, T.B.; Brownell, S.E. Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Adams, S.K. Empowering and motivating undergraduate students through the process of developing publishable research. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, A.; Bischoff, W.R.; Aduddell, K. Research prescription for undergraduate students: Research mentoring in a small liberal arts university. J. Prof. Nurs. 2018, 35, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mann, G.; Bishop, T.U.; Kaiser, K.; Cafer, A. College2Youth: Design of multidisciplinary interdisciplinary undergraduate research experience. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2020, 52, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peifer, J.S. Context and reasons for bolstering diversity in undergraduate research. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, C.; Ma, J.; Xu, W.; Hua, Z. A social recommendation system for academic collaboration in undergraduate research. Expert Syst. 2018, 36, e12365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyles, C.T.; Moynihan, A.R.; Mulroy, J.D.; Fitch, B.; Watts, P.J.; Evans, J.L. Undergraduate student experiences with composite materials. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 2011, 39, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saliba, M.A.; Cassar, D.J.; Axiak, M. Undergraduate mechatronics research case study: Contributing towards a dexterous robot hand. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 2012, 40, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stappenbelt, B. Undergraduate mechanical engineering research project work in an action learning environment. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 2009, 37, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishay, P.L. Introducing undergraduate research in numerical analysis of engineering systems course. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 2018, 46, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaefer, D.; Panchal, J.H. Incorporating research into undergraduate design courses: A patent-centered approach. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 2009, 37, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stöckert, A.; Bogner, F.X. Cognitive learning about waste management: How relevance and interest influence long-term knowledge. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sanganyado, E.; Nkomo, S. Incorporating sustainability into engineering and chemical education using E-learning. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Witik, R.A.; Teuscher, R.; Michaud, V.; Ludwig, C.; Månson, J.A.E. Carbon fibre reinforced composite waste: An environmental assessment of recycling, energy recovery and landfilling. Compos. Part A 2013, 49, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, L.O.; Schulte, K.; Grove-Nielsen, E. Optimisation of a pyrolysis process for recycling of CFRP’s. In ICCM-16; Japan Society for Composite Materials: Kyoto, Japan, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering, S.J.; Kelly, R.M.; Kennerley, J.R.; Rudd, C.D.; Fenwick, N.J. A fluidised-bed process for the recovery of glass fibres from scrap thermoset composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2000, 60, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimenta, S.; Pinho, S. Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications: Technology review and market outlook. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 378–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marsh, G. Carbon recycling: A soluble problem. Reinf. Plast. 2009, 53, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, G. Reclaiming value from post-use carbon composite. Reinf. Plast. 2008, 52, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, M.; Chandra, A.; Livirya, A.; Beryozkina, S. AR-LabOr: Design and assessment of an augmented reality application for lab orientation. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Farnsworth, M.; Tiwari, A. A review of optimisation techniques used in the composite recycling area: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 140, 1775–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pimenta, S.; Pinho, S.T. The effect of recycling on the mechanical response of carbon fibers and their composites. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 3669–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dong, P.A.; Azzaro-Pantel, C.; Cadene, A. Economic and environmental assessment of recovery and disposal pathways for CFRP waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Turhan, D.; Celep, Z.; Zain-Edden, I.K. Transient wave propagation in layered media conducting heat. J. Sound Vib. 1991, 144, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Kim, D.; Williams, T.; Nutt, S. Recycling of carbon fiber composites using chemical treatment: Reaction characterization and optimization. In Proceedings of the The Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering(SAMPE), Seattle, WA, USA, 14−16 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, K.; Shi, Q.; Dunn, M.L.; Wang, T.; Qi, H.J. Carbon fiber reinforced thermoset composite with near 100% recyclability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 6098–6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law No.21 of 2005 Waste Management in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi; Emirates of Abu Dhabi: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2005; Chapter I, II & III, Article 1, 2 & 3.
- ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. ASTM International—Standards Worldwide. Available online: www.astm.org/Standards/D3039 (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Bindurani, P.; Ganesan, N.; Indira, P.V. Tensile properties of FRP and Ferrocement—A comparative study. In Advances in Civil Engineerin; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Singh, R.M., Sudheer, K.P., Kurian, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 83, pp. 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaneldin, E.; Ashur, S. Using spreadsheets as a tool in teaching construction management concepts and applications. In Proceedings of the 2008 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 22–25 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, W.; Alnaqbi, A.; Almazrouei, A.; Almarzooqi, L.; Al Jamal, D.; Genena, F. Method of Recycling Carbon Fiber Prepreg Waste. U.S. Patent 10,328,610, 25 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Adam, S.A.A.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y. Modeling and simulation of 5DOF robot manipulator and trajectory using MATLAB and CATIA. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Nagoya, Japan, 24–26 April 2017; Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7942657 (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Louisy, E.; Samyn, F.; Bourbigot, S.; Fontaine, G.; Bonnet, F. Preparation of glass fabric/poly(l-lactide) composites by thermoplastic resin transfer molding. Polymers 2019, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pócsová, J.; Bednárová, D.; Bogdanovská, G.; Mojžišová, A. Implementation of agile methodologies in an engineering course. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngereja, B.; Hussein, B.; Andersen, B. Does Project-Based Learning (PBL) promote student learning? A performance evaluation. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, M.K.; Nagata, F.; Watanabe, K. Mechatronics: Experiential learning and the stimulation of thinking skills. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Väisänen, S.; Hirsto, L. How can flipped classroom approach support the development of university students’ working life skills?—University teachers’ viewpoint. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ahmed, W.; Zaneldin, E.; Al Hassan, A. Undergraduate Research Program to Recycle Composite Waste. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070354
Ahmed W, Zaneldin E, Al Hassan A. Undergraduate Research Program to Recycle Composite Waste. Education Sciences. 2021; 11(7):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070354
Chicago/Turabian StyleAhmed, Waleed, Essam Zaneldin, and Amged Al Hassan. 2021. "Undergraduate Research Program to Recycle Composite Waste" Education Sciences 11, no. 7: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070354
APA StyleAhmed, W., Zaneldin, E., & Al Hassan, A. (2021). Undergraduate Research Program to Recycle Composite Waste. Education Sciences, 11(7), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070354