1. Introduction
Graph coloring is one of the most studied problems in graph theory, because it has many important applications [
1,
2,
3]. The main aim of the problem is to assign colors to the elements of a graph, such as vertices, subject to certain constraints.
For a plane graph
G,
,
, and
are the sets of vertices, edges, and faces of
G, respectively. The
degree of a vertex
, denoted by
, is the number of neighbors of
v in
G. The
degree of a face
, denoted by
, is the number of edges in its boundary, cut edges being counted twice. When no confusion can arise,
and
are simplified as
and
, respectively. A face
f is a
k-face if
and a
-face if
. Two faces
and
of
G are
adjacent -faces if
,
, and
and
have at least one common edge. Two distinct paths of
G are
internally disjoint if they have no internal vertices in common. For other terminologies and notations in graph theory, we refer to [
4].
A
k-coloring of a graph
G is an assignment of
k colors to the vertices of
G such that no two adjacent vertices are assigned the same color. A graph
G is
k-colorable if
G admits a
k-coloring. The
chromatic number of
G, denoted by
, is the minimum number
k such that
G is
k-colorable. A graph
G is
uniquely k-colorable if
and
G has only one
k-coloring up to the permutation of the colors, where the coloring is called a
unique k-coloring of
G. In other words, all
k-colorings of
G induce the same partition of
into
k independent sets, in which an independent set is called a
color class of
G. In addition, uniquely colorable graphs may be defined in terms of their chromatic polynomials, which was initiated by Birkhoff [
5] for planar graphs in 1912 and for general graphs by Whitney [
6] in 1932. A graph
G is uniquely
k-colorable if and only if its chromatic polynomial is
. For a discussion of chromatic polynomials, see Read [
7].
Uniquely colorable graphs were first studied by Harary and Cartwright [
8] in 1968. They proved the following theorem.
Theorem 1 (Harary and Cartwright [
8]).
Let G be a uniquely k-colorable graph. Then, for any unique k-coloring of G, the subgraph induced by the union of any two color classes is connected. As a corollary of Theorem 1, it can be seen that a uniquely
k-colorable graph
G has at least
edges. There are many references on uniquely colorable graphs [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13].
Dailey [
14] proved that the problem of determining whether a graph
G is uniquely colorable is NP-complete. However, it is still open for the case of planar graphs. Therefore, it is important to characterize the structure of uniquely colorable planar graphs.
Chartrand and Geller [
10] in 1969 started to study uniquely colorable planar graphs. They proved that uniquely three-colorable planar graphs with at least four vertices contain at least two triangles, uniquely four-colorable planar graphs are maximal planar graphs, and uniquely five-colorable planar graphs do not exist. Aksionov [
15] in 1977 improved the lower bound for the number of triangles in a uniquely three-colorable planar graph. He proved that a uniquely three-colorable planar graph with at least five vertices contains at least three triangles and gave a complete description of uniquely three-colorable planar graphs containing exactly three triangles. Li et al. [
12] proved that if a uniquely three-colorable planar graph
G has at most four triangles, then
G has two adjacent triangles. Moreover, for any
, they constructed a uniquely three-colorable planar graph with
k triangles and without adjacent triangles.
Let
G be a uniquely
k-colorable graph.
G is
edge-critical if
is not uniquely
k-colorable for any edge
. Obviously, if a uniquely
k-colorable graph
G has exactly
edges, then
G is edge-critical. Mel’nikov and Steinberg [
16] in 1977 asked to find an exact upper bound for the number of edges in an edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graph with
n vertices. In 2013, Matsumoto [
17] proved that an edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graph has at most
edges and constructed an infinite family of edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graphs with
n vertices and
edges, where
. This upper bound was improved by Li et al. [
13] to
when
.
In this paper, we mainly prove Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. If G is a uniquely three-colorable plane graph, then G has adjacent -faces, where . The bound five for k is the best possible.
Furthermore, by using constructions, we prove that there exist uniquely three-colorable plane graphs having neither adjacent -faces nor adjacent -faces, where are fixed in and . One of our constructions implies that there exists an infinite family of edge-critical uniquely three-colorable plane graphs with n vertices and edges, where is odd and . Our results further characterize the structure of the uniquely three-colorable plane graphs. The results can be used in optimal territorial distribution of mobile operators’ transmitters.
2. Proof of Theorem 2
Now, we prove Theorem 2. First we give a useful Lemma 1.
Lemma 1. Let G be a plane graph with three faces. If G has no adjacent -faces, where , then .
Proof. We prove this by using a simple charging scheme. Since G has no adjacent -faces when , for any edge e incident to a three-face f, e is incident to a face of degree at least six. Let for any face , and we call the initial charge of the face f. Let initial charges in G be redistributed according to the following rule.
Rule: For each three-face f of G and each edge e incident with f, the -face incident with e sends charge to f through e.
Denote by
the charge of a face
after applying the redistributed rule. Then:
On the other hand, for any three-face
f of
G, since the degree of each face adjacent to
f is at least six, then by the redistributed rule,
. For any four-face or five-face
f of
G,
. For any
-face
f of
G, since
f is incident to at most
edges, each of which is incident to a three-face, then
. Therefore, we have:
By Formulae (1) and (2), we have . □
Proof of Theorem 2. Suppose that the theorem is not true, and let
G be a counterexample to the theorem. Then,
G has at least one three-face and no adjacent
-faces, where
. By Lemma 1,
. Using Euler’s Formula
, we can obtain:
Since G is uniquely three-colorable, then by Theorem 1, we have This is a contradiction.
Note that the graph shown in
Figure 1 is a uniquely three-colorable plane graph having neither adjacent
-faces nor adjacent
-faces. Therefore, the bound of five for
k is the best possible. □
Remark 1. By piecing together more copies of the plane graph in Figure 1, one can construct an infinite class of uniquely three-colorable plane graphs having neither adjacent -faces nor adjacent -faces. 3. Construction of Uniquely Three-Colorable Plane Graphs without Adjacent (3,3)-Faces or Adjacent (3,5)-Faces
There are many classes of uniquely three-colorable plane graphs having neither adjacent -faces nor adjacent -faces, such as even maximal plane graphs (maximal plane graphs in which each vertex has even degree) and maximal outerplanar graphs with at least six vertices. Now, we construct a class of uniquely three-colorable plane graphs having neither adjacent -faces nor adjacent -faces and prove that these graphs are edge-critical.
We construct a graph as follows:
- (1)
;
- (2)
or
or
, where
k is odd and
(see an example
shown in
Figure 2).
Theorem 3. For any odd k with , is uniquely three-colorable.
Proof. Let
f be any three-coloring of
. Since
is a cycle of odd length and each
is adjacent to
u or
w, we have
. Without loss of generality, let
and
. By the construction of
, we know that
is adjacent to both
u and
w, where
. Therefore,
can only receive the color three, namely
,
. Since
is adjacent to both
w and
in
, we have
,
. Similarly, we can obtain
,
. Therefore, the three-coloring
f is uniquely decided as shown in
Figure 2, and then,
is uniquely three-colorable. □
Theorem 4. For any odd k with , is edge-critical.
Proof. To complete the proof, it suffices to show that
is not uniquely three-colorable for any edge
. Let
f be a uniquely three-coloring of
shown in
Figure 2. Denote by
the set of edges in
whose ends are colored by
i and
j, respectively, where
. Namely:
Observation 1. Both the subgraphs and of induced by and are trees.
Observation 2. The subgraph of induced by consists of k internally disjoint paths , where .
If , then is not uniquely three-colorable by Observation 1. Suppose that . By Observation 2, there exists a number such that . Moreover, contains at least one vertex of degree two. By repeatedly deleting vertices of degree two in , we can obtain a subgraph of . Now, we prove that is not uniquely three-colorable.
It can be seen that the restriction of f to the vertices of is a three-coloring of . On the other hand, is a path, denoted by P. Let , and alternately, color the vertices of P by the other two colors. We can obtain a three-coloring of , which is distinct from . Since each three-coloring of can be extended to a three-coloring of , we know that is not uniquely three-colorable when .
Since , is not uniquely three-colorable for any edge . □
Note that has vertices and edges by the construction. From Theorem 4, we can obtain the following result.
Corollary 1. There exists an infinite family of edge-critical uniquely three-colorable plane graphs with n vertices and edges, where is odd and .
Denote by
the upper bound of the number of edges of edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graphs with
n vertices. Then, by Corollary 1 and the result due to Li et al. [
13], we can obtain the following result.
Corollary 2. For any odd integer n such that and , we have .
Proof. First, in [
13], Li et al. proved that
for any edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graph
G with
vertices. Then, by Corollary 1, we can conclude that Corollary 2 is true. □
Corollary 2 improves the lower bound
of
given by Matsumoto [
17] and gives a negative answer to a problem proposed by Mel’nikov and Steinberg [
16], who asked that
for any
.
4. Conclusions and Conjectures
In this paper, we obtained a structural property of uniquely three-colorable plane graphs. We proved that every uniquely three-colorable plane graph has adjacent
-faces, where
, and the bound of five for
k is the best possible. The graph in
Figure 1 shows a uniquely three-colorable plane graph having neither adjacent
-faces nor adjacent
-faces. However this plane graph is two-connected. This prompts us to propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 1. Let G be a three-connected uniquely three-colorable plane graph. Then, G has adjacent -faces, where .
It can be seen that the uniquely three-colorable plane graph
constructed in
Section 3 is three-connected. So Therefore, Conjecture 1 is true, then the bound of four for
k is the best possible. Moreover, because the family of graphs
is the edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graphs with the largest number of edges found at present, we recall the follow conjecture proposed by Li et al [
13].
Conjecture 2 ([
13]).
Let G be an edge-critical uniquely three-colorable planar graph with n vertices. Then, .