Next Article in Journal
A Quadratic Diophantine Equation Involving Generalized Fibonacci Numbers
Next Article in Special Issue
On Nonnil-S-Noetherian Rings
Previous Article in Journal
An Extension of Fuzzy Competition Graph and Its Uses in Manufacturing Industries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Linear Operators That Preserve Two Genera of a Graph
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(6), 1009; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061009
Submission received: 13 May 2020 / Revised: 11 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 19 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Algebra and Discrete Mathematics 2020)

Abstract

:
There are six different classes of endomorphisms for a graph. The sets of these endomorphisms always form a chain under the inclusion of sets. For a more systematic treatment of different endomorphisms, Böttcher and Knauer proposed the concepts of the endomorphism type and the endomorphism spectrum of a graph in 1992. In this paper, we studied endomorphism types and endomorphism spectra of double fan graphs.

1. Introduction

More and more scholars paid attention to monoids of graphs during the last few years and many important results concerning endomorphism monoids of graphs have been attained ([1,2,3,4,5,6]). In order to study six classes of endomorphisms of a graph more systematically, Böttcher and Knauer proposed the concepts of the endomorphism type and the endomorphism spectrum in [7]. In [8], Fan explored endomorphism spectra of bipartite graphs with diameter three and girth six. In [9] various endomorphisms of generalized polygons were explored and endomorphism types of generalized polygons were provided. In [10] Hou, Luo, and Cheng characterized the endomorphism monoid of P n ¯ . The endomorphism type and the endomorphism spectrum of P n ¯ were obtained. In [11] Hou, Gu, and Song explored six classes of endomorphisms of fan graphs. Endomorphism types and endomorphism spectra of these graphs were given. In this paper, we explore endomorphism types and endomorphisms spectra of double fan graphs.

2. Preliminary Concepts

Throughout this paper, all graphs are assumed to be finite, undirected, and simple. For a graph X, denote by V ( X ) and E ( X ) the vertex set and edge set of X, respectively. Let v V ( X ) . Denote N ( v ) = { x V ( X ) | { x , v } E ( X ) } . Let f be a mapping on V ( X ) . If { x 1 , x 2 } E ( X ) implies that { f ( x 1 ) , f ( x 2 ) } E ( X ) , then f is known as an endomorphism of X. If { f ( a ) , f ( b ) } E ( X ) implies that there exist x 1 , x 2 V ( X ) with f ( a ) = f ( x 1 ) and f ( b ) = f ( x 2 ) such that { x 1 , x 2 } E ( X ) , then f is said to be half-strong. If { f ( a ) , f ( b ) } E ( X ) implies that the subgraph of X induced by f 1 ( f ( a ) ) f 1 ( f ( b ) ) has no isolated vertex, then f is said to be locally strong. If { f ( a ) , f ( b ) } E ( X ) implies that there exists x 1 f 1 ( f ( a ) ) which is adjacent to every vertex of f 1 ( f ( b ) ) and analogously for preimage of f ( b ) , then f is said to be quasi-strong. If { f ( a ) , f ( b ) } E ( X ) implies that the subgraph of X induced by f 1 ( f ( a ) ) f 1 ( f ( b ) ) is complete bipartite, then f is said to be strong. If f is bijective, then f is known as an automorphism of X. Denote the set of automorphisms, strong endomorphisms, quasi-strong endomorphisms, locally strong endomorphisms, half-strong endomorphisms, and endomorphisms for a graph X by A u t ( X ) , s E n d ( X ) , q E n d ( X ) , l E n d ( X ) , h E n d ( X ) , and E n d ( X ) , respectively. Clearly
E n d ( X ) h E n d ( X ) l E n d ( X ) q E n d ( X ) s E n d ( X ) A u t ( X ) .
The 6-tuple
( | E n d ( X ) | , | h E n d ( X ) | , | l E n d ( X ) | , | q E n d ( X ) | , | s E n d ( X ) | , | A u t ( X ) | )
is known as the endomorphism spectrum of X and we denote it by E n d o s p e c X . Let s i { 0 , 1 } , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , where s i = 0 if and only if the ith element equals to the ( i + 1 ) th element in E n d o s p e c X and s i = 1 otherwise. The integer i = 1 5 s i 2 i 1 is known as the endomorphism type of X and we denote it by E n d o t y p e X .
Let f E n d ( X ) and A V ( X ) . Denote by f | A the restriction of f on A. The endomorphic image I f of X under f is a subgraph of X with V ( I f ) = f ( V ( X ) ) and { f ( a ) , f ( b ) } E ( I f ) if and only if there exist s f 1 ( f ( a ) ) and t f 1 ( f ( b ) ) such that { s , t } E ( X ) . The endomorphic kernel ρ f induced by f is an equivalence relation on V ( X ) such that for a , b V ( X ) , ( a , b ) ρ f if and only if f ( a ) = f ( b ) .
Example 1.
Let D F 4 be a double fan graph, as shown in Figure 1. Let
f 1 = 1 2 3 4 s t s 1 t 3 2 2 , f 2 = 1 2 3 4 s t 3 2 3 4 s t ,
f 3 = 1 2 3 4 s t 1 2 1 2 s t , f 4 = 1 2 3 4 s t 1 2 3 4 s s ,
Then it is easy to check that f 1 E n d ( D F 4 ) \ h E n d ( D F 4 ) , f 2 h E n d ( D F 4 ) \ l E n d ( D F 4 ) , f 3 l E n d ( D F 4 ) \ q E n d ( D F 4 ) and f 4 s E n d ( D F 4 ) \ A u t ( D F 4 ) ,
We refer the reader to [12,13,14,15] for all the concepts of semigroup theory and graph theory not defined here.

3. Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs

Let D F n be a double fan graph as shown in Figure 2 and A = 1 , 2 , , n . Denote by B = 1 , 3 , 5 , the subset of A containing all the odd numbers and by C = 2 , 4 , 6 the subset of A containing all the even numbers.
Lemma 1.
([16]) Let X be a graph and f E n d ( X ) . Then f h E n d ( X ) if and only if I f is an induced subgraph of X.
Lemma 2.
Let f E n d ( D F n ) . Then f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , or f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t .
(1) If f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , then f | A E n d ( P n ) .
(2) If f ( s ) = f ( t ) = i for some i A , then I f K 3 , or I f F 3 , or I f D F 3 .
(3) If f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = j for some i , j A , then | i j | = 2 , I f F 3 or I f D F 3 .
Proof. 
(1) Let f E n d ( D F n ) and f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . Then f ( A ) A . Since the subgraph of D F n induced by A is P n , f | A E n d ( P n ) .
(2) If f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , there are three cases:
Case 1. f ( s ) = f ( t ) = i for some i A . Since s and t are adjacent to all vertices of A, f ( s ) and f ( t ) are adjacent to all vertices of f ( A ) . Note that i is adjacent to at most 4 vertices. If V ( I f ) = 3 , then I f K 3 . If V ( I f ) = 4 , then I f F 3 . If V ( I f ) = 5 , then I f D F 3 .
Case 2. f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = j for some i , j A . Since s and t are adjacent to all vertices of A, i and j are adjacent to all vertices of f ( A ) . Thus | i j | = 2 . If f ( A ) has two vertices, then I f F 3 . If f ( A ) has three vertices, then I f D F 3 . Thus (3) is proved.
Case 3. f ( s ) s , t and f ( t ) s , t . Without loss of generalization, suppose that f ( s ) = i for some i A and f ( t ) = t . Since t is adjacent to all vertices of A and N ( t ) = A , f ( A ) A . Now f ( A ) has two adjacent vertices f ( x ) and f ( y ) . As s is adjacent to all vertices of A, i is adjacent to all vertices of f ( A ) . In particular, i is adjacent to f ( x ) and f ( y ) . Thus the subgraph of D F n induced by { f ( x ) , f ( y ) , i } is isomorphic to K 3 . This is impossible since the subgraph of D F n induced by A is a path. □
Lemma 3.
Let D F n be a double fan graph. Then E n d ( D F n ) = h E n d ( D F n ) if and only if n 3 .
Proof. 
Necessity. We only need to prove that E n d ( D F n ) h E n d ( D F n ) for any n 4 . Define a mapping f on V ( D F n ) by
f ( x ) = s , x = 1 , 1 , x = 2 , t , x 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 , , 3 , x 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , , 2 , x s , t .
Then f E n d ( D F n ) and s , 3 E ( D F n ) . Note that f 1 ( s ) = 1 , f 1 ( 3 ) 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 and { u , v } E ( D F n ) for any u f 1 ( s ) and v f 1 ( 3 ) . Then f h E n d ( D F n ) .
Sufficiency. If n = 2 , there are only two vertices s and t which are not adjacent in V ( D F n ) . Let f E n d ( D F n ) \ A u t ( D F n ) . Then f ( s ) = f ( t ) . Note that N ( s ) = N ( t ) . Then f s E n d ( D F n ) . If n = 3 , then there are two pairs of vertices in V ( D F n ) , which are not adjacent. They are 1 and 3, s and t. Let f E n d ( D F n ) . If f ( i ) = f ( j ) , then i = 1 and j = 3 , or i = s and j = t . Note that N ( 1 ) = N ( 3 ) and N ( s ) = N ( t ) . Thus E n d ( D F 3 ) = s E n d ( D F 3 ) . Therefore E n d ( D F n ) = h E n d ( D F n ) for n = 2 , 3 . □
Lemma 4.
Let D F n be a double fan graph with n 4 , as shown in Figure 3. If n is odd, then | E n d ( D F n ) | = 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 4 ( 2 n 1 ) n 1 2 n 1 + 16 n 24 + ( 10 n 12 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) 2 n + 1 2 2 2 n 1 2 2 ; If n is even, then | E n d ( D F n ) | = 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 4 n n 2 n + 16 n 24 + ( 16 n 24 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) 2 .
Proof. 
Let f E n d ( D F n ) . By Lemma 2, f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t or f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t .
(1) Suppose that f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . By Lemma 2 (1), f | A E n d ( P n ) . Thus the number of endomorphisms of D F n such that f ( s ) = s and f ( t ) = t is equal to E n d ( P n ) . A similar argument will show that the number of endomorphisms is equal to E n d ( P n ) for the case of f ( s ) = t and f ( t ) = s , f ( s ) = f ( t ) = s and f ( s ) = f ( t ) = t . Hence there are 4 E n d ( P n ) endomorphisms in this case. It is known from [17] that
E n d ( P n ) = ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 ( 2 n 1 ) n 1 2 n 1 , i f n i s o d d , ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 n n 2 n , i f n i s e v e n .
(2) Suppose that f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . By Lemma 2, there are three cases:
Case 1. Assume that I f K 3 . Then f ( A ) = 2 and ρ f = B , C , s , t . There are 2 ( n 1 ) subgraphs in D F n isomorphic to K 3 . Select a subgraph X of D F n such that X K 3 . Without loss of generality, let V ( X ) = i , j , k , where i , j A and k { s , t } . Since f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , f ( s ) = i or f ( s ) = j . At the same time, f can map B , C to V ( X ) \ f ( s ) in two ways. Therefore there are 8 ( n 1 ) endomorphisms in this case.
Case 2. Assume that I f F 3 . Then V ( I f ) = i , j , s , t for some i , j A with i , j E ( D F n ) , or V ( I f ) = i , j , k , m for some i , j , k A and m s , t with i , j E ( D F n ) and j , k E ( D F n ) . There are three cases:
(i) Assume that f ( s ) = f ( t ) and V ( I f ) = i , j , s , t . If n is odd, then B = n + 1 2 and C = n 1 2 . Now there are n 1 subgraphs in D F n which are isomorphic to I f and there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to divide B into two non-empty subsets B 1 and B 2 . Clearly, there are two ways to map { B 1 , B 2 } to { s , t } and there are two ways to map { C , [ s , t ] } to { i , j } . Similarly, there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to divide C into two non-empty subsets C 1 and C 2 . Now there are two ways to map { C 1 , C 2 } to { s , t } and there are two ways to map { B , [ s , t ] } to { i , j } . Therefore, there are 4 ( n 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) endomorphisms in this case. If n is even, a similar argument will show that there are 8 ( n 1 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) endomorphisms.
(ii) Assume that f ( s ) = f ( t ) = j and V ( I f ) = i , j , k , m . Then there are 2 ( n 2 ) endomorphism images. If n is odd, there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to divide B into two non-empty subsets B 1 and B 2 and there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to divide C into two non-empty subsets C 1 and C 2 . If f ( C ) = m , then there are two ways to map { B 1 , B 2 } to { i , k } . If f ( B ) = m , then there are two ways to map { C 1 , C 2 } to { i , k } . Therefore, there are 2 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) endomorphisms in this case. If n is even, a similar argument will show that there are 4 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) endomorphisms.
(iii) Assume that f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = k for some i , j A and V ( I f ) = i , j , k , m . Then | i j | = 2 and there are 2 ( n 2 ) endomorphisms images. Note that f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = k . Now there are two ways map { B , C } to { m , j } . Analogously for the case of f ( s ) = k and f ( t ) = i . Therefore, there are 8 ( n 2 ) endomorphisms in this case.
Therefore, if I f F 3 and n is odd, then there are ( 6 n 8 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) endomorphisms. If I f F 3 and n is even, then there are ( 12 n 16 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) endomorphisms.
Case 3. Assume that I f D F 3 . Then there are n 2 subgraphs in D F n isomorphic to D F 3 . Select a subgraph Z of D F n such that Z D F 3 . Then Z has three vertices in A. Suppose V ( Z ) = i , j , k , s , t for some i , j , k A such that i , j E ( D F n ) and j , k E ( D F n ) . Then f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = k , or f ( s ) = k and f ( t ) = i , or f ( s ) = f ( t ) = j .
(i) If n is odd, then B = n + 1 2 and C = n 1 2 . Note that there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to divide B into two non-empty subsets B 1 and B 2 and there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to divide C into two non-empty subsets C 1 and C 2 .
If f ( s ) = f ( t ) = j , then there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to map the vertices in B to { i , k } and there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to map vertices in C to { s , t } , or there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to map the vertices in B to { s , t } and there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to map the vertices in C to { i , j } . Therefore, there are 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 2 ) ( 2 n 1 2 2 ) endomorphisms in this case.
If f ( s ) = i , f ( t ) = k and f ( C ) = j , then there are 2 n + 1 2 2 ways to map the vertices in B to { s , t } . If f ( s ) = i , f ( t ) = k and f ( B ) = j , then there are 2 n 1 2 2 ways to map vertices in C to { s , t } . It is also analogous for the case of f ( s ) = k and f ( t ) = i . Therefore, there are 2 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) endomorphisms in this case.
(ii) If n is even, then B = C = n 2 . Thus, there are 2 n 2 2 ways to divide B into two non-empty subsets B 1 and B 2 and there are 2 n 2 2 ways to divide C into two non-empty subsets C 1 and C 2 .
If f ( s ) = f ( t ) = j , then there are 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) 2 endomorphisms. If f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = k , then there are 2 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) endomorphisms. Analogously for the case of f ( s ) = k and f ( t ) = i . Then there are 4 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) endomorphisms.
Therefore, if I f D F 3 and n is odd, then there are 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 2 ) ( 2 n 1 2 2 ) + 2 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) endomorphisms. If I f D F 3 and n is even, then there are 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) 2 + 4 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) endomorphisms.
From the above discussion, we finish our proof. □
Lemma 5.
Let D F n be a double fan graph with n 4 . Then h E n d ( D F 4 ) = E n d ( D F 4 ) 16 . If n is odd, then h E n d ( D F n ) = E n d ( D F n ) 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 5 2 a i ; If n is even and n 6 , then h E n d ( D F n ) = E n d ( D F n ) 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 6 2 a i + b n 4 2 + 1 , where a m = b 1 2 m 1 + b 2 2 m 2 + + b m 2 2 2 + 5 b m 1 + 2 b m 2 m 3 and b m = 1 5 1 + 5 2 m 1 5 2 m is the Fibonacci sequence.
Proof. 
Let f E n d ( D F n ) . By Lemma 2, f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , or f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . If f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , then f | A E n d ( P n ) . It is easy to check that f h E n d ( X ) . If f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t , then I f K 3 , or I f F 3 , or I f D F 3 . If I f K 3 or I f F 3 , then I f is an induced subgraph, and so f h E n d ( X ) .
In the following, we assume that I f D F 3 . Clearly, there are n 2 subgraphs in D F n isomorphic to D F 3 . Select a subgraph Y of D F n such that Y D F 3 . Without loss of generality, suppose V ( Y ) = i , j , k , s , t for some i , j , k A such that i , j E ( D F n ) and j , k E ( D F n ) . Let A 1 B such that 1 A 1 , A 2 = { k | k C a n d | k j | = 1 f o r s o m e j A 1 } , A 3 = B \ A 1 and A 4 = C \ A 2 . Now f is not half-strong if and only if f maps A 1 , A 3 to s , t and maps A 2 , A 4 to i , k , or f maps A 2 , A 4 to s , t and maps A 1 , A 3 to i , k . There are three cases:
Case 1. Assume that n = 4 . Then there are only one way to divide A into four non-empty subsets A 1 , A 2 , A 3 , A 4 . It is easy to see that there are 2 ways to map A 1 , A 3 to s , t and there are 2 ways to map A 2 , A 4 to i , k . Similarly, there are 2 ways to map A 2 , A 4 to s , t and there are 2 ways to map A 1 , A 3 to i , k . Note that there are two subgraphs in D F 4 isomorphic to D F 3 . Thus there are 16 endomorphisms of D F 4 which are not half-strong.
Case 2. Assume that n is odd. Then A 1 = 1 + i = 1 n 5 2 a i , where a m = b 1 2 m 1 + b 2 2 m 2 + + b m 2 2 2 + 5 b m 1 + 2 b m 2 m 3 and b m = 1 5 1 + 5 2 m 1 5 2 m is the Fibonacci sequence. It is easy to see that there are 2 ways to map A 1 , A 3 to s , t and there are 2 ways to map A 2 , A 4 to i , k . Similarly, there are 2 ways to map A 2 , A 4 to s , t and there are 2 ways to map A 1 , A 3 to i , k . Note that there are n 2 subgraphs in D F n isomorphic to D F 3 . Thus, there are 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 5 2 a i endomorphisms of D F 3 which are not half-strong in this case.
Case 3. Assume that n is even and n 6 . Then A 1 = 1 + i = 1 n 6 2 a i + b n 4 2 + 1 . Thus, there are 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 6 2 a i + b n 4 2 + 1 endomorphisms of D F 3 , which are not half-strong.
From the above discussion, we get the results of Lemma 5 to finish our proof. □
Lemma 6.
Let D F n be a double fan graph. Then h E n d ( D F n ) = l E n d ( D F n ) if and only if n 3 .
Proof. 
Necessity. We only need to prove that h E n d ( D F n ) l E n d ( D F n ) for any n 4 . Define a mapping f on V ( D F n ) by
f ( x ) = 3 , x = 1 , x , o t h e r w i s e .
Then f h E n d ( D F n ) . It is not hard to show that { 3 , 4 } = { f ( 3 ) , f ( 4 ) } E ( I f ) , f 1 ( 3 ) = { 1 , 3 } and f 1 ( 4 ) = { 4 } . Note that { 1 , 4 } E ( D F n ) . Then f l E n d ( D F n ) . Therefore, h E n d ( D F n ) l E n d ( D F n ) .
Sufficiency. If n = 2 , 3 , then E n d ( D F n ) = s E n d ( D F n ) by the proof of Lemma 3. Therefore, h E n d ( D F n ) = l E n d ( D F n ) for n = 2 , 3 . □
Lemma 7.
Let f E n d ( D F n ) be such that f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . Then f l E n d ( D F n ) if and only if f | A l E n d ( P n ) .
Proof. 
Necessity. Let f l E n d ( D F n ) be such that f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . Then f | A E n d ( P n ) . Let i , j V ( I f | A ) be such that { i , j } E ( I f | A ) . Since f is locally-strong, for every i f 1 ( i ) there exists j f 1 ( j ) such that i , j E ( P n ) and analogously for preimage of j. Note that f | A 1 ( i ) = f 1 ( i ) A and f | A 1 ( j ) = f 1 ( j ) A . Then f | A l E n d ( P n ) .
Sufficiency. Let i , j V ( I f ) be such that i , j E ( I f ) . If i s , t , then f 1 ( i ) s , t . Clearly, s and t are adjacent to all vertices of f 1 ( j ) . If i , j s , t , then i , j A . Now we have i , j E ( I f | A ) . Since f | A l E n d ( P n ) , for every preimage i f | A 1 ( i ) there exists a preimage j f | A 1 ( j ) such that i , j E ( P n ) and analogously for preimage of j. Note that f | A 1 ( i ) = f 1 ( i ) A and f | A 1 ( j ) = f 1 ( j ) A . Then f l E n d ( D F n ) . □
Lemma 8.
l E n d ( D F n ) = 8 l | ( n 1 ) n l + 24 n 36 , i f n i s o d d a n d n 4 , 8 l | ( n 1 ) n l + 16 n 24 , i f n i s e v e n a n d n 4 .
Proof. 
Let f E n d ( D F n ) . Firstly, suppose that f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . By Lemma 7, f l E n d ( D F n ) if and only if f | A l E n d ( P n ) . It is known from [18] that l E n d ( P n ) = 2 l | ( n 1 ) ( n l ) . Now we have f ( s ) = s and f ( t ) = t , or f ( s ) = t and f ( t ) = s , or f ( s ) = f ( t ) = s , or f ( s ) = f ( t ) = t . Thus, we have l E n d ( D F n ) = 8 l | ( n 1 ) ( n l ) endomorphisms in this case.
Next, suppose that f ( s ) = f ( t ) = i for some i A . By Lemma 2, I f K 3 , or I f F 3 , or I f D F 3 . There are three cases.
Case 1. Assume that I f K 3 . Then f ( A ) = 2 and ρ f = { B , C , [ s , t ] } . The subgraphs of D F n induced by B C , B s , t , C s , t have no isolated vertices. Then f l E n d ( D F n ) . There are 8 ( n 1 ) endomorphisms of D F n by Lemma 4.
Case 2. Assume that I f F 3 . Denote B 1 = 4 m + 1 B | w h e r e m = 0 , 1 , 2 , and B 2 = 4 m + 3 B | w h e r e m = 0 , 1 , 2 , . Then it is easy to see that f l E n d ( D F n ) if and only if n is odd and ρ f = B 1 , B 2 , C , s , t . Now V ( I f ) = { i , j , s , t } for some i , j A such that i , j E ( D F n ) , or V ( I f ) = { i , j , k , m } for some i , j , k A and m { s , t } such that i , j E ( D F n ) and j , k E ( D F n ) . If V ( I f ) = { i , j , s , t } , then there are n 1 endomorphism images. Note that there are two ways to map { B 1 , B 2 } to { s , t } and there are two ways to map { C , { s , t } } to { i , j } . Thus there are 4 ( n 1 ) locally strong endomorphisms. If V ( I f ) = { i , j , k , m } , then there are 2 ( n 2 ) endomorphism images. Now f ( s ) = f ( t ) = j and f ( C ) = m . Note that there are two ways to map { B 1 , B 2 } to { i , k } . Thus, there are 4 ( n 2 ) locally strong endomorphisms. Therefore, there are 8 n 12 locally strong endomorphisms in this case.
Case 3. Assume that I f D F 3 . Then f is not locally strong.
Finally, suppose that f ( s ) = i and f ( t ) = j for some i , j A . By Lemma 2, | i j | = 2 , I f F 3 or I f D F 3 .
(1) If I f F 3 , it is easy to check that ρ f = B , C , s , t . Note that the subgraphs of D F n induced by B C , B { s } , C { s } , B { t } , C { t } have no isolated vertices. Then f l E n d ( D F n ) . By Lemma 4, There are 8 ( n 2 ) endomorphisms in this case.
(2) If I f D F 3 , then f l E n d ( D F 3 ) for any n 4 . Hence there are no locally endomorphisms in this case.
From the discussion above, we deduce Lemma 8 to finish our proof. □
Lemma 9.
l E n d ( D F n ) = q E n d ( D F n ) if and only if n = 2 , 3 , 4 .
Proof. 
Necessity. We only need to show that l E n d ( D F n ) q E n d ( D F n ) for any n 5 . Define a mapping f on V ( D F n ) by
f ( x ) = 1 , x B , 2 , x C , x , o t h e r w i s e .
It is not difficult to show that f l E n d ( D F n ) \ q E n d ( D F n ) . Therefore, l E n d ( D F n ) q E n d ( D F n ) .
Sufficiency. If n = 2 , 3 , then l E n d ( D F n ) = q E n d ( D F n ) by the proof of Lemma 3. If n = 4 , then there exist only two positive integers 1 and 3 such that 1 | n 1 , 3 | n 1 . Let f l E n d ( D F 4 ) , then ρ f = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , s , t , or ρ f = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , s , t , or ρ f = 1 , 3 , 2 , 4 , s , t or ρ f = 1 , 3 , 2 , 4 , s , t . If ρ f = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , s , t , then f A u t ( D F 4 ) . If ρ f = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , s , t , then I f F 4 . It is easy to check that f q E n d ( D F 4 ) . If ρ f = 1 , 3 , 2 , 4 , s , t or ρ f = 1 , 3 , 2 , 4 , s , t , it is a routine matter to check that f q E n d ( D F 4 ) . Therefore, we have l E n d ( D F n ) = q E n d ( D F n ) . □
Lemma 10.
q E n d ( D F n ) = s E n d ( D F n ) if and only if n 4 .
Proof. 
Necessity. We show that q E n d ( D F 4 ) s E n d ( D F 4 ) . Define a mapping f on V ( D F 4 ) by
f ( x ) = 1 , x 1 , 3 , 2 , x 2 , 4 , x , x s , t .
It is easy to check that f q E n d ( D F 4 ) , f 1 ( 1 ) 1 , 3 , f 1 ( 2 ) 2 , 4 and 1 , 4 E ( D F 4 ) . Then f s E n d ( D F 4 ) .
Sufficiency. If n = 2 , 3 , then E n d ( D F n ) = s E n d ( D F n ) by the proof of Lemma 3. In the following, we suppose that n 5 . Let f D F n .
(1) If I f K 3 , then ρ f = B , C , s , t . Since n 5 , B 3 . Note that f q E n d ( D F n ) and f ( B ) , f ( C ) E ( I f ) . Then there exists d C adjacent to every vertex of B. This is impossible since each vertex of A is adjacent to at most two vertices of A.
(2) If I f is not isomorphic to K 3 . Then f ( A ) contains at least 3 vertices. Since f A u t ( D F n ) , there exist i , j A such that f ( i ) = f ( j ) . Suppose there exist f ( a ) , f ( b ) f ( A ) such that f ( i ) , f ( a ) E ( I f ) and f ( i ) , f ( b ) E ( I f ) . Then there exists a preimage a of f ( a ) such that a is adjacent to both i and j. Similarly, there exists b f 1 ( f ( b ) ) such that b is adjacent to both i and j. Thus i , j , a , b forms a cycle C 4 . This is impossible since the subgraph of D F n induced by A is a path. Suppose there exists only one vertex f ( c ) f ( A ) such that f ( i ) , f ( c ) E ( I f ) . Then there exists f ( d ) f ( A ) such that f ( c ) , f ( d ) E ( I f ) since f ( A ) 3 . Now there exists c f 1 ( f ( c ) ) such that c is adjacent to both i and j, and there exists d f 1 ( f ( d ) ) such that d is adjacent to c . Thus c is adjacent to 3 vertices of A. This is a contradiction since each vertex of A is adjacent to at most 2 vertices in A. Consequently, q E n d ( D F n ) = s E n d ( D F n ) for n 5 . □
Lemma 11.
s E n d ( D F n ) A u t ( D F n ) for any n 2 .
Proof. 
Define a mapping f on V ( D F n ) by
f ( x ) = t , x = s , x , o t h e r w i s e .
It is not hard to check that f s E n d ( D F n ) , but f A u t ( D F n ) . Therefore, s E n d ( D F n ) A u t ( D F n ) . □
Lemma 12.
A u t ( D F n ) = 4 , n = 2 , 8 , n = 3 , 4 , n 4 .
Proof. 
Let f A u t ( D F n ) . If n = 2 , then f ( 1 ) , f ( 2 ) 1 , 2 and f ( s ) , f ( t ) s , t . So A u t ( D F 2 ) = 4 . If n = 3 , then f ( 2 ) = 2 . Denote by Y the subgraph of D F 3 induced by 1 , 3 , x , y . Then f | Y A u t ( Y ) . Thus A u t ( D F 3 ) = 8 . If n 4 , then f ( x ) , f ( y ) { x , y } . If f ( x ) = x and f ( y ) = y , then the number of automorphisms of D F n is equal to the number of automorphisms of P n . It is 2. And analogously for f ( x ) = y and f ( y ) = x . Therefore A u t ( D F n ) = 4 . □
Lemma 13.
If n 4 , then s E n d ( D F n ) = 8 .
Proof. 
Assume n 4 . Let f s E n d ( D F n ) \ A u t ( D F n ) . Then there exist x , y V ( D F n ) such that f ( x ) = f ( y ) . Then N ( x ) = N ( y ) . Thus x , y { s , t } , f ( x ) = f ( y ) = x or f ( x ) = f ( y ) = y . If f ( x ) = f ( y ) = x , then s E n d ( D F n ) = A u t ( F n ) = 2 . Analogously for f ( x ) = f ( y ) = y . Hence, the number of strong endomorphisms of D F n which are not automorphism is 4. By Lemma 12, A u t ( D F 4 ) = 4 . Therefore, s E n d ( D F n ) = 8 . □
Now we obtain the main result in this paper.
Theorem 1.
Let D F n be a double fan graph. Then
E n d o s p e c ( D F n ) = ( 16 , 16 , 16 , 16 , 16 , 4 ) , n = 2 , ( 64 , 64 , 64 , 64 , 64 , 8 ) , n = 3 , ( 284 , 232 , 72 , 72 , 8 , 4 ) , n = 4 , ( A 1 ( n ) , A 2 ( n ) , B 1 ( n ) , 8 , 8 , 4 ) , n 5 , a n d n i s o d d , ( C 1 ( n ) , C 2 ( n ) , B 2 ( n ) , 8 , 8 , 4 ) , n 5 , a n d n i s e v e n .
where
A 1 ( n ) = 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 4 ( 2 n 1 ) n 1 2 n 1 + 16 n 24 + ( 10 n 12 ) ( 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) 2 n + 1 2 2 2 n 1 2 2 , A 2 n = 4 n + 1 2 n 1 4 2 n 1 n 1 2 n 1 + 16 n 24 + 10 n 12 2 n + 1 2 + 2 n 1 2 4 + 8 ( n 2 ) 2 n + 1 2 2 2 n 1 2 2 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 5 2 a i , C 1 ( n ) = 4 ( n + 1 ) 2 n 1 4 n n 2 n + 16 n 24 + ( 16 n 24 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) + 8 ( n 2 ) ( 2 n 2 2 ) 2 , C 2 n = 4 n + 1 2 n 1 4 n n 2 n + 16 n 24 + 16 n 12 2 n 2 2 + 8 n 2 2 n 2 2 2 8 n 2 1 + i = 1 n 6 2 a i + b n 4 2 + 1 ,
B 1 ( n ) = 8 l | ( n 1 ) n l + 24 n 36 ,   B 2 ( n ) = 8 l | ( n 1 ) n l + 16 n 24 ,
a m = b 1 2 m 1 + b 2 2 m 2 + + b m 2 2 2 + 5 b m 1 + 2 b m 2 m 3 , b m = 1 5 1 + 5 2 m 1 5 2 m i s t h e F i b o n a c c i s e q u e n c e .
Proof. 
This follows immediately from Lemmas 4, 5, 7–12. □
Theorem 2.
Let D F n be a double fan graph. Then
E n d o t y p e ( D F n ) = 16 , n = 2 , 16 , n = 3 , 27 , n = 4 , 23 , n 5 .
Proof. 
This follows directly from Lemmas 3, 5, 8–10. □

Author Contributions

Create and conceptualize ideas, M.T. and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, M.T. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11301151) and the Innovation Team Funding of Henan University of Science and Technology (NO.2015XTD010).

Acknowledgments

The authors want to express their gratitude to the referees for their helpful suggestions and comments. The second author Hailong Hou wants to express his gratitude to Chris Godsil for his guidance and support during his study in University of Waterloo from November 2016 to November 2017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gu, R.; Hou, H. Unicyclic graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid. Mathematics 2020, 8, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hou, H.; Gu, R. Split graphs whose completely regular endomorphisms form a monoid. ARS Comb. 2016, 127, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, H.; Luo, Y. Graphs whose endomorphism monoids are regular. Discret. Math. 2008, 308, 3888–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kelarev, A.V.; Praeger, C.E. On transitive Cayley graphs of groups and semigroups. Eur. J. Comb. 2003, 24, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kelarev, A.V.; Ryan, J.; Yearwood, J. Cayley graphs as classifiers for data mining: The influence of asymmetries. Discret. Math. 2009, 309, 5360–5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kelarev, A.V. Labelled Cayley graphs and minimal automata. Australas. J. Comb. 2004, 30, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  7. Böttcher, M.; Knauer, U. Endomorphism spectra of graphs. Discret. Math. 1992, 109, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan, S. Endomopphism spectra of bipartite graph with dimater three and girth six. Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 2001, 25, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hou, H.; Fan, X.; Luo, Y. Endomorphism types of generalized polygons. Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 2009, 33, 433–441. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hou, H.; Luo, Y.; Cheng, Z. The Endomorphism monoid of P n ¯ . Eur. J. Comb. 2008, 29, 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hou, H.; Gu, R.; Song, Y. Endomorphism spectra of fan graphs. Ars Comb. 2019, 142, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  12. Godsil, C.; Royle, G. Algebraic Graph Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kelarev, A.V. Graph Algebras and Automata; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelarev, A.V. Ring Constructions and Applications; World Scientific: River Edge, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  15. Knauer, U. Algebraic Graph Theory: Morphisms, Monoids and Matrices; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, W. Graphs with regular monoid. Discrete Math. 2003, 265, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, Z.; Zeng, J. On the number of congruence classes of paths. Discret. Math. 2012, 312, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Arworn, S.; Knauer, U.; Leeratanavalee, S. Locally strong endomorphisms of paths. Discret. Math. 2008, 308, 2525–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Graph D F 4 .
Figure 1. Graph D F 4 .
Mathematics 08 01009 g001
Figure 2. Graph D F n .
Figure 2. Graph D F n .
Mathematics 08 01009 g002
Figure 3. Graph D F 5 .
Figure 3. Graph D F 5 .
Mathematics 08 01009 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tong, M.; Hou, H. Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061009

AMA Style

Tong M, Hou H. Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs. Mathematics. 2020; 8(6):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tong, Mengdi, and Hailong Hou. 2020. "Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs" Mathematics 8, no. 6: 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061009

APA Style

Tong, M., & Hou, H. (2020). Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs. Mathematics, 8(6), 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop