1. Introduction
In the literature, the well-known Jensen inequality [
1] states that if
f is a convex function on an interval and contains
, then:
where
and
.
In the theory of convex functions, the Hermite–Hadamard inequality is very important. It was independently discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard (see also [
2,
3] (p. 137)):
where
is a convex function over
I, and
, with
In the case of concave mappings, the above inequality is satisfied in reverse order.
The following variant of the Jensen inequality, known as the Jensen–Mercer, was demonstrated by Mercer [
4]:
Theorem 1. If f is a convex function on , then the following inequality is true:where , and In [
5], the idea of the Jensen–Mercer inequality was used by Kian and Moslehian, and the following Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer inequality was demonstrated:
where
f is a convex function on
For some recent studies linked to the Jensen–Mercer inequality, one can consult [
6,
7].
2. Harmonic Convexity and Related Inequalities
In this section, we will study the concepts of harmonically convex functions and the integral inequalities associated with them.
Definition 1. A mapping such as [8] is called harmonically convex if the following inequality holds for all and When the inequality (6) is reversed, f is described as harmonically concave. Dragomir recently proved the following Jensen-type inequality for harmonically convex functions:
Theorem 2 (Jensen inequality)
. If f is a harmonically convex function on an interval containing , then the following inequality is true [9]:where and . In [
8], İsçan established the Hermite–Hadamard type of inequalities for harmonically convex functions as follows:
Theorem 3. For a harmonically convex mapping with and , the following inequality holds: Furthermore, to find right-hand-side estimates of inequality (
8), İsçan proved the following lemma:
Lemma 1. For a differentiable mapping on with and , the following equality holds: For the estimates of the right-hand side of the inequality (
8), one can consult [
8].
The Jensen–Mercer inequality is a new variant of Jensen’s inequality (
7) for harmonically convex functions, as proved by Baloch:
Theorem 4 (Jensen–Mercer inequality)
. For harmonically convex functions on , the following inequality is true [10]:where , and For some recent inequalities via harmonically convex functions, one can consult [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15].
The authors used the inequality (
10) to prove the following Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer type of inequalities in [
10,
16]:
Theorem 5. For a harmonically convex mapping with and , the following inequality holds [10]:for . Theorem 6. For a harmonically convex mapping with and , the following inequality holds:for . Inspired by these ongoing studies, we will then establish modified versions of inequalities (
11) and (
12) for harmonically convex functions because we discovered some flaws in the proof of inequality (
11). We will also prove some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions.
3. Main Results
For harmonically convex functions and differentiable harmonically convex functions, we will prove Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities in this section.
Theorem 7. For a harmonically convex mapping with and , the following inequality holds:for . Proof. Since the given mapping
f is harmonically convex, we have
By setting
and
inequality (
14) becomes
Integrating inequality (
15) with respect to
over an interval
, we have
Thus, we obtain the first inequality of (
13) because each integral on the right side of (
16) is equal to
To prove the second inequality in (
13) through the harmonic convexity function of
f, we have the following:
and
By adding (
17) and (
18) and using inequality (
10), we have
Integrating inequality (
19) with respect to
over an interval
, we have
Hence, we obtain the last inequality of (
13). □
Remark 1. In Theorem 7, if we set and , then inequality (13) is reduced to inequality (8). The simple lemma below is needed to discover some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities for functions whose first derivatives are harmonically convex.
Lemma 2. For a differentiable mapping on with and , the following equality holds:for . Proof. Using the basic rules of integration, we have
Thus, we obtain the resultant equality (
21) by multiplying the equality (
22) with
□
Remark 2. In Lemma 2, if we put and , then equality (21) becomes equality (9). Now, for the sake of brevity, we shall use the following notations:
Theorem 8. The conditions of Lemma 2 are assumed to be true. The following inequality holds if the mapping , is harmonically convex on I:whereand Proof. We can deduce from Lemma 2 and the power mean inequality that:
By inequality (
10), we have the following:
It is simple to verify this:
and
□
Remark 3. In Theorem 8, if we set and , then Theorem 8 becomes ([8], Theorem 2.6). Theorem 9. The conditions of Lemma 2 are assumed to be true. The following inequality holds if the mapping , is harmonically convex on I:whereand Proof. We can deduce from Lemma 2 and Hölder’s inequality that:
By inequality (
10), we have the following:
It is simple to verify this:
and
□
Remark 4. In Theorem 9, if we choose and , then Theorem 9 is reduced to ([8], Theorem 2.7). 4. Application to Special Means
For arbitrary positive numbers , we consider the means as follows:
The generalized logarithmic mean
These means are often employed in numerical approximations and other fields. However, the following straightforward relationship has been stated in the literature:
Proposition 1. For , the following inequality is true: Proof. Inequality (
13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping
,
leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 2. For , the following inequality is true: Proof. Inequality (
13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping
,
leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 3. For and , the following inequality is true: Proof. Inequality (
13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping
,
leads to this conclusion. □
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we proved some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer inequalities for harmonically convex functions and differentiable harmonically convex functions. It was also demonstrated that the results of this paper generalize the findings of İsçan in [
8]. It is an interesting and challenging problem, and researchers may be able to obtain similar inequalities for various fractional operators in their future work.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; methodology, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; validation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; formal analysis, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; investigation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; funding acquisition, J.R. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. Contract no. KMUTNB-63-KNOW-19.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments. This work was also supported by Philosophy and Social Sciences of Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (20Y109). This work was also supported by Key Projects of Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (D20192501).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers Group: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Pearce, C.E.M. Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications; RGMIA Monographs; Victoria University: Footscray, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Pečarić, J.E.; Proschan, F.; Tong, Y.L. Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Mercer, A.M. A Variant of Jensen’s Inequality. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 4, 73. [Google Scholar]
- Kian, M.; Moslehian, M.S. Refinements of the operator Jensen-Mercer inequality. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2013, 26, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.M.; Khan, A.R. Generalized integral Mercer’s inequality and integral means. J. Inequal. Spec. Funct. 2019, 10, 60–76. [Google Scholar]
- Niezgoda, M. A generalization of Mercer’s result on convex functions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- İsçan, İ. Hermite-Hadamard type inequaities for harmonically functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014, 43, 935–942. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities of Jensen type for HA-convex functions. An. Univ. Oradea Fasc. Mat. 2020, 27, 103–124. [Google Scholar]
- Baloch, I.A.; Mughal, A.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Haq, A.U.; Sen, M.D.L. A variant of Jensen-type inequality and related results for harmonic convex functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 6404–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, M.U.; Akhtar, N.; Iftikhar, S.; Noor, M.A.; Chu, Y.-M. New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial harmonically convex functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 2020, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baloch, I.A.; Chu, Y.M. Petrović-type inequalities for harmonic h-convex functions. J. Funct. Space. 2020, 2020, 3075390. [Google Scholar]
- Baloch, I.A.; İsçan, İ.; Dragomir, S.S. Fejer’s type inequalities for harmonically (s,m)-convex functions. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2016, 12, 188–197. [Google Scholar]
- Baloch, I.A.; İsçan, İ. Some Ostrowski type inequalities for harmonically (s,m)-convex functions in Second Sense. Int. J. Anal. 2015, 2015, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, D.F.; An, T.Q.; Ye, G.J.; Torres, D.F.M. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonical h-convex interval-valued functions. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 23, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
- Baloch, I.A.; Mughal, A.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Haq, A.U.; Sen, M.D.L. Improvements and generalization of some results related to the class of harmonically convex functions and applications. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2021, 22, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).