Next Article in Journal
Sustainability, Big Data and Mathematical Techniques: A Bibliometric Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Jensen Functional, Quasi-Arithmetic Mean and Sharp Converses of Hölder’s Inequalities
Previous Article in Journal
Symbol-Pair Distance of Repeated-Root Constacyclic Codes of Prime Power Lengths over \({{\mathbb{F}_{p^m}[u]}/{\langle u^3\rangle}}\)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some New Simpson’s and Newton’s Formulas Type Inequalities for Convex Functions in Quantum Calculus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Mappings

by
Xuexiao You
1,
Muhammad Aamir Ali
2,*,
Hüseyin Budak
3,
Jiraporn Reunsumrit
4 and
Thanin Sitthiwirattham
5,*
1
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey
4
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
5
Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2021, 9(20), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202556
Submission received: 11 September 2021 / Revised: 1 October 2021 / Accepted: 8 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends in Convex Analysis and Mathematical Inequalities)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we prove Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer inequalities, which is a new version of the Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for harmonically convex functions. We also prove Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities for functions whose first derivatives in absolute value are harmonically convex. Finally, we discuss how special means can be used to address newly discovered inequalities.

1. Introduction

In the literature, the well-known Jensen inequality [1] states that if f is a convex function on an interval and contains x 1 , x 2 , , x n , then:
f j = 1 n λ j x j j = 1 n λ j f x j ,
where λ j 0 , j = 0 , 1 , , n and j = 1 n λ j = 1 .
In the theory of convex functions, the Hermite–Hadamard inequality is very important. It was independently discovered by C. Hermite and J. Hadamard (see also [2,3] (p. 137)):
f κ 1 + κ 2 2 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 1 κ 2 f x d x f κ 1 + f κ 2 2 ,
where f : I R is a convex function over I, and κ 1 , κ 2 I , with κ 1 < κ 2 . In the case of concave mappings, the above inequality is satisfied in reverse order.
The following variant of the Jensen inequality, known as the Jensen–Mercer, was demonstrated by Mercer [4]:
Theorem 1.
If f is a convex function on a , b , then the following inequality is true:
f a + b j = 1 n λ j x j f a + f b j = 1 n λ j f x j ,
where j = 1 n λ j = 1 , x j a , b and λ j 0 , 1 .
In [5], the idea of the Jensen–Mercer inequality was used by Kian and Moslehian, and the following Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer inequality was demonstrated:
f κ 1 + κ 2 x + y 2 f κ 1 + f κ 2 1 y x x y f τ d τ f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + y 2
f κ 1 + κ 2 x + y 2 1 y x x y f κ 1 + κ 2 τ d τ f κ 1 + κ 2 x + f κ 1 + κ 2 y 2 f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + f y 2 ,
where f is a convex function on κ 1 , κ 2 . For some recent studies linked to the Jensen–Mercer inequality, one can consult [6,7].

2. Harmonic Convexity and Related Inequalities

In this section, we will study the concepts of harmonically convex functions and the integral inequalities associated with them.
Definition 1.
A mapping such as f : I R 0 R  [8] is called harmonically convex if the following inequality holds for all x , y I and τ 0 , 1 :
f 1 τ y + 1 τ x τ f y + 1 τ f x .
When the inequality (6) is reversed, f is described as harmonically concave.
Dragomir recently proved the following Jensen-type inequality for harmonically convex functions:
Theorem 2
(Jensen inequality). If f is a harmonically convex function on an interval containing x 1 , x 2 , , x n , then the following inequality is true [9]:
f 1 i = 1 n λ i x i i = 1 n λ i f x i ,
where λ j 0 , j = 0 , 1 , , n and j = 1 n λ j = 1 .
In [8], İsçan established the Hermite–Hadamard type of inequalities for harmonically convex functions as follows:
Theorem 3.
For a harmonically convex mapping f : I R 0 R with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following inequality holds:
f 2 κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 κ 2 κ 1 κ 1 κ 2 f x x 2 d x f κ 1 + f κ 2 2 .
Furthermore, to find right-hand-side estimates of inequality (8), İsçan proved the following lemma:
Lemma 1.
For a differentiable mapping f : I R 0 R on I with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following equality holds:
f κ 1 + f κ 2 2 κ 1 κ 2 κ 2 κ 1 κ 1 κ 2 f x x 2 d x = κ 1 κ 2 κ 2 κ 1 2 0 1 1 2 τ τ κ 2 + 1 τ κ 1 2 f κ 1 κ 2 τ κ 2 + 1 τ κ 1 d τ .
For the estimates of the right-hand side of the inequality (8), one can consult [8].
The Jensen–Mercer inequality is a new variant of Jensen’s inequality (7) for harmonically convex functions, as proved by Baloch:
Theorem 4
(Jensen–Mercer inequality). For harmonically convex functions on a , b , the following inequality is true [10]:
f 1 1 a + 1 b i = 1 n λ i x i f a + f b i = 1 n λ i f x i ,
where i = 1 n λ i = 1 , x i a , b and λ i 0 , 1 .
For some recent inequalities via harmonically convex functions, one can consult [11,12,13,14,15].
The authors used the inequality (10) to prove the following Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer type of inequalities in [10,16]:
Theorem 5.
For a harmonically convex mapping f : I R 0 R with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following inequality holds [10]:
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 2 x y x + y f κ 1 + f κ 2 x y y x x y f τ τ 2 d τ f κ 1 + f κ 2 f 2 x y x + y
for x , y [ κ 1 , κ 2 ] .
Theorem 6.
For a harmonically convex mapping f : I R 0 R with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following inequality holds:
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 1 2 x + y x y x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + f y 2
for x , y [ κ 1 , κ 2 ] .
Inspired by these ongoing studies, we will then establish modified versions of inequalities (11) and (12) for harmonically convex functions because we discovered some flaws in the proof of inequality (11). We will also prove some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions.

3. Main Results

For harmonically convex functions and differentiable harmonically convex functions, we will prove Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities in this section.
Theorem 7.
For a harmonically convex mapping f : I R 0 R with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following inequality holds:
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 1 2 x + y x y x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + f y 2
for x , y [ κ 1 , κ 2 ] .
Proof. 
Since the given mapping f is harmonically convex, we have
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 1 2 x 1 + y 1 x 1 y 1 1 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 1 + f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 .
By setting
1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 = τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y
and
1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 1 = 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y ,
inequality (14) becomes
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 1 2 x + y x y 1 2 f 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + f 1 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y .
Integrating inequality (15) with respect to τ over an interval 0 , 1 , we have
f 1 κ 1 + κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 1 2 x + y x y 1 2 0 1 f 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y d τ + 0 1 f 1 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y d τ .
Thus, we obtain the first inequality of (13) because each integral on the right side of (16) is equal to x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ . To prove the second inequality in (13) through the harmonic convexity function of f, we have the following:
f 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x τ f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + 1 τ f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2
and
f 1 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 τ f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + τ f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 .
By adding (17) and (18) and using inequality (10), we have
f 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x + f 1 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + f y .
Integrating inequality (19) with respect to τ over an interval 0 , 1 , we have
0 1 f 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x d τ + 0 1 f 1 1 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y + τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x d τ f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 f κ 1 + f κ 2 f x + f y .
Hence, we obtain the last inequality of (13). □
Remark 1.
In Theorem 7, if we set x = κ 1 and y = κ 2 , then inequality (13) is reduced to inequality (8).
The simple lemma below is needed to discover some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-type inequalities for functions whose first derivatives are harmonically convex.
Lemma 2.
For a differentiable mapping f : I R 0 R on I with κ 1 , κ 2 I and κ 1 < κ 2 , the following equality holds:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ = y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x d τ
for x , y [ κ 1 , κ 2 ] .
Proof. 
Using the basic rules of integration, we have
0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x d τ = x y 1 2 τ y x f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 0 1 2 x y y x 0 1 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x d τ = x y y x f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x 2 y 2 y x 2 κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ .
Thus, we obtain the resultant equality (21) by multiplying the equality (22) with y x 2 x y .  □
Remark 2.
In Lemma 2, if we put x = κ 1 and y = κ 2 , then equality (21) becomes equality (9).
Now, for the sake of brevity, we shall use the following notations:
L = 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x and M = 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y .
Theorem 8.
The conditions of Lemma 2 are assumed to be true. The following inequality holds if the mapping f q , q 1 is harmonically convex on I:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y Λ 1 1 1 q Λ 1 f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q Λ 2 f y q + Λ 3 f x q 1 q ,
where
Λ 1 L , M = 1 L M 2 L M 2 ln L + M 2 4 L M , Λ 2 L , M = 1 M M L + 3 L + M M L 3 ln L + M 2 4 L M
and
Λ 3 L , M = Λ 1 L , M Λ 2 L , M .
Proof. 
We can deduce from Lemma 2 and the power mean inequality that:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 d τ 1 1 q × 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x q d τ 1 q .
By inequality (10), we have the following:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 d τ 1 1 q 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 × f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q τ f y q 1 τ f x q d τ 1 q = y x 2 x y Λ 1 1 1 q Λ 1 f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q Λ 2 f y q + Λ 3 f x q 1 q .
It is simple to verify this:
0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 d τ = 0 1 1 2 τ τ M + 1 τ L 2 d τ = 1 L M 2 L M 2 ln L + M 2 4 L M , 0 1 τ 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 d τ = 0 1 τ 1 2 τ τ M + 1 τ L 2 d τ = 1 M M L + 3 L + M M L 3 ln L + M 2 4 L M
and
0 1 1 τ 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 d τ = 0 1 1 2 τ τ M + 1 τ L 2 d τ 0 1 τ 1 2 τ τ M + 1 τ L 2 d τ = 1 L M 2 L M 2 ln L + M 2 4 L M 1 M M L + 3 L + M M L 3 ln L + M 2 4 L M .
Remark 3.
In Theorem 8, if we set x = κ 1 and y = κ 2 , then Theorem 8 becomes ([8], Theorem 2.6).
Theorem 9.
The conditions of Lemma 2 are assumed to be true. The following inequality holds if the mapping f q , q > 1 is harmonically convex on I:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y 1 1 + p 1 p Π 1 f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q Π 2 f y q + Π 3 f x q 1 q ,
where
Π 1 = M 1 2 q L 1 2 q 2 q 1 L M , Π 2 = L 2 2 q + M 1 2 q M L 1 2 q L 2 M L 2 1 q 1 2 q
and
Π 2 = M 2 2 q + L 1 2 q M L 1 2 q + M 2 M L 2 1 q 1 2 q .
Proof. 
We can deduce from Lemma 2 and Hölder’s inequality that:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ p d τ 1 p × 0 1 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 q f 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x q d τ 1 q .
By inequality (10), we have the following:
f κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 + f κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 2 x y y x κ 1 κ 2 y κ 2 y + κ 1 y κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 κ 2 x κ 2 x + κ 1 x κ 1 κ 2 f τ τ 2 d τ y x 2 x y 0 1 1 2 τ p d τ 1 p 0 1 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 q × f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q τ f y q 1 τ f x q d τ 1 q = y x 2 x y 1 1 + p 1 p Π 1 f κ 1 q + f κ 2 q Π 2 f y q + Π 3 f x q 1 q .
It is simple to verify this:
0 1 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 q d τ = M 1 2 q L 1 2 q 2 q 1 L M , 0 1 τ 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 q d τ = L 2 2 q + M 1 2 q M L 1 2 q L 2 M L 2 1 q 1 2 q
and
0 1 1 τ 1 2 τ 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 τ y + 1 τ x 2 q d τ = M 2 2 q + L 1 2 q M L 1 2 q + M 2 M L 2 1 q 1 2 q .
Remark 4.
In Theorem 9, if we choose x = κ 1 and y = κ 2 , then Theorem 9 is reduced to ([8], Theorem 2.7).

4. Application to Special Means

For arbitrary positive numbers κ 1 , κ 2   ( κ 1 κ 2 ) , we consider the means as follows:
  • The arithmetic mean
    A = A ( κ 1 , κ 2 ) = κ 1 + κ 2 2 ;
  • The geometric mean
    G = G κ 1 , κ 2 = κ 1 κ 2 ;
  • The harmonic mean
    H = H κ 1 , κ 2 = 2 κ 1 κ 2 κ 1 + κ 2 ;
  • The logarithmic mean
    L = L κ 1 , κ 2 = κ 2 κ 1 ln κ 2 ln κ 1 ;
  • The generalized logarithmic mean
    L p = L p κ 1 , κ 2 = κ 2 p + 1 κ 1 p + 1 κ 2 κ 1 p + 1 1 p , p R 1 , 0 ;
  • The identric mean
    I = I κ 1 , κ 2 = 1 e κ 2 κ 2 κ 1 κ 1 1 κ 2 κ 1 , if κ 1 κ 2 , κ 1 , if κ 1 = κ 2 , κ 1 , κ 2 > 0 .
These means are often employed in numerical approximations and other fields. However, the following straightforward relationship has been stated in the literature:
H G L I A .
Proposition 1.
For κ 1 , κ 2 0 , , the following inequality is true:
1 2 H 1 κ 1 , κ 2 H 1 x , y 1 L 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 1 , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 A 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 1 , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 2 A κ 1 , κ 2 A x , y .
Proof. 
Inequality (13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping f : 0 , R , f x = x leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 2.
For κ 1 , κ 2 0 , , the following inequality is true:
1 2 H 1 κ 1 , κ 2 H 1 x , y 2 G 1 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x A 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 2 , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 2 2 A κ 1 2 , κ 2 2 A x 2 , y 2 .
Proof. 
Inequality (13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping f : 0 , R , f x = x 2 leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 3.
For κ 1 , κ 2 0 , and p 1 , 0 , the following inequality is true:
1 2 H 1 κ 1 , κ 2 H 1 x , y p + 2 L p p 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y 1 , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x 1 A 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 y p + 2 , 1 κ 1 + 1 κ 2 1 x p + 2 2 A κ 1 p + 2 , κ 2 p + 2 A x p + 2 , y p + 2 .
Proof. 
Inequality (13) in Theorem 7 for the mapping f : 0 , R , f x = x p + 2 leads to this conclusion. □

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we proved some new Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer inequalities for harmonically convex functions and differentiable harmonically convex functions. It was also demonstrated that the results of this paper generalize the findings of İsçan in [8]. It is an interesting and challenging problem, and researchers may be able to obtain similar inequalities for various fractional operators in their future work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; methodology, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; validation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; formal analysis, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; investigation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., M.A.A., H.B., J.R. and T.S.; funding acquisition, J.R. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. Contract no. KMUTNB-63-KNOW-19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments. This work was also supported by Philosophy and Social Sciences of Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (20Y109). This work was also supported by Key Projects of Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (D20192501).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers Group: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dragomir, S.S.; Pearce, C.E.M. Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications; RGMIA Monographs; Victoria University: Footscray, Australia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pečarić, J.E.; Proschan, F.; Tong, Y.L. Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mercer, A.M. A Variant of Jensen’s Inequality. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 4, 73. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kian, M.; Moslehian, M.S. Refinements of the operator Jensen-Mercer inequality. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2013, 26, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ali, M.M.; Khan, A.R. Generalized integral Mercer’s inequality and integral means. J. Inequal. Spec. Funct. 2019, 10, 60–76. [Google Scholar]
  7. Niezgoda, M. A generalization of Mercer’s result on convex functions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. İsçan, İ. Hermite-Hadamard type inequaities for harmonically functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014, 43, 935–942. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dragomir, S.S. Inequalities of Jensen type for HA-convex functions. An. Univ. Oradea Fasc. Mat. 2020, 27, 103–124. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baloch, I.A.; Mughal, A.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Haq, A.U.; Sen, M.D.L. A variant of Jensen-type inequality and related results for harmonic convex functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 6404–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Awan, M.U.; Akhtar, N.; Iftikhar, S.; Noor, M.A.; Chu, Y.-M. New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial harmonically convex functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 2020, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baloch, I.A.; Chu, Y.M. Petrović-type inequalities for harmonic h-convex functions. J. Funct. Space. 2020, 2020, 3075390. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baloch, I.A.; İsçan, İ.; Dragomir, S.S. Fejer’s type inequalities for harmonically (s,m)-convex functions. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2016, 12, 188–197. [Google Scholar]
  14. Baloch, I.A.; İsçan, İ. Some Ostrowski type inequalities for harmonically (s,m)-convex functions in Second Sense. Int. J. Anal. 2015, 2015, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, D.F.; An, T.Q.; Ye, G.J.; Torres, D.F.M. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonical h-convex interval-valued functions. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 23, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
  16. Baloch, I.A.; Mughal, A.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Haq, A.U.; Sen, M.D.L. Improvements and generalization of some results related to the class of harmonically convex functions and applications. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2021, 22, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, X.; Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Reunsumrit, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Mappings. Mathematics 2021, 9, 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202556

AMA Style

You X, Ali MA, Budak H, Reunsumrit J, Sitthiwirattham T. Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Mappings. Mathematics. 2021; 9(20):2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202556

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Xuexiao, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Jiraporn Reunsumrit, and Thanin Sitthiwirattham. 2021. "Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Mappings" Mathematics 9, no. 20: 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202556

APA Style

You, X., Ali, M. A., Budak, H., Reunsumrit, J., & Sitthiwirattham, T. (2021). Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer-Type Inequalities for Harmonically Convex Mappings. Mathematics, 9(20), 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop